Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

A generalized distributed delay model of COVID-19: An endemic model with immunity waning

  • The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been spreading worldwide for over two years, with millions of reported cases and deaths. The deployment of mathematical modeling in the fight against COVID-19 has recorded tremendous success. However, most of these models target the epidemic phase of the disease. The development of safe and effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 brought hope of safe reopening of schools and businesses and return to pre-COVID normalcy, until mutant strains like the Delta and Omicron variants, which are more infectious, emerged. A few months into the pandemic, reports of the possibility of both vaccine- and infection-induced immunity waning emerged, thereby indicating that COVID-19 may be with us for longer than earlier thought. As a result, to better understand the dynamics of COVID-19, it is essential to study the disease with an endemic model. In this regard, we developed and analyzed an endemic model of COVID-19 that incorporates the waning of both vaccine- and infection-induced immunities using distributed delay equations. Our modeling framework assumes that the waning of both immunities occurs gradually over time at the population level. We derived a nonlinear ODE system from the distributed delay model and showed that the model could exhibit either a forward or backward bifurcation depending on the immunity waning rates. Having a backward bifurcation implies that Rc<1 is not sufficient to guarantee disease eradication, and that the immunity waning rates are critical factors in eradicating COVID-19. Our numerical simulations show that vaccinating a high percentage of the population with a safe and moderately effective vaccine could help in eradicating COVID-19.

    Citation: Sarafa A. Iyaniwura, Rabiu Musa, Jude D. Kong. A generalized distributed delay model of COVID-19: An endemic model with immunity waning[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(3): 5379-5412. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023249

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yinwan Cheng, Chao Yang, Bing Yao, Yaqin Luo . Neighbor full sum distinguishing total coloring of Halin graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6959-6970. doi: 10.3934/math.2022386
    [2] Baolin Ma, Chao Yang . Distinguishing colorings of graphs and their subgraphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26561-26573. doi: 10.3934/math.20231357
    [3] Ningge Huang, Lily Chen . AVD edge-colorings of cubic Halin graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27820-27839. doi: 10.3934/math.20231423
    [4] Huifen Ge, Shumin Zhang, Chengfu Ye, Rongxia Hao . The generalized 4-connectivity of folded Petersen cube networks. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14718-14737. doi: 10.3934/math.2022809
    [5] Kai An Sim, Kok Bin Wong . On the cooling number of the generalized Petersen graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 36351-36370. doi: 10.3934/math.20241724
    [6] Fugang Chao, Donghan Zhang . Neighbor sum distinguishing total choice number of IC-planar graphs with restrictive conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 13637-13646. doi: 10.3934/math.2023692
    [7] Bana Al Subaiei, Ahlam AlMulhim, Abolape Deborah Akwu . Vertex-edge perfect Roman domination number. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21472-21483. doi: 10.3934/math.20231094
    [8] Yanyi Li, Lily Chen . Injective edge coloring of generalized Petersen graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 7929-7943. doi: 10.3934/math.2021460
    [9] Ali Raza, Mobeen Munir, Tasawar Abbas, Sayed M Eldin, Ilyas Khan . Spectrum of prism graph and relation with network related quantities. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2634-2647. doi: 10.3934/math.2023137
    [10] Bao-Hua Xing, Nurten Urlu Ozalan, Jia-Bao Liu . The degree sequence on tensor and cartesian products of graphs and their omega index. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16618-16632. doi: 10.3934/math.2023850
  • The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been spreading worldwide for over two years, with millions of reported cases and deaths. The deployment of mathematical modeling in the fight against COVID-19 has recorded tremendous success. However, most of these models target the epidemic phase of the disease. The development of safe and effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 brought hope of safe reopening of schools and businesses and return to pre-COVID normalcy, until mutant strains like the Delta and Omicron variants, which are more infectious, emerged. A few months into the pandemic, reports of the possibility of both vaccine- and infection-induced immunity waning emerged, thereby indicating that COVID-19 may be with us for longer than earlier thought. As a result, to better understand the dynamics of COVID-19, it is essential to study the disease with an endemic model. In this regard, we developed and analyzed an endemic model of COVID-19 that incorporates the waning of both vaccine- and infection-induced immunities using distributed delay equations. Our modeling framework assumes that the waning of both immunities occurs gradually over time at the population level. We derived a nonlinear ODE system from the distributed delay model and showed that the model could exhibit either a forward or backward bifurcation depending on the immunity waning rates. Having a backward bifurcation implies that Rc<1 is not sufficient to guarantee disease eradication, and that the immunity waning rates are critical factors in eradicating COVID-19. Our numerical simulations show that vaccinating a high percentage of the population with a safe and moderately effective vaccine could help in eradicating COVID-19.



    Let G be a simple, non-trivial connected graph with vertex set V(G). For any two distinct vertices u and v in G, u-v geodesic is a shortest walk between u and v without repetition of vertices. Two vertices are said to be adjacent if there is an edge between them, and they are also called neighbors of each other. The collection of all the neighbors of a vertex v in G is called the (open) neighborhood of v, denoted by N(v).

    A vertex v of G distinguishes a pair (x,y) of distinct vertices of G, if the number of edges in v-x geodesic is different from the number of edge in v-y geodesic. If (x,y) is a pair of neighbors in G, then v is said to be adjacently distinguish the pair (x,y). Equivalently, a vertex v adjacently distinguishes a pair (x,y) of two neighbors if the difference between the number of edges in v-x geodesic and the number of edges in v-y geodesic is one.

    A set DV(G) is a distinguishing set (metric generator) for G if the members of D distinguish every pair of distinct vertices in G. The cardinality of a smallest distinguishing set for G is called the metric dimension of G, denoted by dim(G) [7,23]. The concept of distinguishing set was introduced, very firstly, by Blumenthal [5] in the general context of metric spaces. It was later rediscovered and studied, in the context of graphs, by Slater with the name locating set/reference set [23]. Independently, Harary and Melter studied distinguishing set as resolving set (metric generator) [7,20]. Applications of this notion to the navigation of robots in networks are discussed in [13,21], and applications to pharmaceutical chemistry in [10,11]. For more details about the theory and applications of this notion, we refer the readers to the papers cited in [3,5,8,9,12,13,14,15,19,22] and the references therein.

    A set AV(G) is a neighbor-distinguishing set (local metric generator) for G if the members of A adjacently distinguish every pair of neighboring (adjacent) vertices in G. The cardinality of a smallest neighbor-distinguishing set for G is called the adjacency (local) metric dimension of G, and we denote it by dima(G).

    The problem of distinguishing every two neighbors with the aid of distance (the number of edges in a geodesic) in a connected graph was introduced and studied by Okamoto et al. in 2010 [16]. Then, up till now, this notion endlessly received remarkable interest of many researchers working with distance in graphs. In 2015 and 2018, every two neighbors in the corona product of graphs are distinguished [6,18], while this problem for strong product and lexicographic product of graphs was solved in 2016 [4] and in 2018 [2,6], respectively. Using the neighbor-distinguishing problem of primary subgraphs, this problem was solved for the super graphs of these subgraphs in 2015 [17]. In 2018, Salman et al. proposed linear programming formulation for this problem and distinguished neighbors in two families of convex polytopes [19]. Recently, in 2019, split graphs of complete and complete bipartite graphs have been considered in the context of this problem [1]. Due to this noteworthy attention of researchers to this problem, we extend this study towards a very renowned family of generalized Petersen graphs in this article. Next, we state two results, proved by Okamoto et al. [16], and Salman et al. [19], respectively, which will be used in the sequel.

    Theorem 1. [16] Let G be a non-trivial connected graph of order n. Then dima(G) =n1 if and only if G is a complete graph, and dima(G)=1 if and only if G is a bipartite graph.

    Proposition 2. [19] A subset A of vertices in a connected graph G is a neighbor-distinguishing set for G if and only if for every uV(G) and for each vN(u), the pair (u,v) adjacently distinguished by some element of A.

    Watkins, in 1969 [24], generalized the eminent Petersen graph, and proposed the notation P(n,m) to this generalized family, where n3 and 1mn12. P(n,m) is a cubic graph having the set

    V(P(n,m))={u1,u2,,un,v1,v2,,vn}

    as the vertex set, and the set

    E(P(n,m))=ni=1{uix,viy;xN(ui),yN(vi)}

    as the edge set, where N(ui)={ui+1,ui1,vi} and N(vi)={ui,vi+m,vim} for each 1in, and the indices greater than n or less than 1 will be taken modulo n. Vertices ui and vi (1in) are called the outer vertices and inner vertices, respectively, in P(n,m). Figure 1 depicts graphs to two different families of generalized Petersen graphs.

    Figure 1.  Generalized Petersen graphs P(15,4) and P(16,7).

    The rest of the paper is divided into two sections: one is on the family of generalized Petersen graphs P(n,4); and the second is on the family of generalized Petersen graphs P(2n,n1). These families have been considered in the context of metric dimension problem by Naz et al. [15] and Ahmad et al. [3], respectively. Here, we solve the neighbor-distinguishing problem for these families.

    In the next result, we show that only two vertices of P(n,4) perform the neighbor-distinguishing.

    Theorem 3. For n9, let G be a generalized Petersen graph P(n,4), then a neighbor-distinguishing set for G is a 2-element subset of V(G).

    Proof. For n=9, it is an easy exercise to see that the set A={v1,v2} is a neighbor-distinguishing set for G. For n10, let A be a 2-element subset of V(G). Then, according to Proposition 2, we would perform neighbor-distinguishing for each pair (x,y), where xV(G) and yN(x). Note that, if xA, then (x,y) is adjacently distinguished, because the number of edges in yx geodesic is 1, while the number of edges in xx geodesic is 0. Now, we discuss the following eight cases:

    Case 1: (n=8k with k2)

    Let A={v1=a1,v3=a2}, then

    ● the number of edges in u1a2 geodesic is 3,

    ● the number of edges in u2a2 geodesic is 2,

    ● the number of edges in v1a2 geodesic is 4,

    ● the number of edges in v2a2 geodesic is 3.

    Further, Tables 1 and 2 provide the lists of number of edges in xa1 and xa2 geodesics for all xV(G)A.

    Table 1.  List of the number of edges in geodesics from the outer vertices to aA in P(n,4).
    GeodesicThe number of edges in the geodesic
    uiai0 (mod 4)i1 (mod 4)i2 (mod 4)i3 (mod 4)
    n=8k with k2, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2}
    uia1, 1i4k+1i+84i+34i+64i+94
    uia1, 4k+2inni+84ni+54ni+104ni+114
    uia2, 3i4k+3i+44i+74i+64i+14
    uia2, 4k+4inni+124ni+134ni+104ni+74
    n=8k+1 with k2, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2}
    uia1, 1i4k+1i+84i+34i+64i+94
    uia1, 4k+2inni+114ni+84ni+54ni+104
    uia2, 4i5k+1i4i+34i+64i+54
    uia2, 5k+2inni+114ni+84ni+134ni+144
    n=8k+2 with k1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2}
    uia1, 1i4k+2i+84i+34i+64i+94
    uia1, 4k+3inni+104ni+114ni+84ni+54
    uia2, 2i4k+3i+84i+74i+24i+54
    uia2, 4k+4inni+64ni+114ni+124ni+94
    n=8k+3 with k1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2}
    uia1, 1i4k+2i+84i+34i+64i+94
    uia1, 4k+3inni+54ni+104ni+114ni+84
    uia2, 3i5ki+44i+74i+64i+14
    uia2, 5k+1inni+134ni+104ni+74ni+124
    n=8k+4 with k1, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2}
    uia1, 1i4k+3i+84i+34i+64i+94
    uia1, 4k+4inni+84ni+54ni+104ni+114
    uia2, 3i5k+2i4i+34i+64i+54
    uia2, 5k+3inni+84ni+134ni+144ni+114
    n=8k+5 with k1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2}
    uia1, 1i5k+1i+84i+34i+64i+94
    uia1, 5k+2inni+114ni+84ni+54ni+104
    uia2, 2i5k+2i+84i+74i+24i+54
    uia2, 5k+3inni+114ni+124ni+94ni+64
    n=8k+6 with k1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2}
    uia1, 1i4k+2i+84i+34i+64i+94
    uia1, 4k+6inni+104ni+114ni+84ni+54
    uia2, 1i4k+3i+84i+74i+24i+54
    uia2, 4k+7inni+64ni+114ni+124ni+94
    n=8k+7 with k1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2}
    uia1, 1i4k+3i+84i+34i+64i+94
    uia1, 4k+6inni+54ni+104ni+114ni+84
    uia2, 2i5k+1i+44i+74i+64i+14
    uia2, 5k+4inni+134ni+104ni+74ni+124

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2.  List of the number of edges in geodesics from the inner vertices to aA in P(n,4).
    GeodesicThe number of edges in the geodesic.
    viai0 (mod 4)i1 (mod 4)i2 (mod 4)i3 (mod 4)
    n=8k with k2, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2}
    via1, 1i4k+1i+124i14i+104i+134
    via1, 4k+2inni+124ni+14ni+144ni+154
    via2, 3i4k+3i+84i+114i+104i34
    via2, 4k+4inni+164ni+174ni+144ni+34
    n=8k+1 with k2, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2}
    via1, 1i3k+1i+124i14i+104i+134
    via1, 3k+10inni+154ni+124ni+14ni+144
    via2, 4i4ki44i+74i+104i+94
    via2, 4k+6inni+154ni+44ni+174ni+184
    n=8k+2 with k1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2}
    via1, 1i3k+2i+124i14i+104i+134
    via1, 3k+10inni+144ni+154ni+124ni+14
    via2, 2i3k+3i+124i+114i24i+94
    via2, 3k+11inni+24ni+154ni+164ni+134
    n=8k+3 with k1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2}
    via1, 1i3k+3i+124i14i+104i+134
    via1, 3k+10inni+14ni+144ni+154ni+124
    via2, 3i4k+1i+84i+114i+104i34
    via2, 4k+8inni+174ni+144ni+34ni+164
    n=8k+4 with k1, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2}
    via1, 1i4k+3i+124i14i+104i+134
    via1, 4k+4inni+124ni+14ni+144ni+154
    via2, 3i5k+2i44i+74i+104i+94
    via2, 5k+3inni+44ni+174ni+184ni+154
    n=8k+5 with k1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2}
    via1, 1i4k+1i+124i14i+104i+134
    via1, 4k+6inni+154ni+124ni+14ni+144
    via2, 2i4k+2i+124i+114i24i+94
    via2, 4k+7inni+154ni+164ni+134ni+24
    n=8k+6 with k1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2}
    via1, 1i3k+2i+124i14i+104i+134
    via1, 3k+14inni+144ni+154ni+124ni+14
    via2, 1i3k+3i+124i+114i24i+94
    via2, 3k+15inni+24ni+154ni+164ni+134
    n=8k+7 with k1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2}
    via1, 1i3k+3i+124i14i+104i+134
    via1, 3k+14inni+14ni+144ni+154ni+124
    via2, 2i4k+1i+84i+114i+104i34
    via2, 4k+12inni+174ni+144ni+34ni+164

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Case 2: (n=8k+1 with k2)

    Let A={v1=a1,v4=a2}, then

    ● the number of edges in u1a2 geodesic is 3,

    ● the number of edges in u2a2 geodesic is 3,

    ● the number of edges in u3a2 geodesic is 2.

    Further, Tables 13 provide the lists of number of edges in xa1 and xa2 geodesics for all xV(G)A.

    Table 3.  λi is the number of edges in a via1 geodesic, and λj is the number of edges in a vja2 geodesic.
    i3k+22(mod 4)3k+33(mod 4)3k+40(mod 4)3k+51(mod 4)3k+62(mod 4)3k+73(mod 4)3k+80(mod 4)3k+91(mod 4)
    λi5k43k+1643k+1643k+445k445k+845k+843k+84
    j1234k+11(mod 4)4k+22(mod 4)4k+33(mod 4)4k+40(mod 4)4k+51(mod 4)
    λj443k+1k+3k+3kk

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Case 3: (n=8k+2 with k1)

    Let A={v1=a1,v2=a2}, then

    ● the number of edges in u2a2 geodesic is 2.

    Further, Tables 1, 2 and 4 provide the lists of number of edges in xa1 and xa2 geodesics for all xV(G)A.

    Table 4.  λi is the number of edges in a via1 geodesic, and λj is the number of edges in a vja2 geodesic.
    i3k+33(mod 4)3k+40(mod 4)3k+51(mod 4)3k+62(mod 4)3k+73(mod 4)3k+80(mod 4)3k+91(mod 4)
    λi5k43k+1643k+443k+1645k445k+843k+84
    j123k+40(mod 4)3k+51(mod 4)3k+62(mod 4)3k+73(mod 4)3k+80(mod 4)3k+91(mod 4)3k+102(mod 4)
    λj305k43k+1643k+445k+845k445k+843k+84

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Case 4: (n=8k+3 with k1)

    Let A={v1=a1,v3=a2}, then

    ● the number of edges in u1a2 geodesic is 3,

    ● the number of edges in u2a2 geodesic is 2.

    Further, Tables 1, 2 and 5 provide the lists of number of edges in xa1 and xa2 geodesics for all xV(G)A.

    Table 5.  λi is the number of edges in a via1 geodesic, and λj is the number of edges in a vja2 geodesic.
    i3k+40(mod 4)3k+51(mod 4)3k+62(mod 4)3k+73(mod 4)3k+80(mod 4)3k+91(mod 4)
    λi5k43k+443k+1645k+845k443k+84
    j124k+22(mod 4)4k+33(mod 4)4k+40(mod 4)4k+51(mod 4)4k+62(mod 4)4k+73(mod 4)
    λj43k+1kk+3k+3kk+1

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Case 5: (n=8k+4 with k1)

    Let A={v1=a1,v4=a2}, then

    ● the number of edges in v1a2 geodesic is 4,

    ● the number of edges in v2a2 geodesic is 4,

    ● the number of edges in u1a2 geodesic is 3,

    ● the number of edges in u2a2 geodesic is 3.

    Moreover, Tables 1 and 2 provide the lists of number of edges in xa1 and xa2 geodesics for all xV(G)A.

    Case 6: (n=8k+5 with k1)

    Let A={v1=a1,v2=a2}, then

    ● the number of edges in u1a2 geodesic is 2,

    ● the number of edges in v1a2 geodesic is 3.

    Further, Tables 1, 2 and 6 provide the lists of number of edges in xa1 and xa2 geodesics for all xV(G)A.

    Table 6.  λi is the number of edges in a via1 geodesic, and λj is the number of edges in a vja2 geodesic.
    i4k+22(mod 4)4k+33(mod 4)4k+40(mod 4)4k+51(mod 4)
    λik+1k+4k+4k+1
    j4k+33(mod 4)4k+40(mod 4)4k+51(mod 4)4k+62(mod 4)
    λjk+1k+4k+4k+1

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Case 7: (n=8k+6 with k1)

    Let A={v1=a1,v2=a2}, then

    ● the number of edges in v3k+3a1 geodesic is 5k+443(mod 4),

    ● the number of edges in v3k+4a2 geodesic is 5k+440(mod 4),

    ● the number of edges in u4k+3a1 geodesic is k+2,

    ● the number of edges in u4k+4a1 geodesic is k+3,

    ● the number of edges in u4k+5a1 geodesic is k+2,

    ● the number of edges in u4k+4a2 geodesic is k+2,

    ● the number of edges in u4k+5a2 geodesic is k+3,

    ● the number of edges in u4k+6a2 geodesic is k+2.

    Further, Tables 1, 2 and 7 provide the lists of number of edges in xa1 and xa2 geodesics for all xV(G)A.

    Table 7.  λi is the number of edges in a via1 geodesic, and λj is the number of edges in a vja2 geodesic.
    i3k+40(mod 4)3k+51(mod 4)3k+62(mod 4)3k+73(mod 4)3k+80(mod 4)3k+91(mod 4)3k+102(mod 4)3k+113(mod 4)3k+120(mod 4)3k+131(mod 4)
    λi3k+1643k+443k+1645k43k+2043k+845k+645k445k+843k+124
    j3k+51(mod 4)3k+62(mod 4)3k+73(mod 4)3k+80(mod 4)3k+91(mod 4)3k+102(mod 4)3k+113(mod 4)3k+120(mod 4)3k+131(mod 4)3k+142(mod 4)
    λj3k+1643k+443k+1645k43k+2043k+845k+845k445k+843k+124

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Case 8: (n=8k+7 with k1)

    Let A={v1=a1,v3=a2}, then

    ● the number of edges in v1a2 geodesic is 4,

    ● the number of edges in u4k+4a1 geodesic is k+2,

    ● the number of edges in u4k+5a1 geodesic is k+2,

    ● the number of edges in u1a2 geodesic is 3,

    ● the number of edges in u5k+2a2 geodesic is 3k+1242(mod 4),

    ● the number of edges in u5k+3a2 geodesic is 5k+443(mod 4).

    Moreover, Tables 1, 2 and 8 provide the lists of number of edges in xa1 and xa2 geodesics for all xV(G)A.

    Table 8.  λi is the number of edges in a via1 geodesic, and λj is the number of edges in a vja2 geodesic.
    i3k+40(mod 4)3k+51(mod 4)3k+62(mod 4)3k+73(mod 4)3k+80(mod 4)3k+91(mod 4)3k+102(mod 4)3k+113(mod 4)3k+120(mod 4)3k+131(mod 4)
    λi5k+443k+443k+1643k+2045k43k+843k+845k+1245k+845k44
    j4k+22(mod 4)4k+33(mod 4)4k+40(mod 4)4k+51(mod 4)4k+62(mod 4)4k+73(mod 4)4k+80(mod 4)4k+91(mod 4)4k+102(mod 4)4k+113(mod 4)
    λjk+2kk+3k+4k+1k+1k+4k+3kk+2

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In all of these eight cases, for yN(x), if we denote

    ● the number of edges in xa1 geodesic by α1,

    ● the number of edges in ya1 geodesic by β1,

    ● the number of edges in xa2 geodesic by α2,

    ● the number of edges in ya2 geodesic by β2,

    then it can be seen that

    either|α1β1|=1wheneverα2=β2,or|α2β2|=1wheneverα1=β1,

    which implies that either a1A or a2A adjacently distinguishes the pair (x,y). Hence, A is a neighbor-distinguishing set for G.

    Theorem 4. For n9, if G is a generalized Petersen graph P(n,4), then dima(G)=2.

    Proof. Since dima(G)=1 if and only if G is a bipartite graph, by Theorem 1. So dima(G)2, because G is not a bipartite graph. Hence, we get the required result, by Theorem 3.

    The results of this section provide the solution of the problem of neighbor-distinguishing in the generalized Petersen graphs P(2n,n1).

    Theorem 5. For all n3, if G is a generalized Petersen graph P(2n,n1), then the set A={u1,vn1} is a neighbor-distinguishing set for G.

    Proof. According to Proposition 2, we have to perform neighbor-distinguishing for each pair (x,y), where xV(G) and yN(x). When xA, then the pair (x,y) adjacently distinguished by x, because the number of edges in yx geodesic is 1 while the number of edges in xx geodesic is 0. Further, Table 9 provides the list of number of edges in xu1 and xvn1 geodesics for all xV(G)A.

    Table 9.  List of the number of edges in xa geodesics for xV(G)A and aA.
    GeodesicThe number of edges in the geodesics
    When n=2k+1, k1
    For i/geodesicsuiu1uivn1viu1 i is oddviu1 i is evenvivn1 i is oddvivn1 i is even
    1ik1i1i+2iii+3i+1
    kik+1i12ki+1ii2ki+22ki
    i=k+2n+12k1n+12n+122ki+22ki
    k+3i2k2ki+42ki+12ki+32ki+32ki+22ki
    i=2k+1i2k+2i2k+1i2k+1i2k+1i2k+2i2k+2
    i=2k+24in+233i2ki2k
    2k+3i3ki2ki2k+1i2k1i2k1i2k+2i2k
    i=3k+1i2kin+1inink+2k
    i=3k+2n+12kinink+1k1
    3k+3i4k2ni+14ki+22ni+22ni+24ki+34ki+1
    i=2n1233344
    i=2n122211
    When n=2k, k2
    1ik2i1i+2iii+3i+1
    i=k1i1niiikk
    kik+1i1niii2ki12ki+1
    i=k+2i1nin2n2ni1ni+1
    k+3i2k12ki+32ki2ki+22ki+22ki12ki+1
    i=2k322233
    i=2k+1433322
    2k+2i3k2i2k+1i2k+2i2ki2ki2k+1i2k+3
    i=3k1i2k+1i2k+2i2ki2kkk
    3ki3k+12ni+14kii2ki2k4ki+14ki1
    i=3k+2k1k2n2n24ki+14ki1
    3k+3i4k22ni+14ki2ni+22ni+24ki+14ki1
    i=2n1233344
    i=2n122211

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Now, for any yN(x), if we denote

    ● the number of edges in xu1 geodesic by α1,

    ● the number of edges in yu1 geodesic by β1,

    ● the number of edges in xvn1 geodesic by α2,

    ● the number of edges in yvn1 geodesic by β2,

    then it can be seen that

    either|α1β1|=1wheneverα2=β2,or|α2β2|=1wheneverα1=β1,

    which implies that either u1A or vn1A adjacently distinguishes the pair (x,y). Hence, A is a neighbor-distinguishing set for G.

    Theorem 6. For n3, if G is a generalized Petersen graph P(2n,n1), then dima(G)=2.

    Proof. Since dima(G)=1 if and only if G is a bipartite graph, by Theorem 1. So dima(G)2, because G is not a bipartite graph. Hence, we get the required result, by Theorem 5.

    Distinguishing every two vertices in a graph is an eminent problem in graph theory. Many graph theorists have been shown remarkable interest to solve this problem with the aid of distance (the number of edges in a geodesic) from last four decades. Using the technique of finding geodesics between vertices, we solved the problem of distinguishing every two neighbors in generalized Petersen graphs P(n,4) and P(2n,n1). We investigated that, in both the families of generalized Petersen graphs, only two vertices are adequate to distinguish every two neighbors.

    The authors are grateful to the editor and anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions to improve the quality of this article. This research is supported by Balochistan University of Engineering and Technology Khuzdar, Khuzdar 89100, Pakistan.

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.



    [1] World Health Organization (WHO), WHO's COVID-19 response timeline, 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline/#category-Information.
    [2] World Health Organization (WHO), WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard, 2022. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/.
    [3] Y. Guo, Q. Cao, Z. Hong, Y. Tan, S. Chen, H. Jin, et al., The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) outbreak–an update on the status, Mil. Med. Res., 7 (2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00240-0 doi: 10.1186/s40779-020-00240-0
    [4] R. Karia, I. Gupta, H. Khandait, A. Yadav, A. Yadav, Covid-19 and its modes of transmission, SN Compr. Clin. Med., 2 (2020), 1798–1801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00498-4 doi: 10.1007/s42399-020-00498-4
    [5] S. W. Ong, Y. K. Tan, P. Y. Chia, T. Lee, O. T. Ng, M. S. Wong, et al., Air, surface environmental, and personal protective equipment contamination by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (sars-cov-2) from a symptomatic patient, Jama, 323 (2020), 1610–1612. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.3227 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3227
    [6] National Center for Immunization, Science brief: Sars-cov-2 and surface (fomite) transmission for indoor community environments, in CDC COVID-19 Science Briefs [Internet], Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), 2021.
    [7] World Health Organization (WHO), Scientific Brief: Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions, (accessed August 3, 2021). Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/transmission-of-sars-cov-2-implications-for-infection-prevention-precautions#: :text=Transmission.
    [8] S. Mallapaty, Why does the coronavirus spread so easily between people?, Nature, 579 (2020), 183–184.
    [9] Z. Abdelrahman, M. Li, X. Wang, Comparative review of sars-cov-2, sars-cov, mers-cov, and influenza a respiratory viruses, Front. Immunol., (2020), 2309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.552909
    [10] World Health Organization (WHO), Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), (accessed June 15, 2021). Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/.
    [11] World Health Organization (WHO), WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19. 2020, (accessed June 15, 2021). Available from: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19—11-march-2020.
    [12] N. Lurie, M. Saville, R. Hatchett, J. Halton, Developing covid-19 vaccines at pandemic speed, N. Engl. J. Med., 382 (2020), 1969–1973. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2005630 doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005630
    [13] G. Forni, A. Mantovani, Covid-19 vaccines: where we stand and challenges ahead, Cell Death Differ., 28 (2021), 626–639. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-020-00720-9 doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-00720-9
    [14] J. K. Jackson, Global economic effects of covid-19, in Technical report, Congressional Research Service, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00289-8
    [15] P. K. Ozili, T. Arun, Spillover of covid-19: impact on the global economy, SSRN Electron. J., 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3562570
    [16] N. Fernandes, Economic effects of coronavirus outbreak (covid-19) on the world economy, in IESE Business School Working Paper, 2020. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3557504
    [17] US FDA, Fda takes key action in fight against covid-19 by issuing emergency use authorization for first covid-19 vaccine, 2020. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-key-action-fight-against-covid-19-issuing-emergency-use-authorization-first-covid-19.
    [18] M. G. Thompson, J. L. Burgess, A. L. Naleway, H. L. Tyner, S. K. Yoon, J. Meece, et al., Interim estimates of vaccine effectiveness of bnt162b2 and mrna-1273 covid-19 vaccines in preventing sars-cov-2 infection among health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers—eight us locations, december 2020–march 2021, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep., 70 (2021), 495. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7013e3 doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7013e3
    [19] T. Pilishvili, K. E. Fleming-Dutra, J. L. Farrar, R. Gierke, N. M. Mohr, D. A. Talan, et al., Interim estimates of vaccine effectiveness of pfizer-biontech and moderna covid-19 vaccines among health care personnel—33 us sites, january–march 2021, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep., 70 (2021), 753. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7020e2 doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7020e2
    [20] W. H. Self, M. W. Tenforde, J. P. Rhoads, M. Gaglani, A. A. Ginde, D. J Douin, et al., Comparative effectiveness of moderna, pfizer-biontech, and janssen (johnson & johnson) vaccines in preventing covid-19 hospitalizations among adults without immunocompromising conditions—united states, march–august 2021, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep., 70 (2021), 1337. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7038e1 doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7038e1
    [21] L. Wang, G. Cheng, Sequence analysis of the emerging sars-cov-2 variant omicron in south africa, J. Med. Virol., 94 (2022), 1728–1733. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27516 doi: 10.1002/jmv.27516
    [22] L. T. Brandal, E. MacDonald, L. Veneti, T. Ravlo, H. Lange, U. Naseer, et al., Outbreak caused by the sars-cov-2 omicron variant in norway, november to december 2021, Eurosurveillance, 26 (2021), 2101147. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.50.2101147 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.50.2101147
    [23] R. Antia, M. E. Halloran, Transition to endemicity: Understanding covid-19, Immunity, 54 (2021), 2172–2176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2021.09.019 doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.09.019
    [24] J. S. Lavine, O. N. Bjornstad, R. Antia, Immunological characteristics govern the transition of covid-19 to endemicity, Science, 371 (2021), 741–745. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe6522 doi: 10.1126/science.abe6522
    [25] Y. Tang, S. Wang, Mathematic modeling of covid-19 in the united states. Emerging Microbes Infect., 9 (2020), 827–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1760146
    [26] A. R. Tuite, D. N. Fisman, A. L. Greer, Mathematical modelling of covid-19 transmission and mitigation strategies in the population of ontario, canada, CMAJ, 192 (2020), E497–E505. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.200476 doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200476
    [27] A. J. Kucharski, T. W. Russell, C. Diamond, Y. Liu, J. Edmunds, S. Funk, et al., Early dynamics of transmission and control of covid-19: a mathematical modelling study, Lancet Infect. Dis., 20 (2020), 553–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30144-4 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30144-4
    [28] S. A. Iyaniwura, R. C. Falcão, N. Ringa, P. A. Adu, M. Spencer, M. Taylor, et al., Mathematical modeling of covid-19 in british columbia: an age-structured model with time-dependent contact rates, Epidemics, (2022), 100559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100559
    [29] F. Ndaïrou, I. Area, J. J. Nieto, D. F. M. Torres, Mathematical modeling of covid-19 transmission dynamics with a case study of wuhan, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 135 (2020), 109846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109846 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109846
    [30] D. K. Chu, E. A. Akl, S. Duda, K. Solo, S. Yaacoub, H. J. Schünemann, et al., Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of sars-cov-2 and covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Lancet, 395 (2020), 1973–1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9
    [31] M. A. Khan, Ab. Atangana, E. Alzahrani, Fatmawati, The dynamics of covid-19 with quarantined and isolation, Adv. Differ. Equations, 2020 (2020), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02882-9 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02882-9
    [32] S. C. Anderson, A. M. Edwards, M. Yerlanov, N. Mulberry, J. E. Stockdale, S. A. Iyaniwura, et al., Quantifying the impact of covid-19 control measures using a bayesian model of physical distancing, PLoS Comput. Biol., 16 (2020), e1008274. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008274 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008274
    [33] S. A. Iyaniwura, M. A. Rabiu, J. David, J. D. Kong, Assessing the impact of adherence to non-pharmaceutical interventions and indirect transmission on the dynamics of covid-19: a mathematical modelling study, medRxiv, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.23.21265421
    [34] M. Sadarangani, B. A. Raya, J. M. Conway, S. A. Iyaniwura, R. C. Falcao, C. Colijn, et al., Importance of covid-19 vaccine efficacy in older age groups, Vaccine, 39 (2021), 2020–2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.020 doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.020
    [35] N. Mulberry, P. Tupper, E. Kirwin, C. McCabe, C. Colijn, Vaccine rollout strategies: The case for vaccinating essential workers early, PLOS Global Public Health, 1 (2021), e0000020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000020 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000020
    [36] J. Demongeot, Q. Griette, P. Magal, G. Webb, Modeling vaccine efficacy for covid-19 outbreak in new york city, Biology, 11 (2022), 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11030345 doi: 10.3390/biology11030345
    [37] L. M. Pinto, V. Nanda, A. Sunavala, C. Rodriques, Reinfection in covid-19: A scoping review, Med. J. Armed Forces India, 77, S257–S263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.02.010
    [38] S, Roy, Covid-19 reinfection: myth or truth?, SN Compr. Clin. Med., 2 (2020), 710–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00335-8 doi: 10.1007/s42399-020-00335-8
    [39] D. de A. Torres, L. Ribeiro, A. de F. Riello, D. D. G. Horovitz, L. F. R. Pinto, J. Croda, Reinfection of covid-19 after 3 months with a distinct and more aggressive clinical presentation: Case report, J. Med. Virol., 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26637
    [40] CDC Covid, Vaccine Breakthrough Case Investigations Team, CDC COVID, Vaccine Breakthrough Case Investigations Team, CDC COVID, Vaccine Breakthrough Case Investigations Team, et al., Covid-19 vaccine breakthrough infections reported to cdc—united states, january 1–april 30, 2021, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep., 70 (2021), 792. http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7021e3.
    [41] M. Bergwerk, T. Gonen, Y. Lustig, S. Amit, M. Lipsitch, C. Cohen, et al., Covid-19 breakthrough infections in vaccinated health care workers, N. Engl. J. Med., 385 (2021), 1474–1484. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2109072 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2109072
    [42] R. K. Gupta, E. J. Topol, Covid-19 vaccine breakthrough infections, Science, 374 (2021), 1561–1562. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl8487 doi: 10.1126/science.abl8487
    [43] Y. Goldberg, M. Mandel, Y. M. Bar-On, O. Bodenheimer, L. Freedman, E. J. Haas, et al., Waning immunity after the bnt162b2 vaccine in israel, N. Engl. J. Med., 385 (2021), e85. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2114228 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114228
    [44] Elie Dolgin, Covid vaccine immunity is waning-how much does that matter, Nature, 597 (2021), 606–607. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02532-4 doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02532-4
    [45] E. G. Levin, Y. Lustig, C. Cohen, R. Fluss, V. Indenbaum, S. Amit, et al., Waning immune humoral response to bnt162b2 covid-19 vaccine over 6 months, N. Engl. J. Med., 385 (2021), e84. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2114583 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114583
    [46] E. B. Are, Y. Song, J. E. Stockdale, P. Tupper, C. Colijn, Covid-19 endgame: from pandemic to endemic? vaccination, reopening and evolution in a well-vaccinated population, medRxiv, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.18.21268002
    [47] A. V. Tkachenko, S. Maslov, T. Wang, A. Elbana, G. N. Wong, N. Goldenfeld, Stochastic social behavior coupled to covid-19 dynamics leads to waves, plateaus, and an endemic state, Elife, 10 (2021), e68341. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68341 doi: 10.7554/eLife.68341
    [48] M. Rabiu, S. A Iyaniwura, Assessing the potential impact of immunity waning on the dynamics of covid-19 in south africa: an endemic model of covid-19, Nonlinear Dyn., (2022), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07225-9
    [49] N. Nuraini, K. Khairudin, M. Apri, Modeling simulation of covid-19 in indonesia based on early endemic data, Commun. Biomath. Sci., 3 (2020), 1–8.
    [50] W. Zhou, B. Tang, Y. Bai, Y. Shao, Y. Xiao, S. Tang, The resurgence risk of covid-19 in the presence of immunity waning and ade effect: A mathematical modelling study, medRxiv, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.25.21262601
    [51] F. Inayaturohmat, R. N. Zikkah, A. K. Supriatna, N. Anggriani, Mathematical model of covid-19 transmission in the presence of waning immunity, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1722 (2021), 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012038 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012038
    [52] T. Xiang, B. Liang, Y. Fang, S. Lu, S. Li, H. Wang, et al., Declining levels of neutralizing antibodies against sars-cov-2 in convalescent covid-19 patients one year post symptom onset, Front. Immunol., 12 (2021), 2327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.708523 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.708523
    [53] B. Pell, M. D. Johnston, P. Nelson, A data-validated temporary immunity model of covid-19 spread in michigan, Math. Biosci. Eng., 19 (2022), 10122–10142. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2022474 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022474
    [54] S. Ghosh, M. Banerjee, V. Volpert, Immuno-epidemiological model-based prediction of further covid-19 epidemic outbreaks due to immunity waning, Math. Modell. Nat. Phenom., 17 (2022), 9. https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/2022017 doi: 10.1051/mmnp/2022017
    [55] C. P. Tadiri, J. D. Kong, G. F. Fussmann, M. E. Scott, H. Wang, A data-validated host-parasite model for infectious disease outbreaks, Front. Ecol. Evol., (2019), 307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00307
    [56] Y. Kuang, Delay differential equations: with applications in population dynamics, Academic press, 1993.
    [57] T. Cassidy, Distributed delay differential equation representations of cyclic differential equations, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 81 (2021), 1742–1766. https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1351606 doi: 10.1137/20M1351606
    [58] P. J. Hurtado, A. S. Kirosingh, Generalizations of the 'linear chain trick': incorporating more flexible dwell time distributions into mean field ode models, J. Math. Biol., 79, 1831–1883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-019-01412-w
    [59] H. L. Smith, An introduction to delay differential equations with applications to the life sciences, Springer New York, 2011.
    [60] O. Diekmann, J. A. P. Heesterbeek, J. A. Metz, On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio r 0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations, J. Math. Biol., 28 (1990), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178324 doi: 10.1007/BF00178324
    [61] P. Van den Driessche, J. Watmough, Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission, Math. Biosci., 180 (2002), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6 doi: 10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6
    [62] J. H. Jones, Notes on r0, Calif. Dep. Anthropol. Sci., 323 (2007), 1–19.
    [63] C. Castillo-Chavez, B. Song, Dynamical models of tuberculosis and their applications, Math. Biosci. Eng., 1 (2004), 361. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2004.1.361 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2004.1.361
    [64] M. Rabiu, R. Willie, N. Parumasur, Mathematical analysis of a disease-resistant model with imperfect vaccine, quarantine and treatment, Ric. Mat., 69 (2020), 603–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11587-020-00496-7 doi: 10.1007/s11587-020-00496-7
    [65] O. Dyer, Covid-19: Unvaccinated face 11 times risk of death from delta variant, cdc data show, BMJ, 374 (2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2282
    [66] A. Khan, R. Zarin, G. Hussain, N. A. Ahmad, M. H. Mohd, A. Yusuf, Stability analysis and optimal control of covid-19 with convex incidence rate in khyber pakhtunkhawa (pakistan), Results Phys., 20 (2021), 103703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103703 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103703
    [67] J. P. La Salle, The stability of dynamical systems, SIAM, 1976.
    [68] U. C. Bureau, Census Bureau Reveals Fastest-Growing Large Cities, (accessed May 27, 2022). Available from: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2018/estimates-cities.html.
    [69] S. Mushayabasa, E. T. Ngarakana-Gwasira, J. Mushanyu, On the role of governmental action and individual reaction on covid-19 dynamics in south africa: A mathematical modelling study, Inf. Med. Unlocked, 20 (2020), 100387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2020.100387 doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100387
    [70] Z. Yang, Z. Zeng, K. Wang, S. Wong, W. Liang, M. Zanin, et al., Modified seir and ai prediction of the epidemics trend of covid-19 in china under public health interventions, J. Thorac. Dis., 12 (2020), 165. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.02.64 doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.64
    [71] A. Mahajan, R. Solanki, N. Sivadas, Estimation of undetected symptomatic and asymptomatic cases of covid-19 infection and prediction of its spread in the usa, J. Med. Virol., 93 (2021), 3202–3210. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26897 doi: 10.1002/jmv.26897
    [72] S. Choi, M. Ki, Estimating the reproductive number and the outbreak size of covid-19 in korea, Epidemiol. Health, 42, (2020). https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2020011
    [73] S. Khajanchi, K. Sarkar, J. Mondal, Dynamics of the covid-19 pandemic in india, preprint, arXiv: 2005.06286.
    [74] L. Zou, F. Ruan, M. Huang, L. Liang, H. Huang, Z. Hong, et al., Sars-cov-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients, N. Engl. J. Med., 382 (2020), 1177–1179. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2001737 doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2001737
    [75] L. Tindale, M. Coombe, J. E. Stockdale, E. Garlock, W. Y. V. Lau, M. Saraswat, et al., Transmission interval estimates suggest pre-symptomatic spread of covid-19, MedRxiv, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.03.20029983
    [76] T. Ganyani, C. Kremer, D. Chen, A. Torneri, C. Faes, J. Wallinga, et al., Estimating the generation interval for coronavirus disease (covid-19) based on symptom onset data, march 2020, Eurosurveillance, 25 (2020), 2000257. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.17.2000257 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.17.2000257
    [77] Z. Zhao, X. Li, F. Liu, G. Zhu, C. Ma, L. Wang, Prediction of the covid-19 spread in african countries and implications for prevention and control: A case study in south africa, egypt, algeria, nigeria, senegal and kenya, Sci. Total Environ., 729 (2020), 138959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138959 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138959
    [78] L. Peng, W. Yang, D. Zhang, C. Zhuge, L. Hong, Epidemic analysis of covid-19 in china by dynamical modeling, preprint, arXiv: 2002.06563.
    [79] W. Jassat, C. Mudara, L. Ozougwu, S. Tempia, L. Blumberg, M. Davies, et al., Difference in mortality among individuals admitted to hospital with covid-19 during the first and second waves in south africa: a cohort study, Lancet Global Health, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00289-8
    [80] Webometer, Total Coronavirus Deaths in South Africa, (accessed August 28, 2021). Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/south-africa.
    [81] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Data, Urban population by city size, (accessed May 27, 2022). Available from: https://data.oecd.org/popregion/urban-population-by-city-size.htm.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. 莉 周, Vertex Reducible Edge (Total) Coloring of Two Classes of Generalized Petersen Graph, 2023, 13, 2160-7583, 1851, 10.12677/PM.2023.136188
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3438) PDF downloads(218) Cited by(9)

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog