Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Research article Special Issues

'Localizing' the sustainable development goals: a multivariate analysis of Spanish regions

  • Based on the content analysis of the websites of 102 Spanish municipalities related to actions aligned with the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the X-STATIS technique was applied to analyze the status and dynamic evolution of commitment to the SDGs in regional and local governments over the period of 2016–2021. The results show a low but increasing level of SDG commitment, which also varies significantly across municipalities and regions, as well as by SDGs, which can be attributed to the influence of several sociodemographic factors, such as the number of inhabitants, dependent population and population density. SDG8 and SDG11 stand out as the main priorities of the municipalities, while initiatives related to SDG5, SDG6 and SDG 17 are the least prioritized. The COVID-19 pandemic has marked a turning point in this regard, with greater importance being given to the SDGs more related to people and prosperity. Our findings help citizens and public authorities to understand sustainable regions and municipalities, assess their performance in relation to different dimensions of sustainability and identify key challenges for future improvements. Specifically, the results suggest that public policies should promote actions related to gender equality, drinking water and sanitation and partnerships, as well as favor investment in the regions and municipalities that are lagging behind, in order to improve their level of commitment to the 2030 Agenda and reduce inequalities. From an academic point of view, our results open a door for the analysis of possible trajectories in the implementation of the SDGs at regional and local levels and the study of their determinants.

    Citation: Manuel Rieiro-García, Víctor Amor-Esteban, Cristina Aibar-Guzmán. 'Localizing' the sustainable development goals: a multivariate analysis of Spanish regions[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(3): 356-381. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023021

    Related Papers:

    [1] José M. Campos-Salazar, Roya Rafiezadeh, Juan L. Aguayo-Lazcano, Constanza Márquez . Reduction of harmonic distortion in electromagnetic torque of a single-phase reluctance motor using a multilevel neutral-point-clamped DC-AC converter. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2025, 9(2): 215-242. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2025011
    [2] Cristian Cadena-Zarate, Juan Caballero-Peña, German Osma-Pinto . Simulation-based probabilistic-harmonic load flow for the study of DERs integration in a low-voltage distribution network. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2024, 8(1): 53-70. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2024003
    [3] Tarun Naruka, Debasis Tripathy, Prangya Mohanty . Power quality enhancement by a solar photovoltaic-based distribution static compensator. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2025, 9(2): 192-214. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2025010
    [4] Said Oucheriah, Abul Azad . Current-sensorless robust sliding mode control for the DC-DC boost converter. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2025, 9(1): 46-59. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2025003
    [5] Rasool M. Imran, Kadhim Hamzah Chalok, Siraj A. M. Nasrallah . Innovative two-stage thermal control of DC-DC converter for hybrid PV-battery system. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2025, 9(1): 26-45. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2025002
    [6] I.E.S. Naidu, S. Srikanth, A. Siva sarapakara Rao, Adabala Venkatanarayana . A novel mine blast optimization algorithm (MBOA) based MPPT controlling for grid-PV systems. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2023, 7(2): 135-155. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2023008
    [7] Anjan Ku. Sahoo, Ranjan Ku. Jena . Improved DTC strategy with fuzzy logic controller for induction motor driven electric vehicle. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2022, 6(3): 296-316. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2022018
    [8] Cherechi Ndukwe, M. Tariq Iqbal, Xiaodong Liang, Jahangir Khan, Lawrence Aghenta . LoRa-based communication system for data transfer in microgrids. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2020, 4(3): 303-325. doi: 10.3934/ElectrEng.2020.3.303
    [9] Mulualem T. Yeshalem, Baseem Khan, Om Prakash Mahela . Conducted electromagnetic emissions of compact fluorescent lamps and electronic ballast modeling. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2022, 6(2): 178-187. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2022011
    [10] Sundararajan Seenivasaan, Naduvil Madhusoodanan Kottarthil . Enhancing sensor linearity through the translinear circuit implementation of piecewise and neural network models. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2023, 7(3): 196-216. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2023012
  • Based on the content analysis of the websites of 102 Spanish municipalities related to actions aligned with the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the X-STATIS technique was applied to analyze the status and dynamic evolution of commitment to the SDGs in regional and local governments over the period of 2016–2021. The results show a low but increasing level of SDG commitment, which also varies significantly across municipalities and regions, as well as by SDGs, which can be attributed to the influence of several sociodemographic factors, such as the number of inhabitants, dependent population and population density. SDG8 and SDG11 stand out as the main priorities of the municipalities, while initiatives related to SDG5, SDG6 and SDG 17 are the least prioritized. The COVID-19 pandemic has marked a turning point in this regard, with greater importance being given to the SDGs more related to people and prosperity. Our findings help citizens and public authorities to understand sustainable regions and municipalities, assess their performance in relation to different dimensions of sustainability and identify key challenges for future improvements. Specifically, the results suggest that public policies should promote actions related to gender equality, drinking water and sanitation and partnerships, as well as favor investment in the regions and municipalities that are lagging behind, in order to improve their level of commitment to the 2030 Agenda and reduce inequalities. From an academic point of view, our results open a door for the analysis of possible trajectories in the implementation of the SDGs at regional and local levels and the study of their determinants.



    Defined as any degree of glucose intolerance with onset during pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a temporary condition that predisposes pregnant women to type 2 diabetes [1],[2]. Prenatal screenings are used to diagnose GDM, a condition that is present when blood glucose levels are above normal but below diagnostic value for diabetes [3]. According to International Diabetes Federation's statistics, 21.3 million of live births (16.2%) had some form of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy [4], and globally GDM accounts for up to 90% of cases of hyperglycaemia during pregnancy (4,5). Collectively, low- and middle-income countries accounted for more than 90% of cases of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy [5]. Middle-Eastern and North African regions recorded highest prevalence of GDM (12.9%), followed by South-East Asian and Western Pacific regions (11.7% respectively) [6].

    Most common risk factors for GDM were older age, obesity, excessive pregnancy weight gain, family history of diabetes, history of GDM and previous history of poor obstetric outcomes (macrosomia and congenital anomalies) [7]. In addition, a recently published systematic review and meta-analysis reported pregnancy-induced hypertension, polycystic ovarian syndrome, history of abortion, and preterm delivery or abortion to be associated with the risk for GDM [8].

    With every 1 in 7 live births is affected by GDM [4], its consequences are of public health concern. Although GDM-caused proportions of maternal and perinatal deaths, and obstructed births are unknown [7], GDM increases the risk of various adverse outcomes for the mother and child during pregnancy, childbirth and post-delivery [9]. Women with GDM have higher risks for pregnancy-related hypertension, pre-eclampsia spontaneous abortion, preterm labour and caesarean section [10],[11]. Studies have also shown these women to be at a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular, renal and ophthalmic diseases [2],[6],[11]. Short-term adverse outcomes for infants born to women with GDM include macrosomia, hypoglycaemia, polycythemia, cardiac complications, neurological impairment [12]. Risks of future development of obesity, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome also increase in offspring of women with GDM [7],[13].

    Evidence from varying populations suggest that 70–85% of women diagnosed with GDM can achieve normal glycaemic levels with lifestyle modification alone [14]. The value of lifestyle modification as the first-line strategy for the prevention and management of GDM is therefore, well-recognised. Thus, measures to improve diet and physical activity are important prior to, during and post-delivery in GDM pregnancies [15].

    Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT) is commonly described as the ‘cornerstone’ of GDM management. Recent American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes (2019) recommends that a diagnosis of GDM is followed by a treatment that ‘starts with MNT, physical activity, and weight management’. The goal of this treatment is to (i) support maternal, placental, and foetal metabolic needs [16] while achieving targets recommended for maternal weight gain, glycaemic control and foetal development and (ii) to prevent long-term complications [14],[17]. The benefits of MNT in managing GDM pregnancies cannot be understated since effective management ensures the long-term health for these mothers and their infants.

    Generally, MNT for GDM mothers includes an individualized diet plan that maintains adequate nutrition to facilitate appropriate weight gain and optimises carbohydrate consumption to manage maternal glycaemia within an acceptable range [15],[18]. The former goal is achieved ideally through ensuring a daily calorie intake in the range of 1800–2000 kcal. The latter is attempted through achieving a macronutrient distribution to account for approximately 50–60%, 15–20%, and 25–30% of daily energy intake from carbohydrate, protein, and fat intakes respectively [15]. Dietary quality indicators such as adequate intake of fruits, green leafy vegetables, poultry, fish and nuts are also known to be beneficial. Additionally, reducing postprandial glycaemia in GDM pregnancies with low glycaemic index (GI) is also associated with reduced the prevalence of maternal insulin use and reduced central adiposity in women born to GDM mothers [15],[18]. Therefore, current MNT practice ensures appropriate dietary quantity and quality through individualised diet counselling during pregnancy [15].

    Interestingly, while MNT has long been recognised as a key to GDM treatment, experts lament that current MNT advice lacks sufficient scientific substantiation and it is feared to be “non–evidence-based, fragmented, and inconsistent” [16]. Therefore, the growing momentum to build evidence in this area is more than justified. A recent meta-analysis on the effectiveness of MNT in the GDM management found that available evidence is limited by the small sample size and short duration of the intervention trials in this target population. The authors emphasised the need for holistic evaluation of nutrient quality and quantity, and dietary patterns in GDM management. Specifically, an urgent need for well-designed and sufficiently powered dietary randomised-controlled trials in low and middle-income countries, where the long-term and inter-generational consequences of GDM create the heaviest burden, was identified [19]. Furthermore, there is very little specific advice for women at risk for GDM or for women with prior GDM. Current recommendations for these populations are built on the premise of body weight management and its beneficial effect in preventing the deterioration of glucose tolerance.

    This AIMS Medical Science special issue on “Diet in Gestational Diabetes” synthesises some interesting evidence in this much needed area of maternal nutrition. Our final selection of papers for this Special Issue presents three interesting reviews, giving the readers an opportunity to be aware of possible areas of research ranging from epidemiology to clinical nutrition to functional foods. Misra et al evaluate the existing evidence for dietary patterns, diet quality and micronutrient composition in GDM prevention and management across populations that vary in their socio-economic status. Mahadzir et al in their review evaluate the evidence for lifestyle interventions in improving maternal and foetal outcomes. Gulati et al explore the potential for development of novel functional foods from mushroom for prevention and treatment of GDM. Collectively these reviews showcase the scope for further research in the area of nutrition in the prevention and management of GDM. We believe that these articles will be useful to readers who are working in the area of prevention, treatment and management of acute and long-term complications of GDM.



    [1] Valencia S C, Simon D, Croese S, et al. (2019) Adapting the Sustainable Development Goals and the New Urban Agenda to the city level: Initial reflections from a comparative research project. Int J Urban Sustain 11: 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2019.1573172 doi: 10.1080/19463138.2019.1573172
    [2] Hu A H, Huang L H, Chang Y L. (2016, September) Assessing corporate sustainability of the ICT sector in Taiwan on the basis of UN Sustainable Development Goals. In 2016 Electronics goes green 2016+(EGG) (pp. 1–6) IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EGG.2016.7829866
    [3] Verboven H, Vanherck L. (2016) The sustainability paradox of the sharing economy. uwf UmweltWirtschaftsForum, 24: 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-016-0410-y
    [4] ElMassah S, Mohieldin M (2020) Digital transformation and localizing the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Ecol Econ 169: 106490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106490 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106490
    [5] UN Development Group. 2014. Localizing the Post-2015 Agenda: Dialogues on Implementation. New York. p. 6–7
    [6] Oosterhof PD (2018) Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals to Accelerate Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Gov Brief 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/BRF189612
    [7] Kanuri C, Revi A, Espey J, et al. (2016) Getting Started with the SDGs in Cities: A Guide for Stakeholders. Sustainable Development Solutions Network, NY, USA.
    [8] Bardal KG, Reinar MB, Lundberg AK, et al. (2021) Factors Facilitating the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals in Regional and Local Planning—Experiences from Norway. Sustainability 13: 4282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084282 doi: 10.3390/su13084282
    [9] Croese S, Oloko M, Simon D, et al. (2021) Bringing the global to the local: The challenges of multi-level governance for global policy implementation in Africa. Int J Urban Sustain Dev13: 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2021.1958335 doi: 10.1080/19463138.2021.1958335
    [10] Sisto R, García López J, Quintanilla A, et al. (2020) Quantitative analysis of the impact of public policies on the sustainable development goals through budget allocation and indicators. Sustainability 12: 10583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410583 doi: 10.3390/su122410583
    [11] Tavares A F, da Cruz NF (2020) Explaining the transparency of local government websites through a political market framework. Gov Inform Q 37: 101249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.005
    [12] Fenton P, Gustafsson S (2017) Moving from high-level words to local action: governance for urban sustainability in municipalities. Curr Opin Environ Sust 26–27: 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.07.009 doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.07.009
    [13] Gustafsson S, Ivner J (2018) Implementing the Global Sustainable Goals (SDGs) into Municipal Strategies Applying an Integrated Approach. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63007-6_18
    [14] Schudson M (2020) The shortcomings of transparency for democracy. Am Behav Sci 64: 1670–1678. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276422094534 doi: 10.1177/000276422094534
    [15] Akande A, Cabral P, Gomes P, et al. (2019) The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe. Sustain Cities Soc 44: 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009
    [16] D'Adamo I, Gastaldi M, Ioppolo G, et al. (2022a) An analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in Italian cities: Performance measurements and policy implications. Land Use Policy 120: 106278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106278 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106278
    [17] D'Adamo I, Gastaldi M (2022) Sustainable Development Goals: A Regional Overview Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Sustainability 14: 9779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159779 doi: 10.3390/su14159779
    [18] D'Adamo I, Gastaldi M, Morone P (2022b) Economic sustainable development goals: Assessments and perspectives in Europe. J Clean Prod 354: 131730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131730 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131730
    [19] Martínez-Córdoba PJ, Amor-Esteban V, Benito B, et al. (2021a) The commitment of Spanish local governments to Sustainable Development Goal 11 from a multivariate perspective. Sustainability 13: 1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031222 doi: 10.3390/su13031222
    [20] United Nations General Assembly (2015) Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York. Available at: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol = A/RES/70/1 & Lang = E
    [21] Martínez-Córdoba PJ, Raimo N, Vitolla F, et al. (2020) Achieving sustainable development goals. Efficiency in the Spanish clean water and sanitation sector. Sustainability 12: 3015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073015 doi: 10.3390/su12073015
    [22] Alcaraz-Quiles FJ, Navarro-Galera A, Ortiz-Rodríguez D (2017) La transparencia sobre sostenibilidad en gobiernos regionales: el caso de España. Convergencia 24: 113–140.
    [23] Navarro-Galera A, Alcaraz-Quiles FJ, Ortiz-Rodriguez D (2018) Enhancing sustainability transparency in local governments—An empirical research in Europe. Sustainability 10: 2161. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072161 doi: 10.3390/su10072161
    [24] García-Sánchez IM, Frías-Aceituno JV, Rodríguez-Domínguez L (2013) Determinants of corporate social disclosure in Spanish local governments. J Clean Prod 39: 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.037 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.037
    [25] Ribeiro VP, Aibar-Guzmán C, Aibar-Guzman B, et al. (2016) Determinants of environmental accounting and reporting practices in Portuguese local entities. Corp Commun 21: 352–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-11-2015-0071 doi: 10.1108/CCIJ-11-2015-0071
    [26] Lopez Subires MD, Alcaide Munoz L, Navarro Galera A, et al. (2019) The influence of socio-demographic factors on financial sustainability of public services: A comparative analysis in regional governments and local governments. Sustainability 11: 6008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216008 doi: 10.3390/su11216008
    [27] Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing Inc.
    [28] Rose J, Flak LS, Sæbø Ø (2018) Stakeholder theory for the E-government context: Framing a value-oriented normative core. Gov Inform Q 35: 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.06.005
    [29] DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48: 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 doi: 10.2307/2095101
    [30] Navarro A, Alcaraz FJ, Ortiz D (2010) La Divulgación de Información Sobre Responsabilidad Corporativa en Administraciones Públicas: Un Estudio Empírico en Gobiernos Locales: The Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Information in Public Administratons: An Empirical Study in Local Governments. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review 13: 285–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138-4891(10)70019-4 doi: 10.1016/S1138-4891(10)70019-4
    [31] Guillamón MD, Bastida F, Benito B (2011) The determinants of local government's financial transparency. Local Gov Stud 37: 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2011.588704 doi: 10.1080/03003930.2011.588704
    [32] Prado-Lorenzo JM, García-Sánchez IM, Cuadrado-Ballesteros B (2012) Sustainable cities: do political factors determine the quality of life? J Clean Prod 21: 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.021 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.021
    [33] Bengtsson M (2016) How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. Nursing Plus open 2: 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001 doi: 10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
    [34] Bonsón E, Flores F (2011) Social media and corporate dialogue: the response of global financial institutions. Online information review. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684521111113579
    [35] Bonsón E, Torres L, Royo S, et al. (2012) Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Gov Inform Q 29: 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001
    [36] Alcaraz-Quiles FJ, Galera AN, Ortiz‐Rodríguez D (2015) Les facteurs déterminant la publication en ligne par les gouvernements locaux des rapports sur la durabilité. Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives 81: 85–115.
    [37] Navarro-Galera A, Ruiz-Lozano M, Tirado-Valencia P, et al. (2017) Promoting sustainability transparency in European local governments: An empirical analysis based on administrative cultures. Sustainability 9: 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030432 doi: 10.3390/su9030432
    [38] Ortiz-Rodríguez D, Navarro-Galera A, Alcaraz-Quiles FJ (2018) The influence of administrative culture on sustainability transparency in European local governments. Admin Soc 50: 555–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715616838 doi: 10.1177/0095399715616838
    [39] Amor-Esteban V, García-Sánchez IM, Galindo-Villardón MP (2018a) Analysing the effect of legal system on corporate social responsibility (CSR) at the country level, from a multivariate perspective. Soc Indic Res 140: 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1782-2 doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1782-2
    [40] García‐Sánchez IM, Amor‐Esteban V, Aibar‐Guzmán C, et al. (2022) Translating the 2030 Agenda into reality through stakeholder engagement. Sustain Dev https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2431
    [41] Amor-Esteban V, Galindo-Villardón MP, David F (2018b) Study of the importance of national identity in the development of corporate social responsibility practices: A multivariate vision. Adm Sci 8: 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8030050 doi: 10.3390/admsci8030050
    [42] Amor-Esteban V, Galindo-Villardón MP, García-Sánchez IM (2018c) Industry mimetic isomorphism and sustainable development based on the X-STATIS and HJ-biplot methods. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25: 26192–26208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2663-1 doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2663-1
    [43] Gallego-Alvarez I, Galindo-Villardón MP, Rodriguez-Rosa M (2015) Evolution of sustainability indicator worldwide: A study from the economic perspective based on the X-STATICO method. Ecol Indic 58: 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.025 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.025
    [44] Medina-Hernández EJ, Fernández-Gómez MJ, Barrera-Mellado I (2021) Analysis of time use surveys using co-statis: a multiway data analysis of gender inequalities in time use in Colombia. Sustainability 13: 13073. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313073 doi: 10.3390/su132313073
    [45] Prieto JM, Amor V, Turias I, et al. (2021) Evaluation of Paris MoU Maritime Inspections Using a STATIS Approach. Mathematics 9: 2092. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9172092 doi: 10.3390/math9172092
    [46] Gallego-Álvarez I, Rodríguez-Rosa M, Vicente-Galindo P (2021) Are worldwide governance indicators stable or do they change over time? A comparative study using multivariate analysis. Mathematics 9: 3257. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9243257 doi: 10.3390/math9243257
    [47] Escoufier Y (1976) Opérateur associé à un Tableau de Données. In Annales de l'INSEE; Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (pp. 165.179).
    [48] L'Hermier des Plantes H (1976) Structuration des Tableauya trois Indices de la Statistique; Université Montpellier II, Montpellier, France.
    [49] Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Dole S, et al. (1997) ADE-4: A multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Stat Comput 7: 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018513530268 doi: 10.1023/A:1018513530268
    [50] Alcaraz-Quiles FJ, Navarro-Galera A, Ortiz-Rodríguez D (2014) Factors influencing the transparency of sustainability information in regional governments: An empirical study. J Clean Prod 82: 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.086 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.086
    [51] Navarro-Galera A, Ortiz-Rodríguez D, Alcaraz-Quiles FJ (2019) Un impulso a la transparencia sobre sostenibilidad en gobiernos locales europeos mediante factores poblacionales, socioeconómicos, financieros y legales. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 48: 525–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2019.1629204 doi: 10.1080/02102412.2019.1629204
    [52] Martínez-Córdoba PJ, Benito B, García-Sánchez IM. (2021b) Efficiency in the governance of the Covid-19 pandemic: political and territorial factors. Globalization health 17: 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00759-4 doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00759-4
    [53] Cheng Y, Liu H, Wang S, et al. (2021). Global action on SDGs: policy review and outlook in a post-pandemic Era. Sustainability 13: 6461. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116461 doi: 10.3390/su13116461
    [54] Hartanto D, Siregar SM (2021) Determinants of overall public trust in local government: Meditation of government response to COVID-19 in Indonesian context. Transform Gov-People 15: 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2020-0193 doi: 10.1108/TG-08-2020-0193
    [55] Padeiro M, Bueno-Larraz B, Freitas  (2021) Local governments' use of social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Portugal. Gov Inform Q 38: 101620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101620 doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101620
    [56] Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (2020) SDSN Italy SDGs City Index. Available at: https://www.feem.it/m/publications_pages/rpt-2020-city-index.pdf.Accessed March 25, 2023
    [57] Masuda H, Kawakubo S, Okitasari M, et al. (2022) Exploring the role of local governments as intermediaries to facilitate partnerships for the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain Cities Soc 82: 103883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103883 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103883
    [58] Armstrong A, Li Y (2022) Governance and sustainability in local government. Australas Account Bu 16: 12–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v16i2.3
    [59] Conard B (2013) Some Challenges to Sustainability. Sustainability 2013: 3368–3381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083368 doi: 10.3390/su5083368
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3033) PDF downloads(135) Cited by(5)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(7)  /  Tables(7)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog