Let n be a nonnegative integer. The n-th Apéry number is defined by
An:=n∑k=0(n+kk)2(nk)2.
Z.-W. Sun investigated the congruence properties of Apéry numbers and posed some conjectures. For example, Sun conjectured that for any prime p≥7
p−1∑k=0(2k+1)Ak≡p−72p2Hp−1(modp6)
and for any prime p≥5
p−1∑k=0(2k+1)3Ak≡p3+4p4Hp−1+65p8Bp−5(modp9),
where Hn=∑nk=11/k denotes the n-th harmonic number and B0,B1,… are the well-known Bernoulli numbers. In this paper we shall confirm these two conjectures.
Citation: Chen Wang. Two congruences concerning Apéry numbers conjectured by Z.-W. Sun[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(2): 1063-1075. doi: 10.3934/era.2020058
[1] | Chen Wang . Two congruences concerning Apéry numbers conjectured by Z.-W. Sun. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(2): 1063-1075. doi: 10.3934/era.2020058 |
[2] | Chunli Li, Wenchang Chu . Infinite series about harmonic numbers inspired by Ramanujan–like formulae. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(8): 4611-4636. doi: 10.3934/era.2023236 |
[3] | Dmitry Krachun, Zhi-Wei Sun . On sums of four pentagonal numbers with coefficients. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(1): 559-566. doi: 10.3934/era.2020029 |
[4] | Ji-Cai Liu . Proof of Sun's conjectural supercongruence involving Catalan numbers. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(2): 1023-1030. doi: 10.3934/era.2020054 |
[5] | Jianghua Li, Zepeng Zhang, Tianyu Pan . On two-term exponential sums and their mean values. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(9): 5559-5572. doi: 10.3934/era.2023282 |
[6] | Jin Zhang, Xiaoxue Li . The sixth power mean of one kind generalized two-term exponential sums and their asymptotic properties. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(8): 4579-4591. doi: 10.3934/era.2023234 |
[7] | Jian Cao, José Luis López-Bonilla, Feng Qi . Three identities and a determinantal formula for differences between Bernoulli polynomials and numbers. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(1): 224-240. doi: 10.3934/era.2024011 |
[8] | Jiafan Zhang . On the distribution of primitive roots and Lehmer numbers. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(11): 6913-6927. doi: 10.3934/era.2023350 |
[9] | Qingjie Chai, Hanyu Wei . The binomial sums for four types of polynomials involving floor and ceiling functions. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(3): 1384-1397. doi: 10.3934/era.2025064 |
[10] | Massimo Grossi . On the number of critical points of solutions of semilinear elliptic equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 4215-4228. doi: 10.3934/era.2021080 |
Let n be a nonnegative integer. The n-th Apéry number is defined by
An:=n∑k=0(n+kk)2(nk)2.
Z.-W. Sun investigated the congruence properties of Apéry numbers and posed some conjectures. For example, Sun conjectured that for any prime p≥7
p−1∑k=0(2k+1)Ak≡p−72p2Hp−1(modp6)
and for any prime p≥5
p−1∑k=0(2k+1)3Ak≡p3+4p4Hp−1+65p8Bp−5(modp9),
where Hn=∑nk=11/k denotes the n-th harmonic number and B0,B1,… are the well-known Bernoulli numbers. In this paper we shall confirm these two conjectures.
The well-known Apéry numbers given by
An:=n∑k=0(n+kk)2(nk)2=n∑k=0(n+k2k)2(2kk)2(n∈N={0,1,…}), |
were first introduced by Apéry to prove the irrationality of
η(τ)=q1/24∞∏n=1(1−qn)withq=e2πiτ, |
where
A(p−1)/2≡a(p)(modp2), |
where
η4(2τ)η4(4τ)=q∞∏n=1(1−q2n)4(1−q4n)4=∞∑n=1a(n)qn. |
This conjecture was later confirmed by Ahlgren and Ono [1].
In 2012, Z.-W. Sun [16] introduced the Apéry polynomials
An(x)=n∑k=0(n+kk)2(nk)2xk(n∈N) |
and deduced various congruences involving sums of such polynomials. (Clearly,
p−1∑k=0(2k+1)Ak(x)≡p(xp)(modp2), | (1) |
where
p−1∑k=0(2k+1)Ak≡p+76p4Bp−3(modp5), | (2) |
where
B0=0, n−1∑k=0(nk)Bk=0(n=2,3,…). |
In 1850 Kummer (cf. [9]) proved that for any odd prime
Bk(p−1)+bk(p−1)+b≡Bbb(mod p)for k∈N. | (3) |
For
H(m)n:=n∑k=11km(n=1,2,…) |
and
p−1∑k=0(2k+1)Ak≡p−72p2Hp−1(modp5). | (4) |
Via some numerical computation, Sun [16,Conjecture 4.2] conjectured that (4) also holds modulo
Theorem 1.1. For any prime
p−1∑k=0(2k+1)Ak≡p−72p2Hp−1(modp6). | (5) |
Motivated by Sun's work, Guo and Zeng [6,7] studied some congruences for sums involving Apéry polynomials. Particularly, they obtained
n−1∑k=0(2k+1)3Ak≡0(modn3) | (6) |
and
p−1∑k=0(2k+1)3Ak≡p3(mod2p6), | (7) |
where
Conjecture 1. For any prime
p−1∑k=0(2k+1)3Ak≡p3+4p4Hp−1+65p8Bp−5(modp9). |
This is our second theorem.
Theorem 1.2. Conjecture 1 is true.
Proofs of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 will be given in Sections 2 and 3, respectively.
The proofs in this paper strongly depend on the congruence properties of harmonic numbers and the Bernoulli numbers. For their properties, the reader is referred to [9,13,15,17]. Below we first list some congruences involving harmonic numbers and the Bernoulli numbers which will be used later.
Lemma 2.1. [4,Remark 3.2] For any prime
2Hp−1+pH(2)p−1≡25p4Bp−5(modp5). |
From [13,Theorems 5.1 and 5.2], we have the following congruences.
Lemma 2.2. For any prime
H(p−1)/2≡−2qp(2)(modp),H(2)p−1≡(43Bp−3−12B2p−4)p+(49Bp−3−14B2p−4)p2(modp3),H(2)(p−1)/2≡(143Bp−3−74B2p−4)p+(149Bp−3−78B2p−4)p2(modp3),H(3)p−1≡−65p2Bp−5(modp3),H(3)(p−1)/2≡6(2Bp−3p−3−B2p−42p−4)(modp2),H(4)p−1≡45pBp−5(modp2),H(4)(p−1)/2≡0(modp),H(5)p−1≡0(modp2), |
where
Remark 1. By Kummer's congruence (3), we know
H(2)p−1≡(43Bp−3−12B2p−4)p+19p2Bp−3(modp3) |
and
H(2)(p−1)/2≡(143Bp−3−74B2p−4)p+718p2Bp−3(modp3) |
respectively. By Lemma 2.1, we immediately obtain that
Hp−1≡(14B2p−4−23Bp−3)p2−118p3Bp−3(modp4). | (8) |
Recall that the Bernoulli polynomials
Bn(x):=n∑k=0(nk)Bkxn−k(n∈N). | (9) |
Clearly,
n−1∑k=1km−1=Bm(n)−Bmm | (10) |
for any positive integer
Let
H(s;n):=∑1≤k1<k2<⋯kd≤nd∏i=1sgn(si)kik|si|i. |
Clearly,
Let
A:=p−3∑k=2BkBp−3−k,B:=p−3∑k=22kBkBp−3−k,D:=p−3∑k=2BkBp−3−kk,E:=p−3∑k=22kBkBp−3−kk,F:=p−3∑k=22p−3−kBkBp−3−kk. |
Lemma 2.3. For any prime
D−4F≡2B−2A−qp(2)Bp−3(modp). |
Proof. In [18,Section 6], Tauraso and Zhao proved that
H(1,−3;p−1)≡B−A≡2E−2D+2qp(2)Bp−3(modp) |
and
52D−2E−2F−32qp(2)Bp−3≡0(modp). |
Combining the above two congruences we immediately obtain the desired result.
Lemma 2.4. Let
H(3,1;(p−1)/2)≡H(3)(p−1)/2H(p−1)/2−4B+4A(modp). | (11) |
Proof. By Lemma 2.2, it is easy to check that
H(3)(p−1)/2H(p−1)/2=H(1,3;(p−1)/2)+H(3,1;(p−1)/2)+H(4)(p−1)/2≡H(1,3;(p−1)/2)+H(3,1;(p−1)/2)(modp). | (12) |
Thus it suffices to evaluate
H(1,3;(p−1)/2)=∑1≤j<k≤(p−1)/21jk3≡∑1≤j<k≤(p−1)/2jp−2k3=∑1≤k≤(p−1)/2Bp−1(k)−Bp−1k3(p−1)=∑1≤k≤(p−1)/2p−1∑i=1(p−1i)ki−3Bp−1−ip−1=p−1∑i=1(p−1i)Bp−1−ip−1(p−1)/2∑k=1ki−3≡(p−12)Bp−3p−1H(p−1)/2+p−1∑i=4(p−1i)Bp−1−ip−1⋅Bi−2(12)−Bi−2i−2(modp), |
where the last step follows from the fact
H(1,3;(p−1)/2)≡−Bp−3H(p−1)/2−p−1∑i=4(23−i−2)Bp−1−iBi−2i−2=−Bp−3H(p−1)/2−p−3∑i=2(21−i−2)Bp−3−iBii≡−Bp−3H(p−1)/2−8F+2D(modp). |
With help of Lemmas 2.2 and 2.3, we have
H(1,3;(p−1)/2)≡4B−4A(modp). |
Combining this with (12), we have completed the proof of Lemma 2.4.
Lemma 2.5. Let
(p−1)/2∑k=1H(2)kk≡32p2Hp−1+12H(3)(p−1)/2+12H(2)p−1H(p−1)/2−pH(3)(p−1)/2H(p−1)/2+4p(B−A)(modp2). |
Proof. By [10,Eq. (3.13)] we know that for any odd prime
p−1∑k=1H(2)kk≡3p2Hp−1(modp2). | (13) |
On the other hand,
p−1∑k=1H(2)kk=(p−1)/2∑k=1H(2)kk+(p−1)/2∑k=1H(2)p−kp−k. |
For
H(2)p−k=p−1∑j=k1(p−j)2≡p−1∑j=k(1j2+2pj2)≡H(2)p−1−H(2)k−1−2pH(3)k−1(modp2) |
by Lemma 2.2. Thus
p−1∑k=1H(2)kk≡2(p−1)/2∑k=1H(2)kk−H(3)(p−1)/2+pH(2,2;(p−1)/2)−H(2)p−1H(p−1)/2+2pH(3,1;(p−1)/2)(modp2). |
In view of Lemma 2.2, we have
H(2,2;(p−1)/2)=(H(2)(p−1)/2)22−H(4)(p−1)/22≡0(modp). |
This together with Lemma 2.4 proves Lemma 2.5.
Lemma 2.6. [16,Lemma 2.1] Let
n−1∑m=0(2m+1)(m+k2k)2=(n−k)22k+1(n+k2k)2. |
Proof of Theorem 1.1. By Lemma 2.6 it is routine to check that
p−1∑m=0(2m+1)Am=p−1∑m=0(2m+1)m∑k=0(m+k2k)2(2kk)2=p−1∑k=0(2kk)2p−1∑m=0(2m+1)(m+k2k)2=p−1∑k=0(2kk)2(p−k)22k+1(p+k2k)2=p2p−1∑k=012k+1(p−1k)2(p+kk)2. |
Note that
(p−1k)2(p+kk)2=k∏j=1(1−p2j2)2≡k∏j=1(1−2p2j2+p4j4)≡1−2p2H(2)k+p4H(4)k+4p4H(2,2;k)(modp5). |
Since
p−1∑m=0(2m+1)Am≡p2Σ1−2p4Σ2(modp6), | (14) |
where
Σ1:=p−1∑k=012k+1andΣ2:=p−1∑k=0H(2)k2k+1. |
We first consider
p−1∑k=(p+1)/212k+1=(p−3)/2∑k=012(p−1−k)+1≡−8p3(p−3)/2∑k=01(2k+1)4−2p(p−3)/2∑k=01(2k+1)2−4p2(p−3)/2∑k=01(2k+1)3−(p−3)/2∑k=012k+1(modp4). |
For
(p−3)/2∑k=01(2k+1)r=H(r)p−1−12rH(r)(p−1)/2. |
By the above and Lemma 2.2,
Σ1=1p+(p−3)/2∑k=012k+1+p−1∑k=(p+1)/212k+1≡1p−2p(H(2)p−1−14H(2)(p−1)/2)+12p2H(3)(p−1)/2(modp4). | (15) |
Now we turn to
p−1∑k=(p+1)/2H(2)k2k+1=(p−3)/2∑k=0H(2)p−1−k2(p−1−k)+1≡(p−3)/2∑k=0H(2)k2k+1+2p(p−3)/2∑k=0H(2)k(2k+1)2+12H(2)p−1H(p−1)/2+2p(p−3)/2∑k=0H(3)k2k+1(modp2). |
Thus
Σ2≡H(2)(p−1)/2p+2σ1+12H(2)p−1H(p−1)/2+2pσ2(modp2), |
where
σ1:=(p−3)/2∑k=0H(2)k2k+1+p(p−3)/2∑k=0H(2)k(2k+1)2 |
and
σ2:=(p−3)/2∑k=0H(3)k2k+1. |
It is easy to see that
σ1≡−(p−3)/2∑k=0H(2)kp−1−2k=−(p−1)/2∑k=1H(2)(p−1)/2−k2k≡−12H(p−1)/2H(2)(p−1)/2+12(p−1)/2∑k=11kk−1∑j=0(4(2j+1)2+8p(2j+1)3)=12(p−1)/2∑k=11k(4H(2)2k−H(2)k+8pH(3)2k−pH(3)k)−12H(p−1)/2H(2)(p−1)/2(modp2). |
Also,
σ2≡−(p−3)/2∑k=0H(3)kp−1−2k=−(p−1)/2∑k=1H(3)(p−1)/2−k2k≡−12H(p−1)/2H(3)(p−1)/2+12(p−1)/2∑k=11kk−1∑j=0−8(2j+1)3=−12H(p−1)/2H(3)(p−1)/2−4(p−1)/2∑k=11k(H(3)2k−18H(3)k)(modp). |
Combining the above we deduce that
Σ2≡H(2)(p−1)/2p−H(p−1)/2H(2)(p−1)/2+4(p−1)/2∑k=1H(2)2kk−(p−1)/2∑k=1H(2)kk+12H(2)p−1H(p−1)/2−pH(p−1)/2H(3)(p−1)/2(modp2). | (16) |
Note that
(p−1)/2∑k=1H(2)2kk=p−1∑k=1H(2)kk+H(2,−1;p−1)+14H(3)(p−1)/2−H(3)p−1. | (17) |
By [18,Proposition 7.3] we know that
H(2,−1;p−1)≡−32X−76pqp(2)Bp−3+p(B−A)(modp2), | (18) |
where
Σ2≡H(2)(p−1)/2p+21Hp−12p2(modp2). | (19) |
Substituting (15) and (19) into (14) and using (13) and Lemma 2.2 we have
p−1∑m=0(2m+1)Am≡p−2p3H(2)p−1−32p3H(2)(p−1)/2+12p4H(3)(p−1)/2−21p2Hp−1≡p−72p2Hp−1(modp6). |
The proof of Theorem 1.1 is complete now.
In order to show Theorem 1.2, we need the following results.
Lemma 3.1. Let
p−1∑k=1H(2,2;k)k≡−12Bp−5(modp). |
Proof. Clearly,
p−1∑k=1H(2,2;k)k=H(2,2,1;p−1)+H(2,3;p−1). |
By [19,Theorems 3.1 and 3.5] we have
H(2,3;p−1)≡−2Bp−5(modp)andH(2,2,1;p−1)≡32Bp−5(modp). |
Combining the above we obtain the desired result.
Lemma 3.2. For any prime
p−1∑k=1H(2)kk≡3Hp−1p2−12p2Bp−5(modp3). | (20) |
Proof. Note that
p−1∑k=1H(2)kk=H(2,1;p−1)+H(3)p−1. |
By [8,Lemma 3] we know that
H(1,2;p−1)≡−3Hp−1p2+12p2Bp−5(modp3) |
for any prime
H(2,1;p−1)=Hp−1H(2)p−1−H(1,2;p−1)−H(3)p−1≡3Hp−1p2−12p2Bp−5−H(3)p−1(modp3). |
Then (20) follows at once.
Lemma 3.3. For any prime
p−1∑k=0H(2,2;k)≡−p2H(4)p−1−3Hp−1p2+H(3)p−1+12p2Bp−5(modp3), | (21) |
p−1∑k=0(H(2,4;k)+H(4,2;k))≡3Bp−5(modp), | (22) |
p−1∑k=0H(2,2,2;k)≡−32Bp−5(modp). | (23) |
Proof. By Lemma 2.2 we arrive at
p−1∑k=0H(2,2;k)=p−1∑k=1∑1≤i<j≤k1i2j2=∑1≤i<j≤p−1p−ji2j2=p2((H(2)p−1)2−H(4)p−1)−∑1≤i<j≤p−11i2j≡−p2H(4)p−1+p−1∑k=1Hkk2(modp3). |
Furthermore,
p−1∑k=1Hkk2=p−1∑k=11k2k∑j=11j=p−1∑j=11jp−1∑k=j1k2≡−p−1∑j=1H(2)jj+H(3)p−1(modp3). |
From the above and Lemma 3.2, we obtain (21).
Now we turn to prove (22). It is easy to see that
p−1∑k=0(H(2,4;k)+H(4,2;k))=∑1≤i<j≤p−1p−ji2j4+∑1≤i<j≤p−1p−ji4j2≡−H(2,3;p−1)−H(4,1;p−1)(modp). |
By [18,Theorem 3.1] we have
Finally, we consider (23). Clearly,
p−1∑k=0H(2,2,2;k)=∑1≤i1<i2<i3≤p−1p−i3i21i22i23≡−H(2,2,1;p−1)(modp). |
By [19,Theorem 3.5], we have
H(2,2,1;p−1)≡32Bp−5(modp). |
The proof of Lemma 3.3 is now complete.
Lemma 3.4. Let
n−1∑m=0(2m+1)3(m+k2k)2=(n−k)2(2n2−k−1)k+1(n+k2k)2. |
Proof. It can be verified directly by induction on
Proof of Theorem 1.2. The case
p−1∑m=0(2m+1)3Am=p−1∑m=0(2m+1)3m∑k=0(m+k2k)2(2kk)2=p−1∑k=0(2kk)2p−1∑m=0(2m+1)3(m+k2k)2=p−1∑k=0(2kk)2(p−k)2(2p2−k−1)k+1(p+k2k)2=p2p−1∑k=02p2−k−1k+1(p−1k)2(p+kk)2. |
Noting that
(p−1k)2(p+kk)2=k∏j=1(1−p2j2)2≡k∏j=1(1−2p2j2+p4j4)≡1−2p2H(2)k+p4H(4)k+4p4H(2,2;k)−2p6(H(2,4;k)+H(4,2;k))−8p6H(2,2,2;k)(modp7), |
we arrive at
p−1∑m=0(2m+1)3Am≡ 2p4p−1∑k=11k+1(1−2p2H(2)k+p4H(4)k+4p4H(2,2;k))−p2p−1∑k=0(1−2p2H(2)k+p4H(4)k+4p4H(2,2;k)−2p6(H(2,4;k)+H(4,2;k))−8p6H(2,2,2;k))(modp9). |
It is clear that
p−1∑k=01k+1=Hp−1+1p. |
With the help of Lemma 3.2 we obtain that
p−1∑k=0H(2)kk+1=p∑k=1H(2)k−1k=p−1∑k=1H(2)kk−H(3)p−1+H(2)p−1p≡3p2Hp−1+H(2)p−1p−H(3)p−1−12p2Bp−5(modp3). |
Clearly,
p−1∑k=0H(4)kk+1=H(4,1;p−1)+H(4)p−1p≡−Bp−5+H(4)p−1p(modp). |
Furthermore,
p−1∑k=0H(2,2;k)k+1=12p∑k=11k((H(2)k−1)2−H(4)k−1)=12p∑k=11k((H(2)k)2−H(4)k−2H(2)kk2+2k4)=p−1∑k=1H(2,2;k)k−H(2,3;p−1)+12p((H(2)p−1)2−H(4)p−1). |
Then by Lemmas 2.2 and 3.1 we arrive at
p−1∑k=0H(2,2;k)k+1≡32Bp−5−12pH(4)p−1(modp). |
For
p−1∑k=0H(r)k=p−1∑k=1k∑l=11lr=p−1∑l=1p−llr=pH(r)p−1−H(r−1)p−1. |
Combining the above and in view of Lemma 3.3 we obtain
p−1∑m=0(2m+1)3Am≡2p4Hp−1+2p3−12p4Hp−1+4p6H(3)p−1−4p5H(2)p−1+2p8Bp−5−2p8Bp−5+2p7H(4)p−1+12p8Bp−5−4p7H(4)p−1−p3+2p5H(2)p−1−2p4Hp−1−p7H(4)p−1+p6H(3)p−1+2p7H(4)p−1+12p4Hp−1−2p8Bp−5−4p6H(3)p−1−6p8Bp−5=p3−2p4Hp−1−2p5H(2)p−1+p6H(3)p−1−p7H(4)p−1+4p8Bp−5(modp9). |
Then Theorem 1.2 follows from Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2.
The author would like to thank the anonymous referees for their helpful comments.
[1] |
A Gaussian hypergeometric series evaluation and Apéry number congruences. J. Reine Angew. Math. (2000) 518: 187-212. ![]() |
[2] | Irrationalité de ζ(2) et ζ(3). Astérisque (1979) 61: 11-13. |
[3] |
Another congruence for the Apéry numbers. J. Number Theory (1987) 25: 201-210. ![]() |
[4] |
Congruences for Apéry numbers βn=∑nk=0(nk)2(n+kk). Int. J. Number Theory (2020) 16: 981-1003. ![]() |
[5] | On the residues of the sums of products of the first p−1 numbers, and their powers, to modulus p2 or p3. Quart. J. Math. (1900) 31: 321-353. |
[6] |
Proof of some conjectures of Z.-W. Sun on congruences for Apéry polynomials. J. Number Theory (2012) 132: 1731-1740. ![]() |
[7] |
New congruences for sums involving Apéry numbers or central Delannoy numbers. Int. J. Number Theory (2012) 8: 2003-2016. ![]() |
[8] | Congruences arising from Apéry-type series for zeta values. Adv. Appl. Math. (2012) 49: 218-238. |
[9] |
K. Ireland and M. Rosen, A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory, 2nd edition, Graduate Texts in Math., Vol. 84, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2103-4
![]() |
[10] |
Congruences for the (p−1)th Apéry number. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. (2019) 99: 362-368. ![]() |
[11] | K. Ono, The Web of Modularity: Arithmetic of Coefficients of Modular Forms and q-Series, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2004. |
[12] | N. J. A. Sloane, Sequence A005259 in OEIS, http://oeis.org/A005259. |
[13] |
Congruences concerning Bernoulli numbers and Bernoulli polynomials. Discrete Appl. Math. (2000) 105: 193-223. ![]() |
[14] | Z.-W. Sun, Open conjectures on congruences, preprint, arXiv: 0911.5665v57. |
[15] |
Arithmetic theory of harmonic numbers. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (2012) 140: 415-428. ![]() |
[16] |
On sums of Apéry polynomials and related congruences. J. Number Theory (2012) 132: 2673-2699. ![]() |
[17] |
Arithmetic theory of harmonic numbers(II). Colloq. Math. (2013) 130: 67-78. ![]() |
[18] | Congruences of alternating multiple harmonic sums. J. Comb. Number Theory (2010) 2: 129-159. |
[19] |
Wolstenholme type theorem for multiple harmonic sums. Int. J. Number Theory (2008) 4: 73-106. ![]() |
1. | Wei Xia, Zhi-Wei Sun, On congruences involving Apéry numbers, 2023, 0002-9939, 10.1090/proc/16387 |