Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Review Topical Sections

Overview of wind power development over the two past decades (2000-2019) and its role in the Taiwan's energy transition and sustainable development goals

  • In response to the international agreement on the climate change and the energy supply diversification, the Taiwan government actively promoted the use of wind power since 2000. This paper highlighted the Taiwan's wind resources, and interactively analyzed the regulatory strategies for promoting wind power and trend analysis of wind power over the two past decades (2000–2019). In the first development stage, the electricity generation by onshore wind power rapidly grew from 1.38 gigawatt-hours (GW-h) in 2000 to 1,492.7 GW-h in 2011 because of the implementations of promotional measures and official subsidies. However, its growth rate became slow due to the restrictions on available land for the onshore wind power farms. With the promulgation of the Renewable Energy Development Act in 2009, the government not only declared preferable feed-in-tariff (FIT) rates, but also announced some incentive and promotional plans, focusing on offshore wind power farms from the early 2010s. Therefore, the electricity generation by offshore wind power significantly increased from 26.7 GW-h in 2018 to 175.4 GW-h in 2019. Using the data on the electricity generation by wind power in 2019 (i.e., 1,871.3 × 106 kW-h) and the average default value (i.e., 0.539 kg CO2/kW-h), the equivalent mitigation of CO2 emission from the wind power systems in Taiwan was thus estimated to be about one million metric tons. Based on the progressive development of wind power and other renewable resources over the past two decades, one of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) for nuclear-free homeland and 20% renewable electricity generation may be prospective in the energy transition by 2025. However, this goal has faced serious challenges because the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused the delays in the Taiwanese wind power industry.

    Citation: Wen-Tien Tsai. Overview of wind power development over the two past decades (2000-2019) and its role in the Taiwan's energy transition and sustainable development goals[J]. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(2): 342-354. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021018

    Related Papers:

    [1] Malhar Padhee, Rajesh Karki . Bulk system reliability impacts of forced wind energy curtailment. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(3): 505-520. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.3.505
    [2] Wolf-Gerrit Früh . From local wind energy resource to national wind power production. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(1): 101-120. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.1.101
    [3] D. Marene Larruskain, Inmaculada Zamora, Oihane Abarrategui, Garikoitz Buigues, Víctor Valverde, Araitz Iturregi . Adapting AC Lines to DC Grids for Large-Scale Renewable Power Transmission. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(4): 385-398. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.4.385
    [4] Solomon A. A., Michel Child, Upeksha Caldera, Christian Breyer . Exploiting wind-solar resource complementarity to reduce energy storage need. AIMS Energy, 2020, 8(5): 749-770. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.5.749
    [5] Bitian Wu . Day ahead scheduling model of wind power system based on fuzzy stochastic chance constraints—considering source-load dual-side uncertainty case. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(3): 471-492. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025018
    [6] Ladislas Mutunda Kangaji, Atanda Raji, Efe Orumwense . Cutting-edge progress in offshore wind and tidal stream power technology—State-of-the-Art. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(1): 188-230. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025007
    [7] Christopher R. Jones, Eckart Lange, Jian Kang, Aki Tsuchiya, Robert Howell, Aidan While, Richard J. Crisp, John Steel, Keelan Meade, Fei Qu, Danial Sturge, Agnes Bray . WindNet: Improving the impact assessment of wind power projects. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(4): 461-484. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.4.461
    [8] Saiyad S. Kutty, M. G. M. Khan, M. Rafiuddin Ahmed . Estimation of different wind characteristics parameters and accurate wind resource assessment for Kadavu, Fiji. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(6): 760-791. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.6.760
    [9] Yanting Liu, Zhe Xu, Yongjia Yu, Xingzhi Chang . A novel binary genetic differential evolution optimization algorithm for wind layout problems. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(1): 321-349. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024016
    [10] Rashid Al Badwawi, Mohammad Abusara, Tapas Mallick . Speed control of synchronous machine by changing duty cycle of DC/DC buck converter. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 728-739. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.728
  • In response to the international agreement on the climate change and the energy supply diversification, the Taiwan government actively promoted the use of wind power since 2000. This paper highlighted the Taiwan's wind resources, and interactively analyzed the regulatory strategies for promoting wind power and trend analysis of wind power over the two past decades (2000–2019). In the first development stage, the electricity generation by onshore wind power rapidly grew from 1.38 gigawatt-hours (GW-h) in 2000 to 1,492.7 GW-h in 2011 because of the implementations of promotional measures and official subsidies. However, its growth rate became slow due to the restrictions on available land for the onshore wind power farms. With the promulgation of the Renewable Energy Development Act in 2009, the government not only declared preferable feed-in-tariff (FIT) rates, but also announced some incentive and promotional plans, focusing on offshore wind power farms from the early 2010s. Therefore, the electricity generation by offshore wind power significantly increased from 26.7 GW-h in 2018 to 175.4 GW-h in 2019. Using the data on the electricity generation by wind power in 2019 (i.e., 1,871.3 × 106 kW-h) and the average default value (i.e., 0.539 kg CO2/kW-h), the equivalent mitigation of CO2 emission from the wind power systems in Taiwan was thus estimated to be about one million metric tons. Based on the progressive development of wind power and other renewable resources over the past two decades, one of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) for nuclear-free homeland and 20% renewable electricity generation may be prospective in the energy transition by 2025. However, this goal has faced serious challenges because the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused the delays in the Taiwanese wind power industry.



    1. Introduction

    1.1. The Hippo signaling pathway

    The Hippo pathway was initially identified by genetic screens for growth regulating genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Recent studies have uncovered its function as a highly conserved tumor-suppressor pathway which plays essential roles in regulating multiple aspects of tumorigenesis, including cell growth, proliferation and survival [1,2,3]. The first identified four core components of Hippo pathway are the NDR family kinase Warts (Wts), the Ste20-like family kinase Hippo (Hpo), the WW-domain containing protein Salvador (Sav), and the adaptor protein Mob-as-tumor-suppressor (Mts) [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Hpo complexes with Sav to phosphorylate and activate Wts, which in turn, in conjunction with Mts, directly phosphorylates the transcriptional co-activator Yorkie (Yki), resulting in its cytoplasmic accumulation and activity inhibition [9,13,14]. Once the Hippo pathway is deactivated, Yki can translocate into nucleus to partner with different DNA-binding transcription factors, including the TEAD/TEF family transcription factor Scalloped (Sd) [15,16,17], to activate the transcription of many cell growth and viability regulating genes, such as cyclin E (cycE), expanded (ex) and Drosophila inhibitor of apoptosis protein 1 (diap1) [1,3]. In short, cells with reduced Hippo signal or increased Yki activity overgrowth [1,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. So far, over 20 Hippo pathway regulators have been identified in Drosophila [18], and overwhelming evidence in mammals has further confirmed their conserved roles in regulating tumorigenesis and cancer development [2,19,20].

    1.2. The JNK signaling pathway

    The c-Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK) pathway represents another key conserved eukaryotic signaling pathway. Initially identified as a stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK) [21], JNK can be activated by various stimuli ranging from UV irradiation to DNA damage, bacterial infection, and cytokines [22,23]. Upon stimulation, JNK will be activated by the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) phosphorylation kinase cascade composed of different members of JNK Kinase Kinases and JNK Kinases (JNKKKs JNKKs JNKs) [23]. Then JNK translocates into the nucleus to phosphorylate and activate the prototypical transcription factors including AP-1 family members Jun and Fos [24]. In Drosophila, the JNK pathway is much simpler than in mammals, with only a single JNK (Basket, Bsk) and two JNKKs (Hemipterous, Hep and MKK4) [25]. In the past 18 years, increasing studies have revealed that JNK pathway is involved in a wide range of cellular processes including proliferation, cell competition, regeneration, survival and tumor progression [23,26,27]. Notably, unlike Hippo pathway, recent studies in Drosophila discovered that JNK activation can lead to tumor suppression or tumor progression depending on the context [28,29,30], which will be discussed in this review.

    2. Crosstalk between Hippo and JNK signaling

    2.1. Gut homeostasis and regeneration

    Drosophila gut is under constant attack due to exposure to different pathogens and chemical stimuli during normal feeding. In order to maintain gut homeostasis, intestine stem cell (ISC) proliferation is required to ensure the replenishment of damaged cells [31,32], while disruption of this process would cause diseases including cancer [33]. Drosophila midgut epithelia is mainly composed of four cell types, namely ISC, enteroblast (EB) cells, absorptive enterocyte (EC) cells, and secretory enteroendocrine (ee) cells. The ISC division gives rise to a new ISC and enteroblast, the later further differentiates into either an absorptive enterocyte or a secretory enteroendocrine cell, based on the level of Notch signaling [34]. For the past decade, extensive studies using Drosophila midgut have uncovered a signaling network that maintains the homeostasis of gut epithelia, including Hippo and JNK pathway [35].

    As a major stress sensor, JNK can be activated both in EC and ISC by bacterial infection or DNA damage to stimulate non-autonomous and autonomous ISC proliferation, respectively [36,37,38,39,40]. In the EC cells, JNK activation via Puc (a phosphatase which inhibits JNK activity) RNAi or Hep overexpression increased ISC mitosis [38] and resulted in nuclear Yki translocation and Hpo target genes expression [36,41], which could further trigger secretion of the Unpaired (Upd) cytokines to drive non-autonomous ISC proliferation through JAK/STAT signaling pathway (Figure 1) [36,40,41]. Moreover, JNK activation in the progenitor cells of Drosophila midgut is sufficient to upregulate Wg expression, which in turn induces Myc-dependent ISC renewal (Figure 1) [42].

    Figure 1. Crosstalk of JNK and Hippo signaling during Drosophila midgut regeneration. Upon damage or bacterial infection, JNK signaling acts autonomously in ECs and acts non-autonomously in ISC to stimulate regeneration through Hippo pathway inactivation. See text for details. Abbreviations: ISC, intestinal stem cell; EC, enterocyte; EB, enteroblast; ee, enteroendocrine cell; Wg, Wingless.

    In addition, JNK and Hippo signaling have also been shown to regulate ISC proliferation in an autonomous manner [39,40,41,43]. Reducing JNK activity within ISCs significantly blocked Ecc15 (Erwinia carotovora carotovora 15, Gram-negative bacteria) infection and paraquat-induced proliferation [37,44], whereas ectopic JNK activation by Hep or Rac1 (small GTPase acting upstream of JNK) overexpression promoted ISC self-renewal [39,45]. Similarly, silencing yki reduced excessive ISC proliferation induced by Gram-negative bacteria Pseudomonas entomophila (P. e) [41], while inactivation of Hippo signaling had an opposite effect [40,41]. Additionally, Ren and colleagues recently identified Myc as a crucial integrator of multiple signaling including Hippo and JAK/STAT in ISC regeneration (Figure 1) [46]. Importantly, unlike Myc, neither Yki nor JNK inhibition reduced ISC number under normal condition [36,43,44,46], highlighting their essential role as stress sensors in gut epithelia.

    2.2. Regeneration in wing disc

    JNK signaling activation has been considered as a universal hallmark of regenerating tissue in response to damage [47,48,49]. Besides, it is also shown that JNK plays critical roles in apoptosis-induced non-autonomous compensatory proliferation [50], which could accelerate the regeneration process. Two recent studies revealed that Hippo pathway also regulates regenerative growth in Drosophila wing disc. They found that Yki functions as a pivotal determinant for regeneration, as removing only one copy of yki could dramatically impair regenerating ability, while does not affect normal wing development [51,52]. Furthermore, activation of JNK by ectopic expression of Eiger (Egr, the Drosophila TNF homolog) or HepCA (a constitutive form of Hep) could induce Yki nuclear accumulation and target gene expression, both autonomously and non-autonomously [51,52]. In the former situation, JNK upregulates Wg secretion as well as Yki target gene expression, while it simultaneously triggers extensive cell death which may counteract the Yki induced growth advantage. In the latter scenario, JNK might propagate into neighboring cells [53] to induce non-autonomous compensatory proliferation via activation of Yki, Wg, Dpp, and Myc [18,50,51,54].

    2.3. Cell competition

    The phenomenon “cell competition” was first discovered in mosaic Drosophila proliferating wing epithelia [55], in which the faster growing cells (winner) would outcompete the slower growing cells (loser) via inducing apoptosis [56,57]. It is known that both JNK and Hippo pathway play essential roles in regulating cell competition [58,59], while not until recently, studies in fly have provided a link between cell competition and Hippo, JNK signaling [60,61,62,63].

    2.3.1. Cell competition as tumor suppressor

    The discovery of cell competition raised a key question: what is the physiological function of cell competition? Given the fact that around 85% of cancer arise from mutated epithelia cells (Cancerstats), cell competition has been rationally assumed as an intrinsic tumor suppressing mechanism removing “unwanted” cells to maintain normal tissue homeostasis [57]. Consistent with this hypothesis, mutant clones generated in Drosophila wing epithelium which lost the neoplastic tumor suppressor genes, including lethal (2) giant larvae (l(2)gl), discs large (dlg) or scribble (scrib), would be eliminated by JNK-dependent apoptosis or engulfment by neighboring wild-type cells (Figure 2A) [30,60,61,62,64,65,66,67]. Interestingly, Froldi et al found that l(2)gl−/− clones express relative low levels of Myc compared to surrounding wild-type tissue [67]. Since Myc was recently identified as a direct target of Yki [68,69], and plays essential roles in cell competition and growth control [70,71], hence it is highly possible cell polarity disruption is related with Yki-Myc activation during cell competition (Figure 2A). Strikingly, it is also reported that in spite of facing cell competition, scrib−/− clones can induce non-autonomous Yki activation in neighboring cells [51], which may further accelerate the elimination of scrib−/− clones.

    Figure 2. JNK and Hippo context-dependent interactions during cell competition. (A) scrib−/− cells are eliminated by wild-type neighboring cells. (B) scrib−/− cells with JNK inhibition induces Yki-mediated tumor growth. (C) Src64B overexpression clones causes non-autonomous overgrowth of surrounding tissue. (D) Blocking JNK signaling in Src-expressing clones releases inhibition of Yki activity and results in autonomous growth. (E) RasV12 expression turn scrib−/− cells into super-competitor by activating both Yki and JNK. (F) Hippo inactivation upregulates Rho1-JNK signaling to induce autonomous growth and super-competitor behavior.

    Several recent studies demonstrated that scrib−/− clones indeed have a hyper-proliferate potential, which however was dramatically inhibited by JNK activity [28,62,64,72,73]. When scrib−/− clones were protected from cell competition via expression of BskDN (a dominant negative form of Drosophila JNK, Bsk), they can ectopically proliferate and induce Yki target genes expression [62,72], in Sd/Yki-dependent manner [72]. Consistently, overexpression of Yki or Myc is sufficient to rescue scrib−/− clones from being outcompeted [62]. Therefore, Yki level in scrib−/− clones is an essential determinant of whether they would be outcompeted or became super-competitors when JNK signaling is dysregulated (Figure 2B).

    Another intriguing question focusing on cell competition is how the loser cells were marked? A recent study shed lights on this puzzle [74]. The transmembrane protein Flower encodes three different isoforms, two of which are only detected in loser cells facing competition. Knocking down those two flower isoforms protected the losers from being outcompeted, and conversely, overexpression of them would lead to apoptosis and elimination. It would be worthwhile to further investigate whether Flower-induced competition also operates in a JNK- or Yki-dependent manner (Figure 2A).

    Remarkably, it is also reported that unlike scrib, depletion of l(2)gl in eye epithelial alone is sufficient to suppress Hpo pathway activity, resulting in mild proliferation and Yki activation [75]. Similarly, blocking JNK via expression of Puc in l(2)gl−/− cells did not produce tumor growth phenotype in wing epithelia, even though apoptosis was abolished [60].

    2.3.2. Cell competition in promoting tumor progression

    Interestingly, Enomoto and Igaki recently found that loser clones expressing oncoprotein Src64B could contribute to proliferation of surrounding winner cells, which also rely on both JNK and Hippo signaling [63]. Src64B overexpression clones have increased JNK activity, leading to their elimination by cell competition, while at the same time, JNK induces dramatic non-autonomous growth via Yki activation in neighboring cells (Figure 2C). Conversely, inhibiting JNK activity within Src64B overexpression clones not only blocked the non-autonomous overgrowth of surrounding tissue, but also results in autonomous proliferation and Yki hyperactivation (Figure 2D), highlighting anti-Yki effects of JNK activation in the presence of Src64B. However, the mechanism of how Src64B switches its functions from JNK-dependent pro-Yki to anti-Yki remains unknown. Hence, in addition to the tumor-suppressing role, cell competition could also act as a tumor-promoting factor, promoting JNK activation and subsequently Yki-mediated proliferation of neighboring cell. In accordance with this view, a recent study in Drosophila showed that cell competition could possess both tumor-suppressing and tumor-inducing roles depending on the population of loser cells [76].

    2.3.3. RasV12 hijacks scrib−/− clones into super-competitors

    Apart from the pro-apoptotic role discussed above, JNK pathway can promote oncogenic transformation and tumorigenesis as well [23,28,77,78]. In the Drosophila antennal-eye disc, expression of oncogenic Ras (RasV12) could convert loser scrib−/− clones into super-competitors with massive overgrowth and proliferation [64,79]. Both JNK and Hippo pathways are essential for scrib−/−/RasV12 cooperation-induced growth, as reducing either JNK or Yki activity would be sufficient to block tumor growth (Figure 2E) [29,60,72,78]. By using eye epithelia as a model, Ohsawa and colleagues found JNK activation (via Egr overexpression) could cooperate with RasV12 to autonomously activate Yki target genes expression, including diap1 and cycE, indicating a pro-Yki activity of JNK in the presence of RasV12 [77]. Wu and colleagues investigated the cooperation between scrib−/− and RasV12 clones in both intra- and interclonal situations, and revealed a JNK-dependent upregulation of upd, which accelerated both tumor growth and metastasis [53]. In accordance with this genetic data, clones lacking JAK/STAT activity would be eliminated without JNK activation [80]. In consideration of the epistasis data obtained from Hippo and JAK/STAT signaling in Drosophila intestine homeostasis [40,41,43], it is highly possible that Yki may play essential roles in linking scrib−/−/RasV12 induced tumor growth and JAK/STAT activation (Figure 2E). Moreover, in addition to autonomous proliferation observed in scrib−/−/RasV12 clones, a non-autonomous effect on Hippo signaling was also seen in surrounding neighbors [62], probably owing to JNK propagation and subsequent compensatory proliferation [53].

    In summary, the evidence outlined above indicates that in Drosophila JNK can have both pro- and anti-Yki function depending on the context, highlighting the importance for a further understanding of the regulatory crosstalk between Hippo and JNK in developing potential therapeutic treatments of different cancers.

    2.3.4. Yki super-competitor property requires JNK activity

    Missing core components of Hippo pathway or Yki overexpression are sufficient to turn clones into super-competitors via autonomous proliferation and induction of cell death in surrounding wild-type neighbors [60,68]. Apart from the involvement of Myc-mediated cell competition [68], our recent study provide a further mechanistic insight into the overgrowth properties caused by Hippo signaling loss (unpublished data, Figure 2F). By using Drosophila wing epithelia as a model, we found that impaired Hpo pathway activates JNK signaling in vivo and JNK activity is essential for Yki-induced growth and proliferation. Furthermore, we identified rho1 as a direct transcriptional target of Yki/Sd complex. In agreement with previous studies [81,82], we found Rho1 overexpression promotes growth when cell death is compromised. Finally, we also demonstrate that the mammalian YAP is also able to activate rho1 transcription and JNK activation in Sd-dependent manner when expressed in Drosophila, indicating a likely conserved role of Yap in regulating Rho1-JNK mediated growth in mammals (Figure 2F). Thus, our study reveals a novel means of crosstalk between Hippo and JNK signaling.

    2.4. Ajuba links Hippo to JNK signaling

    The direct evidence illuminating Hippo and JNK interaction came from a recent study by Sun and Irvine [83]. They found HepCA overexpression in the Drosophila wing epithelia can induce Yki nuclear accumulation and target gene expression, which were dramatically suppressed by activating Hippo pathway (Hpo or Wts overexpression). Their epitasis analysis further identified that Ajuba LIM protein (Jub), which has been shown to interact with Wts [84], functions as a bridge mediating Yorkie activation by JNK. Moreover, JNK can directly phosphorylate the mammalian Ajuba family protein LIMD1 and enhance its binding to LATS (Wts homolog in mammal), indicating a conserved role of JNK-Ajuba-Hippo signaling in mammalian cells.

    2.5. Cell invasion and migration

    Apart from regulating tumor growth and cell competition, JNK pathway also plays critical roles in cell invasion and migration [64,79,85]. For the past decade, Drosophila has been used extensively as an excellent model to investigate the mechanism of tumor invasion and metastasis [86,87,88]. Metastasis begins with the local invasion of tumor cells [89], and in Drosophila eye antennal discs, expression of RasV12 can cooperate with mutants that simultaneously disrupt apical-basal cell polarity to induce invasive tumors into the ventral nerve cord (VNC) [64,79], while subsequent studies showed this invasion requires numerous JNK pathway components [78,85,90,91,92]. Despite the well documented role of Yap in promoting invasion [2,93], it is found that in Drosophila Yki activity is dispensable for invasive behavior of scrib−/−/RasV12 tumors, nevertheless the tumor size is significantly reduced [72]. Similarly, JNK activation specifically along the anterior/posterior boundary of wing disc is sufficient to induce cell invasion phenotype [85,94], while overexpression of Yki cannot [95], despite the dramatic upregulation of MMP1 (unpublished data), a protein required for basement membrane degradation and cell invasion [85,96]. Remarkably, Yuan and colleagues found that Yap actually can function as a negative regulator of invasion in breast cancer [97], they observed reduced Yap protein level in breast cancer sample and reducing Yap activity significantly increased cell migration and invasion. In accordance with this view, studies using Drosophila oocyte found that loss of Hippo activity (generating hpo−/− or wts−/− clones) markedly impeded border cell migration during oogenesis [98,99], phenocopying JNK loss-induced defects [100]. Given the complicated and context-dependent crosstalk between JNK and Hippo signaling (see above), it would be quite interesting to further investigate their corresponding roles in cell invasion and migration both in fly and mammal.

    Recent studies in Drosophila also linked mechanical tension to Hippo and JNK signaling in tumor progression and invasive migration [101,102,103]. Cheerio (Cher/Filamin), an actin cross-linking protein, was found to be enriched in a JNK-dependent manner in invasive scrib−/−/RasV12 tumors [101]. Loss of cher not only dramatically impeded scrib−/−/RasV12 induced tumor growth and invasion, but also enabled larvae to form pupae [101], in contrast to scrib−/−/RasV12 tumor-bearing animals that mostly die as giant larvae [64,79]. In addition, it is also revealed that inhibiton of cher, but not JNK signaling, suppressed Yki target gene elevation in the scrib−/−/RasV12 clones [101], however the mechanism of how Cher interacts with Hippo pathway remains unknown. In another study, Fernandez and colleagues showed that in the wing epithelia, actin-Capping Protein (CP) could antagonize oncoprotein Src64B induced overgrowth by restricting JNK signaling, and they also found Src64B upregulated Yki target genes expression via JNK, supporting a pro-Yki activity of JNK signaling [103]. Yet, whether and how JNK and Hippo signaling are coordinated in tumor invasion remains to be further addressed.

    3. Conclusion

    Both JNK and Hippo pathway regulate various essential biological processes including cell survival, growth and regeneration, and deregulation of either pathway is associated with cancer development in human [2,104]. For the past decade, thanks to the elegant genetic screen performed in Drosophila, a complex network composed of numerous novel components of Hippo and JNK pathway has been established, which shed lights on the treatment of related human cancers. JNK signaling integrates with Hippo signaling in a context dependent manner (this review), and increasing studies show that both pathway possess components that are potential attractive drug targets for cancer treatment [105,106]. Thus, more comprehensive work is clearly needed to further address the regulatory mechanism between JNK and Hippo in diverse physiological functions in vivo. Moreover, given that studies have overwhelmingly proven that Drosophila can be an excellent drug screening model [107,108], it is promising to expect that the small fruit fly will make important contributions to the pharmaceutical intervention of Hippo and JNK related cancers.

    Acknowledgements

    I am grateful for Dr. Lei Xue for guidance and valuable advice, Dr. Tatsushi Igaki for personal communication, Dr. Yonggang Zheng for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful comments. I apologize to all the researchers whose work I have not cited due to space limitations.

    Conflict of Interest

    Authordeclares no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] World Economic Outlook Databases (2019). Available from: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2019/02/weodata/index.aspx.
    [2] Ministry of Economic Affairs (2020). Energy statistics handbook-2019. MOEA: Taipei (Taiwan).
    [3] Wu JH, Huang YH (2006) Renewable energy perspectives and support mechanisms in Taiwan. Renew Energy 31: 1718-1732. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2005.09.007
    [4] Chen FL, Lu SM, Chang YL (2007) Renewable energy in Taiwan: Its developing status and strategy. Energy 32: 1634-1646. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.12.007
    [5] Hwang JJ (2010) Promotional policy for renewable energy development in Taiwan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14: 1079-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.029
    [6] Liou HM (2010) Policies and legislation driving Taiwan's development of renewable energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14: 1763-1781. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.02.013
    [7] Chen HH, Lee AHI (2014) Comprehensive overview of renewable energy development in Taiwan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 37: 215-228. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.055
    [8] Balat M (2010) Sustainable developments of wind power in Europe. Part 1: utilization and future prospects. Energy Sources B 5: 409-423. doi: 10.1080/15567240802532528
    [9] Pablo-Romero MP, Pozo-Barajas R (2017) Global changes in total and wind electricity (1990-2014). AIMS Energy 5: 290-312. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.2.290
    [10] Soares-Ramos EPP, de Oliveira-Assis L, Sarrias-Mena R, et al. (2020) Current status and future trends of offshore wind power in Europe. Energy 202: 117787. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117787
    [11] Dawn S, Tiwari PK, Goswami AK, et al. (2019) Wind power: Existing status, achievements and government's initiative towards renewable power dominating India. Energy Strategy Rev 23: 178-199. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.002
    [12] Zhang S, Wei J, Chen X, et al. (2020) China in global wind power development: Role, status and impact. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 127: 109881. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109881
    [13] Energy Statistics Information Query System (2020). Available from: https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/wesnq/.
    [14] Guidelines on Energy Development (2017). Available from: https://adapt.epa.gov.tw/TCCIP-1-D/TCCIP-1-D-6.
    [15] Laws and Regulation Retrieving System (2021). Available from: https://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/index.aspx.
    [16] Shieh CL, Wang CM, Chen YS, et al. (2010) An overview of disasters resulted from Typhoon Morakot in Taiwan. J Disaster Res 5: 236-244. doi: 10.20965/jdr.2010.p0236
    [17] Global Offshore Wind Speeds Rankings (2020). Available from: https://www.4coffshore.com/windfarms/windspeeds.aspx.
    [18] Fang HF (2014) Wind energy potential assessment for the offshore areas of Taiwan west coast and Penghu Archipelago. Renew Energy 67: 237-241. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.11.047
    [19] Chang PC, Yang RY, Lai CM (2015) Potential of offshore wind energy and extreme wind speed forecasting on the west coast of Taiwan. Energies 8: 1685-1700. doi: 10.3390/en8031685
    [20] Valentin SV (2010) A STEP toward understanding wind power development policy barriers in advanced economies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14: 2796-2807. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.043
    [21] Lu SM (2017) Renewable Energies in Taiwan: Reserve, Status, Policy; LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing: Saarbrucken, Germany, 2017.
    [22] Lin CJ, Yu OS, Chang CL, et al. (2007) Challenges of wind farms connection to future power systems in Taiwan. Renew Energy 34: 1926-1930. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.12.004
    [23] Lee YM, Tzeng YE (2008) Development and life-cycle inventory analysis of wind energy in Taiwan. J Energy Eng 134: 53-57. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(2008)134:2(53)
    [24] Yue CD, Yang MH (2009) Exploring the potential of wind energy for a coastal state. Energy Policy 37: 3925-3940. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.055
    [25] Chen FL, Lu SM, Tseng KT, et al. (2010) Assessment of renewable energy reserves in Taiwan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14: 2511-2528. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.06.021
    [26] Lee TL (2010) Assessment of the potential of offshore wind energy in Taiwan using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Open Civil Eng J 4: 96-104. doi: 10.2174/1874149501004010096
    [27] Chou CJ, Wu YK, Han GY, et al. (2012) Comparative evaluation of the HVDC and HVAC links integrated in a large offshore wind farm-an actual case study in Taiwan. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 48: 1639-1648. doi: 10.1109/TIA.2012.2209622
    [28] Kao SM, Pearre NS (2017) Administrative arrangement for offshore wind power developments in Taiwan: Challenges and prospects. Energy Policy 109: 463-472. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.027
    [29] Zhang Y, Zhang C, Chang YC, et al. (2017) Offshore wind farm in marine spatial planning and the stakeholders engagement: Opportunities and challenges for Taiwan. Ocean Coast Manag 149: 69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.09.014
    [30] Chien KH (2020) Pacing for renewable energy development: The development state in Taiwan's offshore wind power. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 110: 793-807.
    [31] Valentin SV (2010) Disputed wind directions: Reinvigorating wind power development in Taiwan. Energy Sustain Dev 14: 22-34. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2009.12.005
    [32] Huang YH, Wu JH (2011) Assessment of the feed-in tariff mechanism for renewable energies in Taiwan. Energy Policy 39: 8106-8115. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.005
    [33] Tsai WT (2013) Prospects of renewable energy development in Taiwan. Energy Sources B 8: 263-269. doi: 10.1080/15567240903394281
    [34] Tsai WT (2014) Feed-in tariff promotion and innovative measures for renewable electricity: Taiwan case analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40: 1126-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.019
    [35] Chang CT, Lee HC (2016) Taiwan's renewable energy strategy and energy-intensive industrial policy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 64: 456-465. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.052
    [36] Kung CC, Zhang L, Chang MS (2017) Promotion policies for renewable energy and their effects in Taiwan. J Clean Prod 142: 965-975. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.034
    [37] Kung CC, McCarl BA (2020) The potential role of renewable electricity generation in Taiwan. Energy Policy 138: 111227. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111227
    [38] Electricity carbon emission factor (2020). Available from: https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/ecw/populace/content/ContentDesc.aspx?menu_id=6989.
    [39] World Health Organization (2020). WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/.
    [40] Cheval S, Adamescu CM, Georgiadis T, et al. (2020) Observed and potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17: 4140. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114140
    [41] International Energy Agency (2020) Covid-19 Impact on Renewable Energy Growth, Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/renewable-energy-market-update/covid-19-impact-on-renewable-energy-growth.
    [42] Eroglu H (2020) Effects of Covid-19 outbreak on environment and renewable energy sector. Environ Dev Sustain (in press). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00837-4.
    [43] Gillingham KT, Knittel CR, Li J, et al. (2020) The Short-run and Long-run Effects of Covid-19 on Energy and the Environment. Joule 4: 1337-1341. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.06.010
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Haize Hu, Yunyi Li, Xiangping Zhang, Mengge Fang, A novel hybrid model for short-term prediction of wind speed, 2022, 127, 00313203, 108623, 10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108623
    2. Yu-Ru Lee, Wen-Tien Tsai, Overview of Biomass-to-Energy Supply and Promotion Policy in Taiwan, 2022, 15, 1996-1073, 6576, 10.3390/en15186576
    3. Hon Chung Lau, Steve C. Tsai, A Decarbonization Roadmap for Taiwan and Its Energy Policy Implications, 2022, 14, 2071-1050, 8425, 10.3390/su14148425
    4. Rami Al-Hajj, Mohamad M. Fouad, Ali Assi Smieee, Emad Mabrouk, 2023, Ultra-Short-Term Forecasting of Wind Speed Using Lightweight Features and Machine Learning Models, 979-8-3503-3793-8, 93, 10.1109/ICRERA59003.2023.10269374
    5. Wen-Tien Tsai, 2023, 9780443184390, 493, 10.1016/B978-0-443-18439-0.00002-1
    6. Saiyad S. Kutty, M.G.M. Khan, M. Rafiuddin Ahmed, Analysis of wind characteristics and wind energy resource assessment for Tonga using eleven methods of estimating Weibull parameters, 2024, 10, 24058440, e30047, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30047
    7. Wen-Tien Tsai, Green finance for mitigating greenhouse gases and promoting renewable energy development: Case study in Taiwan, 2024, 6, 2643-1092, 249, 10.3934/GF.2024010
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4143) PDF downloads(194) Cited by(7)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog