Research article Special Issues

Resistive and propulsive forces in wheelchair racing: a brief review

  • Wheelchair racing is one of the most important sports in the Paralympics. The detailed analysis of all parameters is of great importance to achieve sporting excellence in this modality. In wheelchair racing, resistive and propulsive forces determine the movement of the athlete-wheelchair system. Most of propulsive forces are generated by the strength of individuals. As a result, strength levels play an important role in propelling the athlete-wheelchair system. Thus, the main objective of this study is to provide a set of methodologies to assess propulsive and resistive forces. The manuscript presents different methods and procedures, based on previous studies, that can be used for wheelchair racing athletes. Resistive forces in wheelchair racing can be evaluated by analytical procedures, experimental tests, and numerical simulations. Moreover, the strength of athletes' upper limbs to generate propulsion in wheelchair races can be assessed by dynamometry, one-repetition maximum, and medicine ball throw test. It may be that the tests presented may be useful to predict the strength and endurance of athletes' upper limbs. However, this competitive sport still presents a considerable gap in the Paralympics research. Currently, in Paralympic sport, evidence-based methodologies are lacking, making it an issue for athletes, coaches and researchers to support their work on scientific evidences.

    Citation: Ricardo Silveira, Daniel A. Marinho, Catarina C. Santos, Tiago M. Barbosa, Eduarda Coelho, Jorge Morais, Pedro Forte. Resistive and propulsive forces in wheelchair racing: a brief review[J]. AIMS Biophysics, 2022, 9(1): 42-55. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2022004

    Related Papers:

    [1] Shasha Bian, Yitong Pei, Boling Guo . Numerical simulation of a generalized nonlinear derivative Schrödinger equation. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(8): 3130-3152. doi: 10.3934/era.2022159
    [2] Huanhuan Li, Lei Kang, Meng Li, Xianbing Luo, Shuwen Xiang . Hamiltonian conserved Crank-Nicolson schemes for a semi-linear wave equation based on the exponential scalar auxiliary variables approach. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(7): 4433-4453. doi: 10.3934/era.2024200
    [3] Yunxia Niu, Chaoran Qi, Yao Zhang, Wahidullah Niazi . Numerical analysis and simulation of the compact difference scheme for the pseudo-parabolic Burgers' equation. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(3): 1763-1791. doi: 10.3934/era.2025080
    [4] Shao-Xia Qiao, Li-Jun Du . Propagation dynamics of nonlocal dispersal equations with inhomogeneous bistable nonlinearity. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(3): 2269-2291. doi: 10.3934/era.2020116
    [5] Guoliang Zhang, Shaoqin Zheng, Tao Xiong . A conservative semi-Lagrangian finite difference WENO scheme based on exponential integrator for one-dimensional scalar nonlinear hyperbolic equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(1): 1819-1839. doi: 10.3934/era.2020093
    [6] Wenjing An, Xingdong Zhang . An implicit fully discrete compact finite difference scheme for time fractional diffusion-wave equation. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(1): 354-369. doi: 10.3934/era.2024017
    [7] Chang Hou, Hu Chen . Stability and pointwise-in-time convergence analysis of a finite difference scheme for a 2D nonlinear multi-term subdiffusion equation. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(3): 1476-1489. doi: 10.3934/era.2025069
    [8] Xuefei He, Kun Wang, Liwei Xu . Efficient finite difference methods for the nonlinear Helmholtz equation in Kerr medium. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(4): 1503-1528. doi: 10.3934/era.2020079
    [9] E. A. Abdel-Rehim . The time evolution of the large exponential and power population growth and their relation to the discrete linear birth-death process. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(7): 2487-2509. doi: 10.3934/era.2022127
    [10] Junseok Kim . Maximum principle preserving the unconditionally stable method for the Allen–Cahn equation with a high-order potential. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(1): 433-446. doi: 10.3934/era.2025021
  • Wheelchair racing is one of the most important sports in the Paralympics. The detailed analysis of all parameters is of great importance to achieve sporting excellence in this modality. In wheelchair racing, resistive and propulsive forces determine the movement of the athlete-wheelchair system. Most of propulsive forces are generated by the strength of individuals. As a result, strength levels play an important role in propelling the athlete-wheelchair system. Thus, the main objective of this study is to provide a set of methodologies to assess propulsive and resistive forces. The manuscript presents different methods and procedures, based on previous studies, that can be used for wheelchair racing athletes. Resistive forces in wheelchair racing can be evaluated by analytical procedures, experimental tests, and numerical simulations. Moreover, the strength of athletes' upper limbs to generate propulsion in wheelchair races can be assessed by dynamometry, one-repetition maximum, and medicine ball throw test. It may be that the tests presented may be useful to predict the strength and endurance of athletes' upper limbs. However, this competitive sport still presents a considerable gap in the Paralympics research. Currently, in Paralympic sport, evidence-based methodologies are lacking, making it an issue for athletes, coaches and researchers to support their work on scientific evidences.



    In [12,Definition 11.2] and [18,p. 134,Theorem A], the second kind Bell polynomials Bn,k for nk0 are defined by

    Bn,k(x1,x2,,xnk+1)=Nnk+10n!nk+1i=1i!nk+1i=1(xii!)i,

    where N0={0}N, the sum is taken over =(1,2,,nk+1) with iN0 satisfying nk+1i=1i=k and nk+1i=1ii=n. This kind of polynomials are very important in combinatorics, analysis, and the like. See the review and survey article [53] and closely related references therein.

    In [36,pp. 13–15], when studying Grothendieck's inequality and completely correlation-preserving functions, Oertel obtained the interesting identity

    2nk=1(1)k(2n+k)!k!B2n,k(0,16,0,340,0,5112,,1+(1)k+12[(2nk)!!]2(2nk+2)!)=(1)n

    for nN, where

    Bn,k(x1,x2,,xnk+1)=k!n!Bn,k(1!x1,2!x2,,(nk+1)!xnk+1). (1.1)

    In [36,p. 15], Oertel wrote that "However, already in this case we don't know a closed form expression for the numbers

    B2n,k(0,16,0,340,0,5112,,1+(1)k+12[(2nk)!!]2(2nk+2)!). (1.2)

    An even stronger problem appears in the complex case, since already a closed-form formula for the coefficients of the Taylor series of the inverse of the Haagerup function is still unknown''.

    By virtue of the relation (1.1), we see that, to find a closed-form formula for the sequence (1.2), it suffices to discover a closed-form formula for

    B2n,k(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,1+(1)k+12[(2nk)!!]22nk+2). (1.3)

    In this paper, one of our aims is to derive closed-form formulas for the sequence (1.3). The first main result can be stated as the following theorem.

    Theorem 1.1. For k,n0, mN, and xmC, we have

    B2n+1,k(0,x2,0,x4,,1+(1)k2x2nk+2)=0. (1.4)

    For k,nN, we have

    B2n,2k1(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,0,[(2n2k+1)!!]22n2k+3)=22n(2k1)![kp=1(4)p1(2k12p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)k1p=1(1)p1(2k12p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)]

    and

    B2n,2k(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,[(2n2k1)!!]22n2k+1,0)=22n(2k)![kp=1(1)p1(2k2p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)kp=1(4)p1(2k2p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)],

    where s(n,k), which can be generated by

    xn=nm=0s(n,m)xm, (1.5)

    denote the first kind Stirling numbers and

    T(r;q,j;ρ)=(1)q[rm=q(ρ)ms(r,m)(mq)][rm=jq(ρ)ms(r,m)(mjq)]. (1.6)

    In Section 2, for proving Theorem 1.1, we will establish two general expressions for power series expansions of (arcsinx)21 and (arcsinx)2 respectively.

    In Section 3, with the aid of general expressions for power series expansions of the functions (arcsinx)21 and (arcsinx)2 established in Section 2, we will prove Theorem 1.1 in details.

    In Section 4, basing on arguments in [20,p. 308] and [28,Section 2.4] and utilizing general expressions for power series expansions of (arcsinx)21 and (arcsinx)2 established in Section 2, we will derive series representations of generalized logsine functions which were originally introduced in [34] and have been investigating actively, deeply, and systematically by mathematicians [9,10,14,15,16,17,29,30,31,37,38,57] and physicists [3,19,20,28].

    Finally, in Section 5, we will list several remarks on our main results and related stuffs.

    To prove Theorem 1.1, we need to establish the following general expressions of the power series expansions of (arcsinx) for N.

    Theorem 2.1. For N and |x|<1, the functions (arcsinx) can be expanded into power series

    (arcsinx)21=(4)1n=04n(2n)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]x2n+21(2n+2121) (2.1)

    or

    (arcsinx)2=(1)1n=04n(2n)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]x2n+2(2n+22), (2.2)

    where s(n,k) denotes the first kind Stirling numbers generated in (1.5) and T(r;q,j;ρ) is defined by (1.6).

    Proof. In [4,pp. 262–263,Proposition 15], [7,p. 3], [20,p. 308], and [28,pp. 49–50], it was stated that the generating expression for the series expansion of (arcsinx)n with nN is

    exp(tarcsinx)==0b(t)x!,

    where b0(t)=1, b1(t)=t, and

    b2(t)=1k=0[t2+(2k)2],b2+1(t)=tk=1[t2+(2k1)2]

    for N. This means that, when writing

    b(t)=k=0β,ktk,0,

    where β0,0=1, β2,0=0, β2,2k+1=0, and β21,2k=0 for k0 and 1, we have

    =0(arcsinx)t!==0x!k=0β,ktk=k=0=kx!β,ktk==0[m=βm,xmm!]t.

    Equating coefficients of t gives

    (arcsinx)=!m=βm,xmm!=!n=0βn+,xn+(n+)!,N. (2.3)

    It is not difficult to see that

    b2(t)=41t2(1it2)1(1+it2)1andb2+1(t)=4t(12it2)(12+it2),

    where i=1 is the imaginary unit and

    (z)n=n1=0(z+)={z(z+1)(z+n1),n11,n=0

    is called the rising factorial of zC, while

    zn=n1=0(z)={z(z1)(zn+1),n11,n=0 (2.4)

    is called the falling factorial of zC. Making use of the relation

    (z)n=(1)nznorzn=(1)n(z)n

    in [52,p. 167], we acquire

    b2(t)=41t2it211it211andb2+1(t)=4tit212it212.

    Utilizing the relation (1.5) in [59,p. 19,(1.26)], we obtain

    b2(t)=41t21m=0s(1,m)2m(it2)m1m=0(1)ms(1,m)2m(it+2)m=41t21m=0s(1,m)2mmk=0(mk)iktk(2)mk1m=0(1)ms(1,m)2mmk=0(mk)iktk2mk=41t21m=0(1)ms(1,m)mk=0(1)k2k(mk)iktk1m=0(1)ms(1,m)mk=012k(mk)iktk=41t21k=0[1m=k(1)m+ks(1,m)2k(mk)]iktk1k=0[1m=k(1)ms(1,m)2k(mk)]iktk=41t22(1)k=0kq=0[1m=q(1)m+qs(1,m)2q(mq)1m=kq(1)ms(1,m)2kq(mkq)]iktk=41t22(1)k=012kkq=0[1m=q(1)m+qs(1,m)(mq)1m=kq(1)ms(1,m)(mkq)]iktk=412(1)k=0ik2k[kq=0(1m=q(1)ms(1,m)(mq))1m=kq(1)ms(1,m)(mkq)]tk+2=412(1)k=0ik2k[kq=0T(1;q,k;1)]tk+2

    and

    b2+1(t)=4tm=0s(,m)2m(it1)mm=0(1)ms(,m)2m(it+1)m=4tm=0s(,m)2mmk=0(1)mk(mk)iktkm=0(1)ms(,m)2mmk=0(mk)iktk=4tk=0[m=k(1)ms(,m)2m(mk)](i)ktkk=0[m=k(1)ms(,m)2m(mk)]iktk=42k=0ik[kq=0(1)q(m=q(1)ms(,m)2m(mq))m=kq(1)ms(,m)2m(mkq)]tk+1=42k=0ik[kq=0T(;q,k;12)]tk+1.

    This means that

    2k=0β2,ktk=2(1)k=2β2,k+2tk+2=2(1)k=0β2,k+2tk+2=412(1)k=0ik2k[kq=0T(1;q,k;1)]tk+2

    and

    2+1k=0β2+1,ktk=2k=1β2+1,k+1tk+1=2k=0β2+1,k+1tk+1=42k=0ik[kq=0T(;q,k;12)]tk+1.

    Further equating coefficients of tk+2 and tk+1 respectively arrives at

    β2,k+2=41ik2kkq=0T(1;q,k;1)andβ2+1,k+1=4ikkq=0T(;q,k;12)

    for k0.

    Replacing by 21 for N in (2.3) leads to

    (arcsinx)21=(21)!n=0βn+21,21xn+21(n+21)!=(21)!n=0β2n+21,21x2n+21(2n+21)!=(21)!n=0[4n+1i2(1)2(1)q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]x2n+21(2n+21)!=(1)141(21)!n=0[4n2(1)q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]x2n+21(2n+21)!=(4)1n=04n(2n)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]x2n+21(2n+2121).

    Replacing by 2 for N in (2.3) leads to

    (arcsinx)2=(2)!n=0βn+2,2xn+2(n+2)!=(2)!n=0β2n+2,2x2n+2(2n+2)!=(1)1(2)!n=0[4n2(1)q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]x2n+2(2n+2)!=(1)1n=04n(2n)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]x2n+2(2n+22).

    The proof of Theorem 2.1 is complete.

    We now start out to prove Theorem 1.1.

    In the last line of [18,p. 133], there exists the formula

    1k!(m=1xmtmm!)k=n=kBn,k(x1,x2,,xnk+1)tnn! (3.1)

    for k0. When taking x2m1=0 for mN, the left hand side of the formula (3.1) is even in t(,) for all k0. Therefore, the formula (1.4) is valid.

    Ones know that the power series expansion

    arcsint==0[(21)!!]2(2+1)!t2+1,|t|<1 (3.2)

    is valid, where (1)!!=1. This implies that

    B2n,k(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,1+(1)k+12[(2nk)!!]22nk+2)=B2n,k((arcsint)|t=02,(arcsint)|t=03,(arcsint)(4)|t=04,,(arcsint)(2nk+2)|t=02nk+2).

    Employing the formula

    Bn,k(x22,x33,,xnk+2nk+2)=n!(n+k)!Bn+k,k(0,x2,x3,,xn+1)

    in [18,p. 136], we derive

    B2n,k(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,1+(1)k+12[(2nk)!!]22nk+2)=(2n)!(2n+k)!B2n+k,k(0,(arcsint)|t=0,(arcsint)|t=0,,(arcsint)(2n+1)|t=0).

    Making use of the formula (3.1) yields

    n=0Bn+k,k(x1,x2,,xn+1)k!n!(n+k)!tn+kn!=(m=1xmtmm!)k,n=0Bn+k,k(x1,x2,,xn+1)(n+kk)tn+kn!=(m=1xmtmm!)k,Bn+k,k(x1,x2,,xn+1)=(n+kk)limt0dndtn[m=0xm+1tm(m+1)!]k,B2n+k,k(x1,x2,,x2n+1)=(2n+kk)limt0d2ndt2n[m=0xm+1tm(m+1)!]k.

    Setting x1=0 and xm=(arcsint)(m)|t=0 for m2 gives

    d2ndt2n[m=0xm+1tm(m+1)!]k=d2ndt2n[1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!]k=d2ndt2n(arcsinttt)k=d2ndt2nkp=0(1)kp(kp)(arcsintt)p=kp=1(1)kp(kp)d2ndt2n(arcsintt)p.

    Accordingly, we obtain

    limt0d2ndt2n[1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!]2k1=2k1p=1(1)2kp1(2k1p)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)p=kp=1(2k12p1)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2p1k1p=1(2k12p)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2p

    and

    limt0d2ndt2n[1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!]2k=2kp=1(1)2kp(2kp)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)p=kp=1(2k2p)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2pkp=1(2k2p1)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2p1.

    From the power series expansions (2.1) and (2.2) in Theorem 2.1, it follows that

    limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2p1=(1)p14p1(2p1)!×limt0d2ndt2nj=0[4j2p2q=0T(j+p1;q,2p2;12)]t2j(2j+2p1)!=(1)p14n+p1(2n+2p12n)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)

    and

    limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2p=(1)p1(2p)!limt0d2ndt2nj=0[4j2p2q=0T(j+p1;q,2p2;1)]t2j(2j+2p)!=(1)p14n(2n+2p2n)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1).

    Therefore, we arrive at

    limt0d2ndt2n[1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!]2k1=4nkp=1(4)p1(2k12p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)4nk1p=1(1)p1(2k12p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)

    and

    limt0d2ndt2n[1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!]2k=4nkp=1(1)p1(2k2p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)4nkp=1(4)p1(2k2p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12).

    Consequently, we acquire

    B2n,2k1(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,0,[(2n2k+1)!!]22n2k+3)=(2n)!(2n+2k1)!B2n+2k1,2k1(0,(arcsint)|t=0,(arcsint)|t=0,,(arcsint)(2n+1)|t=0)=(2n)!(2n+2k1)!(2n+2k12k1)limt0d2ndt2n(1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!)2k1=1(2k1)![4nkp=1(4)p1(2k12p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)4nk1p=0(1)p1(2k12p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)]

    and

    B2n,2k(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,[(2n2k1)!!]22n2k+1,0)=(2n)!(2n+2k)!B2n+2k,2k(0,(arcsint)|t=0,(arcsint)|t=0,,(arcsint)(2n+1)|t=0)=(2n)!(2n+2k)!(2n+2k2k)limt0d2ndt2n(1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!)2k=1(2k)![4nkp=1(1)p1(2k2p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)4nkp=1(4)p1(2k2p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)].

    The proof of Theorem 1.1 is complete.

    The logsine function

    Lsj(θ)=θ0(ln|2sinx2|)j1dx

    and generalized logsine function

    Ls()j(θ)=θ0x(ln|2sinx2|)j1dx

    were introduced originally in [34,pp. 191–192], where ,j are integers, j+11, and θ is an arbitrary real number. There have been many papers such as [3,9,10,14,15,16,17,19,20,28,29,30,31,37,38,57] devoted to investigation and applications of the (generalized) logsine functions in mathematics, physics, engineering, and other mathematical sciences.

    Theorem 4.1. Let zn for zC and n{0}N denote the falling factorial defined by (2.4) and let T(r;q,j;ρ) be defined by (1.6). In the region 0<θπ and for j,N, generalized logsine functions Ls()j(θ) have the following series representations:

    1. for j2+13,

    Ls(21)j(θ)=θ22[ln(2sinθ2)]j2(1)(j2)(21)!(ln2)j1(2sinθ2ln2)2×n=0(2sinθ2)2n(2n+2)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×[j21α=0(lnsinθ2ln2)α(j21α)αk=0(1)kαk(2n+2)k+1(lnsinθ2)k]; (4.1)

    2. for j2+24,

    Ls(2)j(θ)=θ2+12+1[ln(2sinθ2)]j21+(1)(j21)(2)!(ln2)j12(4sinθ2ln2)2+1×n=0[(2sinθ2)2n(2n+2+1)!2q=0T(n+;q,2;12)]×[j22α=0(j22α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+2+1)k+1(lnsinθ2)k]; (4.2)

    3. for j211,

    Ls(22)j(θ)=(1)243(22)!(ln2)j(sinθ2ln2)21×n=0[(2sinθ2)2n(2n+22)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]×j2+1α=0(j2+1α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+21)k+1(lnsinθ2)k; (4.3)

    4. for j211,

    Ls(21)j(θ)=(1)(21)!(ln2)j(2sinθ2ln2)2×n=0[(2sinθ2)2n(2n+21)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×j2α=0(j2α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+2)k+1(lnsinθ2)k. (4.4)

    Proof. In [28,p. 49,Section 2.4], it was obtained that

    Ls(k)j(θ)=θk+1k+1[ln(2sinθ2)]jk1+2k+1(jk1)k+1sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)k+1lnjk2(2x)xdx (4.5)

    for 0<θπ and jk20. Making use of Theorem 2.1 and the formula

    xnlnmxdx=xn+1mk=0(1)kmklnmkx(n+1)k+1,m,n0 (4.6)

    in [22,p. 238,2.722], we acquire

    sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)2lnj21(2x)xdx=(1)1(2)!n=04n(2n+2)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]sin(θ/2)0x2n+21lnj21(2x)dx=(1)1(2)!n=04n(2n+2)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×[sin(θ/2)0x2n+21(ln2+lnx)j21dx]=(1)1(2)!n=04n(2n+2)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×[j21α=0(j21α)(ln2)j2α1sin(θ/2)0x2n+21(lnx)αdx]=(1)1(2)!n=04n(2n+2)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×[j21α=0(j21α)(ln2)j2α1(sinθ2)2n+2αk=0(1)kαk(2n+2)k+1(lnsinθ2)αk]=(1)1(2)!(ln2)j21(sinθ2)2n=04n(2n+2)!(sinθ2)2n[22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×[j21α=0(lnsinθ2ln2)α(j21α)αk=0(1)kαk(2n+2)k+1(lnsinθ2)k]

    for j2+13. Substituting this result into (4.5) for k=21 yields (4.1).

    Similarly, by virtue of Theorem 2.1 and the formula (4.6), we also have

    sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)2+1lnj22(2x)xdx=(1)4(2+1)!n=0[4n(2n+2+1)!2q=0T(n+;q,2;12)]sin(θ/2)0x2n+2lnj22(2x)dx=(1)4(2+1)!n=0[4n(2n+2+1)!2q=0T(n+;q,2;12)]×j22α=0(j22α)(ln2)j2α2sin(θ/2)0x2n+2(lnx)αdx=(1)4(2+1)!n=0[4n(2n+2+1)!2q=0T(n+;q,2;12)]×j22α=0(j22α)(ln2)j2α2(sinθ2)2n+2+1αk=0(1)kαk(lnsinθ2)αk(2n+2+1)k+1=(1)4(2+1)!(sinθ2)2+1(ln2)j22n=0[4n(2n+2+1)!(sinθ2)2n2q=0T(n+;q,2;12)]×[j22α=0(j22α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+2+1)k+1(lnsinθ2)k]

    for N and j2(+1)4. Substituting this result into (4.5) for k=2 yields (4.2).

    In [20,p. 308], it was derived that

    Ls(k)j(θ)=2k+1sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)k1x2lnjk1(2x)dx (4.7)

    for 0<θπ and jk+11. Differentiating with respect to x on both sides of the formulas (2.1) and (2.2) in Theorem 2.1 results in

    (arcsinx)221x2=(1)141(22)!n=0[4n22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]x2n+22(2n+22)! (4.8)

    and

    (arcsinx)211x2=(1)1(21)!n=0[4n22q=0T(n+;q,2;1)]x2n+21(2n+21)! (4.9)

    for N. Substituting the power series expansions (4.8) and (4.9) into (4.7) and employing the indefinite integral (4.6) respectively reveal

    Ls(22)j(θ)=221sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)221x2lnj2+1(2x)dx=(1)243(22)!n=0[4n(2n+22)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]×sin(θ/2)0x2n+22(ln2+lnx)j2+1dx=(1)243(22)!n=0[4n(2n+22)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]×j2+1α=0(j2+1α)(ln2)j2α+1sin(θ/2)0x2n+22(lnx)αdx=(1)243(22)!(ln2)j(sinθ2ln2)21n=0[4n(2n+22)!(sinθ2)2n×22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]×j2+1α=0(j2+1α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+21)k+1(lnsinθ2)k

    for j211 and

    Ls(21)j(θ)=22sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)211x2lnj2(2x)dx=(1)22(21)!n=0[4n(2n+21)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×sin(θ/2)0x2n+21(ln2+lnx)j2dx=(1)22(21)!n=0[4n(2n+21)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×j2α=0(j2α)(ln2)j2αsin(θ/2)0x2n+21(lnx)αdx=(1)(21)!(ln2)j(2sinθ2ln2)2n=0[(2sinθ2)2n(2n+21)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×j2α=0(j2α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+2)k+1(lnsinθ2)k

    for j21. The series representations (4.3) and (4.4) are thus proved. The proof of Theorem 4.1 is complete.

    Finally, we list several remarks on our main results and related stuffs.

    Remark 5.1. For nk1, the first kind Stirling numbers s(n,k) can be explicitly computed by

    |s(n+1,k+1)|=n!n1=k11112=k112k21k1=21k1k11k=11k. (5.1)

    The formula (5.1) was derived in [41,Corollary 2.3] and can be reformulated as

    |s(n+1,k+1)|n!=nm=k|s(m,k)|m!

    for nk1. From the equation (1.5), by convention, we assume s(n,k)=0 for n<k and k,n<0. In recent years, the first kind Stirling numbers s(n,k) have been investigated in [39,40,41,42,45] and closely related references therein.

    Remark 5.2. For |x|<1, we have the following series expansions of arcsinx and its powers.

    1. The series expansion (3.2) of arcsinx can be rewritten as

    arcsinxx=1!n=0[(2n1)!!]2x2n(2n+1)!, (5.2)

    where (1)!!=1. Various forms of (5.2) can be found in [1,4.4.40] and [2,p. 121,6.41.1].

    2. The series expansion of (arcsinx)2 can be rearranged as

    (arcsinxx)2=2!n=0[(2n)!!]2x2n(2n+2)!. (5.3)

    The variants of (5.3) can be found in [2,p. 122,6.42.1], [4,pp. 262–263,Proposition 15], [5,pp. 50–51 and p. 287], [6,p. 384], [7,p. 2,(2.1)], [13,Lemma 2], [20,p. 308], [21,pp. 88-90], [22,p. 61,1.645], [32,p. 1011], [33,p. 453], [47,Section 6.3], [58], [60,p. 59,(2.56)], or [62,p. 676,(2.2)]. It is clear that the series expansion (5.3) and its equivalent forms have been rediscovered repeatedly. For more information on the history, dated back to 1899 or earlier, of the series expansion (5.3) and its equivalent forms, see [7,p. 2] and [32,p. 1011].

    3. The series expansion of (arcsinx)3 can be reformulated as

    (arcsinxx)3=3!n=0[(2n+1)!!]2[nk=01(2k+1)2]x2n(2n+3)!. (5.4)

    Different variants of (5.4) can be found in [2,p. 122,6.42.2], [4,pp. 262–263,Proposition 15], [11,p. 188,Example 1], [20,p. 308], [21,pp. 88–90], [22,p. 61,1.645], or [27,pp. 154–155,(832)].

    4. The series expansion of (arcsinx)4 can be restated as

    (arcsinxx)4=4!n=0[(2n+2)!!]2[nk=01(2k+2)2]x2n(2n+4)!. (5.5)

    There exist three variants of (5.5) in [4,pp. 262–263,Proposition 15], [7,p. 3,(2.2)], and [20,p. 309].

    5. Basing on the formula (2.21) in [28,p. 50], we concretely obtain

    (arcsinxx)5=5!2n=0[(2n+3)!!]2[(n+1k=01(2k+1)2)2n+1k=01(2k+1)4]x2n(2n+5)!. (5.6)

    6. In [7], the special series expansions

    (arcsinx2)2=12n=1x2n(2nn)n2,(arcsinx2)4=32n=1(n1m=11m2)x2n(2nn)n2,(arcsinx2)6=454n=1(n1m=11m2m1=112)x2n(2nn)n2,(arcsinx2)8=3152n=1(n1m=11m2m1=1121p=11p2)x2n(2nn)n2

    were listed. In general, it was obtained in [7,pp. 1–2] that

    (arcsinx2)2=(2)!n=1H(n)x2n(2nn)n2,N (5.7)

    and

    (arcsinx2)2+1=(2+1)!n=1G(n)(2nn)24n+1x2n+12n+1,{0}N, (5.8)

    where H1(n)=14, G0(n)=1,

    H+1(n)=14n1m1=11(2m1)2m11m2=11(2m2)2m11m=11(2m)2,

    and

    G(n)=n1m1=01(2m1+1)2m11m2=01(22+1)2m11m=01(2m+1)2.

    The convention is that the sum is zero if the starting index exceeds the finishing index.

    7. In [7,(2.9) and (4.3)], [25,p. 480,(88.2.2)], and [56,p. 124], there exist the formulas

    (arcsinxx)=n=0[(1k=1{nk1nk=0(2nk12nk)![(nk1nk)!]2(2nk12nk+1)122nk12nk})×(2n1)!(n1!)2(2n1+1)122n1]x2n (5.9)

    and

    (arcsinxx)=!n=0[nn1=0(2n1n1)2n1+1nn2=n1(2n22n1n2n1)2n2+2nn=n1(2n2n1nn1)2n+14n]xn. (5.10)

    All the power series expansions from (5.2) to (5.6) can also be deduced from Theorem 2.1.

    By the way, we notice that the quantity in the pair of bigger brackets, the coefficient of x2n, in the formula (5.9) has no explicit relation with n. This means that there must be some misprints and typos somewhere in the formula (5.9). On 30 January 2021, Christophe Vignat (Tulane University) pointed out that n0=n is the missing information in the formula (5.9).

    In [28,pp. 49–50,Section 2.4], the power series expansions of (arcsinx)k for 2k13 were concretely and explicitly written down in alternative forms. The main idea in the study of the power series expansions of (arcsinx)k for 2k13 was related with series representations for generalized logsine functions in [28,p. 50,(2.24) and (2.25)]. The special interest is special values of generalized logsine functions defined by [28,p. 50,(2.26) and (2.27)].

    In [54,Theorem 1.4] and [55,Theorem 2.1], the nth derivative of arcsinx was explicitly computed.

    In [43,44], three series expansions (5.2), (5.3), (5.4) and their first derivatives were used to derive known and new combinatorial identities and others.

    Because coefficients of x2n+21 and x2n+2 in (2.1) and (2.2) contain three times sums, coefficients of x2n and x2n+1 in (5.7) and (5.8) contain times sums, coefficients of x2n in (5.9) contain 1 times sums, and coefficients of xn in (5.10) contain times sums, we conclude that the series expansions (2.1) and (2.2) are more elegant, more operable, more computable, and more applicable.

    Remark 5.3. Two expressions (2.1) and (2.2) in Theorem 2.1 for series expansions of (arcsinx)21 and (arcsinx)2 are very close and similar to, but different from, each other. Is there a unified expression for series expansions of (arcsinx)21 and (arcsinx)2? If yes, two closed-form formulas for B2n,k in Theorem 1.1 would also be unified. We believe that the formula

    exp(2aarcsinx2)=n=0(ia)n/2(ia+1)n/2(ix)nn! (5.11)

    mentioned in [7,p. 3,(2.7)] and collected in [25,p. 210,(10.49.33)] would be useful for unifying two expressions (2.1) and (2.2) in Theorem 2.1, where extended Pochhammer symbols

    (ia)n/2=Γ(ia+n2)Γ(ia)and(ia+1)n/2=Γ(ia+1n2)Γ(ia+1) (5.12)

    were defined in [25,p. 5,Section 2.2.3], and the Euler gamma function Γ(z) is defined [59,Chapter 3] by

    Γ(z)=limnn!nznk=0(z+k),zC{0,1,2,}.

    What are closed forms and why do we care closed forms? Please read the paper [8].

    Remark 5.4. In [2,p. 122,6.42], [27,pp. 154–155,(834)], [33,p. 452,Theorem], and [47,Section 6.3,Theorem 21,Sections 8 and 9], it was proved or collected that

    arcsinx1x2=n=022n(n!)2x2n+1(2n+1)!,|x|1. (5.13)

    In [6,p. 385], [47,Theorem 24], and [61,p. 174,(10)], it was proved that

    n=1(2x)2n(2nn)=x21x2+xarcsinx(1x2)3/2,|x|<1. (5.14)

    These series expansions (5.13) and (5.14) can be derived directly from the series expansion for (arcsinx)2 and are a special case of (4.9) for =1.

    Remark 5.5. The series expansion of the function 1x2arcsinx was listed in [2,p. 122,6.42.4] which can be corrected and reformulated as

    1x2arcsinx=x1!n=1[(2n2)!!]2(2n)x2n+1(2n+1)!,|x|1. (5.15)

    Basing on the relation

    (1x2)[(arcsinx)]=1x2(arcsinx)1

    and utilizing series expansions of (arcsinx)3 and (arcsinx)4, after simple operations, we can readily derive

    1x2(arcsinx)2=x22!n=1[(2n1)!!]2[(2n+1)n1k=01(2k+1)21]x2n+2(2n+2)! (5.16)

    and

    1x2(arcsinx)3=x33!n=1[(2n)!!]2[(2n+2)n1k=01(2k+2)21]x2n+3(2n+3)!. (5.17)

    From (4.8) and (4.9), we can generalize the series expansions (5.15), (5.16), and (5.17) as

    1x2(arcsinx)22=x22+(1)141(22)!×n=1[A(,n)(2n+22)(2n+23)A(,n1)]x2n+22(2n+22)! (5.18)

    and

    1x2(arcsinx)21=x21+(1)1(21)!×n=1[B(,n)(2n+21)(2n+22)B(,n1)]x2n+21(2n+21)! (5.19)

    for N, where

    A(,n)=4n22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12),B(,n)=4n22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1),

    and T(r;q,j;ρ) is defined by (1.6). Considering both coefficients of x22 and x21 in the power series expansions (5.18) and (5.19) must be 1, we acquire two combinatorial identities

    2q=0T(;q,2;12)=(1)4and2q=0T(;q,2;1)=(1)

    for {0}N, where T(r;q,j;ρ) is defined by (1.6).

    Remark 5.6. Making use of Theorem 1.1, we readily obtain the first several values of the sequence (1.3) in Tables 1 and 2.

    Table 1.  The sequence B2n,2k1 in (1.3) for 1n,k8.
    B2n,2k1 k=1 k=2 k=3 k=4 k=5 k=6 k=7 k=8
    n=1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=2 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=3 2257 59 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=4 1225 42 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=5 89302511 3951 359 0 0 0 0 0
    n=6 10805602513 25155245 1155 0 0 0 0 0
    n=7 1217431215 85621185 314314 500581 0 0 0 0
    n=8 410883035062517 18974980350 2847704863 1401403 0 0 0 0

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2.  The sequence B2n,2k in (1.3) for 1n,k8.
    B2n,2k k=1 k=2 k=3 k=4 k=5 k=6 k=7 k=8
    n=1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=2 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=4 20675 3527 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=5 30525 210 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=6 234839257 35211 38527 0 0 0 0 0
    n=7 516651345 10679068415 7007 0 0 0 0 0
    n=8 106480673775 88916832815 2892890 2502581 0 0 0 0

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In the papers [46,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55] and closely related references therein, the authors and their coauthors discovered and applied closed form expressions for many special values of the second kind Bell polynomials Bn,k(x1,x2,,xnk+1) for nk0.

    Remark 5.7. Taking θ=π3 in (4.3) and (4.4) give

    Ls(22)j(π3)=(1)(44)!!(ln2)j2+1n=0[1(2n+22)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]×j2+1α=0(1)α(j2+1α)αk=0αk(2n+21)k+1(ln2)k

    and

    Ls(21)j(π3)=(1)(21)!(ln2)j2n=0[1(2n+21)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×j2α=0(1)α(j2α)αk=0αk(2n+2)k+1(ln2)k

    for N, where zn for zC and n{0}N denotes the falling factorial defined by (2.4) and T(r;q,j;ρ) is defined by (1.6). In [28,p. 50], it was stated that the values Ls()j(π3) have been related to special interest in the calculation of the multiloop Feynman diagrams [19,20].

    Similarly, we can also deduce series representations for special values of the logsine function Ls()j(θ) at θ=π2, π4, π6 and θ=π. These special values were originally derived in [30,31,34] and also considered in [3,9,10,14,15,16,17,19,20,28,29,37,38,57] and closely related references therein.

    Remark 5.8. This paper is a revised version of electronic arXiv preprints [23,24].

    The authors thank

    1. Frank Oertel (Philosophy, Logic & Scientific Method Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Sciences, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK; f.oertel@email.de) for his citing the paper [53] in his electronic preprint [35]. On 10 October 2020, this citation and the Google Scholar Alerts leaded the authors to notice the numbers (1.2) in [35]. On 26 January 2021, he sent the important paper [7] to the authors and others. We communicated and discussed with each other many times.

    2. Chao-Ping Chen (Henan Polytechnic University, China; chenchaoping@sohu.com) for his asking the combinatorial identity in [43,Theorem 2.2], or the one in [44,Theorem 2.1], via Tencent QQ on 18 December 2020. Since then, we communicated and discussed with each other many times.

    3. Mikhail Yu. Kalmykov (Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Russia; kalmykov.mikhail@googlemail.com) for his noticing [43,Remark 4.2] and providing the references [19,20,28,30,31,34] on 9 and 27 January 2021. We communicated and discussed with each other many times.

    4. Li Yin (Binzhou University, China; yinli7979@163.com) for his frequent communications and helpful discussions with the authors via Tencent QQ online.

    5. Christophe Vignat (Department of Physics, Universite d'Orsay, France; Department of Mathematics, Tulane University, USA; cvignat@tulane.edu) for his sending electronic version of those pages containing the formulas (5.9), (5.11), and (5.12) in [25,56] on 30 January 2021 and for his sending electronic version of the monograph [27] on 8 February 2021.

    6. Frédéric Ouimet (California Institute of Technology, USA; ouimetfr@caltech.edu) for his photocopying by Caltech Library Services and transferring via ResearchGate those two pages containing the formulas (5.9) and (5.11) on 2 February 2021.

    7. anonymous referees for their careful corrections to and valuable comments on the original version of this paper.

    The author Dongkyu Lim was partially supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea under Grant NRF-2021R1C1C1010902, Republic of Korea.

    All authors contributed equally to the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


    Acknowledgments



    This research is supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P. (project UIDB04045/2020) and The APC. It has been funded by the Research Center in Sports Health and Human Development, Covilhã, Portugal.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    Author contributions:



    Conceptualization, R.S.; P.F.; E.C. and J.E.M..; methodology, P.F. and J.E.M.; validation, T.M.B, D.A.M; formal analysis, R.S., C.C.S P.F.; investigation, R.S. and P.F.; resources, D.A.M and T.M.B.; data curation, R.S. and P.F.; writing—original draft preparation, R.S. C.C.S. and P.F.; writing—review and editing, P.F., J.E.M., E.C., T.M.B; visualization, D.A.M, E.C. and J.E.M.; supervision, P.F., E.C. and J.E.M.; project administration, R.S. and P.F.; funding acquisition, D.A.M. and T.M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    [1] Celestino T, Pereira A (2018) In a pursuit of excellence in the adapted sport: a case study. Desporto e Atividade Física para Todos–Revista Ciêntifica da FPDD 4: 25-37.
    [2] Forte P, Barbosa TM, Marinho DA (2015) Technologic appliance and performance concerns in wheelchair racing–helping Paralympic athletes to excel, In: Liu, C.H., 101-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/61806
    [3] IPC International Paralympic Committee Athletics Classification Rules and Regulations, 2018. Available from: https://www.paralympic.org/athletics/classification
    [4] Tweedy S, Bourke J (2009) IPC athletics classification project for physical impairments: Final report—stage 1.
    [5] Forte P, Marinho DA, Morais JE, et al. (2018) Estimation of mechanical power and energy cost in elite wheelchair racing by analytical procedures and numerical simulations. Comput Method Biomec Biomed Eng 21: 585-592. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2018.1502277
    [6] Barbosa TM, Forte P, Morais JE, et al. (2014) Partial contribution of rolling friction and drag force to total resistance of an elite wheelchair athlete. In 1st International Conference in Sports Science & Technology : 749-753.
    [7] Barbosa TM, Coelho E (2017) Monitoring the biomechanics of a wheelchair sprinter racing the 100 m final at the 2016 Paralympic games. Eur J Phys 38: 044001.
    [8] Vanlandewijck YC, Verellen J, Tweedy SM (2010) Towards evidence-based classification-the impact of impaired trunk strength on wheelchair propulsion. Adv Rehabil 3: 1-5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284843638
    [9] Cooper RA (1990) Wheelchair racing sports science: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev 27: 295-312.
    [10] Forte P, Marinho DA, Morais JE, et al. (2019) Analysis of the resistive forces acting on a world-ranked wheelchair sprinter at different speeds. Motricidade 15: 78-79.
    [11] Forte P, Marinho DA, Morais JE, et al. (2018) The variations on the aerodynamics of a world-ranked wheelchair sprinter in the key-moments of the stroke cycle: a numerical simulation analysis. PloS One 13: e0193658. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193658
    [12] Beaumont F, Lestriez P, Estocq P, et al. (2019) Aerodynamic investigation of the thermo-dependent flow structure in the wake of a cyclist. J Biomech 82: 387-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.11.006
    [13] Blocken B, Toparlar Y, van Druenen T, et al. (2018) Aerodynamic drag in cycling team time trials. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 182: 128-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.09.015
    [14] Fuss FK (2009) Influence of mass on the speed of wheelchair racing. Sports Eng 12: 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-009-0027-2
    [15] de Groot S, Vegter RJK, van der Woude LHV (2013) Effect of wheelchair mass, tire type and tire pressure on physical strain and wheelchair propulsion technique. Med Eng Phys 35: 1476-1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.03.019
    [16] Cowan RE, Nash MS, Collinger JL, et al. (2009) Impact of surface type, wheelchair weight, and axle position on wheelchair propulsion by novice older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehab 90: 1076-1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.10.034
    [17] Sagawa Y, Watelain E, Lepoutre FX, et al. (2010) Effects of wheelchair mass on the physiologic responses, perception of exertion, and performance during various simulated daily tasks. Arch Phys Med Rehab 91: 1248-1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.05.011
    [18] Samuelsson KAM, Tropp H, Nylander E, et al. (2004) The effect of rear-wheel position on seating ergonomics and mobility efficiency in wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 41: 65-74.
    [19] MacLeish MS, Cooper RA, Harralson J, et al. (1993) Design of a composite monocoque frame racing wheelchair. J Rehabil Res Dev 30: 233.
    [20] Forte P, Marinho DA, Nikolaidis PT, et al. (2020) Analysis of cyclist's drag on the aero position using numerical simulations and analytical procedures: a case study. Int J Env Res Pub He 17: 3430. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103430
    [21] Forte P, Morais JE, P Neiva H, et al. (2020) The drag crisis phenomenon on an elite road cyclist—a preliminary numerical simulations analysis in the aero position at different speeds. Int J Env Res Pub He 17: 5003. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145003
    [22] Moonen P, Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2007) Indicators for the evaluation of wind tunnel test section flow quality and application to a numerical closed-circuit wind tunnel. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 95: 1289-1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2007.02.027
    [23] Defraeye T, Blocken B, Koninckx E, et al. (2010) Aerodynamic study of different cyclist positions: CFD analysis and full-scale wind-tunnel tests. J Biomech 43: 1262-1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.025
    [24] Singh M, Singh N (2013) Review of design and construction of an open circuit low speed wind tunnel. Glob J Res Eng .
    [25] Moonen P, Blocken B, Roels S, et al. (2006) Numerical modeling of the flow conditions in a closed-circuit low-speed wind tunnel. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 94: 699-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2006.02.001
    [26] Panda MK, Samanta AK (2016) Design of low cost open circuit wind tunnel-a case study. Indian J Sci Technol 9: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i30/99195
    [27] Calautit JK, Chaudhry HN, Hughes BR, et al. (2014) A validated design methodology for a closed-loop subsonic wind tunnel. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 125: 180-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.12.010
    [28] Forte P, Marinho DA, Barbosa TM, et al. (2020) Estimation of an elite road cyclist performance in different positions based on numerical simulations and analytical procedures. Front Bioeng Biotech 8: 538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00538
    [29] Kolitzus HJ (2003) Ball roll behavior: The functional relationship of the ball roll distance and the timing gate method: How to calculate the ball roll distance from timing gate measurements. Int Assoc Sport Surf Sci .
    [30] Minkin L, Sikes D (2018) Coefficient of rolling friction-Lab experiment. Am J Phys 86: 77-78. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5011957
    [31] Marinho DA, Barbosa TM, Mantha V, et al. (2012) Modelling propelling force in swimming using numerical simulations. Fluid Dyn, Comput Model Appl : 439-448.
    [32] Forte P, Marinho DA, Barbosa TM, et al. (2020) Estimation of an elite road cyclist performance in different positions based on numerical simulations and analytical procedures. Front Bioeng Biotech 8: 538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00538
    [33] Forte P, Marinho DA, Barbosa TM, et al. (2020) Analysis of a normal and aero helmet on an elite cyclist in the dropped position. AIMS Biophys 7: 54-64. https://doi.org/10.3934/biophy.2020005
    [34] White F (1999) Fluid Mechanics 7 Eds., New York. New York: .
    [35] Barbosa TM, Forte P, Estrela JE, et al. (2016) Analysis of the aerodynamics by experimental testing of an elite wheelchair sprinter. Procedia Eng 147: 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.180
    [36] Sawatzky B, Kim W, Denison I (2004) The ergonomics of different tyres and tyre pressure during wheelchair propulsion. Ergonomics 47: 1475-1483. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130412331290862
    [37] Richard S, Champoux Y, Lépine J, et al. (2015) Using an alternative forced-choice method to study shock perception at cyclists' hands: the effect of tyre pressure. Procedia Eng 112: 361-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.263
    [38] Besson U, Borghi L, De Ambrosis A, et al. (2007) How to teach friction: Experiments and models. Am J Phys 75: 1106-1113. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2779881
    [39] Krasner S (1992) Why wheels work: a second version. Phys Teach 30: 212-215. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343520
    [40] Mungan CE (2012) Rolling friction on a wheeled laboratory cart. Phys Educ 47: 288.
    [41] Morais JE, Silva AJ, Marinho DA, et al. (2016) Effect of a specific concurrent water and dry-land training over a season in young swimmers' performance. Int J Perf Anal Sport 16: 760-775. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2016.11868926
    [42] Yanci J, Granados C, Otero M, et al. (2015) Sprint, agility, strength and endurance capacity in wheelchair basketball players. Biol Sport 32: 71. https://doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1127285
    [43] Miyazaki Y, Iida K, Nakashima M, et al. (2020) Measurement of push-rim forces during racing wheelchair propulsion using a novel attachable force sensor system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology : 1754337120904260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337120904260
    [44] Kauer JB, Antúnez MLVS, Fração VB, et al. Avaliação da razão de torque dos músculos flexores e extensores do cotovelo em paratletas (2007) 39-46.
    [45] Smith DJ (2003) A framework for understanding the training process leading to elite performance. Sports Med 33: 1103-1126. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200333150-00003
    [46] Turbanski S, Schmidtbleicher D (2010) Effects of heavy resistance training on strength and power in upper extremities in wheelchair athletes. J Strength Cond Res 24: 8-16.
    [47] Tørhaug T, Brurok B, Hoff J, et al. (2016) The effect from maximal bench press strength training on work economy during wheelchair propulsion in men with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 54: 838-842.
    [48] Ragnarsson KT (2008) Functional electrical stimulation after spinal cord injury: current use, therapeutic effects and future directions. Spinal Cord 46: 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3102091
    [49] Yang YS, Koontz AM, Triolo RJ, et al. (2009) Biomechanical analysis of functional electrical stimulation on trunk musculature during wheelchair propulsion. Neurorehab Neural Re 23: 717-725.
    [50] Stockbrugger BA, Haennel RG (2001) Validity and reliability of a medicine ball explosive power test. J Strength Cond Res 15: 431-438.
    [51] Van den Tillaar R, Marques MC (2011) A comparison of three training programs with the same workload on overhead throwing velocity with different weighted balls. J Strength Cond Res 25: 2316-2321. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181f159d6
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3168) PDF downloads(165) Cited by(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog