Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Food choices and body weight changes: A mathematical model analysis

  • Received: 10 January 2025 Revised: 15 March 2025 Accepted: 19 May 2025 Published: 05 June 2025
  • A short–term stochastic model of minute–by–minute food intake is formulated, incorporating the interaction of appetite, insulinemia, and glycemia in determining the size and frequency of meals. By assuming a person would maintain his or her eating habit over time, we extend the simulation period to several years and explore scenarios based on food choices (high–fiber vs. high–carbohydrate) or appetite suppression. The model coherently predicts increments or decrements in body weight in the long–term when altering appetite in the short–term. Further, the model shows how food type choice, at the same appetite drive and habitual proposed meal size, induces macroscopic changes in body weight over a very few years. The model is innovative in that it connects the minute–by–minute behavior of the individual with long–term changes in metabolic compensation, in insulin sensitivity, in glycemic variability, and eventually in body size, thus helping to interpret the long–term development of Type 2 diabetes mellitus resulting from an unhealthy lifestyle.

    Citation: Mantana Chudtong, Andrea De Gaetano. Food choices and body weight changes: A mathematical model analysis[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(7): 1790-1824. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025065

    Related Papers:

    [1] Windarto, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Fatmawati . Parameter estimation and fractional derivatives of dengue transmission model. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2758-2779. doi: 10.3934/math.2020178
    [2] Khaled A. Aldwoah, Mohammed A. Almalahi, Kamal Shah, Muath Awadalla, Ria H. Egami . Dynamics analysis of dengue fever model with harmonic mean type under fractal-fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 13894-13926. doi: 10.3934/math.2024676
    [3] Asma Hanif, Azhar Iqbal Kashif Butt . Atangana-Baleanu fractional dynamics of dengue fever with optimal control strategies. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15499-15535. doi: 10.3934/math.2023791
    [4] Ahmed Alshehri, Miled El Hajji . Mathematical study for Zika virus transmission with general incidence rate. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 7117-7142. doi: 10.3934/math.2022397
    [5] Najat Almutairi, Sayed Saber, Hijaz Ahmad . The fractal-fractional Atangana-Baleanu operator for pneumonia disease: stability, statistical and numerical analyses. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29382-29410. doi: 10.3934/math.20231504
    [6] Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Aqeel Ahmad, Mustafa Inc, Muhammad Farman, Hadi Rezazadeh, Lanre Akinyemi, Muhammad Mannan Akram . Analysis of dengue transmission using fractional order scheme. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8408-8429. doi: 10.3934/math.2022469
    [7] B. S. Alofi, S. A. Azoz . Stability of general pathogen dynamic models with two types of infectious transmission with immune impairment. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 114-140. doi: 10.3934/math.2021009
    [8] Saiwan Fatah, Arkan Mustafa, Shilan Amin . Predator and n-classes-of-prey model incorporating extended Holling type Ⅱ functional response for n different prey species. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5779-5788. doi: 10.3934/math.2023291
    [9] Mamta Barik, Chetan Swarup, Teekam Singh, Sonali Habbi, Sudipa Chauhan . Dynamical analysis, optimal control and spatial pattern in an influenza model with adaptive immunity in two stratified population. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 4898-4935. doi: 10.3934/math.2022273
    [10] Muhammad Altaf Khan, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farhan . The dynamics of Zika virus with Caputo fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(1): 134-146. doi: 10.3934/Math.2019.1.134
  • A short–term stochastic model of minute–by–minute food intake is formulated, incorporating the interaction of appetite, insulinemia, and glycemia in determining the size and frequency of meals. By assuming a person would maintain his or her eating habit over time, we extend the simulation period to several years and explore scenarios based on food choices (high–fiber vs. high–carbohydrate) or appetite suppression. The model coherently predicts increments or decrements in body weight in the long–term when altering appetite in the short–term. Further, the model shows how food type choice, at the same appetite drive and habitual proposed meal size, induces macroscopic changes in body weight over a very few years. The model is innovative in that it connects the minute–by–minute behavior of the individual with long–term changes in metabolic compensation, in insulin sensitivity, in glycemic variability, and eventually in body size, thus helping to interpret the long–term development of Type 2 diabetes mellitus resulting from an unhealthy lifestyle.



    Dengue fever, a highly transmissible illness, threatens more than two to three million individuals annually on a global scale [1,2]. Dengue, the second most lethal mosquito-borne illness after malaria, results in hundreds of fatalities and over 4 million infections each year [3]. More than 129 nations are home to it, and it can cause from mild to severe symptoms, especially in the tropics and subtropics [4,5]. About three quarters of all dengue cases are dengue fever (DF), the most prevalent type of disease. Five distinct serotypes of dengue virus define the viral infection known as dengue fever, which is transmitted by mosquitoes: DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3, DEN-4, and DEN-5. When mosquitoes bite an infected person, they take the virus and let it incubate for eight to ten days. Following a mosquito bite that carries an infection, patients often start symptoms for five to seven days after. DF symptoms include a high temperature, intense headaches, joints and muscles discomfort, and rashes [6,7].

    People, insects, and the virus disseminate dengue in several environments. Due to space complexity, dengue transmission studies are complex [8]. The epidemic has many causes. Worldwide host and vector mobility boosted viral circulation, urban congestion encouraged multiple transmissions from a single infected vector, and vector control mechanisms were lost. Temperature, precipitation, and humidity affect vector development from egg viability to adult longevity and dispersal, among other dengue transmission factors [9]. Unplanned construction, high population density, and unstable trash collection promote mosquito breeding sites and dengue.

    Dengue has no cure; thus, severe cases require hospitalization and supportive care [10]. A cheap, efficient vaccine is essential for universal control. Governments mostly use vector control and insect repellents to lower infection rates. Community education about dengue hazards is essential for prevention [11]. Media campaigns and community involvement may spread preventative knowledge. Community-government miscommunications can raise dengue risk, making ongoing community awareness crucial for successful interventions.

    Mathematical models of infectious illness are valuable tools for comprehending and forecasting the patterns of outbreaks, comprehending the advancement and development of diseases, and estimating the consequences of health interventions on people or populations [12,13,14]. The models generated by mathematics can be used to improve tactics for reducing disease spread and enhance public health decisions with epidemiological evidence. Numerous authors have widely employed mathematical modeling to inform public health initiatives aimed at controlling the transmission of dengue [15,16]. The mathematical modeling approach is quite demanding due to the intricate nature of the dengue transmission mechanism. Utilizing a more intricate model can enhance the accuracy of the modeling process, but it also presents challenges when attempting to derive analytical data and draw conclusions. Therefore, the researcher must construct a practical yet uncomplicated model based on realistic assumptions. Utilizing actual incidence data is essential for accurately adjusting the model's performance. Various methodologies can be employed to build the dengue transmission model, including differential equations, fractional differential equations, stochastic differential equations, and alternative techniques. Rao et al. [17] introduced a variational model for delayed impulsive epidemic models, tackling mathematical challenges in the reaction-diffusion model with a delayed impulse. Yang et al. [18] investigated the presence of positive periodic solutions to neutral-type integral differential equations inside an epidemic model, employing Mawhin's continuation theorem and the characteristics of neutral-type operators. Zhao et al. [19] explored the stability of impulsive stochastic competition models with time-varying delays, focusing on persistence, extinction, and practical exponential stability. Xiao et al. [20] provided an innovative methodology for analyzing the dynamics of rumors inside social networks, differentiating between enthusiasts and ordinary individuals. Hattaf [21] presented a novel definition of fractional derivatives that integrates singular and non-singular kernels, along with an associated fractional integral, augmenting their utility in computational biology. Hattaf [22] introduced a novel class of generalized differential and integral operators that generalize the definitions of fractal-fractional derivatives and integral operators employed to model complex dynamics in various disciplines.

    Many modeling analysis of viral illnesses like dengue, chikungunya, and zika have been conducted in the literature. Naaly et al. [23] studied how vector management, treatment, and mass awareness affect dengue fever transmission dynamics. The authors in [24] discovered awareness and control strategies for dengue disease transmission. Researchers Aldila et al. [25] looked into the interaction between social awareness, the detection of cases, and the capability of hospitals in Jakarta to eliminate dengue. Li et al. [26] analyzed the effects of awareness initiatives on dengue and identified the optimal control approaches. Bonyah et al. [27] performed an analysis of the fractional stochastic modeling of dengue illness, specifically focusing on the perspective of social awareness. The authors [28] conducted a mathematical analysis to investigate how community ignorance affects dengue population dynamics. Sood et al. [29] conducted an investigation on a sophisticated healthcare system designed to forecast and avert dengue virus illness. Macalalag et al. [30] analyzed the dengue model's global stability incorporating awareness and temporal delays. A dengue disease model was used by Saha et al. [31] to study the host-vector dynamics using the optimal control technique. The authors of [32] conducted a study on forecasting dengue epidemic outbreaks by utilizing climate variation and Monte Carlo techniques. Bhuju et al. [33] examined the fuzzy SEIR-SEI dengue disease model's sensitivity and bifurcation analysis. Harshit [34] conducted a sensitivity study to examine dengue transmission. Based on the sensitivity analysis of the dengue epidemic using a modified saturation incidence rate, the authors of [35] invented an optimal control strategy. Guo et al. [36] performed a stability analysis and simulation of a delayed dengue transmission model incorporating logistic growth and a nonlinear incidence rate. Leandro et al. [37] investigated the spatial distribution of dengue transmission in a city with a high incidence of the disease in Brazil, demonstrating significant spatial organization in the local dynamics of dengue transmission. Hasan et al. [38] performed a sensitivity analysis of a dynamic dengue epidemic model incorporating vector-host interactions. Abidemi et al. [39] performed a Lyapunov stability study and implemented optimization strategies for a model that simulates the transmission of dengue disease. The author of [40] conducted a thorough analysis of effective control measures for managing dengue infection in East Java. A study on the mathematical evaluation of the impact of hospitalization in dengue intervention was carried out by Nawawi et al. [41]. Researchers Hamdan et al. [42] used a case study of hospitalized infected individuals in Malaysia to determine the impact of temperature on creating a deterministic dengue epidemic model. The study by Abidemi et al. [43] offered valuable insights into the dynamics of dengue, with a specific focus on the asymptomatic, isolated, and vigilant compartments. Jan et al. [44] conducted a study on the transmission dynamics of dengue by asymptomatic carriers and the effectiveness of control strategies. A study by Jose et al. [45] used mathematical models to look into how the Zika virus and Dengue fever spread in people who show symptoms of both diseases.

    All of these studies are predicated on deterministic models; however, none have examined the consequences of the infection rate within the host or the symptomatically infected and hospitalized humans in question. Furthermore, the immune system's enhancement through the consumption of natural foods and awareness of symptomatic human infections were not taken into account. In light of the aforementioned, this work presents a novel mathematical model that accurately captures the interactions between dengue hosts and vectors. The model includes compartments for infected individuals, individuals with symptoms, and individuals requiring hospitalization. This paradigm will help us to better understand the reality of dengue transmission, and eradication.

    The following parts of this work are arranged as follows: Our model is presented in Section 2, together with a biological justification of its parameters. Section 3 is devoted to analyzing the positivity as well as boundedness of the model. In addition, we analyze the equilibrium points and compute the basic reproduction number, represented as R0. Section 4 discusses the stability of the model. Section 5 focuses on sensitivity analysis to illustrate the influence of the proposed model on R0. In Section 6, we introduce a computational method for solving the model. Furthermore, this section presents the numerical findings and their accompanying explanations. Ultimately, the concluding portion of the study provides a concise summary of the main contributions of our work and identifies prospective areas for further research.

    The compartmental models provide a thorough description of how the epidemic spreads and the various preventive measures that can be taken to stop it. In order to create the epidemic model, we utilize the compartmental modeling approach. The model consists of seven compartments which represent two distinct sub-populations: the human (host) population and the vector (mosquito) population. The total host population, can be divided into five distinct groups: Sh represents susceptible humans who are capable of contracting the disease, Ih0 signifies infected humans who are not capable of transmitting the disease to others, Ih1 represents symptomatically infected humans who are able to transmit the disease to others, Hh implies hospitalized infected humans, and Rh reflects the recovered population who have temporary immunity against dengue. Similarly, the vector population Nm of mosquitoes is divided into two groups: mosquitoes capable of being infected (susceptible, Sm) and mosquitoes that are infected by the dengue virus (infected, Im). Figure 1 shows a transmission diagram illustrating compartment interactions, while Table 1 describes the parameters.

    Figure 1.  Dengue transmission diagram.
    Table 1.  Parameter's biological descriptions of dengue model.
    Parameter Descriptions
    Λ1 Human population recruitment rates
    β1 Infection transmission rate from vector to host
    α Rate of immune system of susceptible host by the consumption of natural foods
    β2 Infections rate within the host
    μ1 Human population natural mortality
    β3 Rate of symptomatic to hospitalized infected individuals
    β4 Symptomatic infection recovery rate
    γ Awareness rate among symptomatic infected people
    β5 Hospitalized infected individual's recovery rate
    Λ2 Vector population recruitment rates
    β6 Infection transmission rate from human to vector
    μ2 Vector population natural mortality

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In order to construct the model, we take into account the rate of immune system of the susceptible host achieved by the consumption of natural foods, denoted by α. β1 is the infection transmission rate from vector to host, and the infection rate within hosts is β2. Additionally, the human awareness of individuals who are symptomatically infected (γ) has protected them from dengue by employing mosquito-nets and mosquito -repellent sprays. Also, the hospitalized infected humans Hh are introduced here.

    The model is governed by the differential equations that are shown in the following system:

    dShdt=Λ1β1ShImβ2ShIh1αShμ1Sh,dIh0dt=β1ShImμ1Ih0,dIh1dt=β2ShIh1β3Ih1β4Ih1γIh1μ1Ih1,dHhdt=β3Ih1β5Hhμ1Hh,dRhdt=β4Ih1+β5Hh+αSh+γIh1μ1Rh,dSmdt=Λ2β6SmIh1μ2Sm,dImdt=β6SmIh1μ2Im, (2.1)

    With initial host population Sh(0)0,Ih0(0)0,Ih1(0)0,Hh(0)0,andRh(0)0, and the vector population Sm(0)0,andIm(0)0.

    A fundamental need for an epidemiological model is that its solutions must exhibit both non-negativity and boundedness. Therefore, it is essential to demonstrate that all variables remain positive for every instance where t is greater than zero.

    Theorem 3.1. The system (2.1)'s feasible region stated as

    χ={Sh(t),Ih0(t),Ih1(t),Hh(t),Rh(t),Sm(t),Im(t)ϵR+7:Nh(t)Λ1μ1,Nm(t)Λ2μ2}

    is positively invariant along with the initial condition defined by R+7.

    Proof. One way to express system (1) is :

    dYdt=K(Y)+Z, (3.1)
    Y=(Sh,Ih0,Ih1,Hh,Rh,Sm,Im)t,
    K=(k1000000k2μ100000k30k4000000k5k6000k70k8k9μ10000000k10000000k11μ2),

    where, k1=β1Im+β2Ih1+α+μ1, k2=β1ShIm, k3=β3Ih1, k4=β3+β4+γ+μ1, k5=β3Ih1, k6=β5+μ1, k7=α, k8=β4+γ, k9=β5, k10=β6Ih1+μ2, k11=β4Ih1.

    And

    Z=(Λ1,0,0,0,0,Λ2,0)t.

    In this case, any entry of the matrix K(Y) off-diagonal is non-negative. Therefore, the matrix is referred to as the Metzler matrix. Furthermore, vector Z possesses a positive character. Consequently, it may be deduced that the system (3.1) is always positively invariant in the region R+7.

    Setting each system of model (2.1) to zero, results in the production of the dengue-free equilibrium (DFE). Additionally, the DFE has no infections or recovery procedures in place. Therefore, the DFE of the dengue model is provided by

    E0=(S0h,I0h0,I0h1,H0h,R0h,S0m,I0m)=(Λ1μ1+α,0,0,0,0,Λ2μ2,0).

    The basic reproduction number is a critical threshold in mathematical epidemiology research since it helps predict the possibility of disease transmission. Utilizing the next-generation matrix to calculate the system (1)'s R0 as

    F=(00β1S0h0β2S0h00β6S0m0),V=(μ1000β3+β4+μ1+γ000μ2).

    The next-generation matrix FV1 generates R0 as

    R0=β2Λ1(μ1+α)(β3+β4+μ1+γ).

    The endemic equilibrium of system (2.1) is

    E1=(Sh,Ih0,Ih1,Hh,Rh,Sm,Im)

    where,

    Sh=β3+β4+μ1β2,Ih0=β1β6Λ2(β3+β4+μ1+γ)Ih1μ1μ2(β6+μ2),
    Ih1=(μ1+α)μ2(β5+μ1)(β6+μ2)(R01)β1β6Λ2+β2μ2(β6+μ2),Hh=β3Ih1β5+μ1,
    Rh=β2(β4+γ)(β5+μ1)+β2β3β5)Ih1+α(β5+μ1)(β3+β4+μ1)μ1β2(β5+μ1),
    Sm=Λ2β6Ih1+μ2,Im=Λ2β6Ih1μ2(β6+μ2).

    The endemic equilibria exist if R0>1.

    Theorem 4.1.1. System (2.1)'s DFE (E0) is locally asymptotically stable if R0<1 and unstable if R0>1.

    Proof. The Jacobian matrix at the dengue-free equilibrium point (E0) is

    J(E0)=((μ1+α)0β2S0h000β1S0h0μ10000β1S0h00β2S0h(β3+β4+μ1+γ)000000β3β5μ1000α0β4+γβ5μ10000β6S0m00μ2000β6S0m000μ2).

    The eigenvalues for the matrix J(E0) are μ1(multiplicity 2), μ2(multiplicity 2), (μ1+α), (β5+μ1), and β2S0h(β3+β4+μ1+γ). An obvious negative sign appears in the first six eigenvalues. As this is the case, the DFE E0 is locally asymptotically stable if

    β2S0h(β3+β4+μ1+γ)<0,
    β2S0h<(β3+β4+μ1+γ),
    β2S0h(β3+β4+μ1+γ)<1,
    β2Λ1(μ1+α)(β3+β4+μ1+γ)<1,
    R0<1.

    So, E0 is locally asymptotically stable if R0<1, otherwise; it is unstable.

    Theorem 4.1.2. System (2.1)'s E1 is locally asymptotically stable if R0>1.

    Proof. The Jacobian matrix at the endemic equilibrium point (E1) is

    J(E1)=(ϕ10β2Sh000β1Shβ1Imμ10000β1Shβ2Ih10ϕ2000000β3β5μ100000β4+γβ5μ10000ϕ300ϕ4μ2000ϕ300ϕ4μ2),

    where, ϕ1=β1Im+β2Ih1+α+μ1, ϕ2=β3+β4+γ+μ1β2Sh, ϕ3=β6Sm, ϕ4=β16Ih1.

    Four eigenvalues of the above matrix are μ1, μ1, -μ2, (β5+μ1), and the other roots may be found by using the cubic equation

    λ3+ϵ1λ2+ϵ2λ+ϵ3=0, (4.1)

    where,

    ϵ1=ϕ1+ϕ2+ϕ4+μ2,
    ϵ2=β22Ih1Sh+ϕ1μ2+ϕ2μ2+ϕ1ϕ2μ2+ϕ1ϕ2+ϕ1ϕ4+ϕ2ϕ4,
    ϵ3=ϕ1ϕ2ϕ4+μ2β22Ih1Sh+ϕ3β1β2Ih1Sh.

    Here, ϵ1>0, ϵ3>0, ϵ1ϵ2ϵ3>0.

    For this

    ϵ1=ϕ1+ϕ2+ϕ4+μ2=β1Im+β2Ih1+α+μ1+β3+β4+γ+μ1β2Sh+β6Ih1+μ2=Λ2β1β6(μ1+α)μ2(β5+μ1)(β6+μ2)(R01)μ2(β6+μ2)β1β6Λ2+β2μ2(β6+μ2)+β2(μ1+α)μ2(β5+μ1)(β6+μ2)(R01)β1β6Λ2+β2μ2(β6+μ2)+β6(μ1+α)μ2(β5+μ1)(β6+μ2)(R01)β1β6Λ2+β2μ2(β6+μ2)+μ1+α+γ+μ2>0,

    if R0>1.

    Hence, the Routh-Hurwitz criterion ϵ1>0, ϵ3>0, ϵ1ϵ2ϵ3>0 ensues the local asymptotically stability for R0>1.

    Lemma 4.2.1. The region ω1={Xϵω:ShS0h,SmS0m} is a positively invariant for the model (1), where X={Sh,Ih0,Ih1,Hh,Rh,Sm,Im}.

    Proof. Using the model's first equation, we obtain

    dShdt=Λ1β1ShImβ2ShIh1αShμ1ShΛ1αShμ1Sh(μ1+α)(Λ1(μ1+α)Sh)(μ1+α)(S0hSh).

    Implying that, ShS0h(S0hSh(0))e(μ1+α)t. Thus Sh(t)S0h for all t0.

    Using the model's fifth equation, we obtain

    dSmdt=Λ2β6SmIh1μ2SmΛ2μ2Smμ2(Λ2μ2Sm).

    Implying that, SmS0m(S0mSm(0))eμ2t. Thus Sm(t)S0m for all t0.

    In summary, we conclude that the ω1 is positively invariant.

    Theorem 4.2.1. The vector-host model may be expressed generally as

    dϰ1dt=F(ϰ1,ϰ2),dϰ2dt=G(ϰ1,ϰ2),G(ϰ1,0)=0. (4.2)

    Where, ϰ1=(Sh,Rh,Sm)t,andϰ2=(Ih0,Ih,Hh,Im)t represent the individuals who are infected and those who are not. Then, the DFE is now represented by the following:

    E0=(ϰ01,0)=(Λ1(μ1+α),μ1(μ1+α)αΛ1,Λ2μ2,0,0,0,0).

    The following conditions must be met in order for E0 to maintain global asymptomatic stability:

    H1:dϰ1dt=F(ϰ01,0),ϰ01 is global asymptomatic stable, H2: ˆG(ϰ1,ϰ2)=Aϰ2G(ϰ1,ϰ2),ˆG(ϰ1,ϰ2)0, where A=Dϰ2F(ϰ01,0) is Metzler matrix.

    Theorem 4.2.2. If the criteria of Eq (4.2) are met and R0<1, E0=(ϰ01,0) is a global asymptomatic stable.

    Proof. Applying the theorem (4.1.2)

    F(ϰ01,0)=Λ1αShμ1Sh,ˆG(ϰ1,ϰ2)=Aϰ2G(ϰ1,ϰ2).

    Where,

    A=[μ100β1S0h0β2S0hβ3+β4+γ+μ1000β3(β5+μ1)00β6S0m0μ2].

    Now,

    ˆG(ϰ1,ϰ2)=Aϰ2G(ϰ1,ϰ2)=[β1Im(S0hSh)β2Ih1(S0hSh)0β6Ih1(S0mSm)]=[ˆG1ˆG20ˆG3].

    Clearly, ˆG10,ˆG20andˆG30, since ShS0h,SmS0m. Therefore, ˆG(ϰ1,ϰ2)0.

    Also, A is Metzler matrix. Hence, the dengue-free equilibrium E0 is global asymptotical stable.

    Theorem 4.2.3. System (2.1)'s E1 is globally asymptotically stable if R0>1.

    Proof. The form's Lyapunov function in

    W(t)=12(ShSh)2+12(Ih0Ih0)2+12(Ih1Ih1)2+12(HhHh)2+12(RhRh)2+12(SmSm)2+12(ImIm)2.

    Differentiating with respect to time t, we get:

    W'(t)=(ShSh)S'h+(Ih0Ih0)I'h0+(Ih1Ih1)I'h1+(HhHh)H'h+(RhRh)R'h+(SmSm)S'm+(ImIm)I'm=(ShSh)(Λ1β1ShImβ2ShIh1αShμ1Sh)+(Ih0Ih0)(β1ShImμ1Ih0)+(Ih1Ih1)(β2ShIh1β3Ih1β4Ih1γIh1μ1Ih1)+(HhHh)(β3Ih1β5Hhμ1Hh)+(RhRh)(β4Ih1+β5Hh+αSh+γIh1μ1Rh)+(SmSm)(Λ2β6SmIh1μ2Sm)+(ImIm)(β6SmIh1μ2Im).

    Using the equilibrium conditions Λ1=μ1Sh+μ1Ih0+μ1Ih1+μ1Hh+μ1Rh and Λ2=μ2Sm+μ2Im into the above equation

    W'(t)=(ShSh)(μ1Sh+μ1Ih0+μ1Ih1+μ1Hh+μ1Rh)(ShSh)(β1ShIm+β2ShIh1+αSh+μ1Sh)+(Ih0Ih0)(β1ShImμ1Ih0)+(Ih1Ih1)(β2ShIh1β3Ih1β4Ih1γIh1μ1Ih1)+(HhHh)(β3Ih1β5Hhμ1Hh)+(RhRh)(β4Ih1+β5Hh+αSh+γIh1μ1Rh)+(SmSm)(μ2Sm+μ2Imβ6SmIh1μ2Sm)+(ImIm)(β6SmIh1μ2Im)=μ1(ShSh)2+μ1Ih0(ShSh)+μ1Ih1(ShSh)β2ShIh1(ShSh)+μ1Hh(ShSh)+μ1Rh(ShSh)β1ShIm(ShSh)αSh(ShSh)+β1ShIm(Ih0Ih0)μ1Ih0(Ih0Ih0)+β2ShIh1(Ih1Ih1)γIh1(Ih1Ih1)(β3+β4)Ih1(Ih1Ih1)μ1Ih1(Ih1Ih1)+β3Ih1(HhHh)μ1Hh(HhHh)+β4Ih1(RhRh)+β5Hh(RhRh)+αSh(RhRh)+γIh1(RhRh)μ1Rh(RhRh)μ2(SmSm)2+μ2Im(SmSm)β6SmIh1(SmSm)+β6SmIh1(ImIm)μ2Sm(ImIm)=μ1(ShSh)2μ1{Ih0(Ih0Ih0)Ih0(ShSh)}β2Sh{Ih1(ShSh)Ih1(Ih1Ih1)}μ1{Ih1(Ih1Ih1)Ih1(ShSh)}μ1{Hh(HhHh)Hh(ShSh)}αSh(ShShRh+Rh)γIh1(Ih1Ih1Rh+Rh)β1ShIm(ShShIh0+Ih0)β3Ih1(Ih1Ih1Hh+Hh)β4Ih1(Ih1Ih1Rh+Rh)β5Hh(HhHhRh+Rh)μ1{Rh(RhRh)Rh(ShSh)}μ2(SmSm)2μ2{(ImIm)SmIm(SmSm)}β6SmIh1(SmSmIm+Im).

    Now, W'(t)0and W'(t)=0 for

    Sh=Sh,Ih0=Ih0,Ih1=Ih1,Hh=Hh,Rh=Rh,Sm=Sm,,Im=Im.

    So, the largest invariance set is the singleton set {E1}. Therefore, using the principle of LaSalle's invariance, the endemic equilibrium E1 is globally asymptotically stable.

    To mitigate and manage dengue outbreaks, a sensitivity analysis is performed to pinpoint the factors that exert the most significant influence on the transmission and dissemination of dengue within the population, as outlined in the model (2.1), employing the same methodology as previous studies [46,47,48]. The normalized forward sensitivity index of R0 relates to the system (2.1) parameter ϑ, which is signified by ζϑR0=R0ϑ.ϑR0.

    Table 2 and Figure 2 display the dengue fever model's sensitivity index in relation to R0. When an index has a positive sign, R0 increases; when it has a negative sign, R0 declines. If the other parameters are maintained constantly and the negative indices (α,μ1,γ,β3,β4) are increased, the value of R0 falls, suggesting a reduction in the rate of disease transmission. Conversely, if all other parameters remain constant and the indices with positive values (Λ1,β2) are raised, R0 will also rise, resulting in a higher rate of disease transmission among humans. Furthermore, the sensitivity index shows that the infectious rate within the host has the highest positive value (+1), suggesting that changes in the host's infectious rate will affect R0. In addition, the negative sensitivity index of -0.99324 for the rate of immune system of susceptible host by consumption of natural foods (α) indicates that a rise in α leads to a reduction in R0 and vice versa. So, the best control approach to keep diseases under control is to increase the immune system rate of susceptible hosts by eating natural foods.

    Table 2.  Sensitivity measures of R0.
    Parameter Sensitivity index
    Λ1 +1.0
    β2 +1.0
    α -0.993245927
    μ1 -0.0084993573
    γ -0.3573103612
    β3 -0.2793059925
    β4 -0.3616383535

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 2.  Sensitivity measures of R0.

    Figure 36 display the R0 of the proposed system as it varies with different input parameters. Visualizing these parameters' effect on the outcomes of R0 is the primary goal of this endeavor. Dengue fever in the population decreases as the rate of the immune system in the susceptible host grows due to the consumption of natural foods (α), while the rate of infection within the host (β2) remains constant (refer to Figure 3). It is indeed possible to take R0 to a satisfactory level of R0<1 by enhancing the immune system of susceptible hosts by consuming natural foods, with an α value of approximately 0.42.

    Figure 3.  Impact of variability α on R0.
    Figure 4.  Impact of variability γ on R0.
    Figure 5.  Impact of variability β3 on R0.
    Figure 6.  Impact of variability β4 on R0.

    Figures 46 demonstrate that while the infectious disease rate (β2) stays constant within the host, there is noticeable variation in the awareness rate among symptomatic infected humans (γ), the rate of symptomatic to hospitalized infected (β3), and symptomatic infection recovery rate (β4). The results indicate that γ and β3 have small effects on R0, but the symptomatic infection recovery rate has a larger impact on R0(Figure 6).

    To demonstrate the findings of this study, the model's numerical simulations are performed using the parameter values specified in Table 3. The simulation visually represents the quantities of susceptible, infected, symptomatic infected, and hospitalized infected carriers within the host population, as well as the quantities of susceptible and infected people within the vector population.

    Table 3.  References and parameters values of system (2.1).
    Parameter Values Reference
    Λ1 .9999 [49]
    β1 .8500 Assumed
    β2 .6294 [50]
    α .2520 Assumed
    μ1 .003468 [51]
    β3 .555 [52]
    β4 .7186 [53]
    γ .111 [54]
    β5 .0062 Assumed
    Λ2 .00034 [55]
    β6 .009 [56]
    μ2 .000244 Assumed

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Figure 7 shows the dynamic behavior of an epidemic model over 150 days, illustrating the impact of fluctuations in the parameter α: the rate of the immune system of susceptible hosts by consumption of natural foods. Figure 7 shows the susceptible human (Sh), symptomatically infected human (Ih1), recovered human (Rh), and total infected population (Ih0+Ih1+Hh) under three conditions: the original α(green), a 10% increase in α(red), and a 10% decrease in α(blue). The susceptible human (Sh) experiences rapid decline and stabilization, with α influencing the initial peak and pace of stabilization (Figure 7(a)). The symptomatically infected human (Ih1) shows a dramatic initial surge followed by a steady reduction, with greater peaks and faster falls found with increased α (Figure 7(b)). Increased α leads to a fast increase in the recovered human (Rh) in Figure 7(c), before settling at higher values. In Figure 7(d), the overall infected human follows a similar trend of rapid rise and stabilization, with higher and faster stabilization found with a 10% increase in α levels. Increasing α intensifies and shortens the epidemic, whereas decreasing α leads to a less severe but longer epidemic course.

    Figure 7.  The effects of α.

    Figure 8 displays four graphs illustrating the impacts of altering the parameter β3 on an epidemic model over a span of 150 days. The figure illustrates the fluctuations in the susceptible human population (Sh), hospitalized infected human population (Hh), infected vector population (Im), and the total population (Sh+Ih0+Ih+Hh) across three scenarios: the initial β3(green), a 10% rise in β3(red), and a 10% drop in β3(blue). The population of individuals susceptible to the infection (Sh) initially drops and then reaches a stable state. This is due to a decrease in the transmission rate β3, which results in a smaller peak in infections and a faster population stability. The population of infected individuals who are hospitalized (Hh) exhibits a notable peak followed by a steady fall, which is caused by a reduced β3 resulting in a more significant peak and longer duration of hospitalization. The population of infected vectors (Im), diminishes with time, with a reduced β3 leading to a more significant initial value and a slower rate of decline. The aggregate population (Sh+Ih0+Ih+Hh) experiences a significant increase followed by a period of stability, with negligible influence from changes in β3 on the overall pattern. Overall, a reduction in β3 exacerbates and lengthens the epidemic, while an augmentation in β3 alleviates its severity and duration.

    Figure 8.  The effects of β3.

    Figure 9 illustrates the impact of changing the parameter β5 on the number of hospitalized infected and recovered individuals over a period of time, measured in days. The initial β5(green) of the hospitalized infected exhibits a fast ascent, reaching its maximum around day 40, and subsequently undergoes a slow decrease (Figure 9(a)). An increment of 10% in the value of β5(red) leads to a decrease in the highest point and a slightly swifter decrease. A reduction of 10% in the value of β5 (blue) results in an increased peak and a longer duration of hospitalization. In Figure 9(b), the population of the original β5(green) strain has rapid growth, reaching its highest point around day 50, and then remains stable. A 10% augmentation in the value of β5(red) leads to a marginally elevated peak and a faster attainment of stability. A reduction of 10% in the value of β5(blue) results in a marginally diminished highest point and a delayed attainment of stability. In general, raising the value of β5 has the tendency to decrease the maximum number of patients requiring hospitalization and speed up the process of recovery, leading to a less severe outbreak.

    Figure 9.  The effects of β5.

    This study focuses on developing and examining a nonlinear mathematical model that represents the dynamics of dengue. The model considers different compartments for infected people, individuals with symptoms, and individuals requiring hospitalization. We took a look at the suggested model's fundamental characteristics. The model equilibria were used to produce the control reproduction number, the most essential mathematical quantity with major public health relevance. The results of the model's stability tests were presented. The application of the Jacobian matrix method reveals that the local asymptotic stability of the disease-free steady-state is disrupted. Numerical simulation using several parameter configurations demonstrated the evolution of epidemics, the dynamics of the system, and validated theoretical findings. The numerical simulations illustrate the impact of parameters such as the rate of immune system of susceptible hosts by consuming natural foods, the rate of symptomatic infection to hospitalized infected humans, and the recovery rate of hospitalized infected humans. We also conducted a sensitivity study to evaluate the impact of model parameters on the dynamics and management of the disease. We examined the impact of various parameter rates in order to determine the extent to which this variance influences the epidemic trajectory. The research findings indicate that raising the rate of α has the most significant impact on reducing the reproduction number, with no other parameter having a comparable effect on reducing infection. An investigation of this nature can provide crucial information for policymakers and health experts who may be faced with the harsh reality of infectious diseases.

    All authors contributed equal significant contributions to the study's concept, design, methodology, validation, and analysis. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

    The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any conflict of interest.



    [1] Obesity and overweight, URL https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.
    [2] N. J. Temple, The origins of the obesity epidemic in the USA–lessons for today, Nutrients, 14 (2022), 4253. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14204253 doi: 10.3390/nu14204253
    [3] S. Bleich, D. Cutler, C. Murray, A. Adams, Why is the developed world obese?, Annu. Rev. Public Health, 29 (2008), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090954 doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090954
    [4] M. Ng, T. Fleming, M. Robinson, B. Thomson, N. Graetz, C. Margono, et al., Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013, Lancet (London, England), 384 (2014), 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8
    [5] H. F. Wells, J. C. Buzby, Dietary assessment of major trends in U.S. food consumption, 1970–2005. URL http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid = 44220.
    [6] Y. Ritze, G. Bárdos, J. G. D'Haese, B. Ernst, M. Thurnheer, B. Schultes, S. C. Bischoff, Effect of high sugar intake on glucose transporter and weight regulating hormones in mice and humans, PLOS ONE, 9 (2014), e101702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101702 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101702
    [7] L. T. Morenga, S. Mallard, J. Mann, Dietary sugars and body weight: Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies, BMJ, 346 (2013), e7492. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7492 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7492
    [8] H. Gu, S. Shao, J. Liu, Z. Fan, Y. Chen, J. Ni, et al., Age- and sex-associated impacts of body mass index on stroke type risk: a 27-year prospective cohort study in a low-income population in China, Front. Neurol., 10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00456 doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00456
    [9] K. Cheng, Health oriented lifelong nutrition controls: Preventing cardiovascular diseases caused by obesity, 2020, URL /paper/Health-Oriented-Lifelong-Nutrition-Controls%3A-Caused-Cheng/e8ba816f29502370121f6c44217d019fcbae0223.
    [10] K. Mc Namara, H. Alzubaidi, J. K. Jackson, Cardiovascular disease as a leading cause of death: how are pharmacists getting involved?, Integr. Pharm. Res. Pract., 8 (2019), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2147/IPRP.S133088 doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S133088
    [11] N. Taghizadeh, H. M. Boezen, J. P. Schouten, C. P. Schröder, E. G. E. de Vries, J. M. Vonk, BMI and lifetime changes in BMI and cancer mortality risk, PLoS ONE, 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125261
    [12] K. Bhaskaran, I. Douglas, H. Forbes, I. dos Santos-Silva, D. A. Leon, L. Smeeth, Body-mass index and risk of 22 specific cancers: A population-based cohort study of 5·24 million UK adults, The Lancet, 384 (2014), 755–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60892-8 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60892-8
    [13] M. Kalligeros, F. Shehadeh, E. K. Mylona, G. Benitez, C. G. Beckwith, P. A. Chan, et al., Association of obesity with disease severity among patients with coronavirus disease 2019, Obesity, 28 (2020), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22859 doi: 10.1002/oby.22859
    [14] A. Golay, J. Ybarra, Link between obesity and type 2 diabetes, Best Pract Res. Clin. Endocrinol Metab., 19 (2005), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2005.07.010 doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2005.07.010
    [15] A. S. Al-Goblan, M. A. Al-Alfi, M. Z. Khan, Mechanism linking diabetes mellitus and obesity, Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes., 7 (2014), 587–591. https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S67400 doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S67400
    [16] A. S. Barnes, The epidemic of obesity and diabetes, Tex. Heart Inst. J., 38 (2011), 142–144. URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3066828/.
    [17] N. A. Roper, R. W. Bilous, W. F. Kelly, N. C. Unwin, V. M. Connolly, Cause-specific mortality in a population with diabetes: south tees diabetes mortality study, Diabetes Care, 25 (2002), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.1.43 doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.1.43
    [18] M. Tancredi, A. Rosengren, A.-M. Svensson, M. Kosiborod, A. Pivodic, S. Gudbjörnsdottir, et al., Excess mortality among persons with type 2 diabetes, NEJM, 373 (2015), 1720–1732. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504347 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504347
    [19] R. A. DeFronzo, R. C. Bonadonna, E. Ferrannini, Pathogenesis of NIDDM: a balanced overview, Diabetes Care, 15 (1992), 318–368. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.15.3.318 doi: 10.2337/diacare.15.3.318
    [20] A. D. Baron, G. Brechtel, P. Wallace, S. V. Edelman, Rates and tissue sites of non-insulin- and insulin-mediated glucose uptake in humans, Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol Metab., 255 (1988), E769–E774. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1988.255.6.E769 doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1988.255.6.E769
    [21] R. A. DeFronzo, D. Tripathy, Skeletal muscle insulin resistance is the primary defect in type 2 diabetes, Diabetes Care, 32 (2009), S157–S163. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-S302 doi: 10.2337/dc09-S302
    [22] R. A. DeFronzo, The triumvirate: -cell, muscle, liver: A collusion responsible for NIDDM, Diabetes, 37 (1988), 667–687. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.37.6.667 doi: 10.2337/diab.37.6.667
    [23] E. Archer, C. J. Lavie, J. O. Hill, The contributions of 'diet', 'genes', and physical activity to the etiology of obesity: contrary evidence and consilience, Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis., 61 (2018), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2018.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2018.06.002
    [24] E. Archer, G. Pavela, S. McDonald, C. J. Lavie, J. O. Hill, Cell-specific "competition for calories" drives asymmetric nutrient-energy partitioning, obesity, and metabolic diseases in human and non-human Animals, Front. Physiol., 9 (2018), 1053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01053 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01053
    [25] A. V. Greco, G. Mingrone, A. Giancaterini, M. Manco, M. Morroni, S. Cinti, et al., Insulin resistance in morbid obesity: reversal with intramyocellular fat depletion, Diabetes, 51 (2002), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.51.1.144 doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.1.144
    [26] O. T. Hardy, M. P. Czech, S. Corvera, What causes the insulin resistance underlying obesity?, Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes., 19 (2012), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0b013e3283514e13 doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e3283514e13
    [27] C. Roberts-Toler, B. T. O'Neill, A. M. Cypess, Diet-induced obesity causes insulin resistance in mouse brown adipose tissue: DIO causes BAT insulin resistance, Obesity, 23 (2015), 1765–1770. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21134 doi: 10.1002/oby.21134
    [28] E. Christiansen, L. Garby, Prediction of body weight changes caused by changes in energy balance, Eur. J. Clin. Invest., 32 (2002), 826–830. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2362.2002.01036.x doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2002.01036.x
    [29] E. Christiansen, L. Garby, T. I. A. Sørensen, Quantitative analysis of the energy requirements for development of obesity, J. Theor. Biol., 234 (2005), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.11.012 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.11.012
    [30] C. C. Chow, K. D. Hall, The dynamics of human body weight change, PLoS Comput. Biol., 4 (2008), e1000045. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000045 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000045
    [31] K. D. Hall, P. N. Jordan, Modeling weight-loss maintenance to help prevent body weight regain, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 88 (2008), 1495–1503. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2008.26333 doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26333
    [32] D. M. Thomas, A. Ciesla, J. A. Levine, J. G. Stevens, C. K. Martin, A mathematical model of weight change with adaptation, MBE, 6 (2009), 873–887. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2009.6.873 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.873
    [33] E. H. Livingston, I. Kohlstadt, Simplified resting metabolic rate-predicting formulas for normal-sized and obese individuals, Obes. Res., 13 (2005), 1255–1262. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2005.149 doi: 10.1038/oby.2005.149
    [34] D. M. Thomas, C. K. Martin, S. Heymsfield, L. M. Redman, D. A. Schoeller, J. A. Levine, A simple model predicting individual weight change in humans, J. Biol. Dyn., 5 (2011), 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513758.2010.508541 doi: 10.1080/17513758.2010.508541
    [35] J. Guo, D. C. Brager, K. D. Hall, Simulating long-term human weight-loss dynamics in response to calorie restriction, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 107 (2018), 558–565. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqx080 doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqx080
    [36] P. Jacquet, Y. Schutz, J.-P. Montani, A. Dulloo, How dieting might make some fatter: modeling weight cycling toward obesity from a perspective of body composition autoregulation, Int. J. Obes., 44 (2020), 1243–1253. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-0547-1 doi: 10.1038/s41366-020-0547-1
    [37] A. Peña Fernández, A. Youssef, C. Heeren, C. Matthys, J.-M. Aerts, Real-time model predictive control of human bodyweight based on energy intake, Appl. Sci., 9 (2019), 2609. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9132609 doi: 10.3390/app9132609
    [38] O. Babajide, T. Hissam, P. Anna, G. Anatoliy, A. Astrup, J. Alfredo Martinez, et al., A machine learning approach to short-term body weight prediction in a dietary intervention program, Computational Science – ICCS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020,441–455.
    [39] K. D. Hall, G. Sacks, D. Chandramohan, C. C. Chow, Y. C. Wang, S. L. Gortmaker, et al., Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight, Lancet (London, England), 378 (2011), 826–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60812-X doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60812-X
    [40] B.-H. Lin, T. A. Smith, J.-Y. Lee, K. D. Hall, Measuring weight outcomes for obesity intervention strategies: the case of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax, Econ. Hum. Biol., 9 (2011), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2011.08.007 doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2011.08.007
    [41] T. A. Smith, Taxing Caloric Sweetened Beverages: Potential Effects on Beverage Consumption, Calorie Intake, and Obesity, DIANE Publishing, 2010, Google-Books-ID: 3hBCqYKh0JQC.
    [42] T. S. Church, D. M. Thomas, C. Tudor-Locke, P. T. Katzmarzyk, C. P. Earnest, R. Q. Rodarte, et al., Trends over 5 decades in U.S. occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity, PLOS ONE, 6 (2011), e19657. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019657 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019657
    [43] K. D. Hall, Metabolism of mice and men: mathematical modeling of body weight dynamics, Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care, 15 (2012), 418–423. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0b013e3283561150 doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e3283561150
    [44] K. D. Hall, J. Guo, M. Dore, C. C. Chow, The progressive increase of food waste in America and its environmental impact, PLOS ONE, 4 (2009), e7940. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007940 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007940
    [45] F. P. Kozusko, Body weight setpoint, metabolic adaption and human starvation, Bull. Math. Biol., 63 (2001), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2001.0229 doi: 10.1006/bulm.2001.0229
    [46] F. P. Kozusko, The effects of body composition on setpoint based weight loss, Math. Comput. Model., 35 (2002), 973–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(02)00064-X doi: 10.1016/S0895-7177(02)00064-X
    [47] D. M. Thomas, J. E. Navarro-Barrientos, D. E. Rivera, S. B. Heymsfield, C. Bredlau, L. M. Redman, et al., Dynamic energy-balance model predicting gestational weight gain, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 95 (2012), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.024307 doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.024307
    [48] K. Ejima, D. M. Thomas, D. B. Allison, A mathematical model for predicting obesity transmission with both genetic and nongenetic heredity, Obesity (Silver Spring), 26 (2018), 927–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22135 doi: 10.1002/oby.22135
    [49] K. D. Hall, Computational model of in vivo human energy metabolism during semistarvation and refeeding, Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab., 291 (2006), E23–37. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00523.2005 doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00523.2005
    [50] D.-M. Li, T.-N. Guo, Q. Wang, B. Chai, R.-X. Zhang, D.-M. Li, et al., Quantitative analysis of body metabolism regulation model in the process of weight loss, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 2500–2525. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2020165 doi: 10.3934/math.2020165
    [51] G. M. Barnwell, F. S. Stafford, Mathematical model for decision-making neural circuits controlling food intake, Bull. Psychon. Soc., 5 (1975), 473–476. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333304 doi: 10.3758/BF03333304
    [52] R. C. Boston, P. J. Moate, K. C. Allison, J. D. Lundgren, A. J. Stunkard, Modeling circadian rhythms of food intake by means of parametric deconvolution: results from studies of the night eating syndrome, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 87 (2008), 1672–1677. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/87.6.1672 doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.6.1672
    [53] F. Cameron, G. Niemeyer, B. A. Buckingham, Probabilistic evolving meal detection and estimation of meal total glucose appearance, J. Diabetes Sci. Technol., 3 (2009), 1022–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229680900300505 doi: 10.1177/193229680900300505
    [54] N. P. Balakrishnan, L. Samavedham, G. P. Rangaiah, Personalized mechanistic models for exercise, meal and insulin interventions in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, J. Theor. Biol., 357 (2014), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.04.038 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.04.038
    [55] M. Jacquier, F. Crauste, C. O. Soulage, H. A. Soula, A predictive model of the dynamics of body weight and food intake in rats submitted to caloric restrictions, PLOS ONE, 9 (2014), e100073. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100073 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100073
    [56] A. L. Murillo, M. Safan, C. Castillo-Chavez, E. D. C. Phillips, D. Wadhera, Modeling eating behaviors: The role of environment and positive food association learning via a ratatouille effect, MBE, 13, 841–855. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2016020
    [57] M. Chudtong, A. D. Gaetano, A mathematical model of food intake, MBE, 18 (2021), 1238–1279. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2021067 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021067
    [58] A. Hinsberger, B. K. Sandhu, Digestion and absorption, Curr. Pediatr., 14 (2004), 605–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cupe.2004.08.004 doi: 10.1016/j.cupe.2004.08.004
    [59] A. D. Jackson, J. McLaughlin, Digestion and absorption, Surgery (Oxf), 27 (2009), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2009.03.003 doi: 10.1016/j.mpsur.2009.03.003
    [60] I. Campbell, Digestion and absorption, Anaesth. Intensive Care Med., 13 (2012), 62–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpaic.2011.11.001 doi: 10.1016/j.mpaic.2011.11.001
    [61] P. R. Kiela, F. K. Ghishan, Physiology of intestinal absorption and secretion, Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol., 30 (2016), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2016.02.007 doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.02.007
    [62] A. B. Strathe, A. Danfær, A. Chwalibog, A dynamic model of digestion and absorption in pigs, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 143 (2008), 328–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.018 doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.018
    [63] S. Salinari, A. Bertuzzi, G. Mingrone, Intestinal transit of a glucose bolus and incretin kinetics: a mathematical model with application to the oral glucose tolerance test, Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab., 300 (2011), E955–965. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00451.2010 doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00451.2010
    [64] A. D. Gaetano, S. Panunzi, A. Matone, A. Samson, J. Vrbikova, B. Bendlova, et al., Routine OGTT: a robust model including incretin effect for precise identification of insulin sensitivity and secretion in a single individual, PLOS ONE, 8 (2013), e70875. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070875 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070875
    [65] M. Taghipoor, G. Barles, C. Georgelin, J. R. Licois, P. Lescoat, Digestion modeling in the small intestine: impact of dietary fiber, Math. Biosci., 258 (2014), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2014.09.011 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2014.09.011
    [66] E. D. Lehmann, T. Deutsch, A physiological model of glucose-insulin interaction in type 1 diabetes mellitus, J. Biomed. Eng., 14 (1992), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-5425(92)90058-s doi: 10.1016/0141-5425(92)90058-s
    [67] A. Roy, R. S. Parker, Dynamic modeling of exercise effects on plasma glucose and insulin levels, J. Diabetes Sci. Technol., 1 (2007), 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229680700100305 doi: 10.1177/193229680700100305
    [68] R. Hovorka, V. Canonico, L. J. Chassin, U. Haueter, M. Massi-Benedetti, M. Orsini Federici, et al., Nonlinear model predictive control of glucose concentration in subjects with type 1 diabetes, Physiol. Meas., 25 (2004), 905–920. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/25/4/010 doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/25/4/010
    [69] B. K. Mani, K. Shankar, J. M. Zigman, Ghrelin's relationship to blood glucose, Endocrinol., 160 (2019), 1247–1261. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2019-00074 doi: 10.1210/en.2019-00074
    [70] R. D. Palmiter, Is dopamine a physiologically relevant mediator of feeding behavior?, Trends Neurosci., 30 (2007), 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2007.06.004 doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.06.004
    [71] D. P. Figlewicz, S. B. Evans, J. Murphy, M. Hoen, D. G. Baskin, Expression of receptors for insulin and leptin in the ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra (VTA/SN) of the rat, Brain Res., 964 (2003), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(02)04087-8 doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)04087-8
    [72] D. P. Figlewicz, P. Szot, M. Chavez, S. C. Woods, R. C. Veith, Intraventricular insulin increases dopamine transporter mRNA in rat VTA/substantia nigra, Brain Res., 644 (1994), 331–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(94)91698-5 doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91698-5
    [73] J. Vartiainen, Ghrelin, obesity and type 2 diabetes : Genetic, metabolic and epidemiological studies, University of Oulu, Place: University of Oulu.
    [74] J. L. Jameson, L. J. D. Groot, Endocrinology: Adult and Pediatric, E-Book, Elsevier Health Sciences, 2015, Google-Books-ID: xmLeBgAAQBAJ.
    [75] D. A. Schatz, M. Haller, M. Atkinson, Type 1 Diabetes, An Issue of Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, E-Book, Elsevier Health Sciences, 2010, Google-Books-ID: nu2IxmYJkjkC.
    [76] J. Morales, D. Schneider, Hypoglycemia, AJM, 127 (2014), S17–S24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.07.004 doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.07.004
    [77] C. Kenny, When hypoglycemia is not obvious: Diagnosing and treating under-recognized and undisclosed hypoglycemia, Prim. Care Diabetes, 8 (2014), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2013.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2013.09.002
    [78] G. Cheney, Medical Management of Gastrointestinal Disorders, Year Book, 1950, Google-Books-ID: nwiyAAAAIAAJ.
    [79] M. M, How to Manage Your Diabetes and Lead a Normal Life, Peacock Books, 2008, Google-Books-ID: bavxjgZa2NIC.
    [80] R. K. Bernstein, Hunger–a common symptom of hypoglycemia, Diabetes Care, 16 (1993), 1049. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.16.7.1049a doi: 10.2337/diacare.16.7.1049a
    [81] L. C. Perlmuter, B. P. Flanagan, P. H. Shah, S. P. Singh, Glycemic control and hypoglycemia, Diabetes Care, 31 (2008), 2072–2076. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1441 doi: 10.2337/dc08-1441
    [82] B. Schultes, K. M. Oltmanns, W. Kern, H. L. Fehm, J. Born, A. Peters, Modulation of hunger by plasma glucose and metformin, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 88 (2003), 1133–1141. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-021450 doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021450
    [83] B. Schultes, A. Peters, M. Hallschmid, C. Benedict, V. Merl, K. M. Oltmanns, et al., Modulation of food intake by glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes, Diabetes Care, 28 (2005), 2884–2889. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.12.2884 doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.12.2884
    [84] H. A. J. Gielkens, M. Verkijk, W. F. Lam, C. B. H. W. Lamers, A. A. M. Masclee, Effects of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia on satiety in humans, Metab. Clin. Exp., 47 (1998), 321–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-0495(98)90264-5 doi: 10.1016/S0026-0495(98)90264-5
    [85] B. Schultes, A.-K. Panknin, M. Hallschmid, K. Jauch-Chara, B. Wilms, F. de Courbière, et al., Glycemic increase induced by intravenous glucose infusion fails to affect hunger, appetite, or satiety following breakfast in healthy men, Appetite, 105 (2016), 562–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.032 doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.032
    [86] G. H. Anderson, D. Woodend, Consumption of sugars and the regulation of short-term satiety and food intake, Am. J. Clin. Nut., 78 (2003), 843S–849S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/78.4.843S doi: 10.1093/ajcn/78.4.843S
    [87] J. M. McMillin, Blood Glucose, Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations (eds. H. K. Walker, W. D. Hall and J. W. Hurst), 3rd edition. Butterworths, Boston, 1990. URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK248/.
    [88] S. J. Russell, F. H. El-Khatib, M. Sinha, K. L. Magyar, K. McKeon, L. G. Goergen, et al., Outpatient glycemic control with a bionic pancreas in type 1 diabetes, N. Engl. J. Med., 371 (2014), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1314474 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314474
    [89] A. Boutayeb, A. Chetouani, A critical review of mathematical models and data used in diabetology, Biomed. Eng. OnLine., 5 (2006), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-5-43 doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-5-43
    [90] P. Palumbo, S. Ditlevsen, A. Bertuzzi, A. De Gaetano, Mathematical modeling of the glucose-insulin system: A review, Math. Biosci., 244 (2013), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-5-43 doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-5-43
    [91] A. Mari, A. Tura, E. Grespan, R. Bizzotto, Mathematical modeling for the physiological and clinical investigation of glucose homeostasis and diabetes, Front. Physiol., 11 (2020), 575789. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.575789 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.575789
    [92] B. Huard, G. Kirkham, Mathematical modelling of glucose dynamics, Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Metab. Res., 25 (2022), 100379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coemr.2022.100379 doi: 10.1016/j.coemr.2022.100379
    [93] R. N. Bergman, G. Bortolan, C. Cobelli, G. Toffolo, Identification of a minimal model of glucose disappearance for estimating insulin sensitivity, IFAC Proc. Vol., 12 (1979), 883–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)65505-8 doi: 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)65505-8
    [94] G. Toffolo, R. N. Bergman, D. T. Finegood, C. R. Bowden, C. Cobelli, Quantitative estimation of beta cell sensitivity to glucose in the intact organism: a minimal model of insulin kinetics in the dog, Diabetes, 29 (1980), 979–990. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.29.12.979 doi: 10.2337/diab.29.12.979
    [95] A. De Gaetano, O. Arino, Mathematical modelling of the intravenous glucose tolerance test, J. Math. Biol., 40 (2000), 136–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002850050007 doi: 10.1007/s002850050007
    [96] S. Panunzi, P. Palumbo, A. De Gaetano, A discrete single delay model for the intra-venous glucose tolerance test, Theor. Biol. Med. Model., 4 (2007), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-4-35 doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-4-35
    [97] S. Panunzi, A. De Gaetano, G. Mingrone, Advantages of the single delay model for the assessment of insulin sensitivity from the intravenous glucose tolerance test, Theor. Biol. Med. Model., 7 (2010), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-7-9 doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-7-9
    [98] G. Pacini, R. N. Bergman, MINMOD: a computer program to calculate insulin sensitivity and pancreatic responsivity from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 23 (1986), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(86)90106-9 doi: 10.1016/0169-2607(86)90106-9
    [99] C. Dalla Man, R. A. Rizza, C. Cobelli, Meal simulation model of the glucose-insulin system, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 54 (2007), 1740–1749. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2007.893506 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.893506
    [100] W. Liu, F. Tang, Modeling a simplified regulatory system of blood glucose at molecular levels, J. Theor. Biol., 252 (2008), 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.021 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.021
    [101] W. Liu, C. Hsin, F. Tang, A molecular mathematical model of glucose mobilization and uptake, Math. Biosci., 221 (2009), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2009.07.005 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2009.07.005
    [102] Z. Wu, C. K. Chui, G. S. Hong, S. Chang, Physiological analysis on oscillatory behavior of glucose–insulin regulation by model with delays, J. Theor. Biol., 280 (2011), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.032 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.032
    [103] M. Lombarte, M. Lupo, G. Campetelli, M. Basualdo, A. Rigalli, Mathematical model of glucose–insulin homeostasis in healthy rats, Math. Biosci., 245 (2013), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2013.07.017 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2013.07.017
    [104] A. C. Pratt, J. A. D. Wattis, A. M. Salter, Mathematical modelling of hepatic lipid metabolism, Math. Biosci., 262 (2015), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2014.12.012 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2014.12.012
    [105] J. Girard, The incretins: From the concept to their use in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Part A: incretins: concept and physiological functions, Diabetes Metab., 34 (2008), 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2008.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2008.09.001
    [106] J. J. Holst, C. F. Deacon, T. Vilsbøll, T. Krarup, S. Madsbad, Glucagon-like peptide-1, glucose homeostasis and diabetes, Trends Mol. Med., 14 (2008), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2008.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2008.01.003
    [107] J. J. Holst, T. Vilsbøll, C. F. Deacon, The incretin system and its role in type 2 diabetes mellitus, Mol. Cell. Endocrinol., 297 (2009), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2008.08.012 doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.08.012
    [108] K. Kazakos, Incretin effect: GLP-1, GIP, DPP4, Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract., 93 (2011), S32–S36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8227(11)70011-0 doi: 10.1016/S0168-8227(11)70011-0
    [109] J. J. Holst, C. F. Deacon, Is there a place for incretin therapies in obesity and prediabetes?, Trends Endocrinol. Metab., 24 (2013), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2013.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2013.01.004
    [110] G. Zhao, D. Wirth, I. Schmitz, M. Meyer-Hermann, A mathematical model of the impact of insulin secretion dynamics on selective hepatic insulin resistance, Nat. Commun., 8 (2017), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01627-9 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01627-9
    [111] S. Masroor, M. G. J. van Dongen, R. Alvarez-Jimenez, K. Burggraaf, L. A. Peletier, M. A. Peletier, Mathematical modeling of the glucagon challenge test, J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn., 46 (2019), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-019-09655-2 doi: 10.1007/s10928-019-09655-2
    [112] M. C. Palumbo, M. Morettini, P. Tieri, F. Diele, M. Sacchetti, F. Castiglione, Personalizing physical exercise in a computational model of fuel homeostasis, PLoS Comput. Biol., 14 (2018), e1006073. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006073 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006073
    [113] M. C. Palumbo, A. A. de Graaf, M. Morettini, P. Tieri, S. Krishnan, F. Castiglione, A computational model of the effects of macronutrients absorption and physical exercise on hormonal regulation and metabolic homeostasis, Comput. Biol. Med., 163 (2023), 107158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107158 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107158
    [114] J. Deichmann, S. Bachmann, M. Pfister, G. Szinnai, H.-M. Kaltenbach, A comprehensive model of glucose-insulin regulation including acute and prolonged effects of physical activity in type 1 diabetes, bioRxiv, 2021.06.09.447693. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.09.447693
    [115] N. E. López-Palau, J. M. Olais-Govea, Mathematical model of blood glucose dynamics by emulating the pathophysiology of glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetes mellitus, Sci. Rep., 10 (2020), 12697. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69629-0 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69629-0
    [116] H. Kurata, Virtual metabolic human dynamic model for pathological analysis and therapy design for diabetes, iScience, 24 (2021), 102101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102101 doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102101
    [117] R. N. Bergman, Y. Z. Ider, C. R. Bowden, C. Cobelli, Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity., Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab., 236 (1979), E667. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1979.236.6.E667 doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1979.236.6.E667
    [118] A. Mukhopadhyay, A. De Gaetano, O. Arino, Modeling the intra-venous glucose tolerance test: a global study for a single-distributed-delay model, DCDS-B, 4 (2004), 407. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.407 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.407
    [119] J. Li, M. Wang, A. De Gaetano, P. Palumbo, S. Panunzi, The range of time delay and the global stability of the equilibrium for an IVGTT model, Math. Biosci., 235 (2012), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2011.11.005 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2011.11.005
    [120] D. V. Giang, Y. Lenbury, A. De Gaetano, P. Palumbo, Delay model of glucose–insulin systems: Global stability and oscillated solutions conditional on delays, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 343 (2008), 996–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.02.016 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.02.016
    [121] C.-L. Chen, H.-W. Tsai, Modeling the physiological glucose–insulin system on normal and diabetic subjects, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 97 (2010), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.06.005
    [122] P. Palumbo, P. Pepe, S. Panunzi, A. De Gaetano, Time-delay model-based control of the glucose-insulin system, by means of a state observer, European J. Control, 6 (2012), 591–606. https://doi.org/10.3166/EJC.18.591-606 doi: 10.3166/EJC.18.591-606
    [123] A. De Gaetano, S. Panunzi, A. Matone, A. Samson, J. Vrbikova, B. Bendlova, et al., Routine OGTT: a robust model including incretin effect for precise identification of insulin sensitivity and secretion in a single individual, PLOS ONE, 8 (2013), e70875. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070875 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070875
    [124] P. Palumbo, G. Pizzichelli, S. Panunzi, P. Pepe, A. De Gaetano, Model-based control of plasma glycemia: Tests on populations of virtual patients, Math. Biosci., 257 (2014), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2014.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2014.09.003
    [125] U. Picchini, A. De Gaetano, S. Panunzi, S. Ditlevsen, G. Mingrone, A mathematical model of the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, Theor. Biol. Med. Model., 2 (2005), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-2-44 doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-2-44
    [126] U. Picchini, S. Ditlevsen, A. De Gaetano, Modeling the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp by stochastic differential equations, J. Math. Biol., 53 (2006), 771–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-006-0032-z doi: 10.1007/s00285-006-0032-z
    [127] P. Palumbo, A. De Gaetano, An islet population model of the endocrine pancreas, J. Math. Biol., 61 (2010), 171–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-009-0297-0 doi: 10.1007/s00285-009-0297-0
    [128] A. De Gaetano, C. Gaz, P. Palumbo, S. Panunzi, A unifying organ model of pancreatic insulin secretion, PLOS ONE, 10 (2015), e0142344. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142344 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142344
    [129] A. De Gaetano, C. Gaz, S. Panunzi, Consistency of compact and extended models of glucose-insulin homeostasis: the role of variable pancreatic reserve, PLOS ONE, 14 (2019), e0211331. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211331 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211331
    [130] B. Topp, K. Promislow, G. deVries, R. M. Miura, D. T. Finegood, A model of beta-cell mass, insulin, and glucose kinetics: pathways to diabetes, J. Theor. Biol., 206 (2000), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2150 doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2150
    [131] A. De Gaetano, T. Hardy, B. Beck, E. Abu-Raddad, P. Palumbo, J. Bue-Valleskey, et al., Mathematical models of diabetes progression, Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab., 295 (2008), E1462–1479.
    [132] P. C. Fletcher, P. J. Kenny, Food addiction: A valid concept?, Neuropsychopharmacology, 43 (2018), 2506–2513. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-018-0203-9 doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0203-9
    [133] T. Hardy, E. Abu-Raddad, N. Porksen, A. De Gaetano, Evaluation of a mathematical model of diabetes progression against observations in the Diabetes Prevention Program, Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab., 303 (2012), E200–E212. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00421.2011 doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00421.2011
    [134] A. De Gaetano, T. A. Hardy, A novel fast-slow model of diabetes progression: Insights into mechanisms of response to the interventions in the diabetes prevention program, PLOS ONE, 14 (2019), e0222833. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222833 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222833
    [135] P. Toghaw, A. Matone, Y. Lenbury, A. De Gaetano, Bariatric surgery and T2dm improvement mechanisms: A mathematical model, Theor. Biol. Med. Model, 9 (2012), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-9-16 doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-9-16
    [136] C. C. Y. Noguchi, E. Furutani, S. Sumi, Enhanced mathematical model of postprandial glycemic excursion in diabetics using rapid-acting insulin, 2012 SICE AC., 2012,566–571.
    [137] A. De Gaetano, S. Panunzi, D. Eliopoulos, T. Hardy, G. Mingrone, Mathematical modeling of renal tubular glucose absorption after glucose load, PLOS ONE, 9 (2014), e86963, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086963 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086963
    [138] A. Borri, S. Panunzi, A. De Gaetano, A glycemia-structured population model, J. Math. Biol., 73 (2016), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-015-0935-7 doi: 10.1007/s00285-015-0935-7
    [139] S. Sakulrang, E. J. Moore, S. Sungnul, A. De Gaetano, A fractional differential equation model for continuous glucose monitoring data, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2017 (2017), 150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-017-1207-1 doi: 10.1186/s13662-017-1207-1
    [140] S. Panunzi, A. Borri, L. D'Orsi, A. DeGaetano, Order estimation for a fractional Brownian motion model of glucose control, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer., 127 (2023), 107554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2023.107554 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2023.107554
    [141] J. Yokrattanasak, A. De Gaetano, S. Panunzi, P. Satiracoo, W. M. Lawton, Y. Lenbury, A simple, realistic stochastic model of gastric emptying, PLoS ONE, 11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153297 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153297
    [142] Y. T. Wondmkun, Obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes: Associations and therapeutic implications, Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. Targets Ther., 13 (2020), 3611–3616. https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S275898 doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S275898
    [143] B. B. Kahn, J. S. Flier, Obesity and insulin resistance, J. Clin. Invest, 106 (2000), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI10842 doi: 10.1172/JCI10842
    [144] L. Pénicaud, M. F. Kinebanyan, P. Ferré, J. Morin, J. Kandé, C. Smadja, et al., Development of VMH obesity: In vivo insulin secretion and tissue insulin sensitivity, Am. J. Physiol., 257 (1989), E255–260. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1989.257.2.E255 doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1989.257.2.E255
    [145] S. Virtue, A. Vidal-Puig, Adipose tissue expandability, lipotoxicity and the metabolic syndrome–an allostatic perspective, BBA, 1801 (2010), 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.12.006 doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.12.006
    [146] D. S. Ludwig, C. B. Ebbeling, The carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity: beyond 'calories in, calories out', JAMA Intern. Med., 178 (2018), 1098–1103. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2933 doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2933
    [147] R Core Team, R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2023, URL https://www.R-project.org/.
    [148] U. N. UNIVERSITY, Human energy requirements Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation, 1, 2004.
    [149] A. E. Black, W. A. Coward, T. J. Cole, A. M. Prentice, Human energy expenditure in affluent societies: An analysis of 574 doubly-labelled water measurements, Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 50 (1996), 72–92.
    [150] M. D. Mifflin, S. T. St Jeor, L. A. Hill, B. J. Scott, S. A. Daugherty, Y. O. Koh, A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 51 (1990), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/51.2.241 doi: 10.1093/ajcn/51.2.241
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Jiraporn Lamwong, Puntani Pongsumpun, Fractional-order modeling of dengue dynamics: exploring reinfection mechanisms with the Atangana–Baleanu derivative, 2025, 11, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-025-02441-9
    2. Tahir Wasim, Tariq Ismaeel, Amir Naseem, Thabet Abdeljawad, Manar A. Alqudah, Modelling and sensitivity analysis to control dengue through inclusion of genetically modified hybrid mosquitoes, 2025, 31, 1387-3954, 10.1080/13873954.2025.2500446
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(376) PDF downloads(18) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(8)  /  Tables(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog