Overview

A quantitative and qualitative macroeconomic and sociopolitical outlook of the MEDA transitional economies: development-paths, governance climate, and sociocultural factors

  • We present a quantitative and qualitative macroeconomic and sociopolitical outlook of the South-East Mediterranean transitional economies (MEDA), aiming to understand their development challenges and growth potential. We used various analytical techniques integrated in this study, including macroeconomic indicators, SWOT analysis, clustering, Markovian chains, investment development-path, and sociocultural factors. MEDA countries differ principally due to varying levels of oil dependence, underdeveloped manufacturing systems, and high unemployment rates. Despite various efforts, institutional deficiencies and a lack of governance persist, hindering countries' growth and attractiveness. Finally, the importance of international cooperation, particularly with the European Union, to support MEDA transitional economies in addressing governance issues, enhancing human development, and fostering internal stability is highlighted.

    Citation: Francesco Scalamonti. A quantitative and qualitative macroeconomic and sociopolitical outlook of the MEDA transitional economies: development-paths, governance climate, and sociocultural factors[J]. National Accounting Review, 2024, 6(3): 407-448. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2024019

    Related Papers:

    [1] Paul Daniel Phillips, Timothy Andersen, Owen M. McDougal . Assessing the utility and limitations of high throughput virtual screening. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(2): 238-245. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.2.238
    [2] Somisetti V. Sambasivarao, David M. Granum, Hua Wang, C. Mark Maupin . Identifying the Enzymatic Mode of Action for Cellulase Enzymes by Means of Docking Calculations and a Machine Learning Algorithm. AIMS Molecular Science, 2014, 1(1): 59-80. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2014.1.59
    [3] Bhawna Sharma, Bennet Angel, Vankadoth Umakanth Naik, Annette Angel, Vinod Joshi, BM Shareef, Neha Singh, Ambreen Shafaat Khan, Poorna Khaneja, Shilpa Barthwal, Ramesh Joshi, Nuzhat Maqbool Peer, Kiran Yadav, Komal Tomar, Satendra Pal Singh . Repurposed drug molecules targeting NSP12 protein of SARS-CoV-2: An in-silico study. AIMS Molecular Science, 2023, 10(4): 322-342. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2023019
    [4] Mohd Shukri Abd Shukor, Mohd Yunus Abd Shukor . Molecular docking and dynamics studies show: Phytochemicals from Papaya leaves extracts as potential inhibitors of SARS–CoV–2 proteins targets and TNF–alpha and alpha thrombin human targets for combating COVID-19. AIMS Molecular Science, 2023, 10(3): 213-262. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2023015
    [5] Harshita Maheshwari, Maitreyi Pathak, Prekshi Garg, Prachi Srivastava . Computational analysis reveals the therapeutic potential of Asiatic acid against the miRNA correlated differentially expressed genes of bipolar disorder. AIMS Molecular Science, 2024, 11(2): 99-115. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2024007
    [6] S. Garg, N. Raghav . N-formylpyrazolines and N-benzoylpyrazolines as potential inhibitors cathepsin L. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(3): 454-465. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.3.454
    [7] Abdulrahman Mahmoud Dogara, Ateeq Ahmed Al-Zahrani, Sarwan W. Bradosty, Saber W. Hamad, Aisha Abdullahi Mahmud, Hussain D. Almalki, Mustapha Abdullahi, Abubakar Abdullahi Lema, Hasan Nudin Nur Fatihah . In-vitro biological activity and in-silico studies of some volatile phytochemicals from the ethanol extract of Eugenia uniflora. AIMS Molecular Science, 2024, 11(3): 303-321. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2024018
    [8] Manikandan Alagumuthu, Divakar Dahiya, Poonam Singh Nigam . Phospholipid—the dynamic structure between living and non-living world; a much obligatory supramolecule for present and future. AIMS Molecular Science, 2019, 6(1): 1-19. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2019.1.1
    [9] Amena W. Smith, Swapan K. Ray, Arabinda Das, Kenkichi Nozaki, Baerbel Rohrer, Naren L. Banik . Calpain inhibition as a possible new therapeutic target in multiple sclerosis. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(4): 446-462. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.4.446
    [10] Joanne L. Hopper, Natasha Begum, Laura Smith, Thomas A. Hughes . The role of PSMD9 in human disease: future clinical and therapeutic implications. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(4): 476-484. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.4.476
  • We present a quantitative and qualitative macroeconomic and sociopolitical outlook of the South-East Mediterranean transitional economies (MEDA), aiming to understand their development challenges and growth potential. We used various analytical techniques integrated in this study, including macroeconomic indicators, SWOT analysis, clustering, Markovian chains, investment development-path, and sociocultural factors. MEDA countries differ principally due to varying levels of oil dependence, underdeveloped manufacturing systems, and high unemployment rates. Despite various efforts, institutional deficiencies and a lack of governance persist, hindering countries' growth and attractiveness. Finally, the importance of international cooperation, particularly with the European Union, to support MEDA transitional economies in addressing governance issues, enhancing human development, and fostering internal stability is highlighted.



    Mycobacterium tuberculosis is an acid-fast Gram-positive bacteria, the causative agent of tuberculosis in human beings [1]. TB is a disease of poverty, malnutrition and overcrowding, affecting people of all age groups [2]. It is a tough bacterium due to the presence of an inimitable cell wall which has a waxlike coating predominantly composed of mycolic acid [3],[4]. This allows the bacillus to lie in a covert situation for long periods, may be decades, centuries or even more [5][7]. The host's immune system may restrain the disease, but it does not destroy it [8][10]. According to a WHO factsheet from 2022, there were an estimated 10.6 million new TB cases in 2021, of which 6.7 % were people coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [11]. The treatment of TB has become a global public health program due to various factors like the requirement of long-term multidrug therapy, the emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains, and its invasion in HIV patients [12]. The chemotherapeutic regime of a TB treatment includes administering of Isoniazid, Rifampin, Pyrazinamide and Ethambutol (EMB) for two months followed by Isoniazid and Rifampin for four months [13]. The latest WHO reports point out the emergence of TDR (totally drug resistant) strains of TB [14]

    Compounds with some antibacterial activity may be considered as a good source of new leads for TB drug development. Nitrofuranylamide, metronidazole, nitrofurantoin and nitroimidazole pyran, are some antibacterial agents (Figure 1) used in different microbial infections [15],[16]. Among these compounds, nitrofuranylamide has been reported to inhibit UDP-galactose mutase (Glf), an enzyme accountable for the biosynthesis of galactofuranose, an indispensable component in the bacterial cell wall [17]. Tangallapally et al. designed several nitrofuran derivatives as antitubercular agents [18] Previously, we have explored the QSARs of a few juglone derivatives [19], C-3 arylalkyl 2,3-dideoxy hex-2-enopyranosides and multi-functionalized heptenol and octenol derivatives for their antitubercular activity [20]. These studies have specified that for juglone derivatives, structures with compact molecular arrangement and the substituent groups with electropositive character are favorable for activity. For C-3 alkyl and arylalkyl 2,3-dideoxy hex-2-enopyranosides and highly functionalized heptenol and octenol derivatives, few degrees of symmetry, least quirkiness and squeezed geometric and electronegativity centers, few branches, and saturated structural templates favor antitubercular activity. Recently, there was a 2D-QSAR study performed on the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) inhibitors. The genetic algorithm multiple linear regression (GA-MLR) methods, Dragon descriptors and PaDEL software were combined together for the development of models. The study emphasized the importance of aliphatic primary amino groups, existence of O-S at topological distance, Al-O-Ar/Ar-O-Ar/R..O..R/R-O-C=X and hydrogen bond donors for the MGMT inhibition activity [21],[22]. The quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models between fused/non-fused polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (FNFPAHs) and toxicity were also explored [23].

    Figure 1.  Antibacterial agents.

    In the medicinal chemistry paradigm, establishing a correlation between the structure and the associated activity helps in understanding the system under investigation. Additionally, rationales from different matrics provide mutually exclusive information. The COMFA and COMSIA analysis of nitrofuranylamide and related aromatic compounds suggested that lipophilic, steric and electronic features are important for the penetration of drug to the cell wall [24]. The pharmacophore mapping study of these compounds emphasized that the manifestation of negative potential regions above the oxygen atoms of the nitro group, covering laterally to the isoxazole ring/amide bond is indispensable for potent antitubercular activity [25]. In this context, we have contemplated a comprehensive quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study on the nitrofuran analogue with topological and structural fragment descriptors from Dragon [26] to offer rationales in terms of designated indices. Also, the quantitative structure–activity relationship models to determine the influences of physiochemical structures of nitroreductase inhibitors on antitubercular activities.

    The study has involved 126 diverse nitrofuran derivatives and related compounds along with their antitubercular activities reported in the literature [18],[27][30]. In these analogues, 102 compounds are with furan ring system, and 24 compounds are with different ring systems like, thiophene, thiazole, pyrrole, and imidazole. Broadly, the structural variation in the compounds may be represented as shown in (Figure 2). In 121 compounds, the furanyl/heterocyclic moiety is connected to the rest of the scaffold through the amide linkers. In 5 molecules an isoxazole linker is present in place of the amide linker.

    Figure 2.  General structure of nitrofuran derivatives.

    The other variations in the scaffold are schematically represented as A, Q, S, and U regions connected to the amide/isoxazole with P, R, T linkers, respectively. The A region is satisfied with furan ring, imidazole ring, pyrrole ring, thiazole ring, etc. The Q region is satisfied with an aryl, substituted aryl, fused ring system, heteroaryl etc. and the P linkage consists of methyl, ethyl, isobutyl. The Q region is connected with the S region by a 1-4 or 1-3 system. The S region consists of piperazine, benzodiazepine, isoxazole, piperidine rings. The R linkage present in very few compounds. It consists of cyano, methoxy. The U region consists of an aromatic ring or open chain like methoxy, ethoxy, amide, etc. The T linkage consists of methyl, carbonyl group, etc.

    The antitubercular activity was taken as the logarithm of the inverse of minimum inhibitory concentration (−log MIC, where MIC is in moles per liter against M. tuberculosis, H37Rv). The common structure of all these compounds is given in (Figure 2), and their structural alternatives are given (Table 1 and Figure 3). For the QSAR study the structures of all compounds were drawn in ChemDraw 10 [31]. The 2D ChemDraw structures were changed into 3D structures using the default conversion procedure applied in the ChemDraw 10 3D Ultra. The 3D structures were energy minimized in the MM2 module using the minimum RMS gradient 0.100. All these energy structures were transported to Dragon software [26] for the computation of 0D, 1D and 2D molecular descriptors.

