Research article

Theoretical and numerical aspects of the Malaria transmission model with piecewise technique

  • Received: 25 July 2023 Revised: 08 September 2023 Accepted: 27 September 2023 Published: 18 October 2023
  • MSC : 26A33, 34Axx, 34Lxx, 52Bxx, 65Yxx, 92-10

  • In this paper, we apply piecewise derivatives with both singular and non-singular kernels to investigate a malaria model. The singular kernel is the Caputo derivative, while the non-singular kernel is the Atangana-Baleanu operator in Caputo's sense (ABC). The existence, uniqueness, and numerical algorithm of the proposed model are presented using piecewise derivatives with both kernels. The stability is also presented for the proposed model using Ulam-Hyers stability. The numerical simulations are performed considering different fractional orders and compared the results with the real data to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed approach.

    Citation: Shakeel Muhammad, Obaid J. Algahtani, Sayed Saifullah, Amir Ali. Theoretical and numerical aspects of the Malaria transmission model with piecewise technique[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28353-28375. doi: 10.3934/math.20231451

    Related Papers:

    [1] Hasib Khan, Jehad Alzabut, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, Praveen Agarwal . Piecewise mABC fractional derivative with an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24345-24366. doi: 10.3934/math.20231241
    [2] Rashid Jan, Sultan Alyobi, Mustafa Inc, Ali Saleh Alshomrani, Muhammad Farooq . A robust study of the transmission dynamics of malaria through non-local and non-singular kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 7618-7640. doi: 10.3934/math.2023382
    [3] K. A. Aldwoah, Mohammed A. Almalahi, Mansour A. Abdulwasaa, Kamal Shah, Sunil V. Kawale, Muath Awadalla, Jihan Alahmadi . Mathematical analysis and numerical simulations of the piecewise dynamics model of Malaria transmission: A case study in Yemen. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 4376-4408. doi: 10.3934/math.2024216
    [4] Fatmawati, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Ebenezer Bonyah, Zakia Hammouch, Endrik Mifta Shaiful . A mathematical model of tuberculosis (TB) transmission with children and adults groups: A fractional model. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 2813-2842. doi: 10.3934/math.2020181
    [5] Abdon Atangana, Saima Rashid . Analysis of a deterministic-stochastic oncolytic M1 model involving immune response via crossover behaviour: ergodic stationary distribution and extinction. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3236-3268. doi: 10.3934/math.2023167
    [6] Muhammad Altaf Khan, Muhammad Ismail, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farhan . Fractional order SIR model with generalized incidence rate. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 1856-1880. doi: 10.3934/math.2020124
    [7] Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dilshad Ahmad, Aqeel Ahmad, Sarfaraz Kamangar, C Ahamed Saleel . Epidemiological analysis of fractional order COVID-19 model with Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 756-783. doi: 10.3934/math.2022046
    [8] Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Sameh Askar, Thongchai Botmart, Aqeel Ahmad, Hijaz Ahmad . Modeling and analysis of fractional order Zika model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3912-3938. doi: 10.3934/math.2022216
    [9] Mohammed A. Almalahi, Satish K. Panchal, Fahd Jarad, Mohammed S. Abdo, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad . Qualitative analysis of a fuzzy Volterra-Fredholm integrodifferential equation with an Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 15994-16016. doi: 10.3934/math.2022876
    [10] Fawaz K. Alalhareth, Seham M. Al-Mekhlafi, Ahmed Boudaoui, Noura Laksaci, Mohammed H. Alharbi . Numerical treatment for a novel crossover mathematical model of the COVID-19 epidemic. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 5376-5393. doi: 10.3934/math.2024259
  • In this paper, we apply piecewise derivatives with both singular and non-singular kernels to investigate a malaria model. The singular kernel is the Caputo derivative, while the non-singular kernel is the Atangana-Baleanu operator in Caputo's sense (ABC). The existence, uniqueness, and numerical algorithm of the proposed model are presented using piecewise derivatives with both kernels. The stability is also presented for the proposed model using Ulam-Hyers stability. The numerical simulations are performed considering different fractional orders and compared the results with the real data to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed approach.



    Although there has been significant progress in the struggle with infectious diseases in the 20th century, various diseases still pose a substantial threat to public health in underdeveloped countries [1,2]. In particular, diseases like yellow fever, HIV/AIDS, Malaria, and Ebola continue to cause suffering and increase mortality rates. One reason these diseases continue is due to the shortage of access to healthcare and basic requirements like fresh and clean water and hygiene in underdeveloped countries. In addition, poverty, starvation, and other social factors of health can also worsen the impact of infectious diseases. The struggles are in progress to report these problems, though, including improving access to healthcare and executing precautionary measures like vaccinations and mosquito control. Additionally, there is constant research to improve novel treatments and vaccines for these diseases. It is important to identify that infectious diseases are a global health dispute that needs a joint effort from all countries to resolve the conflict [3,4]. However, although improvements have been made, there is still much work to be done to confirm that everybody has access to quality healthcare and the tools essential to inhibit and treat infectious diseases. In recent years, the mathematical modeling has become a countless way for investigation of infectious diseases and control schemes improvement. Numerous scientists and scholars have been working on infectious diseases considering different mathematical models including SIQR Covid-19 model [5], Rubella disease [6], Agitation of SARS-CoV-2 disease [7], spatiotemporal HIV CD4+ T cell model [8], the monkeypox disease [9,10] and some other fractional order models with control tactics [11,12] to analyze the dynamics of diseases considering various factors.

    Malaria is an infectious disease caused by the Plasmodium parasites. These parasites are transferred to humans through bites by Anopheles mosquitoes which are already infected. The major kinds of species of the Plasmodium are four that can infect humans in which falciparum and vivax are the most common species found in different countries. Plasmodium falciparum is generally considered to be the most dangerous species, as it can cause severe malaria and is responsible for most malaria-related deaths globally. Plasmodium vivax, while generally causing less severe illness, can lead to long-term health problems if left untreated. Malaria is serious public health issue in the world. The different governments have implemented a number of measures to control malaria's spread, which includes distribution of bed nets which are insecticide-treated and use of antimalarial medicines. Despite these efforts, malaria remains a significant cause of illness and death, particularly among vulnerable populations such as young children and pregnant women [13].

    Malaria is mainly contracted through the bites of female mosquitoes that are infected with the Plasmodium parasite. If diagnosed and treated properly on time, the disease can be well managed [14]. It is a persistent illness having substantial economic, social, and health concerns, particularly in tropical regions and countries. Despite centuries of research, malaria is a major public health problem, with 109 countries classified as having endemic levels of the disease in 2008. In that year alone, an estimated one million people, mostly children under the age of five, died from malaria, and 243 million infected cases were reported [15].

    Presently, the major recommendation for individuals who are sick with malaria is anticipation through the use of bed nets, since there is no known vaccine and many available anti-malarial drugs are becoming less effective due to parasite drug tolerance. The relevance of malaria has grown in recent years due to concerns about how climate change or global warming might affect its prevalence. Temperature changes can affect both the parasite and vector life cycles. For over a century, mathematical models have been used to study the patterns of human malaria transmission. However, it is important to critically review existing models and investigate their effectiveness in describing host-parasite biology, as the disease continues to be a significant threat to health and wellbeing in the face of shifting environmental and socioeconomic conditions [16].

    Here, we consider [15]

    Dϱt(Sh1(t))=Ah+b1Rh1wr1Sh1Ih1ζr2Sh1Im1(d1+ϱh)Sh1,Dϱt(Eh1(t))=wr1Sh1Ih1+ζr2Sh1Im1(ϱh+b2+d2)Eh1,Dϱt(Ih1(t))=b2Eh1(t)(ϱh+α+ων)Ih1,Dϱt(Rh1(t))=νωIh1+d1Sh1+d2Eh1(b1+ϱh)Rh1,Dϱt(Sm1(t))=Amqr3Sm1Ih1(ϱM+υ)Sm1,Dϱt(Im1(t))=qr3Sm1Ih1(ϱM+υ)Im1, (1.1)

    with NH=Sh1+Eh1+Ih1+Rh1 is four classes of humans, and NM=Sm1+Im1 is two classes of mosquitos, in which, Sh1 represents the susceptible human individuals, Eh1 represents exposed humans, Ih1 and Rh1 stands for the infected and recovered humans, Sm1 and Im1 represents susceptible and infected mosquitoes, Ah is recruitment rate into Sh1, Am recruitment rate into Sm1, b1 rate of recovery of humans, b2 rate of transition from Eh1 to Ih1, w is blood transfusion's average number from Sh1 to Ih1 in specific period, r1 is rate of transfer of disease from Ih1 to Sh1, r2 is rate of transfer of disease from Im1 to Sh1, r3 probability of Im1, ζ the average rate of biting of Sh1 by infected mosquito, d1 is recovery rate of Sh1, d2 is recovery rate of Eh1, ςh natural rate of mortality of humans, ςM natural rate of mortality of mosquitoes, α is the death rate of Ih1 because of disease, ω is the human's recovery rate, v the rate of medicines potency which are anti-malarial, the Sm1 and Im1 classes die at ν because of the spraying use in specific time, and q at which Sm1 bites those who are infected with the disease in specific time. The compartmental model, as shown in Figure 1, represents malaria disease transmission.

    Figure 1.  Compartmental flowchart for the malaria mathematical model's transmission.

    Various operators, including fractal derivative, non-integer order derivative with kernel of singularity and non-singularity, fractal-fractional operator have been proposed to address crossover behavior in different fields such as infectious disease models, heat transfer, fluid dynamics, and other advection problems [17,18].

    Similarly, fractional operators have been used to analyze bifurcations and control mechanisms [19,20] and discrete predator-prey competitive models [21]. However, despite the addition of stochastic terms to capture randomness and provide more realistic dynamics, crossover behavior remain a significant challenge [22,23]. To address this issue, a novel approach called piece-wise differentiation and the integration was recently developed and discussed in reference [24]. The authors explore classical and global piecewise derivatives and provide examples. Further, the analysis of piecewise tumor-immune interaction [25,26], dengue internal transmission and Leftospirosis models have been extensively studied using different fractional derivatives [27,28].

    Here, we interpret the system (1.1) for both theoretical and numerical analysis using the Caputo and ABC piece-wise derivative. The remaining sections are organized as follows: Section 2 presents model (1.1) using the piecewise derivative, considering singular as well as non-singular kernels. The basic results are covered in Section 3. In Section 4 the existence and uniqueness of the model is presented. Section 5 includes the numerical investigations of the model, while the simulations and discussions of the system are included in Section 6. Finally, Section 7 provides concluding remarks and future work.

    The equation represented by model (1.1) can be expressed using a piecewise derivative having the singular and the non-singular kernels in the form:

    CABC0Dϱt(Sh1(t))=Ah+b1Rh1wr1Sh1Ih1ζr2Sh1Im1(d1+ϱh)Sh1,CABC0Dϱt(Eh1(t))=wr1Sh1Ih1+ζr2Sh1Im1(ϱh+b2+d2)Eh1,CABC0Dϱt(Ih1(t))=b2Eh1(t)(ϱh+α+ων)Ih1,CABC0Dϱt(Rh1(t))=νωIh1+d1Sh1+d2Eh1(b1+ϱh)Rh1,CABC0Dϱt(Sm1(t))=Amqr3Sm1Ih1(ϱM+υ)Sm1,CABC0Dϱt(Im1(t))=qr3Sm1Ih1(ϱM+υ)Im1, (2.1)

    for 0<ϱ1, t[0,T]. To elaborate further, Eq (2.1) can be expressed in the form

    CABC0Dϱt(Sh1(t))={C0Dϱt(Sh1(t))=CM1(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),  0<tt1,ABC0Dϱt(Sh1(t))=ABCM1(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),  t1<tT,CABC0Dϱt(Eh1(t))={C0Dϱt(Eh1(t))=CM2(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),  0<tt1,ABC0Dϱt(Eh1(t))=ABCM2(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),  t1<tT,CABC0Dϱt(Ih1(t))={C0Dϱt(Ih1(t))=CM3(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),  0<tt1,ABC0Dϱt(Ih1(t))=ABCM3(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),  t1<tT,CABC0Dϱt(Rh1(t))={C0Dϱt(Rh1(t))=CM4(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),  0<tt1,ABC0Dϱt(Rh1(t))=ABCM4(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),  t1<tT,CABC0Dϱt(Sm1(t))={C0Dϱt(Sm1(t))=CM5(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),  0<tt1,ABC0Dϱt(Sm1(t))=ABCM5(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),  t1<tT,CABC0Dϱt(Im1(t))={C0Dϱt(Im1(t))=CM6(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),  0<tt1,ABC0Dϱt(Im1(t))=ABCM6(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),  t1<tT, (2.2)

    where C0Dϱt and ABC0Dϱt are Caputo's and ABC derivatives, respectively, and

    CM1(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t)=ABCM1(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t)=Ah+b1Rh1wr1Sh1Ih1ζr2Sh1Im1(d1+ϱh)Sh1,CM2(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t)=ABCM2(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t)=wr1Sh1Ih1+ζr2Sh1Im1(ϱh+b2+d2)Eh1,CM3(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t)=ABCM3(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t)=b2Eh1(t)(ϱh+α+ων)Ih1,CM4(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t)=ABCM4(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t)=νωIh1+d1Rh1+d2Eh1(b1+ϱh)Rh1,CM5(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t)=ABCM5(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t)=Amqr3Sm1Ih1(ϱM+υ)Sm1,CM6(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t)=ABCM6(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t)=qr3Sm1Ih1(ϱM+υ)Im1.

    Here, we provide some important definitions and preliminaries of the Caputo and the ABC fractional order derivatives and integrals.

    Definition 3.1. Suppose U(t)H1(0,τ), the ABC derivative of function U(t) is given by [17]

    ABC0Dϱt(U(t))=ABC(ϱ)1ϱt0ddϕU(ϕ)Eϱ[ϱ1ϱ(tϕ)ϱ]dϕ. (3.1)

    Definition 3.2. Let U(t) is differentiable function, then the Caputo and the ABC fractional piecewise derivative is given by [24] :

    CABC0DϱtU(t)={C0DϱtU(t),  0<tt1,ABC0DϱtU(t)  t1<tT.

    Here, CABC0DϱtU(t) is piecewise derivative in which the Caputo operator for 0<tt1 and the ABC operator for t1<tT.

    Definition 3.3. Let U(t) be a differentiable function, then the Caputo and the ABC piece-wise integration is defined by [24]:

    PCABC0ItU(t)={1Γ(ϱ)tt1(tϕ)ϱ1U(ϕ)d(ϕ),  0<tt1,1ϱABC(ϱ)U(t)+ϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tt1(tϕ)ϱ1U(ϕ)d(ϕ)  t1<tT,

    where CABC0IϱtU(t) is piecewise integral in which Caputo operator is in 0<tt1 and ABC operator in t1<tT.

    Lemma 3.1. The solution of a piecewise differentiable equation

    PCABC0DϱtG(t)=H(t,G(t)),  0<ϱ1,

    can be obtained in the form [24]

    G(t)={G(0)+1Γ(ϱ)t0H(ϕ,G(ϕ))(tϕ)ϱ1dϕ, 0<tt1,G(t1)+1ϱABC(ϱ)H(t,G(t))+ϱABCϱΓ(ϱ)tt1(tϕ)ϱ1H(ϕG(ϕ))d(ϕ)  t1<tT.

    In this section, we establish both the existence and uniqueness of the proposed model (2.2) using the piecewise approach. For this, we can represent model (2.2) as shown in Lemma 3.1, which can be further elaborated as follows:

    PCABC0DϱtK(t)=M(t,K(t)),  0<ϱ1,

    with

    K(t)={K0+1Γ(ϱ)t0M(ϕ,K(ϕ,))(tϕ,)ϱ1dϕ, 0<tt1,K(t1)+1ϱABC(ϱ)M(t,K(t))+ϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tt1(tϕ)ϱ1M(ϕ,K(ϕ))dϕ,  t1<tT, (4.1)

    where

    K(t)={Sh1(t)Eh1(t)Ih1(t)Rh1(t)Sm1(t)Im1(t),   K0={Sh1(0)Eh1(0)Ih1(0)Rh1(0)Sm1(0)Im1(0),   K(t1)={Sh1(t1)Eh1(t1)Ih1(t1)Rh1(t1)Sm1(t1)Im1(t1), (4.2)
    M(t,K(t))={M1={CM1(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),ABCM1(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),M2={CM2(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),ABCM2(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),M3={CM3(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),ABCM3(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t). (4.3)

    Consider 0<tT< and define E1=C[0,T] (Banach space) with

    K=maxt[0,T]|K(t)|.

    Let the growth and Lipschitz condition be in the form:

    C1: LM>0; M, ˉKE, we have |M(t,K)M(t,ˉK)|LM|KˉK|,

    C2: CM>0 & MM>0,

    |M(t,K(t))|CM|K|+MM.

    If M is piecewise continuous on 0<tt1 and t1<tT in [0,T], also satisfy (C2), then model (2.2) has at least single solution in the sub-intervals.

    Proof. Consider closed sub-set in both sub-intervals on [0,T] in the form of E and B. Then using Schauder FP theorem [29], we have

    B={KE: KR1,2, R>0},

    next consider operator Q:BB and apply to (4.1) in the form

    Q(K)={K0+1Γ(ϱ)t10M(ϕ,U(ϕ))(tϕ)ϕ1dϕ, 0<tt1,K(t1)+1ρABC(ρ)M(t,K(t))+ρABC(ρ)Γ(ρ)tt1(tϕ)ρ1M(ϕ,K(ϕ))d(ϕ),  t(t1,T]. (4.4)

    For any KB, one can get

    |Q(K(t))|{|K0|+1Γ(ϱ)t10(tϕ)ϱ1|M(ϕ,K(ϕ))|dϕ,|K(t1)|+1ϱABC(ϱ)|M(t,K(t))|+ϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tt1(tϕ)ϱ1|M(ϕK(ϕ))|d(ϕ),{|K0|+1Γ(ϱ)t10(tϕ)ϱ1[CM|K|+MM]dϕ,|K(t1)|+1ϱABC(ϱ)[CM|K|+MM]+ϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tt1(tϕ)ϱ1[CM|K|+MM]d(ϕ),{|K0|+TϱΓ(ϱ+1)[CH|U|+MM]=R1, 0<tt1,|K(t1)|+1ϱABC(ϱ)[CM|K|+MM]+ϱ(TT)ϱABC(ϱ)Γϱ+1[CM|K|+MM]d(ϕ)=R2,t(t1,T],{R1, 0<tt1,R2, t(t1,T]. (4.5)

    From Eq (4.5), since KB and Q(B)B. Therefore, it shows that Q is a close as well as complete. Furthermore to prove that it is completely continuous, we take ti<tj[0,t1], so

    |Q(K)(tj)Q(K)(ti)|=|1Γ(ϱ)tj0(tjϕ)ϱ1M(ϕ,K(ϕ))dϕ,1Γ(ϱ)ti0(tiϕ)ϱ1M(ϕ,K(ϕ))dϕ|1Γ(ϱ)ti0[(tiϕ)ϱ1(tjϕ)ϱ1]|M(ϕ,K(ϕ))|dϕ+1Γ(ϱ)tjti(tjϕ)ϱ1|M(ϕ,K(ϕ))|dϕ1Γ(ϱ)[ti0[(tiϕ)ϱ1(tjϕ)ϱ1]dϕ+tjti(tjϕ)ϱ1dϕ](CM|K|+MM)(CMK+MM)Γ(ϱ+1)[tϱjtϱi+2(tjti)ϱ]. (4.6)

    Further (4.6), we get titj, so

    |Q(K)(tj)Q(K)(ti)|0, as titj.

    Hence, Q is equi-continuous in interval [0,t1]. Now consider second sub-interval ti,tj[t1,T] as

    |Q(K)(tj)Q(K)(ti)|=|1ϱABC(ϱ)M(t,K(t))+ϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tjt1(tjϕ)ϱ1M(ϕ,K(ϕ))dϕ1ϱABC(ϱ)M(t,K(t))+(ϱ)ABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tit1(tiϕ)ϱ1M(ϕ,K(ϕ))dϕ|ϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tit1[(tiϕ)ϱ1(tjϕ)ϱ1]|M(ϕ,K(ϕ))|dϕ+ϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tjti(tjϕ)ϱ1|M(ϕ,K(ϕ))|dϕϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)[tit1[(tiϕ)ϱ1(tjϕ)ϱ1]dϕ+tjti(tjϕ)ϱ1dϕ](CM|K|+MM)ϱ(CMK+MM)ABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ+1)[tϱjtϱi+2(tjti)ϱ]. (4.7)

    Further as in (4.7), we take titj, then

    |Q(K)(tj)Q(K)(ti)|0, as titj.

    So Q shows that it is equi-continuous in [t1,T]. Hence, Q is uniform continuous, completely continuous, and is bounded, due to Arzela-Ascoli result. Hence, the suggested model exhibits at least single solution in each interval.

    Theorem 4.1. With (C1), the model's solution is unique if Q is contraction.

    Proof. Since the operator is piecewise continuous, then consider K and ˉKB on [0,t1]

    Q(K)Q(ˉK)=maxt[0,t1]|1Γ(ϱ)t0(tϕ)ϱ1M(ϕ,K(ϕ))dϕ1Γ(ϱ)t0(tϕ)ϱ1M(ϕ,ˉK(ϕ))dϕ|TϱΓ(ϱ+1)LMKˉK. (4.8)

    From (4.8), we have

    Q(K)Q(ˉK)TϱΓ(ϱ+1)LMKˉK. (4.9)

    So Q is contraction. Hence, using Banach's contraction, the suggested system has unique solution [30]. Further on t[t1,T], we have

    Q(K)Q(ˉK)1ϱABC(ϱ)LMKˉK+ϱ(TTϱ)ABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ+1)LMKˉK. (4.10)

    or

    Q(K)Q(ˉK)LM[1ϱABC(ϱ)+ϱ(TT)ϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ+1)]KˉK. (4.11)

    Hence, Q is a contraction. Hence, from Eqs (4.9) and (4.11), the piecewise differentiable function has a unique solution.

    Here, we established the Hyers-Ulam stability for the proposed model.

    Definition 5.1. The piecewise malaria transmission disease model (2.1) is Ulam-Hyers stable if α>0,

    |PCABCDϱtK(t)M(t,K(t))|<α,tT, (5.1)

    and H>0 and a unique solution ¯KZ,

    ||K¯K||ZHα,tT. (5.2)

    Additionally, for the inequality shown above, for a non-decreasing function Φ:[0,)R+

    ||K¯K||ZHΦ(α),tT. (5.3)

    If Φ(0)=0 as fated, then the resultant solution is typically U-H stable.

    Definition 5.2. Our suggested model (2.1) is Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stable if Ψ:[0,)R+, α>0, and the inequality

    |PCABCDϱtK(t)M(t,K(t))|<αΨ(t),tT, (5.4)

    and HΨ>0 and a unique solution ¯KZ, so that

    ||K¯K||ZHΨαΨ(t),tT. (5.5)

    If there exist Ψ:[0,)R+ for the inequality

    |PCABCDϱtK(t)M(t,K(t))|<Ψ(t),tT. (5.6)

    If there exist a unique solution ¯KZ with constant HΨ>0, so

    ||K¯K||ZHΨΨ(t),tT. (5.7)

    Then, the result is typically H-U-R stable.

    Remark 5.1. Suppose a function ϕC(T) is not dependent on KZ, and ϕ(0)=0, then

    |ϕ(t)|α,tT,PCABCDϱtK(t)=M(t,K(t))+ϕ(t),tT.

    Lemma 5.1. Suppose the function

    PCABC0DϱtK(t)=M(t,K(t)),  0<ϱ1. (5.8)

    The solution of Eq (5.8) can be obtained in the form

    K(t)={K0+1Γ(ϱ)t0M(ϕ,K(ϕ))(tϕ)ϱ1dϕ, 0<tt1,K(t1)+1ϱABC(ϱ)M(t,K(t))+ϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tt1(tϕ)ϱ1M(ϕ,K(ϕ))d(ϕ),  t1<tT, (5.9)
    ||M(K)M(¯K)||{Tϱ1Γ(ϱ+1)α,tT1,[(1ϱ)Γ(ϱ)+(Tϱ2)ABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)]α=Θα,tT2. (5.10)

    Theorem 5.1. Considering Lemma 5.1, if the condition LfTϱΓ(ϱ)<1 satisfy, then the solution of model (2.1) is Hyers-Ulam as well as generalized Hyers-Ulam stable.

    Proof. Suppose KZ is the solution of model (2.1) and ¯KZ is a unique solution of model (2.1). Thus we have

    Case 1: For tT, we have

    ||K¯K||=suptT|K(K+1Γ(ϱ)t10(t1s)ϱ1M(s,¯K(s))ds)|suptT|K(K+1Γ(ϱ)t10(t1s)ϱ1M(s,¯K(s))ds)|+suptT|+1Γ(ϱ)t10(t1s)ϱ1M(s,K(s))ds1Γ(ϱ)t10(t1s)ϱ1M(s,¯K(s))ds|T1ϱΓ(ϱ+1)α+LfT1Γ(ϱ+1)||K¯K||.

    On further simplification, we obtain

    ||K¯K||(T1Γ(ϱ+1)1LfT1Γ(ϱ+1))α. (5.11)

    Case 2:

    ||K¯K||suptT|K[K(t1)+1ϱABC(ϱ)[M(t,K(t))]+ϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)[tt1(ts)ϱ1M(s,¯K(s))d(s)]]|+suptT1ϱABC(ϱ)|M(t,K(t))M(t,¯K(t))|+suptTϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tt1(ts)ϱ1|M(s,K(s))M(s,¯K(s))|ds.

    By further simplification and using Θ=[(1ϱ)Γ(ϱ)+Tϱ2ABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)], we obtain

    ||K¯K||ZΘα+ΘLf||K¯K||Z, (5.12)

    and

    ||K¯K||Z(Θ1ΘLf)α||K¯K||Z,

    by using

    H=max{(T1Γ(ϱ+1)1LfT1Γ(ϱ+1)),Θ1ΘLf1Mf}.

    Finally, from Eqs (5.11) and (5.12), we have

    ||K¯K||ZHα,tT.

    Hence, the solution of model (2.1) is Hyers-Ulam stable. Also, if we replace α by Φ(α) then from (5.13), we obtain

    ||K¯K||ZHΦ(α),tT.

    Now, Φ(0)=0 shows that solution of our proposed model (2.1) is generalized Hyers-Ulam stable.

    We include the following remark to conclude the Rassias stability results and also the generalized form.

    Remark 5.2. Suppose a function ϕC(T) does not depend upon KZ, and ϕ(0)=0, then

    |ϕ(t)|Ψ(t)α,tT,PCABCDϱtK(t)=M(t,K(t))+ϕ(t),tT,t0Ψ(s)dsCΨΨ(t),tT.

    Lemma 5.2. Solution to the model

    PCABCDϱtK(t)=M(t,K(t))+ϕ(t),K(0)=K,

    holds the relation

    ||M(K)M(¯K)||{Tϱ1Γ(ϱ+1)CΨΨ(t)α,tT1,[(1ϱ)Γ(ϱ)+(Tϱ2)ABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)]CΨΨ(t)α=ΘCΨΨ(t)α,tT2. (5.13)

    Where Hf,Ψ,Θ=ΘHf,Ψ. With the help of Remark 5.2, one can get Eq (5.13).

    Theorem 5.2. The solution of model (5.13) is H-U-R stable if the following conditions hold

    H1: For each K,vZ and a constant CΦ>0, we get

    |Φ(K)Φ(v)|CΦ|Kv|;

    H2: For each K,v,¯K,¯vZ and constant Lf>0,0<Mf<1, we get

    |M(t,K,v)M(t,¯K,¯v)|Lf|K¯K|+Mf|v¯v|Mf<1.

    Proof. We prove these results in two cases.

    Case 1: for tT, we have

    ||K¯K||=suptT|K(K+1Γ(ϱ)t10(t1s)ϱ1M(s,¯K(s))ds)|suptT|K(K+1Γ(ϱ)t10(t1s)ϱ1M(s,¯K(s))ds)|+suptT|+1Γ(ϱ)t10(t1s)ϱ1M(s,K(s))ds1Γ(ϱ)t10(t1s)ϱ1M(s,¯K(s))ds|Tϱ1Γ(ϱ+1)CΦΦ(t)α+LfT1Γ(ϱ+1)||K¯K||.

    On further simplification

    ||K¯K||(CΦΦ(t)T1Γ(ϱ+1)1LfT1Γ(ϱ+1))α. (5.14)

    Case 2:

    ||K¯K||suptT|K[K(t1)+1ϱABC(ϱ)[M(t,K(t))]+ϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)[tt1(ts)ϱ1M(s,¯K(s))d(s)]]|+suptT1ϱABC(ϱ)|M(t,K(t))M(t,¯K(t))|+suptTϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tt1(ts)ϱ1|M(s,K(s))M(s,¯K(s))|ds.

    By further simplification and using Θ=[(1ϱ)Γ(ϱ)+Tϱ2ABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)], we obtain

    ||K¯K||ZΘCΦΦ(t)α+ΘLf||K¯K||Z, (5.15)

    and

    ||K¯K||Z(ΘCΦΦ(t)1ΘLf)α||K¯K||Z,

    by using

    HΘ,CΦ=max{(T1Γ(ϱ+1)1LfT1Γ(ϱ+1)),CΦΦ(t)Θ1ΘLf1Mf}.

    Now from Eqs (5.14) and (5.15), we have

    ||K¯K||ZHΘ,CΦα,tT.

    So the solution of model (2.1) is H-U-R stable.

    Remark 5.3. Suppose a function ϕC(T) does not depend upon KZ, and ϕ(0)=0, then

    |ϕ(t)|Ψ(t),tT.

    Theorem 5.3. In light of H1, H2, Remark 5.3 and Lemma 5.2, the solution of model 2.1 is generalized H-U-R stable, if Mf<1.

    Where

    H1: For each K,vZ and constant CΦ>0, we get

    |Φ(K)Φ(v)|CΦ|Kv|,

    and

    H2: For each K,v,¯K,¯vZ and constant Lf>0,0<Mf<1, we get

    |M(t,K,v)M(t,¯K,¯v)|Lf|K¯K|+Mf|v¯v|.

    Proof. Here, we will discuss two cases:

    Case 1: For tT, we have

    ||K¯K||=suptT|K(K+1Γ(ϱ)t10(t1s)ϱ1M(s,¯K(s))ds)|suptT|K(K+1Γ(ϱ)t10(t1s)ϱ1M(s,¯K(s))ds)|+suptT|+1Γ(ϱ)t10(t1s)ϱ1M(s,K(s))ds1Γ(ϱ)t10(t1s)ϱ1M(s,¯K(s))ds|Tϱ1Γ(ϱ+1)CΦΦ(t)α+LfT1Γ(ϱ+1)||K¯K||.

    On further simplification

    ||K¯K||(CΦΦ(t)T1Γ(ϱ+1)1LfT1Γ(ϱ+1))α. (5.16)

    Case 2:

    ||K¯K||suptT|K[K(t1)+1ϱABC(ϱ)[M(t,K(t))]+ϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)[tt1(ts)ϱ1M(s,¯K(s))d(s)]]|+suptT1ϱABC(ϱ)|M(t,K(t))M(t,¯K(t))|+suptTϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tt1(ts)ϱ1|M(s,K(s))M(s,¯K(s))|ds.

    By further simplification and using Θ=[(1ϱ)Γ(ϱ)+Tϱ2ABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)], we have

    ||K¯K||ZΘCΦΦ(t)α+ΘLf||K¯K||Z, (5.17)

    we have

    ||K¯K||Z(ΘCΦΦ(t)1ΘLf)||K¯K||Z,

    using

    HΘ,CΦ=max{(T1Γ(ϱ+1)1LfT1Γ(ϱ+1)),CΦΦ(t)Θ1ΘLf}.

    Now from Eqs (5.16) and (5.17), we have

    ||K¯K||ZHΘ,CΦ,tT.

    Hence the solution of the model (2.1) is generalized H-U-R stable.

    Here, we formulate a numerical method for solving the given problem with a piecewise derivative, presented in Eq (2.1). This approach focuses on constructing a numerical scheme applicable for two sub-intervals within the range of [0,T] using the Caputo and ABC operators. To achieve this, we use the insights provided by the piecewise operator numerical scheme presented in [24]. By employing the piecewise integration technique to Eq (2.2) in the Caputo and ABC form, the following procedure occurs:

    Sh1(t)={Sh1(0)+1Γ(ϱ)t10(tτ)ϱ1CM1(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)dτ  0<tt1,Sh1(t1)+1ϱAB(ϱ)M1(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)+ϱAB(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tt1(tτ)ϱ1M1(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)dτ  t1<tT,
    Eh1(t)={Eh1(0)+1Γ(ϱ)t10(tτ)ϱ1cM2(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)dτ  0<tt1,Eh1(t1)+1ϱAB(ϱ)M2(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)+ϱAB(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tt1(tτ)ϱ1M2(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)dτ  t1<tT,
    Ih1(t)={Ih1(0)+1Γ(ϱ)t10(tτ)ϱ1cM3(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)dτ  0<tt1,Ih1(t1)+1ϱAB(ϱ)M3(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)+ϱAB(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tt1(tτ)ϱ1M3(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)dτ  t1<tT, (6.1)
    Rh1(t)={Rh1(0)+1Γ(ϱ)t10(tτ)ϱ1cM4(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)dτ  0<tt1,Rh1(t1)+1ϱAB(ϱ)M4(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)+ϱAB(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tt1(tτ)ϱ1M4(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)dτ  t1<tT,
    Sm1(t)={Sm1(0)+1Γ(ϱ)t10(tτ)ϱ1cM5(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)dτ  0<tt1,Sm1(t1)+1ϱAB(ϱ)M5(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)+ϱAB(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tt1(tτ)ϱ1M5(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)dτ  t1<tT,
    Im1(t)={Im1(0)+1Γ(ϱ)t10(tτ)ϱ1cM6(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)dτ  0<tt1,Im1(t1)+1ϱAB(ϱ)M6(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)+ϱAB(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tt1(tτ)ϱ1M6(t,Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1)dτ  t1<tT.

    Here,

    CMi(t)=CMi(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t),ABCMi(t)=ABCiM(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,t)

    are left hand sides of Eq (6.1) for i=1,2,3, also given in Eq (2.2). We present a scheme for model (6.1) which will be used for other compartments as well. At t=tn+1

    Sh1(tn+1))={Sh1(0)+1Γ(ϱ)t10(tϕ)ϱ1CM1(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,ϕ)dϕ,Sh1(t1)+1ϱABC(ϱ)ABCM1(Sh1,Eh1,Ih1,Rh1,Sm1,Im1,tn)+ϱABC(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)tn+1t1(tϕ)ϱ1ABCM1(ϕ)dϕ,  t1<tT. (6.2)

    Using newton interpolation approximation, Eq (6.2) follows as [24]

    For other five compartment, one can derive the Newton interpolation as above. Here

    A1=(n+1K)ϱ(2(nK)2+(3ϱ+10)(K+n)+2ϱ2+9ϱ+12)(K+n)(2(nK)2+(5ϱ+10)(nK)+6ϱ2+18ϱ+12),A2=(1K+n)ϱ(3K+2ϱ+n)(K+n)(n+3ϱK+3),Δ=(1+nK)ϱ(nK)ϱ.

    The objective of this section is to present simulations of a mathematical model (2.1) that combines the Caputo and ABC piecewise operators. This model is employed to investigate the dynamics of a population consisting of susceptible, exposed, infected, and recovered humans, as well as susceptible and infected mosquitoes. The parameter values employed to generate the figures in this section are as follows: Ah=0.027,Am=0.13,b1=1/730,b2=0.001,w=0.038,r1=0.020,r2=0.010,r3=0.072,ζ=0.13,d1=0.001,d2=0.001,ϱh=0.0004,ϱM=0.04,α=0.05,p=0.611,ν=0.01,υ=0.01,q=0.022. The initial population values are set as Sh1=1100,Eh1=150,Ih1=20,Rh1=200,Sm1=1000,Im1=100 considered from reference [15]. The time interval is divided into two sub-intervals: for the left panels of Figs. 2-7, the interval is [0,t1]=[0,23] and [t1,T]=[23,60]. Similarly, for the right panels, the interval is divided as [0,t1]=[0,13] and [t1,T]=[13,400].

    Figure 2.  The behavior of susceptible human population Sh1(t) in the C-ABC piece-wise model (2.1).
    Figure 3.  The behavior of the exposed human population Eh1(t) in the C-ABC piece-wise model (2.1).
    Figure 4.  The behavior of the infected human population Ih1(t) in the C-ABC piece-wise model (2.1).
    Figure 5.  The behavior of the recovered human population Rh1(t) in the C-ABC piece-wise model (2.1).
    Figure 6.  The behavior of the susceptible mosquitoes population Sm1(t) in the C-ABC piece-wise model (2.1).
    Figure 7.  The behavior of the infected mosquitoes population Im1(t) in the C-ABC piece-wise model (2.1).

    In Figure 2, the behavior of the susceptible human population is depicted. These sub figures illustrate the decline in the number of susceptible individuals over time, with a more rapid decrease observed during the second interval. Figure 3 display the evolution of the exposed individuals. These figures show how the population of exposed individuals changes over time.

    The behavior of the infected population of humans is demonstrated in Figure 4. These sub figures provide insights into the dynamics of the infected individuals and how their population varies over time.

    Similarly, Figure 5 shows the populous of recovered humans. These graphs show the initial rise in the number of recovered individuals, which gradually enhances after t=23 and stabilizes at t=60. Notably, individuals with small fractional orders of recovery get stability more quickly compared to those with higher values.

    Furthermore, Figsures 6 and 7 illustrate the behavior of susceptible and infected mosquitoes, respectively. These figures provide insights into the dynamics of mosquito populations in relation to the transmission of the virus. The simulations reveal crucial insights into the behavior of the various populations involved in the present mathematical model. The results show the decrease in the susceptible population over time, the rapid decrease in the infections when considering the ABC operator, and the patterns seen in the recovered population with different fractional orders. These findings add to our understanding of the spread and control of infections of a viral disease, particularly in relation to human and mosquito populations.

    The comparison between the outcomes of the proposed model, whether real-world or simulated, is illustrated in Figure 8. The left panel of the figure presents the recorded instances of infection cases within the Western Pacific region, while the corresponding data from the Mediterranean region is depicted on the right panel. These data points have been taken from [31]. It is worth noting that the scaling factor for infections is such that a value of 1 corresponds to 1000 cases. Furthermore, the temporal units are defined in such a way that 1 time unit equates to a span of 4 months.

    Figure 8.  The comparison of the real vs simulated results of infected population of humans in C-ABC piece-wise model (2.1).

    Upon close examination of the left panel, it becomes evident that a multitude of data points align precisely with a fractional order of 0.81 within the proposed model. A similar observation can be made in the right panel, where the data points conform to distinct fractional orders. This intriguing finding underscores the significance of employing piece-wise operators when analyzing biological models. The utilization of such operators allows for a more accurate representation of the intricate dynamics present within these systems, as evidenced by the varying fractional orders that align with the real data points. This emphasizes the model's capability to capture the nuanced behavior of the biological phenomena under investigation.

    We have studied a malaria model using a novel approach that incorporates both singular and non-singular kernels through piecewise derivatives. By employing the Caputo derivative for the singular kernel and the Atangana-Baleanu operator for the non-singular kernel, we have thoroughly investigated the existence and uniqueness of solutions characterized by piecewise derivatives. To approximate the solutions, we used a piecewise Newton polynomial approach. This numerical scheme is specially designed to handle piecewise derivatives for singular and non-singular kernels. Further, the numerical simulations are performed considering various fractional orders. These simulations offer valuable insights into the dynamics of the malaria model, effectively taking into account crossover behaviors and the efficacy of the proposed approach. Furthermore, the results are thoroughly compared with real-world data, signifying their high effectiveness in analyzing disease dynamics.

    For possible future work, one possibility could involve exploring the applications of this approach to different disease models, allowing for a broader understanding of disease dynamics and the development of adaptable strategies for various health challenges. Additionally, investigating the sensitivity of our results to variations in model parameters and exploring the impact of interventions or control measures could further enhance the practical implications of our research.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2023R447), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

    The data regarding this manuscript is available within the manuscript.

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.



    [1] T. S. Faniran, A. O. Falade, J. Ogunsanwo, Sensitivity analysis of an untreated liver-stage Malaria, J. Comput. Sci. Comput. Math., 10 (2020), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.20967/jcscm.2020.04.002 doi: 10.20967/jcscm.2020.04.002
    [2] R. M. Anderson, R. M. May, Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control, London: Oxford University Press, 1991.
    [3] L. Zhang, M. Rahman, M. Arfan, A. Ali, Investigation of mathematical model of transmission co-infection TB in HIV community with a non-singular kernel, Results Phys., 28 (2021), 104559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104559 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104559
    [4] Adnan, S. Ahmad, A. Ullah, M. B. Riaz, A. Ali, A. Akgül, et al., Complex dynamics of multi strain TB model under nonlocal and nonsingular fractal fractional operator, Results Phys., 30 (2021), 104823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104823 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104823
    [5] Adnan, A. Ali, M. Rahman, M. Arfan, Z. Shah, P. Kumam, W. Deebani, Investigation of time-fractional SIQR Covid-19 mathematical model with fractal-fractional Mittage-Leffler kernel, Alex. Eng. J., 61 (2022), 7771–7779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.01.030 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.01.030
    [6] C. J. Xu, S. Saifullah, A. Ali, Adnan, Theoretical and numerical aspects of Rubella disease model involving fractal fractional exponential decay kernel, Results Phys., 34 (2022), 105287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105287 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105287
    [7] A. Ullah, S. Ahmad, G. Rahman, A. Ali, F. Qayum, Agitation of SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19) using ABC fractional-order modified SEIR model, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 46 (2023), 12996–13011. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.9229 doi: 10.1002/mma.9229
    [8] N. Ahmed, A. Elsonbaty, W. Adel, D. Baleanu, M. Rafiq, Stability analysis and numerical simulations of spatiotemporal HIV CD4+ T cell model with drug therapy, Chaos, 30 (2020), 083122. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0010541 doi: 10.1063/5.0010541
    [9] W. Adel, A. Elsonbaty, A. Aldurayhim, A. El-Mesady, Investigating the dynamics of a novel fractional-order monkeypox epidemic model with optimal control, Alex. Eng. J., 73 (2023), 519–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.04.051 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2023.04.051
    [10] A. El-Mesady, A. Elsonbaty, W. Adel, On nonlinear dynamics of a fractional order monkeypox virus model, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 164 (2022), 112716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112716 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112716
    [11] P. L. Li, Y. J. Lu, C. J. Xu, J. Ren, Insight into Hopf bifurcation and control methods in fractional order BAM neural networks incorporating symmetric structure and delay, Cogn. Comput., 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-023-10155-2
    [12] D. Mu, C. Xu, Z. Liu, Y. Pang, Further insight into bifurcation and hybrid control tactics of a chlorine dioxide-iodine-malonic acid chemical reaction model incorporating delays, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 89 (2023), 529–566. http://doi.org/10.46793/match.89-3.529M doi: 10.46793/match.89-3.529M
    [13] E. A. Bakare, C. R. Nwozo, Mathematical analysis of the dynamics of Malaria disease transmission model, Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., 99 (2015), 411–437. http://doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v99i4.3 doi: 10.12732/ijpam.v99i4.3
    [14] J. K. Baird, D. J. Fryauff, S. L. Hoffman, Primaquine for prevention of malaria in travelers, Clin. Infect. Dis., 37 (2003), 1659–1667. http://doi.org/10.1086/379714 doi: 10.1086/379714
    [15] M. Sinan, H. Ahmad, Z. Ahmad, J. Baili, S. Murtaza, M. A. Aiyashi, et al., Fractional mathematical modeling of malaria disease with treatment & insecticides, Results Phys., 34 (2022), 105220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105220 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105220
    [16] H. Y. Zhu, X. F. Zou, Dynamics of a HIV-1 infection model with cell-mediated immune response and intracellular delay, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 12 (2009), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2009.12.511 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.12.511
    [17] A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with non-local and non-singular kernel: Theory and application to heat transfer model, Therm. Sci., 20 (2016), 763–769. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI160111018A doi: 10.2298/TSCI160111018A
    [18] A. Atangana, S. I. Araz, Nonlinear equations with global differential and integral operators: Existence, uniqueness with application to epidemiology, Results Phys., 20 (2020), 103593. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103593 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103593
    [19] C. J. Xu, D. Mu, Y. L. Pan, C. Aouiti, L. Y. Yao, Exploring bifurcation in a fractional-order predator-prey system with mixed delays, J. Appl. Anal. Comput., 13 (2023), 1119–1136. https://doi.org/10.11948/20210313 doi: 10.11948/20210313
    [20] C. J. Xu, D. Mu, Z. X. Liu, Y. C. Pang, C. Aouiti, O. Tunc, et al., Bifurcation dynamics and control mechanism of a fractional-order delayed Brusselator chemical reaction model, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 89 (2023), 73–106. https://doi.org/10.46793/match.89-1.073X doi: 10.46793/match.89-1.073X
    [21] C. J. Xu, X. H. Cui, P. L. Li, J. L. Yan, L. Y. Yao, Exploration on dynamics in a discrete predator-prey competitive model involving time delays and feedback controls, J. Biol. Dyn., 17 (2023), 2220349. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513758.2023.2220349 doi: 10.1080/17513758.2023.2220349
    [22] C. J. Xu, Q. Y. Cui, Z. X. Liu, Y. L. Pan, X. H. Cui, W. Ou, et al., Extended hybrid controller design of bifurcation in a delayed chemostat model, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 90 (2023), 609–648. https://doi.org/10.46793/match.90-3.609X doi: 10.46793/match.90-3.609X
    [23] A. Atangana, S. I. Araz, Mathematical model of COVID-19 spread in Turkey and South Africa: Theory, methods and applications, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 1–87. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.08.20095588 doi: 10.1101/2020.05.08.20095588
    [24] A. Atangana, S. I. Araz, New concept in calculus: Piecewise differential and integral operators, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 145 (2021), 110638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110638 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110638
    [25] S. Saifullah, S. Ahmad, F. Jarad, Study on the dynamics of a piecewise tumor-immune interaction model, Fractals, 30 (2022), 2240233. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22402332 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X22402332
    [26] S. Ahmad, M. F. Yassen, M. M. Alam, S. Alkhati, F. Jarad, M. B. Riaz, A numerical study of dengue internal transmission model with fractional piecewise derivative, Results Phys., 39 (2022), 105798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105798 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105798
    [27] H. D. Qu, S. Saifullah, J. Khan, A. Khan, M. Rahman, G. D. Zheng, Dynamics of leptospirosis disease in context of piecewise classical-global and classical-fractional operators, Fractals, 30 (2022), 2240216. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22402162 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X22402162
    [28] A. Ali, S. Althobaiti, A. Althobaiti, K. Khan, R. Jan, Chaotic dynamics in a non-linear tumor-immune model with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional operator, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top., 2023. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-023-00929-y
    [29] R. P. Kellogg, Uniqueness in the Schauder fixed point theorem, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 60 (1976), 207–210.
    [30] R. S. Palais, A simple proof of the Banach contraction principle, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2 (2007), 221–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784-007-0041-6 doi: 10.1007/s11784-007-0041-6
    [31] World Health Organization, Estimated number of malaria cases, 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/estimated-number-of-malaria-cases
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. K. A. Aldwoah, Mohammed A. Almalahi, Mansour A. Abdulwasaa, Kamal Shah, Sunil V. Kawale, Muath Awadalla, Jihan Alahmadi, Mathematical analysis and numerical simulations of the piecewise dynamics model of Malaria transmission: A case study in Yemen, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 4376, 10.3934/math.2024216
    2. Nnaemeka Stanley Aguegboh, Walter Okongo, Diallo Boubacar, Munkaila Dasumani, Kingsley Chinedu Nnamaga, Daniel Ugochukwu Nnaji, Netochukwu Onyiaji, Anthonia Uchenna Nwachukwu, A novel approach to modeling malaria with treatment and vaccination as control strategies in Africa using the Atangana–Baleanu derivative, 2025, 11, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-024-02273-z
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1393) PDF downloads(71) Cited by(2)

Figures and Tables

Figures(8)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog