In regions with a restricted availability of drinkable water, solar stills offer a solution for a passive solar desalination method. In this study, three designs for solar stills are examined: the conventional solar still (CSS), the hemispheric solar still (HSS), and the pyramidal solar still (PSS). The experimental investigations were conducted over three consecutive days, thereby varying the total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations in the basin water at 1000, 2000, and 3000 ppm. A comparative analysis focused on the performance of the various solar stills and the impact of TDS variation. The results revealed that the PSS consistently outperformed the CSS and HSS across all TDS levels. Notably, the PSS exhibited superior daily energy and exergy efficiencies. Furthermore, the daily productivity and energy efficiencies displayed an inverse relationship with the TDS concentration. A cost analysis indicated that the PSS achieved the lowest distilled water price, reaching a value of 0.0151 ＄/L. Specifically, the PSS exhibited a 17.3% and 3.5% higher accumulated daily productivity compared to CSS and HSS, respectively, at TDS = 1000. However, at TDS = 3000, the daily productivity of the PSS decreased by 3.5% and 7.5% compared to TDS = 2000 and 1000, respectively. Similarly, the energy efficiency of the PSS decreased by 5.27% and 8.67% as the TDS increased from 1000 to 3000. Notably, across all solar still types, the lowest cost values were consistently associated with the lowest TDS concentrations, with the PSS yielding the lowest cost overall.
Citation: Hind I. El-Refaey, Saleh. M. Shalaby, Swellam W. Sharshir, Hewida Omara, Tamer A. Gado. Experimental investigation of the effect of TDS on the thermal performance of the different types of solar stills[J]. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(2): 428-448. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025016
In regions with a restricted availability of drinkable water, solar stills offer a solution for a passive solar desalination method. In this study, three designs for solar stills are examined: the conventional solar still (CSS), the hemispheric solar still (HSS), and the pyramidal solar still (PSS). The experimental investigations were conducted over three consecutive days, thereby varying the total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations in the basin water at 1000, 2000, and 3000 ppm. A comparative analysis focused on the performance of the various solar stills and the impact of TDS variation. The results revealed that the PSS consistently outperformed the CSS and HSS across all TDS levels. Notably, the PSS exhibited superior daily energy and exergy efficiencies. Furthermore, the daily productivity and energy efficiencies displayed an inverse relationship with the TDS concentration. A cost analysis indicated that the PSS achieved the lowest distilled water price, reaching a value of 0.0151 ＄/L. Specifically, the PSS exhibited a 17.3% and 3.5% higher accumulated daily productivity compared to CSS and HSS, respectively, at TDS = 1000. However, at TDS = 3000, the daily productivity of the PSS decreased by 3.5% and 7.5% compared to TDS = 2000 and 1000, respectively. Similarly, the energy efficiency of the PSS decreased by 5.27% and 8.67% as the TDS increased from 1000 to 3000. Notably, across all solar still types, the lowest cost values were consistently associated with the lowest TDS concentrations, with the PSS yielding the lowest cost overall.
| [1] | Duffie JA, Beckman WA (2013) Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118671603 |
| [2] |
Kandeal AW, Joseph A, Elsharkawy M, et al. (2022) Research progress on recent technologies of water harvesting from atmospheric air: A detailed review. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 52: 102000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102000 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102000
|
| [3] |
Devesa R, Dietrich A (2018) Guidance for optimizing drinking water taste by adjusting mineralization as measured by total dissolved solids (TDS). Desalination 439: 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.04.017 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2018.04.017
|
| [4] | Rai G, Rai G (1999) Solar Energy Utilisation. Khhanna Publishers. Available from: https://khannapublishers.in/index.php?route = product/product & product_id = 165. |
| [5] |
Kumaravel S, Nagaraj M, Bharathiraja G (2023) Experimental investigation on the performance analysis of blue metal stones and pebble stones as thermal energy storage materials in single slope solar still. Mater Today: Proc 77: 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.100 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.100
|
| [6] |
Afolabi LO, Enweremadu CC, Kareem MW, et al. (2023) Experimental investigation of double slope solar still integrated with PCM nanoadditives microencapsulated thermal energy storage. Desalination 553: 116477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2023.116477 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2023.116477
|
| [7] |
Nwosu EC, Nwaji GN, Ononogbo C, et al. (2023) Effects of water thickness and glazing slope on the performance of a double-effect solar still. Sci Afr 21: e01777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01777 doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01777
|
| [8] |
Seralathan S, Chenna Reddy G, Sathish S, et al. (2023) Performance and exergy analysis of an inclined solar still with baffle arrangements. Heliyon, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14807 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14807
|
| [9] |
Khan MZ (2022) Diffusion of single-effect vertical solar still fixed with inclined wick still: An experimental study. Fuel 329: 125502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125502 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125502
|
| [10] |
Emran NY, Ahsan A, Al-Qadami EH, et al. (2022) Efficiency of a triangular solar still integrated with external PVC pipe solar heater and internal separated condenser. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 52: 102258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102258 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102258
|
| [11] |
Banoqitah E, Sathyamurthy R, Moustafa EB, et al. (2023) Enhancement and prediction of a stepped solar still productivity integrated with paraffin wax enriched with nano-additives. Case Stud Therm Eng 49: 103215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.103215 doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.103215
|
| [12] |
Davra D, Mehta P, Patel N, et al. (2024) Solar-enhanced freshwater generation in arid coastal environments: A double basin stepped solar still with vertical wick assistance study in northern Gujarat. Sol Energy 268: 112297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.112297 doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2023.112297
|
| [13] |
Ahmed H, Najib A, Zaidi AA, et al. (2022) Modeling, design optimization and field testing of a solar still with corrugated absorber plate and phase change material for Karachi weather conditions. Energy Rep 8: 11530–11546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.08.276 doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.08.276
|
| [14] |
Elashmawy M, Nafey A, Sharshir SW, et al. (2024) Experimental investigation of developed tubular solar still using multi-evaporator design. J Cleaner Prod 443: 141040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141040 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141040
|
| [15] |
Kabeel AE, Abdelgaied M, Attia MEH, et al. (2023) Performance enhancement of a conical solar still by optimizing inclination angle. Sol Energy 264: 112001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.112001 doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2023.112001
|
| [16] |
Essa FA (2024) Aspects of energy, exergy, economy, and environment for performance evaluation of modified spherical solar still with rotating ball and phase change material. J Energy Storage 81: 110500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.110500 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2024.110500
|
| [17] |
Abdullah A, Alqsair U, Aljaghtham MS, et al. (2023) Productivity augmentation of rotating wick solar still using different designs of porous breathable belt and quantum dots nanofluid. Ain Shams Eng J 14: 102248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102248 doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2023.102248
|
| [18] |
Abdullah A, Hadj-Taieb L, Omara Z, et al. (2023) Evaluating a corrugated wick solar still with phase change material, and external spiral copper heating coil. J Energy Storage 65: 107377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.107377 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107377
|
| [19] |
Sharshir SW, Farahat MA, Joseph A, et al. (2023) Comprehensive thermo-enviroeconomic performance analysis of a preheating-assisted trapezoidal solar still provided with various additives. Desalination 548: 116280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2022.116280 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2022.116280
|
| [20] |
Chauhan VK, Shukla SK (2023) Performance analysis of Prism shaped solar still using Black phosphorus quantum dot material and Lauric acid in composite climate: An experimental investigation. Sol Energy 253: 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.02.017 doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2023.02.017
|
| [21] |
Shareef AS, Kurji HJ, Hamzah AH (2024) Modifying performance of solar still, by using slices absorber plate and new design of glass cover, experimental and numerical study. Heliyon 10: e24021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24021 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24021
|
| [22] |
Alshamrani A (2023) Investigation of the performance of a double-glazing solar distiller with external condensation and nano-phase change material. J Energy Storage 73: 109075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.109075 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.109075
|
| [23] |
Hameed HG (2022) Experimentally evaluating the performance of single slope solar still with glass cover cooling and square cross-section hollow fins. Case Stud Therm Eng 40: 102547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.102547 doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2022.102547
|
| [24] |
Shatar NM, Sabri MFM, Salleh MFM, et al. (2023) Investigation on the performance of solar still with thermoelectric cooling system for various cover material. Renewable Energy 202: 844–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.11.105 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.11.105
|
| [25] |
Abdullah A, Hadj-Taieb L, Hikal M, et al. (2023) Enhancing a solar still's performance by preheating the feed water and employing phase-change material. Alexandria Eng J 77: 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2023.07.002
|
| [26] |
Abdullah A, Alawee WH, Mohammed SA, et al. (2023) Utilizing a single slope solar still with copper heating coil, external condenser, phase change material, along with internal and external reflectors—Experimental study. J Energy Storage 63: 106899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.106899 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.106899
|
| [27] |
Dhivagar R, Shoeibi S, Parsa SM, et al. (2023) Performance evaluation of solar still using energy storage biomaterial with porous surface: An experimental study and environmental analysis. Renewable Energy 206: 879–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.097 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.097
|
| [28] |
Ebrahimpour B, Shafii MB (2022) Experimental evaluation of the effect of boulders and fines in biodegradable organic materials on the improvement of solar stills. Sol Energy 247: 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.10.045 doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2022.10.045
|
| [29] |
Prasanna Y, Deshmukh SS (2022) Energy, exergy and economic analysis of an air cavity appended passive solar still of different basin material at varying depth. Energy Sustainable Dev 71: 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2022.09.008 doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2022.09.008
|
| [30] |
Farghaly MB, Alahmadi RN, Sarhan H, et al. (2023) Experimental study of simultaneous effect of evacuated tube collectors coupled with parabolic reflectors on traditional single slope solar still efficiency. Case Studies Therm Eng 49: 103304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.103304 doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.103304
|
| [31] |
Singh AK (2024) Analysis for optimized prerequisites of modified solar stills. Heliyon 10: e25804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25804 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25804
|
| [32] |
Madhusudhan P, Devi NL, Kaliappan S, et al. (2023) Improving the productivity of the solar-based evaporative still (SBES) using the nano-coated absorber. Mater Today: Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.09.014 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.09.014
|
| [33] |
Abdullah AS, Omara ZM, Essa FA, et al. (2022) Enhancing trays solar still performance using wick finned absorber, nano-enhanced PCM. Alexandria Eng J 61: 12417–12430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.06.033 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.06.033
|
| [34] |
Darbari B, Rashidi S (2022) Performance analysis for single slope solar still enhanced with multi-shaped floating porous absorber. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 50: 101854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101854 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101854
|
| [35] |
Nehar L, Rahman T, Tuly S, et al. (2022) Thermal performance analysis of a solar still with different absorber plates and external copper condenser. Groundwater Sustainable Dev 17: 100763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100763 doi: 10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100763
|
| [36] |
Adam A, Saffaj N, Mamouni R (2023) Enhancement of adjusted solar still integrated with renewable energy: An experimental approach to recycling industrial wastewater. Mater Today: Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.056 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.056
|
| [37] |
Verma S, Das R, Mishra NK (2023) Concept of integrating geothermal energy for enhancing the performance of solar stills. Desalination 564: 116817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2023.116817 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2023.116817
|
| [38] |
Toosi SSA, Goshayeshi HR, Zahmatkesh I, et al. (2023) Experimental assessment of new designed stepped solar still with Fe3O4+ graphene oxide+ paraffin as nanofluid under constant magnetic field. J Energy Storage 62: 106795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.106795 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.106795
|
| [39] |
Mandev E, Muratçobanoğlu B, Çelik A, et al. (2024) Improving solar still efficiency through integration of cellulose-based water absorbers and Peltier condensation unit. Therm Sci Eng Prog 49: 102475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102475 doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102475
|
| [40] |
Köse M, Akyürek EF, Afshari F (2025) Experimental investigation of horizontal solar stills using central container and transparent material as alternative to glass cover. Heat Transfer Res 56: 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1615/HeatTransRes.2024055441 doi: 10.1615/HeatTransRes.2024055441
|
| [41] |
Elsawy IM, Hamoda A, Sharshir SW, et al. (2023) Experimental study on optimized using activated agricultural wastes at hemispherical solar still for different types of water. Process Saf Environ Prot 177: 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2023.07.002
|
| [42] |
Dahab MA, Omara M, El-Dafrawy MM, et al. (2023) Thermo-economic performance enhancement of the hemispherical solar still integrated with various numbers of evacuated tubes. Therm Sci Eng Prog 42: 101922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101922 doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101922
|
| [43] |
Attia MEH, Hussein AK, Radhakrishnan G, et al. (2023) Energy, exergy and cost analysis of different hemispherical solar distillers: A comparative study. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 252: 112187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2023.112187 doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2023.112187
|
| [44] |
Beggas A, Abdelgaied M, Attia MEH, et al. (2023) Improving the freshwater productivity of hemispherical solar distillers using waste aluminum as store materials. J Energy Storage 60: 106692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.106692 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.106692
|
| [45] |
Sharshir SW, Omara MA, Elsisi G, et al. (2023) Thermo-economic performance improvement of hemispherical solar still using wick material with V-corrugated basin and two different energy storage materials. Sol Energy 249: 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.11.038 doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2022.11.038
|
| [46] |
Ghandourah E, Panchal H, Fallatah O, et al. (2022) Performance enhancement and economic analysis of pyramid solar still with corrugated absorber plate and conventional solar still: A case study. Case Studies Therm Eng 35: 101966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.101966 doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2022.101966
|
| [47] |
Kumar A, Maurya A (2022) Experimental analysis and CFD modelling for pyramidal solar still. Mater Today: Proc 62: 2173–2178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.360 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.360
|
| [48] |
Abdullah A, Alawee WH, Mohammed SA, et al. (2023) Increasing the productivity of modified cords pyramid solar still using electric heater and various wick materials. Process Saf Environ Prot 169: 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.11.016 doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.11.016
|
| [49] |
Sharshir SW, Rozza MA, Joseph A, et al. (2022) A new trapezoidal pyramid solar still design with multi thermal enhancers. Appl Therm Eng 213: 118699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118699 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118699
|
| [50] |
Omara Z, Alawee WH, Mohammed SA, et al. (2022) Experimental study on the performance of pyramid solar still with novel convex and dish absorbers and wick materials. J Cleaner Prod 373: 133835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133835 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133835
|
| [51] |
Sharshir SW, Rozza M, Elsharkawy M, et al. (2022) Performance evaluation of a modified pyramid solar still employing wick, reflectors, glass cooling and TiO2 nanomaterial. Desalination 539: 115939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2022.115939 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2022.115939
|
| [52] |
Modi KV, Gamit AR (2022) Investigation on performance of square pyramid solar still using nanofluid and thermal energy storage material: An experimental and theoretical study. J Cleaner Prod 381: 135115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135115 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135115
|
| [53] | Kajal G, Malik P, Garg H, et al. (2023) Thermophysical properties analysis of Al2O3, MgO and GO nanofluids with water for solar still. Mater Today: Proc. |
| [54] |
Senthil Kumar S, Uma Mageswari SD, Meena M, et al. (2022) Effect of energy storage material on a triangular pyramid solar still operating with constant water depth. Energy Rep 8: 652–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.203 doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.203
|
| [55] |
Pandey H, Gupta NK (2022) Productivity analysis of pyramid solar still with solid clay pots. Mater Today: Proc 62: 4081–4085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.629 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.629
|
| [56] |
Asadabadi MJR, Sheikholeslami M (2022) Impact of utilizing hollow copper circular fins and glass wool insulation on the performance enhancement of pyramid solar still unit: An experimental approach. Sol Energy 241: 564–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.06.029 doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2022.06.029
|
| [57] |
Alshqirate A, Awad AS, Al Alawin A, et al. (2023) Experimental investigation of solar still productivity enhancement of distilled water by using natural fibers. Desalination 553: 116487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2023.116487 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2023.116487
|
| [58] |
Ahmed ME, Abdo S, Abdelrahman M, et al. (2023) Finned-encapsulated PCM pyramid solar still–Experimental study with economic analysis. J Energy Storage 73: 108908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.108908 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.108908
|
| [59] |
Sudhakar M, Sundar V, Farooq IU, et al. (2023) Experimental study on double slope (DSl) and triangular pyramid (TPy) solar stills under the influence of latent heat storage material (LHSM). Mater Today: Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.350 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.350
|
| [60] |
Bhoopathi R, Premnath A, Surendhar T, et al. (2023) Comparative study on pentagonal pyramid (PPy) and tubular (Tub) solar stills with thermal energy storage (TES). Mater Today: Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.336 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.336
|
| [61] |
Noman S, Manokar AM (2024) Experimental investigation of pistachio shell powder (bio-waste) to augment the performance of tubular solar still: Energy, exergy, and environmental analysis. Desalination 576: 117317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.117317 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2024.117317
|
| [62] |
Prasad AR, Harshith V, Harish R, et al. (2023) Investigating single sloped (SSl) and square pyramid (SPy) solar stills using phase changing material (PCM). Mate Today: Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.334 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.334
|
| [63] |
Dumka P, Mishra DR (2020) Performance evaluation of single slope solar still augmented with the ultrasonic fogger. Energy 190: 116398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116398 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116398
|
| [64] |
AbuShanab WS, Elsheikh AH, Ghandourah EI, et al. (2022) Performance improvement of solar distiller using hang wick, reflectors and phase change materials enriched with nano-additives. Case Stud Therm Eng 31: 101856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.101856 doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2022.101856
|
| [65] |
Kandeal AW, Xu Z, Peng G, et al. (2022) Thermo-economic performance enhancement of a solar desalination unit using external condenser, nanofluid, and ultrasonic foggers. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 52: 102348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102348 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102348
|
| [66] |
Sharshir SW, Kandeal A, Algazzar AM, et al. (2022) 4-E analysis of pyramid solar still augmented with external condenser, evacuated tubes, nanofluid and ultrasonic foggers: A comprehensive study. Process Saf Environ Prot 164: 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.06.026 doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.06.026
|
| [67] |
El-Gazar E, Zahra W, Hassan H, et al. (2021) Fractional modeling for enhancing the thermal performance of conventional solar still using hybrid nanofluid: Energy and exergy analysis. Desalination 503: 114847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114847 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114847
|
| [68] |
Fath HE, El-Samanoudy M, Fahmy K, et al. (2003) Thermal-economic analysis and comparison between pyramid-shaped and single-slope solar still configurations. Desalination 159: 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(03)90046-4 doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(03)90046-4
|
| [69] |
Kumar S, Tiwari G (2009) Life cycle cost analysis of single slope hybrid (PV/T) active solar still. Appl Energy 86: 1995–2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.005 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.005
|
Figures(5) / Tables(4)
Hind I. El-Refaey, Saleh. M. Shalaby, Swellam W. Sharshir, Hewida Omara, Tamer A. Gado. Experimental investigation of the effect of TDS on the thermal performance of the different types of solar stills[J]. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(2): 428-448. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025016
DownLoad: