In this paper, we consider the conditional regularity for the 3D incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in Vishik spaces. These results will be regarded an improvement of the results given by Huang-Li-Xin, (SIAM J. Math. Anal., 2011) and Jiu-Wang-Ye, (J. Evol. Equ., 2021).
Citation: Jae-Myoung Kim. Blow-up criteria for the full compressible Navier-Stokes equations involving temperature in Vishik Spaces[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15693-15703. doi: 10.3934/math.2022859
[1] | Yina Lin, Qian Zhang, Meng Zhou . Global existence of classical solutions for the 2D chemotaxis-fluid system with logistic source. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 7212-7233. doi: 10.3934/math.2022403 |
[2] | Kaile Chen, Yunyun Liang, Nengqiu Zhang . Global existence of strong solutions to compressible Navier-Stokes-Korteweg equations with external potential force. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27712-27724. doi: 10.3934/math.20231418 |
[3] | Qingkun Xiao, Jianzhu Sun, Tong Tang . Uniform regularity of the isentropic Navier-Stokes-Maxwell system. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6694-6701. doi: 10.3934/math.2022373 |
[4] | Jia Jia . Analytical solutions to the 2D compressible Navier-Stokes equations with density-dependent viscosity coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(5): 10831-10851. doi: 10.3934/math.2025492 |
[5] | Li Lu . One new blow-up criterion for the two-dimensional full compressible magnetohydrodynamic equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15876-15891. doi: 10.3934/math.2023810 |
[6] | Shaoliang Yuan, Lin Cheng, Liangyong Lin . Existence and uniqueness of solutions for the two-dimensional Euler and Navier-Stokes equations with initial data in $ H^1 $. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 9310-9321. doi: 10.3934/math.2025428 |
[7] | Hui Fang, Yihan Fan, Yanping Zhou . Energy equality for the compressible Navier-Stokes-Korteweg equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5808-5820. doi: 10.3934/math.2022321 |
[8] | Jianlong Wu . Regularity criteria for the 3D generalized Navier-Stokes equations with nonlinear damping term. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 16250-16259. doi: 10.3934/math.2024786 |
[9] | Jae-Myoung Kim . Time decay rates for the coupled modified Navier-Stokes and Maxwell equations on a half space. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13423-13431. doi: 10.3934/math.2021777 |
[10] | Yunxi Guo, Ying Wang . The Cauchy problem to a gkCH equation with peakon solutions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12781-12801. doi: 10.3934/math.2022707 |
In this paper, we consider the conditional regularity for the 3D incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in Vishik spaces. These results will be regarded an improvement of the results given by Huang-Li-Xin, (SIAM J. Math. Anal., 2011) and Jiu-Wang-Ye, (J. Evol. Equ., 2021).
We study the following system of Newton heat-conducting compressible fluid in three-dimensional space
{ρt+∇⋅(ρu)=0,ρut+ρu⋅∇u+∇P(ρ,θ)−μΔu−(μ+λ)∇div u=0,cv[ρθt+ρu⋅∇θ]+Pdiv u−κΔθ=μ2|∇u+(∇u)tr|2+λ(div u)2,(ρ,u,θ)|t=0=(ρ0,u0,θ0). | (1.1) |
Here, ρ,u,θ stand for the flow density, velocity and the absolute temperature, respectively. The scalar function P represents the pressure, the state equation of which is determined by
P=Rρθ, R>0, | (1.2) |
and κ is a positive constant and two constants μ and λ are the coefficients of viscosity satisfying the physical restrictions μ>0, 2μ+3λ≥0. The initial conditions satisfy
ρ(x,t)→0, u(x,t)→0, θ(x,t)→0, as |x|→∞, for t≥0. | (1.3) |
Let γ>0. For all (t,x)∈R×R3, we consider the following scaled functions:
ρλ=ρ(λ2t,λx),uλ=λu(λ2t,λx),θλ=λ2θ(λ2t,λx). | (1.4) |
There are huge literatures on the study of the existence of solutions to compressible Navier-Stokes equations, we only give a brief survey for blow-up criteria rather than the existence of solutions. When the initial data contain vacuums, after Xin's blow-up works [21,22], the various result for blow up critria for strong solutions to the system (1.1) is investigated. In present paper, in particular, we focus on the Serrin type criteria (e.g. [6,7,8,9]) as
limsupT↗T⋆(‖div u‖L1(0,T;L∞(R3))+‖u‖Lp(0,T;Lq(R3)))=∞,2p+3q=1,q>3, |
or
limsupT↗T⋆(‖ρ‖L∞(0,T;L∞(R3))+‖u‖Lp(0,T;Lq(R3)))=∞,2p+3q=1,q>3 |
and it is aimed to expand them into Vishik space motivated by the results of two recent papers Kanamaru [10] and Wu [20] (see also [2,3,4,5,11,12,13,14,15,16,18,19] for other criteria containing Beale-Kato-Majda blow-up mechanism).
We remind the local well-posedness of strong solutions to the equations (1.1) (see [1]).
Theorem 1.1. Let λ<3μ. Suppose u0,θ0∈(D1∩D2)(R3) and ρ0∈(W1,q∩H1∩L1)(R3) for some q∈(3,6]. If ρ0 isnonnegative and the initial data satisfy the compatibility condition
−μΔu0−(μ+λ)∇divu0+∇P(ρ0,θ0)=√ρ0g1Δθ0+μ2|∇u0+(∇u0)tr|2+λ(divu0)2=√ρ0g2 |
forvector fields g1,g2∈L2(R3). Then there exist atime T∈(0,∞] and unique solution tp the equations (1.1)–(1.3), satisfying
(ρ,u,θ)∈C([0,T);(L1∩H1∩W1,q))(R3)×C([0,T);(D1∩D2)(R3))×L2([0,T);D2,q(R3)), |
(ρt,ut,θt)∈C([0,T);(L2∩Lq)(R3))×L2([0,T);D1(R3))×L2([0,T);D1(R3)), |
(ρ1/2ut,ρ1/2θt)∈L∞([0,T);L2(R3))×L∞([0,T);L2(R3)). |
If the maximal existence time T∗ is finite, then there holds
lim supT↗T∗(‖ρ‖L∞(0,T;L∞(R3))+‖θ‖L2q2q−3(0,T;˙V0q,σ,1(R3)))=∞, q>32, | (1.5) |
where σ∈[1,∞],θ∈[1,σ].
Remark 1.1. In the light of the arguments in [7,8], we observe that (1.5) be replaced by
lim supT↗T∗(‖div u‖L1(0,T;L∞(R3))+‖θ‖Lp(0,T;Lq(R3)))=∞. |
We note that the condition (1.5) is in scaling invariant norm in the sense of (1.4) for the temperature.
Remark 1.2. Without the restriction λ<3μ, in the case away from vacuum, through the argument in [9] and our proof, we obtain the similar results [9,Theorem 1.3] of what the authors in [9] says in Vishik space.
Next, we consider the full compressible Navier-Stokes equations without temperature.
{∂tρ+div(ρu)=0,∂t(ρu)+div(ρu⊗u)−μΔu−(μ+λ)∇(divu)+∇P(ρ)=0,(ρ,u)(x,0)=(ρ0,u0)(x), | (1.6) |
where ρ,u, and P are the density, velocity and pressure respectively. The equation of state is given by
P(ρ)=aργ,(a>0,γ>1). | (1.7) |
The constants μ and λ are the shear viscosity and the bulk viscosity coefficients respectively. They satisfy the following physical restrictions: μ>0,3λ+2μ≥0.
Through a similar scheme in Theorem 1.1, we also obtain the following result for the equations (1.6).
Theorem 1.2. Let (ρ,u) be a strongsolution to the Cauchy problem (1.6)–(1.7) with theinitial data (ρ0,u0) satisfy
0≤ρ0∈(L1∩H1∩W1,r)(R3),u0∈(D1∩D2)(R3), |
for some r∈(3,∞) and the compatibility condition:
−μ△u0−(λ+μ)∇divu0+∇P(ρ0)=ρ1/20gfor some g∈L2(R3). |
If T∗<∞ is the maximal time of existence, then both
limT→T∗(‖divu‖L1(0,T;L∞(R3))+‖u‖L2pp−3(0,T;˙V0q,σ,1R3)))=∞, |
and
limT→T∗(‖ρ‖L∞(0,T;L∞(R3))+‖u‖L2pp−3(0,T;˙V0q,σ,1(R3)))=∞,3<p≤∞. |
where σ∈[1,∞],θ∈[1,σ].
We follow the notation of [6] and [9]. For 1≤p≤∞, Lp(R3) represents the usual Lebesgue space. The classical Sobolev space Wk,p(R3) is equipped with the norm ‖f‖Wk,p(R3)=k∑α=0‖Dαf‖Lp(R3). A function f belongs to the homogeneous Sobolev spaces Dk,l if u∈L1loc(R3):‖∇ku‖Ll<∞. C>0 is an absolute constant which may be different from line to line unless otherwise stated in this paper. We also now introduce a Banach space ˙Vsp,σ,θ(R3) which is larger than the homogeneous Besov space; see [10,17].
Definition 2.1. Let s∈R,p,σ∈[1,∞],θ∈[1,σ], the Vishik space ˙Vsp,σ,θ is defined by
˙Vsp,σ,θ(R3):={f∈D′(R3):‖f‖˙Vsp,σ,θ<∞}, |
with the norm
‖f‖˙Vsp,σ,θ(R3):={supN=1,2,⋯(∑|j|<N2jsθ‖˙Δjf‖θLp)1θN1θ−1σ,θ≠∞,‖f‖˙B0p,∞(RN),θ=∞. |
Here D′(R3) is the dual space of D(R3)={f∈S(R3);Dαˆf(0)=0,∀ α∈N3}. As mentioned in [20], we remind that the following continuous embeddings hold:
˙Bsp,σ(R3)=˙Vsp,σ,σ(R3)⊂˙Vsp,σ,θ1(R3)⊂˙Vsp,σ,θ2(R3)⊂˙Vsp,σ,1(R3) |
for s∈R, p,σ∈[1,∞] and θ1,θ2∈[1,σ] with θ1≥θ2.
In what follows, for simplicity, we write
Lp=Lp(R3), Hk=Wk,2(R3), Dk=Dk,2(R3), ˙Vsp,σ,θ:=˙Vsp,σ,θ(R3). |
We will prove Theorem 1.1 by a contradiction argument. Therefore, we assume that
‖ρ‖L∞(0,T;L∞)+‖θ‖L2q2q−3(0,T;˙V0q,σ,1(R3))≤C, 2p+3q=2, q>32. | (3.1) |
Lemma 3.1. Suppose that (3.1) is valid and λ<3μ, then there holds
sup0≤t≤T∫R3[μ2|∇u|2+(μ+λ)(div u)2+12μ+λP2−2Pdiv u+C2ρθ2+C+12μρ|u|4] |
+∫T0[κ∫R3|∇θ|2+12ρ|˙u|2+|u|2|∇u|2]dt≤C. |
Proof. From Lemma 2.3 and Lemma 3.1 in [9], we know that
ddt∫[μ2|∇u|2+(μ+λ)(div u)2+12μ+λP2−2Pdiv u+C2ρθ2] |
+κ∫|∇θ|2+12∫ρ|˙u|2≤C∫ρ|θ|3+C∫ρ|u|2|θ|2+C∫|u|2|∇u|2, | (3.2) |
and
ddt∫ ρ|u|4+∫R3∩{|u|>0}|u|2|∇u|2≤C∫ρ|u|2|θ|2. | (3.3) |
Multiplying the inequality (3.3) by (C+1) and adding the result to the inequality (3.2), we have
ddt∫[μ2|∇u|2+(μ+λ)(div u)2+12μ+λP2−2Pdiv u+C2ρθ2+C+12μρ|u|4] |
+κ∫|∇θ|2+12∫ρ|˙u|2+∫|u|2|∇u|2≤C∫ρ|θ|3+C∫ρ|u|2|θ|2. | (3.4) |
For the second term in the right hand side of (3.4), we note that
∫ρ|u|2|θ|2=∫ρ12|θ|ρ12|u|2|∑j<−NΔjθ|+∫ρ12|θ|ρ12|u|2|j=N∑j=−NΔjθ| | (3.5) |
+∫ρ12|θ|ρ12|u|2|∑j>−NΔjθ|:=I+II+III. |
Now, let's control each term sequentially by Hölder's inequality, interpolation inequality(for the term II below), Sobolev embedding theorem, Berstein's inequality and Young's inequalities:
(The term (I)):
I≤‖∑j<−NΔjθ‖L∞‖ρ12θ‖L2‖ρ12|u|2‖L2≤C∑j<−N232j‖θ‖L2‖ρ12θ‖L2‖ρ12|u|2‖L2 |
≤C2−3N2‖θ‖2L2(‖ρ12θ‖2L2+‖ρ12|u|2‖2L2). |
(The term (II)):
II≤j=N∑j=−N‖Δjθ‖Lq‖ρ12θ‖L2qq−1‖ρ12|u|2‖L2qq−1≤j=N∑j=−N‖Δjθ‖Lq‖ρ12θ‖1−32qL2‖ρ12θ‖32qL6‖ρ12|u|2‖1−32qL2‖ρ12|u|2‖32qL6≤CN1−1σsupN=1,2,⋯∑j=Nj=−N‖˙Δju‖LqN1−1σ‖ρ12θ‖1−32qL2‖ρ12|u|2‖1−32qL2‖(‖∇θ‖3qL2+‖∇|u|2‖3qL2)≤C‖θ‖2q2q−3˙V0q,σ,1‖ρ12θ‖L2‖ρ12|u|2‖L2+116‖∇θ‖2L2+116‖∇|u|2‖2L2≤C‖θ‖2q2q−3˙V0q,σ,1(‖ρ12θ‖2L2+‖ρ12|u|2‖2L2)+116‖∇θ‖2L2+116‖∇|u|2‖2L2. | (3.6) |
(The term (III)):
III≤∑j>N‖Δjθ‖L3‖ρ12|u|2‖L6‖ρ12θ‖L2≤C‖ρ12|u|2‖L6∑j>N212j‖θ‖L2‖ρ12θ‖L2 |
≤C2−N2‖θ‖L2‖∇|u|2‖L2‖ρ12θ‖L2≤2−N2‖θ‖2L2‖ρ12θ‖2L2+132‖|u|∇|u|‖2L2. |
Summing up the estimates above, we have
∫ρ|u|2|θ|2≤C2−3N2‖θ‖2L2(‖ρ12θ‖2L2+‖ρ12|u|2‖2L2)+C‖θ‖2q2q−3˙V0q,σ,1(‖ρ12θ‖2L2+‖ρ12|u|2‖2L2) |
+116‖∇θ‖2L2+116‖∇|u|2‖2L2+2−N2‖θ‖2L2‖ρ12θ‖2L2. | (3.7) |
By similar above arguments, we get
∫ρ|θ|3=∫ρ12|θ|ρ12θ|θ|≤C2−3N2‖θ‖2L2‖ρ12θ‖2L2+C‖θ‖2q2q−3˙V0q,σ,1‖ρ12θ‖2L2+116‖∇θ‖2L2+116‖∇|u|2‖2L2+2−N2‖θ‖2L2‖ρ12θ‖2L2. | (3.8) |
Substituting (3.7) and (3.8) into (3.4), we obtain
ddt∫[μ2|∇u|2+(μ+λ)(div u)2+12μ+λP2−2Pdiv u+C2ρθ2+C+12μρ|u|4] +κ2∫|∇θ|2+12∫ρ|˙u|2+12∫R3∩{|u|>0}|u|2|∇u|2≤C2−3N2‖θ‖2L2(‖ρ12θ‖2L2+‖ρ12|u|2‖2L2)+C‖θ‖2q2q−3˙V0q,σ,1(‖ρ12θ‖2L2+‖ρ12|u|2‖2L2)+116‖∇θ‖2L2+116‖∇|u|2‖2L2+2−N2‖θ‖2L2‖ρ12θ‖2L2≤C(C2−3N2+2−N2‖θ‖2L2‖θ‖2L2+‖θ‖2q2q−3˙V0q,σ,1)(∫[μ2|∇u|2+(μ+λ)(div u)2+12μ+λP2−2Pdiv u+C2ρθ2+C+12μρ|u|4])+116‖∇θ‖2L2+116‖∇|u|2‖2L2, | (3.9) |
where we used the fact that
∫[(μ+λ)(div u)2+12μ+λP2−2Pdiv u+C2ρθ2]≥∫ρθ2, |
for a sufficiently large constant C>0. Now, choosing N>0 sufficiently large such that C2−N2‖θ‖2L2≤1128, the estimate (3.9) becomes
ddt∫[μ2|∇u|2+(μ+λ)(div u)2+12μ+λP2−2Pdiv u+C2ρθ2+C+12μρ|u|4] | (3.10) |
+κ∫|∇θ|2+12∫ρ|˙u|2+∫|u|2|∇u|2≤C∫ρ|θ|3+C∫ρ|u|2|θ|2≤CN‖u‖2pp−3˙V0q,σ,1‖∇u‖2L2. |
Then, Grönwall's inequality and (3.10) enables us to obtain that the desired results.
sup0≤t≤T∫R3[μ2|∇u|2+(μ+λ)(div u)2+12μ+λP2−2Pdiv u+C2ρθ2+C+12μρ|u|4] |
+∫T0[κ∫R3|∇θ|2+12ρ|˙u|2+|u|2|∇u|2]dt≤C. |
Proof of Theorem 1.1. In the proof in Theorem 1.1 in [9], as long as Lemma 3.2 in [9] is only replaced by Lemma 3.1 in present paper, the proof is completed.
Let (ρ,u) be a strong solution to the problem (1.6)-(1.7) as described in Theorem 1.2. Then the standard energy estimate yields
sup0≤t≤T(‖ρ1/2u(t)‖2L2+‖ρ‖L1+‖ρ‖γLγ)+∫T0‖∇u‖2L2dt≤C,0≤T<T∗. | (4.1) |
We first prove Theorem 1.2 by a contradiction argument. Otherwise, there exists some constant M0>0 such that
limT→T∗(‖ρ‖L∞(0,T;L∞)+‖u‖L2pp−3(0,T;˙V0q,σ,1(R3)))≤M0. | (4.2) |
The first key estimate on ∇u will be given in the following lemma.
Lemma 4.1. Under the condition (4.2), it holds that
sup0≤t≤T‖∇u‖2L2+∫T0∫ρu2tdxdt≤C,0≤T<T∗. | (4.3) |
Proof. It follows from the momentum equations in (1.6) that
△G=div(ρ˙u),μ△ω=∇×(ρ˙u), |
where ˙v:=vt+u⋅∇v,G:=(2μ+λ)divu−P(ρ),ω:=∇×u are the material derivative of f, the effective viscous flux G and the vorticity ω, respectively. In particular, for the effective viscous flux, it is well-known that
‖∇G‖Lp≤‖ρ˙u‖Lp, ∀p∈(1,+∞), |
and
‖∇G‖L2+‖∇ω‖L2≤C(‖ρut‖L2+‖ρu⋅∇u‖L2). | (4.4) |
Multiplying the momentum equation (1.6)2 by ut and integrating the resulting equation over R3 gives
12ddt∫(μ|∇u|2+(λ+μ)(divu)2)dx+∫ρu2tdx=∫Pdivutdx−∫ρu⋅∇u⋅utdx. | (4.5) |
From (1.6)1, we note that
Pt+div(Pu)+(γ−1)Pdivu=0. |
For the first term in the right hand side of (4.5), one has
∫Pdivutdx≤ddt∫Pdivudx+18‖∇G‖2L2+C‖∇u‖2L2+C. | (4.6) |
Substituting (4.6) into (4.5), we have
ddt∫(μ2|∇u|2+λ+μ2(divu)2−Pdivu)dx+12∫ρu2tdx≤C‖∇u‖2L2+∫ρ|u⋅∇u⋅ut|dx+C. |
For the second term in the right hand side of (4.5), we have
∫|ρ1/2u⋅∇u⋅ρ1/2ut|dx≤∫|ρ1/2∑j<−NΔju||∇u||ρ1/2ut|dx |
+∫|ρ1/2j=N∑j=−NΔju||∇u||ρ1/2ut|dx+∫|ρ1/2∑j>−NΔju||∇u||ρ1/2ut|dx:=I+II+III. |
In a similar way to (3.5), we let control each term sequentially.
(The term (I)):
I≤C2−3N2‖u‖2L2‖∇u‖2L2+132‖ρ1/2ut‖2L2. |
(The term (II)):
II≤CN‖u‖2pp−3˙V0p,σ,1‖∇u‖2L2+132(‖ρ1/2ut‖L2+‖∇2u‖2L2). |
(The term (III)):
III≤C2−N2‖u‖2L2‖∇2u‖2L2+132‖ρ1/2ut‖2L2. |
Summing up the estimates I–III, it is bounded by
C2−3N2‖u‖2L2‖∇u‖2L2+CN‖u‖2pp−3˙V0p,σ,1‖∇u‖2L2+C2−N2‖u‖2L2‖∇2u‖2L2 | (4.7) |
+116(‖ρ1/2ut‖L2+‖∇2u‖2L2). |
On the other hand, due to (4.4), we note that
‖∇2u‖2L2(R3)≤C(‖√ρut‖2L2(R3)+‖ρu⋅∇u‖2L2(R3)) | (4.8) |
≤C‖√ρut‖2L2(R3)+C2−3N2‖u‖2L2‖∇u‖2L2+C2−N2‖u‖2L2‖∇2u‖2L2+CN‖u‖2pp−3˙V0p,σ,1‖∇u‖2L2. |
Collecting (4.7) and (4.8), we have
ddt∫∅(μ2|∇u|2+λ+μ2(divu)2−Pdivu)dx+14∫ρu2tdx+∫|∇G|2dx | (4.9) |
≤C‖√ρut‖2L2(R3)+C2−3N2‖u‖2L2‖∇u‖2L2+C2−N2‖u‖2L2‖∇2u‖2L2+CN‖u‖2pp−3˙V0p,σ,1‖∇u‖2L2. |
Now, choosing N>0 sufficiently large such that C2−N2‖u‖2L2≤1128, (indeed, the constant C>0 is also depending on ‖ρ1/20u0‖2L2) the estimate (4.9) becomes
ddt∫R3(μ2|∇u|2+λ+μ2(divu)2−Pdivu+ρ|u|2+ρ+ργ)dx | (4.10) |
+∫R3(|∇G|2+|∇u|2+14ρ|ut|2)dx≤CN(‖u‖2pp−3˙V0p,σ,1+1)(‖∇u‖2L2+1), |
which, together with (4.2) and Grönwall's inequality, gives (4.3). The proof of Lemma 4.1 is completed.
Proof of Theorem 1.2. In the proof in Theorem 1.1 in [6], as long as Lemma 3.1 in [6] is only replaced by Lemma 4.1 in our paper, the proof is completed.
For the convenience of the reader, we give the proof for (4.6), given in [6].
∫Pdivutdx=ddt∫Pdivudx−∫Ptdivudx=ddt∫Pdivudx+∫div(Pu)divudx+(γ−1)∫P(divu)2dx=ddt∫Pdivudx−∫(Pu)⋅∇divudx+(γ−1)∫P(divu)2dx=ddt∫Pdivudx−12μ+λ∫Pu⋅∇Gdx−12(2μ+λ)∫P2divudx+(γ−1)∫P(divu)2dx≤ddt∫Pdivudx+18‖∇G‖2L2+C‖∇u‖2L2+C, | (5.1) |
Our result is focused on the full compressible Navier-Stokes equationss. However, it is believed that our results can be expanded in various ways for the coupled equations or system. In this regard, we think of it as a future study and intend to produce more meaningful results.
The current paper results are Blow-up criteria for solutions in Vishik Space which is a weaker space to Besov space and Lebesgue space. It seems to be a meaningful result in this regard, and it is new.
The authors thank the very knowledgeable referee very much for his/her valuable comments and helpful suggestions. Jae-Myoung Kim was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2020R1C1C1A01006521).
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] |
Y. Cho, H. Kim, Existence results for viscous polytropic fluids with vacuum, J. Differential Equations., 228 (2006), 377–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2006.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2006.05.001
![]() |
[2] |
L. Du, Y. Wang, Blowup criterion for 3-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes equations involving velocity divergence, Commun. Math. Sci., 12 (2014), 1427–1435. https://doi.org/10.4310/CMS.2014.v12.n8.a3 doi: 10.4310/CMS.2014.v12.n8.a3
![]() |
[3] |
J. Fan, S. Jiang, Y. Ou, A blow-up criterion for compressible viscous heat-conductive flows, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire., 27 (2010), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anihpc.2009.09.012 doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2009.09.012
![]() |
[4] |
S. Gala, M. A. Ragusa, Y. Sawano, H. Tanaka, Uniqueness criterion of weak solutions for the dissipative quasi-geostrophic equations in Orlicz-Morrey spaces, Appl. Anal., 93 (2014), 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2013.772582 doi: 10.1080/00036811.2013.772582
![]() |
[5] |
X. Huang, J. Li, On breakdown of solutions to the full compressible Navier-Stokes equations, Meth. Appl. Anal., 16 (2009), 479–490. https://doi.org/10.4310/MAA.2009.v16.n4.a4 doi: 10.4310/MAA.2009.v16.n4.a4
![]() |
[6] |
X. Huang, J. Li, Z. Xin, Serrin-type criterion for the three-dimensional viscous compressible flows, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 43 (2011), 1872–1886. https://doi.org/10.1137/100814639 doi: 10.1137/100814639
![]() |
[7] |
X. Huang, J. Li, Serrin-type blowup criterion for viscous, compressible, and heat conducting Navier-Stokes and magnetohydrodynamic flows, Comm. Math. Phys., 324 (2013), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-013-1791-1 doi: 10.1007/s00220-013-1791-1
![]() |
[8] |
X. Huang, J. Li, Y. Wang, Serrin-type blowup criterion for full compressible Navier-Stokes system, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 207 (2013), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-012-0577-5 doi: 10.1007/s00205-012-0577-5
![]() |
[9] | Q. Jiu, Y. Wang, Y. Ye, Refined blow-up criteria for the full compressible Navier-Stokes equations involving temperature, J. Evol. Equ., 21 (2021), 1895–1916. |
[10] | R. Kanamaru, Optimality of logarithmic interpolation inequalities and extension criteria to the Navier-Stokes and Euler equations in Vishik spaces. J. Evol. Equ., (2020), 1–17. |
[11] | J. M. Kim, Regularity for 3D inhomogeneous Naiver-Stokes equations in Vishik spaces, J. Funct. Spaces, 2022, Article ID 7061004, 4 pp. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7061004 |
[12] | Y. Li, J. Xu, S. Zhu, Blow-up criterion for the 3D compressible non-isentropic Navier-Stokes equations without thermal conductivity, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 431 (2015), 822–840. |
[13] |
Q. Li, M.L. Zou, A regularity criterion via horizontal components of velocity and molecular orientations for the 3D nematic liquid crystal flows, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 9278–9287. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022514 doi: 10.3934/math.2022514
![]() |
[14] |
Y. Sun, C. Wang, Z. Zhang, A Beale-Kato-Majda blow-up criterion for the 3D compressible Navier-Stokes equations, J. Math. Pures Appl., 95 (2011), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2010.08.001 doi: 10.1016/j.matpur.2010.08.001
![]() |
[15] | Y. Sun, C. Wang, Z. Zhang, A Beale-Kato-Majda criterion for three dimensional compressible viscous heat-conductive flows, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 201 (2011), 727–742. |
[16] | Y. Sun, Z. Zhang, Blow-up criteria of strong solutions and conditional regularity of weak solutions for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, Handbook of mathematical analysis in mechanics of viscous fluids, 2263–2324, Springer, Cham, 2018. |
[17] |
M. Vishik, Incompressible flows of an ideal fluid with unbounded vorticity, Comm. Math. Phys., 213 (2000), 697–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002200000255 doi: 10.1007/s002200000255
![]() |
[18] | H. Wen, C. Zhu, Blow-up criterions of strong solutions to 3D compressible Navier-Stokes equations with vacuum, Adv. Math., 248 (2013), 534–572. |
[19] |
H. Wen, C. Zhu, Global solutions to the three-dimensional full compressible Navier-Stokes equations with vacuum at infinity in some classes of large data, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 49 (2017), 162–221. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1055414 doi: 10.1137/16M1055414
![]() |
[20] |
F. Wu, Navier-Stokes regularity criteria in Vishik spaces, Appl. Math. Optim., 84 (2021), suppl. 1, S39–S53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-021-09757-9 doi: 10.1007/s00245-021-09757-9
![]() |
[21] |
Z. Xin, Blowup of smooth solutions to the compressible Navier-Stokes equation with compact density, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 51 (1998), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0312(199803)51:3<229::AID-CPA1>3.0.CO;2-C doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0312(199803)51:3<229::AID-CPA1>3.0.CO;2-C
![]() |
[22] | Z. Xin, W. Yan, On blow up of classical solutions to the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comm. Math. Phys., 321 (2013), 529–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-012-1610-0 |