
Low energy electron beam (e-beam) has the ability to decontaminate or reduce bioburden and enhance the food product's safety with minimal quality loss. The current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of e-beam on natural microbiota and quality changes in black peppercorns. The black pepper was exposed to e-beam at doses from 6–18 kGy. The microbial quality, physicochemical attributes, total phenolic compounds, and antioxidant activity were evaluated. Results demonstrated the microbial population in black pepper decreased with increasing e-beam treatment doses. Significant inactivation of Total Plate Count (TPC), yeasts, and molds were observed at dose 6 kGy by 2.3, 0.7, and 1.3 log CFU g−1, respectively, while at 18 kGy the reduction level was 6, 2.9, and 4.4 log CFU g−1, respectively. Similarly, 18 kGy of e-beam yielded a reduction of 3.3 and 3.1 log CFU g−1 of Salmonella Typhimurium and coliform bacteria, respectively. A significant difference (p < 0.05) was noted between doses 12, 15, and 18 kGy on Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens in black pepper. During e-beam doses, the values L*, a* and b* of black peppercorn were not noticeably altered up to 18 kGy dose. No significant (p > 0.05) difference in moisture, volatile oil, and piperine content upon (6–18 kGy) treatments in comparison to the control. A slight difference in the bioactive compound, retaining > 90% of total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity. Results revealed that e-beam doses ≥ 18 kGy were influential for inactivating natural microbes and foodborne pathogens without compromising the physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of black peppercorns.
Citation: Abdul Basit M. Gaba, Mohamed A. Hassan, Ashraf A. Abd El-Tawab, Mohamed A. Abdelmonem, Mohamed K. Morsy. Impact of low energy electron beam on black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) microbial reduction, quality parameters, and antioxidant activity[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(3): 737-749. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022045
[1] | Budi Suarti, Sukarno, Ardiansyah, Slamet Budijanto . Bio-active compounds, their antioxidant activities, and the physicochemical and pasting properties of both pigmented and non-pigmented fermented de-husked rice flour. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 49-64. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021004 |
[2] | Cerine Yasmine Boulahlib, Moufida Aggoun, Rabah Arhab, Mohammed Gagaoua . Potential applications of biosurfactants in animal production and meat research. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(1): 237-253. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024014 |
[3] | María Cámara-Ruiz, José María García Beltrán, Francisco Antonio Guardiola, María Ángeles Esteban . In vitro and in vivo effects of purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) on gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 799-824. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.799 |
[4] | Sana Hayyat, Mehdi Maqbool, Abdul Hamid, Muhammad Shehzad, Raheel Anwar, Sandra Horvitz, Noosheen Zahid, Muhammad Azam Khan . Appropriate harvest maturity for exploitation of wild black raspberry (Rubus sp.) fruits during shelf life period from Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(1): 1-16. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025001 |
[5] | Araya Ranok, Chanida Kupradit . Effect of whey protein and riceberry flour on quality and antioxidant activity under gastrointestinal transit of gluten-free cookies. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(3): 434-448. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.3.434 |
[6] | Orbe Chamorro Mayra, Luis- Armando Manosalvas-Quiroz, Nicolás Pinto Mosquera, Iván Samaniego . Effect of fermentation parameters on the antioxidant activity of Ecuadorian cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(3): 872-886. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024047 |
[7] | Rossaporn Jiamjariyatam, Orachorn Mekkerdchoo, Pakkapong Phucharoenrak, Lu Zheng . Effects of freeze-drying and vacuum-drying on the quality, total phenolic contents, and antioxidant activities of bee honey in northern Thailand. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(2): 430-444. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024025 |
[8] | Hathairat Chokthaweepanich, Chuleeporn Chumnanka, Sribud Srichaijaroonpong, Rungnapa Boonpawa . Effect of harvesting age and drying condition on andrographolide content, antioxidant capacity, and antibacterial activity in Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Nees. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(1): 137-150. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023007 |
[9] | Santi Noviasari, Feri Kusnandar, Agus Setiyono, Slamet Budijanto . Antioxidant activity and inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase in fermented black rice bran-based analog rice. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(1): 61-72. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022004 |
[10] | Teti Estiasih, Jatmiko Eko Witoyo, Khofifah Putri Wulandari, Fadhillah Dwi Juniati, Widiastuti Setyaningsih, Hanifah Nuryani Lioe, Miguel Palma, Kgs Ahmadi, Hamidie Ronald Daniel Ray, Elya Mufidah . Stability comparison of conventional and foam-mat red and purple dried roselle calyces powder as a function of pH. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(1): 177-198. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025010 |
Low energy electron beam (e-beam) has the ability to decontaminate or reduce bioburden and enhance the food product's safety with minimal quality loss. The current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of e-beam on natural microbiota and quality changes in black peppercorns. The black pepper was exposed to e-beam at doses from 6–18 kGy. The microbial quality, physicochemical attributes, total phenolic compounds, and antioxidant activity were evaluated. Results demonstrated the microbial population in black pepper decreased with increasing e-beam treatment doses. Significant inactivation of Total Plate Count (TPC), yeasts, and molds were observed at dose 6 kGy by 2.3, 0.7, and 1.3 log CFU g−1, respectively, while at 18 kGy the reduction level was 6, 2.9, and 4.4 log CFU g−1, respectively. Similarly, 18 kGy of e-beam yielded a reduction of 3.3 and 3.1 log CFU g−1 of Salmonella Typhimurium and coliform bacteria, respectively. A significant difference (p < 0.05) was noted between doses 12, 15, and 18 kGy on Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens in black pepper. During e-beam doses, the values L*, a* and b* of black peppercorn were not noticeably altered up to 18 kGy dose. No significant (p > 0.05) difference in moisture, volatile oil, and piperine content upon (6–18 kGy) treatments in comparison to the control. A slight difference in the bioactive compound, retaining > 90% of total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity. Results revealed that e-beam doses ≥ 18 kGy were influential for inactivating natural microbes and foodborne pathogens without compromising the physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of black peppercorns.
Spices are the most important food additives for enhancing color and flavor since ancient times in Egypt, and different parts of the world. It has many benefits besides seasoning food such as antimicrobials, antioxidants, and anti-inflammatory [1]. Currently, the application of spices occupies an important position in the global market, and its safety during the supply chain is targeted [2]. Egypt is one of the major exporter countries of spices i.e. fennel, basil, parsley, marjoram, cumin, thyme, and anise, but imports black pepper from Vietnam, Indonesia and Brazil, oregano, and sage from Turkey and Albania [3]. While, the USA is the largest importer country of spices from Egypt, India, China, and Europe [4]. During harvest, processing, and handling, the spices may be subjected to significant microbial contamination [5]. Therefore, spices act as a real factor in food contamination when added after cooking and/or ready-to-eat (RTE) foods, leading to serious health risks [6]. Recent studies [7,8] have discovered a link between mortality and consumption of spicy foods due to microbiological contamination and chemical agents.
Black peppercorn (Piper nigrum L) is quite used as a spice to enrich the taste and odor of foods. Further, it is beneficial to human health [9]. Black peppercorn liquors contain antioxidant compounds and anti-radical properties [10] and antimicrobial properties [11]. However, black pepper has been found to contain Clostridium perfringens, Bacillus spp., and Staphylococcus spp. [12]. In the United States in 2010, approximately 272 people grew sick as a result of Salmonella Montevideo contamination in sliced salami [13]. Black pepper was discovered to be the primary source of pathogen contamination, which was added to salami after it had been pasteurized.
Microbial food safety of dried spices is a substantial concern with trade and health implications. According to a study by Van Doren, Neil [14], three outbreaks from the spices in the United States from (2007 to 2010) were reported. An estimated 457 illness cases, 68 hospitalizations, and one death. Most illness cases are caused by serotypes of Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica (87%) and Bacillus spp. (13%). According to the CDC estimates one million people get sick in the USA from food contaminated with Salmonella each year [15,16]. Other studies confirmed that spices were contaminated with different foodborne pathogens i.e. fecal coliform, E. coli, Listeria monocytogenes, B. cereus, and Salmonella Typhimurium [17,18]. Spices associated with the outbreaks were red pepper (Capsicum spp.), black peppercorn (Piper nigrum), anise seed (Pimpinella anisum), fennel seed (Foeniculum vulgare), thyme powder (Thymus vulgaris), sage powder (Salvia officinalis), and oregano powder (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) [14]. As seen, many spice contaminants with undesirable bacteria and pathogens, whereas enzymatic and biochemical deterioration also occur [6].
One way to control and reducing of microbial contamination in these spices, thereby improving quality and safety, is using ethylene oxide (EO) and/or steam sterilization (SS) [19]. Although EO is effective for the reduction of microbial population and killing insects in spices, but has health hazards and is carcinogenic [20]. EO is permitted in the USA with less than 50 ppm, while not permitted in European countries [21]. The SS is safe and effective against microbial growth as well, not chemical residue but a loss of essential oil [22]. One novel approach to overcome these disadvantages of prior methods is the use of irradiation by electron beam low energy [23].
Food irradiation was utilized on a commercial scale in the 1950s, and since then it's well known to be a safe and effective way of decontamination and inactivating foodborne pathogens of spices [24]. Nowadays, more than 60 countries permit irradiation of spices and other food commodities, around 24 countries recommended a dose of ~10 kGy, and other countries, including the USA allow up to 30 kGy [25,26]. The main sources of γ-rays (nuclear energy) are 137Cs or 60Co of shorter half-life [27]. Recently, electron beams (e-beam) and also called β- rays are linear and/or circular electron accelerators, the electrons generated from an electrical machine with an energy level of 10 MeV [23]. E-beam has benefits, i.e. chemical-free, nonthermal, no nuclear waste, and more effective against foodborne pathogens, fungi, and molds comparatively with Ethylene oxide (ETO), Propylene oxide (PPO), and steam sterilization technologies [28]. In vitro studies found that e-beam with energy of 80 and 200 keV was effective against E. coli, Bacillus pumilus, and viruses [29,30,31]. The impact of e-beam (low energy) was checked for tainted spices [32]. Another study demonstrated the effectiveness of e-beam at an energy of 300 keV against foodborne pathogens in white and black pepper [23]. Also, found that e-beam irradiation had positive impacts on Fuzhuan brick-tea for improving sensory quality and concentration of polyphenolic compounds [33]. The current study aimed to assess the impact of e-beam irradiation on microbial decontamination, physicochemical properties, and antioxidant ability of black peppercorns.
Whole black peppercorn (Piper nigrum L.) was obtained from Vietnam, in August 2020. Foreign materials and impurities were mechanically removed. The pure samples were packed in bags (~ 50 pounds).
The electron beam treatment of whole black peppercorn samples was done at 20 ± 2 ℃ according to Woldemariam, Kießling [34]. The system consists of two low-energy electron beam lamps in a face-to-face configuration. The black peppercorn free falls between them in a thin layer. The lamps emit electrons with low electron energy, defined as having a maximum kinetic energy of 300 keV. The processing unit conveys the material to the treatment zone and then out of the system, where the tested material is collected. The system ramps up in seconds and only allows the conveying of the foodstuff into the treatment zone once the electron beams are stable at the facility in New Jersey, USA. The accelerator could generate between 248 and 250 keV energy levels. The e-beam can deliver dose ranges up to 18 kGy at different levels of doses (6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 kGy) were applied. A radio-chromic film (B3) is utilized for dose measurements and is calibrated to international standards (NPL). On-the-product Dosimetry is not possible so, a product model combined with a Monte Carlo simulation is used to estimate the dose delivered to the black peppercorns. B3 radiochromic film Dosimetry systems are commonly used in industrial irradiation processing. The Dosimetry system is calibrated by RISO HDRL with traceability to The NPL national standard and measures Dμ, the dose to the first micron of the dosimeter film [35]. The B3 Dosimeters are measured using the RisoScan software provided by RISO HDRL.
Microbial quality (naturally contaminated) of black peppercorn samples irradiated and control was carried out. The samples were handled aseptically in a filtered bag (Bethlehem, PA., USA) containing 25 mL buffered peptone water (BPW; Difco; 0.1%), homogenised (Seward 400 Stomacher, West Sussex, England). Serial dilutions were done and 100 μL spread plated onto Plate Count Agar (TBC, Difco) for the total bacterial count, Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate Agar (XLD, Difco) for Salmonella Typhimurium, Violet Red Bile Agar (VRBA, Difco) for coliform, Bacara agar (chromogenic) for Bacillus cereus, Tryptone-sulfite-neomycin (TSN) agar for Clostridium perfringens, and YM Agar and YM Broth for mold and yeast to ascertain the presence of any microbial cells. The colonies were counted after 24 to 48 hours of incubation at 37 ℃, while molds and yeasts were counted after 5 days at 7 ℃ at 25 ℃, the populations expressed as log10 CFU/g [36].
The ability of black pepper to scavenge DPPH radicals was done according to Liu, Ardo [37]. In brief, 200 µg of black pepper was blended with a 3.8 mL DPPH solution and placed at 25 ℃ in a dark condition for 1 h. At 517 nm, the absorbance of the mixture was measured. Results were expressed as IC50 (µg mL−1) using a standardized ascorbic acid solution [38].
The color value of irradiated and control samples was measured by a spectrophotometer CM-508d (Minolta Corp., Ramsey, U.S.A.) [39]. The values of L∗, a∗, and b∗ were measured. A standard white tile was used to calibrate the instrument.
The TP content of black peppercorn was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu method at 750 nm [40]. In brief, 200 µg of the sample and 3 mL distilled water, mixed gently with Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (0.5 mL/3 min), and then 2 mL sodium carbonate (20%; w/v) were added. The mixture was placed in the dark for 60 minutes before the absorbance was at 750 nm. TP was expressed as mg of Gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per 100 g of black peppercorn.
The volatile matter in black pepper was determined using the distillation method by the Clevenger instrument [41]. The moisture content in the sample was performed according to AOAC [41]. The piperine content was determined using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer at wavelength 342–345 nm [41].
Results were statically analyzed using one-way ANOVA with a significance level of (p ≤ 0.05) using SPSS software (version 19; Chicago, IL, U.S.A.). The physicochemical properties and microbiological assay variance were analyzed as a completely randomized design according to Steel and Torrie [42]. All experiments and tests were carried out in triplicate. Multiple comparisons were made, using the least significant difference (LSD).
Black peppercorn (Piper nigrum L.) is a crucial spice and most consumed worldwide. The impact of e-beam doses on the decontamination of microbes presented in black peppercorns was evaluated. Results revealed that the control sample had a preliminary microbial count of 6, 3.3, 3.1, 2.9, 4.4, 2.1, and 1.7 log CFU/g of TPC, Salmonella, Coliform, yeasts, molds, Bacillus cereus, and Clostridium perfringens, respectively. Generally, a significant reduction (p < 0.05) was observed in microbial counts in irradiated samples compared to the control. At dose six kGy, the number of TPCs that were initially assigned was reduced by 2.3 log CFU g−1, yeasts 0.7 log CFU g−1, and molds 1.3 log CFU g−1 (Figure 1). While at 12 kGy the reduction level was 4, 1.9, and 2.4 log CFU g−1 of TPC, yeasts, and molds, respectively. Moreover, an irradiation dose of 18 kGy was required for decontamination of the initial count of TPC, yeasts, and molds by 6, 2.9, and 4.4 log CFU g−1, respectively. One study by Esmaeili, Barzegar [43] found that e-beam dose treatment at 5 kGy decreased the count of yeasts and molds in turmeric by 4 log CFU g−1. Another study by Byun, Cho [44] revealed that e-beam treatment with a dose of 3.5 kGy reduced Aspergillus flavus (> 4 log) in red pepper. The effectiveness of e-beam reduction of TPC in black peppercorn samples increased significantly with dose (p < 0.05). For example, 2.3, 4.2, and 6 log reduction of TPC in black pepper from an initial count of 6 log CFU g−1 was accomplished at doses of 6, 12, and 18 kGy (Figure 1). A significant difference (p < 0.05) was verified in TPC between the 6, 12 and 18 kGy treatments. A similar investigation demonstrated that γ- irradiation at 10 and 30 kGy inactivated the TPC by 4–5 and 5–7 logs, respectively [45,46]. This remarkable decrease in microbial load may be due to the direct impact of e-beam, as a result of the disintegration of links in the RNA/DNA molecule of microbial cells and death [47]. The dose levels used in our study were within the FDA's maximum allowable limit (30 kGy) for spice irradiation [48].
As shown in (Figure 2), the impact of e-beam on Salmonella spp. and coliform bacteria in black pepper was investigated. Results demonstrated that the potentially pathogenic bacteria were reduced in the samples treated with e-beam at different doses. At dose 6 kGy, the initial count of Salmonella and coliform was reduced by 1.2 and 0.9 log CFU g−1, respectively. While the samples were treated with a high dose of 18 kGy, the reduction level was 3.3 and 3.1 log CFU g−1 of Salmonella and coliform, respectively. Lee, Ameer [49] showed that e-beam irradiation at dose 7 kGy reduced coliform 2.5 log CFU g−1 in dried laver products. Another study by Kundu, Gill [50] demonstrated that e-beam irradiation more against E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella serovars.
Also, the e-beam affected on spore-forming bacteria such as Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens in black pepper samples (Figure 3). Data showed that the e-beam was more effective at high doses against Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens. No significant (p > 0.05) difference between doses 6 and 9 kGy on Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens, however, a significant (p < 0.05) difference was noted between doses 12, 15, and 18 kGy on spore-forming bacteria. At 18 kGy the reduction level was 2.1 and 1.7 log CFU g−1 of Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens, respectively. The findings corroborate those reported by Fertey, Bayer [29] who discovered that an e-beam at 200 keV was successful in the inactivation of spore-forming i.e. Bacillus pumilus spores [29].
The impact of e-beam on moisture content in black pepper is shown in Figure 4. The initial moisture content was 8.6%. There was no statistically significant (p > 0.05) difference in moisture contents between treatment doses 6–12 kGy. However, a significant (p < 0.05) difference was noted in high doses. A study by Nieto-Sandoval, Almela [51] reported that a quite high dose of 12.5 kGy not affected the moisture of red paprika. Duncan, Moberg [52] found water activity (aw) to be significantly lower of irradiated peppercorn and cumin seeds. Another study by Kotilainen, Meneses [53] revealed that black peppercorn and coriander had a slight reduction in moisture content. A reason for this slight reduction of moisture may be due to the low energy of the e-beam, which affects water distribution and content.
The volatile oil and piperine content in black pepper was 3.15 and 5.28%, respectively (Figure 4). No significant (p > 0.05) difference in volatile oil and piperine content upon (6-18 kGy) treatments as compared with the control. Sádecká, Kolek [54] found no remarkable changes in volatile oil in irradiated black pepper (up to 30 kGy), while the most important changes were a threefold increase in caryophyllene oxide concentration and a parallel decrease of sesquiterpene caryophyllene, comparison to control. Another study by Rahman, Islam [55] confirmed that irradiation has not any negative impact on volatile compounds and sensory evaluation.
Table 1 demonstrates the color of the black peppercorn sample changes with varying e-beam doses. The lightness (L*) parameter of samples increased significantly with dose gradient-wise. While the positive a* values indicated, the redness was not changed (p > 0.05) at different irradiation dose treatments. The positive b* values indicating yellowness of the sample were increased significantly (p < 0.05) upon treatments. However, color differences could not be seen with the naked eye. Song, Sung [56] showed that different doses of γ-irradiation (2, 3, and 5 kGy) had no impact on the color values of black and red peppercorns. Bambirra, Junqueira [57] reported remarkably lower a* and b* values in turmeric with increased of irradiation doses. In the current work, all samples exposed to e-beam treatment doses ranging from 6 to 18 kGy showed' slight variations in color when in comparison to the control.
Dose (kGy) | Total phenols [mg g−1 dw] | Scavenging activity [%] | Color values | ||
L* | a* | b* | |||
Control | 26.56 ± 0.65a | 62.44 ± 1.28a | 31.2 ± 0.45c | 6.3 ± 0.15b | 9.5 ± 0.18d |
6 | 26.38 ± 0.44a | 61.86 ± 1.05a | 31.8 ± 0.32c | 6.2 ± 0.19b | 9.9 ± 0.22d |
9 | 26.29 ± 0.72a | 61.32 ± 0.94a | 32.1 ± 0. 28b | 6.6 ± 0.12a | 10.4 ± 0.14c |
12 | 26.18 ± 0.38b | 60.65 ± 1.14b | 33.8 ± 0.56a | 6.5 ± 0.25a | 12.2 ± 0.28a |
15 | 25.12 ± 0.62c | 58.24 ± 0.85c | 33.9 ± 0.62a | 6.4 ± 0.22a | 11.1 ± 0.24b |
18 | 24.88 ± 0.26d | 57.78 ± 0.68d | 34.2 ± 0.40a | 6.4 ± 0.18a | 12 ± 0.16a |
Note: abc There is no significant differences between any two means 'in the same column' have the same superscript small letter (p > 0.05). |
The influence of different doses of e-beam treatment on the TP content of black pepper was evaluated. The content of total phenolic compounds (TP) in black peppercorn was between 24.88 and 26.56 g GAE g−1 (Table 1). A significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the TP (6.3%) upon the highest dose of e-beam treatment (18 kGy). Koseki, Villavicencio [58] found that rosemary irradiated with 10–30 kGy had a lower TP content. Jamshidi, Barzegar [59] reported no significant (p > 0.05) reduction of TP content in Cinnamomum zeylanicum up to 15 kGy dose. On the other hand, [60] found a significant increase (p < 0.05) in TP contents of clove and nutmeg after γ-irradiation.
Table 1 demonstrates black pepper's antioxidant activity at various treatment doses. The antioxidant capacity of the untreated sample (control) was 62.44%. It was noted only a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in the antioxidant capacity (7.5%) with the highest treatment e-beam (12, 15, and 18 kGy) dose. The findings are consistent with those previously reported by Sajilata and Singhal [61] who discovered a decrease in the free radical scavenging activity of plant extracts following irradiation. This decrease could be attributed to the oxidation or radiolysis processes that occur after irradiation [62].
The e-beam treatment was found to be effective in inactivating the microbiota naturally present in black peppercorn, where the degree of reduction is heavily influenced based on doses. The results support e-beam treatment within the ranges (6–18 kGy) of investigated doses was efficient for decontamination of TPC, yeasts, molds, Salmonella spp., and coliform bacteria. A significant (p < 0.05) decrease was noted at doses 12, 15, and 18 kGy on Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens in black pepper. While, L*, a* and b* values of black peppercorn were not significantly altered up until 18 kGy dose. Slightly decrease in moisture, volatile oil, and piperine content upon (6–18 kGy) doses as compared to the control. A significant decrease in the bioactive compounds, retaining > 90% of total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity. According to the current study's approach, e-beam treatments up to 12 kGy had a positive impact on the inactivation of natural microbiota and could improve the safety of black peppercorns without compromising their qualities or antioxidant activity.
The authors express their sincere appreciation for Kalustyan Corporation for provided black pepper and plant to conduct this project.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
[1] |
Jiang TA (2019) Health benefits of culinary herbs and spices. J AOAC Int 102: 395–411. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.18-0418 doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.18-0418
![]() |
[2] |
Székács A, Wilkinson MG, Mader A, et al. (2018) Environmental and food safety of spices and herbs along global food chains. Food Control 83: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.06.033 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.06.033
![]() |
[3] | Sultan NA (2019) The consistency of export and agricultural policies in Egypt.[Master's Thesis, the American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/849 |
[4] |
Nguyen L, Duong LT, Mentreddy RS (2019) The US import demand for spices and herbs by differentiated sources. J. Appl Res Med Aromat Plants 12: 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2018.12.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jarmap.2018.12.001
![]() |
[5] |
Man A, Mare A, Toma F, et al. (2016) Health threats from contamination of spices commercialized in romania: Risks of fungal and bacterial infections. Endocr Metab Immune Disord—Drug Targets (Formerly Current Drug Targets-Immune, Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders) 16: 197–204. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871530316666160823145817 doi: 10.2174/1871530316666160823145817
![]() |
[6] |
Nur F, Libra UK, Rowsan P, et al. (2018) Assessment of bacterial contamination of dried herbs and spices collected from street markets in Dhaka. Bangladesh J Pharmacol 21: 96–100. https://doi.org/10.3329/bpj.v21i2.37919 doi: 10.3329/bpj.v21i2.37919
![]() |
[7] | Nielsen K (2016) Spicy Food as Cause of Death—Coincidence and Necessity in Metaphysics E 2–3. |
[8] |
Lv J, Qi L, Yu C, et al. (2015) Consumption of spicy foods and total and cause specific mortality: Population based cohort study. BMJ 351: h3942. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3942 doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3942
![]() |
[9] |
Stojanović-Radić Z, Pejčić M, Dimitrijević M, et al. (2019) Piperine—A major principle of black pepper: A review of its bioactivity and studies. Appl Sci 9: 4270. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9204270 doi: 10.3390/app9204270
![]() |
[10] |
Gülçin İ (2005) The antioxidant and radical scavenging activities of black pepper (Piper nigrum) seeds. Int J Food Sci Nutr 56: 491–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637480500450248 doi: 10.1080/09637480500450248
![]() |
[11] | Sharma N, Sharma T, Choudhary J (2021) Antimicrobial activity of some herbal feed additives. Pharma Innov 10: 392–394. |
[12] |
Banerjee M, Sarkar PK (2003) Microbiological quality of some retail spices in India. Food Res Int 36: 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(02)00194-1 doi: 10.1016/S0963-9969(02)00194-1
![]() |
[13] | CDC (2010) Investigation update: Multistate outbreak of human Salmonella Montevideo infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA. |
[14] |
Van Doren JM, Neil KP, Parish M, et al. (2013) Foodborne illness outbreaks from microbial contaminants in spices, 1973–2010. Food Microbiol 36: 456–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2013.04.014 doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2013.04.014
![]() |
[15] |
Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, et al. (2011) Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—Major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 17: 7–15. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1701.P11101 doi: 10.3201/eid1701.P11101
![]() |
[16] | CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) (2011) Vital signs: Incidence and trends of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through foode foodborne diseases active surveillance network. 10 U.S. sites, 1996–2010. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 60: 749–755. |
[17] |
Bakobie N, Addae AS, Duwiejuah AB, et al. (2017) Microbial profile of common spices and spice blends used in tamale, Ghana. Int J Food Cont 4: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40550-017-0055-9 doi: 10.1186/s40550-017-0055-9
![]() |
[18] |
Golden CE, Berrang ME, Kerr WL, et al. (2019) Slow-release chlorine dioxide gas treatment as a means to reduce Salmonella contamination on spices. Innovative Food Sci & Emerging Technol 52: 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2019.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.01.003
![]() |
[19] | Caver CB (2016) Recovery of Salmonella from Steam and Ethylene Oxide-Treated Spices Using Supplemented Agar with Overlay. Masters Theses, Virginia Tech. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/81456 |
[20] |
Jinot J, Fritz JM, Vulimiri SV, et al. (2018) Carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide: key findings and scientific issues. Toxicol Mech Methods 28: 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2017.1414343 doi: 10.1080/15376516.2017.1414343
![]() |
[21] | Peter K (2006) Handbook of herbs and spices: Woodhead publishing. |
[22] | Bagdatlioglu N, Orman S (2010) The effect of steam sterilization on antioxidant activities of sage, oregano and basil. Ital J Food Sci 22: 343. |
[23] |
Gryczka U, Kameya H, Kimura K, et al. (2020) Efficacy of low energy electron beam on microbial decontamination of spices. Radiat. Phys Chem 170: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108662 doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108662
![]() |
[24] |
Ehlermann DA (2016) The early history of food irradiation. Radiat Phys Chem 129: 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.07.024 doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.07.024
![]() |
[25] |
Roberts PB (2016) Food irradiation: Standards, regulations and world-wide trade. Radiat Phys Chem 129: 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.06.005
![]() |
[26] | Wilkinson VM (1997) Food irradiation: A reference guide: CRC Press. |
[27] | Molins RA (2001) Food irradiation: Principles and applications: John Wiley & Sons. |
[28] | Demirci A, Ngadi MO (2012) Microbial decontamination in the food industry: Novel methods and applications: Woodhead Publishing. |
[29] |
Fertey J, Bayer L, Grunwald T, et al. (2016) Pathogens inactivated by low-energy-electron irradiation maintain antigenic properties and induce protective immune responses. Viruses 8: 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/v8110319 doi: 10.3390/v8110319
![]() |
[30] |
Zhang Y, Moeller R, Tran S, et al. (2018) Geobacillus and Bacillus spore inactivation by low energy electron beam technology: resistance and influencing factors. Front Microbiol 9: 2720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.0272 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.0272
![]() |
[31] |
Baek M-e, Ameer K, Jo Y, et al. (2019) Microbial assessment of medicinal herbs (Cnidii Rhizoma and Alismatis Rhizoma), effects of electron beam irradiation and detection characteristics. Food Sci Biotechnol 29: 705–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-019-00701-w doi: 10.1007/s10068-019-00701-w
![]() |
[32] |
Gryczka U, Migdał W, Bułka S (2018) The effectiveness of the microbiological radiation decontamination process of agricultural products with the use of low energy electron beam. Radiat Phys Chem 143: 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.09.020 doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.09.020
![]() |
[33] |
Zhang H, Zhang Y, Chambers Ⅳ E, et al. (2020) Electron beam irradiation on Fuzhuan brick-tea: Effects on sensory quality and chemical compositions. Radiat Phys Chem 170: 108597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108597 doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108597
![]() |
[34] |
Woldemariam HW, Kießling M, Emire SA, et al. (2021) Influence of electron beam treatment on naturally contaminated red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) powder: Kinetics of microbial inactivation and physicochemical quality changes. Innovative Food Sci & Emerging Technol 67: 102588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102588 doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102588
![]() |
[35] |
Helt-Hansen J, Miller A, Sharpe P, et al. (2010) Dμ—A new concept in industrial low-energy electron dosimetry. Radiat Phys Chem 79: 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2009.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2009.09.002
![]() |
[36] | Yousef AE, Carlstrom C (2003) Food microbiology: A laboratory manual: John Wiley & Sons. |
[37] |
Liu X, Ardo S, Bunning M, et al. (2007) Total phenolic content and DPPH radical scavenging activity of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in Colorado. LWT-Food Sci Technol 40: 552–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2005.09.007 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2005.09.007
![]() |
[38] | Ebrahimzadeh MA, Nabavi SM, Nabavi SF, et al. (2010) Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of H. officinalis L. var. angustifolius, V. odorata, B. hyrcana and C. speciosum. Pak J Pharm Sci 23: 29–34. |
[39] | Berns RS (2019) Billmeyer and Saltzman's principles of color technology: John Wiley & Sons. |
[40] |
Hajimahmoodi M, Faramarzi MA, Mohammadi N, et al. (2010) Evaluation of antioxidant properties and total phenolic contents of some strains of microalgae. J Appl Phycol 22: 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-009-9424-y doi: 10.1007/s10811-009-9424-y
![]() |
[41] | AOAC (2016) Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. (20th Ed.) Maryland, USA. 2016. |
[42] | Steel RG, Torrie JH (1986) Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach: McGraw-Hill New York, NY, USA. |
[43] |
Esmaeili S, Barzegar M, Sahari MA, et al. (2018) Effect of gamma irradiation under various atmospheres of packaging on the microbial and physicochemical properties of turmeric powder. Radiat Phys Chem 148: 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.02.028 doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.02.028
![]() |
[44] |
Byun K-H, Cho M-J, Park S-Y, et al. (2019) Effects of gamma ray, electron beam, and X-ray on the reduction of Aspergillus flavus on red pepper powder (Capsicum annuum L.) and gochujang (red pepper paste). Food Sci Technol Inter 25: 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013219857019 doi: 10.1177/1082013219857019
![]() |
[45] |
Gryczka U, Madureira J, Verde SC, et al. (2021) Determination of pepper microbial contamination for low energy e-beam irradiation. Food Microbiol 98: 103782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2021.103782 doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2021.103782
![]() |
[46] |
Rico CW, Kim G-R, Ahn J-J, et al. (2010) The comparative effect of steaming and irradiation on the physicochemical and microbiological properties of dried red pepper (Capsicum annum L.). Food Chem 119: 1012–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.08.005
![]() |
[47] | Barkai-Golan R, Follett PA (2017) Irradiation for quality improvement, microbial safety and phytosanitation of fresh produce: Academic Press. |
[48] |
Pauli G, Tarantino L (1995) FDA regulatory aspects of food irradiation. J Food Prot 58: 209–212. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-58.2.209 doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-58.2.209
![]() |
[49] |
Lee E-J, Ameer K, Kim G-R, et al. (2018) Effects of approved dose of e-beam irradiation on microbiological and physicochemical qualities of dried laver products and detection of their irradiation status. Food Sci Biotechnol 27: 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-017-0194-z doi: 10.1007/s10068-017-0194-z
![]() |
[50] |
Kundu D, Gill A, Lui C, et al. (2014) Use of low dose e-beam irradiation to reduce E. coli O157: H7, non-O157 (VTEC) E. coli and Salmonella viability on meat surfaces. Meat Sci 96: 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.07.034 doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.07.034
![]() |
[51] |
Nieto-Sandoval JM, Almela L, Fernandez-Lopez JA, et al. (2000) Effect of electron beam irradiation on color and microbial bioburden of red paprika. J Food Prot 63: 633–637. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-63.5.633 doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-63.5.633
![]() |
[52] |
Duncan SE, Moberg K, Amin KN, et al. (2017) Processes to preserve spice and herb quality and sensory integrity during pathogen inactivation. J Food Sci 82: 1208–1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13702 doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13702
![]() |
[53] |
Kotilainen H, Meneses N, Laaksonen O, et al. (2021) Effects of low-energy electron beam (LEEB) treatment on physicochemical attributes of black pepper and coriander. Innovative Food Sci & Emerging Technol 2021: 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.23013-8 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.23013-8
![]() |
[54] | Sádecká J, Kolek E, Petka J, et al. (2005) Impact of gamma-irradiation on microbial decontamination and organoleptic quality of oregano (Origanum vulgare L.). Proceedings of Euro Food Chem XIII, Hamburg 2005: 590–594. |
[55] |
Rahman M, Islam M, Das KC, et al. (2021) Effect of gamma radiation on microbial load, physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of common spices for storage. J Food Sci Technol 58: 3579–3588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-021-05087-4 doi: 10.1007/s13197-021-05087-4
![]() |
[56] |
Song W-J, Sung H-J, Kim S-Y, et al. (2014) Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium in black pepper and red pepper by gamma irradiation. Int J Food Microbiol 172: 125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.11.017 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.11.017
![]() |
[57] |
Bambirra MLA, Junqueira RG, Glória MBA (2002) Influence of post harvest processing conditions on yield and quality of ground turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Braz Arch Biol Technol 45: 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132002000600004 doi: 10.1590/S1516-89132002000600004
![]() |
[58] |
Koseki PM, Villavicencio ALC, Brito MS, et al. (2002) Effects of irradiation in medicinal and eatable herbs. Radiat Phys Chem 63: 681–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-806X(01)00658-2 doi: 10.1016/S0969-806X(01)00658-2
![]() |
[59] | Jamshidi M, Barzegar M, Sahari M (2014) Effect of gamma and microwave irradiation on antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Cinnamomum zeylanicum and Echinacea purpurea. Inter Food Res J 21: 1289–1296. |
[60] |
Variyar PS (1998) Effect of gamma‐irradiation on the phenolic acids of some Indian spices. Int J Food Sci & Technol 33: 533–537. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2621.1998.00219.x doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2621.1998.00219.x
![]() |
[61] |
Sajilata M, Singhal R (2006) Effect of irradiation and storage on the antioxidative activity of cashew nuts. Radiat Phys Chem 75: 297–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2005.07.004 doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2005.07.004
![]() |
[62] |
Fernandes Â, Barreira JC, Antonio AL, et al. (2016) Extended use of gamma irradiation in wild mushrooms conservation: Validation of 2 kGy dose to preserve their chemical characteristics. LWT-Food Sci Technol 67: 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.11.038 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.11.038
![]() |
1. | Dadang Rustandi, Sensus Wijonarko, Mersi Kurniati, Tatik Maftukhah, The Role of Thermal and Electrical Energies to Increase the Pepper Quality: A Review, 2024, 1344, 1755-1307, 012021, 10.1088/1755-1315/1344/1/012021 | |
2. | Elettra Berni, Andrea Brutti, Electromagnetic radiations and their effect on filamentous fungi and mycotoxins: recent advances and perspectives, 2023, 52, 22147993, 101073, 10.1016/j.cofs.2023.101073 | |
3. | Ibtihal Al-Zobaidi, Mohammad-Taghi Ebadi, Hamid Ghomi, Mahdi Ayyari, Optimisation of disinfection and packaging methods for the preservation of Persian shallot (Allium hirtifolium L.), 2025, 60, 0950-5423, 10.1093/ijfood/vvaf060 |
Dose (kGy) | Total phenols [mg g−1 dw] | Scavenging activity [%] | Color values | ||
L* | a* | b* | |||
Control | 26.56 ± 0.65a | 62.44 ± 1.28a | 31.2 ± 0.45c | 6.3 ± 0.15b | 9.5 ± 0.18d |
6 | 26.38 ± 0.44a | 61.86 ± 1.05a | 31.8 ± 0.32c | 6.2 ± 0.19b | 9.9 ± 0.22d |
9 | 26.29 ± 0.72a | 61.32 ± 0.94a | 32.1 ± 0. 28b | 6.6 ± 0.12a | 10.4 ± 0.14c |
12 | 26.18 ± 0.38b | 60.65 ± 1.14b | 33.8 ± 0.56a | 6.5 ± 0.25a | 12.2 ± 0.28a |
15 | 25.12 ± 0.62c | 58.24 ± 0.85c | 33.9 ± 0.62a | 6.4 ± 0.22a | 11.1 ± 0.24b |
18 | 24.88 ± 0.26d | 57.78 ± 0.68d | 34.2 ± 0.40a | 6.4 ± 0.18a | 12 ± 0.16a |
Note: abc There is no significant differences between any two means 'in the same column' have the same superscript small letter (p > 0.05). |
Dose (kGy) | Total phenols [mg g−1 dw] | Scavenging activity [%] | Color values | ||
L* | a* | b* | |||
Control | 26.56 ± 0.65a | 62.44 ± 1.28a | 31.2 ± 0.45c | 6.3 ± 0.15b | 9.5 ± 0.18d |
6 | 26.38 ± 0.44a | 61.86 ± 1.05a | 31.8 ± 0.32c | 6.2 ± 0.19b | 9.9 ± 0.22d |
9 | 26.29 ± 0.72a | 61.32 ± 0.94a | 32.1 ± 0. 28b | 6.6 ± 0.12a | 10.4 ± 0.14c |
12 | 26.18 ± 0.38b | 60.65 ± 1.14b | 33.8 ± 0.56a | 6.5 ± 0.25a | 12.2 ± 0.28a |
15 | 25.12 ± 0.62c | 58.24 ± 0.85c | 33.9 ± 0.62a | 6.4 ± 0.22a | 11.1 ± 0.24b |
18 | 24.88 ± 0.26d | 57.78 ± 0.68d | 34.2 ± 0.40a | 6.4 ± 0.18a | 12 ± 0.16a |
Note: abc There is no significant differences between any two means 'in the same column' have the same superscript small letter (p > 0.05). |