The striking dominance of groundwater-related defects in the operational high-speed railway tunnels in China calls for swift and accurate detection and identification. Thus, it is a new attempt to detect the water-bearing defects at 5 to 10 meters via train-borne transient electromagnetic method in operating tunnels. Due to the short detection distance, the interaction between transmitting and receiving coils is more important than those normally used coils. Thus, numerical and experimental methods are combined to investigate the mutual induction. The influence of turns, current and coil size on the mutual induction and the impact of damping coefficient on the receiving system are manifested. To further verify these findings, full-scale model experiments are conducted. During these physical experiments, the detection results of different coil parameters including coil size, number of turns, and emission current are compared and analyzed. Then, a special effort to minimize the induction between transmitting and receiving coils is expended to acquire the suitable coils for close range detection in the tunnel context. Finally, in order to verify the availability of the detection system, different detection distances are conducted. It turns out that different detection distances have slight difference at the detection results, but they are still within the measuring range of the detection instrument. Obviously, these findings can provide theoretical support for the detection of water-bearing anomalies in operating tunnels and it also has reference significance for the detection of anomalies at close distance.
Citation: Zongyang Li, Taiyue Qi, Shaojie Qin, Wangping Qian. The research on minimizing the induction between the transmitting and receiving coils in close range transient electromagnetic inspection of groundwater-related defects in the operating tunnels[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 4508-4527. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021229
| [1] | Sarafa A. Iyaniwura, Musa Rabiu, Jummy F. David, Jude D. Kong . Assessing the impact of adherence to Non-pharmaceutical interventions and indirect transmission on the dynamics of COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 8905-8932. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021439 |
| [2] | Gabriel McCarthy, Hana M. Dobrovolny . Determining the best mathematical model for implementation of non-pharmaceutical interventions. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(3): 700-724. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025026 |
| [3] | Wenhan Guo, Yixin Xie, Alan E Lopez-Hernandez, Shengjie Sun, Lin Li . Electrostatic features for nucleocapsid proteins of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(3): 2372-2383. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021120 |
| [4] | Roman Zúñiga Macías, Humberto Gutiérrez-Pulido, Edgar Alejandro Guerrero Arroyo, Abel Palafox González . Geographical network model for COVID-19 spread among dynamic epidemic regions. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(4): 4237-4259. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022196 |
| [5] | Beatriz Machado, Liliana Antunes, Constantino Caetano, João F. Pereira, Baltazar Nunes, Paula Patrício, M. Luísa Morgado . The impact of vaccination on the evolution of COVID-19 in Portugal. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(1): 936-952. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022043 |
| [6] | Salma M. Al-Tuwairqi, Sara K. Al-Harbi . Modeling the effect of random diagnoses on the spread of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(10): 9792-9824. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022456 |
| [7] | Anichur Rahman, Muaz Rahman, Dipanjali Kundu, Md Razaul Karim, Shahab S. Band, Mehdi Sookhak . Study on IoT for SARS-CoV-2 with healthcare: present and future perspective. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 9697-9726. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021475 |
| [8] | Avinash Shankaranarayanan, Hsiu-Chuan Wei . Mathematical modeling of SARS-nCoV-2 virus in Tamil Nadu, South India. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(11): 11324-11344. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022527 |
| [9] | Yangyang Yu, Yuan Liu, Shi Zhao, Daihai He . A simple model to estimate the transmissibility of the Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants of SARS-COV-2 in South Africa. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(10): 10361-10373. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022485 |
| [10] | Fang Wang, Lianying Cao, Xiaoji Song . Mathematical modeling of mutated COVID-19 transmission with quarantine, isolation and vaccination. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(8): 8035-8056. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022376 |
The striking dominance of groundwater-related defects in the operational high-speed railway tunnels in China calls for swift and accurate detection and identification. Thus, it is a new attempt to detect the water-bearing defects at 5 to 10 meters via train-borne transient electromagnetic method in operating tunnels. Due to the short detection distance, the interaction between transmitting and receiving coils is more important than those normally used coils. Thus, numerical and experimental methods are combined to investigate the mutual induction. The influence of turns, current and coil size on the mutual induction and the impact of damping coefficient on the receiving system are manifested. To further verify these findings, full-scale model experiments are conducted. During these physical experiments, the detection results of different coil parameters including coil size, number of turns, and emission current are compared and analyzed. Then, a special effort to minimize the induction between transmitting and receiving coils is expended to acquire the suitable coils for close range detection in the tunnel context. Finally, in order to verify the availability of the detection system, different detection distances are conducted. It turns out that different detection distances have slight difference at the detection results, but they are still within the measuring range of the detection instrument. Obviously, these findings can provide theoretical support for the detection of water-bearing anomalies in operating tunnels and it also has reference significance for the detection of anomalies at close distance.
| [1] | C. X. Liu, Cause Analysis and construction technology study of water-leakage of liner in Huangdengxian Tunnel, J. Railw. Sci. Eng., 2 (2010), 79-82. |
| [2] | P. Li, Displacement characteristics of high-speed railway tunnel construction in loess ground by using multi-step excavation method, Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 51 (2015), 41-55. |
| [3] |
X. Liang, T. Qi, Z. Jin, W. Qian, Hybrid support vector machine optimization model for inversion of tunnel transient electromagnetic method, Math. Biosci. Eng., 17 (2020), 3998-4017. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020221
|
| [4] | K. Y. Wang, H.Xiao, Y. J. Shang, K. M. Sun, W. T. He, Prediction of rock burst at wall rocks of tunnels in Southwest, J. Eng. Geol., 5 (2014), 903-914. |
| [5] |
G. Q. Xue, C. Y. Bai, S. Yan, S. Greenhalgh, M. F. Li, N. N. Zhou, Deep sounding tem investigation method based on a modified fixed central-loop system, J. Appl. Geophys., 76 (2012), 23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.10.007
|
| [6] |
G.Q. Xue, L. Zhang, N. Zhou, W. Chen, Developments measurements of TEM sounding in china, Geol. J., 55 (2020), 1636-1643. doi: 10.1002/gj.3544
|
| [7] | E. Auken, Approaching 10 microsec (and earlier) with the Skytem system, ASEG Extended Abstracts, 1 (2010), 1. |
| [8] | B. R. Spies, The dual loop configuration of the transient electromagnetic method, Geophysics, 40 (1974), 1051. |
| [9] | G. Q. Xue, J. L. Cheng, N. N. Zhou, W. Y. Chen, H. Li, Detection and monitoring of water-filled voids using transient electromagnetic method: A case study in shanxi, china, Environ. Earth Sci., 70 (2013), 2263-2270. |
| [10] |
A. E. Plotnikov, Evaluation of limitations of the transient electromagnetic method in shallow-depth studies: Numerical experiment, Russ. Geol. Geophys., 55 (2014), 907-914. doi: 10.1016/j.rgg.2014.06.009
|
| [11] | Z. Xi, X. Long, L. Huang, S. Zhou, G. Song, H. Hou, et al., Opposing-coils transient electromagnetic method focused near-surface resolution, Geophysics, 81 (2016), E279-E285. |
| [12] |
D. V. Fitterman, W. L. Anderson, Effect of transmitter turn-off time on transient soundings, Geoexploration, 24 (1987), 131-146. doi: 10.1016/0016-7142(87)90087-1
|
| [13] | F. Kamenetsky, C. Oelsner, Distortions of EM transients in coincident loops at short time-delays, Geophys. Prospect., 48 (2008), 983-993. |
| [14] |
I. M. Lee, Q. H. Truong, D. H. Kim, J. S. Lee, Discontinuity detection ahead of a tunnel face utilizing ultrasonic reflection: Laboratory scale application, Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 24 (2009), 155-163. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2008.06.001
|
| [15] | Denghai Bai, Maxwell Meju, The effect of two types of turn-off current on TEM responses and the correction techniques, Seismology and Geology, 23 (2001), 245-251. |
| [16] | B. R. Spies, D. E. Eggers, The use and misuse of apparent resistivity in electromagnetic methods, Geophysics, 51 (1986), 1462. |
| [17] |
K. Vozoff, Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics, Geophys. Surveys, 4 (1980), 9-29. doi: 10.1007/BF01452955
|
| [18] | H. J. Wang, Characteristics of damping coefficient effect on transient electromagnetic signal, Chin. J. Geophys., 53 (2010), 428-434. (In Chinese). |
| 1. | S. Olaniyi, O. S. Obabiyi, K. O. Okosun, A. T. Oladipo, S. O. Adewale, Mathematical modelling and optimal cost-effective control of COVID-19 transmission dynamics, 2020, 135, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00954-z | |
| 2. | Ricardo A. G. Unglaub, Kathrin Spendier, A Model for the Spread of Infectious Diseases with Application to COVID-19, 2021, 12, 2078-1547, 3, 10.3390/challe12010003 | |
| 3. | Akhil Kumar Srivastav, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Prashant K Srivastava, Mini Ghosh, Yun Kang, A mathematical model for the impacts of face mask, hospitalization and quarantine on the dynamics of COVID-19 in India: deterministic vs. stochastic, 2021, 18, 1551-0018, 182, 10.3934/mbe.2021010 | |
| 4. | Pakwan Riyapan, Sherif Eneye Shuaib, Arthit Intarasit, Kazuhisa Nishizawa, A Mathematical Model of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Bangkok, Thailand, 2021, 2021, 1748-6718, 1, 10.1155/2021/6664483 | |
| 5. | Akhil Kumar Srivastav, Mini Ghosh, Shraddha Ramdas Bandekar, Modeling of COVID-19 with limited public health resources: a comparative study of three most affected countries, 2021, 136, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01333-y | |
| 6. | Matthew O. Adewole, Akindele A. Onifade, Farah A. Abdullah, Funmilayo Kasali, Ahmad I. M. Ismail, Modeling the Dynamics of COVID-19 in Nigeria, 2021, 7, 2349-5103, 10.1007/s40819-021-01014-5 | |
| 7. | P. K. Santra, D. Ghosh, G. S. Mahapatra, Ebenezer Bonyah, Chung-Min Liao, Mathematical Analysis of Two Waves of COVID-19 Disease with Impact of Vaccination as Optimal Control, 2022, 2022, 1748-6718, 1, 10.1155/2022/2684055 | |
| 8. | Xinyu Bai, Shaojuan Ma, Stochastic dynamical behavior of COVID-19 model based on secondary vaccination, 2022, 20, 1551-0018, 2980, 10.3934/mbe.2023141 | |
| 9. | Asghar Atifa, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Kulpash Iskakova, Fuad S. Al-Duais, Irshad Ahmad, Mathematical modeling and analysis of the SARS-Cov-2 disease with reinfection, 2022, 98, 14769271, 107678, 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2022.107678 | |
| 10. | Isa Abdullahi Baba, Musbahu Aminu Sani, Bashir Ahmad Nasidi, Fractional dynamical model to assess the efficacy of facemask to the community transmission of COVID-19, 2022, 25, 1025-5842, 1588, 10.1080/10255842.2021.2024170 | |
| 11. | Newton I. Okposo, Matthew O. Adewole, Emamuzo N. Okposo, Herietta I. Ojarikre, Farah A. Abdullah, A mathematical study on a fractional COVID-19 transmission model within the framework of nonsingular and nonlocal kernel, 2021, 152, 09600779, 111427, 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111427 | |
| 12. | Akin Abayomi, Mobolanle R. Balogun, Munir Bankole, Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas, Bamidele Mutiu, John Olawepo, Morakinyo Senjobi, Oluwakemi Odukoya, Lanre Aladetuyi, Chioma Ejekam, Akinsanya Folarin, Madonna Emmanuel, Funke Amodu, Adesoji Ologun, Abosede Olusanya, Moses Bakare, Abiodun Alabi, Ismail Abdus-Salam, Eniola Erinosho, Abimbola Bowale, Sunday Omilabu, Babatunde Saka, Akin Osibogun, Ololade Wright, Jide Idris, Folasade Ogunsola, From Ebola to COVID-19: emergency preparedness and response plans and actions in Lagos, Nigeria, 2021, 17, 1744-8603, 10.1186/s12992-021-00728-x | |
| 13. | Salihu Sabiu Musa, Xueying Wang, Shi Zhao, Shudong Li, Nafiu Hussaini, Weiming Wang, Daihai He, The Heterogeneous Severity of COVID-19 in African Countries: A Modeling Approach, 2022, 84, 0092-8240, 10.1007/s11538-022-00992-x | |
| 14. | Guangxuan Yan, Jincai Yang, Shibing Qin, Peng Yin, Aixing Pan, Yong Hai, Rahim Khan, Mathematical Modeling and Nail Placement Accuracy Analysis of NF-1 Neurofibromatosis Scoliosis, 2022, 2022, 2040-2309, 1, 10.1155/2022/4229377 | |
| 15. | Bassey Echeng Bassey, Jeremiah U. Atsu, Global stability analysis of the role of multi-therapies and non-pharmaceutical treatment protocols for COVID-19 pandemic, 2021, 143, 09600779, 110574, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110574 | |
| 16. | Oluwatayo Michael Ogunmiloro, On the mathematical modeling of COVID-19 pandemic disease with some non-pharmaceutical interventions: Nigerian case study, 2022, 25, 0972-0502, 1071, 10.1080/09720502.2021.1930659 | |
| 17. | Mustafa Kamal, Mintodê Nicodème Atchadé, Yves Morel Sokadjo, Sabir Ali Siddiqui, Fathy H. Riad, M. M. Abd El-Raouf, Ramy Aldallal, Eslam Hussam, Huda M. Alshanbari, Hassan Alsuhabi, Ahmed M. Gemeay, Influence of COVID-19 vaccination on the dynamics of new infected cases in the world, 2022, 20, 1551-0018, 3324, 10.3934/mbe.2023156 | |
| 18. | Alexander Domoshnitsky, Alexander Sitkin, Lea Zuckerman, Mathematical Modeling of COVID-19 Transmission in the Form of System of Integro-Differential Equations, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 4500, 10.3390/math10234500 | |
| 19. | David O. Akeju, Samuel O. Adejoh, Ayoola J. Fakunmoju, Matthew J. Allsop, Bassey Ebenso, Titilayo Tade, Babasola O. Okusanya, The COVID‐19 pandemic: Stay Home policy and exposure to risks of infection among Nigerians, 2021, 1948-4682, 10.1002/wmh3.445 | |
| 20. | Saratu Yusuf Ilu, Prasad Rajesh, Hassan Mohammed, Prediction of COVID-19 using long short-term memory by integrating principal component analysis and clustering techniques, 2022, 31, 23529148, 100990, 10.1016/j.imu.2022.100990 | |
| 21. | Taye Samuel Faniran, Aatif Ali, Nawal E. Al-Hazmi, Joshua Kiddy K. Asamoah, Taher A. Nofal, Matthew O. Adewole, Dan Selişteanu, New Variant of SARS-CoV-2 Dynamics with Imperfect Vaccine, 2022, 2022, 1099-0526, 1, 10.1155/2022/1062180 | |
| 22. | Taye Samuel Faniran, Leontine Nkague Nkamba, Thomas Timothee Manga, Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of COVID-19 Dynamics, 2021, 10, 2075-1680, 210, 10.3390/axioms10030210 | |
| 23. | B. I. Omede, U. B. Odionyenma, A. A. Ibrahim, Bolarinwa Bolaji, Third wave of COVID-19: mathematical model with optimal control strategy for reducing the disease burden in Nigeria, 2023, 11, 2195-268X, 411, 10.1007/s40435-022-00982-w | |
| 24. | Jiraporn Lamwong, Puntani Pongsumpun, I-Ming Tang, Napasool Wongvanich, Vaccination’s Role in Combating the Omicron Variant Outbreak in Thailand: An Optimal Control Approach, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 3899, 10.3390/math10203899 | |
| 25. | Abadi Abay Gebremeskel, Hailay Weldegiorgis Berhe, Adugna Temesgen Abay, Kamal Shah, A Mathematical Modelling and Analysis of COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics with Optimal Control Strategy, 2022, 2022, 1748-6718, 1, 10.1155/2022/8636530 | |
| 26. | Samantha J. Brozak, Binod Pant, Salman Safdar, Abba B. Gumel, Dynamics of COVID-19 pandemic in India and Pakistan: A metapopulation modelling approach, 2021, 6, 24680427, 1173, 10.1016/j.idm.2021.10.001 | |
| 27. | Matthew O. Adewole, Taye Samuel Faniran, Farah A. Abdullah, Majid K.M. Ali, COVID-19 dynamics and immune response: Linking within-host and between-host dynamics, 2023, 173, 09600779, 113722, 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113722 | |
| 28. | Konstantin Kogan, Fouad El Ouardighi, Avi Herbon, The economic impact of lockdown and bounded treatment capability for an epidemic without vaccine, 2024, 77, 0938-2259, 283, 10.1007/s00199-023-01531-y | |
| 29. | Wandera Ogana, Victor Ogesa Juma, Wallace D. Bulimo, Mathematical modelling of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control infectious diseases: application to COVID-19 in Kenya, 2024, 10, 2297-4687, 10.3389/fams.2024.1365184 | |
| 30. | Charu Krishna, Dinesh Kumar, Dharmender Singh Kushwaha, A Comprehensive Survey on Pandemic Patient Monitoring System: Enabling Technologies, Opportunities, and Research Challenges, 2023, 131, 0929-6212, 2125, 10.1007/s11277-023-10535-9 | |
| 31. | Tan Su, Xinhong Zhang, Daqing Jiang, Dynamic analysis of generalized epidemic models with latent period, quarantine, governmental intervention and Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process, 2024, 112, 0924-090X, 7749, 10.1007/s11071-024-09458-2 | |
| 32. | Yvette Montcho, Sidoine Dako, Valère Kolawole Salako, Chénangnon Frédéric Tovissodé, Martin Wolkewitz, Romain Glèlè Kakaï, Assessing marginal effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 across Africa: a hybrid modeling study, 2024, 41, 1477-8599, 225, 10.1093/imammb/dqae013 | |
| 33. | Israel Huaman, Vasiliy Leonenko, 2023, Chapter 21, 978-3-031-36023-7, 270, 10.1007/978-3-031-36024-4_21 | |
| 34. | Mohammed M. Al-Shamiri, N. Avinash, P. Chellamani, Manal Z. M. Abdallah, G. Britto Antony Xavier, V. Rexma Sherine, M. Abisha, Sergey Dashkovskiy, Stability Analysis and Simulation of Diffusive Vaccinated Models, 2024, 2024, 1076-2787, 10.1155/2024/5595996 | |
| 35. | Matthew O. Adewole, Farah A. Abdullah, Majid K. M. Ali, 2024, 3203, 0094-243X, 030007, 10.1063/5.0225272 | |
| 36. | José Geiser Villavicencio-Pulido, Ignacio Barradas, Claudia Nila-Luévano, Additive multiple contacts and saturation phenomena in epidemiological models are not detected by R0, 2024, 19, 0973-5348, 8, 10.1051/mmnp/2024006 | |
| 37. | Trisha Greenhalgh, C. Raina MacIntyre, Michael G. Baker, Shovon Bhattacharjee, Abrar A. Chughtai, David Fisman, Mohana Kunasekaran, Amanda Kvalsvig, Deborah Lupton, Matt Oliver, Essa Tawfiq, Mark Ungrin, Joe Vipond, Ferric C. Fang, Linsey Marr, Masks and respirators for prevention of respiratory infections: a state of the science review, 2024, 37, 0893-8512, 10.1128/cmr.00124-23 | |
| 38. | Khalaf M. Alanazi, The asymptotic spreading speeds of COVID-19 with the effect of delay and quarantine, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 19397, 10.3934/math.2024945 | |
| 39. | C. K. Mahadhika, Dipo Aldila, A deterministic transmission model for analytics-driven optimization of COVID-19 post-pandemic vaccination and quarantine strategies, 2024, 21, 1551-0018, 4956, 10.3934/mbe.2024219 | |
| 40. | Sarita Bugalia, Jai Prakash Tripathi, Hao Wang, Mutations make pandemics worse or better: modeling SARS-CoV-2 variants and imperfect vaccination, 2024, 88, 0303-6812, 10.1007/s00285-024-02068-x | |
| 41. | Jonner Nainggolan, Moch. Fandi Ansori, Hengki Tasman, An optimal control model with sensitivity analysis for COVID-19 transmission using logistic recruitment rate, 2025, 27724425, 100375, 10.1016/j.health.2024.100375 | |
| 42. | Nikola Geciová, Lukáš Tomaščík, Marek Horváth, 2025, Development of a MATLAB Application for Simulating the SEIQRD Pandemic Spread Model, 979-8-3503-7936-5, 000215, 10.1109/SAMI63904.2025.10883239 | |
| 43. | Tuğba Akman, Emek Köse, Necibe Tuncer, Assessment of vaccination and underreporting on COVID-19 infections in Turkey based on effective reproduction number, 2025, 18, 1793-5245, 10.1142/S1793524523501024 |
Figures(24)
Zongyang Li, Taiyue Qi, Shaojie Qin, Wangping Qian. The research on minimizing the induction between the transmitting and receiving coils in close range transient electromagnetic inspection of groundwater-related defects in the operating tunnels[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 4508-4527. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021229
DownLoad: