Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Review Special Issues

Sustainability and innovation in 3D printing: Outlook and trends

  • The convergence of additive manufacturing (AM), sustainability, and innovation holds significant importance within the framework of Industry 4.0. This article examines the environmentally friendly and sustainable aspects of AM, more commonly referred to as 3D printing, a cutting-edge technology. It describes the fundamentals of AM in addition to its diverse materials, processes, and applications. This paper demonstrates how several 3D printing techniques can revolutionize sustainable production by examining their environmental impacts. The properties, applications, and challenges of sustainable materials, such as biodegradable polymers and recyclable plastics, are thoroughly examined. Additionally, the research explores the implications of 3D printing in domains including renewable energy component fabrication, water and wastewater treatment, and environmental monitoring. In addition, potential pitfalls and challenges associated with sustainable 3D printing are examined, underscoring the criticality of continuous research and advancement in this domain. To effectively align sustainability goals with functional performance requirements, it is imperative to address complexities within fused deposition modeling (FDM) printing processes, including suboptimal bonding and uneven fiber distribution, which can compromise the structural integrity and durability of biodegradable materials. Ongoing research and innovation are essential to overcome these challenges and enhance the viability of biodegradable FDM 3D printing materials for broader applications.

    Citation: Muhammad Ali Saqib, Muhammad Sohail Abbas, Hiroyuki Tanaka. Sustainability and innovation in 3D printing: Outlook and trends[J]. Clean Technologies and Recycling, 2024, 4(1): 1-21. doi: 10.3934/ctr.2024001

    Related Papers:

    [1] Lei Chen, Ruyun Qu, Xintong Liu . Improved multi-label classifiers for predicting protein subcellular localization. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 214-236. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024010
    [2] Yongyin Han, Maolin Liu, Zhixiao Wang . Key protein identification by integrating protein complex information and multi-biological features. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(10): 18191-18206. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023808
    [3] Linlu Song, Shangbo Ning, Jinxuan Hou, Yunjie Zhao . Performance of protein-ligand docking with CDK4/6 inhibitors: a case study. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(1): 456-470. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021025
    [4] Yutong Man, Guangming Liu, Kuo Yang, Xuezhong Zhou . SNFM: A semi-supervised NMF algorithm for detecting biological functional modules. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(4): 1933-1948. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019094
    [5] Haipeng Zhao, Baozhong Zhu, Tengsheng Jiang, Zhiming Cui, Hongjie Wu . Identification of DNA-protein binding residues through integration of Transformer encoder and Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 170-185. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024008
    [6] Madeleine Dawson, Carson Dudley, Sasamon Omoma, Hwai-Ray Tung, Maria-Veronica Ciocanel . Characterizing emerging features in cell dynamics using topological data analysis methods. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 3023-3046. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023143
    [7] Wenjun Xia, Jinzhi Lei . Formulation of the protein synthesis rate with sequence information. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2018, 15(2): 507-522. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018023
    [8] Jinmiao Song, Shengwei Tian, Long Yu, Qimeng Yang, Qiguo Dai, Yuanxu Wang, Weidong Wu, Xiaodong Duan . RLF-LPI: An ensemble learning framework using sequence information for predicting lncRNA-protein interaction based on AE-ResLSTM and fuzzy decision. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(5): 4749-4764. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022222
    [9] Sathyanarayanan Gopalakrishnan, Swaminathan Venkatraman . Prediction of influential proteins and enzymes of certain diseases using a directed unimodular hypergraph. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 325-345. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024015
    [10] Shun Li, Lu Yuan, Yuming Ma, Yihui Liu . WG-ICRN: Protein 8-state secondary structure prediction based on Wasserstein generative adversarial networks and residual networks with Inception modules. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(5): 7721-7737. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023333
  • The convergence of additive manufacturing (AM), sustainability, and innovation holds significant importance within the framework of Industry 4.0. This article examines the environmentally friendly and sustainable aspects of AM, more commonly referred to as 3D printing, a cutting-edge technology. It describes the fundamentals of AM in addition to its diverse materials, processes, and applications. This paper demonstrates how several 3D printing techniques can revolutionize sustainable production by examining their environmental impacts. The properties, applications, and challenges of sustainable materials, such as biodegradable polymers and recyclable plastics, are thoroughly examined. Additionally, the research explores the implications of 3D printing in domains including renewable energy component fabrication, water and wastewater treatment, and environmental monitoring. In addition, potential pitfalls and challenges associated with sustainable 3D printing are examined, underscoring the criticality of continuous research and advancement in this domain. To effectively align sustainability goals with functional performance requirements, it is imperative to address complexities within fused deposition modeling (FDM) printing processes, including suboptimal bonding and uneven fiber distribution, which can compromise the structural integrity and durability of biodegradable materials. Ongoing research and innovation are essential to overcome these challenges and enhance the viability of biodegradable FDM 3D printing materials for broader applications.



    Essential proteins are required for organism life, and their absence results in the loss of functional modules of protein complexes, as well as the death of the organism [1]. Essential proteins identification aids in the understanding of cell growth control mechanisms, the discovery of disease-causing genes and possible therapeutic targets, and has crucial theoretical and practical implications for drug development and disease therapy. In biological experiments, essential proteins are mainly identified by gene culling, gene suppression, transposon mutation and other methods, which cost lot of time and difficult unfortunately. Essential protein identification using computational approaches becomes achievable as high-throughput data accumulates. This identification method means utilizing the available data to find the key features that affect the importance of proteins and to determine if it is important of biological functions based on these features. The most common measuring technique is based on the topological properties of the PPI network to obtain network topology features, like Degree Centrality (DC) [2], Information Centrality (IC) [3], Closeness Centrality (CC) [4] and Subgraph Centrality (SC) [5], Betweenness Centrality (BC) [6], sum of Edge Clustering Coefficient Centrality (NC) [7]. These methods are sensitive to network structure, so false positive noise and data missing will reduce the performance of prediction easily.

    In addition to characteristics of network topological, the biological characteristics involved in essential proteins identification mainly include sequence features and functional features. Zhang and Li et al. combined features of profiles of gene expression with topological features of PPI network, and proposed CoEWC [8] and PeC [9] methods respectively. Zhao et al. [10] put forward an essential protein detection model named POEM which utilize the module features of essential proteins. A weighted network with high confidence is built based on the topological structure and intrinsic characters of network and information about expression of genes, and overlap of functional modules, that coupling nature is weak and cohesive nature is strong, are discovered. In the end, the weighted density of the module to which the protein belongs was used to determine scores. Zhang et al. [11] got a new model named FDP to employs the global and local topological properties of network and protein homology information, to combine the dynamic PPI network at different times. In 2021, Zhong et al. [12] introduced a novel measuring approach named JDC that binary gene expression data with a dynamic threshold and combines the Jaccard index of similarity and degree centrality.

