
The main purpose of this paper is to present a new computational for approximate analytical solutions of nonlinear time-fractional wave-like equations with variable coefficients using the fractional residual power series method (FRPSM). The fractional derivative is considered in the Caputo sense. This method is based on the generalized Taylor series formula and residual error function. Unlike other analytical methods, FRPSM has a special advantage, that it solves the nonlinear problems without using linearization, discretization, perturbation or any other restrictions. By numerical examples, it is shown that the FRPSM is a simple, effective, and powerful method for finding approximate analytical solutions of nonlinear fractional partial differential equations.
Citation: Ali Khalouta, Abdelouahab Kadem. A new computational for approximate analytical solutions of nonlinear time-fractional wave-like equations with variable coefficients[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 1-14. doi: 10.3934/math.2020001
[1] | Muhammad Imran Liaqat, Sina Etemad, Shahram Rezapour, Choonkil Park . A novel analytical Aboodh residual power series method for solving linear and nonlinear time-fractional partial differential equations with variable coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16917-16948. doi: 10.3934/math.2022929 |
[2] | Musawa Yahya Almusawa, Hassan Almusawa . Numerical analysis of the fractional nonlinear waves of fifth-order KdV and Kawahara equations under Caputo operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 31898-31925. doi: 10.3934/math.20241533 |
[3] | M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Khalil Hadi Hakami, Mohammad Alqudah, Qasem M. Tawhari, Hussain Gissy . Novel Laplace-integrated least square methods for solving the fractional nonlinear damped Burgers' equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 7099-7126. doi: 10.3934/math.2025324 |
[4] | Emad Salah, Ahmad Qazza, Rania Saadeh, Ahmad El-Ajou . A hybrid analytical technique for solving multi-dimensional time-fractional Navier-Stokes system. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1713-1736. doi: 10.3934/math.2023088 |
[5] | M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Osama Y. Ababneh, Rasool Shah, Nehad Ali Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon . Combination of Laplace transform and residual power series techniques of special fractional-order non-linear partial differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5266-5280. doi: 10.3934/math.2023264 |
[6] | Safyan Mukhtar, Wedad Albalawi, Faisal Haroon, Samir A. El-Tantawy . Analytical insight into fractional Fornberg-Whitham equations using novel transform methods. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8165-8190. doi: 10.3934/math.2025375 |
[7] | Qasem M. Tawhari . Mathematical analysis of time-fractional nonlinear Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 9237-9255. doi: 10.3934/math.2025424 |
[8] | Jian-Gen Liu, Jian Zhang . A new approximate method to the time fractional damped Burger equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 13317-13324. doi: 10.3934/math.2023674 |
[9] | Krunal B. Kachhia, Jyotindra C. Prajapati . Generalized iterative method for the solution of linear and nonlinear fractional differential equations with composite fractional derivative operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 2888-2898. doi: 10.3934/math.2020186 |
[10] | Humaira Yasmin, Aljawhara H. Almuqrin . Efficient solutions for time fractional Sawada-Kotera, Ito, and Kaup-Kupershmidt equations using an analytical technique. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 20441-20466. doi: 10.3934/math.2024994 |
The main purpose of this paper is to present a new computational for approximate analytical solutions of nonlinear time-fractional wave-like equations with variable coefficients using the fractional residual power series method (FRPSM). The fractional derivative is considered in the Caputo sense. This method is based on the generalized Taylor series formula and residual error function. Unlike other analytical methods, FRPSM has a special advantage, that it solves the nonlinear problems without using linearization, discretization, perturbation or any other restrictions. By numerical examples, it is shown that the FRPSM is a simple, effective, and powerful method for finding approximate analytical solutions of nonlinear fractional partial differential equations.
Fractional calculus is a branch of mathematical analysis, which studies the generalization of integrals and derivatives of integer order to arbitrary order, that can be real or complex. In recent years, many scientists and researchers have been interested in the topic of fractional calculus because of its several applications in many fields, such as physics, chemistry, engineering, and so on. See for example [9,10,11,19,23,24,25].
Theory and applications of nonlinear fractional partial differential equations (NFPDEs) play an important role in the various fields of engineering and science, including fluid flow, diffusion, viscoelasticity, quantum mechanics, electromagnetic, electrochemistry, biological population models and other applications. The exact solutions of NFPDEs are sometimes too complicated to be attained by conventional techniques due to the computational complexities of nonlinear parts involving them. Therefore, to search of solutions for NFPDEs there are variety of numerical and analytical methods found in literature, among them: Adomian decomposition method (ADM) [22] variational iteration method (VIM) [6], new iterative method (NIM) [12], reduced differential transform method (RDTM) [2], homotopy analysis method (HAM) [3], homotopy perturbation method (HPM) [8]. The residual power series method (RPSM), that was first proposed by Omar Abu Arqub [1], is implemented to obtaine analytic approximate solutions of fractional partial differential equations and convergence of RPSM for these equations is considered [5,7,17,21].
The main aim of this paper is to apply the fractional residual power series method (FRPSM) to find approximate analytical solutions of nonlinear time-fractional wave-like equations with variable coefficients in the form
D2αtu=N∑i,j=1F1ij(X,t,u)∂k+m∂xki∂xmjF2ij(uxi,uxj)+N∑i=1G1i(X,t,u)∂p∂xpiG2i(uxi)+H(X,t,u)+S(X,t), | (1.1) |
with the initial conditions
u(X,0)=f0(X),Dαtu(X,0)=f1(X), | (1.2) |
where D2αt=DαtDαt is the Caputo time-fractional derivative operator of order 2α, 12<α≤1, u={u(X,t),X=(x1,x2,...,xN)∈RN,t≥0,N∈N∗}, F1ij,G1i i,j∈{1,2,...,N} are nonlinear functions of X,t and u, F2ij,G2i i,j∈{1,2,...,N} are nonlinear functions of derivatives of u with respect to xi and xj i,j∈{1,2,...,N}, respectively. Also H,S are nonlinear functions and k,m,p are integers. When α=1, the equation (1.1) reduces to the classical wave-like equations with variable coefficients.
Recently, we have used many numerical techniques to solve this kind of equations, where the Caputo time-fractional derivative operator is Dαt,1<α≤2. Note that, the solution of Eqs. (1.1)-(1.2) obtained by the FRPSM is quite different from the solutions found in [12,13,14,15].
The rest of the paper is structured as follows: In Section 2, we present basic definitions and properties of fractional calculus theory and fractional power series. In Section 3, we introduce our results of fractional residual power series method (FRPSM) for the nonlinear time-fractional wave-like equations (1.1) with the initial conditions (1.2). In Section 4, we propose three numerical examples in order to show the validity and effectiveness of this approach. In Section 5, we discuss our obtained results represented by figures and table. Finally, conclusions are drawn in the last section.
In this section, we give the necessary notations and basic definitions and properties of fractional calculus theory, which are used further in this paper. For more details, see [16,18,20].
Definition 2.1. A real function u(X,t),X∈RN,N∈N∗,t∈R+, is considered to be in the space Cμ(RN×R+), μ∈ R, if there exists a real number p>μ, so that u(X,t)=tpv(X,t), where v ∈C(RN×R+), and it is said to be in the space Cnμ if u(n)∈Cμ(RN×R+),n∈N.
Definition 2.2. The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator of order α>0 of u∈Cμ(RN×R+),μ≥−1, is defined as follows
Iαtu(X,t)={1Γ(α)t∫t0(t−ξ)α−1u(X,ξ)dξ,α>0,t>ξ>t0≥0,u(X,t), α=0. | (2.1) |
Definition 2.3. The Caputo time-fractional derivative operator of order α>0 of u∈Cn−1(RN×R+),n∈N, is defined as follows
Dαtu(X,t)={1Γ(n−α)t∫t0(t−ξ)n−α−1u(n)(X,ξ)dξ,n−1<α<n,u(n)(X,t), α=n. | (2.2) |
The following are the basic properties of the Caputo time-fractional derivative operator which we will need here.
Let n−1<α≤n and β≥−1. Then
(1)
Dαt(c)=0, where c is a constant. |
(2)
Dαt(t−t0)β={Γ(β+1)Γ(β−α+1)(t−t0)β−α if β>n−1, 0, if β≤n−1. |
For the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral and Caputo time-fractional derivative, we have the following relation
IαtDαtu(X,t)=u(X,t)−n−1∑k=0u(k)(X,t+0)(t−t0)kk!,X∈RN,t>t0≥0. | (2.3) |
Now, we introduce some definitions and theorems related to the fractional power series (FPS) which are used in this paper. For more details, see [4].
Definition 2.4. A power series of the form
∞∑n=0cn(X)(t−t0)nα=c0(X)+c1(X)(t−t0)α+c2(X)(t−t0)2α+... | (2.4) |
where m−1<α≤m and t≥t0is called the multiple fractional power series (MFPS) about t0, where t is a variable and cn(X) are constants called the coefficients of the series.
Theorem 2.1. Suppose that u(X,t) has a MFPS representation at t=t0 of the form
u(X,t)=∞∑n=0cn(X)(t−t0)nα,0≤m−1<α≤m,X∈RN, t0≤t≤t0+R, | (2.5) |
and R is the radius of convergence of the MFPS.
If u∈C(RN×[t0,t0+R)) and Dnαtu∈C(RN×(t0,t0+R)) for n=0,1,2,..., then the coefficients Cn(X) will take the form of
cn(X)=Dnαtu(X,t0)Γ(nα+1), | (2.6) |
where Dnαt=Dαt.Dαt.....Dαt (n-times).
Theorem 3.1. Consider the nonlinear time-fractional wave-like equations (1.1) with the initial conditions (1.2). Then, the solution of Eqs. (1.1)-(1.2) is given in the form of infinite series which converges rapidly to the exact solution as follows
u(X,t)=∞∑n=0fn(X)tnαΓ(nα+1),12<α<1,0≤t<R,X∈RN,N∈N∗, |
where fn(X) are the coefficients of the series have been constructed by FRPSM and R is the radius of convergence.
Proof. We consider the following nonlinear time-fractional wave-like equations (1.1) with the initial conditions (1.2).
First we define
N(u,uxi,uxj)=N∑i,j=1F1ij(X,t,u)∂k+m∂xki∂xmjF2ij(uxi,uxj),M(u,uxi)=N∑i=1G1i(X,t,u)∂p∂xpiG2i(uxi),K(u)=H(X,t,u). |
Eq. (1.1) is written in the form
D2αtu=N(u,uxi,uxj)+M(u,uxi)+K(u)+S(X,t). | (3.1) |
The FRPSM assumes the solution for Eq. (3.1) as a multiple fractional power series about the initial point t=0, as follows
u(X,t)=∞∑n=0fn(X)tnαΓ(nα+1), | (3.2) |
where R is the radius of convergence of the MFPS.
In the next step, the kth truncated series of u(X,t) that is uk(X,t) can be written as
uk(X,t)=k∑n=0fn(X)tnαΓ(nα+1),k=0,1,2,... | (3.3) |
Since the initial conditions in Eq. (1.2). Then, the approximate solution to (3.1) can be written in the form of
u(X,t)=f0(X)+f1(X)tαΓ(α+1)+∞∑n=2fn(X)tnαΓ(nα+1), |
where f0(X)+f1(X)tαΓ(α+1) is considered to be the 1st FRPS approximate solution of u(X,t).
Then uk(X,t) could be reformulated as
uk(X,t)=f0(X)+f1(X)tαΓ(α+1)+k∑n=2fn(X)tnαΓ(nα+1),k=2,3,4,... | (3.4) |
Now, we define the residual function as
Res(X,t)=D2αtu−N(u,uxi,uxj)−M(u,uxi)−K(u)−S(X,t), | (3.5) |
and the kth truncated residual function as
Resk(X,t)=D2αtuk−N(uk,ukxi,ukxj)−M(uk,ukxi)−K(uk)−S(X,t),k=2,3,4,... | (3.6) |
It is clear that Res(X,t)=0 and limk⟶∞Resk(X,t)=Res(X,t) for each X∈RN and t≥0. In fact this lead to D(n−2)αtRes(X,t)=0 for n=2,3,4,...,k because the fractional derivative of a constant is zero in the Caputo sense. Also, the fractional derivative D(n−2)αt of Res(X,t) and Resk(X,t) are matching at t=0 for each n=2,3,4,...,k, that is,
D(n−2)αtRes(X,0)=D(n−2)αtResk(X,0)=0,n=2,3,4,...,k. | (3.7) |
To clarify the FRPS technique, we substitute the kth truncated series of u(X,t) into Eq. (3.6), find the fractional derivative formula D(n−2)αt of Resk(X,t) and then, we solve the obtained algebraic (3.7), to get the required coefficients fn(X),n=2,3,4,...in Eq. (3.4). Thus the uk(X,t) approximate solutions can be obtained respectively.
In this section, we describe the method explained in the Section 3. Three numerical examples of nonlinear time-fractional wave-like equations with variable coefficients are considered to validate the capability, reliability and efficiency of FRPSM.
Example 4.1. Consider the 2-dimensional nonlinear time-fractional wave-like equation with variable coefficients
D2αtu=∂2∂x∂y(uxxuyy)−∂2∂x∂y(xyuxuy)−u, 12<α≤1, | (4.1) |
with the initial conditions
u(x,y,0)=exy,Dαtu(x,y,0)=exy, | (4.2) |
where D2αt is the Caputo fractional derivative operator of order 2α, u is a function of x,y,t∈R×R×R+.
For α=1, the exact solution of Eqs. (4.1)-(4.2) is given by [14]
u(x,y,t)=(cos(t)+sin(t))exy. |
According to FRPSM described in Section 3, by applying on the Eqs. (4.1)-(4.2), we have
First, the 1st FRPS approximate solution of u(x,y,t) is
u2(x,y,t)=exy+exytαΓ(α+1). | (4.3) |
Secondly, construct the kth truncated series and kth residual function of Eqs. (4.1)-(4.2) as follow
uk(x,y,t)=exy+exytαΓ(α+1)+k∑n=2fn(x,y)tnαΓ(nα+1), | (4.4) |
Resk(x,y,t)=D2αtuk−∂2∂x∂y(ukxxukyy)+∂2∂x∂y(xyukxuky)+uk. | (4.5) |
By (3.7), we have
D(k−2)αtResk(x,y,0)=0,k=2,3,4,... | (4.6) |
Taking k=2 in (4.6), we obtain
f2(x,y)=−exy. |
Then, the 2nd truncated approximate solution will be
u2(x,y,t)=exy+exytαΓ(α+1)−exyt2αΓ(2α+1). |
In a similar way, taking k=3,4,5 in (4.6), we have
f3(x,y)=−exy,f4(x,y)=exy,f5(x,y)=exy. |
Then the 5th order truncated approximate solution of Eqs. (4.1)-(4.2) can be obtained as follows
u5(x,y,t)=exy+exytαΓ(α+1)−exyt2αΓ(2α+1)−exyt3αΓ(3α+1)+exyt4αΓ(4α+1)+exyt5αΓ(5α+1). |
Following the same step, then the solution of Eqs. (4.1)-(4.2) can be expressed by
u(x,y,t)=(1−t2αΓ(2α+1)+t4αΓ(4α+1)−...)exy+(tαΓ(α+1)−t3αΓ(3α+1)+t5αΓ(5α+1)−...)exy=(cos(tα,α)+sin(tα,α))exy. | (4.7) |
When α=1, the exact solution is
u(x,y,t)=(cos(t)+sin(t))exy. |
Remark 4.1. Comparing our obtained result (4.7) with the results in [12,13,14,15], it can be seen that the result is new.
Example 4.2. Consider the following nonlinear time-fractional wave-like equation with variable coefficients
D2αtu=u2∂2∂x2(uxuxxuxxx)+u2x∂2∂x2(u3xx)−18u5+u, 12<α≤1, | (4.8) |
with the initial conditions
u(x,0)=ex,Dαtu(x,0)=ex, | (4.9) |
where D2αtis the Caputo fractional derivative operator of order 2α, and u is a function of x,t∈]0,1[×R+.
For α=1, the exact solution of Eqs. (4.8)-(4.9) is given by [14]
u(x,t)=exp(t+x). |
According to FRPSM described in Section 3, by applying on the Eqs. (4.8)-(4.9), we have
First, the 1st FRPS approximate solution of u(x,t) is
u2(x,t)=ex+extαΓ(α+1). | (4.10) |
Secondly, construct the kth truncated series and kth residual function of Eqs. (4.8)-(4.9) as follow
uk(x,t)=ex+extαΓ(α+1)+k∑n=2fn(x)tnαΓ(nα+1), | (4.11) |
Resk(x,t)=D2αtuk−(uk)2∂2∂x2(ukxukxxukxxx)−(ukx)2∂2∂x2(ukxx)3+18(uk)5−uk. | (4.12) |
By (3.7), we have
D(k−2)αtResk(x,0)=0,k=2,3,4,... | (4.13) |
Taking k=2 in (4.13), we obtain
f2(x)=ex. |
Then the 2nd truncated approximate solution will be
u2(x,t)=ex+extαΓ(α+1)+ext2αΓ(2α+1). |
In a similar way, taking k=3,4,5 in (4.13), we have
f3(x)=ex,f4(x)=ex,f5(x)=ex. |
Then the 5th order truncated approximate solution of Eqs. (4.8)-(4.9) can be obtained as follows:
u5(x,t)=ex+extαΓ(α+1)+ext2αΓ(2α+1)+ext3αΓ(3α+1)+ext4αΓ(4α+1)+ext5αΓ(5α+1). |
Following the same step, then the solution of Eqs. (4.8)-(4.9) can be expressed by
u(x,t)=(1+tαΓ(α+1)+t2αΓ(2α+1)+t3αΓ(3α+1)+t4αΓ(4α+1)+t5αΓ(5α+1)+...)ex=exp((tα,α)+x). | (4.14) |
When α=1, the exact solution is
u(x,t)=exp(t+x). |
Remark 4.2. Comparing our obtained result (4.14) with the results in [12,13,14,15], it can be seen that the result is new.
Example 4.3 Consider the following one dimensional nonlinear time-fractional wave-like equation with variable coefficients
D2αtu=x2∂∂x(uxuxx)−x2(uxx)2−u, 1<α≤2, | (4.15) |
with the initial conditions
u(x,0)=0,Dαtu(x,0)=x2, | (4.16) |
where D2αtis the Caputo fractional derivative operator oforder 2α, and u is a function of x,t∈]0,1[×R+.
For α=1, the exact solution of Eqs. (4.15)-(4.16) is given by [14]
u(x,t)=x2sin(t). |
According to FRPSM described in Section 3, by applying on the Eqs. (4.15)-(4.16), we have
First, the 1st FRPS approximate solution of u(x,t) is
u2(x,t)=x2tαΓ(α+1). | (4.17) |
Secondly, construct the kth truncated series and kth residual function of Eqs. (4.15)-(4.16) as follow
uk(x,t)=x2tαΓ(α+1)+k∑n=2fn(x)tnαΓ(nα+1), | (4.18) |
Resk(x,t)=D2αtuk−x2∂∂x(ukxukxx)−x2(ukxx)2−uk. | (4.19) |
By (3.7), we have
D(k−2)αtResk(x,t)=0,k=2,3,4,... | (4.20) |
Taking k=2 in (4.18), we obtain
f2(x)=0. |
Then the 2nd truncated approximate solution will be
u2(x,t)=x2tαΓ(α+1). |
In a similar way, taking k=3,4,5 in (4.20), we have
f3(x)=−x2,f4(x)=0,f5(x)=x2. |
Then the 5th order truncated approximate solution of Eqs. (4.15)-(4.16) can be obtained as follows:
u5(x,t)=x2tαΓ(α+1)−x2t3αΓ(3α+1)+x2t5αΓ(5α+1). |
Following the same step, then the solution of Eqs. (4.15)-(4.16) can be expressed by
u(x,t)=x2(tαΓ(α+1)−t3αΓ(3α+1)+t5αΓ(5α+1)−...)=x2sin(tα,α). | (4.21) |
When α=1, the exact solution is
u(x,t)=x2sin(t). |
Remark 4.3. Comparing our obtained result (4.21) with the results in [12,13,14,15], it can be seen that the result is new.
In this section, we discuss and evaluate the numerical results of the approximate solutions for Examples 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 respectively. Figures 1, 3 and 5 represents the surface graph of the 5th FRPSM approximate solution at α=0.6,0.8,1 and the exact solution. Figures 2, 4 and 6 represents the behavior of the 5th FRPSM approximate solution at α=0.7,0.8,0.95,1 and the exact solution. These figures afirm that when the order of the fractional derivative α approaches 1, the approximate solutions obtained by FRPSM approach the exact solutions.
Tables 1–3 represents the numerical values of the 5th FRPSM approximate solution for different values of α and the exact solution. These tables clarifies the convergence of the approximate solutions to the exact solutions.
t | α=0.7 | α=0.8 | α=0.9 | α=1 | Absolute error | |
uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uexact | |uexact−uFRPSM| | |
0.1 | 1.5207 | 1.4784 | 1.4394 | 1.4058 | 1.4058 | 1.8085×10−9 |
0.3 | 1.6652 | 1.6594 | 1.6375 | 1.6061 | 1.6061 | 1.3536×10−6 |
0.5 | 1.6750 | 1.7193 | 1.7411 | 1.7425 | 1.7424 | 2.9725×10−5 |
0.7 | 1.6137 | 1.6956 | 1.7634 | 1.8095 | 1.8093 | 6.7065×10−2 |
0.9 | 1.5164 | 1.6112 | 1.714 | 1.805 | 1.8040 | 1.0547×10−3 |
t | α=0.7 | α=0.8 | α=0.9 | α=1 | Absolute error | |
uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uexact | |uexact−uFRPSM| | |
0.1 | 2.0702 | 1.9606 | 1.8809 | 1.8221 | 1.8221 | 2.323×10−9 |
0.3 | 2.7499 | 2.5282 | 2.3585 | 2.2255 | 2.2255 | 1.7436×10−6 |
0.5 | 3.5066 | 3.1781 | 2.9222 | 2.7182 | 2.7183 | 3.8504×10−5 |
0.7 | 4.3927 | 3.9506 | 3.6011 | 3.3198 | 3.3201 | 2.9890×10−4 |
0.9 | 5.4403 | 4.8764 | 4.4228 | 4.0538 | 4.0552 | 1.3929×10−3 |
t | α=0.7 | α=0.8 | α=0.9 | α=1 | Absolute error | |
uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uexact | |uexact−uFRPSM| | |
0.1 | 0.054 | 0.042209 | 0.032605 | 0.024958 | 0.024958 | 4.9596×10−12 |
0.3 | 0.10969 | 0.097871 | 0.085658 | 0.07388 | 0.07388 | 1.0835×10−8 |
0.5 | 0.14473 | 0.13893 | 0.13028 | 0.11986 | 0.11986 | 3.8618×10−7 |
0.7 | 0.16673 | 0.16866 | 0.16664 | 0.16106 | 0.16105 | 4.0574×10−6 |
0.9 | 0.17926 | 0.18843 | 0.19429 | 0.19586 | 0.19583 | 2.346×10−5 |
In this paper, fractional residual power series method (FRPSM) is successfully applied to find approximate analytical solutions of time-fractional wave-like equations with variables coefficients. This method was tested on three numerical examples. Numerical results obtained confirm the easily, accurately and efficiency of the proposed method. The advantage of the FRPSM is that it reduces significantly the numerical computations to find approximate analytical solutions for this type of equations compared to current methods such as the perturbation technique, differential transform method (DTM) and Adomian decomposition method (ADM), thus, we can conclude that, the FRPSM is simple, effective, and practically method for solving many other nonlinear fractional partial differential equations.
The authors are thankful to a Professor Hamouche Zakia and to the anonymous referees for their careful checking of the details and for their valuable suggestions and comments which cause substantial improvements in the paper.
[1] |
O. Abu Arqub, Series solution of fuzzy differential equations under strongly generalized differentiability, J. Adv. Res. Appl. Math., 5 (2013), 31-52. doi: 10.5373/jaram.1447.051912
![]() |
[2] |
O. Acan, M. M. Al Qurashi and D. Baleanu, Reduced differential transform method for solving time and space local fractional partial differential equations, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 10 (2017), 5230-5238. doi: 10.22436/jnsa.010.10.09
![]() |
[3] | M. Dehghan, J. Manafian and A. Saadatmandi, Solving nonlinear fractional partial differential equations using the homotopy analysis method, Numer. Meth. Part. D. E., 26 (2009), 448-479. |
[4] |
A. El-Ajou, O. Abu Arqub, Z. Al Zhour, et al. New results on fractional power series: theories and applications, Entropy, 15 (2013), 5305-5323. doi: 10.3390/e15125305
![]() |
[5] |
A. El-Ajou, O. AbuArquba and Sh. Momanib, Approximate analytical solution of the nonlinear fractional KdV-Burgers equation: A new iterative algorithm, J. Comput. Phys., 293 (2015), 81-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.08.004
![]() |
[6] |
A. Elsaid, The variational iteration method for solving Riesz fractional partial differential equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 60 (2010), 1940-1947. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.07.027
![]() |
[7] |
A. A. Freihet and M. Zuriqat, Analytical Solution of Fractional Burgers-Huxley Equations via Residual Power Series Method, Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics, 40 (2019), 174-182. doi: 10.1134/S1995080219020082
![]() |
[8] |
P. K. Gupta and M. Singh, Homotopy perturbation method for fractional Fornberg-Whitham equation, Comput. Math. Appl., 61 (2011), 250-254. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.10.045
![]() |
[9] | K. Hosseini, A. Bekir, M. Kaplan, et al. On On a new technique for solving the nonlinear conformable time-fractional differential equations, Opt. Quant. Electron., 49 (2017), 343. |
[10] | M. Kaplan, A. Bekir, A. Akbulut, et al. The modified simple equation method for nonlinear fractional differential equations, Rom. J. Phys., 60 (2015), 1374-1383. |
[11] |
M. Kaplan and A. Bekir, Construction of exact solutions to the space-time fractional differential equations via new approach, Optik, 132 (2017), 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.11.139
![]() |
[12] | A. Khalouta and A. Kadem, Comparison of New Iterative Method and Natural Homotopy Perturbation Method for Solving Nonlinear Time-Fractional Wave-Like Equations with Variable Coefficients, Nonlinear Dyn. Syst. Theory, 19 (2019), 160-169. |
[13] |
A. Khalouta and A. Kadem, Fractional natural decomposition method for solving a certain class of nonlinear time-fractional wave-like equations with variable coefficients, Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: Mathematica, 11 (2019), 99-116. doi: 10.2478/ausm-2019-0009
![]() |
[14] | A. Khalouta and A. Kadem, A New Technique for Finding Exact Solutions of Nonlinear TimeFractional Wave-Like Equations with Variable Coefficients, Proc. Inst. Math. Mech. Natl. Acad.Sci. Azerb., 2019. |
[15] | A. Khalouta and A. Kadem, A New iterative natural transform method for solving nonlinear Caputo time-fractional partial differential equations, Appear in: Jordan J. Math. Stat., 2019. |
[16] | A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava and J. J. Trujillo, Theory and Application of Fractional Differential equations, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006. |
[17] |
A. Kumar, S. Kumar and M. Singh, Residual power series method for fractional Sharma-TassoOlever equation, Commun. Numer. Anal., 2016 (2016), 1-10. doi: 10.5899/2016/cna-00235
![]() |
[18] | K. S. Miller and B. Ross, An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations, John Willey and Sons, New York, 1993. |
[19] | Z. Pinar, On the explicit solutions of fractional Bagley-Torvik equation arises in engineering, An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA), 9 (2019), 52-58. |
[20] | I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, Academic Press, New York, 1999. |
[21] | F. Tchier, M. Inc, Z. S. Korpinar, et al. Solutions of the time fractional reaction-diffusion equations with residual power series method, Adv. Mech. Eng., 8 (2016), 1-10. |
[22] | H. Thabet and S. Kendre, New modification of Adomian decomposition method for solving a system of nonlinear fractional partial differential equations, Int. J. Adv. Appl. Math. and Mech., 6 (2019), 1-13. |
[23] |
S. Uçar, E. Uçar, N. Özdemira, et al. Mathematical analysis and numerical simulation for a smoking model with Atangana-Baleanu derivative, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 118 (2019), 300-306. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.12.003
![]() |
[24] | M. Yavuz, Novel solution methods for initial boundary value problems of fractional order with conformable differentiation, An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA), 8 (2017), 1-7. |
[25] | M. Yavuz and N. Özdemira, Comparing the new fractional derivative operators involving exponential and Mittag-Leffler kernel, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 13 (2020), 995-1006. |
1. | Hossein Saboorkazeran, Mehdi Raoofian Naeeni, Mohammad Ali Banihashemi, Short-Term and Long-Term Solutions of Two-Dimensional Shallow Water Equations Using the Modified Decomposition Method, 2020, 2228-6160, 10.1007/s40996-020-00423-8 | |
2. | Suliman Alfaqeih, Gizel Bakıcıerler, Emine Mısırlı, Application of Double Shehu Transforms to Caputo Fractional Partial Differential Equations, 2022, 1016-2526, 1, 10.52280/pujm.2022.540101 | |
3. | Bahram Jalili, Payam Jalili, Amirali Shateri, Davood Domiri Ganji, Rigid plate submerged in a Newtonian fluid and fractional differential equation problems via Caputo fractional derivative, 2022, 6, 26668181, 100452, 10.1016/j.padiff.2022.100452 | |
4. | Muhammad Imran Liaqat, Sina Etemad, Shahram Rezapour, Choonkil Park, A novel analytical Aboodh residual power series method for solving linear and nonlinear time-fractional partial differential equations with variable coefficients, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 16917, 10.3934/math.2022929 | |
5. | Muhammad Imran Liaqat, Ali Akgül, Eugenii Yurevich Prosviryakov, An efficient method for the analytical study of linear and nonlinear time-fractional partial differential equations with variable coefficients, 2023, 27, 1991-8615, 214, 10.14498/vsgtu2009 | |
6. | Mohammad Alaroud, Hussam Aljarrah, Abedel-Karrem Alomari, Anuar Ishak, Maslina Darus, Explicit and approximate series solutions for nonlinear fractional wave-like differential equations with variable coefficients, 2024, 10, 26668181, 100680, 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100680 | |
7. | Hijaz Ahmad, Dilber Uzun Ozsahin, Umar Farooq, Mohamed Abdelsabour Fahmy, M. Daher Albalwi, Hanaa Abu-Zinadah, Comparative analysis of new approximate analytical method and Mohand variational transform method for the solution of wave-like equations with variable coefficients, 2023, 51, 22113797, 106623, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106623 | |
8. | Yu-Ming Chu, Sobia Sultana, Shazia Karim, Saima Rashid, Mohammed Shaaf Alharthi, A New Scheme of the ARA Transform for Solving Fractional-Order Waves-Like Equations Involving Variable Coefficients, 2024, 138, 1526-1506, 761, 10.32604/cmes.2023.028600 |
t | α=0.7 | α=0.8 | α=0.9 | α=1 | Absolute error | |
uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uexact | |uexact−uFRPSM| | |
0.1 | 1.5207 | 1.4784 | 1.4394 | 1.4058 | 1.4058 | 1.8085×10−9 |
0.3 | 1.6652 | 1.6594 | 1.6375 | 1.6061 | 1.6061 | 1.3536×10−6 |
0.5 | 1.6750 | 1.7193 | 1.7411 | 1.7425 | 1.7424 | 2.9725×10−5 |
0.7 | 1.6137 | 1.6956 | 1.7634 | 1.8095 | 1.8093 | 6.7065×10−2 |
0.9 | 1.5164 | 1.6112 | 1.714 | 1.805 | 1.8040 | 1.0547×10−3 |
t | α=0.7 | α=0.8 | α=0.9 | α=1 | Absolute error | |
uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uexact | |uexact−uFRPSM| | |
0.1 | 2.0702 | 1.9606 | 1.8809 | 1.8221 | 1.8221 | 2.323×10−9 |
0.3 | 2.7499 | 2.5282 | 2.3585 | 2.2255 | 2.2255 | 1.7436×10−6 |
0.5 | 3.5066 | 3.1781 | 2.9222 | 2.7182 | 2.7183 | 3.8504×10−5 |
0.7 | 4.3927 | 3.9506 | 3.6011 | 3.3198 | 3.3201 | 2.9890×10−4 |
0.9 | 5.4403 | 4.8764 | 4.4228 | 4.0538 | 4.0552 | 1.3929×10−3 |
t | α=0.7 | α=0.8 | α=0.9 | α=1 | Absolute error | |
uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uexact | |uexact−uFRPSM| | |
0.1 | 0.054 | 0.042209 | 0.032605 | 0.024958 | 0.024958 | 4.9596×10−12 |
0.3 | 0.10969 | 0.097871 | 0.085658 | 0.07388 | 0.07388 | 1.0835×10−8 |
0.5 | 0.14473 | 0.13893 | 0.13028 | 0.11986 | 0.11986 | 3.8618×10−7 |
0.7 | 0.16673 | 0.16866 | 0.16664 | 0.16106 | 0.16105 | 4.0574×10−6 |
0.9 | 0.17926 | 0.18843 | 0.19429 | 0.19586 | 0.19583 | 2.346×10−5 |
t | α=0.7 | α=0.8 | α=0.9 | α=1 | Absolute error | |
uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uexact | |uexact−uFRPSM| | |
0.1 | 1.5207 | 1.4784 | 1.4394 | 1.4058 | 1.4058 | 1.8085×10−9 |
0.3 | 1.6652 | 1.6594 | 1.6375 | 1.6061 | 1.6061 | 1.3536×10−6 |
0.5 | 1.6750 | 1.7193 | 1.7411 | 1.7425 | 1.7424 | 2.9725×10−5 |
0.7 | 1.6137 | 1.6956 | 1.7634 | 1.8095 | 1.8093 | 6.7065×10−2 |
0.9 | 1.5164 | 1.6112 | 1.714 | 1.805 | 1.8040 | 1.0547×10−3 |
t | α=0.7 | α=0.8 | α=0.9 | α=1 | Absolute error | |
uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uexact | |uexact−uFRPSM| | |
0.1 | 2.0702 | 1.9606 | 1.8809 | 1.8221 | 1.8221 | 2.323×10−9 |
0.3 | 2.7499 | 2.5282 | 2.3585 | 2.2255 | 2.2255 | 1.7436×10−6 |
0.5 | 3.5066 | 3.1781 | 2.9222 | 2.7182 | 2.7183 | 3.8504×10−5 |
0.7 | 4.3927 | 3.9506 | 3.6011 | 3.3198 | 3.3201 | 2.9890×10−4 |
0.9 | 5.4403 | 4.8764 | 4.4228 | 4.0538 | 4.0552 | 1.3929×10−3 |
t | α=0.7 | α=0.8 | α=0.9 | α=1 | Absolute error | |
uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uFRPSM | uexact | |uexact−uFRPSM| | |
0.1 | 0.054 | 0.042209 | 0.032605 | 0.024958 | 0.024958 | 4.9596×10−12 |
0.3 | 0.10969 | 0.097871 | 0.085658 | 0.07388 | 0.07388 | 1.0835×10−8 |
0.5 | 0.14473 | 0.13893 | 0.13028 | 0.11986 | 0.11986 | 3.8618×10−7 |
0.7 | 0.16673 | 0.16866 | 0.16664 | 0.16106 | 0.16105 | 4.0574×10−6 |
0.9 | 0.17926 | 0.18843 | 0.19429 | 0.19586 | 0.19583 | 2.346×10−5 |