Group | λ (nm) | Diode | ED (J/cm2) | P (mW) | E (J) | TE (J) | A (cm2) | T (s) |
PBM | 808 | GaAlAs | 20 | 25 | 0,825 | 0,825 | 0,02 | 33 |
Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease that affects the synovial joints. Low-level laser photobiomodulation (LLLT) has microcirculatory, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory effects. In this paper, the percentage of collagen fibrils and IL-6 protein expression in the synovia were measured to evaluate the effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) with LLLT (λ = 808 nm) on the morphology. Eighteen female Wistar rats were assigned into three groups: Control, Sham, and PBM. To induce arthritis, animals from the Sham and PBM groups received one intraarticular dose of zymosan (200 µg) under anesthesia. Twenty-four hours after induction, an LLLT treatment (λ = 808 nm, 25 mW nominal power, fluence of 20J/cm2, beam area of 0.02 mm2, time of 33 s, total energy of 0.825 J) was applied. Seven days after induction, samples from the animals' knees were subjected to histological and morphometric analyses, and the percentage of collagen fibers in the synovial area (% total area) with and without polarized light and IL-6 protein expression were measured by immunohistochemistry. Statistical analyses were performed an ANOVA and Tukey's post-test with p < 0.05 to compare the experimental groups using. Inflammation of the synovial region showed significant differences between Sham vs. Control, p < 0.0001, and PBM vs. Sham, p < 0.001. The areas of collagen fibers (total percentage) showed differences between Sham vs. Control, p < 0.0001, and Sham vs. PBM, p = 0.0149. IL-6 showed differences between Sham vs. Control and PBM vs. Sham, p < 0.001. Treatment with PBM using LLLT showed decreased synovial inflammation, collagen fiber formation, fibrosis, and IL-6 protein expression, and consequently decreased joint degradation.
Citation: Luiz Felipe Barreta, Danielly Mandato Oliveira, Bruna Silva Gomes, Sabrina Zanchetta Lanza, Marcelo Augusto Marretto Esquisatto, Gaspar de Jesus Lopes-Filho, Fernando Russo Costa do Bomfim. Photobiomodulation with low-level laser (λ = 808nm) to treat experimental rheumatoid arthritis: A morphological study, collagen fiber analysis and IL-6 protein expression[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2025, 12(2): 122-132. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2025008
[1] | Sarika Amdekar, Avnish Kumar, Vinod Singh . Transcriptional activity of cytokines induced by oral administration of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus acidophilus in experimental model of arthritis. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(2): 164-174. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.2.164 |
[2] | Marwa M. Esawy, Amir Abd-elhameed, Alshimaa L. Abdallah, Maha E. Alsadik, Elsayed S. Abd elbaser, Marwa A. Shabana, Rania M. Abdullah . Long noncoding RNA HULC is an independent predictor of COVID-19 severity and mortality in relation to microRNA-9 and IL-6. AIMS Molecular Science, 2022, 9(2): 79-90. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2022005 |
[3] | Radwa El-Sayed Mahmoud Marie, Aya Mohamed kamal Lasheen, Hebat-Allah Hassan Nashaat, Mona A. Atwa . Assessment of serum interleukin 19 level in patients with warts. AIMS Molecular Science, 2023, 10(1): 1-10. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2023001 |
[4] | Dimitra Beroukas, Maurice Selhorst, Stuart M. Pitson, Dusan Matusica, Ian L. Gibbins, Michaela Kress, Rainer V. Haberberger . Sphingosine kinase 1 in murine dorsal root ganglia. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 1(1): 22-33. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.1.22 |
[5] | Mairembam Stelin Singh, PV Parvati Sai Arun, Mairaj Ahmed Ansari . Unveiling common markers in COVID-19: ADAMTS2, PCSK9, and OLAH emerged as key differential gene expression profiles in PBMCs across diverse disease conditions. AIMS Molecular Science, 2024, 11(2): 189-205. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2024011 |
[6] | Noor Riyadh Thiab, Nicola King, Mary McMillan, Amer Almashhadany, Graham L Jones . Age-related protein and mRNA expression of glutathione peroxidases (GPx) and Hsp-70 in different regions of rat kidney with and without stressor. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(2): 125-137. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.2.125 |
[7] | Vahid Pouresmaeil, Marwa Mawlood Salman Al-zand, Aida Pouresmaeil, Seyedeh Samira Saghravanian, Masoud Homayouni Tabrizi . Loading diltiazem onto surface-modified nanostructured lipid carriers to evaluate its apoptotic, cytotoxic, and inflammatory effects on human breast cancer cells. AIMS Molecular Science, 2024, 11(3): 231-250. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2024014 |
[8] | Geovanni Alberto Ruiz-Romero, Carolina Álvarez-Delgado . Effects of estrogens in mitochondria: An approach to type 2 diabetes. AIMS Molecular Science, 2024, 11(1): 72-98. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2024006 |
[9] | J.R. Calvo, M.D. Maldonado . The role of melatonin in autoimmune and atopic diseases. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(2): 158-186. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.2.158 |
[10] | Fazle Khuda, Nur Najmi Mohamad Anuar, Badiah Baharin, Nurrul Shaqinah Nasruddin . A mini review on the associations of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) -1, -8, -13 with periodontal disease. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(1): 13-31. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021002 |
Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease that affects the synovial joints. Low-level laser photobiomodulation (LLLT) has microcirculatory, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory effects. In this paper, the percentage of collagen fibrils and IL-6 protein expression in the synovia were measured to evaluate the effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) with LLLT (λ = 808 nm) on the morphology. Eighteen female Wistar rats were assigned into three groups: Control, Sham, and PBM. To induce arthritis, animals from the Sham and PBM groups received one intraarticular dose of zymosan (200 µg) under anesthesia. Twenty-four hours after induction, an LLLT treatment (λ = 808 nm, 25 mW nominal power, fluence of 20J/cm2, beam area of 0.02 mm2, time of 33 s, total energy of 0.825 J) was applied. Seven days after induction, samples from the animals' knees were subjected to histological and morphometric analyses, and the percentage of collagen fibers in the synovial area (% total area) with and without polarized light and IL-6 protein expression were measured by immunohistochemistry. Statistical analyses were performed an ANOVA and Tukey's post-test with p < 0.05 to compare the experimental groups using. Inflammation of the synovial region showed significant differences between Sham vs. Control, p < 0.0001, and PBM vs. Sham, p < 0.001. The areas of collagen fibers (total percentage) showed differences between Sham vs. Control, p < 0.0001, and Sham vs. PBM, p = 0.0149. IL-6 showed differences between Sham vs. Control and PBM vs. Sham, p < 0.001. Treatment with PBM using LLLT showed decreased synovial inflammation, collagen fiber formation, fibrosis, and IL-6 protein expression, and consequently decreased joint degradation.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune and inflammatory disease. Symptoms include, pain, swelling, heat, morning fatigue, and stiffness. Synovial membrane damage impacts joint inflammation bone and cartilage destruction, which can cause progressive damage and loss of function [1].
RA is a disease that has a worldwide prevalence of 0.5–1%. It can occur in any race and ethnic group; however, it mostly affects North Americans and the population of Northern Europe. Women are three times more likely to develop RA throughout their lives compared to men, and the age range is from 35 to 50 years [2]. Treatments for RA consist of drug combinations, physical exercises, disease understanding, and diet, which collectively aim to achieve complete remission or at least significantly reduce the incidence of joint damage, disability, and systemic manifestations [3],[4].
Photobiomodulation (PBM) with a low-level laser (LLL) (i.e., LLLT) is a non-invasive and sterile treatment which provides inflammation control and pain reduction. PBM has photochemical, photophysical, and photobiological therapeutic effects capable of altering the cellular behavior, thus improving tissue repair [5],[6].
LLLs have proprieties to improve cellular oxygenation through the production of ATP associated with neo angiogenesis by increasing microcirculation and accelerating the repair of injured tissues [7],[8]. In addition, treatment with LLLT shows analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects [9].
Most studies have used multiple sessions of PBM with laser therapy, unlike our study, which uses a single dose laser to promote PBM [5]–[9]. Another important point is an early collagen fiber analysis, which is not commonly used but has been shown to be an important biomarker for the disease prognosis [4].
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of PBM with single dose of LLL (λ = 808 nm) on the morphology and percentage of collagen fibers in the synovial region of Wistar rats in an experimental model of RA.
This study was performed with approval by the Animal Ethics Care Committee–CEUA of Hermínio Ometto Foundation, protocol number 025/2021. All the experiments were conducted using the ARRIVE guidelines, which are recommended by the National Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA) of the Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation.
Thirty-six female Wistar rats (60 days old, 180 ± 20 g) were kept in light-dark cycles of 12 hours each, with food and water ad libitum throughout all experimental periods. There were randomly assigned into three groups (n = 12): Control (without arthritis), Sham (arthritis induced with Zymosan), and PBM (arthritis induced with Zymosan and treated with PBM). At time zero, after the administration of Ketamine (30 mg/kg) and Xylazine (10 mg/kg), animals of the Sham and PBM groups underwent intra-articular injections of Zymosan (200 µg) in the right knee of the hind limb [10].
Twenty-four hours after the induction of arthritis by Zymosan, animals of the PBM group were anesthetized with Ketamine [30 mg/kg]-Xylazine [10 mg/kg] and received treatment with PBM by a LLL with a Gallium Aluminum Arsenide device (GaAlAs, Magnus Plus model, DMC Equipamentos, São Carlos, Brazil), with the following parameters: λ = 808nm, nominal power = 25 mW, fluence = 20 J/cm2, area = 0.02mm2, time = 33 s, E = 0.825 J (per point/total), and punctual application in the right patellar region by a single dose application (Table 1) [10]. The Control and Sham groups received treatments with the laser turned off, thereby simulating time and stress that can be caused.
Group | λ (nm) | Diode | ED (J/cm2) | P (mW) | E (J) | TE (J) | A (cm2) | T (s) |
PBM | 808 | GaAlAs | 20 | 25 | 0,825 | 0,825 | 0,02 | 33 |
The euthanasia of the animals occurred after seven days with an anesthetic plan (3:1) of Ketamine (90 mg/kg) and Xylazine (30 mg/kg); additionally, cervical dislocation was used as a second physical method for euthanasia after confirming the absence of ocular and plantar reflexes. Samples were collected from the right knee, at the hip-femoral level, and from the joints of the hind limbs for morphometric analyses and the percentage of collagen fibers [11].
Samples of the animals' knees were kept in Millonig buffer and were processed using a standard histological protocol (decalcification, dehydration, clearing, paraffinization, and embedding of histological pieces). Morphometric analyses of the inflammatory areas of the synovium (Hematoxylin and Eosin) and the percentage of collagen fibers in the area (% total area [104 µm] - Picro-Sirius red) with and without polarized light were performed [10],[12].
Histological sections were prepared with 5 µM thickness and the slides were stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE). For the morphological evaluation, measurements of the inflammatory areas of the synovial membrane (µm2) were obtained from the data of three digital images from each of the three documented sessions (n = 9 images/animal) of the central region of the knee joint of each animal from the different experimental groups. The evaluation of the collagen fibers percentage (% of total area) was forwarded from the collection of six digital images from each of the three sessions (n = 18 images/animal) documented from the center of the knee joint of each animal from the different experimental groups. The photo documentation was performed using a Leica DFC300 FX microscope, and the images were analyzed using the ImageJ program (NIH/USA, free program).
Protein expression by immunohistochemistry was analyzed using the immunohistochemistry technique previously described by Bomfim et al [12]. Briefly, the sections were processed, labeled with the primary antibody (IL-6, 1:500, Sigma Aldrich), and detected utilizing the Peroxidase Detection Systems secondary antibody kit. The immunoreactivity was quantified by evaluating the intensity of the color formed by the immunohistochemical reaction with the DAB stain, counting the cells in five fields per slide, and analyzing images using the Image J program.
Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 5.0, and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post-tests were applied with p < 0.05 to analyze the measurement of synovial inflammation and the percentage of collagen fibers between the experimental groups.
Inflammation of the synovial region (Figure 1) in mean ± SD showed significant differences between the Sham (Figure 1B) 187.8 ± 56.95 vs Control (Figure 1A) 9.55 ± 1.675 with p < 0.0001 and Sham (Figure 1B) vs PBM (Figure 1C) 15.15 ± 3.554 (See Figure 2A).
The areas of collagen fibers (Figure 2B) (total percentage) in showed differences (mean ± SD) between the Sham (Figure 3C and D) 60.07 ± 1.604 vs Control 22.13 ± 2,120 (Figure 3A and B) with p < 0.0001, and the Sham (Figure 3C and D) vs PBM 54.40 ± 1.778 with p = 0.0149 (Figure 3E and F). The number of positive cells for IL-6 protein expression (Figure 4A) showed significant differences between the Control (1.600 ± 0.910) vs Sham (6.867 ± 2.446) with p<0.0001 and Sham vs PBM (1.333 ± 0.516) with p<0.0001 (Figure 4B).
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of PBM with a LLL (λ = 808nm) by analyzing the morphology and percentage of collagen fibers in the synovial region of joints as a treatment after inducing RA in female animals, an experimental design that is related to the higher incidence of RA in the female population [13].
In our experimental model of RA, acute inflammation was performed after induction by Zymosan, whose application leads to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-18, IL-1β, and IL-6, synovial joint hypertrophy, and recruitment neutrophils. These inflammatory conditions are similarly seen in the acute phase of RA and osteoarthritis [14].
The stress caused by RA can lead to mitochondrial dysfunction, and this organelle is a target for therapy with laser PBM, since the directed light induces a therapeutic photochemical effect that improves the mitochondrial function and antioxidant defenses, thus treating the lesion at the site specific.
In addition, they affect metabolism, signaling, cell growth factors, and inflammatory processes [15].
The components of PBM with a LLL, such as the intensity, time, duration, and wavelength, try to maximize the benefits of the treatment, inducing cell proliferation and increasing cell differentiation, which helps in healing and the normalization of cell functions; in our study, this was observed in the group after laser radiation [16]. After light absorption, ATP activation occurs by the cytochrome c oxidase pathway, which is associated with microcirculation and a greater nutritional support. PBM improves blood circulation, enhances collagen synthesis, promotes tissue regeneration and the stimulation of specific and non-specific immunity, and promotes analgesic effects such as the relief of physical pain or symptoms [17].
Morphological evaluations are important to understand cell flux and the mechanisms to improve repair. One of the parameters is to observe the inflammatory infiltrates in areas affected by the disease, since RA is known to be a chronic, autoimmune disease, and is characterized by the accumulation of an inflammatory infiltrate in the synovial membrane, which significantly reduces the quality of the cartilage through tissue disorganization of the joints, thus leading to synovitis and progressive joint destruction [18].
In the control group, there was no presence of inflammatory infiltrates; on the other hand, in the Sham group, we observed the presence of an intense inflammation area. In the PBM group, which was treated with a LLL, there was a reduction in the inflammatory infiltrate, which was restricted to the synovial membrane.
In a study that evaluated the effects of LLLT on joint homeostasis, there was a decrease in the inflammatory process in the synovial region, with a moderate inflammatory infiltrate only in the synovial membrane [11].
These data are in line with our findings in the morphological analysis: in the PBM group, the infiltrate was limited to the membrane only. In groups treated with LLLT, there were a reduction in synovial inflammation when analyzing the morphological and percentage of collagen fibers. The mechanism associated a LLL on the injured tissue is related to its ability to inhibit chemotactic factors in the early stages of inflammation, to interfere with the effects of chemical mediators induced by inflammation, and to inhibit the synthesis of prostaglandins; all of these effects were also found in Wistar rats [19].
The clinical potential of a laser (λ = 904nm/single dose of 1 J/cm2) for the treatment of arthritis in the experimental model is based on reducing pain and protecting the morphology of the joint region, thus preventing joint degeneration [20]. These effects were evidenced in our animals treated, where edema and local repair presented significant differences in the morphological aspects when compared to the Sham group.
PBM therapy has effects based on the absorption of light by tissues, specifically by the mitochondria, thus resulting in an improvement of ATP, the modulation of intracellular oxidative stress, an induction of transcription factors, cell mitosis, and a higher extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis. This stimulation of angiogenesis affects the inflammatory process and causes an increase in microcirculation [21]. In our study, a decrease in synovial inflammation was observed and the morphology was preserved. In addition, there was the formation of new blood vessels when both treatments were proposed.
In a study with RA-modeled rats that were treated with single dose of a LLL, RA reflected in the morphological and morphometric changes in the anterior tibial muscle of Wistar rats, such as the presence of an inflammatory infiltrate, which may be due to the higher index of adhesion molecules in the vascular endothelium, thus facilitating the process of the migration of inflammatory cells to the site [22]; these results corroborate our findings. Additionally, in the Sham group, the morphology analyses demonstrated a large cluster of cells at the site due to the inflammatory response.
Joint cartilage is mainly composed of type II collagen, which is a target of degradation during RA, mainly mediated by metalloproteinases, and responsible for the destruction of the connective tissue, thus causing a lack of collagen [23]. Due to this destruction of collagen II, it can be replaced by type I collagen fibrocartilage, thus initiating the fibrosis process. When evaluating the Sham group, we observed an increase in collagen fibers by picro-sirius red, which indicates a possible establishment of connective tissue as part of a fibroid healing process.
IL-6 protein expression decreases in the PBM groups; what was expected once IL-6 is involved in cartilage destruction and synovial inflammation associated with RA [24],[25], and PBM was shown to be as effective as some drugs, such as tocilizumab and sarilumab, which also showed a decrease in the IL-6 concentration in clinical trials [26]–[28].
IL-6 and other interleukins such as IL-1β are key in driving inflammation and joint damage. Treatments which target IL-6 have proven to be very useful for those patients who do not respond to conventional therapies or even less standard ones. This information is important and show the relevance to study the regulation of IL-6 protein expression, similar to what was observed in the PBM group when the number of positive cells were close to control group [29].
This study sought to elucidate the effects of PBM treatment with a LLL (λ = 808nm) on the morphology, thereby emphasizing areas containing inflammatory infiltrates and the percentage of collagen fibers, with the beginning of the fibrosis process in the synovial region and how IL-6 can contribute to a decrease in synovial inflammation.
It is important to observe that a decrease in synovial inflammation contribute to an improved bone quality and a decrease in the destruction of femur and tibia. Additionally, its benefits are related to PBM that has a capacity through biochemical and biostimulant effects to improve the repair and bone formation and modify the bone protein expression [30],[31].
Highlighting limitations of our study, it was observed that PBM can differ between human and experimental models in the energy dose; additionally, there is a lack of studies with a single dose of PBM with a LLL therapy. Future prospects may include applications of a single dose of PBM with a LLL in patients with RA and other joint and bone pathologies.
PBM treatment with a single dose LLL showed lower synovial inflammation and a decrease in the formation of collagen fibers, which are related to a decrease in the formation of fibrosis areas and a decreased joint degradation in the experimental period studied.
Conceptualization: Gaspar de Jesus Lopes-Filho, Fernando Russo Costa do Bomfim; Data curation: Luiz Felipe Barreta, Danielly Mandato Oliveira, Bruna Silva Gomes, Sabrina Zanchetta Lanza, Marcelo Augusto Marretto Esquisatto; Formal analysis: Marcelo Augusto Marretto Esquisatto, Gaspar de Jesus Lopes-Filho, Fernando Russo Costa do Bomfim; Investigation: Luiz Felipe Barreta, Danielly Mandato Oliveira, Bruna Silva Gomes, Sabrina Zanchetta Lanza and Fernando Russo Costa do Bomfim. Methodology: Luiz Felipe Barreta, Danielly Mandato Oliveira, Bruna Silva Gomes, Sabrina Zanchetta Lanza and Fernando Russo Costa do Bomfim; Supervision: Overseeing and guiding the research project; Validation: Gaspar de Jesus Lopes-Filho, Fernando Russo Costa do Bomfim; Project administration: Gaspar de Jesus Lopes-Filho, Fernando Russo Costa do Bomfim
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
[1] | Romão VC, Fonseca JE (2021) Etiology and risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis: A state-of-the-art review. Front Med 8: 689698. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.689698 |
[2] | Lora V, Cerroni L, Cota C (2018) Skin manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis. Ital J Dermatol Vene 153: 243-255. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-0488.18.05872-8 |
[3] | Augusto MF, de Silva RVM, Miquelito JT, et al. (2022) Fisiopatologia e tratamento da artrite reumatoide: uma revisão narrativa. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Médico 9: e10106. https://doi.org/10.25248/reamed.e10106.2022 |
[4] | Lin YJ, Anzaghe M, Schülke S (2020) Update on the Pathomechanism, diagnosis, and treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis. Cells 9: 880. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9040880 |
[5] | Castro MF, Barbosa LRP, Silva LL (2020) Action of low-level laser therapy on the healing of diabetic ulcerations. Res Soc Develop 9: e6239109109. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9109 |
[6] | Mosca RC, Ong AA, Albasha O, et al. (2019) Photobiomodulation therapy for wound care: A potent, noninvasive, photoceutical approach. Adv Skin Wound Care 32: 157-167. https://10.1097/01.ASW.0000553600.97572.d2 |
[7] | Hernández E, Khomchenko V, Sola A, et al. (2015) Tratamiento de las úlceras crónicas de las piernas con láser de Er: yag y tecnología recosma. Cirugía Plástica Ibero-Latinoamericana 41: 271-282. http://doi.org/10.4321/s0376-78922015000300007 |
[8] | Bavaresco T, Lucena AF (2022) Low-laser light therapy in venous ulcer healing: a randomized clinical trial. Rev Bras Enferm 75: e20210396. http://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0396 |
[9] | Macedo SPR, de de Almeida Mota MS, Fagundes CF, et al. (2021) Efeitos da fotobiomodulação no tratamento de úlceras por pressão: revisão integrativa. Res Soc Develop 10: e32810212597. http://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12597 |
[10] | Gonçalves AB, Bovo JL, Gomes BS, et al. (2021) Photobiomodulation (λ = 808nm) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of acute rheumatoid arthritis in Wistar rats. J Lasers Med Sci 12: e60. http://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2021.60 |
[11] | Bombo LA, Esquisatto MAM, Bomfim FRC (2019) Efeitos do laser de baixa intensidade na articulação de ratos Wistar submetidos À artrite gotosa experimental. Revista Ensaios Pioneiros 2: 1-12. |
[12] | do Bomfim FRC, Gomes BS, Lanza SZ, et al. (2024) Photobiomodulation effects on synovial morphology, iNOS gene, and protein expression in a model of acute inflammation. Acta Cir Bras 39: e392024. http://doi.org/10.1590/acb392024 |
[13] | Brandão PLKO, Filho STA, Santos JGC, et al. (2020) Comparative study of inflammatory joint diseases ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis. Braz Appl Sci Rev 4: 2258-2268. |
[14] | Guazelli CFS, Staurengo-Ferrari L, Zarpelon AC, et al. (2018) Quercetin attenuates zymosan-induced arthritis in mice. Biomed Pharmacother 102: 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.03.057 |
[15] | Heiskanen V, Michael RH (2018) Photobiomodulation: Lasers vs. light emitting diodes?. Photochem Photobiol Sci 17: 1003-1017. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8PP00176F |
[16] | Dompe C, Moncrieff L, Matys J, et al. (2020) Photobiomodulation-underlying mechanism and clinical applications. J Clin Med 9: 1724. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061724 |
[17] | Ailioaie LM, Litscher G (2020) Molecular and cellular mechanisms of arthritis in children and adults: New perspectives on applied photobiomodulation. Int J Mol Sci 18: 6565. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186565 |
[18] | Eezammuddeen NN, Vaithilingam RD, Hassan NHM, et al. (2020) Association between rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis: Recent progress. Curr Oral Health Rep 7: 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-020-00264-4 |
[19] | Sella VRG, do Bomfim FRC, Machado PCD, et al. (2015) Effect of low-level laser therapy on bone repair: a randomized controlled experimental study. Lasers Med Sci 30: 1061-1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1710-0 |
[20] | Mazulo-Neto JCR, Souza LG, dos Santos Mazulo FR, et al. (2021) Effects of photobiomodulation in pain and articular degeneration in mice arthritis model. Braz J Pain 4: 104-107. https://doi.org/10.5935/2595-0118.20210028 |
[21] | Busanello-Costa M, Rennó ACM, Martignago CCS, et al. (2020) Benefícios do Fator de Crescimento Epidérmico (EGF) associado a terapia de fotobiomodulação a LED no reparo tecidual de feridas cutâneas. Res Soc Develop 10: e9909109369. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9369 |
[22] | Marin E, de Freitas Tavares AL, Neves M, et al. (2021) Avaliação do músculo tibial anterior de ratos submetidos à um modelo de artrite reumatoide e tratados com laser de baixa potência. Revista Saúde (Santa Maria) 47: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236583439971 |
[23] | Oliveira NR, Da Silva IA, Pinto RR (2021) Colágeno: uma breve revisão Collagen: a brief review. Braz J Develop 7: 103346-103355. |
[24] | Guerne PA, Zuraw BL, Vaughan JH, et al. (1989) Synovium as a source of interleukin 6 in vitro. Contribution to local and systemic manifestations of arthritis. J Clin Invest 83: 585-592. http://doi.org/10.1172/JCI113921 |
[25] | van de Loo FA, Joosten LAB, van Lent PLEM, et al. (1995) Role of interleukin-1, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interleukin-6 in cartilage proteoglycan metabolism and destruction. Effect of in situ blocking in murine antigen- and zymosan-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 38: 164-172. http://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780380204 |
[26] | Kremer JM, Rigby W, Singer NG, et al. (2018) Sustained response following discontinuation of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with subcutaneous tocilizumab. Arthritis Rheumatol 70: 1200-1208. http://doi.org/10.1002/art.40493 |
[27] | Rubbert-Roth A, Furst DE, Nebesky JM, et al. (2018) A review of recent advances using tocilizumab in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Rheumatol Ther 5: 21-42. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40744-018-0102-x |
[28] | Finzel S, Kraus S, Figueiredo CP, et al. (2019) Comparison of the effects of tocilizumab monotherapy and adalimumab in combination with methotrexate on bone erosion repair in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 78: 1186-1191. http://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214894 |
[29] | Kim GW, Lee NR, Pi RH, et al. (2015) IL-6 inhibitors for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: Past, present, and future. Arch Pharm Res 38: 575-584. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-015-0569-8 |
[30] | Sella VRG, do Bomfim FRC, Machado PCD, et al. (2015) Effect of low-level laser therapy on bone repair: a randomized controlled experimental study. Lasers Med Sci 30: 1061-1068. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1710-0 |
[31] | Reis CHB, Buchaim RL, Pomini KT, et al. (2022) Effects of a biocomplex formed by two scaffold biomaterials, hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate ceramic and fibrin biopolymer, with photobiomodulation, on bone repair. Polymers 14: 2075. http://doi.org/10.3390/polym14102075 |
Group | λ (nm) | Diode | ED (J/cm2) | P (mW) | E (J) | TE (J) | A (cm2) | T (s) |
PBM | 808 | GaAlAs | 20 | 25 | 0,825 | 0,825 | 0,02 | 33 |