
Citation: Theresa A. Nicklas, Carol E. O'Neil. Prevalence of Obesity: A Public Health Problem Poorly Understood[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2014, 1(2): 109-122. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2014.2.109
[1] | Farhana Sultana, Hasan Mahmud Reza . Are SAARC countries prepared to combat COVID-19 to save young, working-age population?. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(3): 440-449. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020036 |
[2] | Nguyen Tuan Hung, Vu Thu Trang, Trinh Van Tung, Nguyen Xuan Long, Ha Thi Thu, Tran Song Giang, Tran Hoang Thi Diem Ngoc, Vu Thi Thanh Mai, Nguyen Kim Oanh, Nguyen Thi Phuong, Nguyen Hang Nguyet Van, Nguyen Hanh Dung, Pham Tien Nam . COVID-19-related music-video-watching among the Vietnamese population: lessons on health education. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(3): 428-438. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021033 |
[3] | Areeb Khalid, Muhammad Waqar Younas, Hashim Khan, Muhammad Sarfraz Khan, Abdur Rehman Malik, Adam Umair Ashraf Butt, Basit Ali . Relationship between knowledge on COVID-19 and psychological distress among students living in quarantine: an email survey. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(1): 90-99. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021007 |
[4] | Itse Olaoye, Aniebet Ekong, Abiona Samuel, Eirini Kelaiditi, Kyriaki Myrissa, Tsemaye Jacdonmi, Famokun Gboyega . Public beliefs and willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccines among adults in South-Western Nigeria: A cross-sectional study. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(1): 1-15. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023001 |
[5] | Christopher Kitchen, Elham Hatef, Hsien Yen Chang, Jonathan P Weiner, Hadi Kharrazi . Assessing the association between area deprivation index on COVID-19 prevalence: a contrast between rural and urban U.S. jurisdictions. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(3): 519-530. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021042 |
[6] | María D Figueroa-Pizano, Alma C Campa-Mada, Elizabeth Carvajal-Millan, Karla G Martinez-Robinson, Agustin Rascon Chu . The underlying mechanisms for severe COVID-19 progression in people with diabetes mellitus: a critical review. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(4): 720-742. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021057 |
[7] | Theodoros Pesiridis, Petros Galanis, Eleni Anagnostopoulou, Athena Kalokerinou, Panayota Sourtzi . Providing care to patients with COVID-19 in a reference hospital: health care staff intentional behavior and factors that affect it. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(3): 456-466. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021035 |
[8] | Ahmed A Mohsen, Hassan Fadhil AL-Husseiny, Xueyong Zhou, Khalid Hattaf . Global stability of COVID-19 model involving the quarantine strategy and media coverage effects. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(3): 587-605. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020047 |
[9] | Sushant K Singh . COVID-19: A master stroke of Nature. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(2): 393-402. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020033 |
[10] | Ali Moussaoui, El Hadi Zerga . Transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in Algeria: The impact of physical distancing and face masks. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(4): 816-827. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020063 |
COVID-19 is a novel corona virus which is currently treated as severe pneumonia [1] and reportedly has a very high human-to-human transmission risk [2],[3]. COVID-19 was declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in January 2020 [4] and in March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic and since it has affected 213 countries and two international conveyances [5]–[7]. In Pakistan, the Ministry of Health and government of Pakistan confirmed the first case of COVID-19 on February 26, 2020 in Karachi, the capital of the province of Sindh [8]. The early cases of COVID-19 were reported in pilgrims returning from Iran, Iraq, and Syria who were crossing the bordering city Taftan, Balochistan, and reportedly then travelling to other cities, mainly to Karachi and Gilgit-Baltistan. Within a few weeks time, the numbers of COVID-19 cases soared rapidly; affecting every province and territory in Pakistan. Although initially COVID-19 was mainly reported in travellers, with time there was an increase in community transmission. To deal with the pandemic, and following the international protocol [9], the federal government-imposed lockdowns, travel restrictions, and a ban on mass public gatherings to control the spread of COVID-19.
In Pakistan, a common public believe is that the transmission of COVID-19 will decrease with the rise in temperature during the summer season [10]. Human-to-human contact is key in the transmission of viral illnesses such as influenza, however environmental factors such as humidity, temperature [11],[12], wind [13], and sun exposure [14] play an important role in disease transmission. In other corona viruses such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) [15]–[17] and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) [18],[19], climatic factors are known to affect viral transmission. Climatic factors such as temperature [20] and humidity [21] affects factors such as viral viability and persistence [12], as well as people's behavior and decisions—such as meeting for social gatherings [22]. As compared to the better-known corona viruses, COVID-19 is a novel infection and an exact comparison to transmission and mortality is not available. Comparisons are difficult, potentially due to the differences in transmission such as the rapid spread that created limitations in hospital resources that stretched hospitals beyond their capabilities [23]. Although many symptoms of COVID-19 are the same as the seasonal flu, COVID-19 is different than the common flu in terms of the incubation period, transmission, effects on age groups, and risk factors associated with COVID-19 [24].
With the continuous increase in the number of COVID-19 cases and speculations about the second wave throughout the world, there is need for a high level of action, proper, and thoughtful planning, and management [25]. It will be important to explore the transmissibility of COVID-19 and any association with climatic factors that affect daily incidence, mortality, and recovery rate [26]. As Pakistan does not have uniform weather throughout all provinces and territories, having an understanding about the transmission of COVID-19 during natural environment and climatic changes will be helpful to support decision-making related to disease control. The goal of this article was to explore whether climatic factors such as humidity, wind, temperature, and sun exposure influence the transmission of COVID-19.
To conduct this analysis, data was collected from various websites and online sources as reported in previous studies [15],[16],[25],[27],[28], thus ethical approval was not needed. No web scrapping software or programs were used, and data was not altered in any regards. Data was compared to multiple other sources to confirm authenticity.
Population data: COVID-19 cases, deaths, recovery and daily testing for each province and, Islamabad, as well as Gilgit-Baltistan and Azad Kashmir were collected online [29]–[31] from March 10 to July 10th, 2020.
Weather data: Weather data [31]–[34] consisted of daily mean humidity and wind, daily maximum and minimum temperature and sun status. Reports of “broken clouds” and “partly sunny” were merged with “cloudy days”, and “scattered clouds” were merged with “sunny days”.
Statistical analysis: Descriptively we reported the cumulative incidence data, deaths, and daily recovery for each province and territory. Continuous variable such as wind (KM/H), humidity (%) and temperature (°C) were reported with mean and standard deviation (SD); whereas categorical data such as daily tests, sunny days, lock down status were reported with numbers and proportions.
Data was analyzed with a log link of negative binomial distribution using the generalized linear mixed model [35],[36]. We chose to use a negative binominal regression model as it is more suitable for count data [36]. The model of fit was determined with the likelihood ratio [37] and the outcome for each territory was reported separately. Besides weather data, the analysis was also adjusted for other variables such as lock down status (lock down vs. smart lock down vs. no lock down) and maximum daily testing status (≥10,000 vs. <10,000). In March-May of 2020 there were few nationwide events that required mass gatherings during which standard operating procedures (SOP) were potentially compromised. The nationwide events included religious events that required mass gatherings, Ramadan (iftar parties), and Eid days. As the incubation period for COVID-19 is 3 to 14 days, we included the following 14 days as a continuation for each nationwide event. First, we analyzed the association of climatic factors, lock down status, maximum daily testing with outcomes variable in univarable analysis. All variables were included in the final analysis for COVID-19 incidence, but the analyses for daily deaths and recovery were not adjusted for lock down status, number of daily testing, and nationwide social events. As humidity correlates with temperature, the interaction between humidity and temperature [11] was included in our secondary analysis. The effect estimates were reported with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS v.25. statistical software.
A summary of cumulative COVID-19 cases, deaths, and recoveries are reported in Table 1. As of July 10th, 2020, there were 246,351 confirmed cases of COVID-19—5,123 (2.07%) patients died and 153,134 (62.16%) recovered. Sindh was the most affected province in the country, with a confirmed 102,368 (41.55%) cases, whereas Azad Kashmir region (AZK) had the lowest cumulative cases of COVID-19 (0.62%). Daily mortality rate was highest in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) (3.60%) followed by AZK (2.74%). Most recoveries occurred in Gilgit Baltistan (79.93%) followed by Islamabad (74.00%). Figure 1 shows cumulative COVID-19 cases, death, and recoveries. Figure 2 shows the reported daily cases and tests conducted in Pakistan as well as the number of daily COVID-19 cases corresponding with the number of daily tests and trends in daily cases over 123 days. The peaks in daily cases corresponded with the 3–14 day incubation period and were associated with nationwide events and the loosening of lock down restrictions.
REGION | Cumulative incidence | Cumulative Deaths | Cumulative Recovery | Total tests | Mean Wind (KM/H) | Mean Humidity (%) | Mean Temperature-Max (C) mean (SD) | Mean temperature-Min (C) mean (SD) | Sunny Day |
Sindh | 102,368 (41.55%) |
1,713 (33.43%) (1.67%) * |
59,185 (38.64%) (57.81%) * |
254,559 (33.36%) | 16.39 (5.37) | 61.91 (11.63) | 35.23 (3.60) | 26.32 (4.25) | 98 (79.7%) |
Punjab | 85,991 (34.90%) |
1,985 (38.74%) (2.30%) * |
53,836 (35.15%) (62.60%) * |
302,720 (39.67%) | 11.95 (7.35) | 53.41 (15.67) | 34.13 (6.19) | 22.06 (5.7) | 103 (83.7%) |
KPK | 29,775 (12.08%) |
1,074 (20.96%) (3.60%) * |
20,271 (13.23%) (68.08%) * |
84,842 (11.11%) | 14.19 (6.83) | 52.24 (15.62) | 31.86 (6.59) | 20.63 (5.73) | 83 (67.5%9) |
Balochistan | 11,128 (4.51%) |
126 (2.45%) (1.132%) * |
7,224 (4.71%) (64.91%) * |
33,283 (4.36%) | 18.24 (11.99) | 32.08 (18.07) | 28.37 (7.50) | 16.86 (7.33) | 102 (82.9%) |
Islamabad | 13,927 (5.65%) |
147 (2.86%) (1.05%) * |
10,441 (6.81) (74.96%) * |
65,634 (8.601%) | 12.53 (8.09) | 50.83 (20.38) | 31.43 (6.20) | 20.21 (5.49) | 63 (51.2%) |
Gilgit Baltistan | 1,630 (0.66%) |
36 (0.7%) (2.20%) * |
1,303 (0.85%) (79.93%) * |
12,579 (1.64%) | 2.60 (2.49) | 58.19 (19.64) | 25.60 (6.79) | 13.50 (5.95) | 60 (48.8%) |
Azad Kashmir | 1,532 (0.62%) |
42 (0.81%) (2.74%) * |
94 (0.58%) (58.35%) * |
9,437 (1.23%) | 4.39 (5.88) | 57.35 (18.51) | 28.11 (6.21) | 16.14 (5.09) | 60 (48.8%) |
Total | 246,351 1109 cases/million |
5,123 (2.07%) 23 deaths/million |
153,134 (62.16%) 689 recoveries/million |
763,054 |
Note: KPK: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; * = proportions from the total cases of each region
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.11 (1.06, 1.15) |
1.04 (1.00, 1.07) |
1.04 (1.01, 1.07) |
1.01 (0.99, 1.03) |
1.01 (0.99, 1.04) |
1.01 (0.93, 1.10) |
0.99 (0.95, 1.02) |
Humidity | 1.03 (1.01, 1.04) |
0.98 (0.97, 0.99) |
0.96 (0.95, 0.97) |
0.98 (0.97, 0.99) |
0.98 (0.97, 0.99) |
0.99 (0.98, 1.00) |
0.97 (0.96, 0.98) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.59 (1.45, 1.74) |
1.20 (1.15, 1.24) |
1.18 (1.14, 1.21) |
1.12 (1.09, 1.15) |
1.22 (1.18, 1.26) |
1.05 (1.02, 1.08) |
1.19 (1.14, 1.23) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.30 (1.26, 1.34) |
1.15 (1.12, 1.18) |
1.23 (1.19, 1.28) |
1.11 (1.08, 1.15) |
1.28 (1.24, 1.33) |
1.04 (1.01, 1.07) |
1.18 (1.14, 1.23) |
Sunny Day (Sunny day; Ref = No) | 0.76 (0.49, 1.18) |
1.15 (0.71, 1.85) |
0.54 (0.37, 0.79) |
1.18 (0.74, 1.90) |
0.41 (0.29, 0.59) |
0.68 (0.47, 0.99) |
0.40 (0.28, 0.588) |
Lock down stat (Ref = Lock down period) | 3.2 (2.12, 4.81) |
2.92 (1.94, 4.40) |
2.20 (1.46, 3.31) |
2.42 (1.60, 3.65) |
9.29, (6.13, 14.10) |
2.42 (1.57, 3.73) |
5.06 (3.15, 8.14) |
Smart lock down stat (Ref = Lock down period) | 7.87 (4.77, 12.97) |
4.76 (2.89, 7.85) |
4.22 (2.55, 6.95) |
2.51 (1.51, 4.14) |
14.11 (8.50, 23.41) |
3.09 (1.83, 5.20) |
17.71 (10.19, 30.80) |
Nationwide Events* | 0.74 (0.52, 1.06) |
1.12 (0.78, 1.61) |
1.00 (0.70, 1.44) |
1.72 (1.20, 2.47) |
1.53 (1.06, 2.19) |
1.08 (0.74, 1.57) |
0.80 (0.55, 1.16) |
10000/Daily Test | 10.28 (7.20, 14.68) |
8.43 (5.9, 12.04) |
6.88 (4.81, 9.84) |
6.58 (4.59, 9.44) |
26.46 (18.30, 38.25) |
2.81 (1.93, 4.08) |
16.64 (10.85, 25.53) |
COVID-19 Daily Cases—Multivariable Analysis [OR (95%CI)] | |||||||
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.010 (0.969, 1.053) |
1.009 (0.980, 1.039) |
0.998 (0.968, 1.028) |
1.020 (0.999, 1.041) |
0.997 (0.973, 1.022) |
0.985 (0.904, 1.073) |
0.974 (0.939, 1.010) |
Humidity | 0.996 (0.977, 1.015) |
1.001 (0.983, 1.019) |
1.010 (0.992, 1.028) |
1.004 (0.989, 1.019) |
1.015 (1.004, 1.026) |
1.001 (0.991, 1.011) |
0.999 (0.984, 1.014) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.075 (0.965, 1.197) |
1.044 (0.986, 1.106) |
1.009 (0.916, 1.106) |
1.017 (0.949, 1.090) |
1.068 (1.004, 1.136) |
1.027 (0.969, 1.089) |
1.011 (0.941, 1.085) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.130 (1.040, 1.228) |
1.043 (0.989, 1.101) |
1.150 (1.040, 1.271) |
1.055 (0.996, 1.117) |
1.105 (1.032, 1.182) |
0.984 (0.925, 1.046) |
1.012 (0.942, 1.087) |
Sunny Day (Sunny day; Ref = No) | 0.959 (0.587, 1.567) |
1.209 (0.720, 2.029) |
0.979 0.606, 1.58 |
0.780 (0.470, 1.296) |
1.047 (0.680, 1.612) |
1.154 (0.701, 1.900) |
0.976 (0.594, 1.604) |
Lock down stat (Ref = Lock down period) | 1.025 (0.426, 2.465) |
0.611 (0.263, 1.421) |
0.401 0.169, 0.951 |
0.344 (0.198, 0.598) |
0.674 (0.352, 1.293) |
1.550 (0.882, 2.725) |
0.636 (0.273, 1.485) |
Smart lock down stat (Ref = Lock down period) | 2.868 (0.624, 13.175) |
1.222 (0.240, 6.217) |
0.552 0.111, 2.751 |
0.180 (0.073, 0.446) |
0.754 (0.292, 1.949) |
1.608 (0.671, 3.851) |
3.243 (1.069, 9.843) |
Nationwide Events* | 1.963 (0.844, 4.565) |
2.262 (0.991, 5.161) |
1.710 0.759, 3.855 |
1.010 (0.589, 1.733) |
1.761 (1.008, 3.079) |
1.025 (0.624, 1.684) |
2.803 (1.581, 4.969) |
10000/Daily Test | 3.273 (1.115, 9.609) |
5.548 (1.955, 15.74) |
4.9305 (1.622, 14.833) |
9.963 (4.049, 24.514) |
9.496 (3.644, 24.748) |
2.173 (1.031, 4.580) |
9.470 (3.473, 25.819) |
Note: * Includes both religious or nation-wide social event that required mass gatherings or when the SOP were potentially not strictly followed. KPK: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; ISBD: Islamabad; GILGIT: Gilgit Baltistan; AZK: Azad Kashmir. The p-value for the model fit for each region (analysis) was <0.001.
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.10 (1.05, 1.14) |
1.05 (1.02, 1.09) |
1.02 (1.00, 1.05) |
1.029 (1.00, 1.05) |
0.99 (0.96, 1.02) |
0.99 (0.84, 1.16) |
0.99 (0.92, 1.05) |
Humidity | 1.04 (1.02, 1.06) |
0.99 (0.97, 1.00) |
0.96 (0.95, 0.97) |
0.96 (0.95, 0.98) |
0.98 (0.97, 1.00) |
0.98 (0.96, 1.00) |
0.97 (0.95, 0.99) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.45 (1.29, 1.62) |
1.20 (1.15, 1.26) |
1.15 (1.11, 1.19) |
1.09 (1.05, 1.14) |
1.18 (1.12, 1.25) |
1.15 (1.07, 1.24) |
1.24 (1.12, 1.37) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.46 (1.36, 1.56) |
1.26 (1.20, 1.32) |
1.17 (1.12, 1.21) |
1.07 (1.03, 1.12) |
1.27 (1.18, 1.36) |
1.15 (1.07, 1.24) |
1.23 (1.12, 1.35) |
Sunny Day | 0.98 (0.56, 1.41) |
1.11 (0.67, 1.81) |
0.52 (0.35, 0.78) |
1.94 (1.05, 3.56) |
0.42 (0.25, 0.69) |
0.23 (0.09, 0.56) |
0.26 (0.11, 0.58) |
COVID-19 Daily Deaths—Multivariable Analysis [OR (95%CI)] | |||||||
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.018 (0.976, 1.062) |
1.019 (0.985, 1.054) |
1.009 (0.979, 1.040) |
1.020 (0.996, 1.045) |
0.969 (0.932, 1.007) |
0.913 (0.741, 1.124) |
0.947 (0.871, 1.029) |
Humidity | 1.001 (0.980, 1.023) |
1.005 (0.985, 1.029) |
1.002 (0.982, 1.023) |
0.981 (0.961, 1.002) |
1.017 (0.994, 1.040) |
0.998 (0.970, 1.028) |
0.986 (0.955, 1.017) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.057 (0.957, 1.168) |
1.076 (0.982, 1.16) |
1.100 0.997, 1.213 |
1.085 (0.988, 1.191) |
1.100 (1.001, 1.209) |
1.026 (0.900, 1.169) |
1.108 (0.953, 1.288) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.421 (1.307, 1.544) |
1.194 (1.11, 1.296) |
1.065 (0.973, 1.166) |
1.002 (0.921, 1.091) |
1.197 (1.087, 1.317) |
1.105 (0.981, 1.245) |
1.143 (1.004, 1.301) |
Sunny Day | 1.093 (0.640, 1.864) |
1.63 (0.94, 2.81) |
0.955 0.589, 1.54 |
2.066 (1.094, 3.902) |
0.870 (0.459, 1.650) |
0.386 (0.120, 1.240) |
0.883 (0.307, 2.536) |
Note: The p-value for the model fit for each region was <0.001.
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.15 (1.10, 1.20) |
1.01 (0.98, 1.03) |
1.02 (0.99, 1.05) |
1.01 (0.99, 1.03) |
0.97 (0.95, 0.99) |
1.03 (0.95, 1.12) |
0.93 (0.89, 0.97) |
Humidity | 1.06 (1.05, 1.08) |
0.99 (0.97, 1.00) |
0.97 (0.96, 0.98) |
0.97 (0.98, 0.98) |
0.97 (0.95, 0.98) |
0.98 (0.97, 0.99) |
0.99 (0.97, 1.00) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.92 (1.70, 2.18) |
1.42 (1.36, 1.48) |
1.29 (1.25, 1.34) |
1.26 (1.22, 1.30) |
1.43 (1.37, 1.49) |
1.06 (1.04, 1.09) |
1.13 (1.10, 1.17) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.76 (1.66, 1.86) |
1.19 (1.16, 1.21) |
1.34 (1.29, 1.39) |
1.20 (1.17, 1.24) |
1.58 (1.50, 1.67) |
1.10 (1.07, 1.14) |
1.31 (1.24, 1.39) |
Sunny Day | 0.76 (0.49, 1.18) |
0.42 (0.26, 0.69) |
0.77 (0.52, 1.12) |
1.33 (0.83, 2.14) |
0.31 (0.21, 0.44) |
0.46 (0.32, 0.68) |
0.72 (0.49, 1.05) |
COVID-19 Daily Recoveries—Multivariable Analysis [OR (95%CI)] | |||||||
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.031 (0.995, 1.069) |
0.977 (0.949, 1.006) |
0.992 (0.962, 1.023) |
1.021 (1.000, 1.043) |
0.906 (0.878, 0.934) |
1.039 (0.948, 1.138) |
0.992 (0.975, 1.009) |
Humidity | 1.028 (1.012, 1.044) |
1.023 (1.003, 1.043) |
1.016 (0.994, 1.038) |
0.992 (0.978, 1.008) |
1.048 (1.027, 1.069) |
0.987 (0.975, 0.998) |
0.859 (0.809, 0.913) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.069 (0.956, 1.196) |
1.361 (1.276, 1.445) |
1.15 (1.041, 1.269) |
1.212 (1.128, 1.303) |
1.350 (1.255, 1.452) |
0.996 (0.954, 1.039) |
1.075 (1.010, 1.144) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.673, (1.559, 1.796) |
1.132 (1.093, 1.172) |
1.206 (1.108, 1.314) |
1.035 (0.972, 1.102) |
1.338 (1.246, 1.436) |
1.117 (1.060, 1.177) |
1.308 (1.217, 1.405) |
Sunny Day | 0.989 (0.596, 1.642) |
1.858 (0.932, 3.705) |
1.51 0.741, 1.789 |
0.911 (0.531, 1.561) |
1.288 (0.819, 2.025) |
0.763 (0.502, 1.160) |
3.010 (1.751, 5.175) |
Note: The p-value for the model fit for each region was <0.001.
The association of various factors with daily COVID-19 cases, deaths, and recovery are reported in Tables 2, 3, and 4. In univariable analysis, humidity was associated with a lower incidence of COVID-19; whereas temperature, lock down status, and number of daily tests were associated with higher daily incidence rate. Humidity was also associated with a decrease in death and recovery rates, whereas temperature was associated with higher death and recovery rates.
Results of adjusted analysis: Results of the adjusted analysis for daily new cases, deaths, and recoveries are reported in Table 2, 3 and 4, respectively. In multivariable analysis, except >10,000 tests per day, no other variable was consistently associated with an increase in the number of daily cases (Table 2). With more than 10,000 tests per day, the effect estimates (OR) ranged from 2.173 to 9.963. In multivariable analysis, none of the climatic factors were associated with daily COVID-19 incidence. Daily temperature showed a non-significant trend towards higher daily incidence which became more obvious with reports of daily low temperatures, although low temperatures showed a trend towards higher COVID-19 incidence. Similarly, nationwide events showed non-significant but consistent trends towards increased incidence of infection. Lock down status was not associated with daily incidence rate but mostly showed trend towards high daily incidence rate.
In multivariable analysis, no variable was consistently associated with daily death rates or daily recoveries through all regions (Table 3 and 4). Daily low temperatures showed a trend towards higher recovery rate. The analysis of interaction between temperature and humidity was not significant for all three outcomes.
Our goal was to explore the association of four important environmental factors; wind, humidity, temperature, and daily sun exposure with respect to the transmission of COVID-19. We adjusted our analysis for other important variables such as lock down status, nation wide social events, and daily testing for the COVID-19. The multivariable analysis showed trends for higher odds and increased COVID-19 incidence with low daily temperature. However, high temperature was not significantly associated with the daily COVID-19 incidence. The multivariable analysis showed that the number of daily tests performed was the only factor significantly associated with increased daily incidence of COVID-19. Contrary to common belief, climatic factors—particularly temperature and humidity, did not have consistent association with daily COVID-19 cases. Nationwide social events and lock down status mostly showed a non-significant trend towards increased COVID-19 daily incidences. In the multivariable analysis, no factor showed a consistent association with daily deaths or recoveries throughout all regions. For daily recoveries, daily low temperatures showed a trend towards higher recovery rate.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the association between environmental factors, daily tests, nation wide events and lock down status with daily COVID-19 incidence, recoveries, and death dues to COVID-19 in Pakistan. Our study did not show an association between the environmental factors and daily COVID-19 cases, deaths, and recoveries and thus the speculations that the COVID-19 will decrease with warm temperature was not supported. A recent report suggested that weather may alter COVID-19 transmission but may not completely eliminate it [43],[54]. Due to social beliefs among the Pakistani nation, national and local governments need to take rigorous measures to educate people about the importance of social distancing as it remains our strongest method of prevention [42]. Stronger strategies and resources at the national and local levels of government are needed to increase daily testing for COVID-19.More research is needed to explore the true effect of environmental factors such as wind, temperature, humidity, and sun exposure while adjusting for other important factors such as age, gender, socioeconomic factors, underlying comorbidities with daily risks of COVID-19 spread, mortality and recovery, and therefore having more testing, and thus more data, is critical to understanding the true effects and patterns of the virus.
The key strengths of this study were firstly, the analysis was adjusted for other key variables such as lock down status, number of daily testing, and nationwide mass social gatherings. Secondly, we explored the effect of various climatic factors on different outcomes, which makes the interpretation broad. Thirdly, data was collected on daily basis rather than on a weekly or monthly basis. Limitations of our study are due to the nature of the data utilized, we could not adjust for socioeconomic status, gender, air pollutants and comorbidities. As well, data was collected mainly from publicly available websites compared to data used in a population-based study design, however the data was collected through authentic websites and was compared with multiple sources for accuracy.
In Pakistan, temperatures did not show significant association with the COVID-19 daily incidence. However, a trend for increased incidence of COVID-19 was noted with lower temperatures. Similarly, inconsistent association of temperature with the COVID-19 incidence was also reported [38] in Hubei, China, where temperature showed a significant reduction in COVID-19 cases, but similar associations with temperature were not reported in other parts of China.39 Our results differed from previous studies [31],[39]–[41] that showed significant association of environmental factors such as temperature, wind, humidity with incidences of COVID-19 deaths and recoveries. One potential explanation for the variation between our results and the previous studies could be due to differences in the analysis plan. Previous studies [31],[39]–[41] analyzed the association between environmental factors and COVID-19 incidence with correlation analysis. We measured association between environmental factors and COVID-19 incidence, death rates and recoveries using regression. Regression is a more suitable analysis method than correlation when predictive association of a variable is desired with the outcome and allows adjusting for other variables that can potentially affect the outcome [42]. Zhu [43] analyzed data using generalized additive method (GAM) and piecewise linear regression to determine the association between COVID-19 incidence and environmental factors. Zhu [43] did not report significant association of temperature with COVID-19 incidence, which concur with our results. Our findings also support the current international trend of COVID-19. On June 8th, 2020 New Zealand declared the nation free from COVID-19 and lifted all restrictions [44]. June is winter in New Zealand with an average temperature of 11.5°C, ranging from 15°C during the day to 8°C at night [45]. If the temperature had influenced COVID-19 spread, then it should not have experienced dramatic reductions in reported COVID-19 cases. New Zealand initially imposed very strict lock down measures and surveillance for COVID-19 that were considered effective in reducing the transmission of COVID-19, but as New Zealand loosened the restrictions new cases of COVID-19 began to emerge [46],[47]. Also, in countries such as India and Brazil with more moderate-to-warm climate, high temperatures did not show effects on reported daily COVID-19 cases [48],[49]. In a lab study by Chin et al [50], the COVID-19 virus became inactive after 30 minutes at 56°C and 5 minutes at 70°C. If temperature has association with COVID-19 transmission, such high environmental temperatures are not likely in day-to-day life. The only finding that consistently showed significant association with daily COVID-19 incidence was increased daily testing. This also aligns with international trends found in countries with higher reported COVID-19 cases like the United States of America, where they have had the resources to perform more testing.
In multivariable analyses, only daily testing was associated with higher odds of daily COVID-19 incidence. In most regions, lock down status showed trend for lower odds of COVID-19 incidence and although non-significant, nationwide mass gatherings did show consistent trends towards high incidence. As compared to New Zealand and China, lock down status in Pakistan was not significantly associated with COVID-19 incidence. One possible explanation for the lack of association with lock down status could be due to the majority of the Pakistani nation's social beliefs, potentially people did not follow lock down restriction and SOP strictly [51],[52]. This pattern shows that social distancing remains a vital prevention strategy. COVID-19 is the third major corona virus outbreak after SARS and MERS, both which showed some variation with weather, but it was precautionary measures such as the policies adopted at the international, national, and public level that proved effective in controlling the major outbreaks of these viruses [53].
[1] | Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, et al. (2010) Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA 303(3): 235-241. |
[2] | Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, et al. (2010) Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents, 2007-2008. JAMA 303(3): 242-249. |
[3] | Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, et al. (2012) Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. JAMA 307(5): 491-497. |
[4] | Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, et al. (2012) Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010. JAMA 307(5): 483-490. |
[5] | Mei Z, Scanlon KS, Grummer-Strawn LM, et al. (1998) Increasing prevalence of overweight among US low-income preschool children: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention pediatric nutrition surveillance, 1983 to 1995. Pediatr 101(1): E12. |
[6] | Mokdad AH, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, et al. (2000) The continuing epidemic of obesity in the United States. JAMA 284(13): 1650-1651. |
[7] | Webber LS, Cresanta JL, Croft JB, et al. (1986) Transitions of cardiovascular risk from adolescence to young adulthood—the Bogalusa Heart Study: II. Alterations in anthropometric blood pressure and serum lipoprotein variables. J Chron Dis 39(2): 91-103. |
[8] | Serdula MK, Ivery D, Coates RJ, et al. (1993) Do obese children become obese adults? A review of the literature. Prev Med 22(2): 167-177. |
[9] | Guo SS, Roche AF, Chumlea WC, et al. (1994) The predictive value of childhood body mass index values for overweight at age 35 y. Am J Clin Nutr 59(4): 810-819. |
[10] | Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, et al. (2003) Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U. S. adults. N Engl J Med 348(17): 1625-1638. |
[11] | Shike M. (1996) Body weight and colon cancer. Am J Clin Nutr 63(3 Suppl): 442S-444S. |
[12] | Murphy TK, Calle EE, Rodriguez C, et al. (2000) Body mass index and colon cancer mortality in a large prospective study. Am J Epidemiol 152(9): 847-854. |
[13] | Bungum T, Satterwhite M, Jackson AW, et al. (2003) The relationship of body mass index, medical costs, and job absenteeism. Am J Health Behav 27(4): 456-462. |
[14] | Fontaine KR, Redden DT, Wang C, et al. (2003) Years of life lost due to obesity. JAMA 289(2):187-193. |
[15] | Ford ES, Moriarty DG, Zack MM, et al. (2001) Self-reported body mass index and health-related quality of life: findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Obes Res 9(1):21-31. |
[16] | Sturm R, Ringel JS, Andreyeva T. (2004) Increasing obesity rates and disability trends. Health Aff (Millwood) 23(2): 199-205. |
[17] | Burton WN, Chen CY, Schultz AB, et al. (1999) The costs of body mass index levels in an employed population. Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 80(3): 8-14. |
[18] | Cawley J, Meyerhoefer C. (2012) The medical care cost of obesity: an instrumental variables approach. J Health Econ 31(1): 219-230. |
[19] | Wojcicki JM, Heyman MB. (2012) Reducing childhood obesity by eliminating 100% fruit juice. Am J Public Health 102(9): 1630-1633. |
[20] | Santos FL, Esteves SS, da Costa Pereira A, et al. (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials of the effects of low carbohydrate diets on cardiovascular risk factors. Obes Rev 13(11): 1048-1066. |
[21] | Wycherley TP, Moran LJ, Clifton PM, et al. (2012) Effects of energy-restricted high-protein, low-fat compared with standard-protein, low-fat diets: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 96(6): 1281-1298. |
[22] | 25. Lustig R. Fat Chance. (2012) Beating the odds against sugar, processed food, obesity, and disease. New York: Hudson Street Press. |
[23] | 26. Medical College of Wisconsin. Elimination of Juice/Empty Calories. (2013) Available from: http://www. mcw. edu/NDTN/Overweight/DietInterventions/EliminationofJuiceEmptyCalories. ht m. (Accessed on April 26, |
[24] | 27. O'Neil C, Nicklas T. (2008) A Review of the Relationship between 100% Fruit Juice Consumption and Weight in Children and Adolescents. Am J Lifestyle Med 2(4): 315-354. |
[25] | 28. Dharmasena S, Capps O, Jr. (2012) Intended and unintended consequences of a proposed national tax on sugar-sweetened beverages to combat the U. S. obesity problem. Health economics 21(6): 669-694. |
[26] | 29. Fletcher JM, Frisvold DE, Tefft N. (2011) Are soft drink taxes an effective mechanism for reducing obesity? J Policy Anal Manage 30(3): 655-662. |
[27] | 33. Bray GA. (2013) Energy and fructose from beverages sweetened with sugar or high-fructose corn syrup pose a health risk for some people. Adv Nutr 4(2): 220-225. |
[28] | 34. Lustig R. (2013) Fructose: It's "Alcohol without the Buzz". Adv Nutr 4(2): 226-235. |
[29] | 35. Rippe J, Angelopoulos T. (2013) Sucrose, high-fructose corn syrup, and fructose, their metabolism and potential health effects: what do we really know? Adv Nutr 4(2): 236-245. |
[30] | 36. White J. (2013) Challenging the fructose hypothesis: New perspectives on fructose consumption and metabolism. Adv Nutr 4(2): 246-256. |
[31] | 37. Klurfeld D. (2013) What do government agencies consider in the debate over added sugars? Adv Nutr 4(2): 257-261. |
[32] | 38. Gillespie D. (2008) Sweet poison: Why sugar is making us fat. Melbourne: Viking Australia. |
[33] | 39. Max Rubner——1854-1932. (1965) Energy physiologist. JAMA 194(1): 86-87. |
[34] | 40. von Noorden C. (2013) Clinical Treatises on the Pathology and Therapy of Disorders (Vol. 1). Charleston: Nabu Press. |
[35] | 41. Sievenpiper J, de Souza R, Mirrahimi A, et al. (2012) Effect of fructose on body weight in controlled feeding trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 156(4):291-304. |
[36] | 42. Ha V, Sievenpiper JL, de Souza RJ, et al. (2012) Effect of fructose on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. Hypertension 59(4): 787-795. |
[37] | 43. Sievenpiper JL, Carleton AJ, Chatha S, et al. (2009) Heterogeneous effects of fructose on blood lipids in individuals with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental trials in humans. Diabetes Care 32(10): 1930-19 |
[38] | 44. Cozma AI, Sievenpiper JL, de Souza RJ, et al. (2012) Effect of fructose on glycemic control in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. Diabetes Care 35(7):1611-1620. |
[39] | 45. Sievenpiper JL, Chiavaroli L, de Souza RJ, et al. (2012) 'Catalytic' doses of fructose may benefit glycaemic control without harming cardiometabolic risk factors: a small meta-analysis of randomised controlled feeding trials. Br J Nutr 108(3): 418-423. |
[40] | 49. Krebs-Smith SM, Guenther PM, Subar AF, et al. (2010) Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations. J Nutr 110): 1832-1838. |
[41] | 50. Freeland-Graves J, Nitzke S. (2013) Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Total diet approach to healthy eating. J Acad Nutr Diet 113(2): 307-317. |
[42] | 53. Nitzke S, Freeland-Graves J. (2007) Position of the American Dietetic Association: Total diet approach to communicating food and nutrition information. J Am Diet Assoc 107: 7. |
[43] | 54. Briefel RR, Wilson A, Cabili C, et al. (2013) Reducing calories and added sugars by improving children's beverage choices. J Acad Nutr Diet 113(2): 269-275. |
[44] | 55. Barclay AW, Brand-Miller J. (2011) The Australian paradox: a substantial decline in sugars intake over the same timeframe that overweight and obesity have increased. Nutrients 3(4):491-504. |
[45] | 56. Welch J, Sharma A, Grellinger L, et al. (2011) Consumption of added sugars is decreasing in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 94(3): 726-734. |
[46] |
57. Sylvetsky A, Welsh J, Brown R, et al. (2012) Low-calorie sweetener consumption is increasing in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 96: 640-6 doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.034751
![]() |
[47] | 59. Ford E, Dietz W. (2013) Trends in energy intake among adults in the United States: findings from NHANES. Am J Clin Nutr 97(4): 848-853. |
[48] | 60. Malik VS, Schulze MB, Hu FB. (2006) Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 84(2): 274-288. |
[49] | 61. Vartanian LR, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD. (2007) Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 97(4): 667-675. |
[50] | 62. Olsen NJ, Heitmann BL. (2009) Intake of calorically sweetened beverages and obesity. Obes Rev10(1): 68-75. |
[51] | 63. Wolff E, Dansinger ML. (2008) Soft drinks and weight gain: how strong is the link? Medscape J Med 10(8): 189. |
[52] | 64. Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, et al. (2010) Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation 121(11): 1356-1364. |
[53] | 65. van Dam R, Seidell J. (2007) Carbohydrate intake and obesity. Europ J Clin Nutr 61(Suppl 1):S75-S99. |
[54] | 66. Woodward-Lopez G, Kao J, Ritchie L. (2010) To what extent have sweetened beverages contributed to the obesity epidemic? Public Health Nutr 14(3): 499-509. |
[55] |
67. Te Morenga l, Mallard S, Mann J. (2012) Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. Br Med J 346: e7492. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7492
![]() |
[56] | 68. Pereira MA, Jacobs DR, Jr. (2008) Sugar-sweetened beverages, weight gain and nutritional epidemiological study design. Br J Nutr 99(6): 1169-1170. |
[57] | 69. Bachman CM, Baranowski T, Nicklas TA. (2006) Is there an association between sweetened beverages and adiposity? Nutr Rev 64(4): 153-174. |
[58] | 70. Gibson S. (2008) Sugar-sweetened soft drinks and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence from observational studies and interventions. Nutr Res Rev 21(2): 134-147. |
[59] | 71. Mattes RD, Shikany JM, Kaiser KA, et al. (2011) Nutritively sweetened beverage consumption and body weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized experiments. Obes Rev12(5): 346-365. |
[60] | 72. Libuda L, Kersting M. (2006) Soft drinks and body weight development in childhood: is there a relationship? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 12(6): 596-. |
[61] | 73. Van Baak M, Astrup A. (2009) Consumption of sugars and body weight. Obes Rev 10(Suppl 1):9-23. |
[62] |
74. Monasta L, Batty G, Cattaneo A, et al. (2010) Early-life determinanats of overweight and obesity: a review of systematic reviews. Obes Rev 11: 695-708. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00735.x
![]() |
[63] | 75. Forshee RA, Anderson PA, Storey ML. (2008) Sugar-sweetened beverages and body mass index in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 87(6): 1662-1671. |
[64] | 76. Ruxton CH, Gardner EJ, McNulty HM. (2010) Is sugar consumption detrimental to health? A review of the evidence 1995-2006. |
[65] | 77. Janssen I, Katmarzyk PT, Boyce WF, et al. (2005) Health behaviour in school-aged children obesity working group: Comparison of overweight and obesity prevalence in school-aged youth from 34 countries and their relationships with physical activity and dietary patterns. Obes Rev6(2): 123-132. |
[66] | 78. Weed DL, Althuis MD, Mink PJ. (2011) Quality of reviews on sugar-sweetened beverages and health outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 94(5): 1340-1347. |
[67] | 79. Cope MB, Allison DB. (2010) White hat bias: examples of its presence in obesity research and a call for renewed commitment to faithfulness in research reporting. Int J Obes (Lond) 34(1):84-88. |
[68] | 80. James J, Thomas P, Cavan D, et al. (2004) Preventing childhood obesity by reducing consumption of carbonated drinks: cluster randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 328(7450):1237. |
[69] | 81. Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Osganian SK, et al. (2006) Effects of decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption on body weight in adolescents: a randomized, controlled pilot study. Pediatrics 117(3): 673-680. |
[70] | 82. Nicklas T, O'Neil C, Liu Y. (2011) Intake of added sugars is not associated with weight measures in children 6-18 years of age: NHANES 2003-2006. Nutr Res 31(5): 338-346. |
[71] | 83. Storey ML, Forshee RA, Weaver AR, et al. (2003) Demographic and lifestyle factors associated with body mass index among children and adolescents. Int J Food Sci Nutr 54(6): 491-503. |
[72] | 84. Marriott BP, Olsho L, Hadden L, et al. (2010) Intake of added sugars and selected nutrients in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2006. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 50(3): 228-258. |
[73] | 85. Fisher JO, Mitchell DC, Smiciklas-Wright H, et al. (2001) Maternal milk consumption predicts the tradeoff between milk and soft drinks in young girls' diets. J Nutr 131(2): 246-250. |
[74] | 86. Harnack L, Stang J, Story M. (1999) Soft drink consumption among US children and adolescents: nutritional consequences. J Am Diet Assoc 99(4): 436-441. |
[75] | 87. Anderson GH, Luhovyy B, Akhavan T, et al. (2011) Milk proteins in the regulation of body weight, satiety, food intake and glycemia. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program 67:147-159. |
[76] | 88. Barba G, Russo P. (2006) Dairy foods, dietary calcium and obesity: a short review of the evidence. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 16(6): 445-451. |
[77] | 89. Deddo L. (2007) Connecting the dots. Aeon Publishing Inc. Available from: http://www. amazon. com/Connecting-The-Dots-Leonard-Deddo/dp/1595266941/ref=sr_1_1?ie= UTF8&qid=1364933001&sr=8-1&keywords=Connecting+the+Dots+leonard+deddo. (Accessed on April 2, 2013). |
[78] | 90. Darmon N, Drewnowski A. (2008) Does social class predict diet quality? Am J Clin Nutr 87(5):1107-1117. |
[79] | 91. Monsivais P, Drewnowski A. (2009) Lower-energy-density diets are associated with higher monetary costs per kilocalorie and are consumed by women of higher socioeconomic status. J Am Diet Assoc 109(5): 814-822. |
[80] | 92. Brownell KD, Farley T, Willett WC, et al. (2009) The public health and economic benefits of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages. N Engl J Med 361(16): 1599-1605. |
[81] | 93. Brownell KD, Frieden TR. (2009) Ounces of prevention—the public policy case for taxes on sugared beverages. N Engl J Med 360(18): 1805-1808. |
[82] | 94. Fletcher J, Frisvold D, Tefft N. (2010) Can soft drink taxes reduce population weight? Contemp Econ Policy 28(1): 23-35. |
[83] | 96. Fletcher JM, Frisvold DE, Tefft N. (2010) The effects of soft drink taxes on child and adolescent consumption and weight outcomes. J Public Econ 94(11-12): 967-974. |
[84] | 97. Sturm R, Powell LM, Chriqui JF, et al. Deddo L. (2010) Soda Taxes, Soft Drink Consumption, And Children's Body Mass Index. Health Affairs 29(5): 1052-1058. |
[85] | 98. Ogden CL, Kit BK, Carroll MD, et al. (2011) Consumption of sugar drinks in the United States, 2005-2008. NCHS Data Brief 71: 1-8. |
[86] | 99. Cohen DA, Sturm R, Scott M, et al. Deddo L. (2010) Not Enough Fruit and Vegetables or Too Many Cookies, Candies, Salty Snacks, and Soft Drinks? Public Health Rep 125: 88-95. |
[87] | 100. Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM. Deddo L. (2010) Dietary sources of energy, solid fats, and added sugars among children and adolescents in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc 110(10):1477-1484. |
1. | Karla Romero Starke, René Mauer, Ethel Karskens, Anna Pretzsch, David Reissig, Albert Nienhaus, Anna Lene Seidler, Andreas Seidler, The Effect of Ambient Environmental Conditions on COVID-19 Mortality: A Systematic Review, 2021, 18, 1660-4601, 6665, 10.3390/ijerph18126665 | |
2. | Francis Tuluri, Reddy Remata, Wilbur L. Walters, Paul. B. Tchounwou, Application of Machine Learning to Study the Association between Environmental Factors and COVID-19 Cases in Mississippi, USA, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 850, 10.3390/math10060850 | |
3. | Yuan Wei, Zhaomin Dong, Wenhong Fan, Kaiqiang Xu, Song Tang, Ying Wang, Fengchang Wu, A narrative review on the role of temperature and humidity in COVID-19: Transmission, persistence, and epidemiological evidence, 2022, 1, 27729850, 73, 10.1016/j.eehl.2022.04.006 | |
4. | Fitsum Bekele Endeshaw, Fentabil Getnet, Awoke Misganaw Temesgen, Alemnesh H. Mirkuzie, Latera Tesfaye Olana, Kefyalew Addis Alene, Solomon Kibret Birhanie, Effects of climatic factors on COVID-19 transmission in Ethiopia, 2022, 12, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-022-24024-9 | |
5. | Laura Houweling, Anke-Hilse Maitland-Van der Zee, Judith C.S. Holtjer, Somayeh Bazdar, Roel C.H. Vermeulen, George S. Downward, Lizan D. Bloemsma, The effect of the urban exposome on COVID-19 health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2024, 240, 00139351, 117351, 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117351 | |
6. | Malihe Moazeni, Mohammad Rahimi, Afshin Ebrahimi, What Are the Effects of Climate Variables on COVID-19 Pandemic? A Systematic review and Current Update, 2023, 12, 2277-9175, 10.4103/abr.abr_145_21 | |
7. | Shanshan Xu, Haibo Li, Juan Wang, Lin Lu, Zhengxiang Dai, Relationship between meteorological factors and mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A cross-sectional study, 2023, 9, 24058440, e18565, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18565 | |
8. | Laleh R. Kalankesh, Nasim Khajavian, Hamid Soori, Mohammad Hossein Vaziri, Reza Saeedi, Alireza Hajighasemkhan, Association metrological factors with Covid-19 mortality in Tehran, Iran (2020-2021), 2024, 34, 0960-3123, 1725, 10.1080/09603123.2023.2239721 |
REGION | Cumulative incidence | Cumulative Deaths | Cumulative Recovery | Total tests | Mean Wind (KM/H) | Mean Humidity (%) | Mean Temperature-Max (C) mean (SD) | Mean temperature-Min (C) mean (SD) | Sunny Day |
Sindh | 102,368 (41.55%) |
1,713 (33.43%) (1.67%) * |
59,185 (38.64%) (57.81%) * |
254,559 (33.36%) | 16.39 (5.37) | 61.91 (11.63) | 35.23 (3.60) | 26.32 (4.25) | 98 (79.7%) |
Punjab | 85,991 (34.90%) |
1,985 (38.74%) (2.30%) * |
53,836 (35.15%) (62.60%) * |
302,720 (39.67%) | 11.95 (7.35) | 53.41 (15.67) | 34.13 (6.19) | 22.06 (5.7) | 103 (83.7%) |
KPK | 29,775 (12.08%) |
1,074 (20.96%) (3.60%) * |
20,271 (13.23%) (68.08%) * |
84,842 (11.11%) | 14.19 (6.83) | 52.24 (15.62) | 31.86 (6.59) | 20.63 (5.73) | 83 (67.5%9) |
Balochistan | 11,128 (4.51%) |
126 (2.45%) (1.132%) * |
7,224 (4.71%) (64.91%) * |
33,283 (4.36%) | 18.24 (11.99) | 32.08 (18.07) | 28.37 (7.50) | 16.86 (7.33) | 102 (82.9%) |
Islamabad | 13,927 (5.65%) |
147 (2.86%) (1.05%) * |
10,441 (6.81) (74.96%) * |
65,634 (8.601%) | 12.53 (8.09) | 50.83 (20.38) | 31.43 (6.20) | 20.21 (5.49) | 63 (51.2%) |
Gilgit Baltistan | 1,630 (0.66%) |
36 (0.7%) (2.20%) * |
1,303 (0.85%) (79.93%) * |
12,579 (1.64%) | 2.60 (2.49) | 58.19 (19.64) | 25.60 (6.79) | 13.50 (5.95) | 60 (48.8%) |
Azad Kashmir | 1,532 (0.62%) |
42 (0.81%) (2.74%) * |
94 (0.58%) (58.35%) * |
9,437 (1.23%) | 4.39 (5.88) | 57.35 (18.51) | 28.11 (6.21) | 16.14 (5.09) | 60 (48.8%) |
Total | 246,351 1109 cases/million |
5,123 (2.07%) 23 deaths/million |
153,134 (62.16%) 689 recoveries/million |
763,054 |
Note: KPK: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; * = proportions from the total cases of each region
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.11 (1.06, 1.15) |
1.04 (1.00, 1.07) |
1.04 (1.01, 1.07) |
1.01 (0.99, 1.03) |
1.01 (0.99, 1.04) |
1.01 (0.93, 1.10) |
0.99 (0.95, 1.02) |
Humidity | 1.03 (1.01, 1.04) |
0.98 (0.97, 0.99) |
0.96 (0.95, 0.97) |
0.98 (0.97, 0.99) |
0.98 (0.97, 0.99) |
0.99 (0.98, 1.00) |
0.97 (0.96, 0.98) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.59 (1.45, 1.74) |
1.20 (1.15, 1.24) |
1.18 (1.14, 1.21) |
1.12 (1.09, 1.15) |
1.22 (1.18, 1.26) |
1.05 (1.02, 1.08) |
1.19 (1.14, 1.23) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.30 (1.26, 1.34) |
1.15 (1.12, 1.18) |
1.23 (1.19, 1.28) |
1.11 (1.08, 1.15) |
1.28 (1.24, 1.33) |
1.04 (1.01, 1.07) |
1.18 (1.14, 1.23) |
Sunny Day (Sunny day; Ref = No) | 0.76 (0.49, 1.18) |
1.15 (0.71, 1.85) |
0.54 (0.37, 0.79) |
1.18 (0.74, 1.90) |
0.41 (0.29, 0.59) |
0.68 (0.47, 0.99) |
0.40 (0.28, 0.588) |
Lock down stat (Ref = Lock down period) | 3.2 (2.12, 4.81) |
2.92 (1.94, 4.40) |
2.20 (1.46, 3.31) |
2.42 (1.60, 3.65) |
9.29, (6.13, 14.10) |
2.42 (1.57, 3.73) |
5.06 (3.15, 8.14) |
Smart lock down stat (Ref = Lock down period) | 7.87 (4.77, 12.97) |
4.76 (2.89, 7.85) |
4.22 (2.55, 6.95) |
2.51 (1.51, 4.14) |
14.11 (8.50, 23.41) |
3.09 (1.83, 5.20) |
17.71 (10.19, 30.80) |
Nationwide Events* | 0.74 (0.52, 1.06) |
1.12 (0.78, 1.61) |
1.00 (0.70, 1.44) |
1.72 (1.20, 2.47) |
1.53 (1.06, 2.19) |
1.08 (0.74, 1.57) |
0.80 (0.55, 1.16) |
10000/Daily Test | 10.28 (7.20, 14.68) |
8.43 (5.9, 12.04) |
6.88 (4.81, 9.84) |
6.58 (4.59, 9.44) |
26.46 (18.30, 38.25) |
2.81 (1.93, 4.08) |
16.64 (10.85, 25.53) |
COVID-19 Daily Cases—Multivariable Analysis [OR (95%CI)] | |||||||
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.010 (0.969, 1.053) |
1.009 (0.980, 1.039) |
0.998 (0.968, 1.028) |
1.020 (0.999, 1.041) |
0.997 (0.973, 1.022) |
0.985 (0.904, 1.073) |
0.974 (0.939, 1.010) |
Humidity | 0.996 (0.977, 1.015) |
1.001 (0.983, 1.019) |
1.010 (0.992, 1.028) |
1.004 (0.989, 1.019) |
1.015 (1.004, 1.026) |
1.001 (0.991, 1.011) |
0.999 (0.984, 1.014) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.075 (0.965, 1.197) |
1.044 (0.986, 1.106) |
1.009 (0.916, 1.106) |
1.017 (0.949, 1.090) |
1.068 (1.004, 1.136) |
1.027 (0.969, 1.089) |
1.011 (0.941, 1.085) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.130 (1.040, 1.228) |
1.043 (0.989, 1.101) |
1.150 (1.040, 1.271) |
1.055 (0.996, 1.117) |
1.105 (1.032, 1.182) |
0.984 (0.925, 1.046) |
1.012 (0.942, 1.087) |
Sunny Day (Sunny day; Ref = No) | 0.959 (0.587, 1.567) |
1.209 (0.720, 2.029) |
0.979 0.606, 1.58 |
0.780 (0.470, 1.296) |
1.047 (0.680, 1.612) |
1.154 (0.701, 1.900) |
0.976 (0.594, 1.604) |
Lock down stat (Ref = Lock down period) | 1.025 (0.426, 2.465) |
0.611 (0.263, 1.421) |
0.401 0.169, 0.951 |
0.344 (0.198, 0.598) |
0.674 (0.352, 1.293) |
1.550 (0.882, 2.725) |
0.636 (0.273, 1.485) |
Smart lock down stat (Ref = Lock down period) | 2.868 (0.624, 13.175) |
1.222 (0.240, 6.217) |
0.552 0.111, 2.751 |
0.180 (0.073, 0.446) |
0.754 (0.292, 1.949) |
1.608 (0.671, 3.851) |
3.243 (1.069, 9.843) |
Nationwide Events* | 1.963 (0.844, 4.565) |
2.262 (0.991, 5.161) |
1.710 0.759, 3.855 |
1.010 (0.589, 1.733) |
1.761 (1.008, 3.079) |
1.025 (0.624, 1.684) |
2.803 (1.581, 4.969) |
10000/Daily Test | 3.273 (1.115, 9.609) |
5.548 (1.955, 15.74) |
4.9305 (1.622, 14.833) |
9.963 (4.049, 24.514) |
9.496 (3.644, 24.748) |
2.173 (1.031, 4.580) |
9.470 (3.473, 25.819) |
Note: * Includes both religious or nation-wide social event that required mass gatherings or when the SOP were potentially not strictly followed. KPK: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; ISBD: Islamabad; GILGIT: Gilgit Baltistan; AZK: Azad Kashmir. The p-value for the model fit for each region (analysis) was <0.001.
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.10 (1.05, 1.14) |
1.05 (1.02, 1.09) |
1.02 (1.00, 1.05) |
1.029 (1.00, 1.05) |
0.99 (0.96, 1.02) |
0.99 (0.84, 1.16) |
0.99 (0.92, 1.05) |
Humidity | 1.04 (1.02, 1.06) |
0.99 (0.97, 1.00) |
0.96 (0.95, 0.97) |
0.96 (0.95, 0.98) |
0.98 (0.97, 1.00) |
0.98 (0.96, 1.00) |
0.97 (0.95, 0.99) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.45 (1.29, 1.62) |
1.20 (1.15, 1.26) |
1.15 (1.11, 1.19) |
1.09 (1.05, 1.14) |
1.18 (1.12, 1.25) |
1.15 (1.07, 1.24) |
1.24 (1.12, 1.37) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.46 (1.36, 1.56) |
1.26 (1.20, 1.32) |
1.17 (1.12, 1.21) |
1.07 (1.03, 1.12) |
1.27 (1.18, 1.36) |
1.15 (1.07, 1.24) |
1.23 (1.12, 1.35) |
Sunny Day | 0.98 (0.56, 1.41) |
1.11 (0.67, 1.81) |
0.52 (0.35, 0.78) |
1.94 (1.05, 3.56) |
0.42 (0.25, 0.69) |
0.23 (0.09, 0.56) |
0.26 (0.11, 0.58) |
COVID-19 Daily Deaths—Multivariable Analysis [OR (95%CI)] | |||||||
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.018 (0.976, 1.062) |
1.019 (0.985, 1.054) |
1.009 (0.979, 1.040) |
1.020 (0.996, 1.045) |
0.969 (0.932, 1.007) |
0.913 (0.741, 1.124) |
0.947 (0.871, 1.029) |
Humidity | 1.001 (0.980, 1.023) |
1.005 (0.985, 1.029) |
1.002 (0.982, 1.023) |
0.981 (0.961, 1.002) |
1.017 (0.994, 1.040) |
0.998 (0.970, 1.028) |
0.986 (0.955, 1.017) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.057 (0.957, 1.168) |
1.076 (0.982, 1.16) |
1.100 0.997, 1.213 |
1.085 (0.988, 1.191) |
1.100 (1.001, 1.209) |
1.026 (0.900, 1.169) |
1.108 (0.953, 1.288) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.421 (1.307, 1.544) |
1.194 (1.11, 1.296) |
1.065 (0.973, 1.166) |
1.002 (0.921, 1.091) |
1.197 (1.087, 1.317) |
1.105 (0.981, 1.245) |
1.143 (1.004, 1.301) |
Sunny Day | 1.093 (0.640, 1.864) |
1.63 (0.94, 2.81) |
0.955 0.589, 1.54 |
2.066 (1.094, 3.902) |
0.870 (0.459, 1.650) |
0.386 (0.120, 1.240) |
0.883 (0.307, 2.536) |
Note: The p-value for the model fit for each region was <0.001.
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.15 (1.10, 1.20) |
1.01 (0.98, 1.03) |
1.02 (0.99, 1.05) |
1.01 (0.99, 1.03) |
0.97 (0.95, 0.99) |
1.03 (0.95, 1.12) |
0.93 (0.89, 0.97) |
Humidity | 1.06 (1.05, 1.08) |
0.99 (0.97, 1.00) |
0.97 (0.96, 0.98) |
0.97 (0.98, 0.98) |
0.97 (0.95, 0.98) |
0.98 (0.97, 0.99) |
0.99 (0.97, 1.00) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.92 (1.70, 2.18) |
1.42 (1.36, 1.48) |
1.29 (1.25, 1.34) |
1.26 (1.22, 1.30) |
1.43 (1.37, 1.49) |
1.06 (1.04, 1.09) |
1.13 (1.10, 1.17) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.76 (1.66, 1.86) |
1.19 (1.16, 1.21) |
1.34 (1.29, 1.39) |
1.20 (1.17, 1.24) |
1.58 (1.50, 1.67) |
1.10 (1.07, 1.14) |
1.31 (1.24, 1.39) |
Sunny Day | 0.76 (0.49, 1.18) |
0.42 (0.26, 0.69) |
0.77 (0.52, 1.12) |
1.33 (0.83, 2.14) |
0.31 (0.21, 0.44) |
0.46 (0.32, 0.68) |
0.72 (0.49, 1.05) |
COVID-19 Daily Recoveries—Multivariable Analysis [OR (95%CI)] | |||||||
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.031 (0.995, 1.069) |
0.977 (0.949, 1.006) |
0.992 (0.962, 1.023) |
1.021 (1.000, 1.043) |
0.906 (0.878, 0.934) |
1.039 (0.948, 1.138) |
0.992 (0.975, 1.009) |
Humidity | 1.028 (1.012, 1.044) |
1.023 (1.003, 1.043) |
1.016 (0.994, 1.038) |
0.992 (0.978, 1.008) |
1.048 (1.027, 1.069) |
0.987 (0.975, 0.998) |
0.859 (0.809, 0.913) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.069 (0.956, 1.196) |
1.361 (1.276, 1.445) |
1.15 (1.041, 1.269) |
1.212 (1.128, 1.303) |
1.350 (1.255, 1.452) |
0.996 (0.954, 1.039) |
1.075 (1.010, 1.144) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.673, (1.559, 1.796) |
1.132 (1.093, 1.172) |
1.206 (1.108, 1.314) |
1.035 (0.972, 1.102) |
1.338 (1.246, 1.436) |
1.117 (1.060, 1.177) |
1.308 (1.217, 1.405) |
Sunny Day | 0.989 (0.596, 1.642) |
1.858 (0.932, 3.705) |
1.51 0.741, 1.789 |
0.911 (0.531, 1.561) |
1.288 (0.819, 2.025) |
0.763 (0.502, 1.160) |
3.010 (1.751, 5.175) |
Note: The p-value for the model fit for each region was <0.001.
REGION | Cumulative incidence | Cumulative Deaths | Cumulative Recovery | Total tests | Mean Wind (KM/H) | Mean Humidity (%) | Mean Temperature-Max (C) mean (SD) | Mean temperature-Min (C) mean (SD) | Sunny Day |
Sindh | 102,368 (41.55%) |
1,713 (33.43%) (1.67%) * |
59,185 (38.64%) (57.81%) * |
254,559 (33.36%) | 16.39 (5.37) | 61.91 (11.63) | 35.23 (3.60) | 26.32 (4.25) | 98 (79.7%) |
Punjab | 85,991 (34.90%) |
1,985 (38.74%) (2.30%) * |
53,836 (35.15%) (62.60%) * |
302,720 (39.67%) | 11.95 (7.35) | 53.41 (15.67) | 34.13 (6.19) | 22.06 (5.7) | 103 (83.7%) |
KPK | 29,775 (12.08%) |
1,074 (20.96%) (3.60%) * |
20,271 (13.23%) (68.08%) * |
84,842 (11.11%) | 14.19 (6.83) | 52.24 (15.62) | 31.86 (6.59) | 20.63 (5.73) | 83 (67.5%9) |
Balochistan | 11,128 (4.51%) |
126 (2.45%) (1.132%) * |
7,224 (4.71%) (64.91%) * |
33,283 (4.36%) | 18.24 (11.99) | 32.08 (18.07) | 28.37 (7.50) | 16.86 (7.33) | 102 (82.9%) |
Islamabad | 13,927 (5.65%) |
147 (2.86%) (1.05%) * |
10,441 (6.81) (74.96%) * |
65,634 (8.601%) | 12.53 (8.09) | 50.83 (20.38) | 31.43 (6.20) | 20.21 (5.49) | 63 (51.2%) |
Gilgit Baltistan | 1,630 (0.66%) |
36 (0.7%) (2.20%) * |
1,303 (0.85%) (79.93%) * |
12,579 (1.64%) | 2.60 (2.49) | 58.19 (19.64) | 25.60 (6.79) | 13.50 (5.95) | 60 (48.8%) |
Azad Kashmir | 1,532 (0.62%) |
42 (0.81%) (2.74%) * |
94 (0.58%) (58.35%) * |
9,437 (1.23%) | 4.39 (5.88) | 57.35 (18.51) | 28.11 (6.21) | 16.14 (5.09) | 60 (48.8%) |
Total | 246,351 1109 cases/million |
5,123 (2.07%) 23 deaths/million |
153,134 (62.16%) 689 recoveries/million |
763,054 |
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.11 (1.06, 1.15) |
1.04 (1.00, 1.07) |
1.04 (1.01, 1.07) |
1.01 (0.99, 1.03) |
1.01 (0.99, 1.04) |
1.01 (0.93, 1.10) |
0.99 (0.95, 1.02) |
Humidity | 1.03 (1.01, 1.04) |
0.98 (0.97, 0.99) |
0.96 (0.95, 0.97) |
0.98 (0.97, 0.99) |
0.98 (0.97, 0.99) |
0.99 (0.98, 1.00) |
0.97 (0.96, 0.98) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.59 (1.45, 1.74) |
1.20 (1.15, 1.24) |
1.18 (1.14, 1.21) |
1.12 (1.09, 1.15) |
1.22 (1.18, 1.26) |
1.05 (1.02, 1.08) |
1.19 (1.14, 1.23) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.30 (1.26, 1.34) |
1.15 (1.12, 1.18) |
1.23 (1.19, 1.28) |
1.11 (1.08, 1.15) |
1.28 (1.24, 1.33) |
1.04 (1.01, 1.07) |
1.18 (1.14, 1.23) |
Sunny Day (Sunny day; Ref = No) | 0.76 (0.49, 1.18) |
1.15 (0.71, 1.85) |
0.54 (0.37, 0.79) |
1.18 (0.74, 1.90) |
0.41 (0.29, 0.59) |
0.68 (0.47, 0.99) |
0.40 (0.28, 0.588) |
Lock down stat (Ref = Lock down period) | 3.2 (2.12, 4.81) |
2.92 (1.94, 4.40) |
2.20 (1.46, 3.31) |
2.42 (1.60, 3.65) |
9.29, (6.13, 14.10) |
2.42 (1.57, 3.73) |
5.06 (3.15, 8.14) |
Smart lock down stat (Ref = Lock down period) | 7.87 (4.77, 12.97) |
4.76 (2.89, 7.85) |
4.22 (2.55, 6.95) |
2.51 (1.51, 4.14) |
14.11 (8.50, 23.41) |
3.09 (1.83, 5.20) |
17.71 (10.19, 30.80) |
Nationwide Events* | 0.74 (0.52, 1.06) |
1.12 (0.78, 1.61) |
1.00 (0.70, 1.44) |
1.72 (1.20, 2.47) |
1.53 (1.06, 2.19) |
1.08 (0.74, 1.57) |
0.80 (0.55, 1.16) |
10000/Daily Test | 10.28 (7.20, 14.68) |
8.43 (5.9, 12.04) |
6.88 (4.81, 9.84) |
6.58 (4.59, 9.44) |
26.46 (18.30, 38.25) |
2.81 (1.93, 4.08) |
16.64 (10.85, 25.53) |
COVID-19 Daily Cases—Multivariable Analysis [OR (95%CI)] | |||||||
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.010 (0.969, 1.053) |
1.009 (0.980, 1.039) |
0.998 (0.968, 1.028) |
1.020 (0.999, 1.041) |
0.997 (0.973, 1.022) |
0.985 (0.904, 1.073) |
0.974 (0.939, 1.010) |
Humidity | 0.996 (0.977, 1.015) |
1.001 (0.983, 1.019) |
1.010 (0.992, 1.028) |
1.004 (0.989, 1.019) |
1.015 (1.004, 1.026) |
1.001 (0.991, 1.011) |
0.999 (0.984, 1.014) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.075 (0.965, 1.197) |
1.044 (0.986, 1.106) |
1.009 (0.916, 1.106) |
1.017 (0.949, 1.090) |
1.068 (1.004, 1.136) |
1.027 (0.969, 1.089) |
1.011 (0.941, 1.085) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.130 (1.040, 1.228) |
1.043 (0.989, 1.101) |
1.150 (1.040, 1.271) |
1.055 (0.996, 1.117) |
1.105 (1.032, 1.182) |
0.984 (0.925, 1.046) |
1.012 (0.942, 1.087) |
Sunny Day (Sunny day; Ref = No) | 0.959 (0.587, 1.567) |
1.209 (0.720, 2.029) |
0.979 0.606, 1.58 |
0.780 (0.470, 1.296) |
1.047 (0.680, 1.612) |
1.154 (0.701, 1.900) |
0.976 (0.594, 1.604) |
Lock down stat (Ref = Lock down period) | 1.025 (0.426, 2.465) |
0.611 (0.263, 1.421) |
0.401 0.169, 0.951 |
0.344 (0.198, 0.598) |
0.674 (0.352, 1.293) |
1.550 (0.882, 2.725) |
0.636 (0.273, 1.485) |
Smart lock down stat (Ref = Lock down period) | 2.868 (0.624, 13.175) |
1.222 (0.240, 6.217) |
0.552 0.111, 2.751 |
0.180 (0.073, 0.446) |
0.754 (0.292, 1.949) |
1.608 (0.671, 3.851) |
3.243 (1.069, 9.843) |
Nationwide Events* | 1.963 (0.844, 4.565) |
2.262 (0.991, 5.161) |
1.710 0.759, 3.855 |
1.010 (0.589, 1.733) |
1.761 (1.008, 3.079) |
1.025 (0.624, 1.684) |
2.803 (1.581, 4.969) |
10000/Daily Test | 3.273 (1.115, 9.609) |
5.548 (1.955, 15.74) |
4.9305 (1.622, 14.833) |
9.963 (4.049, 24.514) |
9.496 (3.644, 24.748) |
2.173 (1.031, 4.580) |
9.470 (3.473, 25.819) |
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.10 (1.05, 1.14) |
1.05 (1.02, 1.09) |
1.02 (1.00, 1.05) |
1.029 (1.00, 1.05) |
0.99 (0.96, 1.02) |
0.99 (0.84, 1.16) |
0.99 (0.92, 1.05) |
Humidity | 1.04 (1.02, 1.06) |
0.99 (0.97, 1.00) |
0.96 (0.95, 0.97) |
0.96 (0.95, 0.98) |
0.98 (0.97, 1.00) |
0.98 (0.96, 1.00) |
0.97 (0.95, 0.99) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.45 (1.29, 1.62) |
1.20 (1.15, 1.26) |
1.15 (1.11, 1.19) |
1.09 (1.05, 1.14) |
1.18 (1.12, 1.25) |
1.15 (1.07, 1.24) |
1.24 (1.12, 1.37) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.46 (1.36, 1.56) |
1.26 (1.20, 1.32) |
1.17 (1.12, 1.21) |
1.07 (1.03, 1.12) |
1.27 (1.18, 1.36) |
1.15 (1.07, 1.24) |
1.23 (1.12, 1.35) |
Sunny Day | 0.98 (0.56, 1.41) |
1.11 (0.67, 1.81) |
0.52 (0.35, 0.78) |
1.94 (1.05, 3.56) |
0.42 (0.25, 0.69) |
0.23 (0.09, 0.56) |
0.26 (0.11, 0.58) |
COVID-19 Daily Deaths—Multivariable Analysis [OR (95%CI)] | |||||||
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.018 (0.976, 1.062) |
1.019 (0.985, 1.054) |
1.009 (0.979, 1.040) |
1.020 (0.996, 1.045) |
0.969 (0.932, 1.007) |
0.913 (0.741, 1.124) |
0.947 (0.871, 1.029) |
Humidity | 1.001 (0.980, 1.023) |
1.005 (0.985, 1.029) |
1.002 (0.982, 1.023) |
0.981 (0.961, 1.002) |
1.017 (0.994, 1.040) |
0.998 (0.970, 1.028) |
0.986 (0.955, 1.017) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.057 (0.957, 1.168) |
1.076 (0.982, 1.16) |
1.100 0.997, 1.213 |
1.085 (0.988, 1.191) |
1.100 (1.001, 1.209) |
1.026 (0.900, 1.169) |
1.108 (0.953, 1.288) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.421 (1.307, 1.544) |
1.194 (1.11, 1.296) |
1.065 (0.973, 1.166) |
1.002 (0.921, 1.091) |
1.197 (1.087, 1.317) |
1.105 (0.981, 1.245) |
1.143 (1.004, 1.301) |
Sunny Day | 1.093 (0.640, 1.864) |
1.63 (0.94, 2.81) |
0.955 0.589, 1.54 |
2.066 (1.094, 3.902) |
0.870 (0.459, 1.650) |
0.386 (0.120, 1.240) |
0.883 (0.307, 2.536) |
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.15 (1.10, 1.20) |
1.01 (0.98, 1.03) |
1.02 (0.99, 1.05) |
1.01 (0.99, 1.03) |
0.97 (0.95, 0.99) |
1.03 (0.95, 1.12) |
0.93 (0.89, 0.97) |
Humidity | 1.06 (1.05, 1.08) |
0.99 (0.97, 1.00) |
0.97 (0.96, 0.98) |
0.97 (0.98, 0.98) |
0.97 (0.95, 0.98) |
0.98 (0.97, 0.99) |
0.99 (0.97, 1.00) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.92 (1.70, 2.18) |
1.42 (1.36, 1.48) |
1.29 (1.25, 1.34) |
1.26 (1.22, 1.30) |
1.43 (1.37, 1.49) |
1.06 (1.04, 1.09) |
1.13 (1.10, 1.17) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.76 (1.66, 1.86) |
1.19 (1.16, 1.21) |
1.34 (1.29, 1.39) |
1.20 (1.17, 1.24) |
1.58 (1.50, 1.67) |
1.10 (1.07, 1.14) |
1.31 (1.24, 1.39) |
Sunny Day | 0.76 (0.49, 1.18) |
0.42 (0.26, 0.69) |
0.77 (0.52, 1.12) |
1.33 (0.83, 2.14) |
0.31 (0.21, 0.44) |
0.46 (0.32, 0.68) |
0.72 (0.49, 1.05) |
COVID-19 Daily Recoveries—Multivariable Analysis [OR (95%CI)] | |||||||
SINDH | PUNJAB | KPK | BALOCHISTAN | ISBD | GILGIT | AZK | |
Wind | 1.031 (0.995, 1.069) |
0.977 (0.949, 1.006) |
0.992 (0.962, 1.023) |
1.021 (1.000, 1.043) |
0.906 (0.878, 0.934) |
1.039 (0.948, 1.138) |
0.992 (0.975, 1.009) |
Humidity | 1.028 (1.012, 1.044) |
1.023 (1.003, 1.043) |
1.016 (0.994, 1.038) |
0.992 (0.978, 1.008) |
1.048 (1.027, 1.069) |
0.987 (0.975, 0.998) |
0.859 (0.809, 0.913) |
Temperature Daily Max | 1.069 (0.956, 1.196) |
1.361 (1.276, 1.445) |
1.15 (1.041, 1.269) |
1.212 (1.128, 1.303) |
1.350 (1.255, 1.452) |
0.996 (0.954, 1.039) |
1.075 (1.010, 1.144) |
Temperature Daily min | 1.673, (1.559, 1.796) |
1.132 (1.093, 1.172) |
1.206 (1.108, 1.314) |
1.035 (0.972, 1.102) |
1.338 (1.246, 1.436) |
1.117 (1.060, 1.177) |
1.308 (1.217, 1.405) |
Sunny Day | 0.989 (0.596, 1.642) |
1.858 (0.932, 3.705) |
1.51 0.741, 1.789 |
0.911 (0.531, 1.561) |
1.288 (0.819, 2.025) |
0.763 (0.502, 1.160) |
3.010 (1.751, 5.175) |