Research article Special Issues

Characterization of Lysobacter enzymogenes B25, a potential biological control agent of plant-parasitic nematodes, and its mode of action

  • It is certainly difficult to estimate productivity losses due to the action of phytopathogenic nematodes but it might be about 12 % of world agricultural production. Although there are numerous tools to reduce the effect of these nematodes, there is growing concern about their environmental impact. Lysobacter enzymogenes B25 is an effective biological control agent against plant-parasitic nematodes, showing control over root-knot nematodes (RKN) such as Meloidogyne incognita and Meloidogyne javanica. In this paper, the efficacy of B25 to control RKN infestation in tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Durinta) is described. The bacterium was applied 4 times at an average of concentration around 108 CFU/mL showing an efficacy of 50–95 % depending on the population and the pressure of the pathogen. Furthermore, the control activity of B25 was comparable to that of the reference chemical used. L. enzymogenes B25 is hereby characterized, and its mode of action studied, focusing on different mechanisms that include motility, the production of lytic enzymes and secondary metabolites and the induction of plant defenses. The presence of M. incognita increased the twitching motility of B25. In addition, cell-free supernatants obtained after growing B25, in both poor and rich media, showed efficacy in inhibiting RKN egg hatching in vitro. This nematicidal activity was sensitive to high temperatures, suggesting that it is mainly due to extracellular lytic enzymes. The secondary metabolites heat-stable antifungal factor and alteramide A/B were identified in the culture filtrate and their contribution to the nematicidal activity of B25 is discussed. This study points out L. enzymogenes B25 as a promising biocontrol microorganism against nematode infestation of plants and a good candidate to develop a sustainable nematicidal product.

    Citation: Sònia Martínez-Servat, Lola Pinyol-Escala, Oriol Daura-Pich, Marta Almazán, Iker Hernández, Belén López-García, Carolina Fernández. Characterization of Lysobacter enzymogenes B25, a potential biological control agent of plant-parasitic nematodes, and its mode of action[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(1): 151-176. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023010

    Related Papers:

    [1] Hemant Sharma, Arun Kumar Rai, Divakar Dahiya, Rajen Chettri, Poonam Singh Nigam . Exploring endophytes for in vitro synthesis of bioactive compounds similar to metabolites produced in vivo by host plants. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(2): 175-199. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021012
    [2] Yu Song, Rongjun Yin, Hui Shen, Xin Tao, Linmei Li, Nan Gao . Whole-Genome analysis of Bacillus subtilis NRCB002 and characterization of its metabolite acetoin as a plant growth stimulant. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(3): 574-587. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025024
    [3] Yulduzkhon Abdullaeva, Gulsanam Mardonova, Farkhod Eshboev, Massimiliano Cardinale, Dilfuza Egamberdieva . Harnessing chickpea bacterial endophytes for improved plant health and fitness. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(3): 489-506. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024024
    [4] Alaa Fathalla, Amal Abd el-mageed . Salt tolerance enhancement Of wheat (Triticum Asativium L) genotypes by selected plant growth promoting bacteria. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(3): 250-271. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020016
    [5] Ana M. Castañeda-Meléndrez, José A. Magaña-Lizárraga, Marcela Martínez-Valenzuela, Aldo F. Clemente-Soto, Patricia C. García-Cervantes, Francisco Delgado-Vargas, Rodolfo Bernal-Reynaga . Genomic characterization of a multidrug-resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli and evaluation of Echeveria plant extracts as antibacterials. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(1): 41-61. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024003
    [6] Stephen T. Abedon . Active bacteriophage biocontrol and therapy on sub-millimeter scales towards removal of unwanted bacteria from foods and microbiomes. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 649-688. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.649
    [7] Rungaroon Waditee-Sirisattha, Hakuto Kageyama, Teruhiro Takabe . Halophilic microorganism resources and their applications in industrial and environmental biotechnology. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(1): 42-54. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.1.42
    [8] Sergey Y. Morozov, Andrey G. Solovyev . Small hydrophobic viral proteins involved in intercellular movement of diverse plant virus genomes. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(3): 305-329. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020019
    [9] Maria Parapouli, Anastasios Vasileiadis, Amalia-Sofia Afendra, Efstathios Hatziloukas . Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its industrial applications. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(1): 1-31. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020001
    [10] Tru Tran, Stephanie N. Dawrs, Grant J. Norton, Ravleen Virdi, Jennifer R. Honda . Brought to you courtesy of the red, white, and blue–pigments of nontuberculous mycobacteria. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(4): 434-450. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020026
  • It is certainly difficult to estimate productivity losses due to the action of phytopathogenic nematodes but it might be about 12 % of world agricultural production. Although there are numerous tools to reduce the effect of these nematodes, there is growing concern about their environmental impact. Lysobacter enzymogenes B25 is an effective biological control agent against plant-parasitic nematodes, showing control over root-knot nematodes (RKN) such as Meloidogyne incognita and Meloidogyne javanica. In this paper, the efficacy of B25 to control RKN infestation in tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Durinta) is described. The bacterium was applied 4 times at an average of concentration around 108 CFU/mL showing an efficacy of 50–95 % depending on the population and the pressure of the pathogen. Furthermore, the control activity of B25 was comparable to that of the reference chemical used. L. enzymogenes B25 is hereby characterized, and its mode of action studied, focusing on different mechanisms that include motility, the production of lytic enzymes and secondary metabolites and the induction of plant defenses. The presence of M. incognita increased the twitching motility of B25. In addition, cell-free supernatants obtained after growing B25, in both poor and rich media, showed efficacy in inhibiting RKN egg hatching in vitro. This nematicidal activity was sensitive to high temperatures, suggesting that it is mainly due to extracellular lytic enzymes. The secondary metabolites heat-stable antifungal factor and alteramide A/B were identified in the culture filtrate and their contribution to the nematicidal activity of B25 is discussed. This study points out L. enzymogenes B25 as a promising biocontrol microorganism against nematode infestation of plants and a good candidate to develop a sustainable nematicidal product.



    Nematodes are among the most widespread organisms on Earth. Of the about 25000 species that have been described [1], approximately 4300 (corresponding to 197 genera) have been reported as plant parasitic nematodes [2]. Their feeding process damages the root system of the plant, reducing its ability to absorb water and nutrients. In the presence of nematodes, symptoms such as galls or necrotic lesions are observed. These alterations in the tissues often lead to chlorosis, growth retardation, wilting and dwarfism, which globally translates into weak-growing plants, which ultimately affects crop productivity.

    It is certainly difficult to estimate productivity losses due to the action of nematodes but various authors mention that it might be about 12% of world agricultural production [3]. This estimate is an average that varies greatly depending on the crop. For potatoes, losses have been estimated worldwide between 10–15% of the harvest, representing 78 billion USD [4] whereas losses on rice yield due to Meloidogyne graminicola range from 20–80% [5]. Another aspect that must be taken into account is that frequently, the damage caused by nematodes is confused with fungal or bacterial attacks, water stress, or other physiological imbalances [6]. Therefore, it is very possible that yield losses are also being underestimated.

    There are many tools to reduce the effect of nematodes such as applying crop rotations, biofumigation, cover crops, fallow, trap crops, soil amendments, soil solarization, and authorized chemical, botanical and microbial pesticides [7]. Regarding the last, it is worth noting that there are very few microorganisms registered for use as nematicides worldwide. To our knowledge, only four nematicidal strains are registered in Europe (https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/active-substances/?event=search.as; https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/agricultura/temas/sanidad-vegetal/productos-fitosanitarios/registro-productos/), namely Bacillus firmus I-1582, Paecilomyces lilacinus 251, P. lilacinus Pl11, and Pasteuria nishizawae Pn1.

    Numerous reports have described the biocontrol activity of the genus Lysobacter, in particular L. enzymogenes, L. capsicis and L. antibioticus, against plant diseases caused by bacteria, fungi, oomycetes and nematodes and their mode of action has been extensively studied [8][12]. Research on L. enzymogenes as biocontrol agent of plant-parasitic nematodes is very limited in comparison to the numerous reports relating to its activity against fungal and oomycetous pathogens. Chen and coworkers reported that L. enzymogenes C3 was able to lyse several plant-parasitic nematode species in vitro, including M. javanica, Heterodera schachtii, Pratylenchus penetrans and Aphelenchides fragariae [13]. Lysobacter enzymogenes C3 culture filtrate also reduced the survival of juveniles suggesting that the bacterium is able to produce and secrete some nematicidal compounds. In nematodes, chitin occurs as the second layer of the eggshells, so the production of chitinase by L. enzymogenes could be the mechanism for a decrease in egg viability. However, chitinolysis cannot explain the rapid inactivation of vermiform nematodes P. penetrans and A. fragariae suggesting that other enzymes or metabolites secreted by L. enzymogenes might be responsible for the effect of the bacterium over nematodes. Recently, the nematicidal activity of L. enzymogenes C3 against different life stages of Heterodera glycines and H. schachtii has been reported under growth chamber conditions [14]. Yuen and coworkers described that nematodes exposed to mutant strains of L. enzymogenes blocked in the production of heat-stable antifungal factor (HSAF) survived and reproduced, demonstrating that HSAF production is an important mechanism involved in the biocontrol activity of L. enzymogenes against cyst nematodes [14].

    Lysobacter members, like other bacteria lacking flagella, are able to move by the presence of thin and long filamentous appendages on the surface of bacteria called type IV pili (T4P). These are involved in, biofilm formation, interbacterial binding, DNA uptake, phage transduction, pathogenic activity and twitching motility [15]. Twitching is a highly organized multicellular collective behavior that is considered essential for bacterial propagation and colonization within host xylem vessels [10]. T4P-mediated twitching is critical for L. enzymogenes to move vigorously in its natural ecosystem (e.g., soil and plant surface) and it is associated with predatory behavior towards other microorganisms [17].

    In addition to its ability to move in the environment, several secondary metabolites and enzymes are involved in the antimicrobial mode of action of L. enzymogenes. On the one hand, it has been widely reported that the polycyclic tetramate macrolactam HSAF has an important role to control plant disease caused by phytopathogenic fungi [18],[19]. The target of HSAF is the enzyme ceramide synthase implicated in the biosynthesis of sphingolipids and required for filamentous fungi to grow [20]. On the other hand, the main metabolite conferring L. enzymogenes antibacterial activity is the cyclic depsipeptide WAP-8294A2, which selectively recognizes menaquinone present in the cytoplasmic membrane of gram-positive bacteria leading to the disruption and lysis of the membrane [21]. Moreover, L. enzymogenes secretes numerous extracellular lytic enzymes, such as chitinases, proteases, and lipases, which are able to degrade the major cell wall components of various phytopathogenic fungi, oomycetes, bacteria or nematodes, causing their death [17],[22],[23].

    The clp gene product is a master regulator of T4P-dependent twitching and the production of lytic enzymes and antifungal metabolites in L. enzymogenes [16],[24]. However, the treatment of plants with a clp- mutant strain still resulted in a slight biocontrol of summer patch disease caused by Magnaporthe poae [8]. Therefore, additional mechanisms not controlled by the clp gene may be operating. In fact, plant-mediated traits such as induced resistance, growth stimulations, and enhanced nutrient availability could be linked to the biological control activity of L. enzymogenes [25],[26].

    In this study, the biocontrol efficacy of B25 on root-knot nematodes in tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Durinta) under climatic chamber conditions has been investigated. Moreover, the purpose of this study has been to describe the role of lytic enzymes and secondary metabolites, motility, and induction of plant defenses on the mode of action of B25 as a nematicide.

    Lysobacter enzymogenes B25 was isolated from a pepper plant harvested from an agricultural field managed according to organic agriculture practices located in Gavà (northeast Spain). Identification at the species level and genome sequencing analysis was previously performed [27].

    Bacterial growth was measured at different temperatures (4 °C, 18 °C, 22 °C, 25 °C, 28 °C, 30 °C, 34 °C, 37 °C, and 40 °C) and pH range between 3–12 at intervals of 1 pH unit, using nutrient agar (NA) medium as a substrate. The ability of B25 to grow in different salt concentrations was carried out by inoculating bacterial culture in sterile 96-well plates. For the salt tolerance experiment, B25 was cultured overnight in Luria-Bertani (LB) liquid medium (5 g/L of yeast extract, 10 g/L of tryptone and 10 g/L of NaCl) with continuous shaking at 28 °C and 200 rpm. From this stationary culture, 100 µL of bacterial suspension with a final optical density (OD) at 600 nm of 0.01 were added to the wells containing the following final concentrations of NaCl (%): 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. The plate was read after 48 h of incubation at 28 °C using a microplate reader (Multilabel Plater Reader HALO LED96, Dynamica).

    Swarming motility assays were performed according to the methodology previously described by other authors [28]. In brief, swarming assays were performed in two different media: modified M9 salts medium without NH4Cl (0.5 % Casamino Acids, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM CaCl2) supplemented with 0.4 % glucose and BM2 medium (0.5 % Casamino Acids, 62 mM KH2PO4, 1 M MgSO4, 10 mM FeSO4, 0.4 % glucose). Both media were solidified with 0.5% Noble agar. Plates containing 20 mL of fresh swarm medium were dried under a laminar-flow hood for 20 min before inoculation. Bacteria were inoculated by picking fresh colonies using a Drigralski spatula and depositing it on the top of the swarm plate. Plates were sealed to maintain the humidity and incubated overnight at 28 °C or 37 °C. Pictures were taken from a representative plate out of three independent experiments.

    Twitching motility was assayed by two methods. (I) Macroscopic twitching assays were evaluated on TSA 1/20 plates [0.15 % TSB broth (17 g/L tryptone, 3 g/L soy peptone, 5 g/L NaCl, 2.5 g/L K2HPO4, 2.5 g/L glucose) + 1 % (w/v) agar] as previously described [29], with some modifications. Twitch plates were briefly dried and B25 was stab inoculated with a needle to the bottom of the Petri dish from an overnight-grown NA plate. Plates were incubated at 28 °C for 72 h. To aid visualization, the zone of interstitial biofilm expansion at the agar and petri dish interface was visualized by flooding the plate with a TM developer solution (50 % methanol and 10 % acetic acid) or with crystal violet [1 % (wt/vol) solution] after removing the agar layer and washing unattached cells with water, as described [30]. (II) Microscopic twitching assays were carried out essentially as previously described [10],[17],[29]. A folded 9 × 9 cm piece of sterile filter paper was placed on a side of a dish. Then, a sterile glass slide was placed next to the filter paper, and 2 mL of sterile distilled water was added to the paper to provide a moist environment. Subsequently, 1 mL of twitching medium (0.8 % agar, 0.4 % tryptone, 0.2 % yeast extract, 0.2 % NaCl, 0.1 % MgSO4·7H2O) was evenly distributed on the slide and let solidify for 15 minutes. With a plastic loop, from the outer edge of a fresh bacterial colony, a surface in 1 mm of diameter was inoculated to the slide. Besides, a sterile coverslip was placed over the inoculation point. Then, 20 µL of M. incognita suspension, at 1500 J2/mL concentration, was dropped next to the coverslip. Control samples did not contain nematode suspension. After 24 h at 28 °C of incubation, the margin of bacterial culture was observed under a microscope (MOTIC BA310) with 400-fold magnification. Twitching motility was observed when bacterial cells emerged from the edge of the bacterial colony. Three replicates for each treatment were used, and each experiment was performed three times.

    Quantification of biofilm formation in sterile untreated 96-well microtiter plates was performed by crystal violet staining, as previously described [28]. In summary, overnight culture was grown in LB at 28 °C with 200 rpm shaking, followed by dilution of the culture into fresh LB to an OD550 of 0.1. A volume of the bacterial suspension (200 µL) was inoculated into the wells of microtiter plates and incubated for 48 h at 28 °C. Prior to biofilm quantification, total cell biomass was estimated by measuring the OD620 using a microplate reader (Multilabel Plater Reader HALO LED96, Dynamica). Then, wells containing adhered cells were washed three times with water, fixed at 60 °C for 1 h, and stained for 15 min with 200 µL of 0.1 % crystal violet. The stained biofilms were rinsed with distilled water and allowed to dry for 30 min at 37 °C. Bound crystal violet was extracted from the stained biofilm with 95 % ethanol and the absorption was photometrically measured at 550 nm (OD550) using a plate reader. Biofilm formation (OD550 of crystal violet) was normalized by cell growth (OD620) and reported as the relative biofilm formation. For this quantitative assay, sixteen replicate wells were done. In addition, biofilm formation on the glass surface was assayed by inoculating 3 mL of the same bacterial suspension into glass test tubes. After incubation at 28 °C and 250 rpm for 48 h, biofilm formation was measured by crystal violet staining as described above.

    Enzymatic activities from cells and cell-free culture supernatant of B25 were determined using API-ZYM® (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The supernatant was obtained from a B25 fermentation in the following conditions: VEG medium (10 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L glucose, 0.1 g/L KH2PO4, 0.1 g/L K2HPO4 and 0.2 g/L MgSO4 × 7H2O), 30 °C and 24 h. After fermentation, the culture was centrifuged at 5000 g for 10 min (Hitachi CR22N) and the supernatant was filtered by passing through a 0.22 µm pore size polyethersulfone (PES) filter to obtain the cell-free culture supernatant. To confirm that the supernatants were free of bacterial cells, aliquots of 100 µL were plated in NA and the absence of growth was confirmed after incubation at 28 °C for 2 days.

    In addition, the presence of chitinase, protease, lipase, cellulase, and gelatinase activity were analyzed using classic methods. Briefly, 10 µL of overnight grown culture were spot plated on chitin agar medium [31], casein agar medium [32], tween 80 agar medium [33] and microcrystalline cellulose (MC)-agar medium [34]. Plates were incubated for seven days at 28 °C. For observation, the cellulase detection plates were stained using 1 % Congo red dye and, after 15 min, the stained plates were rinsed with 1 M NaCl solution. In all cases, the appearance of a clear halo around colonies indicates enzymatic degradation. On the other hand, the qualitative assay for gelatinase activity was determined by using the nutrient gelatin plate method and nutrient gelatin stab method, as described [35].

    The surfactant activity or the ability to collapse a droplet of water was tested as described [36]. Twenty µL of cell-free culture supernatants were pipetted as a droplet onto parafilm. Subsequently, 3 µL of the Congo red dye (which had no influence on the shape of the droplets) was added to stain the water and supernatants for photographic purposes. The spreading of the droplet on the parafilm surface was followed over hours until the droplet dried. The diameter of the dried droplet was recorded.

    Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cv. Durinta seeds were surface-sterilized, sown in a sterile substrate (vermiculite), and grown in a growth chamber (Fitoclima D-1200®, Aralab) set at 24/20 °C (day/night), 65 % relative humidity, and a photoperiod of 16/8 h (day/night). After 28 days, the plants were transplanted into 3-L pots filled with a commercial substrate (8–14 % organic matter, pH 7.0–8.0, 50–120 mS/m, 95 % particles < 12 mm diameter, mineral fertilization 20-10-15 NPK + 2 Mg; Burés Professional S.A., reference B32002). Three bioassays under growth chamber conditions are described in this study. In the first bioassay, the substrate was artificially infested with a mixed population of M. incognita and M. javanica isolated from infested tomato plants from a commercial tomato field in Viladecans, Spain, at a rate of 6000 eggs per pot. In bioassays 2 and 3, the plants were inoculated with M. javanica isolated from infested tomato plants from a commercial tomato field in Almería, Spain, at a rate of 10000 eggs per pot. B25 was applied 4 times. The first application was done immediately after the plants were transplanted [0 days after transplant (0-DAT)], and then at 7, 21, and 35 DAT. In the three bioassays, the plants were inoculated with nematodes 24 h after the transplant, so the first application of B25 was before inoculation with nematodes. The applications consisted of 50 mL (bioassay 1) or 30 mL (bioassays 2 and 3) of B25 per plant (aqueous suspension), at an average concentration of 108 CFU/mL (bioassay 1) and 2 × 108 CFU/mL (bioassays 2 and 3). In all three bioassays, the reference chemical Sondae® (Oxamyl 10 % w/v) was applied 3 times in 14-day intervals, starting 7 days after transplant.

    Sixty days after transplant the number of nematode eggs per g of root (EgR) and the number of eggs per plant (EP) were determined in the tomato plant roots. For this, the roots were gently rinsed with tap water, ground in a household blender with a solution of 10 % bleach, passed through 100, 75 and 25 µm meshes and the eggs were counted in a McMaster counting chamber under the light microscope.

    After verifying the homoscedasticity and normality of the counting data, ANOVA and LSD post hoc tests were performed. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. Statistical analyses were determined with R.

    B25 has been tested in several greenhouse trials in tomatoes artificially infested with nematodes (with M. incognita plus M. javanica or with Meloidogyne hapla). The substrate was inoculated with 6000 eggs per pot 24 h after the transplant. B25 was applied 4 times (at 0, 7, 21 and 35 DAT) at a rate of 50 mL per plant. In each bioassay a reference chemical and/or biological was used. The reference chemical Oxamyl 10 % was applied 3 times in 14-day intervals, starting 7 days after transplant; the reference chemical Flupyram 40% was applied twice in 21-day intervals; and the biological reference Bacillus firmus was applied as B25.

    Greenhouse conditions depended on the season. In winter (assays 181211 and 190122 in Table S1) the maximum and minimum temperatures were set at 24 °C and 18 °C, respectively. On the other hand, in summer no temperature was set.

    Considering the conditions previously published for metabolite production [18],[37], B25 was grown in VEG medium (as described above) or 1/10-strength tryptic soy broth (TSB 1/10: 1.7 g/L tryptone, 0.3 g/L soy peptone, 0.25 g/L glucose, 0.5 g/L NaCl and 0.25 g/L K2HPO4).

    Cell-free culture supernatants were analyzed by HPLC (2696 Alliance equip with 2998 photodiode array detector, Waters). Chromatography was performed using an XBridge C18 reversed-phase column (5 µm 4.6 × 150 mm, Waters) eluted at 1 mL/min of mobile phase, which consisted of a mix of solvents A [water + 0.05 % trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)] and B (acetonitrile + 0.05 % TFA). The linear gradient was 0–10 % B for 10 min; 10–40 % B for 3 min; 40–100 % B for 3 min; 0 % B for 8 min. Chromatograms were obtained by processing at 254 nm and compared with the culture medium to identify specific compounds produced by this bacterium.

    Cell-free culture supernatant of B25 was submitted to HPLC-high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) analysis (Separative Techniques Unit, Scientific and Technological Center, University of Barcelona, Spain). The liquid chromatography was performed using an Accela chromatograph (Thermo Instruments) with a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (5 µm 4.6 × 150 mm) as the stationary phase. The gradient was the same as described above but with the solvents A (water + 0.2 % CH3COOH) and B (acetonitrile + 0.2 % CH3COOH). For mass spectrometry analysis, the equipment was an LTQ Orbitrap Velos (Thermo Instruments). The capillary temperature was 375 °C, source voltage 3.5 kV, acquisition FTMS (+), and full scan of m/z 100–1000.

    Metabolites produced by L. enzymogenes B25 were purified from cell-free supernatant by preparative HPLC (Delta Prep 4000, Waters) with a 432 detector (Konron Instruments). The stationary phase was an OBD SunFire PrepC reversed-phase column (10 µm 19 × 250 mm, Waters). The mobile phase consisted of a mix of solvents A [water + 0.05 % trifluoracetic acid (TFA)] and B (acetonitrile + 0.05 % TFA). The linear gradient was 50 % B for 2 min; 50–70 % B for 8 min; 50 % B for 3 min. The flow was 15 mL/min.

    The fractions of interest were manually collected and concentrated by a rotatory evaporator. The identity of the purified metabolites was confirmed by Electrospray ionization time-of-flight (ESI-TOF) mass spectrometry analysis (Scientific and Technological Centers, UB, Barcelona, Spain) using a liquid chromatography equipment (model G1969A, Agilent Technologies) with a dual-nebulizer electrospray ion source.

    An assay was designed to measure the egg-hatching rate of a root-knot nematode population in the presence of different metabolic fractions. These fractions were cell-free culture supernatant of B25 after growing in two different media (TSB 1/10 and VEG). In addition, both fractions were subjected to a heat treatment process that consisted of heating at 80 °C for 15 min.

    The original root-knot nematode population, composed of a mixture of M. incognita and M. javanica at unknown proportions, was isolated from a tomato field in Viladecans (Spain). This population was maintained in the roots of susceptible tomato plants (cv. Marmande Cuarenteno) grown in a greenhouse. Sand-loaded sieves were disposed on multiwell plates used as hatching chambers (Nunclon™ Surface multiwall plates, Nunc, Denmark). The sieves were pre-soaked with sterile distilled water, inoculated with a freshly isolated nematode egg suspension (around 500 eggs per sieve) and then treated with 200 µL of ¼ dilution of each metabolite sample.

    The hatching chambers were covered with a lid and incubated at 26 °C for 2 weeks. The egg hatching rate was calculated (number of juveniles recovered/nº of eggs inoculated x 100) at 7 and 14 days after inoculation. Each treatment was replicated 4 times including a negative control with a chemical reference product at the commercially recommended dose and a control with sterile distilled water (to establish a reference to compare the results to the normal hatching percentage).

    Tomato seeds (cv. Marmande Cuarenteno) were surface-sterilized and grown as described before. Twenty-eight day-old plants were transplanted to 3-L pots and transferred to a greenhouse. Starting the day of transplantation, B25 was applied 4 times in 7-day intervals by delivering 30 mL of a B25 solution, containing a total of 5 × 107 CFU for each application, directly to the substrate at the base of the shoot. Seven days after the last application, the terminal leaflet of the youngest fully developed leaf was collected from each plant. The leaflets of 4 replicate plants were pooled and immediately frozen in dry ice. The samples were kept at −80 °C until analysis.

    Total RNA was extracted from the samples using Ribozl according to the manufacturer's instructions (Amresco, Solon, OH). The concentration and purity of the total RNA was determined by microvolume spectrophotometry (DS-11 FX, Denovix). The total RNA (7 µg) was digested with DNaseI according to the manufacturer's instructions (Sigma-Aldrich). The resulting DNA-free RNA (6 µg) was used as a template to synthesize first-strand cDNA by reverse transcription using High Retrotranscriptase according to the manufacturer's instructions (Biotools, Spain) and oligo dT18 primer. The cDNA was diluted to 30 ng/µL for real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR).

    The relative expression levels of plant immune response marker genes (Table S2) were measured by qPCR with intercalating fluorophore chemistry (SYBR Green I, Roche Life Science) in biological triplicates, according to the master mix manufacturer's instructions, and applying the 2-ΔΔCt method for quantifications [38]. All primer pairs used in the present study were previously reported in the literature as markers of plant defense responses in tomatoes [39][44] (see Tables S2 and S3 for details on primers and raw data, respectively). Pathogenesis-related protein 1 (PR1), is a multi-gene family of secreted proteins with an unclear function that has been broadly reported to be upregulated during defense responses [45],[46]. Similarly, PR2's and PR3's are families of β-1,3-glucanases and chitinases, respectively, broadly reported to be involved in the degradation of the pathogen cell wall or cuticle components and to experience an increment in their expression levels upon treatment with jasmonate, ethylene and/or pathogen challenge (see, for instance, [47],[48]) (for cross-reference, the PR1, PR2 and PR3 genes analyzed hereby correspond to Solyc09g007010.1, Solyc01g008620.2 and Solyc10g055810.2, respectively). RCR3 is a papain-like cysteine protease responding to pathogen infection [41]. PINII is a protease inhibitor responding to wounding, jasmonic acid and arbuscular mycorrhiza [39]. And 4CL (4-coumarte:CoA ligase) is a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of complex phenylpropanoids, many of which display a phytoalexin role. Although little is known about the regulation of 4CL in tomatoes, this gene has been reported to respond to wounding, pathogen challenge, stress hormones, etc. in closely related species [49][52]. EF1α was used as a reference gene because in a previous study, we determined that the expression of this gene was more stable than that of UBI3 [39] and RCR3 [42] (the standard deviation of the Ct's were 1.37, 1.44 and 1.92, respectively; n = 15) in tomato plants treated with salicylic acid (400 µM), pyocyanin (10 µM), and other treatments modifying plant immunity.

    Lysobacter enzymogenes B25 is a Gram-negative and bacillus-shaped non-flagellated bacterium, 1–1.7 µm long. B25 can grow at pH 4 to 10, 18 to 37 °C and 0 to 2 % NaCl (Table 1). Consequently, B25 is considered a neutrophilic, mesophilic and non-halotolerant strain.

    Table 1.  Phenotypic characterization of B25.
    Morphological characteristics

    Shape bacillus (rod-shape)
    Size (µm) 1–1.7
    Gram-staining negative
    Cell motility Swarming positive
    Twitching positive

    Growth conditions
    Range of growth temperature (optimal) 18 °C to 37 °C (28 °C to 35 °C)
    Range of growth pH (optimal) 4 to 10 (7 to 9)
    Tolerance to NaCl (optimal) 0 to 2 % (0 to 0.5 %)
    Physiology and metabolism

    Enzymes API-ZYM® Cells: Alkaline phosphatase, Esterase Lipase (C 8), Lipase (C 14), Leucine arylamidase, Valine arylamidase, Trypsin, Acid phosphatase, Naphtol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase
    Supernatant: Alkaline phosphatase, Esterase (C 4), Esterase Lipase (C 8), Leucine aryamidase, Valine arylamidase, α-chymotrypsin, Acid phosphatase, Naftol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase
    Chitinase Positive
    Protease Positive
    Lipase Positive
    Cellulase Positive
    Gelatinase Positive
    Biofilm formation Positive

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Biofilm formation was evaluated on a polystyrene or glass surface. The results showed that B25 has the capacity to form biofilm on both surfaces (Figure S1). In addition, B25 was able to swarm in different conditions (Figure S2) and exhibited surface twitching motility (Figures 1 and 2). Specifically, macroscopic twitching-motility assays revealed that B25 formed a small twitch zone between the agar and the bottom of the petri dish (data not shown). In addition, light microscopy was used to examine the collective and individual behaviors of B25 that occur at the interstitial interface of a glass coverslip and a pad of nutrient media solidified with 0.8 % agar. Under these conditions, the colonies of B25 presented a high cell density in the inner portion of the colony, while a band of lower cell density was observed in the outer margins. B25 showed twitching motility, according to the leading edge raft (LER) modality [29]. These are large groups of cells emerging from the main margin of the colony, that migrate away from it. B25 LER maintains the same structure as the main margin: higher cell density in the center, and a band of lower cell density on the outer edge (Figure 1A). Apart from LER, B25 also presented another twitching modality, which consisted of the disaggregation of the principal colony margin with non-uniform cell migration (Figure 1B). B25 presented twitching in the absence or presence of M. incognita. However, 62 % of the samples containing M. incognita increased twitching motility compared to control samples (Figure 2). Furthermore, it was observed that B25 was capable of forming a high-density cell envelope around the nematode (Figure 1C and Figure S3). It is known that cell motility facilitates bacterial colonization on pathogen surfaces and the data of this study showed changes in the twitching motility of B25 when co-cultured with M. incognita, an important characteristic for the biological control activity of B25.

    Figure 1.  Lysobacter enzymogenes B25 Microscopic twitching (magnification x400). (A–B) B25 twitching modalities. (A) Leading edge raft (LER) formation. (B) Disaggregation of principal colony margin with non-uniform cell migration. (C) High-density cell envelope around the M. incognita formed by B25.
    Figure 2.  Twitching motility of Lysobacter enzymogenes B25 in the presence or absence of Meloidogyne incognita (magnification x400). 62% of samples containing M. incognita (A) increased B25 twitching motility and disaggregation of colony edges, compared to control samples (B) which presented mainly uniform and conserved margins.

    According to API-ZYM®, B25 produces alkaline phosphatase, esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), lipase (C14), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, acid phosphatase, naphtol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, and N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase (Table 1). Moreover, B25 secretes chitinase, protease, lipase, cellulase and gelatinase (Table 1). After incubation, enzymatic degradation was observed in all tested media due to the appearance of a clear halo around colonies and complete liquefaction was detected in the gelatin hydrolysis tubes (Table 1, Figure 3). These data suggest that the ability of B25 to produce abundant extracellular enzymes may be partly responsible for its antagonistic activity.

    To test whether L. enzymogenes B25 secretes compounds that decrease the surface tension of the culture media, a simple assay on parafilm was done with the samples from the cell-free culture supernatant (Figure 4). This strain produces a surfactant compound after growth on rich and poor media, VEG and TSB 1/10 respectively. Moreover, the surfactant activity was kept after heat treatment indicating that the surfactant compound is heat-stable (data not shown).

    Figure 3.  Lysobacter enzymogenes B25 grown on different enzyme determination media. (A) Chitin agar; red arrow indicates a clear zone around the colony due to chitinase production. (B) Casein agar; red arrow indicates a clear zone around the colony formed by protease/caseinase enzymes. (C) Nutrient gelatin plate; gelatin hydrolysis was indicated by the clear zone around the colony, indicated by the red arrow, after the addition of saturated ammonium sulfate. (D) Tween 80 opacity test; red arrow indicates the presence of white precipitation halo around the inoculation due to lipase/esterase activity. (E) Microcrystalline cellulose agar; cellulolytic enzymes formed a clear halo zone after being revealed with congo red 1 %. (F) B25 incubated in a nutrient gelatin tube exhibited positive gelatin hydrolysis, as shown by medium liquefaction maintenance, and no solidification, after 30 minutes in an ice bath.

    Firstly, the nematicidal activity of B25 on tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Durinta) was tested in three bioassays under climatic chamber conditions. As described before, in the first bioassay the substrate was artificially infested with a mixed population of M. incognita and M. javanica but in the second and third tests, the nematode was M. javanica. The inoculation of the substrate with the initial inoculum was higher in bioassays 2 and 3 (10000 nematodes/plant) than in bioassay 1 (6000) due to the higher reproductive rate of the mixed population of M. incognita and M. javanica than the population M. javanica.

    Figure 4.  Biosurfactant activity of cell-free culture supernatant of Lysobacter enzymogenes B25 grown in VEG and TSB 1/10 media. (A) Area (mm2) obtained after drying 20 µL droplets of each cell-free culture supernatant (CS) onto parafilm. As controls, water and both culture media were used. Statistically significant differences of each CS sample with the corresponding control (T-test; p < 0.05) are indicated by “*”. (B) Representative images of each sample. Congo Red dye was added to stain the samples for photographic purposes.

    In the first bioassay, the level of infestation at 60 days after the first application was considered high since untreated control plants presented an average of 25619 eggs/g of root and 429436 eggs/plant (Figure 5). In relation to the efficacy parameters evaluated, the plants treated with B25 reached efficiencies of 55.3 % concerning the number of eggs/plant (EP) and 45.8 % eggs/g of root (EgR), whereas the chemical standard (Oxamyl 10 % w/v) efficacies were 89.6 % and 86.0 %, respectively.

    In a second bioassay with a moderate level of infestation (7126 eggs/g, equivalent to 144994 eggs/plant) compared with bioassay 1, there were no statistical differences between plants treated with B25 or the chemical standard, reaching efficiencies in the plants treated with B25 between 68.1 % (EgR) and 64.9 % (EP) according to the parameter analyzed. The efficacy observed in plants treated with the chemical product was 61.7 % (EgR) and 63.8 % (EP).

    Finally, in the last trial also with a moderate level of infestation (7016 eggs/g, equivalent to 201149 eggs/plant), the performance of B25 was significantly better than that of the reference chemical. The plants treated with B25 reached efficiencies of 91.1 % (EgR) and 87.0 % (EP), whereas the ones treated with oxamyl, efficacies were between 59.2 % (EgR) and 52.3 % (EP).

    In addition, the efficacy of strain B25 has been demonstrated in several greenhouse trials in tomato artificially infested with a mixed population of M. incognita and M. javanica or with M. hapla (Table S1). Moreover, Good Experimental Practice (GEP) field trials assessing B25 against RKN in tomato, cucumber, carrot and melon plants, and against cysts of Globodera pallida and Globodera rostochiensis in potato plants have been performed by different Contract Research Organizations (CROs) (data not shown).

    Figure 5.  Nematicidal activity of Lysobacter enzymogenes B25 on tomato plants. Results are shown as percentage of efficacy by the different treatments regarding the eggs per g of root (A) and per plant (B) when compared to the chemical product (grey bars) (ANOVA and LSD post hoc; P < 0.05, ±SEM). Statistically different values are indicated by “*”.

    By comparison of HPLC chromatograms of the different supernatants with the chromatograms obtained for the culture media, several peaks were detected around 17–18 min as potential metabolites produced by strain B25 (Figure 6). As previously described for L. enzymogenes C3, B25 produces a higher quantity of metabolites in nutritionally limited media, such as TSB 1/10 (Figure 6A), than in rich media, such as VEG (Figure 6B) [18].

    Figure 6.  HPLC chromatogram of cell-free culture supernatant from Lysobacter enzymogenes B25. Chromatograms were obtained by injection of 10 µL of sample and detected by UV at 254 nm. (A) Potential metabolites produced by B25 strain after growing in TSB 1/10 medium (dotted line) compared with the chromatogram of the culture medium (solid line). (B) Different production of metabolites after growing in rich medium VEG (solid line) versus poor medium TSB 1/10 (dotted line).

    By HPLC-HRMS analysis, two peaks with similar retention times were identified (Figure S4). The first one was a [M + H]+ ion with m/z of 513.2960 and a molecular formula of C29H41N2O6, which could correspond to the secondary metabolite HSAF. Another identified peak was its precursor 3-deOH-HSAF with a [M + H]+ ion of 497.3014 and a molecular formula of C29H41N2O5. Moreover, an unidentified compound coeluted with the HSAF peak. To attempt its identification, the two coeluted peaks were purified by preparative HPLC and analysed by ESI-TOF mass spectrometry (Table 2). The m/z values obtained from one of these peaks support its identification as HSAF. The values from the other peak confirm the presence of a compound with a molecular weight of 510 and the empirical formula of C29H38N2O6. According to the literature, the identity of this compound could be alteramide A or B; both compounds have the same molecular formula [53],[54]. Therefore, our results indicate that B25 produces three metabolites belonging to the polycyclic tetramate macrolactam family: HSAF, its precursor 3-deOH-HSAF and alteramide A/B.

    Table 2.  ESI (+) High Resolution data of peaks purified by preparative HPLC.
    Peaks Ions (m/z) Molecular
    Formula
    Possible identity
    Peak 1 [M + H]+ 513.2952 C29H41N2O6 HSAF
    [M + Na]+ 535.2780 C29H40N2O6Na C29H40N2O6
    [M-H + 2Na]+ 557.2598 C29H39N2O6Na2
    Peak 2 [M + H]+ 511.2806 C29H39N2O6 Alteramide A/B
    [M + Na]+ 533.2610 C29H38N2O6Na C29H38N2O6
    [M-H + 2Na]+ 555.2432 C29H37N2O6Na2

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Cell-free culture supernatants after growing B25 in both rich and poor media inhibit the hatching of RKN eggs in vitro (Figure 7). Similar efficacy results have been observed with samples obtained after growing in both media. Considering that the identified secondary metabolites are produced at higher concentrations in the poor medium than in the rich medium, our results suggest that other aspects are involved in the nematicidal activity.

    Figure 7.  In vitro nematicidal activity of cell-free culture supernatant from Lysobacter enzymogenes B25. Results are shown as percentage of efficacy in inhibiting egg hatching of root knot nematodes for three independent experiments. B25 was grown in rich medium VEG (assays 1 and 2) and poor medium TSB 1/10 (assay 3). Within each trial, evaluated samples were cell-free culture supernatant (CS; black bars) and after heat treatment of this supernatant (CS-Heat; grey bars). Statistically different values (T-test; p < 0.05) are indicated by “*”.

    To determine if the biocontrol activity of B25 against nematodes is due to the production of lytic enzymes, cell-free supernatants after the inactivation of enzymes by heat treatment were tested. The efficacy in egg hatching inhibition seems to be sensitive to high temperature; significant loss of activity was detected when the culture supernatant was heated at 80 °C for 15 min. To confirm that secondary metabolites are thermoresistant, HPLC analyses were conducted to compare the culture supernatants before and after treatment (Figure S5).

    The expression of several genes that are hallmarks of plant immune responses was tested in leaves after the application of L. enzymogenes B25 to the roots of healthy tomato plants. The application of B25 to the roots resulted in a mild overexpression (1.4–3.8 ×) of 5 out of the 7 genes tested in leaves (Figure 8), in the absence of nematodes.

    Figure 8.  Relative gene expression levels of plant immune response marker genes in healthy tomato plants treated with Lysobacter enzymogenes B25. Results are shown as relative gene expression, normalized by the control plant expression values and the expression of Elongation factor 1α (EF1α). 4CL, 4-Coumarate:CoA ligase; MTS, Monoterpene synthase 1; PINII, Protease inhibitor II; PR1a, 2b and 3b, Pathogenesis-related 1a, 2b and 2b, respectively; RCR3, Required for C. fulvum resistance 3 (a papain-family cysteine protease). Statistically significant differences with the control plants (T-test; p < 0.05) are indicated by “*”.

    Lysobacter enzymogenes has been widely reported as a biocontrol agent of fungal pathogens [10],[25],[55][57]. However, few reports have been published focusing on the nematicidal activity of L. enzymogenes, particularly with L. enzymogenes C3 [13],[14]. In fact, only one of these studies report the nematicidal activity in plants under growth chamber conditions. Yuen and coworkers published the activity of strain C3 controlling the infestation of cyst nematodes, H. schachtii and H. glycines, in sugarbeet, cabbage, and soybean.

    In the present study, the efficacy of L. enzymogenes B25 controlling different species of root-knot nematodes, such as M. incognita, M. javanica, and M. hapla, in tomato plants is shown. In preliminary experiments under in vitro conditions, B25 showed a direct effect on eggs and juveniles in the mixed population of M. incognita and M. javanica (Viladecans) and M. javanica (Almería) reaching 80–90 % of control depending on the population and the stage of the nematode. In tomato plants, B25 controls RKN infestation with efficacies of 50–95 % depending on the population and the pathogen pressure. In the three bioassays described in this work under growth chamber conditions, the number of nematodes per 100 g of soil applied as initial inoculum was 10 times higher (bioassay 1) or 16 times higher (bioassay 2–3) than that recommended as a threshold to initiate nematicide treatments to control Meloidogyne in tomato [58]. Therefore, we can ensure that the level of inoculum to which the plants were subjected in the three bioassays would correspond to a field with a high infestation level. Despite having inoculated bioassays 2 and 3 with more nematodes, it was in bioassay 1 where the number of nematodes per g of the root was 3.5 times higher, once again highlighting the high rate of reproduction of the Viladecans population. In this case (bioassay 1), the efficiencies reached by B25 were significantly lower than in the chemical control. Under lower pathogen pressure conditions than in the first bioassay, the results achieved by B25 were equal to or even significantly higher than the efficacy achieved by the systemic nematicide oxamyl.

    As it is demonstrated in this study, one aspect linked to the biological control of L. enzymogenes B25 is its capacity to colonize and infect the plant-parasitic-nematodes. B25 shows the ability to form biofilms which play an important role in the colonization of surfaces (soil, roots, or shoots of plants) and enable proliferation in the desired niche. Also, microorganisms form biofilms as a strategy to overcome stress, such as nutrient depletion or changes in pH [59]. In addition, B25 can reach surfaces by swarming and twitching motility. These migration mechanisms allow it to search for nutrients, interact with its surroundings, survive under adverse environmental conditions and move toward the nematodes. It is to be noted that swarming motility is operationally defined as a rapid multicellular bacterial surface movement powered by rotating flagella. Although B25 does not have flagella, it shows swarming motility thanks to the production of surfactants that reduce the tension between bacterial cells and surfaces. In addition, external cell appendages, such as T4P, can also be involved in swarming motility [60]. Twitching motility is associated with the extension and retraction of T4P, and it has been widely reported in L. enzymogenes [61][64]. However, this is the first report describing that L. enzymogenes increases its twitching motility in the presence of M. incognita, suggesting that more bacterial cells might be trying to move toward the nematode. Similar behavior has also been described when L. enzymogenes were co-cultured with the oomycete Pythium aphanidermatum [10]. In addition to the active propagation or biofilm formation presented in the present study, the persistence of B25 in the soil and whether it can colonize plant tissues has been assessed recently [65]. The study showed that the persistence of B25 in the tomato root/rhizosphere was greater than 28 days and that B25 applied to the rhizosphere was also detected in the shoots, which shows that this strain is able to colonize plant tissues.

    Moreover, L. enzymogenes B25 produces and secretes a large number of enzymes related to biocontrol, particularly with nematicidal activity. For instance, as chitin is the main component of the eggshell and cuticle of nematodes, chitinases from B25 could affect nematodes via eggshell digestion and cuticle hydrolysis [13],[66]. Other extracellular enzymes secreted by B25 are proteases, including gelatinases. They degrade denatured collagen, the main constitutive component of nematode cuticle [67],[68]. For example, in a previous study, gelatinases produced by Lysobacter capsici YS1215 have been reported to degrade the cuticle, inducing mortality, in juvenile nematodes [69],[70]. B25 also secretes trypsin, a serine protease that exhibits nematicidal effects by destroying the hatched eggs of M. incognita [71][73]. Other hydrolytic enzymes produced by B25 are lipases and cellulases. Lipases are enzymes that hydrolyze glycerol esters, preferably long-chain fatty acids. The lipid content (including reserves) of free-living nematodes and plant parasitic nematodes ranges from 11 to 67% of dry weight. The nematicidal activity of lipases has been reported in Tylenchorhynchus dubius, where lipases reduced the population by up to 100%. In addition, bacterial lipases belonging to the families Microbacteriaceae, Xanthomonadaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, Burkholderiaceae and Pseudomonadaceae have also been shown to control Bursaphelencus xylophilus populations [74]. Also, the strong lipase activity of Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus megaterium and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens causes mortality to Xiphinema index nematode [75]. Furthermore, lipase C14 produced by B25 might affect the vitellin and lipid layers on the egg cover of invertebrates and esterase lipase (C8) might hydrolyze some nematode egg surface components (short-chain esters) and facilitate the access of some metabolites released by the bacterium with nematicidal activity [76].

    In addition to extracellular enzymes, B25 is able to produce several metabolites belonging to the polycyclic tetramate macrolactam family, i.e. HSAF, 3-deOH-HSAF, and alteramide A/B. Numerous reports have described the antifungal activity of these secondary metabolites and their role to control plant disease [18],[19],[53],[77]. On the contrary, few reports related to the involvement of these metabolites in the activity of L. enzymogenes against nematodes have been published. In addition to our study, the role of HSAF in the biocontrol of plant-parasitic nematodes has been assessed recently [14]. By testing the nematicidal activity of a mutant strain blocked in HSAF production, it was shown that the production of this metabolite is an important mechanism involved in the biocontrol activity against cyst nematodes. However, our results indicate that the contribution of secondary metabolites produced by B25 in inhibiting root-knot nematodes egg hatching is minor compared to the role of lytic extracellular enzymes. According to previous studies on L. enzymogenes C3, B25 produces a higher quantity of HSAF under nutrient-poor conditions [18]. In a rich medium, cellular c-di-GMP levels increase and form a complex with Clp, blocking the activation of the HSAF biosynthesis operon [16]. Another study has also associated increasing intracellular c-di-GMP levels with PilR, a response regulator that controls T4P synthesis and twitching motility [63]. Thus, PilR activates twitching motility while HSAF production is downregulated. This fact is consistent with the increased twitching motility of B25 in the presence of nematodes nearby and a negligible role of the secondary metabolites, probably due to decreased production.

    Finally, the biocontrol activity of B25 could be due in part –the extent of defense gene overexpression is mild– to the enhancement of plant immunity at the systemic level (e.g. induced systemic response and systemic acquired resistance). This phenomenon was previously reported for L. enzymogenes C3 in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) [26]. The authors of this study showed that peroxidases are involved in the induction of plant resistance to fungal pathogens by L. enzymogenes, but the exact role of the enzymes in that process remains unclear.

    In this study, a novel strain of L. enzymogenes has been identified as a biocontrol agent against Meloidogyne spp. and its mode of action has been studied. B25 appears to employ twitching motility to draw near plant-parasitic nematodes, colonizing and invading them. Then, upon contact with the nematodes, B25 kills them by deploying a set of extracellular lytic enzymes that are capable of digesting the main chemical constituents of the nematode cuticle and eggshells (protein, chitin, and lipids), conferring its nematicidal activity. In addition, the induction of resistance in the host plants by B25 may also contribute to its biocontrol activity. Although B25 produces polycyclic tetramate macrolactam metabolites, such as HSAF, our results suggest a minor contribution of these metabolites in the control of RKN infestation.

    The good efficacy of L. enzymogenes B25 controlling RKN infection in tomato plants has been demonstrated under growth chamber and greenhouse conditions. Moreover, several field trials assessing B25 against RKN (Meloidogyne spp.) and potato cyst nematodes (G. pallida and G. rostochiensis) have confirmed its efficacy (additional experiments have not been published yet). All these results highlight the potential of L. enzymogenes B25 to control plant parasitic nematodes as an environmentally friendly method.



    Conflict of interest



    The use of L. enzymogenes B25 as a biocontrol agent is subjected to a patent application. BLG, CF, IH, LPE, MA, ODP, and SMS were employed by Futureco Bioscience S.A.

    Author contributions:



    BLG and SMS conceived the work, contributed to the design and interpretation of the results and did the main writing of the article. CF, IH, LPE, and MA partially wrote specific sections. IH, LPE, MA, and ODP performed the experiments presented in the work and analyzed the data. CF supervised the work and revised the manuscript. All the authors have read the manuscript and agreed to its content.

    [1] Zhang ZQ (2013) Animal biodiversity: An update of classification and diversity in 2013. (Addenda 2013). Zootaxa 3703: 5-11. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3703.1.3
    [2] Decraemer W, Hunt DJ (2006) Structure and classification. Plant nematology . Wallingford, UK; Cambridge, MA, USA: CABI 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845930561.0003
    [3] Singh S, Singh B, Singh AP (2015) Nematodes: A threat to sustainability of agriculture. Procedia Environ Sci 29: 215-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.270
    [4] Lima FSO, Mattos VS, Silva ES, et al. (2018) Nematodes affecting potato and sustainable practices for their management. Potato-From Incas to All Over the World . London: IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.73056
    [5] Mantelin S, Bellafiore S, Kyndt T (2017) Meloidogyne graminicola: a major threat to rice agriculture. Mol Plant Pathol 18: 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12394
    [6] Mesa-Valle CM, Garrido-Cardenas JA, Cebrian-Carmona J, et al. (2020) Global Research on Plant Nematodes. Agronomy 10: 1148. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081148
    [7] Sasanelli N, Konrat A, Migunova V, et al. (2021) Review on control methods against plant parasitic nematodes applied in southern member states (C Zone) of the European Union. Agriculture (Basel) 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11070602
    [8] Kobayashi DY, Yuen GY (2005) The role of clp-regulated factors in antagonism against Magnaporthe poae and biological control of summer patch disease of Kentucky bluegrass by Lysobacter enzymogenes C3. Can J Microbiol 51: 719-723. https://doi.org/10.1139/w05-056
    [9] Han S, Shen D, Zhao Y, et al. (2018) Sigma factor RpoN employs a dual transcriptional regulation for controlling twitching motility and biofilm formation in Lysobacter enzymogenes OH11. Curr Genet 64: 515-527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-017-0770-z
    [10] Zhao Y, Qian G, Chen Y, et al. (2017) Transcriptional and antagonistic responses of biocontrol strain Lysobacter enzymogenes OH11 to the plant pathogenic oomycete Pythium aphanidermatum. Front Microbiol 8: 1025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01025
    [11] Zhou M, Shen D, Xu G, et al. (2017) ChpA controls twitching motility and broadly affects gene expression in the biological control agent Lysobacter enzymogenes. Curr Microbiol 74: 566-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-017-1202-5
    [12] Patel N, Oudemans PV, Hillman BI, et al. (2013) Use of the tetrazolium salt MTT to measure cell viability effects of the bacterial antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes on the filamentous fungus Cryphonectria parasitica. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 103: 1271-1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-013-9907-3
    [13] Chen J, Moore WH, Yuen GY, et al. (2006) Influence of Lysobacter enzymogenes Strain C3 on Nematodes. J Nematol 38: 233-239.
    [14] Yuen GY, Broderick KC, Jochum CC, et al. (2018) Control of cyst nematodes by Lysobacter enzymogenes strain C3 and the role of the antibiotic HSAF in the biological control activity. Biological Control 117: 158-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.11.007
    [15] Xia J, Chen J, Chen Y, et al. (2018) Type IV pilus biogenesis genes and their roles in biofilm formation in the biological control agent Lysobacter enzymogenes OH11. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102: 833-846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8619-4
    [16] Xu K, Lin L, Shen D, et al. (2021) Clp is a ‘‘busy” transcription factor in the bacterial warrior, Lysobacter enzymogenes. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 19: 3564-3572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.06.020
    [17] Zhao Y, Jiang T, Xu H, et al. (2021) Characterization of Lysobacter spp. strains and their potential use as biocontrol agents against pear anthracnose. Microbiol Res 242: 126624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126624
    [18] Yu F, Zaleta-Rivera K, Zhu X, et al. (2007) Structure and biosynthesis of heat-stable antifungal factor (HSAF), a broad-spectrum antimycotic with a novel mode of action. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51: 64-72. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00931-06
    [19] Li S, Jochum CC, Yu F, et al. (2008) An antibiotic complex from Lysobacter enzymogenes strain C3: antimicrobial activity and role in plant disease control. Phytopathology 98: 695-701. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-98-6-0695
    [20] Li S, Calvo AM, Yuen GY, et al. (2009) Induction of cell wall thickening by the antifungal compound dihydromaltophilin disrupts fungal growth and is mediated by sphingolipid biosynthesis. J Eukaryot Microbiol 56: 182-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2008.00384.x
    [21] Itoh H, Tokumoto K, Kaji T, et al. (2018) Total synthesis and biological mode of action of WAP-8294A2: A menaquinone-targeting antibiotic. J Org Chem 83: 6924-6935. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.7b02318
    [22] Odhiambo BO, Xu G, Qian G, et al. (2017) Evidence of an unidentified extracellular heat-stable factor produced by Lysobacter enzymogenes (OH11) that degrade Fusarium graminearum PH1 hyphae. Curr Microbiol 74: 437-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-017-1206-1
    [23] Choi H, Kim HJ, Lee JH, et al. (2012) Insight into genes involved in the production of extracellular chitinase in a biocontrol bacterium Lysobacter enzymogenes C-3. Plant Pathol J 28: 439-445. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.07.2012.0115
    [24] Kobayashi DY, Reedy RM, Palumbo JD, et al. (2005) A clp gene homologue belonging to the Crp gene family globally regulates lytic enzyme production, antimicrobial activity, and biological control activity expressed by Lysobacter enzymogenes strain C3. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.1.261-269.2005
    [25] Kilic-Ekici O, Yuen GY (2004) Comparison of strains of Lysobacter enzymogenes and PGPR for induction of resistance against Bipolaris sorokiniana in tall fescue. Biological Control 30: 446-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2004.01.014
    [26] Kilic-Ekici O, Yuen GY (2003) Induced resistance as a mechanism of biological control by Lysobacter enzymogenes strain C3. Phytopathology 93: 1103-1110. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.9.1103
    [27] Hernández I, Fernàndez C (2017) Draft genome sequence and assembly of a Lysobacter enzymogenes strain with biological control activity against root knot nematodes. Genome Announce 5: e00271-00217. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00271-17
    [28] Huedo P, Yero D, Martínez-Servat S, et al. (2014) Two different rpf clusters distributed among a population of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical strains display differential diffusible signal factor production and virulence regulation. J Bacteriol 196: 2431-2442. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01540-14
    [29] Turnbull L, Whitchurch CB (2014) Motility assay: Twitching motility. Pseudomonas Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology . New York: Springer Science+Business Media 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0473-0_9
    [30] Déziel E, Comeau Y, Villemur R (2001) Initiation of biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 57RP correlates with emergence of hyperpiliated and highly adherent phenotypic variants deficient in swimming, swarming, and twitching motilities. J Bacteriol 183: 1195-1204. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.4.1195-1204.2001
    [31] Murthy N, Bleakley B (2012) Simplified method of preparing colloidal chitin used for screening of chitinase-producing microorganisms. Internet J Microbiol 10 Number 2. https://doi.org/10.5580/2bc3
    [32] Legesse DY (2017) Optimization and partial characterization of Bacillus protease isolated from soil and agro-industrial wastes. Int J Nutr Food Sci 6: 31-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.16
    [33] Ramnath L, Sithole B, Govinden R (2017) Identification of lipolytic enzymes isolated from bacteria indigenous to Eucalyptus wood species for application in the pulping industry. Biotechnol Rep 15: 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2017.07.004
    [34] Li H, Wu S, Wirth S, et al. (2014) Diversity and activity of cellulolytic bacteria, isolated from the gut contents of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) (Valenciennes) fed on Sudan grass (Sorghum sudanense) or artificial feedstuffs. Aquacult Res 2014: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12478
    [35] de la Cruz TEE, Torres JMO (2012) Gelatin hydrolysis test protocol. Am Socr Microbiol : 1-10.
    [36] Kuiper I, Lagendijk EL, Pickford R, et al. (2004) Characterization of two Pseudomonas putida lipopeptide biosurfactants, putisolvin I and II, which inhibit biofilm formation and break down existing biofilms. Mol Microbiol 51: 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03751.x
    [37] Qian G, Wang Y, Liu Y, et al. (2013) Lysobacter enzymogenes uses two distinct cell-cell signaling systems for differential regulation of secondary-metabolite biosynthesis and colony morphology. Appl Environ Microbiol 79: 6604-6616. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01841-13
    [38] Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25: 402-408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
    [39] Song Y, Chen D, Lu K, et al. (2015) Enhanced tomato disease resistance primed by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Front Plant Sci 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00786
    [40] Song YY, Zeng RS, Xu JF, et al. (2010) Interplant communication of tomato plants through underground common mycorrhizal networks. PLoS One 5: e13324. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013324
    [41] Shabab M, Shindo T, Gu C, et al. (2008) Fungal effector protein AVR2 targets diversifying defense-related Cys proteases of tomato. Plant Cell 20: 1169-1183. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.107.056325
    [42] van Schie CCN, Haring MA, Schuurink RC (2007) Tomato linalool synthase is induced in trichomes by jasmonic acid. Plant Mol Biol 64: 251-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-007-9149-8
    [43] Pandey A, Misra P, Choudhary D, et al. (2015) AtMYB12 expression in tomato leads to large scale differential modulation in transcriptome and flavonoid content in leaf and fruit tissues. Sci Rep 5: 12412. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12412
    [44] Lin YM, Shih SL, Lin WC, et al. (2014) Phytoalexin biosynthesis genes are regulated and involved in plant response to Ralstonia solanacearum infection. Plant Sci 224: 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.04.008
    [45] Van Loon LC, Van Strien EA (1999) The families of pathogenesis-related proteins, their activities, and comparative analysis of PR-1 type proteins. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 55: 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmpp.1999.0213
    [46] Akbudak MA, Yildiz S, Filiz E (2020) Pathogenesis related protein-1 (PR-1) genes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.): Bioinformatics analyses and expression profiles in response to drought stress. Genomics 112: 4089-4099.
    [47] Min D, Ai W, Zhou J, et al. (2020) SlARG2 contributes to MeJA-induced defense responses to Botrytis cinerea in tomato fruit. Pest Managet Sci 76: 3292-3301. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5888
    [48] Hwang IS, Oh EJ, Oh CS (2020) Transcriptional changes of plant defense-related genes in response to clavibacter infection in Pepper and Tomato. Plant Pathol J 36: 450-458. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.07.2020.0124
    [49] Yu XY, Bi Y, Yan L, et al. (2016) Activation of phenylpropanoid pathway and PR of potato tuber against Fusarium sulphureum by fungal elicitor from Trichothecium roseum. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32: 142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2108-2
    [50] Douglas CJ, Hauffe KD, Ites-Morales ME, et al. (1991) Exonic sequences are required for elicitor and light activation of a plant defense gene, but promoter sequences are sufficient for tissue specific expression. Embo J 10: 1767-1775. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07701.x
    [51] Ellard-Ivey M, Douglas CJ (1996) Role of Jasmonates in the Elicitor- and Wound-Inducible Expression of Defense Genes in Parsley and Transgenic Tobacco. Plant Physiol 112: 183-192. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.1.183
    [52] Fu J, Zhang S, Wu J, et al. (2020) Structural characterization of a polysaccharide from dry mycelium of Penicillium chrysogenum that induces resistance to Tobacco mosaic virus in tobacco plants. Int J Biol Macromol 156: 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.050
    [53] Ding Y, Li Y, Li Z, et al. (2016) Alteramide B is a microtubule antagonist of inhibiting Candida albicans. Biochim Biophys Acta 1860: 2097-2106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.06.025
    [54] Tang B, Laborda P, Sun C, et al. (2019) Improving the production of a novel antifungal alteramide B in Lysobacter enzymogenes OH11 by strengthening metabolic flux and precursor supply. Bioresour Technol 273: 196-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.085
    [55] Folman LB, Postma J, van Veen JA (2003) Characterisation of Lysobacter enzymogenes (Christensen and Cook 1978) strain 3.1T8, a powerful antagonist of fungal diseases of cucumber. Microbiol Res 158: 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1078/0944-5013-00185
    [56] Gómez Expósito R, Postma J, Raaijmakers JM, et al. (2015) Diversity and activity of lysobacter species from disease suppressive soils. Front Microbiol 6: 1243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01243
    [57] Jochum CC, Osborne LE, Yuen GY (2006) Fusarium head blight biological control with Lysobacter enzymogenes strain C3. Biological Control 39: 336-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.05.004
    [58] Talavera M (2003) Manual de nematologia agricola. Introducción al análisis y al control nematológico para agricultores y técnicos de agrupaciones de defensa vegetal. Conselleria d'Agricultura i Pesca de les Illes Balears .
    [59] Velmourougane K, Prasanna R, Saxena AK (2017) Agriculturally important microbial biofilms: Present status and future prospects. J Basic Microbiol 57: 548-573. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201700046
    [60] Tomada S, Puopolo G, Perazzolli M, et al. (2016) Pea broth enhances the biocontrol efficacy of Lysobacter capsici AZ78 by triggering cell motility associated with biogenesis of type IV pilus. Front Microbiol 7: 1136. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01136
    [61] Chen J, Shen D, Odhiambo BO, et al. (2018) Two direct gene targets contribute to Clp-dependent regulation of type IV pilus-mediated twitching motility in Lysobacter enzymogenes OH11. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102: 7509-7519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9196-x
    [62] Yang M, Ren S, Shen D, et al. (2020) ClpP mediates antagonistic interaction of Lysobacter enzymogenes with a crop fungal pathogen. Biological Control 140: 104125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104125
    [63] Chen Y, Xia J, Su Z, et al. (2017) Lysobacter PilR, the regulator of type IV pilus synthesis, controls antifungal antibiotic production via a cyclic di-GMP pathway. Appl Environ Microbiol 83. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03397-16
    [64] Zhou X, Qian G, Chen Y, et al. (2015) PilG is involved in the regulation of twitching motility and antifungal antibiotic biosynthesis in the biological control agent Lysobacter enzymogenes. Phytopathology 105: 1318-1324. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-12-14-0361-R
    [65] Hernández I, Sant C, Martínez R, et al. (2020) Design of bacterial strain-specific qPCR assays using NGS data and publicly available resources and its application to track biocontrol strains. Front Microbiol 11: 208. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00208
    [66] Yang J, Liang L, Li J, et al. (2013) Nematicidal enzymes from microorganisms and their applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97: 7081-7095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5045-0
    [67] Duong B, Nguyen HX, Phan HV, et al. (2021) Identification and characterization of Vietnamese coffee bacterial endophytes displaying in vitro antifungal and nematicidal activities. Microbiol Res 242: 126613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126613
    [68] Nguyen XH, Naing KW, Lee YS, et al. (2013) Antagonistic potential of Paenibacillus elgii HOA73 against the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Nematology 15: 991-1000. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685411-00002737
    [69] Lee YS, Nguyen XH, Naing KW, et al. (2015) Role of lytic enzymes secreted by Lysobacter capsici YS1215 in the control of root-knot nematode of tomato plants. Indian J Microbiol 55: 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-014-0499-z
    [70] Lee YS, Park YS, Anees M, et al. (2013) Nematicidal activity of Lysobacter capsici YS1215 and the role of gelatinolytic proteins against root-knot nematodes. Biocontrol Sci Technol 23: 1427-1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2013.840359
    [71] Mukhopadhyay RK D (2020) Trichoderma: a beneficial antifungal agent and insights into its mechanism of biocontrol potential. Egyptian J Biological Pest Control 30: 133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00333-x
    [72] Jamshidnejad V, Sahebani N, Etebarian H (2013) Potential biocontrol activity of Arthrobotrys oligospora and Trichoderma harzianum BI against Meloidogyne javanica on tomato in the greenhouse and laboratory studies. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot 46: 1632-1640. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2013.778476
    [73] Suarez B, Rey M, Castillo P, et al. (2004) Isolation and characterization of PRA1, a trypsin-like protease from the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum CECT 2413 displaying nematicidal activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 65: 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1610-x
    [74] Castaneda-Alvarez C, Aballay E (2016) Rhizobacteria with nematicide aptitude: enzymes and compounds associated. World Microbiol Biotechnol 32: 203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2165-6
    [75] Aballay E, Prodan S, Zamorano A, et al. (2017) Nematicidal effect of rhizobacteria on plant-parasitic nematodes associated with vineyards. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 33: 131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-017-2303-9
    [76] Sánchez Ortiz I, Alvarez Lugo I, Wong Padilla I, et al. (2018) Characterization of Cuban native bacteria isolated from nematodes as potential biological control agents for Meloidogyne spp. Rev Protección Veg 33: 1.
    [77] Han Y, Wang Y, Tombosa S, et al. (2015) Identification of a small molecule signaling factor that regulates the biosynthesis of the antifungal polycyclic tetramate macrolactam HSAF in Lysobacter enzymogenes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99: 801-811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6120-x
  • microbiol-09-01-010-s001.pdf
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Priyank Hanuman Mhatre, Yogesh Ekanathrao Thorat, B. Manimaran, K. L. Divya, Aarti Bairwa, Satish N. Chavan, Somnath S. Pokhare, Ajinath S. Dukare, Chinnannan Karthik, 2024, Chapter 12, 978-3-031-52556-8, 297, 10.1007/978-3-031-52557-5_12
    2. Yuchen Sun, Jin Xie, Lihua Tang, Arome Solomon Odiba, Yanlu Chen, Wenxia Fang, Xiaogang Wu, Bin Wang, Isolation, Identification and Molecular Mechanism Analysis of the Nematicidal Compound Spectinabilin from Newly Isolated Streptomyces sp. DT10, 2023, 28, 1420-3049, 4365, 10.3390/molecules28114365
    3. Long Lin, Xiaolong Shao, Yicheng Yang, Aprodisia Kavutu Murero, Limin Wang, Gaoge Xu, Yangyang Zhao, Sen Han, Zhenhe Su, Kangwen Xu, Mingming Yang, Jinxing Liao, Kaihuai Li, Fengquan Liu, Guoliang Qian, Lysobacter enzymogenes: a fully armed biocontrol warrior1, 2024, 20953119, 10.1016/j.jia.2024.02.021
    4. Hashim Ibrahim, Vaderament‐A. Nchiozem‐Ngnitedem, Louise‐Marie Dandurand, Inna Popova, Naturally‐occurring nematicides of plant origin: two decades of novel chemistries, 2024, 1526-498X, 10.1002/ps.8504
    5. Christian Drenker, Doris El Mazouar, Tanja Seib, Sonja Weißhaupt, Dietrich Stephan, Stefan Kunz, Annette Reineke, Yvonne Rondot, Ada Linkies, Eckhard Koch, Biocontrol of plant pathogens by Lysobacter enzymogenes isolate LEC: efficacy of shake flask broth, fermentation broth and dried preparations , 2024, 0958-3157, 1, 10.1080/09583157.2024.2425931
    6. Shan Ye, Yihang Ma, Siyu Zhou, Rui Yan, Zhuhong Yang, Zhong Ding, Biocontrol potential of Priestia megaterium YB-3 against Meloidogyne graminicola and its impact on the rhizosphere microbial community, 2024, 97, 1612-4758, 2237, 10.1007/s10340-024-01753-6
    7. Vinothini Kamalanathan, Nakkeeran Sevugapperumal, Saranya Nallusamy, Suhail Ashraf, Kumanan Kailasam, Mohd Afzal, Metagenomic Approach Deciphers the Role of Community Composition of Mycobiome Structured by Bacillus velezensis VB7 and Trichoderma koningiopsis TK in Tomato Rhizosphere to Suppress Root-Knot Nematode Infecting Tomato, 2023, 11, 2076-2607, 2467, 10.3390/microorganisms11102467
    8. K. Vinothini, S. Nakkeeran, N. Saranya, P. Jothi, J. Infant Richard, Kahkashan Perveen, Najat A. Bukhari, Bernard R. Glick, R. Z. Sayyed, Andrea Mastinu, Rhizosphere Engineering of Biocontrol Agents Enriches Soil Microbial Diversity and Effectively Controls Root-Knot Nematodes, 2024, 87, 0095-3628, 10.1007/s00248-024-02435-7
    9. Helseena Ellickel Hezakiel, Meenu Thampi, Sharrel Rebello, Jisha Manakulam Sheikhmoideen, Biopesticides: a Green Approach Towards Agricultural Pests, 2024, 196, 0273-2289, 5533, 10.1007/s12010-023-04765-7
    10. Sara G. Cazzaniga, Philippe Belliard, Joris van Steenbrugge, Sven van den Elsen, Carin Lombaers, Johnny Visser, Leendert Molendijk, Jose G. Macia-Vicente, Joeke Postma, Liesje Mommer, Johannes Helder, On the diversity of nematode antagonists in an agricultural soil, and their steerability by root-knot nematode density and cover crops, 2025, 202, 00380717, 109693, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109693
    11. Shashi Prabha Yadav, Chhavi Sharma, Puneet Pathak, Anil Kanaujia, Mohan Ji Saxena, Anup Kalra, Management of phyto-parasitic nematodes using bacteria and fungi and their consortia as biocontrol agents, 2025, 2754-7000, 10.1039/D4VA00216D
    12. Bitaisha Nakishuka Shukuru, Natalia Anatolievna Politaeva, Neeta Raj Sharma, Nahid Akhtar, Archana TS, Meenakshi Rana, Bioagents and Beyond: Harnessing the Diversity of Nematophagous Microorganisms and Predators for Sustainable Management of Plant–Parasitic Nematodes, 2024, 172, 0931-1785, 10.1111/jph.70005
    13. Ahmed Elhady, Olivera Topalović, Holger Heuer, The soil bacterium Lysobacter capsici attaches to the nematode surface, and triggers induced systemic resistance in barley, impairing the invasion of root‐lesion nematodes, 2025, 0030-1299, 10.1111/oik.10870
    14. Bansa Singh, M. Devindrappa, Assessing pigeonpea cyst nematode ( Heterodera cajani Koshy) dynamics under variable cropping sequences for strategic management , 2025, 0323-5408, 1, 10.1080/03235408.2025.2476778
    15. Christian Drenker, Tam Dang, Doris El Mazouar, Sonja Weißhaupt, Agnes Mühlenweg, Lei Zhong, Roderich D. Süssmuth, Stefan Kunz, Annette Reineke, Yvonne Rondot, Ada Linkies, Eckhard Koch, Secondary metabolites from Lysobacter enzymogenes isolate LEC possess suppressive activity against microbial plant pathogens in vitro and in planta, 2025, 2239-7264, 10.1007/s42161-025-01896-0
    16. Sandeep Kour, Nandni Sharma, Deepak Kumar, Mohd Ali, Roohi Sharma, Parkirti Parkirti, Vikram Vikram, Puja Ohri, 2025, Chapter 10, 978-981-96-0168-4, 251, 10.1007/978-981-96-0169-1_10
    17. Augusto Salas, Leila Ortiz, José Niz, Francisco Magariños, Eleodoro Eduardo Del Valle, Fernanda Achinelly, Diego Sauka, Characterisation and potential applications of Serratia odorifera INTA L401-1 in nematode biocontrol, 2025, 0958-3157, 1, 10.1080/09583157.2025.2520250
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3212) PDF downloads(159) Cited by(17)

Figures and Tables

Figures(8)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog