Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Production and postharvest quality of Passiflora edulis Sims under brackish water and potassium doses

  • The aim of this research was to assess the yield and postharvest characteristics of 'BRS Sol do Cerrado' sour passion fruits based on irrigation with varying levels of saline water and potassium fertilization. The study was conducted under field conditions at an experimental farm in São Domingos, Paraíba, Brazil. A randomized block design was implemented in a 5 × 4 factorial arrangement, with five levels of electrical conductivity of water (ECw): 0.3, 1.1, 1.9, 2.7, and 3.5 dS m−1, and four potassium doses (KD): 60, 80,100, and 120% of the recommended amount, with 3 replications. The potassium dose equivalent to 120% of the recommended dose in combination with low-salinity water resulted in the highest fresh mass accumulation in the sour passion fruit. Water electrical conductivity up to 2.7 dS m−1, along with the lowest recommended KD, led to increased levels of soluble solids and ascorbic acid in the sour passion fruit. Irrigation with water of 3.5 dS m−1 and using 80 to 100% of the recommended KD enhanced the total sugar content in the sour passion fruit. On the other hand, irrigation with water of 3.5 dS m−1 combined with 60% of the recommended KD resulted in a higher pulp yield in the 'BRS Sol do Cerrado' sour passion fruit 160 days post-transplantation. Adjustments in potassium fertilization management at different irrigation water salinity levels played a crucial role in maintaining both the production and quality of the sour passion fruit.

    Citation: Francisco Jean da Silva Paiva, Geovani Soares de Lima, Vera Lúcia Antunes de Lima, Weslley Bruno Belo de Souza, Lauriane Almeida dos Anjos Soares, Rafaela Aparecida Frazão Torres, Hans Raj Gheyi, Mariana de Oliveira Pereira, Maria Sallydelândia Sobral de Farias, André Alisson Rodrigues da Silva, Reynaldo Teodoro de Fátima, Jean Telvio Andrade Ferreira. Production and postharvest quality of Passiflora edulis Sims under brackish water and potassium doses[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(2): 551-567. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024031

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ruijin Hong, Jialin Ji, Chunxian Tao, Daohua Zhang, Dawei Zhang . Fabrication of Au/graphene oxide/Ag sandwich structure thin film and its tunable energetics and tailorable optical properties. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(1): 223-230. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.1.223
    [2] Purabi R. Ghosh, Derek Fawcett, Michael Platten, Shashi B. Sharma, John Fosu-Nyarko, Gerrard E. J. Poinern . Sustainable green chemical synthesis of discrete, well-dispersed silver nanoparticles with bacteriostatic properties from carrot extracts aided by polyvinylpyrrolidone. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(3): 269-287. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.3.269
    [3] Johnson N. Naat, Yantus A. B Neolaka, Yosep Lawa, Calvin L. Wolu, Dewi Lestarani, Sri Sugiarti, Dyah Iswantini . Modification of Takari natural sand based silica with BSA (SiO2@BSA) for biogenic amines compound adsorbent. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(1): 36-55. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022003
    [4] Mohsen Safaei, Mohammad Salmani Mobarakeh, Bahram Azizi, Ehsan Shoohanizad, Ling Shing Wong, Nafiseh Nikkerdar . Optimization of synthesis of cellulose/gum Arabic/Ag bionanocomposite for antibacterial applications. AIMS Materials Science, 2025, 12(2): 278-300. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2025015
    [5] Reisfeld Renata . Optical Properties of Lanthanides in Condensed Phase, Theory and Applications. AIMS Materials Science, 2015, 2(2): 37-60. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2015.2.37
    [6] Harikrishnan Pulikkalparambil, Jyotishkumar Parameswaranpillai, Jinu Jacob George, Krittirash Yorseng, Suchart Siengchin . Physical and thermo-mechanical properties of bionano reinforced poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate), hemp/CNF/Ag-NPs composites. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(3): 814-831. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.3.814
    [7] Abdulkader A. Annaz, Saif S. Irhayyim, Mohanad L. Hamada, Hashim Sh. Hammood . Comparative study of mechanical performance between Al–Graphite and Cu–Graphite self-lubricating composites reinforced by nano-Ag particles. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(5): 534-551. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.5.534
    [8] Takayuki Aoyama, Mari Aoki, Isao Sumita, Atsushi Ogura . Effects of particle size of aluminum powder in silver/aluminum paste on n-type solar cells. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(4): 614-623. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.4.614
    [9] Abdullah Ahmed Ali Ahmed, Abdullah Mohammed Al-Hussam, Abdu Mohammed Abdulwahab, Ahmed Nasser Ahmed Ali Ahmed . The impact of sodium chloride as dopant on optical and electrical properties of polyvinyl alcohol. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(3): 533-542. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.3.533
    [10] Shreeram S. Joglekar, Harish M. Gholap, Prashant S. Alegaonkar, Anup A. Kale . The interactions between CdTe quantum dots and proteins: understanding nano-bio interface. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(1): 209-222. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.1.209
  • The aim of this research was to assess the yield and postharvest characteristics of 'BRS Sol do Cerrado' sour passion fruits based on irrigation with varying levels of saline water and potassium fertilization. The study was conducted under field conditions at an experimental farm in São Domingos, Paraíba, Brazil. A randomized block design was implemented in a 5 × 4 factorial arrangement, with five levels of electrical conductivity of water (ECw): 0.3, 1.1, 1.9, 2.7, and 3.5 dS m−1, and four potassium doses (KD): 60, 80,100, and 120% of the recommended amount, with 3 replications. The potassium dose equivalent to 120% of the recommended dose in combination with low-salinity water resulted in the highest fresh mass accumulation in the sour passion fruit. Water electrical conductivity up to 2.7 dS m−1, along with the lowest recommended KD, led to increased levels of soluble solids and ascorbic acid in the sour passion fruit. Irrigation with water of 3.5 dS m−1 and using 80 to 100% of the recommended KD enhanced the total sugar content in the sour passion fruit. On the other hand, irrigation with water of 3.5 dS m−1 combined with 60% of the recommended KD resulted in a higher pulp yield in the 'BRS Sol do Cerrado' sour passion fruit 160 days post-transplantation. Adjustments in potassium fertilization management at different irrigation water salinity levels played a crucial role in maintaining both the production and quality of the sour passion fruit.



    Fractional calculus is a notably attractive subject owing to having wide-ranging application areas of theoretical and applied sciences. Despite the fact that there are a large number of worthwhile mathematical works on the fractional differential calculus, there is no noteworthy parallel improvement of fractional difference calculus up to lately. This statement has shown that discrete fractional calculus has certain unforeseen hardship.

    Fractional sums and differences were obtained firstly in Diaz-Osler [1], Miller-Ross [2] and Gray and Zhang [3] and they found discrete types of fractional integrals and derivatives. Later, several authors began to touch upon discrete fractional calculus; Goodrich-Peterson [4], Baleanu et al. [5], Ahrendt et al. [6]. Nevertheless, discrete fractional calculus is a rather novel area. The first studies have been done by Atıcı et al. [7,8,9,10,11], Abdeljawad et al. [12,13,14], Mozyrska et al. [15,16,17], Anastassiou [18,19], Hein et al. [20] and Cheng et al. [21] and so forth [22,23,24,25,26].

    Self-adjoint operators have an important place in differential operators. Levitan and Sargsian [27] studied self-adjoint Sturm-Liouville differential operators and they obtained spectral properties based on self-adjointness. Also, they found representation of solutions and hence they obtained asymptotic formulas of eigenfunctions and eigenvalues. Similarly, Dehghan and Mingarelli [28,29] obtained for the first time representation of solution of fractional Sturm-Liouville problem and they obtained asymptotic formulas of eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the problem. In this study, firstly we obtain self-adjointness of DFSL operator within nabla fractional Riemann-Liouville and delta fractional Grünwald-Letnikov operators. From this point of view, we obtain orthogonality of distinct eigenfunctions, reality of eigenvalues. In addition, we open a new gate by obtaining representation of solution of DFSL problem for researchers study in this area.

    Self-adjointness of fractional Sturm-Liouville differential operators have been proven by Bas et al. [30,31], Klimek et al. [32,33]. Variational properties of fractional Sturm-Liouville problem has been studied in [34,35]. However, self-adjointness of conformable Sturm-Liouville and DFSL with Caputo-Fabrizio operator has been proven by [36,37]. Nowadays, several studies related to Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative and its discrete version are done [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45].

    In this study, we consider DFSL operators within Riemann-Liouville and Grünwald-Letnikov sense, and we prove the self-adjointness, orthogonality of distinct eigenfunctions, reality of eigenvalues of DFSL operator. However, we get sum representation of solutions for DFSL equation by means Laplace transform for nabla fractional difference equations. Finally, we compare the results for the solution of DFSL problem, discrete Sturm-Liouville (DSL) problem with the second order, fractional Sturm-Liouville (FSL) problem and classical Sturm-Liouville (CSL) problem with the second order. The aim of this paper is to contribute to the theory of DFSL operator.

    We discuss DFSL equations in three different ways with;

    i) Self-adjoint (nabla left and right) Riemann-Liouville (R-L) fractional operator,

    L1x(t)=μa(p(t)bμx(t))+q(t)x(t)=λr(t)x(t), 0<μ<1,

    ii) Self-adjoint (delta left and right) Grünwald-Letnikov (G-L) fractional operator,

    L2x(t)=Δμ(p(t)Δμ+x(t))+q(t)x(t)=λr(t)x(t), 0<μ<1,

    iii)(nabla left) DFSL operator is defined by R-L fractional operator,

    L3x(t)=μa(μax(t))+q(t)x(t)=λx(t), 0<μ<1.

    Definition 2.1. [4] Delta and nabla difference operators are defined by respectively

    Δx(t)=x(t+1)x(t),x(t)=x(t)x(t1). (1)

    Definition 2.2. [46] Falling function is defined by, αR

    tα_=Γ(α+1)Γ(α+1n), (2)

    where Γ is Euler gamma function.

    Definition 2.3. [46] Rising function is defined by, αR,

    t¯α=Γ(t+α)Γ(t). (3)

    Remark 1. Delta and nabla operators have the following properties

    Δtα_=αtα1_, (4)
    t¯α=αt¯α1.

    Definition 2.4. [2,7] Fractional sum operators are defined by,

    (i) The left defined nabla fractional sum with order μ>0 is defined by

    μax(t)=1Γ(μ)ts=a+1(tρ(s))¯μ1x(s), tNa+1, (5)

    (ii) The right defined nabla fractional sum with order μ>0 is defined by

    bμx(t)=1Γ(μ)b1s=t(sρ(t))¯μ1x(s), t b1N, (6)

    where ρ(t)=t1 is called backward jump operators, Na={a,a+1,...}, bN={b,b1,...}.

    Definition 2.5. [47] Fractional difference operators are defined by,

    (i) The nabla left fractional difference of order μ>0 is defined

    μax(t)=n(nμ)ax(t)=nΓ(nμ)ts=a+1(tρ(s))¯nμ1x(s), tNa+1, (7)

    (ii) The nabla right fractional difference of order μ>0 is defined

    bμx(t)=(1)nΔn b(nμ)x(t)=(1)nΔnΓ(nμ)b1s=t(sρ(t))¯nμ1x(s), t b1N. (8)

    Fractional differences in (78) are called the Riemann-Liouville (R-L) definition of the μ-th order nabla fractional difference.

    Definition 2.6. [1,21,48] Fractional difference operators are defined by,

    (i) The left defined delta fractional difference of order μ, 0<μ1, is defined by

    Δμx(t)=1hμts=0(1)sμ(μ1)...(μs+1)s!x(ts), t=1,...,N. (9)

    (ii) The right defined delta fractional difference of order μ, 0<μ1, is defined by

    Δμ+x(t)=1hμNts=0(1)sμ(μ1)...(μs+1)s!x(t+s), t=0,..,N1. (10)

    Fractional differences in (910) are called the Grünwald-Letnikov (G-L) definition of the μ-th order delta fractional difference.

    Theorem 2.7. [47] We define the summation by parts formula for R-L fractional nabla difference operator, u is defined on bN and v is defined on Na, then

    b1s=a+1u(s)μav(s)=b1s=a+1v(s)bμu(s). (11)

    Theorem 2.8. [26,48] We define the summation by parts formula for G-L delta fractional difference operator, u, v is defined on {0,1,...,n}, then

    ns=0u(s)Δμv(s)=ns=0v(s)Δμ+u(s). (12)

    Definition 2.9. [20] f:NaR, s, Laplace transform is defined as follows,

    La{f}(s)=k=1(1s)k1f(a+k),

    where =C{1} and is called the set of regressive (complex) functions.

    Definition 2.10. [20] Let f,g:NaR, all tNa+1, convolution property of f and g is given by

    (fg)(t)=ts=a+1f(tρ(s)+a)g(s),

    where ρ(s) is the backward jump function defined in [46] as

    ρ(s)=s1.

    Theorem 2.11. [20] f,g:NaR, convolution theorem is expressed as follows,

    La{fg}(s)=La{f}La{g}(s).

    Lemma 2.12. [20] f:NaR, the following property is valid,

    La+1{f}(s)=11sLa{f}(s)11sf(a+1).

    Theorem 2.13. [20] f:NaR, 0<μ<1, Laplace transform of nabla fractional difference

    La+1{μaf}(s)=sμLa+1{f}(s)1sμ1sf(a+1),tNa+1.

    Definition 2.14. [20] For |p|<1, α>0, βR and tNa, discrete Mittag-Leffler function is defined by

    Ep,α,β(t,a)=k=0pk(ta)¯αk+βΓ(αk+β+1),

    where t¯n={t(t+1)(t+n1),nZΓ(t+n)Γ(t),nR is rising factorial function.

    Theorem 2.15. [20] For |p|<1, α>0, βR, |1s|<1, and |s|α>p, Laplace transform of discrete Mittag-Leffler function is as follows,

    La{Ep,α,β(.,a)}(s)=sαβ1sαp.

    Definition 2.16. Laplace transform of f(t)R+, t0 is defined as follows,

    L{f}(s)=0estf(t)dt.

    Theorem 2.17. For z, θC,Re(δ)>0, Mittag-Leffler function with two parameters is defined as follows

    Eδ,θ(z)=k=0zkΓ(δk+θ).

    Theorem 2.18. Laplace transform of Mittag-Leffler function is as follows

    L{tθ1Eδ,θ(λtδ)}(s)=sδθsδλ.

    Property 2.19. [28] f:NaR, 0<μ<1, Laplace transform of fractional derivative in Caputo sense is as follows, 0<α<1,

    L{CDα0+f}(s)=sαL{f}(s)sα1f(0).

    Property 2.20. [28] f:NaR, 0<μ<1, Laplace transform of left fractional derivative in Riemann-Liouville sense is as follows, 0<α<1,

    L{Dα0+f}(s)=sαL{f}(s)I1α0+f(t)|t=0,

    here Iα0+ is left fractional integral in Riemann-Liouville sense.

    We consider discrete fractional Sturm-Liouville equations in three different ways as follows:

    First Case: Self-adjoint L1 DFSL operator is defined by (nabla right and left) R-L fractional operator,

    L1x(t)=μa(p(t)bμx(t))+q(t)x(t)=λr(t)x(t), 0<μ<1, (13)

    where p(t)>0, r(t)>0, q(t) is a real valued function on [a+1,b1] and real valued, λ is the spectral parameter, t[a+1,b1], x(t)l2[a+1,b1]. In 2(a+1,b1), the Hilbert space of sequences of complex numbers u(a+1),...,u(b1) with the inner product is given by,

    u(n),v(n)=b1n=a+1u(n)v(n),

    for every uDL1, let's define as follows

    DL1={u(n), v(n)2(a+1,b1):L1u(n), L1v(n)2(a+1,b1)}.

    Second Case: Self-adjoint L2 DFSL operator is defined by(delta left and right) G-L fractional operator,

    L2x(t)=Δμ(p(t)Δμ+x(t))+q(t)x(t)=λr(t)x(t), 0<μ<1, (14)

    where p,r,λ is as defined above, q(t) is a real valued function on [0,n], t[0,n], x(t)l2[0,n]. In 2(0,n), the Hilbert space of sequences of complex numbers u(0),...,u(n) with the inner product is given by, n is a finite integer,

    u(i),r(i)=ni=0u(i)r(i),

    for every uDL2, let's define as follows

    DL2={u(i), v(i)2(0,n):L2u(n), L2r(n)2(0,n)}.

    Third Case:L3 DFSL operator is defined by (nabla left) R-L fractional operator,

    L3x(t)=μa(μax(t))+q(t)x(t)=λx(t), 0<μ<1, (15)

    p,r,λ is as defined above, q(t) is a real valued function on [a+1,b1], t[a+1,b1].

    Firstly, we consider the first case and give the following theorems and proofs;

    Theorem 3.1. DFSL operator L1 is self-adjoint.

    Proof.

    u(t)L1v(t)=u(t)μa(p(t)bμv(t))+u(t)q(t)v(t), (16)
    v(t)L1u(t)=v(t)μa(p(t)bμu(t))+v(t)q(t)u(t). (17)

    If (1617) is subtracted from each other

    u(t)L1v(t)v(t)L1u(t)=u(t)μa(p(t)bμv(t))v(t)μa(p(t)bμu(t))

    and sum operator from a+1 to b1 to both side of the last equality is applied, we get

    b1s=a+1(u(s)L1v(s)v(s)L1u(s))=b1s=a+1u(s)μa(p(s)bμv(s)) (18)
    b1s=a+1v(s)μa(p(s)bμu(s)).

    If we apply the summation by parts formula in (11) to right hand side of (18), we have

    b1s=a+1(u(s)L1v(s)v(s)L1u(s))=b1s=a+1p(s)bμv(s)bμu(s)b1s=a+1p(s)bμu(s)bμv(s)=0,
    L1u,v=u,L1v.

    Hence, the proof completes.

    Theorem 3.2. Two eigenfunctions, u(t,λα) and v(t,λβ), of the equation (13) are orthogonal as λαλβ.

    Proof. Let λα and λβ are two different eigenvalues corresponds to eigenfunctions u(t) and v(t) respectively for the the equation (13),

    μa(p(t)bμu(t))+q(t)u(t)λαr(t)u(t)=0,μa(p(t)bμv(t))+q(t)v(t)λβr(t)v(t)=0.

    If we multiply last two equations by v(t) and u(t) respectively, subtract from each other and apply definite sum operator, owing to the self-adjointness of the operator L1, we have

    (λαλβ)b1s=a+1r(s)u(s)v(s)=0,

    since λαλβ,

    b1s=a+1r(s)u(s)v(s)=0,u(t),v(t)=0.

    Hence, the proof completes.

    Theorem 3.3. All eigenvalues of the equation (13) are real.

    Proof. Let λ=α+iβ, owing to the self-adjointness of the operator L1, we can write

    L1u(t),u(t)=u(t),L1u(t),λru(t),u(t)=u(t),λr(t)u(t),
    (λ¯λ)u(t),u(t)r=0.

    Since u(t),u(t)r0,

    λ=¯λ

    and hence β=0. The proof completes.

    Secondly, we consider the second case and give the following theorems and proofs;

    Theorem 3.4. DFSL operator L2 is self-adjoint.

    Proof.

    u(t)L2v(t)=u(t)Δμ(p(t)Δμ+v(t))+u(t)q(t)v(t), (19)
    v(t)L2u(t)=v(t)Δμ(p(t)Δμ+u(t))+v(t)q(t)u(t). (20)

    If (1920) is subtracted from each other

    u(t)L2v(t)v(t)L2u(t)=u(t)Δμ(p(t)Δμ+v(t))v(t)Δμ(p(t)Δμ+u(t))

    and definite sum operator from 0 to t to both side of the last equality is applied, we have

    ts=0(u(s)L1v(s)v(s)L2u(s))=ts=0u(s)Δμ(p(s)Δμ+v(s))ts=0v(s)Δμ(p(s)Δμ+u(s)). (21)

    If we apply the summation by parts formula in (12) to r.h.s. of (21), we get

    ts=0(u(s)L2v(s)v(s)L2u(s))=ts=0p(s)Δμ+v(s)Δμ+u(s)ts=0p(s)Δμ+u(s)Δμ+v(s)=0,
    L2u,v=u,L2v.

    Hence, the proof completes.

    Theorem 3.5. Two eigenfunctions, u(t,λα) and v(t,λβ), of the equation (14) are orthogonal as λαλβ. orthogonal.

    Proof. Let λα and λβ are two different eigenvalues corresponds to eigenfunctions u(t) and v(t) respectively for the the equation (14),

    Δμ(p(t)Δμ+u(t))+q(t)u(t)λαr(t)u(t)=0,Δμ(p(t)Δμ+v(t))+q(t)v(t)λβr(t)v(t)=0.

    If we multiply last two equations to v(t) and u(t) respectively, subtract from each other and apply definite sum operator, owing to the self-adjointness of the operator L2, we get

    (λαλβ)ts=0r(s)u(s)v(s)=0,

    since λαλβ,

    ts=0r(s)u(s)v(s)=0u(t),v(t)=0.

    So, the eigenfunctions are orthogonal. The proof completes.

    Theorem 3.6. All eigenvalues of the equation (14) are real.

    Proof. Let λ=α+iβ, owing to the self-adjointness of the operator L2

    L2u(t),u(t)=u(t),L2u(t),λr(t)u(t),u(t)=u(t),λr(t)u(t),
    (λ¯λ)u,ur=0.

    Since u,ur0,

    λ=¯λ,

    and hence β=0. The proof completes.

    Now, we consider the third case and give the following theorem and proof;

    Theorem 3.7.

    L3x(t)=μa(μax(t))+q(t)x(t)=λx(t),0<μ<1, (22)
    x(a+1)=c1,μax(a+1)=c2, (23)

    where p(t)>0, r(t)>0, q(t) is defined and real valued, λ is the spectral parameter. The sum representation of solution of the problem (22)(23) is found as follows,

    x(t)=c1[(1+q(a+1))Eλ,2μ,μ1(t,a)λEλ,2μ,2μ1(t,a)] (24)
    +c2[Eλ,2μ,2μ1(t,a)Eλ,2μ,μ1(t,a)]ts=a+1Eλ,2μ,2μ1(tρ(s)+a)q(s)x(s),

    where |λ|<1, |1s|<1, and |s|α>λ from Theorem 2.15.

    Proof. Let's use the Laplace transform of both side of the equation (22) by Theorem 2.13, and let q(t)x(t)=g(t),

    La+1{μa(μax)}(s)+La+1{g}(s)=λLa+1{x}(s),=sμLa+1{μax}(s)1sμ1sc2=λLa+1{x}(s)La+1{g}(s),=sμ(sμLa+1{x}(s)1sμ1sc1)1sμ1sc2=λLa+1{x}(s)La+1{g}(s),
    =La+1{x}(s)=1sμ1s1s2μλ(sμc1+c2)1s2μλLa+1{g}(s),

    from Lemma 2.12, we get

    La{x}(s)=c1(sμλs2μλ)1ss2μλ(11sLa{g}(s)11sg(a+1))+c2(1sμs2μλ). (25)

    Applying inverse Laplace transform to the equation (25), then we get representation of solution of the problem (22)(23),

    x(t)=c1((1+q(a+1))Eλ,2μ,μ1(t,a)λEλ,2μ,2μ1(t,a))+c2(Eλ,2μ,2μ1(t,a)Eλ,2μ,μ1(t,a))ts=a+1Eλ,2μ,2μ1(tρ(s)+a)q(s)x(s).

    Now, let us consider comparatively discrete fractional Sturm-Liouville (DFSL) problem, discrete Sturm-Liouville (DSL) problem, fractional Sturm-Liouville (FSL) problem and classical Sturm-Liouville (CSL) problem respectively as follows by taking q(t)=0,

    DFSL problem:

    μ0(μ0x(t))=λx(t), (26)
    x(1)=1, μax(1)=0, (27)

    and its analytic solution is as follows by the help of Laplace transform in Lemma 2.12

    x(t)=Eλ,2μ,μ1(t,0)λEλ,2μ,2μ1(t,0), (28)

    DSL problem:

    2x(t)=λx(t), (29)
    x(1)=1, x(1)=0, (30)

    and its analytic solution is as follows

    x(t)=12(1λ)t[(1λ)t(1+λ)(1+λ)(1+λ)t], (31)

    FSL problem:

     CDμ0+(Dμ0+x(t))=λx(t), (32)
    I1μ0+x(t)|t=0=1, Dμ0+x(t)|t=0=0, (33)

    and its analytic solution is as follows by the help of Laplace transform in Property 2.19 and 2.20

    x(t)=tμ1E2μ,μ(λt2μ), (34)

    CSL problem:

    x(t)=λx(t), (35)
    x(0)=1, x(0)=0, (36)

    and its analytic solution is as follows

    x(t)=coshtλ, (37)

    where the domain and range of function x(t) and Mittag-Leffler functions must be well defined. Note that we may show the solution of CSL problem can be obtained by taking μ1 in the solution of FSL problem and similarly, the solution of DSL problem can be obtained by taking μ1 in the solution of DFSL problem.

    Firstly, we compare the solutions of DFSL and DSL problems and from here we show that the solutions of DFSL problem converge to the solutions of DSL problem as μ1 in Figure 1 for discrete Mittag-Leffler function Ep,α,β(t,a)=1000k=0pk(ta)¯αk+βΓ(αk+β+1); let λ=0.01,

    Figure 1.  Comparison of solutions of DFSL–DSL problems.

    Secondly, we compare the solutions of DFSL, DSL, FSL and CSL problems for discrete Mittag-Leffler function Ep,α,β(t,a)=1000k=0pk(ta)¯αk+βΓ(αk+β+1). At first view, we observe the solution of DSL and CSL problems almost coincide in any order μ, and we observe the solutions of DFSL and FSL problem almost coincide in any order μ. However, we observe that all of the solutions of DFSL, DSL, FSL and CSL problems almost coincide to each other as μ1 in Figure 2. Let λ=0.01,

    Figure 2.  Comparison of solutions of DFSL–DSL–CSL–SL problems.

    Thirdly, we compare the solutions of DFSL problem (2223) with different orders, different potential functions and different eigenvalues for discrete Mittag-Leffler function Ep,α,β(t,a)=1000k=0pk(ta)¯αk+βΓ(αk+β+1) in the Figure 3;

    Figure 3.  Analysis of solutions of DFSL problem.

    Eigenvalues of DFSL problem (2223), correspond to some specific eigenfunctions for numerical values of discrete Mittag-Leffler function Ep,α,β(t,a)=ik=0pk(ta)¯αk+βΓ(αk+β+1), is given with different orders while q(t)=0 in Table 1;

    Table 1.  Approximations to three eigenvalues of the problem (22–23).
    i λ1,i λ2,i λ3,i λ1,i λ2,i λ3,i λ1,i λ2,i λ3,i
    750 0.992 0.982 0.057 0.986 0.941 0.027 0.483 0.483 0
    1000 0.989 0.977 0.057 0.990 0.954 0.027 0.559 0.435 0
    2000 0.996 0.990 0.057 0.995 0.978 0.027 0.654 0.435 0
    x(5),μ=0.5 x(10),μ=0.9 x(2000),μ=0.1
    i λ1,i λ2,i λ3,i λ1,i λ2,i λ3,i λ1,i λ2,i λ3,i
    750 0.951 0.004 0 0.868 0.793 0.0003 0.190 3.290×106 0
    1000 0.963 0.004 0 0.898 0.828 0.0003 0.394 3.290×106 0
    2000 0.981 0.004 0 0.947 0.828 0.0003 0.548 3.290×106 0
    x(20),μ=0.5 x(100),μ=0.9 x(1000),μ=0.7
    i λ1,i λ2,i λ3,i λ1,i λ2,i λ3,i λ1,i λ2,i λ3,i
    750 0.414 9.59×107 0 0.853 0.0003 0 0.330 4.140×106 0
    1000 0.478 9.59×107 0 0.887 0.0003 0 0.375 4.140×106 0
    2000 0.544 9.59×107 0 0.940 0.0003 0 0.361 4.140×106 0
    x(1000),μ=0.3 x(100),μ=0.8 x(1000),μ=0.9
    i λ1,i λ2,i λ3,i λ1,i λ2,i λ3,i λ1,i λ2,i λ3,i
    750 0.303 3.894×106 0 0.192 0.066 0 0.985 0.955 0.026
    1000 0.335 3.894×106 0 0.197 0.066 0 0.989 0.941 0.026
    2000 0.399 3.894×106 0 0.289 0.066 0 0.994 0.918 0.026
    x(1000),μ=0.8 x(2000),μ=0.6 x(10),μ=0.83

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Finally, we give the solutions of DFSL problem (2223) with different orders, different potential functions and different eigenvalues for discrete Mittag-Leffler function Ep,α,β(t,a)=100k=0pk(ta)¯αk+βΓ(αk+β+1) in Tables 24;

    Table 2.  q(t)=0,λ=0.2.
    x(t) μ=0.1 μ=0.2 μ=0.5 μ=0.7 μ=0.9
    x(1) 1 1 1 1 1
    x(2) 0.125 0.25 0.625 0.875 1.125
    x(3) 0.075 0.174 0.624 1.050 1.575
    x(5) 0.045 0.128 0.830 1.968 4.000
    x(7) 0.0336 0.111 1.228 4.079 11.203
    x(9) 0.0274 0.103 1.878 8.657 31.941
    x(12) 0.022 0.098 3.622 27.05 154.56
    x(15) 0.0187 0.0962 7.045 84.75 748.56
    x(16) 0.0178 0.0961 8.800 124.04 1266.5
    x(18) 0.0164 0.0964 13.737 265.70 3625.6
    x(20) 0.0152 0.0972 21.455 569.16 10378.8

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 3.  λ=0.01,μ=0.45.
    x(t) q(t)=1 q(t)=t q(t)=t
    x(1) 1 1 1
    x(2) 0.2261 0.1505 0.1871
    x(3) 0.1138 0.0481 0.0767
    x(5) 0.0518 0.0110 0.0252
    x(7) 0.0318 0.0043 0.0123
    x(9) 0.0223 0.0021 0.0072
    x(12) 0.0150 0.0010 0.0039
    x(15) 0.0110 0.0005 0.0025
    x(16) 0.0101 0.0004 0.0022
    x(18) 0.0086 0.0003 0.0017
    x(20) 0.0075 0.0002 0.0014

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 4.  λ=0.01,μ=0.5.
    x(t) q(t)=1 q(t)=t q(t)=t
    x(1) 1 1 1
    x(2) 0.2261 0.1505 0.1871
    x(3) 0.1138 0.0481 0.0767
    x(5) 0.0518 0.0110 0.0252
    x(7) 0.0318 0.0043 0.0123
    x(9) 0.0223 0.0021 0.0072
    x(12) 0.0150 0.0010 0.0039
    x(15) 0.0110 0.0005 0.0025
    x(16) 0.0101 0.0004 0.0022
    x(18) 0.0086 0.0003 0.0017
    x(20) 0.0075 0.0002 0.0014

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Now, let's consider the problems together DFSL (26)(27), DSL (29)(30), FSL (32)(33) and CSL (35)(36). Eigenvalues of these problems are the roots of the following equation

    x(35)=0.

    Thus, if we apply the solutions (28), (31), (34) and (37) of these four problems to the equation above respectively, we can find the eigenvalues of these problems for the orders μ=0.9 and μ=0.99 respectively in Table 5, and Table 6,

    Table 5.  μ=0.9.
    λ1 λ2 λ3 λ4 λ5 λ6 λ7 λ8 λ9 λ10
    DFSL 0.904 0.859 0.811 0.262 0.157 0.079 0.029 0.003 0.982
    FSL 0.497 0.383 0.283 0.196 0.124 0.066 0.026 0.003 0 ...
    DSL 1.450 0.689 0.469 0.310 0.194 0.112 0.055 0.019 0.002
    CSL 0.163 0.128 0.098 0.072 0.050 0.032 0.008 0.002 0

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 6.  μ=0.99.
    λ1 λ2 λ3 λ4 λ5 λ6 λ7 λ8 λ9 λ10
    DFSL 0.866 0.813 0.200 0.115 0.057 0.020 0.002 0 0.982
    FSL 0.456 0.343 0.246 0.165 0.100 0.051 0.018 0.002 0 ...
    DSL 1.450 0.689 0.469 0.310 0.194 0.112 0.055 0.019 0.002 ...
    CSL 0.163 0.128 0.098 0.072 0.050 0.032 0.008 0.002 0

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In here, we observe that these four problems have real eigenvalues under different orders μ=0.9 and μ=0.99, hence we can find eigenfunctions putting these eigenvalues into the four solutions. Furthermore, as the order changes, we can see that eigenvalues change for DFSL problems.

    We consider firstly discrete fractional Sturm-Liouville (DFSL) operators with nabla Riemann-Liouville and delta Grünwald-Letnikov fractional operators and we prove self-adjointness of the DFSL operator and fundamental spectral properties. However, we analyze DFSL problem, discrete Sturm-Liouville (DSL) problem, fractional Sturm-Liouville (FSL) problem and classical Sturm-Liouville (CSL) problem by taking q(t)=0 in applications. Firstly, we compare the solutions of DFSL and DSL problems and we observe that the solutions of DFSL problem converge to the solutions of DSL problem when μ1 in Fig. 1. Secondly, we compare the solutions of DFSL, DSL, FSL and CSL problems in Fig. 2. At first view, we observe the solutions of DSL and CSL problems almost coincide with any order μ, and we observe the solutions of DFSL and FSL problem almost coincide with any order μ. However, we observe that all of solutions of DFSL, DSL, FSL and CSL problems almost coincide with each other as μ1. Thirdly, we compare the solutions of DFSL problem (2223) with different orders, different potential functions and different eigenvalues in Fig. 3.

    Eigenvalues of DFSL problem (2223) corresponded to some specific eigenfunctions is given with different orders in Table 1. We give the eigenfunctions of DFSL problem (2223) with different orders, different potential functions and different eigenvalues in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4.

    In Section 4.1, we consider DFSL, DSL, FSL and CSL problems together and thus, we can compare the eigenvalues of these four problems in Table 5 and Table 6 for different values of μ. We observe that these four problems have real eigenvalues under different values of μ, from here we can find eigenfunctions corresponding eigenvalues. Moreover, when the order change, eigenvalues change for DFSL problems.

    Consequently, important results in spectral theory are given for discrete Sturm-Liouville problems. These results will lead to open gates for the researchers studied in this area. Especially, representation of solution will be practicable for future studies. It worths noting that visual results both will enable to be understood clearly by readers and verify the results to the integer order discrete case while the order approaches to one.

    This paper includes a part of Ph.D. thesis data of Ramazan OZARSLAN.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] Guimarães SF, Lima IM, Modolo LV (2020) Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of parts of Passiflora edulis as a function of plant developmental stage. Acta Bot Brasilica 34: 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062019abb0148 doi: 10.1590/0102-33062019abb0148
    [2] Melo NJDA, Negreiros AMP, Sarmento JDA, et al. (2020) Physical-chemical characterization of yellow passion fruit produced in different cultivation systems. Emirates J Food Agric 32: 897–908. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2020.v32.i12.2224 doi: 10.9755/ejfa.2020.v32.i12.2224
    [3] Costa CAR, Machado GGL, Rodrigues LJ, et al. (2023) Phenolic compounds profile and antioxidant activity of purple passion fruit's pulp, peel and seed at different maturation stages. Sci Hortic 321: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112244 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112244
    [4] Xu H, Qiao P, Pan J, et al. (2023) CaCl2 treatment effectively delays postharvest senescence of passion fruit. Food Chem 417: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135786 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135786
    [5] IBGE—Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2023) Produção agrícola municipal 2022. Available from: https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/pesquisa/pam/tabelas.
    [6] Rady MM, Mossa AH, Youssof AMA, et al. (2023) Exploring the reinforcing effect of nano-potassium on the antioxidant defense system reflecting the increased yield and quality of salt-stressed squash plants. Sci Hortic 308: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111609 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111609
    [7] Stiller V (2009) Soil salinity and drought alter wood density and vulnerability to xylem cavitation of baldcypress (Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich.) seedlings. Environ Exp Bot 67: 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.03.012 doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.03.012
    [8] Abdalla M, Ahmed MA, Cai G, et al. (2022) Coupled effects of soil drying and salinity on soil-plant hydraulics. Plant Physiol 190: 1228-1241. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiac229 doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac229
    [9] Li C, Wang P, Wei Z, et al. (2012) The mitigation effects of exogenous melatonin on salinity-induced stress in Malus hupehensis. J Pineal Res 53: 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-079X.2012.00999.x doi: 10.1111/j.1600-079X.2012.00999.x
    [10] Mohamed IAA, Shalby N, El-Badri AMA, et al. (2020) Stomata and xylem vessels traits improved by melatonin application contribute to enhancing salt tolerance and fatty acid composition of Brassica napus L. plants. Agronomy 10: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081186 doi: 10.3390/agronomy10081186
    [11] Azzam, CR, Zaki SS, Bamagoos AA, et al. (2022) Soaking maize seeds in zeatin-type cytokinin biostimulators improves salt tolerance by enhancing the antioxidant system and photosynthetic efficiency. Plants 11: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081004 doi: 10.3390/plants11081004
    [12] Rahimi E, Nazari F, Javadi T, et al. (2021) Potassium-enriched clinoptilolite zeolite mitigates the adverse impacts of salinity stress in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) by increasing silicon absorption and improving the K/Na ratio. J Environ Manag 285: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112142 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112142
    [13] Meurer JM, Tiecher T, Mattielo L (2018) Potássio. In: Fernandes MS, Souza SR, Santos LA (Eds.), Nutrição mineral de plantas, Viçosa, MG: SBCS, 429–464.
    [14] Abdelraouf EAA, Nassar IN, Shoman AM (2022) Impacts of successive accumulation of salinity, drought and potassium on maize (Zea Mays L.) germination and growth. Assiut J Agric Sci 53: 101–117. https://doi.org/10.21608/ajas.2022.128649.1125 doi: 10.21608/ajas.2022.128649.1125
    [15] Tittal M, Mir RA, Jatav KS, et al. (2021) Supplementation of potassium alleviates water stress-induced changes in Sorghum bicolor L. Physiol Plant 172: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13306 doi: 10.1111/ppl.13306
    [16] Asaduzzaman MD, Asao T (2018) Potassium—improvement of quality in fruits and vegetables through hydroponic nutrient management. London, UK: IntechOpen. 118p. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68611.
    [17] Lima GS, Souza WBB, Soares LAA, et al. (2020) Dano celular e pigmentos fotossintéticos do maracujazeiro-azedo em função da natureza catiônica da água. Irriga 25: 663–669. http://dx.doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2020v25n4p663-669 doi: 10.15809/irriga.2020v25n4p663-669
    [18] Costa AFS, Costa NA, Ventura JÁ, et al. (2008) Recomendações técnicas para o cultivo do maracujazeiro. Vitória, ES: Incaper (Incaper. Documentos, 162) 56p. Available from: https://biblioteca.incaper.es.gov.br/digital/bitstream/item/106/1/DOC-162-Tecnologias-Producao-Maracuja-CD-7.pdf.
    [19] Lima GS, Souza WBB, Paiva FJS, et al. (2023) Tolerance of sour passion fruit cultivars to salt stress in a semi-arid region. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 27: 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v27n10p785-794 doi: 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v27n10p785-794
    [20] Teixeira PC, Donagemma GK, Fontana A, et al. (2017) Manual de métodos de análise de solo. 3rd. Brasília, DF, Brazil. 574p. Available from: https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/handle/doc/1085209
    [21] Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Washington: U.S, Department of Agriculture, 160p.
    [22] BRASIL (2005) Normas analíticas do Instituto Adolfo Lutz. São Paulo: Instituto Adolfo Lutz. Available from: https://wp.ufpel.edu.br/nutricaobromatologia/files/2013/07/Normas ADOLFOLUTZ.pdf.
    [23] AOAC—Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2005) Official methods of analysis of the AOAC. 18th ed., Gaithersburg, M.D, USA. 26p.
    [24] Yemn EW, Willis AJ (1954) The estimation of carbohydrate in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem J 57: 508–514. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0570508 doi: 10.1042/bj0570508
    [25] Strohecker R, Henning HM (1967) Analisis de vitaminas: métodos comprobados. Madrid: Paz Montalvo. 428p.
    [26] Govaerts B, Sayre KD, Lichter K, et al. (2007) Influence of permanent raised bed planting and residue management on physical and chemical soil quality in rain fed maize/wheat systems. Plant Soil 291: 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9172-6 doi: 10.1007/s11104-006-9172-6
    [27] Hotelling H (1947) Multivariate quality control illustrated by air testing of sample bombsights. In: Eisenhart C, Hastay MW, Wallis WA (Eds.), Techniques of Statistical Analysis, McGraw Hill, New York, 111–184.
    [28] Hair FJ, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. (2009) Análise multivariada de dados. 6th ed., Tradução Adonai Schlup Sant'Anna. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 688p.
    [29] Statsoft INC (2004) Programa computacional Statistica (data analysis software system) version 7.0. E. A. U.141-197. Available from: https://statsoft-academic.com.br.
    [30] Ferreira DF (2019) SISVAR: A computer analysis system to fixed effects split plot type designs. Revista Brasileira de Biometria 37: 529–535. https://doi.org/10.28951/rbb.v37i4.450 doi: 10.28951/rbb.v37i4.450
    [31] Kaiser HF (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Edu Psychol Meas 20: 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116 doi: 10.1177/001316446002000116
    [32] Chen Z, Guo Z, Xu N, et al. (2023) Graphene nanoparticles improve alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) growth through multiple metabolic pathways under salinity-stressed environment. J Plant Physiol 289: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2023.154092 doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2023.154092
    [33] Ramos JG, Lima VLA, Lima GS, et al. (2022) Produção e qualidade pós-colheita do maracujazeiro-azedo irrigado com águas salinas e aplicação exógena de H2O2. Irriga 27: 540–556. https://doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2022v27n3p540-556 doi: 10.15809/irriga.2022v27n3p540-556
    [34] Sousa GG, Viana TA, Pereira ED, et al. (2014) Fertirrigação potássica na cultura do morango no litoral Cearense. Bragantia 73: 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1590/brag.2014.006 doi: 10.1590/brag.2014.006
    [35] Li B, Wim V, Shukla MK, et al. (2021) Drip irrigation provides a trade-off between yield and nutritional quality of tomato in the solar greenhouse. Agric Water Manag 249: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106777 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106777
    [36] Zhang X, You S, Tian Y, et al. (2019) Comparison of plastic film, biodegradable paper and bio-based film mulching for summer tomato production: Soil properties, plant growth, fruit yield and fruit quality. Sci Hortic 249: 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.01.037 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.01.037
    [37] Qureshi MI, Abdin MZ, Ahmad J, et al. (2013) Effect of long-term salinity on cellular antioxidants, compatible solute and fatty acid profile of sweet annie (Artemisia annua L.). Phytochemistry 95: 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2013.06.026 doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2013.06.026
    [38] Julkowska MM, Testerink C (2015) Tuning plant signaling and growth to survive salt. Trends Plant Sci 20: 586–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.06.008 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.06.008
    [39] Paiva FJS, Lima GS, Lima, VLA, et al. (2021) Gas exchange and production of passion fruit as affected by cationic nature of irrigation water. Revista Caatinga 34: 926–936. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252021v34n420rc doi: 10.1590/1983-21252021v34n420rc
    [40] Nascimento JAM, Cavalcante LF, Dantas SAG, et al. (2015) Biofertilizante e adubação mineral na qualidade de frutos de maracujazeiro amarelo irrigado com água salina. Irriga 20: 220–232. https://doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2015v20n2p220 doi: 10.15809/irriga.2015v20n2p220
    [41] BRASIL—Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento (2018) Instrução normativa nº 37, de 1 de outubro de 2018. Regulamento técnico geral para fixação dos padrões de identidade e qualidade para suco de maracujá, Brasília, DF. Available from: https://www.legisweb.com.br/legislacao/?id = 368178.
    [42] Raimundo K, Magri RS, Simionato EMRS, et al. (2009) Avaliação física e química da polpa de maracujá congelada comercializada na região de Bauru. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 31: 539–543. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452009000200031 doi: 10.1590/S0100-29452009000200031
    [43] Dias TJ, Cavalcante LF, Freira JLO, et al. (2011) Qualidade química de frutos do maracujazeiro-amarelo em solo com biofertilizante irrigado com águas salinas. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 15: 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662011000300002 doi: 10.1590/S1415-43662011000300002
    [44] Matsura FCAU, Folegatti MIS (2002) Maracujá: pós-colheita. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica (Frutas do Brasil, 23), 51p.
    [45] Rocha MC, Silva ALB, Almeida A, et al. (2001) Efeito do uso de biofertilizante Agrobio sobre as características físico-químicas na pós-colheita do maracujazeiro amarelo (Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa Deg) no município de Taubaté. Revista Biociências 7: 7–13.
    [46] Pinheiro FWA, Lima GS, Sousa PFN, et al. (2023) Potassium fertilization in the cultivation of sour passion fruit under irrigation strategies with brackish water. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 27: 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v27n1p42-50 doi: 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v27n1p42-50
    [47] Wang XG, Zhao HZX, Jiang JC, et al. (2015) Effects of potassium deficiency on photosynthesis and photoprotection mechanisms in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). J Integr Agric 14: 856–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60848-0 doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60848-0
    [48] Pinheiro AM, Fernandes AG, Fai AEC, et al. (2006) Avaliação química, físicoquímica e microbiológica de sucos de frutas integrais: Abacaxi, caju e maracujá. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos 26: 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612006000100017 doi: 10.1590/S0101-20612006000100017
    [49] Costa JRM, Lima CAA, Lima EDPA, et al. (2001) Caracterização dos frutos de maracujá amarelo irrigados com água salina. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 5: 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662001000100027 doi: 10.1590/S1415-43662001000100027
    [50] Vianna-Silva T, Resende ED, Viana AP, et al. (2008) Qualidade do suco de maracujá-amarelo em diferentes épocas de colheita. Ciências e Tecnologia de Alimentos 28: 545–550. DOI:10.1590/S0101-20612008000300007 doi: 10.1590/S0101-20612008000300007
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1368) PDF downloads(98) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)  /  Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog