Loading [MathJax]/jax/element/mml/optable/GeneralPunctuation.js
Research article Special Issues

A new test for detecting specification errors in Gaussian linear mixed-effects models

  • Received: 07 March 2024 Revised: 15 June 2024 Accepted: 25 June 2024 Published: 29 October 2024
  • MSC : 62F05, 62J05, 62J20

  • Linear mixed-effects models (LMEMs) are widely used in medical, engineering, and social applications. The accurate specification of the covariance matrix structure within the error term is known to impact the estimation and inference procedures. Thus, it is crucial to detect the source of errors in LMEMs specifications. In this study, we propose combining a user-friendly computational test with an analytical method to visualize the source of errors. Through statistical simulations under different scenarios, we evaluate the performance of the proposed test in terms of the Power and Type I error rate. Our findings indicate that as the sample size n increases, the proposed test effectively detects misspecification in the systematic component, the number of random effects, the within-subject covariance structure, and the covariance structure of the error term in the LMEM with high Power while maintaining the nominal Type I error rate. Finally, we show the practical usefulness of our proposed test with a real-world application.

    Citation: Jairo A. Angel, Francisco M.M. Rocha, Jorge I. Vélez, Julio M. Singer. A new test for detecting specification errors in Gaussian linear mixed-effects models[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30710-30727. doi: 10.3934/math.20241483

    Related Papers:

    [1] Nora Nader, Dina A. Ramadan, Hanan Haj Ahmad, M. A. El-Damcese, B. S. El-Desouky . Optimizing analgesic pain relief time analysis through Bayesian and non-Bayesian approaches to new right truncated Fréchet-inverted Weibull distribution. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 31217-31245. doi: 10.3934/math.20231598
    [2] Alaa M. Abd El-Latif, Hanan H. Sakr, Mohamed Said Mohamed . Fractional generalized cumulative residual entropy: properties, testing uniformity, and applications to Euro Area daily smoker data. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18064-18082. doi: 10.3934/math.2024881
    [3] Mohamed Abdelkader, Rafik Aguech . Moran random walk with reset and short memory. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 19888-19910. doi: 10.3934/math.2024971
    [4] H. M. Barakat, M. A. Alawady, I. A. Husseiny, M. Nagy, A. H. Mansi, M. O. Mohamed . Bivariate Epanechnikov-exponential distribution: statistical properties, reliability measures, and applications to computer science data. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32299-32327. doi: 10.3934/math.20241550
    [5] Abdullah Ali H. Ahmadini, Amal S. Hassan, Ahmed N. Zaky, Shokrya S. Alshqaq . Bayesian inference of dynamic cumulative residual entropy from Pareto Ⅱ distribution with application to COVID-19. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2196-2216. doi: 10.3934/math.2021133
    [6] Mashael A. Alshehri, Mohamed Kayid . Cumulative entropy properties of consecutive systems. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 31770-31789. doi: 10.3934/math.20241527
    [7] Yang Du, Weihu Cheng . Change point detection for a skew normal distribution based on the Q-function. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28698-28721. doi: 10.3934/math.20241392
    [8] Abdulhakim A. Al-Babtain, Amal S. Hassan, Ahmed N. Zaky, Ibrahim Elbatal, Mohammed Elgarhy . Dynamic cumulative residual Rényi entropy for Lomax distribution: Bayesian and non-Bayesian methods. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3889-3914. doi: 10.3934/math.2021231
    [9] Mohieddine Rahmouni, Dalia Ziedan . The Weibull-generalized shifted geometric distribution: properties, estimation, and applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 9773-9804. doi: 10.3934/math.2025448
    [10] Essam A. Ahmed, Laila A. Al-Essa . Inference of stress-strength reliability based on adaptive progressive type-Ⅱ censing from Chen distribution with application to carbon fiber data. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 20482-20515. doi: 10.3934/math.2024996
  • Linear mixed-effects models (LMEMs) are widely used in medical, engineering, and social applications. The accurate specification of the covariance matrix structure within the error term is known to impact the estimation and inference procedures. Thus, it is crucial to detect the source of errors in LMEMs specifications. In this study, we propose combining a user-friendly computational test with an analytical method to visualize the source of errors. Through statistical simulations under different scenarios, we evaluate the performance of the proposed test in terms of the Power and Type I error rate. Our findings indicate that as the sample size n increases, the proposed test effectively detects misspecification in the systematic component, the number of random effects, the within-subject covariance structure, and the covariance structure of the error term in the LMEM with high Power while maintaining the nominal Type I error rate. Finally, we show the practical usefulness of our proposed test with a real-world application.



    Infectious diseases, also referred to as illnesses, have long been acknowledged as a constant danger to people worldwide. Contagious infections are those that can be transmitted from animals to humans, humans to humans or humans to animals. HIV-1 is a human pathogen that targets and infiltrates physically active CD4+ T cells, which are essential constituents of the living person's immune response. Accumulated immunodeficiency virus (AIDS), a catastrophic autoimmune condition, plays a role in HIV-1. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 36.7 thousand individuals were thriving with HIV-1 at the end of 2017 and 2.0 million people were severely affected worldwide in 2016 [1]. In vitro tests show two ways HIV-1 spreads in vitro: virus-to-cell (VTC) and cell-to-cell (CTC). HIV-1 antimatter amassed by HIV-1-infected CD4+ T cells seeks out additional better and healthier CD4+ T mitochondria to infiltrate during VTC propagation. HIV-1 could be converted from immune-deficient CD+T cells to stable CD+T cells in the CTC phase of spread via immediate communication via antiviral therapy synaptic configuration. Numerous research findings have demonstrated that HIV-1 transmission via immediate CTC spread seems to be more productive and powerful than via VTC processing [2,3]. According to Sigal et al. [4], HIV-1 CTC pervasiveness creates significant pathogens of balanced CD4+T cells, reducing the effectiveness of therapeutic strategies. The immune system's two sets are cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and autoantibodies for innate immunity. HIV-infected CD+T cells are decapitated by CTLs, whereas HIV-1 granules are neutralized by B-cell immune cells.

    HTLV-Ⅰ causes diseases such as HTLV-Ⅰ-associated myelopathy (HAM) and tropical spastic paraparesis (TSP). Between 11 and 21 million individuals globally are infected by HTLV-Ⅰ. HTLV-Ⅰ, such as HIV-1, infiltrates balanced CD4+T cells. Precise CTC connection between HTLV-Ⅰ-infected CD4+T lymphocytes and balanced CD4+T lymphocytes results in infestation [5]. The CTL inflammatory reaction is crucial for manipulating HTLV-Ⅰ disease by solubilizing HTLV-Ⅰ diseased CD4+T cells [6]. Wu and Zhao [7] contemplated the dynamics of an HIV infection model with two infection routes and evolutionary competition between two viral strains. Wu et al. [8] expounded the evolution dynamics of a time-delayed reaction-diffusion HIV latent infection model with two strains and periodic therapies. Wu and Zhao [9] presented the dynamical analysis of a nonlocal delayed and diffusive HIV latent infection model with spatial heterogeneity.

    Both HIV-1 and HTLV-Ⅰ can indeed be carried from afflicted to un-immunized individuals via intimate intercourse, severely immuno-compromised items, intravenous fluids and stem cell therapy. HTLV-Ⅰ may be injected through infant feed intake. Patients can be encountered all over the globe, including Germany, Asia, Brazil, Mexico, Tanzania and Portugal [10]. According to Isache et al. [11], the HTLV-Ⅰ co-infection proportion among HIV-1-afflicted individuals is 95 to 600 times more than in the general population. Co-dynamics with HTLV-Ⅰ and HIV-1 may hasten the evolution of AIDS and pathogen improvement [12].

    Mathematical modelling and simulation of viral illness can help with recognizing pathogen complexities within a host, evaluating various antiretroviral therapies and forecasting the evolution of sickness over time. Numerous investigators have worked to create and test numerical simulations of HIV-1 mono-infection, HTLV-Ⅰ mono-infection and HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ co-dynamics. Nowak et al. [13] established a predominant and benchmark HIV-1 mechanism framework that includes three divisions: Balanced CD4+ T cells, effective HIV-1-infected CD4+ T cells and unrestricted HIV-1 molecules. This analysis implies that HIV-1 inflammation is solely caused by V-T-C transmission. This framework has been customized to compensate for the two HIV-1 contagion mechanisms, VTC and CTC. Several studies have been inspired by the modelling of HIV-1 disease with VTC and CTC configurations of propagation and have specified supplemental biological pathways in the framework described in [14], such as: Lai and Zou [15] explored an HIV-1 infectious disease framework involving CTC transmission and different kinds of decentralized time delays, Wang et al. [16] incorporated latent diseased microbes and cytoplasmic delays into their framework of HIV-1 complexities for CTC propagation. Elaiw and Al-Shamrani [17] presented a comprehensive review of HIV-1 interactions in connection to the CTL immune system in contexts where CTC propagation is exacerbated by both deep-seated and productive virus particles. Ren et al. [18] investigated the consequences of CTC propagation, infection and cell flexibility on HIV-1 complexities. Wang et al. [19] investigated the maturity level of the HIV-1 approach that incorporates CTC spread. Al-Shamrani et al. [20] contemplated the HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ infections framework incorporating innate immunity and a cellular pathogen.

    Numerous quantitative ideas have been created throughout antiquity to aid us in comprehending the environment in which we reside. In regard to prediction, the notion of temporal and spatial modelling was implemented and advanced machine learning techniques were developed to control manifestations with moderate challenges. The notion of differentiation is one of the most frequently utilized computational theories in prognostication and modelling. This idea has been employed to create mathematical algorithms known as differential equations (DEs). The scientists proposed various formulae with complex correlations in the initial attempt, where differential formulations could be: local (exchange rate, conformable derivative and fractal derivative) [21,22,23]; not local with a singular kernel (Riemann-Liouville, Liouville-Caputo and various manifestations) [24]; local with a non-singular kernel (Caputo-Fabrizio operators) [25]; and eventually non-local and non-singular (Atangana-Baleanu operators) [26]. Several scholars recommend several groundbreaking orientations for the alternate meanings of differential derivatives or those who preplanned the underpinnings. Calculus with fractional order is affiliated with pragmatic endeavours and it is widely used in nanoscience, photonics, viral agents, quantum physics and image processing, among several other fields [21,22,23,27].

    Fractional calculus is a branch of numeracy and physical science that studies the behaviour of artefacts and technologies using fractional order differentiation. In contrast to integer-order configurations, fractional order simulations can encapsulate non-local spatial-temporal connections using recollection kernels of the index, exponential or Mittag-Leffler form law. The potential strengths of applying the fractional formulation of Atangana-Baleanu include every non-locality, which is intrinsic in its description, as is the case with all past iterations; even so, the key important feature is that it possesses a nonsingular and non-local kernel, symbolized by the feature of Mittag-Leffler, that, from a quantitative perspective, encompasses the explanatory progression of capabilities demarcated by a sequence of prerogatives. Kumar and Kumar [28] presented a study on an eco-epidemiological model with fractional operators. Ghanbari et al. [29] investigated a behaviour for immune and tumor cells an immunogenetic tumour model with non-singular fractional derivative. However, the aforesaid formulation has been demonstrated to accurately represent the intricate patterns of assorted real-world manifestations [23,27]. Unlike each derivative, Atangana and Araz [30] introduced the concept of the piecewise derivative, that can replicate the overlapping pathways of these fractional formulas in a differentiated methodology and has lately acquired popularity [31]. All of this suggests that the notified experiments are premised on a deterministic technique, whereas the existence of HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ is stochastic rather than deterministic. Several scholars utilized the core idea of stochastic modelling to examine the evolution of communicable diseases in real life, as detailed in [32,33,34]. Because there is no latent infection in the stochastic structure, the virus's perseverance cannot be determined. Inevitably, the stationary distribution of the stochastic mechanism must be studied.

    Based on the stochastic linear perturbation approach, in which the environmental white noise is proportional to the size of each subpopulation, a few stochastic HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ models involving humoral immune response and cellular outbreak models have been established to analyze the impact of stochastic white noise and provide some effective measures to regulate disease dynamics. A stochastic HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model with a half-saturated incidence rate has been theoretically proven to suppress an HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ outbreak. Inspired by such results [35,36,37], we similarly assume that the white noise is directly proportional to subpopulations V,GL,GA,UL,UA,T and Q. As a result, in this document, we attempted to demonstrate the noticeable impact of a stochastic scheme criterion stated in [20]. Furthermore, we develop a stochastic conceptual framework that analyses the HIV-1/HTLV-1 involving humoral immune response and cellular outbreak workflow in specified time intervals using piecewise fractional derivative formulations. To accomplish this, we divide the entire community into prevalence and distribution of the latent HIV-1-infected CD4+ T cells and latent HTLV-Ⅰ-infected CD4+ T cells, as well as random fluctuations. The fraction coefficient λ(0,1) represents the likelihood that the latest HIV-1-infected CD4+ T cells would be involved, while the surviving portion 1λ will be latent. We specifically demonstrated the existence and uniqueness of the codynamics of HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ non-negative successful approach to exemplify that the framework is both quantitatively and biologically viable. We then investigate the extinction, ergodic and stationary distribution processes to determine the prerequisites for disease extinction and persistence. In a nutshell, numerical simulations of the projected model are investigated in fractional calculus theory, incorporating white noise and crossover patterns.

    Al-Shamrani et al. [20] developed a codynamics of HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model in which humoral immunity and cellular infection coexist. The DEs depict the dynamical transmission of HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ and the framework is as shown in:

    {dVdt=ϑβVυ1VTυ2VGAυ3VUAdGLdt=(1λ)(υ1VT+υ2VGA)(ϵ+ξ)GLdGLdt=λ(υ1VT+υ2VGA)+ϵGLϱGAdULdt=τυ3VUA(σ+ς)ULdUAdt=σULϕUAdTdt=ω1GAρTω2QTdQdt=δQTϰQ (2.1)

    supplemented with initial conditions (ICs) V(0)0,GL0,GA0,UL0,UA0,T0,Q0.

    If R0<1, model (2.1) has a disease-free equilibrium which is globally asymptotically stable, given by E0=(H0,0,0,0,0,0,0)=(ϑβ,0,0,0,0,0,0). This new equilibrium identifies a health status in which both HIV-1 and HTLV-Ⅰ are eliminated from the organ.

    The system's (2.1) fundamental reproduction number is specified by

    R0=ϑ(ω1υ1+ρυ2)(ϵ+λξ)βρϱ(ξ+ϵ). (2.2)

    If R0>1, then model (2.1) satisfies an endemic equilibrium E=(V,GL,GA,UL,UA,T,Q) and the disease is uniformly persistent. Based on biological interpretations, all variables and factors are tabulated in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Explanation of the biological scaling variables in the system (2.1).
    Symbols Explanation Value References
    V Wellbeing CD4+ T cells
    GL CD4+ T cells afflicted with HIV-1 that are latent
    GA Effective HIV-1-afflicted CD4+ T cells
    UL CD4+ T cells afflicted with HTLV-Ⅰ that are latent
    UA Effective HTLV-Ⅰ-afflicted CD4+ T cells
    T HIV-1 particles
    Q HIV-1 Restricted antibodies
    ϑ Availability of balanced CD4+ T cells 10 [34,38]
    β Mortality risk of balanced CD4+ T cells 0.01 [39,40]
    υ1 Rate of pathogenic virus caused by interaction between HIV-1 granules and balanced CD4+ T cells varied -
    υ2 Rate of cellular infestation caused by interaction between effective immunodeficient cells and balanced CD4+ T cells varied -
    υ3 Rate of cellular infestation resulted from interaction between effective HTLV-Ⅰ-infected cells and balanced CD4+ T cells varied -
    λ(0,1) Proportion coefficient denotes the likelihood of fresh HIV-1-infected cells becoming operative and the residual portion 1 will be passive 0.3 [41]
    ϵ Rates of stimulation of innate HIV-1-infected CD4+ T cells 0.4 Supposed
    ξ Mortality risk of CD4+ T cells contaminated with innate HIV-1 0.1 [41]
    ϱ Mortality risk of CD4+ T cells contaminated with energetic HIV-1 0.5 [42,43,44]
    τ(0,1) Possibility of fresh HTLV-Ⅰ pathogens entering an unexpressed duration 0.2 [45]
    σ Rates of stimulation of hidden HTLV-Ⅰ-pathogenic CD4+ T cells 0.5 Supposed
    ϖ Mortality risk of hidden HTLV-Ⅰ-pathogenic CD4+ T cells 0.3 Supposed
    φ Mortality risk of energetic HTLV-Ⅰ-pathogenic CD4+ T cells 0.2 [46,47]
    ω1 Generation of unrestricted HIV-1 granules 5 [34]
    ρ Mortality risk of HIV-1 particles 2 [34]
    ω2 Inactivation rate of HIV-1 particulate by HIV-1-particular antibody levels 0.8 Supposed
    δ HIV-1-specific antibody prevalence varied -
    ϰ Mortality risk of HIV-1-particular antibodies 0.1 [48]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    By taking into consideration the impact of white noise, we use the technique of Imhof et al. [49]. Assume that the structure's elements are inversely related to the random noise (2.1). The stochastic framework of strategy (2.1) then comes, as shown below:

    {dV=[ϑβVυ1VTυ2VGAυ3VUA]dt+1VdQ1(t),dGL=[(1λ)(υ1VT+υ2VGA)(ϵ+ξ)GL]dt+2GLdQ2(t),dGA=[λ(υ1VT+υ2VGA)+ϵGLϱGA]dt+3GAdQ3(t),dUL=[τυ3VUA(σ+ς)UL]dt+4ULdQ4(t),dUA=[σULϕUA]dt+5UAdQ5(t),dT=[ω1GAρTω2QT]dt+6TdQ6(t),dQ=[δQTϰQ]dt+7QdQ7(t), (2.3)

    where Qι(t),ι=1,...,7 are independent standard Brownian motions having Qι(0)=0 and 2ι>0 are instances of white noise for ι=1,...,7. The initial conditions (ICs) have been the same as in the framework (2.3).

    For the sake of straightforwardness, assume an exhaustive probability space (,F,{Ft}t0,P) containing filtration {Ft}t0 maintaining regular suppositions in mind (i.e., increasing and right continuous for F0 contains every T-null sets) and Qι(t),ι=1,...,8 are stated in (,F,{Ft}t0,P). Also, consider R+={y0},R7+={ˉy=(y1,...,y7)R7:yι>0,ι=1,...,8}. Let us suppose MT is the transpose of M. Symbolize ˉy(t)=(V(t),GL(t),GA(t),UL(t),UA(t),T(t),Q(t))T as the main finding of (2.3) supplemented by ICs ˉy(0)=(V(0),GL(0),GA(0),UL(0),UA(0),T(0),Q(0))T. Moreover, take z1z2=max{z1,z2} and z1z2=min{z1,z2}. The stochastic DE in ˜d-dimensions is outlined as:

    dw(t)=Θ1(w(t),t)dt+Θ2(w(t),t)dB(t),w(t0)=w0,t0t<, (2.4)

    where Θ1:R˜d×[t0,]R˜d and Θ2:R˜d×[t0,]R˜d×m1 are Borel measurable containing B={B(t)}tt0 is an Rm1-valued Wiener approach and w0 is an R˜d-valued r.v defined on ϝ.

    Furthermore, C2,1(R˜d×[t0,);R+) is considered as the set of all non-negative functions S(w,t) on R˜d×[t0,) that are continuously twice differentiable in wR˜d and once in t[t0,). The differential function L for the stochastic DE (2.4) is outlined as:

    L=t+˜dp=1Θ1p(w,t)wp+12˜di,p=1m1ȷ=1Θ2pȷ(w,t)Θ2pȷ(w,t)2wpwi.

    Introduce the function HC2,1(R˜d×[t0,), then

    LH(w,t)=Ht(w,t)+Hw(w,t)Θ1(w,t)+12˜di,p=1m1ȷ=1Θ2iȷ(w,t)Θ2pȷ(w,t)Hww(w,t),

    where Ht:=Ht;Hs1=(Hwp,...,Hw˜d),Hww=(Hwp,Hwp)˜dטd.

    For w(t)R˜d, then Itô's formula is presented as:

    dH(w(t),t)=LH(w(t),t)dt+Hw(w(t),t)Θ2(w(t),t)dQ(t).

    We offer the corresponding overview below to assist individuals in becoming familiar with fractional calculus [24,25,26].

    C0DηtF(t)=1Γ(1η)t0F(w)(tw)ηdw,η(0,1].
    CF0DηtF(t)=Z(η)1ηt0F(w)exp[η1η(tw)]dw,η(0,1],

    where Z(η) is considered to be normalized mapping with Z(0)=Z(1)=1.

    The following is the structure of the Atangana-Baleanu derivative:

    ABC0DηtF(t)=ABC(η)1ηt0F(w)Eη[η1η(tw)η]dw,η(0,1],

    where ABC(η)=1η+ηΓ(η) signifies the normalization function.

    The accompanying consequence is suggested to define the (2.3) existence-uniqueness of the stochastic approach.

    Theorem 2.1. Assume that the stochastic system (2.3) for t0 containing ICs ˜(0)R7+ has a unique solution. Furthermore, the solution of ˜(t) occurs in R7+ almost surely (1.e) 1, i.e., ˜(0)R7+t0.

    Proof. Consider the model parameters ˜(t)R7+ are continuous and locally lipschtz supplemented with ICs. Consequently, the model ˜(t) has a unique solution for t[0,ε). The explosive period ε is completely investigated in [50]. To demonstrate the solution's versatility, we have to illustrate that ε= (a.s). Consider we hold a sufficiently large positive number χ0 such that the ICs of all conditions come up within the specified time frame [χ0,1χ0]. Selecting χχ0 be the final time requirements for every positive integer,

    χ=inf{t[0,ε):min{˜(t)}1χormax{˜(t)}χ}.

    During this research process, we utilize inf=, whereas presents a null set. This technique χ encourages us to assert that this figure expands as χ tends to . Taking =limχε (a.s). Following affirming that = (a.s), We'll challenge the argument that ε= and thus ˜(t) occur in R7+ a.s t0. So, verifying that = (a.s). We assume two positive determined numbers for the above ε(0,1) and must exist such that

    P{}>ϵ. (2.5)

    Therefore, the integer υ1χ0 occurs in the following form

    P{χ}ϵ,υ1χ.

    Thus, we aim to present a function J:R7+R+ in this form:

    J(˜(t))=V+GL+GA+UL+UA+T+Q7(V+GL+GA+UL+UA+T+Q). (2.6)

    In accordance with the criteria, 0w1lnw11,w1>0, we find J(˜(t)) is a positive mapping.

    Assume the random terminology χ0χ and >0.

    Considering Ito's approach to (2.6) produces

    dJ(˜(t))=LJ(˜)+1(V1)dQ1(t)+2(GL1)dQ2(t)+3(GA1)dQ3(t)+4(UL1)dQ4(t)+5(UA1)dQ5(t)+6(T1)dQ6(t)+7(Q1)dQ7(t). (2.7)

    Considering (2.7), define the following functional LJ:R7+R+ as:

    LJ=(11V)(ϑβVυ1VTυ2VGAυ3VUA)+212+(11GL)((1λ)(υ1VT+υ2VGA)(ϵ+ξ)GL)+222+(11GA)(λ(υ1VT+υ2VGA)+ϵGLϱGA)+232+(11UL)(τυ3VUA(σ+ς)UL)+242+(11UA)(σULϕUA)+252+(11T)(ω1GAρTω2QT)+262+(11Q)(δQTϰQ)+272=ϑ+β+(ϵ+ξ)+ϱ+(σ+ς)+ϕ+ρ+ϰβVυ1VTυ2VGAυ3VUA+(1λ)(υ1VT+υ2VGA)(ϵ+ξ)GL+λ(υ1VT+υ2VGA)+ϵGLϱGA+σULϕUA+ω1GAρTω2QT+δQTϰQ+21+22+23+24+25+26+272ϑ+β+(ϵ+ξ)+ϱ+(σ+ς)+ϕ+ρ+ϰ+21+22+23+24+25+26+272:=Ω.

    For a positive constant ς, it is independent of ˜ as well as of t. So, we get

    dJ(˜)=Ωdt+1(V1)dQ1(t)+2(GL1)dQ2(t)+3(GA1)dQ3(t)+4(UL1)dQ4(t)+5(UA1)dQ5(t)+6(T1)dQ6(t)+7(Q1)dQ7(t). (2.8)

    Furthermore, we have

    E[J(V(χ),GL(χ),GA(χ),UL(χ),UA(χ),T(χ),Q(χ))]J(˜(0))+E{χ0Ωdt}J(˜(0))+Ω. (2.9)

    Choosing Ψχ={χ} for χυ1 and (2.5) produces that P(Ψω1)ϵ. Evidently, every ς from Ψχ has one or more V(χ,ς),GL(χ,ς),GA(χ,ς),UL(χ,ς),UA(χ,ς),T(χ,ς) and Q(χ,ς) that are identical to 1χ or χ. Therefore, J(V(χ),GL(χ),GA(χ),UL(χ),UA(χ),T(χ),Q(χ)) is no less than lnχ1+1χ or χ1lnχ.

    Finally,

    J(V(χ),GL(χ),GA(χ),UL(χ),UA(χ),T(χ),Q(χ))(lnχ1+1χ)E(χ1lnχ).

    Making the use of (2.5) and (2.9), we have

    J(˜(0))+ΩE[1Ψ(ς)J(V(χ),GL(χ),GA(χ),UL(χ),UA(χ),T(χ),Q(χ))]ϵ{(lnχ1+1χ)(χ1lnχ)}.

    Observing that, the indicator function Ψ is 1Ψ(ς). Therefore, it tends to and produces the contradiction >J(˜(0))+Ω=, indicating that = a.s.

    In what follows, we intend to calculate the significant value for disease eradication. We determine how to regulate the subtleties of the disease so that it eventually appears to become extinct over time, which is a significant factor in the transmission of infection.

    This section examines at the framework's extinction and ergodic stationary distributions (ESD). Let us present

    GA(t)=1tt0y(s)ds. (2.10)

    Following that, we will discuss the widely recognized consequence of the strong law of huge quantities, which is primarily attributed to [51].

    Lemma 2.1. ([51]) Assume that a local martingale for continuous and real-valued mapping Z={Z}t0 goes extinct as t0, then

    limtZ,Zt=,a.s.,limtZtZ,Zt=0,a.s.,andalso
    limtZ,Ztt<0,a.s.,limtZtt=0,a.s.

    Let us categorize an additional threshold value for our future necessities:

    Rp0=ϑλυ2β(ϱ+232). (2.11)

    Theorem 2.2. For τ>12(21222324252627) and surmise that for positive solution ˜(t) for the system (2.3) supplemented with ICs ˜(0)R7+, we obtain:

    If Rp0<1, then

    limtsuplnGA(t)t(ϱ+232){Rp01}<0a.s.,

    which suggests that the infection will be eradicated in future generations. Also,

    limtV(t)=ϑβ,limtGL(t)=0,limtGA(t)=0,limtUL(t)=τϑ+λ3,limtUA(t)=0,limtT(t)=0,limtQ(t)=0.

    Proof. Employing integration on (2.3), we get

    V(t)V(0)t=ϑβV(t)υ1V(t)T(t)υ2V(t)GA(t)υ3V(t)UA(t)+1tt0V(s1)dQ1(s1),GL(t)GL(0)t=(1λ)(υ1V(t)T(t)+υ2V(t)GA(t))(ϵ+ξ)GL(t)+2tt0GL(s1)dQ2(s1),GA(t)GA(0)t=λ(υ1V(t)T(t)+υ2V(t)GA(t))+ϵGL(t)ϱGA(t)+3tt0GA(s1)dQ3(s1),UL(t)UL(0)t=τυ3V(t)UA(t)(σ+ς)UL(t)+4tt0UL(s1)dQ4(s1),UA(t)UA(0)t=σUL(t)ϕUA(t)+5tt0GA(s1)dQ5(s1),T(t)T(0)t=ω1GA(t)ρT(t)ω2Q(t)T(t)+6tt0T(s1)dQ6(s1),Q(t)Q(0)t=δQ(t)T(t)ϰQ(t)+7tt0Q(s1)dQ7(s1). (2.12)

    Considering Itô's technique on ln(GA(t)), we attain

    ln(GA(t))={λ(υ1VTGA+υ2V)+ϵGLGA(ϱ+32)}dt+3dQ3(t).

    Performing integration over (0,t), we get

    ln(GA(t))ln(GA(0))=t0{λ(υ1VTGA+υ2V)+ϵGLGA(ϱ+32)}ds+3t0dQ3(s)ds.

    In view of the strong law of large numbers [52], we have limt1tt0dQ3(s)ds=0,(a.s).

    Taking the superior limit and implementing the stochastic comparison theory yields

    limtsuplnGA(t)t=limtsup1tt0{λ(υ1VTGA+υ2V)+ϵGLGA(ϱ+32)}ds(ϱ+232)ϑλυ2β(ϱ+232)(ϱ+232){Rp01}<0(a.s).

    It follows that limtGA(t)=0,(a.s).

    A simple computation reduces (2.12) as

    V(t)=ϑβ1β{V(t)V(0)t+υ1V(t)T(t)+υ2V(t)GA(t)+υ3V(t)UA(t)1tt0V(s1)dQ1(s1)}.

    Therefore, we have limtV(t)=ϑβ,(a.s).

    Additionally, we will demonstrate that limtGL(t)=0,a.s.,limtUL(t)=τϑ+λ1,a.s.,limtUA(t)=0,a.s., limtT(t)=0,a.s., and limtQ(t)=0,a.s.

    This entails that infection extermination is determined by the setting's significance Rs0, that is, if Rs0<1. As a result, the infection will eventually become extinct.

    Regardless of the dearth of a chronic stable state position in the random system (2.3), we desire to explore the existence of an ESD (stochastic positive equilibrium), which would indicate disease perseverance more thoroughly. First, we offer some of the consequences of Has'minskii's theory. Additional details are accessible at [51].

    Consider that there is a homogeneous Markov technique ˜Q(t) in ϑ (the d-dimensional Euclidean space) that efficiently tackles the stochastic DE described as:

    d˜Q(t)=h1(y)dt+n1ι=1gι(˜Q)dQι(t). (2.13)

    The diffusion matrix A1(y)=(aιk(y)) and aιk(y)=n1ω1=1g(ι)ω1(y)g(k)ω1(y).

    Lemma 2.2. ([51]) Let us assume a bounded region UΛd containing a regular boundary Γ such that

    (Z1) A positive number Z such that dι,k=1aιk(y)tιtkZ|t|2,yU,tRd.

    (Z2) a non-negative C2-mapping H such that LH is negative for some yΛdU (specifically LH1, every yΛdU), then the Markov process ˜Q(t) has only one ESD ω2(.), and

    T{lim10f1(˜Q(t))dt=ϰdf1(y)ω2(dy)=1}, (2.14)

    holds yΛd, where f1(.) is an integrable function with respect to the measure ω2.

    We introduce a threshold

    Rs0=υ2λ(1λ)(β+212)(ϵ+ξ+222)(ϱ+232)(ρ+262)(ϰ+272).

    Furthermore, we will prove prerequisites that ensure the existence of an ESD based on Has'minskii's theorem.

    Theorem 2.3. If Rs0>1, then for an ICs ˜(0)R7+, the system (2.3) has only one stationary distribution ω2(.) and has the ergodicity.

    Proof. To prove the argument 2.3, straightforwardly examine suppositions (Z1) and (Z2) in Lemma 2.2. For this, we construct a suitable Lyapunov mapping ϝ and suppose a closed set UϵR7+ such that sup˜UϵR7+Lϝ is negative to examine the suitability of (Z2) in Lemma 2.2.

    Next we aim to introduce a non-negative C2-mapping H:R7+R+ as

    H1=V+GL+GA+UL+UA+T+Qχ1lnVχ2lnGLχ3lnGAχ4lnTχ5lnQ, (2.15)

    here the positive constants χ1,χ2,χ3,χ4 and χ5 can be evaluated later. By applying Itô's approach and the suggested framework, we accomplish the following results (2.3) as

    L(V+GL+GA+UL+UA+T+Q)=ϑβ(V+GL+GA+UL+UA+T+Q),ln(V)=ϑV+βυ1Tυ2GAυ3UA+212,ln(GL)=(1λ)(υ1VTGL+υ2VGAGL)+(ϵ+ξ)+222,ln(GA)=λ(υ1VTGA+υ2V)ϵGLGA+ϱ+232,ln(UL)=τυ3VUAUL+(σ+ς)+242,ln(UA)=σULUA+ϕ+252,ln(T)=ω1GAT+ρ+ω2Q+262,ln(Q)=δT+ϰ+272. (2.16)

    Therefore, we have

    LH1(˜(t))=β(V+GL+GA+UL+UA+T+Q)χ1ϑVχ1υ1Tχ1υ2GAχ1υ3UA+χ1(β+212)+χ2(ϵ+ξ+222)+χ3(ϱ+232)+χ4(ρ+262)+χ5(ϰ+272)++λυ2V+(1λ)υ1V, (2.17)

    which gives

    LH1(˜(t))7{β(V+GL+GA+UL+UA+T+Q)χ1ϑVχ1υ1Tχ1υ2GAχ1υ3UA++λυ2V+(1λ)υ1Vβ(V+GL+GA+UL+UA+T+Q)}1/7+χ1(β+212)+χ2(ϵ+ξ+222)+χ3(ϱ+232)+χ4(ρ+262)+χ5(ϰ+272)+ϑ. (2.18)

    Choosing

    χ1(β+212)=χ2(ϵ+ξ+222)=χ3(ϱ+232)=χ4(ρ+262)=χ5(ϰ+272)=ϑ. (2.19)

    Indicating

    χ1=ϑβ+212,χ2=ϑϵ+ξ+222,χ3=ϑϱ+232,χ4=ϑρ+262,χ5=ϑϰ+272. (2.20)

    Therefore, we get

    LH1(˜(t))7[(ϑ7υ2λ(1λ)(β+212)(ϵ+ξ+222)(ϱ+232)(ρ+262)(ϰ+272))1/7ϑ]+χ1ϑV4ϑ[(Rs0)1/41]+χ1χV. (2.21)

    Additionally, we express

    H2(˜(t))=χ6(V+GL+GA+UL+UA+T+Qχ1lnVχ2lnGLχ3lnGAχ4lnTχ5lnQ)lnVlnULlnUA+V+GL+GA+UL+UA+T+Q=(χ6+1)(V+GL+GA+UL+UA)(χ6χ1+1)lnVχ6χ2lnGLχ6χ3lnGAχ6χ4lnTχ6χ5lnQlnULlnUA. (2.22)

    In this case, χ4>0 is a constant that will be identified later on. As a result, it is critical for displaying

    liminf(˜(t))R7+Uω1H2(˜(t))=+,asω1, (2.23)

    thus, Uω1=(1ω1,ω1)×(1ω1,ω1)×(1ω1,ω1)×(1ω1,ω1)×(1ω1,ω1)×(1ω1,ω1)×(1ω1,ω1). Moreover, we exhibit that H2(˜(t)) has unique minimum value H2(˜(0)).

    The partial derivative of H2(˜(t)) in respect to V,GL,GA,UL,UA,T,Q, is as follows:

    H2(˜(t))V=1+χ6χ1χ6+1V,H2(˜(t))GL=1+χ6χ6χ2GLH2(˜(t))GA=1+χ6χ6χ3GA,H2(˜(t))UL=1+χ61UL,H2(˜(t))UA=1+χ41UA,H2(˜(t))T=1+χ6χ6χ4T,H2(˜(t))Q=1+χ6χ5χ6Q. (2.24)

    Clearly, it can be revealed that H2 has a different stagnation point, identified by the subsequent formula:

    ˜(0)=(χ1χ6+11+χ6,χ2χ61+χ6,χ3χ61+χ6,11+χ6,11+χ6,χ4χ61+χ6,χ5χ61+χ6). (2.25)

    Also, the Hessian matrix of H2(˜(t)) at ˜(0) is

    P=[1+χ1χ6V2(0)0000000χ2χ6G2L(0)0000000χ3χ6G2A(0)00000001U2L(0)00000001U2A(0)0000000χ4χ6T(0)0000000χ5χ6Q(0)]. (2.26)

    It is obvious that the aforementioned matrix is positive definite. As a result, H2(˜(t)) has a minimum of H2(˜(0)).

    Considering (2.23) and by the continuity of H2(˜(t)), we can determine from this H2(˜(t)) has at least one value H2(˜(0)) stayed in R7+.

    Analogously, we introduce a non-negative C2-mapping H3:R7+R+ as follows:

    H3(˜(t))=H2(˜(t))H2(˜(0)). (2.27)

    Utilizing Itô's technique and proposed model (2.3) yields

    LH3(˜(t))χ6{7ϑ[(Rs0)1/71]+χ1ϑV}ϑV+βυ1Tυ2GAυ3UA+212(1λ)(υ1VTGL+υ2VGAGL)+(ϵ+ξ)+222λ(υ1VTGA+υ2V)ϵGLGA+ϱ+232ω1GAT+ρ+ω2Q+262δT+ϰ+272+ϑβ(V+GL+GA+UL+UA), (2.28)

    As an outcome, the preceding idea can be expressed as

    LH3(˜(t))χ6δ7+(χ1χ61)ϑV+βυ1Tυ2GAυ3UA+212(1λ)(υ1VTGL+υ2VGAGL)+(ϵ+ξ)+222λ(υ1VTGA+υ2V)ϵGLGA+ϱ+232ω1GAT+ρ+ω2Q+262δT+ϰ+272+ϑβ(V+GL+GA+UL+UA), (2.29)

    where δ7=7ϑ[(Rs0)1/71]>0. A group's description is supplied by

    W={V(ϵ1,1/ϵ2),GL(ϵ1,1/ϵ2),GA(ϵ1,1/ϵ2),UL(ϵ1,1/ϵ2),UA(ϵ1,1/ϵ2),T(ϵ1,1/ϵ2),Q(ϵ1,1/ϵ2)}, (2.30)

    where ϵι,ι=1,2 are constants, which are very small and are likely to be noticed afterward. We will break up the entire R7+W into ten regions:

    W1={(˜(t))R7+,0<Vϵ1},W2={(˜(t))R7+,0<GLϵ2,V>ϵ2},W3={(˜(t))R7+,0<GAϵ1,GL>ϵ2},W4={(˜(t))R7+,0<ULϵ1,GA>ϵ2},W5={(˜(t))R7+,0<UAϵ1,UL>ϵ2},W6={(˜(t))R7+,0<Tϵ1,UA>ϵ2},W7={(˜(t))R7+,0<Qϵ1,T>ϵ2},W8={(˜(t))R7+,V1ϵ2},W9={(˜(t))R7+,GL1ϵ2},W10={(˜(t))R7+,GL1ϵ2},W11={(˜(t))R7+,UL1ϵ2},W12={(˜(t))R7+,UA1ϵ2},W13={(˜(t))R7+,T1ϵ2},W14={(˜(t))R7+,Q1ϵ2}. (2.31)

    Likewise, we will demonstrate that LH3((˜(t))<0, which is similar to displaying it within the earlier specified fourteen categories.

    Case I. If ˜(t)W1, in view of (2.29), it gives

    LH3(˜(t))χ6δ7+(χ1χ61)ϑV+βυ1Tυ2GAυ3UA+212(1λ)(υ1VTGL+υ2VGAGL)+(ϵ+ξ)+222λ(υ1VTGA+υ2V)ϵGLGA+ϱ+232ω1GAT+ρ+ω2Q+262δT+ϰ+272+ϑβ(V+GL+GA+UL+UA)(χ1χ61)ϑϵ1+βυ1Tυ2GAυ3UA+212(1λ)(υ1VTGL+υ2VGAGL)+(ϵ+ξ)+222λ(υ1VTGA+υ2V)ϵGLGA+ϱ+232ω1GAT+ρ+ω2Q+262δT+ϰ+272+ϑ.

    Selecting ϵ1>0, produces LH3(˜(t))<0 each ˜(t)W1. Repeating the same procedure, we can get the other cases immediately.

    As a consequence, we demonstrate that an integer P>0 ensures

    LH3(˜(t))<P<0˜(t)R7+W.

    Therefore, we have

    dH3(˜(t))<Pdt+[(χ6+1)V(1+χ1χ6)1]dQ1(t)+[(χ6+1)GLχ2χ62]dQ2(t)+[(χ6+1)GAχ3χ63]dQ3(t)+[(χ6+1)YL4]dQ4(t)+[(χ6+1)UA5]dQ5(t)+[(χ6+1)Tχ4χ66]dQ6(t)+[(χ6+1)Qχ6χ56]dQ7(t). (2.32)

    Consider that ((˜(t))(0))=(w1,w2,w3,w4,w5,w6,w7)=wR7+W and ξw is the duration wherein a sequence of events starting at w results in the subsequent set W

    ξn=inf{t:|(t)|=n}andξ(n)(t)=min{ξw,t,ξn}.

    The consequence that follows can be produced by integrating both sides of the inequality (2.32) from 0 to ξ(n)(t)), applying expectation with the use of Dynkin's computation, we have:

    EH3(V(ξ(n)(t)),GL(ξ(n)(t)),GA(ξ(n)(t)),UL(ξ(n)(t)),UA(ξ(n)(t),T(ξ(n)(t),Q(ξ(n)(t))H3(w))=Eξ(n)(t)0LH3(V(w),GL(w),GA(w),UL(w),UA(w),T(w),Q(w))dwEξ(n)(t)0Pdw=PEξ(n)(t).

    H3(w) is a non-negative number, hence

    Eξ(n)(t)H3(w)P.

    Thus, we deduce T{ξϵ=}, the desired result of Theorem 2.3.

    Conversely, the scheme established in (2.3) can be considered regular. For this, considering t and n, we will get ξ(n)(t)ξw(a.s).

    Thus, employing Fatou's lemma, we attain

    Eξ(n)(t)H3(w)P<.

    Clearly, supwCEξw<. Here, CR7+ is a compact subset. It confirms the hypothesis (Z2) of Lemma 2.1.

    Also, the model's (2.3) diffusion matrix is

    P=[21V2000000022G2L000000023G2A000000024U2L000000025U2A000000026T000000027Q].

    Selecting M=min(˜(t))¯WR7+{21V2,22G2L,23G2A,24U2L,25U2A,26T,27Q}, we find

    5ι,ȷ=1aιȷ(˜(t))rιrȷ=21V2r21+22G2Lr22+23G2Ar23+24U2Lr24+25U2Ar25+26Tr26+27Qr27M|r|2(˜(t))¯W,

    where r=(r1,r2,r3,r4,r5,r6,r7)R7+. This implies that the notion (Z1) of Lemma 2.1 is also accurate.

    In accordance to the initial review, Lemma 2.1 indicates that the system (2.3) has a unique ESD.

    This part consists of the numerical schemes of crossover effects when the differentiation formulations are in integer-order and there are fraction differential formulations via local and non-local memory. The order of the fractional operators lies between 0 and 1.

    Here, we want to explore the codynamics of the HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ models (2.1) and (2.3) that include responses of immunity and cellular outbreak, including integer-order, power-law and culminating in random procedures. If is identified as the last phase of dissemination, then the conceptual structure will be constructed in the initial stage employing the integer-order derivative form, followed by the index-law kernel in the next phase, culminating in the random setting in the following steps. Following that, a numerical convention that clarifies this occurrence is offered as:

    {dVdt=ϑβVυ1VTυ2VGAυ3VUA,dGLdt=(1λ)(υ1VT+υ2VGA)(ϵ+ξ)GL,dGLdt=λ(υ1VT+υ2VGA)+ϵGLϱGA,dULdt=τυ3VUA(σ+ς)UL,if0t1,dUAdt=σULϕUA,dTdt=ω1GAρTω2QT,dQdt=δQTϰQ. (3.1)
    {c0DηtV=ϑβVυ1VTυ2VGAυ3VUA,c0DηtGL=(1λ)(υ1VT+υ2VGA)(ϵ+ξ)GL,c0DηtGL=λ(υ1VT+υ2VGA)+ϵGLϱGA,c0DηtUL=τυ3VUA(σ+ς)UL,if1t2,c0DηtUA=σULϕUA,c0DηtT=ω1GAρTω2QT,c0DηtQ=δQTϰQ. (3.2)
    {dV=[ϑβVυ1VTυ2VGAυ3VUA]dt+1VdQ1(t),dGL=[(1λ)(υ1VT+υ2VGA)(ϵ+ξ)GL]dt+2GLdQ2(t),dGA=[λ(υ1VT+υ2VGA)+ϵGLϱGA]dt+3GAdQ3(t),dUL=[τυ3VUA(σ+ς)UL]dt+4ULdQ4(t),if2t,dUA=[σULϕUA]dt+7UAdQ7(t),dT=[ω1GAρTω2QT]dt+6TdQ6(t),dQ=[δQTϰQ]dt+7QdQ7(t). (3.3)

    Here, we apply the technique described in [30] in the frame of Caputo's derivative to numerically review the piecewise structures (3.1)–(3.3). We set out the process by performing the following:

    {dΥk(t)dt=ϝ(t,Υk).Υk(0)=Υk,0,k=1,2,...,nift[0,1],c1DηtΥk(t)=ϝ(t,Υk),Υk(1)=Υk,1,ift[1,2],dΥk(t)=ϝ(t,Υk)dt+kΥkdQk(t),Υk(2)=Υk,2,ift[2,].

    It follows that

    Υvk={Υk(0)+vȷ=2{2312ϝ(tȷ,Υȷ)Δt43ϝ(tȷ1,Υȷ1)Δt+712ϝ(tȷ2,Υȷ2)Δt},t[0,T1].Υk(1)+(Δt)η1Γ(η+1)vȷ=2ϝ(tȷ2,Υȷ2)1+(Δt)η1Γ(η+2)vȷ=2{ϝ(tȷ1,Υȷ1)ϝ(tȷ2,Υȷ2)}2+η(Δt)η12Γ(η+3)vȷ=2{ϝ(tȷ,Υȷ)2ϝ(tȷ1,Υȷ1)+ϝ(tȷ2,Υȷ2)}3,t[1,2],Υk(2)+nȷ=v+3{712ϝ(tȷ2,Υȷ2)Δt43ϝ(tȷ1,Υȷ1)Δt+2312ϝ(tȷ,Υȷ)Δt}+nȷ=v+3{712(B(tȷ1)B(tȷ2))Υȷ243(B(tȷ)B(tȷ1))Υȷ1+2312(B(tȷ+1)B(tȷ))Υȷ},t[2,],

    where

    1:=(vȷ1)η(vȷ)η, (3.4)
    2:=(vȷ+1)η(vȷ+2η+3)(vȷ)η(vȷ+3η+3), (3.5)

    and

    3:={(vȷ+1)η(2(vȷ)2+(3η+10)(vȷ)+2η2+9η+12),+(vȷ)η(2(vȷ)2+(5η+10)(vȷ)+6η2+18η+12). (3.6)

    In what follows, we aim to investigate the codynamics of the HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ models (2.1) and (2.3) that include responses of immunity and cellular outbreak, including integer-order, exponential decay and culminating in the random procedures. If is identified as the last phase of dissemination, then the conceptual structure will be constructed in the initial stage employing the integer-order derivative form, followed by the exponential decay kernel in the next phase, culminating in the random setting in the following steps. Following that, a numerical convention that clarifies this occurrence is offered as:

    {dVdt=ϑβVυ1VTυ2VGAυ3VUA,dGLdt=(1λ)(υ1VT+υ2VGA)(ϵ+ξ)GL,dGLdt=λ(υ1VT+υ2VGA)+ϵGLϱGA,dULdt=τυ3VUA(σ+ς)UL,if0t1,dUAdt=σULϕUA,dTdt=ω1GAρTω2QT,dQdt=δQTϰQ. (3.7)
    {CF0DηtV=ϑβVυ1VTυ2VGAυ3VUA,CF0DηtGL=(1λ)(υ1VT+υ2VGA)(ϵ+ξ)GL,CF0DηtGL=λ(υ1VT+υ2VGA)+ϵGLϱGA,CF0DηtUL=τυ3VUA(σ+ς)UL,if1t2,CF0DηtUA=σULϕUA,CF0DηtT=ω1GAρTω2QT,CF0DηtQ=δQTϰQ. (3.8)
    {dV=[ϑβVυ1VTυ2VGAυ3VUA]+1VdQ1(t),dGL=[(1λ)(υ1VT+υ2VGA)(ϵ+ξ)GL]+2GLdQ2(t),dGA=[λ(υ1VT+υ2VGA)+ϵGLϱGA]+3GAdQ3(t),dUL=[τυ3VUA(σ+ς)UL]+4ULdQ4(t),if2t,dUA=[σULϕUA]+7UAdQ7(t)]+7UAdQ7(t),dT=[ω1GAρTω2QT]+6TdQ6(t),dQ=[δQTϰQ]+7QdQ7(t). (3.9)

    Here, we apply the technique described in [30] in the frame of Caputo-Fabrizio derivative to numerically review the piecewise structures (3.7)–(3.9). We set out the process by performing the following:

    {dΥk(t)dt=ϝ(t,Υk).Υk(0)=Υk,0,k=1,2,...,nift[0,1],CF1DηtΥk(t)=ϝ(t,Υk),Υk(1)=Υk,1,ift[1,2],dΥk(t)=ϝ(t,Υk)dt+kΥkdQk(t),Υk(2)=Υk,2,ift[2,]. (3.10)

    It follows that

    Υvk={Υk(0)+vȷ=2{2312ϝ(tȷ,Υȷ)Δt43ϝ(tȷ1,Υȷ1)Δt+712ϝ(tȷ2,Υȷ2)Δt},t[0,T1].Υk(1)+1ηM(η)ϝ(tn,Υn)+ηM(η)vȷ=2{712ϝ(tȷ2,Υȷ2)Δt43ϝ(tȷ1,Υȷ1)Δt+2312ϝ(tȷ,Υȷ)Δt},t[1,2],Υk(2)+nȷ=v+3{712ϝ(tȷ2,Υȷ2)Δt43ϝ(tȷ1,Υȷ1)Δt+2312ϝ(tȷ,Υȷ)Δt}+nȷ=v+3{712(B(tȷ1)B(tȷ2))Υȷ243(B(tȷ)B(tȷ1))Υȷ1+2312(B(tȷ+1)B(tȷ))Υȷ},t[2,]. (3.11)

    This section devotes to investigate the codynamics of the HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ models (2.1) and (2.3) that include responses of immunity and cellular outbreak, including integer-order, generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel and culminating in the random procedures. If is identified as the last phase of dissemination, then the conceptual structure will be constructed in the initial stage employing the integer-order derivative form, followed by the generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel in the next phase, culminating in the random setting in the following steps. Following that, a numerical convention that clarifies this occurrence is offered as:

    {dVdt=ϑβVυ1VTυ2VGAυ3VUA,dGLdt=(1λ)(υ1VT+υ2VGA)(ϵ+ξ)GL,dGLdt=λ(υ1VT+υ2VGA)+ϵGLϱGA,dULdt=τυ3VUA(σ+ς)UL,if0t1,dUAdt=σULϕUA,dTdt=ω1GAρTω2QT,dQdt=δQTϰQ. (3.12)
    {ABC0DηtV=ϑβVυ1VTυ2VGAυ3VUA,ABC0DηtGL=(1λ)(υ1VT+υ2VGA)(ϵ+ξ)GL,ABC0DηtGL=λ(υ1VT+υ2VGA)+ϵGLϱGA,ABC0DηtUL=τυ3VUA(σ+ς)UL,if1t2,ABC0DηtUA=σULϕUA,ABC0DηtT=ω1GAρTω2QT,ABC0DηtQ=δQTϰQ. (3.13)
    {dV=[ϑβVυ1VTυ2VGAυ3VUA]+1VdQ1(t),dGL=[(1λ)(υ1VT+υ2VGA)(ϵ+ξ)GL]+2GLdQ2(t),dGA=[λ(υ1VT+υ2VGA)+ϵGLϱGA]+3GAdQ3(t),dUL=[τυ3VUA(σ+ς)UL]+4ULdQ4(t),if2t,dUA=[σULϕUA]+7UAdQ7(t)]+7UAdQ7(t),dT=[ω1GAρTω2QT]+6TdQ6(t),dQ=[δQTϰQ]+7QdQ7(t). (3.14)

    Here, we apply the technique described in [30] in the frame of Atanagan-Baleanu-Caputo derivative to numerically review the piecewise structures (3.12)–(3.14). We set out the process by performing the following:

    {dΥk(t)dt=ϝ(t,Υk).Υk(0)=Υk,0,k=1,2,...,nift[0,1],ABC1DηtΥk(t)=ϝ(t,Υk),Υk(1)=Υk,1,ift[1,2],dΥk(t)=ϝ(t,Υk)dt+kΥkdQk(t),Υk(2)=Υk,2,ift[2,].

    It follows that

    Υvk={Υk(0)+vȷ=2{2312ϝ(tȷ,Υȷ)Δt43ϝ(tȷ1,Υȷ1)Δt+712ϝ(tȷ2,Υȷ2)Δt},t[0,T1].Υk(1)+ηABC(η)ϝ(tn,Υn)+η(Δt)η1ABC(η)Γ(η+1)vȷ=2ϝ(tȷ2,Υȷ2)1+η(Δt)η1ABC(η)Γ(η+2)vȷ=2{ϝ(tȷ1,Υȷ1)ϝ(tȷ2,Υȷ2)}2+η(Δt)η12ABC(η)Γ(η+3)vȷ=2{ϝ(tȷ,Υȷ)2ϝ(tȷ1,Υȷ1)+ϝ(tȷ2,Υȷ2)}3,t[1,2],Υk(2)+nȷ=v+3{712ϝ(tȷ2,Υȷ2)Δt43ϝ(tȷ1,Υȷ1)Δt+2312ϝ(tȷ,Υȷ)Δt}+nȷ=v+3{712(B(tȷ1)B(tȷ2))Υȷ243(B(tȷ)B(tȷ1))Υȷ1+2312(B(tȷ+1)B(tȷ))Υȷ},t[2,],

    where 1,2 and 3 are stated before in (3.4)–(3.6).

    In this section, we will show numerical modelling concepts that use the Atangana and Araz methods referenced previously [30] to substantiate research hypotheses. Multiple numerical illustrations are used to exemplify the suitability and utility of the proposed HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ structure in the deterministic-stochastic setting. All figurative and numerical calculations were carried out using the MATLAB 21 software.

    We determine numerically the pathways for the stochastic ailment framework (3.1)–(3.2) and its commensurate deterministic structure to demonstrate our findings. The time interval is [0,100] units, while the initial values (V,GL,GA,UL,UA,T,Q)(0)=(600,0.5,1.5,1,2,5,1). By Table 2, we re-select the amalgamation (A1) as the valuation of the mechanism of biological parameters for (3.1)–(3.2) via piecewise technique. A straightforward computations demonstrates that Rp0=ϑλυ2β(ϱ+232)<1. According to Theorem 2.2, HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ will become exterminated with unit probability, then become stable at fractional order η=0.95. Moreover, when R0<1 (see [20]), the deterministic solution (3.1) under (A1) and (A2) suggests that both HIV-1 and HTLV-Ⅰ are expected to die out, regardless of the ICs. Attempting to make (3.1)–(3.2) will be an appropriate strategy from a control standpoint, but HTLV-Ⅰ and HIV-1 viruses are prolonged and the pathogens are very seldom removed. Figure 1 can illustrate the above two conclusions. Figures 24 shows the corresponding three ICs, (V,GL,GA,UL,UA,T,Q)(0)=(400,1,1,1.5,4,2,2), (V,GL,GA,UL,UA,T,Q)(0)=(200,1.5,0.5,2,6,1.5,3) and (V,GL,GA,UL,UA,T,Q)(0)=(500,3,1.5,0.8,3,2,3), under varying population systems.

    Table 2.  Some configurations of biological process variables (2.3) from Table 1.
    Combinations Values
    (A1) υ1=υ2=υ3=0.0001,δ=0.01,1=0.01,2=0.012,
    3=0.02,4=0.03,5=0.04,6=0.05,7=0.06.
    (A2) υ1=υ2=υ3=0.0003,δ=0.001,1=0.01,2=0.012,
    3=0.02,4=0.03,5=0.04,6=0.05,7=0.06.
    (A3) υ1=υ2=0.0001,υ3=0.003,δ=0.001,1=0.01,2=0.012,
    3=0.02,4=0.03,5=0.04,6=0.05,7=0.06.
    (A4) υ1=υ2=0.0003,υ3=0.002,δ=0.01,1=0.01,2=0.012,
    3=0.02,4=0.03,5=0.04,6=0.05,7=0.06.
    (A5) υ1=υ2=0.0005,υ3=0.003,δ=0.1.
    (A6) \upsilon_{1}=\upsilon_{2}=0.0005, \upsilon_{3}=0.003, \delta–varied.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 1.  The HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model exhibits deterministic-stochastic behaviour with humoral immune response and cellular outbreak (3.1)–(3.3) via the power-law memory with \eta = 0.95 and white noises with ICs of (600, 0.5, 1.5, 1, 2, 5, 1) .
    Figure 2.  The HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model exhibits deterministic-stochastic behaviour with humoral immune response and cellular outbreak (3.1)–(3.3) via the power-law memory with \eta = 0.95 and white noises with ICs of (400, 1, 1, 1.5, 4, 2, 2) .
    Figure 3.  The HIV-1/HTLV-I model exhibits deterministic-stochastic behaviour with humoral immune response and cellular outbreak (3.1)–(3.3) via the power-law memory with \eta=0.95 and white noises with ICs of (200,1.5,0.5,2,6,1.5,3) .
    Figure 4.  The HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model exhibits deterministic-stochastic behaviour with humoral immune response and cellular outbreak (3.1)–(3.3) via the power-law memory with \eta = 0.95 and white noises with ICs of (500, 3, 1.5, 0.8, 3, 2, 3) .

    Applying the analogous technique to Caputo-Fabrizio system of DEs (3.7)–(3.9), we consider the same parameters as in (\mathcal{A}_{1}) and (\mathcal{A}_{2}) , but alter the ICs as stated above. The threshold quantities \mathcal{R}_{0} > 1 (see [20]) and \mathbb{R}_{0}^{s} > 1 can be easily calculated. The codynamics will proceed in the mean, as illustrated in Figure 5, assisting outcome of Theorem 2.3 (see Figures 68). This finding implies that HTLV-Ⅰ will become extinct while HIV-1 will become systemic with unproductive humoral immunity.

    Figure 5.  The HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model exhibits deterministic-stochastic behaviour with humoral immune response and cellular outbreak (3.7)–(3.9) via the exponential decay memory with \eta = 0.95 and white noises with ICs of (600, 0.5, 1.5, 1, 2, 5, 1) .
    Figure 6.  The HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model exhibits deterministic-stochastic behaviour with humoral immune response and cellular outbreak (3.7)–(3.9) via the exponential decay with \eta = 0.95 and white noises with ICs of (400, 1, 1, 1.5, 4, 2, 2) .
    Figure 7.  The HIV-1/HTLV-I model exhibits deterministic-stochastic behaviour with humoral immune response and cellular outbreak (3.7)–(3.9) via the exponential decay with \eta=0.95 and white noises with ICs of (200,1.5,0.5,2,6,1.5,3) .
    Figure 8.  The HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model exhibits deterministic-stochastic behaviour with humoral immune response and cellular outbreak (3.7)–(3.9) via the exponential decay memory with \eta = 0.95 and white noises with ICs of (500, 3, 1.5, 0.8, 3, 2, 3) .

    Considering the environmental intensities and parametric variations mentioned in (\mathcal{A}_{3}) and (\mathcal{A}_{4}), the numerical results for (3.12)–(3.14) will be an appropriate strategy from a control standpoint. Theorems 2.2 and 2.3 illustrate that there exists an ESD of probabilistic model (2.3). These findings indicate that HIV-1 will become extinct, whereas HTLV-Ⅰ will become persistent. This is supported by the Figures 912.

    Figure 9.  The HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model exhibits deterministic-stochastic behaviour with humoral immune response and cellular outbreak (3.12)–(3.14) via the generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel with \eta = 0.95 and white noises with ICs of (600, 0.5, 1.5, 1, 2, 5, 1) .
    Figure 10.  The HIV-1/HTLV-I model exhibits deterministic-stochastic behaviour with humoral immune response and cellular outbreak (3.12)–(3.14) via the generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel with \eta=0.95 and white noses with ICs (400,1,1,1.5,4,2,2) .
    Figure 11.  The HIV-1/HTLV-I model exhibits deterministic-stochastic behaviour with humoral immune response and cellular outbreak (3.12)–(3.14) via the generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel with \eta=0.95 and white noises with ICs of (200,1.5,0.5,2,6,1.5,3) .
    Figure 12.  The HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model exhibits deterministic-stochastic behaviour with humoral immune response and cellular outbreak (3.12)–(3.14) via the generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel with \eta = 0.95 and white noises with ICs of (500, 3, 1.5, 0.8, 3, 2, 3) .

    Consider the biological parameters of the system (2.3), which supports the combination (\mathcal{A}_{5}) . Figure 13 depicts the implementation of the control and without control by considering the deterministic version of the system (2.1). The plots evidently depict the current work's goal. When \delta increases, the intensities of HIV-1 particulate and latent/active HIV-1-infected CD4 ^{+} T cells decrease, while the densities of latent/active HTLV-Ⅰ-infected CD4 ^{+} T cells increase. As a result, while HIV-1-specific immune responses can regulate HIV-1 infection, they may also accelerate the evolution of HTLV-Ⅰ.

    Figure 13.  Graphical illustration of the dynamical behavior of HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model with humoral immune response and cellular outbreak derived from model (2.3) in the presence (red-dotted zigzag) and absence (blue-dotted zigzag) of the control.

    To investigate the local appropriate result of the HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model (2.1) for the true density function of the distribution, \mathbb{T} = 2000 is the total iteration time with condition (\mathcal{A}_{6}). The frequency histograms of the HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model (2.1) are shown in Figure 14, along with the corresponding frequency histogram fitting curves of the system (2.1). The probability density function and histogram all nearly coincide with the corresponding fitting curves, implying that the fitting effect of the HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model (2.1) is not only local but also global.

    Figure 14.  The seven histograms of the HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model with probability distribution and probability density functions for (\mathcal{V}, \mathcal{G}^{L}, \mathcal{G}^{A}, \mathcal{U}^{L}, \mathcal{U}^{A}, \mathcal{T}, \mathcal{Q}) are presented. The combination (\mathcal{A}_{6}) determines the other specifications.

    With the increasing occurrence and re-emergence of numerous disease outbreaks, self-preservation has emerged as a significant problem all over the world. We investigated a within-host HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ codynamics system involving immune activation and both virus-to-cell and cell-to-cell mechanisms of propagation utilizing random perturbations and piecewise fractional differential operators. We describe our initial findings on the non-negativity and boundedness of the system's solutions. Furthermore, the presence of a stationary distribution in the system (2.3) was quantitatively authenticated by employing the Khasminskii concept and an appropriate Lyapunov formulation. According to threshold parameter \mathbb{R}_{0}^{p}, we determined the disease's extinction.

    Besides that, we outlined the threshold parameter

    \mathbb{R}_{0}^{s} = \frac{\upsilon_{2}\lambda(1-\lambda)}{\big(\beta+\frac{\wp_{1}^{2}}{2}\big)\big(\epsilon+\xi+\frac{\wp_{2}^{2}}{2}\big)\big(\varrho+\frac{\wp_{3}^{2}}{2}\big)\big(\rho+\frac{\wp_{6}^{2}}{2}\big)\big(\varkappa+\frac{\wp_{7}^{2}}{2}\big)} > 1

    for the unique ergodic and stationary distribution supported by Lyapunov functions. More specifically, it has been demonstrated that the vigour and authenticity of our simulated predictions and numerical results have been furnished with a piecewise fractional differential. Whereas the generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel, exponential decay and power law are currently shown to be effective in capturing multiple interconnection practises, we claim that the capacity to do so could potentially be confined by the enormity of biological form. We may infer that fluctuation may eradicate widespread signals while allowing transmittable illnesses to endure.

    Several intriguing and unresolved issues merit additional deliberation. While analyzing the dynamic behavior of this type of challenge, it is necessary to investigate processes that are influenced by other considerations, including global stochastic Hopf bifurcations or oscillation frequency interference. In research just like this, a few accurate but intricate notions, such as assessing the impact of Markov transitions or Lévy and telegraph noise, can be involved. Such relevant aspects may indeed be addressed in the forthcoming analysis.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors declare no competing interests.



    [1] J. Afiune, Avaliação Ecocardiografica Evolutiva de Recém-nascidos Pre-termo, do Nascimento Até o Termo, Phd thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, 2000.
    [2] E. Demidenko, Mixed Models: Theory and Applications with R, 2 Eds., Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013.
    [3] R. Drikvandi, G. Verbeke, G. Molenberghs, Diagnosing Misspecification of the Random-Effects Distribution in Mixed Models, Biometrics, 73 (2017), 63–71.
    [4] D. A. Freedman, On the so-called 'Huber Sandwich Estimator' and 'Robust Standard Errors', Amer. Stat., 60 (2006), 299–302. http://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152207 doi: 10.1198/000313006X152207
    [5] S. K. Hanneman, Design, Analysis, and Interpretation of Method-Comparison Studies, AACN Adv. Crit. Care, 19 (2008), 223–234. http://doi.org/10.4037/15597768-2008-2015 doi: 10.4037/15597768-2008-2015
    [6] D. A. Harville, Maximum Likelihood Approaches to Variance Component Estimation and to Related Problems, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 72 (1977), 320–338.
    [7] X. Huang, Detecting Random-Effects Model Misspecification via Coarsened Data, Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 55 (2011), 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2010.06.012 doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2010.06.012
    [8] J. Jiang, Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Mixed Model Diagnostics, Ann. Stat., 29 (2001), 1137–1164.
    [9] N. Lange, L. Ryan, Assessing Normality in Random Effects Models, Ann. Stat., 17 (1989), 624–642.
    [10] S. Litière, A. Alonso, G. Molenberghs, Type I and Type II Error under Random-Effects Misspecification in Generalized Linear Mixed Models, Biometrics, 63 (2007), 1038–1044.
    [11] C. Nagle, An Introduction to Fitting and Evaluating Mixed-effects Models in R, Proceedings of the 10th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, 2018, 82–105.
    [12] H. D. Patterson, R. Thompson, Recovery of Inter-block Information when Block Sizes are Unequal, Biometrika, 58 (1971), 545–554,
    [13] R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Available from: https://www.r-project.org/.
    [14] G. K. Robinson, That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects, Stat. Sci., 6 (1991), 15–32,
    [15] F. M. Rocha, J. M. Singer, Selection of Terms in Random Coefficient Regression Models, J. Appl. Stat., 45 (2018), 225–242.
    [16] H. Schielzeth, N. J. Dingemanse, S. Nakagawa, D. F. Westneat, H. Allegue, C. Teplitsky, et al., Robustness of Linear Mixed-Effects Models to Violations of Distributional Assumptions, Methods Ecol. Evol., 11 (2020), 1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13434 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13434
    [17] P. Sen, J. Singer, Large Sample Methods in Statistics: An Introduction with Applications, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1993.
    [18] J. M. Singer, F. M. Rocha, J. S. Nobre, Graphical Tools for Detecting Departures from Linear Mixed Model Assumptions and Some Remedial Measures, Int. Stat. Rev., 85 (2017), 290–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12178 doi: 10.1111/insr.12178
    [19] H. White, Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models, Econometrica, 50 (1982), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912526 doi: 10.2307/1912526
    [20] D. Yu, X. Zhang, K. K. Yau, Asymptotic Properties and Information Criteria for Misspecified Generalized Linear Mixed Models, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.), 80 (2018), 817–836.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Sobia Sultana, Analysis of a generalized proportional fractional stochastic differential equation incorporating Carathéodory's approximation and applications, 2024, 22, 2391-5471, 10.1515/phys-2024-0074
    2. Saima Rashid, Sher Zaman Hamidi, Saima Akram, Muhammad Aon Raza, S. K. Elagan, Beida Mohsen Tami Alsubei, Theoretical and mathematical codynamics of nonlinear tuberculosis and COVID-19 model pertaining to fractional calculus and probabilistic approach, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-59261-7
    3. Saima Rashid, Sher Zaman Hamidi, Muhammad Aon Raza, Rafia Shafique, Assayel Sultan Alsubaie, Sayed K. Elagan, Robustness and exploration between the interplay of the nonlinear co-dynamics HIV/AIDS and pneumonia model via fractional differential operators and a probabilistic approach, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-65329-1
    4. Sobia Sultana, Robustness and dynamical features of fractional difference spacecraft model with Mittag–Leffler stability, 2024, 22, 2391-5471, 10.1515/phys-2024-0066
    5. Saima Rashid, Sher Zaman Hamidi, Saima Akram, Moataz Alosaimi, Yu-Ming Chu, Enhancing the trustworthiness of chaos and synchronization of chaotic satellite model: a practice of discrete fractional-order approaches, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-60268-3
    6. Ru Liu, Jiajin Wen, Lingzhi Zhao, Chebyshev–Jensen-Type Inequalities Involving χ-Products and Their Applications in Probability Theory, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 1495, 10.3390/math12101495
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(812) PDF downloads(57) Cited by(0)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog