Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Research article

Digital transformation and corporate resilience: Evidence from China during the COVID-19 pandemic

  • To investigate the relationship between digital transformation and corporate resilience in the face of external shocks, we empirically analyzed the relationship between digital transformation and corporate resilience in the context of COVID-19 by dividing corporate resilience into two dimensions: Resistance and recovery. The data in this paper came from manufacturing companies listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-shares from 2017 to 2021. The empirical results showed that there was a significant inverted U-shaped relationship between digitalization and corporate resilience. After rich robustness tests, the major findings of this paper hold. Performance surpluses and external competition positively moderate the inverted U-shaped relationship between digitalization and corporate resilience. Performance deficits negatively moderate the inverted U-shaped relationship between digitalization and corporate resilience.

    Citation: AiMin Yan, Hao Ma, Dandan Zhu, Julan Xie. Digital transformation and corporate resilience: Evidence from China during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2024, 8(4): 779-814. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2024030

    Related Papers:

    [1] Saboura Haghighi, Hamid Reza Goli . High prevalence of blaVEB, blaGES and blaPER genes in beta-lactam resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(2): 153-166. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022013
    [2] Chioma Lilian Ozoaduche, Katalin Posta, Balázs Libisch, Ferenc Olasz . Acquired antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas spp., Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter spp. in the Western Balkans and Hungary with a One Health outlook. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(2): 436-461. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025020
    [3] Ogueri Nwaiwu, Chiugo Claret Aduba . An in silico analysis of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes in Aeromonas plasmids. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(1): 75-91. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020005
    [4] Alaa Fathalla, Amal Abd el-mageed . Salt tolerance enhancement Of wheat (Triticum Asativium L) genotypes by selected plant growth promoting bacteria. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(3): 250-271. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020016
    [5] Mohammad Abu-Sini, Mohammad A. Al-Kafaween, Rania M. Al-Groom, Abu Bakar Mohd Hilmi . Comparative in vitro activity of various antibiotic against planktonic and biofilm and the gene expression profile in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(2): 313-331. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023017
    [6] Kholoud Baraka, Rania Abozahra, Eman Khalaf, Mahmoud Elsayed Bennaya, Sarah M. Abdelhamid . Repurposing of paroxetine and fluoxetine for their antibacterial effects against clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in Egypt. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(1): 126-149. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025007
    [7] Rana Abdel Fattah Abdel Fattah, Fatma El zaharaa Youssef Fathy, Tahany Abdel Hamed Mohamed, Marwa Shabban Elsayed . Effect of chitosan nanoparticles on quorum sensing-controlled virulence factors and expression of LasI and RhlI genes among Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(4): 415-430. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021025
    [8] Taish Ramkisson, Diane Rip . Carbapenem resistance in Enterobacterales from agricultural, environmental and clinical origins: South Africa in a global context. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(4): 668-691. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023034
    [9] Arsenio M. Fialho, Nuno Bernardes, Ananda M Chakrabarty . Exploring the anticancer potential of the bacterial protein azurin. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(3): 292-303. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.3.292
    [10] Amira ElBaradei, Dalia Ali Maharem, Ola Kader, Mustafa Kareem Ghareeb, Iman S. Naga . Fecal carriage of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in Egyptian patients admitted to the Medical Research Institute hospital, Alexandria University. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(4): 422-433. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020025
  • To investigate the relationship between digital transformation and corporate resilience in the face of external shocks, we empirically analyzed the relationship between digital transformation and corporate resilience in the context of COVID-19 by dividing corporate resilience into two dimensions: Resistance and recovery. The data in this paper came from manufacturing companies listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-shares from 2017 to 2021. The empirical results showed that there was a significant inverted U-shaped relationship between digitalization and corporate resilience. After rich robustness tests, the major findings of this paper hold. Performance surpluses and external competition positively moderate the inverted U-shaped relationship between digitalization and corporate resilience. Performance deficits negatively moderate the inverted U-shaped relationship between digitalization and corporate resilience.



    Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a significant microorganism involved in urinary, bloodstream, pulmonary, soft tissue and surgical site infections [1],[2]. Antibiotic resistance is one of the most pressing problems in public health and will remain threatening to modern medicine in the coming decades. Because of the increasing abuse of antibiotics in hospitals and the community, some widely used antibiotics are losing their function, and scientists and doctors must develop new antibiotics to overcome this problem. [3],[4]. Metallo-β-lactamaseproducing (MBL) strains to hydrolyze the β-lactam ring of the drug compound, thereby inactivating them. In contrast to serine β-lactamases, MBLs use at least one but more commonly two Zn2+ ions in their active site to catalyze the hydrolysis of β-lactam rings [5],[6]. There are various methods for identifying MBL and NDM-producing strains, which fall into two phenotypic and genotypic groups. Usually, phenotypic methods have low specificity and low speed, and error results [7],[8]. Therefore, it is necessary to use molecular methods along with phenotypic methods. High-resolution melting (HRMA) analysis is one of the most sensitive and precise molecular methods based on real-time PCR [9],[10].

    HRMA is used to characterize bacterial DNA samples according to their dissociation behavior as they transition from double-strand DNA to single-strand DNA with increasing temperature and fluorescence detection [8],[11]. The HRMA is entirely precise warming of the amplicon DNA from around 50 °C up to around 95 °C. During this process, the amplicon's melting temperature is reached, and the two strands of DNA separate or “melt” apart. The concept of HRMA is to monitor this process happening with real-time PCR [12]. This rationale is achieved by using intercalating dyes. The intercalating dye binds explicitly to double-strand DNA and forms the stable fluorescent, and thus one can monitor the relative quantity of the product during DNA amplification in real-time PCR [13]. However, HRMA takes it one step further in its ability to capture much more detail. It has an increased resolving power, as melting curves from different amplicons may be differentiated based on the melt curve's shape even when the melt temperature values are the same [14],[15].

    HRMA has the potential to be a powerful tool in the clinical microbiology laboratory, providing rapid detection of genetic determinants conferring antibiotic resistance to complement current phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods [16],[17]. These methods are labor-intensive, expensive and require unique expertise, and the results are difficult to interpret [18]. An accurate, rapid and cost-effective typing scheme is urgently needed for active surveillance and epidemiological investigations [19]. HRMA typing is a compassionate, rapid and cost-effective option for detection purposes [20],[21]. It can perform highly accurate genotyping to a hefty quantity of samples in a short amount of time [8],[22]. HRMA also is a straightforward technology that can perform both the PCR analysis and HRMA in one instrument [20]. This reduces extra expenses, saves time and creates a simpler workflow [16]. It is only necessary to create the PCR reaction volume for each sample to be analyzed, and it eliminates the need for solvents and electrophoresis gels [22].

    Therefore, we try to extend the application of the HRMA assay to this area to help detect the antibiotic resistance in different strains of NDM producing P. aeruginosa. We modified the multiplex HRMA to amplify both the bacteria NDM producing gene and MBL producing gene and analyze its melting curve.

    Subcultures of P. aeruginosa ATCC 15442, P. aeruginosa PAO-1, and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used from Hamadan Medical University, Microbiology Department microbial bank. Reference strains were cultivated at 37 °C for 24 h in cetrimide agar (Merck, Germany). All strains were kept at −20 °C in TSB containing 20% glycerol. The Ethics Committee approved this study of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (Code No: IR.UMSHA.REC.1398.573).

    P. aeruginosa DNA extraction was performed using a DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Germany); the steps were followed according to the kit protocol. DNA concentration was determined using a spectrophotometer (Nanodrop-200, Hangzhou Allsheng Instruments Co., Ltd., China). In this study, the sequencing method used was the dideoxy chain-terminating Sanger method [23].

    Primer sequences were initially set up as outlined in previous studies [24][27] (Table 1). For sensitivity and specificity of primers, nine-fold serial dilutions of 0.5 McFarland DNA (1.5 × 108 CFU/mL) were made (1:1–1, 1:1–2, 1:1–3, 1:1–4, 1:1–5, 1:1–6, 1:1–7, 1:1–8). Serial dilution real-time PCR tested primers' efficiencies for both target genes and reference genes. Standard curves were constructed by the Ct (y-axis) versus log DNA dilution (x-axis). The primer efficiency (E) of one cycle in the exponential phase was calculated according to the equation: E = 10−(1/slope)−1 × 100 [28].

    Briefly, 2 µL (0.5 µM) of each primer, 2 µL of DNA template, 4 µL of EvaGreen, and made up to a final volume of 20 µL using ddH2O. Real-time PCR reactions were performed on the ABI real-time machine (ABI StepOnePlus, USA). The thermal cycles were set for reverse transcription steps (55 °C for 5 min, 95 °C for 10 min, 95 °C for 20 s) followed by PCR steps: 95 °C for 15 s, 59 °C for 30 s, repeated for 40 cycles. The slope value was calculated from serial dilutions for each gene, which was then used to determine the reaction's efficiency [12].

    Table 1.  Oligonucleotide sequences used in this study.
    Target Primer Name Sequence of Primers Melting Tm (±0.5 °C) Accession Number Primer Location Product Size (bp) Ref
    NDM-1 N-1 F: GACCGCCCAGATCCTCAA
    R: CGCGACCGGCAGGTT
    89.57 MN193055.1 71–122 55 [24]
    N-2 F: TTGGCCTTGCTGTCCTTG
    R: ACACCAGTGACAATATCACCG
    76.92 MH168506.2 630–586 85 [25]
    N-3 F: GCGCAACACAGCCTGACTTT
    R: CAGCCACCAAAAGCGATGTC
    82.97 MK371546.1 298–452 155 [23]

    MBL blaSIM F: TACAAGGGATTCGGCATCG
    R: TAATGGCCTGTTCCCATGTG
    85.35 KX452682.1 1–570 570 [27]
    blaVIM F: TCTCCACGCACTTTCATGAC
    R: GTGGGAATCTCGTTCCCCTC
    84.56 NG_068039.1 332–455 124 [26]
    blaSPM F: AAAATCTGGGTACGCAAACG
    R: ACATTATCCGCTGGAACAGG
    86.62 KX452683.1 1–271 271 [27]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The efficiency and the analytical sensitivity of the HRMA-PCR were evaluated by triplicate testing of 9-fold serial dilution series of each of the three reference strains. The Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus real-time PCR system was used to amplify and detect products. The reaction mix was prepared using the following components for each of the samples: 4 µL of Master Mix HRMA (HOT FIREPol EvaGreen HRMA Mix), 1 µM of each respective primer and 12 µL of DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The following cycle parameters were used: 2 min at 50 °C, 10 min at 95 °C. Moreover, 40 cycles with denaturing for 15 s at 95 °C and by annealing/elongation for 1 min at 60 °C. Melting curves were generated after each run to confirm a single PCR product (from 60 °C to 95 °C, increasing 1 °C/3 s).

    Data analysis was performed using ABI Thermo Fisher software (release 2018, version 3.0.2) and BioEdit 7.4 software (Caredata, Inc., USA). Normalized and difference plots were generated.

    After 9-fold dilutions, a high CT was observed in the 100 CFU/mL and low CT in the 108 CFU/mL. Moreover, increasing CT values were identified as the inhibitor binding to the DNA, as such binding will reduce the amount of template available for amplification. More comprehensive CT value ranges indicated more binding; likewise, smaller ranges corresponded to less interaction between DNA and inhibitor. The CT values for these cell densities were within the 9 to 40 cycle range in the amplification process, while higher DNA concentrations appeared within 9 to 31 cycles. As seen in Figures 1 and 2, relative to a linear range of each standard curve, melting peaks can be seen for many lower DNA concentrations; however, the concentrations could not be quantified. Therefore, the actual quantitative, linear portions of the calibration curves did not extend as low as the detection limit. Melting curves displayed a single melting Tm: 89.57 °C for the N-1 gene, 76.92 °C for the N-2 gene, 82.97 °C for the N-3 gene, 84.56 °C for the blaVIM gene, 86.62 °C for the blaSIM gene, and 85.35 °C for the blaSPM gene (Figures 1 and 2). Samples containing DNA exhibited positive real-time PCR amplification, and negative controls failed to show amplification. Also, serial dilutions of positive-control DNA amplification curves showed Ct values inversely related to template DNA concentration (Figure 3).

    Figure 1.  Analytical sensitivity of real-time PCR and examples of optimization of primer pairs based on melting curve analysis for NDM primers to detect NDM producing P. aeruginosa strains. The melting curves for each primer pair were investigated: (left) N-1 gene with a melting point of 89.53 ± 0.5 °C, (middle) N-2 gene with a melting point of 76.92 ± 0.5 °C, (right) N-3 gene with a melting point 82.97 ± 0.5 °C. The mean of a: 108; b: 107; c: 106; d: 105; e: 104; f: 103; g: 102; h: 101 and i: 100 CFU/mL of DNA dilutions. Bold black horizontal lines represent the cycle threshold of real-time PCR. One peak with a shoulder corresponds to genomic DNA amplification; no peak corresponds to no amplification. EvaGreen color and single-tube reactions were used in this test. Also, real-time PCR was performed as a single step.
    Figure 2.  Analytical sensitivity of real-time PCR and examples of optimization of primer pairs based on melting curve analysis for MBL primers to detect NDM producing P. aeruginosa strains. The melting curves for each primer pair were investigated: (left) blaVIM gene with a melting point of 84.56 ± 0.5 °C, (middle) blaSPM gene with a melting point of 85.35 ± 0.5 °C, (right) blaSIM gene a melting point of 86.62 ± 0.5 °C. The mean of a: 108; b: 107; c: 106; d: 105; e: 104; f: 103; g: 102; h: 101 and i: 100 CFU/mL of DNA dilutions. Bold black horizontal lines represent the cycle threshold of real-time PCR. One peak with a shoulder corresponds to genomic DNA amplification; no peak corresponds to no amplification. EvaGreen color and single-tube reactions were used in this test. Also, real-time PCR was performed as a single step.
    Figure 3.  Melting curve analysis and analytical specificity of real-time PCR for NDM primers (A) and MBL primers (B) used to detect NDM producing P. aeruginosa strains: (a) blank tube, (b) P. aeruginosa PAO-1 and (c) P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853. One peak with a shoulder corresponds to genomic DNA amplification; no peak corresponds to no amplification. EvaGreen color and single-tube reactions were used in this test. Also, real-time PCR was performed as a single step. A 0.5-McFarland concentration (1.5 x 108 CFU/mL of DNA) was used to determine primer specificity.

    Reaction efficiencies were found to be within the range of 3 to 3.5 when calculated from the standard curves using the ABI Thermo Fisher analysis software (Version 2.3.2) with a formula of E = 10(−1/slope)−1. For the N-1, N-2 and blaVIM primer set, the reaction efficiency reached a value slightly greater than 3, at 3.2, which would suggest the efficiency of 101%. Efficiencies greater than 100% can be obtained. All the investigated dilutions showed low efficiencies: N-3, E = 98.8%; blaSMP, E = 95.588%; blaSIM, E = 96.493 (Figures 1 and 2).

    For the N-1 and blaVIM primer set, the linear range was determined to extend as low as 100 CFU/mL, N-2 was 103 CFU/mL, N-3 was 104 CFU/mL, blaSMP was 102 CFU/mL, and blaSIM was 105 CFU/mL, as indicated by the lowest DNA concentration value on each of the standard curves. Points that caused the curves to deviate from linearity (mostly those with lower concentrations) were excluded (Figures 1 and 2).

    Fluorescence data were analyzed using the tools for HRMA incorporated in the ABI Thermo Fisher analysis software. HRMA PCR amplification curves of samples analyzed for the presence of NDM producing P. aeruginosa are shown in Figures 3, 4, and 5. Difference plots of normalized data show the differences in fluorescence between each sample of DNA. Derivative plots display the rate of fluorescence change; the peak indicates the melting temperature of a sample. All plots displayed a single melting domain, typically between 87.07 °C–87.57 °C for the N-1 gene, 76.42 °C–76.92 °C for the N-2 gene, 82.47 °C–82.97 °C for the N-3 gene, 84.06 °C–84.56 °C for the blaVIM gene, 86.12 °C–86.62 °C for the blaSIM gene and 85.30 °C–85.80 °C for the blaSPM gene, following different product sizes.

    The results of this representative experiment show that all samples containing P. aeruginosa DNA had measurable amplification, as detected by exponential fluorescence (Figure 3), and all the DNA dilutions of NDM producing P. aeruginosa were identified (dilution of 108 to 100 CFU/mL). The N-1 and blaVIM genes in NDM producing P. aeruginosa were detected in all dilutions of DNA. Moreover, N-2, N-3, blaSPM and blaSIM primers can be able to detect bacterial DNA in dilutions of 103 CFU/mL, 104 CFU/mL, 102 CFU/mL and 105 CFU/mL, respectively (Figures 4 and 5).

    Figure 4.  HRMA graphs corresponding to one high-resolution melting analysis of a subset of NDM producing P. aeruginosa strains by N-1 (A), N-2 (B) and N-3 (C) genes. DNA samples from all the dilutions involved in this study were prepared and amplified successfully using the EvaGreen dye-based method in the ABI instrument. Primers' specific melting peaks (Tm) were obtained via HRMA, allowing the differentiation of all investigated β-lactamase enzymes. Due to the positively saturating EvaGreen dye and the HRMA, the resolution accuracy was ±0.1–0.5 °C.
    Figure 5.  HRMA graphs corresponding to one high-resolution melting analysis of a subset of NDM producing P. aeruginosa strain by blaVIM (A), blaSIM (B) and blaSPM (C) genes. DNA samples from all the dilutions involved in this study were prepared and amplified successfully using the EvaGreen dye-based method in the ABI instrument. Primers' specific melting peaks (Tm) were obtained via HRMA, allowing the differentiation of all investigated β-lactamase enzymes. Due to the positively saturating EvaGreen dye and the HRMA, the resolution accuracy was ±0.1 °C–0.5 °C.

    The software automatically analyzed the raw melting curve data and set the starting (pre-melt) and ending (post-melt) fluorescence signals of all data to actual values to aid interpretation and analysis (Figures 4 and 5). The cursors for these two points have defaulted to the ends of the curve. However, these regions were manually adjusted to encompass a representative baseline for the pre-melt and post-melt phases. Widening the normalization regions into the melt phase was avoided to ensure that curves normalize effectively. Moreover, we performed a melt curve analysis of HRMA PCR samples to assess the amplicon's specificity. The results of the HRMA showed a very similar melt peak for all serial dilutions of P. aeruginosa.

    Based on the current study, the efficiency of genes was at least 99.99%, the r2 was >0.99.99, and melt curves yielded single peaks. Interestingly, the Ct vs. DNA relationship's slope varied little across the nine-fold dilutions tested, ranging from −3.589 to −3.955. According to previous studies, this can be justified because short fragments bind less fluorescent and are compensated by a higher primer concentration [29],[30]. However, sometimes the peak height of the short amplicon increases in a different replicate. This problem gets worse in the MCA, such that sometimes we lost the long amplicon even at the primer ratio of 1:1. Furthermore, these results agree with Mentasti et al. [5].

    Moreover, three blaNDM-1 primers with different amplicon length and MBL primers were used to detect NDM producing P. aeruginosa strains. These results indicated that the primers' specificity, with a 0.5 °C error range, could detect NDM producing P. aeruginosa. Andini et al. showed that an accurate analysis of the melting curve could play a significant role in the diagnosis [31]. Ashrafi et al. found that, to obtain the best performance in sophisticated methods such as HRMA, the DNA's melting temperature must be monitored in various dilutions to obtain accurate sensitivity and specificity [21]. Tahmasebi et al. also confirmed that efficiency is probably due to the shorter length of primers' products, which enabled better amplification in PCR [9].

    Based on the current study, Figures 1 and 2 showed that the highest analytical sensitivity and specificity were reported for the detection of antibiotic-resistant strains, as indicated by the lowest DNA concentration value on each of the standard curves. Smiljanic et al. also illustrated that identifying Gram-negative NDM and MBL producing strains is difficult because the resistance to carbapenems in these bacteria is encoded by similar sequences [32]. Thus, using a sensitive and precise method such as HRMA and specific primers could identify strains such as MBL and NDM producing strains. In a study, Ding et al. proposed the PASGNDM699 strain resistance to a wide range of antibiotics. They also confirmed the clinical importance of PASGNDM strains in causing resistant infections [33].

    Based on Figure 4 and Figure 5, DNA dilutions of NDM producing P. aeruginosa strains were identified (dilution of 108 to 100 CFU/mL). The results were different from those obtained by Naas et al. and Smiljanic et al. [32],[34]. Identification of MBL and NDM producing strains has been performed in various studies in Sweden [17], USA [35], Australia [25] and Italy [36] in Gram-negative bacteria by the HRMA method.

    Nevertheless, one of the most important benefits of the multiplex HRMA method is the simultaneous identification of different NDM varieties. Identification of these variants using phenotypic methods has low accuracy and speed. Those methods also require spending much time optimizing. Makena et al. found that the identification of NDM variants by phenotypic methods requires protein stability and is not practical due to the evolution of NDM-producing strains [37].

    According to our results, primers with a short length had the best sensitivity and specificity in the HRMA assay. Słomka et al. demonstrated that when the DNA quality is low, DNA degradation or long DNA breaks during extraction makes the long template harder to amplify [20]. Though, the capacity to monitor PCRs in real-time has revolutionized how PCR is used in the clinical microbiology field. HRMA assay is used to amplify and concurrently quantify a targeted DNA molecule and enables both detection and quantification of DNA. HRMA PCR needs a fluorescent reporter that binds to the finished product and reports its presence by fluorescence. The Eischeid study confirms these results [38].

    In this study, we optimized the HRMA method to identify antibiotic resistance gene variants. We did not use designed primers in this study. The design and optimization of C + G values ​​ in designed primers provide the sensitivity and specificity of HRMA in the simultaneous identification of drug resistance [39]. Thus, the length of the selected primers should be considered to identify bacterial sub-strains. Another limitation of our study was the lack of use of different fluorescent dyes in identifying subtypes. Based on previous studies, the type of dye used significantly affects the sensitivity and specificity of HRMA [40]. Therefore, in different master mixes from different suppliers, calibration is necessary to establish the new Tm data on the reference and clinical strains.

    We demonstrated that the HRMA assay is a rapid and sensitive pre-sequence screening tool that allows the detection of low DNA concentration. Further, our study results showed that NDM and MBL genes' co-existence could be detected using the HRMA method reference strains. Moreover, the HRMA method for identifying NDM and MBL producing strains has high sensitivity and specificity. The present study also confirmed that primer product length and fluorescent dye play critical roles in increasing the sensitivity and specificity of the HRMA assay. However, the selection of the melting temperature range is essential to the analysis, as there needs to be sufficient data both before and following the melting transition to allow reliable normalization of the melting curves.



    [1] Aarstad J, Kvitastein A (2021) An unexpected external shock and enterprises' innovation performance. Appl Econ Lett 28: 1245–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1814942 doi: 10.1080/13504851.2020.1814942
    [2] Abou-Foul M, Ruiz-Alba L, López-Tenorio J (2023) The impact of artificial intelligence capabilities on servitization: The moderating role of absorptive capacity-A dynamic capabilities perspective. J Bus Res 157: 113609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113609 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113609
    [3] Aghion P, Akcigit U, Howitt P (2015) The Schumpeterian Growth Paradigm. Annu Rev Econ 7: 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115412 doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115412
    [4] Aneshensel S (1992) Social Stress: Theory and Research. Annu. Rev Sociol 18: 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.000311 doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.000311
    [5] Antonopoulou K, Begkos C, Zhu Z (2023) Staying afloat amidst extreme uncertainty: A case study of digital transformation in Higher Education. Technol Forecast Soc Change 192: 122603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122603 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122603
    [6] Badasjane V, Granlund A, Ahlskog M, et al. (2022) Coordination of Digital Transformation in International Manufacturing Networks—Challenges and Coping Mechanisms from an Organizational Perspective. Sustainability 14: 2204. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042204 doi: 10.3390/su14042204
    [7] Bansal S, Singh H (2023) Does market competition foster related party transactions? Evidence from emerging market. Pac-Basin Finance J 77: 101909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101909 doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101909
    [8] Barney J (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. J Manag 17: 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108
    [9] Baum C, Rowley J, Shipilov V, et al. (2005) Dancing with Strangers: Aspiration Performance and the Search for Underwriting Syndicate Partners. Adm Sci Q 50: 536–575. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.50.4.536 doi: 10.2189/asqu.50.4.536
    [10] Bhandari R, Ranta M, Salo J (2022) The resource-based view, stakeholder capitalism, ESG, and sustainable competitive advantage: The firm's embeddedness into ecology, society, and governance. Bus Strategy Environ 31: 1525–1537. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2967 doi: 10.1002/bse.2967
    [11] Bistrova J, Lace N, Kasperovica L (2021) Enterprise Crisis-Resilience and Competitiveness. Sustainability 13: 2057. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042057 doi: 10.3390/su13042057
    [12] Blanka C, Krumay B, Rueckel D (2022) The interplay of digital transformation and employee competency: A design science approach. Technol Forecast Soc Change 178: 121575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121575 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121575
    [13] Bourgeois LJ (1981) On Measurement of Organizational Slack. Acad Manage Rev 6: 29–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/257138 doi: 10.2307/257138
    [14] Branstetter L, Lima F, Taylor J, et al. (2014) Do Entry Regulations Deter Entrepreneurship and Job Creation? Evidence from Recent Reforms in Portugal. Econ J 124: 805–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12044 doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12044
    [15] Cameron A, James D (1987) Efficient Estimation Methods for "Closed-Ended" Contingent Valuation Surveys. Rev Econ Stat 69: 269–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927234 doi: 10.2307/1927234
    [16] Cao Y, Chou Y (2022) Bank resilience over the COVID-19 crisis: The role of regulatory capital. Finance Res Lett 48: 102891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102891 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.102891
    [17] Castells-Quintana D, Krause M, McDermott J (2021) The urbanising force of global warming: the role of climate change in the spatial distribution of population. J Econ Geogr 21: 531–556. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbaa030 doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbaa030
    [18] Caves W, Christensen R (1980) The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Firms in a Competitive Environment: The Case of Canadian Railroads. J Polit Econ 88: 958–976. https://doi.org/10.1086/260916 doi: 10.1086/260916
    [19] Chatterjee S, Chaudhuri R, Vrontis D, et al. (2022) Digital transformation of organization using AI-CRM: From microfoundational perspective with leadership support. J Bus Res 153: 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.019 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.019
    [20] Chen L, Lim S, Xu S, et al. (2023) Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation Input: An Empirical Study Based on Propensity Score-Matching and Quantile Models. Sustainability 15: 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010671 doi: 10.3390/su15010671
    [21] Chen R (2008) Determinants of Firms' Backward- and Forward-Looking R & D Search Behavior. Organ Sci 19: 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0320 doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0320
    [22] Chen R, Miller D (2007) Situational and institutional determinants of firms' R & D search intensity. Strateg Manag J 28: 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.594 doi: 10.1002/smj.594
    [23] Chen Y, Xu J (2023) Digital transformation and firm cost stickiness: Evidence from China. Finance Res Lett 52: 103510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103510 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103510
    [24] Chrpa L, Pilát M, Gemrot J (2022) Planning and acting in dynamic environments: identifying and avoiding dangerous situations. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 34: 925–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2021.1938697 doi: 10.1080/0952813X.2021.1938697
    [25] Cohen M, Levinthal A (1990) Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Adm Sci Q 35: 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553 doi: 10.2307/2393553
    [26] Conz E, Magnani G (2020) A dynamic perspective on the resilience of firms: A systematic literature review and a framework for future research. Eur Manag J 38: 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.004 doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.004
    [27] Cumming J, Nguyen G, Nguyen M (2022) Product market competition, venture capital, and the success of entrepreneurial firms. J Bank Finance 144: 106561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106561 doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106561
    [28] Dai F, Xiong X, Zhang J, et al. (2022) The role of global economic policy uncertainty in predicting crude oil futures volatility: Evidence from a two-factor GARCH-MIDAS model. Resour Policy 78: 102849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102849 doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102849
    [29] Danneels L, Viaene S (2022) Identifying Digital Transformation Paradoxes. Bus Inf Syst Eng 64: 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00735-7 doi: 10.1007/s12599-021-00735-7
    [30] de Chaisemartin C, D'Haultfœuille X (2020) Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. Am Econ Rev 110: 2964–2996. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25904 doi: 10.3386/w25904
    [31] Del Giudice M, Scuotto V, Papa A, et al. (2021) A Self-Tuning Model for Smart Manufacturing SMEs: Effects on Digital Innovation. J Prod Innov Manag 38: 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12560 doi: 10.1111/jpim.12560
    [32] Denkena B, Dittrich A, Stamm S (2018) Dynamic Bid Pricing for an Optimized Resource Utilization in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. 11th CIRP Conf Intell Comput ManufEng 19–21 July 2017 Gulf Naples Italy 67: 516–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.254 doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.254
    [33] DesJardine M, Bansal P, Yang Y (2019) Bouncing Back: Building Resilience Through Social and Environmental Practices in the Context of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. J Manag 45: 1434–1460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317708854 doi: 10.1177/0149206317708854
    [34] Fang M, Nie H, Shen X (2023) Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance? Econ Model 118: 106101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106101 doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106101
    [35] Feliciano-Cestero M, Ameen N, Kotabe M, et al. (2023) Is digital transformation threatened? A systematic literature review of the factors influencing firms' digital transformation and internationalization. J Bus Res 157: 113546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113546 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113546
    [36] Forgione F, Migliardo C (2022) Panel VAR study on the effects of technical efficiency, market competition, and firm value on environmental performance. J Clean Prod 359: 131919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131919 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131919
    [37] Frank G, Mendes S, Ayala F, et al. (2019) Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Change 141: 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.014 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.014
    [38] Gao J, Zhang W, Guan T, et al. (2023) The effect of manufacturing agent heterogeneity on enterprise innovation performance and competitive advantage in the era of digital transformation. J Bus Res 155: 113387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113387 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113387
    [39] Gavetti G, Greve R, Levinthal A, et al. (2012) The Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Assessment and Prospects. Acad Manag Ann 6: 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2012.656841 doi: 10.1080/19416520.2012.656841
    [40] Gayed S, El Ebrashi R (2023) Fostering firm resilience through organizational ambidexterity capability and resource availability: amid the COVID-19 outbreak. Int J Organ Anal 31: 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2021-2977 doi: 10.1108/IJOA-09-2021-2977
    [41] Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2019) Digital Economics. J Econ Lit 57: 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171452 doi: 10.1257/jel.20171452
    [42] Gomez-Mejia R, Patel C, Zellweger M (2018) In the Horns of the Dilemma: Socioemotional Wealth, Financial Wealth, and Acquisitions in Family Firms. J Manag 44: 1369–1397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315614375 doi: 10.1177/0149206315614375
    [43] Halder C, Malikov E (2020) Smoothed LSDV estimation of functional-coefficient panel data models with two-way fixed effects. Econ Lett 192: 109239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109239 doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109239
    [44] Hambrick C, Mason A (1984) Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Acad Manage Rev 9: 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434 doi: 10.2307/258434
    [45] Han M, Kwak J, Sul D (2022) Two-way fixed effects versus panel factor-augmented estimators: asymptotic comparison among pretesting procedures. Econom Rev 41: 291–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2021.1957282 doi: 10.1080/07474938.2021.1957282
    [46] Harris J, Bromiley P (2007) Incentives to Cheat: The Influence of Executive Compensation and Firm Performance on Financial Misrepresentation. Organ Sci 18: 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0241 doi: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0241
    [47] Hasan M, Hossain S, Gotti G (2022) Product market competition and earnings management: the role of managerial ability. Rev Account Financ 21: 486–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-06-2021-0169 doi: 10.1108/RAF-06-2021-0169
    [48] He W, Zhang Z, Li W (2021) Information technology solutions, challenges, and suggestions for tackling the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Inf Manag 57: 102287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102287 doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102287
    [49] Hien N, Nhu H (2022) The effect of digital marketing transformation trends on consumers' purchase intention in B2B businesses: The moderating role of brand awareness. Cogent Bus Manag 9: 2105285. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2105285 doi: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2105285
    [50] Hu S, Blettner D, Bettis A (2011) Adaptive aspirations: performance consequences of risk preferences at extremes and alternative reference groups. Strateg Manag J 32: 1426–1436. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.960 doi: 10.1002/smj.960
    [51] Hu W, Shan Y, Deng Y, et al. (2023) Geopolitical Risk Evolution and Obstacle Factors of Countries along the Belt and Road and Its Types Classification. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20: 1618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021618 doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021618
    [52] Huang M, Bhattacherjee A, Wong S (2018) Gatekeepers' innovative use of IT: An absorptive capacity model at the unit level. Inf Manage 55: 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.06.001 doi: 10.1016/j.im.2017.06.001
    [53] Huang X, Liu W, Zhang Z, et al. (2023) Quantity or quality: Environmental legislation and corporate green innovations. Ecol Econ 204: 107684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107684 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107684
    [54] Huang Y, Zhang Y (2023) Digitalization, positioning in global value chain and carbon emissions embodied in exports: Evidence from global manufacturing production-based emissions. Ecol Econ 205: 107674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107674 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107674
    [55] Iborra M, Safón V, Dolz C (2022) Does ambidexterity consistency benefit small and medium-sized enterprises' resilience? J Small Bus Manag 60: 1122–1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.2014508 doi: 10.1080/00472778.2021.2014508
    [56] Iftikhar A, Purvis L, Giannoccaro I (2021) A meta-analytical review of antecedents and outcomes of firm resilience. J Bus Res 135: 408–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.048 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.048
    [57] Jafari-Sadeghi V, Amoozad Mahdiraji H, Alam M, et al. (2023) Entrepreneurs as strategic transformation managers: Exploring micro-foundations of digital transformation in small and medium internationalisers. J Bus Res 154: 113287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.051 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.051
    [58] Jin X, Lei X, Wu W (2023) Can digital investment improve corporate environmental performance? -- Empirical evidence from China. J Clean Prod 414: 137669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137669 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137669
    [59] Jirásek M (2023) Corporate boards' and firms' R & D responses to performance feedback. J Strategy Manag 16: 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-06-2021-0132 doi: 10.1108/JSMA-06-2021-0132
    [60] Jyoti C, Efpraxia Z (2023) Understanding and exploring the value co-creation of cloud computing innovation using resource based value theory: An interpretive case study. J Bus Res 164: 113970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113970 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113970
    [61] Karim S, Nahar S, Demirbag M (2022) Resource-Based Perspective on ICT Use and Firm Performance: A Meta-analysis Investigating the Moderating Role of Cross-Country ICT Development Status. Technol Forecast Soc Change 179: 121626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121626 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121626
    [62] Khattak A, Ali M, Azmi W, et al. (2023) Digital transformation, diversification and stability: What do we know about banks? Econ. Anal Policy 78: 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.03.004 doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.03.004
    [63] Kim H, Kung H (2017) The Asset Redeployability Channel: How Uncertainty Affects Corporate Investment. Rev Financ Stud 30: 245–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv076 doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhv076
    [64] Lateef A, Omotayo O (2019) Information audit as an important tool in organizational management: A review of literature. Bus Inf Rev 36: 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382119831458 doi: 10.1177/0266382119831458
    [65] Lerman V, Benitez B, Müller M, et al. (2022) Smart green supply chain management: a configurational approach to enhance green performance through digital transformation. Supply Chain Manag Int J 27: 147–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2022-0059 doi: 10.1108/SCM-02-2022-0059
    [66] Levitt B, March G (1988) Organizational Learning. Annu Rev Sociol 14: 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535 doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535
    [67] Li G, Jin Y, Gao X (2023) Digital transformation and pollution emission of enterprises: Evidence from China's micro-enterprises. Energy Rep 9: 552–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.169 doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.169
    [68] Li J, Zhou C, Zajac J (2009) Control, collaboration, and productivity in international joint ventures: theory and evidence. Strateg Manag J 30: 865–884. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.771 doi: 10.1002/smj.771
    [69] Li L, Su F, Zhang W, et al. (2018) Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective. Inf Syst J 28: 1129–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12153 doi: 10.1111/isj.12153
    [70] Li P, Lin Z, Du H, et al. (2021) Do environmental taxes reduce air pollution? Evidence from fossil-fuel power plants in China. J Environ Manage 295: 113112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113112 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113112
    [71] Li S, Wang Q (2023) Green finance policy and digital transformation of heavily polluting firms: Evidence from China. Finance Res Lett 55: 103876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103876 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.103876
    [72] Li Z, Li H, Wang S (2022) How Multidimensional Digital Empowerment Affects Technology Innovation Performance: The Moderating Effect of Adaptability to Technology Embedding. Sustainability 14: 15916. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315916 doi: 10.3390/su142315916
    [73] Liu J, Liu Y, Wang F, et al. (2021) Influence of free-market competition and policy intervention competition on enterprise green evolution. J Clean Prod 325: 129225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129225 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129225
    [74] Love G, Nohria N (2005) Reducing slack: the performance consequences of downsizing by large industrial firms, 1977–93. Strateg Manag J 26: 1087–1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.487 doi: 10.1002/smj.487
    [75] Lu T, Li X, Yuen F (2023) Digital transformation as an enabler of sustainability innovation and performance – Information processing and innovation ambidexterity perspectives. Technol Forecast Soc Change 196: 122860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122860 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122860
    [76] Madadian O, Van den Broeke M (2023) R & D investments in response to performance feedback: moderating effects of firm risk profile and business strategy. Appl Econ 55: 802–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2094879 doi: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2094879
    [77] Mahto V, Llanos-Contreras O, Hebles M (2022) Post-disaster recovery for family firms: The role of owner motivations, firm resources, and dynamic capabilities. J Bus Res 145: 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.089 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.089
    [78] Makarchenko M, Borisova I, Sattorov F (2020) Approach changing into organization processes and personnel management in context of digitalization. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 940: 012097. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/940/1/012097 doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/940/1/012097
    [79] Malesky J, Nguyen V, Bach N, et al. (2020) The effect of market competition on bribery in emerging economies: An empirical analysis of Vietnamese firms. World Dev 131: 104957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104957 doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104957
    [80] Martín-Rojas R, Garrido-Moreno A, García-Morales J (2023) Social media use, corporate entrepreneurship and organizational resilience: A recipe for SMEs success in a post-Covid scenario. Technol Forecast Soc Change 190: 122421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122421 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122421
    [81] Martins C (2022) Competition and ESG practices in emerging markets: Evidence from a difference-in-differences model. Finance Res Lett 46: 102371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102371 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102371
    [82] Matthess M, Kunkel S, Dachrodt F, et al. (2023) The impact of digitalization on energy intensity in manufacturing sectors – A panel data analysis for Europe. J Clean Prod 397: 136598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136598 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136598
    [83] Mikalef P, Krogstie J, Pappas O, et al. (2020) Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities. Inf Manage 57: 103169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.004 doi: 10.1016/j.im.2019.05.004
    [84] Mithani A (2023) Scaling digital and non-digital business models in foreign markets: The case of financial advice industry in the United States. J World Bus 58: 101457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2023.101457 doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2023.101457
    [85] Muneeb D, Ahmad Z. Abu Bakar R, et al. (2023) Empowering resources recombination through dynamic capabilities of an enterprise. J Enterp Inf Manag 36: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-01-2021-0004 doi: 10.1108/JEIM-01-2021-0004
    [86] Nadkarni S, Narayanan K (2007) Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: the moderating role of industry clockspeed. Strateg Manag J 28: 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.576 doi: 10.1002/smj.576
    [87] Papadopoulos T, Gunasekaran A, Dubey R, et al. (2017) The role of Big Data in explaining disaster resilience in supply chains for sustainability. J Clean Prod 142: 1108–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.059 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.059
    [88] Pongtanalert K, Assarut N (2022) Entrepreneur Mindset, Social Capital and Adaptive Capacity for Tourism SME Resilience and Transformation during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 14: 12675. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912675 doi: 10.3390/su141912675
    [89] Ren Y, Li B (2023) Digital Transformation, Green Technology Innovation and Enterprise Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from the Textual Analysis of the Annual Reports of Listed Renewable Energy Enterprises in China. Sustainability 15: 712. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010712 doi: 10.3390/su15010712
    [90] Ren Y, Zhang X, Chen H (2022) The Impact of New Energy Enterprises' Digital Transformation on Their Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability 14: 13928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113928 doi: 10.3390/su142113928
    [91] Saeed A, Alnori F, Yaqoob G (2023) Corporate social responsibility, industry concentration, and firm performance: Evidence from emerging Asian economies. Res Int Bus Finance 64: 101864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101864 doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101864
    [92] Seles P, Mascarenhas J, Lopes de Sousa Jabbour B, et al. (2022) Smoothing the circular economy transition: The role of resources and capabilities enablers. Bus Strategy Environ 31: 1814–1837. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2985 doi: 10.1002/bse.2985
    [93] Shen Z, Liang X, Lv J, et al. (2022) The Mechanism of Digital Environment Influencing Organizational Performance: An Empirical Analysis Based on Construction Data. Sustainability 14: 3330. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063330 doi: 10.3390/su14063330
    [94] Shinkle A (2012) Organizational Aspirations, Reference Points, and Goals: Building on the Past and Aiming for the Future. J Manag 38: 415–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311419856 doi: 10.1177/0149206311419856
    [95] Shinkle A, Hodgkinson P, Gary S (2021) Government policy changes and organizational goal setting: Extensions to the behavioral theory of the firm. J Bus Res 129: 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.056 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.056
    [96] Sirmon G, Hitt A, Ireland D (2007) Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking inside the Black Box. Acad Manage Rev 32: 273–292. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23466005 doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.23466005
    [97] Sriyabhand T, Phoorithewet S (2020) Article Review: Digital Doesn't Have to Be Disruptive. ABAC J 40: 165–167.
    [98] Sull DN (1999) Why good companies go bad. Harv Bus Rev 77: 42–42.
    [99] Tang J (2006) Competition and innovation behaviour. Res Policy 35: 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.004 doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.004
    [100] Tang Z, Hull C (2012) An Investigation of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Perceived Environmental Hostility, and Strategy Application among Chinese SMEs. J Small Bus Manag 50: 132–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2011.00347.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2011.00347.x
    [101] Teece J (2019) A capability theory of the firm: an economics and (Strategic) management perspective. N Z Econ Pap 53: 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2017.1371208 doi: 10.1080/00779954.2017.1371208
    [102] Tian G, Li B, Cheng Y (2022) Does digital transformation matter for corporate risk-taking? Financ Res Lett 49: 103107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103107 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103107
    [103] Troilo G, De Luca M, Atuahene-Gima K (2014) More Innovation with Less? A Strategic Contingency View of Slack Resources, Information Search, and Radical Innovation. J Prod Innov Manag 31: 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12094 doi: 10.1111/jpim.12094
    [104] Troise C, Corvello V, Ghobadian A, et al. (2022) How can SMEs successfully navigate VUCA environment: The role of agility in the digital transformation era. Technol Forecast Soc Change 174: 121227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121227 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121227
    [105] Varadarajan R (2023) Resource advantage theory, resource based theory, and theory of multimarket competition: Does multimarket rivalry restrain firms from leveraging resource Advantages? J Bus Res 160: 113713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113713 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113713
    [106] Wang J, Liu Y, Wang W, et al. (2023) How does digital transformation drive green total factor productivity? Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises. J Clean Prod 406: 136954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136954 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136954
    [107] Wang Y, Ning L, Chen J (2014) Product diversification through licensing: Empirical evidence from Chinese firms. Eur Manag J 32: 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2013.09.001
    [108] Wei R (2022) Load Balancing Optimization of In-Memory Database for Massive Information Processing of Internet of Things (IoTs). Math Probl Eng 2022: 9138084. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9138084 doi: 10.1155/2022/9138084
    [109] Wernerfelt B (1984) A Resource-based View of the Firm. Strategic Manage J 5: 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207 doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050207
    [110] Wong Z, Chen A, Peng D, et al. (2022) Does technology-seeking OFDI improve the productivity of Chinese firms under the COVID-19 pandemic? Glob Finance J 51: 100675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100675 doi: 10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100675
    [111] Wu F, Hu H, Ling H, et al. (2021) Corporate digital transformation and capital market performance-Empirical evidence from equity liquidity. J Manage World 37: 130–144+10 (In Chinese).
    [112] Wu H, Qu Y, Ye Y (2022) The Effect of International Diversification on Sustainable Development: The Mediating Role of Dynamic Capabilities. Sustainability 14: 8981. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14158981 doi: 10.3390/su14158981
    [113] Xu N, Zhao D, Zhang W, et al. (2022) Does Digital Transformation Promote Agricultural Carbon Productivity in China? Land 11: 1966. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11111966 doi: 10.3390/land11111966
    [114] Yang X, Lin S, Li Y, et al. (2019) Can high-speed rail reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from China. J Clean Prod 239: 118135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118135 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118135
    [115] Yao S (2023) Corporate Social Responsibility Regulatory System Based on Sustainable Corporation Law Pathway. Sustainability 15: 1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021638 doi: 10.3390/su15021638
    [116] Zhan J, Zhang Z, Zhang S, et al. (2023) Manufacturing servitization in the digital economy: a configurational analysis from dynamic capabilities and lifecycle perspective. Ind Manag Data Syst 123: 79–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2022-0302 doi: 10.1108/IMDS-05-2022-0302
    [117] Zhang M, Luo Q (2022) A Systematic Literature Review on the Influence Mechanism of Digital Finance on High Quality Economic Development. J Risk Anal Crisis Response 12. https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v12i1.321 doi: 10.54560/jracr.v12i1.321
    [118] Zhang W, Lu C, Liang S (2023) More words but less investment: Rookie CEOs and firms' digital transformations. China J Account Res 16: 100305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100305 doi: 10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100305
    [119] Zhang-Zhang Y, Rohlfer S, Varma A (2022) Strategic people management in contemporary highly dynamic VUCA contexts: A knowledge worker perspective. J Bus Res 144: 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.069 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.069
    [120] Zhuo C, Chen J (2023) Can digital transformation overcome the enterprise innovation dilemma: Effect, mechanism and effective boundary. Technol Forecast Soc Change 190: 122378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122378 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122378
    [121] Zuo L, Li H, Gao H, et al. (2022) The Sustainable Efficiency Improvement of Internet Companies under the Background of Digital Transformation. Sustainability 14: 5600. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095600 doi: 10.3390/su14095600
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Xiaoyu Xu, Nan Wang, Liguo Feng, Jianwen Wang, Simple Sequence Repeat Fingerprint Identification of Essential-Oil-Bearing Rosa rugosa via High-Resolution Melting (HRM) Analysis, 2023, 13, 2218-273X, 1468, 10.3390/biom13101468
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1828) PDF downloads(180) Cited by(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog