Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

A new computational method for sparse optimal control of cyber-physical systems with varying delay

  • In practice, network operators tend to choose sparse communication topologies to cut costs, and the concurrent use of a communication network by multiple users commonly results in feedback delays. Our goal was to obtain the optimal sparse feedback control matrix K. For this, we proposed a sparse optimal control (SOC) problem governed by the cyber-physical system with varying delay, to minimize ||K||0 subject to a maximum allowable compromise in system cost. A penalty method was utilized to transform the SOC problem into a form that was constrained solely by box constraints. A smoothing technique was used to approximate the nonsmooth element in the resulting problem, and an analysis of the errors introduced by this technique was subsequently conducted. The gradients of the objective function concerning the feedback control matrix were obtained by solving the state system and a variational system simultaneously forward in time. An optimization algorithm was devised to tackle the resulting problem, building on the piecewise quadratic approximation. Finally, we have presented of simulations.

    Citation: Sida Lin, Dongyao Yang, Jinlong Yuan, Changzhi Wu, Tao Zhou, An Li, Chuanye Gu, Jun Xie, Kuikui Gao. A new computational method for sparse optimal control of cyber-physical systems with varying delay[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(12): 6553-6577. doi: 10.3934/era.2024306

    Related Papers:

    [1] José M. Campos-Salazar, Roya Rafiezadeh, Juan L. Aguayo-Lazcano, Constanza Márquez . Reduction of harmonic distortion in electromagnetic torque of a single-phase reluctance motor using a multilevel neutral-point-clamped DC-AC converter. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2025, 9(2): 215-242. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2025011
    [2] Cristian Cadena-Zarate, Juan Caballero-Peña, German Osma-Pinto . Simulation-based probabilistic-harmonic load flow for the study of DERs integration in a low-voltage distribution network. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2024, 8(1): 53-70. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2024003
    [3] Tarun Naruka, Debasis Tripathy, Prangya Mohanty . Power quality enhancement by a solar photovoltaic-based distribution static compensator. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2025, 9(2): 192-214. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2025010
    [4] Said Oucheriah, Abul Azad . Current-sensorless robust sliding mode control for the DC-DC boost converter. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2025, 9(1): 46-59. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2025003
    [5] Rasool M. Imran, Kadhim Hamzah Chalok, Siraj A. M. Nasrallah . Innovative two-stage thermal control of DC-DC converter for hybrid PV-battery system. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2025, 9(1): 26-45. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2025002
    [6] I.E.S. Naidu, S. Srikanth, A. Siva sarapakara Rao, Adabala Venkatanarayana . A novel mine blast optimization algorithm (MBOA) based MPPT controlling for grid-PV systems. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2023, 7(2): 135-155. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2023008
    [7] Anjan Ku. Sahoo, Ranjan Ku. Jena . Improved DTC strategy with fuzzy logic controller for induction motor driven electric vehicle. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2022, 6(3): 296-316. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2022018
    [8] Cherechi Ndukwe, M. Tariq Iqbal, Xiaodong Liang, Jahangir Khan, Lawrence Aghenta . LoRa-based communication system for data transfer in microgrids. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2020, 4(3): 303-325. doi: 10.3934/ElectrEng.2020.3.303
    [9] Mulualem T. Yeshalem, Baseem Khan, Om Prakash Mahela . Conducted electromagnetic emissions of compact fluorescent lamps and electronic ballast modeling. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2022, 6(2): 178-187. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2022011
    [10] Sundararajan Seenivasaan, Naduvil Madhusoodanan Kottarthil . Enhancing sensor linearity through the translinear circuit implementation of piecewise and neural network models. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2023, 7(3): 196-216. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2023012
  • In practice, network operators tend to choose sparse communication topologies to cut costs, and the concurrent use of a communication network by multiple users commonly results in feedback delays. Our goal was to obtain the optimal sparse feedback control matrix K. For this, we proposed a sparse optimal control (SOC) problem governed by the cyber-physical system with varying delay, to minimize ||K||0 subject to a maximum allowable compromise in system cost. A penalty method was utilized to transform the SOC problem into a form that was constrained solely by box constraints. A smoothing technique was used to approximate the nonsmooth element in the resulting problem, and an analysis of the errors introduced by this technique was subsequently conducted. The gradients of the objective function concerning the feedback control matrix were obtained by solving the state system and a variational system simultaneously forward in time. An optimization algorithm was devised to tackle the resulting problem, building on the piecewise quadratic approximation. Finally, we have presented of simulations.



    Defined as any degree of glucose intolerance with onset during pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a temporary condition that predisposes pregnant women to type 2 diabetes [1],[2]. Prenatal screenings are used to diagnose GDM, a condition that is present when blood glucose levels are above normal but below diagnostic value for diabetes [3]. According to International Diabetes Federation's statistics, 21.3 million of live births (16.2%) had some form of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy [4], and globally GDM accounts for up to 90% of cases of hyperglycaemia during pregnancy (4,5). Collectively, low- and middle-income countries accounted for more than 90% of cases of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy [5]. Middle-Eastern and North African regions recorded highest prevalence of GDM (12.9%), followed by South-East Asian and Western Pacific regions (11.7% respectively) [6].

    Most common risk factors for GDM were older age, obesity, excessive pregnancy weight gain, family history of diabetes, history of GDM and previous history of poor obstetric outcomes (macrosomia and congenital anomalies) [7]. In addition, a recently published systematic review and meta-analysis reported pregnancy-induced hypertension, polycystic ovarian syndrome, history of abortion, and preterm delivery or abortion to be associated with the risk for GDM [8].

    With every 1 in 7 live births is affected by GDM [4], its consequences are of public health concern. Although GDM-caused proportions of maternal and perinatal deaths, and obstructed births are unknown [7], GDM increases the risk of various adverse outcomes for the mother and child during pregnancy, childbirth and post-delivery [9]. Women with GDM have higher risks for pregnancy-related hypertension, pre-eclampsia spontaneous abortion, preterm labour and caesarean section [10],[11]. Studies have also shown these women to be at a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular, renal and ophthalmic diseases [2],[6],[11]. Short-term adverse outcomes for infants born to women with GDM include macrosomia, hypoglycaemia, polycythemia, cardiac complications, neurological impairment [12]. Risks of future development of obesity, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome also increase in offspring of women with GDM [7],[13].

    Evidence from varying populations suggest that 70–85% of women diagnosed with GDM can achieve normal glycaemic levels with lifestyle modification alone [14]. The value of lifestyle modification as the first-line strategy for the prevention and management of GDM is therefore, well-recognised. Thus, measures to improve diet and physical activity are important prior to, during and post-delivery in GDM pregnancies [15].

    Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT) is commonly described as the ‘cornerstone’ of GDM management. Recent American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes (2019) recommends that a diagnosis of GDM is followed by a treatment that ‘starts with MNT, physical activity, and weight management’. The goal of this treatment is to (i) support maternal, placental, and foetal metabolic needs [16] while achieving targets recommended for maternal weight gain, glycaemic control and foetal development and (ii) to prevent long-term complications [14],[17]. The benefits of MNT in managing GDM pregnancies cannot be understated since effective management ensures the long-term health for these mothers and their infants.

    Generally, MNT for GDM mothers includes an individualized diet plan that maintains adequate nutrition to facilitate appropriate weight gain and optimises carbohydrate consumption to manage maternal glycaemia within an acceptable range [15],[18]. The former goal is achieved ideally through ensuring a daily calorie intake in the range of 1800–2000 kcal. The latter is attempted through achieving a macronutrient distribution to account for approximately 50–60%, 15–20%, and 25–30% of daily energy intake from carbohydrate, protein, and fat intakes respectively [15]. Dietary quality indicators such as adequate intake of fruits, green leafy vegetables, poultry, fish and nuts are also known to be beneficial. Additionally, reducing postprandial glycaemia in GDM pregnancies with low glycaemic index (GI) is also associated with reduced the prevalence of maternal insulin use and reduced central adiposity in women born to GDM mothers [15],[18]. Therefore, current MNT practice ensures appropriate dietary quantity and quality through individualised diet counselling during pregnancy [15].

    Interestingly, while MNT has long been recognised as a key to GDM treatment, experts lament that current MNT advice lacks sufficient scientific substantiation and it is feared to be “non–evidence-based, fragmented, and inconsistent” [16]. Therefore, the growing momentum to build evidence in this area is more than justified. A recent meta-analysis on the effectiveness of MNT in the GDM management found that available evidence is limited by the small sample size and short duration of the intervention trials in this target population. The authors emphasised the need for holistic evaluation of nutrient quality and quantity, and dietary patterns in GDM management. Specifically, an urgent need for well-designed and sufficiently powered dietary randomised-controlled trials in low and middle-income countries, where the long-term and inter-generational consequences of GDM create the heaviest burden, was identified [19]. Furthermore, there is very little specific advice for women at risk for GDM or for women with prior GDM. Current recommendations for these populations are built on the premise of body weight management and its beneficial effect in preventing the deterioration of glucose tolerance.

    This AIMS Medical Science special issue on “Diet in Gestational Diabetes” synthesises some interesting evidence in this much needed area of maternal nutrition. Our final selection of papers for this Special Issue presents three interesting reviews, giving the readers an opportunity to be aware of possible areas of research ranging from epidemiology to clinical nutrition to functional foods. Misra et al evaluate the existing evidence for dietary patterns, diet quality and micronutrient composition in GDM prevention and management across populations that vary in their socio-economic status. Mahadzir et al in their review evaluate the evidence for lifestyle interventions in improving maternal and foetal outcomes. Gulati et al explore the potential for development of novel functional foods from mushroom for prevention and treatment of GDM. Collectively these reviews showcase the scope for further research in the area of nutrition in the prevention and management of GDM. We believe that these articles will be useful to readers who are working in the area of prevention, treatment and management of acute and long-term complications of GDM.



    [1] M. Alowaidi, S. K. Sharma, A. AlEnizi, S. Bhardwaj, Integrating artificial intelligence in cyber security for cyber-physical systems, Electron. Res. Arch., 31 (2023), 1876–1896. http://doi.org/10.3934/era.2023097 doi: 10.3934/era.2023097
    [2] N. Negi, A. Chakrabortty, Sparsity-promoting optimal control of cyber-physical systems over shared communication networks, Automatica, 122 (2020), 109217. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109217 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109217
    [3] M. N. Al-Mhiqani, T. Alsboui, T. Al-Shehari, K. H. Abdulkareem, R. Ahmad, M. A. Mohammed, Insider threat detection in cyber-physical systems: a systematic literature review, Comput. Electr. Eng., 119 (2024), 109489. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109489 doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109489
    [4] S. Liu, X. Wang, B. Niu, X. Song, H. Wang, X. Zhao, Adaptive resilient output feedback control against unknown deception attacks for nonlinear cyber-physical systems, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II: Express Briefs, 71 (2024). 3855–3859. http://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2024.3372413 doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2024.3372413
    [5] M. Zhao, W. Qin, J. Yang, G. Lu, Security control for cyber-physical systems under aperiodic denial-of-service attacks: A memory-event-triggered active approach, Neurocomputing, 600 (2024), 128159. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128159 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128159
    [6] P. E. G. Silva, P. H. J. Nardelli, A. S. de Sena, H. Siljak, N. Nevaranta, N. Marchetti, et al., Semantic-functional communications in cyber-physical systems, IEEE Network, 38 (2024), 241–249. http://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2023.3329192 doi: 10.1109/MNET.2023.3329192
    [7] L. M. Castiglione, E. C. Lupu, Which attacks lead to hazards combining safety and security analysis for cyber-physical systems, IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput., 21 (2024), 2526–2540. http://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2023.3309778 doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2023.3309778
    [8] S. Das, P. Dey, D. Chatterjee, Almost sure detection of the presence of malicious components in cyber-physical systems, Automatica, 167 (2024), 111789. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2024.111789 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2024.111789
    [9] C. Fioravanti, S. Panzieri, G. Oliva, Negativizability: a useful property for distributed state estimation and control in cyber-physical systems, Automatica, 157 (2023), 111240. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2023.111240 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2023.111240
    [10] H. N. AlEisa, F. Alrowais, R. Allafi, N. S. Almalki, R. Faqih, R. Marzouk, et al., Transforming transportation: safe and secure vehicular communication and anomaly detection with intelligent cyber-physical system and deep learning, IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., 70 (2024), 1736–1746. http://doi.org/10.1109/TCE.2023.3325827 doi: 10.1109/TCE.2023.3325827
    [11] L. Khoshnevisan, X. Liu, Resilient neural network-based control of nonlinear heterogeneous multi-agent systems: a cyber-physical system approach, Nonlinear Dyn., 111 (2023), 19171–19185. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-08840-w doi: 10.1007/s11071-023-08840-w
    [12] L. Chen, Y. Li, S. Tong, Robust adaptive control for nonlinear cyber‐physical systems with FDI attacks via attack estimation, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 33 (2023), 9299–9316. http://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.6851 doi: 10.1002/rnc.6851
    [13] G. Routray, R. M. Hegde, Sparsity-driven loudspeaker gain optimization for sound field reconstruction with spherical microphone array, Digital Signal Process., 154 (2024), 104688. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2024.104688 doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2024.104688
    [14] K. Zhou, Y. Wang, B. Qiao, J. Liu, M. Liu, Z. Yang, et al., Non-convex sparse regularization via convex optimization for blade tip timing, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 222 (2025), 111764. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111764 doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111764
    [15] T. Zhang, F. Peng, X. Tang, R. Yan, R. Deng, S. Zhao, A sparse knowledge embedded configuration optimization method for robotic machining system toward improving machining quality, Rob. Comput-Integr. Manuf., 90 (2024), 102818. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102818 doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102818
    [16] J. Yuan, C. Wu, K. L. Teo, J. Xie, S. Wang, Computational method for feedback perimeter control of multiregion urban traffic networks with state-dependent delays, Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol., 153 (2023), 104231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2023.104231 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2023.104231
    [17] J. Yuan, C. Wu, K. L. Teo, S. Zhao, L. Meng, Perimeter control with state-dependent delays: optimal control model and computational method, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 23 (2022), 20614–20627. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2022.3179729 doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3179729
    [18] C. Zhao, Z. Luo, N. Xiu, Some advances in theory and algorithms for sparse optimization, Oper. Res. Trans., 24 (2020), 1–24.
    [19] S. Dai, Variable selection in convex quantile regression: L1-norm or L0-norm regularization?, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 305 (2023), 338–355. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.05.041 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.05.041
    [20] B. Hong, H. Qian, Z. Wang, Iterative hard thresholding algorithm-based detector for compressed OFDM-IM systems, IEEE Commun. Lett., 26 (2022), 2205–2209. http://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2022.3187451 doi: 10.1109/LCOMM.2022.3187451
    [21] H. Liu, T. Wang, Z. Liu, Some modified fast iterative shrinkage thresholding algorithms with a new adaptive non-monotone stepsize strategy for nonsmooth and convex minimization problems, Comput. Optim. Appl., 83 (2022), 651–691. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-022-00396-6 doi: 10.1007/s10589-022-00396-6
    [22] B. Liu, K. Gong, L. Zhang, Convergence analysis of the augmented Lagrangian method for lp-norm cone optimization problems with p2, Numer. Algorithms, 2024 (2024). http://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-024-01912-x doi: 10.1007/s11075-024-01912-x
    [23] D. Han, D. Sun, L. Zhang, Linear rate convergence of the alternating direction method of multipliers for convex composite programming, Math. Oper. Res., 43 (2018), 622–637. https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2017.0875 doi: 10.1287/moor.2017.0875
    [24] E. Hernández, P. Merino, Sparse optimal control of timoshenko's beam using a locking-free finite element approximation, Optim. Control Appl. Methods, 45 (2024), 1007–1029. https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.3085 doi: 10.1002/oca.3085
    [25] K. Ito, T. Ikeda, K. Kashima, Sparse optimal stochastic control, Automatica, 125 (2021), 109438. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109438 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109438
    [26] F. Lejarza, M. Baldea, Economic model predictive control for robust optimal operation of sparse storage networks, Automatica, 125 (2021), 109346. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109346 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109346
    [27] M. Liu, H. Zhu, F. Zhang, J. Wang, C. Zhou, Y. Lv, Model-based sparse optimal control of the hydrogen sulfide synthesis process for acidic wastewater sulfidation, J. Water Process Eng., 65 (2024), 105836. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105836 doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105836
    [28] J. Yuan, C. Wu, Z. Liu, S. Zhao, C. Yu, K. L. Teo, et al., Koopman modeling for optimal control of the perimeter of multi-region urban traffic networks, Appl. Math. Modell., 138 (2025), 115742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2024.115742 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2024.115742
    [29] Q. Li, Y. Bai, C. Yu, Y. Yuan, A new piecewise quadratic approximation approach for L0 norm minimization problem, Sci. China Math. 62 (2019), 185–204. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-017-9315-9 doi: 10.1007/s11425-017-9315-9
    [30] A. Modi, M. K. S. Faradonbeh, A. Tewari, G. Michailidis, Joint learning of linear time-invariant dynamical systems, Automatica, 164 (2024), 111635. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2024.111635 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2024.111635
    [31] K. L. Teo, B. Li, C. Yu, V. Rehbock, Applied and Computational Optimal Control: a Control Parametrization Approach, Springer, Cham, 2021. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69913-0
    [32] X. Wu, K. Zhang, M. Chen, A gradient-based algorithm for non-smooth constrained optimization problems governed by discrete-time nonlinear equations with application to long-term hydrothermal optimal scheduling control, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 412 (2022), 114335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2022.114335 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2022.114335
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(668) PDF downloads(50) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog