
Methods for producing summaries from structured data have gained interest due to the huge volume of available data in the Web. Simultaneously, there have been advances in natural language generation from Resource Description Framework (RDF) data. However, no efforts have been made to generate natural language summaries for groups of multiple RDF entities. This paper describes the first algorithm for summarising the information of a set of RDF entities in the form of human-readable text. The paper also proposes an experimental design for the evaluation of the summaries in a human task context. Experiments were carried out comparing machine-made summaries and summaries written by humans, with and without the help of machine-made summaries. We develop criteria for evaluating the content and text quality of summaries of both types, as well as a function measuring the agreement between machine-made and human-written summaries. The experiments indicated that machine-made natural language summaries can substantially help humans in writing their own textual descriptions of entity sets within a limited time.
Citation: Elizaveta Zimina, Kalervo Järvelin, Jaakko Peltonen, Aarne Ranta, Kostas Stefanidis, Jyrki Nummenmaa. Linguistic summarisation of multiple entities in RDF graphs[J]. Applied Computing and Intelligence, 2024, 4(1): 1-18. doi: 10.3934/aci.2024001
[1] | Shahbaz Ali, Muhammad Khalid Mahmmod, Raúl M. Falcón . A paradigmatic approach to investigate restricted hyper totient graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3761-3771. doi: 10.3934/math.2021223 |
[2] | Syed Ahtsham Ul Haq Bokhary, Zill-e-Shams, Abdul Ghaffar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar . On the metric basis in wheels with consecutive missing spokes. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6221-6232. doi: 10.3934/math.2020400 |
[3] | Jing Su, Qiyue Zhang, Bing Yao . The connection between the magical coloring of trees. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27896-27907. doi: 10.3934/math.20241354 |
[4] | Gohar Ali, Martin Bača, Marcela Lascsáková, Andrea Semaničová-Feňovčíková, Ahmad ALoqaily, Nabil Mlaiki . Modular total vertex irregularity strength of graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 7662-7671. doi: 10.3934/math.2023384 |
[5] | Saeed Kosari, Yongsheng Rao, Zehui Shao, Jafar Amjadi, Rana Khoeilar . Complexity of signed total k-Roman domination problem in graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 952-961. doi: 10.3934/math.2021057 |
[6] | Kotte Amaranadha Reddy, S Sharief Basha . New classes of reverse super edge magic graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3590-3602. doi: 10.3934/math.2022198 |
[7] | T. Deepa, Raúl M. Falcón, M. Venkatachalam . On the r-dynamic coloring of the direct product of a path with either a complete graph or a wheel graph. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1470-1496. doi: 10.3934/math.2021090 |
[8] | Linyu Li, Jun Yue, Xia Zhang . Double total domination number of Cartesian product of paths. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 9506-9519. doi: 10.3934/math.2023479 |
[9] | Muhammad Amir Asif, Rashad Ismail, Ayesha Razaq, Esmail Hassan Abdullatif Al-Sabri, Muhammad Haris Mateen, Shahbaz Ali . An application on edge irregular reflexive labeling for mt-graph of cycle graph. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 1300-1321. doi: 10.3934/math.2025060 |
[10] | Baolin Ma, Chao Yang . Distinguishing colorings of graphs and their subgraphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26561-26573. doi: 10.3934/math.20231357 |
Methods for producing summaries from structured data have gained interest due to the huge volume of available data in the Web. Simultaneously, there have been advances in natural language generation from Resource Description Framework (RDF) data. However, no efforts have been made to generate natural language summaries for groups of multiple RDF entities. This paper describes the first algorithm for summarising the information of a set of RDF entities in the form of human-readable text. The paper also proposes an experimental design for the evaluation of the summaries in a human task context. Experiments were carried out comparing machine-made summaries and summaries written by humans, with and without the help of machine-made summaries. We develop criteria for evaluating the content and text quality of summaries of both types, as well as a function measuring the agreement between machine-made and human-written summaries. The experiments indicated that machine-made natural language summaries can substantially help humans in writing their own textual descriptions of entity sets within a limited time.
A graph labeling is an assignment of integers to the vertices or edges, or both, subject to certain conditions. Gallian [3] has written a dynamic survey of graph labeling. MacDougall et al. [5] introduced the notion of a vertex magic total labeling of graphs. Let G be a graph of order n and size m. A vertex magic total labeling of G is defined as a one-to-one function
f:V(G)∪E(G)→{1,2,⋯,n+m} |
with the property that for each vertex u of G,
f(u)+∑v∈N(u)f(uv)=k |
for some constant k where N(u) is the neighborhood of u. The constant k is called the magic constant for f. The vertex-magic total labelings of wheels and related graphs were studied in [6], and later in [11]. The properties of the general graphs such as cycles, paths, complete graphs, wheels, bipartite graphs and trees, which satisfy the vertex magic total labelings, were studied in [10]. MacDougall et al. [4] introduced the concept of a super vertex magic total labeling. They defined a vertex magic total labeling to be super if
f[V(G)]={1,2,⋯,n}. |
In 2017, Nagaraj et al. [7] introduced the concept of an even vertex magic total labeling. They called a vertex magic total labeling as even if
f[V(G)]={2,4,⋯,2n}. |
A graph G is called an even vertex magic if there exists an even vertex magic total labeling of G. We note that if G is an even vertex magic, then n≤m. The following results, which appeared in [7], are useful to us.
Theorem 1.1. [7] Let G be a nontrivial graph of order n and size m. If G is an even vertex magic, then magic constant k is given by the following:
k=m2+2mn+mn. |
A wheel Wn, n≥3, is a graph of order n+1 that contains a cycle Cn, for which every vertex in the cycle Cn is connected to one other vertex known as the hub. The edges of the wheel which are incident to the hub are called spokes. The vertices and edges of the cycle Cn in Wn are called rim vertices and rim edges, respectively. It was shown in [7] that a wheel Wn has no even vertex magic total labeling, as we state next.
Theorem 1.2. [7] A wheel Wn is not even vertex magic.
In this paper, the labeling problem is related to the work in [1]. In addition to the aforementioned vertex labeling by even numbers 2,4,⋯,2n, they studied vertex labelings by using three consecutive numbers 0,1,2 with some specific properties. These labelings were referred to as a weak Roman dominating function and a perfect Roman dominating function.
From the studies in [8,9,12], there exist graphs with the same order and size that are even vertex magics. Moreover, the wheel related graphs, namely fans, cycles and suns, having the even vertex magic total labelings were established in [7]. However, since these graphs have the same order and size, it is interesting and challenging to study wheel related graphs when the size is greater than the order, which have an even vertex magic total labeling.
The t-fold wheel Wn,t, n≥3, t≥1, is a wheel related graph derived from a wheel Wn by duplicating the t hubs, each adjacent to all rim vertices, and not adjacent to each other. It is observed that the t-fold wheel Wn,t has a size nt+n that exceeds its order n+t. The goal of this paper is to study conditions for an even vertex magic Wn,t in terms of n and t. Furthermore, we also determine an even vertex magic total labeling of some t-fold wheel Wn,t.
Since the 1-fold wheel Wn,1 is isomorphic to the wheel Wn and by Theorem 1.1, Wn is not an even vertex magic. In this section, we consider the t-fold wheel Wn,t, where n and t are integers with n≥3 and t≥2.
In order to present the conditions for an even vertex magic Wn,t, we initially explore the magic constant of the t-fold wheel Wn,t of order n+t and size nt+n by employing Theorem 1.1.
Proposition 2.1. Let n and t be integers with n≥3 and t≥2. If the t-fold wheel Wn,t is an even vertex magic, then the magic constant is defined as follows:
k=2nt+3n+n2t2+2n2t+nn+t. |
We are able to show the bound of an integer t for the t-fold wheel having an even vertex magic total labeling as follows.
Proposition 2.2. Let n and t be integers with n≥3 and t≥2. If the t-fold wheel Wn,t is an even vertex magic, then 2≤t≤n.
Proof. Suppose that the t-fold wheel Wn,t is an even vertex magic with magic constant k. By Proposition 2.1, we obtain the following:
k=2nt+3n+n2t2+2n2t+nn+t. |
On the contrary, assume that t>n. Let t=n+r, for some r≥1. Then,
n2t2+2n2t+n=n4+2n3r+n2r2+2n3+2n2r+n |
and
n+t=n+(n+r)=2n+r. |
Let
P(n)=n4+2n3r+n2r2+2n3+2n2r+n. |
By using the remainder theorem, the remainder when P(n) is divided by 2n+r is as follows:
P(−r2)=r4+4r3−8r16. |
If
P(−r2)=0, |
then r=−2, which is a contradiction. Thus,
P(−r2)≠0. |
Specifically, n2t2+2n2t+n is not divisible by n+t. Thus, k is not an integer, which is a contradiction. Therefore, 2≤t≤n.
According to Proposition 2.2, the t-fold wheel W3,t is not an even vertex magic, where t≥4. Figure 1 shows the even vertex magics W3,2 and W3,3 with magic constants k=36 and k=50, respectively, where their vertices and edges are labeled by the even vertex magic total labelings. We present an even vertex magic total labeling of the t-fold wheel Wn,t by considering only the integer n as the following results.
Proposition 2.3. For every integer n≥3, if the n-fold wheel Wn,n is an even vertex magic, then n is odd.
Proof. Let n be an integer with n≥3. Suppose that the n-fold wheel Wn,n is an even vertex magic with a magic constant k. On the contrary, assume that n is even. There exists an integer q such that n=2q. By Proposition 2.1,
k=2n2+3n+n3+2n2+12. |
Since
n3+2n2+1=8q3+8q2+1 |
is odd, n3+2n2+1 is not divisible by 2. Thus, k is not an integer, which is a contradiction. Therefore, n is odd.
As we have seen in Figure 1, the 3-fold wheel W3,3 is an even vertex magic, as indicated by Proposition 2.3. By an argument similar to the one used in the proof of Proposition 2.3, we obtain the condition for an even vertex magic Wn,n−2, as we now show.
Proposition 2.4. For every integer n≥4, if the (n−2)-fold wheel Wn,n−2 is an even vertex magic, then n is even.
The even vertex magic total labeling of the 2-fold wheel W4,2 with a magic constant k=50 is shown in Figure 2.
In order to deduce an even vertex magic total labeling of the t-fold wheel for achieving the main result, we need some additional notation for the t-fold wheel Wn,t. For every pair of integers n≥3 and t≥2, let
V(Wn,t)={u1,u2,…,un,v1,v2,…,vt} |
and
E(Wn,t)={uiui+1|1≤i≤n−1}∪{unu1}∪{uivj|1≤i≤n,1≤j≤t}. |
Suppose the t-fold wheel Wn,t is an even vertex magic. Then, for any even vertex magic total labeling f of Wn,t, let
Srv=n∑i=1f(ui), Sre=n−1∑i=1f(uiui+1)+f(unu1) |
and
Sh=t∑j=1f(vj), Ss=t∑j=1n∑i=1f(uivj). |
Next, we present the following lemma to show the necessary condition for an even vertex magic Wn,t with the following magic constant:
k=2nt+3n+n2t2+2n2t+nn+t. |
Note that
Srv+2Sre−Sh=(n−t)k. |
Lemma 2.5. Let n and t be integers where n≥3 and t≥2. If the t-fold wheel Wn,t is an even vertex magic, then
Srv+2Sre−Sh=(t2+4t+3)n2+(−2t3−6t2−3t+1)n+(t3+2t2−1)(2nt)n+t. |
With the aid of Lemma 2.5 and Proposition 2.2, the necessary condition for an even vertex magic total labeling of the t-fold wheel Wn,t can also be given in terms of n and t.
Proposition 2.6. Let n and t be integers where n≥3 and t≥2. If the t-fold wheel Wn,t is an even vertex magic, then
(−t2−2t+1)n2+(2t3+6t2+7t+1)n−(t2+t)−(t3+2t2−1)(2nt)n+t≥0. |
Proof. Suppose that the t-fold wheel Wn,t is an even vertex magic. By Lemma 2.5,
Srv+2Sre−Sh=(t2+4t+3)n2+(−2t3−6t2−3t+1)n+(t3+2t2−1)(2nt)n+t. |
Next, we consider the maximum of (Srv+2Sre−Sh).
By Proposition 2.2, 2≤t≤n, and then 2n+2t<nt+n+t+1. The maximum of
(Srv+2Sre−Sh)=∑2t+2≤i≤2n+2tiis eveni+2nt+2n+t∑i=nt+n+t+1i−∑2≤i≤2tiis eveni=(∑2≤i≤2n+2tiis eveni−∑2≤i≤2tiis eveni)+2(nt+2n+t∑i=1i−nt+n+t∑i=1i)−∑2≤i≤2tiis eveni=((2n+2t)(2n+2t+2)4−(2t)(2t+2)4)+2((nt+2n+t)(nt+2n+t+1)2−(nt+n+t)(nt+n+t+1)2)−(2t)(2t+2)4=2n2t+4n2+4nt−t2+2n−t. |
Since Srv+2Sre−Sh does not exceed the maximum of (Srv+2Sre−Sh), the maximum of
(Srv+2Sre−Sh)−(Srv+2Sre−Sh)≥0. |
Therefore,
(−t2−2t+1)n2+(2t3+6t2+7t+1)n−(t2+t)−(t3+2t2−1)(2nt)n+t≥0. |
Now, we investigate the sufficient condition for a labeling f that can be an even vertex magic total labeling of Wn,n when n is odd.
Theorem 2.7. Let n be an odd integer where n≥3. For every n-fold wheel Wn,n, let
f:V(Wn,n)∪E(Wn,n)→{1,2,…,n2+3n} |
be defined by the following:
f(ui) = 2i, if 1≤i≤n,f(vj) = 2n+2j, if 1≤j≤n,f(uiui+1) = 2n+1−2i, if 1≤i≤n−1,f(unu1) = 1, f(un+1−jvj) = n2+3n+1−2j, if 1≤j≤n,f[EH]−f[{un+1−jvj|1≤j≤n}] = {2n+1,2n+3,…,n2+n−1} ∪{4n+2,4n+4,…,n2+3n}, if EH={uivj|1≤i,j≤n}. |
If
n−1∑j=1f(u1vj)=n3+4n2−52, |
then f can be an even vertex magic total labeling of Wn,n.
Proof. Assume that
n−1∑j=1f(u1vj)=n3+4n2−52. |
We have that
Ss−n∑j=1f(un+1−jvj)=∑2n+1≤i≤n2+n−1iis oddi+∑4n+2≤i≤n2+3niis eveni=(∑1≤i≤n2+n−1iis oddi−∑1≤i≤2n−1iis oddi)+(∑2≤i≤n2+3niis eveni−∑2≤i≤4niis eveni)=((n2+n)24−(2n)24)+((n2+3n)(n2+3n+2)4−4n(4n+2)4)=n4+4n3−4n2−n2, |
and then,
(Ss−n∑j=1f(un+1−jvj))−n−1∑j=1f(u1vj)=n4+3n3−8n2−n+52. |
Next, we consider the sum of the label of each vertex and the labels of all edges incident to this vertex. By the assumption, for 1≤j≤n,
f(vj)+n∑i=1f(uivj)=f(vj)+f(un+1−jvj)+∑1≤i≤ni≠n+1−jf(uivj)=f(vj)+f(un+1−jvj)+Ss−n∑j=1f(un+1−jvj)n=(2n+2j)+(n2+3n+1−2j)+n3+4n2−4n−12=n3+6n2+6n+12, |
f(u1)+f(u1u2)+f(unu1)+n∑j=1f(u1vj)=f(u1)+f(u1u2)+f(unu1)+f(u1vn)+n−1∑j=1f(u1vj)=2+(2n+1−2)+1+(n2+n−1+2)+n3+4n2−52=n3+6n2+6n+12. |
For 2≤i≤n,
f(ui)+f(uiui+1)+f(ui−1ui)+n∑j=1f(uivj)=f(ui)+f(uiui+1)+f(ui−1ui)+f(uivn+1−i)+∑1≤j≤nj≠n+1−if(uivj)=f(ui)+f(uiui+1)+f(ui−1ui)+f(uivn+1−i)+(Ss−n∑j=1f(un+1−jvj))−n−1∑j=1f(u1vj)n−1=2i+(2n+1−2i)+(2n+1−2i+2)+(n2+n−1+2i)+n3+4n2−4n−52=n3+6n2+6n+12. |
Therefore, f can be an even vertex magic total labeling of Wn,n with a magic constant
k=n3+6n2+6n+12. |
Now, we investigate the sufficient condition for a labeling f that can be an even vertex magic total labeling of Wn,n−2 when n is even.
Theorem 2.8. Let n be an even integer with n≥4. For every (n−2)-fold wheel Wn,n−2, let
f:V(Wn,n−2)∪E(Wn,n−2)→{1,2,…,n2+n−2} |
be defined by the following:
f(ui)=2i,if 1≤i≤n,f(vj)=2n+2j,if 1≤j≤n−2,f[EC]={a1,a2,⋯,an},if EC={uiui+1,unu1|1≤i≤n−1},f[EH]={1,2,⋯,n2+n−2}−{2,4,⋯,2n+4,a1,a2,⋯,an},if EH={uivj|1≤i≤n,1≤j≤n−2}. |
If
Ss=n4+n3−15n2+20n−42, |
then f can be an even vertex magic total labeling of Wn,n−2.
Proof. Assume that
Ss=n4+n3−15n2+20n−42. |
It suffices to show that for each vertex u of Wn,n−2,
f(u)+∑v∈N(u)f(uv)=k, |
where
k=n3+3n2−3n2. |
To do this, we consider the relevant sums, as follows.
Since the sum of the labels of all rim edges is equal to the sum of the labels of all vertices and the labels of all edges subtracted by the sum of the labels of all vertices and the labels of all spokes, it follows that
Sre=n2+n−2∑i=1i−∑2≤i≤4n−4iis eveni−Ss=(n2+n−2)(n2+n−1)2−(4n−4)(4n−2)4−n4+n3−15n2+20n−42=n3+5n2−11n+22. |
Since the sum of the labels of all hubs is equal to the sum of even integers from 2n+2 to 4n−4,
Sh+Ss=∑2n+2≤i≤4n−4iis eveni+Ss=(∑2≤i≤4n−4iis eveni−∑2≤i≤2niis eveni)+Ss=(4n−4)(4n−2)4−(2n)(2n+2)4+n4+n3−15n2+20n−42=n4+n3−9n2+6n2. |
Since the sum of the labels of all rim vertices is equal to the sum of even integers from 2 to 2n,
Srv+2Sre+Ss=∑2≤i≤2niis eveni+2Sre+Ss=(2n)(2n+2)4+2(n3+5n2−11n+22)+n4+n3−15n2+20n−42=n4+3n3−3n22. |
Next, we consider the sum of the label of each vertex and the labels of all edges incident to this vertex. We have the sum of the label of each hub and the labels of all edges incident to this hub as follows.
For 1≤j≤n−2,
f(vj)+n∑i=1f(uivj)=Sh+Ssn−2=n3+3n2−3n2. |
We obtain the sum of the label of each rim vertex and the labels of all edges incident to this rim vertex as follows.
For 2≤i≤n−1,
f(ui)+f(uiui+1)+f(ui−1ui)+n−2∑j=1f(uivj)=Srv+2Sre+Ssn=n3+3n2−3n2. |
Similarly,
f(un)+f(unu1)+f(un−1un)+n−2∑j=1f(unvj)=n3+3n2−3n2 |
and
f(u1)+f(u1u2)+f(unu1)+n−2∑j=1f(u1vj)=n3+3n2−3n2. |
Therefore, f can be an even vertex magic total labeling of Wn,n−2 with the following magic constant:
k=n3+3n2−3n2. |
In this section, we establish a characterization of an even vertex magic Wn,t for an integer 3≤n≤9. First, we present an n-fold wheel Wn,n which has an even vertex magic total labeling for every odd integer 3≤n≤9 as follows.
Theorem 3.1. For every odd integer 3≤n≤9, the n-fold wheel Wn,n is an even vertex magic.
Proof. Let n be an odd integer where 3≤n≤9. We define
f:V(Wn,n)∪E(Wn,n)→{1,2,⋯,n2+3n}, |
as the sufficient condition of Theorem 2.7, by
f(ui)=2i,if 1≤i≤n,f(vj)=2n+2j,if 1≤j≤n,f(uiui+1)=2n+1−2i,if 1≤i≤n−1,f(unu1)=1, |
and for 1≤i,j≤n, f(uivj) are shown in Tables 1–4,
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 |
u1 | 11 | 18 | 13 |
u2 | 14 | 15 | 9 |
u3 | 17 | 7 | 16 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 | v5 |
u1 | 15 | 21 | 36 | 38 | 31 |
u2 | 13 | 30 | 29 | 33 | 28 |
u3 | 40 | 24 | 35 | 19 | 17 |
u4 | 34 | 37 | 11 | 23 | 32 |
u5 | 39 | 27 | 26 | 22 | 25 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 | v5 | v6 | v7 |
u1 | 15 | 51 | 64 | 40 | 29 | 68 | 57 |
u2 | 66 | 43 | 17 | 38 | 19 | 59 | 70 |
u3 | 25 | 45 | 56 | 48 | 61 | 32 | 47 |
u4 | 52 | 31 | 33 | 63 | 54 | 53 | 30 |
u5 | 42 | 35 | 65 | 34 | 60 | 36 | 46 |
u6 | 55 | 67 | 23 | 58 | 49 | 27 | 41 |
u7 | 69 | 50 | 62 | 37 | 44 | 39 | 21 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 | v5 | v6 | v7 | v8 | v9 |
u1 | 73 | 33 | 102 | 69 | 19 | 79 | 63 | 86 | 91 |
u2 | 43 | 56 | 35 | 62 | 49 | 89 | 85 | 93 | 87 |
u3 | 75 | 61 | 48 | 53 | 104 | 92 | 95 | 23 | 50 |
u4 | 80 | 58 | 72 | 25 | 108 | 97 | 77 | 47 | 39 |
u5 | 51 | 96 | 59 | 81 | 99 | 37 | 55 | 57 | 70 |
u6 | 60 | 100 | 44 | 101 | 67 | 40 | 41 | 90 | 64 |
u7 | 38 | 83 | 103 | 82 | 74 | 78 | 29 | 76 | 46 |
u8 | 88 | 105 | 94 | 65 | 42 | 66 | 52 | 31 | 68 |
u9 | 107 | 21 | 54 | 71 | 45 | 27 | 106 | 98 | 84 |
For every odd integer 3≤n≤9, the labeling f, as defined above, is an even vertex magic total labeling of the n-fold wheel Wn,n with magic constants k=50,153,340 and 635, respectively. Therefore, Wn,n is an even vertex magic.
As a consequence of an even vertex magic W3,2, Proposition 2.2 and Theorem 3.1, in any t-fold wheel W3,t, we are able to show that both W3,t and W3,t are only even vertex magics.
Theorem 3.2. For every integer t≥2, the t-fold wheel W3,t is an even vertex magic if and only if t=2,3.
The following result gives the necessary and sufficient condition for the t-fold wheel Wn,t to be an even vertex magic for every odd integer 5≤n≤9.
Theorem 3.3. For every odd integer 5≤n≤9 and an integer t≥2, the t-fold wheel Wn,t is an even vertex magic if and only if t=n.
Proof. Let n be an odd integer where 5≤n≤9 and t is an integer where t≥2. Assume that the t-fold wheel Wn,t is an even vertex magic. By Proposition 2.2, 2≤t≤n.
Case 1. n=5,7. If 2≤t≤n−1, then n2t2+2n2t+n is not divisible by n+t, and hence k is not an integer, which is a contradiction. Therefore, t=n.
Case 2. n=9. If either t=2 or 4≤t≤n−1, then n2t2+2n2t+n is not divisible by n+t, and hence k is not an integer, which is a contradiction. If t=3, then,
2nt3−n2t2−2n2t+6nt2+7nt+n2−t2+n−t−2nt4+4nt3−2ntn+t=−174<0, |
which is a contradiction with Proposition 2.6. Therefore, t=n.
Conversely, assume t=n. By Theorem 3.1, Wn,t is an even vertex magic.
We show an even vertex magic total labeling of Wn,n−2 for every even integer 4≤n≤8 as follows.
Theorem 3.4. For every even integer 4≤n≤8, the (n−2)-fold wheel Wn,n−2 is an even vertex magic.
Proof. Let n be an even integer with 4≤n≤8. We define
f:V(Wn,n−2)∪E(Wn,n−2)→{1,2,…,n2+n−2} |
as the sufficient condition of Theorem 2.8, by
f(ui)=2i,if 1≤i≤n,f(vj)=2n+2j,if 1≤j≤n−2, |
for 1≤i≤n−1, f(uiui+1) and f(unu1) are shown in Tables 5–7.
f(u1u2) | f(u2u3) | f(u3u4) | f(u4u1) |
18 | 9 | 11 | 13 |
f(u1u2) | f(u2u3) | f(u3u4) | f(u4u5) | f(u5u6) | f(u6u1) |
40 | 39 | 38 | 13 | 17 | 19 |
f(u1u2) | f(u2u3) | f(u3u4) | f(u4u5) | f(u5u6) | f(u6u7) | f(u7u8) | f(u8u1) |
70 | 68 | 66 | 64 | 62 | 19 | 13 | 11 |
And for 1≤i≤n and 1≤j≤n−2, f(uivj) are shown in Tables 8–10.
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 |
u1 | 16 | 1 |
u2 | 14 | 5 |
u3 | 7 | 17 |
u4 | 3 | 15 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 |
u1 | 36 | 24 | 3 | 29 |
u2 | 11 | 25 | 33 | 1 |
u3 | 26 | 9 | 5 | 30 |
u4 | 22 | 23 | 34 | 15 |
u5 | 37 | 21 | 28 | 27 |
u6 | 7 | 35 | 32 | 31 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 | v5 | v6 |
u1 | 69 | 3 | 40 | 56 | 39 | 50 |
u2 | 1 | 67 | 5 | 59 | 31 | 35 |
u3 | 21 | 17 | 65 | 7 | 44 | 46 |
u4 | 42 | 38 | 23 | 33 | 9 | 57 |
u5 | 61 | 27 | 37 | 34 | 30 | 15 |
u6 | 41 | 53 | 49 | 32 | 47 | 25 |
u7 | 29 | 60 | 54 | 52 | 63 | 36 |
u8 | 58 | 55 | 45 | 43 | 51 | 48 |
For every even integer 4≤n≤8, the labeling f, as defined above, is an even vertex magic total labeling of the (n−2)-fold wheel Wn,n−2 with magic constants k=50,153 and 340, respectively. Therefore, Wn,n−2 is an even vertex magic.
There is a similar methodology of the proof of Theorem 3.4, which is also used in the study of graph operations (see [2]). Next, we determine a characterization of the t-fold wheel Wn,t to be an even vertex magic for every even integer 4≤n≤8. In order to we need to present the following lemma involving a 3-fold wheel W8,3.
Lemma 3.5. The 3-fold wheel W8,3 is not an even vertex magic.
Proof. On the contrary, assume that the 3-fold wheel W8,3 is an even vertex magic with a magic constant k. Since W8,3 has an order 11 and a size 32 and by Proposition 2.1, k=160. We have that
Srv=132, 2Sre=1,628−2Ss |
and
Srv+2Sre+Ss=8k=1,280. |
Thus, Ss=480. However, Sh+Ss=3k=480. This is a contradiction because Sh>0. Therefore, W8,3 is not an even vertex magic.
We are able to show that the necessary and sufficient condition for the t-fold wheel Wn,t is an even vertex magic for every even integer 4≤n≤8.
Theorem 3.6. For every even integer 4≤n≤8 and integer t≥2, the t-fold wheel Wn,t is an even vertex magic if and only if t=n−2.
Proof. Let n be an even integer where 4≤n≤8 and t is an integer where t≥2. Assume that the t-fold wheel Wn,t is an even vertex magic. By Proposition 2.2, 2≤t≤n.
Case 1. n=4,6. If either 2≤t≤n−3 or n−1≤t≤n, then n2t2+2n2t+n is not divisible by n+t, and hence k is not an integer, which is a contradiction. Therefore, t=n−2.
Case 2. n=8. If either 4≤t≤n−3 or n−1≤t≤n, then n2t2+2n2t+n is not divisible by n+t, and hence k is not an integer, which is a contradiction. If t=3, then, by Lemma 3.5, Wn,t is not an even vertex magic, which is a contradiction. If t=2, then,
2nt3−n2t2−2n2t+6nt2+7nt+n2−t2+n−t−2nt4+4nt3−2ntn+t=−62<0, |
which is a contradiction with Proposition 2.6. Therefore, t=n−2.
Conversely, assume t=n−2. By Theorem 3.4, Wn,t is an even vertex magic.
In this paper, we have not only established the bound of an integer t for the even vertex magic total labeling of the t-fold wheel, but have also presented the necessary condition for such labeling in terms of n and t. Furthermore, we have conducted an investigation into the sufficient conditions for labelings that can serve as even vertex magic total labelings for Wn,n when n is odd, and Wn,n−2 when n is even.
Our research has led us to the following significant conclusions:
● For every integer t≥2, the t-fold wheel W3,t is an even vertex magic total labeling if and only if t=2,3.
● For every odd integer 5≤n≤9 and an integer t≥2, the t-fold wheel Wn,t is an even vertex magic total labeling if and only if t=n.
● For every even integer 4≤n≤8 and an integer t≥2, the t-fold wheel Wn,t is an even vertex magic total labeling if and only if t=n−2.
In essence, our work has discussed the characterizations of t-fold wheel Wn,t to possess an even vertex magic total labeling for an integer 3≤n≤9. It would be interesting to apply the results of this paper to further study under what conditions for Wn,t will be an even vertex magic, especially for a larger n.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
[1] | V. Christophides, V. Efthymiou, K. Stefanidis, Entity resolution in the Web of data, Synthesis lectures on the Semantic Web: theory and technology, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79468-1 |
[2] |
H. Shah, P. Fränti, Combining statistical, structural, and linguistic features for keyword extraction from web pages, Applied computing and intelligence, 2 (2022), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.3934/aci.2022007 doi: 10.3934/aci.2022007
![]() |
[3] | G. Cheng, T. Tran, Y. Qu, RELIN: relatedness and informativeness-based centrality for entity summarization, The Semantic Web–ISWC 2011, The Semantic Web–ISWC 2011: 10th International Semantic Web Conference, Bonn, Germany, October 23-27, 2011, Proceedings, Part I 10, (2011), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25073-6_8 |
[4] | A. Thalhammer, A. Rettinger, Browsing DBPedia entities with summaries, The Semantic Web: ESWC 2014 Satellite Events, (2014), 511–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11955-7_76 |
[5] | A. Thalhammer, N. Lasierra, A. Rettinger, LinkSUM: using link analysis to summarize entity data, International Conference on Web Engineering, (2016), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38791-8_14 |
[6] | G. Cheng, D. Xu, Y. Qu, Summarizing entity descriptions for effective and efficient human-centered entity linking, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, (2015), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1145/2736277.2741094 |
[7] |
G. Cheng, D. Xu, Y. Qu, C3d+ p: a summarization method for interactive entity resolution, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 35 (2015), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2015.05.004 doi: 10.1016/j.websem.2015.05.004
![]() |
[8] | J. Huang, W. Hu, H. Li, Y. Qu, Automated comparative table generation for facilitating human intervention in multi-entity resolution, The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, (2018), 585–594. |
[9] | K. Gunaratna, A. H. Yazdavar, K. Thirunarayan, A. Sheth, G. Cheng, Relatedness-based multi-entity summarization, Proceedings of the Twenty-national Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (2017), 1060–1066. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/147 |
[10] | G. Troullinou, H. Kondylakis, K. Stefanidis, D. Plexousakis, Exploring RDFS KBs using summaries, The Semantic Web – ISWC, (2018), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00671-6_16 |
[11] |
A. Aker, R. Gaizauskas, Generating descriptive multi-document summaries of geo-located entities using entity type models, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Tech., 66 (2015), 721–738. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23211 doi: 10.1002/asi.23211
![]() |
[12] |
H.Chen, J. Kuo, S. Huang, C. Lin, H. Wung, A summarization system for Chinese news from multiple sources, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tech., 54 (2003), 1224–1236. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10315 doi: 10.1002/asi.10315
![]() |
[13] | E. Baralis, L. Cagliero, S. Jabeen, A. Fiori, S. Shah, Multi-document summarization based on the Yago ontology, Expert Syst. Appl. 40 (2013), 6976–6984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.06.047 |
[14] | K. Gunaratna, K. Thirunarayan, A. Sheth, FACES: diversity-aware entity summarization using incremental hierarchical conceptual clustering, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (2015), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9180 |
[15] |
M. Sydow, M. Pikuła, R. Schenkel, The notion of diversity in graphical entity summarisation on semantic knowledge graphs, J. Intell. Inf. Syst., 41 (2013), 109–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-013-0239-6 doi: 10.1007/s10844-013-0239-6
![]() |
[16] | B. Schäfer, P. Ristoski, H. Paulheim, What is special about Bethlehem, Pennsylvania? Identifying unusual facts about DBpedia entities, Proceedings of the ISWC 2015 Posters & Demonstrations Track, 2015. |
[17] | N. Yan, S. Hasani, A. Asudeh, C. Li, Generating preview tables for entity graphs, Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data, (2016), 1797–1811. https://doi.org/10.1145/2882903.2915221 |
[18] | D. Xu, G. Cheng, Y. Qu, Facilitating human intervention in coreference resolution with comparative entity summaries, The Semantic Web: Trends and Challenges, ESWC 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (2014), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07443-6_36 |
[19] | D. Wei, Y. Liu, F. Zhu, L. Zang, W. Zhou, J. Han, et al., ESA: Entity Summarization with Attention, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1905.10625, 2019. |
[20] | Q. Liu, G. Cheng, Y. Qu, DeepLENS: Deep Learning for Entity Summarization, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2003.03736, 2020. |
[21] | Q. Liu, Y. Chen, G. Cheng, E. Kharlamov, J. Li, Y. Qu, Entity Summarization with User Feedback, ESWC 2020: The Semantic Web, (2020), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49461-2_22 |
[22] | A. Chisholm, W. Radford, B. Hachey, Learning to generate one-sentence biographies from Wikidata, Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers, (2017), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/E17-1060 |
[23] | R. Lebret, D. Grangier, M. Auli, Neural Text Generation from Structured Data with Application to the Biography Domain, Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, (2016), 1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D16-1128 |
[24] |
P. Vougiouklis, H. Elsahar, L. Kaffee, C. Gravier, F. Laforest, J. Hare, et al., Neural Wikipedian: Generating Textual Summaries from Knowledge Base Triples, Journal of Web Semantics, 52 (2018), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2018.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.websem.2018.07.002
![]() |
[25] | C. Jumel, A. Louis, J. C. K. Cheung, TESA: A Task in Entity Semantic Aggregation for Abstractive Summarization, Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, (2020), 8031–8050. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.646 |
[26] |
A. R. Fabbri, W. Kryściński, B. McCann, C. Xiong, R. Socher, D. Radev, SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 9 (2021), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00373 doi: 10.1162/tacl_a_00373
![]() |
[27] | E. Zimina, J. Nummenmaa, K. Järvelin, J. Peltonen, K. Stefanidis, H. Hyyrö, GQA: grammatical question answering for RDF data, Semantic Web Challenges: 5th SemWebEval Challenge at ESWC, (2018), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00072-1_8 |
[28] | T. Saracevic, Measuring the degree of agreement between searchers, Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 21 (1984), 227–230. |
[29] | M. Azmy, P. Shi, I. Ilyas, J. Lin, Farewell Freebase: Migrating the SimpleQuestions Dataset to DBpedia, Proceedings of the 27th international conference on computational linguistics (2018), 2093–2103. |
[30] | T. Tanon, D. Vrandečić, S. Schaffert, T. Steiner, L. Pintscher, From Freebase to Wikidata: The Great Migration, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, (2016), 1419–1428. |
[31] | M. Dubey, D. Banerjee, A. Abdelkawi, J. Lehmann, LC-QuAD 2.0: A Large Dataset for Complex Question Answering over Wikidata and DBpedia, International Semantic Web Conference, (2019), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_5 |
[32] | M. Damova, D. Dannélls, R. Enache, M. Mateva, A. Ranta, Multilingual Natural Language Interaction with Semantic Web Knowledge Bases and Linked Open Data, in Towards the Multilingual Semantic Web: Principles, Methods and Applications, Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., Eds., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (2014), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43585-4_13 |
[33] | D. Dannélls, Multilingual text generation from structured formal representations. PhD Thesis. University of Gothenburg, 2012. |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 |
u1 | 11 | 18 | 13 |
u2 | 14 | 15 | 9 |
u3 | 17 | 7 | 16 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 | v5 |
u1 | 15 | 21 | 36 | 38 | 31 |
u2 | 13 | 30 | 29 | 33 | 28 |
u3 | 40 | 24 | 35 | 19 | 17 |
u4 | 34 | 37 | 11 | 23 | 32 |
u5 | 39 | 27 | 26 | 22 | 25 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 | v5 | v6 | v7 |
u1 | 15 | 51 | 64 | 40 | 29 | 68 | 57 |
u2 | 66 | 43 | 17 | 38 | 19 | 59 | 70 |
u3 | 25 | 45 | 56 | 48 | 61 | 32 | 47 |
u4 | 52 | 31 | 33 | 63 | 54 | 53 | 30 |
u5 | 42 | 35 | 65 | 34 | 60 | 36 | 46 |
u6 | 55 | 67 | 23 | 58 | 49 | 27 | 41 |
u7 | 69 | 50 | 62 | 37 | 44 | 39 | 21 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 | v5 | v6 | v7 | v8 | v9 |
u1 | 73 | 33 | 102 | 69 | 19 | 79 | 63 | 86 | 91 |
u2 | 43 | 56 | 35 | 62 | 49 | 89 | 85 | 93 | 87 |
u3 | 75 | 61 | 48 | 53 | 104 | 92 | 95 | 23 | 50 |
u4 | 80 | 58 | 72 | 25 | 108 | 97 | 77 | 47 | 39 |
u5 | 51 | 96 | 59 | 81 | 99 | 37 | 55 | 57 | 70 |
u6 | 60 | 100 | 44 | 101 | 67 | 40 | 41 | 90 | 64 |
u7 | 38 | 83 | 103 | 82 | 74 | 78 | 29 | 76 | 46 |
u8 | 88 | 105 | 94 | 65 | 42 | 66 | 52 | 31 | 68 |
u9 | 107 | 21 | 54 | 71 | 45 | 27 | 106 | 98 | 84 |
f(u1u2) | f(u2u3) | f(u3u4) | f(u4u1) |
18 | 9 | 11 | 13 |
f(u1u2) | f(u2u3) | f(u3u4) | f(u4u5) | f(u5u6) | f(u6u1) |
40 | 39 | 38 | 13 | 17 | 19 |
f(u1u2) | f(u2u3) | f(u3u4) | f(u4u5) | f(u5u6) | f(u6u7) | f(u7u8) | f(u8u1) |
70 | 68 | 66 | 64 | 62 | 19 | 13 | 11 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 |
u1 | 16 | 1 |
u2 | 14 | 5 |
u3 | 7 | 17 |
u4 | 3 | 15 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 |
u1 | 36 | 24 | 3 | 29 |
u2 | 11 | 25 | 33 | 1 |
u3 | 26 | 9 | 5 | 30 |
u4 | 22 | 23 | 34 | 15 |
u5 | 37 | 21 | 28 | 27 |
u6 | 7 | 35 | 32 | 31 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 | v5 | v6 |
u1 | 69 | 3 | 40 | 56 | 39 | 50 |
u2 | 1 | 67 | 5 | 59 | 31 | 35 |
u3 | 21 | 17 | 65 | 7 | 44 | 46 |
u4 | 42 | 38 | 23 | 33 | 9 | 57 |
u5 | 61 | 27 | 37 | 34 | 30 | 15 |
u6 | 41 | 53 | 49 | 32 | 47 | 25 |
u7 | 29 | 60 | 54 | 52 | 63 | 36 |
u8 | 58 | 55 | 45 | 43 | 51 | 48 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 |
u1 | 11 | 18 | 13 |
u2 | 14 | 15 | 9 |
u3 | 17 | 7 | 16 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 | v5 |
u1 | 15 | 21 | 36 | 38 | 31 |
u2 | 13 | 30 | 29 | 33 | 28 |
u3 | 40 | 24 | 35 | 19 | 17 |
u4 | 34 | 37 | 11 | 23 | 32 |
u5 | 39 | 27 | 26 | 22 | 25 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 | v5 | v6 | v7 |
u1 | 15 | 51 | 64 | 40 | 29 | 68 | 57 |
u2 | 66 | 43 | 17 | 38 | 19 | 59 | 70 |
u3 | 25 | 45 | 56 | 48 | 61 | 32 | 47 |
u4 | 52 | 31 | 33 | 63 | 54 | 53 | 30 |
u5 | 42 | 35 | 65 | 34 | 60 | 36 | 46 |
u6 | 55 | 67 | 23 | 58 | 49 | 27 | 41 |
u7 | 69 | 50 | 62 | 37 | 44 | 39 | 21 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 | v5 | v6 | v7 | v8 | v9 |
u1 | 73 | 33 | 102 | 69 | 19 | 79 | 63 | 86 | 91 |
u2 | 43 | 56 | 35 | 62 | 49 | 89 | 85 | 93 | 87 |
u3 | 75 | 61 | 48 | 53 | 104 | 92 | 95 | 23 | 50 |
u4 | 80 | 58 | 72 | 25 | 108 | 97 | 77 | 47 | 39 |
u5 | 51 | 96 | 59 | 81 | 99 | 37 | 55 | 57 | 70 |
u6 | 60 | 100 | 44 | 101 | 67 | 40 | 41 | 90 | 64 |
u7 | 38 | 83 | 103 | 82 | 74 | 78 | 29 | 76 | 46 |
u8 | 88 | 105 | 94 | 65 | 42 | 66 | 52 | 31 | 68 |
u9 | 107 | 21 | 54 | 71 | 45 | 27 | 106 | 98 | 84 |
f(u1u2) | f(u2u3) | f(u3u4) | f(u4u1) |
18 | 9 | 11 | 13 |
f(u1u2) | f(u2u3) | f(u3u4) | f(u4u5) | f(u5u6) | f(u6u1) |
40 | 39 | 38 | 13 | 17 | 19 |
f(u1u2) | f(u2u3) | f(u3u4) | f(u4u5) | f(u5u6) | f(u6u7) | f(u7u8) | f(u8u1) |
70 | 68 | 66 | 64 | 62 | 19 | 13 | 11 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 |
u1 | 16 | 1 |
u2 | 14 | 5 |
u3 | 7 | 17 |
u4 | 3 | 15 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 |
u1 | 36 | 24 | 3 | 29 |
u2 | 11 | 25 | 33 | 1 |
u3 | 26 | 9 | 5 | 30 |
u4 | 22 | 23 | 34 | 15 |
u5 | 37 | 21 | 28 | 27 |
u6 | 7 | 35 | 32 | 31 |
f(uivj) | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 | v5 | v6 |
u1 | 69 | 3 | 40 | 56 | 39 | 50 |
u2 | 1 | 67 | 5 | 59 | 31 | 35 |
u3 | 21 | 17 | 65 | 7 | 44 | 46 |
u4 | 42 | 38 | 23 | 33 | 9 | 57 |
u5 | 61 | 27 | 37 | 34 | 30 | 15 |
u6 | 41 | 53 | 49 | 32 | 47 | 25 |
u7 | 29 | 60 | 54 | 52 | 63 | 36 |
u8 | 58 | 55 | 45 | 43 | 51 | 48 |