Research article Special Issues

Microbial quality of edible seeds commercially available in southern Portugal

  • In the present work, the microbiological quality of sesame, flaxseed, chia, pumpkin sunflower seeds, a mix of seeds, as well as flaxseed flour, marketed in southern Portugal, were studied through the counting of aerobic microorganisms at 30 °C (AM), molds and yeast (M&Y), Escherichia coli (β-glucuronidase positive) (β-GP E. coli), Staphylococcus coagulase positive, and detection of Salmonella spp. The persistence of AM and M&Y populations were also counted in organic and non-organic flaxseed at 20 °C for 11 months. The seeds with the highest average of AM were flaxseed (1.3 x 106 CFU/g) followed by flaxseed flour (1.1 x 106 CFU/g) while the lowest level was found in chia (2.9 x 104 CFU/g). This seed also presented the lowest average values of filamentous fungi (9.8 x 102 CFU/g), whereas sunflower seeds had the highest levels (1.7 x 105 CFU/g). Flaxseed flour had the highest yeast counts (1.5 x 104 CFU/g). Although some samples had high levels of AM and fungi, β-GP E. coli and Salmonella were not detected, therefore, they complied with the microbiological criteria of the European Union. The organic flaxseed contained higher numbers of AM and M&Y than the non-organic ones (p < 0.05). In addition, the storage of flaxseed at 20 °C resulted in changes of AM and M&Y, showing that these populations were able to remain viable after eleven months (AM Log 5.4–Log 5.6; M&Y Log 2.8–Log 4.1). The results obtained in the present study, namely those high levels of AM and fungi (>106 and 104 CFU/g respectively), alert to the need of improving processing practices, storage/distribution conditions of edible seeds and derivatives, as well as the requirement of implementing adequate decontamination techniques.

    Citation: Daniela Silva, Patrícia Nunes, Jessie Melo, Célia Quintas. Microbial quality of edible seeds commercially available in southern Portugal[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(1): 42-52. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022004

    Related Papers:

    [1] Cheng Zhen, Xian-Feng Ge, Yi-Ting Lu, Wen-Zheng Liu . Chemical structure, properties and potential applications of surfactin, as well as advanced strategies for improving its microbial production. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(2): 195-217. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023012
    [2] Karina Sałek, Tony Gutierrez . Surface-active biopolymers from marine bacteria for potential biotechnological applications. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(2): 92-107. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.2.92
    [3] O. Roger Anderson . Marine and estuarine natural microbial biofilms: ecological and biogeochemical dimensions. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(3): 304-331. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.3.304
    [4] Paola Ortiz-Ojeda, Katty Ogata-Gutiérrez, Doris Zúñiga-Dávila . Evaluation of plant growth promoting activity and heavy metal tolerance of psychrotrophic bacteria associated with maca (Lepidium meyenii Walp.) rhizosphere. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(2): 279-292. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.2.279
    [5] Paola Brun . The profiles of dysbiotic microbial communities. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(1): 87-101. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.1.87
    [6] Thomas Bintsis . Microbial pollution and food safety. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(3): 377-396. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.377
    [7] Patrick Di Martino . Antimicrobial agents and microbial ecology. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(1): 1-4. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022001
    [8] Alejandro Jiménez-Gómez, Lorena Celador-Lera, María Fradejas-Bayón, Raúl Rivas . Plant probiotic bacteria enhance the quality of fruit and horticultural crops. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 483-501. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.483
    [9] George P. Stamou, Sotiris Konstadinou, Nikolaos Monokrousos, Anna Mastrogianni, Michalis Orfanoudakis, Christos Hassiotis, Urania Menkissoglu-Spiroudi, Despoina Vokou, Efimia M. Papatheodorou . The effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and essential oil on soil microbial community and N-related enzymes during the fungal early colonization phase. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 938-959. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.938
    [10] Nieves Barros, Sergio Feijoo, César Pérez-Cruzado, Lee D. Hansen . Effect of soil storage at 4 °C on the calorespirometric measurements of soil microbial metabolism. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 762-773. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.762
  • In the present work, the microbiological quality of sesame, flaxseed, chia, pumpkin sunflower seeds, a mix of seeds, as well as flaxseed flour, marketed in southern Portugal, were studied through the counting of aerobic microorganisms at 30 °C (AM), molds and yeast (M&Y), Escherichia coli (β-glucuronidase positive) (β-GP E. coli), Staphylococcus coagulase positive, and detection of Salmonella spp. The persistence of AM and M&Y populations were also counted in organic and non-organic flaxseed at 20 °C for 11 months. The seeds with the highest average of AM were flaxseed (1.3 x 106 CFU/g) followed by flaxseed flour (1.1 x 106 CFU/g) while the lowest level was found in chia (2.9 x 104 CFU/g). This seed also presented the lowest average values of filamentous fungi (9.8 x 102 CFU/g), whereas sunflower seeds had the highest levels (1.7 x 105 CFU/g). Flaxseed flour had the highest yeast counts (1.5 x 104 CFU/g). Although some samples had high levels of AM and fungi, β-GP E. coli and Salmonella were not detected, therefore, they complied with the microbiological criteria of the European Union. The organic flaxseed contained higher numbers of AM and M&Y than the non-organic ones (p < 0.05). In addition, the storage of flaxseed at 20 °C resulted in changes of AM and M&Y, showing that these populations were able to remain viable after eleven months (AM Log 5.4–Log 5.6; M&Y Log 2.8–Log 4.1). The results obtained in the present study, namely those high levels of AM and fungi (>106 and 104 CFU/g respectively), alert to the need of improving processing practices, storage/distribution conditions of edible seeds and derivatives, as well as the requirement of implementing adequate decontamination techniques.



    Edible seeds bring color and flavor, in addition to essential nutrients to a huge variety of dishes, which can include snacks, drinks, breakfast, salads, desserts, among others [1]. Nutritionally, they are an excellent source of protein, fiber and fat, and are among the richest vegetable sources in α-linoleic acid, being approximately 60% of the total fatty acid content of seeds [2]. Some authors have also measured high levels of antidiabetic and antioxidant agents in seeds [3]. Several edible seeds are consumed mainly because of their nutritional, phytochemical and therapeutic potential. Flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum) is a good source of lignans, which appear to have antioxidant properties [4]. Pumpkin seeds (Curcubita sp.) are also associated to health benefits specially in preventing prostate cancer and as potential functional foods [5],[6]. Other seeds, such as sesame (Sesamum indicum), are rich in oil (50%) and contain minor nutrients in high levels, for example, iron and calcium [7]. Dietary fibers and high amounts of phytochemicals are present in chia seeds (Salvia hispanica) which could mean a benefit to consumers health and its usage in food industries has increased [8]. The sunflower (Helianthus annus) seeds are rich in folic acid, which is important for pregnant women's cellular metabolism [9].

    These food products are grown, harvested, cleaned and mechanically sorted in a similar way to cereals. In some situations, they are subjected to drying processes, such as sunflower seeds [10]. Therefore, microbial colonization in edible seeds is affected by the practices and conditions that occur during pre-harvest, harvest and post-harvest processing. During the pre-harvest, growing plants are susceptible to a wide range of microbial contamination sources, for example: the soil, animal excrement and irrigation water quality. Harvesting includes several stages, such as collecting, classification, packaging and transportation, and in these stages contaminating microbial agents can be introduced through cross-contamination from equipment, containers, transport vehicles and workers. In the post-harvest, possible sources of contamination are materials and equipment, lack of hygiene and even handlers and environments. Size reduction operations, such as in the production of flours, are also responsible for increasing microbial contamination in seed derivatives, when subjected to milling or other size reduction operations. Although seeds are low water activity (aW) foods and generally considered microbiologically safe [11],[12], various outbreaks have been reported in different parts of the world. In 2002, outbreaks caused by Salmonella were identified in Australia and New Zealand, associated with the consumption of imported tahini (sesame paste) [13]. Between 2007 and 2008, a study was carried out in the United Kingdom to assess the microbiological safety of edible seeds through the detection of Salmonella spp. and enumeration of Escherichia coli. In this study, which involved 3,735 seed samples, Salmonella spp. was detected in 0.6% of the samples, of which 57% were sesame seeds. The rest of the contaminated samples were seed mixtures, sunflower seeds, melon seeds and flaxseed. In the same study, E. coli was detected in 9% of the samples, with 1.5% containing unsatisfactory values (≥102 CFU/g) [10]. However, higher values of Salmonella prevail in sesame (12%) and chia (31%) were detected by Arana et al [14]. In 2014, a chia seed meal was associated with an outbreak of Salmonella, which involved 63 cases recorded in Canada and 31 in the United States [15]. In addition, in the United States, several edible seeds, such as chia, sunflower and pumpkin seeds, have been subjected to multiple recalls from the market due to the presence of Salmonella [15]. The same authors alerted to Salmonella outbreaks caused by contaminated sprouts derived from previously contaminated dried seeds. The presence of Salmonella in seeds is worrying as it has been shown that low aW values and high lipid concentrations seem to have a protective effect on Salmonella [16]. In addition, Nascimento et al [17] alert to the fact that high fat concentrations protect these bacteria from gastric acidity. Furthermore, edible seeds are usually eaten raw or minimally processed as they are added to snacks/dishes which are consumed without any heat treatment. Considering the increasing consumption of edible seeds, the recorded outbreaks in recent years, along with the seeds withdrawal from the market in some countries, it is relevant to assess the microbiological quality of these foods. Moreover, there are no legal regulations or guidelines in the European Union that include microbiological criteria for edible seeds, although the European Commission [18],[19] imposes that food commodities should not contain pathogenic bacteria which represent public health risks.

    The present study intended to investigate the microbial quality of edible seeds and flaxseed flour available in the Portuguese commerce. A comparison of the microbial contamination of flaxseed obtained from organic and non-organic farming and the evaluation of the microbial populations during eleven months was also performed.

    The microbiological quality of 126 packed edible dried (not cooked) seeds and flaxseed flour acquired from commercial places in the municipality of Faro (Algarve) was evaluated. Different types of seeds were tested: sesame (18 samples); flaxseeds (18 samples); sunflower (18 samples); pumpkin (18 samples); and chia (18 samples) as well as a seed mixture (18 samples). The microbial quality of flaxseed flour (18 samples) was also assessed. All the samples were transported to the Microbiology Laboratory of the Institute of Engineering of the University of Algarve.

    The microbiological analyses were done following the methodologies described by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) with adaptations. The packed edible seed samples were assessed for aerobic microorganisms count at 30 °C (AM) [20], molds and yeasts (M&Y) [21], β-glucuronidase positive Escherichia coli (β-GP E. coli) [22], and coagulase positive staphylococci [23], as well as detection of Salmonella spp. [24].

    The methodology described in ISO 6579 [24] was carried out to detect Salmonella spp. The pre-enrichment step was done using 25 g (in duplicate) of each type of seeds diluted in 225 mL buffered peptone water (BPW, OXOID) and homogenized in a Stomacher (Model 400 Circulator, Seward, Norfolk, England) during three minutes. From this suspension the enumeration of E. coli, and staphylococci were also prepared. The remaining pre-enrichment was incubated at 37 °C for 18 h for the detection of Salmonella spp. After incubation, aliquots of the pre-enrichment mixture were inoculated in Rappaport-Vassiliadis Enrichment Broth (OXOID) and Muller-Kauffmann Tetrathionate-Novobiocin Broth (OXOID) and were incubated during 24 h at 41.4 °C and 37 °C, respectively. The suspensions were then plated out on the surface of two selective media, Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate Agar (SCHARLAU) and Brilliance Salmonella Agar (OXOID). After 24 h of incubation, the plates were examined for the presence of typical and non-typical colonies, which were then subjected to biochemical confirmation.

    Escherichia coli was enumerated according to the ISO 16649-2 [22] incorporating the aliquots of 1 mL the in Chromocult Triptone Bile X-glucuronide Agar (TBX) (MERCK) (in duplicate), following an incubation at 44 °C during 24 h. This method enumerates β-glucuronidase positive E. coli (β-GP E. coli).

    The enumeration of the coagulase positive staphylococci was done inoculating Baird-Parker medium (OXOID) with 0,1 mL of the dilution (in duplicate), followed by an incubation at 37 °C, during 24–48 h, according to the ISO 6888-1 (1999; Amd 1:2003) [23]. Typical and atypical colonies were tested for coagulase reaction using the Staphylase Test (OXOID).

    The counting of AM was done as described in the ISO 4833 [20]. Subsamples of ten grams of each seed package (in duplicate) were diluted in 90 mL of Ringer solution (OXOID) and homogenized in a stomacher (Model 400 Circulator, Seward, Norfolk, England) during three minutes. Inoculations were done in duplicate, incorporating aliquots (1 ml) of original mix and dilutions, in Plate Count Agar (SCHARLAU) following a 72-h incubation at 30 °C.

    The enumeration of M&Y was done following the ISO 21527-1 [21]. Subsamples of ten grams of each seed package (in duplicate) were diluted in 90 mL of Ringer solution (OXOID) and homogenized in a stomacher (Model 400 Circulator, Seward, Norfolk, England) during three minutes. Inoculations were done in duplicate, spreading the aliquots (0.1 mL) of original mix and dilutions on Dichloran Rose Bengal Chloramphenicol Agar (OXOID) following a 5–7 days incubation at 25 °C.

    In addition to the study of the microbial quality of packaged seeds described previously, the microbial quality of flaxseed sold in bulk resulting from organic and non-organic farming was done throughout a storage period of 11 months, at 20 °C. The seeds were divided in polyethylene packages (90 µm) containing 12 g each. The bags were closed with a soft vacuum (4 out of 10) and medium sealing (4 out of 10) using a packaging and sealing machine (Quick Pack, Speedy, Italy), and left at a constant temperature of 20 °C during 11 months. 20 bags of each type of seed were prepared. In the beginning of the study the flaxseeds were checked for Salmonella spp., β-GP E. coli, staphylococci as described previously, as well as for aerobic microorganisms at 30 °C (AM) and filamentous fungi and yeasts (M&Y). During the eleven-month storage, the seeds were only analyzed for the counting of AM and M&Y. In the first five months, the seeds were analyzed once a month and then three more times until the eleventh month. At every moment of analysis two bags of 12 g were studied for both type of flaxseed. The bulk seeds were purchased from local supermarkets and transported to the Microbiology Laboratory of the Institute of Engineering of the University of Algarve.

    Duplicates of the analyses were done for all samples. The minimum, maximum and average values of colony forming units (CFU/g) of each type of seed were recorded. Regarding the organic and non-organic flaxseed, the results were presented as the average ± standard deviation (log CFU/g). Statistically significant differences among samples were tested using a post-hoc comparison test (Tukey's test) at α = 0.05. The differences of AM and M&Y on flaxseed obtained from organic and non-organic throughout the time were assessed by factorial ANOVA. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. Statistics were carried out by IBM SPSS software version 27.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).

    In none of the tested samples (50 g) β-glucuronidase positive Escherichia coli (β-GP E. coli), coagulase positive staphylococci and Salmonella spp. were found, contrary to the results of Willis et al. [10] and Arana et al. [14] where some seed samples were contaminated with Salmonella and E. coli. However, in the present work the tested seeds revealed high levels of total microbiota including aerobic microorganisms counted at 30 °C (AM) and fungi (M&Y).

    Table 1.  Aerobic Microorganisms counted at 30 °C (AM) (CFU/g) of edible seeds and derivatives (N-Number of samples of each product; aMicrobial population in CFU/g of seed).
    Seed samples N <101 101–102 102–103 103–104 >104 Minimuma Maximuma Averagea
    Sesame 18 1 1 3 2 11 <1.0 x 10 8.0 x 106 6.0 x 105
    Flaxeed 18 1 4 13 7.9 x 102 9.4 x 106 1.3 x 106
    Pumpkin 18 4 14 3.6 x 102 6.8 x 105 1.2 x 105
    Sunflower 18 1 6 10 1 1.0 x 102 6.9 x 105 4.0 x 104
    Chia 18 1 11 3 3 8.0 x 101 2.3 x 105 2.9 x 104
    Mix of seeds 18 1 1 3 13 2.5 x 101 2.5 x 106 2.8 x 105
    Flaxseed flour 18 1 17 4.3 x 103 4.1 x 106 1.1 x 106

    Total 126 1 4 22 27 72 <1.0 x 10 9.4 x 106 5.0 x 105

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The AM ranged from values below 1.0 x 10 to 9.4 x 106 CFU/g (Table 1). About 42.86% of the samples studied, had values lower than or equal to 104 CFU/g. The seeds that presented a lower average level of this type of microbiota were the chia seeds (2.9 x 104 CFU/g). Those with the highest average level were flaxseeds (1.3 x 106 CFU/g), followed by flaxseed flour (1.1 x 106 CFU/g). In the study of Shah et al. [25] values between 104 and 105 CFU/g of AM for flaxseed and corresponding flour, respectively, were reported. These values are lower than those obtained in the present work. The results of Al-Bachir et al. [26], for sesame seeds, are also inferior to those obtained in the present study. The aforementioned author reported 3.16 Log CFU/g, while in the current work an average AM value of 5.79 Log CFU/g (6.0 x 105 CFU/g) was recorded.

    With regard to the counts of filamentous fungi, these microorganisms ranged between the detection limit (1.0 x 10) and 3.1x106 CFU/g (Table 2). About 27.78% of the samples studied, contained values less than or equal to 102 CFU/g. The seeds that presented a lower average level of this type of microbiota were the chia seeds (9.8 x 102 CFU/g). Those with the highest average level were sunflower seeds (1.7 x 105 CFU/g), followed by pumpkin seeds (9.8 x 103 CFU/g). Flaxseed flour was the product with the highest number of samples containing high numbers of filamentous fungi (>103 CFU/g), followed by flaxseed, sunflower and sesame seeds. Robertson et al. [27] enumerated filamentous fungi in sunflower seeds, having reported values of 4.11 Log CFU/g, lower than the average of counts enumerated in the samples analysed in the current work. Regarding the counts of filamentous fungi in sesame seeds, Al-Bachir [26] reported 2.28 Log CFU/g, a value lower than the average found in the present study (3.3 x 103 CFU/g).

    Table 2.  Filamentous fungi (CFU/g) in seeds and derivatives (N-Number of samples of each product; aMicrobial population in CFU/g of seed).
    Seed samples N <101 101–102 102–103 103–104 >104 Minimuma Maximuma Averagea
    Sesame 18 6 5 5 2 <1.0 x 10 1.4 x 104 3.3 x 103
    Flaxseed 18 3 1 7 7 <1.0 x 10 8.5 x 103 1.7 x 103
    Pumpkin 18 5 3 7 1 2 <1.0 x 10 1.5 x 105 9.8 x 103
    Sunfllour 18 1 3 6 5 3 <1.0 x 10 3.1 x 106 1.7 x 105
    Chia 18 5 3 7 2 1 <1.0 x 10 1.1 x 104 9.8 x 102
    Mix of seeds 18 2 12 3 1 <1.0 x 10 2.0 x 104 1.8 x 103
    Flaxseed flour 18 3 4 10 1 <1.0 x 10 1.4 x 104 2.3 x 103

    Total 126 25 10 48 33 10 <1.0 x 10 3.1 x 106 2.8 x 104

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The yeast counts in the seeds varied between the detection limit (1.0 x 10) and 9.6 x 106 CFU/g (Table 3). About 58.73% of the samples studied contained values less than or equal to 102 CFU/g. The seeds that presented a lower average level of this type of microbiota were sunflower seeds (1.4 x 10 CFU/g). The samples with the highest average level were flaxseed flour (1.5 x 104 CFU/g), followed by flaxseed (7.3 x 103 CFU/g). High levels of yeasts may result in product flavor change and also cause spoilage [28].

    According to the Portuguese guidelines, “Guide values for the evaluation/interpretation of the microbiological quality of ready-to-eat foods and surfaces of food preparation as well as distribution environment” [28], the existence of a large number of AM does not mean that the food product is contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms or spoiled but it may suggest that good practices were not followed during production, processing or storage. AM content may be high in case of non-compliance with good manufacturing practices, use of low-quality raw materials, deficient environment sanitation conditions, occurrence of cross contaminations, failure/ insufficient treatments and prolonged stay in inadequate conditions during shelf-life and distribution. In addition, the AM is also an adequate parameter to assess the potential for deterioration of the food/ingredient. In fact, levels higher than 106 CFU/g were found in 2, 3, 2 and 8 samples of sesame, flaxseed, mix of seeds and flaxseed flour, respectively, which indicate a high risk of degradation [28]. According to the guidelines from Luxembourg (Critéres microbiologiques des déenres alimentaires, Luxembourg) [29] values of filamentous fungi higher than 104 CFU/g (established for nuts and nut products and snack products) are associated with spoilage. In a number of samples of edible seeds studied, the filamentous fungi enumerated were higher than 104 CFU/g, namely in 2 samples of sesame, 2 of pumpkin, 3 of sunflower, 1 of chia, 1 of seed mixtures and 1 of flaxseed flour. In fact, one of the possible hazards with edible seeds is the high contamination by mycotoxins, resulting from the presence of certain species of filamentous fungi. Arroyo-Manzanares et al. [30] detected sunflower seeds contaminated with several mycotoxins and in the present work, 8 samples of sunflower seeds contained high levels of filamentous fungi.

    Table 3.  Yeasts (CFU/g) in seeds and derivatives (N-Number of samples of each product; aMicrobial population in CFU/g of seed).
    Seed samples N <101 101–102 102–103 103–104 >104 Minimuma Maximuma Averagea
    Sesame 18 14 2 2 <1.0 x 10 1.0 x 104 6.7 x 102
    Flaxseed 18 1 2 4 6 5 <1.0 x 10 3.2 x 104 7.3 x 103
    Pumpkin 18 7 3 3 3 2 <1.0 x 10 8.5 x 104 6.3 x 103
    Sunflower 18 16 1 1 <1.0 x 10 1.5 x 102 1.4 x 101
    Chia 18 12 3 3 <1.0 x 10 8.5 x 103 9.0 x 102
    Mix of seeds 18 9 3 3 2 1 <1.0 x 10 2.4 x 104 1.6 x 103
    Flaxseed flour 18 6 2 6 4 <1.0 x 10 9.6 x 104 1.5 x 104

    Total 126 65 9 18 22 12 <1.0 x 10 9.6 x 104 4.6 x 103

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In a second part of this work, the levels of AM and molds and yeasts (M&Y) in flaxseeds from organic and non-organic farming, available on the market, were compared. The variation of these populations in seeds conditioned at 20 °C for approximately 11 months was also studied (Figure 1). Initially, the biological seeds had an average AM population of 5.74 Log CFU/g and M&Y of 4.61 Log CFU/g, while the non-biological flaxseed had average levels of AM of 5.01 Log CFU/g and of M&Y of 3.14 Log CFU/g, being these differences statistically significant (p < 0.05). The AM population showed slight variations over time in the two types of samples. At the end of the storage period, the AM were recorded at average levels of 5.63 Log CFU/g in biological seeds, which was not significantly different from the value counted in non-biological seeds, 5.41 Log CFU/g (p > 0.05). No significant differences were detected in the levels of AM in the two types of flaxseed after day 97. The differences in the counting of M&Y in both type of seeds were significant (p < 0.05) during the storage period where the non-biological seeds presented levels of fungal contamination lower than those of the biological seeds, with average values of 2.81 Log CFU/g and 4.14 Log CFU/g, respectively, being recorded at the end of the study. According to Shah et al. [25] the AM population remained practically unchanged over a 36-week storage period. Edible seeds are foods of low aW (<0,70) [11] yet the AM and M&Y, in the present study, were able to remain viable for 11 months. In addition, Arana et al [14] found that Salmonella survived at least 240 days in chia and sesame seeds. Although edible seeds are low aW foods and perceived as microbiologically safe, there are some major concerns related to them. One of these concerns is the survival of some microorganisms, including spoilers and pathogenic, remaining viable for long periods of time (various months and even years). In addition, when these seeds are used as ingredients in the preparation of high aW foods, the microbial growth may be favored, leading to a faster degradation or being responsible for consumer diseases [11],[12].

    Figure 1.  Microbiological quality of biological flaxseeds and non-biological flaxseeds, during almost 11 months, at 20 °C (█ AM organic flaxseeds; ♦ AM non-organic flaxseeds; ○ M&Y organic flaxseeds; Δ M&Y non-organic flaxseeds) (Results are presented as the average ± standard deviation (log CFU/g)).

    The seeds studied in this work were purchased from several commercial brands, from several countries, produced in different climatic and environmental conditions, so the evaluation of microbiological quality results is related to intrinsic factors, but also to different production and processing conditions in various regions of the world. Seeds are exposed to a wide variety of contaminants, including fungi. This problem becomes a relevant issue in some countries where the characteristics of the climate, agricultural practices and storage conditions are favorable to fungal proliferation and consequently to toxin production [31].

    The results obtained in this study highlight the importance of improving manufacturing and hygiene practices at all levels of the production/processing chain in order to prevent and reduce microbial contamination of the final product. Critical control points should be identified throughout the various production/processing operations of edible seeds. These seeds are grown in extensive agriculture areas and collected, cleaned and sorted in similar ways to cereals. Willis et al. [10] call attention to the drying operation as a critical step which should include an adequate heat treatment to reduce unwanted microbiota. In most cases the drying process relies on the seeds distribution on the ground and left to dry in the sun. They may also be dried through the application of hot air in mechanically agitated equipment. Other authors [32] report that the roasting of seeds, an operation applied in some situations, contributes to the control of microbial contamination in this type of food. However, very high temperatures can negatively affect the nutritional quality of edible seeds. In all situations where decontamination treatments are applied, measures must be taken to avoid subsequent cross-contamination.

    Currently edible seeds are commercialized within global systems, where the source of cultivation and harvesting are distant from points of sale and these products may reach the consumers through a long and complex food chain. Therefore, food safety of edible seeds became a relevant public health issue in the current food market.

    Good agricultural practices should be implemented, coupled with good manufacturing practices by the food industry. Improved drying, storage and package conditions, along with appropriate decontamination techniques and good hygienic practices, such as equipment disinfection and hygiene control protocols are crucial guidelines to minimize the risk of cross contamination. This study highlights the potential hazard associated with the consumption of edible seeds and calls attention to the need of safer hygiene measures through all production stages in order to lower the microbial contamination reducing food degradation and public health threats.

    The present work gives an overview of the microbiological quality of edible seeds commercialized in Southern Portugal markets. The high number of filamentous fungi found in some samples warns to the potential of these foods as being vehicles for mycotoxins, representing a health hazard for consumers. The existence of microbial populations at high levels in a large number of samples, as well as their ability to remain viable, shows the importance of increasing microbiological control at certain steps of their production/processing/storage process. On the other hand, the high loads of fungi and yeasts on the organic flaxseed samples, compared to the non-organic ones reinforces the attention to the importance of an appropriate antimicrobial treatment, applied to the seeds to ensure a reduction on fungal contamination. It can also address the need for good hygiene measures during all stages of the chain, including food distribution and sale. Furthermore, training programs for farmers, manufacturers and traders should be encouraged by food safety authorities as part of an integrated strategy to improve the general microbiological quality of edible seeds.


    Acknowledgments



    This study received Portuguese national funds from FCT-Foundation for Science and Technology through project MED/UIDB/05183/2020.

    Conflict of interest



    All authors declare no conflict of interest.

    [1] Thomas H, Edgson V (2017) Amazing edible seeds: Health-Boosting and delicious recipes using nature's nutritional powerhouse. London: Jacqui Small 176.
    [2] Tamber S, Swist E, Oudit D (2016) Physicochemical and bacteriological characteristics of organic sprouted chia and flax seed powders implicated in a foodborne Salmonellosis outbreak. J Food Prot 79: 703-709. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-529
    [3] Ganorkar PM, Jain RK (2013) Flaxseed-a nutritional punch. Int Food Res J 20: 519-525.
    [4] Carraro JCC, Dantas MID, Espeschit ACR, et al. (2012) Flaxseed and human health: Reviewing benefits and adverse effects. Food Rev Int 28: 203-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2011.59502
    [5] Nunes P, Bhat R (2021) Valorization of seeds of genera Cucumis, Citrullus, and Cucurbita. Valorization of agri-food wastes and by-products. London: Academic Press 317-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824044-1.00016-7
    [6] Patel S, Rauf A (2017) Edible seeds from Cucurbitaceae family as potential functional foods: immense promises, few concerns. Biomed Pharmacother 91: 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.04.090
    [7] Agidew MG, Dubale AA, Atlabachew M, et al. (2021) Fatty acid composition, total phenolic contents and antioxidant activity of white and black sesame seed varieties from different localities of Ethiopia. Chem Biol Technol 8: 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-021-00215-w
    [8] Din Z, Alm M, Ullah H, et al. (2021) Nutritional, phytochemical and therapeutic potential of chia seed (Salvia hispanica L.), A mini-review. Food Hydrocoll for Health 1: 10010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhfh.2021.100010
    [9] Aishwarya S, Anisha V (2014) Nutritional composition of sunflower seeds flour and nutritive value of products prepared by incorporating sunflower seeds flour. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci 3: 45-49.
    [10] Willis C, Little CL, Sagoo S, et al. (2009) Assessment of the microbiological safety of edible dried seeds from retail premises in the United Kingdom with a focus on Salmonella spp. Food Microbiol 26: 847-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2009.05.007
    [11] Bechaut LR, Komitopoulou E, Beckers H, et al. (2013) Low-water activity foods: Increased concern as vehicles of foodborne pathogens. J Food Prot 76: 150-172. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-211
    [12] Chitrakar B, Zhang M, Adhikari B (2019) Dehydrated foods: Are they microbiologically safe?. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 59: 2734-2745. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1466265
    [13] Unicomb LE, Simmons G, Merritt T, et al. (2005) Sesame seed products contaminated with Salmonella: Three outbreaks associated with tahini. Epidemiol Infect 133: 1065-1072. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268805004085
    [14] Arana C, Peniche R, Martínez M, et al. (2021) Microbiological profile, incidence, and behavior of Salmonella on seeds traded in Mexican markets. J Food Prot 84: 99-105. https://doi.org/10.4315/JFP-19-595
    [15] Keller SE, Anderson NM, Wang C, et al. (2018) Survival of Salmonella during production of partially sprouted pumpkin, sunflower, and chia seeds dried for direct consumption. J Food Prot 81: 520-527. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-318
    [16] Podolak R, Enache H, Stone W, et al. (2010) Sources and risk factors for contamination, survival, persistence, and heat resistance of Salmonella in low moisture foods. J Food Prot 73: 1919-1936. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-73.10.1919
    [17] Nascimento MS, Brum DM, Pena PO, et al. (2012) Inactivation of Salmonella during cocoa roasting and chocolate conching. Int J Food Microbiol 159: 225-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.08.017
    [18] European commission (EC): Regulation 2073/2005. EU Official Journal 15/11/2005. L.338 1–26
    [19] European commission (EC): Regulation 1441/2007. EU Official Journal 5/12/2007. L.332 1–12
    [20] ISO 4833Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs–Horizontal methods for enumeration of microorganisms-Colony-count at 30 °C, International Organization for Standardization (2003).
    [21] ISO 21527-1.Microbiology-General guidance for enumeration of yeasts and molds. Colony count technique at 25 °C, International Organization for Standardization(2008) .
    [22] ISO 16649-2Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs-Horizontal method for the enumeration of β-glucuronidase-positive Escherichia coli-Part 2: Colony count technique at 44 °C using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl β-D International Organization for Standardization-glucuronide (2001).
    [23] ISO 6888-1Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs-Horizontal method for the enumeration of coagulase-positive staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus and other species)-Part 1: Technique using Baird-Parker agar medium International Organization for Standardization (1999, 2003).
    [24] ISO 6579Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs-Horizontal methods for the detection of Salmonella spp. International Organization for Standardization (2002).
    [25] Shah M, Eklund B, Lima LGC, et al. (2018) Microbial and chemical shelf-life of vacuum steam-pasteurized whole flaxseed and milled flaxseed. J Food Sci 83: 300-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14050
    [26] Al-Bachir M (2016) Some microbial, chemical and sensorial properties of gamma irradiated sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) seeds. Food Chem 197: 191-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.094
    [27] Robertson JA, Chapman GW, Wilson RL, et al. (1984) Effect of moisture content of oil type sunflower seed on fungal growth and seed quality during storage. J Am Oil Chem Soc 61: 768-771. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02672132
    [28] Saraiva M, Correia CB, Cunha IC, et al. Interpretação de resultados de ensaios microbiológicos em alimentos prontos para consumo e em superfícies do ambiente de preparação e distribuição alimentar (2019). Available from: http://www.insa.min-saude.pt/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/INSA_Valores-guia.pdf (In Portuguese)
    [29] Critères microbiologiques applicables aux denrées alimentaires Lignes directrices pour l'interprétationLe Gouvernement du Grand-Duché de Luxemburg, Ministére de la Santé, Luxembourg (2018).
    [30] Arroyo-Manzanares N, Huertas-Pérez JF, Gámiz-Gracia L, et al. (2013) A new approach in sample treatment combined with UHPLC-MS/MS for the determination of multiclass mycotoxins in edible nuts and seeds. Talanta 115: 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2013.04.024
    [31] Aziz NH, El-Far FM, Shahin AAM, et al. (2007) Control of Fusarium moulds and fumonisin B1 in seeds by gamma-irradiation. Food Control 18: 1337-1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.12.013
    [32] Torlak E, Sert D, Serin P (2013) Fate of Salmonella during sesame seeds roasting and storage of tahini. Int J Food Microbiol 163: 214-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.03.010
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Geneviève Coulombe, Sandeep Tamber, Salmonella enterica Outbreaks Linked to the Consumption of Tahini and Tahini-Based Products, 2022, 10, 2076-2607, 2299, 10.3390/microorganisms10112299
    2. A. V. Sinelnikov, T. V. Kolganova, R. V. Ulanova, Obtaining Analogues of Fermented Milk Products from Seed Meal Using New Strains of Lactic Acid Bacteria, 2024, 60, 0003-6838, 476, 10.1134/S0003683824603664
    3. Catelyn Bridges, Robert Hardin, Janie McClurkin-Moore, Changes in cottonseed meal quality during post-harvest processing of cottonseed, 2024, 108, 0022474X, 102371, 10.1016/j.jspr.2024.102371
    4. A. V. Sinelnikov, T. V. Kolganova, R. V. Ulanova, Obtaining analogues of fermented milk products from seed meal using new strains of lactic acid bacteria, 2024, 60, 0555-1099, 294, 10.31857/S0555109924030088
    5. Jovana Petrović, Daiana Almeida, Ângela Fernandes, Dejan Stojković, Dragana Robajac, Tayse F.F. da Silveira, Lillian Barros, Exploring the potential of underrated yet versatile crop Lunaria annua L.: new insights into honesty plant, 2025, 24058440, e42248, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42248
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3488) PDF downloads(214) Cited by(5)

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog