age | GYM group | No-GYM group |
7 | N = 3 | N = 3 |
8 | N = 6 | N = 6 |
9 | N = 4 | N = 4 |
10 | N = 1 | N = 1 |
Total | N = 14 | N = 14 |
Multiple sclerosis (MS), is a debilitating neurological disease that currently has various treatments, like disease-modifying therapies, monoclonal antibodies, corticosteroids, and hormonal derivatives. Melatonin has several actions, like regulating circadian rhythms, which are usually used for insomnia. This scoping review aimed to explore the efficacy of melatonin, both as a standalone treatment and in conjunction with other drugs, in the management of MS in animal models.
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar using (“melatonin” OR “melatonin receptor”) AND (“multiple sclerosis”) AND (“animal”). Animal studies that evaluated the effects of melatonin on the development, progression, and outcomes of MS were included. Human studies and other types of studies like case reports were excluded. We used narrative synthesis for reporting the results.
Overall, 21 studies were included, conducted on mice (n = 15) and rats (n = 6). Mostly, studies reported that melatonin led to normal circadian rhythms in animals. Melatonin in doses of both 50 and 100 mg/kg were useful in nociception latency. Melatonin in combination with other drugs like H-89, diisopropylamine dichloroacetate, gibberellins, and IFN-1β improved outcomes, while there was not improved cognition in combination with mesenchymal stem cells. In some tests, male subjects showed significantly better responses. There were controversial results regarding the effects of melatonin on cytokines, but overall, it led to a reduction in proinflammatory cytokines.
Melatonin overall demonstrated favorable outcomes regarding oxidative stress, anti-inflammation, and cytokine levels across various doses. It is recommended conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses with a larger number of primary studies to provide more comprehensive insights.
Citation: Heliya Bandehagh, Farnaz Gozalpour, Ali Mousavi, Mahdi Hemmati Ghavshough. Effects of melatonin on the management of multiple sclerosis: A scoping review on animal studies[J]. AIMS Medical Science, 2024, 11(2): 137-156. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2024012
[1] | Olakunle J. Onaolapo, Adejoke Y. Onaolapo, Moses A. Akanmu, Gbola Olayiwola . Changes in Spontaneous Working-memory, Memory-recall and Approach-avoidance following “Low Dose” Monosodium Glutamate in Mice. AIMS Neuroscience, 2016, 3(3): 317-337. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2016.3.317 |
[2] | Blai Ferrer-Uris, Maria Angeles Ramos, Albert Busquets, Rosa Angulo-Barroso . Can exercise shape your brain? A review of aerobic exercise effects on cognitive function and neuro-physiological underpinning mechanisms. AIMS Neuroscience, 2022, 9(2): 150-174. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2022009 |
[3] | Zoha Deldar, Carlos Gevers-Montoro, Ali Khatibi, Ladan Ghazi-Saidi . The interaction between language and working memory: a systematic review of fMRI studies in the past two decades. AIMS Neuroscience, 2021, 8(1): 1-32. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2021001 |
[4] | Francesca Latino, Francesco Tafuri . The role of physical activity in the physiological activation of the scholastic pre-requirements. AIMS Neuroscience, 2024, 11(3): 244-259. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2024016 |
[5] | Antonio G. Lentoor, Tiro B. Motsamai, Thandokuhle Nxiweni, Bongumusa Mdletshe, Siyasanga Mdingi . Protocol for a systematic review of the effects of gardening physical activity on neuroplasticity and cognitive function. AIMS Neuroscience, 2023, 10(2): 118-129. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2023009 |
[6] | Damien Moore, Paul D Loprinzi . The association of self-reported physical activity on human sensory long-term potentiation. AIMS Neuroscience, 2021, 8(3): 435-447. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2021023 |
[7] | Chris Cadonic, Benedict C. Albensi . Oscillations and NMDA Receptors: Their Interplay Create Memories. AIMS Neuroscience, 2014, 1(1): 52-64. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.1.52 |
[8] | Monireh Asadi Ghaleni, Forouzan Fattahi Masrour, Narjes Saryar, Alexandra J. Bratty, Ebrahim Norouzi, Matheus Santos de Sousa Fernandes, Georgian Badicu . Effects of an intervention combining physical activity and components of Amygdala and Insula Retraining (AIR) on sleep and working memory among older male adults. AIMS Neuroscience, 2024, 11(4): 421-438. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2024025 |
[9] | Piali Bhati, Theodore C. K. Cheung, Gobika Sithamparanathan, Mark A. Schmuckler . Striking a balance in sports: the interrelation between children's sports experience, body size, and posture. AIMS Neuroscience, 2022, 9(2): 288-302. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2022016 |
[10] | Marian E. Berryhill . Longitudinal tDCS: Consistency across Working Memory Training Studies. AIMS Neuroscience, 2017, 4(2): 71-86. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2017.2.71 |
Multiple sclerosis (MS), is a debilitating neurological disease that currently has various treatments, like disease-modifying therapies, monoclonal antibodies, corticosteroids, and hormonal derivatives. Melatonin has several actions, like regulating circadian rhythms, which are usually used for insomnia. This scoping review aimed to explore the efficacy of melatonin, both as a standalone treatment and in conjunction with other drugs, in the management of MS in animal models.
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar using (“melatonin” OR “melatonin receptor”) AND (“multiple sclerosis”) AND (“animal”). Animal studies that evaluated the effects of melatonin on the development, progression, and outcomes of MS were included. Human studies and other types of studies like case reports were excluded. We used narrative synthesis for reporting the results.
Overall, 21 studies were included, conducted on mice (n = 15) and rats (n = 6). Mostly, studies reported that melatonin led to normal circadian rhythms in animals. Melatonin in doses of both 50 and 100 mg/kg were useful in nociception latency. Melatonin in combination with other drugs like H-89, diisopropylamine dichloroacetate, gibberellins, and IFN-1β improved outcomes, while there was not improved cognition in combination with mesenchymal stem cells. In some tests, male subjects showed significantly better responses. There were controversial results regarding the effects of melatonin on cytokines, but overall, it led to a reduction in proinflammatory cytokines.
Melatonin overall demonstrated favorable outcomes regarding oxidative stress, anti-inflammation, and cytokine levels across various doses. It is recommended conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses with a larger number of primary studies to provide more comprehensive insights.
Clinical and experimental evidence shows that physical exercise (PE) is able to cause structural and functional brain changes [1]–[3]. These modifications affect the processes of brain functioning and psychological well-being [4],[5]. The multiple benefits observed in individuals who practice PE have contributed to deepen and characterize these effects. According to current knowledge, PE is a protective factor for different pathologies and mental disorders, such as anxiety and depression and it is an effective weapon to counteract physiological and pathological aging [6],[7]. Many studies have focused on understanding the biological mechanisms that regulate the phenomena of neuroplasticity induced by PE [5], as well as on correlating PE and improvement of cognitive functions [8]. While in adults these issues have been extensively investigated and the ongoing research is in an attempt to understand which type of PE is needed to produce beneficial effects (i.e. aerobic vs. anaerobic) [9]–[11], the studies on children and adolescents are not well deepened. In fact, the few studies performed on children and adolescents mainly concern the effects of PE in relation to academic successes [12],[13]. This approach probably depends on the difficulty in comparing data obtained in children performing PE with those obtained in sedentary children, because typically developing children spontaneously move, run, play, and do not stand still. Therefore, selecting a “real” control group becomes difficult. However, evidence show that children with higher levels of PE display best performances in learning and memory tasks in comparison to children who do not play any sport [13]–[15]. Interestingly, these beneficial effects are associated with larger size of the hippocampal regions and increased volume of cortical areas involved in action planning and decision-making processes [16]. Furthermore, positive effects of PE correlated to academic achievement have been observed on attention, working memory [17]–[21], and flexible modulation of cognitive control processes [22]–[24]. Recently, it has been reported that competitive young athletes display better performances in mental imagery skills in comparison to non-athletes ones [25]. These and other evidence suggest that the sport trains all brain processes. In fact, each action is cognition (i.e. elaboration, planning, choice of strategy, decision making). Therefore, any type of PE (or sport) is able at exercising brain functioning determining improvements in behaviours [5]. Then, PE allows the development of many cognitive domains and for this reason it is a fundamental factor for growth.
Although evidence has documented that PE is an effective tool for improving academic achievements, cognitive abilities, and emotion regulation [21],[26], the findings are rather heterogeneous both for type of PE analyzed and assortment of cognitive assessment [13].
Like other cognitive domains already investigated in relation to PE, such as executive function, also the spatial cognition appears to be crucial in growth. In particular, to explore any environment, it is necessary to know what environmental elements are present, where they are positioned [27]–[29], and how to implement strategies to reach (or avoid) them [30],[31]. These components, commonly defined “declarative knowledge” and “procedural knowledge” [32],[33], are fundamental in everyday life because both of them allow to orient oneself, move from place to place, form a cognitive map of environments and places, and interact with others [34]. Moreover, the exploration of an environment implies putting into action specific navigational strategies (praxis, taxis, place) that generally develop during the first decade of life [29],[35]. In addition, spatial abilities become essential also for the development of other cognitive domains. For example, closely linked to them are the attentional processes: to move it is necessary to direct the attention towards objects to be reached or obstacles to be avoid [29]. Moreover, proper functioning of spatial abilities becomes a prerequisite also for the socialization and, last but not least, to achieve autonomy. Although PE is closely related to spatial exploration and to the other cognitive domains, there is still no evidence that PE may affect spatial knowledge in children and adolescents, as it does in adults and especially in the elderly. Understanding how much PE is able to develop spatial abilities it could be useful to promote physical education in schools and a lifestyle based on PE.
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the capacities of short-term spatial memory in children practicing artistic gymnastics and to compare their performances with those of children practicing no sport. As PE we chose the artistic gymnastics because it involves aerobic and anaerobic components, requires a combination of explosive muscle contractions, elicits high heart rate [36]. In addition to these characteristics, artistic gymnastics trains all body muscles and develops strength, coordination, balance, rhythm, speed, appearing thus a complex and complete PE to be correlated to orientation spatial processes. It is important to underline as some of artistic gymnastics characteristics are very important for cognition. Indeed, while aerobic activity stimulates blood circulation in the neural circuits (i.e the prefrontal circuits are correlated to visuospatial working memory) [5],[9],[37], the coordination, the rhythm and the speed allow to move efficiently in an environment to explore it comprehensively and with little effort.
In the present study, we have chosen to study a specific aspect of spatial abilities that is visuospatial memory easily investigated with the methodological tools present in the literature. In particular, to evaluate visuospatial abilities, we used the table version of the Radial Arm Maze (table-RAM) [29], a task that reproduces in small scale the classical walking RAM task [30],[31],[35]. While the walking RAM task allows to separately evaluate declarative from procedural components, and to study allocentric memory processes, the table-RAM allows to evaluate visuospatial information processing correlated to peripersonal space [29]. In accordance with our previous studies [29]–[31], we administered the forced-choice RAM paradigm that allow evaluating short-term visuospatial memory disentangling short-term memory from working memory abilities.
Fourteen preadolescent girls practicing artistic gymnastics (GYM group) and 14 preadolescent girls who did not practice any sport (no-GYM group) were recruited to participate in the current study. All participants were aged between 7 and 10 years (mean chronological age: 8.21 years ± 1.1) and were right-handed and native Italian speakers (Table 1). There was no significant difference in the mean age between groups (F1,26 = 0.28, p = 0.87).
age | GYM group | No-GYM group |
7 | N = 3 | N = 3 |
8 | N = 6 | N = 6 |
9 | N = 4 | N = 4 |
10 | N = 1 | N = 1 |
Total | N = 14 | N = 14 |
In the present study, only children found to be behaviourally normotypic on the psychological evaluation were considered. Participants belonging to GYM group had a minimum of 2 years of training in artistic gymnastics with a frequency of three times a week, while participants belonging to no-GYM group had no continuous experience in any sport. No-GYM group was formed by children of different classes of the same primary school attended by participants of GYM group. As a criterion for the inclusion in the no-GYM group, the negative response of their parents to the question “Has your daughter ever played sports after school?” was considered.
BVN 5–11 neuropsychological battery [38] was administered only to GYM group in order to evaluate the potential correlations between the benefits induced by artistic gymnastics and cognitive performance.
Written informed consent was obtained from all the parents of the participants. The study had been approved by the Local Ethics Committee of Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy and was carried out in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.
The table-RAM is made of a round central platform (5 cm in diameter). Eight white arms (3 cm wide × 25 cm long) depart the central platform like the spokes of a wheel. At the end of each arm, a small black round cap (2.5 cm in diameter × 2.8 cm height) covered the reward (a little coloured wooden ladybug). As detailed in the next section, in the first phase of the task, four arms of the maze were closed by pieces of black plastic (3.5 cm wide × 1 cm long × 1 cm height) (Figure 1). The table-RAM was placed on an orange desk. All extra-maze cues (windows, paintings, posters, doors, and experimenter) were held in constant spatial relations throughout the experiment. The RAM arms were virtually numbered clockwise, arm 1 being in front of the children. Participants had visual access to the table-RAM only during the experiment.
In according to Foti and colleagues [29], the table-RAM task was presented as “Ladybug game”. The child had to move the older sister ladybug (“Ladybug”) which was placed on the central platform, to find its sisters hidden inside the caps at the end of each arm of the RAM. To increase participants' motivation, at the end of each trial the child received a reward (a coin) in exchange for the ladybugs discovered. All children performed the table-RAM forced-choice paradigm after a short training (3 trials) of habituation to the task in the classic free-choice paradigm. In this training phase, the child could explore the eight arms freely to find the ladybugs hidden inside the caps at the ends of each arm.
After the habituation training, all children were tested in the forced-choice paradigm consisting of two phases. In the first phase, although all arms contained the ladybugs on them, only four arms (for example, arms 1, 3, 4, 7) were accessible, because the remaining four arms were closed at the proximal end of each arm (Figure 1). Different angles separated the open arms to avoid the children reaching the solution through the employment of a procedural strategy (as occurring exploring for example arms 1, 2, 3, 4 or 2, 4, 6, 8). The task started with the Ladybug placed on the central area of the maze and the participant was allowed to explore the four open arms by moving the Ladybug to collect the four accessible ladybugs. Afterwards, each child was invited to interrupt the game for 120 s before the second phase of the task started. During this time, the child was kept in a different place and invited to chat with the experimenter. In the second phase, the participant was allowed moving the Ladybug in all arms, but only the four previously closed arms were rewarded (since the other four ladybugs had been collected in the previous phase). The arrangement of the table-RAM and the child's position was identical to the first phase. The successes in visiting only the rewarded arms essentially depended on remembering which arms had already been visited, stressing the memory component and neglecting the search patterns. In according to procedures describes by Foti and colleagues [29], each participant performed three trials a day for two consecutive days (two sessions), with an inter-trial interval of at least 1 h. In each of the six trials, a different configuration of closed arms was used. At the beginning of the first trial, the experimenter explained the task to each participant using the same simple verbal instructions (“Do you remember the Ladybug that had to find its sisters under the black upturned caps? Well, the mischievous sisters have hidden themselves again. However, they do not know you're there to help the Ladybug find them. Now, some corridors are blocked. You have to let the Ladybug enter only in the arms that are open. Go!”). The verbal instructions after the 120 s interval were: “Uh! Something now has changed, there are no blocks anymore. Then, the Ladybird can freely go and look for the other sisters! Good job!”).
The parameters considered in the second phase were the entries, defined as the total number of the visited arms (correct and incorrect); spatial span, defined as the longest sequence of correctly visited arms (ranged from 1 to 4); short-term memory errors, defined as the re-visits into already visited arms. This parameter was broken down further into two error subtypes: across-phase errors, defined as visits into an arm that had been visited during the first phase of the same trial; within-phase errors, defined as re-visits into an arm already visited in the same phase. While the across-phase errors are correlated to short-term memory, the within-phase errors to working memory. Briefly for each table-RAM parameter (entries, spatial span, short-term memory errors) obtained during task, the average of the correct responses and errors were computed for each participant.
The choices made by the participants during the forced-choice task were videotaped and registered manually.
All data were presented as the mean ± SD and were first tested for normality (Shapiro-Wilk's test) and homoscedasticity (Levene's test). When normally distributed, data were analyzed by using one-way ANCOVA, the age was entered as covariate of no interest (i.e. entries, spatial-span and short-term errors). When data were not normally distributed, non-parametric analyses (Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon's test) were used (i.e., across-phase errors and within-phase errors). The two-tailed Pearson's correlation analyses were used to test for correlations between the score of the BVN 5–11 and years of gymnastics practiced by girls of the GYM group. Moreover, correlation analyses were made between the results of the table-RAM forced-choice task and the ones of the BVN 5–11.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23 Statistical Software Package for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). The significance level was defined as p < 0.05.
All children completed the first phase of table-RAM task without errors. In fact, no one entered an arm already visited, and all children collected the four ladybugs. In the second phase, when all the arms were opened and the participants could move the Ladybug without restrictions, significant statistical differences between groups were found.
A one-way ANCOVA on number of entries, a parameter expressing the general performance level, revealed that children practicing artistic gymnastics made a significantly lower number of entries than children who did not practice sport (GYM group: x = 5.3 ± 0.64; no-GYM group: x = 6.7 ± 2.3; F(1, 26) = 4.88, p = 0.04, ηP2 = 0.16) (Figure 2a).
A one-way ANCOVA on the longest sequence of correctly visited arms in the second phase of the task revealed that children practicing artistic gymnastics had a significantly higher spatial span value than children who did not practice sport (GYM group: x = 3.6 ± 0.7; no-GYM group: x = 2.8 ± 0.6; F(1, 26) = 6.2, p = 0.019, ηP2 = 0.19) (Figure 2b).
A one-way ANCOVA on short-term memory errors performed in the second phase of the task revealed that children who did not practice sport made a significantly higher number of short-term memory errors than children practicing artistic gymnastics (GYM group: x = 1.4 ± 0.6; no-GYM group: x: 2.8 ± 2.25; F(1, 26) = 4.88, p = 0.04, ηP2 = 0.16) (Figure 3). To better understand if the significant reduction of errors by the gymnasts was due to a superior functioning of the short-term or working memory processes, we analyzed the two subtypes of short-term memory errors: across-phase errors (visits into an arm that had been entered during the first phase) and within-phase errors (re-visits into an arm previously visited in the same phase). While across-phase errors reflect a short-term memory deficit, within-phase errors express a working memory deficit. Non-parametric analyses (Mann-Whitney) revealed that no-GYM group made a significantly higher number of within-phase errors compared with GYM group (GYM group: x = 0.1 ± 0.2; no-GYM group: x: 0.5 ± 0.6; U = 57, Z = −2.07, p = 0.04). A similar pattern was observed in relation to across-phase errors, even if the statistical difference did not reach the significant level (GYM group: x = 1.4 ± 0.6; no-GYM group: x: 2.2 ± 1.7; U = 64, Z = −1.6, p = 0.057). When considering the distribution of errors between groups, we observed a significant lower number of errors in the within phase in the GYM group in comparison to NO-GYM one (Chi2 = 3.6, d.f = 1, p = 0.05).
In Table 2, the two-tailed Pearson's correlations analysis between the neuropsychological scores of BVN 5–11 and years of gymnastics practiced by girls of the GYM group are shown, while in Figure 4 the significant correlations between the subtest delayed recall of word list and two parameters of table-RAM forced choice task (short term memory errors and spatial span) are reported. No significant correlations resulted when considering the other scores of BVN 5–11 and the parameters of the RAM.
The present study analyzed in school-age children the effects of physical exercise (PE) on short-term visuospatial memory by means of a table version of the RAM [29] that reproduces in small scale the walking RAM task [30],[31],[35]. In particular, we focused on forced-choice paradigm of the RAM that allows analysing different facets of the short-term memory processes. In fact, the two subtypes of short-term memory errors, across-phase errors (visits into an arm that had been entered during the first phase) and within-phase errors (re-visits into an arm previously visited in the same phase), permit to differentiate short-term components (across-phase errors) from working memory ones (within-phase errors).
BVN 5–11 neuropsychological battery | |||
test | r | p | |
PERCEPTION | Visual discrimination (time) | −0.615 | 0.004 |
Auditory discrimination | 0.514 | 0.020 | |
PRAXIS | Upper limb gestures | 0.473 | 0.035 |
CALCULATION | Forward enumeration (time) | −0.484 | 0.031 |
Total accuracy | 0.462 | 0.046 | |
REASONING | Raven's Progressive Matrices | 0.537 | 0.015 |
VISUO-SPATIAL SHORT-TERM MEMORY | Corsi block tappingTest | 0.445 | 0.050 |
VISUO-SPATIAL LONG-TERM MEMORY and PRAXIA | Rey's complex figure (copy) | 0.580 | 0.009 |
Rey's complex figure (delayed recall) | 0.492 | 0.032 | |
VERBAL LONG-TERM MEMORY | Delayed recall of word list | 0.431 | 0.050 |
EXECUTIVE FUNCTION | Phonological verbal fluency | 0.440 | 0.059 |
The main result of the present research is that PE, when regularly and consistently practiced, as is the case of the artistic gymnastics we analysed, impacts on visuospatial working memory. In particular, comparing the performances of preadolescent girls practicing artistic gymnastics (GYM group) with those who do not practice any sport (no-GYM group), we found significantly reduced the number of within-phase errors in the GYM group (Figure 3). This result agrees with previous studies showing in young populations a correlation between extended chronic exercise and improved working memory [19],[39]. Chronic exercise is a type of PE, which consists of multiple exercise sessions per week and lasts for an extended period (typically over 6 weeks). Although we cannot maintain that our gymnasts were trained multiple times per week, we can state that their PE was an extended physical activity, given that being trained for at least two years with a frequency of three times a week was an inclusion criterion in the GYM group. Therefore, even if the GYM group did not perform exercises in a strictly “chronic” way, the present findings indicate that a prolonged and intensive training is associate with an improvement in the functioning of some cognitive domains, such as spatial working memory abilities.
The present data closely fit with the improvement of working memory correlated to PE in a young population previously reported [19],[39] that however do not concern the spatial domain. In fact, as underlined in the Introduction, most of these studies are focused on executive domain in general (i.e., attention, working memory, inhibition) [40].
The better functioning of visuospatial working memory in gymnasts is also reflected in the other parameters, such as errors and spatial span (Figure 2a,b), suggesting thus that an efficient availability of information in the short-term memory storage allows a better resolution of the task. In support of the present data, some voxel-based morphometry studies have evidenced that the gymnasts exhibit higher grey matter volume in specific cortical areas, such as prefrontal cortices correlated to the working memory [41]–[43] emphasizing from a psychobiological perspective that PE does determine changes in the brain structure.
Interestingly, we found in the GYM group significant correlations between years of practice of gymnastics and several cognitive functions such as perception, praxis abilities, calculation, deductive logical reasoning, verbal and visuospatial long/short-term memory (Table 2). Moreover, we found significant correlations between the performances obtained at the verbal long-term memory tests and the number of RAM errors (Figure 4). Although these data are very preliminary, they indicate a relationship between PE and cognitive functioning, suggesting thus as the neuroplastic effect exerted by PE on the brain may result in enhancement of cognitive functions. However, these findings shall be considered with cautions and further investigations will be needed.
The present study does not allow to establish whether the better performances of gymnasts in working memory abilities depend on the specific type of physical training. In other words, is it due to gymnastics if spatial working memory works better? Certainly, the artistic gymnastics facilitates abilities, such as the estimation of the direction of movements, the speed of execution, and the identification of their own and surrounding objects' locations [44], but these considerations cannot be sufficient to definitely answer the question. Other studies using the table-RAM should be performed on other young people playing sports, for example considering open skill sport, that take place in an unpredictable and constantly changing environment where movements need to be continually adapted, such as basketball, soccer [45]. In addition to this question, it is necessary to underline the limitations of the present study which cannot be overcome requiring caution when generalize the data. In particular, the small size of the samples and the inclusion of only female participants do not allow to generalize completely the results and replicate the study. Another limitation concerns the age of the participants (Table 1) which ranged from 7 to 10 years. We know that spatial abilities are not fully developed in children younger than about 10 years of age [30],[35],[46] and this could determine variability. However, these limitations can be overcome by increasing the sample in future studies. Moreover, further studies based on randomized controlled designs are desirable to better investigate the possible causal relation between PE and the cognitive improvements.
Although these aspects deserve remarkable attention, the present results indicate that the constant practice of the artistic gymnastics may contribute to improve spatial working memory, suggesting thus specific promotion of this type of PE in educational contexts. In this line, it is important underline that it has been observed that the spatial aspects of working memory are crucial to arithmetic learning and problem solving [47]. Therefore, promoting specific exercises capable of enhancing visuospatial skills could be a targeted and effective educational strategy. Unfortunately, PE is limited in Italy but we hope for the present results and further researches may shed light on the importance of PE in improving cognitive functioning during childhood-adolescence. Moreover, we wish for these evidences lead to enhancement of school programs in Italy and other countries where PE is more limited.
[1] |
Jakimovski D, Bittner S, Zivadinov R, et al. (2023) Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 403: 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01473-3 ![]() |
[2] |
Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, et al. (2018) Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 391: 1622-1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30481-1 ![]() |
[3] |
McGinley MP, Goldschmidt CH, Rae-Grant AD (2021) Diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review. JAMA 325: 765-779. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.26858 ![]() |
[4] |
Hauser SL, Cree BAC (2020) Treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review. Am J Med 133: 1380-1390.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.05.049 ![]() |
[5] |
Qian Z, Li Y, Guan Z, et al. (2023) Global, regional, and national burden of multiple sclerosis from 1990 to 2019: findings of global burden of disease study 2019. Front Public Health 11: 1073278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1073278 ![]() |
[6] |
Català-Senent JF, Andreu Z, Hidalgo MR, et al. (2023) A deep transcriptome meta-analysis reveals sex differences in multiple sclerosis. Neurobiol Dis 181: 106113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106113 ![]() |
[7] |
Cardinali DP (2019) Melatonin: clinical perspectives in neurodegeneration. Front Endocrinol 10: 480. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00480 ![]() |
[8] |
Gunata M, Parlakpinar H, Acet HA (2020) Melatonin: a review of its potential functions and effects on neurological diseases. Rev Neurol 176: 148-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2019.07.025 ![]() |
[9] |
Hardeland R (2018) Melatonin and inflammation—story of a double-edged blade. J Pineal Res 65: e12525. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpi.12525 ![]() |
[10] |
Loloei S, Sepidarkish M, Heydarian A, et al. (2019) The effect of melatonin supplementation on lipid profile and anthropometric indices: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Diabetes Metab Syndr 13: 1901-1910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2019.04.043 ![]() |
[11] |
Razmaray H, Nasiri E, Vakilipour P, et al. (2024) The effects of melatonin supplementation on neurobehavioral outcomes and clinical severity in rodent models of multiple sclerosis; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inflammopharmacology 32: 927-944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-023-01414-7 ![]() |
[12] |
Morsali S, Sabahi Z, Kakaei J, et al. (2023) Clinical efficacy and safety of melatonin supplementation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Inflammopharmacology 31: 2213-2220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-023-01271-4 ![]() |
[13] |
Skarlis C, Anagnostouli M (2020) The role of melatonin in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci 41: 769-781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04137-2 ![]() |
[14] |
Muñoz-Jurado A, Escribano BM, Caballero-Villarraso J, et al. (2022) Melatonin and multiple sclerosis: antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulator mechanism of action. Inflammopharmacology 30: 1569-1596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-022-01011-0 ![]() |
[15] |
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. (2018) PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 169: 467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 ![]() |
[16] |
Abo Taleb HA, Alghamdi BS (2020) Neuroprotective effects of melatonin during demyelination and remyelination stages in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. J Mol Neurosci 70: 386-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-019-01425-6 ![]() |
[17] |
Wen J, Ariyannur PS, Ribeiro R, et al. (2016) Efficacy of N-acetylserotonin and melatonin in the EAE model of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 11: 763-773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-016-9702-9 ![]() |
[18] |
Escribano BM, Muñoz-Jurado A, Caballero-Villarraso J, et al. (2022) Protective effects of melatonin on changes occurring in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 58: 103520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.103520 ![]() |
[19] |
Ghareghani M, Dokoohaki S, Ghanbari A, et al. (2017) Melatonin exacerbates acute experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by enhancing the serum levels of lactate: a potential biomarker of multiple sclerosis progression. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 44: 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1681.12678 ![]() |
[20] |
Ortíz GG, Briones-Torres AL, Benitez-King G, et al. (2022) Beneficial effect of melatonin alone or in combination with glatiramer acetate and interferon β-1b on experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Molecules 27: 4217. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27134217 ![]() |
[21] |
Ghareghani M, Farhadi Z, Rivest S, et al. (2022) PDK4 inhibition ameliorates melatonin therapy by modulating cerebral metabolism and remyelination in an EAE Demyelinating mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol 13: 862316. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.862316 ![]() |
[22] |
Ghareghani M, Pons V, Laflamme N, et al. (2023) Inhibiting nighttime melatonin and boosting cortisol increase patrolling monocytes, phagocytosis, and myelination in a murine model of multiple sclerosis. Exp Mol Med 55: 215-227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-023-00925-1 ![]() |
[23] | Gharib D, Rashed L, Yousuf A, et al. (2022) Therapeutic effect of microvesicles derived from BM-MSCS transplantation and/or melatonin in cuprizone model of multiple sclerosis: a pharmacodynamic biochemical assay. Egypt J Chem 65: 153-169. |
[24] |
González EJR, Jirano LJ, Martínez DZG, et al. (2021) A comparative study of melatonin and immunomodulatory therapy with interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Neurología 36: 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrleng.2018.01.004 ![]() |
[25] |
Ghareghani M, Scavo L, Arnoult D, et al. (2018) Melatonin therapy reduces the risk of osteoporosis and normalizes bone formation in multiple sclerosis. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 32: 181-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcp.12337 ![]() |
[26] |
Jand Y, Ghahremani MH, Ghanbari A, et al. (2022) Melatonin ameliorates disease severity in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis by modulating the kynurenine pathway. Sci Rep 12: 15963. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20164-0 ![]() |
[27] |
Labunets I, Rodnichenko A, Savosko S, et al. (2023) Reaction of different cell types of the brain on neurotoxin cuprizone and hormone melatonin treatment in young and aging mice. Front Cell Neurosci 17: 1131130. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2023.1131130 ![]() |
[28] |
Álvarez-Sánchez N, Cruz-Chamorro I, López-González A, et al. (2015) Melatonin controls experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by altering the T effector/regulatory balance. Brain Behav Immun 50: 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2015.06.021 ![]() |
[29] |
Chen SJ, Huang SH, Chen JW, et al. (2016) Melatonin enhances interleukin-10 expression and suppresses chemotaxis to inhibit inflammation in situ and reduce the severity of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Int Immunopharmacol 31: 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2015.12.020 ![]() |
[30] |
Long T, Yang Y, Peng L, et al. (2018) Neuroprotective effects of melatonin on experimental allergic encephalomyelitis mice via anti-oxidative stress activity. J Mol Neurosci 64: 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-017-1022-x ![]() |
[31] |
Ghareghani M, Zibara K, Sadeghi H, et al. (2018) Spasticity treatment ameliorates the efficacy of melatonin therapy in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE) mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Cell Mol Neurobiol 38: 1145-1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-018-0580-y ![]() |
[32] |
Dokoohaki S, Ghareghani M, Ghanbari A, et al. (2017) Corticosteroid therapy exacerbates the reduction of melatonin in multiple sclerosis. Steroids 128: 32-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2017.10.006 ![]() |
[33] |
Alghamdi BS, AboTaleb HA (2020) Melatonin improves memory defects in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis by up-regulating cAMP-response element-binding protein and synapse-associated proteins in the prefrontal cortex. J Integr Neurosci 19: 229-237. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.jin.2020.02.32 ![]() |
[34] |
Sharif R, Aghsami M, Gharghabi M, et al. (2017) Melatonin reverses H-89 induced spatial memory deficit: involvement of oxidative stress and mitochondrial function. Behav Brain Res 316: 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.08.040 ![]() |
[35] |
Labunets IF, Utko NA, Toporova OK (2021) Effects of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells of the human umbilical cord and their combination with melatonin in adult and aging mice with a toxic cuprizone model of demyelination. Adv Gerontol 11: 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079057021020077 ![]() |
[36] |
Vakilzadeh G, Khodagholi F, Ghadiri T, et al. (2016) The effect of melatonin on behavioral, molecular, and histopathological changes in cuprizone model of demyelination. Mol Neurobiol 53: 4675-4684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-015-9404-y ![]() |
[37] |
Pivovarova-Ramich O, Zimmermann HG, Paul F (2023) Multiple sclerosis and circadian rhythms: can diet act as a treatment?. Acta Physiol 237: e13939. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.13939 ![]() |
[38] |
Ohl K, Tenbrock K, Kipp M (2016) Oxidative stress in multiple sclerosis: central and peripheral mode of action. Exp Neurol 277: 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.11.010 ![]() |
[39] |
Pereira GM, Soares NM, Souza AR, et al. (2018) Basal cortisol levels and the relationship with clinical symptoms in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 76: 622-634. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20180091 ![]() |
[40] |
Cohen JA (2013) Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 333: 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2012.12.009 ![]() |
[41] |
Hu C, Li L (2019) Melatonin plays critical role in mesenchymal stem cell-based regenerative medicine in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cell Res Ther 10: 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-1114-8 ![]() |
[42] |
Farhadi N, Oryan S, Nabiuni M (2014) Serum levels of melatonin and cytokines in multiple sclerosis. Biomed J 37: 90-92. https://doi.org/10.4103/2319-4170.125885 ![]() |
1. | Tommaso Palombi, Laura Mandolesi, Fabio Alivernini, Andrea Chirico, Fabio Lucidi, Application of Real and Virtual Radial Arm Maze Task in Human, 2022, 12, 2076-3425, 468, 10.3390/brainsci12040468 | |
2. | Qiqi Zhu, Jie Deng, Meixi Yao, Chong Xu, Demin Liu, Liya Guo, Yu Zhu, Effects of physical activity on visuospatial working memory in healthy individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2023, 14, 1664-1078, 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1103003 | |
3. | Laura Serra, Laura Petrosini, Laura Mandolesi, Sabrina Bonarota, Francesca Balsamo, Marco Bozzali, Carlo Caltagirone, Francesca Gelfo, Walking, Running, Swimming: An Analysis of the Effects of Land and Water Aerobic Exercises on Cognitive Functions and Neural Substrates, 2022, 19, 1660-4601, 16310, 10.3390/ijerph192316310 | |
4. | Ilona Bidzan-Bluma, Magdalena Jochimek, Małgorzata Lipowska, Cognitive Functioning of Preadolescent Gymnasts, Including Bioelectrical Brain Activity, 2023, 0031-5125, 003151252311567, 10.1177/00315125231156722 | |
5. | G. D’Aurizio, I. Di Pompeo, N. Passarello, E. Troisi Lopez, P. Sorrentino, G. Curcio, L. Mandolesi, Visuospatial working memory abilities in children analyzed by the bricks game task (BGT), 2023, 0340-0727, 10.1007/s00426-023-01803-1 | |
6. | Noemi Passarello, Marianna Liparoti, Caterina Padulo, Pierpaolo Sorrentino, Fabio Alivernini, Beth Fairfield, Fabio Lucidi, Laura Mandolesi, Motor Imagery as a Key Factor for Healthy Ageing: A Review of New Insights and Techniques, 2022, 12, 2076-3425, 1492, 10.3390/brainsci12111492 | |
7. | Yuntian Guan, Zhen Yan, Molecular Mechanisms of Exercise and Healthspan, 2022, 11, 2073-4409, 872, 10.3390/cells11050872 | |
8. | Noemi Passarello, Ludovica Varini, Marianna Liparoti, Emahnuel Troisi Lopez, Pierpaolo Sorrentino, Fabio Alivernini, Onofrio Gigliotta, Fabio Lucidi, Laura Mandolesi, Boosting effect of regular sport practice in young adults: Preliminary results on cognitive and emotional abilities, 2022, 13, 1664-1078, 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.957281 | |
9. | Emahnuel Troisi Lopez, Marianna Liparoti, Noemi Passarello, Fabio Lucidi, Laura Mandolesi, Multimodal Physical Exercise Affects Visuo-Spatial Working Memory: Preliminary Evidence from a Descriptive Study on Tai-Chi Practitioners and Runners, 2023, 13, 2076-3425, 1400, 10.3390/brainsci13101400 | |
10. | Hanieh Ghasemian Moghadam, Mahdi Sohrabi, The Effect Of Basic Taekwondo Exercises On Executive Functions Of Children With Learning Disorder, 2024, 14, 2820-932X, 202, 10.61186/JRSM.14.27.202 | |
11. | Laura Mandolesi, Noemi Passarello, Fabio Lucidi, Differences in motor imagery abilities in active and sedentary individuals: new insights from backward-walking imagination, 2024, 88, 0340-0727, 499, 10.1007/s00426-023-01876-y | |
12. | Amir Hamzeh Sabzi, Azar Aghayari, Zahra Ramrodi, The Impact of Table Tennis Exercises on Working Memory of Educable Intellectually Disabled Students, 2024, 5, 2950-5518, 10.5812/jmcl-146342 | |
13. | Noemi Passarello, Patrizia Turriziani, Fabio Lucidi, Laura Mandolesi, Executive function and spatial abilities in physically active children: an explorative study, 2024, 12, 2050-7283, 10.1186/s40359-024-01785-8 | |
14. | Ana Rodrigues, Hélio Antunes, Bebiana Sabino, Duarte Sousa, Ana Luísa Correia, Ricardo Alves, Hélder Lopes, The Effect of Physical Activity Levels on Cognitive Performance: Research in Portuguese Adolescents, 2024, 12, 2075-4663, 146, 10.3390/sports12060146 | |
15. | Dmytro Vus, Zhanneta Kozina, Iryna Sobko, Sergii Riabchykov, Physical exercises improve cognitive abilities of 7-8 years old chess club’s students, 2023, 4, 2958-9010, 20, 10.58962/HSTRPT.2023.4.1.20-33 | |
16. | Laura Piccardi, Anna Pecchinenda, Massimiliano Palmiero, Marco Giancola, Maddalena Boccia, Anna Maria Giannini, Cecilia Guariglia, The contribution of being physically active to successful aging, 2023, 17, 1662-5161, 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1274151 | |
17. | Kacper Cieśluk, Dorota Sadowska, Justyna Krzepota, Assessing Changes in Reaction Time Following RAMP Warm-Up and Short-Term Repeated Volleyball Specific Exercise in Young Players, 2024, 25, 1424-8220, 125, 10.3390/s25010125 | |
18. | Tomás Reyes-Amigo, Gabriel Salinas-Gallardo, Edgardo Mendoza, Camilo Ovalle-Fernández, Jessica Ibarra-Mora, Nicolás Gómez-Álvarez, Hernaldo Carrasco-Beltrán, Jacqueline Páez-Herrera, Juan Hurtado-Almonácid, Rodrigo Yañez-Sepúlveda, Rafael Zapata-Lamana, Felipe Sepúlveda-Figueroa, Jorge Olivares-Arancibia, Jorge Mota, Effectiveness of school-based active breaks on classroom behavior, executive functions and physical fitness in children and adolescent: a systematic review, 2025, 13, 2296-2565, 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1469998 | |
19. | Davide Di Palma, Maria Giovanna Tafuri, Embodied Creativity: An experimental school laboratory on movement to promote the educational development of students with SLD, 2025, 2240-7758, 63, 10.3280/erp2-2024oa18716 | |
20. | Rana Jamaan Alghamdi, Salem Alotaibi, Osama Aljuhani, Shaea Alkahtani, Associations between physical fitness and executive functions in 10–13 year male children in Saudi Arabia, 2025, 16, 1664-1078, 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1493206 | |
21. | Eva Borrega-Alonso, F. Javier Otamendi, Effects of acute and chronic exercise on working memory in healthy adults. An experimental investigation, 2025, 16, 1664-1078, 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1608721 |
age | GYM group | No-GYM group |
7 | N = 3 | N = 3 |
8 | N = 6 | N = 6 |
9 | N = 4 | N = 4 |
10 | N = 1 | N = 1 |
Total | N = 14 | N = 14 |
BVN 5–11 neuropsychological battery | |||
test | r | p | |
PERCEPTION | Visual discrimination (time) | −0.615 | 0.004 |
Auditory discrimination | 0.514 | 0.020 | |
PRAXIS | Upper limb gestures | 0.473 | 0.035 |
CALCULATION | Forward enumeration (time) | −0.484 | 0.031 |
Total accuracy | 0.462 | 0.046 | |
REASONING | Raven's Progressive Matrices | 0.537 | 0.015 |
VISUO-SPATIAL SHORT-TERM MEMORY | Corsi block tappingTest | 0.445 | 0.050 |
VISUO-SPATIAL LONG-TERM MEMORY and PRAXIA | Rey's complex figure (copy) | 0.580 | 0.009 |
Rey's complex figure (delayed recall) | 0.492 | 0.032 | |
VERBAL LONG-TERM MEMORY | Delayed recall of word list | 0.431 | 0.050 |
EXECUTIVE FUNCTION | Phonological verbal fluency | 0.440 | 0.059 |
age | GYM group | No-GYM group |
7 | N = 3 | N = 3 |
8 | N = 6 | N = 6 |
9 | N = 4 | N = 4 |
10 | N = 1 | N = 1 |
Total | N = 14 | N = 14 |
BVN 5–11 neuropsychological battery | |||
test | r | p | |
PERCEPTION | Visual discrimination (time) | −0.615 | 0.004 |
Auditory discrimination | 0.514 | 0.020 | |
PRAXIS | Upper limb gestures | 0.473 | 0.035 |
CALCULATION | Forward enumeration (time) | −0.484 | 0.031 |
Total accuracy | 0.462 | 0.046 | |
REASONING | Raven's Progressive Matrices | 0.537 | 0.015 |
VISUO-SPATIAL SHORT-TERM MEMORY | Corsi block tappingTest | 0.445 | 0.050 |
VISUO-SPATIAL LONG-TERM MEMORY and PRAXIA | Rey's complex figure (copy) | 0.580 | 0.009 |
Rey's complex figure (delayed recall) | 0.492 | 0.032 | |
VERBAL LONG-TERM MEMORY | Delayed recall of word list | 0.431 | 0.050 |
EXECUTIVE FUNCTION | Phonological verbal fluency | 0.440 | 0.059 |