Mini review Special Issues

Iron-containing clay and hematite iron ore in slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure

  • It is shown in this review that addition of clay minerals and hematite iron ore can significantly enhance anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. Liquid-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure consumes a lot of fresh water and energy to keep waste as a suspension. Meanwhile, anaerobic digestion of chicken manure in clay slurry without stirring could minimize energy and water consumption because the initial acceptable content of organic solids can be increased. For example, this content can be increased from 5% (w v-1) in suspension of chicken manure for liquidphase anaerobic digestion up to 15% (w v-1) in the slurry of chicken manure for slurry-phase anaerobic digestion than can save up to 13.3 L of water per kilogram of dry organic solids. The slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of nitrogen-, sulphur-, and fat-containing organic wastes can be enhanced using microbial reduction of Fe(Ⅲ) in clay or in hematite iron ore. This is due to adsorption or precipitation of such inhibitors of microbial acidogenesis and methanogenesis as ammonium, sulphide, long-chain fatty acids, humic and fulvic acids with clay or ferrous ions. For example, maximum concentration of ammonium decreased from 11.4 g L-1 during liquid-phase anaerobic digestion to 1.4 g L-1 during slurry-phase process due to adsorption of ammonium ions on clay. Addition of iron-containing clay to slurry-phase anaerobic reactor removed dissolved sulphide totally due to its precipitation with ferrous ions that are produced by bioreduction of Fe(Ⅲ) in clay. Slurry-phase anaerobic digestion enhanced with bioreduction of Fe(Ⅲ) minerals is also more effective process in terms of environmental safety than widely used liquid-phase anaerobic digestion because of an absence of water supply and wastewater effluent.

    Citation: Volodymyr Ivanov, Viktor Stabnikov, Olena Stabnikova, Anatoliy Salyuk, Evhenii Shapovalov, Zubair Ahmed, Joo Hwa Tay. Iron-containing clay and hematite iron ore in slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(5): 821-832. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.5.821

    Related Papers:

    [1] Jawad Ahmad, Osama Zaid, Muhammad Shahzaib, Muhammad Usman Abdullah, Asmat Ullah, Rahat Ullah . Mechanical properties of sustainable concrete modified by adding marble slurry as cement substitution. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(3): 343-358. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021022
    [2] Falah Mustafa Al-Saraireh . Cold-curing mixtures based on biopolymer lignin complex for casting production in single and small-series conditions. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(5): 876-890. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023047
    [3] Felipe Bastos, Adeildo Cabral, Perboyre Alcântara, Lino Maia . Study case about the production of masonry concrete blocks with CDW and kaolin mining waste. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(6): 990-1004. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021060
    [4] Witsanu Loetchantharangkun, Ubolrat Wangrakdiskul . Combination of rice husk ash, bagasse ash, and calcium carbonate for developing unglazed fired clay tile. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(3): 434-452. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021027
    [5] Laila H. Abdel-Rahman, Ahmed M. Abu-Dief, Badriah Saad Al-Farhan, Doaa Yousef, Mohamed E. A. El-Sayed . Kinetic study of humic acid adsorption onto smectite: The role of individual and blend background electrolyte. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(6): 1176-1190. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.6.1176
    [6] Krzysztof Gargul . Ammonia leaching of slag from direct-to-blister copper smelting technology. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(5): 565-580. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.5.565
    [7] Denise Arrozarena Portilla, Arturo A. Velázquez López, Rosalva Mora Escobedo, Hernani Yee Madeira . Citrate coated iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization, and performance in protein adsorption. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(5): 991-1012. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024047
    [8] Natthakitta Piyarat, Ubolrat Wangrakdiskul, Purinut Maingam . Investigations of the influence of various industrial waste materials containing rice husk ash, waste glass, and sediment soil for eco-friendly production of non-fired tiles. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(3): 469-485. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021029
    [9] Rakesh Kumar . Aluminium/iron reinforced polyfurfuryl alcohol resin as advanced biocomposites. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(3): 908-915. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.3.908
    [10] Aleksander Panichkin, Alma Uskenbayeva, Aidar Kenzhegulov, Axaule Mamaeva, Akerke Imbarova, Balzhan Kshibekova, Zhassulan Alibekov, Didik Nurhadiyanto, Isti Yunita . Assessment of the effect of small additions of some rare earth elements on the structure and mechanical properties of castings from hypereutectic chromium white irons. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(3): 517-540. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023029
  • It is shown in this review that addition of clay minerals and hematite iron ore can significantly enhance anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. Liquid-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure consumes a lot of fresh water and energy to keep waste as a suspension. Meanwhile, anaerobic digestion of chicken manure in clay slurry without stirring could minimize energy and water consumption because the initial acceptable content of organic solids can be increased. For example, this content can be increased from 5% (w v-1) in suspension of chicken manure for liquidphase anaerobic digestion up to 15% (w v-1) in the slurry of chicken manure for slurry-phase anaerobic digestion than can save up to 13.3 L of water per kilogram of dry organic solids. The slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of nitrogen-, sulphur-, and fat-containing organic wastes can be enhanced using microbial reduction of Fe(Ⅲ) in clay or in hematite iron ore. This is due to adsorption or precipitation of such inhibitors of microbial acidogenesis and methanogenesis as ammonium, sulphide, long-chain fatty acids, humic and fulvic acids with clay or ferrous ions. For example, maximum concentration of ammonium decreased from 11.4 g L-1 during liquid-phase anaerobic digestion to 1.4 g L-1 during slurry-phase process due to adsorption of ammonium ions on clay. Addition of iron-containing clay to slurry-phase anaerobic reactor removed dissolved sulphide totally due to its precipitation with ferrous ions that are produced by bioreduction of Fe(Ⅲ) in clay. Slurry-phase anaerobic digestion enhanced with bioreduction of Fe(Ⅲ) minerals is also more effective process in terms of environmental safety than widely used liquid-phase anaerobic digestion because of an absence of water supply and wastewater effluent.


    1. Introduction

    A silicon carbide fiber-reinforced silicon carbide matrix (SiC/SiC) composite is the attractive candidate materials for advanced energy systems, aero-space system and etc. due to their potential excellent mechanical properties at high-temperature, chemical stability, radiation resistance and low induced radioactivity [1,2,3]. In generally, SiC/SiC composites has strength anisotropy depending on the reinforcement fiber architecture and their orientation. Therefore, in order to perform adequate fiber-architecture deign for each structural components, it is essential to understand the strength anisotropy due to fiber architecture.

    On the other hands, there are many methods for SiC/SiC fabrication including chemical vapor infiltration (CVI), polymer impregnation and pyrolysis (PIP), reaction sintering (RS), liquid-phase sintering (LSP) and theirs hybrid process [4,5,6]. It is well known that the performance of SiC/SiC composites is different by fabrication process types. Therefore, properties evaluation of each SiC/SiC composites are necessary. The nano-infiltration and transient eutectic-phase (NITE) process is one of the most attractive processes for SiC/SiC fabrication because of its advantages in the formation of high density SiC matrix, size and shape flexibility and cost efficiency, which is the modified liquid phase sintering process [7,8,9]. The NITE process is improved to the industrialization grade process from the laboratory grade process by Organization of Advanced Sustainability Initiative for Energy System/Material (OASIS), Muroran Institute of Technology, Japan [2,10,11,12]. The feature of the industrialization grade NITE process is to utilize dry type inter-mediate materials such as green sheets and prepreg sheets. Since mechanical properties of SiC/SiC composites depend on fiber architecture, in order to ensure reliability of products by SiC/SiC composites, understanding of the strength anisotropy is important. However, strength anisotropy knowledges of NITE-SiC/SiC composites fabricated by the industrialization grade process are insufficient since this process is a new process.

    This study aims to understand the strength anisotropy of NITE-SiC/SiC composites fabricated by the industrialization grade process with various fiber architecture. This paper is provided the basic strength anisotropy knowledges of Unidirectional (UD) type NITE-SiC/SiC composites with various fiber orientations by evaluation of microstructure and mechanical properties. The strength anisotropy prediction theories were also discussed to evaluate the anisotropic strength of UD NITE-SiC/SiC composites.


    2. Materials and Method

    The SiC mixed slurry for SiC green sheet fabrication consisted of b-SiC nano-powder (IEST, Japan, mean grain size of 32 nm) and sintering additives with Al2O3 (Kojundo Chemical Laboratory Co. Ltd., Japan, mean grain size of 0.3 mm, 99.99%) and Y2O3 (Kojundo Chemical Laboratory Co. Ltd., Japan, mean grain size of 0.4 mm, 99.99%). SiC green sheet were produced by OASIS, Muroran Institute of Technology, Japan. UD prepreg sheets were prepared by a similar fabrication process with those of green sheets, where PyC-coated Cef-NITE fibers (IEST, Japan) were used as a reinforcing fiber. The Cef-NITE fiber is one of the highly crystallized SiC fibers. The PyC coating was formed by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process, and the thickness of the coating was appropriately 0.5 mm. The reinforcements were dipped to mixed slurry in slurry bath before to fabricate the prepreg sheets. The prepreg sheets fabricated were stacked for preparation of UD preforms. The number of prepreg sheets stacked is 30 sheets. The fiber orientation angle variations of preforms are kinds of four types (UD 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°). The preforms prepared were hot-pressed at 1870 °C for 1.5 h in Ar under a pressure of 20 MPa. The bulk density and open porosity of the composites fabricated were measured by the Archimedes’ principle. Strength anisotropy evaluation was performed by axial/off-axial tensile test with the crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min at room-temperature. The specimens were straight bar type, which measured 40L x 4W x 2.0T mm with a gauge length of 15 mm. Aluminum tabs were bonded at the gripping sections. Tensile strains were measured by a couple of strain gauges bonded on the both surface of a specimen. Fracture surface observation after axial/off-axial tensile test was performed by digital microscope and a scanning electron microscope (SEM).


    3. Results and Discussion

    Density, fiber volume fraction and mechanical properties of SiC/SiC composites fabricated with various fiber orientation angles are summarized in Table 1.

    Table 1.Density, fiber volume fraction and mechanical properties of SiC/SiC composites fabricated with various fiber orientation angles in this study.
    IDUD0UD30UD45UD60
    Angle [°]0304560
    Fiber volume fraction [%]46454646
    Bulk density [g/cm3]2.92.92.92.8
    Elastic modulus [GPa]289 ± 8231 ± 15194 ± 7170 ± 7
    Proportional limit strength [MPa]210 ± 188 ± 944 ± 727 ± 2
    Ultimate tensile strength [MPa]210 ± 190 ± 1066 ± 1031 ± 3
    Strain at fracture [%]0.073 ± 0.0030.041 ± 0.0030.036 ± 0.0050.019 ± 0.001
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The composites with fiber orientation angles of UD 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° is called UD0, UD30, UD45, UD60, respectively. PLS and UTS indicates the proportional limit strength (PLS) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS), respectively. The fiber volume fraction of SiC/SiC composites fabricated was about 45%. SiC/SiC composites fabricated have > 2.8 g/cm3 of the balk density regardless of fiber orientation angle. Figure 1 shows elastic modulus and proportional limit strength of SiC/SiC composites fabricated with various fiber orientation angles. Elastic modulus and PLS of UD0 was the most highest. Both of elastic modulus and PLS tend to decrease with increasing of fiber orientation angle. Figure 2 shows digital microscope images of SiC/SiC composites fabricated with various fiber orientation angles after tensile tests. Some fiber pull-outs were observed on UD0 (Figure 2(a)). UD30, UD45 and UD60 indicated fracture along the fiber reinforce direction (Figure 2(b)-(d)). Figure 3 shows SEM images of fracture surface of SiC/SiC composites fabricated with various fiber orientation angles after tensile tests. In the UD0, some fiber pull-outs in the fiber-bundle unit were observed (Figure 3(a)). On the other hands, inter-laminar detachment fracture along the fiber directions was observed in the UD30, UD45 and UD60 (Figure 3 (b)-(d)).

    Figure 1. Elastic modulus and proportional limit strength of SiC/SiC composites fabricated with various fiber orientation angle.
    Figure 2. Digital microscope images of SiC/SiC composites fabricated with various fiber orientation angle after tensile test: (a) UD0, (b) UD30, (c) UD45, (d) UD60.
    Figure 3. SEM images of SiC/SiC composites fabricated with various fiber orientation angle after tensile test: (a) UD0, (b) UD30, (c) UD45, (d) UD60.

    To evaluate correlation of the experimental results and the prediction strength by strength anisotropy prediction theory, the maximum normal stress theory and the Tsai-Hill criterion were applied. The basic equations of the maximum normal stress theory can be described as:

    Maximum normal stress theory;

    σθ<FT,PLScos2θ (1)
    σθ<FTL,PLSsinθcosθ (2)
    σθ<FL,PLSsin2θ (3)

    where FT is tensile strength in the fiber orientation angle 0°, FTL is in-plan shear strength, and FL is inter-laminar detachment strength. Note that the axial T and L correspond to the directions parallel and perpendicular to the fiber longitudinal direction, respectively. The maximum normal stress has assumed to cause failure when any of stress of each equation (1), (2) or (3) reached failure limits. FTL, PLS and FL, PLS of general NITE-SiC/SiC composites by several experimental methods have been reported by T. Nozawa et al. [13]. T. Nozawa et al. reported that FTL, PLS by the Iosipescu method and FL, PLS by the trans-thickness tension method of UD NITE-SiC/SiC composites are 52±7 MPa and 19±2 MPa, respectively. The reinforcements and fiber/matrix interphase of reference materials are highly crystallized and near-stoichiometric SiC fibers and the pyrolytic carbon, respectively. The reference and the fabricated materials were based on the NITE process and a fiber-architecture of both materials was same in the UD type. The tensile strength of reference material in the fiber direction UD 0° was 160±24 MPa. The tensile strength of fabricated material is a little higher than reference material. Here, as a simple parameter study, FTL and FL of fabricated material were assumed to be determined by considering data scatter of FTL and FL of reference material. The strength anisotropy predictions by prediction theories were discussed by case 1 and case 2. The case 1 and the case 2 was defined as calculation results utilizing minimum scatter of reference material and maximum scatter of that, respectively. The case 1 was calculated as FT, PLS=210 MPa, FTL, PLS=45 MPa and FL, PLS=17 MPa. The case 2 was also calculated as FT, PLS=210 MPa, FTL, PLS=59 MPa and FL, PLS=21 MPa. Figure 4 shows an anisotropy map developed by maximum normal stress theory. The dotted line and solid line indicates the case 1 and the case 2, respectively. The experimental results in each fiber orientation angle were consistent with both of the case 1 and the case 2. UD30, UD45 and UD60 are estimated inter-laminar detachment failure from this anisotropy map. The failure mode of UD30, UD45 and UD60 was consistent with fracture surface observation results. The strength in the high fiber orientation angle indicates the relative low strength. In the case of fiber orientation angle 60°, the strength was about 40% strength comparing with the strength in the fiber orientation angle 0°. This reason is that failure in the high fiber orientation angle is dominated by inter-laminar detachment failure. Thus, if SiC/SiC composite products are fabricated, fiber architecture design for suppression of the failure by tensile stress in the inter-laminar detachment angle is very important.

    Figure 4. Anisotropy map by the maximum normal stress theory.

    Tsai-Hill criterion;

    The basic equation of the Tsai-Hill criterion can be described as:

    σθ=[cos4θFT,PLS2+(1FTL,PLS21FL,PLS2)sin2θcos2θ+sin4θFL,PLS]12 (4)

    The Tsai-Hill criterion is one of the criteria considering the mixed failure modes [14]. In generally, since structural materials are often used under the complex stress, it is important to consider application of the criteria by the mixed failure modes. It is well known that prediction values in the low fiber orientation angle side are different between the normal stress theory and the criteria by mixed failure modes such as Tasi-Hill criterion. It is also reported that the prediction values by the Tasi-Hill criterion were consistent with experiment results in the off-axial tensile test than that by the normal stress theory [15,16]. In order to more accurately understand strength anisotropy, it is necessary to evaluate strength anisotropy by the normal stress theory as well as the criteria by mixed failure modes. As a first step of the anisotropy evaluation for the industrialization grade NITE-SiC/SiC composites, the Tasi-Hill criterion were investigated in this study. Although the Tasi-Hill criterion doesnot consider the compression mode, this might be rationalized in this tensile mode only case. The anisotropy map developed by the Tsai-Hill criterion is shown as Figure 5. The dotted line and solid line indicates the case 1 and the case 2, respectively. In the case of case 1, although the experimental results of UD45 and UD60 were consistent with the prediction values, that of UD30 were a little different. On the other hand, the prediction values by case 2 were almost consistent with the experimental results. FTL and FL of fabricated materials are thought to close to case 2 than case 1 because the mechanical properties of fabricated materials are higher than that of reference materials. This result is suggested that the strength anisotropy of UD NITE-SiC/SiC composites is able to predict by Tsai-Hill criterion.

    Figure 5. Anisotropy map by the Tsai-Hill criterion.

    4. Conclusion

    The axial/off-axial mechanical properties of UD NITE-SiC/SiC composites by the industrialization grade process were evaluated by axial/off-axial tensile test. Elastic modulus and proportional limit strength of NITE-SiC/SiC composites tended to decrease with increasing of fiber orientation angle. The experiment results by axial/off-axial tensile test were consistent with the strength anisotropy prediction theories by the maximum normal stress theory and the Tsai-Hill criterion. The failure modes of SiC/SiC composites fabricated with each fiber orientation angle were consistent with fracture surface observation results. Also, the strength anisotropy of UD NITE-SiC/SiC composites was suggested to be able to be predicted by Tsai-Hill criterion. The basic strength anisotropy of UD SiC/SiC composites was understood from correlation evaluation of mechanical properties, fracture surface observation and the strength anisotropy prediction theories.


    Acknowledgments

    The authors acknowledge helpful input from and discussion with Dr. Y. Kohno and Dr. J.S. Park. The authors’ appreciation is due members of OASIS for their continuing support and encouragement.


    Conflict of Interest

    The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.




    [1] Andre L, Pauss A, Ribeiro T (2018) Solid anaerobic digestion: state-of-art, scientific and technological hurdles. Bioresource Technol 247: 1027–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.003
    [2] Bujoczek G, Oleszkiewicz J, Sparling R, et al. (2000) High solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. J Agr Eng Res 76: 51–60. doi: 10.1006/jaer.2000.0529
    [3] Ge X, Xu F, Li Y (2016) Solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: recent progress and perspectives. Bioresource Technol 205: 239–249. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.050
    [4] Yang L, Xu F, Ge X, et al. (2015) Challenges and strategies for solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass. Renew Sust Energ Rev 44: 824–834. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.002
    [5] Wei P, Mudde RF, Uijttewaal WSJ, et al. (2019) Characterising the two-phase flow and mixing performance in a gas-mixed anaerobic digester: importance for scaled-up applications. Water Res 149: 86–97. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.077
    [6] Wang H, Tao Y, Temudo M, et al. (2015) An integrated approach for efficient biomethane production from solid bio-wastes in a compact system. Biotechnol Biofuels 8: 62. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0237-8
    [7] Marks PJ, Wujcik WJ, Loncar AF (1994) Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide, Version 4.0. Available from: https://frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4-14.html.
    [8] Vamini B, Vianney T, Jo YS (2017) Water for small-scale biogas digesters in Sub-Saharan Africa. GCB Bioenergy 9: 339–357. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12339
    [9] Rajagopal R, Massé DI, Singh G (2013) A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia. Bioresource Technol 143: 632–641. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.030
    [10] Yenigun O, Demirel B (2013) Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: a review. Process Biochem 48: 901–911. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2013.04.012
    [11] Niu Q, Qiao W, Qiang H, et al. (2013) Mesophilic methane fermentation of chicken manure at a wide range of ammonia concentration: stability, inhibition and recovery. Bioresource Technol 137: 358–367. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.080
    [12] Niu Q, Kubota K, Qiao W, et al. (2015) Effect of ammonia inhibition on microbial community dynamic and process functional resilience in mesophilic methane fermentation of chicken manure. J Chem Technol Biot 90: 2161–2169. doi: 10.1002/jctb.4527
    [13] Salyuk AI, Zhadan SO, Shapovalov EB (2014) Thermophilic methane digestion of chicken manure. Ukrainian Food J 3: 587–594.
    [14] Salyuk AI, Zhadan SO, Shapovalov EB (2015) Thermophilic methane fermentation of chicken manure in a wide range of substrate moisture contents. J Food Packag Sci Tech Technol 4: 36–40.
    [15] Zhang W, Lau A (2007) Reducing ammonia emission from poultry manure composting via struvite formation. J Chem Technol Biot 82: 598–602. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1701
    [16] Krakat N, Demirel B, Anjum R (2017) Methods of ammonia removal in anaerobic digestion: a review. Water Sci Technol 76: 1925–1938. doi: 10.2166/wst.2017.406
    [17] Zhang L, Lee Y, Jahng D (2012) Ammonia stripping for enhanced biomethanization of piggery wastewater. J Hazard Mater 199: 36–42.
    [18] Surmeli RO, Bayrakdar A, Calli B (2017) Removal and recovery of ammonia from chicken manure. Water Sci Technol 75: 2811–2817. doi: 10.2166/wst.2017.116
    [19] Markou G (2015) Improved anaerobic digestion performance and biogas production from poultry litter after lowering its nitrogen content. Bioresource Technol 196: 726–730. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.067
    [20] Abouelenien F, Fujiwara W, Namba Y, et al. (2010) Improved methane fermentation of chicken manure via ammonia removal by biogas recycle. Bioresource Technol 101: 6368–6373. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.071
    [21] Laureni M, Palatsi J, Llovera M, et al. (2013) Influence of pig slurry characteristics on ammonia stripping efficiencies and quality of the recovered ammonium-sulfate solution. J Chem Technol Biot 88: 1654–1662. doi: 10.1002/jctb.4016
    [22] Alshameri A, He H, Zhu J, et al. (2018) Adsorption of ammonium by different natural clay minerals: characterization, kinetics and adsorption isotherms. Appl Clay Sci 159: 83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2017.11.007
    [23] Zhu R, Chen Q, Zhou Q, et al. (2016) Adsorbents based on montmorillonite for contaminant removal from water: A review. Appl Clay Sci 123: 239–258. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.12.024
    [24] Borisover M, Davis JA (2015) Adsorption of inorganic and organic solutes by clay minerals, In: Tournassat C, Steefel C, Bourg I, et al., Natural and Engineered Clay Barriers, Elsevier 6: 33–70. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100027-4.00002-4
    [25] Khosravi A, Esmhosseini M, Khezri S (2014) Removal of ammonium ion from aqueous solutions using natural zeolite: kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Res Chem Intermediat 40: 2905–2917. doi: 10.1007/s11164-013-1137-9
    [26] Rožić M, Cerjan-Stefanovic S, Kurajica S, et al. (2000) Ammonical nitrogen removal from water by treatment with clays and zeolites. Water Res 34: 3675–3681. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00113-5
    [27] Ma JY, Pan JT, Gao TL, et al. (2016) Enhanced anaerobic digestion of chicken manure by bentonite addition. Res Environ Sci 29: 442–448.
    [28] Chen H, Awasthi MK, Liu T, et al. (2018) Influence of clay as additive on greenhouse gases emission and maturity evaluation during chicken manure composting. Bioresource Technol 266: 82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.073
    [29] Ivanov V, Stabnikov V, Guo CH, et al. (2014) Wastewater engineering applications of BioIronTech process based on the biogeochemical cycle of iron bioreduction and (bio)oxidation. AIMS Environ J 1: 53–66. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2014.2.53
    [30] Ivanov V, Stabnikov V, Tay JH (2018) Removal of the recalcitrant artificial sweetener sucralose and its by-products from industrial wastewater using microbial reduction/oxidation of iron. ChemEngineering 2: 37. doi: 10.3390/chemengineering2030037
    [31] Stabnikov VP, Tay STL, Tay JH, et al. (2004) Effect of iron hydroxide on phosphate removal during anaerobic digestion of activated sludge. Appl Biochem Micro 40: 376–380. doi: 10.1023/B:ABIM.0000033914.52026.e5
    [32] Binner I, Dultz S, Schellhorn M, et al. (2017) Potassium adsorption and release properties of clays in peat-based horticultural substrates for increasing the cultivation safety of plants. Appl Clay Sci 145: 28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2017.05.013
    [33] Visser A, Nozhevnikova AN, Lettinga G (1993) Sulphide inhibition of methanogenic activity at various pH levels at 55 ℃. J Chem Technol Biot 57: 9–14.
    [34] Koster IW, Rinzema A, De Vegt AL, et al. (1986) Sulfide inhibition of the methanogenic activity of granular sludge at various pH levels. Water Res 20: 1561–1567. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(86)90121-1
    [35] Muhlbauer RV, Swestka RJ, Burns RT, et al. (2008) Development and testing of a hydrogen sulfide detection system for use in swine housing. ASABE 6: 084203.
    [36] Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2005) Available from: https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/hydrogensulfide/hazards.html.
    [37] Yuzir A, Yaacob SS, Tijani H, et al. (2017) Addition of ferric chloride in anaerobic digesters to enhance sulphide removal and methanogenesis. Desalin Water Treat 79: 64–72.
    [38] Stabnikov VP, Ivanov VN (2006) The effect of various iron hydroxide concentrations on the anaerobic fermentation of sulfate-containing model wastewater. Appl Biochem Micro 42: 284–288.
    [39] Stabnikov V, Ivanov V (2017) Biotechnological production of biogrout from iron ore and cellulose. J Chem Technol Biot 92: 180–187. doi: 10.1002/jctb.4989
    [40] Stucki JW (2006) Properties and behaviour of iron in clay minerals, In: Bergaya F, Theng BKG, Lagaly G, Developments in Clay Science, Elsevier Science Ltd 1: 423–475.
    [41] Markos N (2003) Bentonite-iron interactions in natural occurrences and in laboratory-the effects of the interactions on the properties of bentonite: a literature survey. Working report 2003-55, Posiva Oy.
    [42] Mueller B (2015) Experimental interactions between clay minerals and bacteria: a review. Pedosphere 25: 799–810. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(15)30061-8
    [43] Kostka JE, Dalton DD, Skelton H, et al. (2002) Growth of iron (Ⅲ)-reducing bacteria on clay minerals as the sole electron acceptor and comparison of growth yields on a variety of oxidized iron forms. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 6256–6262. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.12.6256-6262.2002
    [44] Ahmed Z, Ivanov V, Hyun SH, et al. (2001) Effect of divalent iron on methanogenic fermentation of fat-containing wastewater. Environ Engrg Res 6:139–146.
    [45] Li Z, Wrenn BA, Venosa AD (2006) Effects of ferric hydroxide on methanogenesis from lipids and long-chain fatty acids in anaerobic digestion. Water Environ Res 78: 522–530. doi: 10.2175/106143005X73064
    [46] Ivanov V, Stabnikova EV, Stabnikov VP, et al. (2002) Effects of iron compounds on the treatment of fat-containing wastewaters. Appl Biochem Micro 38: 255–258. doi: 10.1023/A:1015475425566
    [47] Bampalioutas K, Vlysidis A, Lyberatos G, et al. (2019) Detoxification and methane production kinetics from three-phase olive mill wastewater using Fenton's reagent followed by anaerobic digestion. J Chem Technol Biot 94: 265–275. doi: 10.1002/jctb.5772
    [48] Baek G, Kim J, Shin SG, et al. (2016) Bioaugmentation of anaerobic sludge digestion with iron-reducing bacteria: process and microbial responses to variations in hydraulic retention time. Appl Microbiol Biot 100: 927–937. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7018-y
    [49] Park CM, Novak JT (2013) The effect of direct addition of iron(Ⅲ) on anaerobic digestion efficiency and odor causing compounds. Water Sci Technol 68: 2391–2396. doi: 10.2166/wst.2013.507
    [50] Yue ZB, Ma D, Wang J, et al. (2015) Goethite promoted anaerobic digestion of algal biomass in continuous stirring-tank reactors. Fuel 159: 883–886. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.07.059
    [51] Capson-Tojo G, Girard C, Rouez M, et al. (2018) Addition of biochar and trace elements in the form of industrial FeCl3 to stabilize anaerobic digestion of food waste: dosage optimization and long-term study. J Chem Technol Biot 94: 505–515.
    [52] García-Balboa C, Cautivo D, Blázque, ML, et al. (2010) Successive ferric and sulphate reduction using dissimilatory bacterial cultures. Water Air Soil Poll 207: 213–226. doi: 10.1007/s11270-009-0130-9
    [53] Wang MW, Zhao Z, Zhang Y (2018) Sustainable strategy for enhancing anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: driving dissimilatory iron reduction with Fenton sludge. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6: 2220–2230. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03637
    [54] Flores-Alsina X, Solon K, Mbamba CK, et al. (2016) Modelling phosphorus (P), sulfur (S) and iron (Fe) interactions for dynamic simulations of anaerobic digestion processes. Water Res 95: 370–382. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.012
    [55] Yap SD, Astals S, Lu Y, et al. (2018) Humic acid inhibition of hydrolysis and methanogenesis with different anaerobic inocula. Waste Manage 80: 130–136. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.001
    [56] Khadem AF, Azman S, Plugge CM, et al. (2017) Effect of humic acids on the activity of pure and mixed methanogenic cultures. Biomass Bioenerg 99: 21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.02.012
    [57] Stepanov N, Senko O, Perminova I, et al. (2019) A new approach to assess the effect of various humic compounds on the metabolic activity of cells participating in methanogenesis. Sustainability 11: 3158. doi: 10.3390/su11113158
    [58] Greenland DJ (1971) Interactions between humic and fulvic acids and clays. Soil Sci 111: 34–41. doi: 10.1097/00010694-197101000-00004
    [59] Boguta P, D'Orazio V, Senesi N, et al. (2019) Insight into the interaction mechanism of iron ions with soil humic acids. The effect of the pH and chemical properties of humic acids. J Environ Manage 245: 367–374.
    [60] Tay JH, Tay STL, Ivanov V, et al. (2008) Compositions and methods for the treatment of wastewater and other waste. US Patent 7393452.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Zeba Usmani, Minaxi Sharma, Yevgen Karpichev, Ashok Pandey, Ramesh Chander Kuhad, Rajeev Bhat, Rajesh Punia, Mortaza Aghbashlo, Meisam Tabatabaei, Vijai Kumar Gupta, Advancement in valorization technologies to improve utilization of bio-based waste in bioeconomy context, 2020, 131, 13640321, 109965, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109965
    2. Yevhenii Shapovalov, Sergey Zhadan, Günther Bochmann, Anatoly Salyuk, Volodymyr Nykyforov, Dry Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure: A Review, 2020, 10, 2076-3417, 7825, 10.3390/app10217825
    3. Ye B Shapovalov, I L Yakymenko, O M Salavor, K Šebková, The state of the European Union – Ukraine Association Agreement implementation on the air quality, 2022, 1049, 1755-1307, 012044, 10.1088/1755-1315/1049/1/012044
    4. Roman A. Tarasenko, Viktor B. Shapovalov, Stanislav A. Usenko, Yevhenii B. Shapovalov, Iryna M. Savchenko, Yevhen Yu. Pashchenko, Adrian Paschke, Comparison of ontology with non-ontology tools for educational research, 2021, 8, 2833-5473, 82, 10.55056/cte.208
    5. Patrizio Tratzi, Doan Thanh Ta, Zhiping Zhang, Marco Torre, Francesca Battistelli, Eros Manzo, Valerio Paolini, Quanguo Zhang, Chenyeon Chu, Francesco Petracchini, Sustainable additives for the regulation of NH3 concentration and emissions during the production of biomethane and biohydrogen: A review, 2022, 346, 09608524, 126596, 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126596
    6. Yevhenii B. Shapovalov, Viktor B. Shapovalov, Roman A. Tarasenko, Stanislav A. Usenko, Adrian Paschke, A semantic structuring of educational research using ontologies, 2021, 8, 2833-5473, 105, 10.55056/cte.219
    7. Pramod Jadhav, Zaied Bin Khalid, Santhana Krishnan, Prakash Bhuyar, A. W. Zularisam, Abdul Syukor Abd Razak, Mohd Nasrullah, Application of iron-cobalt-copper (Fe-Co–Cu) trimetallic nanoparticles on anaerobic digestion (AD) for biogas production, 2022, 2190-6815, 10.1007/s13399-022-02825-2
    8. Yevhenii B. Shapovalov, Viktor B. Shapovalov, Roman A. Tarasenko, Stanislav A. Usenko, Adrian Paschke, 2021, 10.31812/123456789/4433
    9. Roman A. Tarasenko, Viktor B. Shapovalov, Stanislav A. Usenko, Yevhenii B. Shapovalov, Iryna M. Savchenko, Yevhen Yu. Pashchenko, Adrian Paschke, 2021, 10.31812/123456789/4432
    10. Pramod Jadhav, Zaied Bin Khalid, A.W. Zularisam, Santhana Krishnan, Mohd Nasrullah, The role of iron-based nanoparticles (Fe-NPs) on methanogenesis in anaerobic digestion (AD) performance, 2022, 204, 00139351, 112043, 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112043
    11. Ye B Shapovalov, S A Usenko, A I Salyuk, R A Tarasenko, V B Shapovalov, Sustainability of biogas production: using of Shelford’s law, 2022, 1049, 1755-1307, 012023, 10.1088/1755-1315/1049/1/012023
    12. Xuna Liu, Luqing Qi, Efthalia Chatzisymeon, Ping Yang, Weiyi Sun, Lina Pang, Inorganic additives to increase methane generation during anaerobic digestion of livestock manure: a review, 2021, 19, 1610-3653, 4165, 10.1007/s10311-021-01282-z
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5686) PDF downloads(429) Cited by(12)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog