Research article

Hydrocarbon degradation abilities of psychrotolerant Bacillus strains

  • Received: 18 January 2017 Accepted: 07 June 2017 Published: 13 June 2017
  • Biodegradation requires identification of hydrocarbon degrading microbes and the investigation of psychrotolerant hydrocarbon degrading microbes is essential for successful biodegradation in cold seawater. In the present study, a total of 597 Bacillus isolates were screened to select psychrotolerant strains and 134 isolates were established as psychrotolerant on the basis of their ability to grow at 7 °C. Hydrocarbon degradation capacities of these 134 psychrotolerant isolate were initially investigated on agar medium containing different hydrocarbons (naphthalene, n-hexadecane, mineral oil) and 47 positive isolates were grown in broth medium containing hydrocarbons at 20 °C under static culture. Bacterial growth was estimated in terms of viable cell count (cfu ml–1). Isolates showing the best growth in static culture were further grown in presence of crude oil under shaking culture and viable cell count was observed between 8.3 × 105–7.4 × 108 cfu ml–1. In the final step, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) (chrysene and naphthalene) degradation yield of two most potent isolates was determined by GC-MS along with the measurement of pH, biomass and emulsification activities. Results showed that isolates Ege B.6.2i and Ege B.1.4Ka have shown 60% and 36% chrysene degradation yield, respectively, while 33% and 55% naphthalene degradation yield, respectively, with emulsification activities ranges between 33–50%. These isolates can be used to remove hydrocarbon contamination from different environments, particularly in cold regions.

    Citation: Fulya Kolsal, Zeynep Akbal, Fakhra Liaqat, Oğuzhan Gök, Delia Teresa Sponza, Rengin Eltem. Hydrocarbon degradation abilities of psychrotolerant Bacillus strains[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 467-482. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.467

    Related Papers:

    [1] Temitayo O. Olowomofe, J. O. Oluyege, B.I. Aderiye, O. A. Oluwole . Degradation of poly aromatic fractions of crude oil and detection of catabolic genes in hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria isolated from Agbabu bitumen sediments in Ondo State. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(4): 308-323. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.4.308
    [2] Farzad Rahmati . Characterization of Lactobacillus, Bacillus and Saccharomyces isolated from Iranian traditional dairy products for potential sources of starter cultures. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 815-825. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.815
    [3] Smita H. Panda, Jyothsna Khanna Goli, Sushrirekha Das, NakulanandaMohanty . Production, optimization and probiotic characterization of potential lactic acid bacteria producing siderophores. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 88-107. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.88
    [4] Ananya Mukherjee, Puja Bhattacharjee, Rituparna Das, Arundhati Pal, Amal K. Paul . Endophytic bacteria with plant growth promoting abilities from Ophioglossum reticulatum L.. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 596-612. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.596
    [5] Vakhtang V. Dzhavakhiya, Elena V. Glagoleva, Veronika V. Savelyeva, Natalia V. Statsyuk, Maksim I. Kartashov, Tatiana M. Voinova, Alla V. Sergeeva . New bacitracin-resistant nisin-producing strain of Lactococcus lactis and its physiological characterization. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(4): 608-621. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.608
    [6] Awatif A. Al-Judaibi . Tamarix arabica and Salvadora persica as antibacterial agents. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(2): 121-143. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020008
    [7] Eman Koshlaf, Andrew S Ball . Soil bioremediation approaches for petroleum hydrocarbon polluted environments. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 25-49. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.25
    [8] Alaa Fathalla, Amal Abd el-mageed . Salt tolerance enhancement Of wheat (Triticum Asativium L) genotypes by selected plant growth promoting bacteria. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(3): 250-271. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020016
    [9] Kamila Tomoko Yuyama, Thaís Souto Paula da Costa Neves, Marina Torquato Memória, Iago Toledo Tartuci, Wolf-Rainer Abraham . Aurantiogliocladin inhibits biofilm formation at subtoxic concentrations. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 50-60. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.50
    [10] Thomas Bintsis . Foodborne pathogens. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 529-563. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.529
  • Biodegradation requires identification of hydrocarbon degrading microbes and the investigation of psychrotolerant hydrocarbon degrading microbes is essential for successful biodegradation in cold seawater. In the present study, a total of 597 Bacillus isolates were screened to select psychrotolerant strains and 134 isolates were established as psychrotolerant on the basis of their ability to grow at 7 °C. Hydrocarbon degradation capacities of these 134 psychrotolerant isolate were initially investigated on agar medium containing different hydrocarbons (naphthalene, n-hexadecane, mineral oil) and 47 positive isolates were grown in broth medium containing hydrocarbons at 20 °C under static culture. Bacterial growth was estimated in terms of viable cell count (cfu ml–1). Isolates showing the best growth in static culture were further grown in presence of crude oil under shaking culture and viable cell count was observed between 8.3 × 105–7.4 × 108 cfu ml–1. In the final step, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) (chrysene and naphthalene) degradation yield of two most potent isolates was determined by GC-MS along with the measurement of pH, biomass and emulsification activities. Results showed that isolates Ege B.6.2i and Ege B.1.4Ka have shown 60% and 36% chrysene degradation yield, respectively, while 33% and 55% naphthalene degradation yield, respectively, with emulsification activities ranges between 33–50%. These isolates can be used to remove hydrocarbon contamination from different environments, particularly in cold regions.


    1. Introduction

    Use of hydrocarbons by microorganisms for their growth is called biodegradation of hydrocarbons and the first report about hydrocarbon degradation ability of microorganisms was published in 1895 by Miyoshi. After that hydrocarbon degradation by different species of bacteria, fungus and yeasts have been reported and bacteria were found to be the best group of microorganisms for hydrocarbon biodegradation [1]. Compared to the other physical and chemical methods including photolysis, volatilization, photo-oxidation, chemical oxidation, adsorption combustion, landfill and ultrasonic decomposition, biodegradation is anticipated to be a cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative for removal of hydrocarbons [2].

    Hydrocarbons contain only carbon and hydrogen atoms in their structure and many of these are industrially important compounds. Crude oil as a hydrocarbon mixture is the most imperative hydrocarbon. Benzene, naphthalene, acetylene and many other commonly used chemicals contain hydrocarbon structures [3,4]. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are common pollutants in urban atmospheres [5,6]. The low-aqueous solubility of hydrocarbons including aliphatics, mono and polycyclic-aromatics, increases their recalcitrance to bacteria and limits their biodegradation which leads to continuous contamination of several soil areas and sea water along with harmful effects on the fauna and flora [7]. The presence of hydrocarbon degrading bacteria in the crude oil-contaminated seawater is very important to establish an effective method to bioremediate the contaminated marine environments. PAHs [8]. It was observed that low temperature evidently inhibits the diesel oil-degrading ability of bacteria, since the fluidity of cell membranes is remarkably decreased at low temperature and the exchange of intracellular and extracellular masses is restrained [8].

    Microbial degradation is considered to be the key method involved in degradation of PAH [9]. Thus, more and more research interests are turning to the biodegradation of PAHs. Some microorganisms can utilize PAHs as a source of carbon and energy to degrade PAHs into carbon dioxide and water, or transform them to other nontoxic or less-toxic substances [10]. Microorganisms capable of living in high and low temperature or extreme environments are of great interest now a days. Investigation on biodegradation in cold seawater is becoming more and more essential, due to increased awareness of oil exploration in the arctic areas. However, the majority of research about biodegradation have been conducted at higher temperatures [11].

    Hydrocarbon containing waste accumulation is a problem all over the world, particularly in cold or mild climate areas, as the biodegradation process of hydrocarbons is slower in low temperature. Considering these conditions psychrotolerant bacterial strains are becoming more important [12,13]. The term psychrotolerant is actually used for the mesophilic microorganisms which are cold tolerant and can grow in psychrophilic temperature range. Optimum growth temperature for psychrophilic bacteria is 15 ℃. While, psychrotolerant bacteria have a wider range as they can grow at 40 ℃ and can also survive below 10 ℃ [14,15,16]. The severe climate of northern areas retards the self-remediation of oil pollutants from the soils and water by the indigenous hydrocarbon-oxidizing microflora. Low average annual temperatures, insufficient aeration and shortage of biogenic elements are the key factors that limit the remediation process.

    This study is designed to recover psychrotolerant isolates from "Bacillus Culture Collection of Bioengineering, Department", Ege University, Izmir, Turkey, and to check the biodegradation abilities of these indigenous psychrotolerant isolates against different hydrocarbons. Bacillus species are easy to cultivate and effectual in utilizing complex carbon sources since they are capable of producing a variety of enzymes. Furthermore, this study is carried out to discover psychrotolerant biodegrading bacterial strains therefore, Bacillus species are preferred as they can grow under a wide range of temperatures. Although several works have been done on biodegradation of hydrocarbons and polycyclic aromatic compounds, but the majority of research has been conducted at high temperature and the use of psychrotolerant bacterial strains for this purpose is comparatively very less studied spot. In this work, we studied the ability of psychrotolerant microorganisms isolated from natural localities to degrade oil components in order to use them for bioremediation process in cold areas.


    2. Materials and Methods


    2.1. Screening of psychrotolerant Bacillus isolates

    A total of 597 different Bacillus isolates from "Bacillus Culture Collection of Bioengineering, Department", Ege University, Izmir, Turkey, were administered in this study. All these isolates were inoculated on CASO (Casein-peptone Soymeal-peptone Agar/Merck 105458) agar plates and incubated at 7 and 10 ℃ for 21 days to determine psychrotolerant isolates among these. Isolates showing growth at 7 ℃ were considered as psychrotolerant and further inoculated on CASO agar and incubated at 4 ℃ for 21 days to determine lower temperature limit and at 43 and 47 ℃ for 24–48 hours to determine the upper temperature limit [15].


    2.2. Screening of hydrocarbon degradation abilities of psychrotolerant Bacillus isolates

    To screen the naphthalene, hexadecane and mineral oil degradation capabilities of psychrotolerant Bacillus on solid medium, modified method of Demir et al. 2000 [17] was used. To prepare cell suspension for inoculum, bacterial cultures were inoculated in nutrient broth and incubated at 30 ℃ for 18 hours. At the end of incubation, the broth was centrifuged at 9000 rpm for 15 min and obtained pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of 0.85% sterile NaCl solution and centrifuged two times with this solution to wash the pellet. Washed pellet was resuspended in 10 ml sterile distilled water and used as inoculum. Solidified Bushnell Haas agar plates were poured with 200 μl sterile mineral oil, 200 μl sterile hexadecane and 200 μl of sterile naphthalene solution separately and poured solutions were evenly spread on the surface of the solidified agar with the help of sterile L-shaped rod. Prepared bacterial inoculums were inoculated on these plates and incubated at 20 ℃ for two weeks. Plates having bacterial growth after two weeks were considered positive for biodegradation of added hydrocarbons [17,18].


    2.3. Confirmation of hydrocarbon degradation abilities of psychrotolerant Bacillus isolates

    Three sets of Bushnell Haas broth, two for each hydrocarbon was prepared in 150 ml flasks. The 1% hexadecane and 1% mineral oil were added before autoclaving the medium while naphthalene solution was separately autoclaved and aseptically added later. The 1% bacterial cell suspension or inoculum (prepared by the above mentioned method) was added and flasks were incubated statically at 20 ℃ for 21 days. The pH of medium was noted before inoculation and daily after incubation. At the end of the incubation viable count was measured by pour plate method [18,19,20].


    2.4. Crude oil degradation testing

    Isolates showing positive results for hydrocarbon degradation in broth medium under static culture conditions were selected to determine their abilities of degrading crude oil under shaking culture conditions. The Bushnell Haas broth was added with 1% crude oil and autoclaved to sterilize. Prepared medium was inoculated with bacterial cell suspensions of selected isolates and incubated at 20 ℃ at 200 rpm for 10 days. The pH of medium was noted before inoculation and daily after incubation. At the end of the incubation viable count was measured by pour plate method [21].


    2.5. PAHs degradation testing and emulsifying activity

    Two best hydrocarbon degrading Bacillus isolates were selected and further studied for their ability to degrade PAHs, chrysene and naphthalene were selected as PAH. Inoculum was prepared according to the above mentioned method and the Bushnell Haas broth was prepared by adding 50 mg L–1 chrysene and 100 mg L–1 naphthalene. The 1% bacterial suspension was inoculated into the broth and incubated at 20 ℃ and 200 rpm for 6 days. With two inoculated flasks containing broth added with chrysene (50 mg L–1) and naphthalene (100 mg L–1) two uninoculated flasks were also incubated to serve as controls. The sample was collected from the inoculated broth after every 24 hours to measure the pH, dry mass and viable count. To determine emulsifying activity, 2 ml sample was collected in two different tubes after 48 hours of incubation and 3 ml hexadecane was added in one tube while 3 ml mineral oil was added in the second tube. Tubes were vortexed for 2 min and incubated at room temperature for 24 hours. After incubation the height of the emulsion layer was measured and divided by total height and multiplied by 100 to calculate emulsion index (E24) [18,22].


    2.6. PAH analysis by GC-MS

    GC-MS analysis was used to determine degradation yields of PAHs from the inoculated medium [2,23]. Prior to GC analysis samples removed from inoculated and control broth were prepared by using Amberlite XAD-2 resin of 47 mm diameter. Samples were passed from the resin and obtained liquid was mixed with 30 ml acetone/hexane and kept at sonicator for 60 min. The supernatant of phase separation was collected in clean vial and reduced up to 2 ml with nitrogen gas [24]. For GC-MS analysis of PAHs, naphthalene (NAF) and chrysene (CHR), initial oven temperature was set to 50 ℃ for 1 minute and raised to 200 ℃ at the rate of 25 ℃ per minute. From 200 ℃ oven temperature is further raised to 300 ℃ at the rate of 8 ℃ per minute and 5.5 minutes retention time was selected. Ion source for Injector was determined and guadrapol temperatures were selected as 295,300 and 180 ℃. High purity Helium gas was used as carried gas at 1.5 ml–1, 45 cm s–1 flow rate [25].


    3. Results and Discussion

    Psychrophilic and psychrotolerant microorganisms are habitually found in low temperature ecosystems [26,27]. Difficult elimination of hydrocarbon pollution in cold regions is a reason for growing research interests regarding psychrotolerant hydrocarbon degrading species [20,28,29]. Psychrotolerant Bacillus isolates examined in this study for their hydrocarbon degradation capacities can be used as an effective tool to deal with hydrocarbon impurities. Psychrotolerance was previously observed in Bacillus sp., isolated from oil-contaminated soils in the study performed by Zhan et al [30]. A total of 597 Bacillus isolates found in "Bioengineering Culture Collection" of Ege University, Izmir, Turkey were inoculated on CASO agar plates and incubated at 10 and 7 ℃ temperature for 21 days. These temperature ranges were determined by literature review [14,19,31]. The results determined that out of 597 isolates 388 (65%) isolates have shown growth at 10 ℃ and 134 (22%) isolates have shown the capacities to grow at 7 ℃. These 134 isolates were tested for their growth capabilities at 4 ℃ and only 25 isolates have shown growth at 4 ℃. The upper temperature limits of 134 psychrotolerant isolates were determined by incubating them at 43 and 47 ℃. Out of 134 psychrotolerant isolates 132 were capable of growing at 43 ℃ and 99 isolates have shown growth at 47 ℃. In a previous study, temperature limits for Bacillus cereus, Bacillus mycoides, Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus anthracis were determined and the isolates grown at 7 ℃ or below were considered as psychrotolerant [14]. Another study on Bacillus sp. recovered from the tropical Atlantic and Antarctic and Arctic oceans was conducted at various temperatures (1, 2, 4, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 37 ℃). The results determined that most of the isolates have an upper limit of 30 ℃ and a lower limit of 8 ℃, dissimilar to our study [32].

    Hydrocarbon degradation capabilities of psychrotolerant isolates were initially determined on Bushnell Haas agar. Results depicted that out of 134 psychrotolerant isolates only 18 (13%) isolates have shown an absence of growth in the presence of hydrocarbons and 116 (87%) isolates have shown hydrocarbon degradation abilities against at least one of the selected hydrocarbon. A total of 47 isolates have shown the capabilities to degrade all three selected hydrocarbons (data not shown here). These 47 isolates were further tested for hydrocarbon degradation abilities in broth medium under static culture conditions and the results were represented as biomass (cfu ml–1) (Table 1). In literature biodegradation studies were mostly carried out by shaking culture methods typically at 150–200 rpm [33,34,35]. However, static culture conditions are more appropriate to reflect naturally existing ecosystem. According to the results obtained from static culture experiments five best isolates have been selected and grown in the presence of 1% crude oil as a carbon source in Bushnell Haas broth media under shaking culture conditions. Keeping in mind the temperature tolerance of psychrotolerant microbes and considering the weather conditions of natural environments, incubation temperature was set to 20 ℃ in our study. Biomass obtained after 5 and 10 days in shaking culture experiments are presented in Table 2. Trejo-Hernandez et al [33] determined the biomass after five days as 4.0 × 105 cfu ml–1 in shaking culture in the presence of crude oil as carbon source. On 15th day this number reached to 109 cfu ml–1. In contrast to previous reports, our isolate Bacillus Ege B.6.2i has shown higher growth rate at the end of 5th day (1.2 × 107 cfu ml–1), the rate gradually increased and reached to 7.4 × 108 cfu ml–1 at 10th day. Similarly Bacillus Ege B 1.4 and Bacillus Ege B 39.1 isolates have also shown higher biomass production at 5th days as compared to literature (Table 2).

    Table 1. Degradation of hydrocarbons by psychrotolerant Bacillus isolates in static culture.
    Isolate code Biomass (cfu ml–1) of bacteria calculated after 21 days
    Hexadecane Naphthalene Mineral oil
    Bacillus Ege B.12.3i 5.5 × 104 4.0 × 104 1.9 × 104
    Bacillus Ege B.42.5 5.6 × 106 1.4 × 107
    Bacillus Ege B.13.3i 2.9 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B.27.1 7.6 × 104 1.8 × 104
    Bacillus Ege B.27.2 1.2 × 106 1.1 × 107 2.4 × 106
    Bacillus Ege B.25.3 4.1 × 105 1.5 × 106
    Bacillus Ege B.25.4 7.5 × 104 1.7 × 105 1.8 × 104
    Bacillus Ege B.9.2i 6.3 × 105 1.7 × 106
    Bacillus Ege B.6.3i 1.1 × 106 1.0 × 106 1.3 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B.45.1 5.1 × 106 5.3 × 106 9.3 × 106
    Bacillus Ege B.22.2 1.6 × 107 7.0 × 107
    Bacillus Ege B 44.4 5.3 × 105 4.8 × 105 3.5 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B 1.26 3.7 × 106 2.2 × 106 1.2 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B 1.2k 1.4 × 106 1.7 × 106 2.3 × 106
    Bacillus Ege B 1.3F 2.0 × 104
    Bacillus Ege B 1.2F 7.6 × 105 2.0 × 105 1.3 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B 2.8.2 1.5 × 106 1.9 × 106 1.3 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B 36.3 3.0 × 105 5.5 × 105 1.6 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B 31.4 4.7 × 105 8.3 × 105 1.0 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B 39.1 2.2 × 107 2.0 × 107 1.1 × 107
    Bacillus Ege B 29.1 1.7 × 106 2.0 × 106 1.8 × 106
    Bacillus Ege B 23.2i 1.5 × 106 1.6 × 106 1.3 × 106
    Bacillus Ege B 1.25k 1.4 × 106 1.7 × 106 1.1 × 106
    Bacillus Ege Bi 1.2 1.8 × 106 2.6 × 105 3.0 × 105
    Bacillus Ege Bi 1.3 3.2 × 106 1.3 × 106 5.9 × 106
    Bacillus Ege Bi 1.9 3.8 × 106 4.5 × 106 4.0 × 106
    Bacillus Ege B 2d.7 2.8 × 106 2.5 × 106
    Bacillus Ege B 6.2i 1.1 × 107 4.0 × 106 8.8 × 106
    Bacillus Ege B 1.3
    Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka 3.7 × 106 3.7 × 106 2.7 × 106
    Bacillus Ege B 12.3i
    Bacillus Ege B 25.5
    Bacillus Ege B 2d.9
    Bacillus Ege B 8.4.F 1.0 × 106
    Bacillus Ege B.8.1.F 1.5 × 105 5.2 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B.17.2i 2.3 × 105 2.6 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B.24.4 2.2 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B.24.5 2.8 × 106 8.4 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B.11.8i 2.4 × 106 3.7 × 106 7.0 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B.1.18k 1.7 × 105 4.2 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B 31.2 2.3 × 104 6.0 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B 42.2 1.5 × 105 1.5 × 105 1.5 × 104
    Bacillus Ege B 19.1i 2.5 × 104 1.5 × 105 3.3 × 104
    Bacillus Ege B 43.4 2.0 × 104 8.0 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B 22.3i 4.1 × 105 4.2 × 106 5.0 × 104
    Bacillus Ege B 44.3 7.5 × 105 6.8 × 105 6.7 × 104
    Bacillus Ege B 40.5 3.5 × 104 2.0 × 105
    (–, < 104 cfu ml–1)
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2. Crude oil degradation by psychrotolerant Bacillus isolates in shaking culture.
    Isolate Biomass in presence of crude oil
    5th day 10th day
    Bacillus Ege B.45.1 5.1 × 105 8.3 × 105
    Bacillus Ege B.39.1 5.7 × 106 1.3 × 107
    Bacillus Ege Bi.1.9 5.6 × 105 2.2 × 106
    Bacillus Ege B.6.2i 1.2 × 107 7.4 × 108
    Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka 2.6 × 106 9.6 × 106
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The degradation activity of the bacteria changes according to the structure of the substrate provided [36]. Depending on the differences in structure a priority pattern has been assessed for the biodegradation of hydrocarbons. This pattern can be represented as n-alkanes > branched alkanes > low molecular weight aromatics > cycloalkanes [29]. Therefore, while comparing crude oil to hexadecane, naphthalene and mineral oil as a substrate in bacterial growth medium, crude oil was found to be the most beneficial carbon source. The complex structure of crude oil consists of various compounds which provide bacteria a chance to degrade if not all then at least a few of these compounds. With this reason in mind, isolates were grown in the presence of crude oil in shaking culture. According to the results isolate Bacillus Ege B.8.4.F has shown no growth in the presence of hexadecane and mineral oil while in the presence of crude oil, the biomass reached to 1.2 × 106 cfu ml–1 in a short period of just 5 days (Table 2). Bacillus Ege B.8.1.F has shown 1.5 × 105 cfu ml–1 after 21 days in the presence of hexadecane as carbon source while in the presence of crude oil the count was noted as 9.8 × 105 cfu ml–1 after 5 days. These results depicted that the growth characteristics vary according to the carbon sources as previously mentioned in literature [36].

    After the screening of biodegradation abilities in agar and broth mediums (static and shaker culture) on the basis of results Bacillus Ege B.6.2i and Bacillus Ege B.1.4.Ka were selected as two best biodegrading isolates. These two isolates were tested for their biodegradation potential against PAHs (naphthalene and chrysene); more specific and toxic group of hydrocarbons. Isolates were incubated for 6 days at 20 ℃ in shaking culture. The pH changes of the broth (Figure 1 and Figure 2), dry mass (Table 3) and viable cell counts (cfu ml–1) (Table 4) were calculated on daily bases. In a previous study pH changes were observed in the Bushnell Hass medium for 15 days and a minor change in pH has been observed in contrast to our study [21]. Dry mass for both isolates was gradually increased until 6 days and Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka has shown the maximum dry mass (0.51 g 50 ml–1). In a study conducted with Bacillus and Pseudomonas sp. using chrysene as a carbon source dry mass was noted as 0.2 g 50 ml–1 for Bacillus sp. and 0.3 g 50 ml–1 for Pseudomonas sp. after 7 days, which is lesser as compared to our results [35].

    Figure 1. Graph showing pH changes of chrysene containing medium for Bacillus Ege B.6.2i and Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka.
    Figure 2. Graph showing pH changes of naphthalene containing medium for Bacillus Ege B.6.2i and Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka.
    Table 3. Dry mass of Bacillus Ege B.6.2i and Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka in presence of PAHs.
    Dry mass measures g 50 ml–1
    Hydrocarbon Isolate Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6
    Naphthalene Bacillus Ege B.6.2i 0.02 0.04 0.21 0.35 0.33 0.30
    Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka 0.01 0.03 0.32 0.38 0.43 0.51
    Chrysene Bacillus Ege B.6.2i 0.01 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.40
    Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka 0.01 0.02 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.30
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 4. Viable count of Bacillus Ege B.6.2i and Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka in presence of PAHs.
    Days cfu ml–1 in presence of naphthalene cfu ml–1 in presence of chrysene
    Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka Bacillus Ege B.6.2i Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka Bacillus Ege B.6.2i
    1 1.1 × 105 1.5 × 105 3.8 × 105 4.0 × 104
    2 1.0 × 105 3.4 × 105 4.1 × 105 8.5 × 104
    3 1.8 × 105 7.1 × 105 6.4 × 105 3.3 × 105
    4 4.5 × 105 3.0 × 105 5.8 × 105 3.1 × 105
    5 5.5 × 105 1.8 × 105 7.4 × 105 3.1 × 105
    6 8.6 × 105 1.2 × 105 1.7 × 105 1.2 × 106
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Chrysene and naphthalene residual amounts were measured by GC-MS and results were mentioned in the Table 5 and Table 6. In control flask 80% recovery has been observed for chrysene while for naphthalene this value is recorded up to 86%. According to the results of samples, isolate Bacillus Ege B.6.2i has shown better results in terms of removal of chrysene from the medium than isolate Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka. GC-MS results were represented in graphs (Figure 3 and Figure 4). GC-MS analysis of naphthalene for Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka and Bacillus Ege B.6.2i were shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. In past studies PAH analysis has been carried out using GC-MS, with similar kind of methods [2,21,22,33,34,35]. According to the data in the literature a recovery rate of 88% ± 2 was reported in control flasks using chrysene as substrate [35]. In another study chrysene degradation capacity of Bacillus and Pseudomonas sp. has been studied by GC analysis and degradation efficacy was recorded as 17% for Bacillus sp. and 15% for Pseudomonas sp. [35]. Christova et al [22] worked with n-hexadecane and naphthalene degrading Bacillus subtilis 22BN strain and studied the relation between hydrocarbon degradation and bio-surfactant (rhamnolipid) production.

    Table 5. GC-MS analysis of chrysene degradation capacity of Bacillus Ege B.6.2i and Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka.
    Isolate Initial chrysene quantity (mg L–1) Chrysene quantity recovered from GC-MS (mg L–1) Recovery (%) Yield (%)
    Control 50 40 80
    Bacillus Ege B.6.2i 50 15.45 60
    Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka 50 25.5 36
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 6. GC-MS analysis of naphthalene degradation capacity of Bacillus Ege B.6.2i and Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka.
    Isolate Initial naphthalene quantity (mg L–1) Naphthalene quantity recovered from GC-MS (mg L–1) Recovery (%) Yield (%)
    Control 100 86 86
    Bacillus Ege B.6.2i 100 59.05 33
    Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka 100 38.9 55
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 3. GC-MS analysis of chrysene for Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka.
    Figure 4. GC-MS analysis of chrysene for Bacillus Ege B.6.2i.
    Figure 5. GC-MS analysis of naphthalene for Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka.
    Figure 6. GC-MS analysis of naphthalene for Bacillus Ege B.6.2i.

    In most of the previous studies emulsification activity measurement is done by using the method of Cooper and Goldenberg (1987) [23], but few researchers have modified this method in their works. These modifications include the use of different hydrophobic substrate like toluene, xylene, mineral oil or crude oil as an alternative of kerosene [2,18,35,37]. In our study Cooper and Goldenberg's method [23] is modified and the transfer tube volume is reduced by half (3/2 ml) while mineral oil was used as hydrophobic substrate instead of kerosene. Emulsification indexes calculated in past studies are in accordance with our results [35]. Emulsification index values were found to be higher when high viable counts were present in the chrysene biodegradation experiment (Table 7). Literature shows high emulsification activities up to 53% in presence of chrysene for bio-surfactant production. Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka isolates showed naphthalene removal of 55% and the emulsifying activity was measured as 40%. Naphthalene degradation activity was found higher for Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka while, emulsification activity was higher for isolates Bacillus Ege B.6.2i (Table 7). In case of high emulsification activity the increase in biodegradation activity was observed in our results. All these assessments are in line with the literature [18,35].

    Table 7. Viable count, GC-MS analysis and emulsification activities in presence of PAHs.
    PAH Isolate Viable cell count (cfu ml–1)a Hydrocarbon removal (%) Emulsification activity (%)b
    Naphthalene Bacillus Ege B.6.2i 1.2 × 105 33 37
    Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka 8.6 × 105 55 40
    Chrysene Bacillus Ege B.6.2i 1.2 × 106 60 50
    Bacillus Ege B.1.4Ka 1.7 × 105 36 33
    a, after 6 days; b, after 2 days.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Naphthalene was the only hydrocarbon degraded by isolates under static as well as shaking culture. In static and shaking culture experiment results depicted that shaking culture experiment has shown better results in less time. In a previous study with static and shaking culture conditions naphthalene degradation yield was recorded as 50% after 24 hours in static culture, on the other hand, for shaking culture this value was reported as 95% [38]. However, determining best culture condition for highest biodegradation was not the goal of our present study, but the purpose was to find potential bioremediation agents capable of degrading hydrocarbons in natural environment under unfavourable conditions. Therefore, static culture results are more important as the static culture conditions more closely reflect the natural environmental condition. Accumulation of hydrophobic contaminants on the surface of the medium in a static culture environment would be a more realistic scenario [39]. In case of accidents and leaks occurring in the sea, resulting in spilled oil, it is not possible to provide ideal ecosystem to accelerate the disintegration of leaked oil therefore, isolates showing good results under static culture are believed to be more effective to remove the contaminants from ecosystem under unfavourable conditions. In our study hydrocarbon concentrations are kept very high in the growth medium to create an environment close to accidental oil spill. Studies are found where up to milligram concentration of hydrocarbon had been used in the growth medium [22].

    Bacillus isolates are being considered as an effective organism for biodegradation of hydrocarbons. A survey conducted in Lagos region of Nigeria, nine different bacteria isolated from hydrocarbon contaminated tropical river were identified as hydrocarbon degraders including Pseudomonas fluorescens, P. aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus sp., Alcaligenes sp., Acinetobacter lwoffi, Flavobacterium sp., Micrococcus roseus and Corynebacterium sp. [40]. In another study B.subtilis DM-04, P.aeruginosa M and NM isolates were examined for crude oil biodegradation and all isolates have been recommended as effective bioremediation agents [41]. With other microorganisms different Bacillus species have also been recognized as effective biodegrading agents in many past studies [2,36]. In addition to other studies our work also recommends effectiveness of Bacillus sp. for biodegradation but in contrast to other finding instead of using mesophilic isolates this study has been conducted with psychrotolerant isolates. Similar to our findings, in a study Antarctic marine bacteria have been isolated and biodegrading studies have been conducted at 4 and 15 ℃ [20]. Margesin and Schinner [42] have studied diesel oil biodegradation abilities of RM8/11 psychrotolerant isolate at 10 ℃ with different concentrations of bio-surfactants. In another study hydrocarbon degradation psychrotolerant bacteria isolated from the surface of Antarctic sea were studied at 4 ℃ for their diesel oil degradation properties [13]. In recent studies, it was reported that a number of aerobic bacteria have been used to biodegrade naphthalene with several pathways and metabolic diversities [7]. For example, Zhuang et al [43] found that Bacillus naphthovorans is capable to degrade the anthracene from the oil-contaminated tropical marine sediments with a yield of 77% at 43 ℃. Lin et al [7] found 78% anthracene removal by biodegradation process using Bacillus fusiformis at 27–30 ℃. Swaathy et al [44] observed 67% anthracene removal using Bacillus licheniformis MTCC 5514 at 28 ℃. Dhote et al [35] investigated the chrysene biodegradation with a yield of 72% at 28 ℃ under aerobic conditions with enzymes namely catechol 1, 2-dioxygenase and catechol 2, 3-dioxygenase catalyzing the chrysene mineralization. Ukiwe et al [45] obtained 45% chrysene removal with different bacteria isolates. Cold-adapted indigenous microorganisms play a significant role in the in-situ biodegradation of hydrocarbons in cold environments, where temperatures often coincide with their growth temperature range. The capability to utilize a wide range of hydrocarbons is advantageous for the treatment of mixed pollutions.


    4. Conclusions

    The strains investigated in this study could grow and degrade hydrocarbons over a broad temperature range. The application of such degraders is advantageous in cold and temperate environments that undergo (diurnal and/or seasonal) thermal fluctuations. Such strains are useful at low temperature and consequently can be used for low-energy treatment of industrial effluents contaminated with hydrocarbons. In addition, they could also be useful for the construction of biosensors for the selective, sensitive and rapid monitoring or in situ analysis of pollution. In brief, psychrotolerant Bacillus isolates have shown a great potential for the low-temperature biodegradation of hydrocarbons. Considering their great metabolic versatility, the contribution of these bacteria to the biodegradation of hydrocarbons in the environment and as a potentially exploitable enzyme producer is much more important than currently expected.


    Acknowledgements

    The authors wish to thank to Dokuz Eylül University Research Foundation (BAP) for the supporting the project namely "Removal of Petrochemical Industry Wastewaters in Anaerobic and Aerobic sequentials". This study was supported in part by the Scientific Research Foundation of Dokuz Eylul University (Project No. 2007. KB.FEN.057).


    Conflict of Interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


    [1] Kaczorek E, Chrzanowski L, Pijanowska A, et al. (2008) Yeast and bacteria cell hydrophobicity and hydrocarbon biodegradation in the presence of natural surfactants: Rhamnolipides and saponins. Bioresource Technol 99: 4285–4291. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.08.049
    [2] Toledo FL, Calvo C, Rodelas B, et al. (2006) Selection and identification of bacteria isolated from waste crude oil with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons removal capacities. Syst Appl Microbiol 29: 244–252. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.09.003
    [3] Solomons TWG, Fryhle CB (2000) Organic Chemistry, 7 Eds., New York: Wiley, 1–30.
    [4] Li H, Liu YH, Luo N, et al. (2006) Biodegradation of benzene and its derivatives by a psychrotolerant and moderately haloalkaliphilic Planococcus sp. strain ZD22. Res Microbiol 157: 629–636.
    [5] Chen HY, Teng YG, Wang JS (2013) Source apportionment for sediment PAHs from the Daliao River (China) using an extended fit measurement mode of chemical mass balance model. Ecotox Environ Safe 88: 148–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.11.007
    [6] Sawadogo A, Otoidobiga HC, Nitiema LW, et al. (2016) Optimization of hydrocarbons biodegradation by bacterial strains isolated from wastewaters in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: case study of SAE 40/50 used oils and diesel. J Agric Chem Environ 5: 1–11.
    [7] Lin C, Gan L, Chen ZL (2010) Biodegradation of naphthalene by strain Bacillus fusiformis (BFN). J Hazard Mater 182: 771–777. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.101
    [8] Deng MC, Li J, Liang FR, et al. (2014) Isolation and characterization of a novel hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium Achromobacter sp. HZ01 from the crude oil-contaminated seawater at the Daya Bay, southern China. Mar Pollut Bull 83: 79–86.
    [9] Yuan SY, Shiung LC, Chang BV (2002) Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by inoculated microorganisms in soil. B Environ Contam Tox 69: 66–73. doi: 10.1007/s00128-002-0011-z
    [10] Perelo LW (2010) Review: In situ and bioremediation of organic pollutants in aquatic sediments. J Hazard Mater 177: 81–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.090
    [11] Delille D, Pelletier E, Rodriguez-Blanco A, et al. (2009) Effects of nutrient and temperature on degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in sub-Antarctic coastal seawater. Polar Biol 32: 1521–1528. doi: 10.1007/s00300-009-0652-z
    [12] Männistö MK, Häggblom MM (2006) Characterization of psychrotolerant heterotrophic bacteria from Finnish Lapland. Syst Appl Microbiol 29: 229–243. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.09.001
    [13] Giudice AL, Casella P, Carusa C, et al. (2010) Occurrence and characterization of psychrotolerant hydrocarbon-oxidizing bacteria from surface seawater along the Victoria Land coast. Polar Biol 33: 929–943. doi: 10.1007/s00300-010-0770-7
    [14] Lechner S, Mayr R, Francis KP, et al. (1998) Bacillus weihenstephanensis sp. nov. is a new psychrotolerant species of the Bacillus cereus group. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48: 1373–1382.
    [15] El-Rahman HAA, Fritze D, Spröer C, et al. (2002) Two novel psychrotolerant species, Bacillus psychrotolerants sp. nov. and Bacillus psychrodurans sp. navo., which contain ornithine in their cell walls. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52: 2117–2133.
    [16] Vazquez SC, Coria SH, Cormack WPM (2004) Extracellular proteases from eight psychrotolerant antarctic strains. Microbiol Res 159: 157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2004.03.001
    [17] Demir İ, Demirbağ Z, Beldüz AO (2000) Isolation and characterization of phenanthrene decomposing Pseudomonas sp. Fresen Environ Bull 9: 9–16.
    [18] Nievas ML, Commendatore MG, Estevas JL, et al. (2005) Effect of pH modification on bilge waste biodegradation by a native microbial community. Int Biodeter Biodegr 56: 151–157. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2005.06.006
    [19] Helmke E, Weyland H (2004) Psychrophilic Versus psychrotolerant bacteria occurrence and significance in polar and temperate marine habitats. Cell Mol Biol 50: 553–561.
    [20] Luigi M, Gaetano DM, Vivia B, et al. (2007) Biodegradative potential and characterization of psychrotolerant polychlorinated biphenyl degrading marine bacteria isolated from a coastal station in the Terra Nova Bay (Ross Sea, Antarctica). Mar Pollut Bull 54: 1754–1761. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.07.011
    [21] Okoh A, Ajisebutu S, Babalola G, et al. (2001) Potential of Burkholderia cepacia RQ1 in the biodegradation of heavy crude oil. Int Microbiol 4: 83–87.
    [22] Cooper DG, Goldenberg BG (1987) Surface-active agents from two Bacillus species. Appl Environ Microbiol 53: 224–229.
    [23] Christova N, Tuleva B, Nikolova-Damyanova B (2004) Enhanced hydrocarbon biodegradation by newly isolated Bacillus subtilis strain. Z Naturforsch C 59: 205–208.
    [24] Sponza DT, Gok O (2010) Effect of rhamnolipid on the aerobic removal of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and COD components from petrochemical wastewater. Bioresource Technol 101: 914–924. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.022
    [25] Sponza DT, Gok O (2012) Aerobic biodegradation and inhibition kinetics of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in a petrochemical industry wastewater in the presence of biosurfactants. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87: 658–672. doi: 10.1002/jctb.2762
    [26] Russell NJ, Cowan DA (2006) Handling of psychrophilic micro-organisms. Meth Microbiol 35: 371–374.
    [27] Deming JW (2009) Extremophiles: Cold Environments, In: Encyclopedia of Microbiology, 3 Eds., USA: Schaechter, 147–157.
    [28] Ruberto LAM, Vazquez SC, Cormack WPM (2008) Bacteriology of Extremely Cold Soils Exposed to Hydrocarbon Pollution, In: Dion P, Nautiyal CS, Ediors, Microbiology of Extrem Soils, USA: Springer, 247–274.
    [29] Brakstad OG, Booth AM, Fakness L (2010) Microbial Degradation of Petroleum Compounds in Cold Marine Water and Ice, In: Bej AK, Aislabie J, Atlas RM, Ediors, Polar Microbiology: the Ecology, Biodiversity and Bioremediation Potential of Microorganisms in Extremely Cold Environments, USA: CRC Press, 231–247.
    [30] Zhan Z, Gai L, Hou Z, et al. (2010) Characterization and biotechnological potential of petroleum-degrading bacteria isolated from oil-contaminated soils. Bioresource Technol 101: 8452–8456. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.060
    [31] Connaughton S, Collins G, O'Flaherty V (2006) Psycrophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digestion of brewery effluent; a comparative study. Water Res 40: 2503–2510. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.044
    [32] Rüger HJ, Fritze D, Spröer C (2000) New psychrophilic and psychrotolerant Bacillus marinus strains from tropical and polar deep-sea sediments and emended description of the species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50: 1305–1313. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-3-1305
    [33] Trejo-Hernandez MR, Ortiz A, Okoh AI, et al. (2007) Biodegradation of heavy crude oil Maya using spent compost and sugar cane bagasse wastes. Chemosphere 68: 848–855. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.02.023
    [34] Haddadin MSY, Arqoub AAA, Reesh IA, et al. (2009) Kinetics of hydrocarbon extraction from oil shale using biosurfactant producing bacteria. ‎Energy Convers Manage 50: 983–990. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.12.015
    [35] Dhote M, Juwarkar A, Kumar A, et al. (2010) Biodegration of chrysene by the bacterial strains isolated from oily sludge. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 26: 329–335. doi: 10.1007/s11274-009-0180-6
    [36] Al-Saleh ES, Drobiova H, Obuekwe C (2009) Predominant culturable crude oil-degrading bateria in the coast of Kuwait. Int Biodeter Biodegr 63: 400–406. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2008.11.004
    [37] Toledo FL, Gonzalez-Lopez J, Calvo C (2008) Production of emulsifiers by Bacillus subtilis, Alcaligenes faecalis and Enterobacter species in liquid culture Bioresourse Technol 99: 8470–8475.
    [38] Pathak H, Kantharia D, Malpani A, et al. (2009) Naphthalene degradation by Pseudomonas sp. HOB1: In vitro studies and assessment of naphthalene degradation efficiency in simulated microcosms. J Hazard Mater 166: 1466–1473.
    [39] Larter S, Wilhelms A, Head I, et al. (2003) The controls on the composition of biodegraded oils in the deep subsurface biodegradation rates in petroleum reservoirs. Org Geochem 34: 601–613.
    [40] Das N, Chandran P (2010) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants-an overview. Biotechnol Res Int 2011: 1–13.
    [41] Das K, Mukherjee AK (2007) Crude petroleum-oil biodegradation efficiency of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from a petroleum-oil contaminated soil from North-East India. Bioresource Technol 98: 1339–1345. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.032
    [42] Margesin R, Feller G (2010) Biotechnological applications of psychrophiles. Environ Technol 31: 835–844. doi: 10.1080/09593331003663328
    [43] Zhuang WQ, Tay JH, Maszenan A, et al. (2002) Bacillus naphthovorans sp. nov. from oil-contaminated tropical marine sediments and its role in naphthalene biodegradation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58: 547–554.
    [44] Swaathy S, Kavitha V, Pravin AS, et al. (2014) Microbial surfactant mediated degradation of anthracene in aqueous phase by marine Bacillus licheniformis MTCC 5514. Biotechnol Rep 4: 161–170. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2014.10.004
    [45] Ukiwe LN, Egereonu UU, Njoku PC, et al. (2013) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons degradation techniques: a review. Int J Chem 5: 43–55.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Diana Carolina Rache-Arce, Maryuris Machacado-Salas, Doris Rosero-García, Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria in Colombia: systematic review, 2022, 33, 0923-9820, 99, 10.1007/s10532-022-09976-z
    2. Jayati Arora, Anuj Ranjan, Abhishek Chauhan, Vishnu D. Rajput, Svetlana Sushkova, Evgeniya V. Prazdnova, Tatiana Minkina, Rima Biswas, Sanket Joshi, Tanu Jindal, Ram Prasad, A Novel Study on Anionic Surfactant Degradation Potential of Psychrophillic and Psychrotolerant Pseudomonas spp. Identified from Surfactant-contaminated River Water, 2023, 0273-2289, 10.1007/s12010-023-04647-y
    3. Ankita Das, Nandita Das, Jina Rajkumari, Prisha Pandey, Piyush Pandey, Exploring the bioremediation potential of Bacillus spp. for sustainable mitigation of hydrocarbon contaminants, 2024, 2523-8922, 10.1007/s42398-024-00309-9
    4. Cholpon Omurgazieva, Saikal Bobushova, Aiganysh K. Nurkanbek, Marjan Tashtanbekova, T. Ledashcheva, I. Savin, R. Jashchenko, A. Khaustov, I. Bica, V. Sturman, M. Redina, A. Phiri, E. Parakhina, Potential biodegradable bacteria and their identification, 2024, 555, 2267-1242, 03008, 10.1051/e3sconf/202455503008
    5. Baran Mis, Kemal Karaca, Rengin Eltem, In Vitro Antagonistic Activity of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Against Aggressive Biotypes of the Green Mold, 2024, 0233-111X, 10.1002/jobm.202400422
    6. Adamu Idris Matinja, Nor Hafizah Ahmad Kamarudin, Adam Thean Chor Leow, Siti Nurbaya Oslan, Mohd Shukuri Mohamad Ali, Novel recombinant cold-adapted alkaliphilic lipase (Glalip03) from Antarctic yeast, Glaciozyma antarctica PI12, 2024, 2037-4631, 10.1007/s12210-024-01277-2
    7. Adamu Idris Matinja, Nor Hafizah Ahmad Kamarudin, Adam Thean Chor Leow, Siti Nurbaya Oslan, Mohd Shukuri Mohamad Ali, Structural Insights into Cold-Active Lipase from Glaciozyma antarctica PI12: Alphafold2 Prediction and Molecular Dynamics Simulation, 2024, 0022-2844, 10.1007/s00239-024-10219-3
    8. Sameera Siddiqui, Shraddha Dorlikar, Vijay Nimkande, Shwetha Acharya, Rajesh Biniwale, Amit Bafana, Tailor-made bioremediation regime for the specific recalcitrance posed by crude oil leachate, 2025, 1088-9868, 1, 10.1080/10889868.2025.2480098
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(6254) PDF downloads(1137) Cited by(8)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(7)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog