Loading [MathJax]/jax/element/mml/optable/BasicLatin.js
Research article Special Issues

Numerical study for a class of time fractional diffusion equations using operational matrices based on Hosoya polynomial

  • In this paper, we develop a numerical method by using operational matrices based on Hosoya polynomials of simple paths to find the approximate solution of diffusion equations of fractional order with respect to time. This method is applied to certain diffusion equations like time fractional advection-diffusion equations and time fractional Kolmogorov equations. Here we use the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative. With the help of this approach we convert these equations to a set of algebraic equations, which is easier to be solved. Also, the error bound is provided. The obtained numerical solutions using the presented method are compared with the exact solutions. The numerical results show that the suggested method is convenient and accurate.

    Citation: Ping Zhou, Hossein Jafari, Roghayeh M. Ganji, Sonali M. Narsale. Numerical study for a class of time fractional diffusion equations using operational matrices based on Hosoya polynomial[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(8): 4530-4548. doi: 10.3934/era.2023231

    Related Papers:

    [1] Zhi-Wei Sun . New series for powers of π and related congruences. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(3): 1273-1342. doi: 10.3934/era.2020070
    [2] Harman Kaur, Meenakshi Rana . Congruences for sixth order mock theta functions λ(q) and ρ(q). Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 4257-4268. doi: 10.3934/era.2021084
    [3] Jorge Garcia Villeda . A computable formula for the class number of the imaginary quadratic field Q(p), p=4n1. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 3853-3865. doi: 10.3934/era.2021065
    [4] Fedor Petrov, Zhi-Wei Sun . Proof of some conjectures involving quadratic residues. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(2): 589-597. doi: 10.3934/era.2020031
    [5] Jin-Yun Guo, Cong Xiao, Xiaojian Lu . On n-slice algebras and related algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(4): 2687-2718. doi: 10.3934/era.2021009
    [6] Dušan D. Repovš, Mikhail V. Zaicev . On existence of PI-exponents of unital algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(2): 853-859. doi: 10.3934/era.2020044
    [7] Victor J. W. Guo . A family of q-congruences modulo the square of a cyclotomic polynomial. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(2): 1031-1036. doi: 10.3934/era.2020055
    [8] Chen Wang . Two congruences concerning Apéry numbers conjectured by Z.-W. Sun. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(2): 1063-1075. doi: 10.3934/era.2020058
    [9] Dmitry Krachun, Zhi-Wei Sun . On sums of four pentagonal numbers with coefficients. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(1): 559-566. doi: 10.3934/era.2020029
    [10] Hai-Liang Wu, Zhi-Wei Sun . Some universal quadratic sums over the integers. Electronic Research Archive, 2019, 27(0): 69-87. doi: 10.3934/era.2019010
  • In this paper, we develop a numerical method by using operational matrices based on Hosoya polynomials of simple paths to find the approximate solution of diffusion equations of fractional order with respect to time. This method is applied to certain diffusion equations like time fractional advection-diffusion equations and time fractional Kolmogorov equations. Here we use the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative. With the help of this approach we convert these equations to a set of algebraic equations, which is easier to be solved. Also, the error bound is provided. The obtained numerical solutions using the presented method are compared with the exact solutions. The numerical results show that the suggested method is convenient and accurate.



    The classical rational Ramanujan-type series for π1 (cf. [1,2,8,27] and a nice introduction by S. Cooper [10,Chapter 14]) have the form

    k=0bk+cmka(k)=λdπ,()

    where b,c,m are integers with bm0, d is a positive squarefree number, λ is a nonzero rational number, and a(k) is one of the products

    (2kk)3, (2kk)2(3kk), (2kk)2(4k2k), (2kk)(3kk)(6k3k).

    In 1997 Van Hamme [47] conjectured that such a series () has a p-adic analogue of the form

    p1k=0bk+cmka(k)cp(εddp) (mod p3),

    where p is any odd prime with pdm and λZp, ε1{±1} and εd=1 if d>1. (As usual, Zp denotes the ring of all p-adic integers, and (p) stands for the Legendre symbol.) W. Zudilin [53] followed Van Hamme's idea to provide more concrete examples. Sun [33] realized that many Ramanujan-type congruences are related to Bernoulli numbers or Euler numbers. In 2016 the author [44] thought that all classical Ramanujan-type congruences have their extensions like

    pn1k=0(21k+8)(2kk)3pn1k=0(21k+8)(2kk)3(pn)3(2nn)3Zp,

    where p is an odd prime, and nZ+={1,2,3,}. See Sun [45,Conjectures 21-24] for more such examples and further refinements involving Bernoulli or Euler numbers.

    During the period 2002–2010, some new Ramanujan-type series of the form () with a(k) not a product of three nontrivial parts were found (cf. [3,4,9,29]). For example, H. H. Chan, S. H. Chan and Z. Liu [3] proved that

    n=05n+164nDn=83π,

    where Dn denotes the Domb number nk=0(nk)2(2kk)(2(nk)nk); Zudilin [53] conjectured its p-adic analogue:

    p1k=05k+164kDkp(p3) (mod p3)for any prime p>3.

    The author [45,Conjecture 77] conjectured further that

    1(pn)3(pn1k=05k+164kDk(p3)pn1k=05k+164rDk)Zp

    for each odd prime p and positive integer n.

    Let b,cZ. For each nN={0,1,2,}, we denote the coefficient of xn in the expansion of (x2+bx+c)n by Tn(b,c), and call it a generalized central trinomial coefficient. In view of the multinomial theorm, we have

    Tn(b,c)=n/2k=0(n2k)(2kk)bn2kck=n/2k=0(nk)(nkk)bn2kck.

    Note also that

    T0(b,c)=1,  T1(b,c)=b,

    and

    (n+1)Tn+1(b,c)=(2n+1)bTn(b,c)n(b24c)Tn1(b,c)

    for all nZ+. Clearly, Tn(2,1)=(2nn) for all nN. Those Tn:=Tn(1,1) with nN are the usual central trinomial coefficients, and they play important roles in enumerative combinatorics. We view Tn(b,c) as a natural generalization of central binomial and central trinomial coefficients.

    For nN the Legendre polynomial of degree n is defined by

    Pn(x):=nk=0(nk)(n+kk)(x12)k.

    It is well-known that if b,cZ and b24c0 then

    Tn(b,c)=(b24c)nPn(bb24c)for all nN.

    Via the Laplace-Heine asymptotic formula for Legendre polynomials, for any positive real numbers b and c we have

    Tn(b,c)(b+2c)n+1/224cnπas n+

    (cf. [40]). For any real numbers b and c<0, S. Wagner [48] confirmed the author's conjecture that

    limnn|Tn(b,c)|=b24c.

    In 2011, the author posed over 60 conjectural series for 1/π of the following new types with a,b,c,d,m integers and mbcd(b24c) nonzero (cf. Sun [34,40]).

    Type Ⅰ. k=0a+dkmk(2kk)2Tk(b,c).

    Type Ⅱ. k=0a+dkmk(2kk)(3kk)Tk(b,c).

    Type Ⅲ. k=0a+dkmk(4k2k)(2kk)Tk(b,c).

    Type Ⅳ. k=0a+dkmk(2kk)2T2k(b,c).

    Type Ⅴ. k=0a+dkmk(2kk)(3kk)T3k(b,c).

    Type Ⅵ. k=0a+dkmkTk(b,c)3,

    Type Ⅶ. k=0a+dkmk(2kk)Tk(b,c)2,

    In general, the corresponding p-adic congruences of these seven-type series involve linear combinations of two Legendre symbols. The author's conjectural series of types Ⅰ-Ⅴ and Ⅶ were studied in [6,49,54]. The author's three conjectural series of type Ⅵ and two series of type Ⅶ remain open. For example, the author conjectured that

    k=03990k+1147(288)3kTk(62,952)3=43295π(942+19514)

    as well as its p-adic analogue

    p1k=03990k+1147(288)3kTk(62,952)3p19(4230(2p)+17563(14p)) (mod p2),

    where p is any prime greater than 3.

    In 1905, J. W. L. Glaisher [15] proved that

    k=0(4k1)(2kk)4(2k1)4256k=8π2.

    This actually follows from the following finite identity observed by the author [38]:

    nk=0(4k1)(2kk)4(2k1)4256k=(8n2+4n+1)(2nn)4256n for all nN.

    Motivated by Glaisher's identity and Ramanujan-type series for 1/π, we obtain the following theorem.

    Theorem 1.1. We have the following identities:

    k=0k(4k1)(2kk)3(2k1)2(64)k=1π, (1.1)
    k=0(4k1)(2kk)3(2k1)3(64)k=2π, (1.2)
    k=0(12k21)(2kk)3(2k1)2256k=2π, (1.3)
    k=0k(6k1)(2kk)3(2k1)3256k=12π, (1.4)
    k=0(28k24k1)(2kk)3(2k1)2(512)k=32π, (1.5)
    k=0(30k2+3k2)(2kk)3(2k1)3(512)k=2728π, (1.6)
    k=0(28k24k1)(2kk)3(2k1)24096k=3π, (1.7)
    k=0(42k23k1)(2kk)3(2k1)34096k=278π, (1.8)
    k=0(34k23k1)(2kk)2(3kk)(2k1)(3k1)(192)k=103π, (1.9)
    k=0(64k211k7)(2kk)2(3kk)(k+1)(2k1)(3k1)(192)k=12539π, (1.10)
    k=0(14k2+k1)(2kk)2(3kk)(2k1)(3k1)216k=3π, (1.11)
    k=0(90k2+7k+1)(2kk)2(3kk)(k+1)(2k1)(3k1)216k=932π, (1.12)
    k=0(34k23k1)(2kk)2(3kk)(2k1)(3k1)(12)3k=23π, (1.13)
    k=0(17k+5)(2kk)2(3kk)(k+1)(2k1)(3k1)(12)3k=93π, (1.14)
    k=0(111k27k4)(2kk)2(3kk)(2k1)(3k1)1458k=454π, (1.15)
    k=0(1524k2+899k+263)(2kk)2(3kk)(k+1)(2k1)(3k1)1458k=33754π, (1.16)
    k=0(522k255k13)(2kk)2(3kk)(2k1)(3k1)(8640)k=54155π, (1.17)
    k=0(1836k2+2725k+541)(2kk)2(3kk)(k+1)(2k1)(3k1)(8640)k=2187155π, (1.18)
    k=0(529k245k16)(2kk)2(3kk)(2k1)(3k1)153k=5532π, (1.19)
    k=0(77571k2+68545k+16366)(2kk)2(3kk)(k+1)(2k1)(3k1)153k=5989532π, (1.20)
    k=0(574k273k11)(2kk)2(3kk)(2k1)(3k1)(48)3k=203π, (1.21)
    k=0(8118k2+9443k+1241)(2kk)2(3kk)(k+1)(2k1)(3k1)(48)3k=22503π, (1.22)
    k=0(978k2131k17)(2kk)2(3kk)(2k1)(3k1)(326592)k=990749π, (1.23)
    k=0(592212k2+671387k2+77219)(2kk)2(3kk)(k+1)(2k1)(3k1)(326592)k=4492125749π, (1.24)
    k=0(116234k217695k1461)(2kk)2(3kk)(2k1)(3k1)(300)3k=26503π, (1.25)
    k=0(223664832k2+242140765k+18468097)(2kk)2(3kk)(k+1)(2k1)(3k1)(300)3k=334973253π, (1.26)
    k=0(122k2+3k5)(2kk)2(4k2k)(2k1)(4k1)648k=212π, (1.27)
    k=0(1903k2+114k+41)(2kk)2(4k2k)(k+1)(2k1)(4k1)648k=3432π, (1.28)
    k=0(40k22k1)(2kk)2(4k2k)(2k1)(4k1)(1024)k=4π, (1.29)
    k=0(8k22k1)(2kk)2(4k2k)(k+1)(2k1)(4k1)(1024)k=165π, (1.30)
    k=0(176k26k5)(2kk)2(4k2k)(2k1)(4k1)482k=83π, (1.31)
    k=0(208k2+66k+23)(2kk)2(4k2k)(k+1)(2k1)(4k1)482k=1283π, (1.32)
    k=0(6722k2411k152)(2kk)2(4k2k)(2k1)(4k1)(632)k=1957π, (1.33)
    k=0(281591k2757041k231992)(2kk)2(4k2k)(k+1)(2k1)(4k1)(632)k=2746257π, (1.34)
    k=0(560k242k11)(2kk)2(4k2k)(2k1)(4k1)124k=242π, (1.35)
    k=0(112k2+114k+23)(2kk)2(4k2k)(k+1)(2k1)(4k1)124k=25625π, (1.36)
    k=0(248k218k5)(2kk)2(4k2k)(2k1)(4k1)(3×212)k=283π, (1.37)
    k=0(680k2+1482k+337)(2kk)2(4k2k)(k+1)(2k1)(4k1)(3×212)k=548839π, (1.38)
    k=0(1144k2102k19)(2kk)2(4k2k)(2k1)(4k1)(21034)k=60π, (1.39)
    k=0(3224k2+4026k+637)(2kk)2(4k2k)(k+1)(2k1)(4k1)(21034)k=2000π, (1.40)
    k=0(7408k2754k103)(2kk)2(4k2k)(2k1)(4k1)284k=56033π, (1.41)
    k=0(3641424k2+4114526k+493937)(2kk)2(4k2k)(k+1)(2k1)(4k1)284k=8960003π, (1.42)
    k=0(4744k2534k55)(2kk)2(4k2k)(2k1)(4k1)(214345)k=1932525π, (1.43)
    k=0(18446264k2+20356230k+1901071)(2kk)2(4k2k)(k+1)(2k1)(4k1)(214345)k=66772496525π, (1.44)
    k=0(413512k250826k3877)(2kk)2(4k2k)(2k1)(4k1)(210214)k=12180π, (1.45)
    k=0(1424799848k2+1533506502k+108685699)(2kk)2(4k2k)(k+1)(2k1)(4k1)(210214)k=341446000π, (1.46)
    k=0(71312k27746k887)(2kk)2(4k2k)(2k1)(4k1)15842k=84011π, (1.47)
    k=0(50678512k2+56405238k+5793581)(2kk)2(4k2k)(k+1)(2k1)(4k1)15842k=548800011π, (1.48)
    k=0(7329808k2969294k54073)(2kk)2(4k2k)(2k1)(4k1)3964k=1201202π, (1.49)
    k=0(2140459883152k2+2259867244398k+119407598201)(2kk)2(4k2k)(k+1)(2k1)(4k1)3964k=44×182032π, (1.50)
    k=0(164k2k3)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(2k1)(6k1)203k=752π, (1.51)
    k=0(2696k2+206k+93)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(k+1)(2k1)(6k1)203k=6865π, (1.52)
    k=0(220k28k3)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(2k1)(6k1)(215)k=72π, (1.53)
    k=0(836k21048k309)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(k+1)(2k1)(6k1)(215)k=6862π, (1.54)
    k=0(504k211k8)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(2k1)(6k1)(15)3k=915π, (1.55)
    k=0(189k211k8)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(k+1)(2k1)(6k1)(15)3k=2431535π, (1.56)
    k=0(516k219k7)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(2k1)(6k1)(2×303)k=11152π, (1.57)
    k=0(3237k2+1922k+491)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(k+1)(2k1)(6k1)(2×303)k=39931510π, (1.58)
    k=0(684k240k7)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(2k1)(6k1)(96)3k=96π, (1.59)
    k=0(2052k2+2536k+379)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(k+1)(2k1)(6k1)(96)3k=4866π, (1.60)
    k=0(2556k2131k29)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(2k1)(6k1)663k=63334π, (1.61)
    k=0(203985k2+212248k+38083)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(k+1)(2k1)(6k1)663k=83349334π, (1.62)
    k=0(5812k2408k49)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(2k1)(6k1)(3×1603)k=253309π, (1.63)
    k=0(3471628k2+3900088k+418289)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(k+1)(2k1)(6k1)(3×1603)k=3238855430135π, (1.64)
    k=0(35604k22936k233)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(2k1)(6k1)(960)3k=18915π, (1.65)
    k=0(13983084k2+15093304k+1109737)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(k+1)(2k1)(6k1)(960)3k=4500846155π, (1.66)
    k=0(157752k211243k1304)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(2k1)(6k1)2553k=5132552π, (1.67)
    k=0(28240947k2+31448587k+3267736)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(k+1)(2k1)(6k1)2553k=4500189925570π, (1.68)
    k=0(2187684k2200056k11293)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(2k1)(6k1)(5280)3k=1953330π, (1.69)
    k=0(101740699836k2+107483900696k+5743181813)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(k+1)(2k1)(6k1)(5280)3k=49661001183305π, (1.70)
    k=0(16444841148k21709536232k53241371)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(2k1)(6k1)(640320)3k=167220910005π, (1.71)

    and

    k=0P(k)(2kk)(3kk)(6k3k)(k+1)(2k1)(6k1)(640320)3k=18×5574033100055π, (1.72)

    where

    P(k):=637379600041024803108k2+657229991696087780968k+19850391655004126179.

    Recall that the Catalan numbers are given by

    Cn:=(2nn)n+1=(2nn)(2nn+1)  (nN).

    For kN it is easy to see that

    (2kk)2k1={1if k=0,2Ck1if k>0.

    Thus, for any a,b,c,mZ with |m|64, we have

    k=0(ak2+bk+c)(2kk)3(2k1)3mk=c+k=1(ak2+bk+c)(2Ck1)3mk=c+8mk=0a(k+1)2+b(k+1)+cmkC3k.

    For example, (1.2) has the equivalent form

    k=04k+3(64)kC3k=816π.(1.2)

    For any odd prime p, the congruence (1.4) of V.J.W. Guo and J.-C. Liu [19] has the equivalent form

    (p+1)/2k=0(4k1)(2kk)3(2k1)3(64)kp(1p)+p3(Ep32) (mod p4)

    (where E0,E1, are the Euler numbers), and we note that this is also equivalent to the congruence

    (p1)/2k=04k+3(64)kC3k8(1p(1p)p3(Ep32)) (mod p4).

    Recently, C. Wang [50] proved that for any prime p>3 we have

    (p+1)/2k=0(3k1)(2kk)3(2k1)216kp+2p3(1p)(Ep33) (mod p4)

    and

    p1k=0(3k1)(2kk)3(2k1)216kp2p3 (mod p4).

    (Actually, Wang stated his results only in the language of hypergeometric series.) These two congruences extend a conjecture of Guo and M. J. Schlosser [21].

    We are also able to prove some other variants of Ramanujan-type series such as

    k=0(56k2+118k+61)(2kk)3(k+1)24096k=192π

    and

    k=0(420k2+992k+551)(2kk)3(k+1)2(2k1)4096k=1728π.

    Now we state our second theorem.

    Theorem 1.2. We have the identities

    k=128k2+31k+8(2k+1)2k3(2kk)3=π282, (1.73)
    k=142k2+39k+8(2k+1)3k3(2kk)3=9π2882, (1.74)
    k=1(8k2+5k+1)(8)k(2k+1)2k3(2kk)3=46G, (1.75)
    k=1(30k2+33k+7)(8)k(2k+1)3k3(2kk)3=54G52, (1.76)
    k=1(3k+1)16k(2k+1)2k3(2kk)3=π282, (1.77)
    k=1(4k+1)(64)k(2k+1)2k2(2kk)3=48G, (1.78)
    k=1(4k+1)(64)k(2k+1)3k3(2kk)3=16G16, (1.79)
    k=1(2k211k3)8k(2k+1)(3k+1)k3(2kk)2(3kk)=485π22, (1.80)
    k=2(178k2103k39)8k(k1)(2k+1)(3k+1)k3(2kk)2(3kk)=1125π21109636, (1.81)
    (1.82)
    (1.83)
    (1.84)
    (1.85)
    (1.86)
    (1.87)

    where

    For , it is easy to see that

    Thus, for any with , we have

    For example, (1.77) has the following equivalent form

    In contrast with the Domb numbers, we introduce a new kind of numbers

    The values of are

    respectively. We may extend the numbers further. For , we define

    Note that and for all .

    Now we state our third theorem.

    Theorem 1.3. We have

    (1.88)
    (1.89)
    (1.90)
    (1.91)
    (1.92)
    (1.93)
    (1.94)
    (1.95)
    (1.96)
    (1.97)

    Remark 1.1. The author found the 10 series in Theorem 1.3 in Nov. 2019.

    We shall prove Theorems 1.1-1.3 in the next section. In Sections 3-10, we propose 117 new conjectural series for powers of involving generalized central trinomial coefficients. In particular, we will present in Section 3 four conjectural series for of the following new type:

    Type Ⅷ.

    where are integers with .

    Unlike Ramanujan-type series given by others, all our series for of types Ⅰ-Ⅷ have the general term involving a product of three generalized central trinomial coefficients.

    Motivated by the author's effective way to find new series for (cf. Sun [35]), we formulate the following general characterization of rational Ramanujan-type series for via congruences.

    Conjecture 1.1 (General Criterion for Rational Ramanujan-type Series for ). Suppose that the series converges, where is an integer sequence and are integers with . Suppose also that there are no such that for all . Let and let with irrational for all distinct . Then

    (1.98)

    for some nonzero rational numbers if and only if there are positive integers and rational numbers with , such that for any prime with and we have

    (1.99)

    where , if is not an integer square, and if and .

    For a Ramanujan-type series of the form (1.98), we call its rank. We believe that there are some Ramanujan-type series of rank three but we have not yet found such a series.

    Conjecture 1.2. Let be an integer sequence with no such that for all , and let with . Assume that , and is an algebraic number. Suppose that with , and

    (1.100)

    for all primes with and . Then, for any prime with , and , we have

    Joint with the author's PhD student Chen Wang, we pose the following conjecture.

    Conjecture 1.3 (Chen Wang and Z.-W. Sun). Let be an integer sequence with . Let with , and let be rational numbers. If is an algebraic number, and the congruence (1.100) holds for all primes with and , then we must have

    Remark 1.2. The author [39,Conjecture 1.1(i)] conjectured that

    for any prime , which was confirmed by Y.-P. Mu and Z.-W. Sun [26]. This is not a counterexample to Conjecture 1.3 since diverges.

    All the new series and related congruences in Sections 3-9 support Conjectures 1.1-1.3. We discover the conjectural series for in Sections 3-9 based on the author's previous } stated in [35], the PSLQ algorithm to discover integer relations (cf. [13]), and the following based on the author's experience and intuition.

    Conjecture 1.4 (Duality Principle). Let be an integer sequence such that

    (1.101)

    for any prime and , where and are fixed nonzero integers. If are not all zero and is a nonzero integer such that

    for some , and , then divides , and

    (1.102)

    for any prime with .

    Remark 1.3 (ⅰ) For any prime with , the congruence (1.102) holds modulo by (1.101) and Fermat's little theorem. We call the dual of the sum .

    (ⅱ) For any and odd prime , it is known (see, e.g., [39,Lemma 2.2]) that

    (1.103)

    for all .

    For a series with real numbers, if then we say that the series converge at a geometric rate with ratio . Except for , all other conjectural series in Sections 3-9 converge at geometric rates and thus one can easily check them numerically via a computer.

    In Section 10, we pose two curious conjectural series for involving the central trinomial coefficients.

    Lemma 2.1. Let and be integers. Then

    (2.1)
    (2.2)
    (2.3)
    (2.4)
    (2.5)
    (2.6)
    (2.7)
    (2.8)

    Remark 2.1. The eight identities in Lemma 2.1 can be easily proved by induction on . In light of Stirling's formula, as , we have

    (2.9)
    (2.10)

    Proof of Theorem 1.1. Just apply Lemma 2.1 and the 36 known rational Ramanujan-type series listed in [16]. Let us illustrate the proofs by showing (1.1), (1.2), (1.71) and (1.72) in details.

    By (2.1) with , we have

    Note that

    and recall Bauer's series

    So, we get

    This proves (1.1). By (2.2) with , we have

    and hence

    Combining this with we immediately get .

    In view of (2.7) with , we have

    and hence

    In 1987, D. V. Chudnovsky and G. V. Chudnovsky [8] got the formula

    which enabled them to hold the world record for the calculation of during 1989–1994. Note that

    and hence

    This proves .

    By (2.8) with , we have

    and hence

    Note that

    Therefore, with the help of we get

    This proves .

    The identities (1.3)–(1.70) can be proved similarly.

    Lemma 2.2. Let and be integers. Then

    (2.11)
    (2.12)
    (2.13)
    (2.14)
    (2.15)
    (2.16)

    Remark 2.2. This can be easily proved by induction on .

    Proof of Theorem 1.2. We just apply Lemma 2.2 and use the known identities:

    Here, the first identity was found and proved by D. Zeilberger [52] in 1993. The second, third and fourth identities were obtained by J. Guillera [17] in 2008. The fifth identity on was conjectured by Sun [33] and later confirmed by K. Hessami Pilehrood and T. Hessami Pilehrood [22] in 2012. The last four identities were also conjectured by Sun [33], and they were later proved in the paper [18,Theorem 3] by Guillera and M. Rogers.

    Let us illustrate our proofs by proving (1.77)-(1.79) and (1.82)-(1.83) in details.

    In view of (2.11) with , we have

    for all , and hence

    Notice that

    So we have

    and hence (1.77) holds.

    By (2.11) with , we have

    for all , and hence

    Since and

    we see that

    and hence (1.78) holds. In light of (2.12) with , we have

    for all , and hence

    Since , with the aid of (1.78) we obtain

    This proves (1.79).

    By (2.13) with , we have

    As

    and

    we see that (1.82) follows. By (2.14) with , we have

    and hence

    As

    with the aid of (1.82) we get

    and hence follows.

    Other identities in Theorem 1.2 can be proved similarly.

    For integers , we define

    (2.17)

    For we set

    (2.18)

    Lemma 2.3. For any , we have

    (2.19)

    and

    (2.20)

    where denotes the Franel number .

    Proof. For with , we set

    By the telescoping method for double summation [7], for

    with , we find that

    where

    and

    with regarded as , and and given by

    and

    respectively. Therefore

    and hence

    satisfies the recurrence relation

    As pointed out by J. Franel [14], the Franel numbers satisfy the same recurrence. Note also that and . So we always have . This proves (2.19).

    The identity (2.20) can be proved similarly. In fact, if we use denote the left-hand side or the right-hand side of (2.20), then we have the recurrence

    In view of the above, we have completed the proof of Lemma 2.3.

    Lemma 2.4. For any and , we have

    (2.21)

    Proof. For each , we have

    If and , then

    with the aid of the Chu-Vandermonde identity. Therefore

    This proves (2.21).

    Lemma 2.5. For and , we have

    (2.22)

    Proof. Let . Then

    and

    Hence

    This proves (2.22).

    To prove Theorem 1.3, we need an auxiliary theorem.

    Theorem 2.6. Let and be real numbers. For any integer with , we have

    (2.23)

    Proof. Let . In view of (2.21),

    and similarly

    where we consider as .

    If is an integer in the interval , then by Lemma 2.5 we have

    where is the Legendre polynomial of degree . Thus

    and

    Recall that

    As , we have and hence

    converges. Thus

    and hence by the above we have

    and

    Therefore, with the aid of (2.19), we obtain

    (2.24)

    and

    (2.25)

    In view of (2.25) and (2.20),

    Combining this with (2.24), we immediately obtain the desired (2.23).

    Proof of Theorem 1.3. Let with . Since

    for any , we have for all . Thus, in light of Theorem 2.6,

    Therefore

    It is known (cf. [5,4]) that

    So we get the identities (1.88)-(1.97) finally.

    Now we pose a conjecture related to the series (Ⅰ1)-(Ⅰ4) of Sun [34,40].

    Conjecture 3.1. We have the following identities:

    Remark 3.1. For each , we have

    since and . Thus, for example, [40,(I1)] and (I1) together imply that

    and (I5) and (I5) imply that

    For the conjectural identities in Conjecture 3.1, we have conjectures for the corresponding -adic congruences. For example, in contrast with (I2), we conjecture that for any prime we have the congruences

    and

    Concerning (I5) and (I5), we conjecture that

    and

    for each , and that for any prime with we have

    and

    By [40,Theorem 5.1], we have

    for any prime . The identities (I5), (I5) and (I5) were formulated by the author on Dec. 9, 2019.

    Next we pose a conjecture related to the series (Ⅱ1)-(Ⅱ7) and (Ⅱ10)-(Ⅱ12) of Sun [34,40].

    Conjecture 3.2. We have the following identities:

    Remark 3.2. We also have conjectures on related congruences. For example, concerning (Ⅱ), for any prime we conjecture that

    and that

    where and are integers. The identities (Ⅱ13), (Ⅱ13), (Ⅱ14) and (Ⅱ14) were found by the author on Dec. 11, 2019.

    The following conjecture is related to the series (Ⅲ1)-(Ⅲ10) and (Ⅲ12) of Sun [34,40].

    Conjecture 3.3. We have the following identities:

    and

    The following conjecture is related to the series (Ⅳ1)-(Ⅳ21) of Sun [34,40].

    Conjecture 3.4. We have the following identities:

    For the five open conjectural series (Ⅵ1), (Ⅵ2), (Ⅵ3), (ⅥI2) and (ⅥI7) of Sun [34,40], we make the following conjecture on related supercongruences.

    Conjecture 3.5. Let be an odd prime and let . If , then

    divided by is a -adic integer. If , then

    divided by is a -adic integer. If but , then

    divided by is a -adic integer. If but , then

    divided by is a -adic integer. If but , then

    divided by is a -adic integer.

    Now we pose four conjectural series for of type Ⅷ.

    Conjecture 3.6. We have

    Remark 3.3. The author found the identity (Ⅷ1) on Nov. 3, 2019. The identities (Ⅷ2), (Ⅷ3) and (Ⅷ4) were formulated on Nov. 4, 2019.

    Below we present some conjectures on congruences related to Conjecture 3.6.

    Conjecture 3.7. (ⅰ) For each , we have

    (3.1)

    and this number is odd if and only if is a power of two i.e., .

    (ⅱ) Let be a prime. Then

    (3.2)

    If , then

    (3.3)

    for all .

    (ⅲ) Let be a prime. Then

    (3.4)

    Remark 3.4. The imaginary quadratic field has class number two.

    Conjecture 3.8. (ⅰ) For any , we have

    (3.5)

    and the number is odd if and only if is a power of two.

    (ⅱ) Let be a prime. Then

    (3.6)

    If , then

    (3.7)

    for all .

    (ⅲ) Let be a prime. Then

    (3.8)

    Remark 3.5. This conjecture can be viewed as the dual of Conjecture 3.7. Note that the series diverges.

    Conjecture 3.9. (ⅰ) For each , we have

    (3.9)

    (ⅱ) Let be a prime. Then

    (3.10)

    If , then

    (3.11)

    divided by is a -adic integer for each .

    (ⅲ) Let be a prime. Then

    (3.12)

    Remark 3.6. The imaginary quadratic field has class number two.

    Conjecture 3.10. (ⅰ) For each , we have

    (3.13)

    (ⅱ) Let be a prime. Then

    (3.14)

    If , then

    (3.15)

    divided by is a -adic integer for each .

    (ⅲ) Let be a prime. Then

    (3.16)

    Remark 3.7. This conjecture can be viewed as the dual of Conjecture 3.9. Note that the series

    diverges.

    Conjecture 3.11. (ⅰ) For each , we have

    (3.17)

    (ⅱ) Let be a prime. Then

    (3.18)

    If , then

    (3.19)

    divided by is an -adic integer for any .

    (ⅲ Let be a prime. Then

    (3.20)

    where and are integers.

    Remark 3.8. Note that the imaginary quadratic field has class number .

    Conjecture 3.12. (ⅰ) For each , we have

    (3.21)

    and this number is odd if and only if is a power of two.

    (ⅱ) Let be a prime. Then

    (3.22)

    If , then

    (3.23)

    divided by is a -adic integer for each .

    (ⅲ) Let be a prime with . Then

    (3.24)

    where and are integers.

    Remark 3.9. Note that the imaginary quadratic field has class number .

    Conjectures 4.1–4.14 below provide congruences related to (1.88)–(1.97).

    Conjecture 4.1. (ⅰ) For any , we have

    (4.1)

    (ⅱ) Let be a prime. Then

    (4.2)

    If , then

    (4.3)

    for all .

    (ⅲ) For any prime , we have

    (4.4)

    Conjecture 4.2. (ⅰ) For any , we have

    (4.5)

    and this number is odd if and only if is a power of two.

    (ⅱ) Let be an odd prime. Then

    (4.6)

    and moreover

    (4.7)

    for all .

    (ⅲ) For any prime , we have

    (4.8)

    where and are integers.

    Conjecture 4.3. (ⅰ) For any , we have

    (4.9)

    and this number is odd if and only if is a power of two.

    (ⅱ) Let be an odd prime with . Then

    (4.10)

    If , then

    (4.11)

    for all .

    (ⅲ) For any prime , we have

    (4.12)

    where and are integers.

    Conjecture 4.4. (ⅰ) For any , we have

    (4.13)

    (ⅱ) Let be an odd prime. Then

    (4.14)

    for all .

    (ⅲ) For any prime with , we have

    (4.15)

    where and are integers.

    Conjecture 4.5. (ⅰ) For any , we have

    (4.16)

    and this number is odd if and only if is a power of two.

    (ⅱ) Let be an odd prime with . Then

    (4.17)

    If , then

    (4.18)

    for all .

    (ⅲ) For any prime , we have

    (4.19)

    where and are integers.

    Conjecture 4.6. (ⅰ) For any , we have

    (4.20)

    (ⅱ) Let be an odd prime. Then

    (4.21)

    divided by is a -adic integer for any .

    (ⅲ) For any prime with , we have

    (4.22)

    where and are integers.

    Conjecture 4.7. (ⅰ) For any , we have

    (4.23)

    and this number is odd if and only if .

    (ⅱ) Let be an odd prime with . Then

    (4.24)

    If , then

    (4.25)

    divided by is a -adic integer for any .

    (ⅲ)For any odd prime , we have

    (4.26)

    where and are integers.

    Conjecture 4.8. (ⅰ) For any , we have

    (4.27)

    and this number is odd if and only if .

    (ⅱ) Let be an odd prime. Then

    (4.28)

    divided by is a -adic integer for any .

    (ⅲ) For any prime with , we have

    (4.29)

    where and are integers.

    Conjecture 4.9. (ⅰ) For any , we have

    (4.30)

    (ⅱ) Let be an odd prime. Then

    (4.31)

    If , then

    (4.32)

    divided by is a -adic integer for any .

    (ⅲ) For any prime with , we have

    (4.33)

    where and are integers.

    Conjecture 4.10. (ⅰ) For any , we have

    (4.34)

    Let be an odd prime. Then

    (4.35)

    divided by is a -adic integer for any .

    For any prime with , we have

    (4.36)

    where and are integers.

    Conjecture 4.11. For any odd prime ,

    (4.37)

    Also, for any prime we have

    (4.38)

    Conjecture 4.12. For any , we have

    (4.39)

    and this number is odd if and only if is a power of two.

    For any odd prime and positive integer , we have

    (4.40)

    Let be an odd prime. Then

    (4.41)

    Conjecture 4.13. For any , we have

    (4.42)

    and this number is odd if and only if is a power of two.

    Let be a prime. Then

    (4.43)

    If , then

    (4.44)

    for all .

    For any prime , we have

    (4.45)

    Conjecture 4.14. For any , we have

    (4.46)

    Let be an odd prime. Then

    (4.47)

    If , then

    (4.48)

    for all .

    For any prime , we have

    (4.49)

    where and are integers.

    Conjecture 4.15. Let be an odd prime with . Then

    (4.50)

    where and are integers. If , then

    Remark 4.1. We also have some similar conjectures involving

    modulo , where is a prime greater than .

    Motivated by Theorem 2.6, we pose the following general conjecture.

    Conjecture 4.16. For any odd prime and integer , we have

    (4.51)

    and

    (4.52)

    Remark 4.2 We have checked this conjecture via . In view of the proof of Theorem 2.6, both (4.51) and (4.52) hold modulo .

    The numbers

    were first introduced by D. Zagier in his paper [51] the preprint of which was released in 2002. Thus we name such numbers as Zagier numbers. As pointed out by the author [41,Remark 4.3], for any the number coincides with the so-called CLF (Catalan-Larcombe-French) number

    Let be an odd prime. For any , we have

    by F. Jarvis and H.A. Verrill [24,Corollary 2.2], and hence

    Combining this with Remark 1.3(ⅱ), we see that

    for any with .

    J. Wan and Zudilin [49] obtained the following irrational series for involving the Legendre polynomials and the Zagier numbers:

    Via our congruence approach (including Conjecture 1.4), we find 24 rational series for involving and the Zagier numbers. Theorem 1 of [49] might be helpful to solve some of them.

    Conjecture 5.1. We have the following identities for .

    (5.1)
    (5.2)
    (5.3)
    (5.4)
    (5.5)
    (5.6)
    (5.7)
    (5.8)
    (5.9)
    (5.10)
    (5.11)
    (5.12)
    (5.13)
    (5.14)
    (5.15)
    (5.16)
    (5.17)
    (5.18)
    (5.19)
    (5.20)
    (5.21)
    (5.22)
    (5.23)
    (5.24)

    Below we present some conjectures on congruences related to , , and .

    Conjecture 5.2. (ⅰ) For any , we have

    (5.25)

    Let be an odd prime with . Then

    (5.26)

    If , then

    (5.27)

    for all .

    For any prime , we have

    (5.28)

    Conjecture 5.3. (ⅰ) For any , we have

    (5.29)

    Let be a prime with . Then

    (5.30)

    If , then

    (5.31)

    for all .

    For any prime with , we have

    (5.32)

    Conjecture 5.4. For any , we have

    (5.33)

    Let be a prime. Then

    (5.34)

    If , then

    (5.35)

    for all .

    For any prime , we have

    (5.36)

    Conjecture 5.5. For any , we have

    (5.37)

    Let be an odd prime with . Then

    (5.38)

    If , then

    (5.39)

    for all .

    For any prime , we have

    (5.40)

    where and are integers.

    Sun [36,37] obtained some supercongruences involving the Franel numbers . M. Rogers and A. Straub [30] confirmed the -series for involving Franel polynomials conjectured by Sun [34].

    Let be an odd prime. By [24,Lemma 2.6], we have for each . Combining this with Remark 1.3(ⅱ), we see that

    for any with .

    Wan and Zudilin [49] deduced the following irrational series for involving the Legendre polynomials and the Franel numbers:

    Via our congruence approach (including Conjecture 1.4), we find rational series for involving and the Franel numbers; Theorem 1 of [49] might be helpful to solve some of them.

    Conjecture 6.1. We have

    (6.1)
    (6.2)
    (6.3)
    (6.4)
    (6.5)
    (6.6)
    (6.7)
    (6.8)
    (6.9)
    (6.10)
    (6.11)
    (6.12)

    We now present a conjecture on congruence related to .

    Conjecture 6.2. For any , we have

    (6.13)

    Let be a prime. Then

    (6.14)

    If , then

    (6.15)

    for all .

    For any prime , we have

    (6.16)

    Remark 6.1 This conjecture was formulated by the author on Oct. 25, 2019.

    Conjecture 6.3. For any , we have

    (6.17)

    Let be an odd prime. Then

    (6.18)

    If , then

    (6.19)

    divided by is a -adic integer for any .

    Let be a prime. Then

    (6.20)

    Remark 6.2. This conjecture is the dual of Conjecture 6.2.

    The following conjecture is related to the identity .

    Conjecture 6.4. For any , we have

    (6.21)

    Let be a prime with . Then

    (6.22)

    If , then

    (6.23)

    divided by is a -adic integer for any .

    Let be a prime with . Then

    (6.24)

    where and are integers.

    Remark 6.3. Note that the imaginary quadratic field has class number .

    The following conjecture is related to the identity .

    Conjecture 6.5. For any , we have

    (6.25)

    Let be a prime with . Then

    (6.26)

    If , then

    (6.27)

    divided by is a -adic integer for any .

    Let be a prime with . Then

    (6.28)

    where and are integers.

    Remark 6.4. Note that the imaginary quadratic field has class number .

    The following conjecture is related to the identity .

    Conjecture 6.6. For any , we have

    (6.29)

    Let be an odd prime with . Then

    (6.30)

    If , then

    (6.31)

    divided by is a -adic integer for any .

    Let be a prime with . Then

    (6.32)

    where and are integers.

    Remark 6.5. Note that the imaginary quadratic field has class number .

    The identities are related to the quadratic fields

    (with class number ) respectively. We also have conjectures on related congruences similar to Conjectures 6.4, 6.5 and 6.6.

    For let

    It is known that for all . See [43,20,26] for some congruences on polynomials related to these numbers.

    Let be a prime. For any , we have

    by [24,Lemma 2.7(ⅱ)]. Combining this with Remark 1.3(ⅱ), we see that

    for any with .

    Wan and Zudilin [49] obtained the following irrational series for involving the Legendre polynomials and the sequence :

    Using our congruence approach (including Conjecture 1.4), we find 12 rational series for involving and ; Theorem 1 of [49] might be helpful to solve some of them.

    Conjecture 7.1. We have the following identities.

    (7.1)
    (7.2)
    (7.3)
    (7.4)
    (7.5)
    (7.6)
    (7.7)
    (7.8)
    (7.9)
    (7.10)
    (7.11)
    (7.12)

    Now we present a conjecture on congruences related to .

    Conjecture 7.2. For any , we have

    (7.13)

    and this number is odd if and only if .

    Let be a prime. Then

    (7.14)

    If , then

    (7.15)

    divided by is a -adic integer for any .

    Let be a prime. Then

    (7.16)

    where and are integers.

    Remark 7.1. Note that the imaginary quadratic field has class number .

    The following conjecture is related to the identity .

    Conjecture 7.3. For any , we have

    (7.17)

    and this number is odd if and only if .

    Let be a prime. Then

    (7.18)

    If , then

    (7.19)

    divided by is a -adic integer for any .

    Let be a prime. Then

    (7.20)

    where and are integers.

    Remark 7.2. Note that the imaginary quadratic field has class number .

    Now we pose a conjecture related to the identity .

    Conjecture 7.4. For any , we have

    (7.21)

    Let be a prime with . Then

    (7.22)

    If , then

    (7.23)

    is a -adic integer for any .

    Let be a prime with . Then

    (7.24)

    where and are integers.

    Remark 7.3. Note that the imaginary quadratic field has class number .

    Now we pose a conjecture related to the identity .

    Conjecture 7.5. For any , we have

    (7.25)

    and this number is odd if and only if .

    Let be a prime. Then

    (7.26)

    If , then

    (7.27)

    divided by is a -adic integer for each .

    Let be a prime. Then

    (7.28)

    where and are integers.

    Remark 7.4. Note that the imaginary quadratic field has class number . We believe that is the largest positive squarefree number for which the imaginary quadratic field can be used to construct a Ramanujan-type series for .

    The identities are related to the imaginary quadratic fields , , , (with class number ) respectively. We also have conjectures on related congruences similar to Conjectures 7.2, 7.3, 7.4 and 7.5.

    To conclude this section, we confirm an open series for conjectured by the author (cf. [34,(3.28)] and [35,Conjecture 7.9]) in 2011.

    Theorem 7.1. We have

    (7.29)

    where

    Proof. The Franel numbers of order are given by . Note that

    By [11,(8.1)], for and , we have

    (7.30)

    Since

    putting , and in (7.30) we obtain

    As

    by Cooper [9], we finally get

    This concludes the proof of (7.29).

    Recall that the numbers

    are a kind of Apéry numbers. Let be an odd prime. For any , we have

    by [24,Lemma 2.7(ⅰ)]. Combining this with Remark 1.3(ⅱ), we see that

    for any with .

    Wan and Zudilin [49] obtained the following irrational series for involving the Legendre polynomials and the numbers :

    Using our congruence approach (including Conjecture 1.4), we find one rational series for involving and the Apéry numbers (see (8.1) below); Theorem 1 of [49] might be helpful to solve it.

    Conjecture 8.1. (ⅰ) We have

    (8.1)

    Also, for any we have

    (8.2)

    Let be a prime. Then

    (8.3)

    If , then

    (8.4)

    for all .

    Let be a prime. Then

    (8.5)

    Remark 8.1. This conjecture was formulated by the author on Oct. 27, 2019.

    Conjecture 8.2. For any , we have

    (8.6)

    and this number is odd if and only if .

    Let be a prime. Then

    (8.7)

    If i.e., , then

    (8.8)

    divided by is a -adic integer for any .

    For any prime , we have

    (8.9)

    Remark 8.2. This conjecture was formulated by the author on Nov. 13, 2019.

    Conjecture 8.3. For any , we have

    (8.10)

    and this number is odd if and only if is a power of two.

    Let be a prime. Then

    (8.11)

    If , then

    (8.12)

    for all .

    For any odd prime , we have

    (8.13)

    Remark 8.3. This conjecture was formulated by the author on Nov. 13, 2019.

    Conjecture 8.4. For any , we have

    (8.14)

    and this number is odd if and only if .

    Let be any odd prime. Then

    (8.15)

    If , then

    (8.16)

    for all .

    For any odd prime , we have

    (8.17)

    Conjecture 8.5. For any , we have

    (8.18)

    Let be a prime. Then

    (8.19)

    If , then

    (8.20)

    for all .

    Let be a prime. Then

    (8.21)

    Conjecture 8.6. For any , we have

    (8.22)

    and this number is odd if and only if is a power of two.

    Let be an odd prime. Then

    (8.23)

    If , then

    (8.24)

    for all .

    Let be a prime. Then

    (8.25)

    Conjecture 8.7. For any , we have

    (8.26)

    and this number is odd if and only if is a power of two.

    Let be a prime. Then

    (8.27)

    If , then

    (8.28)

    for all .

    For any prime , we have

    (8.29)

    The numbers

    were first introduced by Zagier [51] during his study of Apéry-like integer sequences, who noted the recurrence

    Lemma 9.1. Let be a prime. Then

    Proof. Note that

    with the help of the known congruence conjectured by F. Rodriguez-Villegas [28] and proved by E. Mortenson [25]. Similarly,

    By induction,

    for all . In particular,

    So we have for . (Note that and .)

    Now let and assume that

    Then

    and hence

    In view of the above, we have proved the desired result by induction.

    For Lemma 9.1 one may also consult [31,Corollary 3.1]. Let be a prime. In view of Lemma 9.1 and Remark 1.3(ⅱ), we have

    for any with .

    Wan and Zudilin [49] obtained the following irrational series for involving the Legendre polynomials and the numbers :

    Using our congruence approach (including Conjecture 1.4), we find five rational series for involving and the numbers ; Theorem 1 of [49] might be helpful to solve them.

    Conjecture 9.1. We have

    (9.1)
    (9.2)
    (9.3)
    (9.4)
    (9.5)

    Below we present our conjectures on congruences related to the identities (9.2) and (9.5).

    Conjecture 9.2. For any , we have

    (9.6)

    and this number is odd if and only if .

    Let be a prime. Then

    (9.7)

    If i.e., , then

    (9.8)

    for all .

    For any prime , we have

    (9.9)

    Conjecture 9.3. For any , we have

    (9.10)

    and this number is odd if and only if .

    Let be a prime with . Then

    (9.11)

    If i.e., , then

    (9.12)

    for all .

    For any prime with , we have

    (9.13)

    Now we give one more conjecture in this section.

    Conjecture 9.4. For any integer , we have

    (9.14)

    Let be a prime. Then

    (9.15)

    If , then

    (9.16)

    for all .

    For any prime , we have

    (9.17)

    Remark 9.1. For primes with , in general the congruence (9.16) is not always valid for all . This does not violate Conjecture 1.2 since . If the series converges, its value times should be a rational number.

    Let be an odd prime and let with . Then

    with the aid of [33,Lemma 2.1]. Thus

    in view of Remark 1.3(ⅱ).

    Let be a prime. By the above, the author's conjectural congruence (cf. [35,Conjecture 1.3])

    implies that

    Motivated by this, we pose the following curious conjecture.

    Conjecture 10.1. We have the following identities:

    (10.1)
    (10.2)

    Remark 10.1. The two identities were conjectured by the author on Dec. 7, 2019. One can easily check them numerically via as the two series converge fast.

    Now we state our related conjectures on congruences.

    Conjecture 10.2. For any prime , we have

    (10.3)

    and

    (10.4)

    Conjecture 10.3. (ⅰ) We have

    for all , and also

    for each prime .

    For any prime and , we have

    (10.5)

    Remark 10.2. See also [45,Conjecture 67] for a similar conjecture.

    Let be an odd prime. We conjecture that

    (10.6)

    and

    (10.7)

    Though (10.6) implies the congruence

    and (10.7) with implies the congruence

    we are unable to find the exact values of the two converging series

    The author would like to thank Prof. Qing-Hu Hou at Tianjin Univ. for his helpful comments on the proof of Lemma 2.3.



    [1] M. Hosseininia, M. H. Heydari, Z. Avazzadeh, Orthonormal shifted discrete Legendre polynomials for the variable-order fractional extended Fisher-Kolmogorov equation, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 155 (2022), 111729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111729 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111729
    [2] X. Peng, D. Xu, W. Qiu, Pointwise error estimates of compact difference scheme for mixed-type time-fractional Burgers' equation, Math. Comput. Simul, 208 (2023), 702–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2023.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2023.02.004
    [3] N. H. Tuan, T. Caraballo, T. N. Thach, New results for stochastic fractional pseudo-parabolic equations with delays driven by fractional Brownian motion, Stochastic Processes Appl., 161 (2023), 24–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spa.2023.03.012 doi: 10.1016/j.spa.2023.03.012
    [4] T. Caraballo, N. H. Tuan, New results for convergence problem of fractional diffusion equations when order approach to , Differ. Integr. Equations, 36 (2023), 491–516. https://doi.org/10.57262/die036-0506-491 doi: 10.57262/die036-0506-491
    [5] J. D. Djida, A. Atangana, I. Area, Numerical computation of a fractional derivative with non-local and non-singular kernel, Math. Modell. Nat. Phenom., 12 (2017), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/201712302 doi: 10.1051/mmnp/201712302
    [6] O. J. J. Algahtani, Comparing the Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo-Fabrizio derivative with fractional order: Allen Cahn model, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 89 (2016), 552–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.03.026 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2016.03.026
    [7] A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: theory and application to heat transfer model, Therm. Sci., 20 (2016), 763–769.
    [8] S. S. Ray, R. K. Bera, An approximate solution of a nonlinear fractional differential equation by Adomian decomposition method, Appl. Math. Comput., 167 (2005), 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.07.020 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2004.07.020
    [9] J. S. Duan, An efficient algorithm for the multivariable Adomian polynomials, Appl. Math. Comput., 217 (2010), 2456–2467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2010.07.046 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2010.07.046
    [10] H. Chen, W. Qiu, M. A. Zaky, A. S. Hendy, A two-grid temporal second-order scheme for the two-dimensional nonlinear Volterra integro-differential equation with weakly singular kernel, Calcolo, 60 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10092-023-00508-6 doi: 10.1007/s10092-023-00508-6
    [11] W. Qiu, D. Xu, X. Yang, H. Zhang, The efficient ADI Galerkin finite element methods for the three-dimensional nonlocal evolution problem arising in viscoelastic mechanics, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. - Ser. S, 28 (2023), 3079–3106. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2022204 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2022204
    [12] R. Wang, Y. Xu, H. Yue, Stochastic averaging for the non-autonomous mixed stochastic differential equations with locally Lipschitz coefficients, Stat. Probab. Lett., 182 (2022), 109294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2021.109294 doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2021.109294
    [13] A. Aytac, O. Ibrahim, Solution of fractional differential equations by using differential transform method, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 34 (2007), 1473–1481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2006.09.004 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.09.004
    [14] L. Qiao, D. Xu, A fast ADI orthogonal spline collocation method with graded meshes for the two-dimensional fractional integro-differential equation, Adv. Comput. Math., 47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-021-09884-5 doi: 10.1007/s10444-021-09884-5
    [15] H. Jafari, M. Ghorbani, M. Ebadattalab, R. M Ganji, D. Baleanu, Optimal Homotopy asymptotic method–-a tool for solving fuzzy differential equations, J. Comput. Complexity Appl., 2 (2016), 112–123.
    [16] R. M. Ganji, H. Jafari, D. Baleanu, A new approach for solving multi variable orders differential equations with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 130 (2020), 109405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109405 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109405
    [17] A. Zhang, R. M. Ganji, H. Jafari, M. N. Ncube, L. Agamalieva, Numerical solution of distributed-order integro-differential equations, Fractals, 30 (2022), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22401235 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X22401235
    [18] H. Jafari, R. M. Ganji, K. Sayevand, D. Baleanu, A numerical approach for solving fractional optimal control problems with mittag-leffler kernel, J. Vib. Control, 28 (2022), 2596–2606. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463211016967 doi: 10.1177/10775463211016967
    [19] H. Tajadodi, A Numerical approach of fractional advection-diffusion equation with Atangana-Baleanu derivative, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 130 (2020), 109527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109527 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109527
    [20] R. M. Ganji, H. Jafari, M. Kgarose, A. Mohammadi, Numerical solutions of time-fractional Klein-Gordon equations by clique polynomials, Alexandria Eng. J., 60 (2021), 4563–4571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.026 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.026
    [21] S. Sadeghi, H. Jafari, S. Nemati, Solving fractional Advection-diffusion equation using Genocchi operational matrix based on Atangana-Baleanu derivative, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. - Ser. S, 14 (2021), 3747–3761. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2020435 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020435
    [22] R. M. Ganji, H. Jafari, S. P. Moshokoa, N. S. Nkomo, A mathematical model and numerical solution for brain tumor derived using fractional operator, Results Phys., 28 (2021), 104671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104671 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104671
    [23] H. Jafari, R. M. Ganji, D. D. Ganji, Z. Hammouch, Y. S. Gasimov, A novel numerical method for solving fuzzy variable-order differential equations with Mittag-Leffler kernels, Fractals, 31 (2023), 2340063. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X23400637 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X23400637
    [24] H. Jafari, R. M. Ganji, S. M. Narsale, M. Nguyen, V. T. Nguyen, Application of Hosoya polynomial to solve a class of time fractional diffusion equations, Fractals, 31 (2023), 2340059. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X23400595 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X23400595
    [25] I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, Academic Press, San Diego, 1999.
    [26] H. Jafari, N. A. Tuan, R. M. Ganji, A new numerical scheme for solving pantograph type nonlinear fractional integro-differential equations, J. King Saud Univ. Sci., 33 (2021), 101185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2020.08.029 doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2020.08.029
    [27] G. Cash, S. Klavzar, M. Petkovsek, Three methods for calculation of the hyper-wiener index of molecular graphs, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 43 (2002), 571–576. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci0100999 doi: 10.1021/ci0100999
    [28] N. Tratnika, P. Z. Pletersek, Relationship between the Hosoya polynomial and the edge-Hosoya polynomial of trees, Match-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 78 (2017), 181–187.
    [29] A. R. Nizami, T. Farmam, Hosoya polynomial and topological indices of the Jahangir graphs J7, m, J. Appl. Comput. Math., 7 (2018), 1–5.
    [30] D. Stevanovic, Hosoya polynomial of composite graphs, Department of Mathematics, Discrete Math., 235 (2001), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-365X(00)00277-6 doi: 10.1016/S0012-365X(00)00277-6
    [31] E. V. Konstantinova, M. V. Diudea, The Wiener polynomial derivatives and other topological indices in chemical research, Croat. Chem. Acta, 73 (2000), 383–403.
    [32] I. Gutman, Hosoya polynomial and the distance of the total graph of a tree, Publ. Elektroteh. Fak. Ser. Mat., 10 (1999), 53–58.
    [33] H. S. Ramane, K. P. Narayankar, S. S. Shirkol, A. B. Ganagi, Terminal Wiener index of line graphs, Match-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 69 (2013), 775–782.
    [34] M. Z. Gecmen, E. Celik, Numerical solution of Volterra-Fredholm integral equations with Hosoya polynomials, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 44 (2021), 11166–11173. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7479 doi: 10.1002/mma.7479
    [35] C. Canuto, M. Y. Hussaini, A. Quarteroni, T. A. Zang, Spectral Methods, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/imamci/dnx041
    [36] P. Rahimkhani, Y. Ordokhani, Generalized fractional-order Bernoulli-Legendre functions: an effective tool for solving two-dimensional fractional optimal control problems, IMA J. Math. Control Inf., 36 (2019), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/imamci/dnx041 doi: 10.1093/imamci/dnx041
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Ji-Cai Liu, On two supercongruences for sums of Apéry-like numbers, 2021, 115, 1578-7303, 10.1007/s13398-021-01092-6
    2. Rong-Hua Wang, Michael X.X. Zhong, q-Rational reduction and q-analogues of series for π, 2023, 116, 07477171, 58, 10.1016/j.jsc.2022.08.020
    3. Qing-hu Hou, Guo-jie Li, Gosper summability of rational multiples of hypergeometric terms, 2021, 27, 1023-6198, 1723, 10.1080/10236198.2021.2007903
    4. Qing-Hu Hou, Ke Liu, Congruences and telescopings of P-recursive sequences, 2021, 27, 1023-6198, 686, 10.1080/10236198.2021.1934462
    5. Ji-Cai Liu, On two congruences involving Franel numbers, 2020, 114, 1578-7303, 10.1007/s13398-020-00935-y
    6. Liuquan Wang, Yifan Yang, Ramanujan-type -series from bimodular forms, 2022, 59, 1382-4090, 831, 10.1007/s11139-021-00532-6
    7. Zhi-Wei Sun, On Motzkin numbers and central trinomial coefficients, 2022, 136, 01968858, 102319, 10.1016/j.aam.2021.102319
    8. Ji-Cai Liu, Ramanujan-Type Supercongruences Involving Almkvist–Zudilin Numbers, 2022, 77, 1422-6383, 10.1007/s00025-022-01607-6
    9. Qing-Hu Hou, Zhi-Wei Sun, q-Analogues of Some Series for Powers of , 2021, 25, 0218-0006, 167, 10.1007/s00026-021-00522-x
    10. Rong-Hua Wang, Rational Reductions for Holonomic Sequences, 2024, 1009-6124, 10.1007/s11424-024-4034-y
    11. Chunli Li, Wenchang Chu, Infinite series about harmonic numbers inspired by Ramanujan–like formulae, 2023, 31, 2688-1594, 4611, 10.3934/era.2023236
    12. Zhi-Wei Sun, 2025, Chapter 21, 978-3-031-65063-5, 413, 10.1007/978-3-031-65064-2_21
    13. Sun Zhi-Wei, Infinite series involving binomial coefficients and harmonic numbers, 2024, 54, 1674-7216, 765, 10.1360/SSM-2024-0007
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1423) PDF downloads(101) Cited by(2)

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog