
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been spreading worldwide for over two years, with millions of reported cases and deaths. The deployment of mathematical modeling in the fight against COVID-19 has recorded tremendous success. However, most of these models target the epidemic phase of the disease. The development of safe and effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 brought hope of safe reopening of schools and businesses and return to pre-COVID normalcy, until mutant strains like the Delta and Omicron variants, which are more infectious, emerged. A few months into the pandemic, reports of the possibility of both vaccine- and infection-induced immunity waning emerged, thereby indicating that COVID-19 may be with us for longer than earlier thought. As a result, to better understand the dynamics of COVID-19, it is essential to study the disease with an endemic model. In this regard, we developed and analyzed an endemic model of COVID-19 that incorporates the waning of both vaccine- and infection-induced immunities using distributed delay equations. Our modeling framework assumes that the waning of both immunities occurs gradually over time at the population level. We derived a nonlinear ODE system from the distributed delay model and showed that the model could exhibit either a forward or backward bifurcation depending on the immunity waning rates. Having a backward bifurcation implies that Rc<1 is not sufficient to guarantee disease eradication, and that the immunity waning rates are critical factors in eradicating COVID-19. Our numerical simulations show that vaccinating a high percentage of the population with a safe and moderately effective vaccine could help in eradicating COVID-19.
Citation: Sarafa A. Iyaniwura, Rabiu Musa, Jude D. Kong. A generalized distributed delay model of COVID-19: An endemic model with immunity waning[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(3): 5379-5412. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023249
[1] | Yinwan Cheng, Chao Yang, Bing Yao, Yaqin Luo . Neighbor full sum distinguishing total coloring of Halin graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6959-6970. doi: 10.3934/math.2022386 |
[2] | Baolin Ma, Chao Yang . Distinguishing colorings of graphs and their subgraphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26561-26573. doi: 10.3934/math.20231357 |
[3] | Ningge Huang, Lily Chen . AVD edge-colorings of cubic Halin graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27820-27839. doi: 10.3934/math.20231423 |
[4] | Huifen Ge, Shumin Zhang, Chengfu Ye, Rongxia Hao . The generalized 4-connectivity of folded Petersen cube networks. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14718-14737. doi: 10.3934/math.2022809 |
[5] | Kai An Sim, Kok Bin Wong . On the cooling number of the generalized Petersen graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 36351-36370. doi: 10.3934/math.20241724 |
[6] | Fugang Chao, Donghan Zhang . Neighbor sum distinguishing total choice number of IC-planar graphs with restrictive conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 13637-13646. doi: 10.3934/math.2023692 |
[7] | Bana Al Subaiei, Ahlam AlMulhim, Abolape Deborah Akwu . Vertex-edge perfect Roman domination number. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21472-21483. doi: 10.3934/math.20231094 |
[8] | Yanyi Li, Lily Chen . Injective edge coloring of generalized Petersen graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 7929-7943. doi: 10.3934/math.2021460 |
[9] | Ali Raza, Mobeen Munir, Tasawar Abbas, Sayed M Eldin, Ilyas Khan . Spectrum of prism graph and relation with network related quantities. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2634-2647. doi: 10.3934/math.2023137 |
[10] | Bao-Hua Xing, Nurten Urlu Ozalan, Jia-Bao Liu . The degree sequence on tensor and cartesian products of graphs and their omega index. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16618-16632. doi: 10.3934/math.2023850 |
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been spreading worldwide for over two years, with millions of reported cases and deaths. The deployment of mathematical modeling in the fight against COVID-19 has recorded tremendous success. However, most of these models target the epidemic phase of the disease. The development of safe and effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 brought hope of safe reopening of schools and businesses and return to pre-COVID normalcy, until mutant strains like the Delta and Omicron variants, which are more infectious, emerged. A few months into the pandemic, reports of the possibility of both vaccine- and infection-induced immunity waning emerged, thereby indicating that COVID-19 may be with us for longer than earlier thought. As a result, to better understand the dynamics of COVID-19, it is essential to study the disease with an endemic model. In this regard, we developed and analyzed an endemic model of COVID-19 that incorporates the waning of both vaccine- and infection-induced immunities using distributed delay equations. Our modeling framework assumes that the waning of both immunities occurs gradually over time at the population level. We derived a nonlinear ODE system from the distributed delay model and showed that the model could exhibit either a forward or backward bifurcation depending on the immunity waning rates. Having a backward bifurcation implies that Rc<1 is not sufficient to guarantee disease eradication, and that the immunity waning rates are critical factors in eradicating COVID-19. Our numerical simulations show that vaccinating a high percentage of the population with a safe and moderately effective vaccine could help in eradicating COVID-19.
Let G be a simple, non-trivial connected graph with vertex set V(G). For any two distinct vertices u and v in G, u-v geodesic is a shortest walk between u and v without repetition of vertices. Two vertices are said to be adjacent if there is an edge between them, and they are also called neighbors of each other. The collection of all the neighbors of a vertex v in G is called the (open) neighborhood of v, denoted by N(v).
A vertex v of G distinguishes a pair (x,y) of distinct vertices of G, if the number of edges in v-x geodesic is different from the number of edge in v-y geodesic. If (x,y) is a pair of neighbors in G, then v is said to be adjacently distinguish the pair (x,y). Equivalently, a vertex v adjacently distinguishes a pair (x,y) of two neighbors if the difference between the number of edges in v-x geodesic and the number of edges in v-y geodesic is one.
A set D⊆V(G) is a distinguishing set (metric generator) for G if the members of D distinguish every pair of distinct vertices in G. The cardinality of a smallest distinguishing set for G is called the metric dimension of G, denoted by dim(G) [7,23]. The concept of distinguishing set was introduced, very firstly, by Blumenthal [5] in the general context of metric spaces. It was later rediscovered and studied, in the context of graphs, by Slater with the name locating set/reference set [23]. Independently, Harary and Melter studied distinguishing set as resolving set (metric generator) [7,20]. Applications of this notion to the navigation of robots in networks are discussed in [13,21], and applications to pharmaceutical chemistry in [10,11]. For more details about the theory and applications of this notion, we refer the readers to the papers cited in [3,5,8,9,12,13,14,15,19,22] and the references therein.
A set A⊆V(G) is a neighbor-distinguishing set (local metric generator) for G if the members of A adjacently distinguish every pair of neighboring (adjacent) vertices in G. The cardinality of a smallest neighbor-distinguishing set for G is called the adjacency (local) metric dimension of G, and we denote it by dima(G).
The problem of distinguishing every two neighbors with the aid of distance (the number of edges in a geodesic) in a connected graph was introduced and studied by Okamoto et al. in 2010 [16]. Then, up till now, this notion endlessly received remarkable interest of many researchers working with distance in graphs. In 2015 and 2018, every two neighbors in the corona product of graphs are distinguished [6,18], while this problem for strong product and lexicographic product of graphs was solved in 2016 [4] and in 2018 [2,6], respectively. Using the neighbor-distinguishing problem of primary subgraphs, this problem was solved for the super graphs of these subgraphs in 2015 [17]. In 2018, Salman et al. proposed linear programming formulation for this problem and distinguished neighbors in two families of convex polytopes [19]. Recently, in 2019, split graphs of complete and complete bipartite graphs have been considered in the context of this problem [1]. Due to this noteworthy attention of researchers to this problem, we extend this study towards a very renowned family of generalized Petersen graphs in this article. Next, we state two results, proved by Okamoto et al. [16], and Salman et al. [19], respectively, which will be used in the sequel.
Theorem 1. [16] Let G be a non-trivial connected graph of order n. Then dima(G) =n−1 if and only if G is a complete graph, and dima(G)=1 if and only if G is a bipartite graph.
Proposition 2. [19] A subset A of vertices in a connected graph G is a neighbor-distinguishing set for G if and only if for every u∈V(G) and for each v∈N(u), the pair (u,v) adjacently distinguished by some element of A.
Watkins, in 1969 [24], generalized the eminent Petersen graph, and proposed the notation P(n,m) to this generalized family, where n≥3 and 1≤m≤⌊n−12⌋. P(n,m) is a cubic graph having the set
V(P(n,m))={u1,u2,…,un,v1,v2,…,vn} |
as the vertex set, and the set
E(P(n,m))=n⋃i=1{uix,viy;x∈N(ui),y∈N(vi)} |
as the edge set, where N(ui)={ui+1,ui−1,vi} and N(vi)={ui,vi+m,vi−m} for each 1≤i≤n, and the indices greater than n or less than 1 will be taken modulo n. Vertices ui and vi (1≤i≤n) are called the outer vertices and inner vertices, respectively, in P(n,m). Figure 1 depicts graphs to two different families of generalized Petersen graphs.
The rest of the paper is divided into two sections: one is on the family of generalized Petersen graphs P(n,4); and the second is on the family of generalized Petersen graphs P(2n,n−1). These families have been considered in the context of metric dimension problem by Naz et al. [15] and Ahmad et al. [3], respectively. Here, we solve the neighbor-distinguishing problem for these families.
In the next result, we show that only two vertices of P(n,4) perform the neighbor-distinguishing.
Theorem 3. For n≥9, let G be a generalized Petersen graph P(n,4), then a neighbor-distinguishing set for G is a 2-element subset of V(G).
Proof. For n=9, it is an easy exercise to see that the set A={v1,v2} is a neighbor-distinguishing set for G. For n≥10, let A be a 2-element subset of V(G). Then, according to Proposition 2, we would perform neighbor-distinguishing for each pair (x,y), where x∈V(G) and y∈N(x). Note that, if x∈A, then (x,y) is adjacently distinguished, because the number of edges in y−x geodesic is 1, while the number of edges in x−x geodesic is 0. Now, we discuss the following eight cases:
Case 1: (n=8k with k≥2)
Let A={v1=a1,v3=a2}, then
● the number of edges in u1−a2 geodesic is 3,
● the number of edges in u2−a2 geodesic is 2,
● the number of edges in v1−a2 geodesic is 4,
● the number of edges in v2−a2 geodesic is 3.
Further, Tables 1 and 2 provide the lists of number of edges in x−a1 and x−a2 geodesics for all x∈V(G)−A.
Geodesic | The number of edges in the geodesic | |||
ui−a | i≡0 (mod 4) | i≡1 (mod 4) | i≡2 (mod 4) | i≡3 (mod 4) |
n=8k with k≥2, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+1 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+2≤i≤n | n−i+84 | n−i+54 | n−i+104 | n−i+114 |
ui−a2, 3≤i≤4k+3 | i+44 | i+74 | i+64 | i+14 |
ui−a2, 4k+4≤i≤n | n−i+124 | n−i+134 | n−i+104 | n−i+74 |
n=8k+1 with k≥2, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+1 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+2≤i≤n | n−i+114 | n−i+84 | n−i+54 | n−i+104 |
ui−a2, 4≤i≤5k+1 | i4 | i+34 | i+64 | i+54 |
ui−a2, 5k+2≤i≤n | n−i+114 | n−i+84 | n−i+134 | n−i+144 |
n=8k+2 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+2 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+3≤i≤n | n−i+104 | n−i+114 | n−i+84 | n−i+54 |
ui−a2, 2≤i≤4k+3 | i+84 | i+74 | i+24 | i+54 |
ui−a2, 4k+4≤i≤n | n−i+64 | n−i+114 | n−i+124 | n−i+94 |
n=8k+3 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+2 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+3≤i≤n | n−i+54 | n−i+104 | n−i+114 | n−i+84 |
ui−a2, 3≤i≤5k | i+44 | i+74 | i+64 | i+14 |
ui−a2, 5k+1≤i≤n | n−i+134 | n−i+104 | n−i+74 | n−i+124 |
n=8k+4 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+3 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+4≤i≤n | n−i+84 | n−i+54 | n−i+104 | n−i+114 |
ui−a2, 3≤i≤5k+2 | i4 | i+34 | i+64 | i+54 |
ui−a2, 5k+3≤i≤n | n−i+84 | n−i+134 | n−i+144 | n−i+114 |
n=8k+5 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤5k+1 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 5k+2≤i≤n | n−i+114 | n−i+84 | n−i+54 | n−i+104 |
ui−a2, 2≤i≤5k+2 | i+84 | i+74 | i+24 | i+54 |
ui−a2, 5k+3≤i≤n | n−i+114 | n−i+124 | n−i+94 | n−i+64 |
n=8k+6 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+2 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+6≤i≤n | n−i+104 | n−i+114 | n−i+84 | n−i+54 |
ui−a2, 1≤i≤4k+3 | i+84 | i+74 | i+24 | i+54 |
ui−a2, 4k+7≤i≤n | n−i+64 | n−i+114 | n−i+124 | n−i+94 |
n=8k+7 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+3 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+6≤i≤n | n−i+54 | n−i+104 | n−i+114 | n−i+84 |
ui−a2, 2≤i≤5k+1 | i+44 | i+74 | i+64 | i+14 |
ui−a2, 5k+4≤i≤n | n−i+134 | n−i+104 | n−i+74 | n−i+124 |
Geodesic | The number of edges in the geodesic. | |||
vi−a | i≡0 (mod 4) | i≡1 (mod 4) | i≡2 (mod 4) | i≡3 (mod 4) |
n=8k with k≥2, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤4k+1 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 4k+2≤i≤n | n−i+124 | n−i+14 | n−i+144 | n−i+154 |
vi−a2, 3≤i≤4k+3 | i+84 | i+114 | i+104 | i−34 |
vi−a2, 4k+4≤i≤n | n−i+164 | n−i+174 | n−i+144 | n−i+34 |
n=8k+1 with k≥2, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤3k+1 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 3k+10≤i≤n | n−i+154 | n−i+124 | n−i+14 | n−i+144 |
vi−a2, 4≤i≤4k | i−44 | i+74 | i+104 | i+94 |
vi−a2, 4k+6≤i≤n | n−i+154 | n−i+44 | n−i+174 | n−i+184 |
n=8k+2 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤3k+2 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 3k+10≤i≤n | n−i+144 | n−i+154 | n−i+124 | n−i+14 |
vi−a2, 2≤i≤3k+3 | i+124 | i+114 | i−24 | i+94 |
vi−a2, 3k+11≤i≤n | n−i+24 | n−i+154 | n−i+164 | n−i+134 |
n=8k+3 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤3k+3 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 3k+10≤i≤n | n−i+14 | n−i+144 | n−i+154 | n−i+124 |
vi−a2, 3≤i≤4k+1 | i+84 | i+114 | i+104 | i−34 |
vi−a2, 4k+8≤i≤n | n−i+174 | n−i+144 | n−i+34 | n−i+164 |
n=8k+4 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤4k+3 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 4k+4≤i≤n | n−i+124 | n−i+14 | n−i+144 | n−i+154 |
vi−a2, 3≤i≤5k+2 | i−44 | i+74 | i+104 | i+94 |
vi−a2, 5k+3≤i≤n | n−i+44 | n−i+174 | n−i+184 | n−i+154 |
n=8k+5 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤4k+1 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 4k+6≤i≤n | n−i+154 | n−i+124 | n−i+14 | n−i+144 |
vi−a2, 2≤i≤4k+2 | i+124 | i+114 | i−24 | i+94 |
vi−a2, 4k+7≤i≤n | n−i+154 | n−i+164 | n−i+134 | n−i+24 |
n=8k+6 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤3k+2 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 3k+14≤i≤n | n−i+144 | n−i+154 | n−i+124 | n−i+14 |
vi−a2, 1≤i≤3k+3 | i+124 | i+114 | i−24 | i+94 |
vi−a2, 3k+15≤i≤n | n−i+24 | n−i+154 | n−i+164 | n−i+134 |
n=8k+7 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤3k+3 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 3k+14≤i≤n | n−i+14 | n−i+144 | n−i+154 | n−i+124 |
vi−a2, 2≤i≤4k+1 | i+84 | i+114 | i+104 | i−34 |
vi−a2, 4k+12≤i≤n | n−i+174 | n−i+144 | n−i+34 | n−i+164 |
Case 2: (n=8k+1 with k≥2)
Let A={v1=a1,v4=a2}, then
● the number of edges in u1−a2 geodesic is 3,
● the number of edges in u2−a2 geodesic is 3,
● the number of edges in u3−a2 geodesic is 2.
Further, Tables 1–3 provide the lists of number of edges in x−a1 and x−a2 geodesics for all x∈V(G)−A.
i | 3k+2≡2(mod 4) | 3k+3≡3(mod 4) | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) |
λi | 5k4 | 3k+164 | 3k+164 | 3k+44 | 5k−44 | 5k+84 | 5k+84 | 3k+84 |
j | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4k+1≡1(mod 4) | 4k+2≡2(mod 4) | 4k+3≡3(mod 4) | 4k+4≡0(mod 4) | 4k+5≡1(mod 4) |
λj | 4 | 4 | 3 | k+1 | k+3 | k+3 | k | k |
Case 3: (n=8k+2 with k≥1)
Let A={v1=a1,v2=a2}, then
● the number of edges in u2−a2 geodesic is 2.
Further, Tables 1, 2 and 4 provide the lists of number of edges in x−a1 and x−a2 geodesics for all x∈V(G)−A.
i | 3k+3≡3(mod 4) | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | − | − |
λi | 5k4 | 3k+164 | 3k+44 | 3k+164 | 5k−44 | 5k+84 | 3k+84 | − | − |
j | 1 | 2 | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | 3k+10≡2(mod 4) |
λj | 3 | 0 | 5k4 | 3k+164 | 3k+44 | 5k+84 | 5k−44 | 5k+84 | 3k+84 |
Case 4: (n=8k+3 with k≥1)
Let A={v1=a1,v3=a2}, then
● the number of edges in u1−a2 geodesic is 3,
● the number of edges in u2−a2 geodesic is 2.
Further, Tables 1, 2 and 5 provide the lists of number of edges in x−a1 and x−a2 geodesics for all x∈V(G)−A.
i | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | − | − |
λi | 5k4 | 3k+44 | 3k+164 | 5k+84 | 5k−44 | 3k+84 | − | − |
j | 1 | 2 | 4k+2≡2(mod 4) | 4k+3≡3(mod 4) | 4k+4≡0(mod 4) | 4k+5≡1(mod 4) | 4k+6≡2(mod 4) | 4k+7≡3(mod 4) |
λj | 4 | 3 | k+1 | k | k+3 | k+3 | k | k+1 |
Case 5: (n=8k+4 with k≥1)
Let A={v1=a1,v4=a2}, then
● the number of edges in v1−a2 geodesic is 4,
● the number of edges in v2−a2 geodesic is 4,
● the number of edges in u1−a2 geodesic is 3,
● the number of edges in u2−a2 geodesic is 3.
Moreover, Tables 1 and 2 provide the lists of number of edges in x−a1 and x−a2 geodesics for all x∈V(G)−A.
Case 6: (n=8k+5 with k≥1)
Let A={v1=a1,v2=a2}, then
● the number of edges in u1−a2 geodesic is 2,
● the number of edges in v1−a2 geodesic is 3.
Further, Tables 1, 2 and 6 provide the lists of number of edges in x−a1 and x−a2 geodesics for all x∈V(G)−A.
i | 4k+2≡2(mod 4) | 4k+3≡3(mod 4) | 4k+4≡0(mod 4) | 4k+5≡1(mod 4) |
λi | k+1 | k+4 | k+4 | k+1 |
j | 4k+3≡3(mod 4) | 4k+4≡0(mod 4) | 4k+5≡1(mod 4) | 4k+6≡2(mod 4) |
λj | k+1 | k+4 | k+4 | k+1 |
Case 7: (n=8k+6 with k≥1)
Let A={v1=a1,v2=a2}, then
● the number of edges in v3k+3−a1 geodesic is 5k+44≡3(mod 4),
● the number of edges in v3k+4−a2 geodesic is 5k+44≡0(mod 4),
● the number of edges in u4k+3−a1 geodesic is k+2,
● the number of edges in u4k+4−a1 geodesic is k+3,
● the number of edges in u4k+5−a1 geodesic is k+2,
● the number of edges in u4k+4−a2 geodesic is k+2,
● the number of edges in u4k+5−a2 geodesic is k+3,
● the number of edges in u4k+6−a2 geodesic is k+2.
Further, Tables 1, 2 and 7 provide the lists of number of edges in x−a1 and x−a2 geodesics for all x∈V(G)−A.
i | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | 3k+10≡2(mod 4) | 3k+11≡3(mod 4) | 3k+12≡0(mod 4) | 3k+13≡1(mod 4) |
λi | 3k+164 | 3k+44 | 3k+164 | 5k4 | 3k+204 | 3k+84 | 5k+64 | 5k−44 | 5k+84 | 3k+124 |
j | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | 3k+10≡2(mod 4) | 3k+11≡3(mod 4) | 3k+12≡0(mod 4) | 3k+13≡1(mod 4) | 3k+14≡2(mod 4) |
λj | 3k+164 | 3k+44 | 3k+164 | 5k4 | 3k+204 | 3k+84 | 5k+84 | 5k−44 | 5k+84 | 3k+124 |
Case 8: (n=8k+7 with k≥1)
Let A={v1=a1,v3=a2}, then
● the number of edges in v1−a2 geodesic is 4,
● the number of edges in u4k+4−a1 geodesic is k+2,
● the number of edges in u4k+5−a1 geodesic is k+2,
● the number of edges in u1−a2 geodesic is 3,
● the number of edges in u5k+2−a2 geodesic is 3k+124≡2(mod 4),
● the number of edges in u5k+3−a2 geodesic is 5k+44≡3(mod 4).
Moreover, Tables 1, 2 and 8 provide the lists of number of edges in x−a1 and x−a2 geodesics for all x∈V(G)−A.
i | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | 3k+10≡2(mod 4) | 3k+11≡3(mod 4) | 3k+12≡0(mod 4) | 3k+13≡1(mod 4) |
λi | 5k+44 | 3k+44 | 3k+164 | 3k+204 | 5k4 | 3k+84 | 3k+84 | 5k+124 | 5k+84 | 5k−44 |
j | 4k+2≡2(mod 4) | 4k+3≡3(mod 4) | 4k+4≡0(mod 4) | 4k+5≡1(mod 4) | 4k+6≡2(mod 4) | 4k+7≡3(mod 4) | 4k+8≡0(mod 4) | 4k+9≡1(mod 4) | 4k+10≡2(mod 4) | 4k+11≡3(mod 4) |
λj | k+2 | k | k+3 | k+4 | k+1 | k+1 | k+4 | k+3 | k | k+2 |
In all of these eight cases, for y∈N(x), if we denote
● the number of edges in x−a1 geodesic by α1,
● the number of edges in y−a1 geodesic by β1,
● the number of edges in x−a2 geodesic by α2,
● the number of edges in y−a2 geodesic by β2,
then it can be seen that
either|α1−β1|=1wheneverα2=β2,or|α2−β2|=1wheneverα1=β1, |
which implies that either a1∈A or a2∈A adjacently distinguishes the pair (x,y). Hence, A is a neighbor-distinguishing set for G.
Theorem 4. For n≥9, if G is a generalized Petersen graph P(n,4), then dima(G)=2.
Proof. Since dima(G)=1 if and only if G is a bipartite graph, by Theorem 1. So dima(G)≥2, because G is not a bipartite graph. Hence, we get the required result, by Theorem 3.
The results of this section provide the solution of the problem of neighbor-distinguishing in the generalized Petersen graphs P(2n,n−1).
Theorem 5. For all n≥3, if G is a generalized Petersen graph P(2n,n−1), then the set A={u1,vn−1} is a neighbor-distinguishing set for G.
Proof. According to Proposition 2, we have to perform neighbor-distinguishing for each pair (x,y), where x∈V(G) and y∈N(x). When x∈A, then the pair (x,y) adjacently distinguished by x, because the number of edges in y−x geodesic is 1 while the number of edges in x−x geodesic is 0. Further, Table 9 provides the list of number of edges in x−u1 and x−vn−1 geodesics for all x∈V(G)−A.
Geodesic | The number of edges in the geodesics | |||||
When n=2k+1, k≥1 | ||||||
For i/geodesics | ui−u1 | ui−vn−1 | vi−u1 i is odd | vi−u1 i is even | vi−vn−1 i is odd | vi−vn−1 i is even |
1≤i≤k−1 | i−1 | i+2 | i | i | i+3 | i+1 |
k≤i≤k+1 | i−1 | 2k−i+1 | i | i | 2k−i+2 | 2k−i |
i=k+2 | n+12 | k−1 | n+12 | n+12 | 2k−i+2 | 2k−i |
k+3≤i≤2k | 2k−i+4 | 2k−i+1 | 2k−i+3 | 2k−i+3 | 2k−i+2 | 2k−i |
i=2k+1 | i−2k+2 | i−2k+1 | i−2k+1 | i−2k+1 | i−2k+2 | i−2k+2 |
i=2k+2 | 4 | i−n+2 | 3 | 3 | i−2k | i−2k |
2k+3≤i≤3k | i−2k | i−2k+1 | i−2k−1 | i−2k−1 | i−2k+2 | i−2k |
i=3k+1 | i−2k | i−n+1 | i−n | i−n | k+2 | k |
i=3k+2 | n+12 | k | i−n | i−n | k+1 | k−1 |
3k+3≤i≤4k | 2n−i+1 | 4k−i+2 | 2n−i+2 | 2n−i+2 | 4k−i+3 | 4k−i+1 |
i=2n−1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
i=2n | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
When n=2k, k≥2 | ||||||
1≤i≤k−2 | i−1 | i+2 | i | i | i+3 | i+1 |
i=k−1 | i−1 | n−i | i | i | k | k |
k≤i≤k+1 | i−1 | n−i | i | i | 2k−i−1 | 2k−i+1 |
i=k+2 | i−1 | n−i | n2 | n2 | n−i−1 | n−i+1 |
k+3≤i≤2k−1 | 2k−i+3 | 2k−i | 2k−i+2 | 2k−i+2 | 2k−i−1 | 2k−i+1 |
i=2k | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
i=2k+1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
2k+2≤i≤3k−2 | i−2k+1 | i−2k+2 | i−2k | i−2k | i−2k+1 | i−2k+3 |
i=3k−1 | i−2k+1 | i−2k+2 | i−2k | i−2k | k | k |
3k≤i≤3k+1 | 2n−i+1 | 4k−i | i−2k | i−2k | 4k−i+1 | 4k−i−1 |
i=3k+2 | k−1 | k−2 | n2 | n2 | 4k−i+1 | 4k−i−1 |
3k+3≤i≤4k−2 | 2n−i+1 | 4k−i | 2n−i+2 | 2n−i+2 | 4k−i+1 | 4k−i−1 |
i=2n−1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
i=2n | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Now, for any y∈N(x), if we denote
● the number of edges in x−u1 geodesic by α1,
● the number of edges in y−u1 geodesic by β1,
● the number of edges in x−vn−1 geodesic by α2,
● the number of edges in y−vn−1 geodesic by β2,
then it can be seen that
either|α1−β1|=1wheneverα2=β2,or|α2−β2|=1wheneverα1=β1, |
which implies that either u1∈A or vn−1∈A adjacently distinguishes the pair (x,y). Hence, A is a neighbor-distinguishing set for G.
Theorem 6. For n≥3, if G is a generalized Petersen graph P(2n,n−1), then dima(G)=2.
Proof. Since dima(G)=1 if and only if G is a bipartite graph, by Theorem 1. So dima(G)≥2, because G is not a bipartite graph. Hence, we get the required result, by Theorem 5.
Distinguishing every two vertices in a graph is an eminent problem in graph theory. Many graph theorists have been shown remarkable interest to solve this problem with the aid of distance (the number of edges in a geodesic) from last four decades. Using the technique of finding geodesics between vertices, we solved the problem of distinguishing every two neighbors in generalized Petersen graphs P(n,4) and P(2n,n−1). We investigated that, in both the families of generalized Petersen graphs, only two vertices are adequate to distinguish every two neighbors.
The authors are grateful to the editor and anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions to improve the quality of this article. This research is supported by Balochistan University of Engineering and Technology Khuzdar, Khuzdar 89100, Pakistan.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
[1] | World Health Organization (WHO), WHO's COVID-19 response timeline, 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline/#category-Information. |
[2] | World Health Organization (WHO), WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard, 2022. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/. |
[3] |
Y. Guo, Q. Cao, Z. Hong, Y. Tan, S. Chen, H. Jin, et al., The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) outbreak–an update on the status, Mil. Med. Res., 7 (2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00240-0 doi: 10.1186/s40779-020-00240-0
![]() |
[4] |
R. Karia, I. Gupta, H. Khandait, A. Yadav, A. Yadav, Covid-19 and its modes of transmission, SN Compr. Clin. Med., 2 (2020), 1798–1801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00498-4 doi: 10.1007/s42399-020-00498-4
![]() |
[5] |
S. W. Ong, Y. K. Tan, P. Y. Chia, T. Lee, O. T. Ng, M. S. Wong, et al., Air, surface environmental, and personal protective equipment contamination by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (sars-cov-2) from a symptomatic patient, Jama, 323 (2020), 1610–1612. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.3227 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3227
![]() |
[6] | National Center for Immunization, Science brief: Sars-cov-2 and surface (fomite) transmission for indoor community environments, in CDC COVID-19 Science Briefs [Internet], Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), 2021. |
[7] | World Health Organization (WHO), Scientific Brief: Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions, (accessed August 3, 2021). Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/transmission-of-sars-cov-2-implications-for-infection-prevention-precautions#: :text=Transmission. |
[8] | S. Mallapaty, Why does the coronavirus spread so easily between people?, Nature, 579 (2020), 183–184. |
[9] | Z. Abdelrahman, M. Li, X. Wang, Comparative review of sars-cov-2, sars-cov, mers-cov, and influenza a respiratory viruses, Front. Immunol., (2020), 2309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.552909 |
[10] | World Health Organization (WHO), Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), (accessed June 15, 2021). Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/. |
[11] | World Health Organization (WHO), WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19. 2020, (accessed June 15, 2021). Available from: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19—11-march-2020. |
[12] |
N. Lurie, M. Saville, R. Hatchett, J. Halton, Developing covid-19 vaccines at pandemic speed, N. Engl. J. Med., 382 (2020), 1969–1973. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2005630 doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005630
![]() |
[13] |
G. Forni, A. Mantovani, Covid-19 vaccines: where we stand and challenges ahead, Cell Death Differ., 28 (2021), 626–639. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-020-00720-9 doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-00720-9
![]() |
[14] | J. K. Jackson, Global economic effects of covid-19, in Technical report, Congressional Research Service, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00289-8 |
[15] | P. K. Ozili, T. Arun, Spillover of covid-19: impact on the global economy, SSRN Electron. J., 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3562570 |
[16] | N. Fernandes, Economic effects of coronavirus outbreak (covid-19) on the world economy, in IESE Business School Working Paper, 2020. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3557504 |
[17] | US FDA, Fda takes key action in fight against covid-19 by issuing emergency use authorization for first covid-19 vaccine, 2020. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-key-action-fight-against-covid-19-issuing-emergency-use-authorization-first-covid-19. |
[18] |
M. G. Thompson, J. L. Burgess, A. L. Naleway, H. L. Tyner, S. K. Yoon, J. Meece, et al., Interim estimates of vaccine effectiveness of bnt162b2 and mrna-1273 covid-19 vaccines in preventing sars-cov-2 infection among health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers—eight us locations, december 2020–march 2021, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep., 70 (2021), 495. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7013e3 doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7013e3
![]() |
[19] |
T. Pilishvili, K. E. Fleming-Dutra, J. L. Farrar, R. Gierke, N. M. Mohr, D. A. Talan, et al., Interim estimates of vaccine effectiveness of pfizer-biontech and moderna covid-19 vaccines among health care personnel—33 us sites, january–march 2021, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep., 70 (2021), 753. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7020e2 doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7020e2
![]() |
[20] |
W. H. Self, M. W. Tenforde, J. P. Rhoads, M. Gaglani, A. A. Ginde, D. J Douin, et al., Comparative effectiveness of moderna, pfizer-biontech, and janssen (johnson & johnson) vaccines in preventing covid-19 hospitalizations among adults without immunocompromising conditions—united states, march–august 2021, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep., 70 (2021), 1337. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7038e1 doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7038e1
![]() |
[21] |
L. Wang, G. Cheng, Sequence analysis of the emerging sars-cov-2 variant omicron in south africa, J. Med. Virol., 94 (2022), 1728–1733. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27516 doi: 10.1002/jmv.27516
![]() |
[22] |
L. T. Brandal, E. MacDonald, L. Veneti, T. Ravlo, H. Lange, U. Naseer, et al., Outbreak caused by the sars-cov-2 omicron variant in norway, november to december 2021, Eurosurveillance, 26 (2021), 2101147. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.50.2101147 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.50.2101147
![]() |
[23] |
R. Antia, M. E. Halloran, Transition to endemicity: Understanding covid-19, Immunity, 54 (2021), 2172–2176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2021.09.019 doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.09.019
![]() |
[24] |
J. S. Lavine, O. N. Bjornstad, R. Antia, Immunological characteristics govern the transition of covid-19 to endemicity, Science, 371 (2021), 741–745. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe6522 doi: 10.1126/science.abe6522
![]() |
[25] | Y. Tang, S. Wang, Mathematic modeling of covid-19 in the united states. Emerging Microbes Infect., 9 (2020), 827–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1760146 |
[26] |
A. R. Tuite, D. N. Fisman, A. L. Greer, Mathematical modelling of covid-19 transmission and mitigation strategies in the population of ontario, canada, CMAJ, 192 (2020), E497–E505. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.200476 doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200476
![]() |
[27] |
A. J. Kucharski, T. W. Russell, C. Diamond, Y. Liu, J. Edmunds, S. Funk, et al., Early dynamics of transmission and control of covid-19: a mathematical modelling study, Lancet Infect. Dis., 20 (2020), 553–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30144-4 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30144-4
![]() |
[28] | S. A. Iyaniwura, R. C. Falcão, N. Ringa, P. A. Adu, M. Spencer, M. Taylor, et al., Mathematical modeling of covid-19 in british columbia: an age-structured model with time-dependent contact rates, Epidemics, (2022), 100559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100559 |
[29] |
F. Ndaïrou, I. Area, J. J. Nieto, D. F. M. Torres, Mathematical modeling of covid-19 transmission dynamics with a case study of wuhan, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 135 (2020), 109846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109846 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109846
![]() |
[30] |
D. K. Chu, E. A. Akl, S. Duda, K. Solo, S. Yaacoub, H. J. Schünemann, et al., Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of sars-cov-2 and covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Lancet, 395 (2020), 1973–1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9
![]() |
[31] |
M. A. Khan, Ab. Atangana, E. Alzahrani, Fatmawati, The dynamics of covid-19 with quarantined and isolation, Adv. Differ. Equations, 2020 (2020), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02882-9 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02882-9
![]() |
[32] |
S. C. Anderson, A. M. Edwards, M. Yerlanov, N. Mulberry, J. E. Stockdale, S. A. Iyaniwura, et al., Quantifying the impact of covid-19 control measures using a bayesian model of physical distancing, PLoS Comput. Biol., 16 (2020), e1008274. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008274 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008274
![]() |
[33] | S. A. Iyaniwura, M. A. Rabiu, J. David, J. D. Kong, Assessing the impact of adherence to non-pharmaceutical interventions and indirect transmission on the dynamics of covid-19: a mathematical modelling study, medRxiv, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.23.21265421 |
[34] |
M. Sadarangani, B. A. Raya, J. M. Conway, S. A. Iyaniwura, R. C. Falcao, C. Colijn, et al., Importance of covid-19 vaccine efficacy in older age groups, Vaccine, 39 (2021), 2020–2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.020 doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.020
![]() |
[35] |
N. Mulberry, P. Tupper, E. Kirwin, C. McCabe, C. Colijn, Vaccine rollout strategies: The case for vaccinating essential workers early, PLOS Global Public Health, 1 (2021), e0000020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000020 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000020
![]() |
[36] |
J. Demongeot, Q. Griette, P. Magal, G. Webb, Modeling vaccine efficacy for covid-19 outbreak in new york city, Biology, 11 (2022), 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11030345 doi: 10.3390/biology11030345
![]() |
[37] | L. M. Pinto, V. Nanda, A. Sunavala, C. Rodriques, Reinfection in covid-19: A scoping review, Med. J. Armed Forces India, 77, S257–S263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.02.010 |
[38] |
S, Roy, Covid-19 reinfection: myth or truth?, SN Compr. Clin. Med., 2 (2020), 710–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00335-8 doi: 10.1007/s42399-020-00335-8
![]() |
[39] | D. de A. Torres, L. Ribeiro, A. de F. Riello, D. D. G. Horovitz, L. F. R. Pinto, J. Croda, Reinfection of covid-19 after 3 months with a distinct and more aggressive clinical presentation: Case report, J. Med. Virol., 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26637 |
[40] | CDC Covid, Vaccine Breakthrough Case Investigations Team, CDC COVID, Vaccine Breakthrough Case Investigations Team, CDC COVID, Vaccine Breakthrough Case Investigations Team, et al., Covid-19 vaccine breakthrough infections reported to cdc—united states, january 1–april 30, 2021, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep., 70 (2021), 792. http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7021e3. |
[41] |
M. Bergwerk, T. Gonen, Y. Lustig, S. Amit, M. Lipsitch, C. Cohen, et al., Covid-19 breakthrough infections in vaccinated health care workers, N. Engl. J. Med., 385 (2021), 1474–1484. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2109072 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2109072
![]() |
[42] |
R. K. Gupta, E. J. Topol, Covid-19 vaccine breakthrough infections, Science, 374 (2021), 1561–1562. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl8487 doi: 10.1126/science.abl8487
![]() |
[43] |
Y. Goldberg, M. Mandel, Y. M. Bar-On, O. Bodenheimer, L. Freedman, E. J. Haas, et al., Waning immunity after the bnt162b2 vaccine in israel, N. Engl. J. Med., 385 (2021), e85. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2114228 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114228
![]() |
[44] |
Elie Dolgin, Covid vaccine immunity is waning-how much does that matter, Nature, 597 (2021), 606–607. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02532-4 doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02532-4
![]() |
[45] |
E. G. Levin, Y. Lustig, C. Cohen, R. Fluss, V. Indenbaum, S. Amit, et al., Waning immune humoral response to bnt162b2 covid-19 vaccine over 6 months, N. Engl. J. Med., 385 (2021), e84. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2114583 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114583
![]() |
[46] | E. B. Are, Y. Song, J. E. Stockdale, P. Tupper, C. Colijn, Covid-19 endgame: from pandemic to endemic? vaccination, reopening and evolution in a well-vaccinated population, medRxiv, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.18.21268002 |
[47] |
A. V. Tkachenko, S. Maslov, T. Wang, A. Elbana, G. N. Wong, N. Goldenfeld, Stochastic social behavior coupled to covid-19 dynamics leads to waves, plateaus, and an endemic state, Elife, 10 (2021), e68341. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68341 doi: 10.7554/eLife.68341
![]() |
[48] | M. Rabiu, S. A Iyaniwura, Assessing the potential impact of immunity waning on the dynamics of covid-19 in south africa: an endemic model of covid-19, Nonlinear Dyn., (2022), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07225-9 |
[49] | N. Nuraini, K. Khairudin, M. Apri, Modeling simulation of covid-19 in indonesia based on early endemic data, Commun. Biomath. Sci., 3 (2020), 1–8. |
[50] | W. Zhou, B. Tang, Y. Bai, Y. Shao, Y. Xiao, S. Tang, The resurgence risk of covid-19 in the presence of immunity waning and ade effect: A mathematical modelling study, medRxiv, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.25.21262601 |
[51] |
F. Inayaturohmat, R. N. Zikkah, A. K. Supriatna, N. Anggriani, Mathematical model of covid-19 transmission in the presence of waning immunity, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1722 (2021), 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012038 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012038
![]() |
[52] |
T. Xiang, B. Liang, Y. Fang, S. Lu, S. Li, H. Wang, et al., Declining levels of neutralizing antibodies against sars-cov-2 in convalescent covid-19 patients one year post symptom onset, Front. Immunol., 12 (2021), 2327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.708523 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.708523
![]() |
[53] |
B. Pell, M. D. Johnston, P. Nelson, A data-validated temporary immunity model of covid-19 spread in michigan, Math. Biosci. Eng., 19 (2022), 10122–10142. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2022474 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022474
![]() |
[54] |
S. Ghosh, M. Banerjee, V. Volpert, Immuno-epidemiological model-based prediction of further covid-19 epidemic outbreaks due to immunity waning, Math. Modell. Nat. Phenom., 17 (2022), 9. https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/2022017 doi: 10.1051/mmnp/2022017
![]() |
[55] | C. P. Tadiri, J. D. Kong, G. F. Fussmann, M. E. Scott, H. Wang, A data-validated host-parasite model for infectious disease outbreaks, Front. Ecol. Evol., (2019), 307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00307 |
[56] | Y. Kuang, Delay differential equations: with applications in population dynamics, Academic press, 1993. |
[57] |
T. Cassidy, Distributed delay differential equation representations of cyclic differential equations, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 81 (2021), 1742–1766. https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1351606 doi: 10.1137/20M1351606
![]() |
[58] | P. J. Hurtado, A. S. Kirosingh, Generalizations of the 'linear chain trick': incorporating more flexible dwell time distributions into mean field ode models, J. Math. Biol., 79, 1831–1883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-019-01412-w |
[59] | H. L. Smith, An introduction to delay differential equations with applications to the life sciences, Springer New York, 2011. |
[60] |
O. Diekmann, J. A. P. Heesterbeek, J. A. Metz, On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio r 0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations, J. Math. Biol., 28 (1990), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178324 doi: 10.1007/BF00178324
![]() |
[61] |
P. Van den Driessche, J. Watmough, Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission, Math. Biosci., 180 (2002), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6 doi: 10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6
![]() |
[62] | J. H. Jones, Notes on r0, Calif. Dep. Anthropol. Sci., 323 (2007), 1–19. |
[63] |
C. Castillo-Chavez, B. Song, Dynamical models of tuberculosis and their applications, Math. Biosci. Eng., 1 (2004), 361. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2004.1.361 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2004.1.361
![]() |
[64] |
M. Rabiu, R. Willie, N. Parumasur, Mathematical analysis of a disease-resistant model with imperfect vaccine, quarantine and treatment, Ric. Mat., 69 (2020), 603–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11587-020-00496-7 doi: 10.1007/s11587-020-00496-7
![]() |
[65] | O. Dyer, Covid-19: Unvaccinated face 11 times risk of death from delta variant, cdc data show, BMJ, 374 (2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2282 |
[66] |
A. Khan, R. Zarin, G. Hussain, N. A. Ahmad, M. H. Mohd, A. Yusuf, Stability analysis and optimal control of covid-19 with convex incidence rate in khyber pakhtunkhawa (pakistan), Results Phys., 20 (2021), 103703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103703 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103703
![]() |
[67] | J. P. La Salle, The stability of dynamical systems, SIAM, 1976. |
[68] | U. C. Bureau, Census Bureau Reveals Fastest-Growing Large Cities, (accessed May 27, 2022). Available from: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2018/estimates-cities.html. |
[69] |
S. Mushayabasa, E. T. Ngarakana-Gwasira, J. Mushanyu, On the role of governmental action and individual reaction on covid-19 dynamics in south africa: A mathematical modelling study, Inf. Med. Unlocked, 20 (2020), 100387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2020.100387 doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100387
![]() |
[70] |
Z. Yang, Z. Zeng, K. Wang, S. Wong, W. Liang, M. Zanin, et al., Modified seir and ai prediction of the epidemics trend of covid-19 in china under public health interventions, J. Thorac. Dis., 12 (2020), 165. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.02.64 doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.64
![]() |
[71] |
A. Mahajan, R. Solanki, N. Sivadas, Estimation of undetected symptomatic and asymptomatic cases of covid-19 infection and prediction of its spread in the usa, J. Med. Virol., 93 (2021), 3202–3210. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26897 doi: 10.1002/jmv.26897
![]() |
[72] | S. Choi, M. Ki, Estimating the reproductive number and the outbreak size of covid-19 in korea, Epidemiol. Health, 42, (2020). https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2020011 |
[73] | S. Khajanchi, K. Sarkar, J. Mondal, Dynamics of the covid-19 pandemic in india, preprint, arXiv: 2005.06286. |
[74] |
L. Zou, F. Ruan, M. Huang, L. Liang, H. Huang, Z. Hong, et al., Sars-cov-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients, N. Engl. J. Med., 382 (2020), 1177–1179. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2001737 doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2001737
![]() |
[75] | L. Tindale, M. Coombe, J. E. Stockdale, E. Garlock, W. Y. V. Lau, M. Saraswat, et al., Transmission interval estimates suggest pre-symptomatic spread of covid-19, MedRxiv, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.03.20029983 |
[76] |
T. Ganyani, C. Kremer, D. Chen, A. Torneri, C. Faes, J. Wallinga, et al., Estimating the generation interval for coronavirus disease (covid-19) based on symptom onset data, march 2020, Eurosurveillance, 25 (2020), 2000257. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.17.2000257 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.17.2000257
![]() |
[77] |
Z. Zhao, X. Li, F. Liu, G. Zhu, C. Ma, L. Wang, Prediction of the covid-19 spread in african countries and implications for prevention and control: A case study in south africa, egypt, algeria, nigeria, senegal and kenya, Sci. Total Environ., 729 (2020), 138959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138959 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138959
![]() |
[78] | L. Peng, W. Yang, D. Zhang, C. Zhuge, L. Hong, Epidemic analysis of covid-19 in china by dynamical modeling, preprint, arXiv: 2002.06563. |
[79] | W. Jassat, C. Mudara, L. Ozougwu, S. Tempia, L. Blumberg, M. Davies, et al., Difference in mortality among individuals admitted to hospital with covid-19 during the first and second waves in south africa: a cohort study, Lancet Global Health, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00289-8 |
[80] | Webometer, Total Coronavirus Deaths in South Africa, (accessed August 28, 2021). Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/south-africa. |
[81] | Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Data, Urban population by city size, (accessed May 27, 2022). Available from: https://data.oecd.org/popregion/urban-population-by-city-size.htm. |
1. | 莉 周, Vertex Reducible Edge (Total) Coloring of Two Classes of Generalized Petersen Graph, 2023, 13, 2160-7583, 1851, 10.12677/PM.2023.136188 |
Geodesic | The number of edges in the geodesic | |||
ui−a | i≡0 (mod 4) | i≡1 (mod 4) | i≡2 (mod 4) | i≡3 (mod 4) |
n=8k with k≥2, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+1 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+2≤i≤n | n−i+84 | n−i+54 | n−i+104 | n−i+114 |
ui−a2, 3≤i≤4k+3 | i+44 | i+74 | i+64 | i+14 |
ui−a2, 4k+4≤i≤n | n−i+124 | n−i+134 | n−i+104 | n−i+74 |
n=8k+1 with k≥2, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+1 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+2≤i≤n | n−i+114 | n−i+84 | n−i+54 | n−i+104 |
ui−a2, 4≤i≤5k+1 | i4 | i+34 | i+64 | i+54 |
ui−a2, 5k+2≤i≤n | n−i+114 | n−i+84 | n−i+134 | n−i+144 |
n=8k+2 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+2 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+3≤i≤n | n−i+104 | n−i+114 | n−i+84 | n−i+54 |
ui−a2, 2≤i≤4k+3 | i+84 | i+74 | i+24 | i+54 |
ui−a2, 4k+4≤i≤n | n−i+64 | n−i+114 | n−i+124 | n−i+94 |
n=8k+3 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+2 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+3≤i≤n | n−i+54 | n−i+104 | n−i+114 | n−i+84 |
ui−a2, 3≤i≤5k | i+44 | i+74 | i+64 | i+14 |
ui−a2, 5k+1≤i≤n | n−i+134 | n−i+104 | n−i+74 | n−i+124 |
n=8k+4 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+3 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+4≤i≤n | n−i+84 | n−i+54 | n−i+104 | n−i+114 |
ui−a2, 3≤i≤5k+2 | i4 | i+34 | i+64 | i+54 |
ui−a2, 5k+3≤i≤n | n−i+84 | n−i+134 | n−i+144 | n−i+114 |
n=8k+5 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤5k+1 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 5k+2≤i≤n | n−i+114 | n−i+84 | n−i+54 | n−i+104 |
ui−a2, 2≤i≤5k+2 | i+84 | i+74 | i+24 | i+54 |
ui−a2, 5k+3≤i≤n | n−i+114 | n−i+124 | n−i+94 | n−i+64 |
n=8k+6 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+2 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+6≤i≤n | n−i+104 | n−i+114 | n−i+84 | n−i+54 |
ui−a2, 1≤i≤4k+3 | i+84 | i+74 | i+24 | i+54 |
ui−a2, 4k+7≤i≤n | n−i+64 | n−i+114 | n−i+124 | n−i+94 |
n=8k+7 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+3 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+6≤i≤n | n−i+54 | n−i+104 | n−i+114 | n−i+84 |
ui−a2, 2≤i≤5k+1 | i+44 | i+74 | i+64 | i+14 |
ui−a2, 5k+4≤i≤n | n−i+134 | n−i+104 | n−i+74 | n−i+124 |
Geodesic | The number of edges in the geodesic. | |||
vi−a | i≡0 (mod 4) | i≡1 (mod 4) | i≡2 (mod 4) | i≡3 (mod 4) |
n=8k with k≥2, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤4k+1 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 4k+2≤i≤n | n−i+124 | n−i+14 | n−i+144 | n−i+154 |
vi−a2, 3≤i≤4k+3 | i+84 | i+114 | i+104 | i−34 |
vi−a2, 4k+4≤i≤n | n−i+164 | n−i+174 | n−i+144 | n−i+34 |
n=8k+1 with k≥2, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤3k+1 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 3k+10≤i≤n | n−i+154 | n−i+124 | n−i+14 | n−i+144 |
vi−a2, 4≤i≤4k | i−44 | i+74 | i+104 | i+94 |
vi−a2, 4k+6≤i≤n | n−i+154 | n−i+44 | n−i+174 | n−i+184 |
n=8k+2 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤3k+2 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 3k+10≤i≤n | n−i+144 | n−i+154 | n−i+124 | n−i+14 |
vi−a2, 2≤i≤3k+3 | i+124 | i+114 | i−24 | i+94 |
vi−a2, 3k+11≤i≤n | n−i+24 | n−i+154 | n−i+164 | n−i+134 |
n=8k+3 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤3k+3 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 3k+10≤i≤n | n−i+14 | n−i+144 | n−i+154 | n−i+124 |
vi−a2, 3≤i≤4k+1 | i+84 | i+114 | i+104 | i−34 |
vi−a2, 4k+8≤i≤n | n−i+174 | n−i+144 | n−i+34 | n−i+164 |
n=8k+4 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤4k+3 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 4k+4≤i≤n | n−i+124 | n−i+14 | n−i+144 | n−i+154 |
vi−a2, 3≤i≤5k+2 | i−44 | i+74 | i+104 | i+94 |
vi−a2, 5k+3≤i≤n | n−i+44 | n−i+174 | n−i+184 | n−i+154 |
n=8k+5 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤4k+1 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 4k+6≤i≤n | n−i+154 | n−i+124 | n−i+14 | n−i+144 |
vi−a2, 2≤i≤4k+2 | i+124 | i+114 | i−24 | i+94 |
vi−a2, 4k+7≤i≤n | n−i+154 | n−i+164 | n−i+134 | n−i+24 |
n=8k+6 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤3k+2 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 3k+14≤i≤n | n−i+144 | n−i+154 | n−i+124 | n−i+14 |
vi−a2, 1≤i≤3k+3 | i+124 | i+114 | i−24 | i+94 |
vi−a2, 3k+15≤i≤n | n−i+24 | n−i+154 | n−i+164 | n−i+134 |
n=8k+7 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤3k+3 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 3k+14≤i≤n | n−i+14 | n−i+144 | n−i+154 | n−i+124 |
vi−a2, 2≤i≤4k+1 | i+84 | i+114 | i+104 | i−34 |
vi−a2, 4k+12≤i≤n | n−i+174 | n−i+144 | n−i+34 | n−i+164 |
i | 3k+2≡2(mod 4) | 3k+3≡3(mod 4) | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) |
λi | 5k4 | 3k+164 | 3k+164 | 3k+44 | 5k−44 | 5k+84 | 5k+84 | 3k+84 |
j | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4k+1≡1(mod 4) | 4k+2≡2(mod 4) | 4k+3≡3(mod 4) | 4k+4≡0(mod 4) | 4k+5≡1(mod 4) |
λj | 4 | 4 | 3 | k+1 | k+3 | k+3 | k | k |
i | 3k+3≡3(mod 4) | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | − | − |
λi | 5k4 | 3k+164 | 3k+44 | 3k+164 | 5k−44 | 5k+84 | 3k+84 | − | − |
j | 1 | 2 | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | 3k+10≡2(mod 4) |
λj | 3 | 0 | 5k4 | 3k+164 | 3k+44 | 5k+84 | 5k−44 | 5k+84 | 3k+84 |
i | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | − | − |
λi | 5k4 | 3k+44 | 3k+164 | 5k+84 | 5k−44 | 3k+84 | − | − |
j | 1 | 2 | 4k+2≡2(mod 4) | 4k+3≡3(mod 4) | 4k+4≡0(mod 4) | 4k+5≡1(mod 4) | 4k+6≡2(mod 4) | 4k+7≡3(mod 4) |
λj | 4 | 3 | k+1 | k | k+3 | k+3 | k | k+1 |
i | 4k+2≡2(mod 4) | 4k+3≡3(mod 4) | 4k+4≡0(mod 4) | 4k+5≡1(mod 4) |
λi | k+1 | k+4 | k+4 | k+1 |
j | 4k+3≡3(mod 4) | 4k+4≡0(mod 4) | 4k+5≡1(mod 4) | 4k+6≡2(mod 4) |
λj | k+1 | k+4 | k+4 | k+1 |
i | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | 3k+10≡2(mod 4) | 3k+11≡3(mod 4) | 3k+12≡0(mod 4) | 3k+13≡1(mod 4) |
λi | 3k+164 | 3k+44 | 3k+164 | 5k4 | 3k+204 | 3k+84 | 5k+64 | 5k−44 | 5k+84 | 3k+124 |
j | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | 3k+10≡2(mod 4) | 3k+11≡3(mod 4) | 3k+12≡0(mod 4) | 3k+13≡1(mod 4) | 3k+14≡2(mod 4) |
λj | 3k+164 | 3k+44 | 3k+164 | 5k4 | 3k+204 | 3k+84 | 5k+84 | 5k−44 | 5k+84 | 3k+124 |
i | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | 3k+10≡2(mod 4) | 3k+11≡3(mod 4) | 3k+12≡0(mod 4) | 3k+13≡1(mod 4) |
λi | 5k+44 | 3k+44 | 3k+164 | 3k+204 | 5k4 | 3k+84 | 3k+84 | 5k+124 | 5k+84 | 5k−44 |
j | 4k+2≡2(mod 4) | 4k+3≡3(mod 4) | 4k+4≡0(mod 4) | 4k+5≡1(mod 4) | 4k+6≡2(mod 4) | 4k+7≡3(mod 4) | 4k+8≡0(mod 4) | 4k+9≡1(mod 4) | 4k+10≡2(mod 4) | 4k+11≡3(mod 4) |
λj | k+2 | k | k+3 | k+4 | k+1 | k+1 | k+4 | k+3 | k | k+2 |
Geodesic | The number of edges in the geodesics | |||||
When n=2k+1, k≥1 | ||||||
For i/geodesics | ui−u1 | ui−vn−1 | vi−u1 i is odd | vi−u1 i is even | vi−vn−1 i is odd | vi−vn−1 i is even |
1≤i≤k−1 | i−1 | i+2 | i | i | i+3 | i+1 |
k≤i≤k+1 | i−1 | 2k−i+1 | i | i | 2k−i+2 | 2k−i |
i=k+2 | n+12 | k−1 | n+12 | n+12 | 2k−i+2 | 2k−i |
k+3≤i≤2k | 2k−i+4 | 2k−i+1 | 2k−i+3 | 2k−i+3 | 2k−i+2 | 2k−i |
i=2k+1 | i−2k+2 | i−2k+1 | i−2k+1 | i−2k+1 | i−2k+2 | i−2k+2 |
i=2k+2 | 4 | i−n+2 | 3 | 3 | i−2k | i−2k |
2k+3≤i≤3k | i−2k | i−2k+1 | i−2k−1 | i−2k−1 | i−2k+2 | i−2k |
i=3k+1 | i−2k | i−n+1 | i−n | i−n | k+2 | k |
i=3k+2 | n+12 | k | i−n | i−n | k+1 | k−1 |
3k+3≤i≤4k | 2n−i+1 | 4k−i+2 | 2n−i+2 | 2n−i+2 | 4k−i+3 | 4k−i+1 |
i=2n−1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
i=2n | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
When n=2k, k≥2 | ||||||
1≤i≤k−2 | i−1 | i+2 | i | i | i+3 | i+1 |
i=k−1 | i−1 | n−i | i | i | k | k |
k≤i≤k+1 | i−1 | n−i | i | i | 2k−i−1 | 2k−i+1 |
i=k+2 | i−1 | n−i | n2 | n2 | n−i−1 | n−i+1 |
k+3≤i≤2k−1 | 2k−i+3 | 2k−i | 2k−i+2 | 2k−i+2 | 2k−i−1 | 2k−i+1 |
i=2k | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
i=2k+1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
2k+2≤i≤3k−2 | i−2k+1 | i−2k+2 | i−2k | i−2k | i−2k+1 | i−2k+3 |
i=3k−1 | i−2k+1 | i−2k+2 | i−2k | i−2k | k | k |
3k≤i≤3k+1 | 2n−i+1 | 4k−i | i−2k | i−2k | 4k−i+1 | 4k−i−1 |
i=3k+2 | k−1 | k−2 | n2 | n2 | 4k−i+1 | 4k−i−1 |
3k+3≤i≤4k−2 | 2n−i+1 | 4k−i | 2n−i+2 | 2n−i+2 | 4k−i+1 | 4k−i−1 |
i=2n−1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
i=2n | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Geodesic | The number of edges in the geodesic | |||
ui−a | i≡0 (mod 4) | i≡1 (mod 4) | i≡2 (mod 4) | i≡3 (mod 4) |
n=8k with k≥2, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+1 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+2≤i≤n | n−i+84 | n−i+54 | n−i+104 | n−i+114 |
ui−a2, 3≤i≤4k+3 | i+44 | i+74 | i+64 | i+14 |
ui−a2, 4k+4≤i≤n | n−i+124 | n−i+134 | n−i+104 | n−i+74 |
n=8k+1 with k≥2, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+1 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+2≤i≤n | n−i+114 | n−i+84 | n−i+54 | n−i+104 |
ui−a2, 4≤i≤5k+1 | i4 | i+34 | i+64 | i+54 |
ui−a2, 5k+2≤i≤n | n−i+114 | n−i+84 | n−i+134 | n−i+144 |
n=8k+2 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+2 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+3≤i≤n | n−i+104 | n−i+114 | n−i+84 | n−i+54 |
ui−a2, 2≤i≤4k+3 | i+84 | i+74 | i+24 | i+54 |
ui−a2, 4k+4≤i≤n | n−i+64 | n−i+114 | n−i+124 | n−i+94 |
n=8k+3 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+2 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+3≤i≤n | n−i+54 | n−i+104 | n−i+114 | n−i+84 |
ui−a2, 3≤i≤5k | i+44 | i+74 | i+64 | i+14 |
ui−a2, 5k+1≤i≤n | n−i+134 | n−i+104 | n−i+74 | n−i+124 |
n=8k+4 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+3 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+4≤i≤n | n−i+84 | n−i+54 | n−i+104 | n−i+114 |
ui−a2, 3≤i≤5k+2 | i4 | i+34 | i+64 | i+54 |
ui−a2, 5k+3≤i≤n | n−i+84 | n−i+134 | n−i+144 | n−i+114 |
n=8k+5 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤5k+1 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 5k+2≤i≤n | n−i+114 | n−i+84 | n−i+54 | n−i+104 |
ui−a2, 2≤i≤5k+2 | i+84 | i+74 | i+24 | i+54 |
ui−a2, 5k+3≤i≤n | n−i+114 | n−i+124 | n−i+94 | n−i+64 |
n=8k+6 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+2 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+6≤i≤n | n−i+104 | n−i+114 | n−i+84 | n−i+54 |
ui−a2, 1≤i≤4k+3 | i+84 | i+74 | i+24 | i+54 |
ui−a2, 4k+7≤i≤n | n−i+64 | n−i+114 | n−i+124 | n−i+94 |
n=8k+7 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
ui−a1, 1≤i≤4k+3 | i+84 | i+34 | i+64 | i+94 |
ui−a1, 4k+6≤i≤n | n−i+54 | n−i+104 | n−i+114 | n−i+84 |
ui−a2, 2≤i≤5k+1 | i+44 | i+74 | i+64 | i+14 |
ui−a2, 5k+4≤i≤n | n−i+134 | n−i+104 | n−i+74 | n−i+124 |
Geodesic | The number of edges in the geodesic. | |||
vi−a | i≡0 (mod 4) | i≡1 (mod 4) | i≡2 (mod 4) | i≡3 (mod 4) |
n=8k with k≥2, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤4k+1 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 4k+2≤i≤n | n−i+124 | n−i+14 | n−i+144 | n−i+154 |
vi−a2, 3≤i≤4k+3 | i+84 | i+114 | i+104 | i−34 |
vi−a2, 4k+4≤i≤n | n−i+164 | n−i+174 | n−i+144 | n−i+34 |
n=8k+1 with k≥2, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤3k+1 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 3k+10≤i≤n | n−i+154 | n−i+124 | n−i+14 | n−i+144 |
vi−a2, 4≤i≤4k | i−44 | i+74 | i+104 | i+94 |
vi−a2, 4k+6≤i≤n | n−i+154 | n−i+44 | n−i+174 | n−i+184 |
n=8k+2 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤3k+2 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 3k+10≤i≤n | n−i+144 | n−i+154 | n−i+124 | n−i+14 |
vi−a2, 2≤i≤3k+3 | i+124 | i+114 | i−24 | i+94 |
vi−a2, 3k+11≤i≤n | n−i+24 | n−i+154 | n−i+164 | n−i+134 |
n=8k+3 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤3k+3 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 3k+10≤i≤n | n−i+14 | n−i+144 | n−i+154 | n−i+124 |
vi−a2, 3≤i≤4k+1 | i+84 | i+114 | i+104 | i−34 |
vi−a2, 4k+8≤i≤n | n−i+174 | n−i+144 | n−i+34 | n−i+164 |
n=8k+4 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v4=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤4k+3 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 4k+4≤i≤n | n−i+124 | n−i+14 | n−i+144 | n−i+154 |
vi−a2, 3≤i≤5k+2 | i−44 | i+74 | i+104 | i+94 |
vi−a2, 5k+3≤i≤n | n−i+44 | n−i+174 | n−i+184 | n−i+154 |
n=8k+5 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤4k+1 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 4k+6≤i≤n | n−i+154 | n−i+124 | n−i+14 | n−i+144 |
vi−a2, 2≤i≤4k+2 | i+124 | i+114 | i−24 | i+94 |
vi−a2, 4k+7≤i≤n | n−i+154 | n−i+164 | n−i+134 | n−i+24 |
n=8k+6 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v2=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤3k+2 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 3k+14≤i≤n | n−i+144 | n−i+154 | n−i+124 | n−i+14 |
vi−a2, 1≤i≤3k+3 | i+124 | i+114 | i−24 | i+94 |
vi−a2, 3k+15≤i≤n | n−i+24 | n−i+154 | n−i+164 | n−i+134 |
n=8k+7 with k≥1, and A={v1=a1,v3=a2} | ||||
vi−a1, 1≤i≤3k+3 | i+124 | i−14 | i+104 | i+134 |
vi−a1, 3k+14≤i≤n | n−i+14 | n−i+144 | n−i+154 | n−i+124 |
vi−a2, 2≤i≤4k+1 | i+84 | i+114 | i+104 | i−34 |
vi−a2, 4k+12≤i≤n | n−i+174 | n−i+144 | n−i+34 | n−i+164 |
i | 3k+2≡2(mod 4) | 3k+3≡3(mod 4) | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) |
λi | 5k4 | 3k+164 | 3k+164 | 3k+44 | 5k−44 | 5k+84 | 5k+84 | 3k+84 |
j | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4k+1≡1(mod 4) | 4k+2≡2(mod 4) | 4k+3≡3(mod 4) | 4k+4≡0(mod 4) | 4k+5≡1(mod 4) |
λj | 4 | 4 | 3 | k+1 | k+3 | k+3 | k | k |
i | 3k+3≡3(mod 4) | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | − | − |
λi | 5k4 | 3k+164 | 3k+44 | 3k+164 | 5k−44 | 5k+84 | 3k+84 | − | − |
j | 1 | 2 | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | 3k+10≡2(mod 4) |
λj | 3 | 0 | 5k4 | 3k+164 | 3k+44 | 5k+84 | 5k−44 | 5k+84 | 3k+84 |
i | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | − | − |
λi | 5k4 | 3k+44 | 3k+164 | 5k+84 | 5k−44 | 3k+84 | − | − |
j | 1 | 2 | 4k+2≡2(mod 4) | 4k+3≡3(mod 4) | 4k+4≡0(mod 4) | 4k+5≡1(mod 4) | 4k+6≡2(mod 4) | 4k+7≡3(mod 4) |
λj | 4 | 3 | k+1 | k | k+3 | k+3 | k | k+1 |
i | 4k+2≡2(mod 4) | 4k+3≡3(mod 4) | 4k+4≡0(mod 4) | 4k+5≡1(mod 4) |
λi | k+1 | k+4 | k+4 | k+1 |
j | 4k+3≡3(mod 4) | 4k+4≡0(mod 4) | 4k+5≡1(mod 4) | 4k+6≡2(mod 4) |
λj | k+1 | k+4 | k+4 | k+1 |
i | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | 3k+10≡2(mod 4) | 3k+11≡3(mod 4) | 3k+12≡0(mod 4) | 3k+13≡1(mod 4) |
λi | 3k+164 | 3k+44 | 3k+164 | 5k4 | 3k+204 | 3k+84 | 5k+64 | 5k−44 | 5k+84 | 3k+124 |
j | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | 3k+10≡2(mod 4) | 3k+11≡3(mod 4) | 3k+12≡0(mod 4) | 3k+13≡1(mod 4) | 3k+14≡2(mod 4) |
λj | 3k+164 | 3k+44 | 3k+164 | 5k4 | 3k+204 | 3k+84 | 5k+84 | 5k−44 | 5k+84 | 3k+124 |
i | 3k+4≡0(mod 4) | 3k+5≡1(mod 4) | 3k+6≡2(mod 4) | 3k+7≡3(mod 4) | 3k+8≡0(mod 4) | 3k+9≡1(mod 4) | 3k+10≡2(mod 4) | 3k+11≡3(mod 4) | 3k+12≡0(mod 4) | 3k+13≡1(mod 4) |
λi | 5k+44 | 3k+44 | 3k+164 | 3k+204 | 5k4 | 3k+84 | 3k+84 | 5k+124 | 5k+84 | 5k−44 |
j | 4k+2≡2(mod 4) | 4k+3≡3(mod 4) | 4k+4≡0(mod 4) | 4k+5≡1(mod 4) | 4k+6≡2(mod 4) | 4k+7≡3(mod 4) | 4k+8≡0(mod 4) | 4k+9≡1(mod 4) | 4k+10≡2(mod 4) | 4k+11≡3(mod 4) |
λj | k+2 | k | k+3 | k+4 | k+1 | k+1 | k+4 | k+3 | k | k+2 |
Geodesic | The number of edges in the geodesics | |||||
When n=2k+1, k≥1 | ||||||
For i/geodesics | ui−u1 | ui−vn−1 | vi−u1 i is odd | vi−u1 i is even | vi−vn−1 i is odd | vi−vn−1 i is even |
1≤i≤k−1 | i−1 | i+2 | i | i | i+3 | i+1 |
k≤i≤k+1 | i−1 | 2k−i+1 | i | i | 2k−i+2 | 2k−i |
i=k+2 | n+12 | k−1 | n+12 | n+12 | 2k−i+2 | 2k−i |
k+3≤i≤2k | 2k−i+4 | 2k−i+1 | 2k−i+3 | 2k−i+3 | 2k−i+2 | 2k−i |
i=2k+1 | i−2k+2 | i−2k+1 | i−2k+1 | i−2k+1 | i−2k+2 | i−2k+2 |
i=2k+2 | 4 | i−n+2 | 3 | 3 | i−2k | i−2k |
2k+3≤i≤3k | i−2k | i−2k+1 | i−2k−1 | i−2k−1 | i−2k+2 | i−2k |
i=3k+1 | i−2k | i−n+1 | i−n | i−n | k+2 | k |
i=3k+2 | n+12 | k | i−n | i−n | k+1 | k−1 |
3k+3≤i≤4k | 2n−i+1 | 4k−i+2 | 2n−i+2 | 2n−i+2 | 4k−i+3 | 4k−i+1 |
i=2n−1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
i=2n | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
When n=2k, k≥2 | ||||||
1≤i≤k−2 | i−1 | i+2 | i | i | i+3 | i+1 |
i=k−1 | i−1 | n−i | i | i | k | k |
k≤i≤k+1 | i−1 | n−i | i | i | 2k−i−1 | 2k−i+1 |
i=k+2 | i−1 | n−i | n2 | n2 | n−i−1 | n−i+1 |
k+3≤i≤2k−1 | 2k−i+3 | 2k−i | 2k−i+2 | 2k−i+2 | 2k−i−1 | 2k−i+1 |
i=2k | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
i=2k+1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
2k+2≤i≤3k−2 | i−2k+1 | i−2k+2 | i−2k | i−2k | i−2k+1 | i−2k+3 |
i=3k−1 | i−2k+1 | i−2k+2 | i−2k | i−2k | k | k |
3k≤i≤3k+1 | 2n−i+1 | 4k−i | i−2k | i−2k | 4k−i+1 | 4k−i−1 |
i=3k+2 | k−1 | k−2 | n2 | n2 | 4k−i+1 | 4k−i−1 |
3k+3≤i≤4k−2 | 2n−i+1 | 4k−i | 2n−i+2 | 2n−i+2 | 4k−i+1 | 4k−i−1 |
i=2n−1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
i=2n | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |