Research article Special Issues

Fuzzy tracking control of singular multi-agent systems under switching topology

  • Received: 19 July 2024 Revised: 26 September 2024 Accepted: 11 October 2024 Published: 21 October 2024
  • MSC : 93D50, 05Cxx

  • The consensus tracking problem of leader-follower multi-agent systems (MASs) with singular structures on jointly connected topology is studied in this paper. To achieve the objective of consensus tracking, a distributed adaptive control protocol is formulated to adjust the coupling weights among the agents using the adaptive rate, where the adaptive protocol can be implemented by each agent in a fully distributed manner without using any global information. A fuzzy logic system method is used to deal with the nonlinear terms in response to the limitations of nonlinear system analysis. The consensus tracking problem is transformed into an error system stability analysis, and two sufficient conditions are provided to guarantee the control objective based on Lyapunov stability theory and singular system theory. Finally, the effectiveness of this method is verified through a simulation example.

    Citation: Jiawen Li, Yi Zhang, Heung-wing Joseph Lee, Yingying Wang. Fuzzy tracking control of singular multi-agent systems under switching topology[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 29718-29735. doi: 10.3934/math.20241440

    Related Papers:

    [1] Vadim Khomich, Svyatoslav Shcheka, Natalia Boriskina . Geodynamic factors in the formation of large gold-bearing provinces with Carlin-type deposits on continental margins in the North Pacific. AIMS Geosciences, 2023, 9(4): 672-696. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2023036
    [2] William Guo . Density investigation and implications for exploring iron-ore deposits using gravity method in the Hamersley Province, Western Australia. AIMS Geosciences, 2023, 9(1): 34-48. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2023003
    [3] Tofig R. Akhmedov . 3D seismic survey data processing and interpretation by use of latest tools applied for discovery of new traps in Pleistocene deposits of Hovsan field. AIMS Geosciences, 2021, 7(1): 95-112. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2021005
    [4] Elmar Buchner, Volker J Sach, Martin Schmieder . Ries impact deposits in the North Alpine Foreland Basin of Germany as a terrestrial analog site for impact-produced seismites and sand spikes on planet Mars. AIMS Geosciences, 2025, 11(1): 68-90. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2025005
    [5] Natascha T. Torres, Thomas Steinsberger, Helen Droz-Georget, Beat Müller, Helmut Brandl, Peter C. Hauser, Gerhard Furrer . A Novel Method to Quantify Bioavailable Elements and Mobile ATP on Rock Surfaces and Lichens. AIMS Geosciences, 2016, 2(3): 245-258. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2016.3.245
    [6] John D Alexopoulos, Nikolaos Voulgaris, Spyridon Dilalos, Georgia S Mitsika, Ioannis-Konstantinos Giannopoulos, Vassileios Gkosios, Nena Galanidou . A geophysical insight of the lithostratigraphic subsurface of Rodafnidia area (Lesbos Isl., Greece). AIMS Geosciences, 2023, 9(4): 769-782. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2023041
    [7] Armin Salsani, Abdolhossein Amini, Shahram shariati, Seyed Ali Aghanabati, Mohsen Aleali . Geochemistry, facies characteristics and palaeoenvironmental conditions of the storm-dominated phosphate-bearing deposits of eastern Tethyan Ocean; A case study from Zagros region, SW Iran. AIMS Geosciences, 2020, 6(3): 316-354. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2020019
    [8] Ray Kenny . Stable isotope ratios and speleothem chronology from a high-elevation alpine cave, southern San Juan Mountains, Colorado (USA): Evidence for substantial deglaciation as early as 13.5 ka. AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(1): 41-65. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.1.41
    [9] Fernando A.B. Danziger, Graziella M.F. Jannuzzi, Ian S.M. Martins . The relationship between sea-level change, soil formation and stress history of a very soft clay deposit. AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(3): 461-479. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.461
    [10] Lev Eppelbaum . Processing and interpretation of magnetic data in the Caucasus Mountains and the Caspian Sea: A review. AIMS Geosciences, 2024, 10(2): 333-370. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2024019
  • The consensus tracking problem of leader-follower multi-agent systems (MASs) with singular structures on jointly connected topology is studied in this paper. To achieve the objective of consensus tracking, a distributed adaptive control protocol is formulated to adjust the coupling weights among the agents using the adaptive rate, where the adaptive protocol can be implemented by each agent in a fully distributed manner without using any global information. A fuzzy logic system method is used to deal with the nonlinear terms in response to the limitations of nonlinear system analysis. The consensus tracking problem is transformed into an error system stability analysis, and two sufficient conditions are provided to guarantee the control objective based on Lyapunov stability theory and singular system theory. Finally, the effectiveness of this method is verified through a simulation example.



    1. Introduction

    The Tersang gold deposit is located approximately 20 km north of the town of Raub along the eastern side of the Bentong-Raub Suture Zone. Other gold deposits, including Ulu Sokor, Pulai, Chenua, Buffalo Reef, Penjom, Selinsing, and Raub, are also situated in the east of the Bentong-Raub Suture Zone (Figure 1). In 1937, a quantity of 53200 cubic meters of alluvium was mined and about 600 oz of gold were recovered at the mine-site [1]. It is also reported that gold-bearing quartz veins were found in quartz-muscovite rocks in northern Tersang [1]. Peninsular Gold Limited, the current owner of the Tersang gold mine, estimates that the deposit hosts an inferred and indicated resource of 120,000 ounces of gold at 0.71 grams per tonne in the JORC category. It is interpreted that the Carboniferous host rocks of the Tersang gold deposit lie within the Raub Group [2]. The purpose of this study is to constrain depositional ages of host rocks, determine major and trace element composition of the host rocks, document trace element distribution between gold-poor and gold-rich pyrite phase and suggest implications for gold exploration.

    Figure 1. Map showing the location of the Tersang gold mine, the Bentong-Raub Suture Zone and the Western, Central, and Eastern Belts in Peninsular Malaysia.

    2. Geological Setting

    Peninsular Malaysia is comprised of three main tectonic terranes/blocks that strike north-south in the Peninsula [2,3,4,5,6]. Yeap [7] defines these terranes as the Western Belt, Central Belt and Eastern Belt after Scrivenor [8] (Figure 1). In recent years, the view that the Malay Peninsula is part of the Southeast Asia continental block which comprises the Sibumasu (Siam, Burma, Malaysia, and Sumatra) Terrane in the west and the Sukhothai Arc (East Malaya Block) in the east has been reiterated [9].

    The Western Belt lies within the Sibumasu Terrane. This belt is characterised by Early Palaeozoic continental margin sequences, Late Palaeozoic platform carbonates, Triassic platform carbonates, deep basinal clastic sequences, and Jurassic-Cretaceous continental deposits (Figure 1). The Western Tin Belt is associated with the Main Range granitoid province which is a large plutonic belt that extends to the southern Peninsular Thailand and central Thailand [7]. The Central Gold Belt is located in the east of the Bentong-Raub Suture Zone and comprises Permo-Triassic metamorphic rocks, and deep to shallow marine sedimentary rocks [10,11]. The Central Belt also contains limestone with intermediate to felsic volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks (Carboniferous-Triassic in age), which were deposited in a fore-arc portion of the Paleo-arc basin [1,12,13,14].

    The Eastern Belt is part of the East Malaya block and characterised by a poly-deformed Late Palaeozoic sequence, overlain unconformably by Late Permian continental conglomerate and Jurassic-Cretaceous continental deposits. Granitoids in this belt cover a compositional range from biotite granite to hornblende-biotite granite/granodiorite and diorite-gabbro [15]. In addition, this belt includes a suite of shoshonitic trachyte in the Segamat area (Johor) which has been dated by K/Ar dating and returned an age of 62 Ma [16]. The Eastern Belt plutons consist of biotite or hornblende-biotite-bearing Ⅰ-type granitoids with Triassic Rb-Sr ages. Ⅰ-type granitoids are typical of modern day Andean-type active margins where oceanic plates are subducted under continental margins or island arcs producing andesite volcanoes.

    The Bentong-Raub Suture Zone is a significant NW-SE trending fault system. The suture is suggested to be genetically related to the gold mineralisation in the mining district of the Central Gold Belt. The Bentong-Raub Suture Zone of the Malay Peninsula represents the main Palaeo-Tethys ocean basin and forms the boundary between the Sibumasu Terrane in the west and the Sukhothai Arc in the east [2]. The suture extends up to 20 km in width containing oceanic radiolarian cherts ranging in age from Devonian to Upper Permian [4]. Within this suture, there is mélange composed of clasts of ribbon-bedded chert, limestone, sandstone, conglomerate, turbidites, volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks. Additionally, bodies of serpentinite interpreted to be mafic/ultramafic rocks and oceanic peridotites are documented [17]. Chert and limestone clasts in the mélange were dated by radiolarians, conodonts and foraminifera and gave an age of Carboniferous and Permian [17]. Ages of metamorphism were determined from Schist and phyllite samples as being Ordovician, Silurian and Devonian. Consistently, the radiolarian cherts returned another wider age range from Devonian to Upper Permian [3].


    3. Methods of Study

    The methods of study described here include field work at the gold deposit area as well as laboratory work that were carried out at the ARC (Australian Research Council) Centre of Excellence in Ore Deposits (CODES), University of Tasmania, Australia. Field mapping was carried out recording lithology and structures at a scale of 1:2000. A GPS (global positioning system) was used to provide positions accurate to 3–10 m depending on the signal reception quality. In this study, coordinate systems are in UTM (Universal Transverse Mercator), zone 47, northern hemisphere (Map datum-WGS 84). If UTM and RSO (Rectified Skew Orthomorphic) systems were used, the coordinates were shown as northing and easting, typically in meters. At some locations, standard mine grids were converted to RSO or UTM for accurate locations of the mapped area. Thirty eight sedimentary rock and quartz vein samples were collected. List of samples is presented in Table 1.

    Table 1. List of samples collected in the field from the Tersang, mesothermal gold deposit, Malaysia.
    Location Sample ID X_UTM Y_UTM Z Field Description Visible mineral-alteration Visible structure
    Main pit TER-R001 812863 440915 148 Sandstone Pyrite boxwork and FeO Bedding and jointing
    Main pit TER-R002 812863 440917 154 Quartz vein quartz vein intersection
    Main pit TER-R003 812863 440918 157 Quartz vein Propylitic alteration Bedding and jointing
    Main pit TER-R004 812863 440921 158 Quartz vein Vein intersection
    Main pit TER-R005 812863 440926 161 Quartz vein Disseminated Pyrite, FeO quartz vein intersection
    Main pit TER-R006 812851 440918 164 Quartz vein Disseminated Pyrite Vein cuts bedding
    Main pit TER-R007 812851 440918 163 Sandstone Disseminated Pyrite Bedding
    Main pit TER-R008 812719 440890 142 Quartz vein
    Main pit TER-R009 812719 440890 142 Quartz vein Propylitic alteration
    Main pit TER-R010 812719 440890 142 Quartz vein
    Main pit TER-R011 812851 440920 151 Quartz vein Disseminated Pyrite Vein parallel to bedding
    West of quarry TER-R012 812846 440914 169 Quartz vein Disseminated Pyrite
    West of quarry TER-R013 812846 440911 171 Quartz vein Disseminated Pyrite Vein intersection
    West of quarry TER-R014 812861 440908 168 Quartz vein Disseminated Pyrite
    Main pit TER-R015 812858 440906 160 Quartz vein Disseminated Pyrite Vein intersection
    Main pit TER-R016 812836 440912 158 Quartz vein Disseminated Pyrite Quartz lens
    Main pit TER-R017 812791 440917 157 Quartz vein Vein cuts across bedding
    Main pit TER-R018 812808 440883 158 Quartz vein Vein parallel to bedding
    Main pit TER-R019 812808 440883 158 Quartz vein Vein cuts across bedding
    Main pit TER-R020 812865 440891 170 Quartz vein Vein intersection
    Main pit TER-R021 812871 440895 159 Quartz vein Sulfide
    East of quarry TER-R022 812889 440918 171 Quartz vein Sulfide Fault F1
    East of quarry TER-R023 812885 440927 178 Quartz vein Disseminated Pyrite Fault F1
    East of quarry TER-R024 812884 440931 179 Quartz vein Propylitic alteration, sulfide Fault F1
    East of quarry TER-R025 812881 440930 180 Quartz vein Disseminated Pyrite Vein parallel to Fault F1
    East of quarry TER-R026 812906 440994 175 Quartz vein Disseminated Pyrite
    East of quarry TER-R027 812894 440898 167 Quartz vein Disseminated Pyrite
    Northwest TER-R028 812630 441094 165 Rhyolite
    Northwest TER-R029 812689 441071 174 Quartz vein Disseminated Pyrite Vein cuts across bedding
    Northwest TER-R030 812753 441009 182 Quartz vein Disseminated Pyrite Vein cuts across bedding
    North TER-R031 812723 441204 210 Quartz vein
    North TER-R032 812782 441210 217 Fault breccia Sulfide
    Northeast TER-R033 812858 441160 226 Felsite
    East TER-R034 812826 441070 221 Quartz vein Sulfide
    East TER-R035 812826 441120 226 Quartz vein Sulfide
    Southeast TER-R036 812910 440853 172 Quartz vein
    Southeast TER-R037 812937 440938 204 Quartz vein Vein parallel to fault plan
    Southeast TER-R038 812937 440938 204 Quartz vein Vein parallel to fault plan
    Southeast TER-R039 812928 440904 186 Quartz vein Sulfide
    Southeast TER-R040 812920 440880 177 Quartz vein Sulfide
    North SM09-17A-B 812725 441170 211 Sandstone
    North SM09-21 812783 441212 212 Rhyolite
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The analytical techniques that were used in the study include: U-Pb zircon dating [18], Back-scattered imaging (BSE) and mineral spectra (EDS) using scanning electron microscope, Trace element determination in pyrite and mapping of pyrite grains by LA ICP-MS [19,20]. In addition, Cathodoluminescence (CL) imaging of zircon grains was carried out. These techniques are described below.


    3.1. U-Pb zircon dating

    Approximately 200 g of rock was crushed and milled in a Cr-steel ring mill to a grain size of less than 400 µm. Non-magnetic heavy minerals were then separated using a gold pan and a Fe-B-Nd hand magnet. The zircons were hand-picked from the heavy mineral concentrate under the microscope in cross-polarised transmitted light. The standard procedure for the LA ICP-MS zircon dating is performed on an Agilent 7500cs quadrupole ICPMS with a 193 nm coherent Ar-F gas laser and the resonetics M50 ablation cell.

    The downhole fractionation, instrument drift and mass bias correction factors for Pb/U ratios on zircons were calculated using two analyses on the primary (91500 standard of Wiendenbeck [21]) and one analysis on each of the secondary standard zircons [22,23] analysed at the beginning of the session and every 12 unknown zircons (roughly every 1/2 hour) using the same spot size and conditions as used on the samples. Additional secondary standards (The Mud Tank Zircon of Black and Gulson [24] were also analysed. The correction factor for the 207Pb/206Pb ratio was calculated using three large spots of NIST610 analysed at the beginning and the end of the day and corrected using the values recommended by Baker [25]. Each analysis on the zircons began with a 30 second blank gas measurement followed by a further 30 seconds of analysis time when the laser was switched on. Zircons were sampled on 32 micron spots using the laser at 5 Hz and a density of approximately 1.5 J/cm2. A flow of He carrier gas at a rate of 0.6 liters/minute carried particles ablated by the laser out of the chamber to be mixed with Ar gas and carried to the plasma torch.

    Isotopes measured include 49Ti, 96Zr, 146Nd, 178Hf, 202Hg, 204Pb, 206Pb, 207Pb, 208Pb, 232Th and 238U with each element being measured sequentially every 0.16 s with longer counting time on the Pb isotopes compared to the other elements. The data reduction used was based on the method outlined in detail in Meffre [26] similar to that outlined in Black [25] and Paton [27]. Element abundances on zircons were calculated using the method outlined by Kosler [18] using Zr as the internal standard element, assuming stoichiometric proportions and using the 91500 to standard correct for mass bias.


    3.2. LA-ICP-MS analysis technique

    Trace element analysis and imaging of pyrite were undertaken using the LA-ICP-MS facility at CODES, University of Tasmania. Analyses were done using a Newwave UP213 laser ablation microprobe coupled with an Agilent 7500 or 7700 ICP-MS. Samples were ablated in He and mixed with Ar before reaching the ICP-MS. Calibration was carried out with the in-house standard (STDGL2b2), which is a lithium borate fused glass disk, with known concentrations of trace elements [19]. The standard was analysed at regular intervals during analysis to correct for drift and mass bias. For standard set-up, the Fe concentration was tabulated at 465000 ppm (46.5 %) for pyrite. To minimize surface contamination, sulphides were pre-ablated with laser pulses. For pyrite imaging, the laser was rastered across the sample in a series of parallel lines. The spot size of the laser was 22µm during pyrite mapping and there was no space between the lines. All the data was binned to give the pixels in the maps.

    Each line was pre-ablated before analysis. The backgrounds were recorded before each image and subtracted from each analysis line [18]. A total of twenty-nine elements were analysed by LA-ICP-MS from pyrites including: Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Mo, Ag, Sb, Te, W, Pt, Au, Hg, Tl, Pb, Bi and U. The element maps were processed as follows: First, the trace element maps were converted from count per second into part per millions (ppm) in order to get a robust representation of element concentration for each pyrite type. Secondly, the csv files were imported into ioGAS© which is an advanced geochemical exploratory data analysis software package. Thirdly, pyrite phases were recognized based on element distribution on each pyrite map. In total, four pyrite phases were identified using ioGAS© software in terms of high content in Te, As and low content in Au and As. In ioGAS software, a clustering method was used by uploading all pyrite pixel data in the form of csv data. Furthermore, an attribute map was made on which pyrite boundaries of all analyzed grains were displayed. Each pyrite phase was discriminated digitally and assigned a colour. In addition, each pyrite phase outline or boundary that is shown on LA-ICPMS maps has been drawn by hands (Figures 28).

    Figure 2. LA-ICPMS pyrite map of euhedral pyrite contained in the host sandstone. This map shows silicates concentrated mostly in matrix and some are found in internal fractures. Elements such as Ni and Co display zoned patterns as well as Au. Gold concentrations are commonly present in the core (pyrite phase 1) and margin of pyrite (pyrite phase 2). Inclusions rich in Sb-Pb, W, As and U are presents. Additionally, rutile and sphalerite inclusions are mapped out. Chalcopyrite inclusions are preferentially present in the rim of pyrite phase 2. Elevated Au concentrations are shown in the inner zone (core) and outer zone (margin/rim).
    Figure 3. LA-ICPMS pyrite map showing pyrite phases 2, 3, and 4 from the host sandstone. Silicates are present in the matrix. Inclusions enriched in Au-Tl-Sb are common in the aggregates. W-rich inclusions are sparse in the pyrite lattice as well as Ti-rich (rutile) inclusions. Gold content ( > 1 ppm Au) is elevated in pyrite phase 2. Low levels of silicates (Mg-Al-K rich) are also recorded in pyrite phase 2.
    Figure 4. LA-ICPMS pyrite map showing pyrite phases 2, 3, and 4. Phase 2 is characterized by elevated Au, Pb, Bi, Sb and As contents. Phase 3 has elevated Co and Ni concentration and phase 4 has elevated Tl, Pb, Sb contents. Ti-rich (rutile) inclusions are numerous in the Titanium pixel image. Few inclusions of Pb-rich (galena) are spotted in the core and rim of pyrite. Pyrite rims are enriched in Pb, Sb and Tl.
    Figure 5. LA-ICPMS images of pyrite showing three pyrite phases: phase 2 has elevated Au, Pb, Bi, Sb, and As contents; phase 3 has elevated Ni and Co, low level of As and phase 3 consists of Minor concentration of Ni, Co, Pb, As combined elevated content of Tl along in the rim. Phase 2 has the highest Au concentration compared to phases 3 and 4.
    Figure 6. LA-ICPMS images of pyrite aggregates indicating the presence of inclusions of arsenopyrite, rutile, as well as W-, Pb-, and U-rich inclusions. The pyrite aggregates are characterized by elevated levels of As, Sb, Tl, Co, and Ni and low levels of Au, Pb, U and W. In addition, traces of Cu, Zn and Se. Matrix (zoned located outside of the pyrite lattice) has elevated contents of chemical elements such as Mg and Al, which are part of aluminosilicate composition commonly found in sandstone.
    Figure 7. LA ICP-MS images of trace elements in pyrite showing three phases of pyrite namely phases 2, 3, and 4. The Ti image shows rutile inclusions. Phase 2 shows elevated levels of As, Co, Ni and Au. Phase 3 has elevated Co and Ni. Phase 4 is particularly enriched Cu, Sb, Tl, Pb, Bi, and Ag. The Zn image shows few sphalerite inclusions. The presence of W-U rich inclusions are common.
    Figure 8. LA-ICPMS images of trace elements showing rutile inclusions in the matrix with elevated vanadium concentration. The pyrite aggregates recorded a complex mix of pyrite phases. Trace elements such as Cu, As, Sb, Au, Tl and Pb have elevated contents in the pyrite aggregates. Low concentrations of Se and Ag are present.

    Finally, pyrite phase values were calculated by grouping all the pixels belonging to a given pyrite phase. Other datasets such as minimum, maximum, median, and standard deviation for the pyrite phases 1, 2, 3, and 4 are also documented. Additionally, the Pearson coefficients of correlation among Au and other trace elements for pyrite phases 1, 2, 3, and 4 are presented in Tables 8AD. Positive correlation implies that both variables tend to move in the same direction: If one variable increases, the other tends to also increase. If one decreases, the other tends to also. Negative correlation means that the variables tend to move in the opposite directions: If one variable increases, the other tends to decrease, and vice-versa. Correlation matrix was calculated for each pyrite phase by looking at the relationship among Au and other trace elements. In this paper, we use a weak correlation for the coefficients that vary from 0.3 to 0.4. A moderate correlation is considered for coefficients ranging from 0.5 to 0.6 and a strong correlation for numbers above or equal to 0.7 [28].


    4. Local and Deposit Geology


    4.1. Local geology

    Haile [29] documented that the Tersang gold deposit lies within a Carboniferous sequence, which comprises shale, quartzite, conglomerate, phyllite belonging to the Raub Formation or Group. These authors correlated the Tersang sedimentary and metamorphic rocks to those of the Raub Group based on lithological features. In addition, these rocks are overlain by Carboniferous to Permian calcareous shale. In the northwest of the Tersang area, tuff sequences overlie the calcareous shale and contain fossils, indicating an age range from Carboniferous to Triassic. In the north (Figure 9), occurrences of felsic igneous rocks may be the extension of the rhyolite that crops out in the open pit. The local geology map (Figure 9) also displays the locality of the Selinsing gold deposit further north. To the west, gabbroic bodies are common and associated with the Bentong-Raub Suture rocks. To the east, intermediate igneous rocks crop out.

    Figure 9. Map of local geology showing localities of the Tersang and Selinsing gold deposits in the Central Gold Belt, Peninsular Malaysia.

    4.2. Deposit geology

    The Tersang gold deposit is characterised by a belt of gold mineralisation trending NS and comprises 1800 m long rhyolite body mixed up with shale and sandstone (Figure 10). The ore zone is characterised by the presence of sheeted quartz veins and sulphide mineralisation hosted in the sandstone and rhyolite. In the north, the rhyolite occurs associated with siltstone and shale beds and also overprinted quartz stockwork. Tuff sequences crop out in the northwest, underlying the shale strata. In the south of the mineralised corridor, the main lithologies are made up of sandstone, breccia and rhyolite in a highly tectonized area. This zone contains multitude of quartz stockwork veins (Figure 10). The area that was mapped during this study is situated between northing 812600 m and 81300 mN and easting 440800 m and 441300 mE (UTM system) (Figure 10). The area represents the open pit, comprising grey sandstone and breccia, which are interfingered with rhyolite. The white area on the mine-scale map (Figure 10) represents the Kaling Formation shown in grey colour on the district-scale map in Figure 9.

    Figure 10. Deposit-scale geology at the Tersang gold deposit showing the belt of mineralisation (Modified from Makoundi, 2012).

    The Tersang northern zone was not considered in this study as it is forested with lack of fresh outcrops. The sandstones are commonly eroded locally in the mining area and the geologic contact between the sandstones and shales (partly metamorphosed to phyllite) is hardly visible. The sandstone crops out in the open pit (the central part) and the southern part of the deposit (Figure 11a), and is grey in colour when less weathered. The sandstone is fine-grained, poorly sorted in contact with the chilled margins in the northwest and northeast parts of the deposit (Figure 11b).

    Figure 11. Outcrop photographs at the Tersang gold deposit. (a) Open pit image looking north. (b) Geological contact between sandstone and rhyolite. (c) Breccia exposure. (d) Rhyolite and quartz stockwork. (e) Mineralised quartz vein (stage 1). (f) Quartz stockwork in the sandstone.

    The sandstone contains pyrite grains and veins and its petrography consists of quartz (60 vol. %), K-feldspar (10 vol. %), biotite (20 vol. %), and disseminated pyrite (up to 10 vol. %). A greyish brown, oxidised breccia unit of 40–50 m in length and 20–25 m in width crops out within the rhyolite unit (Figure 11c). The breccia, under the microscope shows rhyolite and sandstone angular fragments (60 vol. %) and matrix (40 vol. %). The fragments have a size ranging from 0.3 to 1 cm. Small-scale stockworks of quartz veinlets (up to 200 µm thick) are also present. Oxidised pyrite grains are contained in some rock fragments. The matrix is mainly siliceous and contains iron oxides.

    The rhyolite associated with quartz stockwork is exposed over an area of approximately 600 m long and 400 m wide in the central and northern parts of the deposit (Figure 11d). Thin section studies revealed the presence of quartz (70 vol. %), K-feldspar (10 vol. %), muscovite (10 vol. %), and pyrite (up to 10 vol. %). In addition, muscovite occurs in the form of laths and interstitial infillings. Two stages of mineralised quartz veins were delineated: Stage 1 vein trends NNW-SSE (Figure 11e) and stage 2 vein strikes ESE-WNW (Figure 11f). Lithological and mineralogical characteristics of host rock and intrusion are shown in Figure 12. The list of samples and their descriptions is documented in Table 1.

    Figure 12. Lithological characteristics of host rocks and intrusion at the Tersang gold deposit. (a) Photograph of Host sandstone (sample TER-R007). (b) Photomicrograph of Host sandstone (sample TER-R007). (c) Felsic intrusion (sample TER-R033). (d) Photomicrograph of the intrusion (sample TER-R033). (e) Photograph of breccia (sample TER-R032). (f) Photomicrograph of the breccia.

    5. U-Pb Zircon Dating

    The host sandstone and rhyolite were sampled and analysed for age determination. Results of the U-Pb zircon geochronology are shown in Tables 25. The calculation of ages is on 1σ error on each concordia plot. A hand specimen of sandstone (sample SM09-17a) was analysed (Figure 13a). The seven youngest zircons have a mean age of 333.5 ± 2.5 Ma (MSWD = 1.2) and a median value of 333 Ma indicating an Early Carboniferous age (Mississippian). The detrital zircon populations are at ca. 250–400 Ma, ca. 875 Ma and ca.1100 Ma. Th/U values range from 0.07 to 1.56. CL imaging shows that the detrital zircon grains are sub-angular with oscillatory zoning. Results of the U-Pb zircon dating of this sample are presented in Table 2.

    Table 2. Results of U-Pb zircon dating of the host sandstone (sample SM09-17a).
    207 cor 206Pb/238U +/-1 ster 206Pb/238U +/-1 RSE 207Pb/206Pb +/-1 RSE 238U/206Pb +/-1 std err 207Pb/206Pb +/-1 std err 206Pb/238U +/-1 ster
    SM09-17a 0.0136 1.5% 0.0479 6.3% 73.42 1.10 0.0479 0.0030 87 149
    SM09-17a 303 3 0.0497 1.1% 0.0795 4.8% 20.10 0.22 0.0795 0.0039 313 96
    SM09-17a 314 9 0.0521 2.8% 0.0862 25.3% 19.18 0.54 0.0862 0.0218 328 489
    SM09-17a 331 3 0.0532 1.0% 0.0606 2.1% 18.79 0.18 0.0606 0.0013 334 45
    SM09-17a 333 3 0.0530 0.9% 0.0535 3.3% 18.86 0.17 0.0535 0.0017 333 74
    SM09-17a 335 2 0.0535 0.7% 0.0564 2.2% 18.69 0.13 0.0564 0.0013 336 49
    SM09-17a 335 2 0.0535 0.7% 0.0566 2.2% 18.68 0.13 0.0566 0.0012 336 48
    SM09-17a 337 7 0.0541 2.0% 0.0586 4.5% 18.50 0.37 0.0586 0.0027 339 99
    SM09-17a 361 4 0.0588 1.1% 0.0691 3.9% 17.01 0.19 0.0691 0.0027 368 81
    SM09-17a 368 3 0.0589 0.8% 0.0549 2.5% 16.99 0.14 0.0549 0.0014 369 56
    SM09-17a 371 3 0.0593 0.7% 0.0542 1.9% 16.87 0.12 0.0542 0.0010 371 42
    SM09-17a 434 3 0.0699 0.6% 0.0577 1.9% 14.31 0.09 0.0577 0.0011 435 41
    SM09-17a 435 4 0.0701 1.0% 0.0580 3.2% 14.27 0.14 0.0580 0.0018 437 69
    SM09-17a 436 4 0.0704 1.1% 0.0609 3.1% 14.19 0.15 0.0609 0.0019 439 68
    SM09-17a 442 3 0.0712 0.6% 0.0575 2.0% 14.05 0.09 0.0575 0.0011 443 44
    SM09-17a 446 2 0.0717 0.5% 0.0559 1.2% 13.95 0.08 0.0559 0.0007 446 26
    SM09-17a 450 4 0.0723 0.8% 0.0558 2.1% 13.84 0.11 0.0558 0.0012 450 46
    SM09-17a 471 4 0.0758 0.9% 0.0563 3.3% 13.20 0.12 0.0563 0.0019 471 73
    SM09-17a 473 3 0.0764 0.6% 0.0588 1.7% 13.10 0.08 0.0588 0.0010 474 38
    SM09-17a 495 10 0.0814 2.0% 0.0726 4.0% 12.29 0.25 0.0726 0.0029 504 82
    SM09-17a 606 102 0.1022 17.0% 0.0890 16.3% 9.79 1.67 0.0890 0.0145 627 312
    SM09-17a 887 7 0.1522 0.9% 0.0943 2.6% 6.57 0.06 0.0943 0.0024 913 49
    SM09-17a 1146 6 0.1977 0.6% 0.0910 1.0% 5.06 0.03 0.0910 0.0009 1163 19
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 3. Results of U-Pb zircon dating of the host sandstone (sample SM09-17b).
    207 cor 206Pb/238U +/-1 ster 206Pb/238U +/-1 RSE 207Pb/206Pb +/-1 RSE 238U/206Pb +/-1 std err 207Pb/206Pb +/-1 std err 206Pb/238U +/-1 ster
    SM09-17b 260.25 5 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.03 23.92 0.43 0.06 0.00 294.18 7.80
    SM09-17b 265.46 4 0.04 0.01 0.06 0.03 23.42 0.33 0.06 0.00 318.65 5.66
    SM09-17b 266.32 6 0.04 0.02 0.09 0.05 22.71 0.50 0.09 0.00 386.46 11.23
    SM09-17b 323.42 3 0.05 0.01 0.07 0.01 18.98 0.16 0.07 0.00 394.41 7.32
    SM09-17b 337.42 3 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.02 18.49 0.18 0.06 0.00 370.44 5.87
    SM09-17b 338.65 4 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.02 18.36 0.20 0.06 0.00 385.33 7.32
    SM09-17b 352.52 8 0.06 0.02 0.08 0.05 17.14 0.37 0.08 0.00 499.45 20.30
    SM09-17b 360.60 3 0.06 0.01 0.06 0.01 17.27 0.16 0.06 0.00 324.65 5.20
    SM09-17b 362.04 4 0.06 0.01 0.06 0.02 17.25 0.19 0.06 0.00 360.74 5.55
    SM09-17b 368.59 4 0.06 0.01 0.06 0.02 16.82 0.18 0.06 0.00 425.79 7.34
    SM09-17b 403.98 3 0.06 0.01 0.06 0.01 15.39 0.13 0.06 0.00 377.22 5.33
    SM09-17b 404.48 5 0.07 0.01 0.07 0.02 15.21 0.19 0.07 0.00 453.77 10.83
    SM09-17b 435.12 4 0.07 0.01 0.07 0.01 14.08 0.12 0.07 0.00 498.65 6.54
    SM09-17b 475.98 5 0.08 0.01 0.06 0.02 12.99 0.14 0.06 0.00 467.30 8.21
    SM09-17b 507.73 4 0.08 0.01 0.06 0.02 12.12 0.11 0.06 0.00 551.90 8.65
    SM09-17b 746.03 10 0.12 0.01 0.08 0.02 8.03 0.11 0.08 0.00 1057.93 20.11
    SM09-17b 974.43 9 0.17 0.01 0.09 0.00 6.02 0.05 0.09 0.00 766.35 10.96
    SM09-17b 1205.76 13 0.21 0.01 0.10 0.01 4.77 0.05 0.10 0.00 1104.20 22.55
    SM09-17b 1214.78 11 0.21 0.01 0.10 0.01 4.71 0.04 0.10 0.00 1610.63 26.09
    SM09-17b 1357.81 12 0.24 0.01 0.11 0.01 4.17 0.04 0.11 0.00 1537.73 20.29
    SM09-17b 1368.47 17 0.25 0.01 0.12 0.01 4.07 0.05 0.12 0.00 1076.90 19.15
    SM09-17b 1471.61 17 0.26 0.01 0.10 0.01 3.87 0.04 0.10 0.00 1530.94 24.43
    SM09-17b 2272.19 22 0.45 0.01 0.19 0.01 2.24 0.02 0.19 0.00 2269.92 31.38
    SM09-17b 1053.83 44 0.18 0.04 0.10 0.01 5.48 0.24 0.10 0.00 1526.34 49.41
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 4. Results of U-Pb zircon dating of the host sandstone (sample TER-R007).
    207 cor 206Pb/238U +/-1 ster 206Pb/238U +/-1 RSE 207Pb/206Pb +/-1 RSE 238U/206Pb +/-1 std err 207Pb/206Pb +/-1 std err 206Pb/238U +/-1 ster
    TER-R007 313.61 5 0.05 0.02 0.06 0.03 19.99 0.33 0.06 0.00 314.64 5.22
    TER-R007 319.93 5 0.05 0.02 0.06 0.04 19.47 0.31 0.06 0.00 322.95 5.10
    TER-R007 320.88 6 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.02 19.57 0.40 0.05 0.00 321.28 6.52
    TER-R007 323.43 5 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.04 19.40 0.32 0.05 0.00 324.05 5.34
    TER-R007 347.52 4 0.06 0.01 0.05 0.01 18.04 0.21 0.05 0.00 347.73 4.03
    TER-R007 349.41 11 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.04 17.86 0.59 0.06 0.00 351.20 11.57
    TER-R007 396.50 5 0.06 0.01 0.06 0.03 15.74 0.21 0.06 0.00 396.95 5.18
    TER-R007 431.55 6 0.07 0.01 0.06 0.02 14.42 0.21 0.06 0.00 432.31 6.18
    TER-R007 451.91 9 0.07 0.02 0.06 0.02 13.78 0.27 0.06 0.00 451.67 8.81
    TER-R007 1498.24 34 0.26 0.02 0.10 0.01 3.81 0.09 0.10 0.00 1501.07 34.93
    TER-R007 1549.05 15 0.30 0.01 0.17 0.01 3.39 0.03 0.17 0.00 1667.90 16.32
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 5. Results of U-Pb zircon dating of the rhyolite (sample SM09-21).
    207 cor 206Pb/238U +/-1 ster 206Pb/238U +/-1 RSE 207Pb/206Pb +/-1 RSE 238U/206Pb +/-1 std err 207Pb/206Pb +/-1 std err 206Pb/238U +/-1 ster
    SM09-21 207.37 3 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.03 30.52 0.49 0.05 0.00 207.85 3.34
    SM09-21 215.16 2 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.02 29.43 0.30 0.05 0.00 215.42 2.23
    SM09-21 217.23 2 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.01 29.14 0.27 0.05 0.00 217.50 1.99
    SM09-21 218.97 2 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.02 28.89 0.31 0.05 0.00 219.34 2.34
    SM09-21 219.13 2 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.01 28.90 0.28 0.05 0.00 219.31 2.16
    SM09-21 220.01 2 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.02 28.72 0.27 0.05 0.00 220.63 2.04
    SM09-21 222.24 2 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.02 28.51 0.28 0.05 0.00 222.26 2.22
    SM09-21 227.09 2 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.02 27.81 0.27 0.05 0.00 227.73 2.21
    SM09-21 227.43 3 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.02 27.85 0.33 0.05 0.00 227.40 2.68
    SM09-21 228.07 2 0.04 0.01 0.06 0.02 27.47 0.27 0.06 0.00 230.50 2.28
    SM09-21 228.39 2 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.02 27.75 0.28 0.05 0.00 228.23 2.31
    SM09-21 230.78 3 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.02 27.33 0.31 0.05 0.00 231.63 2.66
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 13. Inverse concordia plots of detrital younger zircon dating for the Tersang gold deposit. The dark, blue and red dots represent the analyzed zircon grains (a) Concordia plot of zircon dating from the host sandstone (sample SM09-17a). (b) Concordia plot of zircon dating from the host sandstone (sample SM09-17b). Inverse concordia plots of detrital younger zircon dating for the Tersang gold deposit. (c) Concordia plot of zircon dating from the host sandstone (sample TER-R007). (d) Concordia plot of zircon dating from the rhyolite (sample SM09-21).

    From the upper part of the stratigraphy, a sandstone specimen (sample SM09-17b) was collected and analysed (Figure 13b). Five youngest detrital zircons returned a mean maximum depositional age of 261.5 ± 4.9 Ma at 95% confidence with MSWD = 1.3. The median age is 265 Ma indicating an Early Permian maximum depositional age. The detrital zircon population peaks are at ca. 200–510 Ma, ca. 750 Ma; ca. 1340 Ma, ca. 1560–2030 Ma, ca. 2760 Ma. The Th/U values are greater than 0.1 apart from a single value of 0.1 corresponding to a zircon grain that suffered Pb loss. CL images of the zircon show elongated zircon grains having concealed or not well developed oscillatory zoning. The only Th/U ratio < 0.1 corresponds to the mixing age domain of the analysed zircon grain. Results of the U-Pb zircon dating of this sample are presented in Table 3.

    A sandstone specimen (sample TER-R007), collected from the lowest part of the stratigraphy was analysed (Figure 13c). The four youngest zircon grains have a mean maximum depositional age of 319.3 ± 5.3 Ma (MSWD = 0.63) and the median age is 320 Ma indicating an Early Carboniferous (Mississippian). The sample yields detrital zircon population peaks at ca. 300–500 Ma and ca. 1400–1600 Ma. The Th/U ratio values are all above 0.1 strongly indicating typical igneous origin of the zircons. The zircon grains show thinly developed oscillatory zoning and the grains are angular to sub-angular with some fragmented edges (Figure 13 and Figure 14). Results of the U-Pb zircon dating of this sample are presented in Table 4.

    Figure 14. Back-scattered electron images made from ore and gangue minerals at the Tersang gold deposit. (a) The NNW-SSE trending veins (stage 1) overprinted by the ESE-WNW striking veins (stage 2). (b) Rutile in quartz vein (stage 1). (c) Brecciated pyrite in stage 2 vein. (d) Hematite vein grown syntaxially in quartz vein during stage 2. (e) Back-scattered image of hematite vein crosscutting quartz vein in stage 2 vein. (f) Photomicrograph of hematite in stage 2 vein.

    A rhyolite (sample SM09-21) was analysed (Figure 13d) and the age of the 12 analyses ranges from 207 to 231 Ma. The age of 207 Ma was removed from the main population as it may have suffered post-crystallization Pb loss. The Pb loss is likely related to circulation of metamorphic fluids evidenced by the presence of CO2-rich fluids in quartz veins. Post-crystallization Pb loss can lead to new zircon nucleating on previous undissolved crystals.

    The remaining 11 analyses range from ca. 215 Ma to ca. 231 Ma (median ca. 222 Ma). The age of the rhyolite is evaluated at 218.8 ± 1.7 Ma (MSWD = 1.2) (Late Triassic) based on the six youngest zircon but the remaining may represent an inherited component of the rhyolite. The Th/U ratio values are all above 0.1. Overall, 98% of analysed zircons have Th/U values greater than 0.1 and only 2% are below 0.1. The Th/U ratio shows values greater than 0.1 typical for igneous zircons [30,31]. CL images show euhedral zircon grains with well-developed oscillatory zoning. Results of the U-Pb zircon dating of this sample are presented in Table 5.


    6. Veins and Mineral Occurrence

    Two main stages of mineralised quartz veins were found at Tersang. The NNW-SSE trending veins (stage 1) overprinted by the ESE-WNW striking veins (stage 2) (Figure 14a). The stage 1 is characterised by, milky to smoky quartz veins (up to 1.2 m thick) in which pyrite grains are enclosed in sandstone clasts occurring with minor arsenopyrite, sphalerite, rutile, illite and montmorillonite (Figure 14b). This stage represents the earliest vein-fill material and contains up to 90 vol. % of quartz. The sulphide grains account for approximately 10 vol. % of the vein filling. The stage 2 is characterised by the occurrence of free gold, pyrite, arsenopyrite (Figure 14c), galena, geocronite [Pb14(Sb, As)6S23], covellite, traces of ilmenite, quartz and some silicates (1–5 vol. % of the vein filling). In addition, the stage 2 vein grew syntaxially over periods of cracking and healing followed by precipitation of hematite (Figure 14d) at a late stage (Figures 14e–f). Rutile occurs either in the form of laths or patches in the stage 1 vein (Figure 14b). The patches of rutile are up to 500 µm across and the laths are 10-30 µm wide and 30-40 µm long and are embedded in the silica matrix in stage 1 vein. Hematite occurs in the form of disseminated patches in fractures in the stage 1 vein (Figure 14e). Hematite rims around arsenopyrite crystals in the stage 2 vein.

    In the Tersang gold deposit, the sulphide minerals present are pyrite, arsenopyrite, sphalerite, galena, geocronite, covellite including gold (Figure 15). Gangue minerals are also present including ilmenite, rutile, hematite, illite and montmorillonite. Sulphide minerals occur pervasively in both quartz veins and host rocks whereas clay minerals are only present in quartz veins. Relatively coarse-grained gold particles (20–30 µm) are isolated in the quartz matrix and 2–5 µm grains are locked in arsenopyrite grains (Figure 15), and other gold grains (up to 70 µm) are associated with geocronite.

    Figure 15. Ore minerals present at the Tersang gold deposit. (a) Free gold associated with pyrite and arsenopyrite in quartz-sulphide vein (sample TER-R035). (b) Free gold in quartz-sulphide vein (sample TER-R042). (c) Back-scattered electron image of sphalerite, arsenopyrite and galena (sample TER-R008). (d) Galena and arsenopyrite in quartz-sulphide vein (sample TER-R029). (e) Back-scattered electron image of geocronite and euhedral pyrite 1 (sample TER-R030). (f) Back-scattered electron image of galena associated with covellite (sample TER-R041).

    Gold grains (up to 1 mm) occur at fracture intersections, rimmed by pyrite and arsenopyrite. Arsenopyrite in turn contains 20–50 µm gold inclusions (Figure 15a). Arsenopyrite grains also occur in the form of rhomb-shaped grains ranging from 100 to 200 µm wide. In addition, some arsenopyrite grains are broken, which sizes are 50 to 100 µm wide (Figure 15b). It also rims pyrite grains in veins and sometimes occurs as isolated grains, with size ranges from 200 to 400 µm. Some 2–5 µm wide gold veins were found in fractured arsenopyrite grains. Up to 300 µm wide, subhedral, arsenopyrite grains also occur in the stage 2 quartz veins. Sphalerite occurs as large (up to 1 mm across) patches in the stage 1 vein and found together with arsenopyrite and galena (Figure 15c). Galena occurs in the form of tiny inclusions less than 10 µm in size in sphalerite.

    Galena is found in most of the samples collected from the stage 2 quartz veins. The grains are up to 1 mm across and occur in fractures associated with arsenopyrite and pyrite. Galena also occurs in the form of larger patches around arsenopyrite (Figure 15d). In addition, galena occurs as isolated veinlets that thickness varies from 5 to 10 µm. It also occurs as inclusions in sphalerite grains. Geocronite was newly identified using the electron probe micro-analyser (Figure 15e). The less than 1mm wide geocronite grain was found using the scanning electron microscope. It fills fractures in quartz veins, and associated with euhedral pyrite in stage 2 vein (Figure 15e). Covellite was found by electron microprobe analysis and occurs in fractures where it partly replaces galena in the stage 2 veins (Figure 15f).

    Pyrite predominantly occurs as euhedral to subhedral or aggregate grains (Figures 16a–g) in the fine-grained sandstone. These pyrite grains and aggregate have also been found in host rock bits embedded in quartz veins. Euhedral to subhedral pyrite grains, up to 300 µm wide, have porous cores in the sandstone (Figures 16a, c, and d). Pyrite grains (50 to 100 µm across) are also characterised by the presence of internal fracturing in phases 2 and 3. This type of pyrite is mostly disseminated in the host sandstone with a < 20 µm thick discontinuous rim (Figure 16). The pyrite aggregates are 250–500 µm wide in the host sandstone. The stage 2 vein-hosted pyrite grains are euhedral to subhedral, internally fractured, up to 1 mm in width.

    Figure 16. Textural characteristics of pyrite recorded at the Tersang gold deposit. (a) Subhedral pyrite in host sandstone (sample TER-R007). (b) Euhedral clean pyrite with fractures from sandstone (sample TER-R007). (c) Euhedral clean pyrite with porous core from sandstone (sample TER-R007). (d) Euhedral and aggregate pyrite from sandstone (sample TER-R007). (e) Euhedral pyrite from sandstone clasts in quartz veins (sample TER-R039). (f) Euhedral and aggregate pyrite from sandstone (sample TER-007). (g) Euhedral pyrite with internal fracturing from sandstone pieces in quartz veins (sample TER-R039).

    7. Pyrite Analyses

    A total of seven Laser Ablation ICPMS maps of pyrite grains and aggregates (Figures 28) were made from pyritic sandstone (host rocks) collected from the open pit at Tersang. In this study, vein-hosted pyrite grains in the stages 1 and 2 veins were oxidized due to weathering and they were not mapped to investigate their trace element composition.

    Results of pyrite trace element compositions include maximum, minimum detection limit, mean, and standard deviation are presented in Table 6. The controls on nucleation and growth of the pyrite grains was not an easy task to work out from pyrite morphology; however, the pyrite mapping has helped distinguish four pyrite phases shown by the distribution of some elements such as Te, Bi, As, Au, Pb, Co, and Ni within the pyrite structure (Figures 28). These trace elements show some zonation patterns on pyrite maps (Figures 28). Gold pixel images were useful to distinguish four pyrite phases 1, 2, 3 and 4 (Figures 28). Pyrite phase 1 contains U-rich and Sb-rich inclusions, Pb-rich (galena) inclusions and Zn-rich (sphalerite) inclusions (Figures 25; 7). This pyrite phase contains (a) high levels of As, Co, Ni, Ti, Sb and Se (b) minor levels of Cu, Zn, Pb, Bi, Te, Ag, Tl, W, V and (c) traces of Mo, Pt (Tables 6A-B; Figures 25). Gold levels were detected ranging from 0.08 to 20.5 ppm Au (mean 0.7 ppm). The anomalous trace element compositions range from 1,438 to 15,187.5 ppm As (mean 6,250.6 ppm), 0.01 to 144,733.5 ppm Ti (mean 803 ppm), 0.01 to 1,340 ppm Ni (mean 121.4 ppm) and 0.01 to 2,580.4 ppm Co (mean 117.6 ppm).

    Table 6A. LA-ICPMS analyses of pyrite mapping at the Tersang gold deposit, Malaysia.
    Pyrite phase Co Ni Ti V Cu Zn As Se Mo
    Phase 1: High Te_ Sb_ Bi : Minimum 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 1438.13 1.11 0.01
    Phase 1: High Te_ Sb_ Bi : Maximum 2580.42 1340.05 144733.51 471.88 878.07 8071.16 15187.53 1018.98 5.19
    Phase 1: High Te_ Sb_ Bi : Mean 117.65 121.44 802.83 3.97 14.79 18.47 6250.59 25.40 0.02
    Phase 1: High Te_ Sb_ Bi : Median 44.09 65.01 28.15 0.01 3.54 1.12 6317.82 6.96 0.01
    Phase 1: High Te_ Sb_ Bi : Standard Deviation 200.88 165.88 4504.35 16.18 31.15 274.08 2283.28 74.89 0.16
    Phase 1: High Te_ Sb_ Bi : Interquartile Range 145.83 143.26 261.88 0.88 14.32 2.46 3177.86 11.50 0.00
    Phase 2: High As_ Au and Sb : Minimum 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 355.03 1.11 0.01
    Phase 2: High As_ Au and Sb : Maximum 2126.50 1730.86 76403.04 326.63 34680.84 4153.23 46277.60 1197.12 28.58
    Phase 2: High As_ Au and Sb : Mean 77.58 130.84 1156.85 4.31 40.40 3.34 17035.84 47.32 0.03
    Phase 2: High As_ Au and Sb : Median 7.52 32.50 29.36 0.10 2.77 0.03 8557.27 11.67 0.01
    Phase 2: High As_ Au and Sb : Standard Deviation 160.30 213.55 4660.91 12.17 574.94 60.97 34749.75 140.85 0.47
    Phase 2: High As_ Au and Sb : Interquartile Range 75.32 167.89 308.94 3.17 4.67 1.02 4323.44 10.83 0.00
    Phase 3: Low Au_ Sb_ Pb : Minimum 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 7.76 1.11 0.01
    Phase 3: Low Au_ Sb_ Pb : Maximum 1571.93 1762.27 146398.66 271.26 527.58 14076.02 15187.30 1089.65 2.48
    Phase 3: Low Au_ Sb_ Pb : Mean 105.70 137.99 1400.28 3.65 10.69 9.24 7290.76 25.68 0.01
    Phase 3: Low Au_ Sb_ Pb : Median 32.35 63.99 13.16 0.01 2.77 0.03 5216.75 11.67 0.01
    Phase 3: Low Au_ Sb_ Pb : Standard Deviation 166.75 197.78 7218.96 13.45 35.75 272.46 10636.03 71.09 0.04
    Phase 3: Low Au_ Sb_ Pb : Interquartile Range 128.15 162.08 289.58 0.60 0.32 0.16 3974.68 9.31 0.00
    Phase 4: Low As_ Co_ and Ni : Minimum 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 29.91 1.11 0.01
    Phase 4: Low As_ Co_ and Ni : Maximum 928.99 1281.13 101783.78 145.54 878.07 15127.39 10621.59 174.13 2.74
    Phase 4: Low As_ Co_ and Ni : Mean 52.68 72.09 1342.12 5.37 8.13 43.91 2801.64 12.98 0.02
    Phase 4: Low As_ Co_ and Ni : Median 12.85 31.99 13.16 0.01 2.77 0.02 2512.27 11.67 0.01
    Phase 4: Low As_ Co_ and Ni : Standard Deviation 97.88 108.19 5766.03 14.89 22.91 655.10 1668.34 15.21 0.12
    Phase 4: Low As_ Co_ and Ni : Interquartile Range 38.72 71.80 340.31 2.15 0.32 0.01 2046.17 5.35 0.00
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 6B. LA-ICPMS spot analyses of pyrite at the Tersang gold deposit, Malaysia.
    Pyrite phase Ag Sb Te W Pt Au Tl Pb Bi
    Phase 1: High Te_ Sb_ Bi : Minimum 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.01
    Phase 1: High Te_ Sb_ Bi : Maximum 69.30 2516.13 10.17 1499.88 1.91 20.52 144.91 274.86 25.88
    Phase 1: High Te_ Sb_ Bi : Mean 0.78 43.80 0.49 4.76 0.04 0.77 1.32 10.03 0.38
    Phase 1: High Te_ Sb_ Bi : Median 0.01 8.45 0.26 0.01 0.01 0.48 0.01 4.31 0.18
    Phase 1: High Te_ Sb_ Bi : Standard Deviation 3.88 111.70 0.78 43.04 0.05 0.89 5.37 16.95 1.03
    Phase 1: High Te_ Sb_ Bi : Interquartile Range 0.23 33.72 0.43 0.72 0.06 0.76 0.07 11.92 0.34
    Phase 2: High As_ Au and Sb : Minimum 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
    Phase 2: High As_ Au and Sb : Maximum 784.93 33036.18 20.76 1113.89 3.45 99.36 622.46 4144.54 62.24
    Phase 2: High As_ Au and Sb : Mean 0.94 147.31 0.26 5.07 0.04 4.57 4.10 15.90 1.19
    Phase 2: High As_ Au and Sb : Median 0.01 6.61 0.07 0.01 0.01 2.53 0.01 5.06 0.01
    Phase 2: High As_ Au and Sb : Standard Deviation 13.68 739.25 0.64 30.16 0.08 6.67 22.94 71.62 2.82
    Phase 2: High As_ Au and Sb : Interquartile Range 0.00 26.50 0.39 0.00 0.06 4.52 0.00 18.33 0.67
    Phase 3: Low Au_ Sb_ Pb : Minimum 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
    Phase 3: Low Au_ Sb_ Pb : Maximum 23.15 2440.94 10.17 1876.38 1.62 223.53 555.42 871.22 12.87
    Phase 3: Low Au_ Sb_ Pb : Mean 0.12 38.73 0.24 12.40 0.04 1.48 2.64 4.43 0.24
    Phase 3: Low Au_ Sb_ Pb : Median 0.01 1.12 0.07 0.01 0.03 0.48 0.01 0.01 0.01
    Phase 3: Low Au_ Sb_ Pb : Standard Deviation 0.84 157.06 0.68 78.06 0.05 5.73 16.81 24.48 0.83
    Phase 3: Low Au_ Sb_ Pb : Interquartile Range 0.00 4.84 0.39 1.33 0.06 1.39 0.00 2.76 0.00
    Phase 4: Low As_ Co_ and Ni : Minimum 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
    Phase 4: Low As_ Co_ and Ni : Maximum 5.20 1398.86 9.80 769.55 1.03 14.94 72.09 186.99 6.93
    Phase 4: Low As_ Co_ and Ni : Mean 0.08 31.01 0.18 14.29 0.04 0.51 1.58 4.43 0.12
    Phase 4: Low As_ Co_ and Ni : Median 0.01 2.54 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.01 0.01
    Phase 4: Low As_ Co_ and Ni : Standard Deviation 0.36 86.04 0.44 59.92 0.05 0.98 5.00 12.55 0.52
    Phase 4: Low As_ Co_ and Ni : Interquartile Range 0.00 18.79 0.39 1.06 0.06 0.45 0.35 4.31 0.00
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Pyrite phase 2 contains inclusions enriched in Ti (rutile), As (arsenopyrite), Cu (chalcopyrite) and Pb (galena) (Figures 25). Other inclusions are silicates, Ag-rich inclusions, Sb-rich inclusions, and W-rich inclusions (Table 6A-B; Figures 25; 7). The Ag-Cu enriched inclusions are mostly present in the rim (Figure 7). A Mo-rich inclusion has also been found at the boundary between pyrite phases 1 and 2 (Figure 7). This pyrite phase is characterised by (a) high levels of As, Sb, Ti, Co, Ni, Se, Cu (b) minor levels of Au, Pb, Tl, V, Bi, Zn, W (c) trace amounts of Ag, Te, Pt, and Mo (Table 6A and B; Figures 25 and Figure 7). Detected levels of gold vary from 0.01 to 99.3 ppm Au (mean 4.6 ppm). The anomalous trace element compositions range from 355 to 46,277.6 ppm As (mean 17,035.8 ppm), 0.01 to 76,403 ppm Ti (mean 1157 ppm), 0.01 to 1,731 ppm Ni (mean 131 ppm), and 0.01 to 2,126.5 ppm Co (mean 77.6 ppm).

    Pyrite phase 3 shows Co-Ni zoning patterns and numerous Ti-rich inclusions and V-rich inclusions (Figures 25). This pyrite phase contains (a) high levels of As, Se, Co, Ni, Tl, Sb (b) minor levels of Cu, Zn, V, W, Au, Pb (c) traces of Bi, Mo, Ag, Te, and Pt. Gold concentrations vary from 0.01 to 223.5 ppm (mean 1.5 ppm). The anomalous trace element compositions range from 7.7 to 15,187.3 ppm As (mean 7291 ppm), 0.01 to 146398.7 ppm Ti (mean 1400.3 ppm), 0.01 to 1572 ppm Co (mean 106 ppm), and 0.01 to 1762.3 ppm Ni (mean 138 ppm).

    Pyrite phase 4 is characterised by the presence of Cu, Tl, and Zn-rich inclusions (Figures 25; Figure 7). This pyrite phase consists of (a) elevated levels of As, Ti, Ni, Co, Zn, W, Se, Tl; (b) minor levels of Au, V, and Cu; (c) trace amounts of Mo, Pt, Ag, and Te (Tables 6A-B). Gold concentrations vary from 0.01 to 15 ppm (mean 0.5 ppm). The anomalous trace element compositions range from 30 to 10622 ppm As (mean 2802 ppm), 0.01 to 101,784 ppm Ti (mean 1342 ppm), and 0.01 to 1281 ppm Ni (mean 73 ppm).


    8. Discussion

    Laser Ablation ICPMS pyrite mapping has revealed four chemically distinct pyrite phases, namely pyrite phases 1, 2, 3, and 4 (Table 7). The Ag/Au ratio values have been used to infer the origin of each pyrite phase [18,32,2]. Previous research documented that diagenetic/syngenetic pyrites have Ag/Au > 1, whereas metamorphic-hydrothermal pyrites have Ag/Au < 1. In this study, pyrite phase 1 is characterized by elevated levels of V, As, Mo, Se, Ni, Ag, and Zn, with Ag/Au mean value of 1.01.

    Table 7. Chemical characteristics of pyrite phases at the Tersang gold deposit, Malaysia.
    Pyrite phase 1 Pyrite phase 2 Pyrite phase 3 Pyrite phase 4
    High levels of trace element As, Co, Ni, Ti, Sb, Se As, Sb, Ti, Co, Ni, Se, Cu As, Co, Ni, Tl, Sb, Se As, Se, Co, Tl, Ti, Zn, W
    Low levels of trace element Cu, Zn, Pb, Bi, Te, Ag, Tl, W, V Au, Pb, Te, V, Bi, Zn, W Cu, Zn, V, W, Au, Pb Au, V, Cu
    Traces Mo, Pt Ag, Mo, Pt Bi, Mo, Ag, Te, Pt Ag, Te, Mo, Pt
    Gold content (ppm) 0.08 < Au < 20.5 0.01 < Au < 99.3 0.01 < Au < 223.5 0.01 < Au < 15
    Inclusions Chalcopyrite, sphalerite Arsenopyrite, galena, chalcopyrite Rutile Chalcopyrite, sphalerite
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The Ag/Au ratio mean values of pyrite phases 2, 3, and 4 are 0.2, 0.08 and 0.15 respectively. The evidence indicates that the Ag/Au ratios for pyrite phases 2, 3, and 4 are much lower compared to that of pyrite phase 1. Pyrite phase 1 likely formed from a diagenetic fluid; whereas pyrite phases 2, 3, and 4 may have formed from metamorphic-hydrothermal fluids. Referring to the work of Kolker [33,34], the common range of arsenic content in sedimentary pyrites in the Mississippian Marshall sandstone of south eastern Michigan in USA varies from 0 to 1 wt% (10,000 ppm). Additionally, the arsenic content in hydrothermal pyrites ranges from 0.001 to 10 wt% (100,000 ppm).

    In light with the present study, it turns out that pyrite phases 2, 3, and 4 have elevated As values implying their hydrothermal origin. The pyrite phases indicate temporal and chemical variations during crystallisation of ore forming fluids. Pyrite phase 1 represents the core zones of most euhedral pyrite grains, and contains elevated matrix content and low gold concentrations (mean 0.4 ppm). It is interpreted as the pre-main Au stage in the pyrite generations in the Tersang gold deposit. Pyrite phases 2 and 3 are interpreted to be the main gold stage with mean values ranging from 1.5 to 4.5 ppm Au. Pyrite phase 4 postdates the main Au stage (pyrite phases 2 and 3) with a mean value of 0.5 ppm Au because it is the pyrite phase that is present along the rims or margins. The evidence indicates that there is variation of gold concentration reflected by a differing chemistry (pyrite phases 1–4) of the ore-forming fluids. In all the pyrite phases, gold correlate positively with trace elements (Tables 8AD) such as As, Cu, Pb, Ag, Sb, Tl, Se (Figure 17). Coefficients of correlations (cc) vary from 0.27 to 0.72. Tl shows a particularly strong correlation with Au (cc = 0.72). The trace metals that correlate well with gold, may serve as chemical vectors for proximity to gold mineralisation in the Tersang mineral district. Most gold (or refractory gold) in the pyrite phases 1–4 occurs in the pyrite lattice (Figure 18). Three analysed points (free gold) plot above the saturation line of Reich [35] implying the existence of gold in the form of micro inclusions in pyrite phase 3 (Figure 18). The pyrite phase data are not confined within the Carlin Sediment-Hosted Gold Deposit (SHGD) field (the yellow dotted polygon) indicating a poor affinity with the SHGD-style deposits (Figure 18). Trace element contents in pyrite phases 1, 2, 3, and 4 display broadly two trends: The first trend is that of those trace elements, which concentrations vary tremendously over time including Co, Ni, Ti, Zn, As, Sb, Te, V, Au, Pb, Bi, and Tl. The second trend is for trace elements, which contents do not change much through time and consist of Cu, Mo, Ag, Pt, and Se (Figures 19, 20).

    Table 8A. Pearson correlation matrix of trace elements in pyrite phase 1 at the Tersang gold deposit, Malaysia.
    Co Ni Ti V Cu Zn As Se Mo Ag Sb Te W Pt Au Tl Pb Bi
    Co 1 0.71 0.04 -0.097 -0.11 -0.0016 0.12 -0.12 -0.0053 -0.029 -0.14 -0.11 -0.0017 -0.12 -0.059 -0.13 0.0032 0.046
    Ni 0.71 1 -3.04 -0.13 -0.14 -0.021 0.25 -0.13 -0.015 -0.055 -0.19 -0.025 -0.021 -0.037 -0.018 -0.15 -0.042 0.031
    Ti 0.04 -3.00 1 0.52 -0.0046 -0.0051 -0.066 -0.029 -0.0068 2.80E-05 -0.011 0.0076 0.9 -0.028 0.029 -0.016 0.023 0.039
    V -0.097 -0.13 0.52 1 0.19 -0.015 -0.0089 0.078 -0.013 -0.037 0.21 0.29 0.51 0.23 -0.017 0.19 0.016 -0.012
    Cu -0.11 -0.14 -0.0046 0.19 1 0.059 0.14 0.25 0.0058 0.25 0.46 0.25 -0.011 0.26 0.34 0.46 0.29 0.057
    Zn -0.0016 -0.021 -0.0051 -0.015 0.059 1 -0.013 -0.015 -4.70E-04 0.11 -0.0095 -0.024 -0.0018 0.045 0.016 -0.015 0.05 0.021
    As 0.12 0.25 -0.066 -0.0089 0.14 -0.013 1 0.11 -0.0049 -0.037 0.024 0.16 -0.076 0.12 0.17 0.063 0.037 0.06
    Se -0.12 -0.13 -0.029 0.078 0.25 -0.015 0.11 1 -0.012 -0.024 0.43 0.2 -0.016 0.23 0.068 0.47 0.0091 -0.044
    Mo -0.0053 -0.015 -0.0068 -0.013 0.0058 -4.70E-04 -0.0049 -0.012 1 0.023 -0.0043 0.028 -0.0048 -0.024 0.024 -0.011 0.047 0.13
    Ag -0.029 -0.055 2.80E-05 -0.037 0.25 0.11 -0.037 -0.024 0.023 1 0.014 -0.027 -0.0062 0.019 0.27 -0.015 0.22 0.089
    Sb -0.14 -0.19 -0.011 0.21 0.46 -0.0095 0.024 0.43 -0.0043 0.014 1 0.34 -0.0044 0.27 0.17 0.64 0.23 0.014
    Te -0.11 -0.025 0.0076 0.29 0.25 -0.024 0.16 0.2 0.028 -0.027 0.34 1 0.015 0.43 -0.032 0.23 0.087 0.21
    W -0.0017 -0.021 0.9 0.51 -0.011 -0.0018 -0.076 -0.016 -0.0048 -0.0062 -0.0044 0.015 1 -0.011 0.01 -0.0081 0.0017 0.011
    Pt -0.12 -0.037 -0.028 0.23 0.26 0.045 0.12 0.23 -0.024 0.019 0.27 0.43 -0.011 1 0.0024 0.23 0.027 -0.02
    Au -0.059 -0.018 0.029 -0.017 0.34 0.016 0.17 0.068 0.024 0.27 0.17 -0.032 0.01 0.0024 1 0.14 0.27 0.081
    Tl -0.13 -0.15 -0.016 0.19 0.46 -0.015 0.063 0.47 -0.011 -0.015 0.64 0.23 -0.0081 0.23 0.14 1 0.16 -0.039
    Pb 0.0032 -0.042 0.023 0.016 0.29 0.05 0.037 0.0091 0.047 0.22 0.23 0.087 0.0017 0.027 0.27 0.16 1 0.22
    Bi 0.046 0.031 0.039 -0.012 0.057 0.021 0.06 -0.044 0.13 0.089 0.014 0.21 0.011 -0.02 0.081 -0.039 0.22 1
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 8B. Pearson correlation matrix of trace elements in pyrite phase 2 at the Tersang gold deposit, Malaysia.
    Co Ni Ti V Cu Zn As Se Mo Ag Sb Te Au Tl Pb Bi
    Co 1 0.76 0.077 -0.081 -0.03 0.002 -0.11 -0.1 -0.014 -0.027 -0.09 -0.059 -0.17 -0.084 -0.078 -0.13
    Ni 0.76 1 0.055 -0.12 -0.034 -0.0098 -0.14 -0.13 -0.018 -0.034 -0.11 -0.069 -0.2 -0.11 -0.067 -0.16
    Ti 0.077 0.055 1 0.42 -0.011 0.0071 -0.042 -0.053 -0.0031 -0.012 -0.033 -0.032 -0.05 -0.031 0.018 0.14
    V -0.081 -0.12 0.42 1 0.014 -0.0066 0.055 0.038 -0.009 -0.0075 0.038 0.13 -0.0029 0.058 0.076 0.2
    Cu -0.03 -0.034 -0.011 0.014 1 0.01 0.078 0.079 0.0021 0.88 0.77 0.027 0.046 0.087 0.11 0.12
    Zn 0.002 -0.0098 0.0071 -0.0066 0.01 1 0.041 0.028 0.0047 0.015 0.028 -0.0034 0.032 0.019 -0.0023 -0.014
    As -0.11 -0.14 -0.042 0.055 0.078 0.041 1 0.47 0.034 0.025 0.4 0.17 0.39 0.34 0.032 -0.043
    Se -0.1 -0.13 -0.053 0.038 0.079 0.028 0.47 1 0.044 0.059 0.57 0.14 0.53 0.7 0.058 -0.09
    Mo -0.014 -0.018 -0.0031 -0.009 0.0021 0.0047 0.034 0.044 1 0.0042 0.031 -0.0033 0.025 0.024 -0.0015 -0.01
    Ag -0.027 -0.034 -0.012 -0.0075 0.88 0.015 0.025 0.059 0.0042 1 0.7 -0.00073 0.068 0.11 0.011 0.092
    Sb -0.09 -0.11 -0.033 0.038 0.77 0.028 0.4 0.57 0.031 0.7 1 0.076 0.36 0.47 0.053 0.042
    Te -0.059 -0.069 -0.032 0.13 0.027 -0.0034 0.17 0.14 -0.0033 -0.00073 0.076 1 0.082 0.067 0.059 0.02
    W 0.068 0.034 0.63 0.43 -0.0062 0.01 -0.02 -0.033 0.0065 -0.0043 -0.019 -0.02 -0.038 -0.016 0.0077 0.085
    Pt -0.024 -0.046 0.0028 0.082 0.005 -0.0018 0.07 0.098 -0.0028 -0.0062 0.047 0.064 0.031 0.047 0.0027 -0.015
    Au -0.17 -0.2 -0.05 -0.0029 0.046 0.032 0.39 0.53 0.025 0.068 0.36 0.082 1 0.56 0.052 0.037
    Tl -0.084 -0.11 -0.031 0.058 0.087 0.019 0.34 0.7 0.024 0.11 0.47 0.067 0.56 1 0.066 -0.058
    Pb -0.078 -0.067 0.018 0.076 0.11 -0.0023 0.032 0.058 -0.0015 0.011 0.053 0.059 0.052 0.066 1 0.39
    Bi -0.13 -0.16 0.14 0.2 0.12 -0.014 -0.043 -0.09 -0.01 0.092 0.042 0.02 0.037 -0.058 0.39 1
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 8C. Pearson correlation matrix of trace elements in pyrite phase 3 at the Tersang gold deposit, Malaysia.
    Co Ni Ti V Cu Zn As Se Mo Ag Sb Te Au Tl Pb Bi
    Co 1 0.78 0.091 -0.0014 -0.13 0.011 -0.051 -0.1 -0.0057 -0.072 -0.14 0.013 -0.045 -0.095 -0.056 0.02
    Ni 0.78 1 0.039 -0.048 -0.13 0.013 -0.023 -0.11 -0.0057 -0.079 -0.15 0.024 -0.046 -0.1 -0.048 0.067
    Ti 0.091 0.039 1 0.76 0.0048 0.007 0.012 -0.027 0.004 -0.0089 0.0076 -0.0035 -0.0062 -0.014 0.058 0.16
    V -0.0014 -0.048 0.76 1 0.26 -0.0041 0.091 0.12 0.0022 0.16 0.27 0.1 0.16 0.2 0.14 0.14
    Cu -0.13 -0.13 0.0048 0.26 1 -0.001 0.53 0.35 0.062 0.32 0.57 0.28 0.12 0.31 0.33 0.11
    Zn 0.011 0.013 0.007 -0.0041 -0.001 1 -0.0052 -0.0076 4.20E-04 0.013 -0.0023 -0.0069 -0.0037 -0.0043 0.0052 0.012
    As -0.051 -0.023 0.012 0.091 0.53 -0.0052 1 0.16 0.051 0.05 0.32 0.1 -0.0056 0.12 0.35 0.24
    Se -0.1 -0.11 -0.027 0.12 0.35 -0.0076 0.16 1 0.0074 0.51 0.67 0.078 0.36 0.49 0.064 -0.018
    Mo -0.0057 -0.0057 0.004 0.0022 0.062 4.20E-04 0.051 0.0074 1 0.0065 0.028 -0.0035 -0.0015 0.051 0.011 0.025
    Ag -0.072 -0.079 -0.0089 0.16 0.32 0.013 0.05 0.51 0.0065 1 0.75 -0.0071 0.59 0.42 0.075 0.02
    Sb -0.14 -0.15 0.0076 0.27 0.57 -0.0023 0.32 0.67 0.028 0.75 1 0.093 0.62 0.71 0.19 0.05
    Te 0.013 0.024 -0.0035 0.1 0.28 -0.0069 0.1 0.078 -0.0035 -0.0071 0.093 1 -0.028 0.044 0.086 -0.0034
    W 0.057 0.017 0.87 0.75 0.012 6.80E-04 0.022 -0.019 0.015 -0.0076 0.013 -2.00E-04 -0.01 -0.0091 0.051 0.11
    Pt -0.12 -0.14 -0.031 0.016 0.17 -0.017 0.024 0.022 -0.0045 -0.022 0.024 0.059 -0.072 -0.023 0.03 -0.033
    Au -0.045 -0.046 -0.0062 0.16 0.12 -0.0037 -0.0056 0.36 -0.0015 0.59 0.62 -0.028 1 0.72 0.015 -4.70E-04
    Tl -0.095 -0.1 -0.014 0.2 0.31 -0.0043 0.12 0.49 0.051 0.42 0.71 0.044 0.72 1 0.069 -0.0017
    Pb -0.056 -0.048 0.058 0.14 0.33 0.0052 0.35 0.064 0.011 0.075 0.19 0.086 0.015 0.069 1 0.33
    Bi 0.02 0.067 0.16 0.14 0.11 0.012 0.24 -0.018 0.025 0.02 0.05 -0.0034 -4.70E-04 -0.0017 0.33 1
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 8D. Pearson correlation matrix of trace elements in pyrite phase 4 at the Tersang gold deposit, Malaysia.
    Co Ni Ti V Cu Zn As Se Mo Ag Sb Te Au Tl Pb Bi
    Co 1 0.81 0.061 -0.063 -0.068 0.05 0.56 -0.02 0.008 -0.012 -0.1 0.065 0.068 -0.071 0.053 0.13
    Ni 0.81 1 0.026 -0.1 -0.064 0.05 0.6 -0.025 0.016 0.0084 -0.1 0.043 0.12 -0.061 0.09 0.13
    Ti 0.061 0.026 1 0.65 0.026 -0.0027 -0.029 -0.015 0.017 0.026 0.05 0.03 0.044 -0.0075 0.11 0.1
    V -0.063 -0.1 0.65 1 0.18 -0.01 -0.29 0.072 0.0011 0.1 0.18 0.032 0.11 0.09 0.073 0.063
    Cu -0.068 -0.064 0.026 0.18 1 0.063 -0.16 0.35 0.23 0.48 0.44 0.01 0.47 0.41 0.35 0.14
    Zn 0.05 0.05 -0.0027 -0.01 0.063 1 0.0092 0.017 0.1 0.12 0.036 -0.0073 0.1 0.11 0.14 0.093
    As 0.56 0.6 -0.029 -0.29 -0.16 0.0092 1 -0.026 -0.019 -0.096 -0.26 0.041 0.11 -0.2 -0.05 0.078
    Se -0.02 -0.025 -0.015 0.072 0.35 0.017 -0.026 1 0.12 0.25 0.27 0.0088 0.34 0.27 0.16 0.069
    Mo 0.008 0.016 0.017 0.0011 0.23 0.1 -0.019 0.12 1 0.3 0.089 0.0026 0.19 0.11 0.41 0.13
    Ag -0.012 0.0084 0.026 0.1 0.48 0.12 -0.096 0.25 0.3 1 0.27 0.031 0.48 0.28 0.47 0.2
    Sb -0.1 -0.1 0.05 0.18 0.44 0.036 -0.26 0.27 0.089 0.27 1 -0.0084 0.33 0.86 0.3 0.12
    Te 0.065 0.043 0.03 0.032 0.01 -0.0073 0.041 0.0088 0.0026 0.031 -0.0084 1 0.04 -0.03 0.0041 0.0031
    W 0.044 0.016 0.91 0.64 0.037 -0.0091 -0.043 -0.0097 0.031 0.027 0.057 0.065 0.032 -0.013 0.12 0.13
    Pt -0.17 -0.19 -0.022 0.05 0.0095 -0.033 -0.18 0.11 -0.031 -0.062 0.056 0.053 -0.091 0.049 -0.072 -0.062
    Au 0.068 0.12 0.044 0.11 0.47 0.1 0.11 0.34 0.19 0.48 0.33 0.04 1 0.36 0.48 0.17
    Tl -0.071 -0.061 -0.0075 0.09 0.41 0.11 -0.2 0.27 0.11 0.28 0.86 -0.03 0.36 1 0.36 0.11
    Pb 0.053 0.09 0.11 0.073 0.35 0.14 -0.05 0.16 0.41 0.47 0.3 0.0041 0.48 0.36 1 0.31
    Bi 0.13 0.13 0.1 0.063 0.14 0.093 0.078 0.069 0.13 0.2 0.12 0.0031 0.17 0.11 0.31 1
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 17. Binary plots show relationships of Au with Cu, Pb, Ag, Sb, Tl, and Se in the Tersang gold deposit, Malaysia. (a) Au vs Cu. (b) Au vs Pb. (c) Au vs Ag. (d) Au vs Sb. (e) Au vs Tl. (f) Au vs Se.
    Figure 18. Gold solubility diagram adapted from Reich et al. (2005) showing relationship of Au and As. Pyrite phase 1 data mostly plot within the Carlin Sediment-hosted gold deposit (SHGD) field, whereas data of pyrite phases 2, 3, and 4 are scattered across the SHGD field. Pyrite phase 3 shows the existence of gold nanoparticles (free gold) above the Au saturation line.
    Figure 19. Box plot showing distribution of trace elements Co, Ni, Ti, Zn, As, Se, Sb, Te, and W in pyrite phases in the Tersang gold deposit, Malaysia. In the plot, the black circle represents the mean values (black circle), the line (or bar) is the median, the open circle is an outlier (top and bottom 5% of the data), the triangle the far outlier (highly anomalous value), and the central box represents 25 to 75 percentile of data (interquartile range) from Q1 and Q3. Q1 is the top of box and Q3 is the bottom of box. Whiskers are drawn to the last data point that extends 1.5 times the length of the box toward the maximum and minimum.
    Figure 20. Box plot showing distribution of trace elements V, Cu, Tl, Mo, As, Pb, Pt, Au, and Bi in pyrite phases in the Tersang gold deposit, Malaysia. In the plot, the black circle represents the mean values (black circle), the line (or bar) is the median, the open circle is an outlier (top and bottom 5% of the data), the triangle the far outlier (highly anomalous value), and the central box represents 25 to 75 percentile of data (interquartile range) from Q1 and Q3. Q1 is the top of box and Q3 is the bottom of box. Whiskers are drawn to the last data point that extends 1.5 times the length of the box toward the maximum and minimum.

    Laser Ablation ICPMS analyses on pyrite has shown that pyrite phase 1 has low Au concentration (mean 0.4 ppm) and is interpreted to have preceded the main Au mineralisation event (phase 3). Overall, pyrite phases 2 and 3 are the main Au mineralisation stages with Au mean range from 1.5 to 4.5 ppm and significantly contributed the amount of invisible gold to the ore-forming system at Tersang. Pyrite phase 4 has low gold levels (mean 0.5 ppm) and post-dated the main Au mineralisation stage (pyrite phases 2 and 3). The evidence suggests that the distribution of gold in diagenetic pyrite phase 1 and metamorphic-hydrothermal pyrite phases 2, 3, and 4 likely testify the result of four stages ore-forming system centred on the rhyolite corridor in the Tersang gold deposit. Most gold was sourced from metamorphic-hydrothermal fluids.

    In the Jugan gold deposit [36], As and Tl were utilised as pathfinders to Au mineralisation indicating similarity to the Tersang gold deposit. Back-scattered electron images showed a significant amount of fractured pyrite, arsenopyrite and sphalerite grains, which suggest that sulphide grains have been subjected to brittle deformation. Numerous broken arsenopyrite grains, which contain free gold in its cracks probably, indicate circulation of ore-forming fluids through the cracks in arsenopyrite during deformation. Regionally, lode or quartz stockwork-style mineralisation is known to contain economic Au mineralisation and they have been explored and mined in different locations in mainland Southeast Asia.

    Stratigraphically, our new data implies a Carboniferous maximum depositional age of the underlying sandstone unit (oldest sandstone horizon) and possibly a Permian maximum depositional age for the overlying sandstone unit (youngest sandstone layer) in the deposit. Additionally, the crystallisation age of the volcanic rock (rhyolite) is 218.8 ± 1.7 Ma indicating magmatism in the Late Triassic. This age of the rhyolite also provides a minimum age for the sandstone, possibly ranging from 262 to 219 Ma.

    The maximum depositional age of the host sandstone (333.5 ± 2.5 Ma) at Tersang approximates the age of the host tuffaceous siltstone (331.3 ± 4.2 Ma) in the nearby Selinsing gold deposit [2]. The significance of the U-Pb zircon age is that the age is closer to the tuffaceous siltstone in the Selinsing gold deposit (further north), implying provenance of this zircon population from volcanic activities that produced the tuffaceous siltstone, further north, in the Selinsing area. Again, the maximum depositional age of 319.3 ± 5.3 Ma for the sandstone in the Tersang gold deposit is close to the Mississippian age of the host siltstone (324.1 ± 3.5 Ma) in the Selinsing gold deposit located further north of the Tersang gold deposit [2].

    Most detrital zircon that were dated from the host sandstone and rhyolite are euhedral to subhedral and show a texture of oscillatory zoning implying an igneous origin of the zircon grains as most Th/U values are above 0.1. The zircon detritus may have derived from the N-S trending plutons belonging to the Main Range granites of peninsular Malaysia. The breccia was likely formed during faulting event that post-dated rhyolite emplacement and it is interpreted to be a tectonic breccia. This is consistent with the field observation showing the NE-SW trending breccia outcrop cross-cutting the rhyolite outcrop. Regionally, the evidence indicates that both the Tersang and Selinsing gold deposits [2] contain Carboniferous host rocks which are associated with Triassic magmatism.


    9. Conclusion

    LA-ICP-MS on pyrite from the host sandstone indicates variation in gold content across all pyrite phases at the Tersang gold deposit. Our LA-ICPMS trace element investigations have established that pyrite phases 2 and 3 have the highest gold levels. The significance of the U-Pb zircon age is that the age is closer to the tuffaceous siltstone in the Selinsing gold deposit (further north), implying provenance of this zircon population from volcanic activities that produced the tuffaceous siltstone, in the Selinsing area. Trace element composition of pyrite in the host sandstone indicates that Au positively correlates with As, Ag, Cu, Se, Sb, Pb and Tl in pyrite. These trace metals can be used as indicators for proximity to ore in the Tersang mineral district for orogenic-style gold mineralisation in Malaysia.


    Acknowledgements

    The authors would like to thank support from Peninsular Gold Limited and CODES Industry Project "Ore Deposits of SE Asia Project" led by Khin Zaw, University of Tasmania. Our thanks also go to Christine Cook and Karsten Goemann at the Central Science Laboratory, University of Tasmania for scanning electron microscope analysis. Many thanks go to Dr. Chun Kit Lai for his critical review and Dr. Sebastien Meffre for assistance in handling the LA-ICPMS dataset.


    Conflict of Interest

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.




    [1] J. Sun, J. Zhang, L. Liu, Q. Shan, J. X. Zhang, Event-triggered consensus control of linear multi-agent systems under intermittent communication, J. Franklin Inst., 361 (2024), 106650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2024.106650 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2024.106650
    [2] A. Amirkhani, A. H. Barshooi, Consensus in multi-agent systems: a review, Artif. Intell. Rev., 55 (2022), 3897–3935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10097-x doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-10097-x
    [3] J. Sun, J. Zhang, L. Liu, Y. Wu, Q. Shan, Output consensus control of multi-agent systems with switching networks and incomplete leader measurement, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 21 (2024), 6643–6652. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2023.3328897 doi: 10.1109/TASE.2023.3328897
    [4] S. Liang, F. Wang, Z. Liu, Z. Chen, Necessary and sufficient conditions for leader–follower consensus of discrete-time multiagent systems with smart leader, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.: Syst., 52 (2022), 2779–2788. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2021.3055578 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2021.3055578
    [5] A. Jadbabaie, J. Lin, A. S. Morse, Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 48 (2003), 988–1001. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2003.812781 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2003.812781
    [6] R. Olfati-Saber, R. Murray, Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 49 (2004), 1520–1533. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2004.834113 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2004.834113
    [7] W. Ren, R. W. Beard, Consensus seeking in multi-agent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 50 (2005), 655–661. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2005.846556 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2005.846556
    [8] W. Ni, D. Z. Cheng, Leader-following consensus of multi-agent systems under fixed and switching topologies, Syst. Control Lett., 59 (2010), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2010.01.006 doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2010.01.006
    [9] J. H. Qin, C. B. Yu, H. J. Gao, Coordination for linear multiagent systems with dynamic interaction topology in the leader-following framework, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 61 (2014), 2412–2422. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2013.2273480 doi: 10.1109/TIE.2013.2273480
    [10] D. Yang, Q. Zhang, B. Yao, Singular system, Beijing: Science Press, 2004.
    [11] Y. Mu, H. Zhang, Y. Zhou, L. Yang, A new method of fault estimation observer design for T-S fuzzy singular systems with disturbances using dissipativity theory, IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. II Express Briefs, 69 (2022), 5059–5063. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2022.3202980 doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2022.3202980
    [12] E. Jafari, T. Binazadeh, Robust output regulation in discrete-time singular systems with actuator saturation and uncertainties, IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. II Express Briefs, 67 (2020), 340–344. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2019.2908500 doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2019.2908500
    [13] J. Li, Y. Zhang, Z. Jin, Distributed cooperative control of singular multi agent systems based on fuzzy logic approach, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 19 (2023), 9709–9729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-023-01607-w doi: 10.1007/s40815-023-01607-w
    [14] Y. Mu, H. Zhang, Y. Yan, Z. Wu, A design framework of nonlinear H PD observer for one-sided Lipschitz singular systems with disturbances, IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. II Express Briefs, 69 (2022), 3304–3308. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2022.3166677 doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2022.3166677
    [15] A. Ailon, Disturbance decoupling with stability and impulse-free response in singular systems, Syst. Control Let., 19 (1992), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6911(92)90090-F doi: 10.1016/0167-6911(92)90090-F
    [16] X. R. Yang, G. P. Liu, Necessary and sufficient consensus conditions of descriptor multi-agent systems, IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. I: Regular Papers, 59 (2012), 2669–2677. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2012.2190663 doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2012.2190663
    [17] J. Ren, Q. Song, Y. B. Gao, M. Zhao, G. P. Lu, Leader-following consensus of nonlinear singular multi-agent systems under signed digraph, Int. J. Syst. Sci., 52 (2021), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2020.1825873 doi: 10.1080/00207721.2020.1825873
    [18] T. Y. Liu, A. D. Sheng, C. Q. Ma, G. Q. Qi, Y. Y. Li, Consensus tracking for singular multi-agent systems with Lipschitz nonlinear dynamics and external disturbances, Int. J. Robust Nonlin., 32 (2022), 4899–4922. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.6060 doi: 10.1002/rnc.6060
    [19] J. Xi, Y. Yu, G. Liu, Y. S. Sheng, Guaranteed-cost consensus for singular multi-agent systems with switching topologies, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Regular Papers, 61 (2014), 1531–1542. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2013.2289399 doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2013.2289399
    [20] S. Wang, J. Huang, Cooperative output regulation of singular multi-agent systems under switching network by standard reduction, IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. I: Regular Papers, 65 (2018), 1377–1385. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2017.2755686 doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2017.2755686
    [21] J. Li, Z. Jin, Y. Zhang, Optimal output agreement for T-S fuzzy multi-agent systems: an adaptive distributed approach, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 25 (2023), 2453–2463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-023-01493-2 doi: 10.1007/s40815-023-01493-2
    [22] J. Sun, H. Lei, J. Zhang, L. Liu, Q. Shan, Adaptive consensus control of multiagent systems with an unstable high-dimensional leader and switching topologies, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., 20 (2024), 10946–10953. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2024.3395661 doi: 10.1109/TII.2024.3395661
    [23] X. Jiang, G. Xia, Z. Feng, Guaranteed-performance consensus tracking of singular multi-agent systems with Lipschitz nonlinear dynamics and switching topologies, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 29 (2019), 5227–5250. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.4670 doi: 10.1002/rnc.4670
    [24] T. Zheng, M. He, J. X. Xi, G. B. Liu, Leader-following guaranteed-performance consensus design for singular multi-agent systems with Lipschitz nonlinear dynamics, Neurocomputing, 266 (2017), 651–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.05.073 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.05.073
    [25] K. Li, Y. Li, Fuzzy adaptive optimal consensus fault-tolerant control for stochastic nonlinear multiagent systems, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 30 (2022), 2870–2885. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3094716 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3094716
    [26] D. Chen, X. Liu, W. Yu, Finite-time fuzzy adaptive consensus for heterogeneous nonlinear multi-agent systems, IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng., 7 (2020), 3057–3066. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSE.2020.3013528 doi: 10.1109/TNSE.2020.3013528
    [27] Y. Li, J. Zhang, S. Tong, Fuzzy adaptive optimized leader-following formation control for second-order stochastic multiagent systems, IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform., 18 (2022), 6026–6037. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3133927 doi: 10.1109/TII.2021.3133927
    [28] S. Sui, H. Xu, S. Tong, C. L. P. Chen, Prescribed performance fuzzy adaptive output feedback control for nonlinear MIMO systems in a finite time, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 30 (2022), 3633–3644. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3119750 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3119750
    [29] J. H. Jiang, Y. Y. Jiang, Leader-following consensus of linear time-varying multi-agent systems under fixed and switching topologies, Automatica, 113 (2020), 108804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2020.108804 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2020.108804
    [30] L. An, G. H. Yang, Distributed optimal coordination for heterogeneous linear multiagent systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 67 (2022), 6850–6857. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2021.3133269 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2021.3133269
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Chao Sun, Xiaoyong Yang, Gaofeng Du, Jasmi Hafiz Abdul Aziz, Genesis of the Selinsing gold deposit, Peninsular Malaysia: Constraints from mineralogy, geochemistry and in situ sulfur isotope compositions of sulfides, 2019, 113, 01691368, 103111, 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.103111
    2. Charles Makoundi, Khin Zaw, Zakaria Endut, Fluid Inclusion Study of the Penjom, Tersang, and Selinsing Orogenic Gold Deposits, Peninsular Malaysia, 2020, 10, 2075-163X, 111, 10.3390/min10020111
    3. Charles Makoundi, Khin Zaw, Zakaria Endut, U-Pb Dating, Lead Isotopes, and Trace Element Composition of Pyrite Hosted in Black Shale and Magmatic Rocks, Malaysia: Implications for Orogenic Gold Mineralization and Exploration, 2023, 13, 2075-163X, 221, 10.3390/min13020221
    4. Adi Tonggiroh, Musri Mawaleda, Haerany Sirajuddin, Ulva Ria Irfan, Adiba Safari Triaryanti, 2022, 2543, 0094-243X, 050014, 10.1063/5.0095307
    5. Nur Nadwa Syahirah Ai Zamruddin, Nor Syazwani Zainal Abidin, Zakaria Endut, Charles Makoundi, Low Keng Lok, Mohd Suhaili Ismail, Trace Element Analysis of Pyrite and Arsenopyrite Using the LA-ICPMS Technique in Pulai, Central Belt of Peninsular Malaysia, 2023, 13, 2075-163X, 1026, 10.3390/min13081026
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(910) PDF downloads(79) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(5)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog