We aimed to evaluate the effect of freeze-drying and vacuum-drying on moisture, water activities (aw), total soluble solid (TSS), hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), diastase activity, total phenolic content (TPCs), and antioxidant activities (ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, ORAC) of longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) blossom honey and Siam weed (Chromolaena odorata Lour.) honey. The fresh longan blossom honey and Siam weed honey were collected from a local apiarist in Northern Thailand. Freeze-drying at 0.013 kPa, −54℃ for 72 h or vacuum-drying at 2.5 kPa at 60 ℃ for 12 h was applied to dehydrate fresh honey. The moisture of freeze-dried samples was 10.10% for longan blossom honey and 11.50% for Siam weed honey, and the aw of both freeze-dried honeys was 0.43. Freeze- and vacuum-dried produced more TSS than fresh honey did (p ≤ 0.05). However, the amounts of TSS derived freeze-dry and vacuum-dry were not significantly different. Freeze-dried honey contained the highest HMF and the lowest diastase activity regardless of honey origins (p ≤ 0.05). Drying processes significantly increased the TPCs levels of honey (approximately 2 folds by freeze-drying method). The antioxidant activity of dried honey was significantly higher than that of fresh honey. It was observed that the freeze-drying method tended to better preserve the antioxidant activity of honey compared to vacuum-drying methods in both types of honey. The results indicated that drying processes significantly affect the quality of dried honey, including TSS, HMF, diastase activity, TPCs, and antioxidant activity. In this study, freeze-drying emerged as the relatively low temperature drying method that can preserve the quality of honey, especially in terms of TPCs and antioxidant activity.
Citation: Rossaporn Jiamjariyatam, Orachorn Mekkerdchoo, Pakkapong Phucharoenrak, Lu Zheng. Effects of freeze-drying and vacuum-drying on the quality, total phenolic contents, and antioxidant activities of bee honey in northern Thailand[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(2): 430-444. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024025
[1] | Yulu Feng, Min Qiu . Some results on p-adic valuations of Stirling numbers of the second kind. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4168-4196. doi: 10.3934/math.2020267 |
[2] | Phakhinkon Napp Phunphayap, Prapanpong Pongsriiam . Divisibility of Fibonomial coefficients in terms of their digital representations and applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5314-5327. doi: 10.3934/math.2022296 |
[3] | Babar Sultan, Mehvish Sultan, Aziz Khan, Thabet Abdeljawad . Boundedness of an intrinsic square function on grand p-adic Herz-Morrey spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26484-26497. doi: 10.3934/math.20231352 |
[4] | Tingting Xu, Zaiyong Feng, Tianyang He, Xiaona Fan . Sharp estimates for the p-adic m-linear n-dimensional Hardy and Hilbert operators on p-adic weighted Morrey space. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(6): 14012-14031. doi: 10.3934/math.2025630 |
[5] | Naqash Sarfraz, Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Qasim Ali Malik . Some new characterizations of boundedness of commutators of p-adic maximal-type functions on p-adic Morrey spaces in terms of Lipschitz spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19756-19770. doi: 10.3934/math.2024964 |
[6] | Naqash Sarfraz, Muhammad Aslam . Some weighted estimates for the commutators of p-adic Hardy operator on two weighted p-adic Herz-type spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9633-9646. doi: 10.3934/math.2021561 |
[7] | Pham Thi Kim Thuy, Kieu Huu Dung . Hardy–Littlewood maximal operators and Hausdorff operators on p-adic block spaces with variable exponents. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 23060-23087. doi: 10.3934/math.20241121 |
[8] | Yanlong Shi, Xiangxing Tao . Rough fractional integral and its multilinear commutators on p-adic generalized Morrey spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 17012-17026. doi: 10.3934/math.2023868 |
[9] | Qianjun He, Xiang Li . Necessary and sufficient conditions for boundedness of commutators of maximal function on the p-adic vector spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 14064-14085. doi: 10.3934/math.2023719 |
[10] | Phakhinkon Phunphayap, Prapanpong Pongsriiam . Extremal orders and races between palindromes in different bases. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2237-2254. doi: 10.3934/math.2022127 |
We aimed to evaluate the effect of freeze-drying and vacuum-drying on moisture, water activities (aw), total soluble solid (TSS), hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), diastase activity, total phenolic content (TPCs), and antioxidant activities (ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, ORAC) of longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) blossom honey and Siam weed (Chromolaena odorata Lour.) honey. The fresh longan blossom honey and Siam weed honey were collected from a local apiarist in Northern Thailand. Freeze-drying at 0.013 kPa, −54℃ for 72 h or vacuum-drying at 2.5 kPa at 60 ℃ for 12 h was applied to dehydrate fresh honey. The moisture of freeze-dried samples was 10.10% for longan blossom honey and 11.50% for Siam weed honey, and the aw of both freeze-dried honeys was 0.43. Freeze- and vacuum-dried produced more TSS than fresh honey did (p ≤ 0.05). However, the amounts of TSS derived freeze-dry and vacuum-dry were not significantly different. Freeze-dried honey contained the highest HMF and the lowest diastase activity regardless of honey origins (p ≤ 0.05). Drying processes significantly increased the TPCs levels of honey (approximately 2 folds by freeze-drying method). The antioxidant activity of dried honey was significantly higher than that of fresh honey. It was observed that the freeze-drying method tended to better preserve the antioxidant activity of honey compared to vacuum-drying methods in both types of honey. The results indicated that drying processes significantly affect the quality of dried honey, including TSS, HMF, diastase activity, TPCs, and antioxidant activity. In this study, freeze-drying emerged as the relatively low temperature drying method that can preserve the quality of honey, especially in terms of TPCs and antioxidant activity.
The Fibonacci sequence (Fn)n≥1 is given by the recurrence relation Fn=Fn−1+Fn−2 for n≥3 with the initial values F1=F2=1. For each m≥1 and 1≤k≤m, the Fibonomial coefficients (mk)F is defined by
(mk)F=F1F2F3⋯Fm(F1F2F3⋯Fk)(F1F2F3⋯Fm−k)=Fm−k+1Fm−k+2⋯FmF1F2F3⋯Fk. |
Similar to the binomial coefficients, we define (mk)F=1 if k=0 and (mk)F=0 if k>m, and it is well-known that (mk)F is always an integer for every m≥1 and k≥0.
Recently, there has been an increasing interest in the study of Fibonomial coefficients. Marques and Trojovský [25,26] start the investigation on the divisibility of Fibonomial coefficients by determining the integers n≥1 such that (pnn)F is divisible by p for p=2,3. Marques, Sellers, and Trojovský [24] show that p divides (pa+1pa)F for p≡±2(mod5) and a≥1. Marques and Trojovsk' [27] and Trojovský [42] extend their results further and obtained the p-adic valuation of (pa+1pa)F in [42]. Then Ballot [2,Theorem 2] generalizes the Kummer-like theorem of Knuth and Wilf [22] and uses it to give a generalization of Marques and Trojovský's results. In particular, Ballot [2,Theorems 3.6,5.2,and 5.3] finds all integers n such that p∣(pnn)U for any nondegenerate fundamental Lucas sequence U and p=2,3 and for p=5,7 in the case U=F. Phunphayap and Pongsriiam [31] provide the most general formula for the p-adic valuation of Fibonomial coefficients in the most general form (mn)F. For other recent results on the divisibility properties of the Fibonacci numbers, the Fibonomial coefficients, and other combinatorial numbers, see for example [3,4,5,11,12,13,16,17,28,30,32,33,34,37,38,41,43]. For some identities involving Fibonomial coefficients and generalizations, we refer the reader to the work of Kilic and his coauthors [7,8,18,19,20,21]. For the p-adic valuations of Eulerian, Bernoulli, and Stirling numbers, see [6,9,14,23,40]. Hence the relation p∣(pann)F has been studied only in the case p=2,3,5,7 and a=1.
In this article, we extend the investigation on (pann)F to the case of any prime p and any positive integer a. Replacing n by pa and pa by p, this becomes Marques and Trojovský's results [27,42]. Substituting a=1, p∈{2,3,5,7}, and letting n be arbitrary, this reduces to Ballot's theorems [2]. So our results are indeed an extension of those previously mentioned. To obtain such the general result for all p and a, the calculation is inevitably long but we try to make it as simple as possible. As a reward, we can easily show in Corollaries 3.3 and 3.4 that (4nn)F is odd if and only if n is a nonnegative power of 2, and (8nn)F is odd if and only if n=(1+3⋅2k)/7 for some k≡1(mod3).
We organize this article as follows. In Section 2, we give some preliminaries and results which are needed in the proof of the main theorems. In Section 3, we calculate the p-adic valuation of (pann)F for all a, p, and n, and use it to give a characterization of the positive integers n such that (pann)F is divisible by p where p is any prime which is congruent to ±2(mod5). Remark that there also is an interesting pattern in the p-adic representation of the integers n such that (pnn)F is divisible by p. The proof is being prepared but it is a bit too long to include in this paper. We are trying to make it simpler and shorter and will publish it in the future. For more information and some recent articles related to the Fibonacci numbers, we refer the readers to [15,35,36,39] and references therein.
Throughout this article, unless stated otherwise, x is a real number, p is a prime, a,b,k,m,n,q are integers, m,n≥1, and q≥2. The p-adic valuation (or p-adic order) of n, denoted by νp(n), is the exponent of p in the prime factorization of n. In addition, the order (or the rank) of appearance of n in the Fibonacci sequence, denoted by z(n), is the smallest positive integer m such that n∣Fm, ⌊x⌋ is the largest integer less than or equal to x, {x} is the fractional part of x given by {x}=x−⌊x⌋, ⌈x⌉ is the smallest integer larger than or equal to x, and amodm is the least nonnegative residue of a modulo m. Furthermore, for a mathematical statement P, the Iverson notation [P] is defined by
[P]={1,if P holds;0,otherwise. |
We define sq(n) to be the sum of digits of n when n is written in base q, that is, if n=(akak−1…a0)q=akqk+ak−1qk−1+⋯+a0 where 0≤ai<q for every i, then sq(n)=ak+ak−1+⋯+a0. Next, we recall some well-known and useful results for the reader's convenience.
Lemma 1. Let p≠5 be a prime. Then the following statements hold.
(i) n∣Fm if and only if z(n)∣m
(ii) z(p)∣p+1 if and only if p≡±2(mod5) and z(p)∣p−1, otherwise.
(iii) gcd(z(p),p)=1.
Proof. These are well-known. See, for example, in [31,Lemma 1] for more details.
Lemma 2. (Legendre's formula) Let n be a positive integer and let p be a prime. Then
νp(n!)=∞∑k=1⌊npk⌋=n−sp(n)p−1. |
We will deal with a lot of calculations involving the floor function. So we recall the following results, which will be used throughout this article, sometimes without reference.
Lemma 3. For k∈Z and x∈R, the following holds
(i) ⌊k+x⌋=k+⌊x⌋,
(ii) {k+x}={x},
(iii) ⌊x⌋+⌊−x⌋={−1,if x∉Z; 0,if x∈Z,
(iv) 0≤{x}<1 and {x}=0 if and only if x∈Z.
(v) ⌊x+y⌋={⌊x⌋+⌊y⌋,if {x}+{y}<1; ⌊x⌋+⌊y⌋+1,if {x}+{y}≥1,
(vi) ⌊⌊x⌋k⌋=⌊xk⌋ for k≥1.
Proof. These are well-known and can be proved easily. For more details, see in [10,Chapter 3]. We also refer the reader to [1,29] for a nice application of these properties.
The next three theorems given by Phunphayap and Pongsriiam [31] are important tools for obtaining the main results of this article.
Theorem 4. [31,Theorem 7] Let p be a prime, a≥0, ℓ≥0, and m≥1. Assume that p≡±1(modm) and δ=[ℓ≢0(modm)] is the Iverson notation. Then
νp(⌊ℓpam⌋!)={ℓ(pa−1)m(p−1)−a{ℓm}+νp(⌊ℓm⌋!),if p≡1(modm);ℓ(pa−1)m(p−1)−a2δ+νp(⌊ℓm⌋!),if p≡−1(modm) and a is even;ℓ(pa−1)m(p−1)−a−12δ−{ℓm}+νp(⌊ℓm⌋!),if p≡−1(modm) and a is odd. |
Theorem 5. [31,Theorem 11 and Corollary 12] Let 0≤k≤m be integers. Then the following statements hold.
(i) Let A2=ν2(⌊m6⌋!)−ν2(⌊k6⌋!)−ν2(⌊m−k6⌋!). If r=mmod6 and s=kmod6, then
ν2((mk)F)={A2,if r≥s and (r,s)≠(3,1),(3,2),(4,2);A2+1,if (r,s)=(3,1),(3,2),(4,2);A2+3,if r<s and (r,s)≠(0,3),(1,3),(2,3), (1,4),(2,4),(2,5);A2+2,if (r,s)=(0,3),(1,3),(2,3),(1,4),(2,4), (2,5). |
(ii) ν5((mk)F)=ν5((mk)).
(iii) Suppose that p is a prime, p≠2, and p≠5. If m′=⌊mz(p)⌋, k′=⌊kz(p)⌋, r=mmodz(p), and s=kmodz(p), then
νp((mk)F)=νp((m′k′))+[r<s](νp(⌊m−k+z(p)z(p)⌋)+νp(Fz(p))). |
Theorem 6. [31,Theorem 13] Let a, b, ℓ1, and ℓ2 be positive integers and b≥a. For each p≠5, assume that ℓ1pb>ℓ2pa and let mp=⌊ℓ1pb−az(p)⌋ and kp=⌊ℓ2z(p)⌋. Then the following statements hold.
(i) If a≡b(mod2), then ν2((ℓ12bℓ22a)F) is equal to
{ν2((m2k2)),if ℓ1≡ℓ2(mod3) or ℓ2≡0(mod3);a+2+ν2(m2−k2)+ν2((m2k2)),if ℓ1≡0(mod3) and ℓ2≢0(mod3);⌈a2⌉+1+ν2(m2−k2)+ν2((m2k2)),if ℓ1≡1(mod3) and ℓ2≡2(mod3);⌈a+12⌉+ν2((m2k2)),if ℓ1≡2(mod3) and ℓ2≡1(mod3), |
and if a≢b(mod2), then ν2((ℓ12bℓ22a)F) is equal to
{ν2((m2k2)),if ℓ1≡−ℓ2(mod3) or ℓ2≡0(mod3);a+2+ν2(m2−k2)+ν2((m2k2)),if ℓ1≡0(mod3) and ℓ2≢0(mod3);⌈a+12⌉+ν2((m2k2)),if ℓ1≡1(mod3) and ℓ2≡1(mod3);⌈a2⌉+1+ν2(m2−k2)+ν2((m2k2)),if ℓ1≡2(mod3) and ℓ2≡2(mod3). |
(ii) Let p≠5 be an odd prime and let r=ℓ1pbmodz(p) and s=ℓ2pamodz(p). If p≡±1(mod5), then
νp((ℓ1pbℓ2pa)F)=[r<s](a+νp(mp−kp)+νp(Fz(p)))+νp((mpkp)), |
and if p≡±2(mod5), then νp((ℓ1pbℓ2pa)F) is equal to
{νp((mpkp)),if r=s or ℓ2≡0(modz(p));a+νp(Fz(p))+νp(mp−kp)+νp((mpkp)),if ℓ1≡0(modz(p)) andℓ2≢0(modz(p));a2+νp((mpkp)),if r>s, ℓ1,ℓ2≢0(modz(p)), and a is even;a2+νp(Fz(p))+νp(mp−kp)+νp((mpkp)),if r<s, ℓ1,ℓ2≢0(modz(p)), and a is even;a+12+νp(mp−kp)+νp((mpkp)),if r>s, ℓ1,ℓ2≢0(modz(p)), and a is odd;a−12+νp(Fz(p))+νp((mpkp)),if r<s, ℓ1,ℓ2≢0(modz(p)), and a is odd. |
In fact, Phunphayap and Pongsriiam [31] obtain other results analogous to Theorems 2.5 and 2.6 too but we do not need them in this article.
We begin with the calculation of the 2-adic valuation of (2ann)F and then use it to determine the integers n such that (2nn)F,(4nn)F,(8nn)F are even. Then we calculate the p-adic valuation of (pann)F for all odd primes p. For binomial coefficients, we know that ν2((2nn))=s2(n). For Fibonomial coefficients, we have the following result.
Theorem 7. Let a and n be positive integers, ε=[n≢0(mod3)], and A=⌊(2a−1)n3⋅2ν2(n)⌋. Then the following statements hold.
(i) If a is even, then
ν2((2ann)F)=δ+A−a2ε−ν2(A!)=δ+s2(A)−a2ε, | (3.1) |
where δ=[nmod6=3,5]. In other words, δ=1 if n≡3,5(mod6) and δ=0 otherwise.
(ii) If a is odd, then
ν2((2ann)F)=δ+A−a−12ε−ν2(A!)=δ+s2(A)−a−12ε, | (3.2) |
where δ=(nmod6)−12[2∤n]+⌈ν2(n)+3−nmod32⌉[nmod6=2,4]. In other words, δ=(nmod6)−12 if n is odd, δ=0 if n≡0(mod6), δ=⌈ν2(n)2⌉+1 if n≡4(mod6), and δ=⌈ν2(n)+12⌉ if n≡2(mod6).
Proof. The second equalities in (3.1) and (3.2) follow from Legendre's formula. So it remains to prove the first equalities in (3.1) and (3.2). To prove (ⅰ), we suppose that a is even and divide the consideration into two cases.
Case 1. 2∤n. Let r=2anmod6 and s=nmod6. Then s∈{1,3,5}, r≡2an≡4n≡4s(mod6), and therefore (r,s)=(4,1),(0,3),(2,5). In addition, A=⌊(2a−1)n3⌋=(2a−1)n3 and δ=[s=3,5]. By Theorem 5(ⅰ), the left–hand side of (3.1) is A2 if s=1 and A2+2 if s=3,5, where A2=ν2(⌊2an6⌋!)−ν2(⌊n6⌋!)−ν2(⌊(2a−1)n6⌋!). We obtain by Theorem 4 that
ν2(⌊2an6⌋!)=ν2(⌊2a−1n3⌋!)=(2a−1−1)n3−a−22ε−{n3}+ν2(⌊n3⌋!). |
By Legendre's formula and Lemma 3, we have
ν2(⌊n6⌋!)=ν2(⌊n3⌋!)−⌊n6⌋, |
ν2(⌊(2a−1)n6⌋!)=ν2(⌊(2a−1)n3⌋!)−⌊(2a−1)n6⌋=ν2(A!)−⌊(2a−1)n6⌋, |
⌊n6⌋+⌊(2a−1)n6⌋=n−s6+2an−r6−n−s6+⌊r−s6⌋=2an−r6−[s∈{3,5}]. |
From the above observation, we obtain
A2=(2a−1−1)n3−a−22ε−{n3}+2an−r6−[s∈{3,5}]−ν2(A!)=A−a−22ε−{n3}−r6−[s∈{3,5}]−ν2(A!)={A−a2−ν2(A!),if s=1;A−ν2(A!)−1,if s=3;A−a2−ν2(A!)−1,if s=5. |
It is now easy to check that A2 (if s=1), A2+2 (if s=3,5) are the same as δ+A−a2ε−ν2(A!) in (3.1). So (3.1) is verified.
Case 2. 2∣n. We write n=2bℓ where 2∤ℓ and let m=⌊2aℓ3⌋, k=⌊ℓ3⌋, r=2aℓmod3, and s=ℓmod3. Since a is even, r=s. Then we apply Theorem 6(ⅰ) to obtain
ν2((2ann)F)=ν2((ℓ2a+bℓ2b)F)=ν2((mk))=ν2(m!)−ν2(k!)−ν2((m−k)!). | (3.3) |
We see that ℓ≢0(mod3) if and only if n≢0(mod3). In addition, A=(2a−1)ℓ3 and δ=0. By Theorem 4, we have
ν2(m!)=A−a2ε+ν2(k!). |
In addition,
m−k=⌊2aℓ3⌋−⌊ℓ3⌋=2aℓ−r3−ℓ−s3=2aℓ−ℓ3=A. |
So ν2((m−k)!)=ν2(A!). Substituting these in (3.3), we obtain (3.1). This completes the proof of (ⅰ).
To prove (ⅱ), we suppose that a is odd and divide the proof into two cases.
Case 1. 2∤n. This case is similar to Case 1 of the previous part. So we let r=2anmod6 and s=nmod6. Then s∈{1,3,5}, r≡2an≡2n≡2s(mod6), (r,s)=(2,1),(0,3),(4,5), δ=s−12, and the left–hand side of (3.2) is A2 if s=1, A2+2 if s=3, and A2+3 if s=5, where A2=ν2(⌊2an6⌋!)−ν2(⌊n6⌋!)−ν2(⌊(2a−1)n6⌋!). In addition, we have
ν2(⌊2an6⌋!)=(2a−1−1)n3−a−12ε+ν2(⌊n3⌋!), |
ν2(⌊n6⌋!)=ν2(⌊n3⌋!)−⌊n6⌋, |
ν2(⌊(2a−1)n6⌋!)=ν2(A!)−⌊(2a−1)n6⌋, |
⌊n6⌋+⌊(2a−1)n6⌋=2an−r6−[s∈{3,5}]. |
Therefore
A2=(2a−1−1)n3−a−12ε+2an−r6−[s∈{3,5}]−ν2(A!). |
Furthermore,
A=⌊(2a−1)n3⌋=2an−r3−n−s3+⌊r−s3⌋={(2a−1)n3−13,if s=1;(2a−1)n3,if s=3;(2a−1)n3−23,if s=5, |
which implies that A=(2a−1)n3−r6. Then
A2=A−a−12ε−[s∈{3,5}]−ν2(A!). |
It is now easy to check that A2 (if s=1), A2+2 (if s=3), and A2+3 (if s=5), are the same as δ+A−a−12ε−ν2(A!) in (3.2). So (3.2) is verified.
Case 2. 2∣n. This case is similar to Case 2 of the previous part. So we write n=2bℓ where 2∤ℓ and let m=⌊2aℓ3⌋, k=⌊ℓ3⌋, r=2aℓmod3, and s=ℓmod3. We obtain by Theorem 6 that ν2((2ann)F) is equal to
ν2((ℓ2a+bℓ2b)F)={ν2((mk)),if ℓ≡0(mod3);⌈b+12⌉+ν2((mk)),if ℓ≡1(mod3);⌈b2⌉+1+ν2(m−k)+ν2((mk)),if ℓ≡2(mod3). | (3.4) |
By Theorem 4, we have
ν2(m!)=(2a−1)ℓ3−a−12ε−{ℓ3}+ν2(k!). |
Since (2a−1)ℓ≡ℓ(mod3), {(2a−1)ℓ3}={ℓ3}. This implies that ν2(m!)=A−a−12ε+ν2(k!). In addition, (r,s)=(0,0),(2,1),(1,2), and
m−k=⌊2aℓ3⌋−⌊ℓ3⌋=2aℓ−r3−ℓ−s3=(2a−1)ℓ−(r−s)3=A+[s=2]. |
From the above observation, we obtain
ν2((mk))=ν2(m!)−ν2(k!)−ν2((m−k)!)={A−a−12ε−ν2(A!),if s=0,1;A−a−12ε−ν2((A+1)!),if s=2. |
Substituting this in (3.4), we see that
\begin{equation} \nu_2 \left( {2^an \choose n}_F \right) = \begin{cases} A - \nu_2 (A!), &\text{if $\ell \equiv 0 \pmod{3}$;}\\ \left\lceil \frac{b + 1}{2} \right\rceil + A - \frac{a - 1}{2} - \nu_2 (A!), &\text{if $\ell \equiv 1 \pmod{3}$;}\\ \left\lceil \frac{b}{2} \right\rceil + 1 + A - \frac{a - 1}{2} - \nu_2 (A!), &\text{if $\ell \equiv 2 \pmod{3}$.} \end{cases} \end{equation} | (3.5) |
Recall that n = 2^b \ell \equiv (-1)^b \ell \pmod{3} . So (3.5) implies that
\begin{equation*} \nu_2 \left( {2^an \choose n}_F \right) = \begin{cases} A - \nu_2 (A!), &\text{if $n \equiv 0 \pmod{3}$;}\\ \frac{b}{2} + 1 + A - \frac{a-1}{2} - \nu_2 (A!), &\text{if $n \equiv 1 \pmod{3}$ and $b$ is even;}\\ \frac{b+1}{2} + 1 + A - \frac{a-1}{2} - \nu_2 (A!), &\text{if $n \equiv 1 \pmod{3}$ and $b$ is odd;}\\ \frac{b}{2} + 1 + A - \frac{a-1}{2} - \nu_2 (A!), &\text{if $n \equiv 2 \pmod{3}$ and $b$ is even;}\\ \frac{b+1}{2} + A - \frac{a-1}{2} - \nu_2 (A!), &\text{if $n \equiv 2 \pmod{3}$ and $b$ is odd, }\\ \end{cases} \end{equation*} |
which is the same as (3.2). This completes the proof.
We can obtain the main result of Maques and Trojovský [25] as a corollary.
Corollary 8. (Marques and Trojovský [25]) {2n \choose n}_F is even for all n \geq 2 .
Proof. Let n \geq 2 and apply Theorem 7 with a = 1 to obtain \nu_2 \left({2n \choose n}_F \right) = \delta + s_2 (A) . If n \not \equiv 0, 1 \pmod{6} , then \delta > 0 . If n \equiv 0 \pmod{6} , then n \geq 3\cdot 2^{\nu_2 (n)} , and so A \geq 1 and s_2 (A) > 0 . If n \equiv 1 \pmod{6} , then A = \left\lfloor \frac{n}{3} \right\rfloor > 1 and so s_2 (A) > 0 . In any case, \nu_2 \left({2n \choose n}_F \right) > 0 . So {2n \choose n}_F is even.
Corollary 9. Let n \geq 2 . Then {4n \choose n}_F is even if and only if n is not a power of 2. In other words, for each n \in \mathbb{N} , {4n \choose n}_F is odd if and only if n = 2^k for some k\geq 0 .
Proof. Let \delta , \varepsilon , and A be as in Theorem 7. If n = 2^k for some k \geq 1 , then we apply Theorem 7 with a = 2 , \delta = 0 , \varepsilon = 1 , A = 1 leading to \nu_2 \left({4n \choose n}_F \right) = 0 , which implies that {4n \choose n}_F is odd.
Suppose n is not a power of 2. By Theorem 7, \nu_2 \left({4n \choose n}_F \right) = \delta + s_2 (A) - \varepsilon \geq s_2 (A) - 1 . Since n is not a power of 2, the sum s_2 (n) \geq 2 . It is easy to see that s_2 (m) = s_2 (2^c m) for any c, m \in \mathbb{N} . Therefore s_2 (A) = s_2 \left(\frac{n}{2^{\nu_2 (n)}} \right) = s_2 \left(2^{\nu_2 (n)} \cdot \frac{n}{2^{\nu_2 (n)}} \right) = s_2 (n) \geq 2 , which implies \nu_2 \left({4n \choose n}_F \right) \geq 1 , as required.
Observe that 2, 2^2, 2^3 are congruent to 2, 4, 1 \pmod{7} , respectively. This implies that if k \geq 1 and k \equiv 1 \pmod{3} , then (1 + 3 \cdot 2^k)/7 is an integer. We can determine the integers n such that {8n \choose n}_F is odd as follows.
Corollary 10. {8n \choose n}_F is odd if and only if n = \frac{1 + 3 \cdot 2^k}{7} for some k \equiv 1 \pmod{3} .
Proof. Let a, \delta, A, \varepsilon be as in Theorem 7. We first suppose n = (1 + 3 \cdot 2^k)/7 where k \geq 1 and k \equiv 1 \pmod{3} . Then n \equiv 7n \equiv 1 + 3 \cdot 2^k \equiv 1 \pmod{6} . Then a = 3 , \varepsilon = 1 , \delta = 0 , A = 2^k , and so \nu_{2} \left({8n \choose n}_F \right) = 0 . Therefore {8n \choose n}_F is odd. Next, assume that {8n \choose n}_F is odd. Observe that A \geq 2 and s_2 (A) > 0 . If n \equiv 0 \pmod{3} , then \varepsilon = 0 and \nu_2 \left({8n \choose n}_F \right) = \delta + s_2(A) > 0 , which is not the case. Therefore n \equiv 1, 2 \pmod{3} , and so \varepsilon = 1 . If n\equiv 0 \pmod{2} , then \delta = \left\lceil \frac{\nu_2 (n) + 3 - n \bmod{3}}{2} \right\rceil \geq 1 , and so \left({8n \choose n} \right)_F \geq s_2 (A) > 0 , which is a contradiction. So n \equiv 1 \pmod{2} . This implies n \equiv 1, 5 \pmod{6} . But if n \equiv 5 \pmod{6} , then \delta \geq 2 and \nu_2 \left({8n \choose n}_F \right) > 0 , a contradiction. Hence n \equiv 1 \pmod{6} . Then \delta = 0 . Since s_2 (A) - 1 = \nu_2 \left({8n \choose n}_F \right) = 0 , we see that A = 2^k for some k \geq 1 . Then \frac{7n - 1}{3} = \left\lfloor \frac{7n}{3} \right\rfloor = A = 2^k , which implies n = \frac{1 + 3 \cdot 2^k}{7} , as required.
Theorem 11. For each a, n \in \mathbb{N} , \nu_5 \left({5^a n \choose n}_F \right) = \nu_5 \left({5^a n \choose n} \right) = \frac{s_5 ((5^a - 1)n)}{4} . In particular, {5^an \choose n}_F is divisible by 5 for every a, n \in \mathbb{N} .
Proof. The first equality follows immediately from Theorem 5(ⅱ). By Legendre's formula, \nu_5 \left({n \choose k} \right) = \frac{s_5 (k) + s_5 (n - k) - s_5 (n)}{4} for all n \geq k \geq 1 . So \nu_5 \left({5^a n \choose n}_F \right) is
\begin{equation*} \frac{s_5 (n) + s_5 (5^a n - n) - s_5 (5^a n)}{4} = \frac{s_5 ((5^a - 1)n)}{4}. \end{equation*} |
Theorem 12. Let p \neq 2, 5 , a, n \in \mathbb{N} , r = p^a n \bmod{z(p)} , s = n \bmod{z(p)} , and A = \left\lfloor \frac{n(p^a - 1)}{p^{\nu_p (n)}z(p)} \right\rfloor . Then the following statements hold.
\rm(i) If p \equiv \pm 1 \pmod{5} , then \nu_p \left({p^a n \choose n}_F \right) is equal to
\begin{equation} \frac{A}{p-1} - a\left\{ \frac{n}{p^{\nu_p (n)}z(p)} \right\} - \nu_p (A!) = \frac{s_p (A)}{p - 1} - a\left\{ \frac{n}{p^{\nu_p (n)}z(p)} \right\}. \end{equation} | (3.6) |
\rm(ii) If p \equiv \pm 2 \pmod{5} and a is even, then \nu_p \left({p^a n \choose n}_F \right) is equal to
\begin{equation} \frac{A}{p-1} - \frac{a}{2}[s \neq 0] - \nu_p (A!) = \frac{s_p (A)}{p - 1} - \frac{a}{2}[s \neq 0]. \end{equation} | (3.7) |
\rm(iii) If p \equiv \pm 2 \pmod{5} and a is odd, then \nu_p \left({p^a n \choose n}_F \right) is equal to
\begin{equation} \left\lfloor \frac{A}{p - 1} \right\rfloor - \frac{a-1}{2}[s \neq 0] - \nu_p (A!) + \delta, \end{equation} | (3.8) |
where \delta = \left(\left\lfloor \frac{\nu_p (n)}{2} \right\rfloor + [2 \nmid \nu_p(n)][r > s] + [r < s]\nu_p(F_{z(p)}) \right)[r \neq s] , or equivalently, \delta = 0 if r = s , \delta = \left\lfloor \frac{\nu_p (n)}{2} \right\rfloor + \nu_p (F_{z(p)}) if r < s , and \delta = \left\lceil \frac{\nu_p (n)}{2} \right\rceil if r > s .
Proof. We first prove (ⅰ) and (ⅱ). So we suppose that the hypothesis of (ⅰ) or (ⅱ) is true. By writing \nu_p (A!) = \frac{A - s_p (A)}{p - 1} , we obtain the equalities in (3.6) and (3.7). By Lemma 1(ⅱ), p^a \equiv 1\pmod{z(p)} . Then r = s .
Case 1. p \nmid n . Let m = \left\lfloor\frac{p^a n}{z(p)}\right\rfloor and k = \left\lfloor\frac{n}{z(p)}\right\rfloor . Then we obtain by Theorem 5(ⅲ) that
\begin{equation} \nu_p \left( {p^a n \choose n}_F \right) = \nu_p \left( {m \choose k} \right) = \nu_p(m!) - \nu_p (k!) - \nu_p ((m-k)!). \end{equation} | (3.9) |
By Lemma 1(ⅱ) and Theorem 4, we see that if p \equiv \pm 1 \pmod{5} , then p \equiv 1 \pmod{z(p)} and
\begin{equation} \nu_p (m!) = \nu_p\left( \left\lfloor \frac{n p^a}{z(p)} \right\rfloor! \right) = \frac{n(p^a - 1)}{z(p)(p-1)} - a\left\{ \frac{n}{z(p)} \right\} + \nu_p\left( k ! \right), \end{equation} | (3.10) |
and if p \equiv \pm 2 \pmod{5} and a is even, then p \equiv -1 \pmod{z(p)} and
\begin{equation} \nu_p (m!) = \frac{n(p^a - 1)}{z(p)(p-1)} - \frac{a}{2}[s \neq 0] + \nu_p\left( k ! \right). \end{equation} | (3.11) |
Since z(p) \mid p^a - 1 and p\nmid n , A = \frac{n(p^a -1)}{z(p)} . Therefore
\begin{equation} m-k = \left\lfloor\frac{p^a n}{z(p)}\right\rfloor - \left\lfloor\frac{n}{z(p)}\right\rfloor = \frac{p^a n - r}{z(p)} - \frac{n - s}{z(p)} = \frac{n(p^a - 1)}{z(p)} = A. \end{equation} | (3.12) |
Substituting (3.10), (3.11), and (3.12) in (3.9), we obtain (3.6) and (3.7).
Case 2. p \mid n . Let n = p^b \ell where p \nmid \ell , m = \left\lfloor\frac{\ell p^a}{z(p)}\right\rfloor , and k = \left\lfloor\frac{\ell}{z(p)}\right\rfloor . Since r = s , we obtain by Theorem 6 that \nu_p \left({p^a n \choose n}_F \right) is equal to
\begin{equation} \nu_p \left( {\ell p^{a + b} \choose \ell p^{b}}_F \right) = \nu_p \left( {m \choose k} \right) = \nu_p (m!) - \nu_p (k!) - \nu_p ((m-k)!). \end{equation} | (3.13) |
Since \gcd (p, z(p)) = 1 , we see that \ell \equiv 0 \pmod{z(p)} \Leftrightarrow n \equiv 0 \pmod{z(p)} \Leftrightarrow s = 0 . Similar to Case 1, we have \nu_p(m!) = \frac{\ell(p^a - 1)}{z(p)(p-1)} - a\left\{ \frac{\ell}{z(p)} \right\} + \nu_p (k!) if p \equiv \pm 1 \pmod{5} , \nu_p (m!) = \frac{\ell(p^a - 1)}{z(p)(p-1)} - \frac{a}{2}[s \neq 0] + \nu_p\left(k!\right) if p \equiv \pm 2 \pmod{5} and a is even, \ell p^a \equiv \ell \pmod{z(p)} , A = \frac{\ell (p^a - 1)}{z(p)} , and m-k = A . So (3.13) leads to (3.6) and (3.7). This proves (ⅰ) and (ⅱ).
To prove (ⅲ), suppose that p \equiv \pm 2 \pmod{5} and a is odd. By Lemma 1(ⅱ), p \equiv -1 \pmod{z(p)} . In addition, \frac{p^a - 1}{p - 1} = p^{a-1} + p^{a-2} + \ldots + 1 \equiv 1 \pmod{z(p)} . We divide the consideration into two cases.
Case 1. p \nmid n . This case is similar to Case 1 of the previous part. So we apply Theorems 4 and 5(ⅲ). Let m = \left\lfloor\frac{p^a n}{z(p)}\right\rfloor and k = \left\lfloor\frac{n}{z(p)}\right\rfloor . Then
\begin{equation*} \nu_p(m!) = \frac{n (p^a - 1)}{z(p)(p-1)} - \frac{a-1}{2}[s \neq 0] - \left\{ \frac{n}{z(p)} \right\} + \nu_p (k!), \end{equation*} |
\begin{equation*} m - k = \frac{p^a n -r}{z(p)} - \frac{n-s}{z(p)} = \frac{n(p^a-1) - (r-s)}{z(p)}, \end{equation*} |
\begin{equation*} A = \left\lfloor \frac{np^a-r}{z(p)} - \frac{n - s}{z(p)} + \frac{r-s}{z(p)} \right\rfloor = m - k + \left\lfloor \frac{r-s}{z(p)} \right\rfloor. \end{equation*} |
Since \frac{p^a - 1}{p - 1} \equiv 1 \pmod{z(p)} , \frac{n(p^a - 1)}{p-1} \equiv n \pmod{z(p)} . This implies that \left\{ \frac{n(p^a - 1)}{z(p)(p-1)} \right\} = \left\{ \frac{n}{z(p)} \right\} . Therefore
\begin{align*} \nu_p(m!) & = \left\lfloor \frac{n (p^a - 1)}{z(p)(p-1)} \right\rfloor - \frac{a-1}{2}[s \neq 0] + \nu_p (k!) = \left\lfloor \frac{A}{p-1} \right\rfloor - \frac{a-1}{2}[s \neq 0] + \nu_p (k!). \end{align*} |
From the above observation, if r\geq s , then A = m-k and
\begin{equation*} \nu_p \left( {p^a n \choose n}_F \right) = \nu_p \left( {m \choose k} \right) = \left\lfloor \frac{A}{p-1} \right\rfloor - \frac{a-1}{2}[s \neq 0] - \nu_p (A!), \end{equation*} |
which leads to (3.8). If r < s , then A = m - k - 1 , \left\lfloor \frac{p^a n - n + z(p)}{z(p)} \right\rfloor = A + 1 , and \nu_p \left({p^a n \choose n}_F \right) is equal to
\begin{align*} & \left\lfloor \frac{A}{p-1} \right\rfloor - \frac{a-1}{2}[s \neq 0] - \nu_p ((A+1)!) + \nu_p(A+1) + \nu_{p} (F_{z(p)}) \\ & = \left\lfloor \frac{A}{p-1} \right\rfloor - \frac{a-1}{2}[s \neq 0] - \nu_p (A!) + \nu_p (F_{z(p)}), \end{align*} |
which is the same as (3.8).
Case 2. p \mid n . Let n = p^b \ell where p \nmid \ell , m = \left\lfloor \frac{\ell p^a}{z(p)} \right\rfloor , and k = \left\lfloor \frac{\ell}{z(p)} \right\rfloor . Similar to Case 1, s = 0 \Leftrightarrow \ell \equiv 0 \pmod{z(p)} . In addition, \frac{\ell(p^a - 1)}{p - 1} \equiv \ell \pmod{z(p)} , and so we obtain by Theorem 4 that \nu_p (m!) = \left\lfloor \frac{A}{p-1} \right\rfloor - \frac{a-1}{2}[s \neq 0] + \nu_p (k!) . The calculation of \nu_p \left({p^a n \choose n}_F \right) = \nu_p \left({\ell p^{a+b} \choose \ell p^b}_F \right) is done by the applications of Theorem 6 and is divided into several cases. Suppose r = s . Then p^{a+b} \ell \equiv p^a n \equiv r \equiv s \equiv n \equiv p^b \ell \pmod{z(p)} . Since (p, z(p)) = 1 , this implies \ell p^a \equiv \ell \pmod{z(p)} . Therefore A = \left\lfloor \frac{\ell p^a - \ell}{z(p)} \right\rfloor = \frac{\ell p^a - \ell}{z(p)} = m - k and
\begin{equation*} \nu_p \left( {p^a n \choose n}_F \right) = \nu_p \left( {m \choose k} \right) = \nu_p (m!) - \nu_p (k!) - \nu_p ((m-k)!), \end{equation*} |
which is (3.8). Obviously, if \ell \equiv 0 \pmod{z(p)} , then r = s , which is already done. So from this point on, we assume that r \neq s and \ell \not\equiv 0 \pmod{z(p)} . Recall that p \equiv -1 \pmod{z(p)} and a is odd. So if b is odd, then
\begin{equation*} r \equiv np^a \equiv -n \equiv -p^b \ell \equiv \ell \pmod{z(p)}, \ \ s \equiv n \equiv p^b \ell \equiv -\ell \equiv \ell p^a \pmod{z(p)}, \ \ \text{and} \end{equation*} |
\begin{equation*} A = \left\lfloor \frac{\ell p^a - s}{z(p)} - \frac{\ell - r}{z(p)} + \frac{s-r}{z(p)} \right\rfloor = \frac{\ell p^a - s}{z(p)} - \frac{\ell - r}{z(p)} + \left\lfloor \frac{s - r}{z(p)} \right\rfloor = m - k + \left\lfloor \frac{s - r}{z(p)} \right\rfloor. \end{equation*} |
Similarly, if b is even, then r = \ell p^a \bmod{z(p)} , s = \ell \bmod{z(p)} , and A = m - k + \left\lfloor \frac{r - s}{z(p)} \right\rfloor . Let R = \left\lfloor \frac{A}{p-1} \right\rfloor - \frac{a-1}{2}[s \neq 0] - \nu_p (A!) + \delta be the quantity in (3.8). From the above observation and the application of Theorem 6, we obtain \nu_p \left({p^a n \choose n}_F \right) as follows. If r > s and b is even, then A = m - k and
\begin{equation*} \nu_p \left( {p^a n \choose n}_F \right) = \frac{b}{2} + \nu_p \left( {m \choose k} \right) = \frac{b}{2} + \left\lfloor \frac{A}{p-1} \right\rfloor - \frac{a-1}{2}[s \neq 0] - \nu_{p}(A!) = R. \end{equation*} |
If r > s and b is odd, then A = m - k - 1 and
\begin{align*} \nu_p \left( {p^a n \choose n}_F \right) & = \frac{b + 1}{2} + \nu_p (A+1) + \nu_p \left( {m \choose k} \right) \\ & = \frac{b+1}{2} + \left\lfloor \frac{A}{p-1} \right\rfloor - \frac{a-1}{2}[s \neq 0] - \nu_p (A!) = R. \end{align*} |
If r < s and b is even, then A = m - k - 1 and
\begin{align*} \nu_p \left( {p^a n \choose n}_F \right) & = \frac{b}{2} + \nu_p \left( F_{z(p)} \right) + \nu_p (A+1) + \nu_p \left( {m \choose k} \right) \\ & = \frac{b}{2} + \nu_p (F_{z(p)}) + \left\lfloor \frac{A}{p-1} \right\rfloor - \frac{a-1}{2}[s \neq 0] - \nu_p (A!) = R. \end{align*} |
If r < s and b is odd, then A = m - k and
\begin{align*} \nu_p \left( {p^a n \choose n}_F \right) & = \frac{b-1}{2} + \nu_p \left( F_{z(p)} \right) + \nu_p \left( {m \choose k} \right) \\ & = \frac{b-1}{2} + \nu_p (F_{z(p)}) + \left\lfloor \frac{A}{p-1} \right\rfloor - \frac{a-1}{2}[s \neq 0] - \nu_p (A!) = R. \end{align*} |
This completes the proof.
In the next two corollaries, we give some characterizations of the integers n such that {p^a n \choose n}_F is divisible by p .
Corollary 13. Let p be a prime and let a and n be positive integers. If n \equiv 0 \pmod{z(p)} , then p \mid {p^a n \choose n}_F .
Proof. We first consider the case p \neq 2, 5 . Assume that n \equiv 0 \pmod{z(p)} and r , s , A , and \delta are as in Theorem 12. Then \frac{n}{p^{\nu_p(n)}z(p)}, \frac{A}{p-1} \in \mathbb{Z} , r = s = 0 , and \delta = 0 . Every case in Theorem 12 leads to \nu_p \left({p^a n \choose n}_F \right) = \frac{s_p (A)}{p-1} > 0 , which implies p \mid {p^a n \choose n}_F . If p = 5 , then the result follows immediately from Theorem 11. If p = 2 , then every case of Theorem 7 leads to \nu_2 \left({2^a n \choose n}_F \right) \geq s_2 (A) > 0 , which implies the desired result.
Corollary 14. Let p \neq 2, 5 be a prime and let a , n , r , s , and A be as in Theorem 12. Assume that p \equiv \pm 2 \pmod{5} and n \not \equiv 0 \pmod{z(p)} . Then the following statements hold.
\rm(i) Assume that a is even. Then p \mid {p^a n \choose n}_F if and only if s_p (A) > \frac{a}{2} (p - 1) .
\rm(ii) Assume that a is odd and p \nmid n . If r < s , then p \mid {p^a n \choose n}_F . If r \geq s , then p \mid {p^a n \choose n}_F if and only if s_p (A) \geq \frac{a + 1}{2} (p - 1) .
\rm(iii) Assume that a is odd and p \mid n . If r\neq s , then p \mid {p^a n \choose n}_F . If r = s , then p \mid {p^a n \choose n}_F if and only if s_p (A) \geq \frac{a + 1}{2} (p - 1) .
Proof. We use Lemmas 2 and 3 repeatedly without reference. For (ⅰ), we obtain by (3.7) that
\begin{equation*} \nu_p \left( {p^a n \choose n}_F \right) = \frac{s_p (A)}{p - 1} - \frac{a}{2}, \text{ which is positive if and only if $s_p (A) \gt \frac{a}{2}(p-1)$.} \end{equation*} |
This proves (ⅰ). To prove (ⅱ) and (ⅲ), we let \delta be as in Theorem 12 and divide the consideration into two cases.
Case 1. p \nmid n . If r < s , then we obtain by Theorem 5(ⅲ) that \nu_p \left({p^a n \choose n}_F \right) \geq \nu_p (F_{z(p)}) \geq 1 . Suppose r \geq s . Then \delta = 0 and (3.8) is
\begin{equation*} \left\lfloor \frac{A}{p - 1} \right\rfloor - \frac{a - 1}{2} - \nu_p (A !) = \left\lfloor \frac{A}{p - 1} \right\rfloor - \frac{a - 1}{2} - \frac{A - s_p (A)}{p-1} = \frac{s_p (A)}{p - 1} - \left\{ \frac{A}{p - 1} \right\} - \frac{a - 1}{2}. \end{equation*} |
If s_p(A) \geq \frac{a+1}{2}(p - 1) , then (3.8) implies that
\begin{equation*} \nu_p \left( {p^a n \choose n}_F \right) \geq 1 - \left\{ \frac{A}{p - 1} \right\} \gt 0. \end{equation*} |
Similarly, if s_p (A) < \frac{a+1}{2}(p-1) , then \nu_p \left({p^a n \choose n}_F \right) < 1 - \left\{ \frac{A}{p-1} \right\} \leq 1 . This proves (ⅱ).
Case 2. p \mid n . We write n = p^b \ell where p \nmid \ell . Then b \geq 1 . Recall that \nu_p (F_{z(p)}) \geq 1 . If r \neq s , then Theorem 6 implies that \nu_p \left({p^a n \choose n} \right) \geq \frac{b}{2} if b is even and it is \geq \frac{b + 1}{2} if b is odd. In any case, \nu_p \left({p^a n \choose n}_F \right) \geq 1 . So p \mid {p^a n \choose n}_F . If r = s , then \delta = 0 and we obtain as in Case 1 that p \mid {p^a n \choose n}_F if and only if s_p (A) \geq \frac{a + 1}{2} (p - 1) . This proves (ⅲ).
Corollary 15. Let p \neq 2, 5 be a prime and let A = \frac{n(p-1)}{p^{\nu_p (n)}z(p)} . Assume that p \equiv \pm 1 \pmod{5} . Then p \mid {pn \choose n}_F if and only if s_p (A) \geq p-1 .
Proof. We remark that by Lemma 1(ⅱ), A is an integer. Let x = \frac{n}{p^{\nu_p (n)}z(p)} . We apply Theorem 12(ⅰ) with a = 1 . If s_p (A) \geq p-1 , then (3.6) implies that \nu_p \left({pn \choose n}_F \right) \geq 1 - \{x\} > 0 . If s_p (A) < p - 1 , then \nu_p \left({pn \choose n}_F \right) < 1 - \{x\} \leq 1 . This completes the proof.
We give exact formulas for the p -adic valuations of Fibonomial coefficients of the form {p^an\choose n}_F for all primes p and a, n\in \mathbb N . Then we use it to characterize the integers n such that {p^a n \choose n}_F is divisible by p .
Phakhinkon Phunphayap receives a scholarship from Science Achievement Scholarship of Thailand(SAST). This research was jointly supported by the Thailand Research Fund and the Faculty of Science Silpakorn University, grant number RSA5980040.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.
[1] |
Zerrouk S, Seijo MC, Escuredo O, et al. (2018) Characterization of Ziziphus lotus (jujube) honey produced in Algeria. J Apic Res 57: 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2017.1399663 doi: 10.1080/00218839.2017.1399663
![]() |
[2] |
Bicudo de Almeida-Muradian L, Monika Barth O, Dietemann V, et al. (2020) Standard methods for Apis mellifera honey research. J Apic Res 59: 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2020.1738135 doi: 10.1080/00218839.2020.1738135
![]() |
[3] | Zammit Young GW, Blundell R (2023) A review on the phytochemical composition and health applications of honey. Heliyon 9: e12507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12507 |
[4] |
Zhang Y, Li XQ, Li HM, et al. (2019) Antibiotic residues in honey: A review on analytical methods by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem 110: 344–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.11.015 doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.11.015
![]() |
[5] |
Samborska K (2019) Powdered honey—drying methods and parameters, types of carriers and drying aids, physicochemical properties and storage stability. Trends Food Sci Technol 88: 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.03.019 doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.03.019
![]() |
[6] |
Osés SM, Cantero L, Puertas G, et al. (2022) Antioxidant, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities of ling-heather honey powder obtained by different methods with several carriers. LWT 159: 113235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113235 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113235
![]() |
[7] | The Brainy Insights (2022) Dried Honey Market Size by Category (Conventional and Organic), Form Type (Granular and Powder), Application[Pharmaceuticals (Supplements, Ointment, and Medicines), Food and Beverages (Confectioneries and Bakery, Coffee, Tea, Juice, Frozen Desserts, and Others) and Personal Care and Cosmetics], Sales Channel (Specialty Stores, Supermarkets and Hypermarkets, Retail Stores and Online), Regions, Global Industry Analysis, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecast 2022 to 2030. Pune, Maharashtra, India: The Brainy Insights. TBI-12926 TBI-12926. 235p. |
[8] | IndexBox Inc (2023) Thailand-Honey-Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights California, USA: IndexBox Inc, . 0409 0409. |
[9] |
Wanjai C, Sringarm K, Santasup C, et al. (2012) Physicochemical and microbiological properties of longan, bitter bush, sunflower and litchi honeys produced by Apis mellifera in Northern Thailand. J Apic Res 51: 36–44. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.51.1.05 doi: 10.3896/IBRA.1.51.1.05
![]() |
[10] | Maitip J, Sanpa S, Burgett M, et al. (2023) Antimicrobial activity from five species of stingless bee (Apidae meliponini) honey from South East Asia (Thailand). In: Razak BA, Chilek TZT, Saputra J (Eds.), Recent Advances in Global Meliponiculture, IGI Global, 53–68. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6265-2.ch003 |
[11] | Chen YH, Chuah WC, Chye FY (2021) Effect of drying on physicochemical and functional properties of stingless bee honey. J Food Proc Preserv 45: e15328. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.15328 |
[12] |
Samborska K, Jedlińska A, Wiktor A, et al. (2019) The effect of low-temperature spray drying with dehumidified air on phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity, and aroma compounds of rapeseed honey powders. Food Bioprocess Technol 12: 919–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-019-02260-8 doi: 10.1007/s11947-019-02260-8
![]() |
[13] |
Sarabandi K, Peighambardoust SH, Sadeghi Mahoonak AR, et al. (2018) Effect of different carriers on microstructure and physical characteristics of spray dried apple juice concentrate. J Food Sci Technol 55: 3098–3109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3235-6 doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3235-6
![]() |
[14] |
Sramek M, Woerz B, Horn H, et al. (2016) Preparation of High-Grade Powders from Honey–Glucose Syrup Formulations by Vacuum Foam-Drying Method. J Food Proc Preserv 40: 790–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12660 doi: 10.1111/jfpp.12660
![]() |
[15] |
Sahu JK (2008) The effect of additives on vacuum dried honey powder properties. Int J Food Eng 4: 9. https://doi.org/doi:10.2202/1556-3758.1356 doi: 10.2202/1556-3758.1356
![]() |
[16] |
Vardanega R, Muzio AFV, Silva EK, et al. (2019) Obtaining functional powder tea from Brazilian ginseng roots: Effects of freeze and spray drying processes on chemical and nutritional quality, morphological and redispersion properties. Food Res Int 116: 932–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.030 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.030
![]() |
[17] |
Raja KS, Taip FS, Azmi MMZ, et al. (2019) Effect of pre-treatment and different drying methods on the physicochemical properties of Carica papaya L. leaf powder. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 18: 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2017.04.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2017.04.001
![]() |
[18] |
How YK, Siow LF (2020) Effects of convection-, vacuum-and freeze-drying on antioxidant, physicochemical properties, functional properties and storage stability of stink bean (Parkia speciosa) powder. J Food Sci Technol 57: 4637–4648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-020-04501-7 doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04501-7
![]() |
[19] |
Mutlu C, Erbas M (2023) Evaluating the effects of different drying methods, carrier materials and their ratios to produce bioactive honey-like powder. J Apic Res 62: 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2021.1885877 doi: 10.1080/00218839.2021.1885877
![]() |
[20] | Horwitz W, International A (2002) Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. Gaithersburg, Md.: AOAC International Gaithersburg, Md. |
[21] |
Sarkar A, Hossain MW, Alam M, et al. (2023) Drying conditions and varietal impacts on physicochemical, antioxidant and functional properties of onion powder. J Agric Food Res 12: 100578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100578 doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100578
![]() |
[22] | Sales Junior RdO, Gomes-Filho JE, Almeida WCd, et al. (2022) Evaluation of pH and total soluble solid (° brix) on the cariogenic and erosive potential of milk powder infantile formula. Res, Soc Dev 11: e588111537063. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i15.37063 |
[23] | Bogdanov S (2002) Harmonised methods of the international honey commission. International Honey Commission (IHC), 1–62. |
[24] |
Akther S, Jothi JS, Badsha MR, et al. (2023) Drying methods effect on bioactive compounds, phenolic profile, and antioxidant capacity of mango powder. J King Saud Univ-Sci 35: 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102370 doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102370
![]() |
[25] |
Kamchonemenukool S, Buasum W, Weerawatanakorn M, et al. (2023) Short-chain fructooligosaccharide synthesis from sugarcane syrup with commercial enzyme preparations and some physical and antioxidation properties of the syrup and syrup powder. Foods 12: 2895. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12152895 doi: 10.3390/foods12152895
![]() |
[26] |
Guldas M, Demircan H, Cakmak I, et al. (2022) Antioxidant and bioaccessibility characteristics of functional fruit and vegetable honeys produced by innovative method. Food BioSci 48: 101732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101732 doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101732
![]() |
[27] |
Ranneh Y, Ali F, Zarei M, et al. (2018) Malaysian stingless bee and Tualang honeys: A comparative characterization of total antioxidant capacity and phenolic profile using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. LWT 89: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.10.020 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.10.020
![]() |
[28] |
Ahmad I, Xiong Z, Xiong H, et al. (2023) Physicochemical, rheological and antioxidant profiling of yogurt prepared from non-enzymatically and enzymatically hydrolyzed potato powder under refrigeration. Food Sci Hum Wellness 12: 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2022.07.024 doi: 10.1016/j.fshw.2022.07.024
![]() |
[29] |
Kowalska G, Rosicka-Kaczmarek J, Miśkiewicz K, et al. (2021) Influence of rye bran heteropolysaccharides on the physicochemical and antioxidant properties of honeydew honey microcapsules. Food Bioprod Proc 130: 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2021.09.014 doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2021.09.014
![]() |
[30] |
Khan SU, Anjum SI, Rahman K, et al. (2018) Honey: Single food stuff comprises many drugs. Saudi J Biol Sci 25: 320–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.08.004 doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.08.004
![]() |
[31] |
Singh I, Singh S (2018) Honey moisture reduction and its quality. J Food Sci Technol 55: 3861–3871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3341-5 doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3341-5
![]() |
[32] |
Akhmazillah MFN, Farid MM, Silva FVM (2013) High pressure processing (HPP) of honey for the improvement of nutritional value. Innovative Food Sci Emerging Technol 20: 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2013.06.012 doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2013.06.012
![]() |
[33] |
Umesh Hebbar H, Rastogi NK, Subramanian R (2008) Properties of dried and intermediate moisture honey products: A review. Int J Food Prop 11: 804–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942910701624736 doi: 10.1080/10942910701624736
![]() |
[34] |
Aykas DP (2023) Determination of possible adulteration and quality assessment in commercial honey. Foods 12: 523. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12030523 doi: 10.3390/foods12030523
![]() |
[35] |
Nedic N, Gojak M, Zlatanović I, et al. (2020) Study of vacuum and freeze drying of bee honey. Therm Sci 24: 194–194. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI200317194N doi: 10.2298/TSCI200317194N
![]() |
[36] |
Seerangurayar T, Manickavasagan A, Al-Ismaili AM, et al. (2017) Effect of carrier agents on flowability and microstructural properties of foam-mat freeze dried date powder. J Food Eng 215: 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.07.016 doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.07.016
![]() |
[37] |
Ucar TM, Karadag A (2019) The effects of vacuum and freeze-drying on the physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility of phenolics in oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus). J Food Meas Charact 13: 2298–2309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-019-00149-w doi: 10.1007/s11694-019-00149-w
![]() |
[38] |
Zamora MC, Chirife J, Roldán D (2006) On the nature of the relationship between water activity and % moisture in honey. Food Control 17: 642–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.04.002 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.04.002
![]() |
[39] |
Jalgaonkar K, Mahawar MK, Vishwakarma RK, et al. (2020) Optimization of process condition for preparation of sapota bar using Refractance window drying method. Drying Technol 38: 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2018.1482314 doi: 10.1080/07373937.2018.1482314
![]() |
[40] |
Vu ND, Nguyen VM, Tran TT (2023) Effects of pH, total soluble solids, and pectin concentration on color, texture, vitamin C, and sensory quality of mango fruit bar. Int J Food Sci 2023: 6618300. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6618300 doi: 10.1155/2023/6618300
![]() |
[41] |
Shapla UM, Solayman M, Alam N, et al. (2018) 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) levels in honey and other food products: effects on bees and human health. Chem Cent J 12: 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-018-0408-3 doi: 10.1186/s13065-018-0408-3
![]() |
[42] |
Lee YC, Shlyankevich M, Jeong HK, et al. (1995) Bioactivation of 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furaldehyde to an electrophilic and mutagenic allylic sulfuric acid ester. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 209: 996–1002. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1995.1596 doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1596
![]() |
[43] |
Glatt H, Schneider H, Liu Y (2005) V79-hCYP2E1-hSULT1A1, a cell line for the sensitive detection of genotoxic effects induced by carbohydrate pyrolysis products and other food-borne chemicals. Mutat Res/Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 580: 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.11.005 doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.11.005
![]() |
[44] |
Monien BH, Engst W, Barknowitz G, et al. (2012) Mutagenicity of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in V79 cells expressing human SULT1A1: Identification and mass spectrometric quantification of DNA adducts formed. Chem Res Toxicol 25: 1484–1492. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx300150n doi: 10.1021/tx300150n
![]() |
[45] |
Kanar Y, Mazı BG (2019) HMF formation, diastase activity and proline content changes in bee pollen dried by different drying methods. LWT 113: 108273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108273 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108273
![]() |
[46] |
Bogdanov S, Lüllmann C, Martin P, et al. (2015) Honey quality and international regulatory standards: Review by the International Honey Commission. Bee World 80: 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.1999.11099428 doi: 10.1080/0005772X.1999.11099428
![]() |
[47] |
Thrasyvoulou A, Tananaki C, Goras G, et al. (2018) Legislation of honey criteria and standards. J Apic Res 57: 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2017.1411181 doi: 10.1080/00218839.2017.1411181
![]() |
[48] |
Cianciosi D, Forbes-Hernández TY, Afrin S, et al. (2018) Phenolic compounds in honey and their associated health benefits: A review. Molecules 23: 2322. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092322 doi: 10.3390/molecules23092322
![]() |
[49] |
Chua LS, Rahaman NL, Adnan NA, et al. (2013) Antioxidant activity of three honey samples in relation with their biochemical components. J Anal Methods Chem 2013: 313798. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/313798 doi: 10.1155/2013/313798
![]() |
[50] |
Starowicz M, Ostaszyk A, Zieliński H (2021) The relationship between the browning index, total phenolics, color, and antioxidant activity of polish-originated honey samples. Foods 10: 967. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10050967 doi: 10.3390/foods10050967
![]() |
[51] |
Nedic N, Kalaba M, Radišić P, et al. (2022) Polyphenolic and chemical profiles of honey from the Tara Mountain in Serbia. Front Nutr 9: 941463. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.941463 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.941463
![]() |
[52] |
Nyarko K, Boozer K, Greenlief CM (2023) Profiling of the polyphenol content of honey from different geographical origins in the United States. Molecules 28: 5011. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135011 doi: 10.3390/molecules28135011
![]() |
[53] | Kamiloglu S, Toydemir G, Boyacioglu D, et al. (2016) A review on the effect of drying on antioxidant potential of fruits and vegetables. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 56: S110–S129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2015.1045969 |
[54] |
Jiang N, Liu C, Li D, et al. (2017) Evaluation of freeze drying combined with microwave vacuum drying for functional okra snacks: Antioxidant properties, sensory quality, and energy consumption. LWT-Food Sci Technol 82: 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.04.015 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.04.015
![]() |
[55] | Kieu Tran TM, Kirkman T, Nguyen M, et al. (2020) Effects of drying on physical properties, phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of Robusta wet coffee pulp (Coffea canephora). Heliyon 6: e04498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04498 |
[56] |
Paul ID, Das M (2018) Effect of freeze, microwave-convective hot air, vacuum and dehumidified air drying on total phenolics content, anthocyanin content and antioxidant activity of jamun (Syzygium cumini L.) pulp. J Food Sci Technol 55: 2410–2419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3158-2 doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3158-2
![]() |
[57] |
İzli G (2017) Total phenolics, antioxidant capacity, colour and drying characteristics of date fruit dried with different methods. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos 37: 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457x.14516 doi: 10.1590/1678-457x.14516
![]() |
[58] |
Sayin FK, Alkan SB (2015) The effect of pickling on total phenolic contents and antioxidant activity of 10 vegetables. Food Health 1: 135–141. https://doi.org/10.3153/JFHS15013 doi: 10.3153/JFHS15013
![]() |
[59] |
Hu D, Liu X, Qin Y, et al. (2023) The impact of different drying methods on the physical properties, bioactive components, antioxidant capacity, volatile components and industrial application of coffee peel. Food Chem: X 19: 100807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100807 doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100807
![]() |
[60] |
Lachman J, Orsák M, Hejtmánková A, et al. (2010) Evaluation of antioxidant activity and total phenolics of selected Czech honeys. LWT-Food Sci Technol 43: 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.06.008 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2009.06.008
![]() |
[61] |
Liang N, Kitts DD (2014) Antioxidant property of coffee components: Assessment of methods that define mechanisms of action. Molecules 19: 19180–19208. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules191119180 doi: 10.3390/molecules191119180
![]() |
[62] |
Valadez-Carmona L, Plazola-Jacinto CP, Hernández-Ortega M, et al. (2017) Effects of microwaves, hot air and freeze-drying on the phenolic compounds, antioxidant capacity, enzyme activity and microstructure of cacao pod husks (Theobroma cacao L.). Innovative Food Sci Emerging Technol 41: 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2017.04.012 doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2017.04.012
![]() |
[63] |
Mella C, Vega-Gálvez A, Uribe E, et al. (2022) Impact of vacuum drying on drying characteristics and functional properties of beetroot (Beta vulgaris). Appl Food Res 2: 100120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2022.100120 doi: 10.1016/j.afres.2022.100120
![]() |
[64] |
Subbiah V, Duan X, Agar OT, et al. (2023) Comparative study on the effect of different drying techniques on phenolic compounds in Australian beach-cast brown seaweeds. Algal Res 72: 103140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2023.103140 doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2023.103140
![]() |
[65] |
Gül A, Pehlivan T (2018) Antioxidant activities of some monofloral honey types produced across Turkey. Saudi J Biol Sci 25: 1056–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.02.01 doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.02.01
![]() |
1. | Kritkhajohn Onphaeng, Prapanpong Pongsriiam, Exact divisibility by powers of the integers in the Lucas sequence of the first kind, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 6739, 10.3934/math.2020433 | |
2. | Phakhinkon Napp Phunphayap, Prapanpong Pongsriiam, Jeffrey Shallit, Sumsets associated with Beatty sequences, 2022, 345, 0012365X, 112810, 10.1016/j.disc.2022.112810 | |
3. | Phakhinkon Napp Phunphayap, Prapanpong Pongsriiam, Divisibility of Fibonomial coefficients in terms of their digital representations and applications, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 5314, 10.3934/math.2022296 | |
4. | Kritkhajohn Onphaeng, Prapanpong Pongsriiam, Exact divisibility by powers of the integers in the Lucas sequences of the first and second kinds, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 11733, 10.3934/math.2021682 | |
5. | Christian J.-C. Ballot, Hugh C. Williams, 2023, Chapter 5, 978-3-031-37237-7, 105, 10.1007/978-3-031-37238-4_5 | |
6. | Prapanpong Pongsriiam, Sums of divisors on arithmetic progressions, 2024, 88, 0031-5303, 443, 10.1007/s10998-023-00566-x |