Many natural population growths and interactions are affected by
seasonal changes, suggesting that these natural population dynamics
should be modeled by nonautonomous differential equations instead of
autonomous differential equations. Through a series of carefully
derived models of the well documented high-amplitude, large-period
fluctuations of lemming populations, we argue that when
appropriately formulated, autonomous differential equations may
capture much of the desirable rich dynamics, such as the existence
of a periodic solution with period and amplitude close to that of
approximately periodic solutions produced by the more natural but
mathematically daunting nonautonomous models. We start this series
of models from the Barrow model, a well formulated model for the
dynamics of food-lemming interaction at Point Barrow (Alaska, USA)
with sufficient experimental data. Our work suggests that an
autonomous system can indeed be a good approximation to the
moss-lemming dynamics at Point Barrow. This, together with our
bifurcation analysis, indicates that neither seasonal factors
(expressed by time-dependent moss growth rate and lemming death rate
in the Barrow model) nor the moss growth rate and lemming death rate
are the main culprits of the observed multi-year lemming cycles. We
suspect that the main culprits may include high lemming predation
rate, high lemming birth rate, and low lemming self-limitation rate.
Citation: Hao Wang, Yang Kuang. Alternative models for cyclic lemming dynamics[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2007, 4(1): 85-99. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2007.4.85
Related Papers:
[1] |
Gunog Seo, Mark Kot .
The dynamics of a simple Laissez-Faire model with two predators. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2009, 6(1): 145-172.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.145
|
[2] |
Christian Cortés García .
Bifurcations in a discontinuous Leslie-Gower model with harvesting and alternative food for predators and constant prey refuge at low density. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 14029-14055.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022653
|
[3] |
Claudio Arancibia–Ibarra, José Flores .
Modelling and analysis of a modified May-Holling-Tanner predator-prey model with Allee effect in the prey and an alternative food source for the predator. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(6): 8052-8073.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020408
|
[4] |
Xiao Wu, Shuying Lu, Feng Xie .
Relaxation oscillations of a piecewise-smooth slow-fast Bazykin's model with Holling type Ⅰ functional response. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(10): 17608-17624.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023782
|
[5] |
Xiaoying Wang, Xingfu Zou .
Pattern formation of a predator-prey model with the cost of anti-predator behaviors. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2018, 15(3): 775-805.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018035
|
[6] |
Gianni Gilioli, Sara Pasquali, Fabrizio Ruggeri .
Nonlinear functional response parameter estimation in a stochastic predator-prey model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2012, 9(1): 75-96.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.75
|
[7] |
Maoxiang Wang, Fenglan Hu, Meng Xu, Zhipeng Qiu .
Keep, break and breakout in food chains with two and three species. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(1): 817-836.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021043
|
[8] |
Peter A. Braza .
A dominant predator, a predator, and a prey. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2008, 5(1): 61-73.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2008.5.61
|
[9] |
Lazarus Kalvein Beay, Agus Suryanto, Isnani Darti, Trisilowati .
Hopf bifurcation and stability analysis of the Rosenzweig-MacArthur predator-prey model with stage-structure in prey. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 4080-4097.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020226
|
[10] |
Feng Rao, Carlos Castillo-Chavez, Yun Kang .
Dynamics of a stochastic delayed Harrison-type predation model: Effects of delay and stochastic components. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2018, 15(6): 1401-1423.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018064
|
Abstract
Many natural population growths and interactions are affected by
seasonal changes, suggesting that these natural population dynamics
should be modeled by nonautonomous differential equations instead of
autonomous differential equations. Through a series of carefully
derived models of the well documented high-amplitude, large-period
fluctuations of lemming populations, we argue that when
appropriately formulated, autonomous differential equations may
capture much of the desirable rich dynamics, such as the existence
of a periodic solution with period and amplitude close to that of
approximately periodic solutions produced by the more natural but
mathematically daunting nonautonomous models. We start this series
of models from the Barrow model, a well formulated model for the
dynamics of food-lemming interaction at Point Barrow (Alaska, USA)
with sufficient experimental data. Our work suggests that an
autonomous system can indeed be a good approximation to the
moss-lemming dynamics at Point Barrow. This, together with our
bifurcation analysis, indicates that neither seasonal factors
(expressed by time-dependent moss growth rate and lemming death rate
in the Barrow model) nor the moss growth rate and lemming death rate
are the main culprits of the observed multi-year lemming cycles. We
suspect that the main culprits may include high lemming predation
rate, high lemming birth rate, and low lemming self-limitation rate.