    Table 1.  Observed and calculated antitubercular activities of nitrofuran derivatives (Figure 2).
    Compd No X A B P Q R S T U
    Activity (−log MIC)
    OBSDa
    Calcd
    Eq2 Eq3 Eq4 Eq5 Eq6 Eq7
    001 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q1 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.52 4.91 4.95 4.67 4.91 4.95 4.67
    002 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q2 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.29 4.91 4.95 4.67 4.91 4.95 4.67
    003 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q3 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.50 4.91 4.95 4.67 4.91 4.95 4.67
    004 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q4 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.52 4.91 4.95 4.67 4.91 4.95 4.67
    005 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q5 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.82 4.93 4.98 4.92 4.93 4.98 4.92
    006 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q6 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.89 4.69 4.71 4.42 4.69 4.71 4.42
    007 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q7 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.97 4.86 4.90 4.67 4.86 4.90 4.67
    008 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q8 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.46 4.69 4.71 4.42 4.69 4.71 4.42
    009 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q9 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.58 4.78 4.81 4.67 4.78 4.81 4.67
    010 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q10 R1 S0 T0 U0 5.51 4.93 4.98 4.92 4.93 4.98 4.92
    011 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q5 R0 S0 T0 U0 6.44 5.49 5.58 5.17 5.49 5.58 5.17
    012 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q11 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.24 5.19 5.26 5.42 5.19 5.26 5.42
    013 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q12 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.88 5.71 5.81 5.68 5.71 5.81 5.68
    014 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q13 R0 S0 T0 U0 6.19 5.62 5.71 5.68 5.62 5.71 5.68
    015 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q14 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.62 5.75 5.85 5.93 5.75 5.85 5.93
    016 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q15 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.97 5.24 5.30 5.42 5.24 5.30 5.42
    017 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q16 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.49 5.15 5.21 5.42 5.15 5.21 5.42
    018 X1 A1 B1 P2 Q8 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.21 4.69 4.72 4.67 4.69 4.72 4.67
    019 X1 A1 B1 P2 Q5 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.56 4.98 5.03 5.17 4.98 5.03 5.17
    020 X1 A1 B1 P3 Q8 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.21 4.98 5.03 5.17 4.98 5.03 5.17
    021 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q8 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.92 4.98 5.03 5.17 4.98 5.03 5.17
    022 X1 A1 B1 P2 Q13 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.90 5.49 5.58 5.68 5.49 5.58 5.68
    023 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q17 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.19 4.91 4.95 4.67 4.91 4.95 4.67
    024 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q18 R2 S0 T0 U0 4.43 5.28 5.35 4.92 5.28 5.35 4.92
    025 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q4 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.74 3.77 4.48 4.43 3.77 4.48 4.43
    026 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q4 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.76 4.12 4.85 4.70 4.12 4.85 4.70
    027 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q8 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.87 4.69 4.71 5.17 4.69 4.71 5.17
    028 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q5 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.62 4.93 4.98 5.68 4.93 4.98 5.68
    029 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q19 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.51 5.12 5.18 5.42 5.12 5.18 5.42
    030 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q20 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.87 4.69 4.71 4.42 4.69 4.71 4.42
    031 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q21 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.57 4.69 4.71 4.42 4.69 4.71 4.42
    032 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q22 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.87 4.69 4.71 4.42 4.69 4.71 4.42
    033 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q23 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.55 4.56 4.58 4.42 4.56 4.58 4.42
    034 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q24 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.57 4.69 4.71 4.42 4.69 4.71 4.42
    035 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q20 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.49 4.98 5.03 4.67 4.98 5.03 4.67
    036 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q25 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.30 4.96 4.14 5.42 4.96 4.14 5.42
    037 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q26 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.22 4.91 4.95 4.67 4.91 4.95 4.67
    038 X2 A1 B1 P1 Q27 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.24 5.19 5.26 5.42 5.19 5.26 5.42
    039 X3 A1 B1 P1 Q28 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.41 5.32 5.39 5.93 5.32 5.39 5.93
    040 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q10 R0 S1 T0 U0 5.01 5.50 5.59 5.42 5.50 5.59 5.42
    041 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q10 R0 S2 T0 U0 4.42 5.81 5.92 5.93 5.81 5.92 5.93
    042 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q10 R0 S2 T1 U1 5.71 6.16 6.28 5.93 6.16 6.28 5.93
    043 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q10 R0 S3 T1 U1 5.11 6.16 6.28 5.93 6.16 6.28 5.93
    044 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q10 R0 S2 T0 U2 5.99 5.68 5.77 6.43 5.68 5.77 6.43
    045 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q18 R0 S1 T0 U0 5.01 5.06 5.12 5.17 5.06 5.12 5.17
    046 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q18 R0 S2 T0 U0 4.42 5.32 5.39 5.68 5.32 5.39 5.68
    047 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q18 R0 S2 T1 U1 4.51 5.49 5.57 5.68 5.49 5.57 5.68
    048 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q18 R0 S3 T1 U1 4.51 5.49 5.57 5.68 5.49 5.57 5.68
    049 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q18 R0 S2 T1 U2 5.10 5.40 5.48 6.18 5.40 5.48 6.18
    050 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S1 T0 U0 6.22 5.55 5.64 5.68 5.55 5.64 5.68
    051 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S2 T0 U0 6.24 5.86 5.97 6.18 5.86 5.97 6.18
    052 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S2 T1 U1 7.53 6.21 6.34 6.18 6.21 6.34 6.18
    053 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S3 T1 U1 5.72 6.21 6.34 6.18 6.21 6.34 6.18
    054 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q18 R0 S2 T0 U0 5.04 5.99 6.11 5.93 5.99 6.11 5.93
    055 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q18 R0 S2 T1 U0 6.62 6.16 6.29 5.93 6.16 6.29 5.93
    056 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q18 R0 S3 T1 U1 5.43 6.16 6.29 5.93 6.16 6.29 5.93
    057 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S4 T0 U1 6.54 5.55 4.77 5.68 5.55 4.77 5.68
    058 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S5 T0 U0 5.06 5.86 5.11 5.44 5.86 5.11 5.44
    059 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S6 T0 U0 4.49 6.18 5.44 5.20 6.18 5.44 5.20
    060 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S2 T1 U3 6.89 6.04 6.17 6.24 6.04 6.17 6.24
    061 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R3 S2 T0 U0 5.97 6.23 6.37 5.93 6.23 6.37 5.93
    062 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q29 R0 S2 T1 U1 7.24 6.68 6.84 6.43 6.68 6.84 6.43
    063 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q29 R0 S2 T0 U0 5.66 5.99 6.11 6.43 5.99 6.11 6.43
    064 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q29 R0 S4 T0 U0 5.66 5.68 4.90 5.93 5.68 4.90 5.93
    065 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q29 R0 S1 T0 U0 5.94 5.68 5.77 5.93 5.68 5.77 5.93
    066 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S3 T1 U1 6.34 6.68 6.84 6.43 6.68 6.84 6.43
    067 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S2 T1 U1 7.53 6.21 6.34 6.18 6.21 6.34 6.18
    068 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S2 T2 U4 7.24 6.73 6.89 6.45 6.73 6.89 6.45
    069 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S2 T2 U5 6.59 6.04 6.16 6.20 6.04 6.16 6.20
    070 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S2 T2 U6 7.81 6.04 6.16 6.20 6.04 6.16 6.20
    071 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S2 T2 U7 6.93 6.27 6.40 6.20 6.27 6.40 6.20
    072 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S2 T2 U8 6.93 6.32 6.46 6.45 6.32 6.46 6.45
    073 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S2 T2 U9 5.92 6.18 6.31 5.46 6.18 6.31 5.46
    074 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S2 T2 U10 6.32 6.18 6.31 6.20 6.18 6.31 6.20
    075 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S2 T2 U11 5.72 6.38 6.52 6.20 6.38 6.52 6.20
    076 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S7 T2 U4 6.65 6.71 6.88 6.45 6.71 6.88 6.45
    077 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S7 T1 U1 5.73 6.20 6.33 6.18 6.20 6.33 6.18
    078 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S7 T0 U12 6.62 6.02 6.14 6.20 6.02 6.14 6.20
    079 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S7 T0 U13 5.73 6.37 6.52 6.20 6.37 6.52 6.20
    080 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q30 R0 S2 T0 U14 6.94 6.73 6.89 6.45 6.73 6.89 6.45
    081 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q30 R0 S2 T1 U1 7.83 6.21 6.34 6.18 6.21 6.34 6.18
    082 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q30 R0 S2 T0 U15 6.91 6.04 6.16 6.20 6.04 6.16 6.20
    083 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q30 R0 S2 T0 U16 5.87 6.38 6.52 6.20 6.38 6.52 6.20
    084 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q31 R0 S2 T1 U1 7.86 6.69 6.86 6.68 6.69 6.86 6.68
    085 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q31 R0 S2 T0 U0 6.27 6.52 6.67 6.68 6.52 6.67 6.68
    086 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q31 R0 S4 T0 U0 5.97 6.03 5.28 6.18 6.03 5.28 6.18
    087 X4 A1 B1 P0 Q4 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.47 3.23 4.77 4.17 3.23 4.77 4.17
    088 X5 A1 B1 P0 Q4 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.17 3.74 4.45 3.69 3.74 4.45 3.69
    089 X6 A1 B1 P0 Q4 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.15 3.40 4.09 3.93 3.40 4.09 3.93
    090 X7 A1 B1 P0 Q4 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.16 3.40 4.95 4.18 3.40 4.95 4.18
    091 X8 A1 B1 P0 Q4 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.17 3.74 4.45 3.69 3.74 4.45 3.69
    092 X9 A1 B1 P0 Q4 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.11 3.60 4.30 4.17 3.60 4.30 4.17
    093 X1 A1 B1 P0 Q32 R0 S0 T0 U0 6.35 5.77 5.87 6.18 5.77 5.87 6.18
    094 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q33 R0 S0 T0 U0 6.29 5.45 5.53 5.42 5.45 5.53 5.42
    095 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q34 R0 S0 T0 U0 6.29 5.45 5.53 5.68 5.45 5.53 5.68
    096 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q35 R0 S0 T0 U0 6.46 5.67 5.76 5.68 5.67 5.76 5.68
    097 X1 A1 B1 P1 Q36 R0 S0 T0 U0 5.44 6.01 5.26 4.70 6.01 5.26 4.70
    098 X1 A2 B1 P1 Q12 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.20 5.97 6.08 5.93 5.97 6.08 5.93
    099 X1 A2 B1 P0 Q4 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.13 5.22 5.29 4.92 5.22 5.29 4.92
    100 X1 A2 B1 P0 Q5 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.13 5.24 5.31 5.17 5.24 5.31 5.17
    101 X1 A2 B1 P1 Q21 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.11 5.12 5.18 4.92 5.12 5.18 4.92
    102 X1 A2 B1 P0 Q8 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.08 4.83 4.87 4.67 4.83 4.87 4.67
    103 X1 A2 B1 P1 Q5 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.16 5.58 5.67 5.42 5.58 5.67 5.42
    104 X1 A2 B1 P1 Q13 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.20 5.88 5.99 5.93 5.88 5.99 5.93
    105 X1 A3 B1 P1 Q5 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.16 5.58 5.67 5.42 5.58 5.67 5.42
    106 X1 A3 B1 P1 Q13 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.20 5.88 5.99 5.19 5.88 5.99 5.19
    107 X1 A3 B1 P1 Q12 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.20 5.97 6.08 5.93 5.97 6.08 5.93
    108 X1 A3 B1 P2 Q5 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.18 5.32 5.39 5.42 5.32 5.39 5.42
    109 X1 A3 B1 P1 Q21 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.11 5.12 5.18 4.92 5.12 5.18 4.92
    110 X1 A3 B1 P0 Q32 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.23 6.02 6.14 5.69 6.02 6.14 5.69
    111 X1 A4 B1 P1 Q33 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.18 5.71 5.81 4.94 5.71 5.81 4.94
    112 X1 A4 B1 P0 Q33 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.07 4.89 4.07 4.43 4.89 4.07 4.43
    113 X1 A4 B1 P0 Q37 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.03 4.93 4.11 4.18 4.93 4.11 4.18
    114 X1 A4 B1 P0 Q5 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.05 4.93 4.11 4.18 4.93 4.11 4.18
    115 X1 A5 B1 P0 Q5 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.95 4.93 4.11 4.92 4.93 4.11 4.92
    116 X1 A5 B1 P1 Q11 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.07 5.19 4.39 5.42 5.19 4.39 5.42
    117 X1 A5 B1 P1 Q5 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.67 5.49 4.71 5.17 5.49 4.71 5.17
    118 X1 A5 B1 P1 Q13 R0 S0 T0 U0 4.71 5.62 4.85 5.68 5.62 4.85 5.68
    119 X1 A5 B1 P2 Q5 R0 S0 T0 U0 3.18 4.98 4.16 5.17 4.98 4.16 5.17
    120 X1 A5 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S1 T0 U0 4.73 5.55 4.77 5.68 5.55 4.77 5.68
    121 X1 A5 B1 P1 Q10 R0 S2 T1 U1 5.45 6.21 5.48 6.18 6.21 5.48 6.18
    122 X1 A1 B2 P0 Q10 R0 S2 T0 U14 9.65 9.71 9.75 9.46 9.71 9.75 9.46
    123 X1 A1 B2 P0 Q10 R0 S2 T1 U0 9.94 9.20 9.20 9.19 9.20 9.20 9.19
    124 X1 A1 B2 P0 Q10 R0 S2 T0 U15 8.62 9.02 9.02 9.21 9.02 9.02 9.21
    125 X1 A1 B2 P0 Q10 R0 S2 T0 U16 9.33 9.37 9.38 9.21 9.37 9.38 9.21
    126 X1 A1 B2 P0 Q10 R0 S2 T0 U0 8.34 8.60 8.56 8.69 8.60 8.56 8.69

    Note: Compd: Compound; a:Tangallapy et al., 2004, 2005, 2007a, 2007b, Sun et al., 2009.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 3.  Fragments of nitrofuran derivatives.

    All active compounds were separated into training and test sets. For this, every fifth compound of active analogues has been positioned in the test set for the validation of the generated models. Table 2 shows the activity ranges in training and test set compounds. For all these active compounds, the plot of the activity Vs chosen descriptors indicated compound 119 as an outlier. The reason may be that it is less active (3.185).

    Table 2.  Distribution of antitubercular activities in training and test set compounds.
    Sets Compounds Activity spread
    Total 126 Max Min Avg SD
    Training set 89 9.94 3.15 5.61 1.2734
    Test set 22 9.33 3.16 5.78 1.2965

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In the Dragon software, the compounds have resulted in 529 0D-2D descriptors. All those descriptors which were intercorrelated beyond 0.95 (r ≥ 0.95) and correlated less than 0.1 with the biological end points (descriptor vs. activity, r ≤ 0.1) were omitted from the study. This has compacted the descriptors to 184 descriptors for investigating antitubercular activity. The QSAR model generation and validation have been done using the combinatorial protocol of multiple linear regression (CP-MLR) [32] and partial least squares (PLS) analysis. As the number of descriptors involved in this study is still very large, only those features recognized in the models have been focused on in the discussion.

    CP-MLR is one of the filter-based approaches for the importance of variables in the regression study at different stages of model development [32]. The four filters collectively regulate inter-parameter correlations, t-values of coefficients, multiple correlation coefficient and uniformity of the models through cross-validated R2 or Q2 with a leave-one-out (LOO) strategy.

    Biological response of a chemical entity may be viewed as a cumulative influence of individual components of the structure. The occurrence or nonappearance of individual structural components reflects in the activity of the compound. In view of this, for a quick structure activity assessment, the antitubercular activities of all compounds have been analyzed in terms of indicator parameters (Eq (1)). The definitions of these indicator parameters are given in Table 3.

    Table 3.  Definitions of indicator parameter.
    Parameter Indicator
    I1 If the compound has a furan ring, I1 takes a value of 1; otherwise, it is 0.
    I2 If the compound has a furan ring substituted by nitro group, I2 takes a value of 1; otherwise, it is 0.
    I3 If the compound has a piperazine and benzodiazepine rings, I3 takes a value of 1; otherwise, it is 0.
    I4 If the compound has an isoxazole ring, I4 takes a value of 1; otherwise, it is 0.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In the statistic of regression equations, n is the number of compounds, r2 is the squared correlation coefficient of multiple linear regression, Q2 is cross-validated R2 from leave-one-out (LOO) procedure, Q2L3O is cross-validated R2 from leave 3 compounds out (randomly leave-three-out) procedure, s is the standard error of the estimate, F is the ratio between the variances of calculated and observed activities and r2t is the test set r2 value. The r2yrand (max) is the mean squared multiple correlation coefficients of the randomized activity (Y) from 100 regressions, with its maximum value in parentheses. This clearly shows the absence of chance correlation in the models. The values given in the parentheses immediately after the regression coefficients are their standard errors. The predicted activities of training compounds are in agreements with their experimental values. The predicted activities of test compounds using Eq (1) are statistically in acceptable limits. Furthermore, the compounds with uncertain activity were predicted to be less active. The positive regression coefficient of I1 in the regression equation indicates the favorable nature of the furan ring for antitubercular activity. Its replacement by other moieties like pyrrole and thiophene decreases the activity. The indicator I2 defined for the presence of a nitro group at the 5-positon of furan ring suggests its importance for activity of the compounds. The indicator I3 was introduced to account for the piperazine and benzodiazepine moieties in structure and represents their positive contribution to the activity. The I4 represents presence (or absence) of an isoxazole group in the structure. Its regression coefficient suggests in favor of this moiety for antitubercular activity.

    The QSAR of the antitubercular activity of nitrofurans were also investigated in CP-MLR for three parameter equations using the 0D to 2D descriptors from the Dragon software [26]. The equations identified in CP-MLR shared 16 descriptors among themselves (Table 4). Eqs (2)(5) are typical three parameter models from the identified ones. Also, the equations identified in the study have reasonably well predicted most of the highly active compounds in the training and test sets. However, in the training set some of the low active compounds (e.g., compounds 80, 84 and 86) were predicted about one to two orders more than their observed activity. It is very relevant to note that in congeneric series of compounds, certain modifications drastically alter the biological response of the altered analogue. Unlike the biological response, the physicochemical and molecular properties of congeners only show gradual variation in their values. For brevity, the agreement between the observed and predicted antitubercular activities of the compounds from Eq (2) is shown in Figure 4.

    Figure 4.  The plot of observed versus predicted antitubercular activity (−log MIC) of nitrofuran derivatives (Table 1) from Eq (2). The test and training set compounds are shown by (▲) and (o), respectively.

    The following are selected four parameter equations derived from the 16 identified descriptors listed in (Table 4). The parameters convey the same meaning as discussed as above. The plot of observed vs. predicted antitubercular activity (−log MIC) of nitrofuran derivatives from Eq (6) is shown in Figure 5.

    Figure 5.  The plot of observed versus predicted antitubercular activity (−log MIC) of nitrofuran derivatives (Table 1) from Eq (6). The test and training set compounds are shown by (▲) and (o), respectively.
    Table 4.  Information content of the descriptors appearing in Eqs (2)(8).
    S.No Descriptors Classes/Descriptors Descriptor Information
    Constitutional
    1 SS Sum of Kier-Hall electrotopological states.
    2 nDB No. of double bonds.
    3 nS No. of sulphur atoms.
    Topological Descriptors
    4 IC1 Information content index (neighborhood symmetry of 1-order).
    5 T(O…S) Sum of topological distance between O and S.
    Galvez Topological Charge Indices Descriptors
    6 GGI2 Topological charge index of order 2.
    7 GGI8 Topological charge index of order 8.
    8 GGI9 Topological charge index of order 9.
    2D-Autocorrelations Descriptors
    9 GATS4P Geary-autocorrelation-lag 4/weighted by atomic polarizabilities.
    Functional Group Descriptors
    10 nNO2Ph No. of nitro groups.
    11 nRSR No. of sulfides.
    12 nHAcc No. of acceptor atoms for H-bonds (NOF).
    Atom Centered Fragments
    13 C-025 R-CR-R.
    14 C-032 X-CX-X.
    15 H-051 H-attached to alpha carbon.
    16 N-076 Ar-NO2/R-N-(R)-O/RO-NO2.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The indicator parameters identified in the study have displayed significance in some of the foregoing equations as well, and improved the overall significance of all the models. Inclusion of the indicator parameter I2 in Eqs (2) and (6) has improved the r2 value to 0.759 (three parameter equation) and to 0.765 (four parameter equation) in Eqs (8) and (9), respectively.

    A PLS analysis has been applied to 16 descriptors acknowledged from the CP-MLR descriptors to enable the development of a single-window structure–activity model. It also gives a chance to assess relative importance to the descriptors. The descriptors were autoscaled (zero mean and unit SD) to give each one of them equal importance in the PLS analysis. In the PLS cross-validation two components were found to be best for describing 16 descriptors, and they explained 75.71 percent of the variance (r2 = 0.757, s = 0.634, F = 134.04) in the activity of the training set compounds and 76.8 percent variance in the activity of test set compounds (r2t = 0.768). The MLR-like PLS coefficients of these 16 descriptors are shown in Table 5. For the sake of evaluation, the plot display goodness of fit amongst observed and predicted activities (through PLS analysis) for the training and test-set compounds (Figure 6). The plot of fraction involvement of normalized regression coefficients of these descriptors to the activity is shown in Figure 7.

    Figure 6.  The plot of observed versus PLS predicted (Table 5) antitubercular activity (−log MIC) of nitrofuran derivatives. The test and training set compounds are shown by (▲) and (o), respectively.
    Figure 7.  Plots of fraction contribution of MLR-like PLS coefficients (normalized) (Table 5) of 16 descriptors. The horizontal axis refers to the descriptors numbers as shown in Table 5.
    Table 5.  MLR-like PLS model for the antitubercular activity of nitrofuran derivatives (Table 3) from the 16 descriptors of Eqs (2)(7).
    S. No. MLR-like PLS equation
    −logMIC
    Descriptor MLR-like coeff (f.c)a
    1 Ss 0.009184 (0.051056)
    2 nDB −0.27353 (−0.09041)
    3 nS −0.24087 (−0.05315)
    4 IC1 −0.29546 (−0.03882)
    5 T(O…S) −0.00232 (−0.01709)
    6 GGI2 0.172361 (0.068364)
    7 GGI8 1.429797 (0.066809)
    8 GGI9 1.731782 (0.065156)
    9 GATS4p 0.457094 (0.023938)
    10 nNO2Ph 0.435595 (0.058818)
    11 nRSR −0.02468 (−0.00454)
    12 nHAcc 0.077507 (0.061746)
    13 C-025 0.185328 (0.07147)
    14 C-032 −0.15135 (−0.01471)
    15 H-051 0.746691 (0.166619)
    16 N-076 0.817919 (0.147313)
    Constant 2.749363

    Regression statistics
    n 89
    r2 0.757
    Q2 0.741
    Q2L3O 0.743
    s 0.634
    F 134.0418
    External test set
    r2t 0.768

    Note: a: coefficients of MLR-like PLS equation in terms of descriptors for their original values; fc is fraction contribution of regression coefficient, computed from the normalized regression coefficients obtained from the autoscaled (zero mean and unit s.d) data.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The compound 123 binding energy found to be −8.84 kcal/mol and considered to be most effective at −8.84 kcal/mol. It binds effectively to the binding site Tyr50, Pro47, Leu25, Ala38, Ala37, Tyr97, Tyr91, Gly41 like the Ddn-PA-824 complex (PDB code 3R5R) as shown in Figure 8. The second-best compound, no. 122 was found to be effective at −7.79 kcal/mol (Figure 9).

    Figure 8.  (i): 2D interaction of compound 123 in the active site of Ddn-PA-824 (3R5R). (ii): 3D interaction of compound 123 in the active site of Ddn (3R5R), the compound represented in ball and stick format in green, with interacting residues labeled in black.
    Figure 9.  (i): 2D interaction of compound 122 in the active site of Ddn-PA-824 (3R5R). (ii): 3D interaction of compound 122 in the active site of Ddn (3R5R), the compound represented in ball and stick format in pink, with interacting residues labeled in black.

    The 16 identified variables shown in Table 4 are from the Constitutional, Functional, Atom Centered Fragments, Topological, Galvez, and 2D autocorrelation classes of Dragon descriptors [26]. They are briefly described in Table 4. The 0D descriptors nDB (Eq (4)), nS (Eqs (3) and (6)), and SS are from the Constitutional class. The descriptor nDB (Eq (4)) signifies the number of sequestered double bonds in the molecule. In the compounds, this addressed the carbonyl moiety of the amide group located in the different parts. Its negative regression coefficient implies supports a minimum number of such functions in the different parts of the nitrofuran derivatives for better activity. The descriptor nS (Eqs (3) and (6)) denotes no. of sulphur atoms. Its negative regression coefficient advises that fewer sulphur atoms would be favorable for activity. The descriptor SS represents the sum of Kier-Hall electrotopological states. It has positively influenced the activity, indicating the preference for a higher SS for better inhibition.

    The counts of functional groups nNO2Ph (Eqs (2) and (7)), nRSR (Eqs (5) and (7)) and nHAcc are 2D descriptors. Descriptor nNO2Ph represents the number of aromatic nitro groups in the molecule. Its positive regression coefficient supports antitubercular activity. The descriptor nRSR represents the number of R-S-R groups in various regions of nitrofuran analogue, namely, thiazole, morpholine and thiophene etc. Its negative regression coefficient suggests the unfavorable nature of this fragment in the molecular structure for the activity. The positive regression coefficient of descriptor nHAcc recommends the use of acceptor atoms for hydrogen bonding for improving the activity.

    The descriptor T(O…S) and IC1 are from the topological class (TOPO). They are 2D graph theoretical descriptors from molecular topology and sensitive to changes in the molecules' size, shape, symmetry, branching, and cyclicity, etc. The descriptor T(O…S) represents the sum of topological distance between S and O atoms in the molecules. Its negative regression coefficient advocates that minimum distance between sulphur and oxygen will be advantageous for the activity. The descriptor IC1 measures the information content of 1st order neighborhood symmetry in the molecules. The negative coefficient of this descriptor suggests its unfavorable nature for activity. The other participating 2D descriptors GGI2 (Eq 4), GGI8 (Eqs (2), (3) and (5)(7)) and GGI9 are Galvez topological charge indices (GALVEZ). They are from the first 10 eigenvalues of the multinomial of corrected adjacency matrix of the compounds. All the GALVEZ class descriptors consist of two classes. Of this, one class corresponds to the topological charge index of order n (GGIn), and the other corresponds to the mean topological charge index of order n (JGIn), where “n” denotes the order of eigenvalue. The positive influences of descriptors GGI2, GGI8 and GGI9 (topological charge indices of second, eighth and ninth order, respectively) proposed that a higher values of second, eighth, and ninth order charge indices would be beneficial for the activity.

    Conventionally, molar refractivity (MR), hydrophobicity and Hammett's sigma are a few elements for unfolding the drug receptor interactions. The non-obtainability of proper substituents is repeatedly considered as a restriction for these parameters. It is particularly true for Hammett's sigma constants. The Dragon software offers the estimations of hydrophobicity and molar refractivity of the compounds under descriptor names MLogP and MR, respectively. For the nitrofurans under analysis, the MLogP and MR have not inserted it to any model within the limits of set perimeters. Though, considering the significance of hydrophobicity and molar refractivity in modeling drug-receptor interactions, we have prolonged the study to re-examine the possibility of MLogP and MR along with the identified descriptors for describing the activity of nitrofuran derivatives. For the dataset under study, the relationship between MLogP and the activity is 0.502 (r = 0.502), while the connection between MR and the activity is 0.541 (r = 0.541). Also, MR and GGI8 are intercorrelated (r = 0.877). The GGI8 Galvez class descriptor is a measure of topological charge indices of eighth order. In the regression model (Eq (2)) the parameters GGI8 and MR appear to be exchangeable without causing any destruction (Eq (10)). Here, the positive coefficient of molar refractivity indicates the function of distribution or van der Waals forces in drug-receptor interactions.

    To identify the binding modality of nitroreductase, nitrofuran active derivatives were docked into the ligand-binding site of the deazaflavin-dependent nitroreductase (Ddn)(PDB code 3R5R). The binding energies were then studied and found to be proportional with the -log MIC values for maximum inhibitors. Compound no. 123 binded effectively to the binding site Tyr50, Pro47, Leu25, Ala38, Ala37, Tyr97, Tyr91, Gly41 like the Ddn-PA-824 complex, as shown in Figure 8. The presence of isoxazole linkage in place of amide linkage may be the reason for the highest dock score among the compounds. Notably, the residues Ser39, Lys40 Tyr26, Met48 are involved in the three conventional hydrogen bond formations with the isoxazole, furan and piperazine moieties, respectively. This information implies that the ligand has the ability to form conventional hydrogen bonds and lead towards the stability of protein-ligand complex with better binding affinity than the PA-824. The unique stability of the drug is due to the large number of pi-interactions, such as pi-pi interactions with Tyr 91 and Tyr94 other pi-interactions involved Tyr94 and Tyr49, pi-alkyl interactions with Tyr 91 and finally pi-sigma interactions with Tyr 26. The second-best binding energy of −7.79 kcal/mol was attained by compound no. 122. The hydroxyl group of residues Tyr26 and phenyl ring are involved in the non-covalent interactions between the π-bonds of aromatic rings (Figure 9). The moderately active compounds (compound no. 46 and compound no. 59) showed dock scores −5.92 and −5.95 kcal/mol, respectively. There were hydrophobic interactions with Tyr 97 and Lys 40. Only two hydrogen bond interactions were found between oxygen of nitro group and Lys 40 and Met 48 (compound no. 46). The oxygen of thiomorpholine 1,1-dioxide with Ser 39 and Tyr 94 involve in the hydrogen bond formation (compound no. 59). The least active compound (compound no. 89) docking score found to be −5.55 kcal/mol. The nitro group in the A region replaced by a methylsufinyl group and involvement of steric feature in the Q region leads to the least active compound. The hydrogen bond is involved between the carbonyl carbon of the B region and residue TRP 49. The hydrophobic interactions such as alkyl-alkyl and pi-alkyl were also found.

    Other reported nitrofuran derivatives 62, 70, 84, 102 and 125 were found to have necessary features required to enter the Ddn catalytic pocket and irreversibly reside in it. The development of the covalent complex implied that the enzyme would be permanently damaged, resulting in the release of lethal reactive nitrogen species (RNS) within the mycobacteria. Indeed, more work is required to confirm that the Ddn is a target for the nitrofuran derivatives.

    The quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) of the antitubercular activities of 126 nitrofuran derivatives have been analyzed in terms of different indicator parameters and 0D-2D Dragon descriptors using CPMLR and partial least squares (PLS) procedures. For this study 89 compounds are in the training set, and 22 compounds are in the test set. The 16 descriptors identified in CP-MLR are from six different classes Constitutional, Functional, Atom Centered Fragments, Topological, Galvez, and 2D autocorrelation. The identified 3-parameter and 4-parameter models from CP-MLR have explained about 72% and 76 % variance, respectively, in the training set and equally well predicted the activity of test set compounds. The PLS analysis of the 16 descriptors has resulted in a 2-component model and explained 75.7 percent variance (r2 = 0.757, S = 0.634, F = 134.04) in the activity of the training set compounds and 76.8 per cent variance in the activity of test set compounds (r2t = 0.768).

    Indicator parameters and Dragon descriptors suggest the presence of a furan ring substituted by a nitro group is essential for antitubercular activity. Further descriptors from Constitutional, and Functional classes propose that the number of double bonds, number of sulphur atoms and number of fragments like thiazole, morpholine and thiophene should be minimum along with the positive influence of Kier-Hall electrotopological states (Ss) for improved activity. The ACF class descriptors N-076, H-051, C-025 and C-032 have also shown prevalence in the activity. The TOPO class descriptor T(O…S) suggests that minimum distance between sulphur and oxygen is favorable for activity. The GALVEZ class descriptors GGI2, GGI8 and GGI9 advocated that higher values of second, eighth and ninth order charge indices would be valuable for the activity. The 2D-AUTO descriptor GATS4p shown positive influence on the antitubercular activity. The PLS analysis has also confirmed the importance of information content of CP-MLR identified descriptors for modeling the antitubercular activity as compared to the leftover ones. In addition, exploration of mycobacterial cell enzymes with bioinformatic tools and different ligands of mycobacteria's protein co-crystals indicated nitroreductase as the most probable target of these compounds. Further optimization of highly active compounds may result in effective antitubercular agents.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.



    [1] Aarts P, Van Dijke P, Kolman I, et al. (2012) From Resilience to Revolt: Making Sense of the Arab Spring. Amsterdam, NL: WODC Publisher.
    [2] Abbott P, Teti A (2017) EU Policy Impact and Public Perception in the Mena Region. The Arab Transformations Working Paper Series 11: 1–65.
    [3] Abu-Murad MS, Alshyab N (2019) Political instability and its impact on economic growth: the case of Jordan. Int J Dev Issues 18: 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdi-02-2019-0036 doi: 10.1108/ijdi-02-2019-0036
    [4] Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J (2001) The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development. Am Econ Rev 91: 1369–1401. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7771 doi: 10.3386/w7771
    [5] Acemoglu D, Naidu S, Restrepo P, et al. (2019) Democracy Does Cause Growth. J Polit Econ 127: 47–100. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7771 doi: 10.3386/w7771
    [6] Ahern KR, Daminelli D, Fracassi C (2015) Lost in translation? The effect of cultural values on mergers around the world. J Financ Econ 117: 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.08.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.08.006
    [7] Albarracín J (2011) The Role of Turkey in the New Middle Eastern Economic Architecture, In: AA.VV., IEMed-Mediterranean Yearbook, Barcelona, SP: IEMed, 234–239.
    [8] Ali AJ (1999) Middle East Competitiveness in the 21st Century's Global Market. Acad Manage Rev 13: 102–108. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1999.1567367 doi: 10.5465/ame.1999.1567367
    [9] Altunisik MB (2009) The Role of Turkey in the Middle East, In: AA.VV., IEMed-Mediterranean Yearbook, Barcelona, SP: IEMed, 210–213.
    [10] Amendola A, ‎Ferragina A (2012) Bridging the Gap: The Role of Trade and FDI in the Mediterranean. Soveria Mannelli, IT: Rubbettino.
    [11] Anderson D, Anderson E (2014) An Atlas of Middle Eastern Affairs, 2 Eds., New York, NY: Routledge.
    [12] Antràs P (2020) Conceptual Aspects of Global Value Chains World Bank. Econ Rev 34: 551–574. https://https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhaa006 doi: 10.1093/wber/lhaa006
    [13] Antràs P (2021) De-Globalization? Global Value Chain in the post-COVID-19 Age. NBER Working Paper Series 28115: 1–51.
    [14] Asongu SA, Nwachukwu JC (2015) Revolution empirics: predicting the Arab Spring. Empir Econ 51: 439–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-015-1013-0 doi: 10.1007/s00181-015-1013-0
    [15] Ayadi R, Dabrowski M, De Wulf L (2015) Economic and Social Development of the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean Countries. Berlin, DE: Springer.
    [16] Ayadi R, Giovannetti G, Marvasi E, et al. (2024) Trade networks and the productivity of MENA firms in global value chains. Struct Change Econ Dyn 69: 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2023.11.014 doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2023.11.014
    [17] Bailey M, Cao R, Kuchler T, et al. (2018) Social Connectedness: Measurement, Determinants, and Effects. J Econ Perspect 32: 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.3.259 doi: 10.1257/jep.32.3.259
    [18] Barany Z (2011) The Role of the Military. J Democr 22: 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2011.0069 doi: 10.1353/jod.2011.0069
    [19] Beinin J, Vairel F (2013) Social Movements, Mobilization, and Contestation in the Middle East and North Africa. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [20] Belokurov I, Demidova O, Signorelli M (2020) Cross-Country Inequality: A Markov Chain Approach. Working Paper presented at 21st Annual Scientific Conference of Italian Association for the Study of Comparative Economic Systems, Urbino, IT: 8–10 October.
    [21] Bernard AB, Jensen JB, Redding SJ, et al. (2018) Global Firms. J Econ Lit 56: 565–619. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20160792 doi: 10.1257/jel.20160792
    [22] Beugelsdijk S, Maseland R, Onrust M, et al. (2015) Cultural Distance in International Business and Management: From Mean-based to Variance-based Measures. Int J Hum Resour Manag 26: 165–191. https://doiorg/101080/095851922014922355
    [23] Bianchi R (2013) Islamic Globalization: Pilgrimage, Capitalism, Democracy. Singapore: World Scientific Press.
    [24] Biscop S, Sassel J (2017) Military Factors in the MENA Region: Challenging Trends. MENARA Working Paper Series 6: 1–33.
    [25] Bjornland HC, Thorsrud LA, Torvik R (2019) Dutch Disease Dynamics Reconsidered. Eur Econ Rev 119: 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.07.016 doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.07.016
    [26] Boserup RA, Tassinari F (2012) The Return of Arab Politics and Europe's Chance to Engage. Anew Med Polit 17: 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2012.655047 doi: 10.1080/13629395.2012.655047
    [27] Brzezinski Z (1997) A Geostrategy for Eurasia. Foreign Aff 76: 50–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/20048199 doi: 10.2307/20048199
    [28] Çakmak C (2017) The Arab Spring, Civil Society, and Innovative Activism. New York, NY: Palgrave.
    [29] Calza F, Aliane N, Cannavale C (2010) Cross-Cultural Differences and Italian Firms' Internationalization in Algeria: Exploring Assertiveness and Performance Orientation. Eur Bus Rev 22: 246–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341011023551 doi: 10.1108/09555341011023551
    [30] Calza F, Aliane N, Cannavale C (2013) Intercultural bridges in the internationalization of European businesses towards Islamic countries: the key role of cultural competence. Euro Med J Bus 8: 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-07-2013-0038 doi: 10.1108/EMJB-07-2013-0038
    [31] Cammett M (2018) A Political Economy of the Middle East. Boulder: Westview Press.
    [32] Campante FR, Chor D (2012) Why was the Arab World Poised for Revolution? Schooling, Economic Opportunities, and the Arab Spring. J Econ Perspect 26: 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.2.167 doi: 10.1257/jep.26.2.167
    [33] Carrère C, Masood M (2018) Cultural proximity: A source of trade flow resilience? World Econ 41: 1812–1832. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12646 doi: 10.1111/twec.12646
    [34] Castellani D, Narula R, Nguyen QT, et al. (2018) Contemporary issues in international business: institutions, strategy and performance. London, UK: Palgrave.
    [35] Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [36] Cavatorta E (2010) Unobserved Common Factors in Military Expenditure Interactions Across MENA Countries. Def Peace Econ 21: 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2010.491703 doi: 10.1080/10242694.2010.491703
    [37] Chadwick A (2013) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [38] Çizakça M (2011) Islamic Capitalism and Finance: Origins, Evolution, and the Future. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    [39] Collombier V (2018) Libya: Moving Beyond the Transitional Mood. MENARA-Future Notes 11: 1–6.
    [40] Corden WM, Neary JP (1982) Booming Sector and De-industrialization in a Small Open Economy. Econ J 92: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232670 doi: 10.2307/2232670
    [41] Cordesman AH, Barfi B, Haddad B, et al. (2011) Symposium: The Arab Uprisings and US Policy: What Is the American National Interest? Middle East Policy 18: 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4967.2011.00481.x doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4967.2011.00481.x
    [42] Coveri A, Cozza C, Nascia L, et al. (2020) Supply chain contagion and the role of industrial policy. J Ind Bus Econ 47: 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-020-00167-6 doi: 10.1007/s40812-020-00167-6
    [43] Coveri A, Pianta M (2022) Drivers of inequality: wages vs profits in European industries. Struct Change Econ Dyn 60: 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.11.016 doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2021.11.016
    [44] Coveri A, Zanfei A (2023) The virtues and limits of specialization in global value chains: analysis and policy implications. J Ind Bus Econ 50: 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-022-00247-9 doi: 10.1007/s40812-022-00247-9
    [45] Cuomo MT, Genovino C, Metallo G, et al. (2023) When opposites attract: Impact of cultural distance and polarised success in the future of economic unions. Futures 153: 103223 https://doiorg/101016/jfutures2023103223
    [46] Currie J, Harrison A (1997) Sharing the Costs: The Impact of Trade Reform on Capital and Labor in Morocco. J Labor Econ 15: S44–S71.
    [47] D'Aponte T (2014) A geopolitical overview on the Mediterranean Sea the approach of the Euromed policy towards the countries of the southern front (from Morocco to Egypt). Riv Ital Econ Demogr Stat 68: 77–98.
    [48] Dabashi H (2012) Arab Spring: End Postcolonialism. London, UK: Zed Books.
    [49] Dabrowski M (2012) What Can Arab Countries Learn from the Post-Communist Transition. MED-PRO Commentary of European Commission 1: 1–6.
    [50] Dabrowski M (2019) Can emerging markets be a source of global troubles again? Russ J Econ 5: 67–87. https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.5.35506 doi: 10.32609/j.ruje.5.35506
    [51] Dandashly A (2015) The EU Response to Regime Change in the Wake of the Arab Revolt: Differential Implementation. J Eur Integr 37: 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2014.975988 doi: 10.1080/07036337.2014.975988
    [52] Daniele V, Malanima P, (2008) Divari di sviluppo e crescita nel Mediterraneo 1950–2005. Riv Ital Econ Demogr Stat 62: 59–76.
    [53] Dao MC, Das M, Koczan Z (2019) Why is labor receiving a smaller share of global income? Econ Policy 34: 723–759. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiaa004 doi: 10.1093/epolic/eiaa004
    [54] De Benedictis L, Rondinelli R, Vinciotti V (2023) Cultures as networks of cultural traits: A unifying framework for measuring culture and cultural distances. J R Stat Soc A 186: 264–293. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnac007 doi: 10.1093/jrsssa/qnac007
    [55] De Santis G, Maltagliati M, Salvini S (2016) A Measure of the Cultural Distance Between Countries. Soc Indic Res 126: 1065–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0932-7 doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0932-7
    [56] Dedrick J, Kraemer KL, Linden, G (2010) Who profits from innovation in global value chains?: a study of the iPod and notebook PCs. Ind Corp Change 19: 81–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp032 doi: 10.1093/icc/dtp032
    [57] Del Sarto RA, Malmvig H, Lecha ES (2019) Interregnum: The Regional Order in the Middle East and North Africa after 2011. MENARA-Final Report 1: 1–57.
    [58] Demir F, Im H (2020) Effects of Cultural Institutes on Bilateral Trade and FDI Flows: Cultural Diplomacy or Economic Altruism? World Econ 43: 2463–2489. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12906 doi: 10.1111/twec.12906
    [59] Diamond L (2010) Why Are There No Arab Democracies? J Democr 21: 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0150 doi: 10.1353/jod.0.0150
    [60] Diop N, Marotta D, De Melo J (2012) Natural Resource Abundance, Growth, and Diversification in the Middle East and North Africa: The Effects of Natural Resources and the Role of Policies. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
    [61] Driouchi A (2014) Knowledge-Based Economic Policy Development in the Arab World. Hershey, PA: IGI-Global.
    [62] Dunning J, Narula R (1996) Foreign Direct Investment and Governments. London: UK: Taylor Francis.
    [63] Dupont C, Passy F (2011) Arab Spring or How Explain those Revolutionary Episodes? Swiss Political Sci Rev 17: 447–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02037.x doi: 10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02037.x
    [64] Durán JJ, Úbeda F (2001) Investment Development Path: A New Empirical Approach and Some Theoretical Issues. Transnatl Corpor 10: 1–34.
    [65] Egger PH, Lassmann A (2012) Language effect in international trade: A meta-analysis. Econ Lett 116: 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.02.018 doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.02.018
    [66] Egger PH, Toubal F (2016) Common spoken languages and international trade, In: Ginsburgh, V., Weber, S. (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language, New York, NY: Springer, 263–289.
    [67] Ehteshami A, Huber D, Paciello MC (2017) Mediterranean Reset: Geopolitics New Age. Chichester: Wiley.
    [68] Elbadawi I, Makdisi S, (Eds.) (2017) Democratic Transitions in the Arab World. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [69] El-Said H, Harrigan J (2014) Economic reform, social welfare, and instability: Jordan, Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia, 1983–2004. Middle East J 68: 99–121. https://doi.org/10.3751/68.1.15 doi: 10.3751/68.1.15
    [70] ESI (2005) Islamic Calvinism: Change and Conservatism in Central Anatolia. European Stability Initiative Draft, 19 September, 1–41.
    [71] EURO-MED AGENDA (1995) Barcelona Declaration. Euro-Mediterranean Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 27–28 November: 1–14.
    [72] EURO-MED AGENDA (2021) Ex-Post Evaluation of the Impact of Trade Chapters of the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreements with Six Partners: Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, and Tunisia. Brussels, NL: Directorate General for Trade, 1–930.
    [73] Feenstra RC (1998) Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy. J Econ Perspect 12: 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.4.31 doi: 10.1257/jep.12.4.31
    [74] Felbermayr GJ, Toubal F (2010) Cultural proximity and trade. Eur Econ Rev 54: 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.06.009 doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.06.009
    [75] Fernández R (2008) Culture and Economics, In: Durlauf, S.N., Blume, L.E., (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–10.
    [76] Ferragina AM (2014) Investment in Turbulent Times: How Political Turbulence Has Affected the FDI Level in the MENA Region, In: AA.VV., IEMed-Mediterranean Yearbook, Barcelona, SP: IEMed, 280–286.
    [77] Ferragina AM (2016) Frammentazione Internazionale della Produzione: La Posizione dei Paesi Mediterranei dell'area MENA nelle Catene Globali del Valore, In: Ferragina, E. (Ed.), Rapporto sulle Economie del Mediterraneo, Bologna, IT: Il Mulino, Ch 7.
    [78] Ferragina E (2011) Gli Investimenti Esteri: Il Ruolo delle Istituzioni, In: Malanima, P. (Ed.), Rapporto sulle Economie del Mediterraneo, Bologna, IT: Il Mulino, Ch 5.
    [79] Ferragina E (2015) Rapporto sulle Economie del Mediterraneo. Bologna, IT: Il Mulino.
    [80] Forte L, Canitano G, Carli MR (2018) Crescita Economica, Produzione Manifatturiera e Commercio Estero nei Paesi del Mediterraneo: Differenze e Complementarietà tra Paesi Euromediterranei e Paesi della Sponda Sud ed Est del Bacino, In: Ferragina, E. (Ed.), Rapporto sulle Economie del Mediterraneo, Bologna, IT: Il Mulino, Ch 3.
    [81] Freedom House (2011) Freedom in the World: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers State University Press.
    [82] Fukuyama F (2020) The End of History and the Last Man. London, UK: Penguin.
    [83] Gani JK, Hinnebusch R (2019) The Routledge Handbook to the Middle East and North African State and States System. London, UK: Routledge.
    [84] Gerges FA (2013) New Middle East: Protest and Revolution in the Arab World. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [85] Ghazali M (2009) Trade Openness and Wage Inequality between Skilled and Unskilled Workers in Tunisia. Economie Internationale 1: 63–97.
    [86] Gillespie R, Volpi F (2018) Handbook Mediterranean Politics. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [87] Giovannetti G, Marvasi E (2019) Trade Networks in the MENA Region, In: AA.VV., IEMed-Mediterranean Yearbook, Barcelona, SP: IEMed, 270–279.
    [88] Giovannetti G, Marvasi E, Sanfilippo M (2015) Supply Chains and the Internationalization of Small Firms. Small Bus Econ 44: 845–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9625-x doi: 10.1007/s11187-014-9625-x
    [89] Gisselquist RM (2015) Varieties of Fragility: Implications for Aid. Third World Q 36: 1269–1280. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1041104 doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1041104
    [90] Gooris J, Peeters C (2014) Home-host Country Distance in Offshore Governance Choices. J Int Manag 20: 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2013.02.002 doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2013.02.002
    [91] Gorodnichenko Y, Roland G (2017) Culture, Institutions, and the Wealth of Nations. Rev Econ Stat 99: 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00599 doi: 10.1162/rest_a_00599
    [92] Guecioueur A (2019) Obstacles to Arab Economic Integration: The Problems of Arab Economic Development and Integration. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [93] Hafez G (2016) The Arab Spring five years later: toward greater inclusiveness. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.
    [94] Hakimian H, Nugent JB (2003) Trade Policy and Economic Integration in the Middle East and North Africa: Economic boundaries in flux. London, UK: Routledge.
    [95] Haliti B, Merovci S (2020) The Impact of the Investment Environment on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the European Transition Economies. Econ Alternatives 1: 138–147. https://doi.org/10.37075/ea.2020.1.07 doi: 10.37075/ea.2020.1.07
    [96] Halliday F (2005) The Middle East in International Relations Power, Politics and Ideology. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [97] Hanieh A (2014) Shifting Priorities or Business as Usual? Continuity and Change in the post-(2011) IMF and World Bank Engagement with Tunisia, Morocco, and Egypt. Br J Middle East Stud 42: 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2015.973199 doi: 10.1080/13530194.2015.973199
    [98] Harms P, Méon PG (2017) Good and Useless FDI: The Growth Effects of Greenfield Investment and Mergers and Acquisitions. Rev Int Econ 26: 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12302 doi: 10.1111/roie.12302
    [99] Hartmann D, Guevara MR, Jara-Figueroa C, et al. (2017) Linking Economic Complexity, Institutions, and Income Inequality. World Dev 93: 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.020 doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.020
    [100] Hassine NB (2012) Inequality of Opportunity in Egypt. World Bank Econ Rev 2: 265–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhr046 doi: 10.1093/wber/lhr046
    [101] HEIDELBERG INSTITUTE (2020) Conflict Barometer. Heidelberg University: Institute for International Conflict Research, 1–203.
    [102] Hellmanzik C, Schmitz M (2017) Taking gravity online: The role of virtual proximity in international finance. J Int Money Finan 77: 164–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.07.001
    [103] Helpman E (2017) Globalisation and wage inequality. J Br Acad 5: 125–162. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/005.125 doi: 10.5871/jba/005.125
    [104] Hobson C (2005) A Forward Strategy of Freedom in the Middle East: US Democracy Promotion and the 'War on Terror'. Aust J Int Aff 59: 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1035771042000332039 doi: 10.1080/1035771042000332039
    [105] Hoekman B, Messerlin P (2002) Initial Conditions and Incentives for Arab Economic Integration. Policy Research Working Paper Series 2921: 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2921 doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-2921
    [106] Hoekman B, Sekkat K (2010) Arab Economic Integration: Missing Links. CEPR-Discussion Paper 7807: 1–39.
    [107] Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (2010) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3 Eds., New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
    [108] Horst J, Jünemann A, Rothe D (2016) Euro-Mediterranean Relations After the Arab Spring: Persistence in Times of Change. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.
    [109] Howard P (2010) The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Information Technology and Political Islam. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [110] Hudson M (1977) Arab Politics: The Search for Legitimacy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [111] Huidrom R, Kose MA, Ohnsorge F (2017) How Important are Spillovers from Major Emerging Markets? Washington, DC: The World Bank.
    [112] Hutzschenreuter T, Kleindienst I, Lange S (2016) The Concept of Distance in International Business Research: A Review and Research Agenda. Int J Manag Rev 18: 160–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12065 doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12065
    [113] Hutzschenreuter T, Voll JC, Verbeke A (2011) The Impact of Added Cultural Distance and Cultural Diversity on International Expansion Patterns: A Penrosean Perspective. J Manag Stud 48: 305–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00966.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00966.x
    [114] IEMED (2012) What Economic Governance for Arab Transitions? Barcelona, SP: IEMed.
    [115] ILO (2012) Rethinking economic growth: towards productive and inclusive Arab societies. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
    [116] IMF (1996) MENA Conference Stresses Economic Potential of the Region. World Economic and Financial Surveys, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
    [117] IMF (2013) Regional Economic Outlook Report: Middle East and Central Asia. World Economic and Financial Surveys, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
    [118] IMF (2014) Arab Countries in Transition: Economic Outlook and Key challenges. World Economic and Financial Surveys Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
    [119] IMF (2019) Reigniting Growth in Emerging Market and Low-Income Economies: What Role for Structural Reforms? In: AA.VV., World Economic Outlook: Global Manufacturing Downturn, Rising Trade Barriers, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, Ch 3.
    [120] IMF (2020) Middle East and Central Asia: Regional Economic Outlook. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
    [121] IMF (2022) Regional Economic Outlook: Middle East and Central Asia. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
    [122] Irwin D (2020) Free Trade Under Fire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [123] Jaumotte F, Lall S, Papageorgiou C (2013) Rising Income Inequality: Technology, or Trade and Financial Globalization? IMF Econ Rev 61: 271–309. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2013.7 doi: 10.1057/imfer.2013.7
    [124] Joffé G (2011) The Arab Spring in North Africa: Origins and Prospects. J North Afr Stud 16: 507–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2011.630881 doi: 10.1080/13629387.2011.630881
    [125] Joya A (2011) The Egyptian Revolution: Crisis of Neo-Liberalism and the Potential for Democratic Politics. Rev Afr Polit Econ 38: 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2011.602544 doi: 10.1080/03056244.2011.602544
    [126] Kaboub F (2013) The End of Neoliberalism? An Institutional Analysis of the Arab Uprisings. J Econ Issues 47: 533–544 https://doi.org/10.2753/jei0021-3624470227 doi: 10.2753/jei0021-3624470227
    [127] Kahia M (2017) The Framework of Tunisian Textile and Clothing Industry, MPRA-Working Papers 60283, 04 February: 1–21.
    [128] Kamrava M (2004) Structural Impediments to Economic Globalization in the Middle East. Middle East Policy 11: 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1061-1924.2004.00180.x doi: 10.1111/j.1061-1924.2004.00180.x
    [129] Karam F, Zaki C (2015) Trade Volume and Economic Growth in the MENA Region: Goods or Services? Econ Model 45: 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.038 doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.038
    [130] Kaufmann D, Kraay A (2002) Growth without Governance. Economía 3: 169–229. https://doi.org/10.1353/eco.2002.0016 doi: 10.1353/eco.2002.0016
    [131] Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2011) The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. Hague J Rule Law 3: 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1876404511200046 doi: 10.1017/s1876404511200046
    [132] Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Zoido P (1999) Governance Matters. Policy Res Working Paper 2196: 1–64. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2196 doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-2196
    [133] Kenawy E (2016) The Economic Impacts of the New Suez Canal, In: AA.VV., IEMed-Mediterranean Yearbook, Barcelona, SP: IEMed, 282–288.
    [134] Khandelwal P, Roitman A (2013) The Economics of Political Transitions: Implications for the Arab Spring. IMF-Working Papers 2013: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475569643.001 doi: 10.5089/9781475569643.001
    [135] Khondker HH (2011) Role of the New Media in the Arab Spring. Globalizations 8: 675–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2011.621287 doi: 10.1080/14747731.2011.621287
    [136] Kowalewski O, Rybinski KI (2011) The Hidden Transformation: Changing Role of the State After the Collapse of Communism in Central and Easter Europe. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 27: 634–657. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grr030 doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grr030
    [137] Krugman PR, Melitz MJ, Obstfeld M (2018) International Economics: Theory and Policy. London, UK: Pearson.
    [138] Kuran T (2011) The long divergence: How Islamic law held back the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [139] Lall S, Sturgeon TJ, Gereffi G (2009) Measuring success in the global economy: International trade, industrial upgrading, and business function outsourcing in global value chains. Transnat Corporations 18: 1–35. https://doi.org/10.18356/64e03043-en doi: 10.18356/64e03043-en
    [140] Lautier M, Morebaub F (2012) Domestic Investment and FDI in Developing Countries: The Missing Link. J Econ Dev 37: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.35866/caujed.2012.37.3.001 doi: 10.35866/caujed.2012.37.3.001
    [141] Liargovas PG, Skandalis KS (2011) Foreign Direct Investment and Trade Openness: The Case of Developing Economies. Soc Indic Res 106: 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9806-9 doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9806-9
    [142] Liu A, Lu C, Wang Z (2020) The Roles of Cultural and Institutional Distance in International Trade: Evidence from China's Trade with the Belt-and-Road Countries. China Econ Rev 61: 101234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2018.10.001
    [143] Makarychev AS (2009) Russia in the Mediterranean Region: (Re)sources of Influence, In: AA.VV., IEMed-Mediterranean Yearbook, Barcelona, SP: IEMed, 169–172.
    [144] Manhire T (Ed.) (2012) The Arab Spring: Rebellion, Revolution New World Order. London, UK: Guardian Books.
    [145] Marelli E, Signorelli M (2010) Economic Growth and Structural Features of Transition: Theoretical Framework and General Overview, In: Marelli, E., Signorelli, M. (Eds.), Economic Growth and Structural Features of Transition: Studies in Economic Transition, London, UK: Palgrave, 11–38.
    [146] Marsili M (2016) The Islamic State: A Clash within the Muslim Civilization for the New Caliphate. Stud Confl Terror 39: 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2015.1100010 doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2015.1100010
    [147] Martín-Martín O, Drogendijk R (2014) Country Distance (COD): Development and Validation of a New Objective Measure. J Small Bus Manag 52: 102–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12035 doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12035
    [148] Masoud N (2015) John Rawls Theory of Justice: Lessons for Eastern Libya. Int J Manag Inf Tech 10: 2293–2303. https://doi.org/10.24297/ijmit.v10i7.594 doi: 10.24297/ijmit.v10i7.594
    [149] Mathieu P, Pani M, Chen S, et al. (2019) Drivers of Cross-Border Banking in Sub-Saharan Africa. IMF Work Pap 19: 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498321549.001 doi: 10.5089/9781498321549.001
    [150] Matsen E, Natvik GJ, Torvik R (2016). Petro populism. J Dev Econ 118: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.08.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.08.010
    [151] Maystre N, Olivier J, Thoenig M, et al. (2014) Product-based cultural change: Is the village global? J Int Econ 92: 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.10.005
    [152] Mazziotta M, Pareto A (2020) Gli Indici Sintetici. Torino, IT: Giappichelli.
    [153] McKee M, Keulertz M, Habibi N, et al. (2017) Demographic and Economic Material Factors in the MENA Region. MENARA-Working Paper Series 3: 1–43.
    [154] Mebtoul A (2017) Impact of the Decline in Hydrocarbon Prices on the Macroeconomic and Macrosocial Balances of the Algerian Economy: The Urgency of a New Economic Policy, In: AA.VV., IEMed-Mediterranean Yearbook, Barcelona, SP: IEMed, 281–287.
    [155] Mehlum H, Moene K, Torvik R (2006). Institutions and the Resource Curse. Econ J 116: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01045.x doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01045.x
    [156] Melitz J, Toubal F (2014) Native language, spoken language, translation and trade. J Int Econ 93: 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.04.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.04.004
    [157] Montalbano P, Nenci S (2014) Assessing the Trade Impact of the European Neighbourhood Policy on the EU-MED Free Trade Area. Appl Econ 46: 730–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2013.851776 doi: 10.1080/00036846.2013.851776
    [158] Moran TH (2016) Using foreign direct investment to upgrade and diversify exports from Morocco: opportunities and challenges in comparative perspective. OCP-Policy Papers 16: 1–26.
    [159] Moratinos MA (2012) The Mediterranean: Past, Present and Future, In: AA.VV., IEMed-Mediterranean Yearbook, Barcelona, SP: IEMed, 35–38.
    [160] Mulligan M, Keulertz M, McKee M (2017) Environmental Factors in the MENA Region: A Swot Analysis. MENARA-Working Paper Series 4: 1–40.
    [161] Najjar F (2005) The Arabs Islam and Globalization. Middle East Policy 12: 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1061-1924.2005.00215.x doi: 10.1111/j.1061-1924.2005.00215.x
    [162] NATO (2016) Arab Geopolitics in Turmoil: Perceptions, Unknowns and Policies. DFC-Defense College Foundation, Roma: AGRA, 1–160.
    [163] Noueihed L, Warren A (2012) The Battle for the Arab Spring: Revolution, Counter-Revolution and the Making of a New Era. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [164] Noutary E, Luçon Z (2013) The Arab Spring: What Consequences on Foreign Investment? In: AA.VV., IEMed-Mediterranean Yearbook, Barcelona, SP: IEMed, 251–255.
    [165] Obiols EB (2010) China's Influence in the Mediterranean, In: AA.VV., IEMed-Mediterranean Yearbook, Barcelona, SP: IEMed, 23–27.
    [166] Obradovich N, Özak Ö, Martín I, et al. (2022) Expanding the measurement of culture with a sample of two billion humans. J R Soc Interface 19: 1–13 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2022.0085 doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0085
    [167] Pace M (2014) The EU's Interpretation of the 'Arab Uprisings': Understanding the Different Visions about Democratic Change in EU-MENA Relations. J Common Market Stud 52: 969–984. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12159 doi: 10.1111/jcms.12159
    [168] Paglialunga E, Coveri A, Zanfei A (2022) Climate change and within-country inequality: New evidence from a global perspective. World Dev 159: 106030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106030 doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106030
    [169] Peng MY, Lin KH (2019) International Networking in Dynamic Internationalization Capability: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity. Total Qual Manage Bus Excell 32: 1065–1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2019.1661239 doi: 10.1080/14783363.2019.1661239
    [170] Pierangeli F, Iaquinta P, Carabellese A (2015) The Mediterranean economic transition and the liberal perspective. Riv Ital Econ Demogr Stat 69: 111–118.
    [171] Portelli B (2004) Foreign Direct Investment in the European Union's Mediterranean Neighbours: Past Trends and Future Potential in the MEDA Region, In: Attinà, F., Rossi, R. (Eds.), European Neighbourhood Policy: Political, Economic and Social Issues, Catania, IT: Faculty of Political Sciences, 72–83.
    [172] Radl S (2017) Structural Adjustment in Tunisia: The Crisis of Neoliberalism and the 'Gafsa Riots' of 2008, In: Baumgratz, G., et al. (Eds.), Development by Free Trade? The Impact of the European Union's Neoliberal Agenda on the North African Countries, Bern: Peter Land, 109–130.
    [173] Ragionieri R, Schmidt di Friedberg O (2003) Culture e conflitti nel Mediterraneo. Trieste: Asterios.
    [174] Rogmans TJ, Ebbers H (2013) The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in the Middle East North Africa Region. Int J Emerg Markets 8: 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/17468801311330310 doi: 10.1108/17468801311330310
    [175] Saidi S, Hammami S (2016) The Place of Transport Infrastructures among the Economic Factors of Foreign Direct Investment Attractiveness in the Meda-10 Region. Am J Econ Bus Adm 8: 23–34. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajebasp.2016.23.34 doi: 10.3844/ajebasp.2016.23.34
    [176] Salamon J (2016) The economic dimension of the EU cooperation with the Maghreb countries. Ann Mark Manag Econ 2: 111–120. https://doi.org/10.22630/amme.2016.2.2.22 doi: 10.22630/amme.2016.2.2.22
    [177] Saraceno P (1978) Irripetibilità dei modelli di sviluppo, In: Saraceno, P. (Eds.), Economia e Direzione dell'Impresa Industriale, Milano: Isedi, 1–41.
    [178] Sawada N (2010) Technology Gap Matters on Spillover. Rev Dev Econ 14: 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2009.00542.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2009.00542.x
    [179] Scalamonti F (2020) Mercati emergenti e distanza culturale: una rivisitazione dei driver del processo d'internazionalizzazione delle Pmi. Piccol Impresa/Small Bus 1: 161–187. https://doi.org/10.14596/pisb.361 doi: 10.14596/pisb.361
    [180] Scalamonti F (2021) The Transition of the Southern Economies of Mediterranean Sea: The Macroeconomic Framework and the Determinants of Foreign Investments. Ind 3: 533–578. https://doi.org/10.1430/98711 doi: 10.1430/98711
    [181] Scalamonti F (2024a) The foreign investments-growth nexus in underdeveloped countries: the state-of-art of research analysing a selected and recent empirical literature (2020–2022). Tech Forecast Soc Chang 198: 122933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122933 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122933
    [182] Scalamonti F (2024b) The Italy-MEDA emerging markets partnership: trade relationships, cross-border operations on firms' equity, and constant market shares analysis. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4820279
    [183] Schlumberger O (2011) The Ties that Do Not Bind: The Union for the Mediterranean and the Future of Euro-Arab Relations, Med Polit 16: 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2011.547401 doi: 10.1080/13629395.2011.547401
    [184] Schumacher T, Marchetti A, Demmelhuber T (2017) The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighbourhood Policy, London, UK: Routledge.
    [185] Senor D, Singer S (2009) Start-up Nation: The Story of Israel's Economic Miracle. New York, NY: Twelve.
    [186] Sheng L, Yang DT (2017) Offshoring and Wage Inequality: Theory and Evidence from China. IZA-Discussion Papers 10924: 1–65.
    [187] Shenkar O (2001) Cultural Distance Revisited: Towards a More Rigorous Conceptualization and Measurement of Cultural Differences. J Int Bus Stud 32: 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490982 doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490982
    [188] Shenkar O (2012) Beyond Cultural Distance: Switching to a Friction Lens in the Study of Cultural Differences. J Int Bus Stud 43: 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.42 doi: 10.1057/jibs.2011.42
    [189] Silajdzic S, Mehic E (2015) Knowledge Spillovers, Absorptive Capacities and the Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Transition Economies. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 195: 614–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.142 doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.142
    [190] Spolaore E, Wacziarg R (2016) Ancestry, Language and Culture, In: Ginsburgh, V., Weber, S. (Eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language. London, UK: Palgrave, 174–211.
    [191] Spolaore E, Wacziarg R (2018) Ancestry and Development: New Evidence. J Appl Econom 33: 748–762. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2633 doi: 10.1002/jae.2633
    [192] Stansbury A, Summers LH (2020) The Declining Worker Power Hypothesis: An Explanation for the Recent Evolution of the American Economy. Brook Pap Econ Act 1: 1–96. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2020.0000 doi: 10.1353/eca.2020.0000
    [193] Stor M (2021) The Configurations of HRM Bundles in MNCs by Their Contributions to Subsidiaries' Performance and Cultural Dimensions. Int J Cross-Cult Manag 21: 123–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595821997488 doi: 10.1177/1470595821997488
    [194] Summo D, Pepe T (2008) Eterogeneità economica tra i paesi del partenariato Euro-mediterraneo. Riv Ital Econ Demogr Stat 62: 443–450.
    [195] Talahite F, Beji S (2013) Foreign exchange reserves' accumulation and the impact on the economies of Algeria and Tunisia, In: Peeters, M., Sabri, N., Shahin, W. (Eds.), Financial Integration: A Focus on the Mediterranean Region, Berlin, DE: Springer, 29–60.
    [196] Tankosić JV, Redžepagić S, Stojsavljević M (2013) Trade, Regional Integration and Economic Growth: MEDA Region and the Western Balkan Countries, In: Peeters, M., Sabri, N., Shahin, W. (Eds.), Financial Integration: Financial and Monetary Policy Studies, Berlin, DE: Springer, 215–229.
    [197] Timmer MP, Erumban AA, Los B, et al. (2014) Slicing Up Global Value Chains. J Econ Perspect 28: 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.99 doi: 10.1257/jep.28.2.99
    [198] Timmer MP, Miroudot S, De Vries GJ (2018) Functional specialisation in trade. J Econ Geogr 19: 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lby056 doi: 10.1093/jeg/lby056
    [199] Tömmel I (2013) The New Neighbourhood policy of the EU: An Appropriate Response to the Arab Spring? Democr Secur 9: 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2012.736306 doi: 10.1080/17419166.2012.736306
    [200] Torvik R (2002) Natural resources, rent seeking and welfare. J Dev Econ 67: 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3878(01)00195-x doi: 10.1016/s0304-3878(01)00195-x
    [201] Tzannatos Z (2010) The Financial Crisis's Impact on Employment in the Mediterranean Region: The Story of Two Coasts, In: AA.VV., IEMed-Mediterranean Yearbook, Barcelona, SP: IEMed, 33–38.
    [202] Uctum M, Uctum R (2011) Crises, Portfolio Flows, and Foreign Direct Investment: An Application to Turkey. Econ Syst 35: 462–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2010.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2010.10.005
    [203] UNCTAD (2020) World Investment Report. Geneva, CH: United Nations.
    [204] UNHSP (2012) The State of Arab Cities: Challenges of Urban Transition. Geneva, CH: United Nations.
    [205] UNHSP (2020) The State of Arab Cities: Financing Sustainable Urbanization in the Arab Region. Geneva, CH: United Nations.
    [206] Van Bergeijk PA (2018) On the brink of deglobalisation…again. Cambridge J Reg Econ Soc 11: 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx023 doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsx023
    [207] Van Eeten, MJ, Mueller M (2012) Where Is the Governance in Internet Governance? New Media Soc 15: 720–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462850 doi: 10.1177/1461444812462850
    [208] Vandewalle D (2006) A History of Modern Libya. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [209] Volpi F (2013) Explaining (and Re-Explaining) Political Change in the Middle East During the Arab Spring: Trajectories of Democratization and of Authoritarianism in the Maghreb. Democratization 20: 969–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.668438 doi: 10.1080/13510347.2012.668438
    [210] Wijnbergen SV (1986) Macroeconomic Aspects of the Effectiveness of Foreign Aid: On the Two-Gap Model, Home Goods Disequilibrium and Real Exchange Rate Misalignment. J Int Econ 21: 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(86)90009-7 doi: 10.1016/0022-1996(86)90009-7
    [211] Williams DW, Gregoire DA (2015) Seeking Commonalities or Avoiding Differences? Re-conceptualizing Distance and Its Effects on Internationalization Decisions. J Int Bus Stud 46: 253–284. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.52 doi: 10.1057/jibs.2014.52
    [212] Woertz E (2014) Mining Strategies in the Middle East and North Africa. Third World Q 35: 939–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.907706 doi: 10.1080/01436597.2014.907706
    [213] Wolde H, Bhattacharya R (2010) Constraints on Trade in the MENA region. IMF-Working Papers 10: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451962604.001 doi: 10.5089/9781451962604.001
    [214] WORLD BANK (2009) From privilege to competition: unlocking private-led growth in the Middle East and North Africa. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
    [215] WORLD BANK (2013) Lebanon: Economic and Social Impact Assessment of the Syrian Conflict. Policy Note 81098LB: 1–189.
    [216] Yitzhak R (2018) Between reform and Islam: The Arab spring in Jordan 2011–2014. Democr Secur 14: 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2017.1408464 doi: 10.1080/17419166.2017.1408464
    [217] Zeng D (2015) Global Experiences with Special Economic Zones: Focus on China and Africa. World Bank Group Policy Res 7240: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7240 doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-7240
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1340) PDF downloads(50) Cited by(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog