Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Review

Climate change adaptation in Nigerian agricultural sector: A systematic review and resilience check of adaptation measures

  • Received: 26 August 2019 Accepted: 03 November 2019 Published: 15 November 2019
  • The changing climate is adversely affecting the productivity and livelihoods of Nigerian smallholder rural farmers. Several studies predict worsening outcomes for future climate events, for example heat waves, drought and intense precipitation. Farmers are required to adopt several measures to thrive, given the observed or expected climate change events. Existing studies about the interaction between climate change the agriculture sector has focused evaluating the bi-directional causal relationships, and identifying adaptation measures, but research on the climate resilience aspect of these adaptation measures is missing, or at best, low. This study aims to fill this gap in knowledge by assessing resilience and contribution to sustainability of farmer-adopted measures aimed at addressing risks posed by climate change. We conduct a systematic review of 95 studies concentrating on climate adaptation by smallholder rural farmers in Nigeria in the period 2010 to 2019. We assess the climate resilience of adaptation measures using the Ifejika-Speranza Resilience Check Toolkit. Our findings show that farmers are using climate-resilient adaptation measures; however, we could not ascertain how these have led to sustainable agricultural systems, since it is not the focus of the current study. Our findings show that majority of the adaptation studies in Nigeria are focused on crop farming subsystem. The major agricultural ecosystems and the broad adaptation areas are: Crop farming (improved soil and land management, crop-specific Innovation, water management practices, climate information services and education, access to finance, and off-farm diversification), livestock farming (improved livestock management systems, improved breeding strategies, sustainable health improvement, proper feed formulation early maturing and heat-resistant bird varieties), and fish farming (water harvesting measures, organic material, quick-maturing varieties).

    Citation: Robert Ugochukwu Onyeneke, Chinyere Augusta Nwajiuba, Chukwuemeka Chinonso Emenekwe, Anurika Nwajiuba, Chinenye Judith Onyeneke, Precious Ohalete, Uwazie Iyke Uwazie. Climate change adaptation in Nigerian agricultural sector: A systematic review and resilience check of adaptation measures[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(4): 967-1006. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.4.967

    Related Papers:

    [1] Christopher A Birt . Food and Agriculture Policy in Europe. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(1): 131-140. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.131
    [2] Flora Douglas, Edwin van Teijlingen, Cairns Smith, Mandy Moffat . Implementing health policy: lessons from the Scottish Well Mens policy initiative. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(4): 887-905. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.4.887
    [3] Terri Rebmann, Kristin D. Wilson, Travis Loux, Ayesha Z. Iqbal, Eleanor B. Peters, Olivia Peavler . Outcomes, Approaches, and Challenges to Developing and Passing a Countywide Mandatory Vaccination Policy: St. Louis County’s Experience with Hepatitis A Vaccine for Food Service Personnel. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(1): 116-130. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.116
    [4] Carlos Vílchez-Román, Alberto Paucar-Caceres, Silvia Quispe-Prieto . The impact of research on health education/health literacy on policymaking in Latin America and the Caribbean Region. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(2): 330-348. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024017
    [5] Davies Banda . Sport for Development and Global Public Health Issues: A Case Study of National Sports Associations. AIMS Public Health, 2017, 4(3): 240-257. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.3.240
    [6] Sarah Moreland-Russell PhD MPH, Todd Combs PhD, Janice Jones MPH, Amy A. Sorg MPH . State level point-of-sale policy priority as a result of the FSPTCA. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(4): 681-690. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.4.681
    [7] Rosemary Mamka Anyona, Maximilian de Courten . An Analysis of the Policy Environment Surrounding Noncommunicable Diseases Risk Factor Surveillance in Kenya. AIMS Public Health, 2014, 1(4): 256-274. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2014.4.256
    [8] Gareth Morgan . Does Utilitarian Policy such as Smoking Cessation Lend Support to Wider Aspirin Use?. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(2): 223-226. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.2.223
    [9] Claudia Chaufan, Natalie Hemsing . Is resistance to Covid-19 vaccination a “problem”? A critical policy inquiry of vaccine mandates for healthcare workers. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(3): 688-714. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024035
    [10] Theresa A. Nicklas, Carol E. O'Neil . Prevalence of Obesity: A Public Health Problem Poorly Understood. AIMS Public Health, 2014, 1(2): 109-122. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2014.2.109
  • The changing climate is adversely affecting the productivity and livelihoods of Nigerian smallholder rural farmers. Several studies predict worsening outcomes for future climate events, for example heat waves, drought and intense precipitation. Farmers are required to adopt several measures to thrive, given the observed or expected climate change events. Existing studies about the interaction between climate change the agriculture sector has focused evaluating the bi-directional causal relationships, and identifying adaptation measures, but research on the climate resilience aspect of these adaptation measures is missing, or at best, low. This study aims to fill this gap in knowledge by assessing resilience and contribution to sustainability of farmer-adopted measures aimed at addressing risks posed by climate change. We conduct a systematic review of 95 studies concentrating on climate adaptation by smallholder rural farmers in Nigeria in the period 2010 to 2019. We assess the climate resilience of adaptation measures using the Ifejika-Speranza Resilience Check Toolkit. Our findings show that farmers are using climate-resilient adaptation measures; however, we could not ascertain how these have led to sustainable agricultural systems, since it is not the focus of the current study. Our findings show that majority of the adaptation studies in Nigeria are focused on crop farming subsystem. The major agricultural ecosystems and the broad adaptation areas are: Crop farming (improved soil and land management, crop-specific Innovation, water management practices, climate information services and education, access to finance, and off-farm diversification), livestock farming (improved livestock management systems, improved breeding strategies, sustainable health improvement, proper feed formulation early maturing and heat-resistant bird varieties), and fish farming (water harvesting measures, organic material, quick-maturing varieties).


    After Turkey, Iranians consume the most bread per capita in the world in a way that bread consumption rate in Iran is almost twice as those in European countries [1]. Bread is categorized as a staple food worldwide [2],[3], being responsible for an average of 30% of daily salt intake [4],[5]. It is also recognized as the first food among Iranians, whose daily consumption is very common [6]. Accordingly; salt plays an important role in qualitative properties of bread including giving flavor to it, controlling yeast growth and fermentation, improving product texture, as well as reducing bread mold especially spoilage [7]. While adding salt to bread is inappropriate in terms of nutritional principles, it can technologically have positive effects at every stage of production including mixing, fermentation, and baking, as well as characteristics of the final product [8],[9]. High salt intake is associated not only with hypertension but also with some vascular anomalies that may increase independently [8]. Furthermore, sodium intake causes arterial stiffness independently of hypertension [10] and can be associated with diseases such as gastric cancer [11] and osteoporosis [12].

    Among the countries reviewed in the national action plan for non-communicable disease (NCD) prevention and control by the National and Sub-National Burden of Diseases Study (NASBOD), Iran has the highest rates of mortality and disability-adjusted life year (DALY) due to high salt intake [13]. Recently, health policy institutions have been also planning to reduce the amount of sodium consumed by communities due to increased costs in health systems and an elevated number of patients affected with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [7]. In this respect, the World Health Organization (WHO) identifies salt reduction as the “best choice” in terms of cost-effectiveness and feasibility of this approach in prevention of NCDs [14]. Accordingly, it has been estimated that rates of strokes and CVDs will decrease by 23% and 17%, respectively, as the daily salt intake is reduced from 10 g per day to 5 g [15].

    In addition, reducing the amount of salt intake to 6 g per day can prevent 2.5 million deaths each year across the world [15]. Lowering sodium intake has been followed up seriously by the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education and all its subsidiary units over the past 10 years (since 2009) [15]. Given the fact that Iranians consume 15–10 g of salt every day [15], with a large percentage related to bread, cheese, and fast food [16]; various policies have been developed to cut salt in bread as a staple food.

    It should be noted that reduction in salt levels in bread affects several qualitative characteristics of this product, which are of importance in terms of customer acceptance and industry [7]. In addition, bakers are reluctant to lower salt content since they believe that it might change bread taste and quality. Furthermore, they are not likely to abide by these strategies due to performing longer mixing and dough-processing periods [18]. Accordingly, assessment of such policies along with stakeholder analysis might result in recognition of unintended and inappropriate outcomes arising from implementation of decisions and policies as well as their related barriers to achieving national goals to promote health and to moderate prevalence and occurrence of NCDs, to help formulate and implement these policies, and to utilize technical evidence in support of policy processes [18]. The main objective of this study was to provide an opportunity to recognize the unwanted and unfavorable outcomes of implementing decisions and policies as well as associated problems of salt reduction in bread in order to accomplish national and global health promotion goals.

    This study was a qualitative and retrospective policy analysis, in which policy-making for reduction of salt in bread in Iran in 2018 was described and assessed. As a general rule, qualitative studies are appropriate for illustrating and analyzing issues that have not been thoroughly investigated until now. In addition, these types of studies provide comprehensive and complete data on the subject matter [20].

    In the present study, three data collection methods were utilized including interview, observation, and focus group discussion.

    The study population consisted of a total of 37 informants and key individuals including two groups of administrative assistants and experts in policy-making for salt reduction in bread such as university professors with a history of research in this field, managers, as well as policy-makers and specialists with an administrative experience regarding salt and bread policies (Box 1), selected via snowball sampling as a purposeful method of sampling. The data were then collected through semi-structured interviews with the participants in a face-to-face manner. This research tool encompassed open-ended questions prepared by the interviewer (thematic interview guide) and also created naturally throughout the interview. It is noteworthy that the 15-item thematic interview guide on salt reduction in bread (Appendix 1) was developed based on the researchers' experiences and evaluations of the related literature. In total, five pilot interviews were completed prior to the study.

    A consent form was further obtained from the interviewees, in-person or through a phone call. Afterwards; the research characteristics sheet was submitted to the participants, in-person or through emails, and they were returned after completion. Each interview lasted about 45 minutes and the data were collected during six months. In order to record the interviewees' voices, they were ensured of confidentiality of the data and their personal information. No consent to record their voices was also resolved by taking notes by the interviewer. The audio files were subsequently transcribed and a copy was then sent to the interviewees to confirm the accuracy of the data in case of any doubt in their content. The interviews also continued until data saturation.

    It should be noted that the researchers traveled to six different parts of Iran, and used relevant documents along with interviews with key actors. These cities were selected mainly based on the quality and quantity of wheat produced. There were also attempts to cover the entire country geographically.

    This research was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

    Interviewees. At the national level:

    • Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education: 1 former head of the office and 1 head of the current Office of Social Nutrition Improvement, 1 major policy-maker, and 3 supervisors
    • Ministry of Agriculture Jihad: 1 individual in monitoring units
    • Tehran Bakers Union: 1 individual
    • Iran's Flour Industries Union: 1 individual
    • Iranian National Standards Organization: 1 individual
    At the provincial level:
    • Environmental health inspectors: 5 individuals
    • Government Trading Corporation of Iran: 5 individuals
    • Ministry of Agriculture Jihad: 2 individuals
    • University professors: 5 individuals
    • Bakers (industrial and traditional): 10 individuals

    The researcher attended bakeries (traditional and industrial) as well as traditional flour mills and assessed their work method, especially use of salt in bread. If needed, some processes were photographed and videotaped after receiving permissions. Other resources exploited in this study were documents and reports. To this end; the websites of the WHO, as well as the domestic ones were searched to find reports related to the policy of salt reduction in bread in Iran. Furthermore, the researchers referred to some organizations in-person to search for relevant documents. Other documents utilized included articles, newspapers, magazines, authorized news agency websites, as well as annual and six-month reports from various centers. The documents were also used as additional resources for validating other collected data.

    A total of five focus group discussions were held while people were waiting in the queue of bakeries, to obtain public opinions in this respect and to gather information about the effects of the policy of salt reduction in bread on people.

    In the vein of most qualitative studies, data analysis was performed simultaneously with data collection. This concomitance allows for returning to questions and correcting, modifying, or eliminating them for future interviews. It should be noted that the data were analyzed using framework analysis, formed based on existing ideas (i.e. a predetermined framework) which does not seek to develop a new theory. In the present study, the framework employed was policy analysis triangle adapted from Walt and Gilson (1994), encompassing four categories of context, actors, process, and content in the analysis of policies (20).

    Credibility was also measured to ensure the accuracy of the results. In order to boost credibility, participants with sufficient experience in this area were selected and then integration was applied in all stages of the study including diversity in data collection methods (methodological triangulation) (e.g., interview, observation, and focus group discussion). Moreover, there were attempts to allot sufficient time to data analysis. If required, the transcribed interviews were returned to the interviewees for further revisions. To improve transferability, all research stages were recorded to allow for the follow-up of each stage and to have a clear process. In addition to citations, research design and stages were explicated. Given the fact that confirmability is interpreted as unbiased data, controversial and negative cases were evaluated to understand the reason for inconsistency between results. Furthermore, long-term presence of the researcher and allocation of sufficient time, accuracy in all research stages, and clarity of the research methodology could help concretize the data. In addition, dependency was obtained using complementary views of supervisors and counselors in terms of coding and analyzing the transcribed interviews.

    The results were reported in four categories of the policy analysis triangle framework i.e. context, policy content, policy-making process, and actors.

    Implementation of a new policy depends on the setting in which it is formed. In this part of the study, the environmental aspects having direct or indirect effects on the policy of salt reduction in bread were delineated. In terms of wheat, it could be concluded that all the relevant stages had been monopolized by the Iranian government with the exception of production. While the state had devoted its main subsidy to wheat, flour, and bread with the aim of protecting vulnerable populations, this act had led to loss of competitiveness in wheat, flour, and bread supply chain in this country. Given the effect of the competitiveness on increasing product quality and the direct relationship between use of salt in bread and quality of wheat and flour; the sovereignty of the government over wheat, flour, and bread was considered as one of the challenges to successful execution of the this policy. For example, one of the interviewees had stated that:

    “Salt strengthens gluten bonding and gives it structure. So, relative success will be achieved in implementing this policy if wheat quality is overlooked and I think that it is aimed to solve the problems just in the last stage of the production process (I mean, bakeries)” (A university professor)

    Over recent years, the main government incentive has been allocated to provision, supply, and distribution of wheat and bread. As a result, bread is available to Iranians at a supported cost to protect vulnerable populations. Due to continuous increase in the cost of flour and the constant rate of selling flour to bakeries, bread subsidies have further generated adverse effects such as increased government spending, difference between bread costs in urban and rural areas, as well as bread waste off the scale. Despite much emphasis of high-level documents on supports for bread production industry and promotion of culture of using industrial bread in this country, traditional flat breads, unfortunately, constitute 93% of the bread consumed by the public, and the overall popularity of loaf bread is negligible. In this respect, a former policy-maker had said that:

    “In the course of industrial bread production, majority of processes are automatically carried out and less flour is thus wasted. In addition, fermentation is definitely performed and salt use can be properly controlled. Even salt-free bread can be produced. Moreover, bread is baked with indirect heat and there is no residual of fossil fuels on the bread” (Former nutritional policy-maker)

    Generally; in addition to the completely mechanized production process of industrial bread, fermentation is more complete and the final product is endowed with high food safety and health. Owing to their stable production processes and equipment, adhering to bread production standards is thus more practical in these units and they can be effectively monitored. Moreover, monitoring these units and assessing their compliance with the standards can be carried out with high operational capabilities.

    In spite of the structure of the Supreme Council of Health and Food Security as the coordinator of other organizations working on public health, all state-run agencies involved in wheat, flour, and bread pursue their own goals and there is less intersectoral collaboration regarding the issues of bread health and salt reduction in this staple food.

    Accordingly, three important factors affecting quality and health of the final product (i.e. traditional types of bread) include right ingredients; knowledge, education, and specialty of workforce (that is, bakers), and use of appropriate tools and technologies in bread preparation. The most popular of the traditional Iranian bread prepared in Iran have been already mentioned in [6]. Unfortunately, due to long work hours and difficulty of bakery, especially in hot seasons, skilled workers are reluctant to be in bakeries and they merely work as temporary ones. Accordingly, unwillingness leads to a decrease in effectiveness of vocational training to such workers in bakeries, and ultimately reduces quality and health of the final product.

    Bakery equipment is another issue to be considered; since need for salt used in bread is reduced in some cases, according to observations, such as use of dough sheeter machines in Lavash flat bread bakeries, because the dough is uniformly spread under the pressure and there is less probability of being torn. Therefore; use of salt, which is mainly to prevent the tearing of bread decreases in the production phase.

    Following the former order of the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education in 2013, a specialized working group was established to promote bread quality with the main objective of providing effective and practical solutions to eliminate use of baking soda and reducing salt content in bread production process. The intervention recommended included improving formulation of traditional (i.e. flat) bread to provide a model of healthy bread, reviewing list of materials authorized and used in baking industry, revising national standards and guidelines, reducing problems through industrialization of traditional bread production (in other words, changing bread consumption pattern), building proper culture (through Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting, newspapers, books, educational booklets, and urban advertising) for healthy bread consumption, determining quality indices of wheat for domestic purchases and imports of wheat in order to take account of effective components in production of high-quality flour and bread products such as gluten, employing food industry graduates to implement precise technical and sanitary supervision on flat and loaf bread bakeries, as well as closing traditional bakeries to build industrial complexes of traditional (flat) breads to improve quality of this product. Unfortunately, attempts made in bread production and results of meetings by the specialized working group on promotion of bread quality have failed due to changes in the government and the priorities of the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education.

    One of the most common and useful methods for evaluating and analyzing the policy-making process is the use of heuristic stages [22]. This model encompasses four stages of agenda-setting, policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy evaluation.

    Given the much importance of bread along with complexity of wheat, flour, and bread issues; bread quality improvement was put into operation in early 2014. Eventually; after numerous meetings, review of bread and flour standards and monitoring of their proper implementation were announced and approved in 2015. Along with the implementation of the Health Promotion in Iran's five-year Development Plans in the field of prevention and health, environmental health inspectors became equipped with portable salinity meters to measure and record salt content of dough in bakeries.

    Unfortunately, first-line staff (i.e. bakers) has considered the policy of standard reduction of salt in bread as a top-down one, and even impossible in some areas. In the top-down approach, policy-makers are key actors and the role of other stakeholders is overlooked. In this approach, the government is usually recognized as the main ruler, and other actors, including individuals and organizations, are merely subordinates. With regard to a limited perspective in policy-making, there is little chance that all prerequisites for successful policy implementation are taken into account. For example, one of the interviewees had reiterated that:

    “The current policy is just an order. Salt in bread should be approximately 1%, but what is the strategy? How can we fulfill it? The imperative policy is not the answer. I think in-depth interviews must be conducted with bakers in order to perceive the problem” (A provincial environmental health inspector)

    In the top-down approach, first-line actors are also dissatisfied with the policy formulated and show little commitment for its implementation, which means failure in policy execution. In addition, some stakeholders had controversial ideas concerning reduction of salt in bread, which seemed to be unknown to main policy-makers in the policy-making process. In this respect, two employees had stated that:

    “A big problem is that we ignore salt functions. The salt function is being substituted by some additives whose recognition is not possible due to lack of a proper method. Our major concern is use of unauthorized salt substitutes” (An employee in Iranian National Standards Organization)

    “Memory loss and goiter has increased in this province since the implementation of salt reduction program” (A provincial employee of Government Trading Corporation of Iran).

    According to Standard No. 2628 of the Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran, salt content in the dry matter of bread should be measured and reported. Meanwhile, environmental health officers need to measure amount of salt in dough using salinity meters and then consider cases above 1% as violation of standard regulations. At the same time, in order to adhere to the standard of 1 g salt per 100 g of bread, bakers should consider a bag of flour as a weight criterion and add 400 g of salt to it (40 kg). It is clear that the standard of salt reduction in bread is not clear and such a contradiction in implementation of the given standard should be resolved as soon as possible.

    Furthermore, water quality is of great importance and very hard or soft water is not suitable for baking. In general, water hardness affects dough and the resulting bread, since minerals in water can exert impacts on rising process and solubility, intensity of fermentation, aromatic substances, and bread taste. Very soft water also causes numerous problems due to production of runny dough [23]. In some regions of Iran, the amount of salt and minerals in water used for making dough and baking bread is extremely high. According to bakers, the amount of salt used in bread depends on the season and the temperature of the region. Studies in this line have also demonstrated that salt percentage in traditional bread is lower in the second six months of the year (compliance with the new standard, in 71% of samples), compared with the first six months of the year (compliance with the new standard, in 52% of samples). Moreover; there are many different climates in Iran, so it is not feasible to determine a single standard of salt content in bread for the whole country during a year.

    Some people have also questioned the ability to apply the new standard and have further mentioned that the current flour quality does not allow compliance with this standard in Iran. Others have also considered the implementation of this policy to be based on bakers' skills and have expressed that if bakers receive the necessary training from reputable organizations, such as Iran Technical and Vocational Organizations, the given standard can be properly adhered to and bread quality will be significantly improved. Some issues such as lack of attractiveness of bakery job due to its demanding conditions and low wages, seasonal nature of bakery workers in most parts of Iran, and lack of specialized bakery training centers have all led to serious problems in bakery training, especially in reducing salt in traditional bread.

    The policy of salt reduction in bread officially started at the beginning of 2016 and it has not been so far evaluated in research studies, to the best of authors' knowledge. However, a study conducted in southeastern Iran in 2015 showed that salt reduction in bread could be an acceptable and effective intervention in lowering uric sodium and systolic blood pressure in the community [1].

    Some bakers believed that similar pricing by the government regarding both low-quality and high-quality subsidized bread producers had put an end to competitions among bakers to offer a high-quality product. For example, an expert had said that:

    “The biggest problem is the subsidy. In fact, we have done away with competitiveness in this industry. This also applies to flour factories. When the government purchases any type of flour, I think there is no point in increasing its quality” (A provincial health expert)

    Others had also assumed that encouragements and incentive policies would be more effective instead of punitive ones together with penalties for bakeries. In this respect, a baker had added that:

    “For example, they could put a sign on top of the bakery highlighting that the baker has managed to reduce salt content in bread. This would both encourage bakers and lead to an increase in the number of customers” (A baker)

    One of the policies adopted by the government is to use the Primary Health Care (PHC) system to educate people about needs for consuming low-salt products. In this way, bread producers (industrial and traditional) will try to offer low-salt bread when the public demands this type of product. The important note is gradual reduction of salt in such products. As seen in other countries such as the United Kingdom, salt reduction must be slow but sure in order to get people to eat low-salt products and to prevent decline in sales [24]. In focus group discussion, one major concern was also iodine deficiency due to beliefs that the only source of iodine was edible salt. Given the greater tangibility of complications of iodine deficiency to these individuals, compared with NCDs, there were serious questions and concerns among them regarding this issue. For example, one of the individuals in the focus group discussion had stated that:

    “The public has shown and will show positive attitudes to any factor contributing to their health. Reducing salt intake is no exception, and people are willing to reduce salt content in bread and other products. However, this decrease in salt consumption should be managed in a way that other problems (e.g. iodine deficiency) and other complications are avoided”

    Some people have also become so sensitive to lowering salt content in bread, so they would purchase from another bakery in case of detecting a high salt content in bread of a certain bakery. Due to the risks of diseases associated with high salt intake, some people are not just satisfied with reduction of salt content in bread and demand a decrease of this mineral substance in other salty food, including pickles and different types of sauce. On the other hand, some people are indifferent to the amount of salt in bread and only focus on its quality, taste, and appearance, as well as shelf life.

    Despite the important role of bread as the main source of salt in the diet of Iranian people, no research has been conducted thus far on reduction of salt content in bread in this country to the best of authors' knowledge. In the present study, the policy of salt reduction in bread was thus evaluated from different viewpoints. While the policy seemed initially simple, its complicated dimensions were recognized after the study and some serious challenges were also found, especially in terms of implementation of the given policy in Iran.

    In this regard, the main problem in the area of bread production and not just reduction of salt in this product was lack of competitions either in terms of use of the main raw material, namely flour, or in the final product, i.e. bread types. On the other hand, given the strategic importance of wheat, flour, and bread and the significance of wheat in Iranian households' food basket; governmental supports for producers and consumers, especially vulnerable populations, are inevitable [25]. One of the solutions suggested to eliminate this problem is subsidy allocation of the healthier types of flour (whole-wheat and high-gluten content) and bread (e.g. Sangak, because of using whole-wheat flour and thorough fermentation in the process of its production by sourdough starter), so that healthy nutrition in the community can be indirectly promoted and a competitive environment can be created for other types of flour and bread.

    Ambiguity in implementing this policy is also due to lack of understanding of the environment, definition of vague goals, as well as no familiarity with existing facilities of organizations [26]. Given the presence of portable salinity meters for monitoring the implementation of this policy, it is suggested that the amount of salt allowed in the dough of traditional bread types be used instead of the permitted salt in the final dry matter in the new standard of salt content in bread. Doing so, contradictions in implementing policies will be removed and then conditions for production of bread types and amount of salt and water used in different types of bread will be taken into account.

    Another point is that central policy-makers should not expect unconditioned obedience of policy-executers [27]. In fact, bakers can play a role in implementing the policy of salt reduction in bread both as facilitator and deterrence to achieving the goals of this policy. Engaging bakers in the policy of salt reduction in bread, a commitment can be further built in these individuals to better implement the policy and to make the best use of their practical experiences in more rational policies [26]. Considering the role of salt in bread preparation as a controller of yeast fermentation [28] and given the direct effect of ambient temperature on this function, it can be concluded that the amount of salt used in bread depends on the temperature of the environment as well. With regard to the geography of Iran and difference in temperature between the coldest and hottest regions, it is necessary to determine the standard salt content in bread according to weather conditions of different areas instead of formulating a single salt standard in bread.

    It is notable that most of the countries that have successfully reduced salt in bread, including the United Kingdom [24], Finland [29], and New Zealand [30] have a small area, which can be considered as a factor involved in successful implementation of the policy of salt reduction in bread. In some other countries, such as Kuwait [31], almost all flour and bread are produced and distributed by the government. Therefore, being a policy-maker and a policy-executer in this area at the same time is an important factor affecting successful implementation of the policy of salt reduction in bread.

    Reduction of salt in bread has faced serious barriers especially in its implementation in Iran. Even as this study mainly discussed use of salt in bread in Iran and given the implementation of the mentioned policy and lack of similar investigations on the implementation method of this policy, the present study can be utilized as a model for several countries with similar or different contexts.



    [1] IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability-Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    [2] IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Retrieved July 1, 2019, Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf.
    [3] Abidoye BO, Kurukulasuriya P, Mendelsohn R (2017) South-East Asian farmer perceptions of climate change. Clim Change Econ 8: 1740006. doi: 10.1142/S2010007817400061
    [4] Konchar KM, Staver B, Salick J, et al. (2015) Adapting in the shadow of Annapurna: a climate tipping point. J Ethnobiol 35: 449-471. doi: 10.2993/0278-0771-35.3.449
    [5] Aldunce P, Handmer J, Beilin R, et al. (2016) Is climate change framed as 'business as usual' or as a challenging issue? The practitioners' dilemma. Environ Plann 34: 999-1019.
    [6] Scheffers BR, Meester L, Bridge TC, et al. (2016) The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people. Science 354: 6313.
    [7] Voccia A (2012) Climate change: What future for small, vulnerable states? Int J Sust Dev World Ecol 19: 101-115. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2011.634032
    [8] Spires M, Shackleton S, Cundill G (2014) Barriers to implementing planned community-based adaptation in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Clim Dev 6: 277-287. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2014.886995
    [9] Bockel L, Vian L, Torre C (2016) Towards sustainable impact monitoring of green agriculture and forestry investments by NDBs: Adapting MRV methodology. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization.
    [10] Glenn A, James WE, Fuller RA (2016) Global mismatch between greenhouse gas emissions and the burden of climate change. Sci Rep 6: 20281. doi: 10.1038/srep20281
    [11] Jackson G, McNamara K, Witt B (2017) A framework for disaster vulnerability in a small island in the Southwest Pacific: A case study of Emae Island, Vanuatu. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 8: 358-373. doi: 10.1007/s13753-017-0145-6
    [12] Easterling WE (1996) Adapting North American agriculture to climate change in review. Agric For Meteorol 80: 1-53. doi: 10.1016/0168-1923(95)02315-1
    [13] FAO (2007) Adaptation to climate change in agriculture, forestry and fisheries: Perspective, framework and priorities. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
    [14] Berrang-Ford L, Pearce T, Ford JD (2015) Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research. Reg Environ Chang 15: 755-769. doi: 10.1007/s10113-014-0708-7
    [15] Ifejika-Speranza C (2010) Resilient adaptation to climate change in African Agriculture. Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE).
    [16] Abiodun BJ, Salami AT, Tadross M (2011) Climate change scenarios for Nigeria: Understanding biophysical impacts. Ibadan, Nigeria: Building Nigeria's Response to Climate Change (BNRCC) Project.
    [17] IPCC (2018) Global warming of 1.5 ℃ Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on climate change.
    [18] NBS (2017) Nigerian Gross Domestic Product Report, Abuja, Nigeria: National Bureau of Statistics.
    [19] Yakubu MM, Akanegbu BN (2015) The Impact of international trade on economic growth in Nigeria: 1981-2012. Eur J Bus Econ Account 3: 26-36.
    [20] Berg A, de Noblet-Ducoudre N, Benjamin S, et al. (2013) Projections of climate change impacts on potential C4 crop productivity over tropical regions. Agric For Meteorol 170: 89-102. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.12.003
    [21] Mereu V, Santini M, Cervigni R, et al (2018) Robust decision making for a climate-resilient development of the agricultural sector in Nigeria. In: Lipper L, McCarthy N, Zilberman D, et al., Eds., Climate Smart Agriculture: Building Resilience to Climate Change, Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 277-306.
    [22] Adejuwon JO (2005) Food crop production in Nigeria. Present effects of climate variability. Clim Res 30: 53-60.
    [23] Odekunle TO (2004) Rainfall and the length of the growing season in Nigeria. Int J Climatol 24: 467-479. doi: 10.1002/joc.1012
    [24] Remling E, Veitayaki J (2016) Community-based action in Fiji's Gau Island: A model for the Pacific? Int J Clim Chang Str Manage 8: 375-398. doi: 10.1108/IJCCSM-07-2015-0101
    [25] Ogbo A, Lauretta NE, Ukpere W (2013) Risk management and challenges of climate change in Nigeria. J Hum Ecol 41: 221-235.
    [26] Obioha EE (2008) Climate change, population drift and violent conflict over land resources in Northeastern Nigeria. J Hum Ecol 23: 311-324. doi: 10.1080/09709274.2008.11906084
    [27] Mburu BM, Kung'u JB, Muriuku JN (2015) Climate change adaptation strategies by small-scale farmers in Yatta District, Kenya. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 9: 712-722. doi: 10.5897/AJEST2015.1926
    [28] Cooper C, Booth A, Varley-Campbell J, et al. (2018) Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: A literature review of guidance and supporting studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 85: 1-14.
    [29] Babatunde KA, Begum RA, Said FF (2017) Application of computable general equilibrium (CGE) to climate change mitigation policy: A systematic review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 78: 61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.064
    [30] Escarcha JF, Lassa JA, Zander KK (2018) Livestock under climate change: A systematic review of impacts and adaptation. Climate 6: 54. doi: 10.3390/cli6030054
    [31] Folke C (2006) Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environ Chang 16: 253-267. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
    [32] Ifejika-Speranza C (2013) Buffer capacity: Capturing a dimension of resilience to climate change in African smallholder agriculture. Reg Environ Chang 13: 521-535. doi: 10.1007/s10113-012-0391-5
    [33] Pretty J (2008) Agricultural sustainability: Concepts, principles and evidence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363: 447-465. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2163
    [34] Dorward A, Anderson S, Clark S (2001) Asset functions and livelihood strategies: A framework for pro-poor analysis, policy and practice. Imperial College at Wye, Department of Agricultural Sciences: ADU Working Papers 10918.
    [35] Shaffril HA, Krauss SE, Samsuddin SF (2018) A systematic review on Asian's farmers' adaptation practices towards climate change. Sci Total Environ 644: 683-695. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.349
    [36] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6: e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
    [37] Singh C, Deshpande T, Basu R (2017) How do we assess vulnerability to climate change in India? A systematic review of literature. Reg Environ Chang 17: 527-538.
    [38] Rusinamhodzi L, Corbeels M, Nyamangara J, et al. (2012) Maize-grain legume intercropping is an attractive option for ecological intensification that reduces climatic risk for smallholder farmers in central Mozambique. Field Crops Res 136: 12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.07.014
    [39] Challinor A, Wheeler T, Garfoth C, et al. (2007) The vulnerability of food crop systems in Africa to climate change. Clim Chang 83: 381-399. doi: 10.1007/s10584-007-9249-0
    [40] Morton JF (2007) The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 19680-19685. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701855104
    [41] Armbrecht I, Gallego-Ropero MC (2007) Testing ant predation on the coffee berry borer in shaded and sun coffee plantations in Colombia. Entomol Exp Appl 124: 261-267. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2007.00574.x
    [42] Lin BB (2011) Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: Adaptive management for environmental change. BioScience 61: 183-193. doi: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.4
    [43] Grubben G, Klaver W, Nono-Womdim R, et al. (2014) Vegetables to combat the hidden hunger in Africa. Chronica Hort 54: 24-32.
    [44] Luoh JW, Begg CB, Symonds RC, et al. (2014) Nutritional yield of African indigenous vegetables in water-deficient and water-sufficient conditions. Food Nutri Sci 5: 812-822.
    [45] Lunduka RW, Mateva KL, Magoroshoko C, et al. (2019) Impact of adoption of drought-tolerant maize varieties on total maize production in south Eastern Zimbabwe. Clim Dev 11: 35-46. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2017.1372269
    [46] Akinnagbe OM, Irohibe IJ (2014) Agricultural adaptation strategies to climate change impacts in Africa: A review. Bangladesh J Agric Res 39: 407-418.
    [47] Waha K, Müller C, Bondeau A, et al. (2013) Adaptation to climate change through the choice of cropping system and sowing date in sub-Saharan Africa. Global Environ Chang 23: 130-143. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.001
    [48] Atedhor GO (2015) Strategies for agricultural adaptation to climate change in Kogi state, Nigeria. Ghana J Geogr 7: 20-37.
    [49] Westengen OT, Brysting AK (2014) Crop adaptation to climate change in the semi-arid zone in Tanzania: The role of genetic resources and seed systems. Agri Food Secur 3: 1-12. doi: 10.1186/2048-7010-3-1
    [50] Sanz MJ, de Vente J, Chotte JL, et al. (2017) Sustainable land management contribution to successful land-based climate change adaptation and mitigation: A report of the science-policy interface. Bonn, Germany: United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD).
    [51] FAO (2017) Voluntary guidelines for sustainable soil management. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization.
    [52] Stavi I (2013) Biochar use in forestry and tree-based agro-ecosystems for increasing climate change mitigation and adaptation. Int J Sust DevWorld Ecol 20: 166-181. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2013.773466
    [53] Lal R (2015) Sequestering carbon and increasing productivity by conservation agriculture. J Soil Water Conserv 70: 55-62. doi: 10.2489/jswc.70.3.55A
    [54] Stavi I, Bel G, Zaady E (2016) Soil functions and ecosystem services in conventional, conservation, and integrated agricultural systems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 36: 1-12. doi: 10.1007/s13593-015-0343-9
    [55] Agbonlahor MU, Aromolaran AB, Aiboni VI (2003) Sustainable soil management practices in small farms of southern Nigeria: A poultry-food crop integrated farming approach. J Sustain Agric 22: 51-62. doi: 10.1300/J064v22n04_05
    [56] Thierfelder C, Matemba-Mutasa R, Rusinamhodzi L (2015) Yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) to conservation agriculture cropping system in Southern Africa. Soil Till Res 146: 230-242.
    [57] Oyekale AS, Oladele OI (2012) Determinants of climate change adaptation among cocoa farmers in Southwest Nigeria. ARPN J Sci Technol 2: 154-168.
    [58] Merrey DJ, Sally H (2008) Micro-AWM Technologies for food security in Southern Africa: Part of the solution or a red herring? Water Policy 10: 515-530. doi: 10.2166/wp.2008.025
    [59] CGIAR (2016) Agricultural practices and technologies to enhance food security, resilience and productivity in a sustainable manner: Messages to SBSTA 44 agriculture workshops, CCAFS Working Paper no. 146, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2016.
    [60] Abraham TW, Fonta WM (2018) Climate change and financing adaptation by farmers in northern Nigeria. Financ Innov 4: 11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-018-0094-0. doi: 10.1186/s40854-018-0094-0
    [61] BNRCC (2011) Reports of pilot projects in community-based adaptation to climate change in Nigeria. Ibadan, Nigeria: Building Nigeria's Response to Climate Change (BNRCC) Project.
    [62] Asfaw A, Simane B, Hassen A, et al. (2017) Determinants of non-farm livelihood diversification: Evidence from rainfed-dependent smallholder farmers in Northcentral Ethiopia (Woleka sub-basin). Dev Stud Res 4: 22-36. doi: 10.1080/21665095.2017.1413411
    [63] Nzegbule EC, Nwajiuba C, Ujor G, et al. (2019) Sustainability and the effectiveness of BNRCC community-based adaptation (CBA) to address climate change impact in Nigeria. In: Leal FW Eds., Handbook of Climate Change Resilience, Cham: Springer, 1-22.
    [64] Akrofi-Atitianti F, Ifejika-Speranza C, Bockel L, et al. (2018) Assessing climate smart agriculture and its determinants of practice in Ghana: A case of the cocoa production system. Land 7: 30. doi: 10.3390/land7010030
    [65] Adepoju AO, Osunbor PP (2018) Small scale poultry farmers' choice of adaption strategies to climate change in Ogun State, Nigeria. Rural Sustain Res 40: 32-40.
    [66] Salem BH, López-Francos A (2012) Feeding and management strategies to improve livestock productivity, welfare and product quality under climate change. 14th International Seminar of the Sub-Network on Nutrition of the FAO-CIHEAM Inter-Regional Cooperative Research and Development Network on Sheep and Goats. Hammamet, Tunisia.
    [67] IAEA (2010) Improving livestock production using indigenous resources and conserving the environment. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency.
    [68] Lamy E, van Harten S, Sales-Baptista E, et al. (2012) Factors influencing livestock productivity. In: Sejian V, Naqvi SM, Ezeji T, et al. Eds., Environmental Stress and Amelioration in Livestock Production, Berlin, Germany: Springer, 19-51.
    [69] Gebremedhin B, Hoekstra D, Jemaneh S (2007) Heading towards commercialization? The case of live animal marketing in Ethiopia. Nairobi, Kenya: Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers. Working Paper 5. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute).
    [70] Batima P (2006) Climate change vulnerability and adaptation in the livestock sector of Mongolia. Washington, DC: Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change (AIACC), Project No. AS 06.
    [71] Okonkwo WI, Akubuo CO (2001) Thermal analysis and evaluation of heat requirement of a passive solar energy poultry chick brooder. Nig J Renew Energ 9: 83-87.
    [72] Nyoni NM, Grab S, Archer ER (2019) Heat stress and chickens: Climate risk effects on rural poultry farming in low-income countries. Clim Dev 11: 83-90. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2018.1442792
    [73] Elijah OA, Adedapo A (2006) The effect of climate on poultry productivity in Ilorin Kwara State, Nigeria. Int J Poult Sci 5: 1061-1068. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2006.1061.1068
    [74] Ampaire A, Rothschild MF (2010) Effects of training and facilitation of farmers in Uganda on livestock development. Livest Res Rural Dev 22: 1-7.
    [75] Shelton C (2014) Climate change adaptation in fisheries and aquaculture: Compilation of initial examples. FAO Fisheries and Agriculture Circular No. 1088. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
    [76] Ficke AD, Myrick CA, Hansen LJ (2007) Potential impacts of global climate change on freshwater fisheries. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 17: 581-613. doi: 10.1007/s11160-007-9059-5
    [77] Nwabeze GO, Erie AP, Erie GO (2012) Fishers' adaptation to climate change in the Jebba Lake Basin, Nigeria. J Agric Ext 16: 68-78.
    [78] Adebayo OO (2012) Climate change perception and adaptation strategies on catfish farming in Oyo State, Nigeria. Glob J Sci Frontier Res Agric Vet Sci 12: 1-7.
    [79] Huq S, Reid H (2007) Community-based adaptation: A vital approach to the threat climate change poses to the poor. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
    [80] Achoja FO, Oguh VO (2018) Income effect of climate change adaptation technologies among crop farmers in Delta State, Nigeria. Int J Agric Rural Dev 21: 3611-3616.
    [81] Agomuo CI, Asiabaka CC, Nnadi FN, et al. (2015) Rural women farmers' use of adaptation strategies to climate change in Imo State. Nigeria Int J Agric Rural Dev 18: 2305-2310.
    [82] Ajayi JO (2015) Adaptation strategies to climate change by farmers in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Appl Trop Agric 20: 01-07.
    [83] Ajieh PC, Okoh RN (2012) Constraints to the implementation of climate change adaptation measures by farmers in delta state, Nigeria. Glob J Sci Frontier Res Agric Vet Sci 12: 1-7.
    [84] Akinbile LA, Oluwafunmilayo AO, Kolade RI (2018) Perceived effect of climate change on forest dependent livelihoods in Oyo State, Nigeria. J Agric Ext 22: 169-179.
    [85] Akinwalere BO (2017) Determinants of adoption of agroforestry practices among farmers in Southwest Nigeria. Appl Trop Agric 22: 67-72.
    [86] Anyoha NO, Nnadi FN, Chikaire J, et al. (2013) Socio-economic factors influencing climate change adaptation among crop farmers in Umuahia South Area of Abia State, Nigeria. Net J Agric Sci 1: 42-47.
    [87] Apata TG (2011) Factors influencing the perception and choice of adaptation measures to climate change among farmers in Nigeria: Evidence from farm households in Southwest Nigeria. Environ Econ 2: 74-83.
    [88] Arimi K (2014) Determinants of climate change adaptation strategies used by rice farmers in Southwestern, Nigeria. J Agr Rural Dev Trop 115: 91-99.
    [89] Asadu AN, Ozioko RI, Dimelu MU (2018) Climate change information source and indigenous adaptation strategies of cucumber farmers in Enugu State, Nigeria. J Agric Ext 22: 136-146.
    [90] Ayanlade A, Radeny M, Morton JF (2017) Comparing smallholder farmers' perception of climate change with meteorological data: A case study from southwestern Nigeria. Weather Clim Extremes 15: 24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2016.12.001
    [91] Ayoade AR (2012) Determinants of climate change on cassava production in Oyo State, Nigeria. Glob J Sci Frontier Res Agric Vet Sci 12: 1-7.
    [92] Chukwuone N (2015) Analysis of impact of climate change on growth and yield of yam and cassava and adaptation strategies by farmers in Southern Nigeria. African Growth and Development Policy Modelling Consortium Working Paper 0012. Dakar-Almadies, Senegal: African Growth and Development Policy Modelling Consortium.
    [93] Chukwuone NA, Chukwuone C, Amaechina EC (2018) Sustainable land management practices used by farm households for climate change adaptation in South East Nigeria. J Agric Ext 22: 185-194.
    [94] Emodi AI, Bonjoru FH (2013) Effects of climate change on rice farming in Ardo Kola Local Government Area of Taraba State, Nigeria. Agric J 8: 17-21.
    [95] Enete AA, Madu II, Mojekwu JC, et al. (2011) Indigenous agricultural adaptation to climate change: Study of Imo and Enugu States in Southeast Nigeria. African Technology Policy Studies Network Working Paper No. 53. Nairobi: African Technology Policy Studies Network.
    [96] Enete AA, Otitoju MA, Ihemezie EJ (2015) The choice of climate change adaptation strategies among food crop farmers in Southwest Nigeria. Nig J Agric Econ 5: 72-80.
    [97] Eregha PB, Babatolu JS, Akinnubi RT (2014) Climate change and crop production in Nigeria: An error correction modelling approach. Int J Energ Econ Policy 4: 297-311.
    [98] Esan VI, Lawi MB, Okedigba I (2018) Analysis of cashew farmers adaptation to climate change in South-Western Nigeria. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Sociol 23: 1-12.
    [99] Ezeh AN, Eze AV (2016) Farm-level adaptation measures to climate change and constraints among arable crop farmers in Ebonyi State of Nigeria. Agric Res J 53: 492-500. doi: 10.5958/2395-146X.2016.00098.3
    [100] Ezike KN (2019) Implications for mitigation and adaptation measures: Rice farmers' response and constraints to climate change in Ivo Local Government Area of Ebonyi State. In: Leal FW Eds., Handbook of Climate Change Resilience, Cham: Springer, 1787-1799.
    [101] Falola A, Achem BA (2017) Perceptions on climate change and adaptation strategies among sweet potato farming households in Kwara State, Northcentral Nigeria. Ceylon J Sci 46: 55-63.
    [102] Farauta BK, Egbule CL, Idrisa YL, et al. (2011) Farmers' perceptions of climate change and adaptation strategies in Northern Nigeria: An empirical assessment. African Technology Policy Studies Network Research Paper No 15. Nairobi, Kenya: African Technology Policy Studies Network.
    [103] Henri-Ukoha A, Adesope OM (2019) Sustainability of climate change adaptation measures in Rivers State, South-South, Nigeria. In: Leal FW, Eds., Handbook of Climate Change Resilience, Cham: Springer, 675-683.
    [104] Ifeanyi-Obi CC, Asiabaka CC, Matthews-Njoku E, et al. (2012) Effects of climate change on fluted pumpkin production and adaptation measures used among farmers in Rivers State. J Agric Ext 16: 50-58.
    [105] Ifeanyi-Obi CC, Asiabaka CC, Adesope OM (2014) Determinants of climate change adaptation measures used by crop and livestock farmers in Southeast Nigeria. J Human Soc Sci 19: 61-70.
    [106] Igwe AA (2018) Effect of livelihood factors on climate change adaptation of rural farmers in Ebonyi State. J Biol Agric Healthc 8: 10-15.
    [107] Iheke OR, Agodike WC (2016) Analysis of factors influencing the adoption of climate change mitigating measures by smallholder farmers in Imo State, Nigeria. Sci Papers Ser Manag Econ Eng Agric Rural Dev 16: 213-220.
    [108] Ihenacho RA, Orusha JO, Onogu B (2019) Rural farmers use of indigenous knowledge systems in agriculture for climate change adaptation and mitigation in Southeast Nigeria. Ann Ecol Environ Sci 3: 1-11.
    [109] Ikehi ME, Onu FM, Ifeanyieze FO, et al. (2014) Farming families and climate change issues in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria: Extent of impact and adaptation strategies. Agric Sci 5: 1140-1151.
    [110] Kim I, Elisha I, Lawrence E, et al. (2017) Farmers adaptation strategies to the effect of climate variation on rice production: Insight from Benue State, Nigeria. Environ Ecol Res 5: 289-301.
    [111] Koyenikan MJ. Anozie O (2017) Climate change adaptation needs of male and female oil palm entrepreneurs in Edo State, Nigeria. J Agric Ext 21: 162-175.
    [112] Mbah EN, Ezeano CI, Saror SF (2016) Analysis of climate change effects among rice farmers in Benue State, Nigeria. Curr Res Agric Sci 3: 7-15.
    [113] Mustapha SB, Undiandeye UC, Gwary MM (2012) The role of extension in agricultural adaptation to climate change in the Sahelian Zone of Nigeria. J Environ Earth Sci 2: 48-58.
    [114] Mustapha SB, Alkali A, Zongoma BA, et al. (2017) Effects of climatic factors on preference for climate change adaptation strategies among food crop farmers in Borno State, Nigeria. Int Acad Inst Sci Technol 4: 23-31.
    [115] Nnadi FN, Chikaire J, Nnadi CD, et al. (2012) Sustainable land management practices for climate change adaptation in Imo State, Nigeria. J Emerg Trends Eng Appl Sci 3: 801-805.
    [116] Nwaiwu IU, Ohajianya DO, Orebiyi JS, et al. (2014) Climate change trend and appropriate mitigation and adaptation strategies in Southeast Nigeria. Glob J Biol Agric Health Sci 3: 120-125.
    [117] Nwalieji HU, Onwubuya EA (2012) Adaptation practices to climate change among rice farmers in Anambra State of Nigeria. J Agric Ext 16: 42-49.
    [118] Nwankwo GC, Nwaobiala UC, Ekumankama OO, et al. (2017) Analysis of perceived effect of climate change and adaptation among cocoa farmers in Ikwuano Local Government Area of Abia State, Nigeria. ARPN J Sci Technol 7: 1-7.
    [119] Nzeadibe TC, Egbule CL, Chukwuone NA, et al. (2011) Climate change awareness and adaptation in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Nairobi, Kenya: African Technology Policy Studies Network Working Paper Series No.57. Nairobi, Kenya: African Technology Policy Studies Network.
    [120] Obayelu OA, Adepoju AO, Idowu T (2014) Factors influencing farmers' choices of adaptation to climate change in Ekiti State, Nigeria. J Agric Environ Int Dev 108: 3-16.
    [121] Ofuoku AU (2011) Rural farmers' perception of climate change in central agricultural zone of Delta State, Nigeria. Indones J Agric Sci 12: 63-69. doi: 10.21082/ijas.v12n2.2011.p63-69
    [122] Ogbodo JA, Anarah SE, Abubakar SM (2018) GIS-based assessment of smallholder farmers' perception of climate change impacts and their adaptation strategies for maize production in Anambra State, Nigeria. In: Amanullah, & S. Fahad (Eds.), Corn production and human health in changing climate, 115-138.
    [123] Ogogo AU, Ekong MU, Ifebueme NM (2019) Climate change awareness and adaptation measures among farmers in Cross River and Akwa Ibom States of Nigeria. In: Leal FW (Ed), Handbook of Climate Change Resilience, 1983-2002, Cham: Springer.
    [124] Okpe B, Aye GC (2015) Adaptation to climate change by farmers in Makurdi, Nigeria. J Agric Ecol Res Int 2: 46-57.
    [125] Oluwatusin FM (2014) The perception of and adaptation to climate change among cocoa farm households in Ondo State, Nigeria. Acad J Interdiscipli Stud 3: 147-156.
    [126] Oluwole AJ, Shuaib L, Dasgupta P (2016) Assessment of level of use of climate change adaptation strategies among arable crop farmers in Oyo and Ekiti States, Nigeria. J Earth Sci Clim Chang 7: 369.
    [127] Onyeagocha SU, Nwaiwu IU, Obasi PC, et al. (2018) Encouraging climate smart agriculture as part solution to the negative effects of climate change on agricultural sustainability in Southeast Nigeria. Int J Agric Rural Dev 21: 3600-3610.
    [128] Onyegbula CB, Oladeji JO (2017) Utilization of climate change adaptation strategies among rice farmers in three states of Nigeria. J Agric Ext Rural Dev 9: 223-229. doi: 10.5897/JAERD2017.0895
    [129] Onyekuru NA (2017) Determinants of adaptation strategies to climate change in Nigerian forest communities. Nig Agric Policy Res J 3: 42-59.
    [130] Onyeneke RU (2016) Effects of livelihood strategies on sustainable land management practices among food crop farmers in Imo State, Nigeria. Nig J Agric Food Environ 12: 230-235.
    [131] Onyeneke RU (2018) Challenges of adaptation to climate change by farmers Anambra State, Nigeria. Int J BioSciences Agric Technol 9: 1-7.
    [132] Onyeneke RU, Madukwe DK (2010) Adaptation measures by crop farmers in the Southeast Rainforest Zone of Nigeria to climate change. Sci World J 5: 32-34.
    [133] Onyeneke RU, Iruo FA, Ogoko IM (2012) Micro-level analysis of determinants of farmers' adaptation measures to climate change in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria: Lessons from Bayelsa State. Nig J Agric Econ 3: 9-18.
    [134] Tarfa PY, Ayuba HK, Onyeneke RU, et al. (2019) Climate change perception and adaptation in Nigeria's Guinea Savanna: Empirical evidence from farmers in Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17: 7085-7112.
    [135] Onyeneke R, Mmagu CJ, Aligbe JO (2017) Crop farmers' understanding of climate change and adaptation practices in South-east Nigeria. World Rev Sci Technol Sust Dev 13: 299-318. doi: 10.1504/WRSTSD.2017.089544
    [136] Oriakhi LO, Ekunwe PA, Erie GO, et al. (2017) Socio-economic determinants of farmers' adoption of climate change adaptation strategies in Edo State, Nigeria. Nig J Agric Food Environ 13: 115-121.
    [137] Orowole PF, Okeowo TA, Obilaja OA (2015) Analysis of level of awareness and adaptation strategies to climate change among crop farmers in Lagos State, Nigeria. Int J Appl Res Technol 4: 8-15.
    [138] Oruonye ED (2014) An Assessment of the level of awareness of climate change and variability among rural farmers in Taraba State, Nigeria. Int J Sustain Agric Res 1: 70-84.
    [139] Oselebe HO, Nnamani CV, Efisue A, et al. (2016) Perceptions of climate change and variability, impacts and adaptation strategies by rice farmers in south east Nigeria. Our Nature 14: 54-63.
    [140] Oti OG, Enete AA, Nweze NJ (2019) Effectiveness of climate change adaptation practices of farmers in Southeast Nigeria: An empirical approach. Int J Agric Rural Dev 22: 4094-4099.
    [141] Owombo PT, Koledoye GF, Ogunjimi SI, et al. (2014) Farmers' adaptation to climate change in Ondo State, Nigeria: A gender analysis. J Geog Reg Plann 7: 30-35. doi: 10.5897/JGRP12.071
    [142] Ozor N, Madukwe MC, Enete AA, et al. (2012) A framework for agricultural adaptation to climate change in Southern Nigeria. Int J Agric 4: 243-251.
    [143] Sangotegbe NS, Odebode SO, Onikoyi MP (2012) Adaptation strategies to climate change by food crop farmers in Oke-Ogun Area of South Western Nigeria. J Agric Ext 16: 119-131.
    [144] Sanni DO (2018) Local knowledge of climate change among arable farmers in selected locations in Southwestern Nigeria. In: Leal FW, Eds., Handbook of Climate Change Resilience, Cham: Springer, 1-18.
    [145] Solomon E, Edet OG (2018) Determinants of climate change adaptation strategies among farm households in Delta State, Nigeria. Curr Invest Agric Curr Res 5: 615-620.
    [146] Tanko L, Muhsinat BS (2014) Arable crop farmers' adaptation to climate change in Abuja, Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria. J Agric Crop Res 2: 152-159.
    [147] Usman MN, Ibrahim FD, Tanko L (2016) Perception and adaptation of crop farmers to climate change to in Niger State, Nigeria. Nig J Agric Food Environ 12: 186-193.
    [148] Uzokwe UN, Okonkwo JC (2012) Survival strategies of women farmers against climate change in Delta State and implication for extension services. Banat J Biotechnol 3: 97-103.
    [149] Weli VE, Bajie S (2017) Adaptation of Root crop farming system to climate change in Ikwerre Local Government Area of Rivers State, Nigeria. Am J Clim Chang 6: 40-51. doi: 10.4236/ajcc.2017.61003
    [150] Chah JM, Odo E, Asadu AN, et al. (2013) Poultry farmers' adaptation to climate change in Enugu North Agricultural Zone of Enugu State, Nigeria. J Agric Ext 17: 100-114
    [151] Chah JM, Attamah CO, Odoh EM (2018) Differences in climate change effects and adaptation strategies between male and female livestock entrepreneurs in Nsukka Agricultural Zone of Enugu State, Nigeria. J Agric Ext 22: 105-115
    [152] Ibrahim FD, Azemheta T (2016) Climate change effects and perception on smallholder poultry farms in Lokoja Local Government Area of Kogi State: Implications for Policy Intervention. Nig J Agric Food Environ 12: 164-173.
    [153] Tologbonse EB, Iyiola-Tunji AO, Issa FO, et al. (2011) Assessment of climate change adaptive strategies in small ruminant production in rural Nigeria. J Agric Ext 15: 40-57.
    [154] Ume SI, Ezeano CI, Anozie R (2018) Climate change and adaptation coping strategies among sheep and goat farmers in Ivo Local Government Area of Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Sustain Agri Food Environ Res 6: 50-68.
    [155] Adeleke ML, Omoboyeje VO (2016) Effects of climate change on aquaculture production and management in Akure Metropolis, Ondo State, Nigeria. Nig J of Fish Aquacult 4: 50-58.
    [156] Aphunu A, Nwabeze GO (2012) Fish farmers' perception of climate change impact on fish production in Delta State, Nigeria. J Agric Ext 16: 1-13.
    [157] Owolabi ES, Olokor J (2016) Climate change and fish farmers adaptation: A case study of New Bussa fishing population. J Natur Sci Res 6: 123-141.
    [158] Amusa TA, Okoye CU, Enete AA (2015) Determinants of climate change adaptation among farm households in Southwest Nigeria: A heckman's double stage selection approach. Rev Agric Appl Econ 18: 3-11.
    [159] NEST, Woodley E (2012) Learning from experience: Community-based adaptation to climate change in Nigeria. Ibadan, Nigeria: Building Nigeria's response to climate change.
    [160] BNRCC, FederalMinistry of Environment (2011) National Adaptation Strategy and Plan of Action on Climate Change for Nigeria (NASPA-CCN). Abuja, Nigeria: Federal Ministry of Environment (Climate Change Department).
    [161] Oladipo E (2010) Towards enhancing the adaptive capacity of Nigeria: A Review of the Country's state of preparedness for climate change adaptation. Abuja, Nigeria: Report Submitted to Heinrich Böll Foundation Nigeria.
    [162] Tijjani AR, Chikaire JU (2016) Fish farmers perception of the effects of climate change on water resource use in Rivers State, Nigeria. J Sci Eng Res 3: 347-353.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Jalila El Ati, Radhouene Doggui, Myriam El Ati-Hellal, A Successful Pilot Experiment of Salt Reduction in Tunisian Bread: 35% Gradual Decrease of Salt Content without Detection by Consumers, 2021, 18, 1660-4601, 1590, 10.3390/ijerph18041590
    2. Neda Kabiri, Rahim Khodayari‐zarnaq, Manouchehr Khoshbaten, Ali Janati, Policy Analysis of Gastrointestinal Cancer Prevention in Iran: A Framework Based on a Qualitative Study, 2021, 1948-4682, 10.1002/wmh3.389
    3. Davit Pipoyan Ashot, Astghik Hovhannisyan Sergey, Meline Beglaryan Radik, Seda Stepanyan Arthur, Alberto Mantovani, Risk assessment of dietary exposure to potentially toxic trace elements in emerging countries: A pilot study on intake via flour-based products in Yerevan, Armenia, 2020, 146, 02786915, 111768, 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111768
    4. Mostafa Amini-Rarani, Seyed Haashem Abutoraabi, Mehdi Nosratabadi, Maria Rosaria Corbo, The Role of Social Health and Demographic Factors in Bread Quality: An Ecological Study in Isfahan, Iran, 2021, 2021, 1745-4557, 1, 10.1155/2021/6654573
    5. Sirous Pourkhajoei, Vahid Yazdi‐Feyzabadi, Mohamadreza Amiresmaeili, Nouzar Nakhaee, Reza Goudarzi, Mean population salt intake in Iran: A systematic review and meta‐analysis, 2022, 5, 2398-8835, 10.1002/hsr2.855
    6. Suene V.S. Souza, Nuno Borges, Elsa F. Vieira, Vitamin d-fortified bread: Systematic review of fortification approaches and clinical studies, 2022, 372, 03088146, 131325, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131325
    7. Ramesh Allipour Birgani, Ali kianirad, Amirhossain Takian, hamed Pouraram, Bread Wastage in Iran during 2001-2021: A Systematic Review, 2021, 20, 1680-7626, 687, 10.52547/payesh.20.6.687
    8. Mohammad Amerzadeh, Amirhossein Takian, Hamed Pouraram, Ali Akbari Sari, Afshin Ostovar, Policy analysis of socio-cultural determinants of salt, sugar and fat consumption in Iran, 2022, 8, 2055-0928, 10.1186/s40795-022-00518-7
    9. Shahin Ghaziani, Delaram Ghodsi, Karsten Schweikert, Gholamreza Dehbozorgi, Shiva Faghih, Shabnam Mohabati, Reiner Doluschitz, Household Food Waste Quantification and Cross-Examining the Official Figures: A Study on Household Wheat Bread Waste in Shiraz, Iran, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 1188, 10.3390/foods11091188
    10. Ayoub Al-Jawaldeh, Alexa Meyer, 2023, 978-1-80064-863-0, 10.11647/OBP.0322
    11. Naiema Vakili Saatloo, Boshra Ebrahiminejad, Parisa Sadighara, Leila Manafi, Najmeh Yazdanfar, Saeid Fallahizadeh, Quantification and human health risk assessment of cadmium and lead in wheat flour on the Iranian market by atomic absorption spectrometry, 2023, 8, 26660164, 100438, 10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100438
    12. Siqi Yang, Baodong Zheng, Luyao Huang, Yi Zhang, Hongliang Zeng, Saltiness perception mechanism and salt reduction strategies in food, 2024, 148, 09242244, 104521, 10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104521
    13. Mohammad Amerzadeh, Amirhossein Takian, Hamed Pouraram, Ali Akbari Sari, Afshin Ostovar, A policy package for socio-cultural factors of promoting healthy diet in Iran, 2024, 2251-6581, 10.1007/s40200-024-01449-9
    14. Giti Kashi, Investigating the mildew and yeast in the bakeries of Abhar City, Iran, 2024, 10, 24058440, e37956, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37956
    15. Naser Kalantari, Morteza Abdollahi, Parisa Amiri, Farid Zayeri, Neda Ezzeddin, Strength and weakness of the National Nutrition Improvement Program in Rural and Nomadic Women: findings from a policy triangle framework, 2023, 7, 2571-581X, 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1171654
    16. Mina Esmaeili, Zahra Kamali, Morteza Abdollahi, Anahita Houshiarrad, Mohammad Soleimani, Soroush Nematollahi, Zahra Abdollahi, Forouzan Salehi, Marjan Ajami, Ali Milani-Bonab, The status of sodium intake and excretion and the primary dietary sources of sodium in Iranian adults, a comprehensive pilot study, 2025, 14, 2574-0954, 10.1097/XCE.0000000000000322
    17. Ali Massomian, Azadeh Rashidimehr, Fatemeh Mohammadi‐Nasrabadi, Khadijeh Khoshtinat, Fatemeh Esfarjani, Salt Contents in Fermented Dairy Products: A Strategic Blueprint for Healthier Intake, 2025, 13, 2048-7177, 10.1002/fsn3.4762
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(14468) PDF downloads(1514) Cited by(24)

Figures and Tables

Figures(9)  /  Tables(8)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog