Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Research article Special Issues

Forecasting algae and shellfish carbon sink capability on fractional order accumulation grey model


  • Received: 03 January 2022 Revised: 21 March 2022 Accepted: 21 March 2022 Published: 25 March 2022
  • Marine biology carbon sinks function is vital pathway to earned carbon neutrality object. Algae and shellfish can capture CO2 from atmosphere reducing CO2 concentration. Therefore, algae and shellfish carbon sink capability investigate and forecast are important problem. The study forecast algae and shellfish carbon sinks capability trend base on 9 China coastal provinces. Fractional order accumulation grey model (FGM) is employed to forecast algae and shellfish carbon sinks capability. The result showed algae and shellfish have huge carbon sinks capability. North coastal provinces algae and shellfish carbon sinks capability trend smoothness. South and east coastal provinces carbon sinks capability trend changed drastically. The research advised coastal provinces defend algae and shellfish population, expand carbon sink capability. Algae and shellfish carbon sink resource will promote environment sustainable develop.

    Citation: Haolei Gu, Kedong Yin. Forecasting algae and shellfish carbon sink capability on fractional order accumulation grey model[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(6): 5409-5427. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022254

    Related Papers:

    [1] Şule Özel, Ozan Kaplan, Bilge Başak Fidan, Mustafa Çelebier, Yaprak Engin-Üstün . Altered plasma levels of arachidonic acid, choline, amino acids, and sphingolipids signal neural tube defects. AIMS Molecular Science, 2025, 12(1): 99-112. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2025006
    [2] Amena W. Smith, Swapan K. Ray, Arabinda Das, Kenkichi Nozaki, Baerbel Rohrer, Naren L. Banik . Calpain inhibition as a possible new therapeutic target in multiple sclerosis. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(4): 446-462. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.4.446
    [3] Kenji Chiba, Yasuhiro Maeda, Noriyasu Seki, Hirotoshi Kataoka, Kunio Sugahara . Role of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) and effects of fingolimod, an S1P receptor 1 functional antagonist in lymphocyte circulation and autoimmune diseases. AIMS Molecular Science, 2014, 1(4): 162-182. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2014.4.162
    [4] Rachel L. Flores, Kayla Gonzales, Ryan W. Seaver, Brian T. Livingston . The skeletal proteome of the brittle star Ophiothrix spiculata identifies C-type lectins and other proteins conserved in echinoderm skeleton formation. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(3): 357-367. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.3.357
    [5] Ana Marote, Nathalie Barroca, Rui Vitorino, Raquel M. Silva, Maria H.V. Fernandes, Paula M. Vilarinho, Odete A.B. da Cruz e Silva, Sandra I. Vieira . A proteomic analysis of the interactions between poly(L-lactic acid) nanofibers and SH-SY5Y neuronal-like cells. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(4): 661-682. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.4.661
    [6] Michael W Patt, Lisa Conte, Mary Blaha, Balbina J Plotkin . Steroid hormones as interkingdom signaling molecules: Innate immune function and microbial colonization modulation. AIMS Molecular Science, 2018, 5(1): 117-130. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2018.1.117
    [7] Irene M. Waita, Atunga Nyachieo, Daniel Chai, Samson Muuo, Naomi Maina, Daniel Kariuki, Cleophas M. Kyama . Genetic polymorphisms in eostrogen and progesterone receptor genes in Papio anubis induced with endometriosis during early stage of the disease. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(1): 86-97. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021007
    [8] Chisato Kinoshita, Koji Aoyama, Toshio Nakaki . microRNA as a new agent for regulating neuronal glutathione synthesis and metabolism. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(2): 124-143. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.2.124
    [9] Joanne L. Hopper, Natasha Begum, Laura Smith, Thomas A. Hughes . The role of PSMD9 in human disease: future clinical and therapeutic implications. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(4): 476-484. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.4.476
    [10] Thomas Rauen, Rose Tanui, Christof Grewer . Structural and functional dynamics of Excitatory Amino Acid Transporters (EAAT). AIMS Molecular Science, 2014, 1(3): 99-125. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2014.3.99
  • Marine biology carbon sinks function is vital pathway to earned carbon neutrality object. Algae and shellfish can capture CO2 from atmosphere reducing CO2 concentration. Therefore, algae and shellfish carbon sink capability investigate and forecast are important problem. The study forecast algae and shellfish carbon sinks capability trend base on 9 China coastal provinces. Fractional order accumulation grey model (FGM) is employed to forecast algae and shellfish carbon sinks capability. The result showed algae and shellfish have huge carbon sinks capability. North coastal provinces algae and shellfish carbon sinks capability trend smoothness. South and east coastal provinces carbon sinks capability trend changed drastically. The research advised coastal provinces defend algae and shellfish population, expand carbon sink capability. Algae and shellfish carbon sink resource will promote environment sustainable develop.



    Proteins are integral part of living organisms that play critical roles in numerous biological processes including the proper functioning, survival and adaptation to changes in external atmosphere. Proteins differ from one another in their sequence of amino acids, which is directed by genetic materials i.e. nucleotides. In living organisms, protein synthesis occurs in a cellular organelle called ribosomes, which links amino acids in an order dictated by messenger RNA (mRNA). Transfer RNA (tRNA) carries amino acids specified by the three nucleotides RNA codon that connect to each other through peptide bond and finally leads to synthesis of proteins [1]. Amino acids are small molecule metabolites containing an amine (–NH2) and a carboxyl (–COOH) functional groups and are present in all living things [2]. To date, 22 amino acids are found to be present in proteins, among which 20 appear in the genetic code and known as proteinogenic amino acids or standard/canonical amino acids and play a central role in cellular metabolism [3]. The remaining two amino acids, selenocysteine and pyrrolysine can be incorporated into proteins by special translational mechanism [4]. Selenocysteine can be found in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes [5], whereas pyrrolysine is only been reported in prokaryotes [6]. Besides 11 non-essential amino acids, which the human body can synthesize, there are 9 amino acids which are known as essential amino acids as they can only be obtained from exogenous sources. The common essential and non-essential amino acids are listed in Table 1 and their structures are summarized in Figure 1. These 20 proteinogenic amino acids showed higher polymerization reactivity and fewer side reactions, which are believed to have contributed towards their appearance in the genetic codes and translation to proteins [7]. The 20 proteinogenic amino acids, also termed as proteinaceous amino acids spontaneously link to form polymers (proteins) through a nucleophilic attack, and often time it proceeds without the aid of any other biological molecules or catalyst.

    All proteinogenic amino acids (except Gly) exist in two stereoisomeric forms and studies report that, all proteins are primarily made up of L-AAs. However, D-AAs are reported to play important biological functions in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems. Therefore, it is imperative to be able to accurately distinguish and measure the correct stereoisomeric version of the proteinogenic amino acids in a given system to explain their role. Due to difference in polarity and acid-base characteristics, it has been a challenge to analytically resolve and quantitate all proteinogenic amino acid stereoisomers (39 species, 38 isomeric AAs and Gly) in a single analytical run. Liquid and gas chromatography have been used for chiral analysis of amino acids using both direct and indirect approach, the later requires derivatization that is time consuming [10]. Tremendous advancements in the field of stationary phases [11],[12], availability of numerous chiral derivatizing reagents [13] and instrumentations [14][17] have tremendously contributed to chiral analysis of amino acids in a much more straightforward fashion [18]. In this review, a comprehensive discussion of numerous biological functions and chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) based analytical methods for chiral analysis of proteinogenic amino acids and their stereoisomers are outlined.

    Table 1.  List of essential and non-essential amino acids [8].
    Essential Amino Acids(Cannot be synthesized within the body and must be provided from exogenous source) Non-Essential Amino Acids(Can be synthesized endogenously from essential amino acids)
    Histidine (His) Alanine (Ala)
    Isoleucine (Iso) Arginine (Arg)
    Leucine (Leu) Asparagine (Asn)
    Lysine (Lys) Aspartic acid (Asp)
    Methionine (Met) Cysteine (Cys)
    Phenylalanine (Phe) Glutamine (Gln)
    Threonine (Thr) Glutamic acid (Glu)
    Tryptophan (Trp) Glycine (Gly)
    Valine (Val) Proline (Pro)
    Serine (Ser)
    Tyrosine (Tyr)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 1.  Structures of common 20 proteinogenic amino acids [9].

    Structural features play a direct role in explaining the physicochemical properties displayed by different amino acids and also direct their classification. Based on the location of core structure, amino acids can be classified into four groups such as alpha- (α-), beta- (β-), gamma- (γ-) or delta- (δ-) amino acids. Certain other criteria such as polarity (polar and non-polar), pH level (positively charged, neutral, negatively charged), and side chain group type (aliphatic, acyclic, aromatic, hydroxyl or sulfur containing etc.) play crucial role in determining the types, characteristic features, behavior, reactivity and functions of the amino acids. Amino acids are primarily composed of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur; the carbon atom next to the carboxyl group is called the α-carbon as showed by asterisk (*) in Figure 2.

    Figure 2.  Structure of amino acid.

    Amino groups when connected to α-carbon referred to as α-amino acids, which is the most common form of amino acids found in nature. Except for proline, all other amino acids contain a primary amino group (NH2). The α-carbon is chiral when the side chain is not a hydrogen (glycine). Therefore, except for glycine, remaining 19 proteinogenic amino acids exist in two stereoisomeric forms, known as D- and L-amino acids, which are mirror images of each other. Most of the proteins are predominately comprised of L-amino acids except for few proteins found in bacteria and cone snails [19]. D-amino acids play a major role in bacterial cell wall biosynthesis [20]. Several D-amino acids have reported to serve important roles in different branches of sciences including food, agriculture, pharmaceutical, microbiology, cosmetic, extraterrestrial etc. Due to presence of the carboxylic acid and amino functional groups, the amino acids are amphiprotic and can coexist as zwitterion within various range of pH. Therefore, the charge distribution on the amino acid molecules largely depends on the pH of the environment, which can also be exploited to ionize them in mass spectrometry-based detection.

    Amino acids are colorless, non-volatile crystalline solids, which have a melting point above 200°C as their inorganic salts. Several factors play important role in determining the nature and physicochemical properties of these amino acids including charge, polarity, size and functional groups as discussed earlier. Properties of the amino acids ultimately contribute to the properties and functions of the proteins they form. For examples, proteins that will bind to negatively charged molecules will have surfaces rich with positively charged amino acids such as lysine, arginine and histidine. Whereas proteins binding to positively charged molecules will have surfaces rich with negatively charged amino acids such as glutamic acid and aspartic acid. Similarly, water-soluble proteins tend to have the hydrophobic amino acids buried in the core, which is inaccessible to water whereas the hydrophilic amino acids remain accessible. Water insoluble or limited water-soluble proteins, on the other hand, have their hydrophobic amino acid residues exposed, for example, lipid membrane bound proteins. There are amino acids with other specific properties such as, cysteine can form covalent disulfide bonds to other cysteines, proline can form a cyclic polypeptide backbone etc. In aqueous solutions, amino acids can exist as dipolar ions and can react with strong acids or bases. Due to these neutralization reactions, amino acids can also be used as a buffer. Depending on the solution pH, amino acids can have a predominating charged form, which determines their movement in an electric environment. The pH at which amino acids do not migrate in an electrical field is called their isoelectric point, which can be manipulated to improve the solubility and stability of the proteins they form [21]. In general, amino acids have good stability in different solution strength, pH and radiation, although glutamic acid is reported to have significant degradation in 0.1 N HCl with time [22] and phenylalanine and tryptophan are reported to degrade when exposed to UV and gamma radiation [23]. It has been reported that, non-proteinogenic amino acids are relatively more stable than proteinogenic amino acids, which also explains why non-proteinogenic amino acids can be found in meteorites as part of terrestrial biochemistry whereas proteinogenic amino acids as part of life biochemistry [24].

    Commercial production of amino acids is primarily dependent on bacterial synthesis in expense of glucose utilization or enzymatic conversion of amine metabolites. Chemically, amino acids can be synthesized using Strecker synthesis reaction by reacting aldehyde with ammonium chloride in presence of potassium cyanide [25]. Most bacteria and plants can synthesize all 20 common proteinogenic amino acids, whereas humans can only synthesize 11 which are also known as non-essential amino acids [26]. Biosynthetically, amino acids are derived from various intermediates of glycolysis, citric acid cycle and pentose phosphate pathway [27] (Figure 3). Biosynthetic pathways for non-essential amino acids are fairly straightforward, however, the pathways involved for the essential amino acids can be more complex [28]. For example, glutamate is synthesized by reductive amination of α-ketoglutarate with the aid of glutamate dehydrogenase, which is then transaminated to other α-ketoacid to form other non-essential amino acids including proline, glutamine, histidine and arginine [29]. Alanine, leucine and valine can be synthesized from pyruvate and aspartate can be synthesized from transamination of oxaloacetate. Serine is synthesized from 3-phosphoglycerate which then act as a precursor for glycine. Other amino acids go through complex multi-step biosynthesis pathway as can be seen in Figure 3. From this discussion, it can be realized how studying proteinogenic amino acid level can provide important information and insights on activity and function of different pathways and enzymes between a normal vs dysregulated biological system.

    Figure 3.  General scheme for the biosynthesis of proteinogenic amino acids from glucose and ammonia. Ammonia is incorporated during the formation of glutamate from α-ketoglutarate (reaction 1) by NADPH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH1) and of glutamine from glutamate (reaction 2) by glutamine synthetase (GLN1). The transamination reactions transferring nitrogen from glutamate (yellow) or glutamine (green) are shown. (Copyright © Genetic Society of America, reprinted with permission) [30].

    The types and reactivity of various reactions different amino acids undergo depend on their functional groups and side chain properties [31]. The most common reaction that amino acids undergo is peptide bond formation by which amino acids can be connected to each other through an amide linkage, which leads to formation of peptides and finally grows in length to form a polymer called protein. Inside cells, proteins are translated from RNA inside ribosome and the synthesis starts at their N-terminal. Similar to metabolism of drugs and xenobiotics, amino acid metabolism and excretion also occur in liver and in kidney respectively, finally entering into urea cycle to be removed from the body. Detection and quantitation of free amino acids are thus important to evaluate and determine the progress of numerous reactions they undergo.

    Proteinogenic amino acids are integral part of almost all biological functions as proteins are ubiquitous and responsible for plethora of important roles. Non-proteinogenic amino acids on the other hand can be a part of proteins through post-translational modification and can be of various uses such as defense mechanism of fungi, synthesis of peptide antibiotics, components of meteorite and inhibition of neurotransmission [32],[33]. Proteinogenic amino acids play a critical role in various pathways of human metabolism such as urea cycle, citric acid cycle, gluconeogenesis as a source of energy [27],[28]. Several amino acids also act as precursors of important bioactive molecules as listed in Table 2.

    Table 2.  Important bioactive molecules, their amino acid precursors, and biological functions.
    Precursor Amino Acid Bioactive Compound Biological Function
    Arg Nitric oxide Signaling molecule [34], vasodilation [35].
    Asp, Gly and Glu Nucleotides DNA biosynthesis [36].
    Gly Porphyrins (heme) Cofactor of hemoglobin which is responsible to supply oxygen to tissue [37], CNS inhibition [38].
    Glu Glutathione Antioxidant [39].
    GABA Inhibition of nerve transmission [40].
    His Tetrahydrofolic acid Carbon metabolism [41], oxidative DNA degradation [42].
    Histamine Gastric acid secretion [43], vasodilation [44], allergic reaction [45].
    Met S-adenosylmethionine/Choline High energy metabolism [46].
    Pro Hydroxyproline Stability of collagen [47].
    Phe and Tyr Dopamine, epinephrine and norepinephrine Motivational salience [48], fight or flight response [49].
    Phenylethylamine (human) and phenylpropanoids (plants) CNS stimulant (human) [50], protection from UV light and pathogens (plants) [51].
    Tyr Melanin Albinism [52].
    Trp Serotonin Modulation of cognition, reward, learning, memory and numerous physiological processes [53].
    Niacin Carbohydrate metabolism [54].

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    However, it should be noted that, not all non-protein functions of proteinogenic amino acids are known until today. Free essential amino acids contribute to glycolytic and Krebs cycle and are used as a source of energy during depletion of carbohydrate and fat [55]. Muscle can catabolize the branched chain amino acids (BCAA), valine, leucine and isoleucine [56]. Imbalance in amino acid levels is also reported to be observed in various diseases due to changes in metabolic capacity including cancer [57], liver cirrhosis [58], neurological [59][62] and metabolic disorder [63]. In plant biology, amino acids are reported to have roles in production of chlorophyll, hormones and growth factors; stimulation of vitamin and enzyme synthesis, mineral chelation, and increased pest and pathogen resistance [64],[65]. D-amino acids exhibit both inhibitory effect (D-Ser, D-Ala and D-Arg) and positive effect (D-Ile, D-Val) on Arabidopsis growth [66], whereas D-Lys promoted growth of both Arabidopsis and tobacco [67].

    Amino acids have been marked by significant dysregulation in more than 50 disorders till date due to mutant genes resulting in abnormal enzymes leading to metabolic errors [68]. Hence, amino acid profiling has been a focus of biomarker study [69],[70] and some of the most important amino acid biomarkers and the associated diseases are listed in Table 3.

    Table 3.  Amino acid biomarkers, associated defective enzymes and diseases.
    Dysregulated Amino Acids Defective Enzyme Associated Diseases
    Ala, Arg, Thr and Phe Parkinson's disease [62].
    His Histidase Histidinemia leading to mental retardation [71].
    Glu Visceral obesity [72].
    Schizophrenia [73].
    Met Cystathione synthetase Homocystinuria leading to brain deficit, osteoporosis and vascular disease [74].
    Phe Phenylalanine hydroxylase Phenylketonuria leading to neurophysiological deficit [75], Alzheimer's disease [81],[82].
    BCAA: Val, Leu and Ile α-ketoacid dehydrogenase Maple syrup urine disease [76],
    Autism spectrum disorder [77],
    Chronic graft vs host disease [78],
    Type 2 diabetes [79],
    Depression [80].
    Trp, Glu and Asp Alzheimer's disease [81],[82].

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The major caveat of using amino acids as biomarkers is that they are vital to many biological processes and their pool might be dysregulated for various other reasons, which need to be carefully considered before using them diagnostically as biomarkers. However, presence of D-amino acids can be a good indication of bacterial infection; although it cannot help in determining the type of bacteria involved, at least not yet. Besides, due to physiological and biochemical differences between different biological systems; and difference in number of subjects in studies, results need to be carefully interpreted to establish suitability of use between species.

    Amino acids and their intermediates have remained of keen interest to scientists across the globe because of their critical role in important biochemical pathways in different biological systems. Both essential and non-essential amino acids are reported to play important roles in array of different physiological and biochemical models across several different species. Numerous therapeutic applications of proteinogenic amino acids have been reported in respiratory physiology, cardiology, nephrology, neurology, immunology, reproductive system, cell signaling, growth and differentiation, gene expression, acid base balance, systemic circulation, metabolic, bone and congenital disorders among others [68],[83]. Role of non-essential amino acids in cancer biology has also been comprehensively discussed [84]. Some of the key therapeutic roles of various proteinogenic amino acids are discussed in Table 4.

    Table 4.  Therapeutic roles of amino acids.
    Amino Acids Therapeutic roles
    Arg Antihypertensive [85] and antiproliferative [86] effect.
    Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease [87] and osteoporosis [88].
    Fat reduction [89].
    Gln Removal of oxidants [90] and immunostimulatory benefit [91].
    Enhances intestinal integrity and cell survival [92].
    Gly Enhances transport of water, ions and other amino acids [93].
    His Prevention of postischemic reperfusion injury [94].
    Wound healing effect [71].
    Lys Treatment of herpetic lesions [95], aphthous ulcer [96] and migraine [97].
    Met Liver detoxification [98].
    Excretion of heavy metal during poisoning [99].
    Anticarcinogenic effect [100],[101] and anti-teratogenic effect [102].
    Reduction of cortical infarct size [103].
    Phe Imaging of cancer cells [104],[105].
    Pro Immunostimulatory benefit [106].
    D-Ser Treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder [107] and schizophrenia [108].
    Thr Treatment of spinal plasticity [109] and multiple sclerosis [110].
    Trp Treatment of depression [111].
    Diagnostic agents in neuropsychopharmacological studies [112].
    Induction of cholecystokinin and pancreatic enzyme production [113].
    BCAA: Val, Leu and Ile Neurophysiological improvement [114].
    Treatment of sepsis with catabolic disorder [115].
    Prevention of skeletal muscle wasting [116].

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    It can be realized that, several amino acids have key therapeutic and diagnostic roles in plethora of diseases. Roles of amino acids as precursors of important bioactive molecules, biomarkers and clinically important agents emphasize why robust analytical methods are required to accurately measure their levels in different biological matrices.

    Besides having numerous roles in different biological systems, proteinogenic amino acids have several industrial applications including use in human nutrition such as parenteral nutrition, dietary supplements for athletes, use in animal feed additives to help improve the health and production of animals [117]. Glutamic acid and aspartame (L-aspartyl-L-phenylalanine-1-methyl ester) are used as flavor enhancer [118] and artificial sweetener [119] in food industry. In agriculture industry, metal chelating amino acids are used in case of mineral deficiencies and help in improving plants' health [120]. Besides, proteinogenic amino acids are regularly used in pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries for various applications [121] such as environmental friendly packaging, in drug delivery and prosthetic implants due to biodegradable characteristics [122]. Polyaspartate due to its water solubility, biodegradable features and metal chelating ability, is used in disposable diapers [123], anti-scaling agent and corrosion inhibitor [124],[125]. Tyrosine on the other hand is reported to be used as an alternative to phenol in polycarbonate synthesis which has various construction and engineering applications [126].

    L-amino acids are primarily present in various prokaryotic and eukaryotic protein. Participation of D-amino acids in protein synthesis is very limited, although some D-amino acids have been detected in bacteria, some vertebrates, marine invertebrates and plants as part of peptide antibiotics, hormones, neuropeptides, opioids and toxins [127]. Proteins have ubiquitous roles in animal and plant kingdom including structural integrity, metabolic functions and transport of necessary entities. The role of L-amino acids is limitless as they make proteins, which are responsible for performing plethora of functions in biology, hence are related to the evolution of life. Reasons for the selection of only one isomer of amino acids are not well established, but it can be understood that a mix of both will hinder proper folding of the proteins and might render them inactive. In general, D-amino acids cannot be digested well as peptide bonds containing D-L, L-D and D-D configurations offer resistance to proteolytic enzymes [127], hence it says homochirality is essential for life. Except for threonine and isoleucine which have stereogenic center and glycine which is achiral, remaining 17 proteinogenic amino acids have similar physicochemical properties but vary in biological functions. Conversion of L- to D-amino acids is primarily carried out by D-amino acid racemase via formation of α-iminoacid. L-amino acid oxidase can also participate in this conversion through α-ketoacid formation. In mammals, oxidase predominates over the racemase pathway; the latter is more common in bacteria. Heat and alkaline treatment can also cause this conversion. Historically, D-amino acids are studied only in the context of microorganisms, but in last few decades, their presence have been found in higher organisms as well. As D-amino acids are less frequently present in nature and biology, curiosity developed in studying these stereoisomers. Several D-amino acids have been reported to be identified in human, mouse, rat, chicken, frog, snail, lobster and spider in free form or part of peptides and proteins and thought to be the result of racemization during development and aging [128], although in general racemase pathway is considered dominant in microorganisms. Table 5 enlists presence of several D-amino acids in different higher organisms.

    Table 5.  List of various D-amino acids in higher organisms, their location and associated roles.
    D-Amino Acids Proteins/Peptides/Free AA Source Associated disease/Function Reference
    D-Asp Elastin Aorta and skin (H) Arteriosclerosis [129],[130]
    Myelin Brain (H) [131]
    β-amyloid Brain (H) Alzheimer's disease [132]
    Free AA Brain (H, R, C) Nueromodulatory effect [133][135]
    Testis, adrenal and pineal glands (R) Inhibit secretion of melatonin
    Increase testosterone production
    D-Asp, D-Asn, D-Ser and D-Thr α-crystallin Lens (H) Cataract [136]
    D-Ala DermorphineDeltorphine Skin (F) 1000 time more analgesia than morphine due to presence of D-Ala [137],[138]
    D-Met Dermenkephalin Skin (F) Analgesia [139]
    D-Phe Achatin I Ganglia and atrium (S) Enhances cardiac activity
    Excitatory action on muscles
    [140]
    Hyperglycemic hormone Sinus gland (L) Increase glucose concentration in response to stress [141],[142]
    Phenylseptin Skin (F) Antimicrobial activity [143]
    D-allo-Ile Brombinin H4 Skin (F) Antimicrobial and antiparasitic activity [144]
    D-Asn Fulicin Ganglia (S) Enhance contraction of penis retractor muscle [145]
    D-Trp Contryphan Venom (CS) Paralysis of fish prey by snails [146]
    D-Ser ω-agatoxin Venom (SP) Calcium channel blocker [147]
    Free AA Brain (M) N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA)/glycine receptor agonist [133]

    Notes: H: Human; R: Rat; C: Chicken; F: Frog; S: Snail; L: Lobster; CS: Cone Snail; SP: Spider; M: Mammals.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The biggest source of D-amino acids is the food industry and its been reported that in general we consume more than 100 mg of D-amino acids everyday [13]. D-amino acids are reported to provide varying taste and flavor besides providing antimicrobial and antiaging effect. Marcone GL et al. discussed elaborately the different D-amino acids present in different food products naturally or due to processing or contamination [13]. Naturally, fruits and vegetable contain some D-amino acids. Till today various D-amino acids such as D-Asn, D-Asp, D-Ala, D-Arg, D-Gln, D-Glu, D-Val, D-Leu, D-Lys and D-Ser have been found in milk, apple, pineapple, papaya, mango, clementine, orange, pear, lemon, passion fruit, grape fruit, cabbage, water melon, tomato, carrot, celery, rice, meat, fish, liquid spice, peanuts, honey etc. [13],[148]. Alcoholic beverages are reported to contain D-Phe and D-Pro in addition to the already stated ones. Coffee has been another major source of D-amino acids containing D-Asp, D-Glu, D-Pro and D-Phe [149]. Soy and corn based meals are reported to contain D-Met in addition to other commonly present D-amino acids in food. Fermented dairy products such as yogurt and cheese are reported to contain several D-amino acids due to lactic, acetic or bacterial fermentation [150]. Finally, temperature and pH induced racemization can also cause formation of certain D-amino acids in processed food items and can be used as a marker for such treatment. But abnormal or higher than normally reported amount of D-amino acids in food items warrants to check the quality as it is often indicative of microbial contamination especially increased level of D-Asp, D-Glu and D-Ala [151].

    D-amino acids have important application in biomedicine as bioactive compounds, biomarkers, essential peptides and proteins. Besides an indicator of bacterial infection, several free and bound D-amino acids have been reported to act as biomarkers, e.g. D-Ser, D-Pro and D-Asn for kidney disease [69],[152],[153], D-amino acid oxidase for post-stroke dementia [154] and cellular senescence [155], D-amino acid peptide for better cellular retention on monoclonal antibody for tumor targeting [156] and D-Glu in heart diseases [157]. Other important D-amino acid containing enzymes includes: D-Pro reductase, D-Glu cyclase, D-Cys desulfhydrase, D-arginase, D-Ser dehydrase and D-Met aminotransferase [158]. There are also reports where the presence of D-amino acid is found to be important for the biological activity, both of therapeutic and adverse origin e.g. D-Ala for analgesic activity of demorphine [137], D-Phe for antibacterial activity of gramicidin S [159], D-Ser for calcium channel blocking activity [160], D-Met for toxicity of defensin like peptide 2 [161], D-Val for cancer therapy [162], D-Tyr for hypertension [163], D-Trp for effect of growth hormone Auxin in plants [164] etc.

    Prokaryotes especially bacteria are a great source of D-amino acids. D-amino acids are present in peptidoglycan (PG) layer of the cell wall, and participate in cell wall biosynthesis and remodeling, spore germination, biofilm formation etc. [165]. Studying bacterial D-amino acid contents can help in better understanding of their cellular adaptation and behavior under stress, which can further aid in antibacterial drug discovery and development. Both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria have a cell wall and one of the major components of the cell wall is the PG layer, which is thicker in the former and thinner in the later (Figure 4). But in both systems, various D-amino acids participate in the formation of the PG layer [20].

    Figure 4.  Difference between cell wall of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (Copyright © Catherine Stanley, Stanley Illustration, reprinted with permission).

    The peptidoglycan layer contributes to the morphology, strength and resistance to stressors, which is primarily composed of linear glycan strands cross-linked by short peptides. The D-amino acids are primarily present in those short-peptides connecting the sugar chains and play important roles in the biosynthesis of the PG i.e. cell wall and are an imperative part of bacterial survival. The linear glycan chain is made up of either N-acetyl glucosamine (GlcNAc, NAG) or N-acetylmuramic acid (MurNAc, NAM). Bacterial PG synthesis occurs in three phases, each of which consists of multiple steps [166] (Figure 5).

    D-amino acids participate in the very early stage i.e. phase I where several D-amino acids such as D-Ala, D-Ala-D-Ala and D-Glu along with L-Ala, L-Lys and L-Glu take part to synthesize the core UDP linked intermediates: UDP-GlcNAc (UDP-NAG), UDP-NAG-enolpyruvate (UDP-EP), UDP-MurNAc (UDP-NAM), UDP–NAM–L-Ala (UDP-Mono), UDP–NAM–L-Ala–D-Glu (UDP-Di), UDP–NAM–L-Ala–γ-D-Glu–L-Lys (UDP-Tri), and UDP–NAM–L-Ala–γ-D-Glu–L-Lys–D-Ala–D-Ala (UDP-Penta) [169]. All these steps take place in the cytoplasm during phase I leading to synthesis of UDP-Penta and phosphor-NAM-pentapeptide, which are then transferred to lipid carrier for further elaboration during phase II on the inner membrane to form lipid I and then ultimately to lipid II by incorporation of NAG from UDP-NAG intermediate. Finally, during phase III, lipid II undergo transglycosylation and transpeptidation by penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) and are assembled into mature peptidoglycan on the outer membrane.

    Figure 5.  Steps involved in bacterial peptidoglycan biosynthesis during all three phases and their associated location in gram-positive bacteria [167]. Most gram-negative bacteria use meso-diaminopimelic acid in place of L-Lys [168]. PEP: phosphoenolpyruvate; AEK: L-Ala-γ-D-Glu-L-Lys. (Copyright © American Society for Microbiology, reprinted with permission).

    D-amino acids are also believed to participate in PG remodeling and metabolism as reported in various studies e.g. effect of D-Met, D-Leu, D-Val and D-Ile in rod-to-sphere shape transition of mrcA type Vibrio cholera [170], negative regulation of PG synthesis on V. cholerae and B. subtilis upon D-amino acids exposure specially D-Arg targeting cell wall independent pathways [171], incorporation of D-Cys by several bacteria from the nutrient media supplemented with D-Cys [172]. A very recent study discussed the role of D-Met and D-Phe in maintaining cell wall integrity during acid stress in Lactococcus lactis strain F44 [173]. Exact mechanism by which D-amino acids participate in bacterial PG remodeling is yet to be determined but it is hypothesized that D-amino acids regulate the periplasmic enzymes responsible for synthesis and modification of PG polymer and by modulating PBPs activity [165]. In addition, Cava P et al discussed about the possibility that presence of D-amino acid in a nutrient-depleted bacterial culture might be indicative of downregulation of PG synthesis i.e. biomarker of stress condition for bacterial population [165]. D-Ala and D-His are reported to act as germination inhibitor for Bacillus species during high spore population and can alter kinetics of germination to enhance infection [174]. On the other hand, D-amino acids containing peptides (D-Ala-D-Lac and D-Ala-D-Met) can also help bacteria to develop resistance e.g. resistance against vancomycin by Enterococcus, by preventing binding of drugs to the PG precursor leading to cell wall inhibition or by making cell wall resistant to various protease enzymes [175].

    D-amino acids are also involved in biofilm formation providing protection to the bacterial cell against antimicrobials and host's immune system and make treatment challenging [176]. Bacterial biofilm is primarily composed of polysaccharides, proteins and/or DNA [177]. Several D-amino acids namely D-Leu, D-Met, D-Trp, D-Tyr, D-Pro and D-Phe are reported to induce dissolution of biofilm produced by B. subtilis, S. aureus, S. epidermidis and P. aeruginosa, an effect which was not observed with L-amino acids [178][180], although there are some contradictions to these conclusions [181], that are believed to have occurred due to variation in experimental setup [182]. Interestingly these roles of D-amino acids such as negative metabolism on PG synthesis and biofilm dispersal effect have been reported to potentiate the antibacterial activities of other agents [183]. For example, D-amino acids are reported to enhance the activity and stability of several peptide antibiotics such as penicillin, cephalosporin, cycloserine, gramicidin, actinomycin, bacitracin and polymyxin [184]. D-amino acids are also present in a metal scavenging agent known as Staphylopine which is derived from S. aureus and can trap various metals including nickel, zinc, cobalt, copper and iron [185].

    Myriad roles and functions of different amino acids have warranted for ways to accurately distinguish and quantify them in a system of interest. Amino acids analysis is also used for quantification and characterization of peptides and proteins [186]. Moreover, important functions attributed to a specific stereoisomer of an amino acid clearly indicates the necessity of accurate identification of the correct stereoisomers to be able to study, predict, explore and explain important phenomena. There are various analytical technologies available to separate and detect the amino acid stereoisomers including chromatographic, spectrometric, fluidics, electrophoretic, microbiological or enzymatic methods. At any given time, complete separation and quantification can be challenging as racemization can occur due to various physical and chemical factors [187]. Frequency of spontaneous racemization has been reported to decrease in the following order [188]: Cys>Asp>Pro>Glu>Met>His>Leu>Lys>Phe>Ala>Tyr>Arg>Trp>Val>Ile>Ser>Thr.

    Microbiological amino acid analysis methods were popular in the primitive days [189] and currently are taken over by other more sensitive and accurate methods. Enzymatic assays and biosensors on the other hand require specific enzymes for total amino acid analysis hence are not very convenient [190]. Chromatographic techniques, including the simple thin layer chromatography [191],[192] or the advanced multidimensional chromatography [193], are the most common platform for amino acid analysis and with the advent of mass spectrometry based detection, this has remained the popular method of choice for analysis of proteinogenic amino acid stereoisomers [194][196]. A carefully developed and optimized chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry based analytical method can provide baseline separation, superior sensitivity and high throughput at analyzing all proteinogenic amino acid stereoisomers [197]. Microfluidics and nanofluidics based devices, such as lab-on-a-chip also enables chiral separation, offers portability and faster analysis [198]. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) on the front end for separation has been recently used due to its reliability, automation and robustness [199] and showed successful chiral analysis of amino acid (non-proteinogenic and proteinogenic) in extraterrestrial [200] and biological [201] samples. It uses various chiral selectors for derivatization such as cyclodextrins, naphthalene dicaroboxaldehyde (NDA), 4-fluoro-7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (NBD-F) and Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) with capillary zone electrophoresis or micellar electrokinetic chromatography [202][204].

    Greatest performance in separation and detection of amino acid stereoisomers can be obtained by combining the resolution power of various chromatographic techniques such as liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, supercritical fluid chromatography etc. to the sensitivity power of mass spectrometry. Sample preparation is a very critical step in chromatographic method especially when the matrix is of complex origin such as plasma, serum, urine, cerebrospinal fluid or cellular extract. In addition, careful selection of solvent, buffer, pH, stationary phase and derivatization reagents is very critical in achieving utmost analytical performance. Chiral analysis of amino acids from proteins or peptides can be more complex than from a system rich in D-amino acids. Acid hydrolysis has been the primary way to obtain free amino acids from proteins and peptides since 1954 [205],[206]. The strength, temperature and duration of reaction are constantly studied and modified to get a stable pool of amino acids for accurate analysis [205]. Microwave assisted acid hydrolysis is reported to reduce time during acid hydrolysis while preserving stability and coverage [207].

    The most commonly used chromatography in amino acid analysis is ion exchange chromatography (IEC) which is an indirect method and requires pre-column derivatization using o-phthalaldehyde (OPA), phenylisothiocyanate (PITC) or post-column derivatization using ninhydrin [208]. Detection on IEC has been traditionally performed with UV detector using a wavelength of 570 nm and 440 nm, which is great for absolute quantification but might not provide sufficient sensitivity for trace level analysis. Additionally, co-eluting peaks cannot be always resolved by manipulating mobile phase compositions, gradients and stationary phases and is a serious limitation of UV based analysis. Chiral ligand exchange chromatography (CLEC) on the other hand is a direct analysis method which does not require any derivatization and utilize chiral stationary phases (CSPs) for enantioseparation of the proteinogenic amino acids [209]. However, CLEC requires non-volatile mobile phase which is not compatible if mass spectrometry or evaporative light scattering based detection are to be used on the back end [210].

    High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) can significantly improve the throughput of amino acid analysis over IECs and CLECs [211]. HPLC can provide better analysis with both pre- and post-column derivatization, where derivatization provide stable chromophore, for example 260 nm for 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate derivatives [212] or 340 nm for 1-fluoro-2-4-dinitrophenyl-5-L-alalnine amide derivatives [213],[214]. It can also enable chiral amino acid analysis in underivatized i.e. in their natural form using modern stationary phases such as hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) [215] or in reverse phase (RP) with ion pairing reagent [216]. Still, such advancements cannot allow separation of co-eluting peaks and create challenges for quantitation of such amino acids. Using mass spectrometers for detection can tremendously help with sensitivity and allow accurate detection of co-eluting peaks due to different mass to charge ratio irrespective of derivatization and/or chromatographic techniques [12],[217][220]. Use of mass spectrometer as a detection tool however incur some challenges such as variability due to ionization efficiency, matrix effect and ion suppression which if not carefully monitored and controlled can affect the accuracy. This can be solved by using stable isotopically labeled internal standard or isobaric tag, which can take recovery of amino acids into consideration for data correction as well as allow separation of isobaric amino acids [221]. Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) although seems like an outstanding option, still has some limitations such as use of ion pairing reagents that are not recommended for mass spec detection. On traditional C18 analytical columns, polar amino acids do not retain well hence cannot provide a quantitation. In addition, in HILIC chromatography some amino acids still do not separate well (D-alloisoleucine from isoleucine) and suffer from lack of reproducibility [218]. All these limitations however points out towards derivatized amino acid analysis with traditional analytical columns as a feasible option, which allows use of both liquid chromatography (LC) and gas chromatography (GC). Inclusion of metals with magnetic properties, namely high performance magneto-chromatography and HPLC coupled to a circular dichroism detector also reported to offer faster and highly reproducible amino acid analysis [222],[223]. Moreover, state of the art technologies on separation science and mass spectrometry such as multi-dimensional separation and ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) brings a paradigm shift to utilize modern approaches to achieve faster, accurate and super sensitive analysis of proteinogenic amino acid stereoisomers [14],[150],[211],[224].

    Gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, on the other hand provides better reproducibility however is restricted to volatile analytes hence chemical derivatization (silylation and alkylation) is a must [225]. Chiral and capillary columns are widely used in GC-MS based amino acids analysis [226]. GC coupled to flame ionization detector (FID), along with GC-MS and LC-MS have also been reported in chiral amino acid analysis from beer [226] and coffee [227]. With the advent of high resolution mass spectrometer and inclusion of machine learning and bioinformatics, amino acids are currently analyzed as part of global metabolome of a biological system that has enabled their identification and quantification in variety of matrices [228]. Comprehensive review of various chromatographic techniques for amino acid analysis can be found in Kasper H et al. 2009 [229], Schurig V et al. 2011 [230], Otter DE 2012 [194] and Szoko E et al. 2016 [231].

    Chiral analysis of amino acids in underivatized form i.e. in their native form is the straightforward way, which does not involve any type of derivatization techniques. Wide difference in polarity among different proteinogenic amino acids holds a chromatographic challenge making the separation difficult using a single chromatographic technique i.e. stationary phase and solvent system. For example, a traditional C18 analytical column (non-polar stationary phase) will not retain the polar amino acids such as Arg, His, Lys, Asp and Glu, on the other hand a HILIC column (polar-stationary phase) will not retain the remaining 15 non-polar amino acids well. Even if a variety of amino acids is retained well in either column, the relative difference between retention times might not be large enough for baseline separation of all the amino acid stereoisomers. Thus, analysis of these proteinogenic amino acids in their underivatized from can be a challenging task. Besides, most of the proteinogenic amino acids do not have any chromophore and cannot be detected using UV detector. However, chiral stationary phases (CSPs) such as α-cyclodextrin, crown ether, zwitterionic selector, teicoplanin, etc. based chiral columns can enable separation of underivatized proteinogenic amino acids. It can be argued that, with mass spectrometry based detection, separation might not be always needed for accurate quantification. However, a good chromatography provides confidence in the accuracy of the mass spectrometry based quantification. Moreover, smaller molecules are difficult to fragment in mass spectrometer and hence are difficult to analyze in tandem mass spectrometry mode (MS/MS). In spite, due to tremendous advancements in stationary phases, chromatographic strategies and mass spectrometers, some tremendously facile routes for underivatized amino acid analysis have been reported to date (Table 6). It should be noted that, amino acids cannot be analyzed by GC without derivatization; chiral ligand exchange chromatography and RP-HPLC require non-volatile solvent and ion-pairing reagents respectively for direct analysis, which are not recommended for mass spectrometry based detection, hence, are not part of Table 6.

    Table 6.  List of direct amino acid analysis approaches in underivatized form.
    Approach Mobile Phase Column Instrument Reference
    LC-MS ACN, EtOH, water, TFA CE, CROWNPAK CR-I(+) and CR-I(−) Shimadzu Nexera LC-Sciex TripleTOF 5600 & Shimadzu LCMS 8060 QqQ [232][234]
    LC-MS ACN, water, FA ZIC-HILIC Agilent 1200 LC-Agilent 6410 QqQ MS [235]
    LC-MS Ammonium formate, MeOH, water, FA ZIC (quinine and quinidine)
    Chiralpak ZWIX(+) and ZWIX(-)
    Agilent 1290 LC-Sceix TripleTOF 5600+ MS [236],[237]
    LC-MS ACN, EtOH, water, TFA CE, CROWNPAK CR-I(+) Sciex Exion LC-Sciex 6500 QqQ MS [238]
    LC-MS MeOH, water, TFA CE, CROWNPAK CR (+) Shimadzu 20 LC-Sciex API 4000 QqQ MS [239]
    LC-MS ACN, water, ammonium acetate HILIC, TSK-Gel Amide 80 Column Agilent 1100 LC-Sciex API 2000 and 3000 QqQ MS [215]
    LC-MS ACN, water, FA Teicoplanin, Chirobiotic T Perkin-Elmer LC-200-Sciex API 3000 QqQ MS [210]
    LC-MS ACN, MeOH, water, FA, Acetic acid SH-ANP, Cogent Diamond Agilent 1100 LC-Agilent 6210 ToF MS [240]
    SFC-MS CO2, MeOH, water, 70 mM ammonium formate ZIC, Chiralpak ZWIX (+) and (−) Waters Acquity Ultra Performance Convergence Chromatography-Waters QDa SQ MS [241],[242]
    SFC-MS CO2, EtOH, water, FA CE, CROWNPAK CR-I (+) Agilent 1260 II Infinity LC-InfinityLab MS [243]
    SFC CO2, MeOH, water Teicoplanin, Chirobiotic T2 Jasco [244]

    Notes: All mass spectrometric detection of underivatized amino acids were performed in positive ionization mode. ACN: Acetonitrile; TFA: Trifluoroacetic acid; FA: Formic acid; LC: Liquid Chromatography Instrument; QqQ: Triple Quadrupole; ToF: Time of Flight; SQ: Single Quadrupole; MS: Mass Spectrometer; CE: Crown Ether; ZIC: Zwitterionic; SH: Silica Hydride; ANP: Aqueous Normal Phase.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Indirect analysis of proteinogenic amino acid utilizes various chemical reagents, which react with amino acids and form derivatives that can offer potential advantages such as chromophore for UV-Vis detection, changes in polarity etc., and can help with better resolution and detection. There are pre-column derivatization and post-column derivatization techniques; former is more popular as post column derivatization cannot be controlled and prone to inconsistency in quantitation between samples during analytical run [245],[246]. Chemical derivatization has some drawbacks such as variation in reaction kinetics between amino acids and their isomers with the derivatizing reagents, stability of the derivatives, removal of excess derivatizing reagents, introduction of racemization due to temperature and pH required for certain derivatization reactions, derivatization time etc. However, this approach allows using the traditional, most reliable and most economic reverse-phase chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry based techniques. Additionally, this offers the flexibility in choosing a suitable derivatizing reagent from a plethora of different reagents that is feasible for a lab. Upon stringent validation in terms of robustness, reproducibility and performance, this approach can be one of the best approaches for targeted amino acid analysis. An exhaustive list of different derivatizing reagents for chiral amino acid analysis can be found in Bhushan R et al. 2004 [247], Ilisz I et al. 2008 [248], Tanwar S et al. 2015 [249], Szoko E et al. 2016 [231] and Marcone GL et al. 2020 [13]. A few notable chiral amino acid analyses using various derivatization techniques are discussed in Table 7.

    Table 7.  List of studies utilizing indirect amino acid analysis in derivatized form.
    Approach Derivatizing Reagent Mobile Phase/Temperature Gradient Column Instrument Reference
    LC (5S,6S,9R)-6-isopropyl-9-methyl-1,4-diazaspiro [4.5]decan-2-one (2)
    (5R,6S,9R)-4-(2-fluoro-3,5-dinitro-benzoyl)-6-isopropyl-9-methyl-1.4-diazaspiro [4.5]decan-2-one
    ACN, water, TFA Kromasil RP 18 Merck/Hitachi LC-Varian MAT 311A MS [250]
    LC-MS* (S)-N-(4-nitrophenoxycarbonyl) phenylalanine methoxyethyl ester ACN, water, MeOH, TFA Vydac C18 Waters M-600 LC-Micromass VG Quattro MS [251],[252],[253]
    10 mM ammonium bicarnonate (pH 9.5), ACN Waters Acquity BEH C18 Waters Acquity UPLC-Waters Xevo QqQ MS
    LC-MS/FLD 6-methoxyquinoline-4-carboxylic acid-succinimide ester (MQ-OSu) ACN, MeOH, 25 mM ammonium formate, FA QN-AX and QD-AX Agilent 1200 LC-Sciex 4000 QTrap QqQ MS [254]
    LC-MS Hydroxy succinimidyl ferrocenyl propionate MeOH, water, 100 mM ammonium formate, FA Cinchona alkaloid based in house prepared column Agilent 1200 LC-Sciex 4000 QTrap QqQ MS [255]
    LC-MS R)-4-nitrophenyl N-[2′-(diethylamino)-6,6′-dimethyL-[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-yl]carbamate hydrochloride ((R)-BiAC) ACN, water, 10 mM ammonium formate, FA Waters Acquity BEH Phenyl column
    YMC Triart Phenyl column
    Shimadzu Nexera LC-Sciex 6500 QqQ MS [256]
    LC-MS Naphthalene-2,3-dicarboxaldehyde (NDA) ACN, water, FA Polymer based RP1 HP 1100 series LC-Mariner ToF MS [257]
    LC-MS 2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl(2-(6-methoxy-4-oxoquinolin-1(4H)-yl)ethyl) carbonate (6-MOQ-EtOCOOSu) ACN, water, FA CAPCELLPAK C18 IF Shiseido NANOSPACE SI-2 series LC-Sciex 5500 QqQ MS [245]
    4-fluoro-7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (NBD-F) ACN, MeOH, ammonium formate, FA Chiralpak QN–AX, Chiralpak ZXIX(+), and KSAACSP-001S
    LC-MS 6-aminoquinolyL-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate (AccQ-Tag) or p-N,N,N-trimethyl ammonioanilyl N′-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate iodide (TAHS) MeOH, Water, 50 mM ammonium formate, 50 mM FA ZIC (Cinchona alkaloid)
    Chiralpak ZWIX(+)
    Shimadzu Nexera X2 LC-Sciex 6500 QTrap QqQ MS [258]
    LC-MS o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) and thiol isobuteryl-L-cysteine (IBLC) ACN, MeOH, 20 mM sodium acetate (pH 6.2) Waters BEH-C18 column Waters Acquity UPLC-Bruker mzXis QqToF MS [259]
    LC-MS* 1-fluoro-2-4-dinitrophenyl-5-L-alanine amide (Marfey's reagent) ACN, water, 10 mM ammonium acetate (pH 6.5) Nucleodur C8 Shimadzu 20A LC-Sciex 3200 QTrap QqQ MS [197],[214]
    GC-MS* Methyl chloroformate, heptafluoro-1-butanol and pyridine T (90–180°C) Chirasil-L-Val QMD 1000 GC–MS [260]
    GC-MS Methyl chloroformate, heptafluoro-1-butanol and pyridine; heptafluorobutyric anhydride (HFBA), 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE) T (60–180°C) Chirasil-L-Val QMD 1000 GC–MS [246]
    GC-MS Ethyl chloroformate, EtOH, Chloropropanol T (100–185°C) Octakis(3-O-butanoyl-2,6-di-O-pentyl)-γ-cyclodextrin (Lipodex E), Agilent CP-Sil 19 CB and Chirasil-L-Val Agilent HP 6890 GC-Agilent 5973 MS [261],[262]
    GC-MS Trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA)-2,2,2-trifluoro-1-ethanol (TFE), TFAA-2,2,3,3,4,4,4-heptafluoro-1-butanol (HFB), and heptafluorobutyric anhydride (HFBA)-HFB T (120–230°C) Chirasil-L-Val and γ-cyclodextrin (Rt-γ-DEXsa) Shimadzu QP-5050 GC-MS [263]
    GC-MS N(O)-pentafluoropropionyl-(2)-propyl esters T (50–195°C) Chirasil-L-Val Shimadzu 17A GC-QP-5000 GC-MS [264]
    Chirasil-L-Val N-propionyl-L-valine-tert-butylamide polysiloxane fused-silica capillary column Varian 3900 GC-MS [265]
    SFC Fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chloride CO2, MeOH, Water ZIC (Cinchona alkaloid)
    Chiralpak ZWIX(+) and ZWIX(−)
    Waters Acquity Ultra Performance Convergence Chromatography [266]
    LC-MS Nα-(2,4-dinitro-5-fluorophenyl)-L-valinamide (L-FDVA) and Nα-(5-fluoro-2,4-dinitrophenyl)-D-leucinamide (D-FDLA) ACN, MeOH, water, FA Zorbax SB-C18 Agilent LC-Agilent G1969A ToF MS [267]
    GC-FID T (80–190°C) L-Chirasil-Val Agilent GC-System with a 6890 N device
    2D LC 5-(dimethylamino)naphthalene-1-sulfonyl chloride (Dns-Cl) ACN, 40 mM ammonium acetate (pH 6.0) 1D: GraceSmart RP18, 2D: Chiralpak QN-AX and QD-AX Shimadzu Class-VP LC-10 [268]
    2D LC 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (Sanger's reagent) ACN, MeOH, water, 100 mM ammonium formate, FA 1D: Zorbax SB-C18, 2D: tBuCQN-Coreshell CSP Agilent 1290 LC [269]
    2D LC-MS 4-fluoro-7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (NBD-F) ACN, MeOH, water, TFA, 5 mM citric acid 1D: KSAARP – micro RP ODS, 2D: KSAACSP – Pirkle type narrowbore-Sumichiral OA-2500S Shiseido NANOSPACE SI-2 series LC-Sciex 5500 QqQ MS [270],[271]
    2D GC-MS N(O,S)-ethoxy-carbonyl heptafluorobutyl ester T1 (40–180°C) 1D: Press-Tight© connected Varian-Chrompack Chirasil-L-Val GC × GC Pegasus IV D-LECO ToF MS [272]
    T1 (offset by 20°C ) (60–210°C) 2D:DB Wax

    Notes: *MS detection performed in (–) ve mode. ACN: Acetonitrile; TFA: Trifluoroacetic acid; FA: Formic acid; tBuCON: tert-butylcarbamoylquinine; LC: Liquid Chromatography Instrument; MS: Mass Spectrometer; QqQ: Triple Quadrupole; Qq: Two Quadrupole (Mass resolving and collision cell); ToF: Time of Flight; SQ: Single Quadrupole; T: Temperature.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Amino acids are important biomolecules, which either play important biochemical roles in different biological systems or indicate occurrence of different biological phenomena. Due to stereochemistry, it is crucial to successfully distinguish the specific stereoisomer responsible for a certain event, for which, an accurate, robust, sensitive, fast and reproducible analytical method is a must. Due to their small size, diverse polarity and absence of chromophore, it is a challenge to achieve baseline separation for different amino acids in a single analytical run using chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry based approaches. Significant advancement in stationary phases, chromatographic and mass spectrometric platforms made direct analysis of amino acids in their native form achievable. However, direct analysis requires specialized stationary phases, such as chiral columns, which might not be feasible or economic in all laboratory settings. Additionally, success of direct analysis utilizing chiral mobile phase additives with an achiral stationary phase depends on the purity of the chiral selectors. Lack of a chromophore does not allow analysis of these amino acids in their native form without a specialized detector such as mass spectrometer. On the other hand, indirect analysis offers selection of plethora of derivatizing reagents, which allows use of traditional stationary phases, chromatographic and mass spectrometric platforms. Although, indirect analysis offers flexibility, it needs to be carefully optimized and monitored routinely to obtain accurate results, as derivatization reactions and derivatives are extremely prone to degradation due to changes in temperature, pH, reaction and storage condition. Both direct and indirect approaches have proven advantages and pitfalls, and the right approach needs to be carefully selected based on the aim of the study, type of samples and the available resources. Myriad analytical methods have been developed till date using various platforms such as IEC, LC-MS, GC-MS, SCF, CE, metal-assisted chromatography, biosensors, multidimensional chromatography and IMS; all have their pros and cons. Direct analysis with chiral mobile phase-achiral stationary phase suffers from lack of control and selectivity of interaction between chiral selector and amino acids. On the other hand, indirect analysis with an ion-pairing reagent-achiral stationary phase requires ion-pairing reagents, which can contaminate the mass spectrometer. In lights of these, direct analysis with a chiral stationary phase and indirect analysis with a chiral derivatizing reagent, provide better analytical performance and could be adopted based on feasibility. However, a carefully developed and validated method using any analytical platform can aid in analyzing proteinogenic amino acid stereoisomers and solely depends on the knowledge, skills and experience of the analytical scientist.

    This review paper discusses important roles of proteinogenic amino acids and their stereoisomers and different analytical approaches to accurately analyze them. In a targeted study, where chiral analysis of amino acids is the primary focus to answer important questions, an indirect approach with chemical derivatization using reverse phase HPLC or GC coupled to mass spectrometry can provide feasible route of their analysis. For example, roles of amino acid stereoisomers in bacterial cell wall biosynthesis can be accurately studied using chemical derivatization with Marfey's reagent and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry technique. However, in global analysis of a physiological model where amino acids are part of the whole metabolome with different other endogenous molecules such as lipids, nucleic acids and sugars in an untargeted manner, such a chemical derivatization is not feasible as a single derivatizing agent might not react to all molecules that belong to different chemical classes. In such cases, direct analysis might be a feasible approach given that the chromatographic performance on the front end is satisfactory and high resolution mass spectrometer is available on the back end to confidently identify the amino acids and their stereoisomers. Now a days, untargeted analysis is often done followed by targeted analysis of the analytes of interest in order to confirm the findings in the former. It is imperative to adhere to strict validation to ensure optimum performance of the analytical platform and sample preparation workflow to accurately and confidently analyze these important biomolecules to identify their functions and explore their roles in different physiological model systems.



    [1] S. Khatiwala, T. Tanhua, S. M. Fletcher, M. Gerber, S. C. Doney, H. D. Graven, et al., Global ocean storage of anthropogenic carbon, Biogeosciences, 10 (2013), 2169–2191. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2169-2013 doi: 10.5194/bg-10-2169-2013
    [2] J. Wu, B. Li, Spatio-temporal evolutionary characteristics of carbon emissions and carbon sinks of marine industry in China and their time-dependent models, Mar. Policy, 135 (2022), 104879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104879 doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104879
    [3] T. DeVries, C. L. Quéré, O. Andrews, Decadal trends in the ocean carbon sink, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 116 (2019), 11646–11651. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900371116 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1900371116
    [4] V. V. S. S. Sarma, M. D. Kumar, T. Saino, Impact of sinking carbon flux on accumulation of deep-ocean carbon in the Northern Indian Ocean, Biogeochemistry, 82 (2007), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-9055-1 doi: 10.1007/s10533-006-9055-1
    [5] M. R. Stukel, L. I. Aluwihare, K. A. Barbeau, A. M. Chekalyuk, R. Goericke, A. J. Miller, et al., Mesoscale ocean fronts enhance carbon export due to gravitational sinksing and subduction, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 114 (2017), 1252–1257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609435114 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609435114
    [6] C. Ma, K. You, D. Ji, W. Ma, F. Li, Primary discussion of a carbon sink in the oceans, J. Ocean Univ. China, 14 (2015), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-015-2548-6 doi: 10.1007/s11802-015-2548-6
    [7] K. Rehdanz, R. S. J. Tol, P. Wetzel, Ocean carbon sinks and international climate policy, Energy Policy, 34 (2006), 3516–3526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.07.015 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.07.015
    [8] L. Gloege, G. A. McKinley, P. Landschützer, A. R. Fay, T. L. Frölicher, J. C. Fyfe, et al., Quantifying errors in observationally based estimates of ocean carbon sink variability, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 35 (2021), e2020GB006788. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006788 doi: 10.1029/2020GB006788
    [9] F. Lacroix, T. Ilyina, G. G. Laruelle, P. Regnier, Reconstructing the preindustrial coastal carbon cycle through a global ocean circulation model: was the global continental shelf already both autotrophic and a CO2 sinks? Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 35 (2021), e2020GB006603. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006603 doi: 10.1029/2020GB006603
    [10] H. J. Jeong, Y. D. Yoo, K. Lee, H. C. Kang, J. S. Kim, K. Y. Kim, Annual carbon retention of a marine-plankton community in the eutrophic masan bay, based on daily measurements, Mar. Biol., 168 (2021), 69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-021-03881-4 doi: 10.1007/s00227-021-03881-4
    [11] A. Olivier, L. L. Vay, S. K. Malham, M. Christie, J. Wilson, S. Allender, et al., Geographical variation in the carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus content of blue mussels, Mytilus edulis, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 167 (2021), 112291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112291 doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112291
    [12] G. K. Vondolia, W. Chen, C. W. Armstrong, M. D. Norling, Bioeconomic modelling of coastal cod and kelp forest interactions: Co-benefits of habitat services, fisheries and carbon sinks, Environ. Resour. Econ., 75 (2020), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00387-y doi: 10.1007/s10640-019-00387-y
    [13] J. Sui, J. Zhang, S. J. Ren, F. Lin, Organic carbon in the surface sediments from the intensive mariculture zone of sanggou bay: Distribution, seasonal variations and dources, J. Ocean Univ. China, 18 (2019), 985–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-019-3768-y doi: 10.1007/s11802-019-3768-y
    [14] A. Roura, J. M. Strugnell, Á. Guerra, Á. F. González, A. J. Richardson, Small copepods could channel missing carbon through metazoan predation, Ecol. Evol., 8 (2018), 10868–10878. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4546 doi: 10.1002/ece3.4546
    [15] J. B. Gallagher, Taking stock of mangrove and seagrass blue carbon ecosystems: A perspective for future carbon trading, Borneo J. Mar. Sci. Aquacult., 1 (2017), 71–74. https://doi.org/10.51200/bjomsa.v1i0.994 doi: 10.51200/bjomsa.v1i0.994
    [16] B. D. Schwartzkopf, S. A. Heppell, A feeding-ecology-based approach to evaluating nursery potential of estuaries for black rockfish, Mar. Coastal Fish., 12 (2020), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcf2.10115 doi: 10.1002/mcf2.10115
    [17] C. Corinaldesi, S. Canensi, A. D. Anno, M. Tangherlini, I. D. Capua, S. Varrella, et al., Multiple impacts of microplastics can threaten marine habitat-forming species, Commun. Biol., 4 (2021), 431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01961-1 doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01961-1
    [18] C. Bertolini, I. Bernardini, D. Brigolin, V. Matozzo, M. Milan, R. Pastres, A bioenergetic model to address carbon sequestration potential of shellfish farming: example from Ruditapes philippinarum in the Venice lagoon, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 78 (2021), 2082–2091. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab099 doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsab099
    [19] J. Guiet, Environmental Impact on Fish Communities in The Global Ocean: A Mechanistic Modeling Approach, 2016.
    [20] J. L. Deng, Control problems of grey systems, Syst. Control Lett., 1 (1982), 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X doi: 10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X
    [21] D. Lei, K. Wu, L. Zhang, W. Li, Q. Liu, Neural ordinary differential grey model and its applications, Expert Syst. Appl., 177 (2021), 114923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114923 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114923
    [22] Y. Kang, S. Mao, Y. Zhang, Variable order fractional grey model and its application, Appl. Math. Modell., 97 (2021), 619–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.03.059 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2021.03.059
    [23] W. Xie, M. Pang, W. Wu, C. Liu, C. X. Liu, A Framework for General Conformable Fractional Grey System Models: A Physical Perspective and Its Actual Application, 2021.
    [24] J. Jiang, T. Feng, C. Liu, An improved nonlinear grey bernoulli model based on the whale optimization algorithm and its application, Math. Probl. Eng., 2021 (2021), 6691724. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6691724 doi: 10.1155/2021/6691724
    [25] L. Yu, X. Ma, W. Wu, X. Xiang, Y. Wang, B. Zeng, Application of a novel time-delayed power-driven grey model to forecast photovoltaic power generation in the Asia-pacific region, Sustainable Energy Technol. Assess., 44 (2021), 100968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100968 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2020.100968
    [26] Z. Xu, L. Liu, L. Wu, Forecasting the carbon dioxide emissions in 53 countries and regions using a non-equigap grey model, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28 (2021), 15659–15672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11638-7 doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11638-7
    [27] J. Wang, P. Du, Quarterly PM2.5 prediction using a novel seasonal grey model and its further application in health effects and economic loss assessment: evidences from Shanghai and Tianjin, China, Nat. Hazards, 107 (2021), 889–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04614-y doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-04614-y
    [28] Y. Cao, K. Yin, X. Li, C. Zhai, Forecasting CO2 emissions from Chinese marine fleets using multivariable trend interaction grey model, Appl. Soft Comput., 104 (2021), 107220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107220 doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107220
    [29] L. Tu, Y. Chen, An unequal adjacent grey forecasting air pollution urban model, Appl. Math. Modell., 99 (2021), 260–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.06.025 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2021.06.025
    [30] S. Ding, R. Li, S. Wu, W. Zhou, Application of a novel structure-adaptative grey model with adjustable time power item for nuclear energy consumption forecasting, Appl. Energy, 298 (2021), 117114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117114 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117114
    [31] S. Ding, R. Lin, Z. Tao, A novel adaptive discrete grey model with time-varying parameters for long-term photovoltaic power generation forecasting, Energy Convers. Manage., 227 (2021), 113644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113644 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113644
    [32] S. Ding, R. Li, S. Wu, A novel composite forecasting framework by adaptive data preprocessing and optimized nonlinear grey bernoulli model for new energy vehicles sales, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 99 (2021), 105847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.105847 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.105847
    [33] M. Wang, W. Wang, L. Wu, Application of a new grey multivariate forecasting model in the forecasting of energy consumption in 7 regions of China, Energy, 243 (2022), 123024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.123024 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.123024
    [34] B. Zeng, H. Li, Prediction of coalbed methane production in China based on an optimized grey system model, Energy Fuels, 35 (2021), 4333−4344. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04195 doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04195
    [35] B. Zeng, M. Zhou, X. Liu, Z. Zhang, Application of a new grey prediction model and grey average weakening buffer operator to forecast China's shale gas output, Energy Rep., 6 (2020), 1608–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.05.021 doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.05.021
    [36] Q. Tang, J. Zhang, J. Fang, Shellfish and seaweed mariculture increase atmospheric CO2 absorption by coastal ecosystems, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 424 (2011), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08979 doi: 10.3354/meps08979
    [37] B. E. Lapointe, M. M. Littler, D. S. Littler, A comparison of nutrient-limited productivity and physiological state in macroalgae from a caribbean barrier reef and mangrove ecosystem, Aquat. Bot., 28 (1987), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(87)90003-9 doi: 10.1016/0304-3770(87)90003-9
    [38] G. Rosenberg, T. A. Probyn, K. H. Mann, Nutrient uptake and growth kinetics in brown seaweeds: response to continuous and single additions of ammonium, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 80 (1984), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(84)90008-X doi: 10.1016/0022-0981(84)90008-X
    [39] D. Xu, G. Bewnn, L. Xu, X. W. Zhang, X. Fan, W. T. Han, et al., Ocean acidification increases iodine accumulation in kelp-based coastal food webs, Global Change Biol., 25 (2019), 629–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14467 doi: 10.1111/gcb.14467
    [40] L. Wu, S. Liu, L. Yao, S. Yan, D. Liu, Grey system model with the fractional order accumulation, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 18 (2013), 1775–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.11.017 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.11.017
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Tuğçe Öztepe, Nermin Büşra Kale, Tuba Reçber, İpek Baysal, Samiye Yabanoğlu-Çiftçi, Mehmet Gumustas, Sedef Kır, Bezhan Chankvetadze, Emirhan Nemutlu, Separation of the enantiomers of underivatized amino acids by using serially connected dual column high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, 2022, 1683, 00219673, 463529, 10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463529
    2. Olha Mykhailenko, Liudas Ivanauskas, Ivan Bezruk, Lyudmila Sidorenko, Roman Lesyk, Victoriya Georgiyants, Characterization of Phytochemical Components of Crocus sativus Leaves: A New Attractive By-Product, 2021, 89, 2218-0532, 28, 10.3390/scipharm89020028
    3. Regina V. Oliveira, Ana Valéria C. Simionato, Quezia B. Cass, Enantioselectivity Effects in Clinical Metabolomics and Lipidomics, 2021, 26, 1420-3049, 5231, 10.3390/molecules26175231
    4. Fenglian Qi, Lin Li, Zhiwei Li, Lili Qiu, Zihui Meng, Yadong Yin, Magnetic/Plasmonic Hybrid Nanodisks with Dynamically Tunable Mechano-Chiroptical Responses, 2023, 1936-0851, 10.1021/acsnano.2c10077
    5. Lin Pu, Chemoselective and enantioselective fluorescent identification of specific amino acid enantiomers, 2022, 58, 1359-7345, 8038, 10.1039/D2CC02363F
    6. Victor V. Dyakin, Vladimir N. Uversky, Arrow of Time, Entropy, and Protein Folding: Holistic View on Biochirality, 2022, 23, 1422-0067, 3687, 10.3390/ijms23073687
    7. Marine Morvan, Ivan Mikšík, Recent Advances in Chiral Analysis of Proteins and Peptides, 2021, 8, 2297-8739, 112, 10.3390/separations8080112
    8. T.N. Lugovitskaya, A.B. Shipovskaya, S.L. Shmakov, X.M. Shipenok, Formation, structure, properties of chitosan aspartate and metastable state of its solutions for obtaining nanoparticles, 2022, 277, 01448617, 118773, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118773
    9. T. N. Lugovitskaya, A. B. Shipovskaya, X. M. Shipenok, Kinetic instability of a chitosan – aspartic acid – water system as a method for obtaining nano- and microparticles, 2021, 8, 2411-1414, 10.15826/chimtech.2021.8.4.05
    10. Eliana Pereira, Filipa A. Fernandes, Filipa Mandim, Manuel Ayuso, Isabel C. F. R. Ferreira, Cristina Caleja, Lillian Barros, 2023, Chapter 10, 978-3-031-18586-1, 331, 10.1007/978-3-031-18587-8_10
    11. Felicia Krämer, Benedikt Gröner, Chris Hoffmann, Austin Craig, Melanie Brugger, Alexander Drzezga, Marco Timmer, Felix Neumaier, Boris D. Zlatopolskiy, Heike Endepols, Bernd Neumaier, Evaluation of 3-l- and 3-d-[18F]Fluorophenylalanines as PET Tracers for Tumor Imaging, 2021, 13, 2072-6694, 6030, 10.3390/cancers13236030
    12. A. B. Shipovskaya, T. N. Lugovitskaya, I. V. Zudina, Biocidal Activity of Chitosan Aspartate Nanoparticles, 2023, 92, 0026-2617, 75, 10.1134/S0026261722602378
    13. Temiloluwa Majekodunmi, Dustin Britton, Jin Kim Montclare, Engineered Proteins and Materials Utilizing Residue-Specific Noncanonical Amino Acid Incorporation, 2024, 124, 0009-2665, 9113, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00855
    14. Xiongwei Yin, Erwin Adams, Ann Van Schepdael, Overview of chromatographic and electrophoretic methods for the determination of branched‐chain amino acids, 2023, 46, 1615-9306, 10.1002/jssc.202300213
    15. X. M. Shipenok, T. N. Lugovitskaya, A. B. Shipovskaya, Structure Formation during the Synthesis of Chitosan L- and D-Asparaginate Nanoparticles, 2024, 98, 0036-0244, 1584, 10.1134/S0036024424700602
    16. Navid J. Ayon, High-Throughput Screening of Natural Product and Synthetic Molecule Libraries for Antibacterial Drug Discovery, 2023, 13, 2218-1989, 625, 10.3390/metabo13050625
    17. Yuting Sun, Qingyu Hu, Jiali Zuo, He Wang, Zhendong Guo, Yulan Wang, Huiru Tang, Simultaneous Quantification of Carboxylate Enantiomers in Multiple Human Matrices with the Hydrazide-Assisted Ultrahigh-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Tandem Mass Spectrometry, 2024, 96, 0003-2700, 18141, 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04187
    18. A. B. Shipovskaya, T. N. Lugovitskaya, I. V. Zudina, Biocidal Activity of Chitosan Asparaginate Nanoparticles, 2023, 92, 0026-3656, 68, 10.31857/S0026365622600547
    19. Xiongwei Yin, Luís Santos Sousa, Bruno André, Erwin Adams, Ann Van Schepdael, Quantification of amino acids secreted by yeast cells by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry, 2024, 47, 1615-9306, 10.1002/jssc.202400318
    20. Devendra Badgujar, Sree Teja Paritala, Shubham Matre, Nitish Sharma, Enantiomeric purity of synthetic therapeutic peptides: A review, 2024, 36, 0899-0042, 10.1002/chir.23652
    21. Simona Felletti, Nicola Marchetti, Chiara De Luca, Martina Catani, Chiara Nosengo, Greta Compagnin, Desiree Bozza, Flavio Antonio Franchina, Luisa Pasti, Alberto Cavazzini, Recent developments and future perspectives of chiral liquid chromatography for food safety and quality, 2024, 176, 01659936, 117740, 10.1016/j.trac.2024.117740
    22. Adelaide R. Mashweu, Vladimir A. Azov, Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery: Anatomy and Molecular Insight into the Self-Assembly of Peptide-Based Hydrogels, 2024, 29, 1420-3049, 5654, 10.3390/molecules29235654
    23. Muboshirkhan Rahimova, Abdurasul Samadov, Erkin Faizullozoda, THE TEMPERATURE INFLUENCE ON THE IONIZATION CONSTANTS OF α- AND β-ALANINE IN AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS, 2024, 2024, 2413-5151, 10.62965/tnu.sns.2024.3.7
    24. Yarden Ben Moshe, Meir Abuaf, Chen Mordechai, Amos Sharoni, Yitzhak Mastai, Enantioselective Crystallization on Chiral Hybrid Magnetic Polymeric Particles, 2025, 2470-1343, 10.1021/acsomega.4c11154
    25. Bethany C. R. Henderson, John M. Sanderson, Andrew Fowles, A review of the foliar application of individual amino acids as biostimulants in plants, 2025, 3, 2731-9598, 10.1007/s44279-025-00222-7
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3560) PDF downloads(357) Cited by(11)

Figures and Tables

Figures(7)  /  Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog