Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Theory article

Effects of oxygen concentration of oxidizer flow on laminar diffusion flame established over liquid fuel beds at microgravity

  • Received: 27 November 2023 Revised: 19 February 2024 Accepted: 28 February 2024 Published: 12 March 2024
  • The effects of oxygen concentration in oxidizer flow with a low speed of 0.1–0.3 m/s on a co-current flame spread over a thin liquid fuel bed at microgravity is numerically studied. The soot model is based on the Laminar Smoke Point (LSP) concept, which was used to reproduce the behaviour of a non-premixed, heavily sooting laminar flame. The results including flame patterns, soot emissions, temperature, and liquid burning rate are examined. Pyrolysis rate of liquid fuel significantly increases by increasing forced flow velocity and oxygen concentration, favouring flame length and soot formation. The flame behaviour at very low strain rates depends on both radiative heat loss and combustion efficiency, which are affected by oxygen concentration. The reactive boundary layer is significantly lifted along the pyrolysis surface due to lack of oxygen in the growing boundary layer, and the 3D effects are of importance due to thermal expansion. The ratio between the flame stand-off distance and the boundary layer thickness converges toward unity, however, the soot resides within the boundary layer. Compared to a heptane flame, a dodecane flame has lower pyrolysis rate and more effective oxygen transport ensures intensive combustion. A high oxidizer flow velocity results in a longer flame, and a reduction in flame standoff distance from the flat plate.

    Citation: Hui Ying WANG, Némo DECAMPS. Effects of oxygen concentration of oxidizer flow on laminar diffusion flame established over liquid fuel beds at microgravity[J]. Metascience in Aerospace, 2024, 1(2): 159-184. doi: 10.3934/mina.2024007

    Related Papers:

    [1] Zhongzi Zhao, Meng Yan . Positive radial solutions for the problem with Minkowski-curvature operator on an exterior domain. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20654-20664. doi: 10.3934/math.20231052
    [2] Wenjia Li, Guanglan Wang, Guoliang Li . The local boundary estimate of weak solutions to fractional p-Laplace equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8002-8021. doi: 10.3934/math.2025367
    [3] Sobajima Motohiro, Wakasugi Yuta . Remarks on an elliptic problem arising in weighted energy estimates for wave equations with space-dependent damping term in an exterior domain. AIMS Mathematics, 2017, 2(1): 1-15. doi: 10.3934/Math.2017.1.1
    [4] Limin Guo, Jiafa Xu, Donal O'Regan . Positive radial solutions for a boundary value problem associated to a system of elliptic equations with semipositone nonlinearities. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1072-1089. doi: 10.3934/math.2023053
    [5] Keqiang Li, Shangjiu Wang . Symmetry of positive solutions of a p-Laplace equation with convex nonlinearites. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 13425-13431. doi: 10.3934/math.2023680
    [6] Zhanbing Bai, Wen Lian, Yongfang Wei, Sujing Sun . Solvability for some fourth order two-point boundary value problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4983-4994. doi: 10.3934/math.2020319
    [7] Lin Zhao . Monotonicity and symmetry of positive solution for 1-Laplace equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6255-6277. doi: 10.3934/math.2021367
    [8] Manal Alfulaij, Mohamed Jleli, Bessem Samet . A hyperbolic polyharmonic system in an exterior domain. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 2634-2651. doi: 10.3934/math.2025123
    [9] Maria Alessandra Ragusa, Abdolrahman Razani, Farzaneh Safari . Existence of positive radial solutions for a problem involving the weighted Heisenberg p()-Laplacian operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 404-422. doi: 10.3934/math.2023019
    [10] Zhiqian He, Liangying Miao . Multiplicity of positive radial solutions for systems with mean curvature operator in Minkowski space. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6171-6179. doi: 10.3934/math.2021362
  • The effects of oxygen concentration in oxidizer flow with a low speed of 0.1–0.3 m/s on a co-current flame spread over a thin liquid fuel bed at microgravity is numerically studied. The soot model is based on the Laminar Smoke Point (LSP) concept, which was used to reproduce the behaviour of a non-premixed, heavily sooting laminar flame. The results including flame patterns, soot emissions, temperature, and liquid burning rate are examined. Pyrolysis rate of liquid fuel significantly increases by increasing forced flow velocity and oxygen concentration, favouring flame length and soot formation. The flame behaviour at very low strain rates depends on both radiative heat loss and combustion efficiency, which are affected by oxygen concentration. The reactive boundary layer is significantly lifted along the pyrolysis surface due to lack of oxygen in the growing boundary layer, and the 3D effects are of importance due to thermal expansion. The ratio between the flame stand-off distance and the boundary layer thickness converges toward unity, however, the soot resides within the boundary layer. Compared to a heptane flame, a dodecane flame has lower pyrolysis rate and more effective oxygen transport ensures intensive combustion. A high oxidizer flow velocity results in a longer flame, and a reduction in flame standoff distance from the flat plate.



    Boundary value problems with p-Laplace operator Δpu=div(|u|p2u) arise in many different areas of applied mathematics and physics, such as non-Newtonian fluids, reaction-diffusion problems, non-linear elasticity, etc. But little is known about the p-Laplace operator cases (p2) compared to the vast amount of knowledge for the Laplace operator (p=2). In this paper, we discuss the existence of positive radial solution for the p-Laplace boundary value problem (BVP)

    {Δpu=K(|x|)f(u),xΩ,un=0,xΩ,lim|x|u(x)=0, (1.1)

    in the exterior domain Ω={xRN:|x|>r0}, where N2, r0>0, 1<p<N, un is the outward normal derivative of u on Ω, K:[r0,)R+ is a coefficient function, f:R+R is a nonlinear function. Throughout this paper, we assume that the following conditions hold:

    (A1) KC([r0,),R+) and 0<r0rN1K(r)dr<;

    (A2) fC(R+,R+);

    For the special case of p=2, namely the Laplace boundary value problem

    {Δu=K(|x|)f(u),xΩ,un=0,xΩ,lim|x|u(x)=0, (1.2)

    the existence of positive radial solutions has been discussed by many authors, see [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The authors of references[1,2,3,4,5,6] obtained some existence results by using upper and lower solutions method, priori estimates technique and fixed point index theory. In [7], the present author built an eigenvalue criteria of existing positive radial solutions. The eigenvalue criterion is related to the principle eigenvalue λ1 of the corresponding radially symmetric Laplace eigenvalue problem (EVP)

    {Δu=λK(|x|)u,xΩ,un=0,xΩ,u=u(|x|),lim|x|u(|x|)=0. (1.3)

    Specifically, if f satisfies one of the following eigenvalue conditions:

    (H1) f0<λ1, f>λ1;

    (H2) f<λ1, f0>λ1,

    the BVP(1.2) has a classical positive radial solution, where

    f0=lim infu0+f(u)u,f0=lim supu0+f(u)u,f=lim infuf(u)u,f=lim supuf(u)u.

    See [7,Theorem 1.1]. This criterion first appeared in a boundary value problem of second-order ordinary differential equations, and built by Zhaoli Liu and Fuyi Li in [8]. Then it was extended to general boundary value problems of ordinary differential equations, See [9,10]. In [11,12], the radially symmetric solutions of the more general Hessian equations are discussed.

    The purpose of this paper is to establish a similar existence result of positive radial solution of BVP (1.1). Our results are related to the principle eigenvalue λp,1 of the radially symmetric p-Laplce eigenvalue problem (EVP)

    {Δpu=λK(|x|)|u|p2u,xΩ,un=0,xΩ,u=u(|x|),lim|x|u(|x|)=0. (1.4)

    Different from EVP (1.3), EVP (1.4) is a nonlinear eigenvalue problem, and the spectral theory of linear operators is not applicable to it. In Section 2 we will prove that EVP (1.4) has a minimum positive real eigenvalue λp,1, see Lemma 2.3. For BVP (1.1), we conjecture that eigenvalue criteria is valid if f0, f0, f and f is replaced respectively by

    fp0=lim infu0+f(u)up1,fp0=lim supu0+f(u)up1,fp=lim infuf(u)up1,fp=lim supuf(u)up1. (1.5)

    But now we can only prove a weaker version of it: In second inequality of (H1) and (H2), λp,1 needs to be replaced by the larger number

    B=[10Ψ(1stp1a(t)dt)ds](p1), (1.6)

    where aC+(0,1] is given by (2.4) and ΨC(R) is given by (2.7). Our result is as follows:

    Theorem 1.1. Suppose that Assumptions (A1) and (A2) hold. If the nonlinear function f satisfies one of the the following conditions:

    (H1) fp0<λp,1, fp>B;

    (H2) fp<λp,1, fp0>B,

    then BVP (1.1) has at least one classical positive radial solution.

    As an example of the application of Theorem 1.1, we consider the following p-Laplace boundary value problem

    {Δpu=K(|x|)|u|γ,xΩ,un=0,xΩ,lim|x|u(x)=0. (1.7)

    Corresponding to BVP (1.1), f(u)=|u|γ. If γ>p1, by (1.5) fp0=0, fp=+, and (H1) holds. If 0<γ<p1, then fp=0, fp0=+, and (H2) holds. Hence, by Theorem 1.1 we have

    Corollary 1. Let K:[r0,)R+ satisfy Assumption (A1), γ>0 and γp1. Then BVP (1.7) has a positive radial solution.

    The proof of Theorem 1.1 is based on the fixed point index theory in cones, which will be given in Section 3. Some preliminaries to discuss BVP (1.1) are presented in Section 2.

    For the radially symmetric solution u=u(|x|) of BVP (1.1), setting r=|x|, since

    Δpu=div(|u|p2u)=(|u(r)|p2u(r))N1r|u(r)|p2u(r),

    BVP (1.1) becomes the ordinary differential equation BVP in [r0,)

    {(|u(r)|p2u(r))N1r|u(r)|p2u(r)=K(r)f(u(r)),r[r0,),u(r0)=0,u()=0, (2.1)

    where u()=limru(r).

    Let q>1 be the constant satisfying 1p+1q=1. To solve BVP (2.1), make the variable transformations

    t=(r0r)(q1)(Np),r=r0t1/(q1)(Np),v(t)=u(r(t)), (2.2)

    Then BVP (2.1) is converted to the ordinary differential equation BVP in (0,1]

    {(|v(t)|p2v(t))=a(t)f(v(t)),t(0,1],v(0)=0,v(1)=0, (2.3)

    where

    a(t)=rq(N1)(t)(q1)p(Np)pr0q(Np)K(r(t)),t(0,1]. (2.4)

    BVP (2.3) is a quasilinear ordinary differential equation boundary value problem with singularity at t=0. A solution v of BVP (2.3) means that vC1[0,1] such that |v|p2vC1(0,1] and it satisfies the Eq (2.3). Clearly, if v is a solution of BVP (2.3), then u(r)=v(t(r)) is a solution of BVP (2.1) and u(|x|) is a classical radial solution of BVP (1.1). We discuss BVP (2.3) to obtain positive radial solutions of BVP (1.1).

    Let I=[0,1] and R+=[0,+). Let C(I) denote the Banach space of all continuous function v(t) on I with norm vC=maxtI|v(t)|, C1(I) denote the Banach space of all continuous differentiable function on I. Let C+(I) be the cone of all nonnegative functions in C(I).

    To discuss BVP (2.3), we first consider the corresponding simple boundary value problem

    {(|v(t)|p2v(t))=a(t)h(t),t(0,1],v(0)=0,v(1)=0, (2.5)

    where hC+(I) is a given function. Let

    Φ(v)=|v|p2v=|v|p1sgnv,vR, (2.6)

    then w=Φ(v) is a strictly monotone increasing continuous function on R and its inverse function

    Φ1(w):=Ψ(w)=|w|q1sgnw,wR, (2.7)

    is also a strictly monotone increasing continuous function.

    Lemma 2.1. For every hC(I), BVP (2.5) has a unique solution v:=ShC1(I). Moreover, the solution operator S:C(I)C(I) is completely continuous and has the homogeneity

    S(νh)=νq1Sh,hC(I),ν0. (2.8)

    Proof. By (2.4) and Assumption (A1), the coefficient a(t)C+(0,1] and satisfies

    10a(t)dt=1[(q1)(Np)]p1r0Npr0rN1K(r)dr<. (2.9)

    Hence aL(I).

    For every hC(I), we verify that

    v(t)=t0Ψ(1sa(τ)h(τ)dτ)ds:=Sh(t),tI (2.10)

    is a unique solution of BVP (2.5). Since the function G(s):=1sa(τ)h(τ)dτC(I), from (2.10) it follows that vC1(I) and

    v(t)=Ψ(1ta(τ)h(τ)dτ),tI. (2.11)

    Hence,

    |v(t)|p2v(t)=Φ(v(t))=1ta(τ)h(τ)dτ,tI.

    This means that (|v(t)|p2v(t)C1(0,1] and

    (|v(t)|p2v(t))=a(t)h(t),t(0,1],

    that is, v is a solution of BVP (2.5).

    Conversely, if v is a solution of BVP (2.5), by the definition of the solution of BVP (2.5), it is easy to show that v can be expressed by (2.10). Hence, BVP (2.5) has a unique solution v=Sh.

    By (2.10) and the continuity of Ψ, the solution operator S:C(I)C(I) is continuous. Let DC(I) be bounded. By (2.10) and (2.11) we can show that S(D) and its derivative set {v|vS(D)} are bounded sets in C(I). By the Ascoli-Arzéla theorem, S(D) is a precompact subset of C(I). Thus, S:C(I)C(I) is completely continuous.

    By the uniqueness of solution of BVP (2.5), we easily verify that the solution operator S satisfies (2.8).

    Lemma 2.2. If hC+(I), then the solution v=Sh of LBVP (2.5) satisfies: vc=v(1), v(t)tvC for every tI.

    Proof. Let hC+(I) and v=Sh. By (2.10) and (2.11), for every tI v(t)0 and v(t)0. Hence, v(t) is a nonnegative monotone increasing function and vC=maxtIv(t)=v(1). From (2.11) and the monotonicity of Ψ, we notice that v(t) is a monotone decreasing function on I. For every t(0,1), by Lagrange's mean value theorem, there exist ξ1(0,t) and ξ2(t,1), such that

    (1t)v(t)=(1t)(v(t)v(0))=v(ξ1)t(1t)v(t)t(1t),tv(t)=tv(1)t(v(1)v(t))=tv(1)tv(ξ2)(1t)tv(1)v(t)t(1t).

    Hence

    v(t)=tv(t)+(1t)v(t)tv(1)=tvC.

    Obviously, when t=0 or 1, this inequality also holds. The proof is completed.

    Consider the radially symmetric p-Laplace eigenvalue problem EVP (1.3). We have

    Lemma 2.3. EVP (1.4) has a minimum positive real eigenvalue λp,1, and λp,1 has a radially symmetric positive eigenfunction.

    Proof. For the radially symmetric eigenvalue problem EVP (1.4), writing r=|x| and making the variable transformations of (2.2), it is converted to the one-dimensional weighted p-Laplace eigenvalue problem (EVP)

    {(|v(t)|p2v(t))=λa(t)|v(t)|p2v(t),t(0,1],v(0)=0,v(1)=0, (2.12)

    where v(t)=u(r(t)). Clearly, λR is an eigenvalue of EVP (1.4) if and only if it is an eigenvalue of EVP (2.12). By (2.4) and (2.9), aC+(0,1]L(I) and 10a(s)ds>0. This guarantees that EVP (2.12) has a minimum positive real eigenvalue λp,1, which given by

    λp,1=inf{10|w(t)|pdt10a(t)wp(t)dt|wC1(I),w(0)=0,w(1)=0,10a(t)wp(t)dt0}. (2.13)

    Moreover, λp,1 is simple and has a positive eigenfunction ϕC+(I)C1(I). See [13, Theorem 5], [14, Theorem 1.1] or [15, Theorem 1.2]. Hence, λp,1 is also the minimum positive real eigenvalue of EVP (1.4), and ϕ((r0/|x|)(q1)(Np)) is corresponding positive eigenfunction.

    Now we consider BVP (2.3). Define a closed convex cone K of C(I) by

    K={vC(I)|v(t)tvC,tI}. (2.14)

    By Lemma 2.2, S(C+(I))K. Let fC(R+,R+), and define a mapping F:KC+(I) by

    F(v)(t):=f(v(t)),tI. (2.15)

    Then F:KC+(I) is continuous and it maps every bounded subset of K into a bounded subset of C+(I). Define the composite mapping by

    A=SF. (2.16)

    Then A:KK is completely continuous by the complete continuity of the operator S:C+(I)K. By the definitions of S and K, the positive solution of BVP (2.3) is equivalent to the nonzero fixed point of A.

    Let E be a Banach space and KE be a closed convex cone in E. Assume D is a bounded open subset of E with boundary D, and KD. Let A:K¯DK be a completely continuous mapping. If Avv for every vKD, then the fixed point index i(A,KD,K) is well defined. One important fact is that if i(A,KD,K)0, then A has a fixed point in KD. In next section, we will use the following two lemmas in [16,17] to find the nonzero fixed point of the mapping A defined by (2.16).

    Lemma 2.4. Let D be a bounded open subset of E with 0D, and A:K¯DK a completely continuous mapping. If μAvv for every vKD and 0<μ1, then i(A,KD,K)=1.

    Lemma 2.5. Let D be a bounded open subset of E with 0D, and A:K¯DK a completely continuous mapping. If Avv and Avv for every vKD, then i(A,KD,K)=0.

    Proof of Theorem 1.1. We only consider the case that (H1)* holds, and the case that (H2)* holds can be proved by a similar way.

    Let KC(I) be the closed convex cone defined by (2.14) and A:KK be the completely continuous mapping defined by (2.16). If vK is a nontrivial fixed point of A, then by the definitions of S and A, v(t) is a positive solution of BVP (2.3) and u=v(r0N2/|x|N2) is a classical positive radial solution of BVP (1.1). Let 0<R1<R2<+ and set

    D1={vC(I):vC<R1},D2={vC(I):vC<R2}. (3.1)

    We prove that A has a fixed point in K(¯D2D1) when R1 is small enough and R2 large enough.

    Since fp0<λp,1, by the definition of fp0, there exist ε(0,λp,1) and δ>0, such that

    f(u)(λp,1ε)up1,0uδ. (3.2)

    Choosing R1(0,δ), we prove that A satisfies the condition of Lemma 2.4 in KD1, namely

    μAvv,vKD1,0<μ1. (3.3)

    In fact, if (3.3) does not hold, there exist v0KD1 and 0<μ01 such that μ0Av0=v0. By the homogeneity of S, v0=μ0S(F(v0))=S(μ0p1F(v0)). By the definition of S, v0 is the unique solution of BVP (2.5) for h=μ0p1F(v0)C+(I). Hence, v0C1(I) satisfies the differential equation

    {(|v0(t)|p2v0(t))=μ0p1a(t)f(v0(t)),t(0,1],v0(0)=0,v0(1)=0. (3.4)

    Since v0KD1, by the definitions of K and D1,

    0v0(t)v0C=R1<δ,tI.

    Hence by (3.2),

    f(v0(t))(λp,1ε)v0p1(t),tI.

    By this inequality and Eq (3.4), we have

    (|v0(t)|p2v0(t))μ0p1(λp,1ε)a(t)v0p1(t),t(0,1].

    Multiplying this inequality by v0(t) and integrating on (0,1], then using integration by parts for the left side, we have

    10|v0(t)|pdtμ0p1(λp,1ε)10a(t)v0p(t)dt(λp,1ε)10a(t)v0p(t)dt. (3.5)

    Since v0KD, by the definition of K,

    10a(t)v0p(t)dtv0Cp10tpa(t)dt=R1p10tpa(t)dt>0.

    Hence, by (2.13) and (3.5) we obtain that

    λp,110|v0(t)|pdt10a(t)v0p(t)dtλp,1ε,

    which is a contradiction. This means that (3.3) holds, namely A satisfies the condition of Lemma 2.4 in KD1. By Lemma 2.4, we have

    i(A,KD1,K)=1. (3.6)

    On the other hand, by the definition (1.6) of B, we have

    B<[1σΨ(1stp1a(t)dt)ds](p1)B(σ0+),σ(0,1). (3.7)

    Since fp>B, by (3.7) there exists σ0(0,1), such that

    B0:=[1σ0Ψ(1stp1a(t)dt)ds](p1)<fp. (3.8)

    By this inequality and the definition of fp, there exists H>0 such that

    f(u)>B0up1,u>H. (3.9)

    Choosing R2>max{δ,H/σ0}, we show that

    AvCvC,vKD2. (3.10)

    For vKD2 and t[σ0,1], by the definitions of K and D2

    v(t)tvCσ0R2>H.

    By this inequality and (3.9),

    f(v(t))>B0vp1(t)B0vp1Ctp1,t[σ0,1]. (3.11)

    Since Av=S(F(v)), by the expression (2.10) of the solution operator S and (3.11), noticing (p1)(q1)=1, we have

    AvCAv(1)=10Ψ(1sa(t)f(v(t))dt)ds1σ0Ψ(1sa(t)f(v(t))dt)ds1σ0Ψ(1sa(t)B0vp1Ctp1dt)ds=Bq10vC1σ0Ψ(1stp1a(t)dt)ds=vC.

    Namely, (3.10) holds. Suppose A has no fixed point on D2. Then by (3.10), A satisfies the condition of Lemma 2.5 in KD2. By Lemma 2.5, we have

    i(A,KD2,K)=0. (3.12)

    By the additivity of fixed point index, (3.6) and (3.11), we have

    i(A,K(D2¯D1),K)=i(A,KD2,K)i(A,KD1,K)=1.

    Hence A has a fixed point in K(D2¯D1).

    The proof of Theorem 1.1 is complete.

    The authors would like to express sincere thanks to the reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundations of China (No.12061062, 11661071).

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.



    [1] Torero JL, Bonneau L, Most JM, et al. (1994) The effect of gravity on a laminar diffusion flame established over a horizontal plate, 25th Symposium (international) on Combustion (Pittsburgh: The Combustion Institute), 25: 1701–1709. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(06)80818-0
    [2] Paul D Ronney (1998) Understanding combustion processes through microgravity research, 27th Symposium (international) on Combustion (Pittsburgh: The Combustion Institute), 27: 2485–2493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(98)80101-X
    [3] Olson SL, T'ien JS (2000) Buoyant low-stretch diffusion flames beneath cylindrical PMMA samples. Combust Flame 121: 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(99)00161-3 doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(99)00161-3
    [4] Legros G, Joulain P, Vantelon JP, et al. (2006) Soot volume fraction measurements in a three dimensional laminar diffusion flame established in microgravity. Combust Sci Technol 178: 813–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200500271344 doi: 10.1080/00102200500271344
    [5] Fuentes A, Legros G, Claverie A, et al. (2007) Influence of the oxidizer velocities on the sooting behaviour of non-buoyant laminar diffusion flame. P Combust Inst 31: 2685–2692.
    [6] Santa KJ, Chao BH, et al. (2007) Radiative extinction of gaseous spherical diffusion flames in microgravity. Combust Flame 151: 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.08.009 doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.08.009
    [7] Konsur B, Megaridis CM, Griffin DW, et al. (1999) Soot aerosol properties in laminar soot-emitting microgravity nonpremixed flames. Combust Flame 118: 509–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(99)00021-8 doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(99)00021-8
    [8] Tyurenkova VV, Smirnova MN (2023) Analytical approach to flame propagation over thermally destructing structured material problem. // Acta Astronautica, Pergamon Press Ltd. (United Kingdom), 213: 438–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.09.020
    [9] Tyurenkova VV, Stamov LI (2019) Flame propagation in weightlessness above the burning surface of material. Acta Astronaut 159: 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.053 doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.053
    [10] Rouvreau S, Torero JL, Joulain P (2005) Numerical evaluation of boundary layer assumptions for laminar diffusion flames in micro gravity. Combust Theor Model 9: 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830500098381 doi: 10.1080/13647830500098381
    [11] Fernandez-Pello AC (1979) Flame spread in a forward forced flow. Combust Flame 36: 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(79)90046-4 doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(79)90046-4
    [12] Fernandez-Pello AC, Mao CP (1981) A unified analysis of concurrent modes of flame spread. Combust Sci Technol 26: 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208108946954 doi: 10.1080/00102208108946954
    [13] Ferkul PV, Y'ien JS (1994) A model of low-speed concurrent flow spread over a thin fuel. Combust Sci Technol 99: 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102209408935440 doi: 10.1080/00102209408935440
    [14] Li C, Liao YTT, James S, et al. (2019) Transient flame growth and spread processes over a large solid fabric in concurrent low-speed flows in microgravity – Model versus experiment. Proc Combust Inst 37: 4163–4171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.168 doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.168
    [15] Urban DL, Ferkul P, Olson S, et al. (2019) Flame spread: Effects of microgravity and scale. Combust Flame 199: 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.10.012 doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.10.012
    [16] Tseng YT, T'ien JS (2010) Limiting length steady spread and nongrowing flames in concurrent flow over solids. J Heat Transfer 132: 091201. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001645 doi: 10.1115/1.4001645
    [17] Zhao X, Liao YTT, Johnston MC, et al. (2017) Concurrent flame growth, spread, and quenching over composite fabric samples in low speed purely forced flow in microgravity. Proc Combust Inst 36: 2971–2978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.028 doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.028
    [18] Mell WE, Kashiwagi T (2000) Effects of finite sample width on transition and flame spread in microgravity. Proc Combust Inst 28: 2785–2792. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80700-6 doi: 10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80700-6
    [19] Guibaud A, Consalvi JL, Orlac'h JM, et al. (2020) Soot production and radiative heat transfer in opposed flame spread over a polyethylene insulated wire in microgravity. Fire Technol 56: 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00850-8 doi: 10.1007/s10694-019-00850-8
    [20] Wen Z, Yun S, Thomson MJ, et al. (2003) Modeling soot formation in turbulent kerosene/air jet diffusion flames. Combust Flame 135: 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(03)00179-2 doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(03)00179-2
    [21] Lui F, Guo HS, Gregory J, et al. (2002) Effects of gas and soot radiation on soot formation in a coflow laminar ethylene diffusion flame. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 73: 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(01)00205-9 doi: 10.1016/S0022-4073(01)00205-9
    [22] Leung KM, Lindstedt RP, Jones WP (1991) A simplified reaction mechanism for soot formation in nonpremixed flames. Combust Flame 87: 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(01)00205-9 doi: 10.1016/S0022-4073(01)00205-9
    [23] Vovelle C, Delfan JL, Reuillon M (1994) Formation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Decane and Kerosene Flames at Reduced Pressure. In: Bockhorn, H. (eds) Soot Formation in Combustion. Springer Series in Chemical Physics, 59. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85167-4_4
    [24] Anderson H, McEnally CS, Pfefferle LD (2000) Experimental study of naphthalene formation pathways in non-premixed methane flames poped with alkylbenzenes, 28th Symposium (international) on Combustion (Pittsburgh: The Combustion Institute), 2577–2585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80675-X
    [25] Hall RJ, Smooke MD, Colket MD (1997) Physical and Chemical Aspects of Combustion, A Tribute to Irvine Glassman, F.L Dryer and R.F Sawyer (Ed.) Gordon & Breach, 189.
    [26] Beji T, Zhang JP, Delichatsios M (2008) Delichatsios, Determination of soot formation rate from laminar smoke point measurements. Combust Sci Technol 180: 927940. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200801894398 doi: 10.1080/00102200801894398
    [27] Mcgrattan K, Mcdermott R, Hostikka S, et al. (2018) Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 6), User's guide, NIST Special Publication.
    [28] Andersen J, Rasmussen CL, Giselsson T, et al. (2009) Global combustion mechanisms for use in CFD modeling under oxy-fuel conditions. Energ Fuel 23: 1379–1389. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef8003619 doi: 10.1021/ef8003619
    [29] Murty KA (1975) Introduction to Combustion Phenomena, New York: Gordon, ISBN 0–6.
    [30] Wang HY, Merino JLF, Dagaut P (2011) Effects of soot formation on shape of a nonpremixed laminar flame established in a shear boundary layer in microgravity. J Phys 327: 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/327/1/012038 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/327/1/012038
    [31] Emmons HW (1956) The film combustion of liquid fuel. Z Angew Math Mech 36: 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19560360105 doi: 10.1002/zamm.19560360105
    [32] Schlichting H (1979) Boundary layer theory, Seventh Edition, McGraw-Hill.
    [33] Fujita O, Ito K, Ito H, et al. (1997) Effect of thermophoretic force on soot agglomeration process in diffusion flame under microgravity, 4th NASA International Microgravity Combustion Workshop, 217–222.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Bo Yang, Radially Symmetric Positive Solutions of the Dirichlet Problem for the p-Laplace Equation, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 2351, 10.3390/math12152351
    2. Yongxiang Li, Pengbo Li, Radial solutions of p-Laplace equations with nonlinear gradient terms on exterior domains, 2023, 2023, 1029-242X, 10.1186/s13660-023-03069-y
    3. 旭莹 唐, The Existence of Positive Solutions to Quasilinear Differential Equation on Infinite Intervals, 2023, 13, 2160-7583, 2103, 10.12677/PM.2023.137217
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1125) PDF downloads(35) Cited by(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog