Ant colonies demonstrate a finely tuned alarm response to potential threats, offering a uniquely manageable empirical setting for exploring adaptive information diffusion within groups. To effectively address potential dangers, a social group must swiftly communicate the threat throughout the collective while conserving energy in the event that the threat is unfounded. Through a combination of modeling, simulation, and empirical observations of alarm spread and damping patterns, we identified the behavioral rules governing this adaptive response. Experimental trials involving alarmed ant workers (Pogonomyrmex californicus) released into a tranquil group of nestmates revealed a consistent pattern of rapid alarm propagation followed by a comparatively extended decay period [
Citation: Michael R. Lin, Xiaohui Guo, Asma Azizi, Jennifer H. Fewell, Fabio Milner. Mechanistic modeling of alarm signaling in seed-harvester ants[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(4): 5536-5555. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024244
[1] | Mohd Danish Siddiqi, Fatemah Mofarreh . Schur-type inequality for solitonic hypersurfaces in (k,μ)-contact metric manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 36069-36081. doi: 10.3934/math.20241711 |
[2] | Hamed Faraji, Shahroud Azami, Ghodratallah Fasihi-Ramandi . h-Almost Ricci solitons with concurrent potential fields. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4220-4228. doi: 10.3934/math.2020269 |
[3] | Rabia Cakan Akpınar, Esen Kemer Kansu . Metallic deformation on para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19125-19136. doi: 10.3934/math.2024932 |
[4] | Yusuf Dogru . η-Ricci-Bourguignon solitons with a semi-symmetric metric and semi-symmetric non-metric connection. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11943-11952. doi: 10.3934/math.2023603 |
[5] | Yanlin Li, Dipen Ganguly, Santu Dey, Arindam Bhattacharyya . Conformal η-Ricci solitons within the framework of indefinite Kenmotsu manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5408-5430. doi: 10.3934/math.2022300 |
[6] | Yanlin Li, Aydin Gezer, Erkan Karakaş . Some notes on the tangent bundle with a Ricci quarter-symmetric metric connection. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 17335-17353. doi: 10.3934/math.2023886 |
[7] | Shahroud Azami, Mehdi Jafari, Nargis Jamal, Abdul Haseeb . Hyperbolic Ricci solitons on perfect fluid spacetimes. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18929-18943. doi: 10.3934/math.2024921 |
[8] | Rajesh Kumar, Sameh Shenawy, Lalnunenga Colney, Nasser Bin Turki . Certain results on tangent bundle endowed with generalized Tanaka Webster connection (GTWC) on Kenmotsu manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30364-30383. doi: 10.3934/math.20241465 |
[9] | Fahad Sikander, Tanveer Fatima, Sharief Deshmukh, Ayman Elsharkawy . Curvature analysis of concircular trajectories in doubly warped product manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21940-21951. doi: 10.3934/math.20241066 |
[10] | Abdul Haseeb, Fatemah Mofarreh, Sudhakar Kumar Chaubey, Rajendra Prasad . A study of ∗-Ricci–Yamabe solitons on LP-Kenmotsu manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 22532-22546. doi: 10.3934/math.20241096 |
Ant colonies demonstrate a finely tuned alarm response to potential threats, offering a uniquely manageable empirical setting for exploring adaptive information diffusion within groups. To effectively address potential dangers, a social group must swiftly communicate the threat throughout the collective while conserving energy in the event that the threat is unfounded. Through a combination of modeling, simulation, and empirical observations of alarm spread and damping patterns, we identified the behavioral rules governing this adaptive response. Experimental trials involving alarmed ant workers (Pogonomyrmex californicus) released into a tranquil group of nestmates revealed a consistent pattern of rapid alarm propagation followed by a comparatively extended decay period [
In his famous paper on Ricci flows [1], Richard S. Hamilton introduced Ricci solitons, which have played a crucial role in deepening our comprehension of the Ricci flow's long-term dynamics and its relationship with geometric structures. Ricci solitons represent self-similar solutions that provide valuable perspectives on the geometry of manifolds.
A Ricci soliton on a Riemannian manifold (N,g) is defined by the existence of a vector field η and a constant κ such that the following equation holds:
Ric+12Lηg=κg, | (1.1) |
where Lηg denotes the Lie derivative of the metric g in the direction of η, and Ric represents the Ricci curvature of (N,g). In this context, (N,g,η,κ) is referred to as a Ricci soliton, with η known as the potential vector field and κ as the Ricci soliton constant.
In [2], S. Pigola introduced the concept of an almost Ricci soliton by allowing the Ricci soliton constant κ to be a function. More specifically, a quadruple (N,g,η,κ) is defined as an almost Ricci soliton (ARS) if Eq (1.1) holds, where κ is a smooth function on N, referred to as the potential function of the ARS.
If the soliton potential vector field η is Killing, then the ARS (N,g,η,κ) is said to be trivial. We also say that the ARS (N,g,η,κ) is parallel if its potential vector field η is a parallel vector field.
An almost Ricci soliton (N,g,η,κ) is categorized as steady under the condition κ=0, as shrinking under the condition κ>0, and as expanding under the condition κ<0. When the potential vector field η is gradient, i.e, η=Df for some smooth function f on N, the almost Ricci soliton (N,g,f,κ) is called a gradient. Equation (1.1) becomes
Ric+Hf=κg, | (1.2) |
where Hf is the Hessian of the function f.
The study of almost Ricci solitons (ARS) provides a natural generalization of Ricci solitons by allowing the soliton constant κ to vary as a smooth function rather than remaining constant. These structures naturally appear in the study of Ricci flow, where they describe shapes of spaces that evolve in a self-similar way over time. Recently, researchers have paid more attention to compact ARS spaces because they often show strong and rigid geometric behavior under certain curvature conditions.
In [3], Corollary 1 and Theorem 2, it was shown that in dimension ≥3, if a compact ARS has either constant scalar curvature or a nontrivial conformal vector field, then the space must be isometric to a standard Euclidean sphere. This extends earlier results about Ricci solitons to the more general ARS case, showing that symmetry and compactness strongly influence the geometry.
In [4], it has been shown that if a nontrivial ARS (N,g,η,κ) has constant scalar curvature, then the vector field η is gradient, and the space (N,g) must again be a sphere. This connects ARS spaces with classical gradient Ricci solitons, suggesting that many of the same rigid properties still apply even in this more general setting.
It is also known (see [5]) that all compact Ricci solitons are gradient solitons. While this does not always hold for ARS (because κ is not constant), adding the condition of constant scalar curvature forces the ARS to behave like a gradient soliton.
In two dimensions, Hamilton showed in [6] that all compact Ricci solitons are trivial. However, [3] gave an example of a nontrivial compact two-dimensional almost Ricci soliton, proving that ARS allow for more complex geometry than Ricci solitons, especially in low dimensions.
For a more detailed study of these topics, including classification results and more examples, readers can refer to the works (see [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]).
Finally, it is worth noting that many researchers have effectively applied soliton theory across various scientific and engineering disciplines. They have also devised several powerful techniques for obtaining analytic solutions, including the inverse scattering transform [14] and Hirota's bilinear method [15], among others.
The present work presents several sufficient conditions for a compact almost Ricci soliton to be isometric to a sphere and other conditions under which it becomes trivial or parallel.
The organization of this paper is as follows: Section 2 contains the fundamental concepts, presenting an overview of the essential principles and key equations within almost Ricci soliton theory. Section 3 determines the sufficient conditions for an almost Ricci soliton on a compact Riemannian manifold to be trivial or parallel. Theorem 3.6 states that given a non-parallel almost Ricci soliton (N,g,η,κ) on an n-dimensional compact and connected Riemannian manifold (N,g), where n≥3, then, (N,g) is isometric to a Euclidean sphere Sn(c) if and only if the following inequality holds:
∫N(Ric(η,η)+(n−1)g(η,Dκ))dv≤0. | (1.3) |
Theorem 3.8 demonstrates that for an almost Ricci soliton on an n-dimensional compact Riemannian manifold (N,g), with n≥2, the condition
∫N(Ric(η,η)+(n−2)g(η,Dκ))dv≤0 | (1.4) |
leads to the potential vector field being parallel. This extends Theorem 3 in [3], which shows that an almost Ricci soliton on a compact Riemannian manifold, with n≥3, is trivial (i.e, the potential vector field is Killing) if condition (1.4) is satisfied. This also generalizes Theorem 1.1 in [16], stating that a compact Ricci soliton is trivial whenever
∫N(Ric(η,η))dv≤0. |
On an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold (N,g), where n≥2, the Riemannian curvature tensor R is given by:
R(U,V)Z=D[U,V]Z−DUDVZ+DVDUZ, | (2.1) |
for all U,V,Z∈X(N), with D being the Levi-Civita connection on (N,g) and X(N) representing the collection of smooth vector fields on (N,g). For more details, see [17].
If {e1,…,en} is a local orthonormal frame on the manifold (N,g), the divergence of a vector field U∈X(N) is described by the equation:
div(U)=n∑i=1g(DDeieiU,ei). |
Similarly, the Laplacian of U is given by:
ΔU=n∑i=1DeiDeiU−DDeieiU. |
The divergence of the (1,1)-tensor ϕ on (N,g) is expressed as:
div(ϕ)=n∑i=1(Deiϕ)(ei). |
The gradient of a smooth function f on N is the vector field Df characterized by:
g(Df,U)=U(f), | (2.2) |
for all U∈X(N), and the Hessian of f is the symmetric (0,2) tensor field defined by"
Hf(U,V)=g(DUDf,V), | (2.3) |
for all U,V∈X(N).
The Laplacian of a smooth function f on N is defined as:
Δf=div(Df). |
Taking the trace of (1.1) yields
S+div(η)=nκ, | (2.4) |
where S is the scalar curvature of (N,g). Also, we have
div(κη)=g(η,Dκ)+nκ2−κS, | (2.5) |
div(Sη)=g(η,DS)+nκS−S2, | (2.6) |
and
div((nκ−S)η)=(nκ−S)2+η(nκ−S). | (2.7) |
For a gradient Ricci soliton (N,g,f,κ), Equation (2.4) becomes
S+Δf=nκ. | (2.8) |
Take a Riemannian manifold (N,g), and η∈X(N). Let θη be the 1-form dual to η (i.e, θη(U)=g(U,η),U∈X(N)), then the Lie derivative Lη can be written as
Lηg(U,V)+dθη(U,V)=2g(DUη,V), | (2.9) |
for all U,V∈X(N).
Now, consider B a symmetric tensor field, and ϕ a skew-symmetric tensor field on (N,g) with the following equations:
Lηg(U,V)=2g(B(U),V), | (2.10) |
and
dθη(U,V)=2g(ϕ(U),V), | (2.11) |
where U,V∈X(N). We get from (2.9) that
DUη=B(U)+ϕ(U), | (2.12) |
for each U∈X(N).
A vector field η is called closed conformal if
DUη=ΨU, | (2.13) |
for each U∈X(N), where Ψ is a smooth function on (N,g).
In this subsection, we prove several key lemmas that will be crucial for the rest of the paper.
Assume (N,g,η,κ) is an almost Ricci soliton on a compact Riemannian manifold (N,g). By substituting (2.10) in (1.1), we deduce that
B=κI−Q, | (3.1) |
where Q is the Ricci operator, that is, the operator satisfying
Ric(U,V)=g(Q(U),V), |
for all U,V∈X(N). Also, by substituting (3.1) in (2.12), it follows that
DUη=κU−Q(U)+ϕ(U), | (3.2) |
for all U∈X(N).
The following lemma gives the value of the Ricci curvature in the direction of η.
Lemma 3.1. Let (N,g,η,κ) be an almost Ricci soliton on an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold (N,g). Then
Ric(η,V)=(1−n)V(κ)+12V(S)−g(div(ϕ),V), | (3.3) |
for all V∈X(N).
Proof. From (2.1), we obtain
R(U,V)η=U(κ)V−V(κ)U−(DUQ)(V)+(DVQ)(U)+(DUϕ)(V)−(DVϕ)(U), |
for all U,V∈X(N).
Assume {e1,…,en} is a local orthonormal frame on (N,g) such that it is parallel. Considering equation (1.1) and Corollary 54 in [17], p 88, we obtain
Ric(V,η)=n∑i=1g(R(ei,V)η,ei)=n∑i=1g(ei(κ)V−V(κ)ei−(DeiQ)(V)+(DVQ)(ei)+(Deiϕ)(V)−(DVϕ)(ei),ei)=V(κ)−nV(κ)+g(div(Q),V)−g(div(ϕ),V)=(1−n)V(κ)+12V(S)−g(div(ϕ),V). |
Remark 1. From the above lemma, we see that
Q(η)=(1−n)Dκ+12DS−div(ϕ). | (3.4) |
In the following lemma, we compute the divergence of the image of η by the Ricci tensor Q.
Lemma 3.2. Let (N,g,η,κ) be an almost Ricci soliton on an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold (N,g). Then
div(Q(η))=12g(DS,η)+κS−||Q||2. | (3.5) |
Proof. Consider {e1,…,en} as a local orthonormal frame on (N,g). By considering (3.4), we deduce
div(Q(η))=n∑i=1g(DeiQ(η),ei)=n∑i=1g((DeiQ)(η),ei)+n∑i=1g(Q(Deiη),ei)=n∑i=1g(η,(DeiQ)ei)+n∑i=1g(Q(Deiη),ei)=g(η,n∑i=1(DeiQ)ei)+n∑i=1g(Deiη,Q(ei))=g(η,12DS)+n∑i=1g(κei−Q(ei)+ϕ(ei),Q(ei))=g(η,12DS)+κn∑i=1g(ei,Q(ei))−n∑i=1g(Q(ei),Q(ei))+n∑i=1g(Q(ei),ϕ(ei))=g(η,12DS)+κS−||Q||2. |
The following formula is well known in the case of Ricci solitons. We extend it here to the case of almost Ricci solitons.
Lemma 3.3. Let (N,g) be an n-Riemannian manifold. If (N,g,η,κ) is an almost Ricci soliton on (N,g), then
||Ric−Sng||2=||Q||2−S2n. | (3.6) |
Proof. Let λ1,λ2,...,λn be the eigenvalues of the Ricci operator Q. Then
||Ric−Sng||2=n∑i=1(λi−Sn)2=n∑i=1(λ2i+S2n2−2Snλi)=n∑i=1λ2i+n∑i=1S2n2−2Snn∑i=1λi=||Q||2+S2n−2S2n=||Q||2−S2n. |
The following lemma provides a useful formula for the Laplacian of the potential vector field for an almost Ricci soliton.
Lemma 3.4. Let (N,g,η,κ) be an almost Ricci soliton on an n-Riemannian manifold (N,g). Then
Δη=(2−n)Dκ−Q(η). | (3.7) |
Proof. Consider {e1,…,en} as a local orthonormal frame on (N,g). Considering Eq (1.1) and Corollary 54 in [17], p 88, we obtain
Δη=n∑i=1DeiDeiη−DDeieiη=n∑i=1Dei(κei−Q(ei)+ϕ(ei))=n∑i=1(g(κ,ei)ei−DeiQ(ei)+Deiϕ(ei))=n∑i=1(g(κ,ei)ei−(DeiQ)(ei)+(Deiϕ)(ei))=Dκ−12DS+div(ϕ). |
Inserting (3.4) in the preceding equation yields (3.7).
Theorem 3.5. Let (N,g,η,κ) be an almost Ricci soliton on an n-dimensional compact Riemannian manifold (N,g), where n≥2. If the inequality
∫N(Ric(η,η)+n(κ2+g(η,Dκ)))dv≤0 | (3.8) |
is satisfied, then the manifold (N,g) is Ricci flat, and η is a closed conformal vector field.
Proof. By (3.3) and (3.5), we have
Ric(η,η)=(1−n)g(η,Dκ)+12g(η,DS)−g(div(ϕ),η)=(1−n)g(η,Dκ)+12g(η,DS)+||ϕ||2+div(ϕ(η))=(1−n)g(η,Dκ)+div(Q(η))−κS+||Q||2+||ϕ||2+div(ϕ(η)). |
Consequently, it follows that
Ric(η,η)+(n−1)g(η,Dκ)=div(Q(η))−κS+||Q||2+||ϕ||2+div(ϕ(η)). | (3.9) |
By substituting the value of κS from (2.5) in (3.9), we deduce that
Ric(η,η)=−ng(η,Dκ)+div(Q(η))−div(κη)−nκ2+||Q||2+||ϕ||2+div(ϕ(η)). | (3.10) |
By integrating (3.10), one obtains
∫N(Ric(η,η)+n(κ2+g(η,Dκ)))dv=∫N(||Q||2+||ϕ||2)dv. | (3.11) |
Now, it is clear that condition (3.8) in (3.11) yields Q=ϕ=0. We deduce from (2.12) that Dη=κI, which means that η is a closed conformal vector field.
Also, since Q=0 we get Ric=0, meaning that (N,g) is Ricci flat.
Theorem 3.6. Let (N,g) be an n-dimensional connected and compact Riemannian manifold, where n≥3. If (N,g,η,κ) is a non-parallel almost Ricci soliton, then (N,g) is isometric to a Euclidean sphere Sn(c) if and only if the subsequent inequality is satisfied
∫N(Ric(η,η)+(n−1)g(η,Dκ))dv≤0. | (3.12) |
Proof. From (2.6), we have
κS=1n(div(Sη)+S2−g(η,DS)). | (3.13) |
By substituting the value of κS in (3.9) and then utilizing (3.6), we obtain
Ric(η,η)+(n−1)g(η,Dκ)=||Ric−Sng||2+div(Q(η)−1ndiv(Sη)+ϕ(η))+1ng(η,DS)+||ϕ||2. | (3.14) |
On the other hand, Theorem 1 in [4] states that
∫N||Ric−Sng||2dv=n−22n∫Ng(η,DS)dv. | (3.15) |
By integrating Eq (3.14), followed by the substitution of equation (3.15) in the result, we derive
∫N(Ric(η,η)+(n−1)g(η,Dκ))dv=12∫N||Ric−Sng||2dv+∫N||ϕ||2dv. |
Taking into account the hypothesis (1.3), we deduce that Ric=Sng and ϕ=0.
Given that n≥3 and Ric=Sng, the Schur Lemma (refer to [17]) can be applied, implying that S must be constant. Also, because ϕ=0, η is a closed conformal vector field with conformal function κ−Sn, that is
DUη=(κ−Sn)U, | (3.16) |
for all U∈X(N).
Given that η is not parallel, it follows that κ≠Sn meaning that η is a non-Killing conformal vector field. From the fact that Ric=Sng and equation (3.16), we obtain
LηRic=2Sn(κ−Sn)g. | (3.17) |
This relation allows us to apply Theorem 4.2 from [18], p. 54, leading to the conclusion that (N,g) is isometric to the standard Euclidean sphere Sn(c) with radius 1√c, where c=Sn(n−1).
Conversely, assume that (N,g,η,κ) is a non-parallel almost Ricci soliton on a connected, compact Riemannian manifold (N,g), where (N,g) is isometric to a Euclidean sphere Sn(c), with c>0. In other words, the Ricci curvature is expressed as Ric=(n−1)cg, whereas the scalar curvature is defined by S=n(n−1)c. From (1.1), it follows that
12Lηg=(κ−(n−1)c)g. | (3.18) |
But, by Corollary 2 in [4], η is gradient, i.e, η=Df for some smooth function f on N. Then (3.18) becomes
Hf=(κ−(n−1)c)g. |
It necessarily follows that κ≠(n−1)c, as otherwise D2f=0, implying that Df=η is a constant vector field, indicating that η is parallel.
As demonstrated by Lemma 2.3 in [18] on page 52, Eq (3.18) shows that
Δκ=−nc(κ−(n−1)). |
Additionally, as indicated by (2.4), it follows that
Δf=nκ−S=n(κ−(n−1)). |
We deduce that Δ(κ+cf)=0. According to the well-known Hopf Lemma, this implies that κ+cf is a constant.
Consequently, Dκ=−cDf=−cη, and therefore
Ric(η,η)+(n−1)g(η,Dκ)=c(n−1)|η|2−c(n−1)|η|2=0. |
This demonstrates that the inequality (1.3) holds true as an equality.
Next, we shall give an example of an almost Ricci soliton on the Euclidean sphere Sn(c), where c>0 satisfies (1.3).
Example 1. Consider (Sn(c),⟨,⟩), the Euclidean sphere in the Euclidean space (Rn+1,⟨,⟩) of radius 1√c, where c>0.
Let ∇ and ¯∇ be the Levi-Civita connections of Sn(c) and Rn+1, respectively.
Let ˉZ∈X(Rn+1) be a constant vector field, with Z as its restriction to Sn(c).
If ψ:Sn(c)⟶Rn+1 represents the position vector field, then consider the unit normal vector field on Sn(c), defined by N=√cψ.
Write
Z=ZT+θN, | (3.19) |
where ZT is the tangential component of Z, and θ=⟨Z,N⟩.
Employing the Gauss and Weingarten formulas, we obtain
∇UZT=−√cθU, | (3.20) |
and
∇θ=√cZT. | (3.21) |
Consequently, ZT serves as a closed conformal vector field associated with the conformal function −√cθ.
Assume that (Sn(c),⟨,⟩,ZT,κ) is an almost Ricci soliton on (Sn(c),⟨,⟩). Given that for the Euclidean sphere (Sn(c), we have Ric=(n−1)cg, and from (3.20) we know that 12LZTg=−√cθg, by substituting these expressions into equation (1.1), we deduce that
−√cθI+(n−1)cI=κI, |
indicating that the function κ is given explicitely by
κ=(n−1)c−θ√c. |
Since Ric(ZT,ZT)=(n−1)c⟨ZT,ZT⟩ and ⟨ZT,Dκ⟩=−c⟨ZT,ZT⟩, it follows that
∫Sn(c)(Ric(ZT,ZT)+(n−1)⟨ZT,Dκ⟩)dv=0, |
meaning that the inequality (1.3) is satisfied as an equality.
We close this subsection with the following result, which characterizes Euclidean spheres in terms of the constancy of the scalar curvature along the integral curves of the potential vector field.
Theorem 3.7. Let (N,g) be an n-dimensional compact oriented Riemannian manifold, n≥3. If (N,g,η,κ) is a non-trivial almost Ricci soliton on (N,g), then (N,g) is isometric to a Euclidean sphere if and only if η leaves the scalar curvature S constant (i.e, S is constant along the integral curves of η).
Proof. Assume that η leaves the scalar curvature S constant. This means that g(η,DS)=0.
Substituting this in Eq (3.15), we obtain
∫N||Ric−Sng||2dv=0. |
This implies that Ric=Sng. With n≥3, Schur's Lemma implies that S must be constant. According to (1.1), we have
12Lηg=(κ−Sn)g=1n(nκ−S)g=div(η)ng. |
Given that (N,g,η,κ) is non-trivial, it follows that div(η)≠0, indicating that η is a non-trivial conformal vector field. It follows that η is a non-homothetic conformal vector field on a compact Einstein Riemannian manifold. Following a similar argument as in the proof of Theorem 3.6 above, and applying Theorem 4.2 from [18], p. 54, we conclude that (N,g) is isometric to a Euclidean sphere. The converse is trivial, since if (N,g) is isometric to a Euclidean sphere, then the scalar curvature is constant.
The next result extends Theorem 3 from [3], shown when n≥3 and with the conclusion that η is a Killing vector field. It also generalizes Theorem 1.1 from [16], which proved for a Ricci soliton on a compact Riemannian manifold that satisfies ∫N(Ric(η,η))dv≤0.
Theorem 3.8. Let (N,g) be an n-dimensional compact Riemannian manifold, n≥2. If (N,g,η,κ) is an almost Ricci soliton on (N,g) satisfying the following inequality
∫N(Ric(η,η)+(n−2)g(η,Dκ))dv≤0, | (3.22) |
then η is a parallel vector field.
Proof. By Lemma 2 in [3], we have
12Δ|η|2=|Dη|2−Ric(η,η)−(n−2)g(η,Dκ). | (3.23) |
By integrating the above equation, we obtain
∫N(Ric(η,η)+(n−2)g(η,Dκ))dv=∫N|Dη|2dv, | (3.24) |
and from the hypothesis (3.22), it follows that Dη=0, which means that η is parallel.
Theorem 3.9. Let (N,g,η,κ) be an almost Ricci soliton on an n-dimensional compact Riemannian manifold (N,g), where n≥2. If (N,g,η,κ) satisfies the following inequality
∫N(Ric(Q(η),η)+(n−1)g(DS,Dκ))dv≤0, | (3.25) |
then η is a parallel vector field, and (N,g) is Einstein.
Proof. By (3.3) and (3.4), we have
Ric(Q(η),η)+Ric(div(ϕ),η)=12Ric(η,DS)−(n−1)Ric(η,Dκ)=12(−(n−1)g(DS,Dκ)+12|DS|2−g(div(ϕ,DS))−(n−1)(−(n−1)g(Dκ,η)+12g(DS,Sκ)−g(div(ϕ),Dκ))=−(n−1)g(DS,Dκ)+12div(ϕ(DS))+14|DS|2+(n−1)2|Dκ|2−(n−1)div(ϕ(Dκ)). |
So, we have
Ric(Q(η),η)+Ric(div(ϕ),η)=−(n−1)g(DS,Dκ)+12div(ϕ(DS))+14|DS|2+(n−1)2|Dκ|2−(n−1)div(ϕ(Dκ)). | (3.26) |
Also, from (3.3), one obtains
Ric(div(ϕ),η)=(n−1)div(ϕ(Dκ)−12div(ϕ(DS))−|div(ϕ)|2. | (3.27) |
Substituting (3.27) in (3.26) and integrating the resulting equation yields
∫N(Ric(Q(η),η)+(n−1)g(DS,Dκ))dv=∫N(14|DS|2+(n−1)2|Dκ|2+|div(ϕ)|2)dv. | (3.28) |
Assuming the hypothesis (3.25), it follows that the scalar curvature S and the potential function κ are constant, and div(ϕ)=0. From equation (2.4), it is deduced that nκ=S.
From (3.5), it follows
||Q||2=κS. |
It follows that Eq (3.6) becomes
||Ric−Sng||2=0. |
This implies that (N,g) is an Einstein manifold, and that η is a Killing vector field.
Furthermore, given that ∫NRic(η,η)dv=0 from (3.28), then (3.24) implies that
∫N|Dη|2dv=0, |
which means that Dη=0, and so η is a parallel vector field.
Remark According to [19], it is proved that an n-dimensional compact almost Ricci soliton (N,g,η,κ), where n≥3, becomes a trivial Ricci soliton precisely when nκ−S remains constant along the integral curve of the potential field η. This condition, essentially, is equivalent to η.div(η)=0. We aim to extend this result as follows.
Theorem 3.10. An almost Ricci soliton (N,g,η,κ) on an n-dimensional compact Riemannian manifold with n≥3 is trivial if and only if the vector field η is incompressible, meaning that div(η)=0.
Proof. Assume that (N,g,η,κ) is trivial. Then, η is a Killing vector field, meaning that Lηg=0. Consequently, div(η)=0.
Conversely, by assuming that div(η)=0, we deduce that nκ=S. By integrating Eq (2.6), we obtain
∫Ng(η,DS)dv=0. |
Substituting this in Eq (3.15), it follows that
∫N||Ric−Sng||2dv=0. |
This implies that Ric=Sng. With n≥3, Schur's Lemma indicates that S must be constant. Since nκ=S, it follows that κ is also constant. Therefore, (N,g,η,κ) is trivial.
Upon reviewing the previous outcome, we derive the following result:
Corollary 1. A compact almost Ricci soliton of dimension n≥3 with an affine potential vector field is trivial.
Proof. By [20], any affine vector field on a compact Riemannian manifold is incompressible.
Theorem 3.11. Let (N,g,η,κ) be an almost Ricci soliton on an n-dimensional compact Riemannian manifold (N,g), where n≥2. If (N,g,η,κ) satisfies the following inequality
∫N(g(η,DS)−2g(η,Dκ))dv≤0, | (3.29) |
then, η is a Killing vector field, and (N,g,η,κ) is trivial.
Proof. By taking the inner product of (3.7) with η and subsequently integrating, it follows
∫N(Ric(η,η)+g(η,Δη)+(n−2)g(η,Dκ))dv=0. | (3.30) |
According to Proposition 5.10 in [21], it follows that
∫N(Ric(η,η)+g(η,Δη)+12|Lηg|2−(div(η))2))dv=0. | (3.31) |
Using Eq (2.12), we obtain
|Dη|2=|B|2+|ϕ|2, |
and
tr(Dη)2=|B|2−|ϕ|2, |
where tr(Dη)2 represents the trace of (Dη)2.
Referencing Lemma 5.9 in [21], we have
|Lηg|2=4|B|2. | (3.32) |
Utilizing (3.31) and considering Eqs (2.7) and (3.32), we obtain
∫N(g(η,DS)−2g(η,Dκ))dv=2∫N|B|2dv. | (3.33) |
Assuming that ∫N(g(η,S)−2g(η,Dκ))dv≤0, we deduce that B=0, implying that Ric=κg. According to (1.1), η becomes a Killing vector field, and the almost Ricci soliton is trivial.
In this paper, we extend and refine recent works about Ricci solitons and almost Ricci solitons by using methods based on integral inequalities that involve Ricci curvature and the potential vector field. Unlike previous studies that often focused on specific curvature assumptions or geometric structures, we use integral conditions to set clear criteria for when a compact Riemannian manifold with an almost Ricci soliton is isometric to a sphere. We also explore the potential vector field in more detail, identifying conditions where it becomes either Killing or parallel, making the almost Ricci soliton trivial. By focusing on both the geometry and the properties of the vector field, our work not only broadens the scope of earlier results but also provides a more unified approach for studying solitons with fewer assumptions. Our methods and findings show how effective integral techniques are in analyzing Ricci-type structures and contribute to the ongoing development of Ricci soliton theory. We expect that future research will focus on exploring the properties of almost Ricci solitons in important contexts, like spacelike submanifolds of Lorentzian manifolds, especially within generalized Robertson-Walker (GRW) spacetimes and general Lorentzian warped products.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to Ongoing Research Funding Project, (ORF-2025-824), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Conceptualization, M.G.; Investigation, N.A. and M.G.; Methodology, N.A. and M.G.; Resources, N.A.; Validation, M.G.; Writing-original draft, N.A.; Writing-review and editing, N.A. and M.G.
[1] |
X. Guo, M. R. Lin, A. Azizi, L. P. Saldyt, Y. Kang, T. P. Pavlic, et al., Decoding alarm signal propagation of seed-harvester ants using automated movement tracking and supervised machine learning, Proc. R. Soc. B, 289 (2022), 20212176. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2176 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2176
![]() |
[2] |
O. Feinerman, A. Korman, Individual versus collective cognition in social insects, J. Exp. Biol., 220 (2017), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.143891 doi: 10.1242/jeb.143891
![]() |
[3] |
B. Doerr, M. Fouz, T. Friedrich, Why rumors spread fast in social networks, Commun. ACM, 55 (2012), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/2184319.2184338 doi: 10.1145/2184319.2184338
![]() |
[4] |
L. Bonnasse-Gahot, H. Berestycki, M. Depuiset, M. B. Gordon, S. Roché, N. Rodriguez, et al., Epidemiological modelling of the 2005 french riots: A spreading wave and the role of contagion, Sci. Rep., 8 (2018), 107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18093-4 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18093-4
![]() |
[5] |
D. A. Sprague, T. House, Evidence for complex contagion models of social contagion from observational data, PLoS One, 12 (2017), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180802 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180802
![]() |
[6] |
C. E. Coltart, B. Lindsey, I. Ghinai, A. M. Johnson, D. L. Heymann, The ebola outbreak, 2013–2016: Old lessons for new epidemics, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 372 (2017), 20160297. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0297 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0297
![]() |
[7] | B. Hölldobler, E. O. Wilson, The Ants, Harvard University Press, 1990. |
[8] |
F. E. Regnier, E. O. Wilson, The alarm-defence system of the ant acanthomyops claviger, J. Insect Physiol., 14 (1968), 955–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(68)90006-1 doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(68)90006-1
![]() |
[9] |
W. H. Bossert, E. O. Wilson, The analysis of olfactory communication among animals, J. Theor. Biol., 5 (1963), 443–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(63)90089-4 doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(63)90089-4
![]() |
[10] |
E. Frehland, B. Kleutsch, H. Markl, Modelling a two-dimensional random alarm process, BioSystems, 18 (1985), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0303-2647(85)90071-1 doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(85)90071-1
![]() |
[11] |
D. J. McGurk, J. Frost, E. J. Eisenbraun, K. Vick, W. A. Drew, J. Young, Volatile compounds in ants: Identification of 4-methyl-3-heptanone from Pogonomyrmex ants, J. Insect Physiol., 12 (1966), 1435–1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(66)90157-0 doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(66)90157-0
![]() |
[12] |
J. B. Xavier, J. M. Monk, S. Poudel, C. J. Norsigian, A. V. Sastry, C. Liao, et al., Mathematical models to study the biology of pathogens and the infectious diseases they cause, Iscience, 25 (2022), 104079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104079 doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104079
![]() |
[13] |
P. Törnberg, Echo chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagion, PLoS One, 13 (2018), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203958 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203958
![]() |
[14] | G. I. Marchuk, Mathematical Modelling of Immune Response in Infectious Diseases, Springer, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8798-3 |
[15] | L. G. de Pillis, A. E. Radunskaya, A mathematical model of immune response to tumor invasion, in Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics 2003, Elsevier, (2003), 1661–1668. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044046-0.50404-8 |
[16] |
L. G. de Pillis, A. Eladdadi, A. E. Radunskaya, Modeling cancer-immune responses to therapy, J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn., 41 (2014), 461–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-014-9386-9 doi: 10.1007/s10928-014-9386-9
![]() |
[17] |
A. M. Smith, Validated models of immune response to virus infection, Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol., 12 (2018), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coisb.2018.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.coisb.2018.10.005
![]() |
[18] |
J. M. Conway, R. M. Ribeiro, Modeling the immune response to hive infection, Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol., 12 (2018), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coisb.2018.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.coisb.2018.10.006
![]() |
[19] |
S. Legewie, N. Blüthgen, H. Herzel, Mathematical modeling identifies inhibitors of apoptosis as mediators of positive feedback and bistability, PLoS Comput. Biol., 2 (2006), e120. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020120 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020120
![]() |
[20] | T. Fasciano, H. Nguyen, A. Dornhaus, M. C. Shin, Tracking multiple ants in a colony, in 2013 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), IEEE, (2013), 534–540. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV.2013.6475065 |
[21] | C. W. Reynolds, Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model, in SIGGRAPH '87: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, ACM, (1987), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/37401.37406 |
[22] |
T. Vicsek, A. Czirók, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, O. Shochet, Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75 (1995), 1226–1229. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1226 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1226
![]() |
[23] |
H. Chaté, F. Ginelli, G. Grégoire, F. Raynaud, Collective motion of self-propelled particles interacting without cohesion, Phys. Rev. E, 77 (2008), 046113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.046113 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.046113
![]() |
[24] |
I. D. Couzin, J. Krause, R. James, G. D. Ruxton, N. R. Franks, Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups, J. Theor. Biol., 218 (2002), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2002.3065 doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3065
![]() |
[25] |
H. S. Fisher, L. Giomi, H. E. Hoekstra, L. Mahadevan, The dynamics of sperm cooperation in a competitive environment, Proc. R. Soc. B, 281 (2014), 20140296. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0296 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0296
![]() |
[26] |
H. Hildenbrandt, C. Carere, C. K. Hemelrijk, Self-organized aerial displays of thousands of starlings: A model, Behav. Ecol., 21 (2010), 1349–1359. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq149 doi: 10.1093/beheco/arq149
![]() |
[27] |
J. C. Lagarias, J. A. Reeds, M. H. Wright, P. E. Wright, Convergence properties of the nelder–mead simplex method in low dimensions, SIAM J. Optim., 9 (1998), 112–147. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623496303470 doi: 10.1137/S1052623496303470
![]() |
[28] |
A. Lipp, H. Wolf, F. Lehmann, Walking on inclines: Energetics of locomotion in the ant Camponotus, J. Exp. Biol., 208 (2005), 707–719. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01434 doi: 10.1242/jeb.01434
![]() |
[29] |
N. C. Holt, G. N. Askew, Locomotion on a slope in leaf-cutter ants: Metabolic energy use, behavioural adaptations and the implications for route selection on hilly terrain, J. Exp. Biol., 215 (2012), 2545–2550. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.057695 doi: 10.1242/jeb.057695
![]() |
[30] |
M. J. Greene, D. M. Gordon, Interaction rate informs harvester ant task decisions, Behav. Ecol., 18 (2007), 451–455. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl105 doi: 10.1093/beheco/arl105
![]() |
[31] |
D. M. Gordon, N. J. Mehdiabadi, Encounter rate and task allocation in harvester ants, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 45 (1999), 370–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050573 doi: 10.1007/s002650050573
![]() |
[32] |
D. M. Gordon, The regulation of foraging activity in red harvester ant colonies, Am. Nat., 159 (2002), 509–518. https://doi.org/10.1086/339461 doi: 10.1086/339461
![]() |
[33] | N. Razin, J. Eckmann, O. Feinerman, Desert ants achieve reliable recruitment across noisy interactions, J. R. Soc. Interface, 10 (2013), 20130079. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0079 |
[34] |
S. C. Pratt, Behavioral mechanisms of collective nest-site choice by the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus, Insect. Soc., 52 (2005), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-005-0823-z doi: 10.1007/s00040-005-0823-z
![]() |
[35] |
S. C. Pratt, Quorum sensing by encounter rates in the ant Temnothorax albipennis, Behav. Ecol., 16 (2005), 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ari020 doi: 10.1093/beheco/ari020
![]() |
[36] |
A. Dornhaus, Specialization does not predict individual efficiency in an ant, PLoS Biol., 6 (2008), e285. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060285 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060285
![]() |
[37] |
S. N. Beshers, J. H. Fewell, Models of division of labor in social insects, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 46 (2001), 413–440. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.413 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.413
![]() |
[38] |
D. Charbonneau, C. Poff, H. Nguyen, M. C. Shin, K. Kierstead, A. Dornhaus, Who are the "lazy" ants? The function of inactivity in social insects and a possible role of constraint: Inactive ants are corpulent and may be young and/or selfish, Integr. Comp. Biol., 57 (2017), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icx029 doi: 10.1093/icb/icx029
![]() |
[39] |
A. Bernadou, J. Busch, J. Heinze, Diversity in identity: Behavioral flexibility, dominance, and age polyethism in a clonal ant, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 69 (2015), 1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1950-9 doi: 10.1007/s00265-015-1950-9
![]() |
[40] |
E. J. H. Robinson, T. O. Richardson, A. B. Sendova-Franks, O. Feinerman, N. R. Franks, Radio tagging reveals the roles of corpulence, experience and social information in ant decision making, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 63 (2009), 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0696-z doi: 10.1007/s00265-008-0696-z
![]() |
[41] | H. G. Tanner, A. Jadbabaie, G. J. Pappas, Stable flocking of mobile agents, part I: Fixed topology, in 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control, IEEE, (2003), 2010–2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2003.1272910 |
[42] |
A. Kolpas, M. Busch, H. Li, I. D. Couzin, L. Petzold, J. Moehlis, How the spatial position of individuals affects their influence on swarms: A numerical comparison of two popular swarm dynamics models, PloS One, 8 (2013), e58525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058525 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058525
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |