Research article Special Issues

An efficient numerical algorithm for solving fractional SIRC model with salmonella bacterial infection

  • This paper revisits the study of numerical approaches for fractional SIRC model with Salmonella bacterial infection (FSIRC-MSBI). This model is investigated by the aid of fully shifted Jacobi's collocation method for temporal discretization. It is concluded that the method of the current paper is far more efficient and reliable for the considered model. Numerical results illustrate the performance efficiency of the algorithm. The results also point out that the scheme can lead to spectral accuracy of the studied model.

    Citation: Rubayyi T. Alqahtani, M. A. Abdelkawy. An efficient numerical algorithm for solving fractional SIRC model with salmonella bacterial infection[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 3784-3793. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020212

    Related Papers:

    [1] Rahat Zarin, Usa Wannasingha Humphries, Amir Khan, Aeshah A. Raezah . Computational modeling of fractional COVID-19 model by Haar wavelet collocation Methods with real data. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(6): 11281-11312. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023500
    [2] H. M. Srivastava, Khaled M. Saad, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, Abdulrhman A. Almadiy . Some new mathematical models of the fractional-order system of human immune against IAV infection. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 4942-4969. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020268
    [3] Biplab Dhar, Praveen Kumar Gupta, Mohammad Sajid . Solution of a dynamical memory effect COVID-19 infection system with leaky vaccination efficacy by non-singular kernel fractional derivatives. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(5): 4341-4367. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022201
    [4] M. Botros, E. A. A. Ziada, I. L. EL-Kalla . Semi-analytic solutions of nonlinear multidimensional fractional differential equations. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 13306-13320. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022623
    [5] Jutarat Kongson, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Apichat Neamvonk, Jehad Alzabut, Weerawat Sudsutad . Investigation of fractal-fractional HIV infection by evaluating the drug therapy effect in the Atangana-Baleanu sense. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(11): 10762-10808. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022504
    [6] Ilse Domínguez-Alemán, Itzel Domínguez-Alemán, Juan Carlos Hernández-Gómez, Francisco J. Ariza-Hernández . A predator-prey fractional model with disease in the prey species. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(3): 3713-3741. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024164
    [7] Alia M. Alzubaidi, Hakeem A. Othman, Saif Ullah, Nisar Ahmad, Mohammad Mahtab Alam . Analysis of Monkeypox viral infection with human to animal transmission via a fractional and Fractal-fractional operators with power law kernel. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(4): 6666-6690. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023287
    [8] Ishtiaq Ali . Bernstein collocation method for neutral type functional differential equation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(3): 2764-2774. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021140
    [9] Simphiwe M. Simelane, Justin B. Munyakazi, Phumlani G. Dlamini, Oluwaseun F. Egbelowo . Projections of human papillomavirus vaccination and its impact on cervical cancer using the Caputo fractional derivative. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(7): 11605-11626. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023515
    [10] Saima Akter, Zhen Jin . A fractional order model of the COVID-19 outbreak in Bangladesh. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 2544-2565. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023119
  • This paper revisits the study of numerical approaches for fractional SIRC model with Salmonella bacterial infection (FSIRC-MSBI). This model is investigated by the aid of fully shifted Jacobi's collocation method for temporal discretization. It is concluded that the method of the current paper is far more efficient and reliable for the considered model. Numerical results illustrate the performance efficiency of the algorithm. The results also point out that the scheme can lead to spectral accuracy of the studied model.



    In the last decades, fractional calculus theory [1,2,3,4] has been developed rapidly. It has been applied in several scientific areas like physics, economic, diffusion processes, serology, engineering, etc. [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Actually, fractional calculus theory was spotted as a veritable development to classical calculus theory. Large amount of work on modelling biological systems has been restricted to fractional order ordinary differential equations [11,12]. Therefore, the urgent necessity to find the exact solutions or merely the approximate ones to these problems has emerged. Whereas obtaining the exact solution is complicated to get, the numerical solution as an alternative was appeared and its methods were developed.

    Mathematical modelling of infectious diseases has been studied for a long time. The classical susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) model has been introduced in [13] and several studies have investigated the dynamical behaviors of SIR model [14,15]. Casagrandi et al. [16] developed SIR model by introducing a new compartment called cross-immune compartment. The new development of SIR model named by SIRC model which describes the case between the fully susceptible and the fully protected one. More recently, the fractional-order SIRC model, a disease in human population, was discussed in [17,18,19].

    Salmonella infection [20] is a common disease caused by the Salmonella bacteria. It affects on the intestinal tract in which develop consequently diarrhea, fever, and abdominal cramps. Salmonella infection is usually considered as the public health issue. The objective of this work is to introduce an efficient numerical algorithm for solving FSIRC-MSBI.

    In many areas of sciences such as engineering, biology, economics, physics and others, several high-order numerical methods have been developed to deal with the related problems. Recently, spectral methods are known as an efficient and highly accurate schemes. Exponential rate of convergence and a high level of accuracy are the main characteristic of spectral methods. The spectral method is classified into four kinds namely collocation [20], tau [21], Galerkin [22] and Petrov Galerkin [23] methods. Here, shifted Jacobi Gauss-Radau collocation (SJ-GR-C) method is developed to approximate the system of a FSIRC-MSBI.

    The paper is organized as follows. We present some mathematical preliminaries in section 2. In sections 3, we propose a numerical technique for solving system of a FSIRC-MSBI. Section 4 implements the proposed method on an example to show its accuracy and efficiency. Finally, in section 5 we outline the main conclusions.

    For shifted Jacobi polynomial P(ρ,σ)L,k(x)=P(ρ,σ)k(2xL1),L>0, where P(ρ,σ)k(x) is the standard Jacobi polynomial [24,25], the analytic formula is

    P(ρ,σ)L,k(x)=kj=0(1)kjΓ(k+σ+1)Γ(j+k+ρ+σ+1)Γ(j+σ+1)Γ(k+ρ+σ+1)(kj)!j!Ljxj=kj=0Γ(k+ρ+1)Γ(k+j+ρ+σ+1)j!(kj)!Γ(j+ρ+1)Γ(k+ρ+σ+1)Lj(xL)j. (1)

    Taking w(ρ,σ)L(x)=(Lx)ρxσ, for the weighted space L2w(ρ,σ)L[0,L], we get

    (φ,ϕ)w(ρ,σ)L=L0φ(x)ϕ(x)w(ρ,σ)L(x)dx
    ϕ2w(ρ,σ)L=(ϕ,ϕ)w(ρ,σ)L,P(ρ,σ)L,k2w(ρ,σ)L=(L2)ρ+σ+1h(ρ,σ)k. (2)

    We used t(ρ,σ)S,s,and(ρ,σ)S,s,0sS, for the nodes and Christoffel numbers of the Jacobi Gauss Radau interpolation. Related to the shifted Jacobi polynomials, we list

    t(ρ,σ)L,S,s=L2(t(ρ,σ)S,s+1),
    w(ρ,σ)L,S,s=(L2)ρ+σ+1w(ρ,σ)S,s,0sS.

    Given R0, ΩS2R+1[0,L] and by means of Jacobi-Gauss quadrature property, we obtain

    L0(Lt)ρtσΩ(t)dt=(L2)ρ+σ+111(1t)ρ(1+t)σΩ(L2(t+1))dt=(L2)ρ+σ+1Ss=0w(ρ,σ)S,sΩ(L2(t(ρ,σ)S,s+1))=Ss=0w(ρ,σ)L,S,sΩ(t(ρ,σ)L,S,s). (3)

    The fractional derivative is occurred in various formulas which are not generally equal, see [26]. The two most famous definitions are Riemann-Liouville and Caputo ones.

    Definition 2.1. For ν>0, the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral is

    JνF(x)=1Γ(ν)ξ0(ξζ)ν1F(ζ)dζ,ν>0,ξ>0,J0F(ξ)=f(ξ), (4)

    where

    Γ(ν)=0xν1exdx,

    is gamma function.

    Definition 2.2. For ν>0, the Caputo fractional derivatives is

    DνF(x)=1Γ(mν)ξ0(ξζ)mν1dmdtmf(ζ)dζ,m1<νm,ξ>0, (5)

    where m is the ceiling function of ν.

    In this work, we want to numerically solve the FSIRC-MSBI. The classical disease model is given as

    ˙S=Ω1(t,S,C,I,R)=μN+ηC(t)(βI(t)+μ)S(t),˙I=Ω2(t,S,C,I,R)=βS(t)I(t)+σβI(t)C(t)(θ+m+μ)I(t),˙R=Ω3(t,S,C,I,R)=(1σ)βC(t)I(t)+θI(t)(μ+δ)R(t),˙C=Ω4(t,S,C,I,R)=δR(t)βC(t)I(t)(μ+η)C(t), (6)

    where θ1,μ,η1,δ1,β,ρ are the infectious period, the mortality rate in every compartment, crossimmune period, the total immune period, the contact rate and the fraction of the exposed cross immune individuals, respectively. While, S,I,R,C are the proportion of susceptible individuals, the proportion of infected individuals, the proportion of recovered individuals and the proportionthe total number of herd animals is N=S+I+R+C. The more general class of the previous system is called FSIRC-MSBI and is given by:

    Dν1S(t)=Ω1(t,S,C,I,R),S(0)=S0,Dν2I(t)=Ω2(t,S,C,I,R),I(0)=0,Dν3R(t)=Ω3(t,S,C,I,R),R(0)=0,Dν4C(t)=Ω4(t,S,C,I,R),C(0)=0. (7)

    We use SJ-GR-C technique to solve FSIRC-MSBI. The main idea is to reduce FSIRC-MSBI to a system of algebraic equations that easily solved. To do this, Shifted Jacobi polynomials are appointed for the temporal discretization. The efficiency of our technique will examine via a numerical test problem.

    Firstly, we rewrite the system (7), as

    DνΨ(t)=F(t,Ψ(t)), (8)

    where

    DνΨ=(Dν1S(t)Dν1I(t)Dν1R(t)Dν1C(t))=(Ω1(t,S,C,I,R)Ω2(t,S,C,I,R)Ω3(t,S,C,I,R)Ω4(t,S,C,I,R)).

    Via SJ-GR-C method, we approximate the independent variable at t(ρ,σ)L,N,j, where t(ρ,σ)L,N,i is a Jacobi-Gauss-Radau collocation nodes.

    The approximate solution of (8) is

    ψi(t)=Nj=0aijP(ρ,σ)L,j(t),i=1,2,3,4. (9)

    the fractional derivative Dνψi(t) is

    Dνψi(t)=Nj=0aijDν(P(ρ,σ)L,j(t)),i=1,2,3,4. (10)

    And using analytical form of shifted Jacobi polynomial, we find

    DνP(ρ,σ)L,j(x)=P(ρ,σ,ν)L,j(t)=jk=0(1)jkΓ(j+σ+1)Γ(k+j+ρ+σ+1)Γ(k+σ+1)Γ(j+ρ+σ+1)(jk)!k!LkDνtk=jk=0(1)jk(Γ(k+1)Γ(j+σ+1)Γ(j+k+ρ+σ+1))k!Lk(jk)!Γ(k+σ+1)Γ(k+ν)Γ(j+ρ+σ+1)tk+ν1. (11)

    Then

    Dνψi(t)=Nj=maijDν(P(ρ,σ)L,j(t))=Nj=maijP(ρ,σ,ν)L,j(t). (12)

    Consequently

    Ψ(ν)(t)=F(t), (13)

    where

    Ψ(ν)(t)=(Nj=ma1jP(ρ,σ,ν1)L,j(t)Nj=ma2jP(ρ,σ,ν2)L,j(t)Nj=ma3jP(ρ,σ,ν3)L,j(t)Nj=ma4jP(ρ,σ,ν4)L,j(t))F(t)=(Ω1(t,Nj=0a1jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t),Nj=0a2jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t),Nj=0a3jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t),Nj=0a4jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t))Ω2(t,Nj=0a1jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t),Nj=0a2jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t),Nj=0a3jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t),Nj=0a4jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t))Ω3(t,Nj=0a1jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t),Nj=0a2jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t),Nj=0a3jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t),Nj=0a4jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t))Ω4(t,Nj=0a1jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t),Nj=0a2jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t),Nj=0a3jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t),Nj=0a4jP(ρ,σ)L,j(t))) (14)

    Let t=t(ρ,σ)L,N,r, to get

    Ψ(ν)(t(ρ,σ)L,N,r)=F(t(ρ,σ)L,N,r),r=1,2,,N. (15)

    Also, we have

    Nj=0a1jP(ρ,σ)L,j(0)=S0,Nj=0aijP(ρ,σ)L,j(0)=0,i=2,3,4, (16)

    merge Eqs (15) and (16), to build a system of (4N+4) algebraic equations that easily solved. The existence and uniqueness are realized by the following theories.

    Theorem 3.1. Let 0μ<ν<1 and let F:[0,L]×RR be a given function continuous in (0,L]×R. Assume that tμF(t,ψ) is a continuous function on (0,L]×R. Then the fractional differential equation

    DνΨ(t)=F(t,Ψ(t)), (17)

    has at least a continuous solution defined on [0,L], d for a suitable dL.

    Theorem 3.2. Let 0μ<ν<1 and assume tμF(t,ψ) is continuous on (0,L]×R. Assume further

    F(t,φ)F(t,ϕ)∥≤Ttμφϕ, (18)

    for some positive constant T independent of φ,ϕR and t[0,L]. Then the equation

    DνΨ(t)=F(t,Ψ(t)), (19)

    has a unique solution φC0[0,L]. The proofs of the previous theories can directly obtain from [27].

    Using Lagrange interpolation polynomials, we introduce an upper bound of the absolute errors.

    Theorem 4.1. Suppose that Dkχ(x)C[0,L] for k=0,1,...,N1,(3+2N+σ)>0. If χN(x) is the best approximation to χ(x) from FN, then the error bound is presented as follows

    χ(x)χN(x)W(ρ,σ)L,f(x)Eγ(ρ+1)Γ((N+1)+1)L(2N+ρ+3)Γ(3+2N+σ)Γ(4+2N+ρ+σ) (20)

    Proof. Since χN(x) is the best approximation to χ(x) from FN, then by the definition of the best approximation, we have

    VN(x)FN,χ(x)χN(x)W(ρ,σ)L,f(x)≤∥χ(x)VN(x)W(ρ,σ)L,f(x) (21)

    Based on the generalized Taylors formula [28], we obtain VN(x)=Nk=0xkΓ(k+1)Dkχ(0+), then

    |χ(x)Nk=0xkΓ(k+1)Dkχ(0+)|Ex(N+1)Γ((N+1)+1).

    Then, we conclude the following

    χ(x)χN(x)2W(ρ,σ)L,f(x)≤∥χ(x)Nk=0xkΓ(k+1)Dkχ(0+)2W(ρ,σ)L,f(x)E2(Γ((N+1)+1))2L0x2(N+1)W(ρ,σ)L,f(x)dxE2(Γ((N+1)+1))2L0x2(N+1)(Lx)ρxσdxL(2N+ρ+3)E2(Γ((N+1)+1))210x2(N+1)+σ(1x)ρdxL(2N+ρ+3)E2γ(ρ+1)Γ(3+2N+σ)Γ(4+2N+ρ+σ)(Γ((N+1)+1))2. (23)

    Thus, an upper bound of the absolute error is acquired.

    Using the algorithm presented in the previous section, we give in this section some numerical results. We discuss the FSIRC-MSBI (8) with the following values of parameters:

    μ=0.11,σ=0.15,θ=0.16,m=0.41,
    η=0.5,σ=0.6,δ=0.5,S0=Nt=345.

    Using the previous algorithm, we numerically treat with the previous equation and the related conditions. We plot the numerical solutions curves of FSIRC-MSBI with values of parameters listed above in Figure 1, where ν1=0.9,ν2=0.5,ν3=0.4,ν4=0.8 and n=20. We observe that, the numerical solutions curves of FSIRC-MSBI are matching with the increment of N. Taking ν1=0.9,ν2=0.5,ν3=0.4,ν4=0.8 and N=20, we obtain the numerical solutions curves of FSIRC-MSBI as:

    s(t)=2.266631510931309314t204.51875061753910212t19+4.16317329073499310t182.35165406129359378t17+9.1115148229469757t160.0000256664t15+0.000543643t140.00883285t13+0.111316t121.09319t11+8.35991t1049.4985t9+224.439t8766.155t7+1920.76t63413.07t5+4082.39t43039.73t3+1242.89t2254.087t+345,
    i(t)=8.881781016+13.1658t139.698t2+485.673t3828.835t4+829.952t5539.16t6+242.091t778.3949t8+18.8519t93.43483t10+0.480438t110.0519666t12+0.00435508t130.000281732t14+0.0000139229t155.15539×107t16+1.38363108t172.54027×1010t18+2.8527×1012t191.477381014t20,
    r(t)=5.551121016+3.23093t28.4521t2+88.0133t3138.078t4+129.504t579.7545t6+34.2339t710.6626t8+2.47775t90.437851t10+0.0595744t110.00628352t12+0.00051453t130.0000325786t14+1.57814×106t155.73525×108t16+1.51241×109t172.73096×1011t18+3.01896×1013t191.54027×1015t20,
    c(t)=5.55112×1017+2.24331t14.3887t2+36.4142t349.226t4+40.958t522.7984t6+8.96153t72.58105t8+0.558842t90.0925786t10+0.0118684t110.00118452t12+0.0000921207t135.55759106t14+2.57246×107t158.95598×109t16+2.26773×1010t173.94014×1012t18+4.19918×1014t192.06912×1016t20.
    Figure 1.  Numerical solutions curves of FSIRC-MSBI, where ν1=0.9,ν2=0.5,ν3=0.4,ν4=0.8 and N=20.

    FSIRC-MSBI is only solved by Rihan et al. [29]. The numerical technique [29] is mentioned as local technique. However, they face complicated treatment due to the nonlocal fractional operator. Otherwise, these methods obtained the approximate solution at given points, whereas the global ones give it in entire domain, consequently, these techniques surely be the preferable. Collocation methods have exponential convergence rates as well as a high accuracy level. Thus, collocation technique surely is the preferable.

    Expanding and development Collocation method for solving FSIRC-MSBI is our aspired. Our aspired was achieved via SJ-GR-C method. We listed an illustrative example to appear the effectiveness and applicability of our method. The results demonstrated that the spectral collection method is effective. The results clarified that the accuracy is achieved even use comparatively few nodes and then lower computational operations. We must emphasize that this method also excelled over other approximated methods. By word, if we have a problem with not smooth solution, the accuracy of the majority techniques may be deteriorated. That would be stopped merely exchanging fractional order Jacobi instead of the Jacobi polynomial [30], also could using smoothing mapping. Finally, we indicated that our algorithm can be used to handle various biological models like novel nonlinear fractal coronavirus (COVID-19) [31].

    The authors thank the Deanship of Scientific research of Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) for their fund to support this research in 1439, Grant number: 381208.

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] M. Al-Smadi, O. A. Arqub, Computational algorithm for solving fredholm time-fractional partial integrodifferential equations of dirichlet functions type with error estimates, Appl. Math. Comput., 342 (2019), 280-294.
    [2] S. Qureshi, A. Yusuf, Mathematical modeling for the impacts of deforestation on wildlife species using Caputo differential operator, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 126 (2019), 32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.05.037
    [3] E. Bas, B. Acay, The direct spectral problem via local derivative including truncated Mittag-Leffler function, Appl. Math. Comput., 367 (2020), 124787.
    [4] B. Acay, E. Bas, T. Abdeljawad, Non-local fractional calculus from different viewpoint generated by truncated M-derivative, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 366 (2020), 112410. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2019.112410
    [5] B. Acay, E. Bas, T. Abdeljawad, Fractional economic models based on market equilibrium in the frame of different type kernels, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 130 (2020), 109438. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109438
    [6] F. Songa, C. Xu, Spectral direction splitting methods for two-dimensional space fractional diffusion equations, J. Comput. phys., 299 (2015), 196-214. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.07.011
    [7] S. Qureshi, A. Yusuf, Fractional derivatives applied to MSEIR problems: Comparative study with real world data, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 134 (2019), 171. doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12661-7
    [8] A. A. Al-nana, O. A. Arqub, M. Al-Smadi, N. Shawagfeh, Fitted spectral Tau Jacobi technique for solving certain classes of fractional differential equations, Appl. Math, 13 (2019) 979-987.
    [9] S. Qureshi, A. Yusuf, Modeling chickenpox disease with fractional derivatives: From caputo to atangana-baleanu, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 122 (2019), 111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.03.020
    [10] R. Mollapourasl, A. Ostadi, On solution of functional integral equation of fractional order, Appl. Math. Comput., 270 (2015), 631-643.
    [11] X. Shu, F. Xub, Y. Shi, S-asymptotically ω-positive periodic solutions for a class of neutral fractional differential equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 270 (2015), 768-776.
    [12] N. Sahin, S. Yuzbasi, M. Gulsu, A collocation approach for solving systems of linear Volterra integral equations with variable coefficients, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 755-769. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.05.057
    [13] W. O. Kermack, A. G. McKendrick, Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics, Proc. R. Soc. London, 115 (1927), 700-721.
    [14] A. Korobeinikov, Lyapunov functions and global stability for SIR and SIRS epidemiological models with non-linear transmission, Bull. Math. Biol., 68 (2006), 615-626. doi: 10.1007/s11538-005-9037-9
    [15] Y. Cha, Stability change of an epidemic model, Dyn. Syst. Appl., 9 (2000), 361-376.
    [16] R. Casagrandi, L. Bolzoni, S. A. Levin, V. Andreasen, The SIRC model and influenza A, Math. Biosci., 200 (2006), 152-169. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2005.12.029
    [17] S. Hasan, A. Al-Zoubi, A. Freihet, M. Al-Smadi, S. Momani, Solution of fractional SIR epidemic model using residual power series method, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., 13 (2019), 1-9. doi: 10.18576/amis/13S101
    [18] S. Hasan, A. El-Ajou, S. Hadid, M. Al-Smadi, S. Momani, Atangana-Baleanu fractional framework of reproducing kernel technique in solving fractional population dynamics system, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 133 (2020), 109624. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109624
    [19] M. El-Shahed, A. Alsaedi, The fractional SIRC model and influenza A, Math. Probl. Eng., 2011 (2011).
    [20] M. A. Abdelkawy, A. M. Lopes, Mohammed M. Babatin, Shifted fractional Jacobi collocation method for solving fractional functional differential equations of variable order, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 134 (2020), 109721. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109721
    [21] E. L. Ortiz, H. J. Samara, An operational approach to the Tau method for the numerical solution of non-linear differential equations, Computing, 27 (1981), 15-25. doi: 10.1007/BF02243435
    [22] R. M. Hafez, M. A. Zaky, M. A. Abdelkawy, Jacobi Spectral Galerkin method for Distributed-Order Fractional Rayleigh-Stokes problem for a Generalized Second Grade Fluid, Front. Phys., 7 (2020).
    [23] E. H. Doha, A. H. Bhrawy, R. H. Hafez, A Jacobi dual-Petrov-Galerkin method for solving some odd-order ordinary differential equations, in Abstract and Applied Analysis, Hindawi, (2011).
    [24] G. Szegö, Orthogonal Polynomials, American Mathematical Society, (1939).
    [25] R. Beals, R. Wong, Special Functions: A graduate text, Cambridge University Press, (2010).
    [26] K. Miller, B. Ross, An Introduction to the Fractional Calaulus and Fractional Differential Equations, John Wiley & Sons Inc., (1993).
    [27] D. Delbosco, L. Rodino, Existence and uniqueness for a nonlinear fractional differential equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 204 (1996), 609-625. doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1996.0456
    [28] Z. M. Odibat, Na.T. Shawagfeh, Generalized Taylor's formula, Appl. Math. Comput., 186 (2007), 286-293.
    [29] F. A. Rihan, D. Baleanu, S. Lakshmanan, R. Rakkiyappan, On fractional SIRC model with salmonella bacterial infection, in Abstract and Applied Analysis, Hindawi, (2011).
    [30] M. A. Abdelkawy, An improved collocation technique for distributed-order fractional partial differential equations, Rom. Rep. Phys., 72 (2020).
    [31] Y. G. Sanchez, Z. Sabir, J. L.G. Guirao, Design of a nonlinear SITR fractal model based on the dynamics of a novel coronavirus (COVID-19), Fractals, 2020 (2020).
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Zeyad Al-Zhour, Fundamental fractional exponential matrix: New computational formulae and electrical applications, 2021, 129, 14348411, 153557, 10.1016/j.aeue.2020.153557
    2. Haidong Qu, Mati ur Rahman, Shabir Ahmad, Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Muhammaad Ibrahim, Tareq Saeed, Investigation of fractional order bacteria dependent disease with the effects of different contact rates, 2022, 159, 09600779, 112169, 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112169
    3. Mohamed A. Abdelkawy, Mohamed M. Al-Shomrani, Spectral solutions for diffusion equations of Riesz distributed-order space-fractional, 2022, 61, 11100168, 1045, 10.1016/j.aej.2021.07.023
    4. Lei Zhang, Mati Ur Rahman, Shabir Ahmad, Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Fahd Jarad, Dynamics of fractional order delay model of coronavirus disease, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 4211, 10.3934/math.2022234
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4065) PDF downloads(245) Cited by(4)

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog