Research article Special Issues

Numerical solution of stochastic and fractional competition model in Caputo derivative using Newton method

  • Many useful numerical algorithms of the numerical solution are proposed due to the increasing interest of the researchers in fractional calculus. A new discretization of the competition model for the real statistical data of banking finance for the years 2004–2014 is presented. We use a novel numerical method that is more reliable and accurate which is introduced recently for the solution of ordinary differential equations numerically. We apply this approach to solve our model for the case of Caputo derivative. We apply the Caputo derivative on the competition system and obtain its numerical results. For the numerical solution of the competition model, we use the Newton polynomial approach and present in detail a novel numerical procedure. We utilize the numerical procedure and present various numerical results in the form of graphics. A comparison of the present method versus the predictor corrector method is presented, which shows the same solution behavior to the Newton Polynomial approach. We also suggest that the real data versus model provide good fitting for both the data for the fractional-order parameter value ρ=0.7. Some more values of ρ are used to obtain graphical results. We also check the model in the stochastic version and show the model behaves well when fitting to the data.

    Citation: Meihua Huang, Pongsakorn Sunthrayuth, Amjad Ali Pasha, Muhammad Altaf Khan. Numerical solution of stochastic and fractional competition model in Caputo derivative using Newton method[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8933-8952. doi: 10.3934/math.2022498

    Related Papers:

    [1] Rahat Zarin, Abdur Raouf, Amir Khan, Aeshah A. Raezah, Usa Wannasingha Humphries . Computational modeling of financial crime population dynamics under different fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20755-20789. doi: 10.3934/math.20231058
    [2] Rahat Zarin, Amir Khan, Pushpendra Kumar, Usa Wannasingha Humphries . Fractional-order dynamics of Chagas-HIV epidemic model with different fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18897-18924. doi: 10.3934/math.20221041
    [3] Najat Almutairi, Sayed Saber . Chaos control and numerical solution of time-varying fractional Newton-Leipnik system using fractional Atangana-Baleanu derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25863-25887. doi: 10.3934/math.20231319
    [4] Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Jutarat Kongson, Weerawat Sudsutad . Dynamics of a fractal-fractional mathematical model for the management of waste plastic in the ocean with four different numerical approaches. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8827-8872. doi: 10.3934/math.2025405
    [5] Fawaz K. Alalhareth, Seham M. Al-Mekhlafi, Ahmed Boudaoui, Noura Laksaci, Mohammed H. Alharbi . Numerical treatment for a novel crossover mathematical model of the COVID-19 epidemic. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 5376-5393. doi: 10.3934/math.2024259
    [6] Shakeel Muhammad, Obaid J. Algahtani, Sayed Saifullah, Amir Ali . Theoretical and numerical aspects of the Malaria transmission model with piecewise technique. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28353-28375. doi: 10.3934/math.20231451
    [7] Peijiang Liu, Taj Munir, Ting Cui, Anwarud Din, Peng Wu . Mathematical assessment of the dynamics of the tobacco smoking model: An application of fractional theory. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 7143-7165. doi: 10.3934/math.2022398
    [8] Xiaoyong Xu, Fengying Zhou . Orthonormal Euler wavelets method for time-fractional Cattaneo equation with Caputo-Fabrizio derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2736-2762. doi: 10.3934/math.2023144
    [9] Bahar Acay, Ramazan Ozarslan, Erdal Bas . Fractional physical models based on falling body problem. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2608-2628. doi: 10.3934/math.2020170
    [10] Ahu Ercan . Comparative analysis for fractional nonlinear Sturm-Liouville equations with singular and non-singular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13325-13343. doi: 10.3934/math.2022736
  • Many useful numerical algorithms of the numerical solution are proposed due to the increasing interest of the researchers in fractional calculus. A new discretization of the competition model for the real statistical data of banking finance for the years 2004–2014 is presented. We use a novel numerical method that is more reliable and accurate which is introduced recently for the solution of ordinary differential equations numerically. We apply this approach to solve our model for the case of Caputo derivative. We apply the Caputo derivative on the competition system and obtain its numerical results. For the numerical solution of the competition model, we use the Newton polynomial approach and present in detail a novel numerical procedure. We utilize the numerical procedure and present various numerical results in the form of graphics. A comparison of the present method versus the predictor corrector method is presented, which shows the same solution behavior to the Newton Polynomial approach. We also suggest that the real data versus model provide good fitting for both the data for the fractional-order parameter value ρ=0.7. Some more values of ρ are used to obtain graphical results. We also check the model in the stochastic version and show the model behaves well when fitting to the data.



    The problems arising in science and engineering have been successfully modeled through the mathematical models tools [1,2,3,4,5]. Besides this, the application of mathematical models to the social sciences and other financial areas are getting attention these days from researchers around the world. In the country's economic growth, the role of the banks is considered to be a backbone. Strong banking policy and its benefits to the citizens play an important role in the overall development of the country, the bank's related terms and explanations can be found in [6]. The banking sector may be Islamic or conventional or maybe both of these. The banks that follow the rule of syriah law or conventionally are defined as per the rule Act No. 10 of 1998. The activities of rural and commercial banks in Indonesia are observed and documented that commercial banks have more business activates than the former [7,8]. Further, in Indonesia, it is reported that commercial banks are more than the rural, but the products of both the banks are consider to be the same [9]. Although, the commercial banks are greater but the rural are still improving their business activities to attract customers. Due to the improvements in their business products, the rural banks may have competition with commercial banks.

    If the rural banks continue their efforts to improve their products, then definitely there may have close competition in Indonesia. This competition can be effectively studied through evolutionary differential equations known as the Lotka Volterra system [10]. The researchers utilized the Lotka Volterra equations in order to study the competition in many real-word problems, see [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. For an instant, one of the applications of the Korean mobile company data through the competition system is explored in [11]. The competition system as a technological substitution, see [12], modeling the policy and their implications to the Korean stock market [13], dynamics estimations of the market exhibition, see [14], competition dynamics in the operating system market, see [15], and the analysis of the banking dynamics system, see [16]. Moreover, some recent works regarding this, can be seen in [17,18,19,20].

    In the above-mentioned studies, it is worthy to mention that the Lotka Volterra system was used to obtain the dynamics of different problems with the integer-order study, except [17,18,19,20]. From the last years, it is observed that fractional calculus plays a vital role in the dynamic modeling of such practical problems. One of the reasons is considered to be the memory and the heredity properties. The model of real-life problems is often nonlinear and the crossover behavior makes it difficult to solve it exactly. The model formulated in fractional derivatives has many advantages, such as the data fitting, the memory index, the heredity properties, and the cross-over behavior. The dynamics of the model with fractional order derivatives and its applications to the real-life problems can be seen in [21,22,26,27,28,29,30,31]. For example, the competition among rural and commercial banks through fractional derivatives is discussed in [21]. The dynamics of TB using the fractional-order derivative are explored in [22]. An introduction to fractional derivative, fractional differential equations, and its numerical solution is discussed in [26]. A fractional lotka Volterra mathematical model and its analysis are studied in [27]. The Hepatitis E model in fractional Caputo Fabrizio derivative is explored in [28]. A fractional-order TB model with relapse is considered in [29]. The authors in [30] considered the HIV infection model using two-sex populations. The RLC circuit model using the fractional derivative and its numerical investigations is considered in [31]. The authors used the concept of fractional derivatives to study different problems, see for example, the training model for football movement trajectory [32], the educational reforms through fractional differential equations [33], a fractional model for the sugar [34], a fractional model for the impact of financial repression [35], and the university education model using fractional differential equations and its numerical solution [36]. Some more mathematical model formulated in fractional derivatives and their applications to COVID-19 infection is explored in [37,38,40], where the authors studied a mathematical model for COVID-19 with isolation class [37], COVID-19 with stochastic perturbation [38], COVID-19 model with control in fractional environment [39] and the COVID-19 model with crowding effect in [40]. Application of fractional derivative to Hepatitis B [41,42], and COVID-19 [43]. The fractional-order model to study the leakage delay [44], the fractional-order with neural networks using multi-delays [45], bifurcation analysis in a fractional-order [46], a delayed BAM fractional-order system [47], fractional-order model with control [48], and fractional-order neural networks with mixed delays [49]. It is important that real-life problems with realistic data, give more accurate information about that particular phenomena than the assumed data, such useful results can be seen in [19,20,21,22], where a particular focus is given to show the data fitting to the system of equations. The works mentioned above, have been solved numerically by using the novel numerical technique.

    The goal of this work is to study the competition of the banking data between two banks in Indonesia with real statistical data through a fractional model. The fractional derivative considered in this work is the Caputo derivative. For the numerical solution of the fractional model, we use the recently developed new numerical method using the approach of Newton polynomial. This novel technique was introduced recently in literature to get the numerical solution of fractional ordinary differential equations, that has been used for many scientific problems, see [23,24,25]. For example, the authors introduced this technique for the solution of the COVID-19 model in fractional derivative in Atangana-Baleanu derivative [23]. The HIV dynamics and its mathematical analysis through a fractional model with real cases using this new approach is considered by the authors in [24]. The application of this new method to groundwater flow is considered by the authors in [25]. This novel technique is more accurate and reasonable than the other technique available in the literature for the factional models. The proposed technique will show how the data fits well with the consideration of the specific fractional orders. The rest of the results in this paper are as follows: The model and their descriptions are shown in Section 2. The related definition and the integral are shown in Section 3. The solution of the model numerically by giving the algorithm is shown in Section 4. Section 5 explain the numerical investigations of the model while Sections 6 and 7 respectively show the formulation of the stochastic problem and the summary of the results.

    We provide here the related concepts for Caputo derivative [59].

    Definition 1. [59] Suppose g:R+R and ρ(m1,m), jK. Then, the representation of Caputo derivative with order ρ for a function g can be defined by the way below,

    C0Dρtg(t)=1Γ(mρ)t0(tψ)mρ1g(m)(ψ)dψ. (2.1)

    Definition 2. [59] The integral for the above is given by the following,

    C0Iρt(g(t))=1Γ(ρ)t0g(ψ)(tψ)ρ1dψ. (2.2)

    The competition among the commercial and rural banks can be described here through the useful mathematical model called the Lotka-Volterra system. The Lotka-Volterra system has two equations, which were designed to have competition among two species for food etc. This competition model has been used effectively in many studies by the authors for real statistical data and found it interesting. So, on the basis of the competition model, it aims to describe the two equations by commercial and rural banks dynamics. At any time t, the dynamics of commercial banks is shown by x(t) while the rural banks dynamics is given by y(t), with the assumptions of maximum profit having both the banks. Further, the banking limited funds behave logistically their growths. So, with this hypothesis, the dynamical analysis of the competition model among the two banks system is shown by,

    dxdt=α1x(1xK1)ψ1xy,dydt=α2y(1yK2)ψ2xy, (3.1)

    the initial conditions to the (3.1) are x(0)=x00, and y(0)=y00. The parameters αi for i=1,2 describe the growth factor respectively for commercial and rural banks and so is positive. The others parameters Ki for i=1,2 that define the maximum profit gained respectively, by the commercial and the rural banks. The coefficients ψi for i=1,2 are used as a competition parameter respectively for commercial and rural banks. So, it is obvious from this discussion that these parameters are positive.

    We use the model presented above (3.2) and apply the Caputo derivative to generalize it. With this generalization, the model (3.2) takes the following fractional form below:

    C0Dρ0(x(t))=α1x(1xK1)ψ1xy,C0Dρ0(y(t))=α2y(1yK2)ψ2xy, (3.2)

    where ρ(0,1) that defines the fractional order is considered in Caputo sense.

    The equilibrium points for the considered model (3.2) can be obtained by the following way,

    C0Dρ0(x(t))=0,C0Dρ0(y(t))=0. (3.3)

    The condition (3.3), gives the following:

    α1x(1xK1)ψ1xy=0,α2y(1yK2)ψ2xy=0. (3.4)

    Solving the equations in (3.4), we have:

    E0=(0,0),E1=(0,K2),E2=(K1,0),E3=(α2K1(K2ψ1α1)K1K2ψ1ψ2α1α2,α1K2(K1ψ2α2)K1K2ψ1ψ2α1α2).

    Consider the aforementioned equilibrium points, we discuss its stability results for the system (3.2) below: Initially, we find the Jacobian matrix of the system (3.2) given by the following:

    J=((12xK1)α1ψ1yψ1xψ2y(12yK2)α2ψ2x).

    We consider now the stability at the above fixed points. First, we consider E0=(0,0). At this equilibrium point, we get the eigenvalues α1,α2 which are positive, and so at this point the system is not stable. At E1, we have the eigenvalues, α2,α1K2ψ1, where the second one can be negative if α1<K2ψ1, and the equilibrium point of the system will be stable. The equilibrium point E2 gives the eigenvalues, α1,α2K1ψ2. If the second one becomes negative, then the proposed model will be locally asymptotically stable. For the last equilibrium point, which is feasible, and their stability is shown below by having the characteristics polynomial:

    λ2+ϖ1λ+ϖ2=0,

    where

    ϖ1=α1α2(α1K2ψ1+α2K1ψ2)α1α2K1K2ψ1ψ2,ϖ2=α1α2(α1K2ψ1)(α2K1ψ2)α1α2K1K2ψ1ψ2.

    The coefficients ϖ1 and ϖ2 can be positive if (α1K2ψ1)>0, (α2K1ψ2)>0 and α1α2K1K2ψ1ψ2>0. If these conditions hold then the system will be locally asymptotically stable.

    Consider the system (3.2), we write for simplicity the model (3.2),

    C0Dρtx(t)=f1(x,y,t),C0Dρty(t)=f2(x,y,t).

    We define the following norm,

    ||x||=suptD|x(t)|,

    where D=[0,T]. We assume to show that x(t) and y(t) are bounded in [0,T], therefore, t[0,T] there exists λ1 and λ2 such that ||x||<λ1 and ||y||<λ2. We first show that f1 and f2 are bounded

    |f1(x,y,t)|=|α1x(1xK1)ψ1xy|,α1|x(1xK1)|+|ψxy|,α1|x||(1xK1)|+|ψ1xy|,α1supt[0,T]|x(t)||supt[0,T](1x(t)K1)|+ψ1supt[0,T]|x(t)|supt[0,T]|y(t)|,α1||x||(1+||x||K1)+ψ1||x||||y||,<α1λ1(1+λ1K1)+ψ1λ1λ2,<.

    Similarly, we can show

    |f2(x,y,t)|<α1λ2(1+λ2K2)+ψ2xy<.

    Therefore, if x and y are bounded then there exists M1 and M2 such that

    supt[0,T]|f1(x,y,t)|<M1,supt[0,T]|f2(x,y,t)|<M2.

    On the other hand if t[0,T], |f1(x,y,t)|<M1 and |f2(x,y,t)|<M2, then ||x||< and ||y||<.

    Proof. Assuming that f1 and f2 are bounded, then

    x(t)=x(0)+1Γ(ρ)t0f1(x,y,τ)(tτ)ρ1dτ,y(t)=y(0)+1Γ(ρ)t0f2(x,y,τ)(tτ)ρ1dτ.
    |x(t)||x(0)|+1Γ(ρ)|t0f1(x,y,τ)(tτ)ρ1dτ|,|y(t)||y(0)|+1Γ(ρ)|t0f2(x,y,τ)(tτ)ρ1dτ|.

    Then without loss of generality, we present for x(t)

    |x(t)||x(0)|+1Γ(ρ)t0|f1(x,y,τ)|(tτ)ρ1dτ,<|x(0)|+1Γ(ρ)t0supt[0,T]|f1(x,y,τ)|(tτ)ρ1dτ,<|x(0)|+M1tρΓ(ρ+1)<|x(0)|+M1tρΓ(ρ+1).

    Therefore,

    |x(t)|<||x||<|x(0)|+M1TρΓ(ρ+1).

    Similarly, we can show

    |y(t)|<||y||<|y(0)|+M2tρΓ(ρ+1).

    To prove that our system admits a unique solution, we need to show that

    t[0,T], f1 and f2 satisfy the following condition, |f1(x,y,t)|2<β1(1+|x|2), |f2(x,y,t)|2<β2(1+|y|2),

    t[0,T], f1 and f2 satisfy the Lipschitz condition |f1(x1,y,t)f1(x2,y,t)|2<¯β1|x1x2|2, |f2(x,y1,t)f2(x,y2,t)|2<¯β2|y1y2|2.

    Without loss of generality, we show he proof for f1,

    |f1(x1,y,t)f1(x2,y,t)|2=|α1x1(1x1K1)ψ1x1yα2x2(1x2K1)+ψ1x2y|2,=|α1(x1x2)α1(x21K1x22K1)ψ1(x1x2)y|<3α21|x1x2|2+3α21|x21K1x22K1|2+3ψ21|x1x2|2|y|<3{α21+2α21(|x1K1|2+|x2K1|2)+ψ21|y|2}|x1x2|2,<3{α21+2α21(supt[0,T]|x1K1|2+supt[0,T]|x2K1|2)+ψ21supt[0,T]|y|2}|x1x2|2,<3(α21+2α21(2λ21K21)+ψ21λ22)|x1x2|2,<¯β1|x1x2|2

    where ¯β1=(α21+2α21(2λ21K21)+ψ21λ22). On the other hand

    |f1(x,y,t)|2=|α1x(1xK1)ψ1xy|2,3α21|x|2+3α21|xK1|2+3ψ21|x|2|y|2,(3α21+3α21K21|x|2+3ψ21|y|2)|x|2,(3α21+3α21K21supt[0,T]|x(t)2|+3ψ21supt[0,T]|y(t)2|)|x|2,<(3α21+3α21K21λ21+3ψ21λ22)|x|2,<β1(1+|x|2),

    where β1=(3α21+3α21K21λ21+3ψ21λ22). Therefore, the system (3.2) has a unique system of solution.

    This section presents a new discretization for the Caputo derivative through Newton polynomial, which was established recently in [60]. We explain below briefly the procedure by considering a general fractional differential equation in the form given by:

    C0Dρtz(t)=f(t,z(t)), (4.1)

    where Dρt shows the Caputo derivative and the f is the nonlinear function. To present a numerical solution procedure to get the solution of fractional differential equation using Newton descritization, we have to rewrite the problems is as follows:

    z(t)z(0)=1Γ(ρ)t0f(τ,z(τ))(tτ)ρ1dτ. (4.2)

    At tn+1=(n+1)Δt, the following can be written,

    z(tn+1)z(0)=1Γ(ρ)tn+10f(τ,z(τ))(tn+1τ)ρ1dτ. (4.3)

    Also, we can write

    z(tn+1)=z(0)+1Γ(ρ)nj=2tj+1tjf(τ,z(τ))(tn+1τ)ρ1dτ. (4.4)

    We now using the Newton approach to approximate the f(τ,z(τ)) which is inside the integral, and has the following

    Pn(τ)=f(tn2,z(tn2))+f(tn1,z(tn1))f(tn2,z(tn2))Δt(τtn2)+f(tn,z(tn))2f(tn1,z(tn1))+f(tn2,z(tn2))2(Δt)2(τtn2)(τtn1). (4.5)

    Substitution of the result (4.5) into (4.4), the following is obtained,

    zn+1=z0+1Γ(ρ)nj=2tj+1tj[f(tj2,zj2)+f(tj1,zj1)f(tj2,zj2)Δt(τtj2)+f(tj,zj)2f(tj1,zj1)+f(tj2,zj2)2(Δt)2(τtj2)(τtj1)]×(tn+1τ)ρ1dτ. (4.6)

    Re-arranging Eq (4.6), leads to the following,

    zn+1=z0+1Γ(ρ)nj=2[tj+1tjf(tj2,zj2)(tn+1τ)ρ1dτ+tj+1tjf(tj1,zj1)f(tj2,zj2)Δt(τtj2)(tn+1τ)ρ1dτ+tj+1tjf(tj,zj)2f(tj1,zj1)+f(tj2,zj2)2(Δt)2(τtj2)(τtj1)×(tn+1τ)ρ1dτ]. (4.7)

    So, we have

    zn+1=z0+1Γ(ρ)nj=2f(tj2,zj2)tj+1tj(tn+1τ)ρ1dτ+1Γ(ρ)nj=2f(tj1,zj1)f(tj2,zj2)Δttj+1tj(τtj2)(tn+1τ)ρ1dτ+1Γ(ρ)nj=2f(tj,zj)2f(tj1,zj1)+f(tj2,zj2)2(Δt)2×tj+1tj(τtj2)(τtj1)(tn+1τ)ρ1dτ. (4.8)

    We simplify the integrals in Eq (4.8) below,

    tj+1tj(tn+1τ)ρ1dτ=hρρ[(nj+1)ρ(nj)ρ],tj+1tj(τtj2)(tn+1τ)ρ1dτ=hρ+1ρ(ρ+1)[(nj+1)ρ(nj+3+2ρ)(nj)ρ(nj+3+3ρ)],tj+1tj(τtj2)(τtj1)(tn+1τ)ρ1dτ=hρ+2ρ(ρ+1)(ρ+2)×[(nj+1)ρ[2(nj)2+(3ρ+10)(nj)+2ρ2+9ρ+12](nj)ρ[2(nj)2+(5ρ+10)(nj)+6ρ2+18ρ+12]], (4.9)

    the following formula is obtained after inserting the above solution into Eq (4.9), the following is presented,

    zn+1=z0+hρΓ(ρ+1)nj=2f(tj2,zj2)[(nj+1)ρ(nj)ρ]+hρΓ(ρ+2)nj=2[f(tj1,zj1)f(tj2,zj2)]×[(nj+1)ρ(nj+3+2ρ)(nj)ρ(nj+3+3ρ)]+hρ2Γ(ρ+3)nj=2[f(tj,zj)2f(tj1,zj1)+f(tj2,zj2)]×[(nj+1)ρ[2(nj)2+(3ρ+10)(nj)+2ρ2+9ρ+12](nj)ρ[2(nj)2+(5ρ+10)(nj)+6ρ2+18ρ+12]]. (4.10)

    The procedure explained above to obtained the graphical results for the model of competition system will be used in next section.

    The efficient numerical algorithm described above is considered to obtain the numerical solution of the fractional model in Caputo derivative. We used the real statistical data to investigate the model parameters for the competition between the two banking systems in Indonesia for the given years 2004–2014. Using the statistical data and the parameters obtained that is considered are below: ψ1=2.90×1010, ψ2=3.9×108, K1=669318.198, K2=17540.6219, α1=0.6, and α2=0.58. These parameters are also the same estimations presented in the work published in [51]. Using these parameters values, we presented the graphical results. The real data of commercial and rural banks in cumulative form is shown in Figure 1. The comparison of real data with the model is shown in Figure 2 when ρ=1. Figures 3 and 4 are plotted in order to show model fitting with real data for the arbitrary order ρ=0.9,0.8,0.7. It is observed from the results depicted in Figures 3 and 4, that decreasing the fractional-order ρ, we see the good agreement of the data versus model fitting. The future predictions of the real statistical data are depicted in Figure 5. It is observed a good fitting for a long time of the model versus real data. Further, we provided by choosing many values of the arbitrary order and show the results in Figure 6. We also utilized the approach of the FDE12 (predictor-corrector PECE method for fractional differential equations) to solve the present model and compare the result with the Newton polynomials method used in this work. We used the method given in [57,58] to obtain the graphical results for the fractional-order model 3.2 using the FDE12 and the Newton polynomial method with the same parameter and initial conditions, with the step size h=0.01. The results are shown in Figure 7. We show them in graphics legends, the Newton method by "present method" while the PECE method is by FDE12. One can observe that both the methods give the same results for the integer and fractional order value ρ=0.96.

    Figure 1.  The profit of commercial and rural banks, (a) commercial; (b) rural.
    Figure 2.  Fitting of data versus model, ρ=1. (a) commercial; (b) rural.
    Figure 3.  Comparison of data versus model fitting considering different fractional order values (a) and (c) commercial banks; (b) and (d) rural banks.
    Figure 4.  Comparison of data versus model fitting when ρ=0.7. (a) commercial banks; (b) rural banks.
    Figure 5.  Comparison of data versus model fitting for long term for different value of ρ.
    Figure 6.  Dynamics of the model for different value of ρ.
    Figure 7.  The comparison of the present method with FDE12. (a) Commercial data versus model; (b) rural data versus model; (c) commercial data versus model for ρ=0.96; (d) rural data versus model for ρ=0.96.

    This section studies the model in stochastic version. There are many stochastic models in literature which study different physical problems, some are listed here [52,53,54,55,56]. The model (3.1) is extended to the stochastic version given by

    dx=[α1x(1xK1)ψ1xy]dt+σ1xdW(t),dy=[α2y(1yK2)ψ2xy]dt+σ2ydW(t), (6.1)

    where σ1 and σ2 are the real constants that represent the intensity of the stochastic differential equations, where W(t) refereed to be the stochastic Brownian motion. Keeping in view the model (3.1), we use it for simulation purposes and check whether the data fit well to the stochastic model. In this regard, we keep the same numerical values as we used for the fractional case model (3.2). The simulation of the model (6.1) with data is given in Figure 8. We can see that the model (6.1) also behaves well with the real data. Figure 9 shows the model behavior for a large time level.

    Figure 8.  Simulation of the model (6.1), (a) fitting for commercial data, (b) fitting with rural data.
    Figure 9.  Prediction of the model (6.1). (a) Fitting for commercial data; (b) fitting with rural data.

    We obtained some new findings regarding the competition system for the real data of the two banks in Indonesia through a fractional model with Caputo derivative through new numerical solution. Initially, we presented the model in ordinary derivative and then applied the Caputo derivative to the model for its generalization. The generalized model is then used to present a novel numerical procedure for their numerical solution. The real statistical data obtained from [50] for the year 2004–2014 are utilized and obtained various graphical results. The realistic parameters are fitted for the model of two different data sets which provide a reasonable fitting to the model. For comparison purposes, we considered also the FDE12 method and presented the results. We found that both the methods provide the same results and it can be used confidently for other physical or social problems. The suggested graphical results were tested in order to find the best fractional-order values for which the data provide good fitting is ρ=0.7. While using the stochastic version of the model, we observed that the data provide reasonable fitting to the model. The stochastic version for some different values of the intensities parameters has been shown. It is obvious that the real data fitting provides useful information for the phenomenon's future prediction, where some policy and rule can be designed to obtain the future goals. Thus, we hope that these new results for the competition model for the bank data with the real statistical data will bring new information for the banking and finance sector.

    This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant No. (D-743-135-1443). The authors, therefore, gratefully acknowledge DSR technical and financial support.

    No conflict of interests exists regarding the publication of this work.



    [1] X. P. Li, Y. Wang, M. A. Khan, M. Y. Alshahrani, T. Muhammad, A dynamical study of SARS-COV-2: A study of third wave, Res. Phys., 29 (2021), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104705 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104705
    [2] Z. H. Shen, Y. M. Chu, M. A. Khan, S. Muhammad, O. A. AlHartomy, M. Higazy, Mathematical modeling and optimal control of the COVID-19 dynamics, Res. Phy., 31 (2021), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105028 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105028
    [3] X. P. Li, N. Gul, M. A. Khan, R. Bilal, A. Ali, M. Y. Alshahrani, et al., A new Hepatitis B model in light of asymptomatic carriers and vaccination study through Atangana-Baleanu derivative, Res. Phys., 29 (2021), 104603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104603 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104603
    [4] P. Y. Xiong, M. I. Khan, R. J. P. Gowda, R. N. Kumar, B. C. Prasannakumara, Y. M. Chu, Comparative analysis of (Zinc ferrite, Nickel Zinc ferrite) hybrid nanofluids slip flow with entropy generation, Mod. Phys. Lett. B, 35 (2021), 1–22.
    [5] P. Y. Xiong, A. Hamid, Y. M. Chu, M. I. Khan, R. J. P. Gowda, R. N. Kumar, et al., Dynamics of multiple solutions of Darcy-Forchheimer saturated flow of Cross nanofluid by a vertical thin needle point, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 136 (2021), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01294-2 doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01294-2
    [6] Laws of the republic indonesia number 10 year 1998 about amendment to law number 7 of 1992 concerning banking. Available from: https://www.global-regulation.com/translation/indonesia/7224941/act-no.-10-of-1998.html.
    [7] S. Arbi, Lembaga perbankan keuangan dan pembiayaan, Yogyakarta: BPFE, 2013.
    [8] S. Iskandar, Bank dan lembaga keuangan lainnya, Jakarta: Penerbit, 2013.
    [9] OJK, Statistik Perbankan Indonesia, 2004–2014. Available from: http://www.ojk.go.id/datastatistikperbankan-indonesia.
    [10] A. Hastings, Population biology: Concepts and models, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
    [11] J. Kim, D. J. Lee, J. Ahn, A dynamic competition analysis on the korean mobile phone market using competitive diffusion model, Comput. Ind. Eng., 51 (2006), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2006.07.009 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2006.07.009
    [12] S. A. Morris, D. Pratt, Analysis of the lotka-volterra competition equations as a technological substitution model, Technol. Forecast. Soc., 70 (2003), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00185-8 doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00185-8
    [13] S. J. Lee, D. J. Lee, H. S. Oh, Technological forecasting at the korean stock market: A dynamic competition analysis using lotka-volterra model, Technol. Forecast. Soc., 72 (2005), 1044–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2002.11.001 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2002.11.001
    [14] C. Michalakelis, C. Christodoulos, D. Varoutas, T. Sphicopoulos, Dynamic estimation of markets exhibiting a prey-predator behavior, Expert Syst. Appl., 39 (2012), 7690–7700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.049 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.049
    [15] S. Lakka, C. Michalakelis, D. Varoutas, D. Martakos, Competitive dynamics in the operating systems market: Modeling and policy implications, Technol. Forecast. Soc., 80 (2013), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.06.011 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.06.011
    [16] C. A. Comes, Banking system: Three level lotka-volterra model, Proc. Econ. Financ., 3 (2012), 251–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00148-7 doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00148-7
    [17] Fatmawati, M. A. Khan, M. Azizah, Windarto, S. Ullah, A fractional model for the dynamics of competition between commercial and rural banks in Indonesia, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 122 (2019), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.02.009 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.02.009
    [18] W. Wang, M. A. Khan, Fatmawati, P. Kumam, P. Thounthong, A comparison study of bank data in fractional calculus, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 126 (2019), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.07.025 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.07.025
    [19] Z. F. Li, Z. Liu, M. A. Khan, Fractional investigation of bank data with fractal-fractional Caputo derivative, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 131 (2020), 109528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109528 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109528
    [20] W. Wang, M. A. Khan, Analysis and numerical simulation of fractional model of bank data with fractal-fractional Atangana-Baleanu derivative, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 369 (2020), 112646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2019.112646 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2019.112646
    [21] M. A. Khan, M. Azizah, S. Ullah, A fractional model for the dynamics of competition between commercial and rural banks in indonesia, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 122 (2019), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.02.009 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.02.009
    [22] S. Ullah, M. A. Khan, M. Farooq, A fractional model for the dynamics of tb virus, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 116 (2018), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.001
    [23] M. A. Khan, Fatmawati, A. Atangana, E. Alzahrani, The dynamics of COVID-19 with quarantined and isolation, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 425. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02882-9 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02882-9
    [24] Fatmawati, M. A. Khan, H. P. Odinsyah, Fractional model of HIV transmission with awareness effect, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 138 (2020), 109967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109967 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109967
    [25] A. Atangana, S. I. Araz, Atangana-Seda numerical scheme for Labyrinth attractor with new differential and integral operators, Fractals, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X20400447
    [26] P. I, Fractional differential equations: An introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications, Academic Press, USA, 1998.
    [27] S. Das, P. Gupta, A mathematical model on fractional lotka-volterra equations, J. Theor. Biol., 277 (2011), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.01.034 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.01.034
    [28] M. A. Khan, Z. Hammouch, D. Baleanu, Modeling the dynamics of hepatitis E via the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Math. Model. Nat. Pheno., 14 (2019), 311. https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/2018074 doi: 10.1051/mmnp/2018074
    [29] M. A. Khan, S. Ullah, M. Farooq, A new fractional model for tuberculosis with relapse via atangana-baleanu derivative, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 116 (2018), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.039 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.039
    [30] F. Fatmawati, E. Shaiful, M. Utoyo, A fractional-order model for hiv dynamics in a two-sex population, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci., 2018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6801475
    [31] A. Atangana, J. J. Nieto, Numerical solution for the model of rlc circuit via the fractional derivative without singular kernel, Adv. Mech. Eng., 7 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814015613758
    [32] Y. Che, M. Y. A. Keir, Study on the training model of football movement trajectory drop point based on fractional differential equation, Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci., 2021, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2021.2.00095
    [33] S. Man, R. Yang, Educational reform informatisation based on fractional differential equation, Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci., 2021, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2021.2.00079
    [34] J. Gao, F. S. Alotaibi, R. T. Ismail, The model of sugar metabolism and exercise energy expenditure based on fractional linear regression equation, Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci., 2021, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2021.2.00026
    [35] N. Zhao, F. Yao, A. O. Khadidos, B. M. Muwafak, The impact of financial repression on manufacturing upgrade based on fractional Fourier transform and probability, Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci., 2021, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2021.2.00060
    [36] C. Li, N. Alhebaishi, M. A. Alhamami, Calculating university education model based on finite element fractional differential equations and macro-control analysis, Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci., 2021, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2021.2.00069
    [37] A. Zeb, E. Alzahrani, V. S. Erturk, G. Zaman, Mathematical model for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) containing isolation class, Biomed Res. Int., 2020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3452402
    [38] Z. Zhang, A. Zeb, S. Hussain, E. Alzahrani, Dynamics of COVID-19 mathematical model with stochastic perturbation, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02909-1 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02909-1
    [39] S. Bushnaq, T. Saeed, D. F. Torres, A. Zeb, Control of COVID-19 dynamics through a fractional-order model, Alex. Eng. J., 60 (2021), 3587–3592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.02.022 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.02.022
    [40] Z. Zhang, A. Zeb, E. Alzahrani, S. Iqbal, Crowding effects on the dynamics of COVID-19 mathematical model, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03137-3 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-03137-3
    [41] A. Din, Y. Li, A. Yousaf, A. I. Ali, Caputo type fractional operator applied to Hepatitis B system, Fractals, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22400230
    [42] A. Din, Y. Li, F. M. Khan, Z. U. Khan, P. Liu, On Analysis of fractional order mathematical model of Hepatitis B using Atangana-Baleanu Caputo (ABC) derivative, Fractals, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22400175
    [43] A. Din, A. Khan, A. Zeb, M. R. Sidi Ammi, M. Tilioua, D. F. Torres, Hybrid method for simulation of a fractional COVID-19 model with real case application, Axioms, 10 (2021), 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10040290 doi: 10.3390/axioms10040290
    [44] C. Xu, M. Liao, P. Li, S. Yuan, Impact of leakage delay on bifurcation in fractional-order complex-valued neural networks, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 142 (2021), 110535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110535 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110535
    [45] C. Xu, Z. Liu, L. Yao, C. Aouiti, Further exploration on bifurcation of fractional-order six-neuron bi-directional associative memory neural networks with multi-delays, Appl. Math. Comput., 410 (2021), 126458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2021.126458 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2021.126458
    [46] C. Xu, M. Liao, P. Li, Y. Guo, Q. Xiao, S. Yuan, Influence of multiple time delays on bifurcation of fractional-order neural networks, Appl. Math. Comput., 361 (2019), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2019.05.057 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.05.057
    [47] C. Xu, M. Liao, P. Li, Y. Guo, Z. Liu, Bifurcation properties for fractional order delayed BAM neural networks, Cogn. Comput., 13 (2021), 322–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-020-09782-w doi: 10.1007/s12559-020-09782-w
    [48] C. J. Xu, W. Zhang, C. Aouiti, Z. X. Liu, M. X. Liao, P. L. Li, Further investigation on bifurcation and their control of fractional-order BAM neural networks involving four neurons and multiple delays, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 2021, 75.
    [49] C. Xu, W. Zhang, Z. Liu, L. Yao, Delay-induced periodic oscillation for fractional-order neural networks with mixed delays, Neurocomputing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.11.079
    [50] OJK, Statistik Perbankan Indonesia 2004–2014.
    [51] A. Atangana, M. A. Khan, Modeling and analysis of competition model of bank data with fractal-fractional Caputo-Fabrizio operator, Alex. Eng. J., 159 (2020), 1985–1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.12.032 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2019.12.032
    [52] A. Din, Y. Li, T. Khan, G. Zaman, Mathematical analysis of spread and control of the novel corona virus (COVID-19) in China, Chaos Soliton Fract., 141 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110286
    [53] A. Din, Y. Li, M. A. Shah, The complex dynamics of hepatitis B infected individuals with optimal control, J. Syst. Sci. Comput., 34 (2021), 1301–1323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-021-0053-0 doi: 10.1007/s11424-021-0053-0
    [54] A. Din, T. Khan, Y. Li, H. Tahir, A. Khan, W. A. Khan, Mathematical analysis of dengue stochastic epidemic model, Result Phys., 20 (2021), 103719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103719 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103719
    [55] A. Din, Y. Li, The extinction and persistence of a stochastic model of drinking alcohol, Result Phys., 28 (2021), 104649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104649 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104649
    [56] A. Din, Y. Li, Stochastic optimal control for norovirus transmission dynamics by contaminated food and water, Chinese Phys. B, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ac2f32
    [57] A. Atangana, Mathematical model of survival of fractional calculus, critics and their impact: How singular is our world? Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 1–59.
    [58] A. Atangana, S. I. Araz, Modeling third waves of Covid-19 spread with piecewise differential and integral operators: Turkey, Spain and Czechia, Result Phys., 29 (2021), 104694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104694 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104694
    [59] M. Caputo, Linear models of dissipation whose Q is almost frequency independent, part II, Geophys. J. Int., 13 (1967), 529–539.
    [60] A. Atangana, S. I. Araz, New numerical scheme with newton polynomial: Theory, methods, and applications, Academic Press, 2021.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Sania Qureshi, Amanullah Soomro, Ioannis K. Argyros, Krzysztof Gdawiec, Ali Akgül, Marwan Alquran, Use of fractional calculus to avoid divergence in newton-like solver for solving one-dimensional nonlinear polynomial-based models, 2025, 10075704, 108631, 10.1016/j.cnsns.2025.108631
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2308) PDF downloads(156) Cited by(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog