A reverse edge magic (REM) labeling of a graph G(V,E) with p vertices and q edges is a bijection f:V(G)∪E(G)→{1,2,⋅⋅⋅,p+q} such that k=f(uv)−{f(u)+f(v)} is a constant k for any edge uv∈E(G). A REM labeling f is called reverse super edge magic (RSEM) labeling if f(V(G))={1,2,3,4,5,…,v} and f(E(G))={v+1,v+2,v+3,v+4,v+5,…,v+e}. In this paper, we find some new classes of RSEM labeling and the investigation of the connection between the RSEM labeling and different classes of labeling.
Citation: Kotte Amaranadha Reddy, S Sharief Basha. New classes of reverse super edge magic graphs[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3590-3602. doi: 10.3934/math.2022198
[1] | Zhao Xiaoqing, Yi Yuan . Square-free numbers in the intersection of Lehmer set and Piatetski-Shapiro sequence. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 33591-33609. doi: 10.3934/math.20241603 |
[2] | Yanbo Song . On two sums related to the Lehmer problem over short intervals. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 11723-11732. doi: 10.3934/math.2021681 |
[3] | Bingzhou Chen, Jiagui Luo . On the Diophantine equations x2−Dy2=−1 and x2−Dy2=4. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(4): 1170-1180. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.4.1170 |
[4] | Jinyun Qi, Zhefeng Xu . Almost primes in generalized Piatetski-Shapiro sequences. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14154-14162. doi: 10.3934/math.2022780 |
[5] | Yukai Shen . kth powers in a generalization of Piatetski-Shapiro sequences. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 22411-22418. doi: 10.3934/math.20231143 |
[6] | Zhenjiang Pan, Zhengang Wu . The inverses of tails of the generalized Riemann zeta function within the range of integers. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28558-28568. doi: 10.3934/math.20231461 |
[7] | Mingxuan Zhong, Tianping Zhang . Partitions into three generalized D. H. Lehmer numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 4021-4031. doi: 10.3934/math.2024196 |
[8] | Jinmin Yu, Renjie Yuan, Tingting Wang . The fourth power mean value of one kind two-term exponential sums. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 17045-17060. doi: 10.3934/math.2022937 |
[9] | Wenpeng Zhang, Jiafan Zhang . The hybrid power mean of some special character sums of polynomials and two-term exponential sums modulo p. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 10989-11004. doi: 10.3934/math.2021638 |
[10] | Guangwei Hu, Huixue Lao, Huimin Pan . High power sums of Fourier coefficients of holomorphic cusp forms and their applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25166-25183. doi: 10.3934/math.20241227 |
A reverse edge magic (REM) labeling of a graph G(V,E) with p vertices and q edges is a bijection f:V(G)∪E(G)→{1,2,⋅⋅⋅,p+q} such that k=f(uv)−{f(u)+f(v)} is a constant k for any edge uv∈E(G). A REM labeling f is called reverse super edge magic (RSEM) labeling if f(V(G))={1,2,3,4,5,…,v} and f(E(G))={v+1,v+2,v+3,v+4,v+5,…,v+e}. In this paper, we find some new classes of RSEM labeling and the investigation of the connection between the RSEM labeling and different classes of labeling.
Let q be a positive integer. For each integer a with 1⩽a<q,(a,q)=1, we know that there exists one and only one ˉa with 1⩽ˉa<q such that aˉa≡1(q). Let r(q) be the number of integers a with 1⩽a<q for which a and ˉa are of opposite parity.
D. H. Lehmer (see [1]) posed the problem to investigate a nontrivial estimation for r(q) when q is an odd prime. Zhang [2,3] gave some asymptotic formulas for r(q), one of which reads as follows:
r(q)=12ϕ(q)+O(q12d2(q)log2q). |
Zhang [4] generalized the problem over short intervals and proved that
∑a≤Na∈R(q)1=12Nϕ(q)q−1+O(q12d2(q)log2q), |
where
R(q):={a:1⩽a⩽q,(a,q)=1,2∤a+ˉa}. |
Let n⩾2 be a fixed positive integer, q⩾3 and c be two integers with (n,q)=(c,q)=1. Let 0<δ1,δ2≤1. Lu and Yi [5] studied the Lehmer problem in the sense of short intervals as
rn(δ1,δ2,c;q):=∑a⩽δ1q∑ˉa⩽δ2qaˉa≡cmod |
and obtained an interesting asymptotic formula,
r_{n}\left(\delta_{1}, \delta_{2}, c ; q\right) = \left(1-n^{-1}\right) \delta_{1} \delta_{2} \phi(q)+O\left(q^{\frac{1}{2}} d^{6}(q) \log ^{2} q\right). |
Liu and Zhang [6] r -th residues and roots, and obtained two interesting mean value formulas. Guo and Yi [7] found the Lehmer problem also has good distribution properties on Beatty sequences. For fixed real numbers \alpha and \beta , the associated non-homogeneous Beatty sequence is the sequence of integers defined by
\mathcal{B}_{\alpha, \beta}: = (\lfloor\alpha n+\beta\rfloor)_{n = 1}^{\infty}, |
where \lfloor t\rfloor denotes the integer part of any t \in \mathbb{R} . Such sequences are also called generalized arithmetic progressions. If \alpha is irrational, it follows from a classical exponential sum estimate of Vinogradov [8] that \mathcal{B}_{\alpha, \beta} contains infinitely many prime numbers; in fact, one has the asymptotic estimate
\#\left\{\text { prime } p \leqslant x: p \in \mathcal{B}_{\alpha, \beta}\right\} \sim \alpha^{-1} \pi(x) \quad \text { as } \quad x \rightarrow \infty |
where \pi(x) is the prime counting function.
We define type \tau = \tau(\alpha) for any irrational number \alpha by the following definition:
\tau: = \sup \left\{t \in \mathbb{R}: \liminf \limits_{n \rightarrow \infty} n^t\|\alpha n\| = 0\right\}. |
Based on the results obtained, we consider the high-dimensional Lehmer problem related to Beatty sequences over incomplete intervals in this paper. That is,
r_{n}\left(\delta_{1}, \delta_{2}, \cdots ,\delta_{k}, c, \alpha, \beta ; q\right): = \mathop {\sum\limits_{{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q}} { \cdots \sum\limits_{{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}} {} } }\limits_{\scriptstyle {x_{1} \cdots x_{k} \equiv c\bmod q } \atop {\scriptstyle {x_{1}, \cdots x_{k-1} \in B_{\alpha,\beta}} \atop \scriptstyle {n \nmid x_{1}+\cdots+x_{k}}}} 1,(0 < \delta_{1}, \delta_{2},\cdots, \delta_{k} \leq 1), |
and where k = 2, we get the result of [7].
By using the properties of Beatty sequences and the estimates for hyper Kloosterman sums, we obtain the following result.
Theorem 1.1. Let k \geq 2 be a fixed positive integer, q\geq n^{3} and c be two integers with (n, q) = (c, q) = 1 , and \delta_{1}, \delta_{2}, \cdots, \delta_{k} be real numbers satisfying 0 < \delta_{1}, \delta_{2}, \cdots, \delta_{k} \leq 1 . Let \alpha > 1 be an irrational number of finite type. Then, we have the following asymptotic formula:
r_{n}\left(\delta_{1}, \delta_{2}, \cdots ,\delta_{k}, c, \alpha, \beta ; q\right) = \left(1-n^{-1}\right) \alpha^{-(k-1)} \delta_{1} \delta_{2} \cdots \delta_{k}\phi^{k-1}(q)+O(q^{k-1-\frac{1}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon} ), |
where \phi(\cdot) is the Euler function, \varepsilon is a sufficiently small positive number, and the implied constant only depends on n .
Notation. In this paper, we denote by \lfloor t\rfloor and \{t\} the integral part and the fractional part of t , respectively. As is customary, we put
\mathbf{e}(t): = e^{2 \pi i t} \quad \text { and } \quad\{t\}: = t-\lfloor t\rfloor . |
The notation \|t\| is used to denote the distance from the real number t to the nearest integer; that is,
\|t\|: = \min \limits_{n \in \mathbb{Z}}|t-n| . |
Let \chi^{0} be the principal character modulo q . The letter p always denotes a prime. Throughout the paper, \varepsilon always denotes an arbitrarily small positive constant, which may not be the same at different occurrences; the implied constants in symbols O, \ll and \gg may depend (where obvious) on the parameters \alpha, n, \varepsilon but are absolute otherwise. For given functions F and G , the notations F \ll G , G \gg F and F = O(G) are all equivalent to the statement that the inequality |F| \leqslant \mathcal{C}|G| holds with some constant \mathcal{C} > 0 .
To complete the proof of the theorem, we need the following several definitions and lemmas.
Definition 2.1. For an arbitrary set \mathcal{S} , we use \mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{S}} to denote its indicator function:
\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{S}}(n): = \begin{cases}1 & { if } \;n \in \mathcal{S}, \\ 0 & { if }\; n \notin \mathcal{S} .\end{cases} |
We use \mathbf{1}_{\alpha, \beta} to denote the characteristic function of numbers in a Beatty sequence:
\mathbf{1}_{\alpha, \beta}(n): = \begin{cases}1 & { if } \;n \in \mathcal{B}_{\alpha, \beta}, \\ 0 & { if }\; n \notin \mathcal{B}_{\alpha, \beta}.\end{cases} |
Lemma 2.2. Let a, q be integers, \delta \in(0, 1) be a real number, \theta be a rational number. Let \alpha be an irrational number of finite type \tau and H = q^{\varepsilon} > 0 . We have
\sum\limits_{\scriptstyle {a \le \delta q} \atop \scriptstyle{a \in {{\cal B}_{\alpha ,\beta }}}} ' 1 = \alpha^{-1} \delta \phi(q)+O\left((\phi(q))^{\frac{\tau}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon}\right), |
and
\sum\limits_{\substack{a \leqslant \delta q \\ a \in \mathcal{B}_{\alpha, \beta}}} \mathbf{e}(\theta a) = \alpha^{-1} \sum\limits_{a \leqslant \delta_1 q} \mathbf{e}(\theta a)+O\left(\|\theta\|^{-1} q^{-\varepsilon}+q^{\varepsilon}\right). |
Taking
H = \|\theta\|^{-\frac{1}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon}, |
we have
\sum\limits_{\substack{a \leqslant \delta q \\ a \in B_{\alpha, \beta}}} \mathbf{e}(\theta a) = \alpha^{-1} \sum\limits_{a \leqslant \delta_1 q} \mathbf{e}(\theta a)+O\left(\|\theta\|^{-\left(\frac{\tau}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon\right)}\right) . |
Proof. This is Lemma 2.4 and Lemma 2.5 of [7].
Lemma 2.3. Let
\mathbf{Kl}(r_{1},r_{2},\cdots,r_{k};q) = \sum\limits_{x_{1} \leqslant q-1} \cdots \sum\limits_{x_{k-1} \leqslant q-1} \mathbf{e}\left(\frac {r_{1}x_{1}+\cdots+r_{k-1}x_{k-1}+ r_{k}\overline{x_{1} \cdots x_{k-1}}}{p}\right). |
Then
\mathbf{Kl}(r_{1},r_{2},\cdots,r_{k};q) \ll q^{\frac{k-1}{2}} k^{\omega(q)}\left(r_{1}, r_{k}, q\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} \cdots\left(r_{k-1}, r_{k}, q\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} |
where (a, b, c) is the greatest common divisor of a, b and c .
Proof. See [9].
Lemma 2.4. Assume that U is a positive real number, K is a positive integer and that a and b are two real numbers. If
a = \frac{s}{r}+\frac{\theta}{r^{2}}, \quad(r, s) = 1, r \geq 1,|\theta| \leq 1, |
then
\sum\limits_{k \leqslant K} \min (U, \frac{1}{\|a k+b\|}) \ll (\frac{K}{r}+1 )(U+r \log r). |
Proof. The proof is given in [10].
We begin by the definition
r_{n}\left(\delta_{1}, \delta_{2}, \cdots ,\delta_{k}, c, \alpha, \beta ; q\right) = S_{1}-S_{2}, |
where
S_{1}: = \mathop {\sum\limits_{{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q}} { \cdots \sum\limits_{{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}} {} } }\limits_{\scriptstyle {x_{1} \cdots x_{k} \equiv c\bmod q } \atop {\scriptstyle {x_{1}, \cdots x_{k-1} \in \mathcal{B}_{\alpha,\beta}} }} 1, |
and
S_{2}: = \mathop {\sum\limits_{{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q}} { \cdots \sum\limits_{{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}} {} } }\limits_{\scriptstyle{x_{1} \cdots x_{k} \equiv c\bmod q }\atop {\scriptstyle{x_{1}, \cdots x_{k-1} \in \mathcal{B}_{\alpha,\beta}}\atop \scriptstyle{n \mid x_{1}+\cdots+x_{k}}}} 1. |
By the Definition 2.1, Lemma 2.2 and congruence properties, we have
\begin{aligned} S_{1}& = \mathop{\sum\limits_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \cdots \sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}}_{x_{1} \cdots x_{k} \equiv c\bmod q }\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{1} \right) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{k-1} \right)\\ & = \frac{1}{\phi(q)} \sum\limits_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \cdots \sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q} \sum\limits_{\chi \bmod q}\chi(x_{1}) \cdots \chi(x_{k}) \chi(\overline c)\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta} \left( x_{1} \right) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{k-1} \right)\\ & = S_{11}+S_{12}, \end{aligned} |
where
\begin{align*} S_{11}: = \frac{1}{\phi(q)}\mathop{ {\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \cdots \mathop{ {\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{1} \right) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{k-1} \right), \end{align*} |
and
S_{12}: = \frac{1}{\phi(q)} \mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \bmod q}}_{\chi \neq \chi_{0}} \chi(\overline c) \left(\sum\limits_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \cdots \sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q} \chi(x_{1}) \cdots \chi(x_{k}) \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta} ( x_{1}) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{k-1} )\right). |
For S_{2} , it follows that
\begin{aligned} S_{2}& = \frac{1}{\phi(q)} \mathop{\sum\limits_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \cdots \sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}}_{n \mid x_{1}+\cdots+x_{k}} \sum\limits_{\chi \bmod q}\chi(x_{1}) \cdots \chi(x_{k}) \chi(\overline c)\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta} \left( x_{1} \right) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{k-1} \right)\\ & = S_{21}+S_{22}, \end{aligned} |
where
\begin{align*} S_{21}: = \frac{1}{\phi(q)} \mathop{\mathop{ {\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \cdots \mathop{ {\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q} }_{n \mid x_{1}+\cdots+x_{k}} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{1} \right) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{k-1} \right), \end{align*} |
and
\begin{align*} S_{22}: = \frac{1}{\phi(q)} \mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \bmod q}}_{\chi \neq \chi_{0}} \chi(\overline c) \mathop{{\sum\limits_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q}} \cdots {\sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}}}_{n \mid x_{1}+\cdots+x_{k}} \chi(x_{1}) \cdots \chi(x_{k-1}) \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta} \left( x_{1} \right) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{k-1}\right) . \end{align*} |
From the classical bound
\sum \limits_{a \le \delta q}' 1 = \delta \phi(q)+O\left(d(q)\right) |
and Lemma 2.2, we have
\begin{align} S_{11}& = \frac{1}{\phi(q)} \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{1} )\right) \cdots \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k-1} \leqslant \delta_{k-1} q}\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{k-1} )\right) \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}1\right) \\ & = \left(\delta_{k}+O\left(\frac{d(q)}{\phi(q)}\right)\right)\prod \limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}\left( \alpha^{-1} \delta_{i} \phi(q)+O\left((\phi(q))^{\frac{\tau}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon}\right)\right) \\ & = \alpha^{-(k-1)}\phi^{k-1}(q)\prod \limits_{i = 1}^{k-1} \delta_{i}+O\left(q^{k-1-\frac{1}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon}\right). \end{align} | (3.1) |
From Lemma 2.2, we obtain
\begin{align} S_{21}& = \frac{1}{\phi(q)}\left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{1} )\right) \cdots \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k-1} \leqslant \delta_{k-1} q}\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{k-1} )\right)\left(\mathop{\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}}_{n \mid x_{k}+(x_{1}+ \cdots +x_{k-1})}1\right) \\ & = \frac{1}{\phi(q)}\left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{1} )\right) \cdots \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k-1} \leqslant \delta_{k-1} q}\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{k-1} )\right) \left(\mathop{\sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q }}_{x_{k} \equiv-(x_{1}+ \cdots +x_{k-1}) \bmod n} \sum\limits_{\substack{d \mid(x_{k}, q)}} \mu(d)\right)\\ & = \frac{1}{\phi(q)}\left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{1} )\right) \cdots \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k-1} \leqslant \delta_{k-1} q}\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{k-1} )\right)\left( \sum\limits_{\substack{d \mid q}} \mu(d) \mathop{\mathop{\sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k}q}}_{d \mid x_{k}}}_{x_{k} \equiv-(x_{1}+ \cdots +x_{k-1})\bmod n} 1 \right) \\ & = \frac{1}{\phi(q)} \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{1} )\right) \cdots \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k-1} \leqslant \delta_{k-1} q}\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{k-1} )\right)\left( \sum\limits_{\substack{d \mid q}} \mu(d) \left( \frac{\delta_{k}q}{nd}+O(1)\right)\right) \\ & = \frac{1}{\phi(q)}\left(\frac{\delta_{k}\phi(q)}{n}+O\left(d(q)\right) \right)\prod \limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}\left( \alpha^{-1} \delta_{i} \phi(q)+O\left((\phi(q))^{\frac{\tau}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon}\right)\right)\\ & = \alpha^{-(k-1)}n^{-1}\phi^{k-1}(q)\prod \limits_{i = 1}^{k-1} \delta_{i}+O (q^{k-1-\frac{1}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon} ). \end{align} | (3.2) |
By the properties of exponential sums,
\begin{align} S_{22} = &\frac{1}{n \phi(q)} \mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q}}_{\chi \neq \chi_{0}} \chi(\overline c) \left({\sum\limits_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q}}\cdots {\sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k-1} q}}\chi(x_{1}) \cdots \chi(x_{k}) \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta} \left( x_{1} \right) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{k-1} \right)\right) \\ &\times \left(\sum \limits_{l = 1}^{n}\mathbf{e}(\frac{x_{1}+\cdots+x_{k}}{n}l) \right)\\ = &\frac{1}{n \phi(q)} \mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q}}_{\chi \neq \chi_{0}} \chi(\overline c)\sum \limits_{l = 1}^{n} \prod \limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}\left( \sum\limits_{x_{i} \leqslant \delta_{i} q}\mathbf{1}_{\alpha, \beta}(x_{i}) \chi(x_{i}) \mathbf{e}(\frac{x_{i}}{n} l)\right)\left( \sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q} \chi(x_{k}) \mathbf{e} (\frac{x_{k}}{n} l)\right). \end{align} | (3.3) |
Let
G(r, \chi): = \sum\limits_{h = 1}^{q} \chi(h) \mathbf{e} (\frac{r h}{q} ) |
be the Gauss sum, and we know that for \chi \neq \chi_{0} ,
\chi(x_{i}) = \frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r = 1}^{q} G(r, \chi) \mathbf{e} (-\frac{x_{i} r}{q} ) = \frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r = 1}^{q-1} G(r, \chi) \mathbf{e} (-\frac{x_{i} r}{q} ), |
and
\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r}{q} \neq 0 |
for 1 \leqslant l \leqslant n, 1 \leqslant r \leqslant q-1 and (n, q) = 1 .
Therefore,
\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q} \chi(x_{k}) \mathbf{e} (\frac{x_{k}}{n} l ) = \frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r_{k} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right) \frac{f\left(\delta_{k}, l, r_{k} ; n, q\right)}{\mathbf{e} (\frac{r_{k}}{q}-\frac{l}{h})-1}, \end{equation} | (3.4) |
where
f(\delta, l, r ; n, p): = 1-\mathbf{e}\left( (\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r}{q} )\lfloor\delta q\rfloor\right) |
and
\left|f\left(\delta_{k}, l, r_{k} ; n, q\right)\right| \leqslant 2. |
For x_{i}(1\leqslant i \leqslant k-1) , using Lemma 2.2, we also have
\begin{align} & \sum\limits_{x_{i} \leqslant \delta_{i} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha, \beta}(x_{i}) \chi(x_{i}) \mathbf{e} (\frac{x_{i}}{n} l ) \\ = & \frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{x_{i} \leqslant \delta_{i} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha, \beta}(x_{i}) \sum\limits_{r_{i} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{i}, \chi\right) \mathbf{e}\left( (\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r_{i}}{q} ) x_{i}\right) \\ = & \frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r_{i} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{i}, \chi\right) \sum\limits_{x_{i} \leqslant \delta_{i} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha, \beta}(x_{i}) \mathbf{e}\left( (\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r_{i}}{q} ) x_{i}\right) \\ = & \frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r_{i} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{i}, \chi\right) \left(\alpha^{-1}\sum\limits_{a \leqslant \delta_{i} q} \mathbf{e}\left( (\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r_{i}}{q} ) x_{i}\right)+O\left(\frac{q^{-\varepsilon}}{\|\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r_{i}}{q}\|} +q^{\varepsilon}\right)\right) \\ = &\frac{1}{q \alpha} \sum\limits_{r_{i} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{i}, \chi\right) \left(\frac{f\left(\delta_{i} , l, r_{i} ; n, q\right)}{\mathbf{e} (\frac{r_{i}}{q}-\frac{l}{n} )-1}+O\left(\frac{q^{-\varepsilon}}{\|\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r_{i}}{q}\|} +q^{\varepsilon}\right)\right) . \end{align} | (3.5) |
Let
\begin{align} S_{23}& = \frac{1}{n \phi(q)} \mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q}}_{\chi \neq \chi_{0}} \chi(\overline c)\sum \limits_{l = 1}^{n}\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{k-1} \left(\frac{1}{q \alpha} \sum\limits_{r_{i} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{i}, \chi\right) \frac{f\left(\delta_{i}, l, r_{i} ; n, q\right)}{\mathbf{e} (\frac{r_{i}}{q}-\frac{l}{n})-1}\right)\left(\frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r_{k} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right) \frac{f\left(\delta_{k}, l, r_{k} ; n, q\right)}{\mathbf{e}(\frac{r_{k}}{q}-\frac{l}{n})-1}\right) \\ & = \frac{1}{n \phi(q) q^{k} \alpha^{k-1}} \sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\sum\limits_{r_{1} = 1}^{q-1}\cdots \sum\limits_{r_{k} = 1}^{q-1} \frac{f\left(\delta_{1} , l, r_{1} ; n, q\right)\cdots f\left(\delta_{k}, l, r_{k} ; n, q\right)}{\left(\mathbf{e} (\frac{r_{1}}{q}-\frac{l}{n} )-1\right)\cdots \left(\mathbf{e} (\frac{r_{k}}{q}-\frac{l}{n} )-1\right)} \\ &\times \mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q}}_{\chi \neq \chi_{0}} \chi(\overline c)G\left(r_{1}, \chi\right)\cdots G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right). \end{align} | (3.6) |
From the definition of Gauss sum and Lemma 2.3, we know that
\begin{align} &\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q}\chi(\overline c)G\left(r_{1}, \chi\right)\cdots G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right)\\ = &\sum\limits_{h_{1} = 1}^{q-1}\cdots \sum\limits_{h_{k} = 1}^{q-1}\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod}q}\chi(\overline c)\chi(h_{1})\cdots \chi(h_{k})\mathbf{e} ( \frac{r_{1}h_{1}+\cdots +r_{k}h_{k}}{q} )\\ = &\phi(q)\mathop{\sum\limits_{h_{1} = 1}^{q-1}\cdots \sum\limits_{h_{k} = 1}^{q-1}}_{h_{1} \cdots h_{k} \equiv c \bmod q}\mathbf{e} ( \frac{r_{1}h_{1}+ \cdots +r_{k}h_{k}}{q} )\\ = &\phi(q)\sum\limits_{h_{1} = 1}^{q-1}\cdots \sum\limits_{h_{k} = 1}^{q-1}\mathbf{e} ( \frac{r_{1}h_{1}+ \cdots r_{k-1}h_{k-1}+r_{k}c\overline{h_{1} \cdots h_{k-1}}}{q} )\\ = &\phi(q) \mathbf{Kl}(r_{1},r_{2},\cdots,r_{k}c;q) \\ \ll& \phi(q) q^{\frac{k-1}{2}} k^{\omega(q)}\left(r_{1}, r_{k}c, q\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} \cdots\left(r_{k-1}, r_{k}c, q\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} \\ \ll&\phi(q) q^{\frac{k-1}{2}} k^{\omega(q)}\left(r_{1}, q\right) \cdots\left(r_{k}, q\right). \end{align} | (3.7) |
By Mobius inversion, we get
G(r, \chi_{0}) = \sum\limits_{h = 1}^{q}' \mathbf{e} (\frac{r h}{q} ) = \mu\left(\frac{q}{(r, q)}\right) \frac{\varphi(q)}{\varphi(q /(r, q))} \ll(r, q), |
and
\chi_{0}(\overline c)G\left(r_{1}, \chi_{0}\right)\cdots G\left(r_{k}, \chi_{0}\right) \ll\left(r_{1}, q\right) \cdots\left(r_{k}, q\right). |
Hence,
\begin{align} &\mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q}}_{\chi \neq \chi_{0}}\chi(\overline c)G\left(r_{1}, \chi\right)\cdots G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right)\\ = &\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q}\chi(\overline c)G\left(r_{1}, \chi\right)\cdots G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right)-\chi_{0}(\overline c)G\left(r_{1}, \chi_{0}\right)\cdots G\left(r_{k}, \chi_{0}\right)\\ \ll&\phi(q) q^{\frac{k-1}{2}} k^{\omega(q)}\left(r_{1}, q\right) \cdots\left(r_{k}, q\right). \end{align} | (3.8) |
From (3.8) we may deduce the following result:
\begin{align} S_{23}&\ll \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\sum\limits_{r = 1}^{q-1} \frac{(r,q)}{\left|\mathbf{e} (\frac{r}{q}-\frac{l}{n} )-1\right|}\right)^{k}\\ &\ll \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\sum\limits_{r = 1}^{q-1} \frac{(r,q)}{\left|\sin \pi (\frac{r}{q}-\frac{l}{n} )\right|}\right)^{k}\\ &\ll \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\sum\limits_{r = 1}^{q-1} \frac{(r,q)}{\|\frac{r}{q}-\frac{l}{n}\|}\right)^{k}\\ & = \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\mathop{\sum\limits_{d \mid q}}_{d < q }\mathop{\sum\limits_{r \leq q-1}}_{(r,q) = d }\frac{d}{\|\frac{r}{q}-\frac{l}{n}\|}\right)^{k }\\ & = \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\mathop{\sum\limits_{d \mid q}}_{d < q }d\mathop{\sum\limits_{m \leq\frac{q-1}{d} }}_{(m,q) = 1}\frac{1}{\|\frac{md}{q}-\frac{l}{n}\|}\right)^{k }\\ & = \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\mathop{\sum\limits_{d \mid q}}_{d < q }d\sum\limits_{k \mid q}\mu(k)\sum\limits_{m \leq\frac{q-1}{kd} }\frac{1}{\|\frac{mkd}{q}-\frac{l}{n}\|}\right)^{k }. \end{align} |
It is easy to see
\|\frac{mkd}{q}-\frac{l}{n}\| = \|\frac{mkn-l(q/d)}{(q/d)n}\| \geq \frac{1}{(q/d)n}, |
and we obtain
S_{23}\ll\frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n \phi(q) q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\mathop{\sum\limits_{d \mid q\\{d < q }}}d\sum\limits_{k \mid q}\sum\limits_{m \leq\frac{q-1}{kd} }\min (\frac{qn}{d},\frac{1}{\|\frac{mkd}{q}-\frac{l}{n}\|} )\right)^{k }. |
Let k d / q = h_{0} / q_{0} , where q_{0} \geq 1, \left(h_{0}, q_{0}\right) = 1 , and we will easily obtain q /(k d) \leq q_{0} \leq q / d . By using Lemma 2.4, we have
\begin{align} S_{23}&\ll \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\sum\limits_{\substack{d \mid q \\ d < q}} d \sum\limits_{k \mid q}\left(\frac{(q-1) /(k d)}{q_{0}}+1\right) (\frac{q n}{d}+q_{0} \log q_{0} )\right)^{k}\\ &\ll \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\sum\limits_{\substack{d \mid q \\ d < q}} d \sum\limits_{k \mid q}\left(\frac{(q-1) /(k d)}{q/(kd)}+1\right) (\frac{q n}{d}+\frac{q}{d} \log \frac{q}{d} )\right)^{k}\\ &\ll \frac{k^{\omega(q)}q^{\frac{k-1}{2}}}{ \alpha^{k-1}}\left(\sum\limits_{\substack{d \mid q \\ d < q}} \sum\limits_{k \mid q}n+\log q\right)^{k}\\ &\ll q^{\frac{k-1}{2}}d^{2k}(q)(\log q+n)^{k}. \end{align} |
Let
S_{24}: = \frac{q^{(k-1)(-\varepsilon)}}{n \phi(q)}\mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q\\{\chi \neq \chi_{0}}} }\chi(\overline c)\sum \limits_{l = 1}^{n}\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}\left(\frac{1}{q \alpha} \sum\limits_{r_{i} = 1}^{q-1} G(r_{i}, \chi)\frac{1}{\|\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r_{i}}{q}\|} \right) \left(\frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r_{k} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right) \frac{f\left(\delta_{k}, l, r_{k} ; n, q\right)}{\mathbf{e}(\frac{r_{k}}{q}-\frac{l}{n})-1}\right) |
and
S_{25}: = \frac{q^{(k-1)(\varepsilon)}}{n \phi(q)}\mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q\\{\chi \neq \chi_{0}}}} \chi(\overline c)\sum \limits_{l = 1}^{n}\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}\left(\frac{1}{q \alpha} \sum\limits_{r_{i} = 1}^{q-1} G(r_{i}, \chi) \right) \left(\frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r_{k} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right) \frac{f\left(\delta_{k}, l, r_{k} ; n, q\right)}{\mathbf{e}(\frac{r_{k}}{q}-\frac{l}{n})-1}\right). |
By the same argument of S_{23} , it follows that
S_{24} \ll q^{\frac{k-1}{2}-\varepsilon}d^{2k}(q)(\log q+n)^{k}, |
S_{25} \ll q^{\frac{k-3}{2}+\varepsilon}(\log q+n). |
Since n\ll q^{\frac{1}{3}} , we have
\begin{equation} S_{25} \ll S_{24} \ll S_{23} \ll q^{\frac{k-1}{2}+\varepsilon}n^{k}\ll q^{k-2+\varepsilon}. \end{equation} | (3.9) |
Taking n = 1 , we get
\begin{equation} S_{12}\ll q^{\frac{k-1}{2}+\varepsilon}. \end{equation} | (3.10) |
With (3.1), (3.2), (3.9) and (3.10), the proof is complete.
This paper considers the high-dimensional Lehmer problem related to Beatty sequences over incomplete intervals. And we give an asymptotic formula by the properties of Beatty sequences and the estimates for hyper Kloosterman sums.
This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation No. 12271422 of China. The authors would like to express their gratitude to the referee for very helpful and detailed comments.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
[1] |
A. Kotzig, A. Rosa, Magic valuations of finite graphs, Canad. Math. Bull., 13 (1970), 451–461. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1970-084-1. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1970-084-1
![]() |
[2] | H. Enomoto, A. S. Lladó, T. Nakamigawa, G. Ringel, Super edge-magic graphs, SUT J. Math., 34 (1998), 105–109. |
[3] |
R. M. Figueroa-Centenoa, R. Ichishimab, F. A. Muntaner-Batle, The place of super edge magic labelings among other classes of labelings, Discrete Math., 231 (2001), 153–168. doi: 10.1016/S0012-365X(00)00314-9. doi: 10.1016/S0012-365X(00)00314-9
![]() |
[4] | R. M. Figueroa-Centenoa, R. Ichishimab, F. A. Muntaner-Batle, Mgical coronations of graphs, Australas. J. Comb., 26 (2002), 199–208. |
[5] | V. Yegnanarayanan, On magic graphs, Utilitas Math., 59 (2001), 181–204. |
[6] | R. M. Figueroa-Centenoa, R. Ichishimab, F. A. Muntaner-Batle, On super edge-magic graphs, Ars Comb., 64 (2002), 81–95. |
[7] | J. C. Bermond, Graceful graphs, radio antennae and French windmills, In: Proceedings one day combinatorics conference, Research notes in mathematics, Pitman, 34 (1979), 18–37. |
[8] | G. Ringel, A. Llado, Another tree conjecture, Bull. Inst. Combin. Appl., 188 (1996), 83–85. |
[9] | K. Kathiresan, Subdivisions of ladders are graceful, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 23 (1992), 21–23. |
[10] |
R. Balakrishnan, R. Sampathkumar, Decompositions of regular graphs into k_{n}^{c} \vee 2k_{2}, Discrete Math., 156 (1996), 19–28. doi: 10.1016/0012-365X(94)00026-F. doi: 10.1016/0012-365X(94)00026-F
![]() |
[11] | R. Balakrishna, A. Selvam, V. Yegnanarayanan, Some results on elegantgraphs, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 28 (1997), 905–916. |