    The method based on multi-source data integration effectively improve the prediction's level of accuracy and robustness. The commonly used processing method is to build a highly reliable weighted PPI network through weighted summary and the features are different for different prediction methods. The processing method of simple superposition will obfuscate the complicated relationship that exists between the multi-source data and generate artificial noise. The parameter setting is also matter which will influence the practical application of the algorithm. Non-negative matrix tri-factorization (NMTF) [13] is mainly used to analyze data matrices with non-negative elements, disintegrate the input matrix into three non-negative factor matrices, and approximate the input matrix through low-rank non-negative representation. It has been widely used in many fields such as text mining [14], recommendation system [15,16] and biological data analysis [17,18].

    In view of the advantages of NMTF in data analysis and integrate protein homology information and subcellular location information to improve the prediction performance of essential proteins, an approach of non-negative matrix symmetric tri-factorization (IEPMSF) is offered as an optimal method for solving the noise problems in identifying essential proteins. In order to avoid more noise caused by multi-source data integration, this paper only uses the topological features of the original protein interaction data to construct the protein weighted network. But this method is not optimal because of the existence of false negatives and false positives. To solve this problem, the traditional NMTF algorithm is optimized. The factorization process is regarded as the "soft clustering" process of proteins, to predict the potential protein-protein interactions by a non-negative matrix symmetric tri-factorization algorithm (NMSTF), thus forming the optimal protein weighted network. Finally, to achieve the goal of predicting essential proteins, the homology information and subcellular location information of proteins are combined to create an initial score for each protein, which is then used to score and order each protein in the optimized network using the restart random walk algorithm.

    This paper builds an improved protein-weighted network using the protein-protein interaction network and the NMSTF algorithm to increase the accuracy of important protein identification, and integrates subcellular localization information with protein homology information to design an essential model to identify essential proteins, IEPMSF. The model consists of three modules: weighted network building module, weighted network optimization module, and proteins scoring and sorting module.

    Figure 1.  Overall workflow of IEPMSF for identifying essential proteins.

    Through topological analysis of yeast networks, the researchers found that PPI networks have small-world and non-scale characteristic [19] and that essential proteins have a strong connection with the topological properties of proteins. The co-neighbor coefficient is commonly utilized in the functional recognition [20] of proteins in PPI networks, demonstrating that the more similar neighbors two proteins in a network have, the more likely they are to interact. To measure the degree of interaction between the two proteins, we use the co-neighbor coefficient to give the edge weights of the network of protein interaction.

    A simple undirected graph G = (V, E) can be a model of a PPI network. Here, the nodes set V = {v1, v2, …} as proteins, the edges set E = {e1, e2, e3 …} is a representation for the interaction of two different proteins. Defining a weighted network is WG = (V, E, P), where P(i, j) indicating the likelihood of the interaction of the vi and vj proteins, can be computed using the equation below :

    P(i,j)={|Nei(i)Nei(j)|2(|Nei(i)|1)(|Nei(j)|1)if |Nei(i)|>1 and |Nei(j)|>10otherwise (1)

    where Nei(i) and Nei(j) respectively represent collection of neighbor nodes of the vi and vj, |Nei(i)Nei(j)| represent the number of common neighbors. If there are not any common neighbor proteins between the vi and vj, then P(i, j) = 0. We are going to assume that the probability of the interaction, the co-neighbor coefficient between the proteins, is independent of each other, and it's going to be in the range of 0 to 1.

    As previously stated, false positives and false negatives can be found in PPI networks derived from high-throughput biological research. In other words, there are still some uncertainties in the construction of weighted networks based on protein interactions. NMTF was proposed by Ding in 2006 [13], which is an effective tool applied to recommendation systems successfully. Therefore, we can exploit the potential new protein interactions based on the existing protein and protein interaction data by using NMTF technology.

    The traditional NMTF is the decomposition of the correlation matrix Yn*n into three low-rank sub-matrices, FRnk, SRkk and GRkn, by which to approximate the original input matrix, as follows:

    PY=FSGT (2)

    Where the parameter k represents the factorization level and reflects the total number of possible vectors in the column spaces and row spaces. After being weighted to the protein interaction network with co-neighbor coefficients, the association matrix of the network can be constructed to represent the connection relationship between proteins. The elements in the correlation matrix are the co-neighbor values for each edge. Due to the singularity of nodes in the protein interaction network and the resulting correlation matrix is a symmetry matrix, the simple utilization of the conventional NMTF technology is not reasonably explanatory. Hart [21] pointed out that essential proteins often gather together, and the criticality of proteins is related to protein complexes rather than dependent on a single protein, which indicates that essential proteins have modular properties. Specifically, given a non-negative input matrix P, factor matrix S can be seen as the cluster index [14] of the vertex. Based on this, this paper proposes an improved NMTF algorithm called a non-negative matrix symmetric three-factors decomposition to rewrite Eq (2) into the following form:

    PY=USUT (3)

    Among them, URnk can be seen as "soft" clustering labels of proteins, and SRkk as a correlation matrix between protein modules, S = ST. Then we can design the loss objective function of Eq (3) as follows:

    D=minU0,S0J(U,S)=||PUSUT||F (4)

    Where ‖⋅‖F refers to the Frobenius specification. We use the multiplication update iteration technique to derive the objective function on the basis of employing the auxiliary function because the object function is a joint nonconvex problem. According to the rules of Squared frobenius norm we can know ||X||2 = Tr(XTX), which can solve D as follows:

    D=Tr(PTP2PTUSUT+USTUTUSUT) (5)

    Solve partial differential equations for U and S factors in Eq (5) respectively:

    DU=4PUS+4USUTUS
    DS=2UTPU+2UTUSUTU (6)

    Followed as Karush-Kuhn Tucker (KKT) complementary condition, we can find a static point, the KKT condition for U and S. These rules can be written as follows:

    DUikUik=0 (7)

    By Eq (7), we can get:

    (USUTUSPUS)ikUik=0
    Uik=Uik(PUS)ik(USUTUS)ik (8)

    Similarly, the S can be calculated using the same procedure:

    Sik=Sik(UTPU)ik(UTUSUTU)ik (9)

    These rules can be expressed in a matrix form:

    UikUik(PUS)ik(USUTUS)ik
    SikSik(UTPU)ik(UTUSUTU)ik (10)

    According to the above multiplication update iteration rules, the final U and S can be calculated, so as to obtain the optimal Y = USUT approximating the original input matrix.

    After the above data processing, we construct an optimized network association matrix, and conduct the corresponding standardization processing as follows:

    P(i,j)={max(Yij,Yji)Nk=0Yik,Nk=0Yik00,else (11)

    The cumulative sum of each row of i in the matrix P* is 0 or 1.

    We give an initial score to every protein from protein interaction network given by direct homology information and sub-cell localization information to improve the accuracy of essential protein prediction.

    Studies have shown that when a protein has more homologous proteins in a reference species, it is highly likely to be an essential protein. The direct homology score of protein node vi is calculated by the equation below:

    HS(i)=HP(i)max1j|V|HP(j) (12)

    where HP(i) represent how many direct homologous proteins in the reference species collection SC node vi has, as follows:

    HP(i)=mSCTNi where TNi={1ifviXSm0otherwise (13)

    where the XSm represents a collection of proteins with direct homologous proteins and is a subset of V. For those proteins that possess homologous proteins in all reference species, their direct homology score of 1 is given. Instead, if a protein does not have a direct homologous protein in all reference species, it has a score of 0.

    Previous research has revealed that the essential state of proteins is not simply linked to the biological properties of PPI networks, but also to their location in space. Therefore, making full use of subcellular localization information is important for essential proteins prediction. Studies have shown that essential proteins are found in higher concentrations in certain subcellular locations than non-essential, and evolve more conserved [22]. Let L(R) be the protein set appearing at subcellular location r, and the frequency of protein appearing at it is possible to calculate each subcellular location r, as shown below:

    OF(r)=|L(r)|maxkR|L(k)| (14)

    Where |L(r)| represents the number of proteins present at subcellular location r, and R represents the set containing each subcellular location. For a protein vi, let C(i) be the set of subcellular sites in which it occurs, and the definition of subcellular localization score LS(i) is the score of the maximum frequency of its occurrence at all subcellular locations by using the following equation:

    LS(i)=maxrC(i)OF(r) (15)

    Combined with the direct homology score and subcellular localization score obtained by Eqs (12) and (15), the initial value score, IS(i), which is possible to compute the vi of each protein in the protein interaction network, with following equation:

    HS(i)=HS(i)×LS(i) (16)

    Based on the weighted network constructed previously and the initial score based on the multi-source biological information, the final score, FS(i), of a protein vi from network can be calculated as bellow:

    FS(i)=αjNei(i)P(i,j)FS(j)+(1α)IS(i) (17)

    where, Nei(i) shows the set of neighbor nodes of vi.

    As can be seen from Eq (17), a protein's final score may be thought of as a linear combination of its multi-source bioinformatics mark and its neighboring correlation mark. Among them, the percentage of these two scores are adjusted using parameter a. When a is equal to 0, the final protein score is only related to the multi-source biological information score, and when the value of a is 1, the score is only related to the common neighbor properties of a protein. However, the amount of protein in the network is numerous and they have great computational complexity. Therefore, we can rewrite Eq (17) into the form of a matrix vector:

    FS(i)=αPFS+(1α)IS (18)

    Finally, the Jacobi iterative method can be used to quantitatively solve the Eq (18):

    FSt=αPFSt1+(1α)IS (19)

    The number of iterations is represented by t = (0, 1, 2, …).

    The validity of the IEPMSF model was evaluated by using the basic data of essential protein. The dataset incorporates essential protein dataset, PPI network dataset, protein homology information dataset, and subcellular location dataset. The benchmark essential proteins involved in the datasets are 1199 essential proteins, mainly from databases of MIPS [23], SGD [24], DEG [25], and SGDP [26]. The DIP [27] database is used to get the PPI network data. Excluding repeated protein interactions and the protein itself interactions, there are 5093 proteins and 24,743 interactions in the collection. The subcellular location data was downloaded from the COMPARTMENTS [28] database, which integrates MGD [29], SGD [24], UniProtKB [30], WormBase [31] and FlyBase [32] databases and eventually obtains 3923 proteins with subcellular location information. The homologous protein data is gathered from the InParanoid database's 7th edition [33], which included pair-wise comparisons of entire genomes of 99 eukaryotes and 1 prokaryote.

    To determine the significance of proteins in the protein interaction network, proteins are compared with results derived by the algorithm IEPMSF or other existing ways, DC [2], IC [3], CC [4], BC [5], SC [6], NC [7], PeC [9], CoEWC [8], POEM [10], FDP [11] and JDC [12] for example.

    In IEPMSF, the ordering score of the proteins are different depending on the a. To study the impact of parameter a on the capability of IEPMSF method, we experimented with several values ranging from 0 to 1 to see how they affected the accuracy of essential proteins prediction of IEPMSF. Table 1 contains detailed experimental data. The range of essential candidates selected is from the top 100 to the top 600. The ratio of actually essential proteins predicted determines predictive accuracy.

    Table 1.  Influence of the parameter a on the accuracy of IEPMSF prediction.
    a Top 100 Top 200 Top 300 Top 400 Top 500 Top 600
    0 78.00% 77.00% 73.70% 72.30% 67.00% 63.00%
    0.1 97.00% 84.50% 78.00% 74.00% 68.40% 64.50%
    0.2 92.00% 85.50% 79.70% 74.50% 69.80% 65.30%
    0.3 89.00% 86.00% 78.30% 72.80% 69.20% 64.80%
    0.4 87.00% 83.00% 76.00% 71.80% 68.60% 65.00%
    0.5 87.00% 78.00% 74.00% 70.00% 67.20% 64.30%
    0.6 86.00% 77.00% 71.30% 69.00% 64.80% 63.00%
    0.7 85.00% 75.00% 69.00% 66.80% 63.80% 60.00%
    0.8 82.00% 74.00% 67.30% 64.50% 62.00% 59.20%
    0.9 83.00% 75.00% 65.30% 62.80% 59.60% 57.30%
    1 81.00% 71.00% 64.70% 59.80% 55.80% 53.20%

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    As shown in Table 1, it is shown that when a = 0, the predicted essential protein only considers the direct homology of the protein, while when a = 1, the predicted essential protein only considers the co-neighbor information. When a = 0 or a = 1, the IEPMSF performs worse than the values of 0 to 1. This means that combination of the direct homologues of proteins and their neighbours can predict the required proteins more accurately than if only one of these properties is considered. To compare with other algorithms, as a = 0.1, when the top 100 ranking proteins are chosen as essential protein candidates, the accuracy can reach 0.97, as shown in the experimental findings in Figure 2.

    Figure 2.  Number of true essential proteins predicted by DC, IC, SC, BC, CC, NC, PeC, CoEWC, POEM, JDC, FDP and IEPMSF, when top 100 ranked proteins as candidates and a = 0.1.

    When essential protein candidates with higher scores at different ratios (top 100,200,300,400,500, and 600) are chosen, their highest values are 97% (a = 0.1), 86% (a = 0.3), 79.7% (a = 0.2), 74.5% (a = 0.2), 69.8% (a = 0.2) and 65.3% (a = 0.2) respectively. The maximum level of accuracy is centered at a = 0.2 as the number of candidate proteins grows. Therefore, we set a as 0.2 to carry out the following experiments.

    The PR curve is applied to further validate the capability of the various approaches. Firstly, according to the final scores computed by each technique, proteins in the protein interaction network are sorted in descending order. The preceding K proteins are considered essential proteins (positive dataset), whereas the remaining proteins are considered non-essential proteins (negative dataset), where the threshold K ranges from 1 to 5093. As the K values be changed, to produce the PR curve, the corresponding precision and recall values for each approach are computed, as illustrated in Figure 3. The PR curves of IEPMSF are compared with PR curves of centrality algorithms (DC, IC, CC, BC, SC, and NC) and of multi-source information fusion methods (PeC, CoEWC, POEM, JDC, and FDP) in Figure 3(a) and (b) respectively. As seen in Figure 3, the PR curve of the IEPMSF has much higher value than that of other algorithms.

    Figure 3.  Compared IEPMSF with other eleven approaches from the point of PR curves. (a) Curves of DC, IC, SC BC, CC, NC and IEPMSF; (b) Curves of PeC, CoEWC, POEM, JDC, FDP and IEPMSF.

    To further examine the prediction performance of IEPMSF and other approaches, we apply the jackknife method. Figure 4 depicts the experimental outcomes. The number of putative essential proteins ranked first by each approach is represented on X-axis and the real number of important proteins found is represented on Y-axis. Performance of each method is compared in the area below the center line. Figure 4(a) demonstrate the outcome of a comparison between DC, IC, CC, BC, SC, NC and IEPMSF. From Figure 4(a), we see that the IEPMSF prediction of essential proteins is significantly more accurate than that of NC. Figure 4(b) shows the comparison of IEPMSF and existing methods based on multi-source information fusion (PeC, CoEWC, POEM, JDC and FDP). According to all of the experimental data. the accuracy of IEPMSF in predicting essential proteins is greater than the other 11 approaches, according to all of the experimental data.

    Figure 4.  Compared IEPMSF with other eleven approaches from the point of jackknife curves. (a) Curves of DC, IC, SC BC, CC, NC and IEPMSF; (b) Curves of PeC, CoEWC, POEM, JDC, FDP and IEPMSF.

    The essential proteins identifying is not only a prerequisite in comprehending organism survival, but it is also critical for the discovery of disease-causing genes and possible therapeutic targets. An essential proteins identification model IEPMSF was designed in this paper. In order to avoid more noise caused by multi-source data integration, to build the weighted network, the model only uses the common neighbor topology properties of the nodes in the network from original PPI data. Considering the issue of false positive and false negative PPI data caused by high-throughput trials, and the clustering function of NMTF, the weighted network was optimized using the non-negative matrix symmetric tri-factorization (NMSTF) technique to uncover probable protein-protein interactions. Finally, the starting score of each protein node was calculated using the subcellular location and homologous proteins information, and the restart random walk method was used to score and rank each protein in the network. Compared with the topological centrality method and the traditional multi-source information integration method, the experimental findings reveal that the suggested essential proteins prediction approach, IEPMSF, significantly improves the performance of essential proteins prediction. On the basis of the existing work, how to design a more effective method to construct a weighted network based on multi-source information integration is the future research direction of essential proteins identification. In long term, we will investigate including more biological data during the weighted network construction step, and try to apply the model to other species.

    This project is partially funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61772089, 62006030), Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2020JJ4648), Major Scientific and Technological Projects for collaborative prevention and control of birth defects in Hunan Province (2019SK1010).

    The authors declare no competing interests.



    [1] Ul Haq MI, Khuroo S, Raina A, et al. (2020) 3D printing for development of medical equipment amidst coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic—review and advancements. Res Biomed Eng 38: 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42600-020-00098-0 doi: 10.1007/s42600-020-00098-0
    [2] Aziz R, Ul Haq MI, Raina A (2020) Effect of surface texturing on friction behaviour of 3D printed polylactic acid (PLA). Polym Test 85: 106434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106434 doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106434
    [3] Chadha A, Ul Haq MI, Raina A, et al. (2019) Effect of fused deposition modelling process parameters on mechanical properties of 3D printed parts. World J Eng 6: 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJE-09-2018-0329 doi: 10.1108/WJE-09-2018-0329
    [4] Naveed N (2020) Investigate the effects of process parameters on material properties and microstructural changes of 3D-printed specimens using fused deposition modelling (FDM). Mater Technol 36: 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2020.1758475 doi: 10.1080/10667857.2020.1758475
    [5] Naveed N (2021) Investigating the Material Properties and Microstructural Changes of Fused Filament Fabricated PLA and Tough-PLA Parts. Polym 13: 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13091487 doi: 10.3390/polym13091487
    [6] Ashrafi N, Duarte JP, Nazarian S, et al. (2018) Evaluating the relationship between deposition and layer quality in large-scale additive manufacturing of concrete. Virtual Phys Prototyping 14: 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2018.1532800 doi: 10.1080/17452759.2018.1532800
    [7] Kumar MB, Sathiya P (2021) Methods and materials for additive manufacturing: A critical review on advancements and challenges. Thin-Walled Struct 159: 107228. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263823120311009
    [8] Rouf S, Raina A, Ul Haq MI, et al. (2022) 3D printed parts and mechanical properties: influencing parameters, sustainability aspects, global market scenario, challenges and applications. Adv Ind Eng Polym 5: 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2022.02.001 doi: 10.1016/j.aiepr.2022.02.001
    [9] Ul Haq MI, Raina A, Ghazali MJ, et al. (2021) Potential of 3D printing technologies in developing applications of polymeric nanocomposites, In: Jena H, Katiyar JK, Patnaik A, Tribology of Polymer and Polymer Composites for Industry 4.0, 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3903-6_10
    [10] Clarissa WHY, Chia CH, Zakaria S, et al. (2022) Recent advancement in 3-D printing: nanocomposites with added functionality. Prog Addit Manuf 7: 325–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-021-00232-z doi: 10.1007/s40964-021-00232-z
    [11] Birosz MT, Andó M, Jeganmohan S (2021) Finite element method modeling of additive manufactured compressor wheel. J Inst Eng (India): Ser D 102: 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-021-00251-8 doi: 10.1007/s40033-021-00251-8
    [12] Andó M, Birosz M, Jeganmohan S (2021) Surface bonding of additive manufactured parts from multi-colored PLA materials. Measurement 169: 108583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108583 doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108583
    [13] Saini JS, Dowling L, Kennedy J, et al. (2020) Investigations of the mechanical properties on different print orientations in SLA 3D printed resin. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C 234: 2279–2293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406220904106 doi: 10.1177/0954406220904106
    [14] Węgrzyn N (2022) The use of additive manufacturing for production of commercial airplane power plants components: A review. Saf Def 8: 2. Available from: https://sd-magazine.eu/index.php/sd/article/view/185.
    [15] Wohlers T, Gornet T, Mostow N, et al. (2016) History of additive manufacturing. Wohlers Rep 20162022, 1–38. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id = 4474824.
    [16] Bourell DL (2016) Perspectives on additive manufacturing. Annu Rev Mater Res 46: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031606 doi: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031606
    [17] Chiarini A, Belvedere V, Grando A (2020) Industry 4.0 strategies and technological developments. an exploratory research from Italian manufacturing companies. Prod Plann Control 31: 1385–1398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1710304 doi: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1710304
    [18] Wu P, Wang J, Wang XY (2016) A critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the construction industry. Autom Constr 68: 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.005 doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.005
    [19] Ryan MJ, Eyers DR, Potter AT, et al. (2017) 3D printing the future: scenarios for supply chains reviewed. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage 47: 992–1014. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-12-2016-0359 doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-12-2016-0359
    [20] Marchi B, Zanoni S (2017) Supply chain management for improved energy efficiency: Review and opportunities. Energies 10: 1618. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10101618 doi: 10.3390/en10101618
    [21] Ford S, Despeisse M (2016) Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. J Cleaner Prod 137: 1573–1587. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652616304395.
    [22] Mehrpouya M, Dehghanghadikolaei A, Fotovvati B, et al. (2019) The potential of additive manufacturing in the smart factory industrial 4.0: A review. Appl Sci 9: 3865. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183865 doi: 10.3390/app9183865
    [23] Majeed A, Zhang YF, Ren S, et al. (2021) A big data-driven framework for sustainable and smart additive manufacturing. Rob Comput Integr Manuf 67: 102026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2020.102026 doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2020.102026
    [24] May G, Psarommatis F (2023) Maximizing energy efficiency in additive manufacturing: A review and framework for future research. Energies 16: 4179. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16104179 doi: 10.3390/en16104179
    [25] Hegab H, Khanna N, Monib N, et al. (2023) Design for sustainable additive manufacturing: A review. Sustainable Mater Technol 35: e00576. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214993723000118.
    [26] Ingarao G, Priarone PC, Deng YL, et al. (2018) Environmental modelling of aluminium based components manufacturing routes: additive manufacturing versus machining versus forming. J Cleaner Prod 176: 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.115 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.115
    [27] Kishawy HA, Hegab H, Saad E (2018) Design for sustainable manufacturing: approach, implementation, and assessment. Sustainability 10: 3604. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103604 doi: 10.3390/su10103604
    [28] Giudice F, Barbagallo R, Fargione G (2021) A design for additive manufacturing approach based on process energy efficiency: electron beam melted components. J Cleaner Prod 290: 125185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125185 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125185
    [29] DeBoer B, Nguyen N, Diba F, et al. (2021) Additive, subtractive, and formative manufacturing of metal components: a life cycle assessment comparison. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 115: 413–432. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00170-021-07173-5.
    [30] Yoris-Nobile AI, Lizasoain-Arteagab E, Slebi-Acevedo CJ, et al. (2022) Life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) analysis to determine the performance of 3D printed cement mortars and geopolymers. J Sustainable Cem-Based Mater 12: 609–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2022.2099479 doi: 10.1080/21650373.2022.2099479
    [31] Jayawardane H, Davies IJ, Leadbeater G, et al. (2021) 'Techno-eco-efficiency' performance of 3D printed impellers: an application of life cycle assessment. Int J Sustainable Manuf 5: 44–80. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSM.2021.116871 doi: 10.1504/IJSM.2021.116871
    [32] Kreiger M, Pearce JM (2013) Environmental life cycle analysis of distributed three-dimensional printing and conventional manufacturing of polymer products. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 1: 1511–1519. Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/sc400093k.
    [33] Gopal M, Lemu HG (2023) Sustainable additive manufacturing and environmental implications: Literature review. Sustainability 15: 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010504 doi: 10.3390/su15010504
    [34] Peng T, Kellens K, Tang RZ, et al. (2018) Sustainability of additive manufacturing: An overview on its energy demand and environmental impact. Addit Manuf 21: 694–704. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860417302646.
    [35] Mecheter A, Tarlochan F, Kucukvar M (2023) A review of conventional versus additive manufacturing for metals: life-cycle environmental and economic analysis. Sustainability 15: 12299. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612299 doi: 10.3390/su151612299
    [36] Tinoco MP, Mendonç a É M, Fernandez LIC, et al. (2022) Life cycle assessment (LCA) and environmental sustainability of cementitious materials for 3D concrete printing: A systematic literature review. J Build Eng 52: 104456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104456 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104456
    [37] Shuaib M, Haleem A, Kumar S, et al. (2021) Impact of 3D printing on the environment: A literature-based study. Sustainable Oper Comput 2: 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2021.04.001 doi: 10.1016/j.susoc.2021.04.001
    [38] Kokare S, Oliveira JP, Godina R (2023) Life cycle assessment of additive manufacturing processes: A review. J Manuf Syst 68: 536–559. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027861252300081X.
    [39] Mehrpouya M, Vosooghnia A, Dehghanghadikolaei A, et al. (2021) The benefits of additive manufacturing for sustainable design and production. Sustainable Manuf 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818115-7.00009-2
    [40] Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh RP, et al. (2021) Role of additive manufacturing applications towards environmental sustainability. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res 4: 312–322. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254250482100049X.
    [41] Woodward DG (1997) Life cycle costing—theory, information acquisition and application. Int J Proj Manage 15: 335–344. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786396000890.
    [42] Camacho DD, Clayton P, O'Brien WJ, et al. (2018) Applications of additive manufacturing in the construction industry—A forward-looking review. Autom Constr 89: 110–119. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580517307847.
    [43] Sepasgozar SME, Shi A, Yang LM, et al. (2020) Additive manufacturing applications for industry 4.0: A systematic critical review. Buildings 10: 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10120231 doi: 10.3390/buildings10120231
    [44] Paolini A, Kollmannsberger S, Rank E (2019) Additive manufacturing in construction: A review on processes, applications, and digital planning methods. Addit Manuf 30: 100894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100894 doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100894
    [45] Valino AD, Dizon JRC, Espera Jr AH, et al. (2019) Advances in 3D printing of thermoplastic polymer composites and nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci 98: 101162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101162 doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101162
    [46] Lee JY, An J, Chua CK (2017) Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials. Appl Mater Today 7: 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.004
    [47] Prabhakar MM, Saravanan AK, Lenin AH, et al. (2021) A short review on 3D printing methods, process parameters and materials. Mater Today: Proc 45: 6108–6114. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214785320378317.
    [48] Picard M, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2020) Recent advances in additive manufacturing of engineering thermoplastics: challenges and opportunities. RSC Adv 10: 36058–36089. Available from: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2020/ra/d0ra04857g.
    [49] Blok LG, Longana ML, Yu H, et al. (2018) An investigation into 3D printing of fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites. Addit Manuf 22: 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.039 doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.039
    [50] Singh S, Ramakrishna S, Berto F (2019) 3D Printing of polymer composites: A short review. Mater Des Process Commun 2: e97. https://doi.org/10.1002/mdp2.97
    [51] Fred Fischer, Stratasys, Inc. Thermoplastics: the best choice for 3D printing. WHITE PAPER. Available from: https://www.smg3d.co.uk/files/ssys-wp-thermoplastics-09-11_ashx.pdf.
    [52] Ramya A, Vanapalli SI (2016) 3D printing technologies in various applications. Int J Mech Eng Technol 7: 396–409. Available from: https://www.robolab.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/IJMET_07_03_036.pdf.
    [53] Martinez DW, Espino MT, Cascolan HM, et al. (2022) A comprehensive review on the application of 3D printing in the aerospace industry. Key Eng Mater 913: 27–34. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-94a9zb doi: 10.4028/p-94a9zb
    [54] Jagadeesh P, Rangappa SM, Siengchin S, et al. (2022) Sustainable recycling technologies for thermoplastic polymers and their composites: A review of the state of the art. Polym Compos 43: 5831–5862. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.27000 doi: 10.1002/pc.27000
    [55] Sethi B (2016) Methods of recycling. Recycl Polym: Methods, Charact Appl, 55–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527689002.ch3
    [56] Dogu O, Pelucchi M, Vijver RV, et al. (2021) The chemistry of chemical recycling of solid plastic waste via pyrolysis and gasification: state-of-the-art, challenges, and future directions. Prog Energy Combust 84: 100901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100901 doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100901
    [57] Jubinville D, Esmizadeh E, Saikrishnan S, et al. (2020) A comprehensive review of global production and recycling methods of polyolefin (PO) based products and their post-recycling applications. Sustainable Mater Technol 25: e00188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00188
    [58] Zhang F, Zhao YT, Wang DD, et al. (2021) Current technologies for plastic waste treatment: A review. J Cleaner Prod 282: 124523. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620345674.
    [59] Markandeya N, Joshi AN, Chavan NN, et al. (2023) Plastic recycling: challenges, opportunities, and future aspects. Adv Mater Recycled Waste, 317–356. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323856041000147.
    [60] Kumar M, Bolan S, Padhye LP, et al. (2023) Retrieving back plastic wastes for conversion to value added petrochemicals: Opportunities, challenges and outlooks. Appl Energy 345: 121307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121307 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121307
    [61] Kazemi M, Kabir SF, Fini EH (2021) State of the art in recycling waste thermoplastics and thermosets and their applications in construction. Resour Conserv Recycl 174: 105776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105776 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105776
    [62] Cheng FM, Li HD, Jiang W, et al. (2006) Properties of compatibilized nylon 6/ABS polymer blends. J Macromol Sci, Part B: Phys 45: 557–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222340600770095 doi: 10.1080/00222340600770095
    [63] Lay M, Thajudin NLN, Hamid ZAA, et al. (2019) Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of PLA, ABS and nylon 6 fabricated using fused deposition modeling and injection molding. Composites Part B 176: 107341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107341 doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107341
    [64] Al-Mazrouei N, Al-Marzouqi AH, Ahmed W (2022) Characterization and sustainability potential of recycling 3D-printed nylon composite wastes. Sustainability 14: 10458. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710458 doi: 10.3390/su141710458
    [65] Kuram E, Ozcelik B, Yilmaz F (2015) The effects of recycling process on thermal, chemical, rheological, and mechanical properties of PC/ABS binary and PA6/PC/ABS ternary blends. J Elastomers Plast 48: 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095244315576239 doi: 10.1177/0095244315576239
    [66] Farina I, Singh N, Colangelo F, et al. (2019) High-performance nylon-6 sustainable filaments for additive manufacturing. Materials 12: 3955. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233955 doi: 10.3390/ma12233955
    [67] Gomes TE, Cadete MS, Dias-de-Oliveira J, et al. (2022) Controlling the properties of parts 3D printed from recycled thermoplastics: A review of current practices. Polym Degrad Stab 196: 109850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.109850 doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.109850
    [68] Andrady AL, Barnes PW, Bornman JF, et al. (2022) Oxidation and fragmentation of plastics in a changing environment; from UV-radiation to biological degradation. Sci Total Environ 851: 158022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158022 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158022
    [69] Dilkes-Hoffman LS, Pratt S, Lant PA, et al. (2019) The role of biodegradable plastic in solving plastic solid waste accumulation. Plast Energy, 469–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813140-4.00019-4
    [70] Cano-Vicent A, Tambuwala MM, Hassan SS, et al. (2021) Fused deposition modelling: current status, methodology, applications and future prospects. Addit Manuf 47: 102378. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860421005327.
    [71] Gregory DA, Fricker ATR, Mitrev P, et al. (2023) Additive manufacturing of polyhydroxyalkanoate-based blends using fused deposition modelling for the development of biomedical devices. J Funct Biomater 14: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14010040 doi: 10.3390/jfb14010040
    [72] Vaes D, Puyvelde PV (2021) Semi-crystalline feedstock for filament-based 3D printing of polymers. Prog Polym Sci 118: 101411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101411 doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101411
    [73] Bakır AA, Atik R, Ö zerinç S (2021) Mechanical properties of thermoplastic parts produced by fused deposition modeling: A review. Rapid Prototyping J 27: 537–561. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2020-0061 doi: 10.1108/RPJ-03-2020-0061
    [74] Fico D, Rizzo D, Casciaro R, et al. (2022) A review of polymer-based materials for fused filament fabrication (FFF): Focus on sustainability and recycled materials. Polymers 14: 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14030465 doi: 10.3390/polym14030465
    [75] Squires AD, Lewis RA (2018) Feasibility and characterization of common and exotic filaments for use in 3D printed terahertz devices. J Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves 39: 614–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-018-0498-y doi: 10.1007/s10762-018-0498-y
    [76] Atakok G, Kam M, Koc HB (2022) A review of mechanical and thermal properties of products printed with recycled filaments for use in 3D printers. Surf Rev Lett 29: 2230002. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218625X22300027 doi: 10.1142/S0218625X22300027
    [77] Gilding DK, Reed AM (1979) Biodegradable polymers for use in surgery—poly (ethylene oxide) poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PEO/PET) copolymers: 1. Polymer 20: 1454–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(79)90008-9 doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(79)90008-9
    [78] Alshehrei F (2017) Biodegradation of synthetic and natural plastic by microorganisms. J Appl Environ Microbiol 5: 8–19. Available from: https://pubs.sciepub.com/jaem/5/1/2/.
    [79] Sharma M, Sharma P, Sharma A, et al. (2015) Microbial degradation of plastic-A brief review. CIBTech J Microbiol 4: 85–89. Available from: https://www.cibtech.org/J-Microbiology/PUBLICATIONS/2015/Vol-4-No-1/13-CJM-MARCH-013-SUBHASH-MICROBIAL.pdf.
    [80] Zeenat, Elahi A, Bukhari DA, et al. (2021) Plastics degradation by microbes: a sustainable approach. J King Saud Univ Sci 33: 101538. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018364721001993.
    [81] Bhagia S, Bornani K, Agrawal R, et al. (2021) Critical review of FDM 3D printing of PLA biocomposites filled with biomass resources, characterization, biodegradability, upcycling and opportunities for biorefineries. Appl Mater Today 24: 101078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101078 doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101078
    [82] Hassan M, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2024) 3D printing in upcycling plastic and biomass waste to sustainable polymer blends and composites: A review. Mater Des 237: 112558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112558 doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112558
    [83] Anwajler B, Zdybel E, Tomaszewska-Ciosk E (2023) Innovative polymer composites with natural fillers produced by additive manufacturing (3D Printing)—A literature review. Polymers 15: 3534. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15173534 doi: 10.3390/polym15173534
    [84] Rett JP, Traore YL, Ho EA (2021) Sustainable materials for fused deposition modeling 3D printing applications. Adv Eng Mater 23: 2001472. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202001472 doi: 10.1002/adem.202001472
    [85] Ji AQ (2023) Utilization of biomass and industrial waste on 3D printing. Available from: https://experts.esf.edu/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode = 01SUNY_ESF & filePid = 1368217480004826 & download = true.
    [86] Zhao HY, Jia Y, Chen GX, et al. (2023) Research status and progress of biomass-based 3D printing materials. Innovative Technol Print Packag 991: 608–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9024-3_79 doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-9024-3_79
    [87] Zander NE, Park JH, Boelter ZR, et al. (2019) Recycled cellulose polypropylene composite feedstocks for material extrusion additive manufacturing. ACS Omega 4: 13879–13888. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01564 doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01564
    [88] Kuhnt T, Camarero-Espinosa S (2021) Additive manufacturing of nanocellulose based scaffolds for tissue engineering: Beyond a reinforcement filler. Carbohydr Polym 252: 117159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117159 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117159
    [89] Pereira C, Pereira AM, Freire C, et al. (2020) Nanoengineered textiles: from advanced functional nanomaterials to groundbreaking high-performance clothing. Handbook of Functionalized Nanomaterials for Industrial Applications, 611–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816787-8.00021-1
    [90] Henke K, Treml S (2013) Wood based bulk material in 3D printing processes for applications in construction. Eur J Wood Prod 71: 139–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-012-0658-z doi: 10.1007/s00107-012-0658-z
    [91] Kariz M, Sernek M, Kuzman MK (2015) Use of wood powder and adhesive as a mixture for 3D printing. Eur J Wood Prod 74: 123–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-015-0987-9 doi: 10.1007/s00107-015-0987-9
    [92] Kromoser B, Reichenbach S, Hellmayr R, et al. (2022) Circular economy in wood construction—Additive manufacturing of fully recyclable walls made from renewables: proof of concept and preliminary data. Constr Build Mater 344: 128219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128219 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128219
    [93] Nadagouda MN, Ginn M, Rastogi V (2020) A review of 3D printing techniques for environmental applications. Curr Opin Chem Eng 28: 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2020.08.002 doi: 10.1016/j.coche.2020.08.002
    [94] Khosravani MR, Reinicke T (2020) On the environmental impacts of 3D printing technology. Appl Mater Today 20: 100689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100689 doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100689
    [95] Gao CJ, Wolff S, Wang S (2021) Eco-friendly additive manufacturing of metals: Energy efficiency and life cycle analysis. J Manuf Syst 60: 459–472. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278612521001357.
    [96] Peng T (2016) Analysis of energy utilization in 3D printing processes. Proc CIRP 40: 62–67. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827116000706.
    [97] Kanyilmaz A, Demir AG, Chierici M, et al. (2022) Role of metal 3D printing to increase quality and resource-efficiency in the construction sector. Addit Manuf 50: 102541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102541 doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102541
    [98] Abdalla H, Fattah KP, Abdallah M, et al. (2021) Environmental footprint and economics of a full-scale 3D-printed house. Sustainability 13: 11978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111978 doi: 10.3390/su132111978
    [99] Kamran M, Saxena A (2016) A comprehensive study on 3D printing technology. MIT Int J Mech Eng 6: 63–69. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310961474_A_Comprehensive_Study_on_3D_Printing_Technology.
    [100] Weng YW, Li MY, Ruan SQ, et al. (2020) Comparative economic, environmental and productivity assessment of a concrete bathroom unit fabricated through 3D printing and a precast approach. J Cleaner Prod 261: 121245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121245 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121245
    [101] Maffia S, Chiappini F, Maggiani G, et al. (2023) Enhancing productivity and efficiency in conventional laser metal deposition process for Inconel 718—Part Ⅱ: advancing the process performance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 129: 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12197-0. doi: 10.1007/s00170-023-12197-0
    [102] Nguyen D, Murialdo M, Hornbostel K, et al. (2019) 3D Printed polymer composites for CO2 capture. Ind Eng Chem Res 58: 22015–22020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04375 doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04375
    [103] Thakkar H, Eastman S, Hajari A, et al. (2016) 3D-printed zeolite monoliths for CO2 removal from enclosed environments. ACS Appl Mater Interface 8: 27753–27761. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b09647 doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b09647
    [104] Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, et al. (2017) Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev 117: 10212–10290. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074
    [105] Soliman A, AlAmoodi N, Karanikolos GN, et al. (2020) A review on new 3-D printed materials' geometries for catalysis and adsorption: paradigms from reforming reactions and CO2 capture. Nanomaterials 10: 2198. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10112198 doi: 10.3390/nano10112198
    [106] Sola A (2022) Materials requirements in fused filament fabrication: A framework for the design of next-generation 3D printable thermoplastics and composites. Macromol Mater Eng 307: 2200197. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.202200197 doi: 10.1002/mame.202200197
    [107] Nazir MH, Al-Marzouqi AH, Ahmed W, et al. (2023) The potential of adopting natural fibers reinforcements for fused deposition modeling: Characterization and implications. Heliyon 9: e15023. Available from: https://www.cell.com/heliyon/pdf/S2405-8440(23)02230-2.pdf.
    [108] Salamone F, Danza L, Meroni I, et al. (2017) A low-cost environmental monitoring system: How to prevent systematic errors in the design phase through the combined use of additive manufacturing and thermographic techniques. Sensors 17: 828. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040828 doi: 10.3390/s17040828
    [109] Zhao L, Yao YJ, Huang S, et al. (2023) Design and implementation of a low-cost and multi-parameter indoor air quality detector based on IoT. Int J Comput Appl T 72: 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCAT.2023.133879 doi: 10.1504/IJCAT.2023.133879
    [110] Aizlewood C, Dimitroulopoulou C (2006) The HOPE project: The UK experience. Indoor Built Environ 15: 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X06069578 doi: 10.1177/1420326X06069578
    [111] Wang Y, Mackenzie FV, Ingenhut B, et al. (2018) AP4. 1-miniaturized 3D printed particulate matter sensor for personal monitoring. 17th International Meeting on Chemical Sensors. https://doi.org/10.5162/IMCS2018/AP4.1
    [112] Xu X, Xiao SN, Willy HJ, et al. (2020) 3D-printed grids with polymeric photocatalytic system as flexible air filter. Appl Catal B 262: 118307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118307 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118307
    [113] Kumar AR, Arya S, Levy A, et al. (2020) Scale and numerical modeling to determine operating points of a non-clogging vortecone filter in mining operation. Prog Scale Model Int J 1, Article 7. Available from: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/psmij/vol1/iss1/7/.
    [114] Aghaei A, Firouzjaei MD, Karami P, et al. (2022) The implications of 3D-printed membranes for water and wastewater treatment and resource recovery. Can J Chem Eng 100: 2309–2321. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.24488 doi: 10.1002/cjce.24488
    [115] Tijing LD, Dizon JRC, Ibrahim I, et al. (2020) 3D printing for membrane separation, desalination and water treatment. Appl Mater Today 18: 100486. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352940719306055.
    [116] Ye YY, Du Y, Hu TY, et al. (2021) 3D printing of integrated ceramic membranes by the DLP method. Ind Eng Chem Res 60: 9368–9377. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02224 doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02224
    [117] Kotz F, Helmer D, Rapp BE (2020) Emerging technologies and materials for high-resolution 3D printing of microfluidic chips. Microfluidics in Biotechnology 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2020_141
    [118] Jonhson W, Xu X, Bian K, et al. (2022) 3D-printed hierarchical ceramic architectures for ultrafast emulsion treatment and simultaneous oil-water filtration. ACS Mater Lett 4: 740–750. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.2c00147 doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.2c00147
    [119] Jin Z, Mei H, Liu H, et al. (2022) High-strength, superhydrophilic/underwater superoleophobic multifunctional ceramics for high efficiency oil-water separation and water purification. Mater Today Nano 18: 100199. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258884202200027X.
    [120] Sreedhar N, Kumar M, Al Jitan S, et al. (2022) 3D printed photocatalytic feed spacers functionalized with β-FeOOH nanorods inducing pollutant degradation and membrane cleaning capabilities in water treatment. Appl Catal B 300: 120318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120318 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120318
    [121] Sreelekshmy BR, Rajappan AJ, Basheer R, et al. (2020) Tuning of surface characteristics of anodes for efficient and sustained power generation in microbial fuel cells. ACS Appl Bio Mater 3: 6224–6236. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c00753 doi: 10.1021/acsabm.0c00753
    [122] Cai T, Meng LJ, Chen G, et al. (2020) Application of advanced anodes in microbial fuel cells for power generation: A review. Chemosphere 248: 125985. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653520301776.
    [123] Mishra S, Ghosh S, Singh T (2020) Progress in materials development for flexible perovskite solar cells and future prospects. ChemSusChem 14: 512–538. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202002095 doi: 10.1002/cssc.202002095
    [124] Liu CH, Xiao CY, Xie CC, et al. (2021) Flexible organic solar cells: materials, large-area fabrication techniques and potential applications. Nano Energy 89: 106399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106399 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106399
    [125] Tian YX, Wang XQ, Li J, et al. (2022) Rapid manufacturing of turbine blades based on reverse engineering and 3D printing technology. Proceedings of 2022 Chinese Intelligent Systems Conference, 540–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6203-5_53
    [126] Rahimizadeh A, Kalman J, Fayazbakhsh K, et al. (2021) Mechanical and thermal study of 3D printing composite filaments from wind turbine waste. Polym Compos 42: 2305–2316. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25978 doi: 10.1002/pc.25978
    [127] Dzogbewu TC, Beer DJ (2023) Additive manufacturing of selected ecofriendly energy devices. Virtual Phys Prototyp 18: e2150230. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2023.2276245
    [128] Browne MP, Redondo E, Pumera M (2020) 3D printing for electrochemical energy applications. Chem Rev 120: 2783–2810. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00783 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00783
    [129] Wang H, Xiong BD, Zhang ZT, et al. (2023) Small wind turbines and their potential for internet of things applications. iScience 26: 107674. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497799/.
    [130] Kantaros A, Soulis E, Petrescu FIT, et al. (2023) Advanced composite materials utilized in FDM/FFF 3D printing manufacturing processes: the case of filled filaments. Materials 16: 6210. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186210 doi: 10.3390/ma16186210
    [131] Al-Maharma AY, Patil SP, Markert B (2020) Effects of porosity on the mechanical properties of additively manufactured components: A critical review. Mater Res Express 7: 122001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/abcc5d doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/abcc5d
    [132] Okolie O, Kumar A, Edwards C, et al. (2023) Bio-based sustainable polymers and materials: From processing to biodegradation. J Compos Sci 7: 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7060213 doi: 10.3390/jcs7060213
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Yane Li, Chengfeng Wang, Haibo Gu, Hailin Feng, Yaoping Ruan, ESMDNN-PPI: a new protein–protein interaction prediction model developed with protein language model of ESM2 and deep neural network, 2024, 35, 0957-0233, 125701, 10.1088/1361-6501/ad761c
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4642) PDF downloads(231) Cited by(2)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(6)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog