Review Special Issues

Gravimetric inversion based on model exploration with growing source bodies (Growth) in diverse earth science disciplines

  • Gravimetry is a discipline of geophysics that deals with observation and interpretation of the earth gravity field. The acquired gravity data serve the study of the earth interior, be it the deep or the near surface one, by means of the inferred subsurface structural density distribution. The subsurface density structure is resolved by solving the gravimetric inverse problem. Diverse methods and approaches exist for solving this non-unique and ill-posed inverse problem. Here, we focused on those methods that do not pre-constrain the number or geometries of the density sources. We reviewed the historical development and the basic principles of the Growth inversion methodology, which belong to the methods based on the growth of the model density structure throughout an iterative exploration process. The process was based on testing and filling the cells of a subsurface domain partition with density contrasts through an iterative mixed weighted adjustment procedure. The procedure iteratively minimized the data misfit residuals jointly with minimizing the total anomalous mass of the model, which facilitated obtaining compact meaningful source bodies of the solution. The applicability of the Growth inversion approach in structural geophysical studies, in geodynamic studies, and in near surface gravimetric studies was reviewed and illustrated. This work also presented the first application of the Growth inversion tool to near surface microgravimetric data with the goal of seeking very shallow cavities in archeological prospection and environmental geophysics.

    Citation: Peter Vajda, Jozef Bódi, Antonio G. Camacho, José Fernández, Roman Pašteka, Pavol Zahorec, Juraj Papčo. Gravimetric inversion based on model exploration with growing source bodies (Growth) in diverse earth science disciplines[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 11735-11761. doi: 10.3934/math.2024575

    Related Papers:

    [1] Lili Jiang, Sirong Chen, Yuanhui Wu, Da Zhou, Lihua Duan . Prediction of coronary heart disease in gout patients using machine learning models. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(3): 4574-4591. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023212
    [2] Zhaobin Qiu, Ying Qiao, Wanyuan Shi, Xiaoqian Liu . A robust framework for enhancing cardiovascular disease risk prediction using an optimized category boosting model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(2): 2943-2969. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024131
    [3] Anastasia-Maria Leventi-Peetz, Kai Weber . Probabilistic machine learning for breast cancer classification. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 624-655. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023029
    [4] Javier Antonio Ballesteros-Ricaurte, Ramon Fabregat, Angela Carrillo-Ramos, Carlos Parra, Andrés Moreno . Artificial neural networks to predict the presence of Neosporosis in cattle. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(5): 1140-1158. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025041
    [5] Huili Yang, Wangren Qiu, Zi Liu . Anoikis-related mRNA-lncRNA and DNA methylation profiles for overall survival prediction in breast cancer patients. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 1590-1609. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024069
    [6] Natalya Shakhovska, Vitaliy Yakovyna, Valentyna Chopyak . A new hybrid ensemble machine-learning model for severity risk assessment and post-COVID prediction system. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(6): 6102-6123. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022285
    [7] Vinh Huy Chau . Powerlifting score prediction using a machine learning method. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(2): 1040-1050. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021056
    [8] Giuseppe Ciaburro . Machine fault detection methods based on machine learning algorithms: A review. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(11): 11453-11490. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022534
    [9] Abhishek Savaliya, Rutvij H. Jhaveri, Qin Xin, Saad Alqithami, Sagar Ramani, Tariq Ahamed Ahanger . Securing industrial communication with software-defined networking. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 8298-8313. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021411
    [10] Wang Cai, Jianzhuang Wang, Longchao Cao, Gaoyang Mi, Leshi Shu, Qi Zhou, Ping Jiang . Predicting the weld width from high-speed successive images of the weld zone using different machine learning algorithms during laser welding. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 5595-5612. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019278
  • Gravimetry is a discipline of geophysics that deals with observation and interpretation of the earth gravity field. The acquired gravity data serve the study of the earth interior, be it the deep or the near surface one, by means of the inferred subsurface structural density distribution. The subsurface density structure is resolved by solving the gravimetric inverse problem. Diverse methods and approaches exist for solving this non-unique and ill-posed inverse problem. Here, we focused on those methods that do not pre-constrain the number or geometries of the density sources. We reviewed the historical development and the basic principles of the Growth inversion methodology, which belong to the methods based on the growth of the model density structure throughout an iterative exploration process. The process was based on testing and filling the cells of a subsurface domain partition with density contrasts through an iterative mixed weighted adjustment procedure. The procedure iteratively minimized the data misfit residuals jointly with minimizing the total anomalous mass of the model, which facilitated obtaining compact meaningful source bodies of the solution. The applicability of the Growth inversion approach in structural geophysical studies, in geodynamic studies, and in near surface gravimetric studies was reviewed and illustrated. This work also presented the first application of the Growth inversion tool to near surface microgravimetric data with the goal of seeking very shallow cavities in archeological prospection and environmental geophysics.



    Cardiovascular diseases, commonly referred to as CVDs, are identified as the most common cause of death worldwide [1]. World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that nearly 17.9 million people die each year of CVDs which is around 1/3rd of the worldwide deaths. Notably, CVD does not refer to a specific heart problem, on the contrary CVD is a general term pointing to a set of disorders of the heart and blood vessels. These disorders include coronary heart disease-a heart condition where the arteries are not able to supply the required amount of oxygenated blood to the heart, cerebrovascular disease-a disease that negatively affects the blood flow in the brain, rheumatic heart disease where heart valves are damaged permanently [1]. Due to its high share in the worldwide deaths and continued increase, predicting heart failure is an important task for clinicians. The early discovery of heart failure can lead to medical interventions that can increase the recovery from CVDs and decrease the number of fatalities as well. However, predicting heart failure is not a trivial task and several studies have focused on identifying features that are associated with predicting heart failure [2-4]. The introduction of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) facilitated medical practitioners to move from paper-based record to electronic record management of patients, simplifying the analysis of large medical data, thereby facilitating the acquisition, storage and processing of medical data [5]. The availability of medical data in electronic form also benefited the scientific community as they used the data to perform various types of analysis to identify novel and previously unknown patterns [3,4]. The availability of data in general also led to the advent of new computational techniques such as deep learning in a wide variety of applications. Some of the application areas include medical sciences [6], social networks analysis [7], environmental science [8], and others [9,11,12].

    Machine learning techniques and deep neural networks are also used in predicting heart failure by several researchers [2-4,13]. However, these researchers used a set of techniques from machine learning and some primitive techniques for comparison. This motivated us to consider the current state-of-the-art of machine learning algorithms for heart failure prediction and evaluate the machine learning algorithms on a standard benchmark dataset. Therefore, the objective of the work is to identify the best-performing machine learning algorithms on the benchmark dataset by selecting various machine learning techniques and evaluating them on the standard benchmark dataset.

    The remainder of this work is organized in the following sections. Section 2 discusses state-of-the-art techniques concerning the use of machine learning algorithms for cardiovascular diseases. In Section 3, we present the experimental set-up and the relevant details. Section 4 covers the results and discussions. Section 5 concludes the work and discusses potential future research directions.

    In the recent past, there is a considerable attention towards the applications of machine learning techniques in medical diagnostic [6-10]. The advancement of Information and Communication Technologies has resulted in development in many fields including medical sciences. The design of smart hardware has enabled the collection of large scale medical data that paved the way for the design of sophisticated machine learning and deep learning techniques used in health sciences [19,20]. Researchers have used a variety of novel approaches obtaining better results [19,20]. Further, novel and effective computational techniques are also developed. As the coverage of these works are beyond the scope of this work, in the following, we only focus on machine learning and related techniques in the area of cardiovascular diseases.

    Ahmad et al. [13] collected the data of 299 patients with heart failure problems and applied statistical techniques to identify important features that contribute to the survival of the patients. The authors identified growing age, high blood pressure, and lower EF values to be key factors that affect the high mortality rate. Chicco and Jurman [2] considered the dataset as used by Ahmad et al. [13] and applied several machine learning algorithms to achieve two objectives. The first objective was to predict the survival possibility of patients whereas the second objective was to identify the features that are more relevant with respect to objective 1. Unlike [13] the authors found that serum creatinine and ejection fraction are the two important feature capable to identify the survival rate from heart failure.

    Khourdifi and Bahaj [14] opined that for CVD prediction machine learning algorithms can provide good results in comparison to other techniques as they can model complex problems with non-linearity. The authors explored the concept of selective features selections which imply that not all features are important to predict the outcome. Further, the authors proposed to use particle swarm optimization and ant colony optimization techniques in conjunction with neural networks, random forest and support vector machines. Shah et al. [15] used naive bayes, k-nearest neighbors, random forest and decision tree techniques for heart disease prediction using the dataset available at the UCI repository. The original dataset contained 76 attributes, however, the authors used only 14 attributes and observed that the k-nearest neighbor technique performed the best.

    Diwakar et al. [16] reviewed the literature addressing the problem of medical diagnosis using machine learning and image fusion techniques. The work of Mohan et al. [17] focused on the long-standing issue of cardiovascular disease prediction. The authors argued that the prediction of heart disease is a challenging scientific problem of real-world importance and the solution of the problem can be of significant importance for medical practitioners including physicians and surgeons. In the work [17], the authors focused on the identification of important features that can help in predicting heart disease. The authors proposed a feature selection method and evaluated several machine learning algorithms, including decision trees and support vector machines.

    Ghosh et al. [3] considered three different datasets and combined them to use as a single dataset for evaluation of the various machine learning algorithms for CVD prediction. The authors used the LASSO feature selection technique to identify important features and produced better results than the other standard approaches. Chen et al. [4] argued that the present techniques of medical diagnostic related to heart failure are heavily dependent on physician knowledge as well as interpretation of the case. The work proposed to use the DPCNN and XGBOOST based hybrid approach for automatic extraction of features from patients' test history text. The authors claimed to achieve significant improvement in prediction sensitivity with the help of the hybrid approach. Porum et al. [18] advocated the use of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for predicting Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) from raw electrocardiogram (ECG) heartbeat. The model is trained on a dataset containing 490,505 heartbeats and the authors claimed to achieve 100% CHF detection accuracy. Machine learning techniques are also used in medical image processing. For instance, machine learning techniques can be used in pre-precessing step to remove noise and other irrelevant information from medical images (such as CT-scans). Further, machine learning techniques are also used for automatic image segmentation and thus reducing the laborious task of manual segmentation of medical imagery [19]. For a detailed review on the use of machine learning techniques for heart failure prediction, readers are highly recommended to look into the following pieces of literature [20-22].

    From the literature survey, this research concluded that a variety of techniques are used in the literature for CVDs, however, for survival prediction there is a gap to experimentally evaluate the machine learning algorithms on a standard data set. This research fills this gap by considering various machine learning techniques and evaluate them on a standard benchmark dataset as used in [2,13].

    In this section, the experimental setup is discussed including the description of the methodology, explanation of the dataset, the set of machine learning algorithms, and the evaluation criteria.

    The steps followed in performing the experiments are listed below:

    i) The dataset is reviewed manually to understand the structure of the data as well as the meaning of the various features. ii) The dataset is pre-processed for missing values, irregular values, values not matching the column description, and outliers. For this purpose various functions of Python's pandas library were used. After ensuring that the pre-processing phase resulted in a cleaned dataset, the data is saved for reproducibility of the results. No feature selection is carried out and all features are selected for model development and implementation. The dataset is split into training and test dataset. The training set contains 80% of the data, whereas the test set contains 20% of the data. Note that the data is randomly divided into training and test sets. Machine learning models are trained using the training set. Models are evaluated based on the performance evaluation criterion using the test set.

    We use the dataset collected by Ahmad et al. [13] and was previously used by Chicco and Jurman [2]. The dataset consists of 299 patients' data. The disease among the patients was identified by the use of the Cardiac Echo report as well as the notes written by the physician. Follow-up meetings were arranged with patients with an average period of 130 days. The gender distribution of the data is 194 men and 105 women. All the patients were over 40 years old and belong to NYHA classes III and IV [13]. The dataset consists of 12 features which include age, anemia, Blood Pressure (BP), Creatinine Phosphokinase, diabetes, Ejection Fraction, gender, platelets, serum creatinine, serum sodium and smoking. The target variable is named DEATH EVENT which is a binary variable expressing the survival outcome. Of the feature variables, age, Creatinine Phosphokinase, and serum sodium are continuous variables whereas ejection fraction, serum creatinine, and platelets are categorical variables. Gender, diabetes, anemia, blood pressure, and smoking are considered binary variables. Note that blood pressure and anemia were continuous variables but were transformed into binary variables. The cause of death of a patient is heart-related diseases. The authors [13] claimed to follow the necessary protocols including informed consent from the patients in data collection.

    The Logistic Regression (LR) classifier is the most basic yet effective classifier. LR is used in situations where an input needs to be classified into a pre-defined set of classes. Logistic regression-based classifiers can be used both for binary and multi-class classification problems. Sigmoid is the most commonly used activation function, however, other alternatives exist as well.

    Support Vector Machine (SVM) is a supervised machine learning technique and is used for classification problems where the boundary between various classes is nonlinear [17]. SVM supports several kernel functions such as linear, non-linear and Lagrangian, etc.

    Like SVM, the Decision Tree (DT) is a type of supervised machine learning-based classifier [17]. DTs can be used both for categorical variables as well as continuous variables. DTs can be binary as well as multiway, depending on the nature of the problem. At each level in DT, a decision variable exists (root at the top) and the decision to move to a lower level is based on the corresponding value observed against the node. The leaf nodes contain the outcome, i.e., in case of classification problem the possible values/outcomes of the target variable are present at the leaf.

    Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are among the most favoured techniques in the machine learning domain for regression as well as classification problems [7]. ANNs are used in a variety of applications [2,12]. The basic constituent of ANN is a neuron which is a computational unit that receives an input (one or more) and produces an input. Other than the input and output layers, ANN contains multiple layers (called hidden layers) each of which contains many neurons. The final layer of the ANN is called the output layer which contains one or more units depending on the nature of the problem being solved.

    To ensure reproducibility of the results, we present the various parameters used for the model in our experiments in Table 1. Note that during the experimentations, several parameters were used, and only the optimal parameters are reported here.

    Table 1.  Summary of the model parameters.
    Technique Parameters
    Decision Tree Max Depth = 4
    Support Vector Machine kernel = poly
    Degree = 4
    Artificial Neural Networks Two layers other than input and output layers
    2nd layer: 6 neurons, activation is sigmoid
    3rd layer, 4 neurons, activation is relu
    loss function: binary-cross entropy
    Metric: Accuracy

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    It is important to mention that the parameters given in Table 1 are obtained after testing various combinations. For instance, in case of Artificial Neural Networks various combinations of hidden layers and neurons in each layers were tested and the configuration which resulted in best performance is chosen.

    As per se, our machine learning problem is a classification problem, therefore, we will use performance evaluation criteria for classification problems. In this regard, we consider the following evaluation criteria;

    ● Accuracy

    ● Precision

    ● Recall

    ● F1-Score

    However, before defining these terms, let us define some key terminologies that are in turn used to define accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score [7].

    True Positive (TP) : An outcome is called as true positive if both the original outcome and predicted outcome are true.

    False Positive (FP): An outcome is referred to as a false positive if the original outcome is false and the predicted outcome is true.

    False Negative (FN): An outcome is called as false negative if the original outcome is positive whereas the predicted outcome is negative.

    True Negative (TN): An outcome is referred to as true negative if both the original outcome and predicted outcome are negative.

    Based on the TP, FP, FN and TN, we define the performance evaluation terms as follows [7];

    Accuracy: Accuracy is the ratio between all the true predictions (sum of TP and TN) and the total number of predictions.

    Precision: Precision is a ratio between the number of true predictions (TP) and that of the sum of instances that are predicted as true (TP+ FP).

    Recall: Recall is the ratio between truly predicted records (TP) and that of the total number of positive records (TP + FN).

    F1-Score: The F1-score uses the precision and recall score and is considered as the harmonic mean of precision and recall.

    In this section, we present the results and discussions based on the evaluation criteria of accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score. However, before discussing the results based on the criteria, we present the summary of TP, FP, FN and TN in Table 2.

    Table 2.  Summary of the confusion matrix scores.
    Technique True Positives False Positives False Negatives True Negatives
    Logistic Regression 11 1 12 36
    Decision Tree 15 4 8 33
    Support Vector Machine 4 1 19 36
    Artificial Neural Networks 2 3 21 34

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    DT is found to be the technique that obtained the best accuracy among the set of algorithms. The achieved accuracy of DT is 80% which is 14% better than the average accuracy of the other 3 models. ANN achieved the minimum accuracy of 60% whereas the accuracy achieved by LR is 78.34% and that of SVM is 66.67%. Figure 1 presents the accuracy achieved by each of the models.

    Figure 1.  Accuracy score by each of the machine learning technique.

    When the machine learning algorithms are evaluated using precision as the criterion, this research observed that LR outperformed the remaining techniques. LR achieved a precision score of 91.67% whereas the DT achieved 78.94% precision. SVM and ANN scored 80% and 40% respectively in terms of precision. The precision scores of all the algorithms are reflected in Figure 2.

    Figure 2.  Precision score by each of the machine learning technique.

    Figure 3 shows the recall score of the selected four machine learning techniques. DT has achieved the highest recall score of 65.21%, whereas the minimum recall score is achieved by ANN which is 8.69%. LR achieved a recall of 47.82% whereas SVMs recall score is 17.39%.

    Figure 3.  Recall score by each of the machine learning technique.

    Finally, in terms of F1-score, this research observed that DT achieved the highest score of 71.4 whereas the second-best performing technique is LR with an F1-score of 62.8. SVM achieved an F1-score of 28.57 and ANN is the least performing technique with an F1-score of 14.28. Figure 4 shows the summary of the F1-score by each of the machine learning techniques.

    Figure 4.  F1 score by each of the machine learning technique.

    We observed that DT performance is better than the rest of the machine learning techniques on all performance evaluation measures except precision. When precision is considered as a performance measure, LR performs better than the rest of the techniques. Overall, LR is better than SVM and ANN. Only DT performs better than LR. The performance of ANN is observed to be the worst, even worse than a basic logistic regression.

    For experiments, the data was randomly divided into 80% and 20% training and test sets respectively. This might result in biased datasets for training and testing. In order to address the shortcoming of random division of data, we performed k-fold cross validation by setting k=5. The results obtained for accuracy metric using k-fold cross validation are presented in Figure 5. The k-fold cross validation confirmed the original performance ordering of the machine learning algorithms. We observed that although there is a slight increase in accuracy scores of all the machine learning techniques, the relative order remained same.

    Figure 5.  Accuracy using k-fold cross validation.

    As identified that decision tree is the best performing technique, it is appropriate to visualize it and identify the factors that play an important role in the decision. Figure 6 is a graphical representation of the decision-making process by the decision tree model. Note that the DT is derived based on the number of instances in the training set (80% of the total data). At the root is variable serum creatinine, if the value of serum creatinine is less than or equal to 0.151 then the left sub-tree is traversed, otherwise, the decision is transferred to the right sub-tree. In the left sub-tree (true block), the ejection fraction value is evaluated, whereas, in the right sub-tree (false block), the Phosphokinase value is checked. A point of importance is to note that these values are normalized. It is important to note that we used a standard scaler for values normalization in the pre-processing phase. Our findings are in line with that of Chicco and Jurman [2] who also identified serum creatinine and ejection fraction as important variables. However, our findings are different from that of Ahmad et al. [13] where age and high blood pressure were marked as key factors.

    Figure 6.  Visualization of the decision tree.

    CVDs are the most common cause of death worldwide with an estimated figure of 17.9 million annual deaths. Early prediction and diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases can reduce the number of associated deaths. In this regard, several computational techniques are introduced in the literature that focuses on various aspects of predicting, identifying, and controlling heart-related diseases. In terms of machine learning techniques, the work mainly focused on identifying features that are vital in influencing the survival rate in CVDs. Several different techniques and datasets are used by the researchers with varying degrees of success.

    In this work, we considered a set of algorithm/techniques as well as a standard benchmark dataset to review the performance of algorithms/techniques against various performance measures. We identified decision tree to be the best performing algorithm and artificial neural networks to be the worst performing on various performance measures. The performance of DT is 14% better than the average performance of other techniques. In terms of accuracy, the performance difference between DT and LR is not significant. This work can be further extended in terms of designing robust machine learning algorithms that can effectively perform well on real-world data sets. Further, the current dataset is relatively imbalanced and it will also be important to collect more robust data regarding various heart-related conditions and use the data for training more robust models. Another potential research direction is to explore the use of medical image processing techniques for CVDs.

    The author declares that there is no conflict of interest to report regarding the present study.



    [1] B. Alhijawi, A. Awajan, Genetic algorithms: theory, genetic operators, solutions, and applications, Evol. Intel., 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-023-00822-6
    [2] V. Araña, A. G. Camacho, A. Garcia, F. G. Montesinos, I. Blanco, R. Vieira, et al., The internal structure of Tenerife (Canary Islands) based on gravity aeromagnetic and volcanological data, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 103 (2000), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(00)00215-8
    [3] V. C. F. Barbosa, J. B. C. Silva, Generalized compact gravity inversion, Geophysics, 59 (1994), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443534 doi: 10.1190/1.1443534
    [4] V. C. F. Barbosa, J. B. C. Silva, W. E. Medeiros, Gravity inversion of basements relief using approximate equality constraints on depths, Geophysics, 62 (1997), 1745–1757. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444275 doi: 10.1190/1.1444275
    [5] G. Berrino, A. G. Camacho, 3D gravity inversion by growing bodies and shaping layers at Mt. Vesuvius (Southern Italy), Pure Appl. Geophys., 165 (2008), 1095–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-008-0348-2 doi: 10.1007/s00024-008-0348-2
    [6] G. Berrino, P. Vajda, P. Zahorec, A. G. Camacho, V. De Novellis, S. Carlino, et al., Interpretation of spatiotemporal gravity changes accompanying the earthquake of 21 August 2017 on Ischia (Italy), Contrib. Geophys. Geod., 51 (2021), 345–371. https://doi.org/10.31577/congeo.2021.51.4.3
    [7] H. Bertete-Aguirre, E. Cherkaev, M. Oristaglio, Non-smooth gravity problem with total variation penalization functional, Geophys. J. Int., 149 (2002), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01664.x doi: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01664.x
    [8] J. Bódi, Inversion of 3D microgravity data for near surface applications for free geometry sources, Rigorous thesis, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia, 2023.
    [9] J. Bódi, P. Vajda, A. G. Camacho, J. Papčo, J. Fernández, On gravimetric detection of thin elongated sources using the growth inversion approach, Surv. Geophys., 44 (2023), 1811–1835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-023-09790-z doi: 10.1007/s10712-023-09790-z
    [10] O. Boulanger, M. Chouteau, Constraints in 3D gravity inversion, Geophys. Prospect., 49 (2001), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00254.x doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00254.x
    [11] A. G. Camacho, R. Vieira, C. de Toro, Microgravimetric model of the Las Cañadas caldera (Tenerife), J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 47 (1991), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(91)90102-6
    [12] A. G. Camacho, R. Vieira, F. G. Montesinos, V. Cuéllar, A gravimetric 3D Global inversion for cavity detection, Geophys. Prospect., 42 (1994), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1994.tb00201.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1994.tb00201.x
    [13] A. G. Camacho, F. G. Montesinos, R. Vieira, A three-dimensional gravity inversion applied to Sao Miguel Island (Azores), J. Geophys. Res., 102 (1997), 7705–7715. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JB03667 doi: 10.1029/96JB03667
    [14] A. Camacho, F. Montesinos, R. Vieira, Gravity inversion by means of growing bodies, Geophysics, 65 (2000), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444729 doi: 10.1190/1.1444729
    [15] A. Camacho, F. Montesinos, R. Vieira, J. Arnoso, Modelling of crustal anomalies of Lanzarote (Canary Islands) in light of gravity data, Geophys. J. Int., 147 (2001), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-540x.2001.01546.x doi: 10.1046/j.0956-540x.2001.01546.x
    [16] A. G. Camacho, F. G. Montesinos, R. Vieira, A 3-D gravity inversion tool based on exploration of model possibilities, Comput. Geosci., 28 (2002), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(01)00039-5 doi: 10.1016/S0098-3004(01)00039-5
    [17] A. G. Camacho, J. C. Nunes, E. Ortíz, Z. Franca, R. Vieira, Gravimetric determination of an intrusive complex under the island of Faial (Azores): some methodological improvements, Geophys. J. Int., 171 (2007), 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03539.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03539.x
    [18] A. G. Camacho, J. Fernández, P. J. González, J. B. Rundle, J. F. Prieto, A. Arjona, Structural results for La Palma island using 3-D gravity inversion, J. Geophys. Res., 114 (2009), B05411. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005628
    [19] A. Camacho, J. Fernández, J. Gottsmann, The 3-D gravity inversion package GROWTH 2.0 and its application to Tenerife Island, Spain, Comput. Geosci., 37 (2011), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.12.003
    [20] A. G. Camacho, J. Fernández, J. Gottsmann, A new gravity inversion method for multiple subhorizontal discontinuity interfaces and shallow basins, J. Geophys. Res., 116 (2011), B02413. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB008023
    [21] A. G. Camacho, P. J. González, J. Fernández, G. Berrino, Simultaneous inversion of surface deformation and gravity changes by means of extended bodies with a free geometry: application to deforming calderas, J. Geophys. Res., 116 (2011), B10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB008165
    [22] A. G. Camacho, E. Carmona, A. García-Jerez, F. Sánchez-Martos, J. F. Prieto, J. Fernández, et al., Structure of alluvial valleys from 3-D gravity inversion: the Low Andarax Valley (Almería, Spain) test case, Pure Appl. Geophys., 172 (2015), 3107–3121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-014-0914-8
    [23] A. G. Camacho, J. Fernández, Modeling 3D free-geometry volumetric sources associated to geological and anthropogenic hazards from space and terrestrial geodetic data, Remote Sens., 11 (2019), 2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11172042 doi: 10.3390/rs11172042
    [24] A. G. Camacho, J. F. Prieto, E. Ancochea, J. Fernández, Deep volcanic morphology below Lanzarote, Canaries, from gravity inversion: new results for Timanfaya and implications, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 369 (2019), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.11.013
    [25] A. G. Camacho, J. Fernández, S. V. Samsonov, K. F. Tiampo, M. Palano, 3D multi-source model of elastic volcanic ground deformation, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 547 (2020), 116445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116445 doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116445
    [26] A. G. Camacho, J. F. A. Aparicio, E. Ancochea, J. Fernández, Upgraded GROWTH 3.0 software for structural gravity inversion and application to El Hierro (Canary Islands), Comput. Geosci., 150 (2021), 104720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104720 doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104720
    [27] A. G. Camacho, P. Vajda, C. A. Miller, J. Fernández, A free-geometry geodynamic modelling of surface gravity changes using Growth-dg software, Sci. Rep., 11 (2021), 23442. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02769-z doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02769-z
    [28] A. G. Camacho, P. Vajda, J. Fernández, GROWTH-23: an integrated code for inversion of complete Bouguer gravity anomaly or temporal gravity changes, Comput. Geosci., 182 (2024), 105495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2023.105495 doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2023.105495
    [29] F. Cannavò, A. G. Camacho, P. J. González, M. Mattia, G. Puglisi, J. Fernández, Real time tracking of magmatic intrusions by means of ground deformation modeling during volcanic crises, Sci. Rep., 5 (2015), 10970. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10970 doi: 10.1038/srep10970
    [30] Z. Chen, X. Meng, L. Guo, G. Liu, GICUDA: a parallel program for 3D correlation imaging of large scale gravity and gravity gradiometry data on graphics processing units with CUDA, Comput. Geosci., 46 (2012), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.04.017 doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.04.017
    [31] Z. Chen, X. Meng, S. Zhang, 3D gravity interface inversion constrained by a few points and its GPU acceleration, Comput. Geosci., 84 (2015), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.08.002 doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2015.08.002
    [32] C. G. Farquharson, M. R. Ash, H. G Miller, Geologically constrained gravity inversion for the Voisey's Bay Ovoid deposit, Lead. Edge, 27 (2008), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2831681
    [33] J. Fernández, J. F. Prieto, J. Escayo, A. G. Camacho, F. Luzón, K. F. Tiampo, et al., Modeling the two-and three-dimensional displacement field in Lorca, Spain, subsidence and the global implications, Sci. Rep., 8 (2018), 14782. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33128-0
    [34] J. Fernández, J. Escayo, Z. Hu, A. G. Camacho, S. V. Samsonov, J. F. Prieto, et al., Detection of volcanic unrest onset in La Palma, Canary Islands, evolution and implications, Sci. Rep., 11 (2021), 2540. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82292-3
    [35] J. Fernández, J. Escayo, A. G. Camacho, M. Palano, J. F. Prieto, Z. Hu, et al., Shallow magmatic intrusion evolution below La Palma before and during the 2021 eruption, Sci. Rep., 12 (2022), 20257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23998-w
    [36] J. Fullea, J. C. Afonso, J. A. D. Connolly, M. Fernàndez, D. Garcia-Castellanos, H. Zeyen, LitMod3D: an interactive 3D software to model the thermal, compositional, density, rheological, and seismological structure of the lithosphere and sublithospheric upper mantle, Geochem. Geophys. Geosy., 10 (2009), Q08019. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GC002391
    [37] M. H. Ghalehnoee, A. Ansari, A. Ghorbani, Improving compact gravity inversion using new weighting functions, Geophys. J. Int., 208 (2017), 546–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw413 doi: 10.1093/gji/ggw413
    [38] D. Gómez-Ortiz, B. N. P. Agarwal, 3DINVER.M: a MATLAB program to invert the gravity anomaly over a 3D horizontal density interface by Parker–Oldenburg's algorithm, Comput. Geosci., 31 (2005), 513–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2004.11.004 doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2004.11.004
    [39] J. Gottsmann, L. Wooller, J. Martí, J. Fernández, A. G. Camacho, P. J. Gonzalez, et al., New evidence for the reawakening of Teide volcano, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33 (2006), L20311. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027523
    [40] J. Gottsmann, A. G. Camacho, J. Martí, L. Wooller, J. Fernández, A. García, et al., Shallow structure beneath the Central Volcanic Complex of Tenerife from new gravity data: implications for its evolution and recent reactivation, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 168 (2008), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2008.06.020
    [41] A. Guillen, V. Menichetti, Gravity and magnetic inversion with minimization of a specific functional, Geophysics, 49 (1984), 1354–1360. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441761 doi: 10.1190/1.1441761
    [42] J. R. Kennedy, J. D. Larsen, Heavy: software for forward modeling gravity change from MODFLOW output, Environ. Modell. Softw., 165 (2023), 105714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105714 doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105714
    [43] C. Klesper, IVIS-3D: a tool for interactive 3D-visualisation of gravity models, Phys. Chem. Earth, 23 (1998), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-1946(98)00025-1 doi: 10.1016/S0079-1946(98)00025-1
    [44] R. A. Krahenbuhl, Y. Li, Inversion of gravity data using a binary formulation, Geophys. J. Int., 167 (2006), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03179.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03179.x
    [45] B. J. Last, K. Kubik, Compact gravity inversion, Geophysics, 48 (1983), 713–721. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441501
    [46] P. G. Lelievre, D. W. Oldenburg, A comprehensive study of including structural information in geophysical inversions, Geophys. J. Int., 178 (2009), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04188.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04188.x
    [47] P. G. Lelièvre, R. Bijani, C. G. Farquharson, Joint inversion using multi-objective global optimization methods, 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, 2016 (2016), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201601655 doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.201601655
    [48] Y. Li, D. W. Oldenburg, 3-D inversion of gravity data, Geophysics, 63 (1998), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444302 doi: 10.1190/1.1444302
    [49] S. Mallick, Optimization using genetic algorithms–Methodology with examples from seismic waveform inversion (chapter), In: Y. H. Chemin, Genetic algorithms: theory, design and programming, IntechOpen, 2024. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.113897
    [50] C. M. Martins, W. A. Lima, V. C. F. Barbosa, J. B. C. Silva, Total variation regularization for depth-to-basement estimate: Part 1–Mathematical details and applications, Geophysics, 76 (2011), I1–I12. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3524286
    [51] C. A. Miller, G. Williams-Jones, D. Fournier, J. Witter, 3D gravity inversion and thermodynamic modelling reveal properties of shallow silicic magma reservoir beneath Laguna del Maule, Chile, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 459 (2017), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.11.007
    [52] C. A. Miller, H. Le Mével, G. Currenti, G. Williams-Jones, B. Tikoff, Microgravity changes at the Laguna del Maule volcanic field: Magma-induced stress changes facilitate mass addition, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 122 (2017), 3179–3196. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014048 doi: 10.1002/2017JB014048
    [53] O. F. Mojica, A. Bassrei, Regularization parameter selection in the 3D gravity inversion of the basement relief using GCV: a parallel approach, Comput. Geosci., 82 (2015), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.06.013 doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2015.06.013
    [54] F. G. Montesinos, A. G. Camacho, R. Vieira, Analysis of gravimetric anomalies in Furnas caldera (Saô Miguel, Azores), J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 92 (1999), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(99)00068-2
    [55] F. G. Montesinos, A. G. Camacho, J. C. Nunes, C. S. Oliveira, R. Vieira, A 3-D gravity model for a volcanic crater in Terceira Island (Azores), Geophys. J. Int., 154 (2003), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01960.x doi: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01960.x
    [56] F. G. Montesinos, J. Arnoso, R. Vieira, Using a genetic algorithm for 3-D inversion of gravity data in Fuerteventura (Canary Islands), Int. J. Earth Sci. (Geol. Rundsch.), 94 (2005), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-005-0471-6
    [57] J. C. Nunes, A. Camacho, Z. França, F. G. Montesinos, M. Alves, R. Vieira, et al., Gravity anomalies and crustal signature of volcano-tectonic structures of Pico Island (Azores), J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 156 (2006), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2006.03.023
    [58] E. Oksum, Grav3CH_inv: A GUI-based MATLAB code for estimating the 3-D basement depth structure of sedimentary basins with vertical and horizontal density variation, Comput. Geosci., 155 (2021), 104856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104856 doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104856
    [59] V. C. Oliveira, V. C. F. Barbosa, 3-D radial gravity gradient inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 195 (2013), 883–902. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt307 doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt307
    [60] L. B. Pedersen, Constrained inversion of potential field data, Geophys. Prosp., 27 (1979), 726–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1979.tb00993.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1979.tb00993.x
    [61] D. Phillips, A technique for the numerical solution of certain integral equations of the first kind, J. ACM, 9 (1962), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1145/321105.321114 doi: 10.1145/321105.321114
    [62] R. Pašteka, M. Terray, M. Hajach, M. Pašiaková, Výsledky geofyzikálneho (mikro-gravimetrického) prieskumu interiéru kostola Sv. Mikuláša v Trnave, unpublished work, 2006.
    [63] R. Pašteka, J. Mikuška, M. Hajach, M. Pašiaková, Microgravity measurements and GPR technique in the search for medieval crypts: a case study from the St. Nicholas church in Trnava, SW Slovakia, Proceedings of the Archaeological Prospection 7th Conference in Nitra, 41 (2007), 222–224.
    [64] R. Pašteka, F. P. Richter, R. Karcol, K. Brazda, M. Hajach, Regularized derivatives of potential fields and their role in semiautomated interpretation methods, Geophys. Prospect., 57 (2009), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00780.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00780.x
    [65] R. Pašteka, J. Pánisová, P. Zahorec, J. Papčo, J. Mrlina, M. Fraštia, et al., Microgravity method in archaeological prospection: methodical comments on selected case studies from crypt and tomb detection, Archaeol. Prospect., 27 (2020), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1787
    [66] M. Pick, J. Picha, V. Vyskočil, Theory of the earth's gravity field, Elsevier, 1973.
    [67] I. Prutkin, P. Vajda, M. Bielik, V. Bezák, R. Tenzer, Joint interpretation of gravity and magnetic data in the Kolárovo anomaly region by separation of sources and the inversion method of local corrections, Geol. Carpath., 65 (2014), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.2478/geoca-2014-0011 doi: 10.2478/geoca-2014-0011
    [68] I. Prutkin, P. Vajda, J. Gottsmann, The gravimetric picture of magmatic and hydrothermal sources driving hybrid unrest on Tenerife in 2004/5, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 282 (2014), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.06.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.06.003
    [69] I. Prutkin, P. Vajda, T. Jahr, F. Bleibinhaus, P. Novák, R. Tenzer, Interpretation of gravity and magnetic data with geological constraints for 3D structure of the Thuringian Basin, Germany, J. Appl. Geophys., 136 (2017), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.10.039
    [70] A. B. Reid, J. M. Allsop, H. Granser, A. J. Millet, I. W. Somerton, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution, Geophysics, 55 (1990), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442774 doi: 10.1190/1.1442774
    [71] R. M. René, Gravity inversion using open, reject, and "shape‐of‐anomaly" fill criteria, Geophysics, 51 (1986), 889–1033. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442157
    [72] D. F. Santos, J. B. C. Silva, C. M. Martins, R. C. S. Santos, L. C. Ramos, A. C. M. Araújo, Efficient gravity inversion of discontinuous basement relief, Geophysics, 80 (2015), G95–G106. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0513.1
    [73] S. V. Samsonov, K. F. Tiampo, A. G. Camacho, J. Fernández, P. J. González, Spatiotemporal analysis and interpretation of 1993–2013 ground deformation at Campi Flegrei, Italy, observed by advanced DInSAR, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41 (2014), 6101–6108. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060595
    [74] P. Shamsipour, D. Marcotte, M. Chouteau, 3D stochastic joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data, J. Appl. Geophys., 79 (2012), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.12.012 doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.12.012
    [75] K. Snopek, U. Casten, 3GRAINS: 3D Gravity Interpretation Software and its application to density modeling of the Hellenic subduction zone, Comput. Geosci., 32 (2006), 592–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2005.08.008 doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2005.08.008
    [76] M. Terray, Správa z georadarového prieskumu Dómu sv. Mikuláša v Trnave, unpublished work, 2006.
    [77] C. Tiede, A. G. Camacho, C. Gerstenecker, J. Fernández, I. Suyanto, Modelling the crust at Merapi volcano area, Indonesia, via the inverse gravimetric problem, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 6 (2005), Q09011. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC000986
    [78] C. Tiede, J. Fernández, C. Gerstenecker, K. F. Tiampo, A hybrid model for the summit region of merapi volcano, Java, Indonesia, derived from gravity changes and deformation measured between 2000 and 2002, In: D. Wolf, J. Fernández, Deformation and gravity change: indicators of isostasy, tectonics, volcanism, and climate change, Pageoph Topical Volumes, Birkhäuser, (2007), 837–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8417-3_12
    [79] A. N. Tikhonov, V. A. Arsenin, Solutions of ill-posed problems, Winston and Sons, Washington, 1977. https://doi.org/10.2307/2006360
    [80] L. Uieda, V. C. F. Barbosa, Robust 3D gravity gradient inversion by planting anomalous densities, Geophysics, 77 (2012), G55–G66. https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2011-0388.1
    [81] P. Vajda, P. Vaníček, B. Meurers, A new physical foundation for anomalous gravity, Stud. Geophys. Geod., 50 (2006), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-006-0012-1 doi: 10.1007/s11200-006-0012-1
    [82] P. Vajda, I. Foroughi, P. Vaníček, R. Kingdon, M. Santos, M. Sheng, et al., Topographic gravimetric effects in earth sciences: Review of origin, significance and implications, Earth-Sci. Rev., 211 (2020), 103428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103428
    [83] P. Vajda, P. Zahorec, C. A. Miller, H. Le Mével, J. Papčo, A. G. Camacho, Novel treatment of the deformation–induced topographic effect for interpretation of spatiotemporal gravity changes: Laguna del Maule (Chile), J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 414 (2021), 107230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2021.107230 doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2021.107230
    [84] P. Vajda, A. G. Camacho, J. Fernández, Benefits and limitations of the growth inversion approach in volcano gravimetry demonstrated on the revisited Tenerife 2004/5 unrest, Surveys Geophys., 44 (2023), 527–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-022-09738-9 doi: 10.1007/s10712-022-09738-9
    [85] S. Vatankhah, V. E. Ardestani, S. S. Niri, R. S. Renaut, H. Kabirzadeh, IGUG: a MATLAB package for 3D inversion of gravity data using graph theory, Comput. Geosci., 128 (2019), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2019.03.008 doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2019.03.008
    [86] E. J. Wahyudi, D. Santoso, W. G. A. Kadir, S. Alawiyah, Designing a genetic algorithm for efficient calculation in time-lapse gravity inversion, J. Eng. Tech. Sci., 46 (2014), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2014.46.1.4 doi: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2014.46.1.4
    [87] R. A. Wildman, G. A. Gazonas, Gravitational and magnetic anomaly inversion using a tree-based geometry representation, Geophysics, 74 (2009), I23–I35. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3110042
    [88] Y. Tian, X. Ke, Y. Wang, DenInv3D: a geophysical software for three-dimensional density inversion of gravity field data, J. Geophys. Eng., 15 (2018), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2140/aa8caf doi: 10.1088/1742-2140/aa8caf
    [89] P. Zahorec, R. Pašteka, J. Papčo, R. Putiška, A. Mojzeš, D. Kušnirák, et al., Mapping hazardous cavities over collapsed coal mines: case study experiences using the microgravity method, Near Surface Geophys., 19 (2021), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12139
    [90] D. Zidarov, Inverse gravimetric problem in geoprospecting and geodesy, Elsevier Science Publ. Co., 1990.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Isaac Kofi Nti, Owusu Nyarko-Boateng, Adebayo Felix Adekoya, Patrick Kwabena Mensah, Mighty Abra Ayidzoe, Godfred Kusi Fosu, Henrietta Adjei Pokuaa, R. Arjun, 2023, Chapter 27, 978-981-19-6630-9, 383, 10.1007/978-981-19-6631-6_27
    2. Amina Magomedovna Alieva, Elena Vladimirovna Reznik, Natalia Vadimovna Teplova, Leyla Ramazanovna Sarakaeva, Elena Valerievna Surskaya, Dzhannet Anuarovna Elmurzaeva, Madina Yakubovna Shavaeva, Alik Magomedovich Rakhaev, Irina Aleksandrovna Kotikova, Igor Gennadievich Nikitin, Interleukin-13 and cardiovascular diseases: literature review, 2022, 28, 2412-9100, 291, 10.17816/medjrf109605
    3. Marianne Lyne Manaog, Luca Parisi, Funnel Random Forest: Inliers-Focused Ensemble Learning for Improved Prognostics of Heart Failure, 2022, 1556-5068, 10.2139/ssrn.4132314
    4. Mohammadreza Salehirad, Mohammad Mollaie Emamzadeh, Mojtaba Barkhordari Yazdi, Improved Equilibrium Optimizer for Accurate Training of Feedforward Neural Networks, 2024, 33, 1060-992X, 133, 10.3103/S1060992X24700048
    5. Betimihirt G. Tsehay, Abdulkeirm M. Yibre, 2025, Chapter 2, 978-3-031-64150-3, 21, 10.1007/978-3-031-64151-0_2
    6. Sorif Hossain, Mohammad Kamrul Hasan, Mohammad Omar Faruk, Nelufa Aktar, Riyadh Hossain, Kabir Hossain, Machine learning approach for predicting cardiovascular disease in Bangladesh: evidence from a cross-sectional study in 2023, 2024, 24, 1471-2261, 10.1186/s12872-024-03883-2
    7. Sonam Palden Barfungpa, Leena Samantaray, Hiren Kumar Deva Sarma, SMOTE-based adaptive coati kepler optimized hybrid deep network for predicting the survival of heart failure patients, 2024, 83, 1573-7721, 65497, 10.1007/s11042-023-18061-3
    8. Charanjeet Gaba, Sonam Khattar, Sheenam Middha, 2023, An Empirical Study of Machine Learning Methods for Analyzing Cardiovascular Disease, 9798400709418, 1, 10.1145/3647444.3647834
    9. Patrizia Ribino, Claudia Di Napoli, Giovanni Paragliola, Luca Serino, Hyper-Parameter Optimization through Reinforcement Learning for Survival Prediction of Patients with Heart Failure, 2024, 239, 18770509, 1754, 10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.354
    10. Abdallah Abdellatif, Hamza Mubarak, Hamdan Abdellatef, Jeevan Kanesan, Yahya Abdelltif, Chee-Onn Chow, Joon Huang Chuah, Hassan Muwafaq Gheni, Graham Kendall, Computational detection and interpretation of heart disease based on conditional variational auto-encoder and stacked ensemble-learning framework, 2024, 88, 17468094, 105644, 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105644
    11. Megha Bhushan, Akkshat Pandit, Ayush Garg, Machine learning and deep learning techniques for the analysis of heart disease: a systematic literature review, open challenges and future directions, 2023, 56, 0269-2821, 14035, 10.1007/s10462-023-10493-5
    12. Joseph Chukwudi Okeibunor, Anelisa Jaca, Chinwe Juliana Iwu-Jaja, Ngozi Idemili-Aronu, Housseynou Ba, Zukiswa Pamela Zantsi, Asiphe Mavis Ndlambe, Edison Mavundza, Derrick Muneene, Charles Shey Wiysonge, Lindiwe Makubalo, The use of artificial intelligence for delivery of essential health services across WHO regions: a scoping review, 2023, 11, 2296-2565, 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1102185
    13. Ashir Javeed, Muhammad Asim Saleem, Ana Luiza Dallora, Liaqat Ali, Johan Sanmartin Berglund, Peter Anderberg, Decision Support System for Predicting Mortality in Cardiac Patients Based on Machine Learning, 2023, 13, 2076-3417, 5188, 10.3390/app13085188
    14. Betimihirt Getnet Tsehay Demis, Abdulkerim M. Yibre, 2024, Chapter 7, 978-3-031-57623-2, 117, 10.1007/978-3-031-57624-9_7
    15. Ling Xue, Wei Lu, 2024, Chapter 11, 978-3-031-47125-4, 159, 10.1007/978-3-031-47126-1_11
    16. Xiaonan Si, Lei Wang, Wenchang Xu, Biao Wang, Wenbo Cheng, Highly Imbalanced Classification of Gout Using Data Resampling and Ensemble Method, 2024, 17, 1999-4893, 122, 10.3390/a17030122
    17. Yogendra Narayan, Mandeep Kaur Ghumman, Charanjeet Gaba, 2024, Chapter 11, 978-981-99-8128-1, 121, 10.1007/978-981-99-8129-8_11
    18. Pranav Kumar Sandilya, Deep Pal, Shrey Rajesh Dahiya, Soven K. Dana, 2024, Prognostic Modeling for Heart Failure Survival: A Classification Approach, 979-8-3503-0843-3, 415, 10.1109/SPIN60856.2024.10512260
    19. Xin-yi Zhou, Yu-mei Li, Ju-kun Su, Yan-feng Wang, Jin Su, Qiao-hong Yang, Effects of posttraumatic growth on psychosocial adjustment in young and middle-aged patients with acute myocardial infarction: The mediating role of rumination, 2023, 62, 01479563, 81, 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2023.06.003
    20. Chunjie Zhou, Pengfei Dai, Aihua Hou, Zhenxing Zhang, Li Liu, Ali Li, Fusheng Wang, A comprehensive review of deep learning-based models for heart disease prediction, 2024, 57, 1573-7462, 10.1007/s10462-024-10899-9
    21. Soundararajan Sankaranarayanan, Elangovan Gunasekaran, Amir shaikh, S Govinda Rao, A novel survival analysis of machine using fuzzy ensemble convolutional based optimal RNN, 2023, 234, 09574174, 120966, 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120966
    22. Shailendra Kumar Mishra, R. Sreelakshmy, Gaurav Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Sujeet Kumar, 2024, chapter 11, 9798369355633, 215, 10.4018/979-8-3693-5563-3.ch011
    23. Qisthi A Hidayaturrohman, Eisuke Hanada, Predictive Analytics in Heart Failure Risk, Readmission, and Mortality Prediction: A Review, 2024, 2168-8184, 10.7759/cureus.73876
    24. Emmanuel Kokori, Ravi Patel, Gbolahan Olatunji, Bonaventure Michael Ukoaka, Israel Charles Abraham, Victor Oluwatomiwa Ajekiigbe, Julia Mimi Kwape, Adetola Emmanuel Babalola, Ntishor Gabriel Udam, Nicholas Aderinto, Machine learning in predicting heart failure survival: a review of current models and future prospects, 2024, 1573-7322, 10.1007/s10741-024-10474-y
    25. Monir Abdullah, Artificial intelligence-based framework for early detection of heart disease using enhanced multilayer perceptron, 2025, 7, 2624-8212, 10.3389/frai.2024.1539588
    26. Alireza Jafarkhani, Behzad Imani, Soheila Saeedi, Amir Shams, Predicting Factors Affecting Survival Rate in Patients Undergoing On‐Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Using Machine Learning Methods: A Systematic Review, 2025, 8, 2398-8835, 10.1002/hsr2.70336
    27. P. Chairmadurai, P. Kavitha, S. Kamalakkannan, 2025, Enhanced Bayesian Optimized Support Vector Machine (BO-SVM) Classification and Prediction of Heart Disease, 979-8-3315-2392-3, 1044, 10.1109/ICSADL65848.2025.10933457
    28. Faisal S. Alsubaei, Abdulwahab Ali Almazroi, Walid Said Atwa, Abdulaleem Ali Almazroi, Nasir Ayub, N. Z. Jhanjhi, Adaptive malware identification via integrated SimCLR and GRU networks, 2025, 15, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-025-08556-4
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2219) PDF downloads(147) Cited by(2)

Figures and Tables

Figures(7)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog