Telehealth during COVID-19 pandemic era: a systematic review

Jonathan Kissi; Daniel Kwame Kwansah Quansah; Jonathan Aseye Nutakor; Alex Boadi Dankyi; Yvette Adu-Gyamfi; Jonathan Kissi; Daniel Kwame Kwansah Quansah; Jonathan Aseye Nutakor; Alex Boadi Dankyi; Yvette Adu-Gyamfi

doi:10.3934/medsci.2022008

AIMS Medical Science

2022, Volume 9, Issue 1: 81-97. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022008

Previous Article Next Article

Review

Telehealth during COVID-19 pandemic era: a systematic review

1.
Department of Health Information Management, College of Health and Allied Sciences, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana
2.
Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Management, Jiangsu University, China
3.
Department of Research and Innovation, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana

Received: 10 December 2021 Revised: 06 March 2022 Accepted: 14 March 2022 Published: 23 March 2022

Background

Across the globe, the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has altered the delivery of healthcare services as patients must maintain their distance from caregivers, and still receive medical treatment. This has triggered a necessity for exploring means which minimizes the physical gap between patients and healthcare givers while offering health care and ensuring high medical protection at a reduced risk of exposure. Even though telehealth services are no replacement for conventional healthcare, its' usefulness in the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is immense.

Objective

This research reviews the ardent utilization, barriers and recommendations with telehealth services for healthcare delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

An assessment of literature in five large digital databases; PubMed, Science Direct, Sage Pub, ProQuest, and Google Scholar was conducted. Inclusion criteria included studies defining telehealth/telemedicine, utilization, barriers and recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic from January 2020 to July 2021, written in English and published in peer-reviewed journals. Two reviewers independently assessed search results, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. Narrative synthesis was undertaken to summarize and report the findings.

Results

Overall, the study discoveries which are most commonly stated as impediments for telehealth services' full utilization between patients and physicians beyond the scope of typical medical confinement are: infrastructure and internet access (20.00%), data privacy and security (13.33%), digital literacy (13.33%), reimbursement and liability (10.00%), and clinician and patient's unwillingness (6.67%).

Conclusions

The intrusion of coronavirus has accelerated the transition to telehealth services in healthcare delivery, but it has also provided a unique chance to demonstrate the critical role that telehealth can play in ensuring that people of all races, ethnicities, and communities receive high-quality treatment (justice). Healthcare professionals should emphasize the effectiveness of telehealth services as an alternate healthcare delivery method in promoting healthcare to all populace.

Keywords:

Citation: Jonathan Kissi, Daniel Kwame Kwansah Quansah, Jonathan Aseye Nutakor, Alex Boadi Dankyi, Yvette Adu-Gyamfi. Telehealth during COVID-19 pandemic era: a systematic review[J]. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(1): 81-97. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022008

Related Papers:

[1]	Emad Salah, Ahmad Qazza, Rania Saadeh, Ahmad El-Ajou . A hybrid analytical technique for solving multi-dimensional time-fractional Navier-Stokes system. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1713-1736. doi: 10.3934/math.2023088
[2]	M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Khalil Hadi Hakami, Mohammad Alqudah, Qasem M. Tawhari, Hussain Gissy . Novel Laplace-integrated least square methods for solving the fractional nonlinear damped Burgers' equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 7099-7126. doi: 10.3934/math.2025324
[3]	Ali Khalouta, Abdelouahab Kadem . A new computational for approximate analytical solutions of nonlinear time-fractional wave-like equations with variable coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 1-14. doi: 10.3934/math.2020001
[4]	Muhammad Imran Liaqat, Sina Etemad, Shahram Rezapour, Choonkil Park . A novel analytical Aboodh residual power series method for solving linear and nonlinear time-fractional partial differential equations with variable coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16917-16948. doi: 10.3934/math.2022929
[5]	Azzh Saad Alshehry, Humaira Yasmin, Ali M. Mahnashi . Exploring fractional Advection-Dispersion equations with computational methods: Caputo operator and Mohand techniques. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 234-269. doi: 10.3934/math.2025012
[6]	Meshari Alesemi . Innovative approaches of a time-fractional system of Boussinesq equations within a Mohand transform. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29269-29295. doi: 10.3934/math.20241419
[7]	Tareq Eriqat, Rania Saadeh, Ahmad El-Ajou, Ahmad Qazza, Moa'ath N. Oqielat, Ahmad Ghazal . A new analytical algorithm for uncertain fractional differential equations in the fuzzy conformable sense. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 9641-9681. doi: 10.3934/math.2024472
[8]	Qasem M. Tawhari . Mathematical analysis of time-fractional nonlinear Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 9237-9255. doi: 10.3934/math.2025424
[9]	Shabir Ahmad, Aman Ullah, Ali Akgül, Fahd Jarad . A hybrid analytical technique for solving nonlinear fractional order PDEs of power law kernel: Application to KdV and Fornberg-Witham equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 9389-9404. doi: 10.3934/math.2022521
[10]	Nader Al-Rashidi . Innovative approaches to fractional modeling: Aboodh transform for the Keller-Segel equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 14949-14981. doi: 10.3934/math.2024724

Abstract

Background

Objective

This research reviews the ardent utilization, barriers and recommendations with telehealth services for healthcare delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Results

Conclusions

1. Introduction

In the modelling of numerous real-world events in control theory, chemistry, physics and other branches of engineering and science, fractional derivatives can be used successfully ^[1,2,3,4,5]. The basic reason for this is that fractional calculus can be used to model real-world issues successfully because realistic models not only depend on the present time but also on the past historical time ^[6,7,8]. As a result, the fractional differential equations (FDEs) have drawn the interest of numerous scientific and engineering academics due to their significant role in understanding a number of real-life process that happen in the natural sciences, such as mechanical systems, wave propagation phenomena, earthquake modelling, image processing and control theory. Fractional calculus can be used to describe and reformulate these processes as FDEs. The use of FDEs in the aforementioned and other phenomena is notable for their nonlocality feature. Similarly, the differential operators give an excellent way to describe the memory and inherited characteristics of distinct processes and materials ^[9,10].

In the framework of fractional derivatives, partial differential equations (PDEs) are regarded as a potential tool in mathematical modelling to explain and understand some physical processes structures that are complicated due to outside influences. Because of this reason, researchers utilized them to both construct a natural problem that is easily accessible and to simplify the regulating plan without losing some inherited material or memorial impact ^[1,2,3]. The development of trustworthy numerical methods to handle the fraction PDEs of physical concern has also been the subject of countless efforts, many of which have been successful ^{[14,15,16,17,18,19]}. Many real-world issues, such as earthquakes, gas dynamics, traffic flow and oscillation, can be formulated as nonlinear PDEs in the framework of fractional derivative, and the solutions of fractional PDEs provide remarkable insight into the behaviour of particular dynamic systems ^[4,5]. Therefore, it is important to develop a practical and useful method for identifying analytical solutions to these and other issues. To examine and develop analytical-approximate solutions of fractional FDEs and PDEs, researchers have recently used a variety of analytical and numerical methodologies, such as the Homotopy perturbation transform method ^[22], residual power series (RPS) method ^[23], Adomian decomposition method ^[24], variational iteration transform method ^[25,26], Iterative laplace transform method ^[27], Elzaki transform decomposition method ^[28,29] and Natural transform decomposition method ^[30,31].

A numerical analytic method for solving many forms of ordinary, partial, integro-differential equations and fractional fuzzy differential equations is known as the residual power series (RPS) technique. The RPSM was introduced by Jordanian mathematician Omar Abu Arqub in 2013 ^[32]. Due to the fact that it offers closed-form solutions of well-known functions, it is an efficient optimization strategy ^[33,34]. With the use of the fractional residual power series (FRPS) technique, fuzzy FDEs, a variety of FDEs, and integral equations having fractional-order are solved. Such as, Coupled fractional resonant Schrödinger equations ^[35], time-fractional Fokker-Planck models ^[36], fractional fredholm integro-differential equations ^[37], fractional Newell-hitehead-Segel equation ^[38], singular initial value problems ^[39], Fractional partial differential equations ^[40], fractional Kundu-Eckhaus and massive Thirring equations ^[41] and several classes of fractional fuzzy differential equations ^[42,43]. The Yang transform (YT) is a powerful tool for resolving numerous complex models that are appearing in various branches of the natural sciences. When analytical methods are combined with the YT operator, non-linear problems can be solved more quickly and with more precision.

Researchers introduced a new approach to solve fractional differential equations by combining two well-known approaches. Several of these groups include a combination of the homotopy analysis method and the natural transform ^[44], also homotopy perturbation approach and the Sumudu transform ^[45], the Yang transform and the Adomian decomposition method ^[46], and the Laplace transform with RPSM ^[47]. The main goal of this work is to examine the approximate solution of nonlinear systems by implementing the Yang residual power series (YRPS) method. The YT and RPS approaches are combined in the YRPS approach, which provides both approximate and accurate solutions as quickly fractional power series (FPS) solutions. The proposed system is converted to Yang space, and then the solutions in the form of algebraic equations are created. Lastly, the Yang inverse is applied to the proposed problem results. In contrast to the FRPS approach, which depends on the fractional derivative and consume time to compute the various derivatives of fractional-order in steps of determining the solutions, the unknown coefficients in a modified Yang expansion can be identified by employing the limit idea. The YRPS approach take less time and provide higher accuracy with minor computational requirements.

In this article, we consider fractional nonlinear systems as:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &D_{t}^{\varsigma}{u}+{v}_{{\vartheta}}{w}_{{\psi}}-{v}_{{\psi}}{w}_{{\vartheta}}+{u} = 0, \ \ \ 0 < \varsigma\leq1, \\ &D_{t}^{\varsigma}{v}+{w}_{{\vartheta}}{u}_{{\psi}}-{u}_{{\psi}}{w}_{{\vartheta}}-{v} = 0, \\ &D_{t}^{\varsigma}{w}+{u}_{{\vartheta}}{v}_{{\psi}}-{u}_{{\psi}}{v}_{{\vartheta}}-{w} = 0, \\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(1.1)

having initial sources

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &{u}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, 0) = f_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi}), \\ &{v}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, 0) = g_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi}), \\ &{w}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, 0) = h_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi}), \\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(1.2)

and

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &D_{t}^{\varsigma}{u}-{u}_{{\vartheta}{\vartheta}}-2{u}{u}_{{\vartheta}}+({u}{v})_{{\vartheta}} = 0, \ \ \ 0 < \varsigma\leq1, \\ &D_{t}^{\varsigma}{v}-{v}_{{\vartheta}{\vartheta}}-2{v}{v}_{{\vartheta}}+({u}{v})_{{\vartheta}} = 0, \\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(1.3)

having initial sources

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &{u}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, 0) = f_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi}), \\ &{v}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, 0) = g_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi}).\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(1.4)

Following is the breakdown of our study. Section 2 reviews the YT, as well as some fundamental definitions and theorem pertaining to fractional calculus. Section 3 describes the idea behind the suggested technique for creating the approximation of the fractional model taken into account in Eq (1.1). In Section 4, the YRPS methodology is applied to solve fractional nonlinear systems in order to show the applicability and efficacy of the method in analysing the solutions of time-PDEs of fractional order. Section 5 concludes with a summary of our results.

2. Preliminaries

In this part, we review some definitions and fractional derivatives theorems in Caputo manner along with YT properties.

Definition 2.1. In Caputo sense the fractional derivative of a function ${u}({\vartheta}, {t})$ is given as ^[48]

$\begin{equation} ^{C}D_{{t}}^{{\varsigma}}{u}({\vartheta}, {t}) = J_{{t}}^{m-{\varsigma}}{u}^{{m}}({\vartheta}, {t}), \ \ m-1 < \varsigma\leq m, \ \ t > 0, \end{equation}$

(2.1)

with $m\in N$ and $J_{{t}}^{\varsigma}$ represents the fractional integral in Riemann-Liouville manner of ${u}({\vartheta}, {t})$ as

$\begin{equation} J_{t}^{\varsigma} u(\vartheta, t) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\varsigma)} \int_{0}^{t}(t-\tau)^{\varsigma-1} u(\vartheta, \tau) d \tau. \end{equation}$

(2.2)

Definition 2.2. The YT of a function $\phi(\kappa)$ is stated by $\mathcal{Y}\{u(t)\}$ or M(s) as ^[49,50]

$\begin{equation} \mathcal{Y}\{u(t)\} = M(s) = \int_0^{\infty}e^{\frac{-t}{s}}u(t)dt, \ \ t > 0, \ \ s\in(-t_1, t_2). \end{equation}$

(2.3)

The inverse YT is given as

$\begin{equation} \mathcal{Y}^{-1}\{M(s)\} = u(t). \end{equation}$

(2.4)

Definition 2.3. The nth derivatives YT is given ^[49,50]

$\begin{equation} \mathcal{Y}\{u^{n}(t)\} = \frac{M(s)}{s^{n}}-\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{n-1}\frac{u^{k}(0)}{s^{n-k-1}}, \ \ \forall \ \ n = 1, 2, 3, \cdots \end{equation}$

(2.5)

Definition 2.4. The YT of derivatives having order fraction is as ^[49,50]

$\begin{equation} \mathcal{Y}\{u^{\varsigma}(t)\} = \frac{M(s)}{s^{\varsigma}}-\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{n-1}\frac{u^{k}(0)}{s^{\varsigma-(k+1)}}, \ \ 0 < \varsigma \leq n. \end{equation}$

(2.6)

Theorem 2.5. The fractional power series $\sum_{m-0}^{\infty} a_m(t-\varepsilon)^{m p}$ can converge within just three of the following ways:

(1) The series converges only when the radius of convergence equals zero, or $t = \varepsilon$ .

(2) The series converges with a radius of convergence equal to $\infty$ for all $t \geq \varepsilon$ .

(3) The series diverges for $t > c+R$ and converges for $\varepsilon \leq t < \varepsilon+R$ and some real positive integer $R$ .

In this context, $R$ refers to the fractional power series radius of convergence.

3. Idea of YRPS

In this part, we will present the general implementation of YRPS for solving fractional nonlinear systems of PDEs.

By employing YT to Eq (1.1), we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)-{s}f_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi})+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\vartheta}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\psi}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\psi}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\vartheta}}]+\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}]\right] = 0, \\ &V({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)-{s}g_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi})+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\vartheta}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\psi}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\psi}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\vartheta}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}]\right] = 0, \\ &W({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)-{s}h_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi})+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\vartheta}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\psi}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\psi}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\vartheta}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}]\right] = 0.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.1)

Considering that the solution of Eq (3.1) has the appropriate expansion

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}s^{n\varsigma+1}f_{n}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s), \ \ V({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}s^{n\varsigma+1}g_{n}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s), \\ &W({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}s^{n\varsigma+1}h_{n}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s).\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.2)

The $k^{th}$ -truncated series are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = {s}f_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)+\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{k}{s^{n\varsigma+1}}f_{n}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s), \ \ V({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = {s}g_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)+\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{k}{s^{n\varsigma+1}}g_{n}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s), \\ &W({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = {s}h_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)+\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{k}{s^{n\varsigma+1}}h_{n}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s).\ \ \ k = 1, 2, 3, 4\cdots \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.3)

By Yang residual functions (YRFs)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{u}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = &U({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)-{s}f_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\vartheta}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\psi}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\psi}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\vartheta}}]+\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}]\right], \\ \mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{v}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = &V({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)-{s}g_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\vartheta}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\psi}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\psi}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\vartheta}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}]\right], \\ \mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{\rho}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = &W({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)-{s}h_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\vartheta}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\psi}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\psi}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\vartheta}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}]\right].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.4)

And the ${k}^{th}$ -YRFs as:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{u, k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = &U_{k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)-{s}f_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\psi}, {k}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\psi}, {k}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]+\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{k}]\right], \\ \mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{v, k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = &V_{k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)-{s}g_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\psi}, {k}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\psi}, {k}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{k}]\right], \\ \mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{w, k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = &W_{k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)-{s}h_{0}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\psi}, {k}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\psi}, {k}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{k}]\right].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.5)

To highlight some facts, the YRPSM contains the following characteristics:

● $\mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = 0$ and $\lim_{{j}\rightarrow \infty}\mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{{u}, {k}}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = \mathcal{Y}_{{{t}}}Res_{{u}}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)$ for each $s > 0.$

● $\lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}s\mathcal{Y}_{{{t}}}Res_{{u}}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = 0\Rightarrow \lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}s\mathcal{Y}_{{{t}}}Res_{{u}, {k}}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = 0.$

● $\lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}s^{k{\varsigma}+1}\mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{{u}, {k}}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = \lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}s^{k{\varsigma}+1}\mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{{u}, {k}}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = 0, \ \ 0 < {\varsigma}\leq 1, \ \ {k} = 1, 2, 3, \cdots$ .

Now to determine the coefficients $f_{n}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)$ , $g_{n}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)$ , $h_{n}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)$ and $l_{n}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)$ , we resolve the below system recursively as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &\lim\limits_{s\rightarrow \infty}s^{{k}{\varsigma}+1}\mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{{u}, {k}}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = 0, \ \ {k} = 1, 2, \cdots, \\ &\lim\limits_{s\rightarrow \infty}s^{{k}{\varsigma}+1}\mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{{v}, {k}}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = 0, \ \ {k} = 1, 2, \cdots, \\ &\lim\limits_{s\rightarrow \infty}s^{{k}{\varsigma}+1}\mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{{\rho}, {k}}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = 0, \ \ {k} = 1, 2, \cdots.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.6)

Finally by employing inverse YT to Eq (3.3), to obtain the ${k}^{th}$ analytical solutions of ${u}_{{k}}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, {t})$ , ${v}_{{k}}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, {t})$ and ${\rho}_{{k}}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, {t})$

4. Applications

In this part, we find the solution of fractional nonlinear systems by implementing the suggested approach.

4.1. Problem

Let us assume the system of fractional PDEs:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &D_{t}^{\varsigma}{u}+{v}_{{\vartheta}}{w}_{{\psi}}-{v}_{{\psi}}{w}_{{\vartheta}}+{u} = 0, \\ &D_{t}^{\varsigma}{v}+{w}_{{\vartheta}}{u}_{{\psi}}-{u}_{{\psi}}{w}_{{\vartheta}}-{v} = 0, \\ &D_{t}^{\varsigma}{w}+{u}_{{\vartheta}}{v}_{{\psi}}-{u}_{{\psi}}{v}_{{\vartheta}}-{w} = 0.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.1)

By considering Eq (4.1), having below initial sources:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &{u}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, 0) = e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}, \\ &{v}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, 0) = e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}, \\ &{w}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, 0) = e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.2)

By employing YT to Eq (4.1) and using Eq (4.2), we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)-{s}e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\vartheta}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\psi}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\psi}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\vartheta}}]+\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}]\right] = 0, \\ &V({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)-{s}e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\vartheta}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\psi}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\psi}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\vartheta}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}]\right] = 0, \\ &W({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)-{s}e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\vartheta}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\psi}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\psi}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\vartheta}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}]\right] = 0.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.3)

The $k^{th}$ -truncated term series are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = {s}e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}+\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{k}{s^{n\varsigma+1}}f_{n}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s), \ \ V({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = {s}e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}+\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{k}{s^{n\varsigma+1}}g_{n}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s), \\ &W({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = {s}e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}+\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{k}{s^{n\varsigma+1}}h_{n}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s), \ \ \ k = 1, 2, 3, 4\cdots \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.4)

and the ${k}^{th}$ -YRFs as:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{u, k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = &U_{k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)-{s}e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\psi}, {k}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\psi}, {k}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]+\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{k}]\right], \\ \mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{v, k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = &V_{k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)-{s}e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\psi}, {k}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\psi}, {k}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{k}]\right], \\ \mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{w, k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = &W_{k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)-{s}e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\psi}, {k}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\psi}, {k}}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{W}_{k}]\right].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.5)

To find $f_{k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)$ , $g_{k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)$ and $h_{k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)$ $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots,$ the $kth$ -truncated series equation Eq (4.4) will be inserted into the $kth$ -Yang residual function equation Eq (4.5), which will then be multiplied by $s^{k{\varsigma}+1}$ to solve the relation recursively $\lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}(s^{k{\varsigma}+1}\mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{u, k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)) = 0$ , $\lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}(s^{k{\varsigma}+1}\mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{v, k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)) = 0$ , and $\lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}(s^{k{\varsigma}+1}\mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{w, k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)) = 0$ , $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots$ .

Few terms are as:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} f_{1}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = &e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}, \ \ g_{1}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}, \ \ h_{1}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}, \\ f_{2}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = &-e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}, \ \ g_{2}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}, \ \ h_{2}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}, \\ f_{3}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = &e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}, \ \ g_{3}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}, \ \ h_{3}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}, \\ f_{4}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = &-e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}, \ \ g_{4}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}, \ \ h_{4}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}, \\ f_{5}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = &e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}, \ \ g_{5}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}, \ \ h_{5}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}, \\ f_{6}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = &-e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}, \ \ g_{6}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}, \ \ h_{6}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.6)

and go on.

By substituting the values of $f_{k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)$ , $g_{k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)$ and $h_{k}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s)$ , $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots,$ in Eq (4.4), we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = {s}e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}-{s^{\varsigma+1}}e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}+{s^{2\varsigma+1}}e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}-{s^{3\varsigma+1}}e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}+{s^{4\varsigma+1}}e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}-{s^{5\varsigma+1}}e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}+{s^{6\varsigma+1}}e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}+\cdots, \\ &V({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = {s}e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}+{s^{\varsigma+1}}e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}+{s^{2\varsigma+1}}e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}+{s^{3\varsigma+1}}e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}+{s^{4\varsigma+1}}e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}+{s^{5\varsigma+1}}e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}+{s^{6\varsigma+1}}e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}+\cdots, \\ &W({\vartheta}, {\psi}, s) = {s}e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}+{s^{\varsigma+1}}e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}+{s^{2\varsigma+1}}e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}+{s^{3\varsigma+1}}e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}+{s^{4\varsigma+1}}e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}+{s^{5\varsigma+1}}e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}+{s^{6\varsigma+1}}e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}+\cdots.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.7)

By employing inverse YT, we have

$\begin{equation*} \begin{split} &u({\vartheta}, {\psi}, {t}) = e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}\left(1-\frac{{t}^{\varsigma}}{\Gamma(\varsigma+1)}+\frac{{t}^{2\varsigma}}{\Gamma(2\varsigma+1)}-\frac{{t}^{3\varsigma}}{\Gamma(3\varsigma+1)}+\frac{{t}^{4\varsigma}}{\Gamma(4\varsigma+1)}-\frac{{t}^{5\varsigma}}{\Gamma(5\varsigma+1)}+\cdots\right), \\ &v({\vartheta}, {\psi}, {t}) = e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}\left(1+\frac{{t}^{\varsigma}}{\Gamma(\varsigma+1)}+\frac{{t}^{2\varsigma}}{\Gamma(2\varsigma+1)}+\frac{{t}^{3\varsigma}}{\Gamma(3\varsigma+1)}+\frac{{t}^{4\varsigma}}{\Gamma(4\varsigma+1)}+\frac{{t}^{5\varsigma}}{\Gamma(5\varsigma+1)}+\cdots\right), \\ &\rho({\vartheta}, {\psi}, {t}) = e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}\left(1+\frac{{t}^{\varsigma}}{\Gamma(\varsigma+1)}+\frac{{t}^{2\varsigma}}{\Gamma(2\varsigma+1)}+\frac{{t}^{3\varsigma}}{\Gamma(3\varsigma+1)}+\frac{{t}^{4\varsigma}}{\Gamma(4\varsigma+1)}+\frac{{t}^{5\varsigma}}{\Gamma(5\varsigma+1)}+\cdots\right).\\ \end{split} \end{equation*}$

Putting $\varsigma = 1$

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &u({\vartheta}, {\psi}, {t}) = e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}}\left(1-{t}+\frac{{t}^{2}}{2!}-\frac{{t}^{3}}{3!}+\frac{{t}^{4}}{4!}-\frac{{t}^{5}}{5!}+\cdots\right), \\ &v({\vartheta}, {\psi}, {t}) = e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}}\left(1+{t}+\frac{{t}^{2}}{2!}+\frac{{t}^{3}}{3!}+\frac{{t}^{4}}{4!}+\frac{{t}^{5}}{5!}+\cdots\right), \\ &w({\vartheta}, {\psi}, {t}) = e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}}\left(1+{t}+\frac{{t}^{2}}{2!}+\frac{{t}^{3}}{3!}+\frac{{t}^{4}}{4!}+\frac{{t}^{5}}{5!}+\cdots\right).\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.8)

Thus we get exact solutions as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &u({\vartheta}, {\psi}, {t}) = e^{{\vartheta}+{\psi}-{t}}, \\ &v({\vartheta}, {\psi}, {t}) = e^{{\vartheta}-{\psi}+{t}}, \\ &\rho({\vartheta}, {\psi}, {t}) = e^{{\psi}-{\vartheta}+{t}}.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.9)

4.2. Problem

Let us assume the system of fractional Burger's equations:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &D_{t}^{\varsigma}{u}-{u}_{{\vartheta}{\vartheta}}-2{u}{u}_{{\vartheta}}+({u}{v})_{{\vartheta}} = 0, \\ &D_{t}^{\varsigma}{v}-{v}_{{\vartheta}{\vartheta}}-2{v}{v}_{{\vartheta}}+({u}{v})_{{\vartheta}} = 0.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.10)

By considering Eq (4.10), having below initial sources:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &{u}({\vartheta}, 0) = \sin({{\vartheta}}), \\ &{v}({\vartheta}, 0) = \sin({{\vartheta}}).\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.11)

By employing YT to Eq (4.10) and using Eq (4.11), we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\vartheta}, s)-{s}\sin({{\vartheta}})+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\vartheta}{\vartheta}}]-2\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\vartheta}}]+\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{(UV)}_{{\vartheta}}]\right] = 0, \\ &V({\vartheta}, s)-{s}\sin({{\vartheta}})+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\vartheta}{\vartheta}}]-2\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\vartheta}}]+\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{(UV)}_{{\vartheta}}]\right] = 0.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.12)

The $k^{th}$ -truncated series are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\vartheta}, s) = {s}\sin({{\vartheta}})+\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{k}{s^{n\varsigma+1}}f_{n}({\vartheta}, s), V({\vartheta}, s) = {s}\sin({{\vartheta}})+\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{k}{s^{n\varsigma+1}}g_{n}({\vartheta}, s), k = 1, 2, 3, 4\cdots \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.13)

and the ${k}^{th}$ -YRFs as:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{u, k}({\vartheta}, s) = &U_{k}({\vartheta}, s)-{s}\sin({{\vartheta}})+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\vartheta}{\vartheta}, {k}}]-2\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{k}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{U}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]+\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{(UV)}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]\right], \\ \mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{v, k}({\vartheta}, s) = &V_{k}({\vartheta}, s)-{s}\sin({{\vartheta}})+{s^{\varsigma}}\mathcal{Y}_{t}\left[-\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\vartheta}{\vartheta}, {k}}]-2\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{k}]\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{V}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]+\mathcal{Y}_{t}^{-1}[{(UV)}_{{\vartheta}, {k}}]\right].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.14)

To find $f_{k}({\vartheta}, s)$ and $g_{k}({\vartheta}, s)$ , $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots,$ the $kth$ -truncated series equation Eq (4.13) will be inserted into the $kth$ -Yang residual function equation Eq (4.14), which will then be multiplied by $s^{k{\varsigma}+1}$ to solve the relation recursively $\lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}(s^{k{\varsigma}+1}\mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{u, k}({\vartheta}, s)) = 0$ and $\lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}(s^{k{\varsigma}+1}\mathcal{Y}_{{t}}Res_{v, k}({\vartheta}, s)) = 0$ , $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots$ .

Few terms are as:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} f_{1}({\vartheta}, s) = &\sin({{\vartheta}}), \ \ g_{1}({\vartheta}, s) = \sin({{\vartheta}}), \\ f_{2}({\vartheta}, s) = &-\sin({{\vartheta}}), \ \ g_{2}({\vartheta}, s) = -\sin({{\vartheta}}), \\ f_{3}({\vartheta}, s) = &\sin({{\vartheta}}), \ \ g_{3}({\vartheta}, s) = \sin({{\vartheta}}), \\ f_{4}({\vartheta}, s) = &-\sin({{\vartheta}}), \ \ g_{4}({\vartheta}, s) = -\sin({{\vartheta}}), \\ f_{5}({\vartheta}, s) = &\sin({{\vartheta}}), \ \ g_{5}({\vartheta}, s) = \sin({{\vartheta}}), \\ f_{6}({\vartheta}, s) = &-\sin({{\vartheta}}), \ \ g_{6}({\vartheta}, s) = -\sin({{\vartheta}}), \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.15)

and so on.

By substituting the values of $f_{k}({\vartheta}, s)$ and $g_{k}({\vartheta}, s)$ , $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots,$ in Eq (4.13), we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\vartheta}, s) = {s}\sin({{\vartheta}})-{s^{\varsigma+1}}\sin({{\vartheta}})+{s^{2\varsigma+1}}\sin({{\vartheta}})-{s^{3\varsigma+1}}\sin({{\vartheta}})+{s^{4\varsigma+1}}\sin({{\vartheta}})-{s^{5\varsigma+1}}\sin({{\vartheta}})+{s^{6\varsigma+1}}\sin({{\vartheta}})+\cdots, \\ &V({\vartheta}, s) = {s}\sin({{\vartheta}})-{s^{\varsigma+1}}\sin({{\vartheta}})+{s^{2\varsigma+1}}\sin({{\vartheta}})-{s^{3\varsigma+1}}\sin({{\vartheta}})+{s^{4\varsigma+1}}\sin({{\vartheta}})-{s^{5\varsigma+1}}\sin({{\vartheta}})+{s^{6\varsigma+1}}\sin({{\vartheta}})+\cdots.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.16)

By employing inverse YT, we have

$\begin{equation*} \begin{split} &u({\vartheta}, {t}) = \sin({{\vartheta}})\left(1-\frac{{t}^{\varsigma}}{\Gamma(\varsigma+1)}+\frac{{t}^{2\varsigma}}{\Gamma(2\varsigma+1)}-\frac{{t}^{3\varsigma}}{\Gamma(3\varsigma+1)}+\frac{{t}^{4\varsigma}}{\Gamma(4\varsigma+1)}-\frac{{t}^{5\varsigma}}{\Gamma(5\varsigma+1)}+\cdots\right), \\ &v({\vartheta}, {t}) = \sin({{\vartheta}})\left(1-\frac{{t}^{\varsigma}}{\Gamma(\varsigma+1)}+\frac{{t}^{2\varsigma}}{\Gamma(2\varsigma+1)}-\frac{{t}^{3\varsigma}}{\Gamma(3\varsigma+1)}+\frac{{t}^{4\varsigma}}{\Gamma(4\varsigma+1)}-\frac{{t}^{5\varsigma}}{\Gamma(5\varsigma+1)}+\cdots\right).\\ \end{split} \end{equation*}$

Putting $\varsigma = 1$

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &u({\vartheta}, {t}) = \sin({{\vartheta}})\left(1-{t}+\frac{{t}^{2}}{2!}-\frac{{t}^{3}}{3!}+\frac{{t}^{4}}{4!}-\frac{{t}^{5}}{5!}+\cdots\right), \\ &v({\vartheta}, {t}) = \sin({{\vartheta}})\left(1-{t}+\frac{{t}^{2}}{2!}-\frac{{t}^{3}}{3!}+\frac{{t}^{4}}{4!}-\frac{{t}^{5}}{5!}+\cdots\right).\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.17)

Thus we get accurate solutions as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &u({\vartheta}, {t}) = e^{-{t}}\sin({{\vartheta}}), \\ &v({\vartheta}, {t}) = e^{-{t}}\sin({{\vartheta}}).\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.18)

4.3. Results and discussion

In the present study, we obtained the closed form solution of two nonlinear fractional systems by means of YRPSM upto sixth order. The obtained results are describes with the help of graphs and table. The YRPSM results for system $1$ on the basis of error is illustrated in Table 1. Figure 1a, b shows the exact and analytical behavior whereas , shows the 3-D and 2-D behavior of approximate solution at different fractional-orders for ${u}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, {t})$ . Figure 2a, b shows the exact and analytical behavior whereas , shows the 3-D and 2-D behavior of approximate solution at different fractional-orders for ${v}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, {t})$ . Figure 3a, b shows the exact and analytical behavior whereas , shows the 3-D and 2-D behavior of approximate solution at different fractional-orders for ${w}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, {t})$ of system 1. Similarly, Figure 4a, b shows the exact and analytical behavior whereas , shows the 3-D and 2-D behavior of approximate solution at different fractional-orders for ${u}({\vartheta}, {t})$ and ${v}({\vartheta}, {t})$ of system 2. The behavior of Table and Figures shows that our solution is in good agreement with the exact solutions of the problems.

Table 1. Behavior on the basis of Error by implementing YRPSM for the suggested problem at different values of t and

${\vartheta}$ with

${\varsigma = 1}$ ,

${\psi} = 1$ .

${t}$	${\vartheta}$	$\|{u}_{exact}-{u}_{YRPSM}\|$	$\|{v}_{exact}-{v}_{YRPSM}\|$	$\|{w}_{exact}-{w}_{YRPSM}\|$
0.2	0.2	2.671 $\times10^{-8}$	9.927 $\times10^{-8}$	1.8080 $\times10^{-8}$
	0.4	3.263 $\times10^{-8}$	1.212 $\times10^{-8}$	1.4810 $\times10^{-8}$
	0.6	3.986 $\times10^{-7}$	1.481 $\times10^{-8}$	1.2126 $\times10^{-7}$
	0.8	4.868 $\times10^{-7}$	1.808 $\times10^{-7}$	9.9270 $\times10^{-7}$
	1	5.945 $\times10^{-6}$	2.209 $\times10^{-7}$	8.1280 $\times10^{-6}$
0.4	0.2	2.1267 $\times10^{-7}$	7.981 $\times10^{-8}$	1.4544 $\times10^{-8}$
	0.4	2.5975 $\times10^{-7}$	9.748 $\times10^{-7}$	1.1908 $\times10^{-7}$
	0.6	3.1727 $\times10^{-6}$	1.190 $\times10^{-7}$	9.7489 $\times10^{-7}$
	0.8	3.8752 $\times10^{-6}$	1.454 $\times10^{-6}$	7.9817 $\times10^{-6}$
	1	4.7330 $\times10^{-5}$	1.776 $\times10^{-6}$	6.5349 $\times10^{-6}$
0.6	0.2	7.142 $\times10^{-6}$	2.707 $\times10^{-7}$	4.9333 $\times10^{-6}$
	0.4	8.7233 $\times10^{-6}$	3.3068 $\times10^{-6}$	4.0390 $\times10^{-6}$
	0.6	1.0654 $\times10^{-5}$	4.0390 $\times10^{-5}$	3.3068 $\times10^{-5}$
	0.8	1.3013 $\times10^{-5}$	4.9333 $\times10^{-5}$	2.7074 $\times10^{-5}$
	1	1.5894 $\times10^{-4}$	6.0254 $\times10^{-5}$	2.2166 $\times10^{-5}$

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Figure 1. 3-D and 2-D behavior for

${u}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, t)$ of Problem

$1$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 2. 3-D and 2-D behavior for

${v}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, t)$ of Problem

$1$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 3. 3-D and 2-D behavior for

${w}({\vartheta}, {\psi}, t)$ of Problem

$1$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 4. 3-D and 2-D behavior for

${u}({\vartheta}, t)$ and

${v}({\vartheta}, t)$ of Problem

$2$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

5. Conclusions

To find the solutions of DEs and FDEs, a variety of numerical and analytical techniques are employed, some of which are regarded by the prospect of non-exact solutions. This work emphasised that the suggested strategy, YRPS, is an easy-to-use analytical technique for developing accurate and approximative solutions for certain systems of FDEs with suitable initial sources. The aforementioned method gave us the solutions in the Yang transform space by making it simple to calculate the expansion series constants with the aid of the limit concept at infinity. In contrast to the RPS approach, the YRPS method requires minimal calculations to obtain the series coefficients since it uses the limit idea rather than the fractional derivative. The calculated results demonstrate how closely the approximative solutions approach the accurate solution. This proves that the aforementioned method is an appropriate and extraordinarily effective method for obtaining the approximative and analytical solutions to a large number of linear and non-linear fractional problems that arise in engineering and applied physics.

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2023R183), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Acknowledgments

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2023R183), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

We wish to render our sincere gratitude to the Management and Staff of Health Information Management, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast for their time and contributions during the period of this research.

Authors' contributions

Conceptualization: JK; formal analysis, investigation, and data curation: JK, DKKQ, JAN and YAG; formal data analysis and results interpretation: JK and YAG; writing, original draft preparation: JK; writing, review and editing: JAN and ABD.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1]	Blandford A, Wesson J, Amalberti R, et al. (2020) Opportunities and challenges for telehealth within, and beyond, a pandemic. Lancet Glob Health 8: e1364-e1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30362-4
[2]	Hoffman DA (2020) Increasing access to care: telehealth during COVID-19. J Law Biosci 7: lsaa043. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa043
[3]	Abdel-Wahab M, Rosenblatt E, Prajogi B, et al. (2020) Opportunities in telemedicine, lessons learned after COVID-19 and the way into the future. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 108: 438-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.006
[4]	Barney A, Buckelew S, Mesheriakova V, et al. (2020) The COVID-19 pandemic and rapid implementation of adolescent and young adult telemedicine: challenges and opportunities for innovation. J Adolesc Health 67: 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05.006
[5]	Gajarawala SN, Pelkowski JN (2020) Telehealth benefits and barriers. J Nurse Pract 17: 218-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.09.013
[6]	Zhai Y (2020) A call for addressing barriers to telemedicine: health disparities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychother Psychosom 4: 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509000
[7]	Al-Samarraie H, Ghazal S, Alzahrani AI, et al. (2020) Telemedicine in Middle Eastern countries: Progress, barriers, and policy recommendations. Int J Med Inform 141: 104232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104232
[8]	Bakshi S, Tandon U (2021) Understanding barriers of telemedicine adoption : a study in North India. Syst Res Behav Sci 39: 128-142. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2774
[9]	Jalali MS, Landman A, Gordon WJ (2021) Telemedicine, privacy, and information security in the age of COVID-19. J Am Med Inform Assoc 28: 671-672. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa310
[10]	Chowdhury SR, Sunna TC, Ahmed S (2021) Telemedicine is an important aspect of healthcare services amid COVID-19 outbreak: Its barriers in Bangladesh and strategies to overcome. Int J Health Plann Manage 36: 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3064
[11]	Triana AJ, Gusdorf RE, Shah KP, et al. (2020) Technology literacy as a barrier to telehealth during COVID-19. Telemed J E Health 26: 1118-1119. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0155
[12]	Smith AC, Thomas E, Snoswell CL, et al. (2020) Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Telemed Telecare 26: 309-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X20916567
[13]	Dubin JM, Wyant WA, Balaji NC, et al. (2020) Telemedicine usage among urologists during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res 22: e21875. https://doi.org/10.2196/21875
[14]	Ahmed S, Sanghvi K, Yeo D (2020) Telemedicine takes centre stage during COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Innov 6: 252-254. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2020-000440
[15]	Monaghesh E, Hajizadeh A (2020) The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence. BMC Public Health 20: 1193. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09301-4
[16]	Okereafor K, Adebola O, Djehaiche R (2020) Exploring the potentials of telemedicine and other non-contact electronic health technologies in controlling the spread of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). IJMR 8: 1-13.
[17]	Bokolo AJ (2021) Exploring the adoption of telemedicine and virtual software for care of outpatients during and after COVID-19 pandemic. Ir J Med Sci 190: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02299-z
[18]	Burroughs M, Urits I, Viswanath O, et al. (2020) Benefits and shortcomings of utilizing telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 33: 699-700. https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2020.1792728
[19]	Nouri S, Khoong EC, Lyles CR, et al. (2020) Addressing equity in telemedicine for chronic disease management during the COVID-19 pandemic. NEJM Catalyst 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1056/CAT.20.0123
[20]	Ortega G, Rodriguez JA, Maurer LR, et al. (2020) Telemedicine, COVID-19, and disparities: Policy implications. Health Policy Technol 9: 368-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.001
[21]	Vidal-Alaball J, Acosta-Roja R, Pastor Hernández N, et al. (2020) Telemedicine in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. Aten Primaria 52: 418-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2020.04.003
[22]	Oyediran KA, Makinde OA, Adelakin O (2020) The role of telemedicine in addressing access to sexual and reproductive health services in sub-Saharan Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic. Afr J Reprod Health 24: 49-55. https://doi.org/10.29063/ajrh2020/v24i2s.8
[23]	Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, et al. (2020) Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 27: 957-962. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa067
[24]	Ohannessian R, Duong TA, Odone A (2020) Global telemedicine implementation and integration within health systems to fight the COVID-19 pandemic: a call to action. JMIR Public Health Surveill 6: e18810. https://doi.org/10.2196/18810
[25]	Nittas V, Von Wyl V (2020) COVID-19 and telehealth: a window of opportunity and its challenges. Swiss Med Wkly 150: w20284. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2020.20284
[26]	Gifford AH, Ong T, Dowd C, et al. (2020) Evaluating barriers to and promoters of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic at U.S. cystic fibrosis programs. J Cyst Fibros 20: 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2021.08.034
[27]	Garfan S, Alamoodi AH, Zaidan BB, et al. (2021) Telehealth utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Comput Biol Med 138: 104878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104878
[28]	Akintunde TY, Akintunde OD, Musa TH, et al. (2021) Expanding telemedicine to reduce the burden on the healthcare systems and poverty in Africa for a post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic reformation. Glob Health J 5: 128-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glohj.2021.07.006
[29]	Rozga M, Handu D, Kelley K, et al. (2021) Telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of registered dietitian nutritionists. J Acad Nutr Diet 121: 2524-2535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2021.01.009
[30]	Cunningham NR, Ely SL, Garcia BNB, et al. (2021) Addressing pediatric mental health using telehealth during coronavirus disease-2019 and beyond: a narrative review. Acad Pediatr 21: 1108-1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2021.06.002

This article has been cited by:

1.	Laila F. Seddek, Essam R. El-Zahar, Jae Dong Chung, Nehad Ali Shah, A Novel Approach to Solving Fractional-Order Kolmogorov and Rosenau–Hyman Models through the q-Homotopy Analysis Transform Method, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 1321, 10.3390/math11061321
2.	Meshari Alesemi, An Innovative Approach to Nonlinear Fractional Shock Wave Equations Using Two Numerical Methods, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 1253, 10.3390/math11051253
3.	Ma’mon Abu Hammad, Albandari W. Alrowaily, Rasool Shah, Sherif M. E. Ismaeel, Samir A. El-Tantawy, Analytical analysis of fractional nonlinear Jaulent-Miodek system with energy-dependent Schrödinger potential, 2023, 11, 2296-424X, 10.3389/fphy.2023.1148306
4.	Mamta Kapoor, Simran Kour, An analytical approach for Yang transform on fractional-order heat and wave equation, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 035222, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad24ab
5.	Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, A constructive numerical approach to solve the Fractional Modified Camassa–Holm equation, 2024, 106, 11100168, 19, 10.1016/j.aej.2024.06.076
6.	R. Jagatheeshwari, C. Ravichandran, P. Veeresha, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, A strong technique for solving the fractional model of multi-dimensional Schnakenberg reaction-diffusion system, 2025, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984925500952

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

AIMS Medical Science

0.4

Metrics

Article views(4907) PDF downloads(340) Cited by(5)

Preview PDF

Download XML

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(3) / Tables(4)

AIMS Medical Science

Telehealth during COVID-19 pandemic era: a systematic review

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Preliminaries

3. Idea of YRPS

4. Applications

4.1. Problem

4.2. Problem

4.3. Results and discussion

5. Conclusions

Funding

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

AIMS Medical Science

Telehealth during COVID-19 pandemic era: a systematic review

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Preliminaries

3. Idea of YRPS

4. Applications

4.1. Problem

4.2. Problem

4.3. Results and discussion

5. Conclusions

Funding

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog