Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Wind of Change or Wind of Challenges: Implementation factors regarding wind energy development, an international perspective

Environmental Assessment and Planning Research Group, Technische Universität Berlin (Berlin Institute of Technology), Sekr. EB 5, Straße des 17. Juni 145, D-10623 Berlin, Germany

Special Issues: Wind Power Implementation Challenges

Countries promoting renewable energies encounter a variety of phenomena that can challenge the implementation of further onshore wind energy development. Those challenges can be observed in many multi-level governance systems, as exhibited in the U.S., Germany, and Mexico, where various regulatory and institutional levels must agree on goals and responsibilities. This is a challenge, as both forms of governance (top-down and bottom-up dominated) are present in wind energy planning and policy. (1) Political and market phenomena, (2) siting issues, (3) the green vs. green dilemma, and (4) social acceptance are selected challenges within the different levels of decision-making processes in wind energy implementation. (1) Political and financial factors can influence the development by implementing incentive- and market-based policies, command-and-control policies, and feed-in tariffs. However, success of these policy designs for renewable energies is based on different political environments, and their electricity markets nationally, regionally, or statewide. (2) Spatial limitations in planning are created based on limited land availability due to conflicts with other land uses such as aviation, nature reserves, residential areas, their respective buffers. (3) The "green vs. green" dilemma involves the incoherent relationship between policies promoting renewable energies with policies protection species and their environments, becoming a major point of concern during siting and operations of wind energy. (4) Lastly, while there is a general overall support for wind energy, social acceptance on a local level is influenced by institutional settings i.e. information availability, as well as public and stakeholder concerns. Involvement in decision-making as well as financial participation (e.g. community-ownership) affects public participation and acceptance. This paper goes into detail on these phenomena and discusses case studies in Europe and North America. Often, these challenges can enhance outlooks in policy and planning, posing solutions to wind energy challenges even in sensitive environments and triggering innovations such as adaptive management.
  Article Metrics

Keywords wind energy; multi-level governance; policy factors; siting; green vs. green; social acceptance; adaptive management

Citation: Victoria Gartman, Kathrin Wichmann, Lea Bulling, María Elena Huesca-Pérez, Johann Köppel. Wind of Change or Wind of Challenges: Implementation factors regarding wind energy development, an international perspective. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(4): 485-504. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.4.485


  • 1. Renewable Energy Source Act of 21 July 2014 as last amended by the Act of 22 July 2014 (Federal Law Gazette I p. 1218).
  • 2. World Wind Energy Association (2014) 2014 Half-year report. Worldwide Wind Market recovered: Wind Capacity over 336 Gigawatts. Available from: http://www.wwindea.org/webimages/WWEA_half_year_report_2014.pdf.
  • 3. American Wind Energy Association (2014) Get the Facts: U.S. Wind Energy Capacity Statistics. Available from: http://www.awea.org/Resources.
  • 4. Bundesverbandes der Energie—und Wasserwirtschaft (2014) Erneuerbare Energien erreichen neuen Rekordwert. Available from: http://www.bdew.de/internet.nsf/id/20140729-pi-erneuerbare-energien-erreichen-neuen-rekordwert-de.
  • 5. Comisión Federal de Electricidad, (2014) Programa de Obras e Inversiones del Sector Eléctrico 2011-2025. Scientific Research.
  • 6. Secretaría de Energía (2012) Estrategia Nacional de Energía 2012-2026. Available from: www.energia.gob.mx/res/PE_y_DT/pub/2012/?ENE_2012_2026.pdf. Accessed 2014 Feb 13.
  • 7. BWE, VDMA (2013) Deutsche WindGuard: Status of Land-Based Wind Energy Development In Germany. Available from: http://www.wind-energie.de/sites/default/files/attachments/page/statistics/fact-sheet-onshore-statistic-year-2013-en.pdf.
  • 8. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2014) Renewable electricity generation projections sensitive to cost, price, policy assumptions. Available from: http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=16051.
  • 9. Bird L, Bolinger M, Gagliano T, et al. (2005) Policies and market factors driving wind power development in the United States. Energ Policy 33: 1397-1407.    
  • 10. Carley S (2009) State renewable energy electricity policies: An empirical evaluation of effectiveness. Energ Policy 37: 3071-3081.    
  • 11. Geißler G, Köppel J, Gunther P (2013) Wind energy and environmental assessments. A hard look at two forerunners' approaches: Germany and the United States. Renew Energ 51: 71-78.
  • 12. Bruns E, Ohlhorst D, Wenzel B, et al. (2011) Renewable energies in Germany's electricity market. A biography of the innovation process. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • 13. Geißler G (2012) Bürger- und Volksentscheide beim Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland. UVP-report 26: 221-226.
  • 14. Gay C, Estrada M (2012) The Clean Development Mechanism under a Mexican perspective.
  • 15. Corbera E, Jover N (2012) The undelivered promises of the Clean Development Mechanism: insights from three projects in Mexico. Carbon Manage 3: 39-54.    
  • 16. Smith A (2007) Emerging in between: The multi-level governance of renewable energy in the English regions. Energ Policy 35: 6266-6280.    
  • 17. Toke D, Breukers S, Wolsink M (2008) Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? Renew Sust Energ Rev 12: 1129-1147.    
  • 18. Klagge B (2013) Governance-Prozesse für erneuerbare Energien. Akteure, Koordinations—und Steuerungsstrukturen. In: Klagge B, Arbach C, Governance-Prozesse für erneuerbare Energien. Hannover Arbeitsberichte der ARL: 7-16.
  • 19. Cowell R (2007) Wind Power and 'The Planning Problem': the Experience of Wales. Eur Environ 17: 291-306.    
  • 20. Menz F, Vachon S (2006) The effectiveness of different policy regimes for promoting wind power: Experiences from the states. Energ Policy 34: 1786-1796.    
  • 21. Nagel PB, Schwarz T, Köppel J (2014) Ausbau der WindenergieAnforderungen aus der Rechtsprechung und fachliche Vorgaben für die planerische Steuerung. Umwelt—und Planungsrecht 10: 371-382.
  • 22. Ohlhorst D, Tews K, Schreurs M (2013) Energiewende als Herausforderung der Koordination im Mehrebenensystem. Technikfolgenabschätzung—Theorie und Praxis 22: 48-55.
  • 23. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2014) CDM Pipeline Overview.
  • 24. Goldthau A (2014) Rethinking the governance of energy infrastructure: Scale, decentralization and polycentrism. Energ Res Soc Sci 1: 134-140.    
  • 25. Beckmann K, Gailing L, Hülz M, et al. (2013) Räumlichen Implikationen der Energiewende. Berlin.
  • 26. Müller K, (2013) Regionale Energiewende. Akteure und Prozesse in Erneuerbare-Energie-Regionen. Dissertation. Kassel. Frankfurt am Main [u.a.]: PL Academic Research.
  • 27. Strauch C (2014) Windenergienutzung in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern—Planung von Eignungsgebieten für Onshore-Windenergieparks. The Use of Wind Energy in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern—Planning of suitable Space for Wind Farms onshore. Coastline Reports 1 1: 261-266.
  • 28. Klagge B, Arbach C (2013) Governance-Prozesse für erneuerbare Energien. Hannover.
  • 29. Jansen B (2013) Auf dem Weg zum Bürgerwindpark. Das Beispiel Nordfriesland. Berliner Energietag 2013. Berlin, 5/14/2013.
  • 30. Staatskanzlei Schleswig-Holstein: Teilfortschreibungen der Regionalpläne zur Ausweisung von Eignungsgebieten für die Windenergienutzung. Available from: http://www.schleswig-holstein.de/STK/DE/Schwerpunkte/Landesplanung/WeitereThemen/Windenergie/Teilfortschreibungen/Teilfortschreibungen_node.html.
  • 31. Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany as last amended by the Act of 11 July 2012 (Federal Law Gazette III p. 1218).
  • 32. Shrimali G, Kniefel J (2011) Are government policies effective in promoting deployment of renewable electricity resources? Energ Policy 39: 4726-4741.    
  • 33. Black G, Holley D, Solan D, et al. (2014) Fiscal and economic impacts of state incentives for wind energy development in the Western United States. Renew Sust Energ Rev 34: 136-144.    
  • 34. Arnette A, Zobel C (2011) The role of public policy in optimizing renewable energy development in the greater southern Appalachian mountains. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15: 3690-3702.    
  • 35. Dong CG (2012) Feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standard: An empirical test of their relative effectiveness in promoting wind capacity development. Energ Policy 42: 476-485.
  • 36. Delmas M, Montes-Sancho M (2011) U.S. state policies for renewable energy: Context and effectiveness. Energ Policy 39: 2273-2288.
  • 37. Lüthi S, Prässler T (2011) Analyzing policy support instruments and regulatory risk factors for wind energy deployment - A developers' perspective. Energ Policy 39: 4876-4892.    
  • 38. Wüstenhagen R, Bilharz M (2006) Green energy market development in Germany: effective public policy and emerging customer demand. Energ Policy 34: 1681-1696.    
  • 39. Ciarreta A, Espinosa M, Pizarro-Irizar C (2014) Is green energy expensive? Empirical evidence from the Spanish electricity market. Energ Policy 69: 205-215.
  • 40. Ernst S (2013): Idaho Power is waging war on renewable energy. Is it winning? One of the West's great old-school monopolies and its multi-pronged attach on wind and solar. High Country News, 9/4/2013. Available from: http://www.hcn.org/issues/45.15/idaho-power-is-waging-war-on-renewable-energy-is-it-winning, checked on 10/13/2014.
  • 41. United Nations (UN) (1992) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
  • 42. Energy for Development (2005) Wind power and the CDM. Emerging practices in developing wind power projects for the Clean Development Mechanism. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory.
  • 43. Lema A, Lema R (2013) Technology transfer in the clean development mechanism: Insights from wind power. Global Environ Chang 23: 301-313.    
  • 44. Pechak O, Mavrotas G, Diakoulaki D (2011) Role and contribution of the clean development mechanism to the development of wind energy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15: 3380-3387.    
  • 45. Lokey E (2009) Barriers to clean development mechanism renewable energy projects in Mexico. Renew Energ 34: 504-508.    
  • 46. Boehringer C, Cuntz A, Harhoff D, et al. (2014) The Impacts of Feed-in Tariffs on Innovation. CESifo Working Paper no. 4680.
  • 47. Frondel M, Ritter N, Schmidt C, et al. (2009) Die ökonomische Wirkung der Förderung erneuerbarer Energien: Erfahrungen aus Deutschland. Projektbericht.
  • 48. Umweltbundesamt (UBA) (2013) Potenzial der Windenergie an Land. Studie zur Ermittlung des bundesweiten Flächenund Leistungspotenzials der Windenergienutzung an Land. Dessau-Roßlau.
  • 49. Auld T, McHenry MP, Whale J (2013) US military, airspace, and meteorological radar system impacts from utility class wind turbines: Implications for renewable energy targets and the wind industry. Renew Energ 55: 24-30.    
  • 50. Hüttig G, Giemulla E, Lehmann O, et al. (2014) Flugsicherheitsanalyse der Wechselwirkungen von Windenergieanlagen und Funknavigationshilfen DVOR/VOR der Deutschen Flugsicherung GmbH im Auftrag Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein. Berlin.
  • 51. Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Vogelschutzwarten (LAG-VSW) (2007) Abstandsregelungen für Windenergieanlagen zu bedeutsamen Vogellebensräumen sowie Brutplätzen ausgewählter Vogelarten. Berichte zum Vogelschutz 44: 151-153.
  • 52. Lindgren F, Johansson B, Malmlöf T, et al. (2013) Siting conflicts between wind power and military aviation - Problems and potential solutions. Land Use Policy 34: 104-111.    
  • 53. Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Klimaschutz, Energie und Landesplanung (MWKEL) (2013) Hinweise für die Beurteilung der Zulässigkeit der Errichtung von Windenergieanlagen in Rheinland-Pfalz (Rundschreiben Windenergie). Gemeinsames Rundschreiben des Ministeriums für Wirtschaft, Klimaschutz, Energie und Landesplanung, des Ministeriums der Finanzen, des Ministeriums für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft, Ernährung, Weinbau und Forsten und des Ministeriums des Innern, für Sport und Infrastruktur Rheinland-Pfalz vom 28.05.2013.
  • 54. Murray J (2013) High court rules against 'buffer zones' for windfarms. The Guardian, 4/15/2013. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/apr/15/high-court-buffer-zones-windfarms, checked on 9/29/2014.
  • 55. Diario Oficial de la Federación (2014): AVISO de cancelación del Proyecto de Norma Oficial Mexicana PROY-NOM-151-SEMARNAT-2006. Available from: http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5333155&fecha=19/02/2014.
  • 56. Musall F D, Kuik O (2011) Local acceptance of renewable energy. A case study from southeast Germany. Energ Policy 39: 3252-3260.
  • 57. Swofford J, Slattery MC (2010) Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making. Greater China Energy: Special Section with regular papers 38: 2508-2519.
  • 58. Huber S, Horbaty R (2012) Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Projects. Final Report IEA Wind Task 28 on Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Projects 2008-2011.
  • 59. Groth T, Vogt C (2014) Rural wind farm development: Social, environmental and economic features important to local residents. Renew Energ 63: 1-8.    
  • 60. Hoen B, Brown J, Jackson T, et al. (2013) A Spatial Hedonic Analysis of the Effects of Wind Energy Facilities on Surrounding Property Values in the United States. LBNL-6362E.
  • 61. Moura Carneiro FO, Barbosa Rocha HH, Costa Rocha PA (2013) Investigation of possible societal risk associated with wind power generation systems. Renew Sust Energ Rev 19: 30-36.    
  • 62. Hessler D, Hessler G (2011) Recommended noise level design goals and limits at residential receptors for wind turbine developments in the United States. Noise Control Eng J 59: 94-104.    
  • 63. Pohl J, Hübner G, Mohs A (2012) Acceptance and stress effects of aircraft obstruction markings of wind turbines. Energ Policy 50: 592-600.    
  • 64. Kontogianni A, Tourkolias C, Skourtos M, et al. (2014) Planning globally, protesting locally: Patterns in community perceptions towards the installation of wind farms. Renew Energ 66: 170-177.    
  • 65. Bund-Länder-Initiative Windenergie (2013): Überblick zu den landesplanerischen Abstandsempfehlungen für die Regionalplanung zur Ausweisung von Windenergiegebieten. Available from: http://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/EE/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/Berichte/2013_05_01_ueberblick_zu_den_landesplanerischen_abstandsempfehlungen_fuer_die_regionalplanung_zur_ausweisung_von_windenergiegebieten.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4.
  • 66. Bayerischer Landtag (2014) Gesetzentwurf der Staatsregierung zur Änderung der Bayerischen Bauordnung und des Gesetzes über die behördliche Organisation des Bauwesens, des Wohnungswesens und der Wasserwirtschaft. Drucksache 17/2137.
  • 67. Deutsche WindGuard GmbH (2014) Status of Land-Based Wind Energy Development In Germany. On behalf of BWE and VDMA. Available from: http://www.wind-energie.de/sites/default/files/attachments/page/statistics/fact-sheet-land-based-statistic-first-half-2014.pdf.
  • 68. Bundesinsitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung (2014) Hintergrundpapier. Länderöffnungsklausel im BauGB—Länderspezifische Mindestabstände für Windenergieanlagen und ihre räumlichen Auswirkungen.
  • 69. Jones C, Eiser R (2010) Understanding ‘local’ opposition to wind development in the UK: How big is a backyard? Energ Policy 38: 3106-3117.    
  • 70. Bund-Länder-Initiative Windenergie (2012) Handreichung zu Windenergieanlagen an Infrastrukturtrassen.
  • 71. Parent O, Ilinca A (2011) Anti-icing and de-icing techniques for wind turbines: Critical review. Cold Reg Sci Technol 65: 88-96.    
  • 72. Bundesverband WindEnergie (2013) Hintergrundpapier: Windenergieprojekte unter Berücksichtigung von Luftverkehr und Radaranlagen.
  • 73. International Civil Aviation Organization (2009) European Guidance Material on Managing Building Restricted Areas. ICAO EUR DOC 015. Second Edition.
  • 74. Kuvlesky W, Brennan L, Morrison M, et al. (2007) Wind Energy Development and Wildlife Conservation: Challenges and Opportunities. J Wildlife Manage 71: 2487-2498.    
  • 75. Drewitt A, Langston R (2006) Assessing the impacts of wind farms on birds. Ibis 148: 29-42.    
  • 76. Köppel J, Dahmen M, Helfrich J, et al. (2014) Cautious but Committed: Moving Toward Adaptive Planning and Operation Strategies for Renewable Energy’s Wildlife Implications. Environ Manage 54: 744-755.    
  • 77. Obermeyer B, Manes R, Kiesecker J, et al. (2011) Development by Design: Mitigating Wind Development's Impacts on Wildlife in Kansas. PLoS ONE 6, e26698.
  • 78. del Río P, Calvo Silvosa A, Iglesias Gómez G (2011) Policies and design elements for the repowering of wind farms: A qualitative analysis of different options. Energ Policy 39: 1897-1908.    
  • 79. Bund-Länder-Initiative Windenergie (2014) Protokoll der fünfzehnten Sitzung. Available from: http://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/EE/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/Protokolle/blwe_protokoll_15_bf.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3.
  • 80. Yonk R M, Simmons R T, Steed BC (2013) Green vs. Green; The Political, Legal, and Administrative Pitfalls Facing Green Energy Production. Environ Development 8: 157-159.
  • 81. National Research Council (2007) Environmental Impacts of Wind-Energy Projects. Washington, D.C.: The International Academies Press.
  • 82. Jakle A (2012) Wind Development and Wildlife Mitigation in Wyoming: A Primer. Laramie, Wyoming: Ruckelshaus Institute of Environment and Natural Resources.
  • 83. Edenhofer O, Madruga R, Sokona Y (2012) Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation;. Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change SRREN. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • 84. Thygesen J, Agarwal A (2014) Key criteria for sustainable wind energy planning—lessons from an institutional perspective on the impact assessment literature. Renew Sust Energ Rev 39: 1012-1023.    
  • 85. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Beech Ridge Energy Wind Project Habitat Conservation Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement. West Virginia, US.
  • 86. Wüstenhagen R, Wolsink M, Bürer MJ (2007) Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energ Policy 35: 2683-2691.    
  • 87. Brown K B (2011) Wind power in northeastern Brazil: Local burdens, regional benefits and growing opposition. Climate Dev 3: 344-360.    
  • 88. Wolsink M (2007) Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’. Renew Sust Energ Rev 11: 1188-1207.    
  • 89. Cowell R, Bristow G, Munday M (2011) Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development. J Environ Plan Manage 54: 539-557.    
  • 90. Gross C (2007) Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energ Policy 35: 2727-2736.    
  • 91. Hübner G, Löffle E (2013) Wirkungen von Windkraftanlagen auf Anwohner in der Schweiz: Einflusskaktoren und Empfehlungen. Available from: http://www.news.admin.ch/NSBSubscriber/message/attachments/32453.pdf.
  • 92. Maruyama Y, Nishikido M, Iida T (2007) The rise of community wind power in Japan: Enhanced acceptance through social innovation. Energ Policy 35: 2761-2769.    
  • 93. Jobert A, Laborgne P, Mimler S (2007) Local acceptance of wind energy: Factors of success identified in French and German case studies. Energ Policy 35: 2751-2760.    
  • 94. Corscadden K, Wile A, Yiridoe E (2012) Social license and consultation criteria for community wind projects. Renew Energ 44: 392-397.    
  • 95. Warren C R, McFadyen M (2010) Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy 27: 204-213.
  • 96. Regionaler Planungsverband Vorpommern (2014) Zweite Änderung des Regionalen Raumentwicklungsprogramms Vorpommern. Entwurf 2014 zum ersten Beteiligungsverfahren. Greifswald.
  • 97. Zoellner J, Schweizer-Ries P, Wemheuer C (2008) Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany. Energ Policy 36: 4136-4141.    
  • 98. Lanz E, Flowers L (2011) Social acceptance of wind energy projects. Winning Hearts and Minds. State-of-the-art-report. Country Report of: United States.
  • 99. Comisión Reguladora de Energía (CRE) (2014) Reporte mensual de estadísticas del sector eléctrico.
  • 100. UNEP DTU Centre on Energy, Climate and Sustainable Development (2014) CDM (Clean Development Mechanism) projects by host region.
  • 101. Comisión Reguladora de Energía (CRE) (2014) Tabla de permisos de Generación e Importación de Energía Eléctrica Administrados al 31 de Mayo de 2014.
  • 102. Dechezleprêtre A, Glachant M, Ménière Y (2009) Technology transfer by CDM projects: A comparison of Brazil, China, India and Mexico. Energ Policy 37, 703-711.
  • 103. Pasqualetti MJ (2011) Opposing wind energy landscapes: A search fo common cause. Ann Assoc American Geographers 101: 907-917.    
  • 104. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2012) IEA Wind 2012 Annual Report. Executive Committee of the Implementing Agreement for Co-operation in the Research, Development, and Deployment of Wind Energy Systems of the International Energy Agency.
  • 105. Ledec GC, Rapp KW, Aiello RG (2011) Greening the Wind: The World Bank. eLibrary.
  • 106. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2012) Benefits of the Clean Development Mechanism 2012 Highlights. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available from: https://cdm.unfccc.int/about/dev_ben/ABC_2012.pdf.
  • 107. Fabricius C, Cundill G (2014) Learning in Adaptive Management: Insights from Published Practice. Ecology Society 19: 29.
  • 108. Walters CJ, Holling, CS (1990) Large-Scale Management Experiments and Learning by Doing. Ecology 71: 2060-2068.    
  • 109. Westgate MJ, Likens GE, Lindenmayer DB (2013) Adaptive management of biological systems: A review. Biol Conserv 158: 128-139.    


This article has been cited by

  • 1. María Elena Huesca-Pérez, Claudia Sheinbaum-Pardo, Johann Köppel, Social implications of siting wind energy in a disadvantaged region – The case of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Mexico, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 58, 952, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.310
  • 2. Victoria Gartman, Lea Bulling, Marie Dahmen, Gesa Geißler, Johann Köppel, Mitigation Measures for Wildlife in Wind Energy Development, Consolidating the State of Knowledge — Part 1: Planning and Siting, Construction, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 2016, 1650013, 10.1142/S1464333216500137
  • 3. Johann Köppel, , Innovation Society Today, 2018, Chapter 13, 273, 10.1007/978-3-658-19269-3_13
  • 4. Johann Köppel, , Innovationsgesellschaft heute, 2016, Chapter 14, 301, 10.1007/978-3-658-10874-8_14
  • 5. Hagen Koch, Ana Lígia Chaves Silva, José Roberto Gonçalves de Azevedo, Werônica Meira de Souza, Johann Köppel, Clecio Barbosa Souza Junior, Alessandra Maciel de Lima Barros, Fred F. Hattermann, Integrated hydro- and wind power generation: a game changer towards environmental flow in the Sub-middle and Lower São Francisco River Basin?, Regional Environmental Change, 2018, 10.1007/s10113-018-1301-2
  • 6. María Elena Huesca-Pérez, Claudia Sheinbaum-Pardo, Johann Köppel, From global to local: impact assessment and social implications related to wind energy projects in Oaxaca, Mexico, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 2018, 1, 10.1080/14615517.2018.1506856
  • 7. Roel May, , Wind Energy and Wildlife Impacts, 2019, Chapter 6, 93, 10.1007/978-3-030-05520-2_6
  • 8. Johann Köppel, Juliane Biehl, Volker Wachendörfer, Alexander Bittner, , Wind Energy and Wildlife Impacts, 2019, Chapter 5, 67, 10.1007/978-3-030-05520-2_5
  • 9. Roel May, Torgeir Nygård, Ulla Falkdalen, Jens Åström, Øyvind Hamre, Bård G. Stokke, Paint it black: Efficacy of increased wind turbine rotor blade visibility to reduce avian fatalities, Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 10.1002/ece3.6592

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2014, Victoria Gartman, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved