
Citation: Dominik Flore, Konrad Wegener. Influence of fibre volume fraction and temperature on fatigue life of glass fibre reinforced plastics[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(3): 770-795. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.3.770
[1] | Qiuyan Zhang, Lingling Liu, Weinian Zhang . Bogdanov-Takens bifurcations in the enzyme-catalyzed reaction comprising a branched network. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(5&6): 1499-1514. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017078 |
[2] | Xiao Wu, Shuying Lu, Feng Xie . Relaxation oscillations of a piecewise-smooth slow-fast Bazykin's model with Holling type Ⅰ functional response. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(10): 17608-17624. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023782 |
[3] | LanJiang Luo, Haihong Liu, Fang Yan . Dynamic behavior of P53-Mdm2-Wip1 gene regulatory network under the influence of time delay and noise. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 2321-2347. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023109 |
[4] | Mohammad Sajid, Sahabuddin Sarwardi, Ahmed S. Almohaimeed, Sajjad Hossain . Complex dynamics and Bogdanov-Takens bifurcations in a retarded van der Pol-Duffing oscillator with positional delayed feedback. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 2874-2889. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023135 |
[5] | Lin Chen, Xiaotian Wu, Yancong Xu, Libin Rong . Modelling the dynamics of Trypanosoma rangeli and triatomine bug with logistic growth of vector and systemic transmission. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(8): 8452-8478. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022393 |
[6] | Zhenliang Zhu, Yuming Chen, Zhong Li, Fengde Chen . Dynamic behaviors of a Leslie-Gower model with strong Allee effect and fear effect in prey. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(6): 10977-10999. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023486 |
[7] | Jinna Lu, Xiaoguang Zhang . Bifurcation analysis of a pair-wise epidemic model on adaptive networks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(4): 2973-2989. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019147 |
[8] | Mohammed Alanazi, Majid Bani-Yaghoub, Bi-Botti C. Youan . Stable periodic solutions of a delayed reaction-diffusion model of Hes1-mRNA interactions. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(8): 2152-2175. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025079 |
[9] | Dan Liu, Shigui Ruan, Deming Zhu . Stable periodic oscillations in a two-stage cancer model of tumor and immune system interactions. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2012, 9(2): 347-368. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.347 |
[10] | Shunyi Li . Hopf bifurcation, stability switches and chaos in a prey-predator system with three stage structure and two time delays. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(6): 6934-6961. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019348 |
Recently, the recurrence phenomenon has received great attention, in particular, in the areas of biological and medical science. For example, Zhang et al. [1] studied a 4-dimensional (4-d) autoimmune disease model, which exhibits recurrent dynamics and is preserved in reduced 3-d and 2-d models, and further proved that the recurrence behavior is induced from Hopf bifurcation. This recurrence behavior has also been found in other diseases such as multifocal osteomyelitis [2,3], eczema [4] and subacute discoid lupus erythematosus [5], etc. Actually, the subtypes of some diseases are clinically classified based on the patterns of this recurrence behavior [6]. Thus, an improved understanding of recurrence phenomenon in autoimmune diseases is important to promoting correct diagnosis, patient management, and treatment decisions.
The recurrence phenomenon belongs to a more general class of so-called "slow-fast" motions in many physical and engineering systems. A slow-fast system usually involves at least two kinds of dynamical variables, evolved on very different time scales. The ratio between the slow and fast time scales is measured by a small parameter. When attention is focused on periodic oscillations, a slow-fast motion implies that the motion is slow on a part of a solution trajectory while fast on the remaining part of the trajectory. In general, for a given dynamical system such as an HIV model, identifying the special periodic solution – recurrence oscillation is not an easy task. The well-know Geometric Singular Perturbation Theory (GSPT) [7] can be applied to consider slow-fast motions in singularly perturbed systems, which are characterized by slow and fast motions along particular system coordinates. Consider the following 2-d singular perturbation system (here choosing a 2-d system for convenience of illustration):
dxdt=f(x,y,ε),dydt=εg(x,y,ε), | (1.1) |
where (x,y)∈R2, 0<ε≪1, and f,g∈Ck,k≥3, x and y are called fast and slow variables. Introducing τ=εt into (1.1), we have
εdxdτ=f(x,y,ε),dydτ=g(x,y,ε), | (1.2) |
where t and τ are called fast and slow times, respectively, and the systems (1.1) and (1.2) are called fast and slow systems, respectively.
The basic idea to study slow-fast motions in systems (1.1) and (1.2) is to first consider the limiting systems as ε→0, which results in the fast subsystem:
dxdt=f(x,y,0),dydt=0, | (1.3) |
and the slow subsystem:
0=f(x,y,0),dydτ=g(x,y,0), | (1.4) |
respectively. The equation f(x,y,0)=0, which generates the singular points for the fast subsystem, defines a critical manifold, also called slow manifold. It is obvious that the fast subsystem defines fast manifolds in the horizontal direction. Thus, if the fast and slow manifolds can form a closed loop, then the system (1.1) may exhibit slow-fast motions (e.g., canard cycle) under a small perturbation. For example, consider the well-known van der Pol's equation,
¨x+ν(x2−1)˙x+x−a=0,(ν≫1), |
where a is a constant. This model can be rewritten in the form of singular perturbation equations [8]:
ε˙x=y−(13x3−x),˙y=−x+a,(ε=1ν). | (1.5) |
The system has a Hopf bifurcation at the critical point a=1. The critical (slow) manifold is defined by the cubic polynomial equation y=13x3−x, and it indeed can form closed loops with fast manifolds (in the horizontal direction). For a fixed a=0.998, the simulated phase portaits and time histories for different values of ε are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. The slow-fast motions are observed from these two figures, which are usually called canard cycles with a head for ε<0.0158 and without a head for ε>0.0158.
Therefore, in order to apply the GSPT to study slow-fast motions, one needs to put one's system in the "shoe" of the GSPT frame. However, in reality it has been found that many physical or biological systems cannot be transformed to ones in the form of singularly perturbed system, but they still exhibit slow-fast motions, like recurrence phenomenon. For example, consider the following 2-d HIV in-house disease model [9,10]:
˙X=1−DX−(B+AYY+C)XY,˙Y=(B+AYY+C)XY−Y, | (1.6) |
where X and Y are the dimensionless healthy and infected cells, respectively, and A, B, C and D are normalized parameters, all of them take positive real values. It has been shown in [9,10] that this model exhibits recurrence behaviour, namely a slow-fast motion, see the simulated oscillation depicted in Figure 3(a). Such sustained oscillation cannot be analyzed by the GSPT since one cannot obtain an ε for one of the equations in (1.6). But it is easy to use dynamical system theory to explain how such a special oscillation occurs. The model (1.6) has two equilibrium solutions: infection-free equilibrium E0 and endemic equilibrium E1; and there exists a transcritical bifurcation between them, see the bifurcation diagram in Figure 3(b). It is seen from Figure 3(b) that the transcritical bifurcation happens at B=0.057, and B=0.060 is chosen for simulating recurrence (or viral blips). It can be seen from the bifurcation diagram that both equilibria E0 and E1 are unstable between the transcritical point and Hopf bifurcation point (marked by two black circles), but the solutions of the system are bounded and so the motion induced by the Hopf bifurcation must be persistent. Moreover, we can see that the point defined by B=0.060 at which the system exhibits recurrence behaviour, is a saddle point and close to the transcrtical bifurcation point, and thus one of the eigenvalues is positive and very small (in order ε), while the other one is negative in the order O(1). Thus, one can image that when a trajectory moves around this saddle point, it moves very slow in the direction of the eigenvector associated with the small positive eigenvalue and fast in the direction of the eigenvector associated with the negative eigenvalue, yielding the slow-fast motion. This is shown in Figure 4, where v1 and v2 denote the two eigenvectors associated with the two eigenvalues 0<ξ1≪1 and ξ2<0, respectively.
So how do we apply the dynamical system approach to identify such slow-fast motions? Recently, four conditions were proposed and a new method was developed in [9,10,11] to study such slow-fast motions. These conditions have been further improved. Roughly speaking, for a given dynamical system, if the following conditions are satisfied:
C1: there exists at least one equilibrium solution;
C2: there exists a transcritical or saddle-node bifurcation;
C3: there is a Hopf bifurcation; and
C4: there is a "window" between the Hopf bifurcation point and the transcritical/saddle-node bifurcation point in which oscillation continuously exists,
then the system exhibits slow-fast motions. To verify these conditions for higher dimensional dynamical systems, identifying Hopf bifurcation (condition C3) becomes crucial.
In this paper, we will apply our new method to study the recurrence phenomenon which occurs in an oscillating network model related to organic reactions [12]. The recurrence behaviour for this network model has been shown by numerical simulations. We will use our approach to prove the existence of such phenomenon and determine the parameter values under which such slow-fast motions can occur. To achieve this, we first study stability and bifurcation of the equilibrium of the system, in particular, find the condition under which Hopf bifurcation occurs, and then verify the four conditions C1-C4.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In the next section, the oscillating network model is described. Then, in section 3, we present a theorem which can be used to identify Hopf bifurcation for general n-dimensional dynamical systems. In section 4, we derive explicit conditions for saddle-node and Hopf bifurcations arising from the equilibrium of the oscillating network model and find the conditions which generate the recurrence phenomenon. Also, we use simulations to verify the analytical predictions, showing that they agree very well with the experiment results reported in [12]. In section 5, a further analysis is given on the Hopf bifurcation to explore the post-critical oscillating behavior. Conclusion and discussion are given in Section 6.
Organic chemical reaction networks have recently become more and more important in life and played a central role in their origins [13,14,15]. Network dynamics regulates cell division [16,17,18], circadian rhythms [19], nerve impulses [20] and chemotaxis [21], and provides guidelines for the development of organisms [22]. In chemical reactions, out-of-equilibrium networks have the potential to display emergent network dynamics such as spontaneous pattern formation, bistability and periodic oscillations. However, it has been noted that the principle of organic reaction networks developing complex behaviors is still not completely understood. In [12], a biologically related network organic reaction was developed, exhibiting bistability and oscillations in the concentrations of organic thiols and amides. Oscillations are generated from the interaction between three sub networks: an autocatalytic cycle that produces thiols and amides from thioesters and dialkyl disulfides; a trigger that controls autocatalytic growth; and inhibitory processes that remove activating thiol species that are generated during the autocatalytic cycle. Previous studies proved oscillations and bistability using highly evolved biomolecules or in organic molecules of questionable biochemical relevance (for example, those used in Belousov-Zhabotinskii-type reactions)[23,24], while the organic molecules used in [12] are related to metabolism, which is similar to those found in early Earth. The network considered in [12] can be modified to study the influence of molecular structure on the dynamics of reaction networks, and may possibly lead to the design of biomimetic networks and of synthetic self-regulating and evolving chemical systems.
Simulations given in [12] have shown that space velocities (defined as the ratio of the flow rate and the reactor volume and given in units of per second) in the range 0.0001-0.01/s would produce hysteresis. In order to test the result of simulations, the authors of [12] studied the total concentration of thiols during stepwise changes. In particular, they started from a low flow rate, then raised to a high flow rate, and finally returned to the low flow rate. To activate the autocatalytic pathway, one needs to use high thiol concentrations which are generated through self-amplification [of Cysteamine (CSH)], requiring the space velocities to be lowered to 0.0005/s. It has been observed that when the space velocity reaches 0.006/s, the system transitions will be out of the self-amplifying state. Such limits may explain the self-amplification which requires maleimide to be removed from the Continuously Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) more rapidly than it is added through the inlet port; while when the termination of self-amplification starts, free thiols should be removed from the CSTR by transporting out from the outlet port more rapidly than they are produced. Noticed from the model prediction, an increase of maleimide concentration reduced the bistable limit flow velocity. This chemical reaction network shows a general process to convert any quadratic autocatalytic system into a bistable switch. In [25], Epstein and Pojman found that bistable systems could generate oscillations in the presence of an inhibition reaction. In the system studied in [12], they chose acrylamide as an inhibitor, and tested this system with acrylamide in batch, which exhibited an oscillation (that is, one peak) in the concentration of free thiols. Moreover, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) analysis has shown that the oscillation is triggered when the maleimide is removed. With a combination of numerical simulations and experiments in the CSTR under different flow rates, they found the conditions under which the addition of acrylamide can produce sustained oscillations in Organic Thiols (RSH). Sustained oscillations are often called recurrent oscillations in disease models, which may generate complex dynamical behaviors. To determine how the changes in flow rate affect such oscillations, the authors of [12] further examined the influence of flow rate on the stability, period and amplitude of oscillations. It showed that period increases nonlinearly with space velocity, while the amplitude increases linearly.
In [12], the authors examined how changes in flow rate affect oscillations and found that sustained oscillations (recurrence) occurred for certain space velocities. In order to explain the trends in period and amplitude of oscillating networks, and the nature of bifurcations at low and high limiting space velocities, a simple kinetic model has been established [12] to enable qualitative analysis on dynamic behaviors. The model simplifies the autocatalytic thiol network to bimolecular autocatalytic production of thiols from thioester, and considers the concentrations of Cystamine (CSSC) and acrylamide as constants. The simple model is described by three ordinary differential equations:
dAdt=k1SA−k2IA−k3A−k0A+k4S,dIdt=k0I0−k0I−k2IA,dSdt=k0S0−k0S−k4S−k1SA, | (2.1) |
where A, I and S represent the concentrations of organic thoils (RSH), maleimide and L-alanine ethyl thioester (AlaSEt), respectively, I0 and S0 are the concentrations of maleimide and AlaSEt fed into the reactor, respectively, ki,i=1,2,3,4, are rate constants and k0 is the space velocity. From a linear analysis of this model [25], it has been found in [12] that increasing k0 from low to high values causes two transitions. Firstly, the system takes the transition from having a stable focus (damped oscillations) to a stable orbit (sustained oscillations) via a Hopf bifurcation [26]. Secondly, the system transits from having a stable orbit to a single stable equilibrium via a saddle-node or fold bifurcation [26]. The sustained oscillations between the two transitions, found numerically and experimentally in [12] indeed show the interesting recurrence phenomenon. In this paper, we will use our method to prove the existence of the recurrence behavior and determine the parameter values underlying this phenomenon.
In this section, we present a theorem for identifying Hopf bifurcation in general n-dimensional dynamical systems, which are assumed to be described by the following nonlinear differential equation:
˙x=f(x,μ), x∈Rn, μ∈Rm, f: Rn+m⟼Rn, | (3.1) |
where the dot denotes differentiation with respect to time t, x and μ are the n-dimensional state variable and m-dimensional parameter variable, respectively. Assume that the nonlinear function f(x,μ) is analytic with respect to x and μ, and suppose that an equilibrium solution of Eq (3.1) is given in the form of xe=xe(μ), which is determined from f(x,μ)=0. In order to analyze the stability of xe, evaluating the Jacobian of system (3.1) at x=xe(μ) yields J(μ)=Dxf|x=xe(μ). If all eigenvalues of J(μ) have nonzero real parts, then the system is said to be hyperbolic, that means no complex dynamics exists in the vicinity of the equilibrium. Otherwise, at least one of the eigenvalues of J(μ) has zero real part at a critical point, defined by μ=μc, and bifurcations may occur from xe(μ). To determine the stability of the equilibrium, we compute the eigenvalues of the Jacobian J(μ), which are the roots of the characteristic polynomial equation:
Pn(λ,μ)=det[λI−J(μ)]=λn+a1(μ)λn−1+a2(μ)λn−2+⋯+an−1(μ)λ+an(μ)=0. | (3.2) |
For a fixed value of μ, if all roots of the polynomial Pn(λ,μ) have negative real part, then the equilibrium is asymptotically stable for this value of μ. If at least one of the eigenvalues has zero real part as μ is varied to cross a critical point μc, then the equilibrium becomes unstable and bifurcation occurs from this critical point. When all roots of Pn(λ,μ) have negative real part, we call Pn(λ,μ) a stable polynomial.
In general, for n⩾3, it is hard to find the roots of Pn(λ,μ). Thus we use the Routh-Hurwitz Criterion [27] to analyze the local stability of the equilibrium solution x=xe(μ). The criterion gives sufficient conditions under which the equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable, i.e., all roots of the characteristic polynomial Pn(λ,μ) have negative real part. These conditions are given by
Δi(μ)>0, i=1,2,…,n, | (3.3) |
where Δi(μ) is called the ith-principal minor of the Hurwitz arrangements of order n, defined as follows (here, order n means that there are n coefficients ai (i=1,2,…,n) in Eq (3.2), which construct the Hurwitz principal minors):
Δ1(μ)=a1,Δ2(μ)=det | (3.4) |
Assume that as \mu is varied to reach a critical point \mu = \mu_{c} , at least one of \Delta_{i} 's becomes zero. Then the fixed point x_{e}(\mu_{c}) loses stability, and \mu_{c} is called a critical point. It can be seen from Eq (3.3) that if a_{n}(\mu_c) = 0 , but other Hurwitz arrangements are still positive (i.e., \Delta_{n}(\mu_c) = 0 , \Delta_i(\mu_c) > 0 , i = 1, 2, \ldots, (n-1) ), then P_n(\lambda, \mu_c) = 0 has one simple zero root. In this case, system (3.1) has a simple zero singularity and a static bifurcation occurs from x_e , usually causes a "jump" from one equilibrium to another one. In other cases, for example, Hopf bifurcation may occur at a critical point when P_n(\lambda, \mu) = 0 has a pair of purely imaginary eigenvalues \pm i\omega (\omega > 0) at this point. However, the pair of purely imaginary eigenvalues are often difficult to be determined explicitly for high dimensional systems. Here, we present a theorem which can be used to determine the necessary and sufficient conditions under which Hopf bifurcation occurs in general n -dimensional dynamical systems. Its proof can be found in [28].
Theorem 1. [28] The necessary and sufficient conditions for system (3.1) to have a Hopf bifurcation from an equilibrium solution x = x_e are \Delta_{n-1} (\mu_c) = 0\, and \, \left. \frac{d \Delta_{n-1} (\mu)}{d \mu} \right|_{\mu = \mu_c} \ne 0 , with other Hurwitz conditions being still held, i.e., a_n (\mu_c) > 0 and \Delta_i(\mu_c) > 0 , for i = 1, \ldots, n-2 .
Note that suppose \, P(\lambda, \mu) = 0 \, has a complex conjugate eigenvalue, \, \alpha(\mu) \pm \omega(\mu) \, near \, \mu = \mu_c . Then, \Delta_{n-1} (\mu_c) = 0\, is equivalent to \, \alpha(\mu_c) = 0 , and \, \left. \frac{d \Delta_{n-1} (\mu)}{d \mu} \right|_{\mu = \mu_c} \ne 0 \, is equivalent to the transversality condition [29]: \, \left. \frac{d \alpha (\mu)}{d \mu} \right|_{\mu = \mu_c} \ne 0 .
In this section, we present a bifurcation analysis for model (2.1) based on the results established for general nonlinear dynamical systems in the previous section and show that the model exhibits recurrence phenomenon.
We start from finding the equilibrium solution of model (2.1), which can be simply obtained by setting \dot{A} \! = \! \dot{I} \! = \! \dot{S} \! = \! 0 and solving the resulting algebraic equations, and obtain the equilibrium solution E_1 , given by
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{l} E_1 = \left(A_1, \ \dfrac{I_0k_0}{A_1k_2+k_0}, \ \dfrac{S_0k_0}{A_1k_1+k_0+k_4}\right), \end{array} \end{equation} | (4.1) |
where A_1 is determined from the equation:
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{l} \dfrac{k_1k_0S_0A_1}{k_0+k_4+k_1A_1} -\dfrac{k_2k_0I_0A_1}{k_0+k_2A_1}-(k_0+k_3)A_1 +\dfrac{k_4k_0S_0}{k_0+k_4+k_1A_1} = 0, \end{array} \end{equation} | (4.2) |
which is equivalent to the following cubic polynomial equation:
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{rl} F(A_1,k_i) \!\!\!\! & = k_1k_2(k_0 \!+\! k_3)\, A_1^3 \!+\! \big[k_0^2(k_1 \!+\! k_2) + k_0(k_1k_2I_0 \!+\! k_2k_3 \!+\! k_2k_4 \!+\! k_1k_3 \!-\! k_1k_2S_0) +k_2k_3k_4 \big]\, A_1^2 \\[0.5ex] &\quad +\, \big[k_0^3+k_0^2(k_2I_0+k_3+k_4-k_1S_0)+k_0(k_2k_4I_0+k_3k_4-k_2k_4S_0) \big]\, A_1-k_4k_0^2S_0 = 0. \end{array} \end{equation} | (4.3) |
The typical parameter values obtained from experiments for the model are given below [12]:
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{lll} S_0 = 0.05 M, & I_0 = 0.01 M, & k_1 = 0.25 s^{-1} M^{-1},\\[0.5ex] k_2 = 300 s^{-1} M^{-1},\quad & k_3 = 0.0035 s^{-1},\quad & k_4 = 7 \times 10^{-5} s^{-1}, \end{array} \end{equation} | (4.4) |
which are substituted into (4.3) to yield
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} F_1(A_1,k_0) = &\left(\dfrac{21}{80}+75k_0\right)A_1^3 +\left(\dfrac{1201}{4}k_0^2-\dfrac{617}{320}k_0 +\dfrac{147}{2000000}\right)A_1^2 \\[0.3cm] &+\left(k_0^3+\dfrac{299107}{100000}k_0^2 -\dfrac{167951}{200000000}k_0\right)A_1-\dfrac{7}{2000000}k_0^2 = 0. \end{array} \end{equation} | (4.5) |
Note that the rational numbers given in (4.5) are obtained from transforming the numbers in digital format for convenience of symbolic computation. The graph depicted in Figure 5 shows the component A_1 of the equilibrium solution E_1 , satisfying F_1(A_1, k_0) = 0 .
Next, we consider the stability of the equilibrium solution E_1 , and give a complete bifurcation classification. Evaluating the Jacobian of (2.1) at E_1 yields a cubic characteristic polynomial, given by
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{l} P_3(\lambda,A_1,k_0) = \lambda^3+a_1(A_1,k_0)\lambda^2 +a_2(A_1,k_0)\lambda+a_3(A_1,k_0) = 0, \end{array} \end{equation} | (4.6) |
where the coefficients a_1(A_1, k_0) , a_2(A_1, k_0) and a_3(A_1, k_0)\, are expressed in terms of A_1 and k_0 as
\begin{array}{ll} a_1(A_1,k_0)&\!\!\!\! = \dfrac{1}{{( 30000000\,A_1+100000\,{\it k_0} )( 25000\,A_1+100000\,{\it k_0}+7 ) }} \big[30000000000\,{{\it k_0}}^{3}\\ &+ ( 12010000000000\,A_1+29912800000 ) {{\it k_0}}^{2} + ( 903750625000000\,{A_1}^{2}\\ &-18440900000\,A_1+2102499) {\it k_0}+225187500000000\,{A_1}^{3}+ 65730000000\,{A_1}^{2}\\ &+749700\,A_1 \big],\\[0.2cm] a_2(A_1,k_0)&\!\!\!\! = \dfrac{1}{200000000(300A_1+k_0)(25000A_1+100000k_0+7)} \big[60000000000000k_0^4\\ &+(30025000000000000A_1+119647000000000)k_0^3+(3612002500000000000A_1^2\\ &-113586100000000A_1+12614896000)k_0^2+(1351125000000000000A_1^3\\ &-15796615625000000A_1^2+8070650000A_1+294343)k_0+112500000000000000A_1^4\\ &+1639312500000000A_1^3+450555000000A_1^2+102900A_1 \big],\\ \end{array} |
\begin{array}{ll} a_3(A_1,k_0)&\!\!\!\! = \dfrac{1}{200000000(300A_1+k_0)(25000A_1+100000k_0+7)} \big[112500000000000000A_1^4k_0\\ &+900750000000000000A_1^3k_0^2+1806001250000000000A_1^2k_0^3 +12010000000000000A_1k_0^4\\ &+20000000000000k_0^5+393750000000000A_1^4+3215625000000000A_1^3k_0\\ &-15922825625000000A_1^2k_0^2-76284300000000A_1k_0^3+59822800000000k_0^4\\ &+220500000000A_1^3+892290000000A_1^2k_0+8041250000A_1k_0^2+8409898000k_0^3\\ &+30870000A_1^2+205800A_1k_0+294343k_0^2 \big]. \end{array} |
Based on the characteristic polynomial (4.6), we consider possible bifurcations from E_1 , including both static (saddle-node) and dynamical (Hopf) bifurcations. First, we consider static bifurcation, which occurs when P_3(\lambda, A_1, k_0) = 0 has zero roots (zero eigenvalues). The simplest case is single zero, i.e., when a_3(A_1, k_0) = 0 , and A_1 should simultaneously satisfy F_1(A_1, k_0) = 0 (see Eq (4.5)). Thus, we obtain
\begin{array}{l} {A_{1s}}({k_{0s}}) = - [{k_{0s}}(143903980000000000000000000000k_{0s}^6 + 428288040277200000000000000000k_{0s}^5\\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; - 6213276890147198000000000000k_{0s}^4 + 2680386939177203000000000k_{0s}^3\\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; + 3631431743948809500000k_{0s}^2 + 1210694204622124250{k_{0s}}\\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; + 15045612346947)]/[43164005995000000000000000000000k_{0s}^6\\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; - 130217314646275350000000000000000k_{0s}^5 + 2997175144063924475000000000000k_{0s}^4\\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; - 2087883562700064162500000000k_{0s}^3 - 511166217034919556250000k_{0s}^2\\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; + 233617980290310525000{k_{0s}} + 2178822504600000], \end{array} | (4.7) |
where k_{0s} is determined from the 8 th-degree polynomial equation,
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} F_2(k_{0s})&\!\!\!\! = 14376010000000000000000000000000000k_{0s}^8\\ &+85670310851400000000000000000000000k_{0s}^7\\ &+126683283344956849000000000000000000k_{0s}^6\\ &-3016017614668520296000000000000000k_{0s}^5\\ &+2922708873924575222500000000000k_{0s}^4\\ &-79581534791494732500000000k_{0s}^3\\ &-377631037207690850937500k_{0s}^2\\ &+63258405194198581500k_{0s}+610426123747209 = 0. \end{array} \end{equation} | (4.8) |
Solving F_2(k_{0s}) = 0 for k_{0s} yields four positive real solutions. Then, substituting the four solutions into A_{1s}(k_{0s}) using (4.7), we get four values of A_{1s}(k_{0s}) , and two of them are positive, which yield two critical values (see the two black circles in Figure 6): (k_{0sn}, A_{1sn}) \! \approx \! (3.0827 \! \times \! 10^{-4}, \, 2.6398 \! \times \! 10^{-5}) and (8.1553 \times 10^{-4}, \, 2.0062 \times 10^{-3}) . By verifying the changes of the stability on both sides of the critical points on the curve F_1(A_1, k_0) = 0 , we find that the first one defines a saddle-node bifurcation. For example, we select A_1 \! = \! 2.7 \! \times \! 10^{-5} (above the critical point), the corresponding value of k_0 is equal to 3.0827 \! \times \! 10^{-4} , under which the eigenvalues defined by equation (4.6) are 1.99 \! \times \! 10^{-5} , -2.49 \! \times \! 10^{-4} and -0.1124 , implying that the corresponding equilibrium solution is unstable. When we select A_1 \! = \! 2.5 \! \times \! 10^{-5} (below the critical point), the corresponding k_0 is equal to 3.0831 \! \times \! 10^{-4} , for which the eigenvalues are -4.61\times 10^{-5} , -2.45\times 10^{-4} and -0.12014 , indicating that the corresponding equilibrium solution is locally asymptotically stable.
Next, we turn to consider Hopf bifurcation which may occur from the equilibrium E_1 . To achieve this, we apply Theorem 1 to the equilibrium E_1 , where A_1 satisfies the polynomial equation F_1(A_1, k_0) \! = \! 0 in (4.5). Based on the cubic characteristic polynomial P_3(\lambda, A_1, k_0) \! = \! 0 , we apply the formula, \Delta_2(A_1, k_0) \! = \! a_1a_2 \!-\! a_3 , to solve the two polynomial equations, \Delta_2(A_1, k_0) \! = \! 0 and F_1(A_1, k_0) \! = \!0 , together with the parameter values given in (4.4), yielding three candidates for Hopf critical points: (k_{0H1}, \, A_{H1}) \! \approx \! (1.7681 \! \times \! 10^{-4}, \, 1.1148 \! \times \! 10^{-3}) , (2.5483 \! \times \! 10^{-4}, \, -2.9768 \! \times \! 10^{-5}) and (3.0912\times 10^{-4}, \, 3.3790\times 10^{-5}) . We only consider the biologically meaningful points with two positive entries to get two candidates for Hopf critical points: (k_{0H1}, A_{H1}) and (k_{0H3}, A_{H3}) . For these two solutions, we need to check if the eigenvalues defined by equation (4.6) contain a pair of purely imaginary eigenvalues. By a simple calculation, we find that the unique Hopf critical point is (k_{0H}, A_{H})\approx(1.7681\times 10^{-4}, 1.1148\times 10^{-3}) , which is shown in Figure 7. Note that at the critical point (k_{0H}, A_{H}) , other stability conditions given in Theorem 1 are still satisfied. Moreover, it can be shown that
\begin{equation} \left. \dfrac{ d \Delta_2(A_1(k_0),k_0)}{d k_0} \right|_{k_0 = k_{0H}} = \left. \dfrac{\partial \Delta_2}{\partial k_0} + \dfrac{\partial \Delta_2}{\partial A_1} \cdot \dfrac{d A_1}{d k_0} \right|_{k_0 = k_{0H}} = \left. \dfrac{\partial \Delta_2}{\partial k_0} - \dfrac{\partial \Delta_2}{\partial A_1} \cdot \dfrac{\frac{\partial F(A_1,k_0)}{\partial k_0}} {\frac{\partial F(A_1,k_0)}{\partial A_1}} \right|_{k_0 = k_{0H}} \gt 0. \end{equation} | (4.9) |
As a matter of fact, by using the Hopf critical value, we may numerically compute the Jacobian of system (2.1) at the equilibrium E_1 to get a purely imaginary pair and one negative real eigenvalues: \pm 1.0879 \! \times \! 10^{-3}\, i and -0.3362 . Therefore, on the equilibrium solution curve defined by F_1(k_0, A_1) \! = \! 0 (see Figure 8), the equilibrium E_1 is stable from the origin to the Hopf critical point (k_{0H}, A_{H}) , and unstable from (k_{0H}, A_{H}) to the saddle-node bifurcation point (k_{0sn}, A_{1sn}) , and then returns to stable from the saddle-node bifurcation point, as shown in Figure 8. This agrees with that observed in experiments and numerical simulations [12].
We have also used the MATCONT software package in Matlab to obtain the numerical bifurcation diagram, as depicted in Figure 9, which confirms our bifurcation diagram as given in Figure 8.
It is seen that all the four conditions \, {\rm C}_1 - {\rm C}_4 (given in the section of introduction) are satisfied for the network oscillating model (2.1). In particular, it is observed that there exists a "window", as shown in Figure 8 bounded by two vertical lines, between the Hopf and saddle-node bifurcation points. Therefore, the recurrence phenomenon occurs in this model when the values of the bifurcation parameter k_0 are chosen from the interval \, k_0 \! \in \! (k_{0H}, \, k_{0sn}) \! = \! (1.7681 \! \times \! 10^{-4}, \, 3.0827 \! \times \! 10^{-4}) .
Next, we present simulations to demonstrate the behavior changes of the solutions, showing a good agreement, in particular for the recurrence behavior as reported in [12]. With the parameter values given in (4.4), system (2.1) becomes
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} \dfrac{dA}{dt} = 0.25SA-300IA-0.0035A-k_0A+0.00007S,\\[0.3cm] \dfrac{dI}{dt} = 0.01k_0-Ik_0-300IA,\\[0.3cm] \dfrac{dS}{dt} = -0.25SA-k_0S-0.00007S+0.05k_0. \end{array} \end{equation} | (4.10) |
We have used the ode45 solver in Matlab for differential equations to simulate system (4.10) by varying the values of \, k_0\, in the interval \, k_0 \! \in\! (1.7681 \! \times \! 10^{-4}, \, 3.0827 \! \times \! 10^{-4}) \, to obtain the results, as shown in Figure 10.
It is seen from Figure 10 that the solutions of A are oscillating when the values of k_0 are chosen between k_{0H} and k_{0sn} to exhibit the relaxation behavior, showing that the method developed in [9,10,11] with the four conditions {\rm C_1} - {\rm C_4} to study recurrence phenomenon is an efficient approach. The period of oscillation increases with the increase of k_0 , as shown in Figure 11, indicating that the period goes to infinity as k_0 is varied towards the saddle-node bifurcation point, as expected. From a biological point of view, certain subtypes of some diseases are classified based on the patterns of this recurrent behavior [6]. Therefore, an improved understanding of recurrence phenomenon in autoimmune diseases is crucial in promoting correct diagnosis, patient management and treatment decisions. For the recurrence phenomenon studied in this paper, our method can be used to realistically explain complex dynamics in organic reactions and improve correct classification, management and utilization of energy resources.
Although in the previous section, we have identified the Hopf bifurcation and the transversality condition (see equation (4.9)) for model (2.1), we do not know whether the Hopf bifurcation is supercritical or subcritical, as well as post-critical behavior of the model. To answer this question, in this section we give a further study on the Hopf bifurcation from the equilibrium E_1 of the model, and use normal form theory to study stability of the bifurcating limit cycles. Assume that k_0 = k_{0H}+\mu = 0.000176806\cdots+\mu , where \mu is a small perturbation (bifurcation) parameter. Using the values given in (4.4), we introduce the following transformation,
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} \left(\begin{matrix} A\\ I\\ S \end{matrix}\right) = \left(\begin{matrix} A_1\\[0.5ex] \dfrac{k_{0H}+\mu}{100\left(300A_1+k_{0H}+\mu\right)}\\[2.0ex] \dfrac{k_{0H}+\mu}{20\left(\frac{A_1}{4}+k_{0H}+\mu+\frac{7}{10000}\right)} \end{matrix}\right)+T \left(\begin{matrix} x_1\\ x_2\\ x_3 \end{matrix}\right), \end{array} \end{equation} | (5.1) |
where
\begin{equation} T = \begin{array}{ll} \left[\begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & 1\\ -4.7373\cdots \times 10^{-3} &1.5401\cdots \times 10^{-5} &1.0021\cdots \\ -1.5142\cdots & 3.1346\cdots &1.2529\cdots \times 10^{-2} \end{matrix}\right], \end{array} \end{equation} | (5.2) |
into system (2.1) to obtain
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} \dfrac{dx_i}{dt} = G_i(x_1,x_2,x_3;\mu,A_1),\ \ \ i = 1,2,3, \end{array} \end{equation} | (5.3) |
where G_{1} , G_{2} and G_{3} are rational functions in x_{1} , x_{2} , x_{3} , \mu and A_{1} , as listed in Appendix.
Note in the above equations that we have used decimal points for convenience. Now, the relation between A_1 and \mu can be still determined by (4.5) with k_0 = k_{0H}+\mu . The Jacobian of system (5.3) evaluated at the origin, x_i = 0, \ i = 1, 2, 3 , and critical point, defined by \mu = 0 , with A_1 = 1.1147\cdots \times \! 10^{-3} (corresponding to the positive equilibrium E_1 for model (2.1)) is then in the Jordan canonical form:
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} \left[\begin{matrix} 0 & \omega_c & 0\\ -\omega_c & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & \alpha \end{matrix} \right], \end{array} \end{equation} | (5.4) |
where \omega_c = 1.0878\cdots \times 10^{-3} and \alpha = -0.3361\cdots . Next, by applying center manifold theory and normal form theory, one can obtain the normal form of the Hopf bifurcation for system (5.3), given in polar coordinates:
\begin{equation} \dot{r} = r\, (v_0\ \mu + v_1\, r^2 + \cdots ),\qquad \dot{\theta} = \omega_c+\tau_0\, \mu+\tau_1\, r^2 + \cdots, \end{equation} | (5.5) |
where r and \theta represent the amplitude and phase of oscillating motions (limit cycles), respectively. The coefficients v_0 and \tau_0 can be found from a linear analysis, while computing v_k and \tau_k ( k \ge 1 ) needs a nonlinear analysis. The v_k is called the k th-order focus value. The following theorem provides explicit formulas for computing v_0 and \tau_0 .
Theorem 2. [31] For the two-dimensional linear system,
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} \left(\, \begin{matrix} \dot{x_1}\\ \dot{x_2} \end{matrix}\, \right) = \left[\begin{matrix} a_{11} \, \mu & \omega+a_{12}\, \mu\\ -\omega+a_{21}\, \mu & a_{22}\, \mu \end{matrix}\right] \left(\, \begin{matrix} x_1\\ x_2 \end{matrix}\, \right), \end{array} \end{equation} | (5.6) |
the following formulas hold:
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} v_0 = \dfrac{1}{2}(a_{11}+a_{22}),\quad \tau_0 = \dfrac{1}{2}(a_{12}-a_{21}). \end{array} \end{equation} | (5.7) |
Based on the center manifold theory, in the vicinity of the Hopf critical point, the system is described on the center manifold of system (5.3) by a two-dimensional dynamical system. Then, applying the formula (5.7), we obtain
\begin{array}{ll} v_0& = \dfrac{1}{2}\left.\left(\dfrac{\partial^2G_1}{\partial x_1\partial \mu} +\dfrac{\partial^2G_2}{\partial x_2\partial \mu}\right) \right|_{x_i = 0,\, \mu = 0}\\[0.5cm] & = \dfrac{1}{2} \left[ \left(\dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_1}{\partial x_1})}{\partial \mu} + \dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_1}{\partial x_1})}{\partial A_1} \dfrac{\partial A_1}{\partial \mu}\right) + \left(\dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_2}{\partial x_2})}{\partial \mu} + \dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_2}{\partial x_2})}{\partial A_1} \dfrac{\partial A_1}{\partial \mu}\right) \right]_{x_i = 0,\, \mu = 0}\\[0.5cm] & = \dfrac{1}{2} \left[ \left(\dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_1}{\partial x_1})}{\partial \mu} - \dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_1}{\partial x_1})}{\partial A_1} \dfrac{\frac{\partial F(\mu,A_1)}{\partial \mu}}{\frac{\partial F(\mu,A_1)}{A_1}}\right) + \left(\dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_2}{\partial x_2})}{\partial \mu} - \dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_2}{\partial x_2})}{\partial A_1} \dfrac{\frac{\partial F(\mu,A_1)}{\partial \mu}}{\frac{\partial F(\mu,A_1)}{A_1}}\right) \right]_{x_i = 0,\, \mu = 0}\\[0.3cm] & = 1.4557\cdots,\\[0.3cm] \end{array} |
\begin{array}{ll} \tau_0& = \dfrac{1}{2}\left. \left(\dfrac{\partial^2G_1}{\partial x_2\partial \mu} -\dfrac{\partial^2G_2}{\partial x_1\partial \mu}\right) \right|_{x_i = 0,\, \mu = 0}\\[0.5cm] & = \dfrac{1}{2} \left[ \left(\dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_1}{\partial x_2})}{\partial \mu} + \dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_1}{\partial x_2})}{\partial A_1} \dfrac{\partial A_1}{\partial \mu}\right) - \left(\dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_2}{\partial x_1})}{\partial \mu} + \dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_2}{\partial x_1})}{\partial A_1} \dfrac{\partial A_1}{\partial \mu}\right) \right]_{x_i = 0,\, \mu = 0}\\[0.5cm] & = \dfrac{1}{2}\left.\left[ \left(\dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_1}{\partial x_2})}{\partial \mu} - \dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_1}{\partial x_2})}{\partial A_1} \dfrac{\frac{\partial F(\mu,A_1)}{\partial \mu}}{\frac{\partial F(\mu,A_1)}{A_1}}\right) - \left(\dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_2}{\partial x_1})}{\partial \mu} - \dfrac{\partial(\frac{\partial G_2}{\partial x_1})}{\partial A_1} \dfrac{\frac{\partial F(\mu,A_1)}{\partial \mu}}{\frac{\partial F(\mu,A_1)}{A_1}}\right) \right]\right|_{x_i = 0,\, \mu = 0}\\[0.3cm] & = 1.5389\cdots. \end{array} |
Next, letting \mu\! = \!0 , and A_1 \! = \! A_H = 0.001114785 in system (5.3), and then applying the Maple program [30] to the resulting system yields
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} v_1 = 36.6458\cdots,\quad \tau_1 = -54130.3501\cdots. \end{array} \end{equation} | (5.8) |
Therefore, the normal form associated with this Hopf bifurcation, up to third-order terms, is given by
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} \dot{r} = r\,(1.4557\mu+36.6458r^2) ,\\[0.3cm] \dot{\theta} = 0.0011+1.5389\mu-54130.350 r^2. \end{array} \end{equation} | (5.9) |
Note in (5.9) that v_0 = 1.4557 > 0 , which is indeed equivalent to the condition given in (4.9).
The steady-state solutions of Eq (5.9) are determined from \dot{r} = \dot{\theta} = 0 , yielding
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} \bar{r} = 0,\quad \bar{r}^2 \approx -\,0.0397\mu. \end{array} \end{equation} | (5.10) |
The solution \bar{r} = 0 represents the equilibrium E_1 of model (2.1). A linear analysis on the first differential equation of (5.9) shows that \frac{d}{dr}(\frac{dr}{dt})|_{\bar{r} = 0} = v_0\mu , and thus \bar{r} = 0\ (i.e., the equilibrium E_1 ) is stable (unstable) for \mu < 0\ (>0) , as expected. When \mu is decreased from positive to cross zero, a Hopf bifurcation occurs and the amplitude of the bifurcating limit cycles is approximated by the nonzero steady state solution,
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} \bar{r}\approx 0.1993 \sqrt{-\mu},\quad \ (\mu \lt 0). \end{array} \end{equation} | (5.11) |
Since \frac{d}{dr}(\frac{dr}{dt})|_{ (5.11)} = 2v_1\bar{r}^2 = -2v_0\mu > 0\ \ (\mu < 0, v_0 > 0, v_1 > 0) , the Hopf bifurcation is subcritical and so the bifurcating limit cycles are unstable. Equation (5.11) gives the approximate amplitude of the bifurcating limit cycles, while the phase of the motion is determined by \theta = \omega t , where \omega is given by
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} \omega = \left. \dot{\theta}\right|_{ (5.11)} \approx 0.0011+2151.7875 \mu. \end{array} \end{equation} | (5.12) |
Further, by simulation we find that the stable region before the Hopf critical point as shown in Figure 8 (i.e., for k_0 \! \in \! (0, \, k_{0H}) ) can be divided into two parts for the equilibrium: globally asymptotically stable and locally asymptotically stable. The approximate value of the dividing point can be obtained as follows: Recalling k_{0H} \! = \! 0.000176806 , we choose k_0 \! = \! 0.00014466350 and two initial points (A, I, S) \! = \! (1, 1, 1) and (0.001, \, 0.000005, \, 0.016) for simulation and obtain the results as shown in Figures 12 and 13, respectively. It is seen that the trajectory starting from the first initial point converges to a stable limit cycle, while that starting from the second critical point converges to the equilibrium E_1 . Moreover, we choose k_0 \! = \! 0.00014466348 and the initial point (A, I, S) = (1, 1, 1) to obtain the result, as depicted in Figure 14, showing that the trajectory eventually converges to the equilibrium E_1 even from a far away initial point, which implies that the equilibrium E_1 is globally asymptotically stable for this value of k_0 . Thus, the approximate value of the point dividing global stability and local stability is k_0 \approx 0.00014466348 .
The subcritical Hopf bifurcation found above implies that there exists an unstable limit cycle, restricted on a local invariant manifold, between the stable equilibrium {\rm E_1} and a stable (outer) limit cycle. This yields a different bistable phenomenon due to bifurcation of multiple limit cycles, which involves a stable equilibrium and a stable periodic motion, different from the classical bistable phenomenon which only contains two stable equilibria.
In this paper, we have introduced a new method to study certain type of slow-fast motions in dynamical systems. This approach is based on dynamical system theory and can be easily applied to identify sustained oscillations. In particular, when the geometric singular perturbation theory (GSPT) fails to investigate such slow-fast motions, our method may work quite well. The basic idea of this new method is to identify a "window" in bifurcation diagrams between Hopf bifurcation and saddle-node/transcritical bifurcation. This approach has been applied to many biological systems to study such slow-fast motions (e.g., see [1,9,10,11,31]). It has been shown that this approach is quite convenient in application and works well for higher-dimensional dynamical systems which involve multiple parameters. The key step is to determine Hopf critical points.
In this work, the new method has been applied to analyze an oscillating network model of biologically relevant organic reactions and confirmed the recurrence behaviour found in [12] based on numerical simulations and experiments. Bifurcation analysis is given to identify saddle-node and Hopf bifurcations and particularly to determine the bifurcation window, which yields the recurrence phenomenon. Simulations are also present to verify the analytical predictions, showing a very good agreement between the simulations and predictions. Moreover, normal form theory is applied to determine that the Hopf bifurcation is subcritical and the equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable near the Hopf critical point, yielding an unstable limit cycle, restricted on an invariant manifold, between the stable equilibrium and the outer stable limit cycle. This bistable phenomenon may explain some special complex dynamics occurring in this model. Further, a critical point is numerically identified, which divides the equilibrium solution into two parts: one is globally asymptotically stable and the other is locally asymptotically stable. The recurrence phenomenon studied in this paper for this kinetic model may be one of the sources of generating complex dynamics in biological systems or even more generally in real physical systems. It is anticipated that the method used in this paper can be applied to study other nonlinear dynamical systems.
However, even the new method can be applied to consider higher-dimensional dynamical systems, it may not applicable for some simple systems such as the van der Pol's equation (1.6). This implies that a slow-fast motion in dynamical systems can be in general very complex, which may involve several "modes" in different time scales. The GSPT can be used to analyze a part of such systems if such a system can be put in the form of singularly perturbed differential systems, while our method can solve a part of such systems if the four conditions {\rm C_1} - {\rm C_4} are satisfied for such a system, which does not need the singular perturbation frame. We have shown that the two approaches can work for different systems: the slow-fast motion in the van der Pol's equation (1.5) can be analyzed by the GSPT, but not by our method; while the slow-fast motion in the 2-d HIV model (1.6) can be investigated by our method, but not by the GSPT. We also found that for some systems, both methods are applicable. For example, consider the following SIS epidemic model [32]:
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} \dfrac{dS}{dt} = b_1 N \Big( 1 -\dfrac{N}{K_1} \Big) - d_1 S - \beta S ( I+ \sigma I^2) + \gamma_1 I, \\[1.5ex] \dfrac{d I}{dt} = \beta S (I+ \sigma I^2 ) - (d_1 + \alpha_1 + \gamma_1) I, \end{array} \end{equation} | (6.1) |
which, by taking N = S+I , can be put in the following form,
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} \dfrac{d I}{dt} = \big[ \beta (N-I) (1+ \sigma I ) - (d_1 + \alpha_1 + \gamma_1) \big]\, I, \\[1.5ex] \dfrac{dN}{dt} = b_1 N \Big( 1 -\dfrac{N}{K_1} \Big) - d_1 N - \sigma I. \end{array} \end{equation} | (6.2) |
Here, S and I denote the numbers of susceptible and infected individuals, respectively, and N is the total population size. b_1 is the per-capita maximum birth rate, and K_1 reflects the effect of total population size on the birth. d_1 and \alpha_1 are the per-capita natural and disease-related death rates respectively, and \gamma_1 is the per-capita recovery rate. All the parameters take real positive values. In [32], it is assumed that b_1 , d_1 and \alpha_1 are small, compared with other parameters, and so letting
b_1 = \varepsilon_1 \, b_2, \quad d_1 = \varepsilon_1 \, d_2, \quad \alpha_1 = \varepsilon_1 \, \alpha_2, \quad (0 \lt \varepsilon_1 \ll 1), |
and introducing
c_2 = b_2 - d_2, \quad K_2 = \dfrac{K_1(b_2-d_2)}{b_2}, \quad \gamma_1 = \gamma_2 + \varepsilon_1 (\lambda_1 - d_2 - \alpha_2), |
into (6.2) yields
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} \dfrac{d I}{dt} = \big[ \beta (N-I) (1+ \sigma I ) - ( \varepsilon_1 \lambda_1 + \gamma_2 ) \big]\, I, \\[1.5ex] \dfrac{dN}{dt} = \varepsilon_1 \Big[ c_2 N \Big( 1 -\dfrac{N}{K_2} \Big) - \alpha_2 I \Big], \end{array} \end{equation} | (6.3) |
which now becomes a singularly perturbed system, where \lambda_1 may be negative, \varepsilon_1 and |\lambda_1 | are chosen small enough so that \gamma_2 > 0 . Further, applying the scaling:
I = \dfrac{u}{\sigma}, \ \ N = \dfrac{v}{\sigma}, \ \ t = \dfrac{\sigma}{\beta}\, t', \ \ \varepsilon = \dfrac{c_1 \sigma}{\beta} \varepsilon_1, \ \ \gamma = \sqrt{ \frac{\sigma \gamma_2}{\beta}}, \ \ k = \frac{1}{K_2 \sigma}, \ \ \mu = \frac{\alpha_2}{c_2}, \ \ \lambda = \dfrac{\lambda_1}{c_2}, |
to (6.3) yields the following dimensionless system:
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} \dfrac{d I}{dt'} = \big[ (v-u)(1+u) - (\varepsilon \lambda + \gamma^2) \big]\, u, \\[1.5ex] \dfrac{dv}{dt'} = \varepsilon \Big[ v ( 1- k v) - \mu u \Big], \end{array} \end{equation} | (6.4) |
where u and v are the fast and slow variables, respectively. Then, the critical manifold (slow manifold) is given (setting \varepsilon = 0 ) by
v = u + \dfrac{\gamma^2}{1+u}, |
which indeed, together with fast manifolds, can form closed loops, as shown in Figure 15.
Numerical simulations for \varepsilon = 0.001, \, \gamma = \mu = \lambda = 3, \ k = 0.101074 are depicted in Figure 16, which clearly shows a slow-fast motion – canard cycle. This result can also be obtained by applying our method to the non-scaled system (6.2).
Finally, we should point out that unlike the GSPT theory which has been developed for more than 40 years and established a fundamental mathematical theory, our new method needs further research to develop a rigorous mathematical theory, in particular, for the existence of the "window". In other words, how to define/obtain the exact conditions under which the window exists and oscillations continuously exist for the whole window, from the Hopf critical point (which induces oscillations) to the saddle-node/transcritical bifurcation point (which ends the oscillation)? Further study is needed to improve our simple and efficient method with a well established mathematical theory.
This work was partially supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (No. R2686A2). The comments and suggestions received from the anonymous reviewer is greatly appreciated.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
The rational functions G_{1} , G_{2} and G_{3} in (5.3) are given below. In Maple calculation, the accuracy is taken up to 100 digits, but here only up to 6 digits are present for brevity.
\begin{array}{rl} & G_1(x_1,x_2,x_3;\mu,A_1) = \dfrac{1}{(A_1 +0.00099 +4\mu)(A_1 +5.89355 \times 10^{-7} +0.00333\mu)} \\[1.0ex] & \times \Big\{ \big[ 1.64244\times 10^{-11} -0.28933\times 10^{-5} A_1 +0.02418 A_1^2 -0.99530 A_1^3 + (1.24609\times 10^{-9} \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +0.03368 A_1 -2.49638 A_1^2) x_1 +(1.23349\times 10^{-9} +0.87868\times 10^{-3} A_1 +3.12237 A_1^2) x_2 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +(3.42734\times 10^{-9} +0.03579 A_1 -2.51329 A_1^2 )x_3 -(0.21112\times 10^{-5} +1.49638 A_1 )x_1^2 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad -(0.35459\times 10^{-5} +2.51329 A_1) x_3^2 +(0.44053\times 10^{-5} +3.12237 A_1 ) x_1 x_2 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad -(0.56571\times 10^{-5} +4.00968 A_1 ) x_1 x_3 +(0.44053\times 10^{-5} +3.12237 A_1 ) x_2 x_3 \big] \mu +o(\mu^2) \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +1.45197 \times 10^{-15} +7.29439\times 10^{-10} A_1 +0.34241\times 10^{-5} A_1^2 -0.00366 A_1^3 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +(-0.00414 A_1^2 -0.37378 A_1^3 +0.50749 \times 10^{ -5} A_1 -6.68597\times 10^{-13}) x_1 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +(0.98883\times 10^{-3} A_1^2 +0.77994 A_1^3 +2.16179\times 10^{-7} A_1 +1.27063\times 10^{-13}) x_2 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +(0.53544\times 10^{-5} A_1 -0.00410 A_1^2 -0.62780 A_1^3 -5.03838\times 10^{-13})x_3 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +( -0.36923\times 10^{-3} A_1 -0.37378 A_1^2 -2.17478\times 10^{-10}) x_1^2 +(-3.65271\times 10^{-10} \\[0.5ex] &\qquad -0.62780 A_1^2 -0.62015\times 10^{ -3} A_1) x_3^2 +(-5.82749\times 10^{-10} -1.00158 A_1^2 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad -0.98938\times 10^{ -3} A_1) x_1 x_3 +(4.53792\times 10^{-10} +0.77994 A_1^2 +0.77044\times 10^{-3} A_1) x_1 x_2 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +(4.53792\times 10^{-10} +0.77994 A_1^2 +0.77044\times 10^{-3} A_1) x_2 x_3 \Big\} \end{array} |
\begin{array}{rl} & G_2(x_1,x_2,x_3;\mu,A_1) = \dfrac{1}{(A_1+0.00099+4\mu)(A_1 +5.89355 \times 10^{-7} +0.00333\mu)} \\[1.0ex] & \times \Big\{ \big[ +7.93372\times 10^{-12} -0.13976\times 10^{-5} A_1 +0.01168 A_1^2 -0.48077 A_1^3 +(5.03409\times 10^{-8} \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +0.00131 A_1 -0.26205 A_1^2) x_1 -(1.38001\times 10^{-9} +0.00155 A_1 +0.49252 A_1^2) x_2 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +(5.04385\times 10^{-8}+0.00139 A_1 +3.58251 A_1^2) x_3 -(3.69712\times 10^{-7} +0.26205 A_1) x_1^2 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +(0.50544\times 10^{-5} +3.58251 A_1) x_3^2 +(7.15993\times10^{-7} +0.50748 A_1) x_1 x_2 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +(0.46847\times 10^{-5} + 3.32046 A_1) x_1 x_3 +(7.15993\times 10^{-7} +0.50748 A_1) x_2 x_3 \big] \mu +o(\mu^2) \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +7.01367\times 10^{ -16} +0.16539\times 10^{-5} A_1^2 +3.52351\times 10^{ -10} A_1 -0.00177 A_1^3 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +(5.04644\times 10^{ -12} -2.44020\times 10^{ -7} A_1 -0.00176 A_1^2 -0.06546 A_1^3 )x_1 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad -(8.22215\times 10^{ -14} +1.39521\times 10^{ -7} A_1 +0.16095\times 10^{-4} A_1^2 -0.12677 A_1^3 )x_2 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +(5.05649\times 10^{ -12} -2.26386\times 10^{ -7} A_1 -0.00079 A_1^2 +0.89488 A_1^3 )x_3 -(3.80846\times 10^{ -11} \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +0.64659\times 10^{-4} A_1 +0.06546 A_1^2 ) x_1^2 + (5.20666\times 10^{ -10} +0.00088 A_1 +0.89488 A_1^2) x_3^2 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +(7.37555\times 10^{ -11} +0.00013 A_1 +0.12677 A_1^2 ) x_1 x_2 +(4.82581\times 10^{ -10} +0.00082 A_1 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +0.82942 A_1^2) x_1 x_3 +(7.37555\times 10^{ -11} +0.00013 A_1 +0.12677 A_1^2) x_2 x_3 \big\} \end{array} |
\begin{array}{rl} & G_3(x_1,x_2,x_3;\mu,A_1) = \dfrac{1}{(A_1+0.00099+4\mu)(A_1+5.89355 \times 10^{-7} +0.00333\mu)} \\[1.0ex] & \times \Big\{ \big[ 7.75215\times 10^{ -14} -1.36559\times 10^{ -8} A_1 +0.00011 A_1^2 -0.00469 A_1^3 -(0.16909\times 10^{-4} \\[0.5ex] &\qquad +0.00980 A_1 -5.67043 A_1^2) x_1 +(5.82800\times 10^{ -12} +0.41256\times 10^{-5} A_1 -0.03705 A_1^2 ) x_2 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad -(0.16910\times 10^{-4} +0.01319 A_1 +1202.01 A_1^2 ) x_3 +(0.80002\times 10^{-5} +5.67043 A_1 ) x_1^2 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad -(0.00169 +1201.01 A_1 ) x_3^2 -(5.22791\times 10^{ -9} +0.00371 A_1 ) x_1 x_2 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad -(0.00169 +1195.34 A_1 ) x_1 x_3 -(5.22791\times 10^{ -9} +0.00371 A_1 ) x_2 x_3 \big] \mu +o(\mu^2) \\[0.5ex] & \qquad +6.85315\times 10^{ -18} +3.44287\times 10^{ -12} A_1 +1.61613\times 10^{ -8} A_1^2 -0.17273\times 10^{-4} A_1^3 \\[0.5ex] & \qquad -(1.74180\times 10^{ -9} +0.17387\times 10^{-5} A_1 -0.00138 A_1^2 -1.41643 A_1^3 ) x_1 +(6.00351\times 10^{ -16} \\[0.5ex] & \qquad +1.01873\times 10^{ -9} A_1 +1.17522\times 10^{ -7} A_1^2 -0.00093 A_1^3 )x_2 -(1.74191\times 10^{ -9} \\[0.5ex] & \qquad +0.20882\times 10^{-5} A_1 +0.29654 A_1^2 +300.003 A_1^3 ) x_3 +(8.24116\times 10^{ -10} +0.00139 A_1 \\[0.5ex] & \qquad +1.41643 A_1^2) x_1^2 -(1.74549\times 10^{ -7} +0.29635 A_1 +300.003 A_1^2 ) x_3^2 -(5.38535\times 10^{ -13} \\[0.5ex] & \qquad +9.14315\times 10^{ -7} A_1 +0.00093 A_1^2 ) x_1 x_2 -(1.73726\times 10^{ -7} +0.29495 A_1 +298.587 A_1^2 ) x_1 x_3 \\[0.5ex] &\qquad -(5.38535\times 10^{ -13} +9.14315\times 10^{ -7} A_1 +0.00093 A_1^2 ) x_3 x_2 \Big\} . \end{array} |
[1] | Lässig R, Eisenhut M, Mathias A, et al. (2012) Serienproduktion von hochfesten Faserverbundbauteilen: VDMA Verlag. |
[2] | Schürmann H (2007) Konstruieren mit Faser-Kunststoff-Verbunden. Berlin: Springer. 672 S. p. |
[3] | Vassilopoulos AP, Keller T (2011) Fatigue of fiber-reinforced composites. London: Springer. 238 S. p. |
[4] | Fertig III RS, Kenik DJ (2011) Predicting Composite Fatigue Life Using Constituent-Level Physics. AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. Denver, Colorado. |
[5] | Krüger H (2012) Ein physikalisch basiertes Ermüdungsschädigungsmodell zur Degradationsberechnung von Faser-Kunststoff-Verbunden [Ph.D Thesis]: Leibniz-Universität Hannover. |
[6] | Talreja R, Singh CV (2012) Damage and Failure of Composite Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-304 p. |
[7] | Salkind MJ (2011) Fatigue of Composites. Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Second Conference). Philadelphia. |
[8] | Kensche CW (1996) Fatigue of materials and components for wind turbine rotor blades. Brussels: German Aerospace Research Establishment. |
[9] | Harris B (2003) Fatigue in composites science and technology of the fatigue response of fibre-reinforced plastics. Boca Raton: Elsevier Science Ltd 742 S. p. |
[10] |
Pandita SD, Huysmans G, Wevers M, et al. (2001) Tensile fatigue behaviour of glass plain-weave fabric composites in on- and off-axis directions. Compos Part A-Appl S 32: 1533-1539. doi: 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00053-7
![]() |
[11] |
Kawai M, Yajima S, Hachinohe A, et al. (2001) High-temperature off-axis fatigue behaviour of unidirectional carbon-fibre-reinforced composites with different resin matrices. Compos Sci Technol 61: 1285-1302. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00027-6
![]() |
[12] |
Quaresimin M, Susmel L, Talreja R (2010) Fatigue behaviour and life assessment of composite laminates under multiaxial loadings. Int J Fatigue 32: 2-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.012
![]() |
[13] |
Kawai M (2004) A phenomenological model for off-axis fatigue behavior of unidirectional polymer matrix composites under different stress ratios. Compos Part A-Appl S 35: 955-963. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.01.004
![]() |
[14] |
Kawai M, Kato K (2006) Effects of R-ratio on the off-axis fatigue behavior of unidirectional hybrid GFRP/Al laminates at room temperature. Int J Fatigue 28: 1226-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.020
![]() |
[15] |
Vassilopoulos AP, Manshadi BD, Keller T (2010) Influence of the constant life diagram formulation on the fatigue life prediction of composite materials. Int J Fatigue 32: 659-669. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.09.008
![]() |
[16] |
Flore D, Wegener K (2016) Modelling the mean stress effect on fatigue life of fibre reinforced plastics. Int J Fatigue 82: 689-699. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.09.027
![]() |
[17] |
Van Paepegem W, Degrieck J (2001) Fatigue damage modeling of fibre-reinforced composite materials: review. Appl Mech Rev 54: 279-300. doi: 10.1115/1.1381395
![]() |
[18] | Kawai M, Teranuma T (2012) A multiaxial fatigue failure criterion based on the principal constant life diagrams for unidirectional carbon/epoxy laminates. Compos Part A 43: 1252-1266. |
[19] | Papanicolaou GC, Zaoutsos SP (2011) Viscoelastic constitutive modeling of creep and stress relaxation in polymers and polymer matrix composites. In: Guedes RM, editor. Creep and fatigue in polymer matrix composites. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited. pp. 572. |
[20] | Dillard DA (1990) Viscoelastic Behavior of Laminated Composite Materials. In: Reifsnider KL, editor. Fatigue of Composite Materials: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.,. |
[21] |
Song J, Wen WD, Cui HT, et al. (2015) Effects of temperature and fiber volume fraction on mechanical properties of T300/QY8911-IV composites. J Reinf Plast Comp 34: 157-172. doi: 10.1177/0731684414565939
![]() |
[22] | Vasiliev VV, Morozov EV (2013) Advanced mechanics of composite materials and structural elements. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 818 S. p. |
[23] | Rejab MRM, Theng CW, Rahman MM, et al. An Investigation into the Effects of Fibre Volume Fraction on GFRP Plate; 2008. |
[24] |
Karahan M (2012) The effect of fibre volume fraction on damage initiation and propagation of woven carbon-epoxy multi-layer composites. Text Res J 82: 45-61. doi: 10.1177/0040517511416282
![]() |
[25] |
He HW, Gao F (2015) Effect of Fiber Volume Fraction on the Flexural Properties of Unidirectional Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composites. Int J Polym Anal Ch 20: 180-189. doi: 10.1080/1023666X.2015.989076
![]() |
[26] |
Allah MHA, Abdin EM, Selmy AI, et al. (1996) Effect of fibre volume fraction on the fatigue behaviour of grp pultruded rod composites. Compos Sci Technol 56: 23-29. doi: 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00125-5
![]() |
[27] |
Mini KM, Lakshmanan M, Mathew L, et al. (2012) Effect of fibre volume fraction on fatigue behaviour of glass fibre reinforced composite. Fatigue Fract Eng M 35: 1160-1166. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2012.01709.x
![]() |
[28] | Samborsky DD, Mandell JF, Cairns DS (2002) Sandia Contractors report-Fatigue of composite materials and substructures for wind turbine blades. Montana State University. |
[29] |
Barbero EJ, Trovillion J, Mayugo JA, et al. (2006) Finite element modeling of plain weave fabrics from photomicrograph measurements. Compos Struct 73: 41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.030
![]() |
[30] |
Kuhn JL, Charalambides PG (1999) Modeling of plain weave fabric composite geometry. J Compos Mater 33: 188-220. doi: 10.1177/002199839903300301
![]() |
[31] |
Sun CT, Vaidya RS (1996) Prediction of composite properties, from a representative volume element. Compos Sci Technol 56: 171-179. doi: 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00141-7
![]() |
[32] | Talreja R, Singh CV (2012) Damage and Failure of Composite Materials. Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1-304 p. |
[33] |
Kennedy CR, Bradaigh CMO, Leen SB (2013) A multiaxial fatigue damage model for fibre reinforced polymer composites. Compos Struct 106: 201-210. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.024
![]() |
[34] | Stellbrink K (1996) Micromechanics of Composites: Composite Properties of Fibre and Matrix Constituents. Cincinnati: Hanser. |
[35] | Pristavok J (2006) Mikromechanische Untersuchung an Epoxidharz Glasfaser Verbunden unter zyklischer Beanspruchung [Ph.D. Thesis]: Technische Universität Dresden. |
[36] |
Soden PD, Hinton MJ, Kaddour AS (1998) Lamina properties, lay-up configurations and loading conditions for a range of fibre-reinforced composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol 58: 1011-1022. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00078-5
![]() |
[37] |
Hashin Z (1980) Failure Criteria for Unidirectional Fiber Composites. J Appl Mech-T Asme 47: 329-334. doi: 10.1115/1.3153664
![]() |
[38] | Miner MA (1945) Cumulative Damage in Fatigue. J Appl Mech-T Asme 12: A159-A164. |
[39] |
Van Paepegem W, Degrieck J (2002) Effects of load sequence and block loading on the fatigue response of fiber-reinforced composites. Mech Adv Mater Struc 9: 19-35. doi: 10.1080/153764902317224851
![]() |
1. | Wenjing Zhang, Leif Ellingson, Federico Frascoli, Jane Heffernan, An investigation of tuberculosis progression revealing the role of macrophages apoptosis via sensitivity and bifurcation analysis, 2021, 83, 0303-6812, 10.1007/s00285-021-01655-6 | |
2. | Rossella Della Marca, Maria da Piedade Machado Ramos, Carolina Ribeiro, Ana Jacinta Soares, Mathematical modelling of oscillating patterns for chronic autoimmune diseases, 2022, 45, 0170-4214, 7144, 10.1002/mma.8229 |