Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Research article Topical Sections

Electrical Resistivity Tomography Investigation of Permafrost Conditions in a Thermokarst Site in Fairbanks, Alaska

  • Received: 12 September 2023 Revised: 23 November 2023 Accepted: 01 December 2023 Published: 09 January 2024
  • The degradation of permafrost poses severe environmental threats to communities in cold regions. As near-surface permafrost warms, extensive topographic variability is prevalent in the Arctic and Sub-Arctic communities. Geologic hazards such as thermokarst are formed due to varying rates of permafrost degradation, resulting in ground subsidence. This gradual subsidence or abrupt collapse of the earth causes a danger to existing infrastructure and the economic activities of communities in cold regions. Understanding the causes of thermokarst development and its dynamics requires imaging its underground morpho-structures and characterizing the surface and subsurface controls. In this study, we conducted a two-dimensional (2D) electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) survey to characterize the permafrost conditions in a thermokarst prone site located in Fairbanks, Alaska. To increase the reliability in the interpretability of the ERT data, borehole data and the depth-of-investigation (DOI) methods were applied. By using the 2D and three-dimensional (3D) ERT methods, we gained valuable information on the spatial variability of transient processes, such as the movement of freezing and thawing fronts. Resistivity imaging across the site exhibited distinct variations in permafrost conditions, with both low and high resistive anomalies observed along the transects. These anomalies, representing taliks and ice wedges, were characterized by resistivity values ranging from 50 Ωm and above 700 Ωm, respectively. The results from this study showed the effectiveness of ERT to characterize permafrost conditions and thermokarst subsurface morpho-structures. The insights gained from this research contribute to a better understanding of the causes and dynamics of thermokarst, which can be instrumental for engineers in developing feasible remedial measures.

    Citation: Abdallah Basiru, Shishay T Kidanu, Sergei Rybakov, Nicholas Hasson, Moustapha Kebe, Emmanuel Osei Acheampong. Electrical Resistivity Tomography Investigation of Permafrost Conditions in a Thermokarst Site in Fairbanks, Alaska[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2024, 10(1): 1-27. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2024001

    Related Papers:

    [1] Belgüzar Kara, Elif Gökçe Tenekeci, Şeref Demirkaya . Factors Associated With Sleep Quality in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. AIMS Medical Science, 2016, 3(2): 203-212. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2016.2.203
    [2] Melissa R. Bowman Foster, Ali Atef Hijazi, Raymond C. Sullivan Jr, Rebecca Opoku . Hydroxyurea and pyridostigmine repurposed for treating Covid-19 multi-systems dysfunctions. AIMS Medical Science, 2023, 10(2): 118-129. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2023010
    [3] Victor Okey Dinwoke, Michael Oluchukwu Amara, Linda Uzo Amara . Abdominal pregnancy—a diagnosis never to miss. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(2): 342-347. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022015
    [4] Ahlam Al-Zahrani, Shorooq Al-Marwani . The effectiveness of an educational session about folic acid on pregnant women's knowledge in Yanbu City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(3): 394-413. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022019
    [5] Juliet A Harvey, Sebastien FM Chastin, Dawn A Skelton . What happened to my legs when I broke my arm?. AIMS Medical Science, 2018, 5(3): 252-258. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2018.3.252
    [6] XinQi Dong, Manrui Zhang . The Prevalence of Neurological Symptoms among Chinese Older Adults in the Greater Chicago Area. AIMS Medical Science, 2015, 2(1): 35-50. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2015.1.35
    [7] Wenping Lin, Kai Dai, Luokun Xie . Recent Advances in αβ T Cell Biology: Wnt Signaling, Notch Signaling, Hedgehog Signaling and Their Translational Perspective. AIMS Medical Science, 2016, 3(4): 312-328. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2016.4.312
    [8] Pasha Grachev, Robert L. Goodman . The GnRH Pulse Generator. AIMS Medical Science, 2016, 3(4): 359-385. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2016.4.359
    [9] Nádia C. M. Okuyama, Fernando Cezar dos Santos, Kleber Paiva Trugilo, Karen Brajão de Oliveira . Involvement of CXCL12 Pathway in HPV-related Diseases. AIMS Medical Science, 2016, 3(4): 417-440. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2016.4.417
    [10] Ying Chen, Sok Kean Khoo, Richard Leach, Kai Wang . MTA3 Regulates Extravillous Trophoblast Invasion Through NuRD Complex. AIMS Medical Science, 2017, 4(1): 17-27. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2017.1.17
  • The degradation of permafrost poses severe environmental threats to communities in cold regions. As near-surface permafrost warms, extensive topographic variability is prevalent in the Arctic and Sub-Arctic communities. Geologic hazards such as thermokarst are formed due to varying rates of permafrost degradation, resulting in ground subsidence. This gradual subsidence or abrupt collapse of the earth causes a danger to existing infrastructure and the economic activities of communities in cold regions. Understanding the causes of thermokarst development and its dynamics requires imaging its underground morpho-structures and characterizing the surface and subsurface controls. In this study, we conducted a two-dimensional (2D) electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) survey to characterize the permafrost conditions in a thermokarst prone site located in Fairbanks, Alaska. To increase the reliability in the interpretability of the ERT data, borehole data and the depth-of-investigation (DOI) methods were applied. By using the 2D and three-dimensional (3D) ERT methods, we gained valuable information on the spatial variability of transient processes, such as the movement of freezing and thawing fronts. Resistivity imaging across the site exhibited distinct variations in permafrost conditions, with both low and high resistive anomalies observed along the transects. These anomalies, representing taliks and ice wedges, were characterized by resistivity values ranging from 50 Ωm and above 700 Ωm, respectively. The results from this study showed the effectiveness of ERT to characterize permafrost conditions and thermokarst subsurface morpho-structures. The insights gained from this research contribute to a better understanding of the causes and dynamics of thermokarst, which can be instrumental for engineers in developing feasible remedial measures.



    Fanconi anemia (FA) is a pathologically diverse and recessive autosomal inherited rare genetic disorder that occurs in one in 130,000 births and is common among Ashkenazi Jews and South Africans [1]. It is caused by mutations in a cluster of proteins that perform DNA repair, especially those of covalent interstrand crosslinks (ICLs), via homologous recombination. FA culminates in bone marrow failure (BMF) in 90% of the affected individuals and leads to the development of various types of cancer, particularly myelogenous leukemia; gynecological squamous cell carcinoma; tumors in the liver, brain, skin, and kidney; esophageal carcinoma; and agammaessive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [2][4]. Approximately, 60–75% of the affected people have congenital defects, short stature, skin hyperpigmentation, missing radii, and abnormal thumb, head, eyes, kidneys, and ears, and developmental disabilities, and 75% people exhibit endocrine disorders of varying severity. The first sign of a hematological problem is usually petechiae and bruises, with later onset of pale appearance, tiredness, and infections.

    Several patients develop BMF sometime during the course of the disease, but the onset of pancytopenia is correlated with the probability of FA. However, in some patients, the condition remains undiagnosed until the development of myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia (MDS-AML). Patients with FA exhibit elevated levels of serum alpha-fetoproteins, fetal hemoglobin (HbF), and macrocytosis, although these cannot exclusively predict FA [5]. FA can be diagnosed in patients of age 0–48 years, and nearly 25–40% patients with FA appear healthy [6].

    The commonly available treatment strategies for BMF involve the use of androgens and hematopoietic growth factors; however, cases where patients have become refractory to these treatments have been reported. In such cases, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the treatment of choice depending on the availability of a donor. For solid tumors in patients with FA, surgery is the preferred mode of treatment than radiotherapy and chemotherapy due to the possibility of severe side effects [7].

    The list of mutations in genes associated with FA has increased ever since the discovery of the first FA gene, FANCC, over 25 years ago. There are over 22 known FA complementation groups, such as FANC-A, B, C, D1, D2, E, F, G, I, J, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, and W [8]. All the proteins associated with FA pathway and their individual functions have been depicted in the Table 1 [9].

    Table 1.  Proteins in FA pathway and their individual roles [9].
    FA Proteins Involved in DNA damage Involved in other cellular processes
    FANCA CD40 signaling pathway; cell proliferation; inflammatory response; T cell differentiation; Sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity
    FANCB DNA damage repair (not entirely dependent on the FA core complex)
    FANCC TP53 Regulation of DNA Repair Genes Generic transcription pathway; Gene expression; Diabetes
    FANCD1 DNA damage repair, (not entirely dependent on the monoubiquitinated D2/I) Cell cycle regulation; meiotic recombination; Presynaptic phase of homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange; Resolution of D-loop structures
    FANCD2 The HHR6 signaling pathway; The ATM signaling pathway; DNA damage repair; TP53 regulation of DNA Repair Genes; MiRNA regulation of DNA damage response Replication: Replication-origin firing, Stalled replication forks; Mitochondria function; gene expression;
    FANCE/F/G DNA damage repair (not entirely depending on the FA core complex)
    FANCI The ATR signaling pathway; TP53 regulation of DNA Repair Genes; DNA damage repair Gene expression
    FANCJ DNA damage repair (not entirely dependent on the monoubiquitinated D2/I); G2/M DNA damage checkpoint Cell cycle regulation; Cytosolic iron-sulfur cluster assembly; P53 activity; Presynaptic phase of homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange; Resolution of D-loop structures
    FANCL DNA damage repair (not entirely dependent on the FA core complex) Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis
    FANCM ATR regulator, or a major sensor of the DDR Stalled replication forks
    FANCN DNA damage repair (HR) (not entirely dependent on monoubiquitinated FANCD2) Resolution of D-loop structures; Homologous DNA Pairing and Strand Exchange
    FANCO DNA damage repair (not entirely dependent on monoubiquitinated FANCD2) Meiosis; Resolution of D-loop structures; Megakaryocyte development and platelet production; Cell cycle
    FANCP DNA damage repair (not entirely dependent on monoubiquitinated FANCD2/I) Resolution of D-loop structures
    FANCQ DNA damage repair (DSB, NER) (not entirely dependent on monoubiquitinated FANCD2) Transcription
    FANCR DNA damage repair (HR) (not entirely dependent on monoubiquitinated FANCD2/I); ATM signaling Cell cycle; Meiosis; Rac1/Pak1/p38/MMP-2 pathway
    FANCS DNA damage repair (HR) (not entirely dependent on monoubiquitinated FANCD2/I); ATM signaling Transcription (ATF-2, E2F, FOXA1 transcription factor networks); Androgen receptor signaling pathway; Aurora A signaling; Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Deubiquitinating;
    FANCT DNA damage repair (not entirely dependent on monoubiquitinated FANCD2/I); Post-translational protein modification
    FANCU DNA damage repair (not entirely dependent on monoubiquitinated FANCD2/I) Resolution of D-loop structures; Presynaptic phase of homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange
    FANCV TLS performed by POL1, POLK, REV1 or Zeta; post replication repair (not entirely dependent on monoubiquitinated FANCD2/I) Cell cycle regulation; Shigellosis; Oocyte meiosis; Endoderm Differentiation
    FANCW Ubiquitination of RPA (not entirely for the activation of the FA pathway) Ubiquitination; Mediation of p53 ubiquitination for its stability

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Moreover, mutations in FANCO, RAD51 (FANCR), and FANCS have been implicated in a FA-like syndrome in which patient cells are hypersensitive to ICL-inducing drugs, but the disease is not characterized with all the clinical features classically observed in FA. Among the bona fide FA genes, FANCA, FANCC, and FANCG are the most frequently inactivated by biallelic mutations linked to the hereditary disorder [10],[11]. Importantly, monoallelic mutations in certain FA genes, including FANCD1 (BRCA2), FANCS (BRCA1), FANCN (PALB2), FANCM, FANCJ (BRIP1), and FANCO (RAD51C), which are believed to operate downstream in the pathway and are implicated in homologous recombination, are associated with sporadic breast and ovarian cancer [11],[12]. With the identification of several FA genes, the pathway for repair of ICLs has become more complex and is now believed to involve nucleotide excision repair, base excision repair, double strand break repair, and mismatch repair. Although ICL repair occurs mostly in replicating cells, studies have also associated it with non-replicative repair, such as in cells treated with DNA crosslinking agents. ICL repair is critical as it affects DNA unwinding for basic life processes such as transcription and replication.

    FA pathway/signaling is crucial for DNA damage response (DDR), which further results in DNA ICL. However, it has been reported that genes and proteins, especially FANCC, of the FA pathway perform additional cytoprotective role. FANCC provides protection against proinflammatory cytokine-induced cell death. This role is associated with FANCC and its various biochemical interactions [13]. One study suggested that patients with FA carrying endogenously expressed FANCC mutant c.67delG exhibited a clinical course that was milder than patients with null mutations in FANCC [14]. FA cells are hypersensitive to oxidative stress, radio/chemotherapeutic agents, and DNA crosslinking agents, such as mitomycin, and exhibit cell cycle abnormalities [15]. Thus, FA phenotypes may require stressors to initiate the disease phenotype [16]. Thus, bone marrow transplant should be performed with extreme care so as not to induce any oxidative stress, especially via radio/chemotherapeutic agents, which may otherwise lead to BMF.

    FANCA, FANCB, FANCC, FANCE, FANCF, FANCG, FANCL, and FANCM form a core complex, which monoubiquitylates FANCD2 and FANCI [17][20]. The monoubiquitylated complex interacts with the endo/exonuclease FAN1 (FA associated nuclease 1) [20][24]. However, FA patients with mutations in FAN1 are not known till date. FANCD1/BRCA2 and BRCA2-interacting protein FANCN/PALB2, essential components of homologous recombination repair, act downstream in this pathway along with the helicase FANCJ /BRIP1/BACH1 [25][31]. The interaction of FANCJ with BRCA1 is dispensable for the FA pathway. Interestingly, although BRCA1 depletion sensitizes cells to crosslink damage, individuals with biallelic BRCA1 mutations have not been reported so far. Multiple proteins, including the nucleases XPF, MUS81, and SLX1, interact with FANCP/SLX4, the latest addition to the family of FA proteins, which acts as a protein scaffold [32][37]. XPF and MUS81 are involved in crosslink repair, and the SLX4-SLX1 interaction is responsible for Holliday junction resolution activity in vitro. However, which activity of SLX4 is essential for crosslink repair is currently unclear [38],[39]. Overall, it is clear that mutations in FA proteins, which perturb ICL resolution, are important for FA pathogenesis.

    BRCA2, a human tumor suppressor, is also known as FANCD1, indicating its associations with the FA complex (discussed above) [40],[41]. It is normally expressed in breast tissues and is involved in the repair of DNA damage as described in the previous section. BRCA2 also prevents nucleolytic degradation of stalled forks during DNA replication [42]. Thus, BRCA2 is critical for maintaining genome stability and preventing deleterious genomic rearrangements, which may lead to cancer. High penetrance mutations in BRCA2/FANCD1 lead to loss of its tumor suppressive character and increase the chances of developing breast cancer [43].

    Several mutations, usually small indels, have been identified in BRCA2, many of which increase the risk of cancer. These mutations lead to the synthesis of an abnormal product that does not function properly. In their analysis of the severity of BRCA2 mutations in 27 cases with breast cancer, Alter et al. (2007) showed that 20 mutations were frameshifts or truncations, three involved splice sites, five were missense variants of unknown severity, and two were benign polymorphisms [44]. Monoallelic germline mutations in BRCA2 increase the susceptibility for breast/ovarian cancer, whereas biallelic germ line mutations lead to the development of FA-D1 in patients. Indeed, among the known FA genes, only BRCA2/FANCD1 plays a major role in the development of high-risk breast cancer [45]. BRCA2-associated FA-D1 subtype accounts for nearly 3% of all FA cases, which, in comparison with other subtypes, results in more severe form of the phenotype, increases the frequency of leukemia and other tumors, as well as early onset of symptoms [44],[46]. Parents of patients with FA are heterozygous for the condition, and therefore are at a high risk of early-onset breast/ovarian cancer [47]. Furthermore, in heterozygous patients, loss of the second wild type BRCA2 allele leads to biallelic extinction of BRCA2, and subsequent exposure to DNA cross-linkers often result in chromosome breakage, resulting in tri-radial chromosomes, which are characteristic of FA cells [48]. Thus, FA and breast cancer are interlinked and share common functions in the DNA repair mechanism [49]. Children with biallelic mutation in BRCA2 show spontaneous chromosomal instability and develop solid tumors of childhood such as Wilm's tumor and medulloblastoma [50].

    Individuals with heterozygous mutations in BRCA2/FANCD1 are also at increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Hahn et al. (2003) showed that frameshift mutations in BRCA2/FANCD1were associated with 19% cases with history of hereditary pancreatic cancer [51]. Similarly, other cancers, such as prostate cancer, gastric cancer, and melanoma, have also been associated with heterozygous mutations in BRCA2/FANCD1 [52]. A recent study showed that colorectal cancer (CRC) can also be associated with biallelicBRCA2 mutations (a frameshift alteration (c. 1845_1846delCT, p. Asn615Lysfs*6) and a missense mutation (c. 7802A > G, p. Tyr2601Cys)) in families with cases of CRC, although CRC driver genes were not involved and the cardinal clinical symptoms of FA were not observed. This indicated that the presence of these mutations should be screened even in the absence of typical FA symptoms [53]. The biallelic p. Lys3326X mutation in BRCA2 was present in 27 of 746 ESCC cases and in 16 of 1,373 controls in a study on mutations in FA genes in Turkmen of Iran with esophageal cancer [54].

    Recently, biallelic BRCA2 mutation was found to predispose toward glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), with multiple genetic rearrangements [55]. In that study, methylation analysis of GBM from a 3-year-old patient with FA, who harbored biallelic mutation in BRCA2, revealed strong clustering with the K27 mutation subetaoup, copy number analysis showed gains of chromosomes 1q, 4q, part of 7q, part of 8q and 17q, with resultant amplifications of MDM4, CDK6, MET, MYC, and PPM1D (WIP1). This study also reported the first germline mutation in BRCA2, c. 8057T > C, resulting in p. Leu2686Pro substitution in the patient. Biallelic BRCA2 mutation has also been reported in two siblings with early age central nervous system embryonal tumor, which is the first reported case of a spinal cord primitive neuroectodermal tumor in BRCA2/FANCD1 kindred [56].

    Currently, the precise effect of mutations in some FA gene leading to breast and ovarian cancer remains unclear. While somatic cells with mutations in the DNA repair pathway undergo apoptosis, estrogen might promote the survival of breast and ovarian cells. Estrogen possibly promotes the survival of breast and ovarian cells harboring significant DNA damage, whereas apoptosis may occur in somatic cells with mutations in the DNA repair pathway [57]. In contrast, breast/ovarian cancer infrequently develop in patients with FA. Hypogonadism with decreased levels of estrogen in females with FA might account for this observation. In families carrying BRCA2/FANCD1 mutations, > 40 years marks the peak age for the onset of breast/ovarian cancer among heterozygote carriers, whereas patients with biallelic mutations frequently die from complications of aplastic anemia before 40 years [58]. Altogether, these observations show that the timing of biallelic loss of BRCA2 can establish the specific cancer spectrum [59][65]. Figure 1 provides a schematic representation of FA pathway [66].

    Figure 1.  FA pathway at a glance [66].

    FA is a genetic disorder that predisposes patients to pancytopenia, MDS, and AML. Better understanding of the FA pathway might lead to the development of methods for correcting the perturbed pathway, thereby preventing carcinogenesis in FA patients or those carrying mutations in FA genes. Indeed, the CRISPR/Cas9 technology has already been used to rectify a FANCD1 deletion in a patient-derived fibroblast with the above mutation, providing proof-of-principle that gene editing may be used to rectify FA. As the sensitivity of cancer cells to chemotherapy drugs is affected by defective DNA repair mechanism, mutations in FA genes could help in predicting the success of chemotherapy drugs such as DNA inhibitors, or DNA crosslinking agents (melphalan, mitomycin C, and cisplatin). In this review, we have specifically discussed the effects of the FANCD1/BRCA2 mutation on FA and cancer pathogenesis. The collective knowledge can be used for further understanding the FA-D1 subtype of the disease.



    [1] Jorgenson MT (2013) Thermokarst Terrains, In: Shroder J, Giardino R, and Harbor J, Eds., Treatise on Geomorphology, San Diego, Academic Press, 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-6.00215-3
    [2] Harris C, Arenson LU, Christiansen HH, et al. (2009) Permafrost and climate in Europe: Monitoring and modelling thermal, geomorphological and geotechnical responses. Earth Sci Rev 92: 117–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.12.002 doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.12.002
    [3] Jorgenson MT, Romanovsky V, Harden J, et al. (2010) Resilience and vulnerability of Permafrost to climate change. Can J For Res 40: 1219–1236. https://doi.org/10.1139/X10-060 doi: 10.1139/X10-060
    [4] Osterkamp TE, Romanovsky VE (1999) Evidence for warming and thawing of discontinuous permafrost in Alaska. Permafrost Periglac 10: 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1530(199901/03)10:1<17:AID-PPP303>3.0.CO;2-4 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1530(199901/03)10:1<17:AID-PPP303>3.0.CO;2-4
    [5] Romanovsky VE, Smith SL, Christiansen HH (2010) Permafrost thermal state in the polar northern hemisphere during the international polar year 2007–2009: A synthesis. Permafrost Periglac 21: 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.689 doi: 10.1002/ppp.689
    [6] Romanovsky VE, Osterkamp TE (2000) Effects of unfrozen water on heat and mass transport processes in the active layer and permafrost. Permafrost Periglac 11: 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1530(200007/09)11:3<219:AID-PPP352>3.0.CO;2-7 doi: 10.1002/1099-1530(200007/09)11:3<219:AID-PPP352>3.0.CO;2-7
    [7] Shur YL, Jorgenson MT (2007) Patterns of permafrost formation and degradation in relation to climate and ecosystems. Permafrost Periglac 18: 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.582 doi: 10.1002/ppp.582
    [8] Osterkamp TE, Jorgenson MT, Schuur EAG, et al. (2009) Physical and ecological changes associated with warming permafrost and thermokarst in Interior Alaska. Permafrost Periglac 20: 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.656 doi: 10.1002/ppp.656
    [9] Olenchenko VV, Gagarin LA, Khristoforov II, et al. (2017) The structure of a site with thermo-suffosion processes within bestyakh terrace of the lena river, according to geophysical data. Kriosfera Zemli 21: 16–26.
    [10] Briggs MA, Campbell S, Nolan J, et al. (2017) Surface Geophysical Methods for Characterising Frozen Ground in Transitional Permafrost Landscapes. Permafrost Periglac 28: 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.1893 doi: 10.1002/ppp.1893
    [11] Shiklomanov NI, Nelson FE (1999) Analytic representation of the active layer thickness field, Kuparuk River Basin, Alaska. Ecol Modell 123: 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00127-1 doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00127-1
    [12] Shur Y, Hinkel KM, Nelson FE (2005) The transient layer: Implications for geocryology and climate-change science. Permafrost Periglac 16: 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.518 doi: 10.1002/ppp.518
    [13] Kneisel C, Hauck C, Fortier R, et al. (2008) Advances in geophysical methods for permafrost investigations. Permafrost Periglac 19: 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.616 doi: 10.1002/ppp.616
    [14] Conaway CH, Johnson CD, Lorenson TD, et al. (2020) Permafrost Mapping with Electrical Resistivity Tomography: A Case Study in Two Wetland Systems in Interior Alaska. J Environ Eng Geophys 25: 199–209. https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG19-091 doi: 10.2113/JEEG19-091
    [15] Douglas TA, Jorgenson MT, Kanevskiy MZ, et al. (2008) Permafrost Dynamics at the Fairbanks Permafrost Experimental Station Near Fairbanks, Alaska. University of Alaska, Fairbanks, 373–377.
    [16] Fortier R, LeBlanc AM, Allard M, et al. (2008) Internal structure and conditions of permafrost mounds at Umiujaq in Nunawik, Canada, inferred from field investigation and electrical resistivity tomography. Can J Earth Sci 45: 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1139/E08-004 doi: 10.1139/E08-004
    [17] Swarzenski PW, Johnson CD, Lorenson TD, et al. (2016) Seasonal Electrical Resistivity Surveys of a Coastal Bluff, Barter Island, North Slope Alaska. J Environ Eng Geophys 21: 37–42. https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG21.1.37 doi: 10.2113/JEEG21.1.37
    [18] Voytek EB, Rushlow CR, Godsey SE, et al. (2016) Identifying hydrologic flowpaths on arctic hillslopes using electrical resistivity and self potential. Geophysics 81: WA225–WA232. https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2015-0172.1 doi: 10.1190/GEO2015-0172.1
    [19] Parshley L (2022) Climate and Science. As permafrost thaws, the ground beneath Alaska is collapsing. Available from: https://grist.org/science/alaska-permafrost-thawing-ice-climate-change/.
    [20] Péwé TL (1975) Quaternary Geology of Alaska, Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
    [21] Péwé TL (1954) Effect of Permafrost on Cultivated Fields, Fairbanks Area, Alaska, US Government Printing Office, 315–351.
    [22] Prindle LM, Smith PS, Katz FJ (1913) A Geologic Reconnaissance of The Fairbanks Quadrangle, Alaska Detailed Description of the Fairbanks District Account of Lode Mining Near Fairbanks, Washington: Government Printing Office.
    [23] Kanevskiy, M, Ping, C, Shur, Y, et al. (2011). Permafrost of Northern Alaska. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First (2011). Int Offshore Polar Eng Conf, 1179–1186.
    [24] Alaska Department of Natural Resources. "DNR Well Log—WELTS, " Well Logs at UAF. Available from: https://dnr.alaska.gov/welts.
    [25] Douglas TA, Jorgenson MT, Brown DRN, et al. (2016) Degrading permafrost mapped with electrical resistivity tomography, airborne imagery and LiDAR, and seasonal thaw measurements. Geophysics 81: WA71–WA85. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0149.1 doi: 10.1190/geo2015-0149.1
    [26] Jorgenson MT, Racine CH, Walters JC, et al. (2001) Permafrost Degradation and Ecological Changes Associated with a Warming Climate in Central Alaska. Clim Change 48: 551–579.
    [27] Frolov AD, Zykov DY, Snegirev AM, et al. (1998) Principal problems, progress, and directions of Geophysical investigations in permafrost regions. 7th International Conference on Permafrost. Université Laval, Canada, 305–311.
    [28] Asare A, Appiah-Adjei EK, Owusu-Nimo F, et al. (2022) Lateral and vertical mapping of salinity along the coast of Ghana using Electrical Resistivity Tomography: The case of Central Region. Results Geophys Sci 12: 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ringps.2022.100048 doi: 10.1016/j.ringps.2022.100048
    [29] Pazzi V, Morelli S, Fanti R (2019) A Review of the Advantages and Limitations of Geophysical Investigations in Landslide Studies. Int J Geophys 2019: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2983087 doi: 10.1155/2019/2983087
    [30] Hoekstra P, Sellmann PV, Delaney A (1975) Ground and Airborne Resistivity Surveys of Permafrost Near Fairbanks, Alaska. Geophysics 40: 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440555 doi: 10.1190/1.1440555
    [31] Hauck C, Kneisel C (2008) Applied geophysics in periglacial environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [32] Fortier R, Allard M, Seguin MK (1994) Effect of physical properties of frozen ground on electrical resistivity logging. Cold Reg Sci Technol 22: 361–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-232X(94)90021-3 doi: 10.1016/0165-232X(94)90021-3
    [33] Mathys T, Hilbich C, Arenson LU, et al. (2022) Towards accurate quantification of ice content in permafrost of the Central Andes—Part 2: An upscaling strategy of geophysical measurements to the catchment scale at two study sites. Cryosphere 16: 2595–2615. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2595-2022 doi: 10.5194/tc-16-2595-2022
    [34] Loke MH (2000) Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies. A practical guide to 2. Available from: https://www.abem.se.
    [35] Gharibi M, Bentley LR (2005) Resolution of 3-D electrical resistivity images from inversions of 2-D orthogonal lines. J Environ Eng Geophys 10: 339–349. https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG10.4.339 doi: 10.2113/JEEG10.4.339
    [36] Kidanu S, Varnavina A, Anderson N, et al. (2020) Pseudo-3D-electrical resistivity tomography imaging of subsurface structure of a sinkhole—A case study in Greene County, Missouri. AIMS Geosci 6: 54–70. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2020005 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2020005
    [37] Golden Software (2019) Surfer ® Powerful contouring, gridding & surface mapping system Full User's Guide. Colorado. Available from: https://www.GoldenSoftware.com.
    [38] Loke MH, Chambers JE, Rucker DF, et al. (2013) Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method. J Appl Geophys 95: 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.02.017 doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.02.017
    [39] Degroot-Hedlin C, Constable S (1990) Occam' s inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric data. Geophysics 55: 1613–1624. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442813 doi: 10.1190/1.1442813
    [40] Loke MH, Barker RD (1996) Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton methodl. Geophys Prospect 44: 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1996.tb00142.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1996.tb00142.x
    [41] Loke MH (2004) Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys. Available from: https://www.geotomosoft.com.
    [42] Hauck C, Mühll DV (2003) Inversion and interpretation of two-dimensional geoelectrical measurements for detecting permafrost in mountainous regions. Permafrost Periglac 14: 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.462 doi: 10.1002/ppp.462
    [43] Loke MH (2021) Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys. Geotomo Software, 1–232. Available from: https://www.geotomosoft.com.
    [44] Oldenburg DW, Li Y (1999) Estimating depth of investigation in dc resistivity and IP surveys. Geophysics 64: 403–41. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444545 doi: 10.1190/1.1444545
    [45] Roy A, Apparao A (1971) Depth of Investigation in Direct Current Methods. Geophysics 36: 943–959. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440226 doi: 10.1190/1.1440226
    [46] Edwards LS (1977) A Modified Pseudosection for Resistivity and IP. Geophysics 42: 1020–1036. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440762 doi: 10.1190/1.1440762
    [47] Szalai S, Novák A, Szarka L (2009) Depth of investigation and vertical resolution of surface geoelectric arrays. J Environ Eng Geophys 14: 15–23. https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG14.1.15 doi: 10.2113/JEEG14.1.15
    [48] Marescot L, Loke MH, Chapellier D, et al. (2003) Assessing reliability of 2D resistivity imaging in mountain permafrost studies using the depth of investigation index method. Near Surf Geophys 1: 57–67. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2002007 doi: 10.3997/1873-0604.2002007
    [49] Hilbich C, Fuss C, Hauck C (2011) Automated time-lapse ERT for improved process analysis and monitoring of frozen ground. Permafrost Periglac 22: 306–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.732 doi: 10.1002/ppp.732
    [50] Loke MH, Dahlin T (2002) A comparison of the Gauss-Newton and quasi-Newton methods in resistivity imaging inversion. J Appl Geophys 49: 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(01)00106-9 doi: 10.1016/S0926-9851(01)00106-9
    [51] Liljedahl AK, Boike J, Daanen R, et al. (2016) Pan-Arctic ice-wedge degradation in warming permafrost and its influence on tundra hydrology. Nature Geosci 9: 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2674 doi: 10.1038/ngeo2674
    [52] Farquharson L, Anthony KW, Bigelow N, et al. (2016) Facies analysis of yedoma thermokarst lakes on the northern Seward Peninsula, Alaska. Sediment Geol 340: 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2016.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2016.01.002
    [53] Douglas TA, Jones MC, Heimstra AC (2014) Sources and Sinks of Carbon in Boreal Ecosystems of Interior Alaska: A review. Elementa 2: 000032. https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000032 doi: 10.12952/journal.elementa.000032
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2438) PDF downloads(187) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(14)  /  Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog