Processing math: 100%
Review

Soil bioremediation approaches for petroleum hydrocarbon polluted environments

  • Increasing industrialisation, continued population growth and heavy demand and reliance on petrochemical products have led to unprecedented economic growth and development. However, inevitably this dependence on fossil fuels has resulted in serious environmental issues over recent decades. The eco-toxicity and the potential health implications that petroleum hydrocarbons pose for both environmental and human health have led to increased interest in developing environmental biotechnology-based methodologies to detoxify environments impacted by petrogenic compounds. Different approaches have been applied for remediating polluted sites with petroleum derivatives. Bioremediation represents an environmentally sustainable and economical emerging technology for maximizing the metabolism of organic pollutants and minimizing the ecological effects of oil spills. Bioremediation relies on microbial metabolic activities in the presence of optimal ecological factors and necessary nutrients to transform organic pollutants such as petrogenic hydrocarbons. Although, biodegradation often takes longer than traditional remediation methods, the complete degradation of the contaminant is often accomplished. Hydrocarbon biodegradation in soil is determined by a number of environmental and biological factors varying from site to site such as the pH of the soil, temperature, oxygen availability and nutrient content, the growth and survival of hydrocarbon-degrading microbes and bioavailability of pollutants to microbial attack. In this review we have attempted to broaden the perspectives of scientists working in bioremediation. We focus on the most common bioremediation technologies currently used for soil remediation and the mechanisms underlying the degradation of petrogenic hydrocarbons by microorganisms.

    Citation: Eman Koshlaf, Andrew S Ball. Soil bioremediation approaches for petroleum hydrocarbon polluted environments[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 25-49. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.25

    Related Papers:

    [1] Gaozhong Sun, Tongwei Zhao . Lung adenocarcinoma pathology stages related gene identification. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(1): 737-746. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020038
    [2] Shuyi Cen, Kaiyou Fu, Yue Shi, Hanliang Jiang, Jiawei Shou, Liangkun You, Weidong Han, Hongming Pan, Zhen Liu . A microRNA disease signature associated with lymph node metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(3): 2557-2568. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020140
    [3] Yuan Yang, Lingshan Zhou, Xi Gou, Guozhi Wu, Ya Zheng, Min Liu, Zhaofeng Chen, Yuping Wang, Rui Ji, Qinghong Guo, Yongning Zhou . Comprehensive analysis to identify DNA damage response-related lncRNA pairs as a prognostic and therapeutic biomarker in gastric cancer. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(1): 595-611. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022026
    [4] Bin Ma, Lianqun Cao, Yongmin Li . A novel 10-gene immune-related lncRNA signature model for the prognosis of colorectal cancer. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 9743-9760. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021477
    [5] Ji-Ming Wu, Wang-Ren Qiu, Zi Liu, Zhao-Chun Xu, Shou-Hua Zhang . Integrative approach for classifying male tumors based on DNA methylation 450K data. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(11): 19133-19151. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023845
    [6] Jinqi He, Wenjing Zhang, Faxiang Li, Yan Yu . Development of metastasis-associated seven gene signature for predicting lung adenocarcinoma prognosis using single-cell RNA sequencing data. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 5959-5977. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021298
    [7] Mengyang Han, Xiaoli Wang, Yaqi Li, Jianjun Tan, Chunhua Li, Wang Sheng . Identification of coagulation-associated subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma and establishment of prognostic models. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(6): 10626-10658. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023470
    [8] Yanping Xie, Zhaohui Dong, Junhua Du, Xiaoliang Zang, Huihui Guo, Min Liu, Shengwen Shao . The relationship between mouse lung adenocarcinoma at different stages and the expression level of exosomes in serum. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1548-1557. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020080
    [9] Ziyu Wu, Sugui Wang, Qiang Li, Qingsong Zhao, Mingming Shao . Identification of 10 differently expressed lncRNAs as prognostic biomarkers for prostate adenocarcinoma. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(3): 2037-2047. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020108
    [10] Siqi Hu, Fang Wang, Junjun Yang, Xingxiang Xu . Elevated ADAR expression is significantly linked to shorter overall survival and immune infiltration in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(10): 18063-18082. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023802
  • Increasing industrialisation, continued population growth and heavy demand and reliance on petrochemical products have led to unprecedented economic growth and development. However, inevitably this dependence on fossil fuels has resulted in serious environmental issues over recent decades. The eco-toxicity and the potential health implications that petroleum hydrocarbons pose for both environmental and human health have led to increased interest in developing environmental biotechnology-based methodologies to detoxify environments impacted by petrogenic compounds. Different approaches have been applied for remediating polluted sites with petroleum derivatives. Bioremediation represents an environmentally sustainable and economical emerging technology for maximizing the metabolism of organic pollutants and minimizing the ecological effects of oil spills. Bioremediation relies on microbial metabolic activities in the presence of optimal ecological factors and necessary nutrients to transform organic pollutants such as petrogenic hydrocarbons. Although, biodegradation often takes longer than traditional remediation methods, the complete degradation of the contaminant is often accomplished. Hydrocarbon biodegradation in soil is determined by a number of environmental and biological factors varying from site to site such as the pH of the soil, temperature, oxygen availability and nutrient content, the growth and survival of hydrocarbon-degrading microbes and bioavailability of pollutants to microbial attack. In this review we have attempted to broaden the perspectives of scientists working in bioremediation. We focus on the most common bioremediation technologies currently used for soil remediation and the mechanisms underlying the degradation of petrogenic hydrocarbons by microorganisms.


    Baló's concentric sclerosis (BCS) was first described by Marburg [1] in 1906, but became more widely known until 1928 when the Hungarian neuropathologist Josef Baló published a report of a 23-year-old student with right hemiparesis, aphasia, and papilledema, who at autopsy had several lesions of the cerebral white matter, with an unusual concentric pattern of demyelination [2]. Traditionally, BCS is often regarded as a rare variant of multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinically, BCS is most often characterized by an acute onset with steady progression to major disability and death with months, thus resembling Marburg's acute MS [3,4]. Its pathological hallmarks are oligodendrocyte loss and large demyelinated lesions characterized by the annual ring-like alternating pattern of demyelinating and myelin-preserved regions. In [5], the authors found that tissue preconditioning might explain why Baló lesions develop a concentric pattern. According to the tissue preconditioning theory and the analogies between Baló's sclerosis and the Liesegang periodic precipitation phenomenon, Khonsari and Calvez [6] established the following chemotaxis model

    ˜uτ=DΔX˜udiffusion ofactivated macrophagesX(˜χ˜u(ˉu˜u)˜v)chemoattractant attractssurrounding activated macrophages+μ˜u(ˉu˜u)production of activated macrophages,˜ϵΔX˜vdiffusion of chemoattractant=˜α˜v+˜β˜wdegradationproduction of chemoattractant,˜wτ=κ˜uˉu+˜u˜u(ˉw˜w)destruction of oligodendrocytes, (1.1)

    where ˜u, ˜v and ˜w are, respectively, the density of activated macrophages, the concentration of chemoattractants and density of destroyed oligodendrocytes. ˉu and ˉw represent the characteristic densities of macrophages and oligodendrocytes respectively.

    By numerical simulation, the authors in [6,7] indicated that model (1.1) only produces heterogeneous concentric demyelination and homogeneous demyelinated plaques as χ value gradually increases. In addition to the chemoattractant produced by destroyed oligodendrocytes, "classically activated'' M1 microglia also can release cytotoxicity [8]. Therefore we introduce a linear production term into the second equation of model (1.1), and establish the following BCS chemotaxis model with linear production term

    {˜uτ=DΔX˜uX(˜χ˜u(ˉu˜u)˜v)+μ˜u(ˉu˜u),˜ϵΔX˜v+˜α˜v=˜β˜w+˜γ˜u,˜wτ=κ˜uˉu+˜u˜u(ˉw˜w). (1.2)

    Before going to details, let us simplify model (1.2) with the following scaling

    u=˜uˉu,v=μˉu˜ϵD˜v,w=˜wˉw,t=μˉuτ,x=μˉuDX,χ=˜χ˜ϵμ,α=D˜α˜ϵμˉu,β=˜βˉw,γ=˜γˉu,δ=κμ,

    then model (1.2) takes the form

    {ut=Δu(χu(1u)v)+u(1u),xΩ,t>0,Δv+αv=βw+γu,xΩ,t>0,wt=δu1+uu(1w),xΩ,t>0,ηu=ηv=0,xΩ,t>0,u(x,0)=u0(x),w(x,0)=w0(x),xΩ, (1.3)

    where ΩRn(n1) is a smooth bounded domain, η is the outward normal vector to Ω, η=/η, δ balances the speed of the front and the intensity of the macrophages in damaging the myelin. The parameters χ,α and δ are positive constants as well as β,γ are nonnegative constants.

    If δ=0, then model (1.3) is a parabolic-elliptic chemotaxis system with volume-filling effect and logistic source. In order to be more line with biologically realistic mechanisms, Hillen and Painter [9,10] considered the finite size of individual cells-"volume-filling'' and derived volume-filling models

    {ut=(Du(q(u)q(u)u)uq(u)uχ(v)v)+f(u,v),vt=DvΔv+g(u,v). (1.4)

    q(u) is the probability of the cell finding space at its neighbouring location. It is also called the squeezing probability, which reflects the elastic properties of cells. For the linear choice of q(u)=1u, global existence of solutions to model (1.4) in any space dimension are investigated in [9]. Wang and Thomas [11] established the global existence of classical solutions and given necessary and sufficient conditions for spatial pattern formation to a generalized volume-filling chemotaxis model. For a chemotaxis system with generalized volume-filling effect and logistic source, the global boundedness and finite time blow-up of solutions are obtained in [12]. Furthermore, the pattern formation of the volume-filling chemotaxis systems with logistic source and both linear diffusion and nonlinear diffusion are shown in [13,14,15] by the weakly nonlinear analysis. For parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel volume-filling chemotaxis model with linear squeezing probability, asymptotic behavior of solutions is studied both in the whole space Rn [16] and on bounded domains [17]. Moreover, the boundedness and singularity formation in parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel volume-filling chemotaxis model with nonlinear squeezing probability are discussed in [18,19].

    Very recently, we [20] investigated the uniform boundedness and global asymptotic stability for the following chemotaxis model of multiple sclerosis

    {ut=Δu(χ(u)v)+u(1u),χ(u)=χu1+u,xΩ,t>0,τvt=Δvβv+αw+γu,xΩ,t>0,wt=δu1+uu(1w),xΩ,t>0,

    subject to the homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions.

    In this paper, we are first devoted to studying the local existence and uniform boundedness of the unique classical solution to system (1.3) by using Neumann heat semigroup arguments, Banach fixed point theorem, parabolic Schauder estimate and elliptic regularity theory. Then we discuss that exponential asymptotic stability of the positive equilibrium point to system (1.3) by constructing Lyapunov function.

    Although, in the pathological mechanism of BCS, the initial data in model (1.3) satisfy 0<u0(x)1,w0(x)=0, we mathematically assume that

    {u0(x)C0(ˉΩ)with0,u0(x)1inΩ,w0(x)C2+ν(ˉΩ)with0<ν<1and0w0(x)1inΩ. (1.5)

    It is because the condition (1.5) implies u(x,t0)>0 for any t0>0 by the strong maximum principle.

    The following theorems give the main results of this paper.

    Theorem 1.1. Assume that the initial data (u0(x),w0(x)) satisfy the condition (1.5). Then model (1.3) possesses a unique global solution (u(x,t),v(x,t),w(x,t)) satisfying

    u(x,t)C0(ˉΩ×[0,))C2,1(ˉΩ×(0,)),v(x,t)C0((0,),C2(ˉΩ)),w(x,t)C2,1(ˉΩ×[0,)), (1.6)

    and

    0<u(x,t)1,0v(x,t)β+γα,w0(x)w(x,t)1,inˉΩ×(0,).

    Moreover, there exist a ν(0,1) and M>0 such that

    uC2+ν,1+ν/2(ˉΩ×[1,))+vC0([1,),C2+ν(ˉΩ))+wCν,1+ν/2(ˉΩ×[1,))M. (1.7)

    Theorem 1.2. Assume that β0,γ0,β+γ>0 and

    χ<{min{22αβ,22αγ},β>0,γ>0,22αβ,β>0,γ=0,22αγ,β=0,γ>0. (1.8)

    Let (u,v,w) be a positive classical solution of the problem (1.3), (1.5). Then

    u(,t)uL(Ω)+v(,t)vL(Ω)+w(,t)wL(Ω)0,ast. (1.9)

    Furthermore, there exist positive constants λ=λ(χ,α,γ,δ,n) and C=C(|Ω|,χ,α,β,γ,δ) such that

    uuL(Ω)Ceλt,vvL(Ω)Ceλt,wwL(Ω)Ceλt,t>0, (1.10)

    where (u,v,w)=(1,β+γα,1) is the unique positive equilibrium point of the model (1.3).

    The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we prove the local existence, the boundedness and global existence of a unique classical solution. In section 3, we firstly establish the uniform convergence of the positive global classical solution, then discuss the exponential asymptotic stability of positive equilibrium point in the case of weak chemotactic sensitivity. The paper ends with a brief concluding remarks.

    The aim of this section is to develop the existence and boundedness of a global classical solution by employing Neumann heat semigroup arguments, Banach fixed point theorem, parabolic Schauder estimate and elliptic regularity theory.

    Proof of Theorem 1.1 (ⅰ) Existence. For p(1,), let A denote the sectorial operator defined by

    Au:=ΔuforuD(A):={φW2,p(Ω)|ηφ|Ω=0}.

    λ1>0 denote the first nonzero eigenvalue of Δ in Ω with zero-flux boundary condition. Let A1=Δ+α and Xl be the domains of fractional powers operator Al,l0. From the Theorem 1.6.1 in [21], we know that for any p>n and l(n2p,12),

    zL(Ω)CAl1zLp(Ω)forallzXl. (2.1)

    We introduce the closed subset

    S:={uX|uL((0,T);L(Ω))R+1}

    in the space X:=C0([0,T];C0(ˉΩ)), where R is a any positive number satisfying

    u0(x)L(Ω)R

    and T>0 will be specified later. Note F(u)=u1+u, we consider an auxiliary problem with F(u) replaced by its extension ˜F(u) defined by

    ˜F(u)={F(u)uifu0,F(u)(u)ifu<0.

    Notice that ˜F(u) is a smooth globally Lipshitz function. Given ˆuS, we define Ψˆu=u by first writing

    w(x,t)=(w0(x)1)eδt0˜F(ˆu)ˆuds+1,xΩ,t>0, (2.2)

    and

    w0w(x,t)1,xΩ,t>0,

    then letting v solve

    {Δv+αv=βw+γˆu,xΩ,t(0,T),ηv=0,xΩ,t(0,T), (2.3)

    and finally taking u to be the solution of the linear parabolic problem

    {ut=Δuχ(ˆu(1ˆu)v)+ˆu(1ˆu),xΩ,t(0,T),ηu=0,xΩ,t(0,T),u(x,0)=u0(x),xΩ.

    Applying Agmon-Douglas-Nirenberg Theorem [22,23] for the problem (2.3), there exists a constant C such that

    vW2p(Ω)C(βwLp(Ω)+γˆuLp(Ω))C(β|Ω|1p+γ(R+1)) (2.4)

    for all t(0,T). From a variation-of-constants formula, we define

    Ψ(ˆu)=etΔu0χt0e(ts)Δ(ˆu(1ˆu)v(s))ds+t0e(ts)Δˆu(s)(1ˆu(s))ds.

    First we shall show that for T small enough

    Ψ(ˆu)L((0,T);L(Ω))R+1

    for any ˆuS. From the maximum principle, we can give

    etΔu0L(Ω)u0L(Ω), (2.5)

    and

    t0etΔˆu(s)(1ˆu(s))L(Ω)dst0ˆu(s)(1ˆu(s))L(Ω)ds(R+1)(R+2)T (2.6)

    for all t(0,T). We use inequalities (2.1) and (2.4) to estimate

    χt0e(ts)Δ(ˆu(1ˆu)v(s))L(Ω)dsCt0(ts)lets2Δ(ˆu(1ˆu)v(s))Lp(Ω)dsCt0(ts)l12(ˆu(1ˆu)v(s)Lp(Ω)dsCT12l(R+1)(R+2)(β|Ω|1p+γ(R+1)) (2.7)

    for all t(0,T). This estimate is attributed to T<1 and the inequality in [24], Lemma 1.3 iv]

    etΔzLp(Ω)C1(1+t12)eλ1tzLp(Ω)forallzCc(Ω).

    From inequalities (2.5), (2.6) and (2.7) we can deduce that Ψ maps S into itself for T small enough.

    Next we prove that the map Ψ is a contractive on S. For ˆu1,ˆu2S, we estimate

    Ψ(ˆu1)Ψ(ˆu2)L(Ω)χt0(ts)l12[ˆu2(s)(1ˆu2(s))ˆu1(s)(1ˆu1(s))]v2(s)Lp(Ω)ds+χt0ˆu1(s)(1ˆu1(s))(v1(s)v2(s))Lp(Ω)ds+t0e(ts)Δ[ˆu1(s)(1ˆu1(s))ˆu2(s)(1ˆu2(s))]L(Ω)dsχt0(ts)l12(2R+1)ˆu1(s)ˆu2(s)Xv2(s)Lp(Ω)ds+χt0(R+1)(R+2)(βw1(s)w2(s)Lp(Ω)+γˆu1(s)ˆu2(s)Lp(Ω))ds+t0(2R+1)ˆu1(s)ˆu2(s)Xdsχt0(ts)l12(2R+1)ˆu1(s)ˆu2(s)Xv2(s)Lp(Ω)ds+2βδχt0(R+1)(R+2)tˆu1(s)ˆu2(s)Lp(Ω)+γˆu1(s)ˆu2(s)Lp(Ω)ds+t0(2R+1)ˆu1(s)ˆu2(s)Xds(CχT12l(2R+1)(β|Ω|1p+γ(R+1))+2βδχT(R2+3R+γ+2)+T(2R+1))ˆu1(s)ˆu2(s)X.

    Fixing T(0,1) small enough such that

    (CχT12l(2R+1)(β|Ω|1p+γ(R+1))+2βδχT(R2+3R+γ+2)+T(2R+1))12.

    It follows from the Banach fixed point theorem that there exists a unique fixed point of Ψ.

    (ⅱ) Regularity. Since the above of T depends on u0L(Ω) and w0L(Ω) only, it is clear that (u,v,w) can be extended up to some maximal Tmax(0,]. Let QT=Ω×(0,T] for all T(0,Tmax). From uC0(ˉQT), we know that wC0,1(ˉQT) by the expression (2.2) and vC0([0,T],W2p(Ω)) by Agmon-Douglas-Nirenberg Theorem [22,23]. From parabolic Lp-estimate and the embedding relation W1p(Ω)Cν(ˉΩ),p>n, we can get uW2,1p(QT). By applying the following embedding relation

    W2,1p(QT)Cν,ν/2(ˉQT),p>n+22, (2.8)

    we can derive u(x,t)Cν,ν/2(ˉQT) with 0<ν2n+2p. The conclusion wCν,1+ν/2(ˉQT) can be obtained by substituting uCν,ν/2(ˉQT) into the formulation (2.2). The regularity uC2+ν,1+ν/2(ˉQT) can be deduced by using further bootstrap argument and the parabolic Schauder estimate. Similarly, we can get vC0((0,T),C2+ν(ˉΩ)) by using Agmon-Douglas-Nirenberg Theorem [22,23]. From the regularity of u we have wC2+ν,1+ν/2(ˉQT).

    Moreover, the maximal principle entails that 0<u(x,t)1, 0v(x,t)β+γα. It follows from the positivity of u that ˜F(u)=F(u) and because of the uniqueness of solution we infer the existence of the solution to the original problem.

    (ⅲ) Uniqueness. Suppose (u1,v1,w1) and (u2,v2,w2) are two deferent solutions of model (1.3) in Ω×[0,T]. Let U=u1u2, V=v1v2, W=w1w2 for t(0,T). Then

    12ddtΩU2dx+Ω|U|2dxχΩ|u1(1u1)u2(1u2)|v1||U|+u2(1u2)|V||U|dx+Ω|u1(1u1)u2(1u2)||U|dxχΩ|U||v1||U|+14|V||U|dx+Ω|U|2dxΩ|U|2dx+χ232Ω|V|2dx+χ2K2+22Ω|U|2dx, (2.9)

    where we have used that |v1|K results from v1C0([0,T],C0(ˉΩ)).

    Similarly, by Young inequality and w0w11, we can estimate

    Ω|V|2dx+α2Ω|V|2dxβ2αΩ|W|2dx+γ2αΩ|U|2dx, (2.10)

    and

    ddtΩW2dxδΩ|U|2+|W|2dx. (2.11)

    Finally, adding to the inequalities (2.9)–(2.11) yields

    ddt(ΩU2dx+ΩW2dx)C(ΩU2dx+ΩW2dx)forallt(0,T).

    The results U0, W0 in Ω×(0,T) are obtained by Gronwall's lemma. From the inequality (2.10), we have V0. Hence (u1,v1,w1)=(u2,v2,w2) in Ω×(0,T).

    (ⅳ) Uniform estimates. We use the Agmon-Douglas-Nirenberg Theorem [22,23] for the second equation of the model (1.3) to get

    vC0([t,t+1],W2p(Ω))C(uLp(Ω×[t,t+1])+wLp(Ω×[t,t+1]))C2 (2.12)

    for all t1 and C2 is independent of t. From the embedded relationship W1p(Ω)C0(ˉΩ),p>n, the parabolic Lp-estimate and the estimation (2.12), we have

    uW2,1p(Ω×[t,t+1])C3

    for all t1. The estimate uCν,ν2(ˉΩ×[t,t+1])C4 for all t1 obtained by the embedded relationship (2.8). We can immediately compute wCν,1+ν2(ˉΩ×[t,t+1])C5 for all t1 according to the regularity of u and the specific expression of w. Further, bootstrapping argument leads to vC0([t,t+1],C2+ν(ˉΩ))C6 and uC2+ν,1+ν2(ˉΩ×[t,t+1])C7 for all t1. Thus the uniform estimation (1.7) is proved.

    Remark 2.1. Assume the initial data 0<u0(x)1 and w0(x)=0. Then the BCS model (1.3) has a unique classical solution.

    In this section we investigate the global asymptotic stability of the unique positive equilibrium point (1,β+γα,1) to model (1.3). To this end, we first introduce following auxiliary problem

    {uϵt=Δuϵ(uϵ(1uϵ)vϵ)+uϵ(1uϵ),xΩ,t>0,Δvϵ+αvϵ=βwϵ+γuϵ,xΩ,t>0,wϵt=δu2ϵ+ϵ1+uϵ(1wϵ),xΩ,t>0,ηuϵ=ηvϵ=0,xΩ,t>0,uϵ(x,0)=u0(x),wϵ(x,0)=w0(x),xΩ. (3.1)

    By a similar proof of Theorem 1.1, we get that the problem (3.1) has a unique global classical solution (uϵ,vϵ,wϵ), and there exist a ν(0,1) and M1>0 which is independent of ϵ such that

    uϵC2+ν,1+ν/2(ˉΩ×[1,))+vϵC2+ν,1+ν/2(ˉΩ×[1,))+wϵCν,1+ν/2(ˉΩ×[1,))M1. (3.2)

    Then, motivated by some ideas from [25,26], we construct a Lyapunov function to study the uniform convergence of homogeneous steady state for the problem (3.1).

    Let us give following lemma which is used in the proof of Lemma 3.2.

    Lemma 3.1. Suppose that a nonnegative function f on (1,) is uniformly continuous and 1f(t)dt<. Then f(t)0 as t.

    Lemma 3.2. Assume that the condition (1.8) is satisfied. Then

    uϵ(,t)1L2(Ω)+vϵ(,t)vL2(Ω)+wϵ(,t)1L2(Ω)0,t, (3.3)

    where v=β+γα.

    Proof We construct a positive function

    E(t):=Ω(uε1lnuϵ)+12δϵΩ(wϵ1)2,t>0.

    From the problem (3.1) and Young's inequality, we can compute

    ddtE(t)χ24Ω|vϵ|2dxΩ(uϵ1)2dxΩ(wϵ1)2dx,t>0. (3.4)

    We multiply the second equations in system (3.1) by vϵv, integrate by parts over Ω and use Young's inequality to obtain

    Ω|vϵ|2dxγ22αΩ(uϵ1)2dx+β22αΩ(wϵ1)2dx,t>0, (3.5)

    and

    Ω(vϵv)2dx2γ2α2Ω(uϵ1)2dx+2β2α2Ω(wϵ1)2dx,t>0. (3.6)

    Substituting inequality (3.5) into inequality (3.4) to get

    ddtE(t)C8(Ω(uϵ1)2dx+Ω(wϵ1)2dx),t>0,

    where C8=min{1χ2β28α,1χ2γ28α}>0.

    Let f(t):=Ω(uϵ1)2+(wϵ1)2dx. Then

    1f(t)dtE(1)C8<,t>1.

    It follows from the uniform estimation (3.2) and the Arzela-Ascoli theorem that f(t) is uniformly continuous in (1,). Applying Lemma 3.1, we have

    Ω(uϵ(,t)1)2+(wϵ(,t)1)2dx0,t. (3.7)

    Combining inequality (3.6) and the limit (3.7) to obtain

    Ω(vϵ(,t)v)2dx0,t.

    Proof of Theorem 1.2 As we all known, each bounded sequence in C2+ν,1+ν2(ˉΩ×[1,)) is precompact in C2,1(ˉΩ×[1,)). Hence there exists some subsequence {uϵn}n=1 satisfying ϵn0 as n such that

    limnuϵnuC2,1(ˉΩ×[1,))=0.

    Similarly, we can get

    limnvϵnvC2(ˉΩ)=0,

    and

    limnwϵnwC0,1(ˉΩ×[1,))=0.

    Combining above limiting relations yields that (u,v,w) satisfies model (1.3). The conclusion (u,v,w)=(u,v,w) is directly attributed to the uniqueness of the classical solution of the model (1.3). Furthermore, according to the conclusion, the strong convergence (3.3) and Diagonal line method, we can deduce

    u(,t)1L2(Ω)+v(,t)vL2(Ω)+w(,t)1L2(Ω)0,t. (3.8)

    By applying Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality

    zLCz2/(n+2)L2(Ω)zn/(n+2)W1,(Ω),zW1,(Ω), (3.9)

    comparison principle of ODE and the convergence (3.8), the uniform convergence (1.9) is obtained immediately.

    Since limtu(,t)1L(Ω)=0, so there exists a t1>0 such that

    u(x,t)12forallxΩ,t>t1. (3.10)

    Using the explicit representation formula of w

    w(x,t)=(w0(x)1)eδt0F(u)uds+1,xΩ,t>0

    and the inequality (3.10), we have

    w(,t)1L(Ω)eδ6(tt1),t>t1. (3.11)

    Multiply the first two equations in model (1.3) by u1 and vv, respectively, integrate over Ω and apply Cauchy's inequality, Young's inequality and the inequality (3.10), to find

    ddtΩ(u1)2dxχ232Ω|v|2dxΩ(u1)2dx,t>t1. (3.12)
    Ω|v|2dx+α2Ω(vv)2dxβ2αΩ(w1)2dx+γ2αΩ(u1)2dx,t>0. (3.13)

    Combining the estimations (3.11)–(3.13) leads us to the estimate

    ddtΩ(u1)2dx(χ2γ232α1)Ω(u1)2dx+χ2β232αeδ3(tt1),t>t1.

    Let y(t)=Ω(u1)2dx. Then

    y(t)(χ2γ232α1)y(t)+χ2β232αeδ3(tt1),t>t1.

    From comparison principle of ODE, we get

    y(t)(y(t1)3χ2β232α(3δ)χ2γ2)e(1χ2γ232α)(tt1)+3χ2β232α(3δ)χ2γ2eδ3(tt1),t>t1.

    This yields

    Ω(u1)2dxC9eλ2(tt1),t>t1, (3.14)

    where λ2=min{1χ2γ232α,δ3} and C9=max{|Ω|3χ2β232α(3δ)χ2γ2,3χ2β232α(3δ)χ2γ2}.

    From the inequalities (3.11), (3.13) and (3.14), we derive

    Ω(vβ+γα)2dxC10eλ2(tt1),t>t1, (3.15)

    where C10=max{2γ2α2C9,2β2α2}. By employing the uniform estimation (1.7), the inequalities (3.9), (3.14) and (3.15), the exponential decay estimation (1.10) can be obtained.

    The proof is complete.

    In this paper, we mainly study the uniform boundedness of classical solutions and exponential asymptotic stability of the unique positive equilibrium point to the chemotactic cellular model (1.3) for Baló's concentric sclerosis (BCS). For model (1.1), by numerical simulation, Calveza and Khonsarib in [7] shown that demyelination patterns of concentric rings will occur with increasing of chemotactic sensitivity. By the Theorem 1.1 we know that systems (1.1) and (1.2) are {uniformly} bounded and dissipative. By the Theorem 1.2 we also find that the constant equilibrium point of model (1.1) is exponentially asymptotically stable if

    ˜χ<2ˉw˜β2Dμ˜α˜ϵˉu,

    and the constant equilibrium point of the model (1.2) is exponentially asymptotically stable if

    ˜χ<22Dμ˜α˜ϵˉumin{1ˉw˜β,1ˉu˜γ}.

    According to a pathological viewpoint of BCS, the above stability results mean that if chemoattractive effect is weak, then the destroyed oligodendrocytes form a homogeneous plaque.

    The authors would like to thank the editors and the anonymous referees for their constructive comments. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11761063, 11661051).

    We have no conflict of interest in this paper.

    [1] Petroleum B, BP statistical review of world energy, 2015. Available from: www. bp. com/statisticalreview.
    [2] Sihag S, Pathak H, Jaroli D (2014) Factors affecting the rate of biodegradation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Int J Pure App Biosci 2: 185-202.
    [3] Stroud JL, Paton GI, Semple KT (2007) Microbe-aliphatic hydrocarbon interactions in soil: implications for biodegradation and bioremediation. J Appl Microbiol 102: 1239-1253. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03401.x
    [4] Das N, Chandran P (2011) Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants: an overview. Biotechnol Res Int 2011: 941810.
    [5] Gallego JL, Loredo J, Llamas JF, et al. (2001) Bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soils: evaluation of potential in situ techniques by study of bacterial degradation. Biodegradation 12: 325-335. doi: 10.1023/A:1014397732435
    [6] Gong R, Hochmuth M, Weatherburn DC (2003) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and diesel particulates.
    [7] Latif I, Karim A, Zuki A, et al. (2010) Pulmonary modulation of benzo [a] pyrene-induced hemato-and hepatotoxicity in broilers. Poultry Sci 89: 1379-1388. doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00622
    [8] Samanta SK, Singh OV, Jain RK (2002) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: environmental pollution and bioremediation. Trends Biotechnol 20: 243-248. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01943-1
    [9] Huang XD, El-Alawi Y, Penrose DM, et al. (2004) A multi-process phytoremediation system for removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 130: 465-476. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2003.09.031
    [10] Arthur EL, Rice PJ, Rice PJ, et al. (2005) Phytoremediation—An Overview. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 24: 109-122. doi: 10.1080/07352680590952496
    [11] Guo J, Feng R, Ding Y, et al. (2014) Applying carbon dioxide, plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium and EDTA can enhance the phytoremediation efficiency of ryegrass in a soil polluted with zinc, arsenic, cadmium and lead. J Environ Manage 141: 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.12.039
    [12] Onwurah I, Ogugua V, Onyike N, et al. (2007) Crude oil spills in the environment, effects and some innovative clean-up biotechnologies.
    [13] Yemashova NA, Murygina VP, Zhukov DV, et al. (2007) Biodeterioration of crude oil and oil derived products: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 6: 315-337. doi: 10.1007/s11157-006-9118-8
    [14] Head IM, Jones DM, Röling WF (2006) Marine microorganisms make a meal of oil. Nat Rev Microbiol 4: 173-182. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1348
    [15] Yasin G, Bhanger MI, Ansari TM, et al. (2013) Quality and chemistry of crude oils. J Pet Technol Altern Fuels 4: 53-63.
    [16] Alvarez PJ, Illman WA (2005) Bioremediation and natural attenuation: process fundamentals and mathematical models. John Wiley & Sons.
    [17] Martinez-Gomez C, Vethaak A, Hylland K, et al. (2010) A guide to toxicity assessment and monitoring effects at lower levels of biological organization following marine oil spills in European waters. ICES J Mar Sci 67: 1105-1118. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsq017
    [18] Haritash A, Kaushik C (2009) Biodegradation aspects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): a review. J Hazard Mater 169: 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.137
    [19] Mishra S, Jyot J, Kuhad RC, et al. (2001) Evaluation of inoculum addition to stimulate in situ bioremediation of oily-sludge-contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microb 67: 1675-1681. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.4.1675-1681.2001
    [20] Kim KH, Jahan SA, Kabir E, et al. (2013) A review of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their human health effects. Environ Int 60: 71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.07.019
    [21] Masih J, Singhvi R, Kumar K, et al. (2012) Seasonal variation and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in indoor and outdoor air in a semi arid tract of northern India. AAQR 12: 515-525.
    [22] Perelo LW (2010) Review: in situ and bioremediation of organic pollutants in aquatic sediments. J Hazard Mater 177: 81-89.
    [23] Gaspar A, Zellermann E, Lababidi S, et al. (2012) Characterization of saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes heavy crude oil fractions by atmospheric pressure laser ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Energ Fuel 26: 3481-3487. doi: 10.1021/ef3001407
    [24] Leyva C, Ancheyta J, Berrueco C, et al. (2013) Chemical characterization of asphaltenes from various crude oils. Fuel Process Technol 106: 734-738. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.10.009
    [25] Vinas M, Grifoll M, Sabate J, et al. (2002) Biodegradation of a crude oil by three microbial consortia of different origins and metabolic capabilities. J Ind Microbiol Biot 28: 252-260. doi: 10.1038/sj.jim.7000236
    [26] He L, Lin F, Li X, et al. (2015) Interfacial sciences in unconventional petroleum production: from fundamentals to applications. Chem Soc Rev 44: 5446-5494. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00102A
    [27] Fuentes S, Méndez V, Aguila P, et al. (2014) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons: catabolic genes, microbial communities, and applications. Appl Microbiol Biot 98: 4781-4794. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5684-9
    [28] Dong TT, Lee BK (2009) Characteristics, toxicity, and source apportionment of polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in road dust of Ulsan, Korea. Chemosphere 74: 1245-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.035
    [29] Ou S, Zheng J, Zheng J, et al. (2004) Petroleum hydrocarbons and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the surficial sediments of Xiamen Harbour and Yuan Dan Lake, China. Chemosphere 56: 107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.02.022
    [30] Chandra S, Sharma R, Singh K, et al. (2013) Application of bioremediation technology in the environment contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbon. Ann Microbiol 63: 417-431. doi: 10.1007/s13213-012-0543-3
    [31] Paruk JD, Adams EM, Uher-Koch H, et al. (2016) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in blood related to lower body mass in common loons. Sci Total Environ 565: 360-368. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.150
    [32] Militon C, Boucher D, Vachelard C, et al. (2010) Bacterial community changes during bioremediation of aliphatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Fems Microbiol Ecol 74: 669-681. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00982.x
    [33] Wasmund K, Burns KA, Kurtböke DI, et al. (2009) Novel alkane hydroxylase gene (alkB) diversity in sediments associated with hydrocarbon seeps in the Timor Sea, Australia. Appl Environ Microb 75: 7391-7398. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01370-09
    [34] Adgate JL, Goldstein BD, McKenzie LM (2014) Potential public health hazards, exposures and health effects from unconventional natural gas development. Environ Sci Technol 48: 8307-8320. doi: 10.1021/es404621d
    [35] Zhu X, Venosa AD, Suidan MT, et al. (2001) Guidelines for the bioremediation of marine shorelines and freshwater wetlands. US EPA
    [36] Sadler R, Connell D (2003) Analytical methods for the determination of total petroleum hydrocarbons in soil. In: Proceedings of the fifth national workshop on the assessment of site contamination, 133-150.
    [37] Van Beilen JB, Funhoff EG (2007) Alkane hydroxylases involved in microbial alkane degradation. Appl Microbiol Biot 74: 13-21.
    [38] Hatzinger PB, Alexander M (1995) Effect of aging of chemicals in soil on their biodegradability and extractability. Environ Sci Technol 29: 537-545. doi: 10.1021/es00002a033
    [39] Semple KT, Morriss A, Paton G (2003) Bioavailability of hydrophobic organic contaminants in soils: fundamental concepts and techniques for analysis. Eur J Soil Sci 54: 809-818. doi: 10.1046/j.1351-0754.2003.0564.x
    [40] Baboshin M, Golovleva L (2012) Aerobic bacterial degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and its kinetic aspects. Microbiology 81: 639-650. doi: 10.1134/S0026261712060021
    [41] Rojo F (2009) Degradation of alkanes by bacteria. Environ Microbiol 11: 2477-2490. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01948.x
    [42] Wentzel A, Ellingsen TE, Kotlar HK, et al. (2007) Bacterial metabolism of long-chain n-alkanes. Appl Microbiol Biot 76: 1209-1221.
    [43] Kotani T, Yurimoto H, Kato N, et al. (2007) Novel acetone metabolism in a propane-utilizing bacterium, Gordonia sp. strain TY-5. J Bacteriol 189: 886-893.
    [44] Bamforth SM, Singleton I (2005) Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: current knowledge and future directions. J Chem Technol Biot 80: 723-736. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1276
    [45] Kanaly RA, Harayama S (2010) Advances in the field of high-molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation by bacteria. Microb Biotechnol 3: 136-164. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00130.x
    [46] Seo JS, Keum YS, Li QX (2009) Bacterial degradation of aromatic compounds. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6: 278-309. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6010278
    [47] Maigari AU, Maigari MU (2015) Microbial metabolism of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): a review. Int J Sci Eng 6: 1449-1459.
    [48] Rojo F, (2010) Enzymes for aerobic degradation of alkanes, In: Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology, Springer, 781-797.
    [49] Tortella GR, Diez MC, Durán N (2005) Fungal diversity and use in decomposition of environmental pollutants. Crit Rev Microbiol 31: 197-212. doi: 10.1080/10408410500304066
    [50] Brooijmans RJ, Pastink MI, Siezen RJ (2009) Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria: the oil-spill clean-up crew. Microb Biotechnol 2: 587-594. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00151.x
    [51] Germida J, Frick C, Farrell R, et al. (2002) Phytoremediation of oil-contaminated soils. Dev Soil Sci 28: 169-186. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2481(02)80015-0
    [52] Wang YN, Cai H, Chi CQ, et al. (2007) Halomonas shengliensis sp. nov., a moderately halophilic, denitrifying, crude-oil-utilizing bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Micr 57: 1222-1226.
    [53] Mnif S, Chamkha M, Sayadi S (2009) Isolation and characterization of Halomonas sp. strain C2SS100, a hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium under hypersaline conditions. J Appl Microbiol 107: 785-794.
    [54] Borzenkov I, Milekhina E, Gotoeva M, et al. (2006) The properties of hydrocarbon-oxidizing bacteria isolated from the oilfields of Tatarstan, Western Siberia, and Vietnam. Microbiology 75: 66-72. doi: 10.1134/S0026261706010127
    [55] Dastgheib SMM, Amoozegar MA, Khajeh K, et al. (2011) A halotolerant Alcanivorax sp. strain with potential application in saline soil remediation. Appl Microbiol Biot 90: 305-312.
    [56] Chaillan F, Le Flèche A, Bury E, et al. (2004) Identification and biodegradation potential of tropical aerobic hydrocarbon-degrading microorganisms. Res Microbiol 155: 587-595. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2004.04.006
    [57] Moody JD, Freeman JP, Fu PP, et al. (2004) Degradation of benzo [a] pyrene by Mycobacterium vanbaalenii PYR-1. Appl Environ Microb 70: 340-345. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.1.340-345.2004
    [58] Van Beilen JB, Li Z, Duetz WA, et al. (2003) Diversity of alkane hydroxylase systems in the environment. Oil Gas Sci Technol 58: 427-440. doi: 10.2516/ogst:2003026
    [59] McKew BA, Coulon F, Osborn AM, et al. (2007) Determining the identity and roles of oil-metabolizing marine bacteria from the Thames estuary, UK. Environ Microbiol 9: 165-176. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01125.x
    [60] Pilon-Smits E (2005) Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56: 15-39. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144214
    [61] Holden P, LaMontagne M, Bruce A, et al. (2002) Assessing the role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa surface-active gene expression in hexadecane biodegradation in sand. Appl Environ Microb 68: 2509-2518. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.5.2509-2518.2002
    [62] Makadia TH, Adetutu EM, Simons KL, et al. (2011) Re-use of remediated soils for the bioremediation of waste oil sludge. J Environ Manage 92: 866-871. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.059
    [63] Sheppard PJ, Simons KL, Kadali KK, et al. (2012) The importance of weathered crude oil as a source of hydrocarbonoclastic microorganisms in contaminated seawater. J Microbiol Biotechnol 22: 1185-1192. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1201.01049
    [64] Rodríguez-Blanco A, Antoine V, Pelletier E, et al. (2010) Effects of temperature and fertilization on total vs. active bacterial communities exposed to crude and diesel oil pollution in NW Mediterranean Sea. Environ Pollut 158: 663-673.
    [65] Sarkar D, Ferguson M, Datta R, et al. (2005) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soils: comparison of biosolids addition, carbon supplementation, and monitored natural attenuation. Environ Pollut 136: 187-195. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.09.025
    [66] Tang J, Wang R, Niu X, et al. (2010) Enhancement of soil petroleum remediation by using a combination of ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and different microorganisms. Soil Till Res 110: 87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2010.06.010
    [67] Li X, Wu Y, Lin X, et al. (2012) Dissipation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil microcosms amended with mushroom cultivation substrate. Soil Biol Biochem 47: 191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.01.001
    [68] Agnello AC, Bagard M, Van Hullebusch ED, et al. (2016) Comparative bioremediation of heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons co-contaminated soil by natural attenuation, phytoremediation, bioaugmentation and bioaugmentation-assisted phytoremediation. Sci Total Environ 563: 693-703.
    [69] Kadali KK, Simons KL, Sheppard PJ, et al. (2012) Mineralisation of weathered crude oil by a hydrocarbonoclastic consortia in marine mesocosms. Water Air Soil Poll 223: 4283-4295. doi: 10.1007/s11270-012-1191-8
    [70] Yu K, Wong A, Yau K, et al. (2005) Natural attenuation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation on biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in mangrove sediments. Mar Pollut Bull 51: 1071-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.06.006
    [71] Margesin R, Hämmerle M, Tscherko D (2007) Microbial activity and community composition during bioremediation of diesel-oil-contaminated soil: effects of hydrocarbon concentration, fertilizers, and incubation time. Microbial Ecol 53: 259-269. doi: 10.1007/s00248-006-9136-7
    [72] Festa S, Coppotelli B, Morelli I (2016) Comparative bioaugmentation with a consortium and a single strain in a phenanthrene-contaminated soil: Impact on the bacterial community and biodegradation. Appl Soil Ecol 98: 8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.08.025
    [73] Nikolopoulou M, Kalogerakis N, (2010) Biostimulation strategies for enhanced bioremediation of marine oil spills including chronic pollution. In: Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology, Springer, 2521-2529.
    [74] Alexander M (1999) Biodegradation and bioremediation. Gulf Professional Publishing.
    [75] Walworth J, Pond A, Snape I, et al. (2007) Nitrogen requirements for maximizing petroleum bioremediation in a sub-Antarctic soil. Cold Reg Sci Technol 48: 84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2006.07.001
    [76] Piehler MF, Swistak J, Pinckney J, et al. (1999) Stimulation of diesel fuel biodegradation by indigenous nitrogen fixing bacterial consortia. Microbial Ecol 38: 69-78. doi: 10.1007/s002489900157
    [77] Li H, Zhao Q, Boufadel MC, et al. (2007) A universal nutrient application strategy for the bioremediation of oil-polluted beaches. Mar Pollut Bull 54: 1146-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.04.015
    [78] Chaillan F, Chaineau C, Point V, et al. (2006) Factors inhibiting bioremediation of soil contaminated with weathered oils and drill cuttings. Environ Pollut 144: 255-265. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.12.016
    [79] Sayara T, Borràs E, Caminal G, et al. (2011) Bioremediation of PAHs-contaminated soil through composting: Influence of bioaugmentation and biostimulation on contaminant biodegradation. Int Biodeter Biodegr 65: 859-865. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2011.05.006
    [80] Ros M, Rodriguez I, Garcia C, et al. (2010) Microbial communities involved in the bioremediation of an aged recalcitrant hydrocarbon polluted soil by using organic amendments. Bioresour Technol 101: 6916-6923. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.126
    [81] Blyth W, Shahsavari E, Morrison PD, et al. (2015) Biosurfactant from red ash trees enhances the bioremediation of PAH contaminated soil at a former gasworks site. J Environ Manage 162: 30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.041
    [82] Mair J, Schinner F, Margesin R (2013) A feasibility study on the bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil from an alpine former military site: effects of temperature and biostimulation. Cold Reg Sci Technol 96: 122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.07.006
    [83] Liu W, Luo Y, Teng Y, et al. (2010) Bioremediation of oily sludge-contaminated soil by stimulating indigenous microbes. Environ Gecochem Hlth 32: 23-29. doi: 10.1007/s10653-009-9262-5
    [84] Palmroth MR, Pichtel J, Puhakka JA (2002) Phytoremediation of subarctic soil contaminated with diesel fuel. Bioresour Technol 84: 221-228. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00055-X
    [85] Schaefer M, Juliane F (2007) The influence of earthworms and organic additives on the biodegradation of oil contaminated soil. Appl Soil Ecol 36: 53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2006.11.002
    [86] Suja F, Rahim F, Taha MR, et al. (2014) Effects of local microbial bioaugmentation and biostimulation on the bioremediation of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in crude oil contaminated soil based on laboratory and field observations. Int Biodeter Biodegr 90: 115-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.03.006
    [87] Al-Sulaimani HS, Al-Wahaibi YM, Al-Bahry S, et al. (2010) Experimental investigation of biosurfactants produced by Bacillus species and their potential for MEOR in Omani oil field. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [88] Reid BJ, Jones KC, Semple KT (2000) Bioavailability of persistent organic pollutants in soils and sediments—a perspective on mechanisms, consequences and assessment. Environ Pollut 108: 103-112. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00206-7
    [89] Liu PWG, Chang TC, Chen CH, et al. (2014) Bioaugmentation efficiency investigation on soil organic matters and microbial community shift of diesel-contaminated soils. Int Biodeter Biodegr 95: 276-284. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.05.004
    [90] Hyun S, Ahn MY, Zimmerman AR, et al. (2008) Implication of hydraulic properties of bioremediated diesel-contaminated soil. Chemosphere 71: 1646-1653. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.01.026
    [91] Nam K, Chung N, Alexander M (1998) Relationship between organic matter content of soil and the sequestration of phenanthrene. Environ Sci Technol 32: 3785-3788. doi: 10.1021/es980428m
    [92] Alexander M (2000) Aging, bioavailability, and overestimation of risk from environmental pollutants. Environ Sci Technol 34: 4259-4265.
    [93] Si-Zhong Y, Hui-Jun J, Zhi W, et al. (2009) Bioremediation of oil spills in cold environments: a review. Pedosphere 19: 371-381. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(09)60128-4
    [94] Okoh AI (2006) Biodegradation alternative in the cleanup of petroleum hydrocarbon pollutants. Biotechnol Mol Biol Rev 1: 38-50.
    [95] Margesin R, Schinner F (2001) Biodegradation and bioremediation of hydrocarbons in extreme environments. Appl Microbiol Biot 56: 650-663.
    [96] Perfumo A, Banat IM, Marchant R, et al. (2007) Thermally enhanced approaches for bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. Chemosphere 66: 179-184. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.006
    [97] Scherr K, Aichberger H, Braun R, et al. (2007) Influence of soil fractions on microbial degradation behavior of mineral hydrocarbons. Eur J Soil Biol 43: 341-350. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.03.009
    [98] Amellal N, Portal J-M, Berthelin J (2001) Effect of soil structure on the bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons within aggregates of a contaminated soil. Appl Geochem 16: 1611-1619. doi: 10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00034-8
    [99] Chaerun S, Tazaki K (2005) How kaolinite plays an essential role in remediating oil-polluted seawater. Clay Miner 40: 481-491. doi: 10.1180/0009855054040185
    [100] Atlas RM, Philp J (2005) Bioremediation. Applied microbial solutions for real-world environmental cleanup. ASM Press.
    [101] Zucchi M, Angiolini L, Borin S, et al. (2003) Response of bacterial community during bioremediation of an oil-polluted soil. J Appl Microbiol 94: 248-257. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01826.x
    [102] Tang J, Wang M, Wang F, et al. (2011) Eco-toxicity of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil. J Environ Sci 23: 845-851.
    [103] Sheppard PJ, Adetutu EM, Makadia TH, et al. (2011) Microbial community and ecotoxicity analysis of bioremediated, weathered hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Soil Research 49: 261-269. doi: 10.1071/SR10159
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Lu Xu, Chunlai Mu, Qiao Xin, Global boundedness and asymptotic behavior of solutions for a quasilinear chemotaxis model of multiple sclerosis with nonlinear signal secretion, 2023, 28, 1531-3492, 1215, 10.3934/dcdsb.2022118
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(22930) PDF downloads(3750) Cited by(198)

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(4)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog