Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Review

Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its industrial applications

  • These two authors contributed equally
  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the best studied eukaryote and a valuable tool for most aspects of basic research on eukaryotic organisms. This is due to its unicellular nature, which often simplifies matters, offering the combination of the facts that nearly all biological functions found in eukaryotes are also present and well conserved in S. cerevisiae. In addition, it is also easily amenable to genetic manipulation. Moreover, unlike other model organisms, S. cerevisiae is concomitantly of great importance for various biotechnological applications, some of which date back to several thousands of years. S. cerevisiae's biotechnological usefulness resides in its unique biological characteristics, i.e., its fermentation capacity, accompanied by the production of alcohol and CO2 and its resilience to adverse conditions of osmolarity and low pH. Among the most prominent applications involving the use of S. cerevisiae are the ones in food, beverage -especially wine- and biofuel production industries. This review focuses exactly on the function of S. cerevisiae in these applications, alone or in conjunction with other useful microorganisms involved in these processes. Furthermore, various aspects of the potential of the reservoir of wild, environmental, S. cerevisiae isolates are examined under the perspective of their use for such applications.

    Citation: Maria Parapouli, Anastasios Vasileiadis, Amalia-Sofia Afendra, Efstathios Hatziloukas. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its industrial applications[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(1): 1-31. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020001

    Related Papers:

    [1] Francesca Giacobbo, Mirko Da Ros, Elena Macerata, Eros Mossini . A case study of management and disposal of TENORMs: radiological risk estimation by TSD Dose and RESRAD-ONSITE. AIMS Environmental Science, 2021, 8(5): 465-480. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2021030
    [2] Christina Priavolou . To BIM or not to BIM? Lessons learned from a Greek vernacular museum building. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(2): 192-207. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020012
    [3] Djordje Vilimanovic, Gangadhar Andaluri, Robert Hannah, Rominder Suri, A. Ronald MacGillivray . Occurrence and aquatic toxicity of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in tributaries of an urbanized section of the Delaware River Watershed. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(4): 302-319. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020019
    [4] Muhammad Arinal Surgama Yusuf, Anwar Mallongi, Anwar Daud, Agus Bintara Birawida, Sukri Palutturi, Lalu Muhammad Saleh, Setiawan Kasim . Environmental health risk analysis from detergent contamination in well water. AIMS Environmental Science, 2025, 12(2): 256-275. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2025013
    [5] Philipp Braun, Timm Faulwasser, Lars Grüne, Christopher M. Kellett, Willi Semmler, Steven R. Weller . On the social cost of carbon and discounting in the DICE model. AIMS Environmental Science, 2024, 11(3): 471-495. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2024024
    [6] Tamara S. Wilson, Benjamin M. Sleeter, Jason Sherba, Dick Cameron . Land-use impacts on water resources and protected areas: applications of state-and-transition simulation modeling of future scenarios. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(2): 282-301. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.2.282
    [7] Siti Rachmawati, Syafrudin, Budiyono, Ellyna Chairani, Iwan Suryadi . Life cycle analysis and environmental cost-benefit assessment of utilizing hospital medical waste into heavy metal safe paving blocks. AIMS Environmental Science, 2024, 11(5): 665-681. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2024033
    [8] David P. Dolowitz . Stormwater management the American way: why no policy transfer?. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(3): 868-883. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.3.868
    [9] Eliasu Issaka, Mabruk Adams, Enock Adjei Agyekum, Josephine Baffoe, Blessing Tornyeava . Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances: A review of sources, properties, chromatographic detection, and toxicological implications. AIMS Environmental Science, 2025, 12(2): 321-351. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2025015
    [10] Jorge Sierra, Antoine Richard . Modeling the temporal dynamics of chlordecone in the profile of tropical polluted soils as affected by land use change. AIMS Environmental Science, 2021, 8(4): 304-320. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2021020
  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the best studied eukaryote and a valuable tool for most aspects of basic research on eukaryotic organisms. This is due to its unicellular nature, which often simplifies matters, offering the combination of the facts that nearly all biological functions found in eukaryotes are also present and well conserved in S. cerevisiae. In addition, it is also easily amenable to genetic manipulation. Moreover, unlike other model organisms, S. cerevisiae is concomitantly of great importance for various biotechnological applications, some of which date back to several thousands of years. S. cerevisiae's biotechnological usefulness resides in its unique biological characteristics, i.e., its fermentation capacity, accompanied by the production of alcohol and CO2 and its resilience to adverse conditions of osmolarity and low pH. Among the most prominent applications involving the use of S. cerevisiae are the ones in food, beverage -especially wine- and biofuel production industries. This review focuses exactly on the function of S. cerevisiae in these applications, alone or in conjunction with other useful microorganisms involved in these processes. Furthermore, various aspects of the potential of the reservoir of wild, environmental, S. cerevisiae isolates are examined under the perspective of their use for such applications.


    The applications of nuclear technologies extend well beyond the energy production in power plants and have essential employments across multiple sectors. These include consumer products, food and agriculture, industry, medicine, scientific research, transport, water resources and environment. An effective and safe management of the nuclear systems demands the assessment of the consequences of accidental and chronic releases of radionuclides to the environment, the projects of plans for the protection from radiation, the development of methodologies for contaminated site clean up, and the realization and siting of high activity waste disposal sites. A needfull task for dose and risk assessment is the study and modeling of the processes that govern the transport of radionuclides through the environment up to reach and expose population to risk.

    These are the reasons, why we started developing a reliable and flexible multipurpose health physics code to be used for:

    ● retrospective calculations of potential radiation doses resulting from routine and accidental releases of radionuclides to the environment;

    ● prospective dose calculations for siting facilities, environmental impact statements, and safety analysis reports.

    GENII-LIN descends from the GENII software package [1,2], a thoroughly peer-reviewed [3,4] and well documented open source software system, which was developed at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). The GENII final stable release was the 1.485 and went to production in the early 90s.

    At the very beginning of the development, GENII-LIN was a simple porting of the GENII software package to the Linux operating system. The code was patched to grant compatibility with recent CPU and compilers. The old text based user interface was replaced by a more modern, more advanced, and more featured graphical one, built on the Qt3 libraries [5]. In these years, GENII-LIN has been continuously improved and its capabilities progressively extended. Internal and external dose rate factor generators have been deeply revised ([6,7]) to couple the embedded environmental pathway analysis models with the more recent internal dosimetry models recommended by the ICRP 72 [8] as well as with the radiological risk estimating procedures of the FGR 13 [9]. The internal nuclide databases now comprise most of the short-lived nuclides used in radiopharmaceutical facilities. The air transport models cover a wider variety of release dispersion and exposure scenarios. The input and output management has been necessarily reviewed and the graphical user interface has been accordingly redesigned and built against the more recent Qt4 [10] and Qt5 [11] libraries to increase flexibility and portability [12]. The external dose rate factor generator has been reworked [13]. Now, it calculates organ dose and total body effective dose, by applying the recommendations of ICRP 103 [14], by accessing the data libraries of radionuclide decay information and gamma and beta yields from ICRP 107 [15], and by accessing the kerma in air at body surface to organ dose conversion coefficients from information in ICRP 116 [16]. The soil transfer model has been reworked in a more physically based manner, by implementing a more sophisticated formulation for the transfer phenomena and by increasing the soil compartment number [17,18]. In this work, we want to show the GENII-LIN capabilities, the code structure, its conceptual design in the light of recent improvements.

    GENII-LIN is an integrated environment modeling software system capable of addressing radiation dose and risk assessments to individuals or populations from a variety of potential release and exposure scenarios. As needed, it implements system thinking and integrative approaches, which go beyond the traditional single discipline approaches, moving towards multi disciplinary analysis of complex environmental problems. The main features of the GENII-LIN system include:

    ● capabilities for calculating annual radiation dose, committed radiation dose and accumulated radiation dose from acute and chronic releases;

    ● capabilities for evaluating a wide variety of exposure scenarios including direct exposure to water (recreational activities), soil (buried and surface sources) and air (semi-infinite cloud and finite cloud model), inhalation pathways and ingestion pathways.

    The releases considered are:

    ● chronic and acute releases to air, from ground level or elevated sources;

    ● chronic and acute releases to water;

    ● chronic releases to deep soil from degradation of waste forms;

    ● existing contamination of soil or surfaces and environmental media.

    A more advanced soil transfer model is under development, that will be able to handle acute releases to deep and surface soil.

    Potential inputs to the code are total or specified releases or release rates of radioactivity to the environment, as well as input of measured concentrations in specified environmental media.

    The code is an integrated environmental modeling system, which is able to perform complex analyses and to make informed predictions, and includes several science based environmental dosimetry modules. Each module is a self supporting standalone system component and is responsible for retrieving, elaborating and producing information autonomously. The very flexible and effective structure of the package is schematized in Figure 1. Each module implements one or more models. When needed, a dedicated user interface allows module specific input and provides implemented model descriptions. Internal and external pre and post data processors grant information transfer by converting module input and output in a form, which is usable by the system and understandable by the user. The main structural components are an environmental transport and human exposure component (collecting most of the implemented models) coupled to internal and external dosimetry modules. Components and modules are governed by an interactive central control unit, by which the user has a full actual control on input setup, on calculation process, and on output management. The central control unit is in charge of

    Figure 1.  The GENII-LIN structure, with some data transfer files.

    ● information transfer from one component to another with unambiguous, shared meaning (syntactic and semantic interoperability);

    ● institution of local (module specific) and global (system wide) metadata standards of input, output and databases;

    ● data and information flow management among modules and through the system;

    ● granting quality control of information exchange, through an effective warning and error handling.

    The central control unit manages the computation process at two distinct levels:

    ● it checks that each individual module runs towards completion successfully;

    ● it calls all modules one by one, in the correct order, within the workflow.

    While some modules are specifically designed to pause to allow user interaction (this is the case of external and internal dosimetry modules, for instance), most of them run sequentially to completion. The individual completion status of modules is monitored and documented by capturing and writing information to the output buffer. The amount of debugging information, to be displayed, is set by the user. The central control unit allows for the complete workflow execution, calling the modules in the appropriate order without interruptions or user action requests. The information exchange among the modules is established by data transfer and buffer files, some of which are reported in Figure 1: these files may be either provided by the user or generated by the modules to transfer information to the downstream ones: the output of one module is stored in a file that feeds the next module in the stream. Most of these files are transparent to the user and can be accessed directly, either for checking intermediate calculation results or for retrieving significant data, like information on intake rates and annual media concentrations. These files are intended to be used as inputs to the dose calculation modules of GENII-LIN and should not be edited without enough programming skills.

    The environmental transfer and exposure modules reproduce the behavior of the environmental system by using computational models. These models numerically simulate the biological, physical, and chemical processes that govern the transfer of radionuclides through the environmental media up to reach the final receptors, and calculate human uptake, and human exposure to contaminants that result from the set up exposure scenario. After reading the input files and capturing a conceptual site model, the code sequentially performs numerical simulations to establish air, surface soil, deep soil, and ground and surface water concentrations of each radionuclide at the start of the exposure scenario, and for each year over all the exposure period. Modeled transfer processes account physical decay of preexisting sources, biotic transport of existing subsurface contamination, geohydrology, surface water transport, and soil contamination from continuing atmospheric or irrigation depositions and leaching. Human exposures and intakes of each radionuclide are calculated for:

    ● external exposure to atmospheric plumes (finite or semi-infinite plume model);

    ● inhalation from plume submersion, from resuspension of deposited material and from suspension of pre-existing contamination in soil;

    ● external exposure to contaminated soil, sediments, and water;

    ● external exposure to arbitrarily shaped sources;

    ● internal exposure from consumption of terrestrial foods, aquatic foods, drinking water, animal products, and from inadvertent intake of soil.

    The different transfer phenomena modeled by the GENII-LIN software system are illustrated in Figure 2, which describes how science based modules can be organized, implemented and mutually interfaced to analyze coherently a specific problem, by merging several usually separate fields of expertise. The data flow diagram explains that known or postulated radioactivity amounts can diffuse through the environment following different available routes up to the final step of exposure scenario definition, and radiation dose calculation. The code flexibility and code capabilities are significantly extended by providing interfaces, through which the user can input calculated or measured values of atmospheric dispersion, ground water concentrations, and surface water concentrations, at specified points in the simulation process (hexagonal boxes). In this way, if the GENII-LIN embedded models are not enough specialized for a given scenario, more accurate and rigorous results may be effectively obtained with minimal effort.

    Figure 2.  The transfer processes and routes simulated in GENII and GENII-LIN.

    In most of the practical situations, the known input quantities are activity releases or activity release rates, collected as "Release Terms" on the left of Figure 2. These terms may express the total activities or activity per unit time released into the transport media: air, surface water, groundwater, or soil. Specialized numerical simulations of the transfer phenomena (square boxes) turn them to basic and derived concentrations in the corresponding environmental media. When basic or derived concentrations are already known, they can be input directly to the code, through provided interfaces, and the upstream transfer calculations can be skipped. When the human exposure scenario is set up, the dose can be estimated.

    The dose calculation modules of the GENII-LIN package capture the exposure scenario assembled by the Environmental Transfer Modules, and convert the annual intake and exposure rates to radiation dose: both effective (total body) dose and equivalent doses to individual organs and tissues. The calculations are done by using precalculated dose factors from external and internal dosimetry modules.

    Three options are available to the user:

    ICRP 30 when he wants to follow the recommendations in the ICRP 26 [19], ICRP 30 [20], and ICRP 48 [21], as incorporated in the FGR 11 [22];

    FGR 13 when he wants to follow the recommendations in the ICRP 72 [8], as incorporated in the FGR 13 [9];

    ICRP 103 when he wants to follow the recommendations in the ICRP 103 [14].

    The dose calculation modules may also generate reports of doses by pathway and by radionuclides. The output detail level is set by the user, before starting calculations. If the recommendations of the FGR 13 [9] or ICRP 103 [14] are followed, the outputs are age dependent, and the code also computes risk estimate for health effects to individuals or populations.

    The code calculates for types of dose:

    ● One-Year Dose: radiation dose to individuals or populations due to one year of external irradiation and to one year of internal irradiation from the radioactivity ingested and inhaled in that same year.

    ● Committed Dose: the ingested or inhaled radionuclides irradiate organs and tissues over time periods, whose lengths may extend well beyond the intake period and depend on nuclide physical half-lives and nuclide persistent keeping within the body; in this vein, incorporated nuclides may continue to irradiate body tissues for many months after the beginning of the intake; in order to regulate exposures to radionuclides and the accumulation of radiation dose over extended periods of time, the ICRP introduced the concept of committed dose. When this option is selected, the code calculates the dose to populations or individuals from one year of external exposure to radioactive materials plus the time integral of the internal dose over an age dependent extended period of time starting from the beginning of the intake. The ICRP recommends commitment periods of 50 years for adults and up to the age of 70 for other people. In most countries, regulatory authorities recommend this dose as a measure of the potential, longer term impact of accidental and routine releases.

    For research and investigation purposes, GENII-LIN allows for specifying arbitrarily long commitment periods.

    ● Cumulative dose: this is the population or individual dose that results from an arbitrarily long external irradiation period plus the committed internal dose from intake of nuclides, via ingestion and inhalation, in the same arbitrarily long period. This kind of calculation requires the knowledge of the time dependent media concentrations of radionuclides in the environment during all the exposure period. The cumulative dose calculation may be useful, when it is required to assess the total potential impacts from exposure scenarios involving chronic releases over periods of several years from residual deposition, resulting from accidental acute releases or from significant residual contamination from decommissioning and spilling operation.

    ● Maximum Annual Dose: the largest committed dose that occurs over a specified arbitrarily long exposure period. For individuals or populations exposed to a contaminated environment for a long time, the committed dose, as well the annual dose, depends on the number of years spent on site before starting the dose calculation, i.e, before the year of interest. Individuals are exposed to an environment, whose contamination levels change over time by nuclide physical decay and transfer processes. Nuclide concentrations in the body and the annual organ and total body dose rates increase and reach their maximum when equilibrium is established between the body burden and the environment radionuclide concentrations. Dose calculations of this kind imply to accounts for external exposure during the year of interest plus the internal dose from radionuclides accumulated in the body from the beginning of exposure up to the end of the year under investigation. Depending on radionuclide species, and on the biological, physical, and chemical processes that determine transport of radionuclides through environmental media, equilibrium may require many years from the beginning of exposure.

    Calculations of this type of dose may be important to verify compliance to the existing dose limits for occupational and public exposure.

    The method, by which the code assembles these doses, is illustrated in Figure 3. The internal dose rate factor generators provide the equivalent dose rates, ˙Dt(τ,y), to a specified organ t, at specified ages y, for unit intake of activity of a specific radionuclide at specified time τ. The dose calculation modules calculate the organ equivalent dose over a commitment period of Tc years from the beginning of the intake, i.e., to the age τ+Tc, as

    τ+Tcτ˙Dt(τ,y)dy (1)
    Figure 3.  The way, GENII and GENII-LIN assemble Annual, Committed and Cumulative Dose. The representation cover up to five year long exposure and commitment periods, for lack of space. The expression ID=n denotes Internal Dose during year n.

    If u(τ) is the intake rate of activity at age τ, when the intake extends over a period of Ti years (TiTc), the accumulated organ equivalent dose is computed as

    τ+Tiτd˜τu(˜τ)˜τ+Tc˜τ˙Dt(˜τ,y)dy (2)

    The effective (total body) dose to an individual is found by calculating a weighted sum of the equivalent doses to different body organ and tissues. The weighting factors express the different radiosensitivities of the different body tissues to ionizing radiation. The number of organs/tissues considered and the related weighting factors depends on the option selected, (see table 1).

    Table 1.  Tissues and weighting factors, corresponding to the available options.
    Organs Tissue Weighting Factors
    ICRP 30 FGR 13 ICRP 103
    Gonads 0.25 0.20 0.08
    Red Bone Marrow 0.12 0.12 0.13
    Colon - 0.12 0.19
    Lung 0.12 0.12 0.16
    Stomach - 0.12 0.12
    Breasts 0.15 0.05 0.12
    Bladder - 0.05 0.04
    Liver - 0.05 0.04
    Esophagus - 0.05 0.04
    Thyroid 0.03 0.05 0.04
    Skin - 0.01 0.01
    Bone surface 0.03 0.01 0.01
    Salivary glands - - 0.01
    Brain - - 0.01
    Remainders 0.30 0.05 0.12

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    For external exposure, no commitment period needs to be considered and the problem. Being c(y) the activity of the radionuclide in the media at the age y, τ the age at the beginning of the exposure and Te the exposure duration, the external organ dose is computed as

    ˙Dtτ+Teτdyc(y) (3)

    where ˙Dt is the age independent, radionuclide specific, and organ related external dose rate factor.

    For internal exposure, the cancer risk over Tc years for unit intake of radionuclide at specified age τ is calculated according to the recommendations in the FGR 13 [9], by the equation:

    τ+TcτS(y)rt(y)˙Dt(τ,y)dyS(τ) (4)

    In equation 4, the term rt(y) denotes the organ or tissue specific lifetime risk coefficient (LRC): the risk of a subsequent cancer death, per unit absorbed dose. The survival function, S(y), is the fraction of live-born individuals in an unexposed population expected to survive at the age y. ˙Dt is the sum of the absorbed dose rate factor for low-LET radiation plus the high-LET absorbed dose rate multiplied by the RBE applicable to the cancer type. If the uptake extends over a period of Ti years (TiTc), the accumulated organ or tissue specific cancer risk to age τ+Tc is calculated as

    Ti+ττd˜τu(˜τ)˜τ+Tc˜τS(y)r(y)˙Dt(˜τ,y)dyS(˜τ) (5)

    Both S(y) and r(y) are gender specific and need to be combined by calculating a weighted mean. The total risk is simply the sum of site specific cancer risk over all cancer sites.

    For external exposure, the organ or tissue specific cancer risk is computed as

    ˙Dtτ+Teτdyr(y)c(y)S(y)S(τ) (6)

    To calculate population dose and risk, the code needs to know the composition and the spatial distribution of the individuals over the area of interest. The user may be asked to provide a population grid. When building the grid, the user must pay attention to avoid unsuitable aggregation of individuals and must pay great attention to their age distribution and to the length of the exposure period [14]. When ingestion is considered, the code may also ask the user to provide a food production grid. The output can be requested for the whole population or for specified sectors of the grid.

    As shown in Figure 3, annual doses, committed doses and accumulated dosed are assembled starting from the knowledge of annual dose rates. The dose factors available in ICRP 30 [20], ICRP 72 [8] and ICRP 103 [14] cannot be used by the code. An annual dose rate cannot be obtained by dividing the provided committed doses by the commitment period. The internal dose rate factor generators, embedded in the GENII-LIN software system, are conceived to generate the required annual increments of organ and tissue doses, for all the years following an initial intake, up to cover any specified period of time. When the user decides to apply the recommendations in FGR11 [22], the internal dose factor generators simulate the nuclide transport through the human boby, by implementing the biokinetic models and by adopting the nuclide body residency data and body transfer data given in ICRP 30 [20]. After calculating the time dependent organ and tissue nuclide concentrations, the code calculates the organ dose equivalent:

    ● by accounting the total number of nuclear transformations for all the nuclides in the source organs over the period of interest;

    ● by accounting the energy absorbed in the unit mass of the target organs, properly modified by applying radiation type specific quality factors, for each transmutation of the radionuclides in the source organs.

    The initial value problem, requires the solution of a coupled set of differential equations. The calculation result is the yearly increment of dose to each organ, which is then used by the dose calculation programs to assess annual doses, committed doses, and accumulated doses. The module has been inherited by GENII-1.485 and has been left almost untouched. Very little patches have been applied to solve numerical stability issues, rising from building the code on newer CPUs, by newer compilers. By selecting the FGR 13 or ICRP 103 option, the user calls completely new dose rate factor generators, which implement the more recent internal dosimetry models recommended by ICRP 72 [8] or the recommendations of ICRP 103 [14]. Instead of solving the equation of transfer through human body, the internal dose factor generators provide precalculated dose rate libraries, which contain the nuclide specific dose rates in the organs and tissues, sampled at non-uniformly spaced times following an acute intake by individuals of the six representative ages: infants, 1 year old children, 5 year old children, 10 year old children, 15 year old children and adults. For all the radionuclides specified in the input file, the code extracts data from those libraries and fits each set of collected dose rate data by splines under tension. The piece-wise interpolation curves are integrated over time, generating age dependent libraries of incremental organ equivalent doses for all the years following the initial unit activity intake. The code generates one library for each of the representative ages. Each library contains yearly increments of doses to 29 organs and tissues. These libraries are then used to calculate age dependent annual doses, committed dose, and accumulated doses.

    Dose from external exposure depends on many factors: source geometry; source composition; nuclide distribution; receptor position; irradiation geometry; shield presence. It is out of question to provide external dose rate factor libraries to be applied to all the arbitrary shaped radiation sources. In environmental radiation protection, most of the used codes commonly provide dose rate factors for simplified and idealized exposure geometries: usually, submersion in a semi-infinite cloud, exposure to ground surface contamination and exposure to soil uniformly contaminated to an infinite depth. The GENII-LIN itself offers built-in dose rate factor libraries, which are suitable for commonly occurring exposure scenarios:

    ● submersion in a semi-infinite cloud of radioactive air;

    ● immersion in contaminated water;

    ● direct exposure to surface ground contamination; and

    ● direct exposure to top soil contaminated to an infinite depth, with optional uncontaminated soil overburden.

    For all those practical situations, where these embedded dose rate factor libraries can not be used without introducing significant errors, GENII-LIN allows for the compilation of dose rate factor libraries for irradiation from arbitrarily shaped sources. The external dose factor generators are specialized and improved versions of the widely tested and well documented shielding code ISOSHLD: [23,24,25,26]. The code has been streamlined by removing the unneeded RIBD/ISOCALC routines, originally implemented to calculate source strength from reactor fission fuel. The originally embedded data libraries, collecting nuclide decay data and gamma and beta yields, have been replaced by updated and extended ones, built on radioactive decay data provided by Kocher [27], and, more recently, further revised by using data retrieved from ICRP 107 [15]. Instead of solving the radiation transfer equation, the ISOSHLD code implements the point kernel method: a macroscopic and widely used approach to compute gamma radiation exposure rate. In the point kernel approach, gamma radiation propagates though media like a beam. Radiation interaction with matter is quantified by using reaction specific macroscopic cross sections. Scattered radiation contributions are accounted by applying appropriate buildup factors, which express the ratio between the total value of the quantity, assessed at the evaluation point, and the value due to only primary radiation. Volumetric sources are ideally divided into an enough large number of elementary individual cells. Each cell acts as an individual point source. Except for few simpler geometries, where analytical solutions are achievable, the radiation field and total dose rate calculation at a given point of interest requires a numerical integration over the source volume. The basic source geometries are the same standard 14 ones available in ISOSHLD. The point kernel calculations result in the assessment of a kerma rate in air, at the point of interest, expressed in Gys or equivalent units. The dose calculation modules require external dose rate factors expressed in terms of tissue dose equivalent and effective dose equivalent. Therefore, the kerma rate in air is converted to dose equivalent by using energy and irradiation geometry dependent surface dose to tissue dose equivalent conversion coefficients. These coefficients express the irradiation geometry dependent ratio between the equivalent tissue dose and air kerma in air at body surface. If the user decides to apply the recommendations in FGR 11 [22], the external dose factor generator adopts the dose rate conversion coefficients collected by Kocher [28]. These libraries are the same originally used by GENII-1.485. Only total body dose rate factors are generated, when this option is selected. When the code is asked to apply the recommendations in FGR 13 [9] or in ICRP 103 [14], the external dose rate factor generators use the newer and more detailed dose rate conversion coefficient libraries provided by ICRP 116 [16]. The computed dose rate factors are organ and tissue specific, and output data are organized for cancer risk calculation.

    The Central Control Unit is a centralized management system, by which the user has a complete control over scenario definition, calculation processes and output management. Its object oriented design allows relatively easy inclusion of additional modules and models, promoting further code development. It grants access to external data file and data libraries, optimizes data flow and data collection, minimizing data exchange requirement within GENII-LIN. It provides interfaces to external programs and addresses linkage concerns to system wide shared libraries. The Central Control Unit is controlled by the user, through a full featured Graphical User Interface written in C++, built on the Qt libraries, [10,11]. By browsing wizard like editors, whose startup page is shown in Figure 4, the user can effectively select the required parameters and options for scenario modeling, and can provide input data to the internal and external dose factor generators, and to the environmental dosimetry programs. Well ordered pages, whose number increases or decreases with the scenario complexity, lead the user, through the stepwise process of input setup. The wizard is designed and structured to:

    Figure 4.  GENII-LIN at startup, just after activating the wizard like editor. The list of the active pages is shown on the right. Diagnostic messages are displayed on the output buffer at the bottom.

    ● minimize data entry, by asking only for current scenario pertinent data;

    ● prevent errors, by checking for option incompatibilities and by alerting the user when these are discovered; no further editing is allowed without solving compatibility issues.

    Default values are suggested for all the variables. All input data are checked against reasonable and mandatory bounds.

    Before starting calculations the central control unit checks for the presence of all the auxiliary files needed by the current scenario and allows the user for reading, editing, creating and importing them, by activating embedded viewers and editors.

    The GUI also gives full access to the output files that can be displayed both through embedded text viewers (Figure 5) and through embedded graphical viewers (Figure 6). The output can also be exported as CSV files or as spreadsheets.

    Figure 5.  Simulation results can be accessed through an embedded text viewer. Depending on scenario complexity, the output may be very detailed: 56 pages in this example.
    Figure 6.  Simulation results can be accessed through an advanced graphical viewer, as well.

    The code development platform is a PC running openSUSE Linux. The code has been successfully built an tested on many other Linux distributions, as confirmed by positive feedbacks from a large number of users. Either to run or to build the code from sources, the Qt4 or Qt5 libraries are mandatory. The large data libraries require at least 500 MB of free space on disk. Code performances on modern CPU are very good: few minute long typical runtimes and low resource demand. Programming skills may be useful for error debugging, but are not required to run calculations. The code is completely open source, available for free, and does not contain any commercial software. The experienced user, who wants to build the code from sources, needs a C++ compiler for the Graphical User interface, and a FORTRAN compiler for the computational modules. Being the one used for the development, the GNU compiler collection is recommended, but not mandatory. Other compilers have been used with success, but not intensively tested.

    We started developing a multipurpose health physics code able to perform:

    ● retrospective calculations of potential radiation doses resulting from routine and accidental releases of radionuclides to the environment;

    ● prospective calculations for siting facilities, environmental impact statements, and safety analysis reports.

    Our work shows how several science based environmental dosimetry components, built by merging usually separate fields of expertise, can be organized, linked and used to synergically assess the diffusion of known or postulated amounts of radioactivity through the environment, along different available routes up to the final step of exposure scenario definition, and radiation dose calculations.

    The result is a reliable and flexible tool, with an effective modular and object oriented design, capable for:

    ● calculating radiation dose for acute and chronic releases to environmental media;

    ● evaluating a large variety of exposure pathways including direct exposure via water, soil and air, inhalation and ingestion.

    The code can handle many exposure pathways, comprising:

    ● external exposure from finite or infinite atmospheric plumes;

    ● external exposure to arbitrarily shaped sources;

    ● external exposure to contaminated soil, sediments, and water;

    ● internal exposure from inhalation, consumption of terrestrial foods, aquatic foods, drinking water, animal products, and inadvertent intake of soil.

    The fully featured graphical interface provide a file editor conceived like a wizard, which effectively guides the user step by step through the scenario definition process. The code is available for free, completely open source. The software design is modular and strictly object oriented, reason why code improvement and patching is easy. The inclusion of new modules and the replacement of the implemented ones require a relatively little effort. The code has been widely and successfully used for environmental impact and safety assessments regarding several nuclear fuel cycle and radiopharmaceutical facilities.

    At present, we are working to enhance the deep soil transfer model.



    Conflict of interest



    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    [1] Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H, et al. (1996) Life with 6000 genes. Science 274: 563-547. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5287.546
    [2] Wood V, Rutherford KM, Ivens A, et al. (2001) A re-annotation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Comp Funct Genomics 2: 143-154. doi: 10.1002/cfg.86
    [3] Doolittle WF (1999) Lateral genomics. Trends Cell Biol 9: M5-8. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(99)01664-5
    [4] Hall C, Brachat S, Dietrich FS (2005) Contribution of horizontal gene transfer to the evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiaeEukaryot Cell 4: 1102-1115. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.6.1102-1115.2005
    [5] Galeote V, Novo M, Salema-Oom M, et al. (2010) FSY1, a horizontally transferred gene in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118 wine yeast strain, encodes a high-affinity fructose/H+ symporter. Microbiology 156: 3754-3761. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.041673-0
    [6] de Zamaroczy M, Bernardi G (1985) Sequence organization of the mitochondrial genome of yeast--a review. Gene 37: 1-17. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90252-5
    [7] Foury F, Roganti T, Lecrenier N, et al. (1998) The complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiaeFEBS Lett 440: 325-331. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01467-7
    [8] Futcher AB (1988) The 2 micron circle plasmid of Saccharomyces cerevisiaeYeast 4: 27-40. doi: 10.1002/yea.320040104
    [9] Wickner RB (1996) Double-stranded RNA viruses of Saccharomyces cerevisiaeMicrobiol Rev 60: 250-265. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.60.1.250-265.1996
    [10] Thomson JM, Gaucher EA, Burgan MF, et al. (2005) Resurrecting ancestral alcohol dehydrogenases from yeast. Nat Genet 37: 630-635. doi: 10.1038/ng1553
    [11] Pronk JT, Yde Steensma H, Van Dijken JP (1996) Pyruvate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeYeast 12: 1607-1633. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199612)12:16<1607::AID-YEA70>3.0.CO;2-4
    [12] Hagman A, Sall T, Compagno C, et al. (2013) Yeast ‘make-accumulate-consume’ life strategy evolved as a multi-step process that predates the whole genome duplication. PLoS One 8: e68734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068734
    [13] Wolfe KH, Shields DC (1997) Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387: 708-713. doi: 10.1038/42711
    [14] Ihmels J, Bergmann S, Gerami-Nejad M, et al. (2005) Rewiring of the yeast transcriptional network through the evolution of motif usage. Science 309: 938-940. doi: 10.1126/science.1113833
    [15] Rozpedowska E, Hellborg L, Ishchuk OP, et al. (2011) Parallel evolution of the make-accumulate-consume strategy in Saccharomyces and Dekkera yeasts. Nat Commun 2: 302. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1305
    [16] Mortimer R, Polsinelli M (1999) On the origins of wine yeast. Res Microbiol 150: 199-204. doi: 10.1016/S0923-2508(99)80036-9
    [17] Taylor MW, Tsai P, Anfang N, et al. (2014) Pyrosequencing reveals regional differences in fruit-associated fungal communities. Environ Microbiol 16: 2848-2858. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12456
    [18] Stefanini I, Dapporto L, Legras JL, et al. (2012) Role of social wasps in Saccharomyces cerevisiae ecology and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 13398-13403. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208362109
    [19] Buser CC, Newcomb RD, Gaskett AC, et al. (2014) Niche construction initiates the evolution of mutualistic interactions. Ecol Lett 17: 1257-1264. doi: 10.1111/ele.12331
    [20] Wang QM, Liu WQ, Liti G, et al. (2012) Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity. Mol Ecol 21: 5404-5417. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05732.x
    [21] Camarasa C, Sanchez I, Brial P, et al. (2011) Phenotypic landscape of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation: evidence for origin-dependent metabolic traits. PLoS One 6: e25147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025147
    [22] Stewart GG (2014) SACCHAROMYCES | Saccharomyces cerevisiaeEncyclopedia of Food Microbiology (Second Edition) Oxford: Academic Press, 309-315. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-384730-0.00292-5
    [23] Hittinger CT, Steele JL, Ryder DS (2018) Diverse yeasts for diverse fermented beverages and foods. Curr Opin Biotechnol 49: 199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.10.004
    [24] McGovern PE, Glusker DL, Exner LJ, et al. (1996) Neolithic resinated wine. Nature 381: 480. doi: 10.1038/381480a0
    [25] Cavalieri D, McGovern PE, Hartl DL, et al. (2003) Evidence for S. cerevisiae fermentation in ancient wine. J Mol Evol 57 Suppl 1: S226-232. doi: 10.1007/s00239-003-0031-2
    [26] Pasteur L (1860)  Mémoire sur la fermentation alcoolique Mallet-Bachelier.
    [27] Marsit S, Dequin S (2015) Diversity and adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces wine yeast: a review. FEMS Yeast Res 15: fov067. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fov067
    [28] Bauer F, Pretorius IS (2000) Yeast stress response and fermentation efficiency: how to survive the making of wine-a review. S Afr J Enol Vitic 21: 27-51.
    [29] Eldarov MA, Kishkovskaia SA, Tanaschuk TN, et al. (2016) Genomics and biochemistry of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains. Biochemistry (Mosc) 81: 1650-1668. doi: 10.1134/S0006297916130046
    [30] Swiegers JH, Saerens SM, Pretorius IS (2016) Novel yeast strains as tools for adjusting the flavor of fermented beverages to market specifications. Biotechnol Flavor Prod 62-132. doi: 10.1002/9781118354056.ch3
    [31] Matallana E, Aranda A (2017) Biotechnological impact of stress response on wine yeast. Lett Appl Microbiol 64: 103-110. doi: 10.1111/lam.12677
    [32] Mina M, Tsaltas D (2017) Contribution of yeast in wine aroma and flavour. Yeast - industrial applications .
    [33] Cordente AG, Curtin CD, Varela C, et al. (2012) Flavour-active wine yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 96: 601-618. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4370-z
    [34] Ehrlich F (1907) Über die Bedingungen der Fuselölbildung und über ihren Zusammenhang mit dem Eiweißaufbau der Hefe. Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 40: 1027-1047. doi: 10.1002/cber.190704001156
    [35] Hazelwood LA, Daran JM, van Maris AJ, et al. (2008) The Ehrlich pathway for fusel alcohol production: a century of research on Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 2259-2266. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02625-07
    [36] Styger G, Jacobson D, Bauer FF (2011) Identifying genes that impact on aroma profiles produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the production of higher alcohols. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91: 713-730. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3237-z
    [37] Styger G, Jacobson D, Prior BA, et al. (2013) Genetic analysis of the metabolic pathways responsible for aroma metabolite production by Saccharomyces cerevisiaeAppl Microbiol Biotechnol 97: 4429-4442. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4522-1
    [38] Swiegers JH, Pretorius IS (2005) Yeast modulation of wine flavor. Adv Appl Microbiol 57: 131-175. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2164(05)57005-9
    [39] Ugliano MA, Henschke P, Herderich M, et al. (2007) Nitrogen management is critical for wine flavour and style. Aust N Z Wine Ind J 22: 24-30.
    [40] Vilanova M, Pretorius IS, Henschke PA (2015) Influence of diammonium phosphate addition to fermentation on wine biologicals. Processing and impact on active components in Food San Diego: Academic Press, 483-491. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-404699-3.00058-5
    [41] Carrau FM, Medina K, Farina L, et al. (2008) Production of fermentation aroma compounds by Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts: effects of yeast assimilable nitrogen on two model strains. FEMS Yeast Res 8: 1196-1207. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00412.x
    [42] Verstrepen KJ, Van Laere SD, Vanderhaegen BM, et al. (2003) Expression levels of the yeast alcohol acetyltransferase genes ATF1, Lg-ATF1, and ATF2 control the formation of a broad range of volatile esters. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 5228-5237. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5228-5237.2003
    [43] Lambrechts MG, Pretorius IS (2000) Yeast and its importance to wine aroma—A Review. S Afri J Enology Viti 21: 97-129.
    [44] Ruiz J, Kiene F, Belda I, et al. (2019) Effects on varietal aromas during wine making: a review of the impact of varietal aromas on the flavor of wine. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103: 7425-7450. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-10008-9
    [45] Saerens SM, Delvaux FR, Verstrepen KJ, et al. (2010) Production and biological function of volatile esters in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeMicrob Biotechnol 3: 165-177. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00106.x
    [46] Mason AB, Dufour JP (2000) Alcohol acetyltransferases and the significance of ester synthesis in yeast. Yeast 16: 1287-1298. doi: 10.1002/1097-0061(200010)16:14<1287::AID-YEA613>3.0.CO;2-I
    [47] Lilly M, Lambrechts MG, Pretorius IS (2000) Effect of increased yeast alcohol acetyltransferase activity on flavor profiles of wine and distillates. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 744-753. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.2.744-753.2000
    [48] Lilly M, Bauer FF, Lambrechts MG, et al. (2006) The effect of increased yeast alcohol acetyltransferase and esterase activity on the flavour profiles of wine and distillates. Yeast 23: 641-659. doi: 10.1002/yea.1382
    [49] Kruis AJ, Levisson M, Mars AE, et al. (2017) Ethyl acetate production by the elusive alcohol acetyltransferase from yeast. Metab Eng 41: 92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2017.03.004
    [50] Kruis AJ, Gallone B, Jonker T, et al. (2018) Contribution of Eat1 and Other Alcohol Acyltransferases to Ester Production in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeFront Microbiol 9: 3202. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03202
    [51] Saerens SM, Verstrepen KJ, Van Laere SD, et al. (2006) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae EHT1 and EEB1 genes encode novel enzymes with medium-chain fatty acid ethyl ester synthesis and hydrolysis capacity. J Biol Chem 281: 4446-4456. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M512028200
    [52] Fukuda K, Kuwahata O, Kiyokawa Y, et al. (1996) Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of the isoamyl acetate-hydrolyzing esterase gene (EST2) from Saccharomyces cerevisiaeJ Ferment Bioeng 82: 8-15. doi: 10.1016/0922-338X(96)89447-5
    [53] Fukuda K, Yamamoto N, Kiyokawa Y, et al. (1998) Balance of activities of alcohol acetyltransferase and esterase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is important for production of isoamyl acetate. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 4076-4078. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.10.4076-4078.1998
    [54] Liu S-Q, Pilone GJ (2000) An overview of formation and roles of acetaldehyde in winemaking with emphasis on microbiological implications. Int J Food Sci Technol 35: 49-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2621.2000.00341.x
    [55] Styger G, Prior B, Bauer FF (2011) Wine flavor and aroma. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 38: 1145-1159. doi: 10.1007/s10295-011-1018-4
    [56] de Assis LJ, Zingali RB, Masuda CA, et al. (2013) Pyruvate decarboxylase activity is regulated by the Ser/Thr protein phosphatase Sit4p in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiaeFEMS Yeast Res 13: 518-528. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12052
    [57] Eglinton J, Griesser M, Henschke P, et al. (2004) Yeast-mediated formation of pigmented polymers in red wine. Red wine color American Chemical Society, 7-21. doi: 10.1021/bk-2004-0886.ch002
    [58] Klosowski G, Mikulski D, Rolbiecka A, et al. (2017) Changes in the concentration of carbonyl compounds during the alcoholic fermentation process carried out with Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast. Pol J Microbiol 66: 327-334. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.4861
    [59] Romano P, Suzzi G, Turbanti L, et al. (1994) Acetaldehyde production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Lett 118: 213-218. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06830.x
    [60] Schuller D, Casal M (2005) The use of genetically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in the wine industry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 68: 292-304. doi: 10.1007/s00253-005-1994-2
    [61] Scacco A, Oliva D, Di Maio S, et al. (2012) Indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains and their influence on the quality of Cataratto, Inzolia and Grillo white wines. Food Res Int 46: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.10.038
    [62] Alves Z, Melo A, Figueiredo AR, et al. (2015) Exploring the Saccharomyces cerevisiae volatile metabolome: indigenous versus commercial strains. PLoS One 10: e0143641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143641
    [63] Álvarez-Pérez JM, Álvarez-Rodríguez ML, Campo E, et al. (2016) Selection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains applied to the production of Prieto Picudo Rosé wines with a different aromatic profile. S Afri J Enology Viti 35: 15.
    [64] Tufariello M, Chiriatti MA, Grieco F, et al. (2014) Influence of autochthonous Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains on volatile profile of Negroamaro wines. LWT - Food Sci Technol 58: 35-48. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.03.016
    [65] Parapouli M, Sfakianaki A, Monokrousos N, et al. (2019) Comparative transcriptional analysis of flavour-biosynthetic genes of a native Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain fermenting in its natural must environment, vs. a commercial strain and correlation of the genes' activities with the produced flavour compounds. J Biol Res (Thessalon) 26: 5. doi: 10.1186/s40709-019-0096-8
    [66] Romano P, Capece A (2017) Wine microbiology. Starter Cultures in Food Production 255-282. doi: 10.1002/9781118933794.ch13
    [67] Bokulich NA, Thorngate JH, Richardson PM, et al. (2014) Microbial biogeography of wine grapes is conditioned by cultivar, vintage, and climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: E139-148. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317377110
    [68] Ciani M, Morales P, Comitini F, et al. (2016) Non-conventional yeast species for lowering ethanol content of wines. Front Microbiol 7: 642.
    [69] Maturano YP, Assof M, Fabani MP, et al. (2015) Enzymatic activities produced by mixed Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces cultures: relationship with wine volatile composition. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 108: 1239-1256. doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0578-0
    [70] Tristezza M, Tufariello M, Capozzi V, et al. (2016) The oenological potential of hanseniaspora uvarum in simultaneous and sequential co-fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae for industrial wine production. Front Microbiol 7: 670. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00670
    [71] Viana F, Belloch C, Valles S, et al. (2011) Monitoring a mixed starter of Hanseniaspora vineae-Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural must: impact on 2-phenylethyl acetate production. Int J Food Microbiol 151: 235-240. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.09.005
    [72] Medina K, Boido E, Farina L, et al. (2013) Increased flavour diversity of Chardonnay wines by spontaneous fermentation and co-fermentation with Hanseniaspora vineaeFood Chem 141: 2513-2521. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.04.056
    [73] Kim DH, Hong YA, Park HD (2008) Co-fermentation of grape must by Issatchenkia orientalis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae reduces the malic acid content in wine. Biotechnol Lett 30: 1633-1638. doi: 10.1007/s10529-008-9726-1
    [74] Gobbi M, Comitini F, Domizio P, et al. (2013) Lachancea thermotolerans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in simultaneous and sequential co-fermentation: a strategy to enhance acidity and improve the overall quality of wine. Food Microbiol 33: 271-281. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.10.004
    [75] Comitini F, Gobbi M, Domizio P, et al. (2011) Selected non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts in controlled multistarter fermentations with Saccharomyces cerevisiaeFood Microbiol 28: 873-882. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2010.12.001
    [76] Sadineni V, Kondapalli N, Obulam VSR (2011) Effect of co-fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Torulaspora delbrueckii or Metschnikowia pulcherrima on the aroma and sensory properties of mango wine. Ann Microbiol 62: 1353-1360. doi: 10.1007/s13213-011-0383-6
    [77] Parapouli M, Hatziloukas E, Drainas C, et al. (2010) The effect of Debina grapevine indigenous yeast strains of Metschnikowia and Saccharomyces on wine flavour. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 37: 85-93. doi: 10.1007/s10295-009-0651-7
    [78] Saez JS, Lopes CA, Kirs VC, et al. (2010) Enhanced volatile phenols in wine fermented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and spoiled with Pichia guilliermondii and Dekkera bruxellensisLett Appl Microbiol 51: 170-176.
    [79] Azzolini M, Fedrizzi B, Tosi E, et al. (2012) Effects of Torulaspora delbrueckii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae mixed cultures on fermentation and aroma of Amarone wine. European Food Res Technol 235: 303-313. doi: 10.1007/s00217-012-1762-3
    [80] Renault P, Coulon J, de Revel G, et al. (2015) Increase of fruity aroma during mixed T. delbrueckii/S. cerevisiae wine fermentation is linked to specific esters enhancement. Int J Food Microbiol 207: 40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.04.037
    [81] Izquierdo Cañas PM, García-Romero E, Heras Manso JM, et al. (2014) Influence of sequential inoculation of Wickerhamomyces anomalus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the quality of red wines. European Food Res Technol 239: 279-286. doi: 10.1007/s00217-014-2220-1
    [82] Kontoudakis N, Gonzalez E, Gil M, et al. (2011) Influence of wine pH on changes in color and polyphenol composition induced by micro-oxygenation. J Agric Food Chem 59: 1974-1984. doi: 10.1021/jf103038g
    [83] Ozturk B, Anli E (2014) Different techniques for reducing alcohol levels in wine: A review. BIO Web of Conferences 3: 02012. doi: 10.1051/bioconf/20140302012
    [84] García-Martín N, Perez-Magariño S, Ortega-Heras M, et al. (2010) Sugar reduction in musts with nanofiltration membranes to obtain low alcohol-content wines. Sep Purif Technol 76: 158-170. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.10.002
    [85] Salgado CM, Palacio L, Prádanos P, et al. (2015) Comparative study of red grape must nanofiltration: Laboratory and pilot plant scales. Food Bioprod Process 94: 610-620. doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2014.08.007
    [86] Mira H, de Pinho MN, Guiomar A, et al. (2017) Membrane processing of grape must for control of the alcohol content in fermented beverages. J Membr Sci Res 3: 308-312.
    [87] Barrio E, González SS, Arias A, et al. (2006) Molecular mechanisms involved in the adaptive evolution of industrial yeasts. Yeasts in food and beverages Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 153-174. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-28398-0_6
    [88] Alonso-Del-Real J, Contreras-Ruiz A, Castiglioni GL, et al. (2017) The use of mixed populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii to reduce ethanol content in wine: limited aeration, inoculum proportions, and sequential inoculation. Front Microbiol 8: 2087. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02087
    [89] Wang C, Mas A, Esteve-Zarzoso B (2016) The interaction between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces yeast during alcoholic fermentation is species and strain specific. Front Microbiol 7: 502.
    [90] Curiel JA, Morales P, Gonzalez R, et al. (2017) Different non-Saccharomyces yeast species stimulate nutrient consumption in S. cerevisiae mixed cultures. Front Microbiol 8: 2121. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02121
    [91] Branco P, Francisco D, Chambon C, et al. (2014) Identification of novel GAPDH-derived antimicrobial peptides secreted by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and involved in wine microbial interactions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98: 843-853. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5411-y
    [92] Perez-Torrado R, Rantsiou K, Perrone B, et al. (2017) Ecological interactions among Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: insight into the dominance phenomenon. Sci Rep 7: 43603. doi: 10.1038/srep43603
    [93] Longo R, Blackman JW, Torley PJ, et al. (2017) Changes in volatile composition and sensory attributes of wines during alcohol content reduction. J Sci Food Agric 97: 8-16. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7757
    [94] Heitmann M, Zannini E, Arendt E (2018) Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolites produced during fermentation on bread quality parameters: A review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 58: 1152-1164. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1244153
    [95] Joseph R, Bachhawat AK (2014) Yeasts: Production and Commercial Uses. Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, 2 Eds Oxford: Academic Press, 823-830. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-384730-0.00361-X
    [96] Nielsen J (2019) Yeast systems biology: model organism and cell factory. Biotechnol J 14: e1800421. doi: 10.1002/biot.201800421
    [97] Money NP (2018)  The Rise of Yeast: How the Sugar Fungus Shaped Civilization Oxford University Press.
    [98] Carbonetto B, Ramsayer J, Nidelet T, et al. (2018) Bakery yeasts, a new model for studies in ecology and evolution. Yeast 35: 591-603. doi: 10.1002/yea.3350
    [99] Duan SF, Han PJ, Wang QM, et al. (2018) The origin and adaptive evolution of domesticated populations of yeast from Far East Asia. Nat Commun 9: 2690. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05106-7
    [100] Menezes R, Tenreiro S, Macedo D, et al. (2015) From the baker to the bedside: yeast models of Parkinson's disease. Microb Cell 2: 262-279. doi: 10.15698/mic2015.08.219
    [101] Hidalgo A, Brandolini A (2014) BREAD | Bread from Wheat Flour. Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, 2Eds Oxford: Academic Press, 303-308. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-384730-0.00044-6
    [102] De Vuyst L, Harth H, Van Kerrebroeck S, et al. (2016) Yeast diversity of sourdoughs and associated metabolic properties and functionalities. Int J Food Microbiol 239: 26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.07.018
    [103] Legras JL, Merdinoglu D, Cornuet JM, et al. (2007) Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Mol Ecol 16: 2091-2102. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03266.x
    [104] Albertin W, Marullo P, Aigle M, et al. (2009) Evidence for autotetraploidy associated with reproductive isolation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: towards a new domesticated species. J Evol Biol 22: 2157-2170. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01828.x
    [105] Peter J, De Chiara M, Friedrich A, et al. (2018) Genome evolution across 1,011 Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates. Nature 556: 339-344. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0030-5
    [106] De Bellis P, Rizzello CG, Sisto A, et al. (2019) Use of a selected Leuconostoc Citreum strain as a starter for making a ‘Yeast-Free’ bread. Foods 8: 70. doi: 10.3390/foods8020070
    [107] Heitmann M, Zannini E, Arendt EK (2015) Impact of different beer yeasts on wheat dough and bread quality parameters. J Cereal Sci $V 63: 49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2015.02.008
    [108] Schwan RF, Wheals AE (2004) The microbiology of cocoa fermentation and its role in chocolate quality. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 44: 205-221. doi: 10.1080/10408690490464104
    [109] De Vuyst L, Weckx S (2016) The cocoa bean fermentation process: from ecosystem analysis to starter culture development. J Appl Microbiol 121: 5-17. doi: 10.1111/jam.13045
    [110] Aprotosoaie AC, Luca SV, Miron A (2016) Flavor chemistry of Cocoa and Cocoa products-an overview. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 15: 73-91. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12180
    [111] Gutiérrez TJ (2017) State-of-the-Art Chocolate manufacture: a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 16: 1313-1344. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12301
    [112] Papalexandratou Z, De Vuyst L (2011) Assessment of the yeast species composition of cocoa bean fermentations in different cocoa-producing regions using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. FEMS Yeast Res 11: 564-574. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00747.x
    [113] Meersman E, Steensels J, Struyf N, et al. (2016) Tuning chocolate flavor through development of thermotolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae starter cultures with increased acetate ester production. Appl Environ Microbiol 82: 732-746. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02556-15
    [114] Meersman E, Steensels J, Paulus T, et al. (2015) Breeding strategy to generate robust yeast starter cultures for Cocoa pulp fermentations. Appl Environ Microbiol 81: 6166-6176. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00133-15
    [115] Ho VT, Zhao J, Fleet G (2014) Yeasts are essential for cocoa bean fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol 174: 72-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.12.014
    [116] Ho VT, Zhao J, Fleet G (2015) The effect of lactic acid bacteria on cocoa bean fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol 205: 54-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.03.031
    [117] Ho VTT, Fleet GH, Zhao J (2018) Unravelling the contribution of lactic acid bacteria and acetic acid bacteria to cocoa fermentation using inoculated organisms. Int J Food Microbiol 279: 43-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.04.040
    [118] Schwan RF (1998) Cocoa fermentations conducted with a defined microbial cocktail inoculum. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 1477-1483. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.4.1477-1483.1998
    [119] Jespersen L, Nielsen DS, Honholt S, et al. (2005) Occurrence and diversity of yeasts involved in fermentation of West African cocoa beans. FEMS Yeast Res 5: 441-453. doi: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.11.002
    [120] Daniel HM, Vrancken G, Takrama JF, et al. (2009) Yeast diversity of Ghanaian cocoa bean heap fermentations. FEMS Yeast Res 9: 774-783. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00520.x
    [121] Meersman E, Steensels J, Mathawan M, et al. (2013) Detailed analysis of the microbial population in Malaysian spontaneous cocoa pulp fermentations reveals a core and variable microbiota. PLoS One 8: e81559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081559
    [122] Ramos CL, Dias DR, Miguel M, et al. (2014) Impact of different cocoa hybrids (Theobroma cacao L.) and S. cerevisiae UFLA CA11 inoculation on microbial communities and volatile compounds of cocoa fermentation. Food Res Int 64: 908-918. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.08.033
    [123] Batista NN, Ramos CL, Ribeiro DD, et al. (2015) Dynamic behavior of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia kluyveri and Hanseniaspora uvarum during spontaneous and inoculated cocoa fermentations and their effect on sensory characteristics of chocolate. LWT-Food Sci Technol 63: 221-227. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.051
    [124] Mota-Gutierrez J, Botta C, Ferrocino I, et al. (2018) Dynamics and biodiversity of bacterial and yeast communities during fermentation of Cocoa beans. Appl Environ Microbiol 84: e01164-01118. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01164-18
    [125] Ardhana MM, Fleet GH (2003) The microbial ecology of cocoa bean fermentations in Indonesia. Int J Food Microbiol 86: 87-99. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00081-3
    [126] Moreira IMdV, Miguel MGdCP, Duarte WF, et al. (2013) Microbial succession and the dynamics of metabolites and sugars during the fermentation of three different cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) hybrids. Food Res Int 54: 9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.06.001
    [127] Mota-Gutierrez J, Barbosa-Pereira L, Ferrocino I, et al. (2019) Traceability of functional volatile compounds generated on inoculated Cocoa fermentation and its potential health benefits. Nutrients 11: 884. doi: 10.3390/nu11040884
    [128] Castro-Alayo EM, Idrogo-Vasquez G, Siche R, et al. (2019) Formation of aromatic compounds precursors during fermentation of Criollo and Forastero cocoa. Heliyon 5: e01157. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01157
    [129] Buamah R, Dzogbefia V, Oldham J (1997) Pure yeast culture fermentation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L): effect on yield of sweatings and cocoa bean quality. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 13: 457-462. doi: 10.1023/A:1018536519325
    [130] Meersman E, Struyf N, Kyomugasho C, et al. (2017) Characterization and degradation of pectic polysaccharides in cocoa pulp. J Agric Food Chem 65: 9726-9734. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03854
    [131] Lefeber T, Papalexandratou Z, Gobert W, et al. (2012) On-farm implementation of a starter culture for improved cocoa bean fermentation and its influence on the flavour of chocolates produced thereof. Food Microbiol 30: 379-392. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2011.12.021
    [132] Visintin S, Ramos L, Batista N, et al. (2017) Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Torulaspora delbrueckii starter cultures on cocoa beans fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol 257: 31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.06.004
    [133] Magalhaes da Veiga Moreira I, de Figueiredo Vilela L, da Cruz Pedroso Miguel MG, et al. (2017) Impact of a microbial cocktail used as a starter culture on cocoa fermentation and chocolate flavor. Molecules 22. doi: 10.3390/molecules22050766
    [134] Menezes AGT, Batista NN, Ramos CL, et al. (2016) Investigation of chocolate produced from four different Brazilian varieties of cocoa ( Theobroma cacao L.) inoculated with Saccharomyces cerevisiaeFood Res Int 81: 83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.12.036
    [135] Assi-Clair BJ, Koné MK, Kouamé K, et al. (2019) Effect of aroma potential of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation on the volatile profile of raw cocoa and sensory attributes of chocolate produced thereof. European Food Res Technol 245: 1459-1471. doi: 10.1007/s00217-018-3181-6
    [136] Songstad D, Lakshmanan P, Chen J, et al. (2009) Historical perspective of biofuels: learning from the past to rediscover the future. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol: Plant 45: 189-192. doi: 10.1007/s11627-009-9218-6
    [137] Guo M, Song W, Buhain J (2015) Bioenergy and biofuels: history, status, and perspective. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 42: 712-725. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.013
    [138] Balat M, Balat H (2009) Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel. Applied energy 86: 2273-2282. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.015
    [139] John RP, Anisha GS, Nampoothiri KM, et al. (2011) Micro and macroalgal biomass: a renewable source for bioethanol. Bioresour Technol 102: 186-193. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.139
    [140] Nigam PS, Singh A (2011) Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources. Progress in energy and combustion science 37: 52-68. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2010.01.003
    [141] Mohd Azhar SH, Abdulla R, Jambo SA, et al. (2017) Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: A review. Biochem Biophys Rep 10: 52-61.
    [142] Pilgrim C, Vierhout R (2017) Status of the worldwide fuel alcohol industry. The alcohol textbook 1-22.
    [143] Walker GM, Walker RS (2018) Enhancing yeast alcoholic fermentations. Adv Appl Microbiol 68: 87-129. doi: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2018.05.003
    [144] Walker GM (2004) Metals in yeast fermentation processes. Adv Appl Microbiol 54: 197-229. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2164(04)54008-X
    [145] Flores JA, Gschaedler A, Amaya-Delgado L, et al. (2013) Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of Agave tequilana fructans by Kluyveromyces marxianus yeasts for bioethanol and tequila production. Bioresour Technol 146: 267-273. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.078
    [146] Passoth V, Blomqvist J, Schnurer J (2007) Dekkera bruxellensis and Lactobacillus vini form a stable ethanol-producing consortium in a commercial alcohol production process. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 4354-4356. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00437-07
    [147] Liang M, Damiani A, He QP, et al. (2013) Elucidating xylose metabolism of Scheffersomyces stipitis for lignocellulosic ethanol production. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2: 38-48. doi: 10.1021/sc400265g
    [148] Obata O, Akunna J, Bockhorn H, et al. (2016) Ethanol production from brown seaweed using non-conventional yeasts. Bioethanology 2: 134-145.
    [149] Nandy SK, Srivastava RK (2018) A review on sustainable yeast biotechnological processes and applications. Microbiol Res 207: 83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2017.11.013
    [150] Giudici P, Zambonelli C, Kunkee R (1993) Increased production of n-propanol in wine by yeast strains having an impaired ability to form hydrogen sulfide. Am J Enol Vitic 44: 17-21.
    [151] Nishimura Y (2016) 1-Propanol production of S. cerevisiae engineering 2-Ketobutyrate biosynthetic pathway.
    [152] Buijs NA, Siewers V, Nielsen J (2013) Advanced biofuel production by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiaeCurr Opin Chem Biol 17: 480-488. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.03.036
    [153] Schadeweg V, Boles E (2016) n-Butanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is limited by the availability of coenzyme A and cytosolic acetyl-CoA. Biotechnol biofuels 9: 44. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0456-7
    [154] Anthony LC, Huang LL, Rick WY (2014) Production of isobutanol in yeast mitochondria. Google Patents.
    [155] Festel G, Boles E, Weber C, et al. (2013) Fermentative production of isobutanol with yeast. Google Patents.
    [156] Urano J, Dundon CA (2012) Cytosolic isobutanol pathway localization for the production of isobutanol. Google Patents.
    [157] Walker GM (2014) Fermentation (Industrial): media for industrial fermentations. Encyclopedia of food microbiology, 2Eds Academic Press, 769-777. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-384730-0.00107-5
    [158] Alvira P, Tomas-Pejo E, Ballesteros M, et al. (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: A review. Bioresour Technol 101: 4851-4861. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.093
    [159] Yang B, Dai Z, Ding SY, et al. (2011) Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass. Biofuels 2: 421-449. doi: 10.4155/bfs.11.116
    [160] Canilha L, Chandel AK, Suzane dos Santos Milessi T, et al. (2012) Bioconversion of sugarcane biomass into ethanol: an overview about composition, pretreatment methods, detoxification of hydrolysates, enzymatic saccharification, and ethanol fermentation. BioMed Res Int 2012.
    [161] Chandel AK, Chan E, Rudravaram R, et al. (2007) Economics and environmental impact of bioethanol production technologies: an appraisal. Biotechnol Mol Biol Rev 2: 14-32.
    [162] Hadiyanto H, Ariyanti D, Aini A, et al. (2013) Batch and fed-batch fermentation system on ethanol production from whey using Kluyveromyces marxianusInt J Renewable Energy Dev 2: 127-131. doi: 10.14710/ijred.2.3.127-131
    [163] Cheng NG, Hasan M, Kumoro AC, et al. (2009) Production of ethanol by fed-batch fermentation. Pertanika J Sci Technol 17: 399-408.
    [164] Ivanova V, Petrova P, Hristov J (2011) Application in the ethanol fermentation of immobilized yeast cells in matrix of alginate/magnetic nanoparticles, on chitosan-magnetite microparticles and cellulose-coated magnetic nanoparticles. arXiv preprint arXiv 11050619.
    [165] Jain A, Chaurasia SP (2014) Bioethanol production in membrane bioreactor (MBR) system: a review. Int J Environ Res Dev 4: 387-394.
    [166] Kang Q, Appels L, Tan T, et al. (2014) Bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: current findings determine research priorities. Sci World J 2014: 298153.
    [167] Caspeta L, Chen Y, Ghiaci P, et al. (2014) Biofuels. Altered sterol composition renders yeast thermotolerant. Science 346: 75-78. doi: 10.1126/science.1258137
    [168] Phisalaphong M, Srirattana N, Tanthapanichakoon W (2006) Mathematical modeling to investigate temperature effect on kinetic parameters of ethanol fermentation. Biochem Eng J 28: 36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2005.08.039
    [169] Lam FH, Ghaderi A, Fink GR, et al. (2014) Biofuels. Engineering alcohol tolerance in yeast. Science 346: 71-75. doi: 10.1126/science.1257859
    [170] Trofimova Y, Walker G, Rapoport A (2010) Anhydrobiosis in yeast: influence of calcium and magnesium ions on yeast resistance to dehydration–rehydration. FEMS Microbiol Lett 308: 55-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01989.x
    [171] Medina VG, Almering MJ, van Maris AJ, et al. (2010) Elimination of glycerol production in anaerobic cultures of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain engineered to use acetic acid as an electron acceptor. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 190-195. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01772-09
    [172] Lopes ML, de Lima Paulillo SC, Godoy A, et al. (2016) Ethanol production in Brazil: a bridge between science and industry. Braz J Microbiol 47: 64-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.003
    [173] Carvalho-Netto OV, Carazzolle MF, Mofatto LS, et al. (2015) Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcriptional reprograming due to bacterial contamination during industrial scale bioethanol production. Microb Cell Fact 14: 13. doi: 10.1186/s12934-015-0196-6
    [174] Steensels J, Snoek T, Meersman E, et al. (2014) Improving industrial yeast strains: exploiting natural and artificial diversity. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38: 947-995. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12073
    [175] Basso LC, de Amorim HV, de Oliveira AJ, et al. (2008) Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res 8: 1155-1163. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00428.x
    [176] Kim JH, Ryu J, Huh IY, et al. (2014) Ethanol production from galactose by a newly isolated Saccharomyces cerevisiae KL17. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 37: 1871-1878. doi: 10.1007/s00449-014-1161-1
    [177] Deparis Q, Claes A, Foulquie-Moreno MR, et al. (2017) Engineering tolerance to industrially relevant stress factors in yeast cell factories. FEMS Yeast Res 17. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fox036
    [178] Demeke MM, Foulquie-Moreno MR, Dumortier F, et al. (2015) Rapid evolution of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae for xylose fermentation through formation of extra-chromosomal circular DNA. PLoS Genet 11: e1005010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005010
    [179] Wright SA (2017) Worldwide distilled spirits production. The alcohol textbook, 6 Eds 23-39.
    [180] Kumari R, Pramanik K (2013) Bioethanol production from Ipomoea carnea biomass using a potential hybrid yeast strain. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 171: 771-785. doi: 10.1007/s12010-013-0398-5
    [181] Ariyajaroenwong P, Laopaiboon P, Jaisil P, et al. (2012) Repeated-batch ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice by Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilized on sweet sorghum stalks. Energies 5: 1215-1228. doi: 10.3390/en5041215
    [182] Argyros DA, Stonehouse EA (2017) Yeast train improvement for alcohol production. The alcohol textbook 287-297.
    [183] Ingledew WM (2017) Very high gravity (VHG) and associated new technologies for fuel alcohol production. The alcohol textbook 363-376.
    [184] Matsushika A, Inoue H, Kodaki T, et al. (2009) Ethanol production from xylose in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84: 37-53. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2101-x
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. María Sancho, Radioactive waste management and disposal – introduction to the special issue, 2023, 10, 2372-0352, 125, 10.3934/environsci.2023007
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(30988) PDF downloads(2693) Cited by(394)

Figures and Tables

Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog