Citation: A. Burhan, G. Rasul, T. Qadir, S. Hussain, M. Saqib, S.A.A. Bukhari. Environmental policies to protect pollinators: attributes and actions needed to avert climate borne crisis of oil seed agriculture in Pakistan[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2017, 2(3): 233-250. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2017.3.233
[1] | Ateeq Al-Zahrani, Natasha Cant, Vassilis Kargas, Tracy Rimington, Luba Aleksandrov, John R. Riordan, Robert C. Ford . Structure of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in the inward-facing conformation revealed by single particle electron microscopy. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(2): 131-152. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.2.131 |
[2] | Mostean Bahreinipour, Hajar Zarei, Fariba Dashtestani, Jamal Rashidiani, Khadijeh Eskandari, Seyed Ali Moussavi Zarandi, Susan Kabudanian Ardestani, Hiroshi Watabe . Radioprotective effect of nanoceria and magnetic flower-like iron oxide microparticles on gamma radiation-induced damage in BSA protein. AIMS Biophysics, 2021, 8(2): 124-142. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2021010 |
[3] | Alyssa D. Lokits, Julia Koehler Leman, Kristina E. Kitko, Nathan S. Alexander, Heidi E. Hamm, Jens Meiler . A survey of conformational and energetic changes in G protein signaling. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 630-648. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.630 |
[4] | Ta-Chou Huang, Wolfgang B. Fischer . Sequence–function correlation of the transmembrane domains in NS4B of HCV using a computational approach. AIMS Biophysics, 2021, 8(2): 165-181. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2021013 |
[5] | Timothy Jan Bergmann, Giorgia Brambilla Pisoni, Maurizio Molinari . Quality control mechanisms of protein biogenesis: proteostasis dies hard. AIMS Biophysics, 2016, 3(4): 456-478. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2016.4.456 |
[6] | Mathieu F. M. Cellier . Evolutionary analysis of Slc11 mechanism of proton-coupled metal-ion transmembrane import. AIMS Biophysics, 2016, 3(2): 286-318. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2016.2.286 |
[7] | Angel Rivera-Calzada, Andrés López-Perrote, Roberto Melero, Jasminka Boskovic, Hugo Muñoz-Hernández, Fabrizio Martino, Oscar Llorca . Structure and Assembly of the PI3K-like Protein Kinases (PIKKs) Revealed by Electron Microscopy. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(2): 36-57. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.2.36 |
[8] | Adam Redzej, Gabriel Waksman, Elena V Orlova . Structural studies of T4S systems by electron microscopy. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(2): 184-199. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.2.184 |
[9] | Lars H. Wegner . Cotransport of water and solutes in plant membranes: The molecular basis, and physiological functions. AIMS Biophysics, 2017, 4(2): 192-209. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2017.2.192 |
[10] | Silvard Tadevosyan, Naira Sahakyan . Influence of menthol on membrane-associated properties of tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli. AIMS Biophysics, 2024, 11(3): 329-339. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2024018 |
With up to 90% of the cellular volume the plant vacuolar system represents the largest compartment group within plant cells and serves as storage compartment, disposal for waste and toxins, lytic compartment, Ca2+-store, and represents an important factor for plant growth and apoptosis [1,2]. These multiple functions require a versatile transport system at the tonoplast. In particular, ion influx and efflux have to be coordinated to ensure proper functionality of the cell. For instance, the cytosolic concentration of calcium ions requires a tight regulation to allow for signal-induced calcium ion release and to maintain a low level of calcium ions in resting non-stimulated cells [3]. Primary active and outward directed Ca2+-pumps are crucial for the resting state, secondary active transporter for the termination of Ca2+-signaling [4]. Another example is the transient nitrate storage to prevent excessive production of cytotoxic nitrite as a result of the nitrate assimilation. Due to the nitrate accumulation in the vacuole, the transport is directed against the concentration gradient so that active transport is required to enable the nitrate deposition in the vacuole [5]. Secondary active transporters such as the calcium ion/proton exchanger CAX1 and anion/proton exchangers of the CLC-family mediate calcium and nitrate transport out of the cytosol into the vacuole [4,6]. Therefore, the formation of a proton motif force (pmf) is essential to energize the secondary active transporters. This pmf is created by the vacuolar-type proton translocating ATPase (V-ATPase) and the vacuolar proton-translocating pyrophospatase (V-PPase) [7]. While the dimeric V-PPase uses a byproduct of the cellular metabolism as energy source, the multimeric enzyme complex V-ATPase consumes comparatively valuable ATP [8]. As a consequence, the V-ATPase activity is linked to ATP-and glucose availability [9]. Besides the co-existence of V-PPase and V-ATPase in mature vacuoles, it is widely accepted that their relationship is altered during plant development. The V-PPase pumps protons into vacuoles during embryo and seedling development, the V-ATPase takes over with increasing age of the plant cell and becomes the dominant proton pump for vegetative growth [10,11]. This arrangement pays attention to the availability of ATP and PPi during development and might be also a consequence of the complex structure of the V-ATPase: The V-ATPase is a multimeric complex of more than 800 kDa, which can be divided into a membrane integral sector VO (subunits VHA-a, VHA-c, VHA-c”, VHA-d, VHA-e) and a membrane associated sector V1 (subunits VHA-A-VHA-H) [2]. The VO-sector is dominated by a rotating ring of approximately six copies of the proteolipids VHA-c/VHA-c”. The C-terminal half of VHA-a resides next to the proteolipid ring and provides half channels so that cytosolic protons have access to their binding sites at VHA-c and can be released into the vacuolar lumen [12]. The rotation of the proteolipids is driven by sequential ATP-hydrolysis within the three copies of VHA-A, which form the hexameric head together with three copies of VHA-B. VHA-D and VHA-F form the central stalk and transduce the sequential conformational alterations of VHA-A into rotation [12]. The peripheral subunits VHA-C, VHA-E, VHA-G and VHA-H form a complex stator structure which prevents co-rotation of the head and anchors the V1-sector to the membrane via the N-terminal domain of VHA-a [2]. Recent work revealed a growing number of additional proteins interacting with the V-ATPase and likely regulating its activity. For instance, a glycolytic aldolase interacts with the V-ATPase in a gibberellin-dependent manner in rice [13,14], following blue light perception a regulatory 14-3-3 protein binds to the phosphorylated VHA-A subunits and activates the V-ATPase, and thus, links the V-ATPase activity to day light [15]. Kinases such as the WNK8 in Arabidopsis thaliana and CDPK1 in barley phosphorylate individual VHA-subunits such as VHA-a, VHA-C, and VHA-A [15,16,17,18]. Additional evidence for an extensive V-ATPase protein interaction network derives from yeast, where the V-ATPase interacts with the cytoskeleton, the RAVE-complex, proteins of the VTC-family, and shows cooperated activity with the cation transporter Vnx1p and Ca2+-releasing channels [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Functional coupling of the secondary active transporter CAX1, NHX1 and the V-ATPase has been observed in plants, too, but a physical interaction was only proven for the canonical vacuolar proton pumps V-PPase and V-ATPase in Kalanchoë blossfeldiana [7].
The V-ATPase subunits VHA-c”1 (23), VHA-d1 (2), VHA-d2 (1), VHA-e1 (54), VHA-B3 (1), VHA-C (7), VHA-E1 (3), VHA-G2 (1), VHA-G3 (3), VHA-H (1) were further included in a large scale screening for interaction partners and regulators of membrane integral proteins using the mating-based split-Ubiquitin system (mbSUS), a yeast-2-hybrid system that has been optimized for the analysis of membrane proteins. The numbers in brackets provide the number of identified interaction partners [26]. A previous attempt by the Arabidopsis Interactome Mapping Consortium applied the conventional yeast-2-hybrid system and included the V-ATPase subunits VHA-A (3), VHA-B1 (4), VHA-B2 (1), VHA-B3 (1), VHA-C (5), VHA-D (2), VHA-E1 (1), and VHA-G1 (1), the obtained data on membrane integral proteins of the VO-sector is omitted here due to the nature of the yeast-2-hybrid system [27]: The common yeast-2-hybrid system relies on the nuclear import of the interaction partners to initiate the expression of reporter genes. The published data suggests that the identity of many proteins involved in the active state of the V-ATPase and its regulation is still elusive. However, the large-scale analyses were performed in yeast and obtained interactions might not be valid in plants, either due to a differential expression or due to the distinct cellular environment in yeast. Therefore, we aimed at the investigation of functional and physical interactions in this work and focused mainly on data obtained in plants.
A. thaliana(Columbia) was grown on soil in a growth chamber with 12 h light (240 µmol quanta m-2 s-1, 19 °C) and 12 h dark (18 °C) with 60% relative humidity. The hypocotyl-derived cell suspension culture At7 [28] was applied for localization studies and physiological analysis. The cells were cultivated at 26 °C upon shaking in the dark. 3 g of cells were transferred weekly to 45 ml MS-media: 0.43% (w/v) Murashige and Skoog basal salt mixture (Sigma-Aldrich M5524), 0.1% Gamborg B5 Vitamin stock (Sigma-Aldrich), 3% sucrose, 0.1 ‰ 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetatic acid, adjusted to pH 5.7. The MS-media contained 18.8 mM KNO3 and 20.61 mM under control conditions. For nitrate-dependent experiments the media was prepared with the indicated concentrations of KNO3 and without NH4NO3 as nitrogen source.
The transgenic insertion lines SALK_105121C (NHX1), SALK_120707C (KUP5), SALK_115644C (CLC-c), SALK_106153C (AVP1) SALK_021486C (Cax1) were generated by the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, department of plant biology, [29] and obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Center (NASC).
Formaldehyde-crosslinking was performed in At7 protoplasts. Cells were incubated for 20 min in 1% formaldehyde with repeated inverting at room temperature in the dark. Approximately 300 µl of cell suspension were mixed with 300 µl of 2% formaldehyde in PBS. Next, the cells were centrifuged for 10 min at 4 °C and 10, 000 × g. The Pierce® co-immunoprecipitation kit (Thermo Scientific, Kit-No. 26149) was applied for co-immunoprecipitation according to the manufacturer’s protocol: Briefly, an antibody directed against VHA-A and VHA-E was immobilized by a 2.5 h incubation with the resin to ensure proper coupling. The pelleted cells were washed in PBS, resuspended in lyse/wash-buffer and incubated for 5 min under mixing at RT. The sample was centrifuged again, the supernatant transferred to a column with the immobilized antibody/resin mix and incubated overnight while mixing at 4 °C. The proteins were finally eluted and subjected to SDS-PAGE in preparation for mass spectroscopy.
Protein bands were excised from SDS-gels and transferred to emollient-free reaction tubes and were washed twice with 200 μl 30% acetonitrile in 0.1 M ammonium hydrogen carbonate for 10 min. The gel-slices were dried in a vacuum-concentrator for 30 min. The tryptic digestion was done with 0.1 µg/µl trypsin in 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate for 30 to 45 min at RT. 20 µl 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate were added to each gel slice to prevent drying and the samples were incubated overnight at 37 °C. After complete evaporation, the samples were rehydrated in 15 µl 50% acetonitrile, 0.1% TFA. 1 µl of the peptide sample was finally plotted on the MTP Anchorchip™ 384 TF (Bruker). Briefly, before the peptide sample was dried, 1 µl of the HCCA matrix was added (0.2 mg・ml-1 α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 90% acetonitrile, 0.1% TFA and 0.1 M NH4H2PO4). After complete evaporation the mass spectra of the peptide samples were obtained with a MALDI-TOF MS/MS (Ultraflextreme, Bruker) in MS-mode and analysed by the Mascot software (Matrix science, UK). The settings were trypsin as the enzyme, no more than one missed cleavage and a peptide tolerance of 100 ppm. The Mascot-score is defined as -10×Log(P) with P as probability of a false positive match to a database. The threshold further depends on the background noise. For the settings used in this analysis, the probability of a false positive match is smaller than 0.05 for proteins showing a Mascot-score of more than 58.
Tonoplasts were isolated as described before [30]. The tonoplast suspension was supplemented with Brij58 (50 mM Tricine, pH 8.0, 20% (v/v) Glycerol, 2% (w/v) Brij58) resulting in a V-ATPase/detergent ratio of 1:10 and incubated for 30 min at 4 °C. The samples were centrifuged at 98, 000 × g and 4 °C. The supernatant contained the solubilised V-ATPase. The activity was measured by recording the released phosphate according to Bencini with modifications as described by Dietz et al. (1998) [30,31]. Bafilomycin-sensitive ATP hydrolysis corresponds to V-ATPase activity, to this end 2.8 µM Bafilomycin was added to the reaction and related to a parallel reaction without Bafilomycin.
For genotyping, one leaf was ground with a micro-pistil in a 1.5 ml reaction tube for 10 s, 500 µl Edwards-buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 25 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS) was given to the samples and grinding was continued. Subsequent vortexing, the samples were centrifuged for 2 min at 10, 000 × g and 300 µl of the supernatant were given to 310 µl isopropanol to precipitate the DNA. Precipitation was performed by incubation at RT for 10 minutes and centrifugation at 10, 000 × g for 7 min. The pellets were resuspended in 100 µl sterile water. The actual genotyping was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the DNA-polymerase from Thermus aquaticus (Taq-Polymerase). A set of three oligo nucleotides was applied for each reaction. The oligo “LBb1” binds to the DNA-insertion, the “LP”-and “RP”-oligo bind the genomic DNA flanking the insertion (for oligo-information see table 1). Homozygous insertion lines are characterized by a PCR-product of either LBb1 and LP or LBb1 and RP, depending on the orientation of the insertion. The wildtype shows a PCR-product of LP and RP, heterozygous lines show both types of PCR-products. Oligo sequences were obtained with the primer design tool from the Salk Institute Genomic Analysis Laboratory (SIGnAL) which suggests sequences for genotyping of SALK-lines (signal.salk.edu/tdnaprimers.2.html).
Oligo | Sequence (5’–3’) | Insertion line | Transporter |
LBb1 | GCGTGGACCGCTTGCTGCAACT | n.a. | n.a. |
NHX1_LP | TTGAGGTAACAACGCTTGGTC | SALK_105121C | NHX1 |
NHX1_RP | GGTGGATCTGATCTGAATTGC | SALK_105121C | NHX1 |
Hak5_LP | TCCCAAATCAACTTCCATCAG | SALK_120707C | KUP5 |
Hak5_RP | CAGCAAGAGGCAAGGTAACAC | SALK_120707C | KUP5 |
CAX1_LP | CTAGTTGCCTGCACGAGAATC | SALK_021486C | Cax1 |
CAX1_RP | AACCGCTCACAACATGTCTTC | SALK_021486C | Cax1 |
AVP1_LP | CATCATCAAACAACCACCAATC | SALK_106153C | AVP1 |
AVP1_RP | TGGCCTGTTTTAATTAAAGGG | SALK_106153C | AVP1 |
CLCc_LP | AAGTTGCCGGAAAAGAATAGC | SALK_115644C | CLC-c |
CLCc_RP | ACCTTGTGGACAAAGTCCTCC | SALK_115644C | CLC-c |
The plasmids 35S-EYFP-C and 35S-ECFP-C [32] were applied for localization studies and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-analyses [32,33,34]. Briefly, FRET describes a dipole-dipole coupling which results in radiation-less energy transfer between the so-called donor molecule and the acceptor molecule. Prerequisites are a proper orientation of the dipoles, a distance of typically less than 10 nm as well as a high spectral overlap of the donor’s emission spectrum and the acceptor’s absorption spectrum. A donor-acceptor pair is called a “FRET-pair” and is characterized by its Förster radius R0. R0 is the distance of half maximal energy transfer between both molecules [34]. Here, cyan fluorescent proteins served as donor and yellow fluorescent proteins as acceptors. The coding sequences (cds) of the analyzed proteins were obtained from The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR, https://arabidopsis.org) using the Arabidopsis locus identifiers according to the Arabidopsis genome initiative (AGI): AT2G38170 (Cation Exchanger 1, CAX1), AT1G15690 (Arabidopsis Vacuolar Pyrophosphatase 1, AVP1), AT5G49890 (Chloride Channel C, CLC-c), AT4G33530 (K+ Uptake Permease 5, KUP5), AT5G27150 (Na+/H+ Exchanger 1, NHX1) and AT1G37130 (Nitrate Reductase 2, NR2). The coding sequences were amplified by PCR using oligo nucleotides with flanking NotI/EcoRI (CAX1, AVP1, NR2) or NotI/StuI (CLC-c, KUP5, NHX1) restriction sites (for oligo-information see table 2). Subsequent a reaction with restriction enzymes, the fragments were used for ligation with the plasmid 35S-EYFP-C. Within 35S-VHA-c3-EYFP [31], the EYFP has been replaced by mTurquoise2 for FRET-analyses of the protein pairs CAX1/VHA-c3 and VHA-c3/VHA-c3.
Oligo | Sequence (5’ – 3’) | AGI (name) direction, enzyme |
CAX1_NotF | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG GCG GGA ATC GTG ACA | At2g38170 (Cax1) forward, NotI |
CAX1-Eco_r | TTTTT GAATTC TTA ACC CGT TTT AAC TTT | At2g38170 (Cax1) reverse, EcoRI |
PM-ATPase_NotF | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG TCA GGT CTC GAA GAT | At2g18960 (AHA1) forward, NotI |
PM-ATPase_EcoR | TTTTT GAATTC TAC ACA GTG TAG TGA TG | At2g18960 (AHA1) reverse, EcoRI |
Ppase_NotF | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG GTG GCG CCT GCT TTG | At1g15690 (AVP1) forward, NotI |
Ppase_EcoR | TTTTT GAATTC TAG AAG TAC TTG AAA AG | At1g15690 (AVP1) reverse, EcoRI |
CLC_c_F-Not1 | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG GAT GAT CGG CAC GAA GGA G | AT5G49890 (CLC-c) forward, NotI |
CLC_c_rev-Stu1 | TTTTT AGGCCT TCA CTT GAG GGG ATC AAT GTG AGG G | AT5G49890 (CLC-c) reverse, StuI |
Hak5-for-Not1 | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG TTT CAC GTG GAA GAA GAA AGC | AT4G33530 (HAK5 / KUP5) forward, NotI |
Hak5-rev-Stu1 | TTTT AGGCCT TCA TAC CAT ATA AGT CAT TCC | AT4G33530 (HAK5 / KUP5) reverse, StuI |
NHX1-for-Not1 | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG TTG GAT TCT CTA GTG TCG | AT5G27150 (NHX1) forward, NotI |
NHX1-rev-Stu1 | TTTT AGGCCT TCA AGC CTT ACT AAG ATC AGG AGG G | AT5G27150 (NHX1) reverse, StuI |
A-Yeast-for | GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATG CCGGCGTTTTACGGAGG | At1g78900 (VHA-A) |
A-Yeast-rev | GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG TTC CCGAGTTTCATCTTC | At1g78900 (VHA-A) |
E1-Yeast-for | GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATG AACGACG GAGATGT | At4g11150 (VHA-E1) |
E1-Yeast-rev | GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG TCC GGCAGTAACTTGGC | At4g11150 (VHA-E1) |
NR-Yeast-for | GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATG GCGGCCTCTGTAGAT | AT1G37130 (NR2) |
NR-Yeast-rev | GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG CTC GAATATCAAGAAATCC | AT1G37130 (NR2) |
CLC-Yeast-for | GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATG GATGATCGGCACGAAG | AT5G49890 (CLC-c) |
CLC-Yeast-rev | GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG TCC CTTGAGGGGATCAATG | AT5G49890 (CLC-c) |
For mbSUS analysis, the cloning was started with Gateway® entry clones made from attB-flanked PCR-products without stop codon (for oligo-information see table 2) and the plasmid pDONR221 following the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). The LR clonase (Invitrogen) was employed to transfer the VHA-A and VHA-E coding sequences to the pX-NubWTgate-vector and the coding sequences of CLC-c and NR2 to the pMetYCgate-vector.
The yeast strains THY.AP4 (MATa ura3, leu2, lexA::LacZ::trp1 lexA::HIS3 lexA::ADE2) and THY.AP5 (MATα URA3, leu2, trp1, his3 loxP::ade2) were transformed with the pX-NubWTgate and pMetYCgate vectors [35], respectively, using the LiAc-protocol (modified of Gietz et al., 1995 [36]). THY.AP4 and THY.AP5 were incubated on -Trp-plates and -Leu-plates, respectively. For mating, one colony of the Nub-construct and one of the Cub-construct were combined and grown overnight in 5 ml YPD. 15 µl of these cultures were selected for diploid cells on diploid media and then screened for robust interactions on interaction media. In both cases the plates were incubated for two days at 30 °C. Finally, overlay assays were performed with X-gal to confirm the interactions [35]. The composition of the yeast media was described by Obrdlik et al. (2004) and Ludewig et al., (2003) [35,37].
Leaves were harvested from soil grown Arabidopsis thaliana plants at the age of about four weeks. Protoplasts were isolated as described before [38]. Protoplast isolation of At7-cells was performed according to Appelhagen et al. (2010) [39]. Transfections were performed in uncoated hydrophobic 8-well slides (Ibidi, Martinsried Germany): 20 µl of protoplast suspension were mixed with 5 µl of plasmid DNA and 25 µl of PEG-solution (40% PEG4000, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 0.2 M mannitol) and incubated for 10 min in the dark. The assay was diluted stepwise with 50 µl, 100 µl and two times 200 µl of W5-solution (154 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 5 mM glucose, 5 mM MES pH 5.7). In between, the cells were incubated for 10 min. The transfected cells were kept in the dark at 25 °C prior to microscopic analysis.
The vacuolar pH was measured with a Leica SP2 confocal laser scanning microscope. Cells were loaded with 5 µM 6-carboxy fluorescein diacetate and the fluorescence was detected with photomultiplier 2 in the range of 500 to 530 nm. The dichroic mirror RSP500 and a water-dipping objective with 40-fold magnification were used. The probe was excited sequentially with the 458 nm and 488 nm line of an argon ion laser, the laser power was adjusted to equal emission intensity at pH 7. Calibration and data evaluation were performed as described before [9,33].
Confocal localization analyses were performed using a Leica SP2 or Zeiss LSM780 microscope as described before [32,34]. ECFP (mTurquoise2), EYFP and the chlorophyll autofluorescence were detected in the range of 470-510 nm, 530-600nm, 650-700 nm, respectively. Cyan fluorescent proteins (ECFP, mTurquoise2) and EYFP were excited using the 458 nm laser line and the 514 nm lines of an argon ion laser, respectively. Chlorophyll was excited with the 458 nm line, too, and transmitted light images were obtained with the 458 nm line. Main beam splitters were applied that allow for sequential excitation with the 458 nm and 514 nm laser line so that tracks were alternating line by line. Images were recorded with one-to four-fold line-averaging and the intensity resolution was 12 bits / pixel. The settings were identical for FRET-measurements, but the signal amplification was strictly defined and kept constant.
Arithmetic mean and standard deviation were calculated for all datasets. For some datasets the standard error was calculated, too, and given in the figures (see legends). Variances of the data were compared by F-test. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney-U-test was applied for the data on vacuolar pH and the effects of KNO3 and bafilomycin on plant cell suspension culture. The student’s t-test was applied for the statistical analysis of the V-ATPase activity. A significant difference was accepted for p ≤ 0.05.
Predictions of transmembrane domains were obtained from Aramemnon [40]. Co-Expression data were collected from the ATTED II-database (http://atted.jp). The ATTED II-database comprises data from Affymetrix microarray-analysis and thus, contains information on transcript abundance [41]. To quantify the degree of co-expression for genes that are co-expressed with the query gene, the correlation coefficients R are calculated and the genes are listed with decreasing R so that the co-expressed genes get rank numbers. The same procedure was performed with the thereby identified co-expressed genes as query to obtain the rank number of the initial query gene. The MR-value of a gene pair is given as the square root of the product of both rank numbers. Data on subcellular localization and organ specificity was obtained from MASCP Gator (http://gator.masc-proteomics.org/). This database contains data from GFP-localization experiments and mass spectroscopy of samples from A. thaliana. These samples were either tissue-or organelle-specific. [42]. Predictions of subcellular localization were collected from the BAR Arabidopsis eFP-browser [43].
The secondary active transporters CAX1 (AT2G38170) and NHX1 (AT5G27150) as well as the proton pump AVP1 (AT1G15690) were reported to interfere with the V-ATPase activity and therefore suggested to interact with the V-ATPase [6,44,45,46]. An ATTED II co-expression analysis [41] for the vacuolar V-ATPase subunit VHA-a3 identified the secondary active transporters KUP5 (AT4G33530), a potassium transporter, and CLC-c (AT5G49890), an anion/proton antiporter (Figure 1). These transporters showed low MR-values for a high number of V-ATPase subunits. MR-values were classified based on the MR-values between the genes encoding for V-ATPase subunits. Finally, the available published data on CAX1, NHX1, AVP1 and the co-expression analysis resulted in the selection of the transporters CAX1, NHX1, AVP1, KUP5 and CLC-c. Crosslinking followed by immunoprecipitation with an antibody directed against VHA-A was performed to identify transporters that are in a proximity close enough for the formaldehyde linkage. The antibody directed against VHA-A was chosen, because VHA-A is part of the catalytic core complex and was successfully used before by the Lüttge group [7]. However, transporters were not identified, but nitrate reductase 2 (AT1G37130) was found with a Mascot-score of 59 that is higher than the background signal. The crosslinking product had an apparent molecular weight (mw) of approximately 170-180 kDa. Subtracting the molecular weight of NR2 (102.8 kDa) leaves 67.2-77.2 kDa what matches the mw of VHA-A which served as bait. Next, in silico analyses were performed to estimate the possibility of a physical interaction between nitrate reductase 2 and the V-ATPase. Aramemnon predicted a weak probability (0.12) for two transmembrane domains within NR2. Proteomic data obtained from the MASCP gator-database revealed localizations in cytosolic, vacuolar and plasma membrane fractions and revealed its presence in all tissues, so that an interaction between V-ATPase and NR2 is possible based on this data.
Before testing the possibility of a direct interaction between V-ATPase and other transporters the proteins were analyzed pairwise for co-localization in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts. This analysis was performed to check if the analyzed proteins show an overlapping subcellular localization which allows for a physical interactions. Since the FRET-analysis was performed to investigate physical interactions between V-ATPase and other membrane-integral proteins, the co-localization and FRET-studies were performed with the membrane integral VO-subunits VHA-a3 and VHA-c3. The V-ATPase subunit VHA-c3 co-localized with CAX1, NHX1, KUP5 while VHA-a3 co-localized with AVP1 and CLC-c (Figure 2). This data indicates the possibility of an interaction. To test the predicted interaction between the V-ATPase and the selected transporters, FRET-measurements were performed in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts. FRET offers a higher distance range than formaldehyde-crosslinking or bimolecular fluorescence complementation and thereby allows monitoring close proximity of proteins and thus, proof of protein interaction without direct physical contact of the labeled termini.
The FRET-pairs ECFP/EYFP and mTurquoise2/EYFP were applied for the analysis. The pairs differ in their Förster-radii so that the distances were calculated to allow for the comparison of the data sets. It should be mentioned that these distances do not correspond to real distances since the fluorophores’ orientation κ2 is unknown. However, under the assumption that κ2 is 0.66 on average, distances of less than 1.5-times R0 were considered as proof of interaction according to Gadella and co-authors (1999) [47]. CAX1/VHA-c3 (5.64 ± 0.36), AVP1/VHA-a3 (6.78 ± 0.51), CLC-c/VHA-a3 (7.31 ± 0.495) showed distances below 1.5-times R0 while KUP5/VHA-c3 (8.05 ± 1.97) and NHX1/VHA-c3 (7.90 ± 1.37) did not meet that criteria (Figure 3A). The combination VHA-c3/VHA-c3 and the direct fusion of ECFP-EYFP served as positive controls showing average distances of 6.06 ± 0.06 and 4.99 ± 0.35 nm, respectively (Figure 3A).
In addition, the mating-based split-Ubiquitin system (mbSUS) was applied to investigate the interaction between the nitrate transporter CLC-c and the V-ATPase subunits VHA-A and VHA-E1 as well as the interaction between the nitrate reductase 2 and VHA-A/VHA-E1. The mbSUS depends on the bimolecular complementation of Ubiquitin in the cytosol. Once Ubiquitin is folded, Ubiquitin-dependent proteases cleave off a transcription factor which activates reporter genes [35]. The C-termini of VHA-a and VHA-c are exposed to the vacuolar lumen, VHA-c” and VHA-e do not reside at the tonoplast, and the role of VHA-d is still elusive, so that VO-subunits did not qualify for mbSUS. Therefore, VHA-A and VHA-E1 were chosen as representatives of the hexameric head and the peripheral stalk, respectively. This approach was selected for the genes related to nitrate metabolism due to an undetectable expression of fluorescent protein-tagged nitrate reductase 2.
For mbSUS-analysis, the V-ATPase subunits VHA-A and VHA-E1 were fused to the N-terminal fragment of Ubiquitin (Nub), CLC-c and NR2 were fused to the C-terminal half of Ubiquitin (Cub). The yeast was selected for diploid cells carrying both Nub-and Cub-constructs. The selection relied on auxotrophy of the yeast strains. Finally, an x-gal assay of the yeast cells proved protein-protein interactions using the β-galactosidase as reporter gene. To this end, cells were lysed, the substrate X-gal was added and the turnover of X-gal by the β-galactosidase resulted in a blue staining. The assay revealed protein-protein interactions between VHA-E1/CLC-c and VHA-A/NR2, whereas it resulted in a lack of blue staining for VHA-A/CLC-c and VHA-E1/NR2 (Figure 3B).
The analysis of the insertion lines confirmed that the lines SALK_105121C (nhx1), SALK_120707C (kup5), SALK_115644C (clc-c), and SALK_106153C (avp1) were homozygous while the transgenic line SALK_021486C (cax1) was heterozygous. Unfortunately, the primer combination for genotyping the insertion line clc-c resulted in two products, but both PCR-products obtained with the insertion line clc-c were distinct from the product obtained with the wildtype so that this transgenic line is homozygous. avp1 and cax1 showed a delayed germination in comparison to the wildtype Col-0: After 5 days 86.6% of the wildtype plants germinated, but only 76.1% of the cax1-line and 52.9% of the avp1-line germinated within five days. However, four weeks old plants of nhx1, kup5, clc-c and avp1 did not show a significant difference to the wildtype, but the growth of cax1, though heterozygous, was significantly reduced (Figure 4). Next, the proton pumping activity was obtained by measuring the vacuolar pH in the plants. Vacuoles were loaded with 6-carboxyfluorescein, ratiometric images were taken with the two excitation wavelengths 458 nm and 488 nm using a confocal laser scanning microscope. The vacuolar pH was determined based on the obtained images. Significant effects of the t-DNA insertion were observed fo r nhx1, which showed an increase of pH by 1.38 units, and for cax1, which showed a decrease of vacuolar pH by 0.52 units (Figure 5). Since at least two proton pumps are active at the tonoplast, the V-ATPase activity was measured by the Bafilomycin-sensitive release of phosphate. The phosphate release was normalized to the protein content of the tonoplast samples. All three antiporter-lines showed a reduced V-ATPase activity, the symporter KUP5 did not affect the activity and lack of the primary active proton pump AVP1 was compensated by an increase of V-ATPase activity (Figure 5).
For simplicity, the heterotrophic Arabidopsis cell culture AT7 was applied to investigate the impact of nitrate on the vacuolar pH and the biomass yield. The strategy had been to analyze combinatory effects of nitrate as nitrogen source and inhibition of V-ATPase by bafilomycin to gain new insights into the interplay of nitrate assimilation and V-ATPase regulation. To this end increasing concentrations of either potassium nitrate as solely nitrogen source or bafilomycin as V-ATPase inhibitor were tested to identify concentrations that resulted in a minor but significant effect on biomass production. Such slight responses were seen for 60 mM potassium nitrate and 10 nM bafilomycin, respectively (table 3): five days after inoculation with 3 g of cell culture, the biomass was 12.3 ± 0.6 g for the control grown in MS-media, 10.2 ± 0.5 g for the supply of 60 mM KNO3 and 11.1 ± 0.1 g for 10 nM bafilomycin. 40 mM KNO3 resulted in an insignificant reduction of biomass (11.7 ± 0.3 g), 100 mM KNO3 resulted in a strong reduction of biomass production (4.3 ± 0.1 g), 200 mM KNO3 in cell death (1.8 ± 0.3 g). Addition of 5 nM bafilomycin gave 11.8 ± 0.5 g which was not significantly different from the control. Concentrations of 20 to 80 nM bafilomycin showed a significant reduction of biomass production to 8.5-3.4 g.
Effector | Biomass | Effector | vacuolar pH | |
MS-media | 12.3 ± 0.6 g | MS-media | 6,73 ± 0.16 | |
40 mM KNO3 | 11.7 ± 0.3 g | 60 mM KNO3 | 7.17 ± 0.17 | |
60 mM KNO3 | 10.2 ± 0.5 g | 10 nM bafilomycin | 6.42 ± 0.03 | |
100 mM KNO3 | 4.3 ± 0.1 g | 60 mM KNO3 & 10 nM bafilomycin | 6.96 ± 0.21 | |
200 mM KNO3 | 1.8 ± 0.3 g | Σ 10 nM bafilomycin, 60 mM KNO3 | 6.86 ± 0.2 | |
5 nM bafilomycin | 11.8 ± 0.5 g | |||
10 nM bafilomycin | 11.1 ± 0.1 g | |||
20 nM bafilomycin | 8.5 ± 0.7 g | |||
40 nM bafilomycin | 5.6 ± 0.5 g | |||
80 nM bafilomycin | 3.4 ± 0.4 g |
Next, the vacuolar pH was measured in response to these conditions as indicator of V-ATPase activity. The vacuolar pH was 6.73 ± 0.16 under control conditions (18.8 mM KNO3 and 20.6 mM NH4NO3), 7.17 ± 0.17 in presence of 60 mM KNO3 and 6.42 ± 0.03 with 10 nM bafilomycin. The response to 10 nM bafilomycin indicates rather a disturbance of pH-homeostasis than an inhibition of proton pumping at the tonoplast. The combination of 60 mM KNO3 and 10 nM bafilomycin gave a vacuolar pH of 6.96 ± 0.21. To determine if this response to both 60 mM KNO3 and 10 nM bafilomycin is an additive effect, the sum of the DpH-values of solely 60 mM KNO3 and solely 10 nM bafilomycin was calculated in relation to the control and finally offset against the vacuolar pH at control conditions. This gave a vacuolar pH of 6.86 ± 0.2 what is close to the response obtained by
the experimental combination of 60 mM KNO3 and 10 mM bafilomycin and indicates a simple additive effect of KNO3 and bafilomycin. However, the data points to a slight overcompensation of the bafilomycin-induced V-ATPase inhibition, probably by the V-PPase, and an effective inhibition of vacuolar acidification by 60 mM nitrate, since the vacuolar pH is close to the cytosolic pH under these conditions. It should be noticed that in this cell type the pH-gradient between cytosol and vacuolar lumen was generally low.
The secondary active transporters NHX1, KUP5, CLC-c and CAX1 and the proton pump AVP1 were tested for their interaction with the V-ATPase. The data demonstrated a physical interaction of CAX1, CLC-c and AVP1 with the V-ATPase, while proof of interaction failed for NHX1 and KUP5. The insertion line affecting AVP1 showed no effect on the vacuolar pH, but an increase of V-ATPase activity. It is concluded, that the V-ATPase compensates successfully for the lack of AVP1. While AVP1 is the dominant pump in younger cells and developing tissues, the V-ATPase is dominant in older tissues [8,10]. This distinct activity during plant development might explain that Li and coworkers (2005) [48] observed an increase of vacuolar pH in AVP1 knockout lines. The observed interaction of V-ATPase and AVP supports the idea of a functional interplay of V-ATPase and AVP1 that might be established at the stage of prevacuolar compartments [49] and which is mediated by a direct protein-protein interaction.
In general, NHX-activity reduces the vacuolar pH by exporting protons from the vacuole [50]. Interestingly, the knockout of NHX in yeast reduced the vacuolar pH, too [51], pointing to a more complex situation. Indeed, it has been reported before, that NHX1 is involved in the regulation of vacuolar pH and even a direct functional interaction of V-ATPase and NHX1 was described [52,53,54]. As FRET depends strongly on dipole-orientation of donor and acceptor, the low FRET-efficiencies measured here do not rule out a physical interaction between V-ATPase and NHX1. The same is valid for the vacuolar potassium ion/proton-symporter KUP5. However, an insertion in the gene encoding KUP5 had no effect on either the vacuolar pH or the V-ATPase activity, so that the coupling of primary and secondary active transport is evident for NHX1 but not for KUP5. It has to be considered that the tonoplast comprises a multitude of transport proteins, which modulate the membrane potential and pH-gradient, and thus, consume or contribute to the energy stored in the pmf. This complexity might have caused the apparent uncoupling of V-ATPase activity and vacuolar acidification in transgenic lines.
The interplay of V-ATPase and CAX1 has been intensively investigated since the nineties. The proton motif force generated by vacuolar proton pumps drives the calcium transport by CAX1 [55,56]. The relationship between both transporters appears mutual: While the calcium-transport depends on the pmf, the knockout of CAX1 resulted in reduced V-ATPase activity but increased AVP1-activity and overexpression of CAX1 led to a higher activity of the V-ATPase [57,58]. In Catharanthus roseus, the vacuolar pH was 5.6, if CAX-proteins were inactivated, and 6.2, if the transporters were active [59]. Based on this data a direct coupling of proton pumps and CAX1 was concluded but a physical interaction was not proven [60]. Due to the role of Ca2+ as important signaling molecule, the double-knockout of CAX1/CAX3 had an impact on plant growth, cell expansion, stomata opening and transpiration [45,61]. Within the present work, heterozygous lines showed a reduced V-ATPase activity and a reduced vacuolar pH, so that the reduced V-ATPase-activity does not simply result in an increase of AVP1-activity, it appears to be overcompensated by AVP1. The FRET-data indicates that the mode of bidirectional regulation is a physical interaction between the V0-sector and CAX1. The FRET-efficiency, the strong impact of CAX1’s knockdown on vacuolar acidification and the negligible degree of transcript correlation might further indicate that the interaction is not established during biosynthesis at the ER, at least not in a stable ratio or constitutive manner.
The connection between nitrate and V-ATPase appears contradictory: on the one hand, nitrate accumulation is a physiological consequence of higher nitrate levels [62]. On the other hand, nitrate is known to function as ATP-competitor and thus, inhibits V-ATPases [63] and the vacuolar nitrate accumulation by secondary active anion/proton exchangers depends on the activity of the V-ATPase. This contradiction of nitrate inhibition and required maintenance/stimulation of V-ATPase activity points to a nitrate concentration-dependent regulation of the V-ATPase, turning the V-ATPase on in response to a moderate increase of cellular nitrate concentration, while high nitrate concentrations inhibit the V-ATPase by blocking the ATP-binding sites. Nitrate and chloride are transported by members of the CLC-family, of which CLC-a, CLC-b and CLC-c are located at the tonoplast [6,64,65]. All three are known to function as antiporters [6,66]. The role of CLC-c is under discussion, initially identified as nitrate transporter, a more recent work stated that CLC-c functions as chloride transporter [6,67,68,69]. Within the present work, it could be shown that CLC-c interacts with the V-ATPase and an insertion within the gene encoding CLC-c resulted in a reduced V-ATPase activity, but only insignificantly increased vacuolar pH. This clearly demonstrates the tight relationship between both transporters, regardless of the substrate of CLC-c. The fact that endosomal V-ATPases co-localize with CLC-d [70] point to a general co-occurence of CLC-proteins and V-ATPases. The coupling of nitrate transport and V-ATPase becomes more evident by the observed interaction of V-ATPase and nitrate reductase 2. NR2 is the dominant nitrate reductase responsible for reduction of 90% of the cellular nitrate, only 10% is reduced by NR1 [71]. The activity of NR2 is highly induced and the vacuolar nitrate accumulation is reduced in leaves of the vha2vha3-mutant which lacks functional V-ATPases at the tonoplast and shows a vacuolar pH that is less acidic by only 0.5 units in root epidermal cells [10]. The higher cytosolic nitrate concentration is known to enhance NR-activity [72] and is related to the reduced vacuolar accumulation of nitrate. The data on the vacuolar acidification differs from the data obtained here. The main difference between both data sets is the presence of an inhibited V-ATPase here and the lack of functional V-ATPases at the tonoplast in the previous work. One possible explanation is that compensation by the V-PPase requires the presence of the V-ATPase so that for instance the V-PPase can sense the activity state of the V-ATPase. On the other hand, high level of nitrate efficiently prevents vacuolar acidification without inducing any compensation, though nitrate is thought to interfere with ATP-binding and should not affect the V-PPase. Obviously, the coordination of vacuolar proton pumps is more complex and depends on multiple factors. Last but not least both V-ATPase and nitrate reductase are regulated in response to blue light via phosphorylation followed by binding of the regulatory 14-3-3 proteins [15,73]. This might contribute to the coordination of nitrate assimilation and nitrate transport, too.
This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), SFB613 TP A5, and Bielefeld University (Faculty of Biology). We are grateful to Karsten Niehaus and Thomas Patschkowski for helpful support in MALDI-MS.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] |
Ollerton J, Rachael W, Sam T (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120: 321-326. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x
![]() |
[2] |
Potts SG, Roberts SPM, Dean R, et al. (2010) Declines of managed honeybees and beekeepers in Europe? J Apic Res 49: 15-22. doi: 10.3896/IBRA.1.49.1.02
![]() |
[3] |
Gallai N, Jean MS, Josef S, et al. (2009) Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecol Econ 68: 810-821. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.014
![]() |
[4] |
Regan EC, Luca S, Lisa I, et al. (2015) Global trends in the status of bird and mammal pollinators. Conserv Lett 8: 397-403. doi: 10.1111/conl.12162
![]() |
[5] |
Eilers EJ, Kremen C, Smith GS, et al. (2011) Contribution of pollinator-mediated crops to nutrients in the human food supply. PLoS One 6: e21363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021363
![]() |
[6] | IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report - contribution of Working Groups 1, 2 and 3 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Change IPoC, Geneva. |
[7] |
Memmott J, Craze PG, Waser NM, et al. (2007) Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. Ecol Lett 10: 710-717. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01061.x
![]() |
[8] | Karim K. Climate Change Cost Pakistan 3.5 Billion Dollars in 18 Years. 2009. Available from: http://freebird.instablogs.com/entry/climate-change-cost-pakistan-35-billion-in-18years/#ixzz0qnHzBhRM |
[9] | Schweiger O, Biesmeijer JC, Bommarco R, et al. (2010) Multiple stressors on biotic interactions: how climate change and alien species interact to affect pollination. Biol Rev 85: 777-795. |
[10] |
Van Der Putten WH, De Ruiter PC, Bezemer TM, et al. (2004) Trophic interactions in a changing world. Basic Appl Ecol 5: 487-494. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2004.09.003
![]() |
[11] |
Sutherst RW, Maywald GF, Bourne AS (2007) Including species interactions in risk assessments for global change. Glob Change Biol 13: 1843-1859. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01396.x
![]() |
[12] | Oliver TH, Isaac NJB, August TA, et al. (2015) Declining resilience of ecosystem functions under biodiversity loss. Nat Commun 6: 2041-1723. |
[13] | UN-Habitat Cities and Climate Change Initiative (2014) e-Newsletter. |
[14] | LWEC. Improving urban grassland for people and wildlife. Living With Environmental Change Policy and Practice Notes Note. 2016, Available from: http://www.nerc.ac.uk/research/partnerships/ride/lwec/ppn/ppn32/ |
[15] | Dicks LV, Mathilde B, Stuart PMR, et al. (2015) How much flower-rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? Answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge. Ecol Entomol 40: 22-35. |
[16] |
Santangeli A, Lynn VD, Irina H, et al. (2016) Voluntary non-monetary approaches for implementing conservation. Biol Conserv 197: 209-214. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.013
![]() |
[17] |
Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37: 637-669. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
![]() |
[18] | Suttle KB, Thomsen MA, Power ME (2007) Species interactions reverse grassland responses to changing climate. Science 80: 640-642. |
[19] |
Walther GR (2010) Community and ecosystem responses to recent climate change. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365: 2019-2024. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0021
![]() |
[20] | IPCC Climate Change (2014) Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Camb Univ Press. |
[21] | CBD COP6. Retired sections: paragraphs 4-6, 14-15, 17 and 21 Agricultural biological diversity Element 3. Capacity-building. 2002. Available from: www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=7179 |
[22] | Rao GM, Suryanarayana MC, Thakar CV (1980) Bees can boost oilseed production. Indian Farming 29: 25-26. |
[23] | Free JB (1993) Insect pollination of crops, 2nd edn. Academic, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishing London. 684. |
[24] | Abrol DP (2007) Foraging behaviour of Apis mellifera and Apis cerana as determined by the energetics of nectar production in different cultivars of Brassica campestris var. toria. J Apic Sci 51: 5-10. |
[25] | Abrol DP (2008) Plant insect interaction in crucifers. In: Gupta SK (ed) Biology and breeding of crucifers. CRC Press/Taylor and Francis USA. 129-149. |
[26] | Abrol DP (2009) Bees and beekeeping in India, 2nd edn. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, 720. |
[27] | Mishra RC, Kumar J, Gupta JK (1988) The effect of mode of pollination on yield and oil potential of Brassica campestris L. var. sarson with observation on insect pollinators. J Apic Res 27: 186-189. |
[28] | Kluser S, Peduzzi P (2007) Global pollinator decline: A literature review. UNEP/GRID, Geneva. |
[29] |
Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, et al. (2010) Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25: 345-353. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007
![]() |
[30] |
Cleland EE, Chuine I, Menzel A, et al. (2007) Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 357-365. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.04.003
![]() |
[31] |
Kudo G, Nishikawa Y, Kasagi T, et al. (2004) Does seed production of spring ephemerals decrease when spring comes early? Ecol Res 19: 255-259. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1703.2003.00630.x
![]() |
[32] | Deutsch CA, Tewksbury JJ, Huey RB, et al. (2008) Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 105: 6668-6672. |
[33] | Zahedi H, Shirani RAH, Noor MG, et al. (2009) The effects of zeolite soil application and selenium foliar applications on growth yield and yield components of three canola cultivars under drought stress. World Appl Sci J 7: 255-262. |
[34] |
Kimball BA (1983) Carbon dioxide and agricultural yield: An assemblage and analysis of 430 prior observations. Agron J 75: 779-788. doi: 10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500050014x
![]() |
[35] |
Griffin KL, Seemann JR (1996) Plants, CO2 and photosynthesis in the 21st century. Chem Biol 3: 245-254. doi: 10.1016/S1074-5521(96)90104-0
![]() |
[36] |
Taub DR, Miller B, Allen H (2008) Effects of elevated CO2 on the protein concentration of food crops: A meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol 14: 565-575. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01511.x
![]() |
[37] |
Harris HC, McWilliams JR, Mason WK (1978) Influence of temperature on oil content and composition of sunflower. Aust J Agric Res 29: 1203-1212. doi: 10.1071/AR9781203
![]() |
[38] | Berthier E, Schiefer E, Clarke GKC, et al. (2010) Contribution of Alaskan glaciers to sea-level rise derived from satellite imagery, Nat Geosci 3: 92-95. |
[39] |
Meier MF, Dyurgerov MB, Rick UK, et al. (2007) Glaciers dominate eustatic sea-level rise in the 21st century. Science 317: 1064. doi: 10.1126/science.1143906
![]() |
[40] |
Hegland SJ, Nielsen A, Lázaro A, et al. (2009) How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interactions? Ecol Lett 12: 184-195. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01269.x
![]() |
[41] |
Cane JH (2002) Pollinating bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) of US alfalfa compared for rates of pod and seed set. J Econ Entomol 95: 22-27. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-95.1.22
![]() |
[42] |
Inouye DW (2008) Effects of climate change on phenology, frost damage, and floral abundance of montane wildflowers. Ecology 89: 353-362. doi: 10.1890/06-2128.1
![]() |
[43] |
Ravi S, James DC, Alex F, et al. (2013) Rolling with the flow: Bumblebees flying in unsteady wakes. J Exp Biol 216: 4299-4309. doi: 10.1242/jeb.090845
![]() |
[44] | Graham JM (1992) The Hive and the Honey Bee. Dadant and Sons, Hamilton, IL. |
[45] | Polito VS, Warren CM, Dale EK (1996) Bud Development, Pollination, and Fertilization. Almond Prod Man Uni CA Agric Nat Res 1996: 98-102. |
[46] | Thorp RW (1996) Bee Management for Pollination. Almond Prod Man Uni CA Agri Nat Res 1996: 132-138. |
[47] |
Timmons AM, O'Brien ET, Charters YM, et al. (1995) Assessing the risks of wind pollination from fields of brassica napus ssp. oleifera. Euphytica 85: 417-423. doi: 10.1007/BF00023975
![]() |
[48] | Thompson CE, Squire G, Mackay GR, et al. (1999) Regional patterns of gene flow and its consequences for GM oilseed rape. Monogr-Br Crop Prot Counc 1999: 95-100. |
[49] | Puškadija Z, Štefanić E, Mijić A, et al. (2007) Influence of weather conditions on honey bee visits (apis mellifera carnica) during sunflower (helianthus annuus l.) blooming period. Poljoprivreda 13: 230-233. |
[50] | Gliddon C, Boudry P, Walker S (1999) Gene flow - a review of experimental evidence. Environ Impact Gene Modif Crops 1999: 65-79. |
[51] | Feehan J, Harley M, Minnen J (2009) Climate change in Europe. Impact on terrestrial ecosystems and biodiversity. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 29: 409-421. |
[52] | Wheeler TR, Craufurd PQ, Ellis RH, et al. (2000) Temperature variability and the yield of annual crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 82: 159-167. |
[53] |
Galloway LF, Cirigliano T, Gremski K (2002) The contribution of display size and dichogamy to potential geitonogamy in Campanula americana. Int J Plant Sci 163: 133-139. doi: 10.1086/324556
![]() |
[54] |
Pacini E, Nepi M, Vesprini JL (2003) Nectar biodiversity: A short review. Plant Syst Evol 238: 7-21. doi: 10.1007/s00606-002-0277-y
![]() |
[55] |
Mitchell RJ, Karron JD, Holmquist KG, et al. (2004) The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Funct Ecol 18: 116-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2004.00812.x
![]() |
[56] |
Hegland SJ, Totland O (2005) Relationships between species' floral traits and pollinator visitation in a temperate grassland. Oecologia 145: 586-594. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0165-6
![]() |
[57] |
Philipp M, Hansen T (2000) The influence of plant and corolla size on pollen deposition and seed set in Geranium sanguineum (Geraniaceae). Nord J Bot 20: 129-140. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2000.tb01556.x
![]() |
[58] |
Kudo G, Harder LD (2005) Floral and inflorescence effects on variation in pollen removal and seed production among six legume species. Funct Ecol 19: 245-254. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.00961.x
![]() |
[59] |
Akhalkatsi M, Lösch R (2005). Water limitation effect on seed development and germination in Trigonella coerulea (Fabaceae). Flora 200: 493-501. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2005.06.001
![]() |
[60] |
Melser C, Klinkhamer PGL (2001) Selective seed abortion increases offspring survival in Cynoglossum officinale (Boraginaceae). Am J Bot 88: 1033-1040. doi: 10.2307/2657085
![]() |
[61] | Boyer JS, Westgate ME (2003) Grain yields with limited water. In: International conference on water-saving agriculture and sustainable use of water and land resources in arid and semi-arid areas: 2385-2394. Oxford, UK, Oxford Univ. Press. |
[62] | Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Pakistan Oilseed Development Board (PODB). |
[63] | IPCC Climate Change (2014) Mitigation of Climate Change Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Camb Univ Press. |
1. | Thorsten Seidel, The Plant V-ATPase, 2022, 13, 1664-462X, 10.3389/fpls.2022.931777 | |
2. | Lara Vogelsang, Jürgen Eirich, Iris Finkemeier, Karl-Josef Dietz, Specificity and dynamics of H2O2 detoxification by the cytosolic redox regulatory network as revealed by in vitro reconstitution, 2024, 22132317, 103141, 10.1016/j.redox.2024.103141 | |
3. | Thorsten Seidel, 2024, Chapter 8, 978-1-0716-3972-6, 115, 10.1007/978-1-0716-3973-3_8 |
Oligo | Sequence (5’–3’) | Insertion line | Transporter |
LBb1 | GCGTGGACCGCTTGCTGCAACT | n.a. | n.a. |
NHX1_LP | TTGAGGTAACAACGCTTGGTC | SALK_105121C | NHX1 |
NHX1_RP | GGTGGATCTGATCTGAATTGC | SALK_105121C | NHX1 |
Hak5_LP | TCCCAAATCAACTTCCATCAG | SALK_120707C | KUP5 |
Hak5_RP | CAGCAAGAGGCAAGGTAACAC | SALK_120707C | KUP5 |
CAX1_LP | CTAGTTGCCTGCACGAGAATC | SALK_021486C | Cax1 |
CAX1_RP | AACCGCTCACAACATGTCTTC | SALK_021486C | Cax1 |
AVP1_LP | CATCATCAAACAACCACCAATC | SALK_106153C | AVP1 |
AVP1_RP | TGGCCTGTTTTAATTAAAGGG | SALK_106153C | AVP1 |
CLCc_LP | AAGTTGCCGGAAAAGAATAGC | SALK_115644C | CLC-c |
CLCc_RP | ACCTTGTGGACAAAGTCCTCC | SALK_115644C | CLC-c |
Oligo | Sequence (5’ – 3’) | AGI (name) direction, enzyme |
CAX1_NotF | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG GCG GGA ATC GTG ACA | At2g38170 (Cax1) forward, NotI |
CAX1-Eco_r | TTTTT GAATTC TTA ACC CGT TTT AAC TTT | At2g38170 (Cax1) reverse, EcoRI |
PM-ATPase_NotF | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG TCA GGT CTC GAA GAT | At2g18960 (AHA1) forward, NotI |
PM-ATPase_EcoR | TTTTT GAATTC TAC ACA GTG TAG TGA TG | At2g18960 (AHA1) reverse, EcoRI |
Ppase_NotF | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG GTG GCG CCT GCT TTG | At1g15690 (AVP1) forward, NotI |
Ppase_EcoR | TTTTT GAATTC TAG AAG TAC TTG AAA AG | At1g15690 (AVP1) reverse, EcoRI |
CLC_c_F-Not1 | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG GAT GAT CGG CAC GAA GGA G | AT5G49890 (CLC-c) forward, NotI |
CLC_c_rev-Stu1 | TTTTT AGGCCT TCA CTT GAG GGG ATC AAT GTG AGG G | AT5G49890 (CLC-c) reverse, StuI |
Hak5-for-Not1 | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG TTT CAC GTG GAA GAA GAA AGC | AT4G33530 (HAK5 / KUP5) forward, NotI |
Hak5-rev-Stu1 | TTTT AGGCCT TCA TAC CAT ATA AGT CAT TCC | AT4G33530 (HAK5 / KUP5) reverse, StuI |
NHX1-for-Not1 | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG TTG GAT TCT CTA GTG TCG | AT5G27150 (NHX1) forward, NotI |
NHX1-rev-Stu1 | TTTT AGGCCT TCA AGC CTT ACT AAG ATC AGG AGG G | AT5G27150 (NHX1) reverse, StuI |
A-Yeast-for | GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATG CCGGCGTTTTACGGAGG | At1g78900 (VHA-A) |
A-Yeast-rev | GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG TTC CCGAGTTTCATCTTC | At1g78900 (VHA-A) |
E1-Yeast-for | GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATG AACGACG GAGATGT | At4g11150 (VHA-E1) |
E1-Yeast-rev | GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG TCC GGCAGTAACTTGGC | At4g11150 (VHA-E1) |
NR-Yeast-for | GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATG GCGGCCTCTGTAGAT | AT1G37130 (NR2) |
NR-Yeast-rev | GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG CTC GAATATCAAGAAATCC | AT1G37130 (NR2) |
CLC-Yeast-for | GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATG GATGATCGGCACGAAG | AT5G49890 (CLC-c) |
CLC-Yeast-rev | GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG TCC CTTGAGGGGATCAATG | AT5G49890 (CLC-c) |
Effector | Biomass | Effector | vacuolar pH | |
MS-media | 12.3 ± 0.6 g | MS-media | 6,73 ± 0.16 | |
40 mM KNO3 | 11.7 ± 0.3 g | 60 mM KNO3 | 7.17 ± 0.17 | |
60 mM KNO3 | 10.2 ± 0.5 g | 10 nM bafilomycin | 6.42 ± 0.03 | |
100 mM KNO3 | 4.3 ± 0.1 g | 60 mM KNO3 & 10 nM bafilomycin | 6.96 ± 0.21 | |
200 mM KNO3 | 1.8 ± 0.3 g | Σ 10 nM bafilomycin, 60 mM KNO3 | 6.86 ± 0.2 | |
5 nM bafilomycin | 11.8 ± 0.5 g | |||
10 nM bafilomycin | 11.1 ± 0.1 g | |||
20 nM bafilomycin | 8.5 ± 0.7 g | |||
40 nM bafilomycin | 5.6 ± 0.5 g | |||
80 nM bafilomycin | 3.4 ± 0.4 g |
Oligo | Sequence (5’–3’) | Insertion line | Transporter |
LBb1 | GCGTGGACCGCTTGCTGCAACT | n.a. | n.a. |
NHX1_LP | TTGAGGTAACAACGCTTGGTC | SALK_105121C | NHX1 |
NHX1_RP | GGTGGATCTGATCTGAATTGC | SALK_105121C | NHX1 |
Hak5_LP | TCCCAAATCAACTTCCATCAG | SALK_120707C | KUP5 |
Hak5_RP | CAGCAAGAGGCAAGGTAACAC | SALK_120707C | KUP5 |
CAX1_LP | CTAGTTGCCTGCACGAGAATC | SALK_021486C | Cax1 |
CAX1_RP | AACCGCTCACAACATGTCTTC | SALK_021486C | Cax1 |
AVP1_LP | CATCATCAAACAACCACCAATC | SALK_106153C | AVP1 |
AVP1_RP | TGGCCTGTTTTAATTAAAGGG | SALK_106153C | AVP1 |
CLCc_LP | AAGTTGCCGGAAAAGAATAGC | SALK_115644C | CLC-c |
CLCc_RP | ACCTTGTGGACAAAGTCCTCC | SALK_115644C | CLC-c |
Oligo | Sequence (5’ – 3’) | AGI (name) direction, enzyme |
CAX1_NotF | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG GCG GGA ATC GTG ACA | At2g38170 (Cax1) forward, NotI |
CAX1-Eco_r | TTTTT GAATTC TTA ACC CGT TTT AAC TTT | At2g38170 (Cax1) reverse, EcoRI |
PM-ATPase_NotF | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG TCA GGT CTC GAA GAT | At2g18960 (AHA1) forward, NotI |
PM-ATPase_EcoR | TTTTT GAATTC TAC ACA GTG TAG TGA TG | At2g18960 (AHA1) reverse, EcoRI |
Ppase_NotF | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG GTG GCG CCT GCT TTG | At1g15690 (AVP1) forward, NotI |
Ppase_EcoR | TTTTT GAATTC TAG AAG TAC TTG AAA AG | At1g15690 (AVP1) reverse, EcoRI |
CLC_c_F-Not1 | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG GAT GAT CGG CAC GAA GGA G | AT5G49890 (CLC-c) forward, NotI |
CLC_c_rev-Stu1 | TTTTT AGGCCT TCA CTT GAG GGG ATC AAT GTG AGG G | AT5G49890 (CLC-c) reverse, StuI |
Hak5-for-Not1 | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG TTT CAC GTG GAA GAA GAA AGC | AT4G33530 (HAK5 / KUP5) forward, NotI |
Hak5-rev-Stu1 | TTTT AGGCCT TCA TAC CAT ATA AGT CAT TCC | AT4G33530 (HAK5 / KUP5) reverse, StuI |
NHX1-for-Not1 | AAAA GCGGCCGC ATG TTG GAT TCT CTA GTG TCG | AT5G27150 (NHX1) forward, NotI |
NHX1-rev-Stu1 | TTTT AGGCCT TCA AGC CTT ACT AAG ATC AGG AGG G | AT5G27150 (NHX1) reverse, StuI |
A-Yeast-for | GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATG CCGGCGTTTTACGGAGG | At1g78900 (VHA-A) |
A-Yeast-rev | GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG TTC CCGAGTTTCATCTTC | At1g78900 (VHA-A) |
E1-Yeast-for | GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATG AACGACG GAGATGT | At4g11150 (VHA-E1) |
E1-Yeast-rev | GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG TCC GGCAGTAACTTGGC | At4g11150 (VHA-E1) |
NR-Yeast-for | GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATG GCGGCCTCTGTAGAT | AT1G37130 (NR2) |
NR-Yeast-rev | GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG CTC GAATATCAAGAAATCC | AT1G37130 (NR2) |
CLC-Yeast-for | GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATG GATGATCGGCACGAAG | AT5G49890 (CLC-c) |
CLC-Yeast-rev | GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG TCC CTTGAGGGGATCAATG | AT5G49890 (CLC-c) |
Effector | Biomass | Effector | vacuolar pH | |
MS-media | 12.3 ± 0.6 g | MS-media | 6,73 ± 0.16 | |
40 mM KNO3 | 11.7 ± 0.3 g | 60 mM KNO3 | 7.17 ± 0.17 | |
60 mM KNO3 | 10.2 ± 0.5 g | 10 nM bafilomycin | 6.42 ± 0.03 | |
100 mM KNO3 | 4.3 ± 0.1 g | 60 mM KNO3 & 10 nM bafilomycin | 6.96 ± 0.21 | |
200 mM KNO3 | 1.8 ± 0.3 g | Σ 10 nM bafilomycin, 60 mM KNO3 | 6.86 ± 0.2 | |
5 nM bafilomycin | 11.8 ± 0.5 g | |||
10 nM bafilomycin | 11.1 ± 0.1 g | |||
20 nM bafilomycin | 8.5 ± 0.7 g | |||
40 nM bafilomycin | 5.6 ± 0.5 g | |||
80 nM bafilomycin | 3.4 ± 0.4 g |