
In this note, we investigate some new characterizations of the p-adic version of Lipschitz spaces via the boundedness of commutators of the p-adic maximal-type functions, including p-adic sharp maximal functions, p-adic fractional maximal functions, and p-adic fractional maximal commutators on p-adic Morrey spaces, when a symbol function b belongs to the Lipschitz spaces.
Citation: Naqash Sarfraz, Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Qasim Ali Malik. Some new characterizations of boundedness of commutators of p-adic maximal-type functions on p-adic Morrey spaces in terms of Lipschitz spaces[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19756-19770. doi: 10.3934/math.2024964
[1] | Xin Zhao, Xin Liu, Jian Li . Convergence analysis and error estimate of finite element method of a nonlinear fluid-structure interaction problem. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 5240-5260. doi: 10.3934/math.2020337 |
[2] | Yuwen He, Jun Li, Lingsheng Meng . Three effective preconditioners for double saddle point problem. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 6933-6947. doi: 10.3934/math.2021406 |
[3] | Jin-Song Xiong . Generalized accelerated AOR splitting iterative method for generalized saddle point problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7625-7641. doi: 10.3934/math.2022428 |
[4] | Zhuo-Hong Huang . A generalized Shift-HSS splitting method for nonsingular saddle point problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13508-13536. doi: 10.3934/math.2022747 |
[5] | Yasir Nadeem Anjam . Singularities and regularity of stationary Stokes and Navier-Stokes equations on polygonal domains and their treatments. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 440-466. doi: 10.3934/math.2020030 |
[6] | Luigi Accardi, El Gheted Soueidi, Abdessatar Souissi, Mohamed Rhaima, Farrukh Mukhamedov, Farzona Mukhamedova . Structure of backward quantum Markov chains. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28044-28057. doi: 10.3934/math.20241360 |
[7] | Danxia Wang, Ni Miao, Jing Liu . A second-order numerical scheme for the Ericksen-Leslie equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 15834-15853. doi: 10.3934/math.2022867 |
[8] | Tiantian Zhang, Wenwen Xu, Xindong Li, Yan Wang . Multipoint flux mixed finite element method for parabolic optimal control problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 17461-17474. doi: 10.3934/math.2022962 |
[9] | Salman Zeb, Muhammad Yousaf, Aziz Khan, Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Thabet Abdeljawad . Updating QR factorization technique for solution of saddle point problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1672-1681. doi: 10.3934/math.2023085 |
[10] | Shu-Xin Miao, Jing Zhang . On Uzawa-SSI method for non-Hermitian saddle point problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7301-7315. doi: 10.3934/math.2020467 |
In this note, we investigate some new characterizations of the p-adic version of Lipschitz spaces via the boundedness of commutators of the p-adic maximal-type functions, including p-adic sharp maximal functions, p-adic fractional maximal functions, and p-adic fractional maximal commutators on p-adic Morrey spaces, when a symbol function b belongs to the Lipschitz spaces.
It is known to us all that tumor growth has attracted considerable attention over the past few decades. In order to study the importance of tumor growth and better understand the disease itself, it is critical to find a model that may help to treat the tumor. For this purpose, some basic relations between mathematical modeling and tumor model have been presented in [1]. With the diffusion process about cell and nutrient proliferation as a basis, many mathematical models [2,3,4,5,6,7,8] have been used to discuss these growth phenomena, such as the fractional mathematical model of tumor invasion and metastasis [2], tumor spheroid models [3,4], the androgen-deprivation prostate cancer treatment model [5], the foundations of cancer modeling [6] and hepatitis C evolution models [7,8].
In this paper, we will discuss the following reaction-diffusion model for cancer invasion [9,10]:
ut=u(1−u)−auw,vt=d[(1−u)vx]x+bv(1−v),wt=wxx+c(v−w), | (1.1) |
where u(x,t),v(x,t) and w(x,t) stand for dimensionless and rescaled versions of healthy tissue, tumor tissue and excess H+ ions, respectively. The subscripts represent the partial derivatives relative to the corresponding variables. a,b,c and d are all constant functions. a indicates the destructive effect of H+ ions on the healthy tissue, b is the productivity of neoplastic tissue which pumps H+ ions at a rate c and d is displayed in the form d=D2/D3 where D2 and D3 are the diffusion coefficients of malignant tissue and H+ ions, respectively. The phenomenon in many instances of tumor propagation of an interstitial gap has been discussed in [9]. Some wave propagation dynamics were considered in [11].
As everyone knows, the Lie group method plays an important role in studying the exact significant solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations [12,13,14,15]. The main aims of the symmetry method are to construct invariance conditions and obtain reductions to differential equations [16,17,18]. Once the reduced equations are given, a large number of corresponding exact solutions can be obtained. Utilizing Lie group analysis, we are going to get some fascinating special solutions of Eq (1.1) and identify the analysis stability behaviors of the model.
The remainder of the paper is arranged as follows. Symmetries of the acid-mediated cancer invasion model are analyzed in Section 2; Section 3 considers the symmetry reductions through the use of similar variables; in Section 4, some new explicit solutions are provided with help of the power-series method, and the convergence of the solutions of the power-series is presented; also, we will investigate the properties of different solutions via imaging analysis; the last section summarizes the results of the study.
In this paper, we demonstrate the Lie symmetry technique for Eq (1.1). First of all, let us think about a vector field of infinitesimal transformations of Eq (1.1) with the form
X=ξ∂x+τ∂t+ϕ∂u+φ∂v+η∂w, | (2.1) |
where ξ,τ,ϕ,φ and η are functions of x,t,u,v,w respectively and are called infinitesimals of the symmetry group.
Based on the transformation (2.1), applying the invariance conditions to Eq (1.1), we get [16,19]
pr(1)X(ut−u(1−u)+auw)=0,pr(2)X(vt−d((1−u)vx)x−bv(1−v))=0,pr(2)X(wt−wxx−c(v−w))=0, |
where pr(i)X,i=1,2 is the ith-order prolongation of X [16,19]. For Eq (1.1),
pr(1)X=X+ϕ(1)t∂∂ut,pr(2)X=X+ϕ(1)x∂∂ux+φ(1)x∂∂vx+φ(1)t∂∂vt+η(1)t∂∂wt+φ(2)xx∂∂vxx+η(2)xx∂∂wxx, |
where
ϕ(1)x=Dxϕ−uxDxξ−utDxτ,ϕ(1)t=Dtϕ−uxDtξ−utDtτ,φ(1)x=Dxφ−vxDxξ−vtDxτ,φ(1)t=Dtφ−vxDtξ−vtDtτ,η(1)t=Dtη−wxDtξ−wtDtτ,φ(2)xx=D2x(φ−ξvx−τvt)+ξvxxx+τvxxt,η(2)xx=D2x(η−ξwx−τwt)+ξwxxx+τwxxt, |
and Dx and Dt represent the total differential operators; for example,
Dt=∂∂t+ut∂∂u+vt∂∂v+wt∂∂w+utx∂∂ux+vtx∂∂vx+utt∂∂ut+wtt∂∂wt+⋯. |
Next, we get an overdetermined system of equations for ξ,τ,ϕ,φ and η
ξx=ξt=ξu=ξv=ξw=0,τx=τt=τu=τv=τw=0,ϕ=φ=η=0. |
Solving the above equations, one gets
ξ=c1,τ=c2,ϕ=φ=η=0, |
where c1 and c2 are arbitrary constants. Therefore, Lie algebra L2 of the transformations of Eq (1.1) is spanned by the following vector fields
X1=∂x,X2=∂t. |
To obtain the symmetry groups, we solve the initial problems of the following ordinary differential equations
d˜xdϵ=ξ(˜x,˜t,˜u,˜v,˜w),˜x|ϵ=0=x,d˜tdϵ=τ(˜x,˜t,˜u,˜v,˜w),˜t|ϵ=0=t,d˜udϵ=ϕ(˜x,˜t,˜u,˜v,˜w),˜u|ϵ=0=u,d˜vdϵ=φ(˜x,˜t,˜u,˜v,˜w),˜v|ϵ=0=v,d˜wdϵ=η(˜x,˜t,˜u,˜v,˜w),˜w|ϵ=0=w; |
then we get the one-parameter symmetry groups Gi:(x,t,u,v,w)→(˜x,˜t,˜u,˜v,˜w) of the infinitesimal generators Xi(i=1,2) as follows:
G1:(x,t,u,v,w)→(x+ϵ,t,u,v,w),G2:(x,t,u,v,w)→(x,t+ϵ,u,v,w). |
Based on the above discussion, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.1. If u=f(x,t),v=g(x,t) and w=h(x,t), constitute a solution of Eq (1.1), then by applying the above-mentioned groups Gi(i=1,2), the corresponding new solutions ui,vi,wi(i=1,2) can be presented respectively as follows:
u1=f(x−ϵ,t),v1=g(x−ϵ,t),w1=h(x−ϵ,t),u2=f(x,t−ϵ),v2=g(x,t−ϵ),w2=h(x,t−ϵ). |
In this section, we are going to cope with the similarity reductions of Eq (1.1).
Case 3.1. For the generator X1+X2, the invariants are z=x−t,u=f(z),v=g(z) and w=h(z), Eq (1.1) becomes
−f′=f−f2−afh,−g′=d(−f′g′+g″−fg″)+bg−bg2,−h′=h″+c(g−h), | (3.1) |
where f′=dfdz,g′=dgdz and h′=dhdz.
Case 3.2. For the generator X1, the invariants are z=t,u=f(z),v=g(z) and w=h(z), Eq (1.1) can be reduced to
f′=f−f2−afh,g′=bg−bg2,h′=c(g−h), | (3.2) |
where f′=dfdz,g′=dgdz and h′=dhdz. The invariant solution of Eq (1.1) is as follows: u(x,t)=f(t),v(x,t)=g(t),w(x,t)=h(t). Obviously, in this case, the variable x has no effect on the solution of Eq (1.1).
Case 3.3. For the generator X2, analogously, we have z=x,u=f(z),v=g(z) and w=h(z). The reduction of Eq (1.1) is
f−f2−afh=0,d(−f′g′+g″−fg″)+bg−bg2=0,h″+c(g−h)=0, | (3.3) |
where f′=dfdz,g′=dgdz and h′=dhdz. The invariant solution of Eq (1.1) is as follows: u(x,t)=f(x),v(x,t)=g(x),w(x,t)=h(x). In this case, the variable t has no effect on the solution of Eq (1.1).
Next, by way of the power-series method which is a very useful technique for treating partial differential equations [20], we will discuss cases 3.1–3.3.
For Case 3.1, we assume that the power-series solution to Eq (3.1) is as follows
f(z)=∞∑n=0pnzn,g(z)=∞∑n=0qnzn,h(z)=∞∑n=0lnzn, | (4.1) |
where the coefficients pn,qn and ln are constants to be resolved.
Putting Eq (4.1) into Eq (3.1), we obtain
−∞∑n=0(n+1)pn+1zn=∞∑n=0pnzn−∞∑n=0n∑k=0pkpn−kzn−a∞∑n=0n∑k=0pkln−kzn,−∞∑n=0(n+1)qn+1zn=d[−∞∑n=0n∑k=0(k+1)(n−k+1)pk+1qn−k+1zn+∞∑n=0(n+1)(n+2)qn+2zn−∞∑n=0n∑k=0(n−k+1)(n−k+2)pkqn−k+2zn]+b∞∑n=0qnzn−b∞∑n=0n∑k=0qkqn−kzn,−∞∑n=0(n+1)ln+1zn=∞∑n=0(n+1)(n+2)ln+2zn+c(∞∑n=0qnzn−∞∑n=0lnzn). | (4.2) |
Comparing the coefficients for Eq (4.2), we get
p1=p0(−1+p0+al0),q2=bq0(q0−1)+q1(dp1−1)2d(1−p0),l2=12[c(l0−q0)−l1]. | (4.3) |
Generally, for n≥1, we have
pn+1=−1n+1[pn−n∑k=0pk(pn−k+aln−k)],qn+2=1(n+1)(n+2)d(1−p0){(dp1−1)(n+1)qn+1−bqn+bn∑k=0qkqn−k+n∑k=1d(n−k+1)[(k+1)pk+1qn−k+1+(n−k+2)pkqn−k+2]},ln+2=1(n+1)(n+2)[c(ln−qn)−(n+1)ln+1]. | (4.4) |
Given Eq (4.4), the coefficients pi(i≥2),qj and lj(j≥3) of (4.1) can be obtained, i.e.,
p2=−12[p1−2p0p1−a(p0l1+p1l0)],q3=16d(1−p0)(4dp1q2+2bq0q1+2dp2q1−2q2−bq1),l3=16[c(l1−q1)−2l2]. |
Therefore, for the arbitrary constants p0≠1,q0,l0,q1 and l1, the other terms of the sequences {pn,qn,ln}∞n=0, according to Eqs (4.3) and (4.4), can be determined. This implies that there is a power-series solution, i.e., Eq (4.1) which has coefficients that are composed of Eqs (4.3) and (4.4).
Furthermore, for Eq (3.1), we confirm the convergence of Eq (4.1). In fact, from Eq (4.4), we get
|pn+1|≤M[|pn|+n∑k=0|pk|(|pn−k|+|ln−k|)],|qn+2|≤N[|qn+1|+|qn|+n∑k=0|qk||qn−k|+n∑k=1(|pk+1||qn−k+1|+|pk||qn−k+2|)],|ln+2|≤L(|ln|+|qn|+|ln+1|), |
where M=max{1,a},N=max{|dp1−1d(1−p0)|,|bd(1−p0)|,|11−p0|} and L=max{1,c}.
Next, we construct three power-series R=R(z)=∑∞n=0rnzn, S=S(z)=∑∞n=0snzn and T=T(z)=∑∞n=0tnzn by using
ri=|pi|,i=0,1,sj=|qj|,tj=|lj|,i=0,1,2, |
and
rn+1=M[rn+n∑k=0rk(rn−k+tn−k)],sn+2=N[sn+1+sn+n∑k=0sksn−k+n∑k=1(rk+1sn−k+1+rksn−k+2)],tn+2=L(tn+sn+tn+1), |
where n=1,2,⋯. It is easily seen that
|pn|≤rn,|qn|≤sn,|ln|≤tn,n=0,1,2,⋯. |
Therefore, R=R(z)=∑∞n=0rnzn, S=S(z)=∑∞n=0snzn and T=T(z)=∑∞n=0tnzn are majorant series of Eq (4.1) respectively. Next, we prove that R=R(z),S=S(z) and T=T(z) have a positive radius of convergence.
R(z)=r0+r1z+∞∑n=1rn+1zn+1=r0+r1z+M[∞∑n=1rnzn+1+∞∑n=1n∑k=0rk(rn−k+tn−k)zn+1]=r0+r1z+M[(R−r0)+(R2−r20)+r0(T−t0)+T(R−r0)]z,S(z)=s0+s1z+s2z2+∞∑n=1sn+2zn+2=s0+s1z+s2z2+N[∞∑n=1sn+1zn+2+∞∑n=1snzn+2+∞∑n=1n∑k=0sksn−kzn+2+∞∑n=1n∑k=1rk+1sn−k+1zn+2+∞∑n=1n∑k=1rksn−k+2zn+2]=s0+s1z+s2z2+N[z(S−s0−s1z)+z2(S−s0)+z2(S2−s20)+(S−s0)(R−r0−r1z)+(R−r0)(S−s0−s1z)], |
and
T(z)=t0+t1z+t2z2+∞∑n=1tn+2zn+2=t0+t1z+t2z2+L[∞∑n=1tnzn+2+∞∑n=1snzn+2+∞∑n=1tn+1zn+2]=t0+t1z+t2z2+L[z2(T−t0)+z2(S−s0)+z(T−t0−t1z)]. |
Then, we discuss the implicit functional system with the independent variable z:
F1(z,R,S,T)=R−r0−r1z−M[(R−r0)+(R2−r20)+r0(T−t0)+T(R−r0)]z,F2(z,R,S,T)=S−s0−s1z−s2z2−N[z(S−s0−s1z)+z2(S−s0)+z2(S2−s20)+(S−s0)(R−r0−r1z)+(R−r0)(S−s0−s1z)],F3(z,R,S,T)=T−t0−t1z−t2z2−L[z2(T−t0)+z2(S−s0)+z(T−t0−t1z)]. |
Based on the implicit function theorem [21], because F1,F2 and F3 are analytic in the neighborhood of (0,r0,s0,t0) and F1(0,r0,s0,t0)=F2(0,r0,s0,t0)=F3(0,r0,s0,t0)=0, and given the Jacobian determinant
∂(F1,F2,F3)∂(R,S,T)∣(0,r0,s0,t0)=1≠0, |
we reach that R=R(z),S=S(z) and T=T(z) are analytic in a neighborhood of the point (0,r0,s0,t0) and have a positive radius. This shows that Eq (4.1) converges in a neighborhood of the point (0,r0,s0,t0). The proof is completed.
Thus the power-series solution given by Eq (4.1) for Eq (3.1) is analytic and can be described as
f(z)=p0+p1z+∞∑n=1pn+1zn+1=p0+p0(−1+p0+al0)z−∞∑n=11n+1[pn−n∑k=0pk(pn−k+aln−k)]zn+1,g(z)=q0+q1z+q2z2+∞∑n=1qn+2zn+2=q0+q1z+bq0(q0−1)+q1(dp1−1)2d(1−p0)z2+∞∑n=11(n+1)(n+2)d(1−p0){(dp1−1)(n+1)qn+1−bqn+bn∑k=0qkqn−k+n∑k=1d(n−k+1)[(k+1)pk+1qn−k+1+(n−k+2)pkqn−k+2]}zn+2,h(z)=l0+l1z+l2z2+∞∑n=1ln+2zn+2=l0+l1z+12[c(l0−q0)−l1]z2+∞∑n=11(n+1)(n+2)[c(ln−qn)−(n+1)ln+1]zn+2. |
Moreover, the power-series solution of Eq (1.1) is
u(x,t)=p0+p1(x−t)+∞∑n=1pn+1(x−t)n+1=p0+p0(−1+p0+al0)(x−t)−∞∑n=11n+1[pn−n∑k=0pk(pn−k+aln−k)](x−t)n+1,v(x,t)=q0+q1(x−t)+q2(x−t)2+∞∑n=1qn+2(x−t)n+2=q0+q1(x−t)+bq0(q0−1)+q1(dp1−1)2d(1−p0)(x−t)2+∞∑n=11(n+1)(n+2)d(1−p0){(dp1−1)(n+1)qn+1−bqn+bn∑k=0qkqn−k+n∑k=1d(n−k+1)[(k+1)pk+1qn−k+1+(n−k+2)pkqn−k+2]}(x−t)n+2,w(x,t)=l0+l1(x−t)+l2(x−t)2+∞∑n=1ln+2(x−t)n+2=l0+l1(x−t)+12[c(l0−q0)−l1](x−t)2+∞∑n=11(n+1)(n+2)[c(ln−qn)−(n+1)ln+1](x−t)n+2, | (4.5) |
where p0≠1,q0,l0,q1 and l1 are arbitrary constants; the other terms pn,qn and ln(n≥2) can be provided according to Eqs (4.3) and (4.4).
We take the first six terms of Eq (4.5) as approximate to u,v and w for a=1.5,b=1,c=2,d=4×10−10,p0=0.5,q0=3,l0=5,q1=4 and l1=6. Then the approximation is depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1 shows that the values of u,v and w tend to be stable when x∈(0,1) and t∈(0,1). However, when x→0 and t→1 or x→1 and t→0, u and w change suddenly in one direction and v changes sharply in the other direction. The rate of change of v is faster than that of u, and that of w is between them. This shows that healthy tissue may be destroyed before malignant cells arrive. Tumor progression is mediated by the acidification of surrounding tissues. Due to anaerobic glycolysis and metabolism, tumor cells produce excessive H+ ions. This leads to local acidification, which then destroys the surrounding healthy tissue and promotes tumor invasion.
For Case 3.2, similarly, we can also obtain the following power-series solution to Eq (1.1):
u(x,t)=p0+∞∑n=0pn+1tn+1=p0+∞∑n=01n+1[pn−n∑k=0pk(pn−k+aln−k)]tn+1,v(x,t)=q0+∞∑n=0qn+1tn+1=q0+∞∑n=0bn+1(qn−n∑k=0qkqn−k)tn+1,w(x,t)=l0+∞∑n=0ln+1tn+1=l0+∞∑n=0cn+1(qn−ln)tn+1, | (4.6) |
where p0,q0 and l0 are arbitrary constants.
We get the first six terms of the power-series solutions of (4.6) as approximate to u,v and w for a=1.5,b=1,c=2,d=4×10−10,p0=0.5,q0=3 and l0=5 respectively, then, the approximations of u,v and w are illustrated in Figure 2.
Figure 2 illustrates that, when t∈(0,1), the values of u,v and w are stable first and mutate over time. When u and v decrease at the same time, w increases. The rate of change of u is the same as that of v, and the rate of change of w is slightly slower than them. This indicates that when healthy cells and cancer cells decrease at the same time, H+ ions will increase. We find that H+ ions are sensitive to changes in healthy cells and cancer cells.
For Case 3.3, the power-series solution to Eq (1.1) is described as follows:
u(x,t)=p0+p1x+∞∑n=2pnxn=p0+ap0l11−2p0−al0x+∞∑n=2ap0ln+n−1∑k=1pk(pn−k+aln−k)1−2p0−al0xn,v(x,t)=q0+q1x+q2x2+∞∑n=1qn+2xn+2=q0+q1x+dp1q1−bq0(1−q0)2d(1−p0)x2+∞∑n=11(n+1)(n+2)d(1−p0){d[(n+1)p1qn+1+n∑k=1(n−k+1)((k+1)pk+1qn−k+1+(n−k+2)pkqn−k+2)]−b(qn−n∑k=0qkqn−k)}xn+2,w(x,t)=l0+l1x+∞∑n=0ln+2xn+2=l0+l1x+∞∑n=0c(ln−qn)(n+1)(n+2)xn+2, | (4.7) |
where p0,l0,q0,q1 and l1 are arbitrary constants and that satisfy 1−2p0−al0≠0 and 1−p0≠0.
We acquire the first six terms of the power-series solutions of Eq (4.7) as approximate to u,v and w for a=0.1,b=1,c=2,d=4×10−10,p0=0.5,q0=3,l0=5,q1=4 and l1=6 respectively; then, the approximations of u,v and w are portrayed in Figure 3.
Figure 3 shows that, when x∈(0,1), the values of u,v and w are initially stable and mutate in the same direction. The rate of change of v is the fastest, and the rates of change of u and w are basically the same. It describes that cancer cells decline faster than healthy cells. This shows a process of complete destruction of healthy tissue after tumor tissue invasion.
Remark 4.1. For Case 3.2 and Case 3.3, the proofs of convergence of the power series solutions are similar to that for Case 3.1. The details have been omitted here.
In this study, we applied the Lie group analysis method to an acid-mediated cancer invasion model. An important feature of this model is that tumor progression is mediated by acidification of the surrounding tissue. Especially, the model presumes that an excess of H+ ions is produced by tumor cells as a consequence of their anaerobic, glycolytic metabolism. Based on this method, the symmetries and reduced equations of Eq (1.1) were derived. Furthermore, explicit solutions of the reduced equations were obtained using the power-series method. Finally, this paper also demonstrates the stability behavior of the model for different parameters as achieved through the use of graphical analysis. In this way, we have found that H+ is decreased ahead of the advancing tumor front. Moreover, for certain parameter values, healthy tissue could be destroyed prior to the arrival of malignant cells. In the future, we can use this method to solve more tumor-related mathematical problems.
This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi (No. 202103021224068).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
[1] | O. Brinon, B. Conrad, CMI Summer School notes on p-adic Hodge theory (preliminary version), course notes, 2009. |
[2] | P. Colmez, Integration sur les variétés p-adiques, Société mathématique de France, 1998. |
[3] | A. Ogus, P. Berthelot, Notes on crystalline cohomology, Princeton University Press, 1978. |
[4] | K. Kedlaya, p-adic differential equations, Cambridge University Press, 2010. |
[5] | L. Berger, La correspondance de Langlands locale p-adique pour GL2(Qp), Astérisque, 339 (2011), 157–180. |
[6] | B. Stum, Rigid cohomology, Cambridge University Press, 2007. |
[7] | F. Gouˆva, Arithmetic of p-adic modular forms, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0082111 |
[8] |
A. Wiles, Modular elliptic curves and Fermat's Last Theorem, Ann. Math., 141 (1995), 443–551. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118559 doi: 10.2307/2118559
![]() |
[9] | V. S. Vladimirov, I. V. Volovich, E. I. Zelenov, p-adic analysis and mathematical physics, Singapore: World Scientific, 1994. |
[10] |
A. Hussain, A. Ajaib, Some results for the commutators of generalized Hausdorff operator, J. Math. Inequal., 13 (2019), 1129–1146. https://doi.org/10.7153/jmi-2019-13-80 doi: 10.7153/jmi-2019-13-80
![]() |
[11] |
A. Hussain, M. Asim, M, Aslam, F. Jarad, Commutators of the fractional Hardy operator on weighted variable Herz-Morrey spaces, J. Funct. Space., 2021 (2021), 9705250. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9705250 doi: 10.1155/2021/9705250
![]() |
[12] |
A. Hussain, I. Khan, A. Mohamed, Variable Herz-Morrey estimates for rough fractional Hausdorff operator, J. Inequal. Appl., 2024 (2024), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-024-03110-8 doi: 10.1186/s13660-024-03110-8
![]() |
[13] |
A. Hussain, G. Gao, Multilinear singular integrals and commutators on Herz space with variable exponent, ISRN Math. Anal., 2014 (2014), 626327. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/626327 doi: 10.1155/2014/626327
![]() |
[14] |
J. Liu, Y. Lu, L. Huang, Dual spaces of anisotropic variable Hardy–Lorentz spaces and their applications, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 26 (2023), 913–942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13540-023-00145-4 doi: 10.1007/s13540-023-00145-4
![]() |
[15] |
N. Sarfraz, M. Aslam, Some estimates for p-adic fractional integral operator and its commutators on p-adic Herz spaces with rough kernels, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 25 (2022), 1734–1755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13540-022-00064-w doi: 10.1007/s13540-022-00064-w
![]() |
[16] | N. Sarfraz, M. Aslam, Q. A. Malik, Estimates for-adic fractional integral operators and their commutators on-adic mixed central Morrey spaces and generalized mixed Morrey spaces, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13540-024-00274-4 |
[17] | J. Bastero, M. Milman, F. Ruiz, Commutators for the maximal and sharp functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 128 (2000), 3329–3334. |
[18] |
G. Fazio, M. Ragusa, Interior estimates in Morrey spaces for strong solutions to nondivergence form equations with discontinuous coefficients, J. Funct. Anal., 112 (1993), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfan.1993.1032 doi: 10.1006/jfan.1993.1032
![]() |
[19] | C. Rios, The Lp Dirichlet problem and nondivergence harmonic measure, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 355 (2003), 665–687. |
[20] |
M. Bramanti, M. C. Cerutti, M. Manfredini, Lp estimates for some ultraparabolic operators with discontinuous coefficients, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 200 (1996), 332–354. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1996.0209 doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1996.0209
![]() |
[21] |
R. Coifman, R, Rochberg, G. Weiss, Factorization theorems for Hardy spaces in several variables, Ann. Math., 103 (1976), 611–635. https://doi.org/10.2307/1970954 doi: 10.2307/1970954
![]() |
[22] |
S. Janson, Mean oscillation and commutators of singular integral operators, Ark. Mat., 16 (1978), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02386000 doi: 10.1007/BF02386000
![]() |
[23] |
V. Guliyev, Y. Mannadov, F. Muslumova, Characterization of fractional maximal operator and its commutators on Orlicz spaces in the Dunkl setting, J. Pseudo-Differ. Oper. Appl., 11 (2020), 1699–1717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11868-020-00364-w doi: 10.1007/s11868-020-00364-w
![]() |
[24] |
M. Milman, T. Schonbek, Second order estimates in interpolation theory and applications, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 110 (1990), 961–969. https://doi.org/10.2307/2047743 doi: 10.2307/2047743
![]() |
[25] |
P. Zhang, Characterization of Lipschitz spaces via commutators of Hardy-Littlewood maximal function, CR Math., 355 (2017), 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2017.01.022 doi: 10.1016/j.crma.2017.01.022
![]() |
[26] |
Y. Kim, Carleson measures and the B˙MO space on the p-adic vector space, Math. Nachr., 282 (2009), 1278–1304. https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.200610806 doi: 10.1002/mana.200610806
![]() |
[27] |
Y. Kim, Lq-estimates of maximal operators on the p-adic vector space, Commun. Korean Math. Soc., 24 (2009), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.4134/CKMS.2009.24.3.367 doi: 10.4134/CKMS.2009.24.3.367
![]() |
[28] |
S. S. Volosivets, Maximal function and Reisz potential on p-adic linear spaces, p-Adic Num. Ultrametr. Anal. Appl., 5 (2013), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070046613030059 doi: 10.1134/S2070046613030059
![]() |
[29] |
Q. He, X. Li, Necessary and sufficient conditions for boundedness of commutators of maximal function on the p-adic vector spaces, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 14064–14085. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023719 doi: 10.3934/math.2023719
![]() |
[30] | P. Zhang, J. Wu, Commutators of the fractional maximal functions, Acta. Math. Sin. Chinese Ser., 52 (2009), 1235–1238. |
[31] |
P. Zhang, Characterization of boundedness of some commutators of maximal functions in terms of Lipschitz spaces, Anal. Math. Phys., 9 (2019), 1411–1427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13324-018-0245-5 doi: 10.1007/s13324-018-0245-5
![]() |
[32] |
X. Yang, Z. Yang, B. Li, Characterization of Lipschitz space via the commutators of fractional maximal functions on variable lebesgue spaces, Potential Anal., 60 (2024), 703–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11118-023-10067-8 doi: 10.1007/s11118-023-10067-8
![]() |
[33] | M. H. Taibleson, Fourier analysis on local fields (MN-15), Princeton University Press, 1975. |
1. | Bing Tan, Wei Ma, Structured backward errors for block three-by-three saddle point systems with Hermitian and sparsity block matrices, 2025, 25, 25900374, 100546, 10.1016/j.rinam.2025.100546 |