Review Topical Sections

Renewable energy perspectives: Brazilian case study on green hydrogen production

  • Hydrogen is recognized as a key component of the future renewable energy landscape. It can be sourced from diverse raw materials, including water, bioethanol, and microalgae. Despite its potential, challenges remain regarding its cost-effectiveness, infrastructure development, and integration into existing energy systems. This study evaluated Brazil's renewable energy production, focusing on resource availability, economic feasibility, technological challenges, and regulatory factors. Data from international energy agencies were analyzed using statistical indicators to compare Brazil's green hydrogen potential with global benchmarks. Findings indicate that Brazil's electrical matrix—comprising hydropower (59%), wind (13.2%), and solar (7%)—offers favorable conditions for large-scale green hydrogen generation. However, high production costs remain a limiting factor due to technological constraints, infrastructure gaps, and policy uncertainties. The results highlight Brazil's strong potential to become a key player in the green hydrogen market, provided that technological advancements, cost reductions, and regulatory frameworks evolve to support large-scale implementation. The study emphasizes the need for targeted investments, government incentives, and energy storage solutions to enhance Brazil's competitiveness in the global energy transition.

    Citation: Gustavo Henrique Romeu da Silva, Andreas Nascimento, Christoph Daniel Baum, Nazem Nascimento, Mauro Hugo Mathias, Mohd Amro. Renewable energy perspectives: Brazilian case study on green hydrogen production[J]. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(2): 449-470. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025017

    Related Papers:

    [1] Dheeraj Rathore, Anoop Singh, Divakar Dahiya, Poonam Singh Nigam . Sustainability of biohydrogen as fuel: Present scenario and future perspective. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(1): 1-19. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.1.1
    [2] Juan A. Conesa, A. Domene . Synthesis gas production from various biomass feedstocks. AIMS Energy, 2013, 1(1): 17-27. doi: 10.3934/energy.2013.1.17
    [3] Saad S. Alrwashdeh . Investigation of the effect of the injection pressure on the direct-ignition diesel engine performance. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(2): 340-355. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022018
    [4] O. Corigliano, G. De Lorenzo, P. Fragiacomo . Techno-energy-economic sensitivity analysis of hybrid system Solid Oxide Fuel Cell/Gas Turbine. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(5): 934-990. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021044
    [5] Angelo Minotti . A new NANOSATs propulsion system: swirling-combustion chamber and water electrolysis. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(3): 402-413. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.3.402
    [6] Gal Hochman, Shisi Wang, Qing Li, Paul D. Gottlieb, Fuqing Xu, Yebo Li . Cost of organic waste technologies: A case study for New Jersey. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(3): 450-462. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.3.450
    [7] Eric Danso-Boateng, Osei-Wusu Achaw . Bioenergy and biofuel production from biomass using thermochemical conversions technologies—a review. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(4): 585-647. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022030
    [8] Simona Silvia Merola, Luca Marchitto, Cinzia Tornatore, Gerardo Valentino . Spray-combustion process characterization in a common rail diesel engine fuelled with butanol-diesel blends by conventional methods and optical diagnostics. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(2): 116-132. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.2.116
    [9] Quoc Dang Tran, Thanh Nhu Nguyen, Vinh Nguyen Duy . Effect of piston geometry design and spark plug position on the engine performance and emission characteristics. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(1): 156-170. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023009
    [10] Mazhyn Skakov, Arman Miniyazov, Timur Tulenbergenov, Igor Sokolov, Gainiya Zhanbolatova, Assel Kaiyrbekova, Alina Agatanova . Hydrogen production by methane pyrolysis in the microwave discharge plasma. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(3): 548-560. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024026
  • Hydrogen is recognized as a key component of the future renewable energy landscape. It can be sourced from diverse raw materials, including water, bioethanol, and microalgae. Despite its potential, challenges remain regarding its cost-effectiveness, infrastructure development, and integration into existing energy systems. This study evaluated Brazil's renewable energy production, focusing on resource availability, economic feasibility, technological challenges, and regulatory factors. Data from international energy agencies were analyzed using statistical indicators to compare Brazil's green hydrogen potential with global benchmarks. Findings indicate that Brazil's electrical matrix—comprising hydropower (59%), wind (13.2%), and solar (7%)—offers favorable conditions for large-scale green hydrogen generation. However, high production costs remain a limiting factor due to technological constraints, infrastructure gaps, and policy uncertainties. The results highlight Brazil's strong potential to become a key player in the green hydrogen market, provided that technological advancements, cost reductions, and regulatory frameworks evolve to support large-scale implementation. The study emphasizes the need for targeted investments, government incentives, and energy storage solutions to enhance Brazil's competitiveness in the global energy transition.



    1. Introduction

    This manuscript is the progress of two previous works, carried out by the author [1,2], that come from the "EU-FP7-HRC-Power" project [3,4].

    The goal of that European project is to design a novel energy device, able to overcome the high level of unused capacity and the high variability of the renewable sources over time (the intermittent nature leads to low capacity factors, low flexibility and high amortization costs).

    To this end, a hybrid energy system, which adopts solar energy and/or chemical energy, has been defined; this kind of hybridization is able to provide reliable and continuous base-load power, as well as peak-load power.

    Moreover, the project imposed the constraint of a miniaturized device, in order to enlarge its fields of application (i.e. smart buildings, mobiles, pc, satellites, space propulsion, etc.), and to allow different configurations (single and/or cluster operability).

    The basic idea consists in integrating micro-swirling combustion chambers inside a parallelepiped brick, which is characterized by emitting surfaces that release heat power to be finally converted into electrical energy by a thermophotovoltaic cell (TPV).

    Surfaces are heated up by the sun and/or by hot gases, produced during the combustion occurred in the micro-swirling chambers integrated inside the device.

    The swirling chambers are adopted to permit efficient combustion in miniaturized devices (swirling motion increases the residence time), without the necessity of catalytic deposition on the internal walls (a procedure as expensive and difficult as the device is shrunk).

    No works like this, apart from what it has been carried out by the author, are available; therefore, it is not possible to provide more comparative data than what it has already been done in [2], where a 500 W H2/Air device, under specific design constraints, is reported.

    The relative reactive fluid dynamics investigations indicated that the hydrogen-air solution does not present significant drawbacks in terms of combustion stability and efficiency.

    In addition, [2] reports a Fourier parametric analysis carried out to mimic the device's performance when works adopting only solar energy (mentioned as the "solar mode operation"), in which the sun has been simulated defining an external radiation source at a fixed temperature.

    The "solar mode" investigation has been carried out to understand the effects of the dimensions of the holes (the combustion chambers) on the converter's thermal conductivity and, consequently, on the overall energy efficiency.

    Results indicate that the converter thickness should not exceed 6 mm to obtain a thermal efficiency greater than 20% when in the "solar mode operation"; this has meant that combustion chambers must not exceed 3 mm of diameter (that is the holes must not be greater than 3 mm for an efficient energy conduction). Moreover, [2] reports that a five connected chambers configuration matches with the following additional design requirements: Tpeak emitting surface > 1000 K, ∆Temitting surface < 100 K and emitting surface of 30 × 30 mm.

    The present manuscript investigates the same device, reported in [2], with the same design requirements but fed with methane.

    It is important to understand the effectiveness of methane feeding because it is much easier, and safer, to be managed than hydrogen, it is a green propellant and, further, it is widely used, both for civil and space applications.

    The current reactive numerical simulations adopt stoichiometric conditions, 500 W of injected chemical power, detailed chemistry, the k-eps turbulence approach and the eddy-dissipation concept to couple chemistry and turbulence.

    In particular, the detailed hydrocarbon GRIMech mechanism [5], 32 species and 177 reactions, is adopted to reproduce the internal combustion.

    Simulations show that, to fulfill with the design requirements, in terms of dimensions and efficiency, it is mandatory to add hydrogen, to the methane fuel injection, and to increase the operating pressure, up to 10 atm. This is due to the methane chemical structure, stiffer than hydrogen, which requires actions to increase the residence time and/or to accelerate the reaction.

    The paper is structured as follows: section 2 describes the converter, the operating and boundary conditions, section 3 describes the numerical modeling, while sections 4–5 report, respectively, the results and the conclusions.


    2. Energy Converter, Operating and Boundary Conditions

    The parallelepiped brick has overall dimensions equal to 30 × 30 × 6 mm, with inside 5 connected swirling combustion chambers characterized by a diameter of 3 mm. The total volume available for combustion is about 1200 mm3 and the relative distance, between 2 consecutive chambers, is 3 mm. Figure 1 shows the hybrid converter with 5 connected chambers, two fuel-air entrances and only one outlet duct. This geometrical configuration permits to increase the residence time throughout the chambers. The internal chamber walls are coupled with the parallelepiped block, in order to permit the combustion products to heat up the emitting surfaces and then to deliver thermal power to the environment through convection and radiation; the emissivity values are reported in Figure 1.

    Figure 1. Swirling combustor converter, Z/D = 11, 5 connected chambers, emissivity values.

    The integration, between the swirling chambers and the emitting converter, is under a pending patent [6].

    The external walls are characterized by a convective coefficient H = 12 W/(m2·K), calculated at standard and rest conditions.

    Internal chamber walls are thermally conductive, while inlet and exhaust ducts walls are adiabatic (to mimic an eventual insulating material). The parallelepiped element is modeled adopting the following material properties:

    Density, ρ = 3100 kg/m3;

    Specific heat at constant pressure, Cp = 600 J/(kg·K)

    Thermal conductivity, according to the polynomial reported in [7].

    Table 1 reports the operating conditions of the 7 (seven) simulations.

    Table 1. Pure methane and methane-hydrogen blends, operating conditions.
    H2 vol% Pressure [atm] Total injected chemical power (W)
    (CH4–H2/Air [kg])
    Re (Fuel, Air)
    0 1 500 (1 × 10–5–0/1.716 × 10–4) 430, 4415
    20 1 500 (9.26 × 10–6–2.92 × 10–7/1.59 × 10–4) 390, 4100
    50 1 500 (7.86 × 10–6–8.93 × 10–7/1.65 × 10–4) 365, 4350
    20 5 500 (9.26 × 10–6–2.92 × 10–7/1.59 × 10–4) 390, 4100
    50 5 500 (7.86 × 10–6–8.93 × 10–7/1.65 × 10–4) 365, 4350
    20 10 500 (9.26 × 10–6–2.92 × 10–7/1.59 × 10–4) 390, 4100
    50 10 500 (7.86 × 10–6–8.93 × 10–7/1.65 × 10–4) 365, 4350
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Pure methane/air and hydrogen-methane/air blends, at different operating pressures, have been investigated. It is evident that laminar and moderately turbulent flow regimes are present, this is a typical feature of micro-meso/combustors [8,9]. Simulations were carried out assuming 500 W of injected power at stoichiometric conditions and adopting inlets temperature equal to 450 K, in order to mimic pre-heating at stationary conditions.


    3. Numerical Modeling

    The domain has been reproduced by a mesh with a total number of cells greater than 1.4 M. The grid sensitivity analysis, reported in [1], indicated that a circumferential distance between gridpoints of 0.2 mm, on the chambers, and of 1 mm, on the walls of the brick, is the optimum. The grid analysis has been carried out at cold conditions because high temperature flows are characterized by smaller gradients (and then turbulence) than the ones at cold conditions with the same boundary conditions (Reynolds number decreases with the increase of the temperature).

    The mesh has been improved by "reordering, smoothing, and swapping" techniques. In particular, reordering (the reverse Cuthill-Mckee method [10]) was adopted to reduce the bandwidth of the cell neighbour number, in order to speed up the calculations, while "smoothing and swapping" were used, respectively, to reposition nodes (by lowering the maximum skewness of the grid) and to modify the cell connectivity and the relative overall quality.

    The first point near the wall is at y + < 3 and Δy + < 1 (only a few points, in the air inlet ducts where velocities are higher, are close to y + ~ 15). This means that the first point away from the wall inside the chamber is within the viscous sublayer.

    As mentioned in [8,9], in micro-meso combustors, laminar zones may co-exist locally with turbulent zones, therefore the laminar vs. turbulent regime uncertainty poses the problem of the modelling approach. A pure laminar approach would be unable to predict turbulent field zones, of crucial importance when reactions are present, while turbulent models would over-predict transport wherever the actual regime was laminar.

    In the light of the above, fluid dynamics has been solved adopting the RANS k-eps turbulence approach, with the enhanced wall treatment [11], able to reproduce accurate laminar dynamics [9].

    The specific heat at constant pressure, Cpi, is fitted by polynomials of temperature from the GRIMech Thermo Data file [12], properly introduced in the CFD code, while viscosity and thermal conductivity, μ and k, are predicted by the gas kinetic theory [13]; mixtures are composition-dependent according to Wilke's formula [14].

    The turbulence-combustion coupling is modelled adopting the eddy dissipation concept (EDC) [15,16], while the methane/air kinetics by means of the GRIMech mechanism [5], 32 species and 177 reactions.

    The reactive Navier–Stokes equations were solved adopting a finite-volume solver (Ansys 14 CFD code). In particular, the pressure-based version, the PISO scheme [17,18] (for the pressure-velocity coupling) and the third-order MUSCL scheme [19] (for the spatial discretization of all the variables) have been implemented.

    The computing resources are part of the CRESCO/ENEAGRID High Performance Computing infrastructure and its staff [20]. CRESCO/ENEAGRID High Performance Computing infrastructure is funded by ENEA, the Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy, and Sustainable Economic Development, and by Italian and European research programs [21].


    4. Combustion Simulations Results and Discussion

    The overall results are reported in the following Table 2.

    Table 2. Overall results.
    H2 vol% Pressure [atm] Combustion efficiency Average Temperature at the exhaust section [K] Swirling Number (reacting conditions)
    0 1 Burns out - -
    20 1 Burns out - -
    50 1 Burns out - -
    20 5 Burns out - -
    50 5 Burns out - -
    20 10 0.917 1433 1.615
    50 10 0.982 1451 1.396
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    It reports the combustion efficiency [Equation (1)], the average temperature at the exhaust section and the swirling number at reacting conditions calculated at Z = 30 mm. It is evident that the pure-methane feeding (additional H2 equal to 0%) burns out. Therefore new strategies, to obtain stable combustion and efficient energy conversion, adopting hydrocarbon-air in such a small device, are mandatory. The chemical structure of the methane, sp3 ibridized [22], affects the chemistry performance, requiring higher activation energy and longer residence time.

    To this end, hydrogen has been added to the methane injection and the operating pressure has been increased; in particular six additional simulations have been carried out adopting a blend of 20% and 50%, in volume of hydrogen, and imposing an operating pressure of 1, 5 and 10 atm, see Table 1.

    Combustion efficiency is defined as follow:

    ηcombustion=χCO2χCO2+χCO+χUHC|outlet (1)

    Where χi=nintotnH2O; and ni is the molar fraction of species "i" at the exhaust section.

    Table 2 indicates that, among all the simulations, only the ones with an operating pressure of 10 atm provide stable combustion, both with 20% and 50% in volume of additional hydrogen. The other configurations burn out.

    The figure 2 reports, as an example, the temperatures map on the xz plane, from which the extinction zones inside the two lateral chambers may be easily distinguished.

    Figure 2. Temperature map, H2 = 50%, P = 5 [atm].

    Table 3 reports the maximum temperature, the minimum temperature, the average temperature, the standard deviation and, finally, the external heat transfer, respectively for "wall 1" and "wall 3" of the two configurations at 10 atm of operating pressure (respectively with H2 = 20%–50% in volume of additional hydrogen).

    Table 3. H2 = 20% and 50% vol, P = 10 atm, results.
    H2 % vol External Heat Transfer Wall1–Wall3 [W] Wall 1 Tmax–Tmin [K] Wall 1 Taverage–σT [K] Wall 3 Tmax–Tmin [K] Wall 3 Taverage–σT [K]
    20 70–51 1445–1304 1395–28 1446–1315 1397–28
    50 73–53 1463–1334 1414–25 1462–1342 1416–25
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The iterative solution was assumed converged when the difference between the inlet and outlet mass flow rates, Δmt, was at least two orders of magnitude smaller than the smallest flow rate at the inlet section (that is, the hydrogen injection).

    The added hydrogen, being characterized by higher latent heat value and faster chemistry, than the methane, speeds up the overall reaction mechanism, while the increased pressure reduces the inlet velocities and increases the overall reaction rates.

    These two strategies contribute, simultaneously, to increase the Damkohler number [23], defined as:

    Da=flowtimescalechemicaltimescale (2)

    As expected, the configuration with H2 = 50% in volume provides better performance in terms of combustion efficiency, maximum temperature and ∆T, on the emitting surfaces, than the one with additional H2 = 20% in volume.

    Notwithstanding, the overall outcomes are only slightly different, as the following discussion demonstrates.

    Table 3 reports that the maximum temperatures, on both the emitting walls, are significantly greater than the design requirement (T > 1450 K vs. T > 1000 K). The total delivered power to the ambient is about 70 W–73 W, from "wall 1", and 51 W–53 W, from "wall 3".

    Significant is the difference in combustion efficiency, ηH2=50%>0.98 while ηH2=20%>0.91, demonstrating how the faster hydrogen chemistry affects the final performance.

    On the other hand the ∆T < 100 K requirement is not fulfilled neither in the H2 = 20% not in the H2 = 50% configurations; in fact, the best result is ∆T ≈ 120 K, 20 K higher than the design requirement for the H2 = 50% configuration. This value is confirmed also by the standard deviation value that is about 25 K versus 28 K in the H2 = 20% configuration. This result would affect the overall performance in terms of compatibility with a thermo-photovoltaic cell, but only an experimental test would provide the concrete effects of such a ∆T.

    The converter thermal behavior is shown in Figures 35, which present, respectively, the temperature maps of the combustion chambers walls, of the xz-plane and of the external walls.

    Figure 3. Temperature map of the five chambers, H2 = 20% (left) and H2 = 50% (right).
    Figure 4. Temperature map on the xz-plane, H2 = 20% (left) and H2 = 50% (right).
    Figure 5. External walls temperature map, H2 = 20% (left) and H2 = 50% (right).

    In particular, Figure 4 shows that the maximum temperature, in the central core of the chambers, is around 2400 K for both the configurations.

    Figure 5 reports the temperature maps of the emitting surfaces. It is evident that the low temperature zones, close to the inlet part of the converter, affect the overall performance, increasing the delta temperature, the standard deviation, and then lowering the eventual TPV energy conversion.

    Finally, it is important to highlight the result regarding the average temperatures at the exhaust sections. The numerical investigations figure out 1433 K and 1451 K of exhaust temperature; this indicates that there is a lot of energy that might be still used, in both the configurations, to further increase the overall energy efficiency. To this end, the feasibility of connecting micro-turbine or micro-nozzle, for additional energy production or for space micro-propulsion, is under investigation.

    Figure 6 reports, instead, the pressure maps inside the chambers; an overpressure of about 0.4–0.5 atm is present between the inlet and the outlet sections.

    Figure 6. Pressure map, H2 = 20% (left) and H2 = 50% (right).

    5. Conclusions

    This work is the last development of a series of works, coming from an EU-FP7 project, that investigate the potentialities of an emitting parallelepiped block, with inside swirling chambers, as a hybrid energy converter connected to a TPV (hybridization considers to adopt solar energy and/or chemical energy).

    The works in [1,2] investigated different configurations of a hydrogen-fed hybrid-converter, and in particular their effectiveness when compared to specific project's requirements.

    The "solar mode investigations" imposed swirling combustion chambers of maximum 3 mm of diameter, while the combustion simulations showed no particular drawbacks or limitations when fed with hydrogen.

    The present manuscript translated the previous outcomes to a hybrid-converter fed with hydrocarbons and the first result is the fact that methane is too stiff to maintain stable combustion inside the 3 mm-diameter connected swirling chambers; therefore, hydrogen has been added to the methane injection and the operating pressure has been increased up to 10 atm.

    In particular, six simulations are carried out, adopting several hydrogen-methane blends (H2 = 20% and H2 = 50% in volume) and several operating pressure (1, 5 and 10 atm).

    Among all the simulations, only the ones with 10 atm of operating pressure obtained successful results; all the other ones burn out.

    The configuration with additional H2 = 50% in volume performs, as expected, better in terms of combustion efficiency, maximum temperature and ∆T, than the one with H2 = 20% in volume.

    Both the configurations match with all the design requirements but miss the ∆T < 100 K requirement. The best result is ∆T = 120 K and it has been obtained adding H2 = 50% in volume.

    In the light of the above, only an experimental test could quantify whether, or not, this affects the TPV energy conversion performance.

    The hydrogen addition and the pressure increase permit to reach high value of combustion efficiency (ηH2=50%>0.98).

    Moreover, a lot of energy is still available at the exhaust section of the converter.

    This indicates that it is possible to increase the overall energy efficiency, for instance connecting the exhaust section with a microturbine or micronozzle in order to produce additional electrical energy or even thrust for microsatellite applications.


    Acknowledgments

    EU-FP7 ENERGY.2012.10.2.1: Future Emerging Technologies Grant, HRC Power Project.


    Conflicts of Interest

    The author declares no conflict of interest in this paper.




    [1] Da Silva GHR, Nascimento A, Baum CD, et al. (2024) Renewable energy potentials and roadmap in Brazil, Austria, and Germany. Energies 17: 1482. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17061482 doi: 10.3390/en17061482
    [2] Silva GHR (2024) Análise da Cadeia Produtiva do Hidrogênio Verde: Potencial de Produção Sustentável Utilizando Biorefinarias. São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Engineering and Sciences: Guaratinguetá, Brazil, 1–80. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/11449/253324.
    [3] Majewski P, Salehi F, Xing K (2023) Green Hydrogen. AIMS Energy 11: 878–895. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2023042 doi: 10.3934/energy.2023042
    [4] Fivga A, Speranza LG, Branco CM, et al. (2019) A review on the current state of the art for the production of advanced liquid biofuels. AIMS Energy 7: 46–76. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2019.1.46 doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.1.46
    [5] Lima G, Nascimento A, Oliveira MP, et al. (2024) Energy efficiency analysis: A household digital transformation. AIMS Energy 12: 774–808. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2024037 doi: 10.3934/energy.2024037
    [6] Dias FLG, Nascimento MAR, Rodrigues LO (2015) Aerodynamic Assessment of Periodicity and Symmetry Conditions in a Flameless Burner. J Mech Eng Autom 5: 80–87. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jmea.20150502.03 doi: 10.5923/j.jmea.20150502.03
    [7] International Energy Agency (2024) World Energy Outlook. Int Energy Agency, IEA Publications. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024.
    [8] Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (2024) Balanço Energético Nacional. EPE. Available from: https://www.epe.gov.br/pt/publicacoes-dados-abertos/publicacoes/balanco-energetico-nacional-2024.
    [9] International Renewable Energy Agency (2022) Renewable Capacity Statistics. Int Renew Energ Agency, Abu Dhabi. Available from: https://www.irena.org/publications/2022/Apr/Renewable-Capacity-Statistics-2022.
    [10] International Renewable Energy Agency (2024) Renewable Capacity Statistics. Int Renew Energ Agency, Abu Dhabi. Available from: https://www.irena.org/Publications/2024/Mar/Renewable-capacity-statistics-2024.
    [11] Secretaria do Estado do Meio Ambiente (2019) Plano Estadual de Recursos Hídricos do Amazonas PERH/AM. SEMA, Manaus. Available from: https://www.sema.am.gov.br/plano-estadual-de-recurso-hidricos-perh/.
    [12] Alfredsen K, Amundsen P, Hahn L, et al. (2022) A synoptic history of the development, production and environmental oversight of hydropower in Brazil, Canada, and Norway. Hydrobiologia 849: 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04709-4 doi: 10.1007/s10750-021-04709-4
    [13] Dias VDS, Pereira M, Medero GM, et al. (2018) An overview of hydropower reservoirs in Brazil: Current situation, future perspectives and impacts of climate change. Water 10: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10050592 doi: 10.3390/w10050592
    [14] Lucena JAY, Lucena KAA (2019) Wind energy in Brazil: An overview and perspectives under the triple bottom line. Clean Energy 3: 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkz001 doi: 10.1093/ce/zkz001
    [15] Vinhoza A, Schaeffer R (2021) Brazil's offshore wind energy potential assessment based on a spatial multi-criteria decision analysis. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 146: 111185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111185 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111185
    [16] Lee J, Zhao F (2022) Global Wind Report 2022. Global Wind Energy Council, Brussels. Available from: https://gwec.net/global-wind-report-2022/.
    [17] Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (2021) Geração Eólica e Fotovoltaica, Dados de entrada para modelos elétricos e energéticos: metodologias e premissas. Planejamento Da Geração, Rio de Janeiro. Available from: https://www.epe.gov.br/sites-pt/publicacoes-dados-abertos/publicacoes/PublicacoesArquivos/publicacao-558/NT-EPE-DEE-011-2021_EOL%20e%20UFV%20-%20Entrada%20para%20modelos.pdf.
    [18] Azevedo SSP, Pereira Junior AO, Silva NF, et al. (2020) Assessment of offshore wind power potential along the Brazilian Coast. Energies 13: 2557. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102557 doi: 10.3390/en13102557
    [19] Denes D, Kindl S (2019) Challenges and opportunities for the growth of solar photovoltaic energy in Brazil. Energy Policy 125: 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.063 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.063
    [20] Rigo PD, Cezar J, Siluk M, et al. (2019) Is the success of small-scale photovoltaic solar energy generation achievable in Brazil? J Cleaner Prod 240: 118243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118243 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118243
    [21] Pereira EB, Martins FR, Gonçalves AR, et al. (2017) Atlas Brasileiro de Energia Solar 2017. 2nd ed.; INPE: São José dos Campos, Brazil, 59. https://doi.org/10.34024/978851700089
    [22] McPherson M, Johnson N, Strubegger M (2018) The role of electricity storage and hydrogen technologies in enabling global low-carbon energy transitions. Appl Energy 216: 649–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.110 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.110
    [23] Zsiborács H, Baranyai NH, Vincze A, et al. (2019) Intermittent renewable energy sources: The role of energy storage in the European power system of 2040. Electronics 8: 729. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8070729 doi: 10.3390/electronics8070729
    [24] Hassan Q, Algburi S, Sameen AZ, et al. (2023) A review of hybrid renewable energy systems: Solar and wind-powered solutions: Challenges, opportunities, and policy implications. Results Eng 20: 2590–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101621 doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101621
    [25] Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (2021) Mapeamento do Setor de Hidrogênio Brasileiro. GIZ, Brasília. Available from: https://www.energypartnership.com.br/fileadmin/user_upload/brazil/media_elements/Mapeamento_H2_-_Diagramado_-_V2h.pdf.
    [26] International Energy Agency (2019) The Future of Hydrogen. Int Energy Agency, IEA Publications. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/the-futureof-hydrogen.
    [27] International Energy Agency (2024) Global Hydrogen Review 2024. Int Energy Agency, IEA Publications. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-hydrogen-review-2024.
    [28] Oliveira RC (2022) Panorama do hidrogênio no Brasil. Inst de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, IPEA. Available from: https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/11291/1/td_2787_web.pdf.
    [29] Agência Nacional de Petróleo, Gás e Biocombustíveis (2021) Autorizações Para Refino de Petróleo. ANP. Available from: https://www.gov.br/anp/pt-br/assuntos/producao-de-derivados-de-petroleo-e-processamento-de-gas-natural/producao-de-derivados-de-petroleo-e-processamento-de-gas-natural/autorizacoes-para-refino-de-petroleo.
    [30] Moraes TS, Silva HNC, Zotes LP, et al. (2019) A techno-economic evaluation of the hydrogen production for energy generation using an ethanol fuel processor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44: 21205–21219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.182 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.182
    [31] Romeu da Silva GH, Nascimento A, Nascimento D, et al. (2025) Analysis of the sugarcane biomass use to produce green hydrogen: Brazilian case study. Appl Sci 15: 1675. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031675 doi: 10.3390/app15031675
    [32] Silva GHR, Nascimento A, Nascimento N (2022) Hydrogen related perspectives in Brazil. In Proc World Conf Mech Eng, 1sd WCME, Berlin, Germany 102: 16–25. https://www.doi.org/10.33422/WCME.2022.12.102.
    [33] Shi X, Qian Y, Yang S (2020) Fluctuation analysis of a complementary wind—Solar energy system and integration for large scale hydrogen production. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 8: 7097–7110. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c01054 doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c01054
    [34] Yadav D, Banerjee R (2018) Economic assessment of hydrogen production from solar driven high-temperature steam electrolysis process Steam generator. J Cleaner Prod 183: 1131–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.074 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.074
    [35] Nadaleti WC, Santos GB, Lourenço VA (2020) The potential and economic viability of hydrogen production from the use of hydroelectric and wind farms surplus energy in Brazil: A national and pioneering analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45: 1373–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.199 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.199
    [36] Silva GHR, Nascimento N (2023) Comparative study of various methods of hydrogen production based on costs and environmental impact. Sodebras 18: 120–124. https://doi.org/10.29367/issn.1809-3957.18.2023.211.120 doi: 10.29367/issn.1809-3957.18.2023.211.120
    [37] International Renewable Energy Agency (2019) Hydrogen: A renewable energy perspective. In Proc 2nd Hydrogen Energy Ministerial Meeting, Tokyo, Japan, 25 September 2019. Available from: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/Sep/IRENA_Hydrogen_2019.pdf.
    [38] Macedo SF, Peyerl D (2022) Prospects and economic feasibility analysis of wind and solar photovoltaic hybrid systems for hydrogen production and storage: A case study of the Brazilian electric power sector. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47: 10460–10473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.133 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.133
    [39] Muhammed G, Tekbiyik-Ersoy N (2020) Development of renewable energy in China, USA, and Brazil: A comparative study on renewable energy policies. Sustainability 12: 9136. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219136 doi: 10.3390/su12219136
    [40] International Energy Agency (2024) Hydrogen Production and Infrastructure Projects Database. IEA, 2024. Available from: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/hydrogen-production-and-infrastructure-projects-database.
    [41] Siqueira AMQ, Bermann C (2020) Fundamentos do planejamento energético centralizado e do descentralizado. Rev Bras Energ 26: 33–44. https://doi.org/10.47168/rbe.v26i1.561 doi: 10.47168/rbe.v26i1.561
    [42] Lazaro LLB, Soares RS, Bermann C, et al. (2022) Energy transition in Brazil: Is there a role for multilevel governance in a centralized energy regime? Energy Res Soc Sci 85: 102404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102404 doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102404
    [43] Silva GDP, Magrini A, Tolmasquim MT, et al. (2019) Environmental licensing and energy policy regulating utility-scale solar photovoltaic installations in Brazil: Status and future perspectives. Impact Assess Proj A 37: 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1595933 doi: 10.1080/14615517.2019.1595933
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Angelo Minotti, A new NANOSATs propulsion system: swirling-combustion chamber and water electrolysis, 2018, 6, 2333-8334, 402, 10.3934/energy.2018.3.402
    2. Angelo Minotti, 2018, Chapter 15, 978-3-319-91790-0, 119, 10.1007/978-3-319-91791-7_15
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(737) PDF downloads(142) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(8)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog