Research article

Unveiling critical ADHD biomarkers in limbic system and cerebellum using a binary hypothesis testing approach


  • Received: 30 December 2023 Revised: 13 March 2024 Accepted: 11 April 2024 Published: 28 April 2024
  • Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common childhood developmental disorder. In recent years, pattern recognition methods have been increasingly applied to neuroimaging studies of ADHD. However, these methods often suffer from limited accuracy and interpretability, impeding their contribution to the identification of ADHD-related biomarkers. To address these limitations, we applied the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) results for the limbic system and cerebellar network as input data and conducted a binary hypothesis testing framework for ADHD biomarker detection. Our study on the ADHD-200 dataset at multiple sites resulted in an average classification accuracy of 93%, indicating strong discriminative power of the input brain regions between the ADHD and control groups. Moreover, our approach identified critical brain regions, including the thalamus, hippocampal gyrus, and cerebellum Crus 2, as biomarkers. Overall, this investigation uncovered potential ADHD biomarkers in the limbic system and cerebellar network through the use of ALFF realizing highly credible results, which can provide new insights for ADHD diagnosis and treatment.

    Citation: Ying Chen, Lele Wang, Zhixin Li, Yibin Tang, Zhan Huan. Unveiling critical ADHD biomarkers in limbic system and cerebellum using a binary hypothesis testing approach[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(4): 5803-5825. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024256

    Related Papers:

    [1] Oluwafolajimi Adesanya, Tolulope Oduselu, Oluwawapelumi Akin-Ajani, Olubusuyi M. Adewumi, Olusegun G. Ademowo . An exegesis of bacteriophage therapy: An emerging player in the fight against anti-microbial resistance. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(3): 204-230. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020014
    [2] Ashrafus Safa, Jinath Sultana Jime, Farishta Shahel . Cholera toxin phage: structural and functional diversity between Vibrio cholerae biotypes. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(2): 144-151. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020009
    [3] Abdullahi Yusuf Muhammad, Malik Amonov, Chandrika Murugaiah, Atif Amin Baig, Marina Yusoff . Intestinal colonization against Vibrio cholerae: host and microbial resistance mechanisms. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(2): 346-374. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023019
    [4] Rochelle Keet, Diane Rip . Listeria monocytogenes isolates from Western Cape, South Africa exhibit resistance to multiple antibiotics and contradicts certain global resistance patterns. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(1): 40-58. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021004
    [5] Ogueri Nwaiwu, Chiugo Claret Aduba . An in silico analysis of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes in Aeromonas plasmids. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(1): 75-91. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020005
    [6] Chioma Lilian Ozoaduche, Katalin Posta, Balázs Libisch, Ferenc Olasz . Acquired antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas spp., Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter spp. in the Western Balkans and Hungary with a One Health outlook. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(2): 436-461. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025020
    [7] Philip Serwer . Restoring logic and data to phage-cures for infectious disease. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 706-712. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.706
    [8] Rosette Mansour, Mohammad H. El-Dakdouki, Sara Mina . Phylogenetic group distribution and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli isolates in aquatic environments of a highly populated area. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(2): 340-362. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024018
    [9] Neda Askari, Hassan Momtaz, Elahe Tajbakhsh . Acinetobacter baumannii in sheep, goat, and camel raw meat: virulence and antibiotic resistance pattern. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(3): 272-284. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.3.272
    [10] Mohammad Abu-Sini, Mohammad A. Al-Kafaween, Rania M. Al-Groom, Abu Bakar Mohd Hilmi . Comparative in vitro activity of various antibiotic against planktonic and biofilm and the gene expression profile in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(2): 313-331. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023017
  • Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common childhood developmental disorder. In recent years, pattern recognition methods have been increasingly applied to neuroimaging studies of ADHD. However, these methods often suffer from limited accuracy and interpretability, impeding their contribution to the identification of ADHD-related biomarkers. To address these limitations, we applied the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) results for the limbic system and cerebellar network as input data and conducted a binary hypothesis testing framework for ADHD biomarker detection. Our study on the ADHD-200 dataset at multiple sites resulted in an average classification accuracy of 93%, indicating strong discriminative power of the input brain regions between the ADHD and control groups. Moreover, our approach identified critical brain regions, including the thalamus, hippocampal gyrus, and cerebellum Crus 2, as biomarkers. Overall, this investigation uncovered potential ADHD biomarkers in the limbic system and cerebellar network through the use of ALFF realizing highly credible results, which can provide new insights for ADHD diagnosis and treatment.



    V. cholera is a gram-negative, facultative, motile anaerobe that secrets a diarrhoeagenic protein called cholera toxin [1]. The organism has over 200 serogroups, but only the O1 and O139 serogroups have been linked to the diarrheal disease commonly known as cholera [2]. In third world countries, the organism typically transmits by drinking contaminated surface water [3], whereas, in developed countries, transmissions are associated with raw or undercooked shellfish consumption [4]. Cholera is a frequent occurrence in Bangladesh, with seasonal outbreaks occurring annually [5]. Since V. cholera is predominantly an aquatic organism, the propagation and epidemiology of these outbreaks are highly influenced by contaminated water sources and flooding. In most rural areas of Bangladesh, access to potable clean drinking water is minimal, especially during annual flooding. A vast majority of the population still drinks untreated surface water in rural areas of the country and most of these annual outbreak buds in those populations.

    Furthermore, underground water sources like tube wells are often submerged and contaminated by flood water during annual flooding. Thus, it is crucial to perform a comparative study of V. cholera contamination among different surface and underground water sources as a part of consistent surveillance operation. Besides, annual cholera outbreaks are often treated with the same group of antibiotics, resulting in a high antibiotic resistance in V. cholera strains against commonly used antibiotics. A yearly evaluation of the antibiotic resistance profile of field strains is necessary for the effective therapeutic use of available antibiotics. Therefore, this research aimed at quantifying V. spp. in different water sources of Bangladesh and evaluating the antibiotic resistance profile of V. cholera to estimate and mitigate the risk of the annual cholera outbreak.

    A total of 45 environmental water samples were aseptically collected from pond, river and tube-well of different designated areas of Gazipur district, Bangladesh (Benupur, Chandabaha, Kaliakoir, Sutrapur and Begunbari). Following collection 4 samples are then serially diluted in alkaline peptone water and streak on selective media of Thiosulfate Citrate Bile Salts Sucrose (TCBS) agar, (Hi media, India) and incubated 37 °C for 24 hours. Following incubation, colonies with shiny yellow color and smooth, convex, and slightly flattened texture with opaque centers (Figure 1A, 1B) were used in viable count of V. spp. [6]. For bacteria isolation 1 mL of buffer peptone solution (1:10 dilution) was enriched in nutrient broth at 37 °C for 16 hours and then transferred in selective media (TCBS agar plate) for incubation (37 °C for 24 hours). Then one colony was randomly selected from each plate for biochemical analysis and hemolysis test (Figure 1C, 1D).

    Table 1.  Concentration (µg /disc) of antibiotic disc used for antimicrobial resistance test.
    Antibiotics Symbol Disc concentration (µg /disc)
    Ciprofloxacin (CIP) 5
    Gentamycin (GEN) 10
    Penicillin (P) 10
    Vancomycin (VA) 30
    Cephalexin (CN) 30
    Chloramphenicol (C) 30
    Tetracycline (TE) 30
    Erythromycin (E) 15
    Sulfamethoxazole (SXT) 25
    Nalidixic Acid (NA) 30
    Azithromycin (AZ) 15

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    V. spp. isolated in selective media were confirmed as V. cholera by different biochemical tests Catalase, Oxidase, MR, VP, Indole, glucose, maltose, mannitol and sucrose fermentation) according to the methodology described in [7].

    Table 2.  Bacterial concentration in different sources collected from 5 different locations.
    Sample type Bacterial conc. (Log CFU/mL)
    10−3 DF1 10−4 DF1 10−5 DF1
    River 4.96A 5.89A 6.79a
    Pond 4.98A 5.92A 6.80a
    Tube well 4.86B 5.73B 6.06b
    SEM2 0.028 0.035 0.500
    P value <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Antibiotic sensitivity test was performed according to Kriby-Bauer disc diffusion method [9] and following the guideline of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [8]. A total of 11 commercially available antibiotics were used (Table 1) in this research to assess drug susceptibility and resistance of isolated species (Mast diagnostics Mersey side, UK). A single colony of pure culture isolated from the samples was incubated in nutrient broth at 37 °C for 16 hours. Then 0.1 ml of broth was spread on Mueller-Hinton agar plate using a cell spreader and an antibiotic disc was placed on top. The plates were then incubated in 37 °C for 24 hours. After incubation, the zone of inhibition near the discs was measured using a millimeter scale and categorized as resistant or sensitive according to the manufacturer's recommendation (Table 1).

    Table 3.  V. spp. concentration in water samples of 5 different location (Benupur, Chandabadha, Kaliakoir, Sutrapur and Begunbari).
    Sample type DF1 Bacterial concentration in each location (Log CFU/mL)
    Benupur Chandabaha Kaliakoir Sutrapur Begunbari
    River Burigonga 10−3 4.95 5.00 4.93 4.99 4.94
    10−4 5.88 5.93 5.87 5.90 5.88
    10−5 6.79 6.80 6.81 6.81 6.79
    Pond 10−3 4.94 4.99 5.00 4.99 5.00
    10−4 5.90 5.89 5.93 5.90 5.87
    10−5 6.80 6.79 6.80 6.77 6.72
    Tube-well 10−3 4.91 4.86 4.86 4.83 5.00
    10−4 5.81 5.76 5.71 5.68 5.89
    10−5 6.62 6.52 6.46 6.57 7.00

    Average 5.84 5.83 5.82 5.83 5.90
    SEM2 0.261 0.257 0.261 0.259 0.247

    P-value 0.996

    *Note: CFU= colony forming unite, 1DF = Dilution factor, 2SEM= Standard error of mean

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    A total of 5 replicate samples were randomly collected from each of the 5 different locations (Benupur, Chandabaha, Kaliakoir, Sutrapur, Begunbari) of each 3 water sources (river, pond and tube-well). Bacterial concentration in samples were log transformed and subjected to Shapiro-Wilk test for normality analysis. Bartlett's Test was performed to ensure the homogeneity of variance among the collected samples. The bacterial concentration in different water sources and at different locations were analyzed with one-way ANOVA using the GLM procedure of SAS software (version 9.2) under the following model. Yij = µ + Ti + δL + ϵij. Where, Yij = Bacterial concentration in each sample; µ = Overall mean bacterial concentration; Ti = Effect of water source; δL = Blocking effect of location and ϵij = random error. We assumed that the variation within the model, caused by from sampling location are normally distributed with a mean of 0 and a variance of σL2. Random error ϵij of the model is also normally distributed with a mean of 0 and a variance of σ2. Both variances σL2 and σ2 are independent of each other. For data analysis, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and when a significant difference is detected, the were subjected to the least significant difference test (LSD) for mean separation.

    Figure 1.  V. spp. on Nutrient's Agar (A), TCBS Agar left the yellow colony and green colony right (B), blood agar hemolytic colony (C), and non-hemolytic colony on blood agar (D).
    Figure 2.  Biochemical test results. Indole test (A), Methyl red test (B), Voges-Proskauer test (C), Simmons citrate test (D), KIA test (E), and MIU test (F).
    Table 4.  Biochemical tests result of 12 isolated strains of V. cholera.
    Tests Results
    R1 R3 R5 R6 R7 P1 P3 P5 P6 T3 T4 T7
    Nit + + + + + + + + + + + +
    Ox + + + + + + - + + + - +
    Ind + + + + - + + + + + + +
    Ci + + + + + + + + + + + +
    MR - - - + - - - + - - - -
    VP + + + + + + + + + + + +
    MIU + + + + + + + - + + + +
    Urease - - - - - - + - - - - -
    KIA Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= -
    Glucose + + + - + + - + + + - +
    Maltose + + + + + + + + + - + +
    Mannitol + + + + + + + + + + + +
    Sucrose + + + + - + + + + + + +
    Gelatin hydrolysis + + + + + + - + + + + +

    *Note: Legends: SL No.: Serial Number, Nit: Nitrate utilization test, Ox: Oxidase test, In: Indole test, Ci: Citrate test, MR: Methyl Red test, VP: Voges-Proskauer test, MIU: Motility indole urease, KIA: Kinglar iron agar +: positive, -: Negative, Y: Yellow, B: Butt, S: Slant, G: Gas.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Viable counts were performed on TCBS agar plate which selects V. spp. based on their sucrose fermentation characteristics and the result is presented in Table 2. There was significantly higher V. spp. in pond and river water than tube-well water (P < 0.001) at all 3 dilution levels (dilution factor: 103, 104 and 105). Bacterial concentration did not vary significantly based on the location of sample collection (P > 0.05) (Table 3).

    Table 5.  Comparative prevalence of V. cholera among the V. spp. isolated from different water sources.
    Bacterial isolate River water Pond water Tube well water Total isolates Percentage (%)
    V. cholera 5 (41.67%) 4 (40%) 3(37.5%) 12 40
    V. parahimulyticus 7 (58.33%) 6 (60%) 5 (62.5%) 18 60
    Total isolates 12 10 8 30

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Total of 14 biochemical tests were performed on isolates of different samples and the result of those tests are presented in Table 4. Out of the 30 isolates, 12 isolates were positive in nitrate, oxidase, indole, citrate utilization, MR, motility, glucose, sucrose, mannitol, maltose, and gelatin hydrolysis agar test (Figure 2A, 2F). V. spp. were also found to be negative in MR, urease, and kingler iron agar test. Hemolytic characteristics of the isolates were also evaluated to differentiate between V. cholera and V. parahaemolyticus (Figure 1C, 1D). V. cholera are known to cause β-hemolysis whereas V. parahaemolyticus causes α-hemolysis. Based on this characteristic 12 of the initial isolates were classified as V. cholera and remaining 18 was classified as V. parahaemolyticus.

    The comparative prevalence of V. cholera among the V. spp. isolated from different water sources are presented in Table 5. River water had the highest prevalence of V. cholera (5 out of 12 isolates; 41.67%) whereas, tube-well water had the lowest prevalence (3 out of 8; 37.5%).

    Table 6.  Outcome of antibiotic sensitivity test of 12 V. cholera isolates obtained from different water samples.
    Isolate GEN CIP CN VA P C TE E NA AZ SXT
    R1 S S S R R S S I I S S
    R3 S S S R R S S R R S S
    R5 S S S I R S I R R S S
    R6 S S S R R S I I R R S
    R7 S S S R R R R R R S S
    P1 S S S R R S R R R S S
    P3 S S S R R S R R R S M
    P5 S S S R R I I R R S S
    P6 S S I I I S I R R R S
    T3 S S I R R S S I R S S
    T4 S S R R R S S I R S S
    T7 S S R I R S I R R S S

    *Note: GEN: Gentamycin, CIP: Ciprofloxacin, CN: Cephalexin, VA: Vancomycin, P: Penicillin, C: Chloramphenicol, TE: Tetracycline, E: Erythromycin, NA: Nalidixic Acid, AZ: Azithromycin, SXT: Sulfamethoxazole, R: River, P; Pond; T; Tap, s: Sensitive and r: Resistance. R1, R3, R5, R6, R7 are the V. cholera isolates collected from rivers, P1, P3, P5 and P6 are the V. cholera isolates collected from pond, T3, T4 and T7 are the V. cholera isolates collected from tube-well.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The results of antibiotic sensitivity test performed on 12 V. cholera isolates are presented in Table 6. The antibiotic sensitivity profiles of those isolates have been compiled in Table 7. All 12 isolates showed 100% sensitivity toward Gentamicin and ciprofloxacin. All the isolates showed multidrug resistance (Table 6). However, these isolates were susceptible to Chloramphenicol (91.67%), and Sulfamethoxazole (91.67%). Azithromycin (66.67%). Tetracycline (33.33%), and Cephalexin (16.67%) had moderate to low sensitivity. All 12 isolates showed 100% resistance toward Penicillin, Vancomycin, Erythromycin, and Nalidixic Acid. This result is congruent with the study of [10] performed in neighboring country Nepal, where they found their isolates sensitive to Ciprofloxacin, Ampicillin, and resistant to Nalidixic acid. However, unlike this study, their isolates also showed higher sensitivity toward Erythromycin and Tetracycline. The majority of resistance in environmental species are thought to have originated from historically resistant organisms. As a result, it's essential to keep track of both the frequency and the antimicrobial resistance profile of V. cholera to identify the high-risk water sources. To minimize the risk of cholera transmission through contaminated water, we recommend screening various water sources against this pathogenic bacteria before using it for washing, drinking and irrigation. Vulnerable populations, especially farmers in rural areas, should take appropriate precautions to avoid cholera transmission through water [11]. There were some limitations to our research. Due to the funding constrain, a limited number of samples were collected, which might not be sufficient to draw a precise conclusion. Our analysis still lacks molecular characterization of the isolates, which might have strengthened our conclusion.

    Table 7.  Antibiotic sensitivity profile of 12 isolates V. spp. obtained from different water samples.
    Organism Antibiotics Susceptibility (%) Resistance (%)
    V. cholera Gentamycin (GEN) 12(100%) 0(0%)
    Ciprofloxacin (CIP) 12(100%) 0(0%)
    Cephalexin (CN) 2(16.67%) 10(83.33%)
    Vancomycin (VA) 0(0%) 12(100%)
    Penicillin (P) 0(0%) 12(100%)
    Chloramphenicol (C) 11(91.67%) 1(8.33%)
    Tetracycline (TE) 4(33.33%) 8(66.67%)
    Erythromycin (E) 0(0%) 12(100%)
    Sulfamethoxazole (SXT) 11(91.67%) 1(8.33%)
    Nalidixic Acid (NA) 0(0%) 12(100%)
    Azithromycin (AZ) 8(66.67%) 4(33.33%)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Based on the data of our experiment we conclude that V. cholera is endemic to the surface water sources like pond and river in Gazipur region of Bangladesh. Underground water like tube well has comparatively lower concentration of V. cholera Antibiotics like, Gentamicin, Ciprofloxacin, Chloramphenicol, Sulfamethoxazole and Azithromycin are highly effective against the V. cholera isolates collected in this study. We suggest the application of these antibiotics in therapeutics of annual cholera outbreak. Furthermore, we highly recommend prioritizing underground water over surface water as drinking water source.



    [1] G. Polanczyk, P. Jensen, Epidemiologic considerations in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A review and update, Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am., 17 (2008), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2007.11.006 doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2007.11.006
    [2] Z. Zhang, G. Li, Y. Xu, X. Tang, Application of artificial intelligence in the MRI classification task of human brain neurological and psychiatric diseases: A scoping review, Diagnostics, 11 (2021), 1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081402 doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11081402
    [3] M. Quaak, L. Mortel, R. M. Thomas, G. V. Wingen, Deep learning applications for the classification of psychiatric disorders using neuroimaging data: Systematic review and meta-analysis, Neuroimage Clin., 30 (2021), 102584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102584 doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102584
    [4] L. Zou, J. Zheng, C. Miao, M. J. Mckeown, Z. J. Wang, 3D CNN based automatic diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder using functional and structural MRI, IEEE Access, 5 (2017), 23626–23636. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2762703 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2762703
    [5] L. Su, S. I. Kamata, ADHD classification with low-frequency fluctuation feature map based on 3D CBAMe, in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Biomedical Signal and Image Processing, ACM, (2022), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563737.3563749
    [6] M. Chen, H. Li, J. Wang, J. R. Dillman, N. A. Parikh, L. He, A multichannel deep neural network model analyzing multiscale functional brain connectome data for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder detection, Radiol. Artif. Intell., 2 (2019), e190012. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.2019190012 doi: 10.1148/ryai.2019190012
    [7] Y. Tang, J. Sun, C. Wang, Y. Zhong, A. Jiang, G. Liu, et al., ADHD classification using auto-encoding neural network and binary hypothesis testing, Artif. Intell. Med., 123 (2022), 102209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102209 doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102209
    [8] Y. Sun, L. Zhao, Z. Lan, X. Jia, S. Xue, Differentiating boys with ADHD from those with typical development based on whole-brain functional connections using a machine learning approach, Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat., 16 (2020), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S239013 doi: 10.2147/NDT.S239013
    [9] Y. Zang, Y. He, C. Zhu, Q. Cao, M. Sui, M. Liang, et al., Altered baseline brain activity in children with ADHD revealed by resting-state functional MRI, Brain Dev., 29 (2007), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.braindev.2006.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2006.07.002
    [10] M. Hoogman, J. Bralten, D. P. Hibar, M. Mennes, M. P. Zwiers, L. S. J. Schweren, et al., Subcortical brain volume differences in participants with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adults: A cross-sectional mega-analysis, Lancet Psychiatry, 4 (2017), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30049-4 doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30049-4
    [11] L. Liu, S. Tang, F. X. Wu, Y. P. Wang, J. Wang, An ensemble hybrid feature selection method for neuropsychiatric disorder classification, IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf., 19 (2021), 1459–1471. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2021.3053181 doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2021.3053181
    [12] J. B. Colby, J. D. Rudie, J. A. Brown, P. K. Douglas, M. S. Cohen, Z. Shehzad, Insights into multimodal imaging classification of ADHD, Front. Syst. Neurosci., 6 (2012), 59. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2012.00059 doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00059
    [13] M. Wang, B. Jie, W. Bian, X. Ding, W. Zhou, Z. Wang, et al., Graph-kernel based structured feature selection for brain disease classification using functional connectivity networks, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 35001–35011. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903332 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903332
    [14] Y. Zhao, H. Chen, R. T. Ogden, Wavelet-based weighted LASSO and screening approaches in functional linear regression, J. Comput. Graphical Stat., 24 (2015), 655–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2014.925458 doi: 10.1080/10618600.2014.925458
    [15] M. Nunez-Garcia, S. Simpraga, M. A. Jurado, M. Garolera, R. Pueyo, L. Igual, FADR: Functional-anatomical discriminative regions for rest fMRI characterization, in Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Springer, (2015), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24888-2_8
    [16] H. W. Loh, C. P. Ooi, P. D. Barua, E. E. Palmer, F. Molinari, U. R. Acharya, Automated detection of ADHD: Current trends and future perspective, Comput. Biol. Med., 146 (2022), 105525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105525 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105525
    [17] Z. Mao, Y. Su, G. Xu, X. Wang, Y. Huang, W. Yue, et al., Spatio-temporal deep learning method for ADHD fMRI classification, Inf. Sci., 499 (2019), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.043 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.043
    [18] T. Zhang, C. Li, P. Li, Y. Peng, X. Kang, C. Jiang, et al., Separated channel attention convolutional neural network (SC-CNN-attention) to identify ADHD in multi-site rs-fMRI dataset, Entropy, 22 (2020), 893. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22080893 doi: 10.3390/e22080893
    [19] Z. Wang, Y. Zhu, H. Shi, Y. Zhang, C. Yan, A 3D multiscale view convolutional neural network with attention for mental disease diagnosis on MRI images, Math. Biosci. Eng., 18 (2021), 6978–6994. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2021347 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021347
    [20] N. Qiang, Q. Dong, F. Ge, H. Liang, B. Ge, S. Zhang, et al., Deep variational autoencoder for mapping functional brain networks, IEEE Trans. Cognit. Dev. Syst., 13 (2020), 841–852. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2020.3025137 doi: 10.1109/TCDS.2020.3025137
    [21] N. Qiang, Q. Dong, H. Liang, B. Ge, S. Zhang, C. Zhang, et al., A novel ADHD classification method based on resting state temporal templates (RSTT) using spatiotemporal attention auto-encoder, Neural. Comput. Appl., 34 (2022), 7815–7833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06868-w doi: 10.1007/s00521-021-06868-w
    [22] A. Gyurak, M. S. Goodkind, J. H. Kramer, B. L. Miller, R. W. Levenson, Executive functions and the down-regulation and up-regulation of emotion, Cognit. Emotion, 26 (2012), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.557291 doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.557291
    [23] C. Fu, S. Chen, A. Qian, R. Zhou, J. Zhou, J. Li, et al., Larger thalamus correlated with inattentive severity in the inattentive subtype of ADHD without comorbidity, Psychiatry Res., 304 (2021), 114079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114079 doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114079
    [24] G. W. Schrimsher, R. L. Billingsley, E. F. Jackson, B. D. Moore, Caudate nucleus volume asymmetry predicts attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptomatology in children, J. Child Neurol., 17 (2002), 877–884. https://doi.org/10.1177/08830738020170122001 doi: 10.1177/08830738020170122001
    [25] T. Frodl, J. Stauber, N. Schaaff, N. Koutsouleris, J. Scheuerecker, M. Ewers, et al., Amygdala reduction in patients with ADHD compared with major depression and healthy volunteers, Acta Psychiatr. Scand., 121 (2010), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01489.x doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01489.x
    [26] K. Nickel, L. T. Elst, E. Perlov, R. Jitten-Schachenmeier, D. Beier, D. Endres, et al., Manual morphometry of hippocampus and amygdala in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging, 267 (2017), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2017.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2017.07.001
    [27] K. J. Plessen, R. Bansal, H. Zhu, R. Whiteman, J. Amat, G. A. Quackenbush, et al., Hippocampus and amygdala morphology in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 63 (2006), 795–807. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.795 doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.795
    [28] Y. Wang, Q. Xu, S. Li, G. Li, C. Zuo, S. Liao, et al., Gender differences in anomalous subcortical morphology for children with ADHD, Neurosci. Lett., 665 (2018), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.12.006 doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.12.006
    [29] S. B. Hong, Thalamocortical functional connectivity in youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, J. Psychiatry Neurosci., 48 (2023), E50–E60. https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.220109 doi: 10.1503/jpn.220109
    [30] J. Posner, F. Siciliano, Z. Wang, J. Liu, E. Sonuga-Barke, L. Greenhill, A multimodal MRI study of the hippocampus in medication-naive children with ADHD: What connects ADHD and depression, Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging, 224 (2014), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.08.006 doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.08.006
    [31] M. M. Bruchhage, M. P. Bucci, E. B. Becker, Cerebellar involvement in autism and ADHD, Handb. Clin. Neurol., 155 (2018), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64189-2.00004-4 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64189-2.00004-4
    [32] M. V. Cherkasova, L. Hechtman, Neuroimaging in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Beyond the frontostriatal circuitry, Can. J. Psychiatry, 54 (2009), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370905401002 doi: 10.1177/070674370905401002
    [33] G. Bush, Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and attention networks, Neuropsychopharmacology, 35 (2010), 278–300. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.120 doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.120
    [34] L. A. Friedman, J. L. Rapoport, Brain development in ADHD, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 30 (2015), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.11.007 doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.11.007
    [35] Y. Chen, Y. Tang, C. Wang, X. Liu, L. Zhao, Z. Wang, ADHD classification by dual subspace learning using resting-state functional connectivity, Artif. Intell. Med., 103 (2020), 101786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101786 doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101786
    [36] Y. Tang, X. Li, Y. Chen, Y. Zhong, A. Jiang, C. Wang, High-accuracy classification of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with l2,1-norm linear discriminant analysis and binary hypothesis testing, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 56228–56237. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982401 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982401
    [37] Y. Tang, C. Wang, Y. Chen, N. Sun, A. Jiang, Z. Wang, Identifying ADHD individuals from resting-state functional connectivity using subspace clustering and binary hypothesis testing, J. Atten. Disord., 25 (2021), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054719837749 doi: 10.1177/1087054719837749
    [38] N. Liu, X. Li, E. Qi, M. Xu, L. Li, B. Gao, A novel ensemble learning paradigm for medical diagnosis with imbalanced data, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 171263–171280. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3014362 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3014362
    [39] Q. Yuan, K. Chen, Y. Yu, N. Q. K. Le, M. C. H. Chua, Prediction of anticancer peptides based on an ensemble model of deep learning and machine learning using ordinal positional encoding, Briefings Bioinf., 24 (2023), bbac630. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbac630 doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac630
    [40] S. Singh, N. Q. K. Le, C. Wang, Vf-pred: Predicting virulence factor using sequence alignment percentage and ensemble learning models, Comput. Biol. Med., 168 (2024), 107662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107662 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107662
    [41] Y. Qin, Y. Lou, Y. Huang, R. Chen, W. Yue, An ensemble deep learning approach combining phenotypic data and fMRI for ADHD diagnosis, J. Signal Process. Syst., 94 (2022), 1269–1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-022-01812-0 doi: 10.1007/s11265-022-01812-0
    [42] B. Miao, L. L. Zhang, J. L. Guan, Q. F. Meng, Y. L. Zhang, Classification of ADHD individuals and neurotypicals using reliable RELIEF: A resting-state study, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 62163–62171. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2915988 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2915988
    [43] L. Shao, Y. Xu, D. Fu, Classification of ADHD with bi-objective optimization, J. Biomed. Inf., 84 (2018), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.011 doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.011
    [44] A. Riaz, M. Asad, E. Alonso, G. Slabaugh, Fusion of fMRI and non-imaging data for ADHD classification, Comput. Med. Imaging Graphics, 65 (2018), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2017.10.002 doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2017.10.002
    [45] A. Riaz, M. Asad, E. Alonso, G. Slabaugh, Deepfmri: End-to-end deep learning for functional connectivity and classification of ADHD using fmri, J. Neurosci. Methods, 335 (2020), 108506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108506 doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108506
    [46] S. Liu, L. Zhao, X. Wang, Q. Xin, J. Zhao, D. S. Guttery, et al., Deep spatio-temporal representation and ensemble classification for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 29 (2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3019063 doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3019063
    [47] S. Pei, C. Wang, S. Cao, Z. Lv, Data augmentation for fmri-based functional connectivity and its application to cross-site adhd classification, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 72 (2022), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2022.3232670 doi: 10.1109/TIM.2022.3232670
    [48] H. Suzuki, K. N. Botteron, J. L. Luby, A. C. Belden, M. S. Gaffrey, C. M. Babb, et al., Structural-functional correlations between hippocampal volume and cortico-limbic emotional responses in depressed children, Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 13 (2013), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0121-y doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0121-y
    [49] V. Vuontela, S. Carlson, A. M. Troberg, T. Fontell, P. Simola, S. Saarinen, et al., Working memory, attention, inhibition, and their relation to adaptive functioning and behavioral/emotional symptoms in school-aged children, Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev., 44 (2013), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-012-0313-2 doi: 10.1007/s10578-012-0313-2
    [50] E. M. Valera, S. V. Faraone, K. E. Murray, L. J. Seidman, Meta-analysis of structural imaging findings in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Biol. Psychiatry, 61 (2007), 1361–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.06.011 doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.06.011
    [51] T. Frodl, N. Skokauskas, Meta-analysis of structural MRI studies in children and adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder indicates treatment effects, Acta Psychiatr. Scand., 125 (2012), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01786.x doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01786.x
    [52] T. Nakao, J. Radua, K. Rubia, D. Mataix-Cols, Gray matter volume abnormalities in ADHD: Voxel-based meta-analysis exploring the effects of age and stimulant medication, Am. J. Psychiatry, 168 (2011), 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020281 doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020281
    [53] I. Ivanov, R. Bansal, X. Hao, H. Zhu, C. Kellendonk, L. Miller, et al., Morphological abnormalities of the thalamus in youths with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Am. J. Psychiatry, 167 (2010), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09030398 doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09030398
    [54] S. Mackie, P. Shaw, R. Lenroot, R. Pierson, D. K. Greenstein, T. F. Nugent, et al., Cerebellar development and clinical outcome in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Am. J. Psychiatry, 164 (2007), 647–655. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.164.4.647 doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.164.4.647
    [55] F. X. Castellanos, J. N. Giedd, P. C. Berquin, J. M. Walter, W. Sharp, T. Tran, et al., Quantitative brain magnetic resonance imaging in girls with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 58 (2001), 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.58.3.289 doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.3.289
    [56] S. H. Mostofsky, A. L. Reiss, P. Lockhart, M. B. Denckla, Evaluation of cerebellar size in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, J. Child Neurol., 13 (1998), 434–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/088307389801300904 doi: 10.1177/088307389801300904
    [57] J. D. Schmahmann, Disorders of the cerebellum: Ataxia, dysmetria of thought, and the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome, J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci., 16 (2004), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.16.3.367 doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.16.3.367
    [58] K. P. Schulz, J. Fan, C. Y. Tang, J. H. Newcorn, M. S. Buchsbaum, A. M. Cheung, et al., Response inhibition in adolescents diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during childhood: An event-related FMRI study, Am. J. Psychiatry, 161 (2004), 1650–1657. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1650 doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1650
    [59] D. Riva, C. Giorgi, The cerebellum contributes to higher functions during development: Evidence from a series of children surgically treated for posterior fossa tumours, Brain, 123 (2000), 1051–1061. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.5.1051 doi: 10.1093/brain/123.5.1051
    [60] D. Dong, Q. Ming, X. Wang, W. Yu, Y. Jiang, Q. Wu, et al., Temporoparietal junction hypoactivity during pain-related empathy processing in adolescents with conduct disorder, Front. Psychol., 7 (2017), 231676. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02085 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02085
    [61] G. Bush, Cingulate, frontal, and parietal cortical dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Biol. Psychiatryry, 69 (2011), 1160–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.01.022 doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.01.022
    [62] F. Biondo, C. N. Thunell, B. Xu, C. Chu, T. Jia, A. Ing, et al., Sex differences in neural correlates of common psychopathological symptoms in early adolescence, Psychol. Med., 52 (2022), 3086–3096. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720005140 doi: 10.1017/S0033291720005140
    [63] K. Jiang, Y. Yi, L. Li, H. Li, H. Shen, F. Zhao, et al., Functional network connectivity changes in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A resting-state fMRI study, Int. J. Dev. Neurosci., 78 (2019), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2019.07.003 doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2019.07.003
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Prasanga Madhushani Kumarage, Liyana Arachchilage Dinithi Sandunika De Silva, Gang-Joon Heo, Aquatic environments: A potential source of antimicrobial-resistant Vibrio spp., 2022, 133, 1365-2672, 2267, 10.1111/jam.15702
    2. Raquiba Sultana, Al Mahmud, Sayad Mahmud Koli, Jannatul Nayema, Aboni Ghosh, Susmita Banik Sushree, Pranta Shom, Tanvir Ahmed Siddiqui, Kamal Kanta Das, Mrityunjoy Acharjee, Isolation and Identification of Vibrio Species from Different Types of Water Sources Along with Their Drug Susceptible Pattern, 2024, 8, 2588-9834, 207, 10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_138_24
    3. Aaron Awere‐Duodu, Onyansaniba K. Ntim, Eric S. Donkor, Vibrio cholerae in Water Environments: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis, 2025, 17, 1758-2229, 10.1111/1758-2229.70103
    4. Bright E IGERE, ONOHUEAN Hope, P.O Adomi, T Bashiru Abeni, Phenicol antibiotic resistance status amongst environmental non-O1/non-O139 Vibrio cholerae and Clinical O1/O139 Vibrio cholerae strains: a systematic review and meta-synthesis, 2025, 29501946, 100474, 10.1016/j.microb.2025.100474
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1979) PDF downloads(97) Cited by(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog