Citation: Isaac R. Rukundo, Mary-Grace C. Danao, Robert B. Mitchell, Steven D. Masterson, Randy L. Wehling, Curtis L. Weller. Effect of scanning samples through polypropylene film on predicting nitrogen content of forage using handheld NIR[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 835-849. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.835
[1] | Hamdy M. Youssef, Najat A. Alghamdi, Magdy A. Ezzat, Alaa A. El-Bary, Ahmed M. Shawky . A new dynamical modeling SEIR with global analysis applied to the real data of spreading COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(6): 7018-7044. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020362 |
[2] | Ayako Suzuki, Hiroshi Nishiura . Transmission dynamics of varicella before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: a modelling study. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(6): 5998-6012. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022280 |
[3] | Anthony Morciglio, R. K. P. Zia, James M. Hyman, Yi Jiang . Understanding the oscillations of an epidemic due to vaccine hesitancy. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(8): 6829-6846. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024299 |
[4] | Adil Yousif, Awad Ali . The impact of intervention strategies and prevention measurements for controlling COVID-19 outbreak in Saudi Arabia. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(6): 8123-8137. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020412 |
[5] | Avinash Shankaranarayanan, Hsiu-Chuan Wei . Mathematical modeling of SARS-nCoV-2 virus in Tamil Nadu, South India. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(11): 11324-11344. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022527 |
[6] | Tao Chen, Zhiming Li, Ge Zhang . Analysis of a COVID-19 model with media coverage and limited resources. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(4): 5283-5307. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024233 |
[7] | Sarafa A. Iyaniwura, Musa Rabiu, Jummy F. David, Jude D. Kong . Assessing the impact of adherence to Non-pharmaceutical interventions and indirect transmission on the dynamics of COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 8905-8932. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021439 |
[8] | Antonios Armaou, Bryce Katch, Lucia Russo, Constantinos Siettos . Designing social distancing policies for the COVID-19 pandemic: A probabilistic model predictive control approach. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(9): 8804-8832. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022409 |
[9] | H. Swapnarekha, Janmenjoy Nayak, H. S. Behera, Pandit Byomakesha Dash, Danilo Pelusi . An optimistic firefly algorithm-based deep learning approach for sentiment analysis of COVID-19 tweets. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 2382-2407. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023112 |
[10] | Pannathon Kreabkhontho, Watchara Teparos, Thitiya Theparod . Potential for eliminating COVID-19 in Thailand through third-dose vaccination: A modeling approach. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(8): 6807-6828. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024298 |
Statistical structures in modern differential geometry have studied by many authors in recent years. One of them is Lauritzen. In [1], Lauritzen created a statistical manifold by defining a totally symmetric tensor field C (cubic form) of type (0,3) on a Riemann manifold (Mn,g). He has shown that there is a torsion-free linear connection (α)∇ such that (α)∇g=αC, where g is Riemann metric and α=±1. Then, he examined some properties of the curvature tensor field and defined the dual connection of this connection. Also, he showed the relationship between curvature and dual curvature tensor field of that connection and presented examples on the statistical manifold.
In this paper, we create a special connection inspired by statistical manifold on locally product Riemann manifold (Mn,φ,g). We call this new connection as statistical (α,φ)-connection. We investigate the decomposable condition for cubic form C expressed by the product structure φ. Then, we calculate the curvature tensor field of that connection and examine its some properties. We give two examples that support this connection. Finally, we define the dual of the new connection and investigate its curvature tensor field.
Let Mn be a n-dimensional manifold. Throughout this article, all tensor fields, linear connections, and manifolds will always be regarded as differentiable of class C∞. The class of (p,q)-type tensor fields will also be denoted ℑpq(Mn). For example if the tensor field V is of type (1,2), then V∈ℑ12(Mn).
The tensor field K of type (0,q) is called pure with respect to the φ if the following equation holds:
K(φY1,Y2,...,Yq)=K(Y1,φY2,...,Yq)=...=K(Y1,Y2,...,φYq), |
where φ is endomorphism, namely, φ∈ℑ11(Mn) and Y1,Y2,...,Yq∈ℑ10(Mn) [2,p.208]. Then, the Φ operator (or Tachibana operator) applied to pure tensor field K of type (0,q) is given by
(ΦφXK)(Y1,Y2,...,Yq)=(φX)(K(Y1,Y2,...,Yq))−X(K(φY1,Y2,...,Yq))+q∑i=1K(Y1,...,(LYiφ)X,...,Yq), | (2.1) |
where LY is the Lie differentiation according to a vector field Y [2,p.211].
In the equation (2.1), if ΦφK=0, then K is named Φ-tensor field. Especially, if φ is product structure, that is, φ2=I and ΦφK=0, then K is called a decomposable tensor field [2,p.214].
The almost product Riemann manifold (Mn,φ,g) is a manifold that satisfies
g(φX,Y)=g(X,φY) |
and φ2=I, where g is Riemann metric. In [3], the authors (in Theorem 1) show that in almost product Riemann manifold, if Φφg=0, then φ is integrable. Then, it is clear that the condition Φφg=0 is equivalent ∇φ=0, where ∇ is Riemann (or Levi-Civita) connection of Riemann metric g. It is well-known that if φ is integrable, then the triplet (Mn,φ,g) is named locally product Riemann manifold. Besides, locally product Riemann manifold (Mn,φ,g) is a locally decomposable if and only if the product structure φ is parallel according to the Riemann connection ∇, in other words, ∇φ=0 [4,p.420]. Thus, it is easily said that the (Mn,φ,g) is a locally decomposable Riemann manifold if and only if Φφg=0 [3] (in Theorem 2).
In adition, in [5], the authors (in Proposition 4.2) examined properties of the Riemann curvature tensor field R of the locally product Riemann manifold (Mn,φ,g) and showed that ΦφR=0, that is, the Riemann curvature tensor field R is decomposable.
Let (Mn,g,φ) be a locally decomposable Riemann manifold and (α)∇ be a torsion-free linear connection on this manifold that provides the following equation:
(α)∇XY=∇XY−α2¯C(X,Y). | (3.1) |
Then, the connection (α)∇ is named statistical α -connection If ((α)∇Xg)(Y,Z)=αC(X,Y,Z) is satisfied and C is totally symmetric, where α=±1, C is a the cubic form such that C(X,Y,Z)=g(¯C(X,Y),Z) and ∇ is Riemann connection of metric g [1,p.179–180].
In this paper, we will study a special version of cubic form ¯C, which is expressed as follows:
¯C(X,Y)=η(X)Y+η(Y)X+g(X,Y)U+η(φX)(φY)+η(φY)(φX)+g(φX,Y)(φU), | (3.2) |
where φ is a product structure, that is, φ2(X)=I(X), η is a covector field (or 1-form) and U is a vector field such that U=g♯(η)=η♯, where g♯:ℑ01(Mn)⟶ℑ10(Mn), that is g♯ is a musical isomorphisms. From the equation (3.2) and C(X,Y,Z)=g(¯C(X,Y),Z), we have
C(X,Y,Z)=η(X)g(Y,Z)+η(Y)g(X,Z)+η(Z)g(X,Y)+η(φX)g(φY,Z)+η(φY)g(φX,Z)+η(φZ)g(φX,Y). | (3.3) |
Then, it is clear that
((α)∇Xg)(Y,Z)=αC(X,Y,Z) |
and C(X,Y,Z) is completely symmetric, that is,
C(X,Y,Z)=C(X,Z,Y)=C(Z,X,Y)=C(Z,Y,X)=C(Y,X,Z)=C(Y,Z,X). |
From the (3.2), we get
Proposition 3.1. The product structure φ is parallel according to the α -connection (α)∇ on locally decomposable Riemann manifold (Mn,g,φ), that is, (α)∇φ=0.
Throughout this paper, the α-connection (α)∇ on locally decomposable Riemann manifold (Mn,g,φ) is called "statistical (α,φ)-connection".
We easily say that the cubic form C is pure with regard to the product structure φ, that is,
C(φX,Y,Z)=C(X,φY,Z)=C(X,Y,φZ). |
Therefore, we get
(α)∇(φX)Y= (α)∇X(φY)=φ((α)∇XY), |
i.e., the connection (α)∇ is pure according to product structure φ. Also, in [6,p.19], the author has already shown that any φ-connection ¯∇ is pure if and only if its torsion tensor is pure. Then, we write
Theorem 3.1. In locally decomposable Riemann manifold (Mn,g,φ), if the covector field η in (3.3) is a decomposable tensor field, then the cubic form C is a decomposable tensor field.
Proof. For the cubic form C given by the (3.3), from the (2.1), we obtain
(ΦφXC)(Y1,Y2,Y3)=(∇φXC)(Y1,Y2,Y3)−(∇XC)(φY1,Y2,Y3). | (3.4) |
Substituting (3.3) into the last equation, we get
(ΦφXC)(Y1,Y2,Y3)=[(∇φXη)(Y1)−(∇Xη)(φY1)]g(Y2,Y3)+[(∇φXη)(Y2)−(∇Xη)(φY2)]g(Y1,Y3)+[(∇φXη)(Y3)−(∇Xη)(φY3)]g(Y1,Y2)+[(∇φXη)(φY1)−(∇Xη)(Y1)]g(φY2,Y3)+[(∇φXη)(φY2)−(∇Xη)(Y2)]g(φY1,Y3)+[(∇φXη)(φY3)−(∇Xη)(Y3)]g(φY1,Y2). | (3.5) |
and for covector field η, we have
(ΦφXη)(Y)=(∇φXη)(Y)−(∇Xη)(φY). | (3.6) |
From the last two equations, we get
(ΦφC)(X,Y1,Y2,Y3)=(ΦφXη)(Y1)g(Y2,Y3)+(ΦφXη)(Y2)g(Y1,Y3)+(ΦφXη)(Y3)g(Y1,Y2)+(ΦφXη)(φY1)g(φY2,Y3)+(ΦφXη)(φY2)g(φY1,Y3)+(ΦφXη)(φY3)g(φY1,Y2). |
It is clear that if Φφη=0, then ΦφC=0.
Corollary 3.1. From the equation (3.4) in Theorem 3.1, we can write
(∇φXC)(Y1,Y2,Y3)=(∇XC)(φY1,Y2,Y3)=(∇XC)(Y1,φY2,Y3)=(∇XC)(Y1,Y2,φY3), |
that is, the covariant derivation of the cubic form C is pure with respect to product structure φ.
In the following sections of the paper, we will assume that the covector field η is decomposable tensor field, i.e., the following equation always applies:
(∇φXη)(Y)−(∇Xη)(φY)=0. |
The α-curvature tensor field (α)¯R of the statistical (α,φ)-connection (α)∇ is given by
(α)¯R(X,Y,Z)=((α)∇X (α)∇Y−(α)∇Y (α)∇X−(α)∇[X,Y])Z. |
Substituting (3.1) into the last equation, we obtain
(α)R(X,Y,Z,W)=R(X,Y,Z,W)−g(Y,W)ρ(X,Z)+g(X,W)ρ(Y,Z)−g(Y,Z)q(X,W)+g(X,Z)q(Y,W)−g(φY,W)ρ(X,φZ)+g(φX,W)ρ(Y,φZ)−g(φY,Z)q(X,φW)+g(φX,Z)q(Y,φW)−g(Z,W)[ρ(X,Y)−ρ(Y,X)]+g(φZ,W)[ρ(X,φY)−ρ(φY,X)], | (3.7) |
where g((α)¯R(X,Y,Z),W)= (α)R(X,Y,Z,W) and R is Riemann curvature tensor field of Riemann metric g,
ρ(X,Y)=α2(∇Xη)Y+α24η(X)η(Y)+α28η(U)g(X,Y)+α24η(φX)η(φY)+α28η(φU)g(φX,Y) | (3.8) |
and
q(X,Y)=α2(∇Xη)Y−α24η(X)η(Y)−α28η(U)g(X,Y)−α24η(φX)η(φY)−α28η(φU)g(φX,Y). | (3.9) |
From the last two equations, we get
ρ(X,Y)−ρ(Y,X)=q(X,Y)−q(Y,X)=α2[(∇Xη)Y−(∇Yη)X]=α2[(∇Xη)Y)−(∇Yη)X+η(∇XY−∇YX)−η([X,Y])]=α2[(∇Xη)Y+η(∇XY)−(∇Yη)X−η(∇YX)−η([X,Y])]=α2[Xη(Y)−Yη(X)−η([X,Y])]=α(dη)(X,Y), |
where d is exterior derivate operator applied to the covector field η. Then, we can write the following proposition and corollary.
Proposition 3.2. The covector field η is closed, that is, dη=0 if and only if
ρ(X,Y)−ρ(Y,X)=q(X,Y)−q(Y,X)=0. | (3.10) |
Corollary 3.2. For the differentiable function f on locally decomposable Riemann manifold (Mn,g,φ), it is well-known that d2f=0. So, if η=df =∂f∂xidxi, then dη=0 is directly obtained and we can write the equation (3.10).
The tensor fields ρ and q are given by Eqs (3.8) and (3.9), respectively, is pure according to the product structure φ. Then, we write
ρ(X,φY)−ρ(φX,Y)=q(X,φY)−q(φX,Y)=α2[(∇Xη)(φY)−(∇φXη)(Y)]=0. |
In addition, from the Eqs (2.1) and (3.8), we get
(ΦφXρ)(Y1,Y2)=(∇φXρ)(Y1,Y2)−(∇Xρ)(φY1,Y2). | (3.11) |
Substituting (3.8) into the Eq (3.11), we obtain
(Φφρ)(X,Y1,Y2)=α2[(∇φX∇Y1η)(Y2)−(∇X∇φY1η)(Y2)]. |
For the Ricci identity of the covector field η, we have
(∇φX∇Y1η)(Y2)=(∇Y1∇φXη)(Y2)−12η(¯R(φX,Y1,Y2)) | (3.12) |
and
(∇X∇Y1η)(φY2)=(∇Y1∇Xη)(φY2)−12η(¯R(X,Y1,φY2)). | (3.13) |
From the last equations, we write
(ΦφXρ)(Y1,Y2)=−12η(¯R(φX,Y1,Y2)−¯R(X,Y1,φY2))=0 |
and in the same way (ΦφXq)=0. Then, we have
Proposition 3.3. The tensor fields ρ and q are given by Eqs (3.8) and (3.9), respectively are a decomposable tensor fields and because of the equation (3.11), we can write
(∇φXρ)(Y,Z)=(∇Xρ)(φY,Z)=(∇Xρ)(Y,φZ) |
and
(∇φXq)(Y,Z)=(∇Xq)(φY,Z)=(∇Xq)(Y,φZ), |
that is, the covariant derivation of the tensor fields ρ and q are pure with respect to the product structure φ.
With the simple calculation, we can say that the α-curvature tensor field(α)R is pure with regard to the product structure φ, namely,
(α)R(φY1,Y2,Y3,Y4)= (α)R(Y1,φY2,Y3,Y4)= (α)R(Y1,Y2,φY3,Y4)= (α)R(Y1,Y2,Y3,φY4). |
Then, from the Eq (2.1), we have
(ΦφX(α)R)(Y1,Y2,Y3,Y4)=(∇φX(α)R)(Y1,Y2,Y3,Y4)−(∇X(α)R)(φY1,Y2,Y3,Y4). | (3.14) |
If the expression of the α-curvature tensor field (α)R is written in the last equation, then we obtain
(ΦφX(α)R)(Y1,Y2,Y3,Y4)=(ΦφXR)(Y1,Y2,Y3,Y4)−[(∇φXρ)(Y1,Y3)−(∇Xρ)(Y1,φY3)]g(Y2,Y4)+[(∇φXρ)(Y2,Y3)−(∇Xρ)(Y2,φY3)]g(Y1,Y4)−[(∇φXq)(Y1,Y4)−(∇Xq)(Y1,φY4)]g(Y2,Y3)+[(∇φXq)(Y2,Y4)−(∇Xq)(Y2,φY4)]g(Y1,Y3)−[(∇φXρ)(Y1,φY3)−(∇Xρ)(Y1,Y3)]g(Y2,φY4)+[(∇φXρ)(Y2,φY3)−(∇Xρ)(Y2,Y3)]g(Y1,φY4)−[(∇φXq)(Y1,φY4)−(∇Xq)(Y1,Y4)]g(Y2,φY3)+[(∇φXq)(Y2,φY4)−(∇Xq)(Y2,Y4)]g(Y1,φY3)−[(∇φXρ)(Y1,Y2)−(∇φXρ)(Y2,Y1) −((∇Xρ)(Y1,φY2)−(∇Xρ)(φY2,Y1))]g(Y3,Y4)+[(∇φXρ)(Y1,φY2)−(∇φXρ)(φY2,Y1) −((∇Xρ)(Y1,Y2)−(∇Xρ)(Y2,Y1))]g(φY3,Y4). |
Furthermore, from Proposition 3, the last equation becomes the following form:
(ΦφX(α)R)(Y1,Y2,Y3,Y4)=(ΦφXR)(Y1,Y2,Y3,Y4)−(ΦφXρ)(Y1,Y3)g(Y2,Y4)+(ΦφXρ)(Y2,Y3)g(Y1,Y4)−(ΦφXq)(Y1,Y4)g(Y2,Y3)+(ΦφXq)(Y2,Y4)g(Y1,Y3)−(ΦφXρ)(Y1,φY3)g(Y2,φY4)+(ΦφXρ)(Y2,φY3)g(Y1,φY4)−(ΦφXq)(Y1,φY4)g(Y2,φY3)+(ΦφXq)(Y2,φY4)g(Y1,φY3)−[(ΦφXρ)(Y1,Y2)−(ΦφXρ)(Y2,Y1)]g(Y3,Y4)+[(ΦφXρ)(Y1,φY2)−(ΦφXρ)(φY2,Y1)]g(φY3,Y4) |
and
(ΦφX(α)R)(Y1,Y2,Y3,Y4)=0. |
Then, we obtain
Theorem 3.2. The α-curvature tensor field (α)R of the statistical (α,φ)-connection (α)∇ is decomposable tensor field and due to the equation (3.14), we can say that
(∇φX(α)R)(Y1,Y2,Y3,Y4)=(∇X(α)R)(φY1,Y2,Y3,Y4)=(∇X(α)R)(Y1,φY2,Y3,Y4)=(∇X(α)R)(Y1,Y2,φY3,Y4)=(∇X(α)R)(Y1,Y2,Y3,φY4), |
namely, the covariant derivation of the α-curvature tensor field (α)R-is pure with respect to the product structure φ.
Example 4.1. Let M2={(x,y)∈R2,x>0} be a manifold with the metric g such that
[gij(x,y)]=[1x001]. |
Then, (M2,g) is a Riemann manifold. The component of the Riemann connection of this manifold is as follow:
Γ111(x,y)=−12x |
and the others are zero. In addition, we say that (M2,g) is a flat manifold, that is, Riemann curvature tensor R of that manifold is vanishing. The equation system satisfying the conditions φmigmj=φmjgim (purity) and φmiφjm=δji (product structure) is
{a2+bc=1b(a+d)=0c(a+d)=0d2+bc=1 c=1xb, | (4.1) |
where
[φji(x,y)]=[a(x,y)b(x,y)c(x,y)d(x,y)]. | (4.2) |
Then, a general solution of the equation system (4.1) is
[a=−d,b=x√−1x(d−1)(d+1),c=√−1x(d−1)(d+1)]. | (4.3) |
In the last equation, a special solution for d=0 is as follow:
[φji(x,y)]=[0√×1√x0]. |
Here, because of ∇φ=0, the triplet (M2,g,φ) is locally decomposable Riemann manifold.
The expression of the cubic form in local coordinates given by (3.2) is
¯Ckij=ηiδkj+ηiδkj+ηkgij+ηtφtiφkj+ηtφtjφki+ηtφktφij, |
where ηk=ηigik and φij=φkigkj. For η(x,y)=(η1(x,y),η2(x,y)), the matrix shape of the cubic form is as follows:
[¯C1ij(x,y)]=[3η13η23η23xη1], |
[¯C2ij(x,y)]=[3xη23η13η13η2], |
for example, ¯C111=3η1, ¯C211=3xη2, ..., etc. In adition, the statistical (α,φ)-connection is given by
(α)Γkij(x,y)=Γkij(x,y)−α2¯C kij(x,y) |
and these components are
[(α)Γ1ij(x,y)]=[−12x−3α2η1−3α2η2−3α2η2−3α2xη1], |
[(α)Γ2ij(x,y)]=[−3α2xη2−3α2η1−3α2η1−3α2η2]. |
For i,j,m=1,2, the components of the Φφη are
(Φφη)ij=φmi(∂∂xmηj)−φmj(∂∂xiηm), |
where ∂∂x1=∂∂x and ∂∂x2=∂∂y. Then, we have
(Φφη)11=−1x(Φφη)22=1√x(∂∂yη1−∂∂xη2),(Φφη)12=−(Φφη)21=1√x(∂∂yη2−x∂∂xη1) |
and because of Φφη=0, we obtain
∂∂yη1=∂∂xη2, |
∂∂yη2=x∂∂xη1. |
Then, the components of the α-curvature tensor field (α)R are
(α)R1212(x,y)= (α)R1221(x,y)=12xη1. |
Example 4.2. Let N2={(x,y)∈R2,x<0} be a manifold with the metric g such that
[gij(x,y)]=[1+x2−x−x1]. |
Then, (N2,g) is a Riemann manifold and the component of the Riemann connection of this manifold is the following form:
Γ211(x,y)=−1 |
and the others are zero. Also, (N2,g) is a flat manifold. The equation system satisfying the conditions φmigmj=φmjgim and φmiφjm=δji is as follow:
{a2+bc=1b(a+d)=0c(a+d)=0d2+bc=1 x(d−a)+c=b(1+x2), |
where
[φji(x,y)]=[a(x,y)b(x,y)c(x,y)d(x,y)]. |
Then, a general solution of the equation system (4.2) is
[a=−d,b=1x2+1(√−d2+x2+1+dx),c=√−d2+x2+1−dx]. | (4.4) |
In the equation (4.4), a special solution for d=1 is
[φji(x,y)]={[−12x1+x201], if x>0[−10−2x1], if x<0, |
where for x<0, (N2,g,φ) is locally decomposable Riemann manifold because of ∇φ=0. Then, we get
[¯C1ij(x,y)]=[6(η1+xη2)000], |
[¯C2ij(x,y)]=[6x(η1+2xη2)−6xη2−6xη26η2] |
and
[(α)Γ1ij(x,y)]=[−3α(η1+xη2)000], |
[(α)Γ2ij(x,y)]=[−3αx(η1+2xη2)−13αxη23αxη2−3αη2]. |
From the equation (3.6), we have
(Φφη)11=2x(∂∂xη2−∂∂yη1),(Φφη)12=2(x∂∂yη2−∂∂xη2),(Φφη)21=2(∂∂yη1+∂∂yη2),(Φφη)22=0. |
and because of Φφη=0,
∂∂xη2=∂∂yη1=−x∂∂yη2. |
Then, we easily say that the components of the α-curvature tensor field (α)R are
(α)R1221(x,y)=−x(α)R1222(x,y)=−6αx(∂∂xη2). |
Then, we get
Corollary 4.1. The α-curvature tensor field (α)R of (N2,g,φ) is vanishing, that is, (α)R=0 if and only if
η=(η1(x,y),η2(x,y))=(η1(x,c1),η2(c2,c3)), |
where c1, c2, and c3 are scalars.
In [1,p.181], the author defined the dual of the α -connection (α)∇ of given by the equation (3.1) as follows:
D(α)∇XY=∇XY+α2¯C(X,Y). |
We easily say that D(α)∇= −(α)∇. Furthermore,
(D(α)∇Xg)(Y,Z)=−((α)∇Xg)(Y,Z)=−αC(X,Y,Z) |
and
(D(α)∇XF)(Y)=0, |
that is, the dual α-connection D(α)∇ is statistical (α,φ)-connection and is named "dual statistical (α,φ)-connection". Also, in [1,p.182] (in Proposition 3.5), the author shows that the dual α-curvature tensor field D(α)R of D(α)∇ is as follow:
(α)R(X,Y,Z,W)=− D(α)R(X,Y,W,Z). |
Then, we have
Theorem 5.1. The dual α-curvature tensor field D(α)R is a decomposable tensor field, i.e.,
Φ φ (α)R=−(Φφ D(α)R)=0. |
In this study, we define a special connection using the cubic form C on locally product Riemann manifold. We name this new connection as statistical (α,φ)-connection. We examine the curvature properties and give examples of this new connection. However, the cubic form C customized for the locally product Riemann manifold is made only for the product structure. This cubic form can also be studied on different special Riemann manifolds such that Kahler (or Anti-Kahler) manifold with complex structure E, E2=−I, Tangent (dual) manifold with tangent structure F, F2=0 and Golden Riemann manifold with golden structure φ, φ2=φ+I, which is the most interesting structure lately.
The author sincerely thank the reviewers for their careful reading and constructive comments.
The author declares no conflict of interest in this paper.
[1] | Blanco M, Villarroya I (2002) NIR spectroscopy: A rapid-response analytical tool. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem 21: 240-250. |
[2] | Alcalà M, Blanco M, Moyano D, et al. (2013) Qualitative and quantitative pharmaceutical analysis with a novel hand-held miniature near infrared spectrometer. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 21: 445-457. |
[3] | Gowen AA, O'Donnell CP, Esquerre C, et al. (2010) Influence of polymer packaging films on hyperspectral imaging data in the visible-near-infrared (450-950 nm) wavelength range. Appl Spectrosc 64: 304-312. |
[4] | Altinpinar S, Sorak D, Siesler HW (2013) Near infrared spectroscopic analysis of hydrocarbon contaminants in soil with a hand-held spectrometer. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 21: 511-521. |
[5] | Kumagai M, Suyama H, Sato T, et al. (2002) Discrimination of plastics using a portable near infrared spectrometer. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 10: 247-255. |
[6] | Miller CE, Svendsen SA, Næ s T (1993) Nondestructive characterizations of polyethylene/nylon laminates by near-infrared spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc 47: 346-356. |
[7] | Nagata T, Ohshima M, Tanigaki M (2000) In-line monitoring of polyethylene density using near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. Polym Eng Sci 40: 1107-1113. |
[8] | Rani M, Marchesi C, Federici S, et al. (2019) Miniaturized Near-Infrared (MicroNIR) Spectrometer in Plastic Waste Sorting. Materials 12: 2740. |
[9] | Shimoyama M, Ninomiya T, Sano K, et al. (1998) Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics Analysis of Linear Low-Density Polyethylene. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 6: 317-324. |
[10] | Xie LG, Sun HM, Jin SH (2011) Screening adulteration of polypropylene bottles with postconsumer recycled plastics for oral drug package by near-infrared spectroscopy. Anal Chim Acta 706: 312-320. |
[11] | Yan H, Siesler HW (2018) Identification Performance of Different Types of Handheld Near-Infrared (NIR) Spectrometers for the Recycling of Polymer Commodities. Appl Spectrosc 72: 1362-1370. |
[12] | Zhu C, Hieftje GM (1992) Near-infrared analysis of chemical constituents and physical characteristics of polymers. Appl Spectrosc 46: 69-72. |
[13] | Zhu S, Chen H, Wang M, et al. (2019) Plastic solid waste identification system based on near infrared spectroscopy in combination with support vector machine. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res 2: 77-81. |
[14] | Rukundo IR, Danao MGC, Weller CL, et al. (2020) Use of a handheld near infrared spectrometer and partial least squares regression to quantify metanil yellow adulteration in turmeric powder. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 28: 096703351989888. |
[15] | Crocombe RA (2018) Portable Spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc72: 1701-1751. |
[16] | Foster AJ, Kakani VG, Ge J, et al. (2013) Rapid assessment of bioenergy feedstock quality by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Agron J 105: 1487-1497. |
[17] | Vogel KP, Dien BS, Jung HG, et al. (2011) Quantifying Actual and Theoretical Ethanol Yields for Switchgrass Strains Using NIRS Analyses. Bioenergy Res 4: 96-110. |
[18] | Watson ME, Isaac RA (1990) Analytical instruments for soil and plant analysis, In: Westerman RL (Ed.), Soil testing and plant analysis, Madison, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., 691-740. |
[19] | Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P (1987) Principal component analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 2: 37-52. |
[20] | Verboven S, Hubert M, Goos P (2012) Robust preprocessing and model selection for spectral data. J Chemom 26: 282-289. |
[21] | Fearn T (2002) Assessing Calibrations: SEP, RPD, RER and R 2. NIR News 13: 12-13. |
[22] | Martens H, Martens M (2000) Modified Jack-knife estimation of parameter uncertainty in bilinear modelling by partial least squares regression (PLSR). Food Quality Preference 11: 5-16. |
[23] | Williams P (2014) The RPD Statistic: A Tutorial Note. NIR News 25: 22-26. |
[24] | Aenugu HPR, Sathis Kumar D, Srisudharson, et al. (2011) Near infrared spectroscopy-An overview. Int J Chem Tech Res 3: 825-836. |
[25] | Ellis DI, Brewster VL, Dunn WB, et al. (2012) Fingerprinting food: Current technologies for the detection of food adulteration and contamination. Chem Soc Rev 41: 5706-5727. |
[26] | Rodriguez-Saona LEE, Giusti MMM, Shotts M (2016) Advances in infrared spectroscopy for food authenticity testing. Advances in Food Authenticity Testing, Elsevier Inc., 71-116. |
[27] | Payne CE, Wolfrum EJ (2015) Rapid analysis of composition and reactivity in cellulosic biomass feedstocks with near-infrared spectroscopy. Biotechnol Biofuels 8: 43. |
1. | Qifang Liang, Buping Liu, Chunping Liu, Wenxing Liu, Xiaoxue Han, Limei Wan, Xiaobo Chen, Peng wu, Hongyu Li, Yujiao Sun, Yubin Yang, Weixiong Chen, 2021, Visual analysis based on the research of SARS and COVID-19, 9781450390002, 38, 10.1145/3448748.3448756 | |
2. | Farai Nyabadza, Josiah Mushanyu, Rachel Mbogo, Gift Muchatibaya, Modelling the Influence of Dynamic Social Processes on COVID-19 Infection Dynamics, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 963, 10.3390/math11040963 | |
3. | Jennifer M. Klasen, Deborah M. Tynes, Caspar J. Peterson, Romano Schneider, Katharina Timper, Ralph Peterli, Cameron L. Randall, Tarik Delko, The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients from a Bariatric Program: A Qualitative Analysis of Their Perceptions of Health and Well-Being, 2022, 10, 2227-9032, 780, 10.3390/healthcare10050780 | |
4. | Fatma Bozkurt, Ali Yousef, Thabet Abdeljawad, Adem Kalinli, Qasem Al Mdallal, A fractional-order model of COVID-19 considering the fear effect of the media and social networks on the community, 2021, 152, 09600779, 111403, 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111403 | |
5. | Tin Phan, Samantha Brozak, Bruce Pell, Anna Gitter, Amy Xiao, Kristina D. Mena, Yang Kuang, Fuqing Wu, A simple SEIR-V model to estimate COVID-19 prevalence and predict SARS-CoV-2 transmission using wastewater-based surveillance data, 2023, 857, 00489697, 159326, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159326 | |
6. | Kaiyan Peng, Zheng Lu, Vanessa Lin, Michael R. Lindstrom, Christian Parkinson, Chuntian Wang, Andrea L. Bertozzi, Mason A. Porter, A multilayer network model of the coevolution of the spread of a disease and competing opinions, 2021, 31, 0218-2025, 2455, 10.1142/S0218202521500536 | |
7. | Ali Yousef, A fractional-order model of COVID-19 with a strong Allee effect considering the fear effect spread by social networks to the community and the existence of the silent spreaders during the pandemic stage, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 10052, 10.3934/math.2022560 | |
8. | Mohammad Masum, M.A. Masud, Muhaiminul Islam Adnan, Hossain Shahriar, Sangil Kim, Comparative study of a mathematical epidemic model, statistical modeling, and deep learning for COVID-19 forecasting and management, 2022, 80, 00380121, 101249, 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101249 | |
9. | Yoh Iwasa, Rena Hayashi, Waves of infection emerging from coupled social and epidemiological dynamics, 2023, 558, 00225193, 111366, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111366 | |
10. | M. Ali Al-Radhawi, Mahdiar Sadeghi, Eduardo D. Sontag, Long-Term Regulation of Prolonged Epidemic Outbreaks in Large Populations via Adaptive Control: A Singular Perturbation Approach, 2022, 6, 2475-1456, 578, 10.1109/LCSYS.2021.3083983 | |
11. | Kirti Jain, Vasudha Bhatnagar, Sadanand Prasad, Sharanjit Kaur, Coupling Fear and Contagion for Modeling Epidemic Dynamics, 2023, 10, 2327-4697, 20, 10.1109/TNSE.2022.3187775 | |
12. | Ali Yousef, Fatma Bozkurt, Thabet Abdeljawad, Emad Emreizeeq, A mathematical model of COVID-19 and the multi fears of the community during the epidemiological stage, 2023, 419, 03770427, 114624, 10.1016/j.cam.2022.114624 | |
13. | S. Manrubia, D. H. Zanette, Individual risk-aversion responses tune epidemics to critical transmissibility ( R = 1) , 2022, 9, 2054-5703, 10.1098/rsos.211667 | |
14. | Giulia De Meijere, Vittoria Colizza, Eugenio Valdano, Claudio Castellano, Effect of delayed awareness and fatigue on the efficacy of self-isolation in epidemic control, 2021, 104, 2470-0045, 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.044316 | |
15. | Wasim Abbas, Masud M. A., Anna Park, Sajida Parveen, Sangil Kim, Siew Ann Cheong, Evolution and consequences of individual responses during the COVID-19 outbreak, 2022, 17, 1932-6203, e0273964, 10.1371/journal.pone.0273964 | |
16. | Musa Rabiu, Sarafa A. Iyaniwura, Assessing the potential impact of immunity waning on the dynamics of COVID-19 in South Africa: an endemic model of COVID-19, 2022, 109, 0924-090X, 203, 10.1007/s11071-022-07225-9 | |
17. | Jinming Wan, Genki Ichinose, Michael Small, Hiroki Sayama, Yamir Moreno, Changqing Cheng, Multilayer networks with higher-order interaction reveal the impact of collective behavior on epidemic dynamics, 2022, 164, 09600779, 112735, 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112735 | |
18. | Bruce Kuwahara, Chris T. Bauch, Predicting Covid-19 pandemic waves with biologically and behaviorally informed universal differential equations, 2024, 10, 24058440, e25363, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25363 | |
19. | Peter Miller, Kira Button, Nicholas Taylor, Kerri Coomber, Ryan Baldwin, Travis Harries, Brittany Patafio, Tahnee Guala, Nathan Harris, Ashlee Curtis, Gery C. Karantzas, Petra K. Staiger, Dominique de Andrade, The Impact of COVID-19 on Trends of Violence-Related Offences in Australia, 2023, 13, 2210-6014, 504, 10.1007/s44197-023-00131-2 | |
20. | Matthew Ryan, Emily Brindal, Mick Roberts, Roslyn I. Hickson, A behaviour and disease transmission model: incorporating the Health Belief Model for human behaviour into a simple transmission model, 2024, 21, 1742-5662, 10.1098/rsif.2024.0038 | |
21. | Iulia Martina Bulai, Mattia Sensi, Sara Sottile, A geometric analysis of the SIRS compartmental model with fast information and misinformation spreading, 2024, 185, 09600779, 115104, 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115104 |