Processing math: 63%
Research article Special Issues

Qualitative behavior of a highly non-linear Cutaneous Leishmania epidemic model under convex incidence rate with real data

  • In the context of this investigation, we introduce an innovative mathematical model designed to elucidate the intricate dynamics underlying the transmission of Anthroponotic Cutaneous Leishmania. This model offers a comprehensive exploration of the qualitative characteristics associated with the transmission process. Employing the next-generation method, we deduce the threshold value R0 for this model. We rigorously explore both local and global stability conditions in the disease-free scenario, contingent upon R0 being less than unity. Furthermore, we elucidate the global stability at the disease-free equilibrium point by leveraging the Castillo-Chavez method. In contrast, at the endemic equilibrium point, we establish conditions for local and global stability, when R0 exceeds unity. To achieve global stability at the endemic equilibrium, we employ a geometric approach, a Lyapunov theory extension, incorporating a secondary additive compound matrix. Additionally, we conduct sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of various parameters on the threshold number. Employing center manifold theory, we delve into bifurcation analysis. Estimation of parameter values is carried out using least squares curve fitting techniques. Finally, we present a comprehensive discussion with graphical representation of key parameters in the concluding section of the paper.

    Citation: Manal Alqhtani, Khaled M. Saad, Rahat Zarin, Amir Khan, Waleed M. Hamanah. Qualitative behavior of a highly non-linear Cutaneous Leishmania epidemic model under convex incidence rate with real data[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(2): 2084-2120. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024092

    Related Papers:

    [1] Hamdy M. Youssef, Najat A. Alghamdi, Magdy A. Ezzat, Alaa A. El-Bary, Ahmed M. Shawky . A new dynamical modeling SEIR with global analysis applied to the real data of spreading COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(6): 7018-7044. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020362
    [2] Nawei Chen, Shenglong Chen, Xiaoyu Li, Zhiming Li . Modelling and analysis of the HIV/AIDS epidemic with fast and slow asymptomatic infections in China from 2008 to 2021. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(12): 20770-20794. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023919
    [3] Xinyu Liu, Zimeng Lv, Yuting Ding . Mathematical modeling and stability analysis of the time-delayed SAIM model for COVID-19 vaccination and media coverage. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(6): 6296-6316. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022294
    [4] Mahmudul Bari Hridoy . An exploration of modeling approaches for capturing seasonal transmission in stochastic epidemic models. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(2): 324-354. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025013
    [5] Sun Yi, Patrick W. Nelson, A. Galip Ulsoy . Delay differential equations via the matrix lambert w function and bifurcation analysis: application to machine tool chatter. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2007, 4(2): 355-368. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2007.4.355
    [6] Thomas Torku, Abdul Khaliq, Fathalla Rihan . SEINN: A deep learning algorithm for the stochastic epidemic model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(9): 16330-16361. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023729
    [7] Yoichi Enatsu, Yukihiko Nakata . Stability and bifurcation analysis of epidemic models with saturated incidence rates: An application to a nonmonotone incidence rate. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2014, 11(4): 785-805. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.785
    [8] M. A. El-Shorbagy, Mati ur Rahman, Maryam Ahmed Alyami . On the analysis of the fractional model of COVID-19 under the piecewise global operators. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(4): 6134-6173. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023265
    [9] Zita Abreu, Guillaume Cantin, Cristiana J. Silva . Analysis of a COVID-19 compartmental model: a mathematical and computational approach. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 7979-7998. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021396
    [10] Abdisa Shiferaw Melese, Oluwole Daniel Makinde, Legesse Lemecha Obsu . Mathematical modelling and analysis of coffee berry disease dynamics on a coffee farm. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(7): 7349-7373. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022347
  • In the context of this investigation, we introduce an innovative mathematical model designed to elucidate the intricate dynamics underlying the transmission of Anthroponotic Cutaneous Leishmania. This model offers a comprehensive exploration of the qualitative characteristics associated with the transmission process. Employing the next-generation method, we deduce the threshold value R0 for this model. We rigorously explore both local and global stability conditions in the disease-free scenario, contingent upon R0 being less than unity. Furthermore, we elucidate the global stability at the disease-free equilibrium point by leveraging the Castillo-Chavez method. In contrast, at the endemic equilibrium point, we establish conditions for local and global stability, when R0 exceeds unity. To achieve global stability at the endemic equilibrium, we employ a geometric approach, a Lyapunov theory extension, incorporating a secondary additive compound matrix. Additionally, we conduct sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of various parameters on the threshold number. Employing center manifold theory, we delve into bifurcation analysis. Estimation of parameter values is carried out using least squares curve fitting techniques. Finally, we present a comprehensive discussion with graphical representation of key parameters in the concluding section of the paper.



    Leishmaniasis, caused by Leishmania type parasites, represents a significant public health concern. Extensive research has focused on four distinct types of Leishmaniasis [1,2]. Among these, Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) emerges as the most prevalent form, primarily attributed to L. tropica and L. major. The condition manifests as skin lesions, often affecting exposed body regions like the extremities and face. CL endemic regions encompass parts of South America, Europe, and Asia. The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies CL as a highly perilous global disease, given its rapid annual incidence growth, surpassing one million new cases. Ten countries collectively contribute to 70–75 percent of the global CL incidence: Peru, Costa Rica, North Sudan, Ethiopia, Syria, Iran, Brazil, Colombia, Algeria, and Afghanistan [3]. The transmission of CL primarily occurs through blood-sucking insects, with various fly species serving as the principal vectors. Worldwide, approximately 700 species of such vectors have been identified, including 37 in Pakistan. Notably, CL has recently surged in northwestern Pakistan, resulting in significant mortality rates, particularly in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) province. A previous CL outbreak in 1997 within this province was linked to an Afghan refugee camp, where migrants from Kabul, Afghanistan, afflicted by CL, facilitated the epidemic [4].

    The vectors responsible for parasite transmission belong to the Phlebotomus genus. These sand flies exhibit a broad habitat range, from arid deserts to tropical rainforests. They exhibit multiple hosts, including dogs, chickens, humans, mammals, livestock, and vertebrates [5]. These sand flies typically measure 2–3mm in length and have a latent period ranging from three to seven days [6]. They can reach heights of up to 2.51 meters (8.3 feet) above ground level [7]. Utilizing animal blood for sand fly feeding has been shown to reduce the risk of accidental transmission of human blood-borne pathogens, rendering it a cost-effective alternative to maintaining and preparing animals as blood sources [8]. Extreme temperatures have been observed to adversely affect the fecundity of these species [9]. Furthermore, recent research has delved into various epidemiological models of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the disease dynamics [10,11,12,13,14,15].

    The utilization of mathematical models stands as a fundamental tool in the comprehensive analysis of the transmission dynamics and management strategies for infectious diseases. The process of formulating a mathematical model inherently involves delineating key assumptions, defining relevant parameters, and specifying the variables that drive the system's behavior. Notably, Chaves et al. [16] have made significant contributions to this field by presenting a mathematical model designed to elucidate the dynamics of American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. Within their research, they delved into the establishment of threshold conditions that govern the persistence of infection within the population, shedding light on critical factors influencing disease prevalence. Building upon this foundation, Chaves et al. have further extended their investigations to explore the intricate interplay between deforestation and vector-borne diseases in recent work [5,16]. Their research endeavors have illuminated the profound impact of environmental alterations on disease transmission dynamics, providing valuable insights for disease control strategies. In a distinct line of inquiry, Das et al. [17] have undertaken a detailed study focusing on the temporal dimension by examining the effect of time delays on the dynamics of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. Their investigations have revealed how temporal factors can significantly influence disease patterns and persistence. Calzada et al. [18] contributed to our understanding of vector-borne diseases by investigating the compositional changes that occur in sandflies following the application of thermal fogging, a method often employed for vector control. This research has provided critical information on the efficacy and potential ecological impacts of vector control interventions. Furthermore, Chaves [19] and Bacaer and Guernaoui [20] have engaged in the study of seasonal models of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. By considering the seasonal variations in disease transmission and vector populations, their work has advanced our understanding of how environmental and climatic factors can influence disease dynamics, thus informing the development of seasonally-tailored control strategies. In light of these diverse research endeavors, it is evident that a multitude of strategies are under consideration for the control and eventual eradication of various infectious diseases. These strategies encompass a broad spectrum of interventions, ranging from environmental management and vector control to the development of mathematical models that offer valuable insights into disease dynamics and guide evidence-based decision-making in public health.

    In this research endeavor, we introduce a more intricate framework, building upon the foundation laid in [21]. We acknowledge the significant role of disease incubation and, consequently, introduce an 'exposed' class for both human and vector populations. This entails accounting for individuals who are susceptible to the disease but are in a latent phase of infection. In essence, we develop a model for CL denoted as ShEhIhRhSvEvIv, featuring a convex incidence rate. The core focus of our investigation centers on unraveling the dynamic behavior of the CL model. Leveraging center manifold theory, we unveil a forward bifurcation phenomenon within the model, leading to the emergence of multiple endemic equilibria. On an alternative note, when a unique endemic equilibrium prevails, we establish its global stability using the geometric approach pioneered by Li and Muldowney [22]. The significance of our findings lies in the demonstration of global asymptotic endemism in a system denoted as ShEhIhRhSvEvIv, demonstrating a convex incidence rate concerning the state variables Ih and Iv. This achievement is particularly captivating, given that such functional characteristics do not typically satisfy the sufficient conditions for global stability as expounded in [23]. Subsequently, we perform a sensitivity analysis to discern the parameters most susceptible to influence, employing the direct differentiation method.

    Our article is organized as follows: Section 1 offers an in-depth exploration of the CL epidemic model. In Section 2, we formulate the ACL epidemic model and ascertain the threshold value R0 through the next-generation method. Sections 3 and 4 impose specific conditions on the threshold value to elucidate our proposed model's local and global stability characteristics. Section 5 delves into a comprehensive bifurcation analysis of the model. The process of parameter estimation and data fitting is undertaken in Section 6. Section 7 focuses on sensitivity analysis, pinpointing the parameters with the greatest influence. Numerical simulations and discussions of the solutions are presented in Section 8. Finally, Section 9 provides a brief conclusion summarizing the findings and future directions of the study.

    In this section, we introduce a comprehensive model to depict the dynamics of the CL epidemic recently formulated in [21]. The model comprises seven distinct classes, further categorized into four human population subclasses denoted as Sh(t), Eh(t), Ih(t), and Rh(t), representing susceptible, exposed, infected, and recovered individuals, respectively. Additionally, three vector population subclasses are included, namely Sv(t), Ev(t), and Iv(t), signifying susceptible, exposed, and infected vectors. The total human population, denoted as Nh(t), is defined as the sum of these subclasses, i.e., Nh(t)=Sh(t)+Eh(t)+Ih(t)+Rh(t). The mathematical model formulated in [21] is given as follows:

    {dShdt=ΓhαΨ1Iv(t)Sh(t)UhSh(t),dEhdt=αΨ1Iv(t)Sh(t)(K1+θ+Uh)Eh(t),dIhdt=K1Eh(t)(β+Uh)Ih(t),dRhdt=θEh(t)+βIh(t)UhRh(t),dSvdt=ΓvαΦ1Ih(t)Sv(t)UvSv(t),dEvdt=αΦ1Ih(t)Sv(t)(Uv+K2)Ev(t),dIvdt=K2Ev(t)UvIv(t). (2.1)

    An intriguing example of a nonlinear incidence rate employed in this model is the convex incidence rate function denoted as f(S,I)=βSI(1+ϑI), where β and ϑ are positive constants. This incidence rate signifies an elevated infection rate over a short time span, arising from dual exposures. The term βIS reflects infection transmission from a single contact, while the component βϑI2S accounts for the generation of new infections resulting from a double exposure. Notably, prior research has predominantly conducted stability analyses of epidemic models employing geometric approaches with nonconvex incidence rates with respect to the infected population I. However, for convex incidence rates, this approach often imposes overly restrictive conditions [24]. The parameter Γh represents the influx of new individuals into the susceptible human class Sh. Infection of susceptible humans occurs when they are bitten by infected sandflies at a rate denoted as αΨ1Iv(t)Sh(t)[1+ϑIv(t)], where Ψ1 represents the transmission probability of ACL from sandflies to humans, and α denotes the sandfly biting rate [25]. The parameter θ characterizes the rate at which uninfected exposed humans transition into the infectious state, while K1 signifies the rate at which exposed humans become infectious. Additionally, β denotes the rate of natural recovery of humans from the infected class.

    Infected humans, following bites from sandflies, transmit the infection to the sandflies at a rate specified as αΦ1Ih(t)Sv(t)[1+ϑIh(t)]. In this context, Uh represents the natural death rate in humans, whereas Uv designates the natural death rate in sandflies. The probability of CL transmission from humans to sandflies is encapsulated by the parameter Φ1. Furthermore, K2 characterizes the rate at which exposed vector classes transition to the infected state. The total vector population Nv is defined as Nv(t)=Sv(t)+Ev(t)+Iv(t). Keeping in view of the above discussion, we reformulate model (2.1) with a convex incidence rate. The complete mathematical representation of the model is given by

    {dShdt=ΓhαΨ1Iv(t)Sh(t)[1+ϑIv(t)]UhSh(t),dEhdt=αΨ1Iv(t)Sh(t)[1+ϑIv(t)](K1+θ+Uh)Eh(t),dIhdt=K1Eh(t)(β+Uh)Ih(t),dRhdt=θEh(t)+βIh(t)UhRh(t),dSvdt=ΓvαΦ1Ih(t)Sv(t)[1+ϑIh(t)]UvSv(t),dEvdt=αΦ1Ih(t)Sv(t)[1+ϑIh(t)](Uv+K2)Ev(t),dIvdt=K2Ev(t)UvIv(t) (2.2)

    with

    Sh(0)=Sh0,Eh(0)=Eh0,Ih(0)=Ih0,Rh(0)=Rh0,Sv(0)=Sv0,Ev(0)=Ev0,Iv(0)=Iv00. (2.3)

    The total population dynamics are described by

    dNh(t)dt=ΓhUhNh(t), (2.4)
    dNv(t)dt=ΓvUvNv(t). (2.5)

    In the context of this study, we define a biologically feasible region, denoted as Δ, which is described by the conditions

    Δ={(Sh,Eh,Ih,Rh,Sv,Ev,Iv)R7+,NvΓvUv;NhΓhUh}. (2.6)

    Here, Δ encompasses a set of non-negative real values for the seven variables representing different population classes. Importantly, this region is bounded by the constraints that the total number of vectors (Nv) should not exceed ΓvUv, and the total number of humans (Nh) should not exceed ΓhUh.

    Furthermore, based on the solutions to Eqs (2.4) and (2.5), it can be established that

    NhΓhUh,NvΓvUvast. (2.7)

    This observation indicates that as time progresses towards infinity, the total human population (Nh) tends to stabilize at ΓhUh, and similarly, the total vector population (Nv) stabilizes at ΓvUv. Consequently, it can be concluded that the model is well-posed, and the region Δ is a positively invariant domain. In other words, the populations remain within this biologically plausible region over time, ensuring the model's validity and stability.

    Lemma 1. The orthant R7+ is positively invariant for the system described by (2.2).

    Proof. Let X represent all the state variables from Sh to Iv, and assume

    A11=Uh+αΨ1Iv[1+ϑIv],A21=αΨ1Iv[1+ϑIv],A17=αΨ1Sh[1+2ϑIv],A27=αΨ1Sh[1+2ϑIv],A53=αΦ1Sv[1+2ϑIh],A63=αΦ1Sv[1+2ϑIh],A65=αΦ1Iv[1+ϑIh],A55=Uv+αΦ1Iv[1+ϑIh].

    System (2.2) is expressed in the form

    dXdt=LX+B (2.8)

    where

    L=(A11000002αΨ1A21(K1+θ+Uh)0000A270K1(β+Uh)00000θβUh000002αΦ10A550000A630A65(Uv+K2)000000K2Uv), (2.9)
    B=(2αΨ1ShαΨ1Sh[1+2ϑIv]0002αΦ1SvαΦ1Sv[1+2ϑIh]00). (2.10)

    In this context, we observe that the matrix denoted as L exhibits properties characteristic of a Metzler matrix, characterized by nonnegative elements in its off-diagonal entries, while matrix B satisfies the condition B0. Consequently, we deduce that the dynamical system described by Eq (2.2) maintains positive invariance within the state space R7+.

    Lemma 2. If solutions exist, they are positive for all t>0 under the initial conditions.

    Proof. Let us assume that solutions exist in the interval I, for all tI[0,). Now, consider the second equation of system (2.2) and its solution. This takes the following form:

    Eh(t)=Eh(0)exp{(K1+θ+Uh)t}+exp{(K1+θ+Uh)t}×t0αΨ1Iv(t)Sh(t)[1+ϑIv(t)]exp{(K1+θ+Uh)x}dx. (2.11)

    We also take the third equation, and it has a solution as follows:

    Ih(t)=Sh(0)exp{(β+Uh)t}+exp{(β+Uh)t}×t0K1Ehexp{(β+Uh)y}dy. (2.12)

    Clearly, it is evident from the preceding solutions that these variables exhibit strictly positive behavior. Similarly, it is possible to establish that Sh,Rh,Sv,Ev, and Iv exhibit solutions that remain non-negative.

    The disease-free equilibrium point of the system represented by Eq (2.2) is designated as E0, which is given by

    E0=(S0h,E0h,I0h,R0h,S0v,E0v,I0v)=(ΓhUh,0,0,0,ΓvUv,0,0). (2.13)

    Considering the compartment comprising individuals in the states (Eh,Ih,Ev,Ev) as the infected cohort, it can be deduced from the dynamics described by system (2.2) that

    {dEhdt=αΨ1Iv(t)Sh(t)[1+ϑIv(t)](K1+θ+Uh)Eh(t),dIhdt=K1Eh(β+Uh)Ih,dEvdt=αΦ1Ih(t)Sv(t)[1+ϑIh(t)](Uv+K2)Ev(t),dIvdt=K2EvUvIv. (2.14)

    Utilizing the approach based on the next-generation matrix, we derive the Jacobian matrix denoted as J for the aforementioned system when it is at the equilibrium point representing the absence of the disease. This matrix is expressed as

    J=((K1+θ+Uh)00αΨ1S0hK1(β+Uh)000αΦ1S0v(Uv+K2)000K2Uv).

    Now, breaking down matrix J into its constituent components represented by F and V, denoted as J=FV, we obtain:

    F=(000αΨ1S0h00000αΦ1S0v000000),

    and

    V=((K1+θ+Uh)000K1(β+Uh)0000(Uv+K2)000K2Uv).

    Hence, we have

    FV1=(00αΨ1K2Uv(Uv+K2)aΨ1S0hUv0000αΦ1S0vK1(K1+θ+Uh)(β+Uh)αΦ1S0vβ+Uh000000).

    Then, the characteristic equation becomes

    λ2(λ2a2K1Ψ1K2Φ1ΓvU2v(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)(Uv+K2))=0. (2.15)

    The dominant eigenvalue gives us R0, i.e.,

    R0=(a2K1Ψ1K2Φ1ΓvU2v(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)(Uv+K2)).

    In this section, we establish the local stability properties of the system described by Eq (2.2) at both the disease-free equilibrium (DFE) point denoted as E0 and the endemic equilibrium point denoted as E.

    Theorem 3.1. The system represented by Eq (2.2) exhibits asymptotic stability at the DFE point E0 when R0<1.

    Proof. Within the framework of system (2.2), the Jacobian matrix at the equilibrium point E0 is expressed as:

    J0=(Uh00000aΨ1S0h0(K1+θ+Uh)0000aΨ1S0h0K1(β+Uh)00000θβUh00000αΦ1S0v0Uv0000αΦ1S0v00(Uv+K2)000000K2Uv).

    Subsequently, the characteristic equation pertaining to the matrix J0 is formulated as follows:

    (λ+Uh)(λ+K1+θ+Uh)(λ+β+Uh)(λ+Uh)(λ+Uv)(λ+Uv+K2)(λ+Uv)aΨ1(K1)(K2)(λ+Uh)(αΦ1ΓvUv)(λ+Uv)(λ+Uh)=0.

    This equation can be organized in the following manner:

    (λ+Uh)(λ+Uh)(λ+Uv)(λ4+a1λ3+a2λ2+a3λ1+a4)=0, (3.1)

    where

    a1=Uv+(Uh+K2)+(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh),a2=Uv(Uh+K2)+Uv(β+Uh)+(β+Uh)(Uh+K2)(K1+θ+Uh)Uv+(Uh+K2)(K1+θ+Uh)+(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh),a3=Uv(β+Uh)(Uh+K2)+(Uh+K2)(K1+θ+Uh)Uv+(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)Uv+(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)(Uh+K2),a4=(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)(Uh+K2)UvaΨ1(K1)(K2)(αΦ1ΓvUv). (3.2)

    Certainly, it is evident that three of the eigenvalues exhibit negativity, specifically, λ1=Uh, λ2=Uh, and λ3=Uv. To analyze the remaining eigenvalues, we have:

    F(λ)=λ4+a1λ3+a2λ2+a3λ1+a4. (3.3)

    We utilize the Routh-Hurwitz (RH) criterion to establish that the roots of the aforementioned equation have negative real parts, specifically satisfying condition (H1):ai>0 where i ranges from 1 to 4, and ensuring that a1a2a3>a23+a1a24. It is clear that a1>0,a2>0,a3>0, and a4>0, under the condition:

    (β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)(Uh+K2)UvaΨ1(K1)(K2)(αΦ1ΓvUv)>0. (3.4)

    This inequality implies:

    (a2K1Ψ1K2Φ1ΓvU2v(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)(Uv+K2))<1,

    and subsequently, a1a2a3>a23+a21a4. Hence, it can be observed that (H1) holds under the condition R0<1. Consequently, the real parts of all eigenvalues are negative if and only if R0<1.

    System (2.2) is rearranged to express Sh,Eh,Ih,Rh,Sv, and Ev in terms of Iv. Thus,

    {Sh=(K1+θ+Uh)(β+Uh)IhaΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)K1,Sv=ΓvK2(Uv+K2)UvIvUvK2,Ih=K2aΦ1Sv+(K2aΦ1Sv)24K2aΦ1Sv(Uv+K2)Iv2K2aΦ1Sv,Eh=(Uv+β)IhK1,Ev=UvIvK2,Rh=θEh+βIhUh. (3.5)

    For ΓvK2>(Uv+K2)UvIv, we can ensure the positivity of Eq (3.5). Moreover, through the substitution of Ev and Sv into

    ΓvUhSh(t)(Uv+K2)Eh(t)=0 (3.6)

    we derive

    F(Iv)=a2+a1Iv+a0I2v=0 (3.7)

    where

    a0=(K1αΨ1ϑΓh(K1+θ+Uh)(β+Uh)ϑ), (3.8)
    a1=K1αΨ1Γh(K1+θ+Uh)(β+Uh)αΨ1, (3.9)
    a2=Uh(K1+θ+Uh)(β+Uh). (3.10)

    Using Descartes' Rule of Signs, one can easily come to the conclusion that Eq (3.7) exhibits two roots with distinct signs when the conditions a0<0 and a1>0 are met.

    K1αΨ1ϑΓh(K1+θ+Uh)(β+Uh)ϑ>0 (3.11)

    implies that

    (K1αΨ1Γh(K1+θ+Uh)(β+Uh))>1

    the term (K1αΨ1Γh(K1+θ+Uh)(β+Uh)) is derived from R0. Therefore, in the case of R0>1, a solitary positive equilibrium point can be identified within the model.

    Theorem 3.2. If R0(1,ΓvShSv(1+ϑIh)(1+2ϑIv)), then the endemic equilibrium E of the system (2.2) is locally asymptotically stable.

    Proof. For system (2.2), the Jacobian matrix at E is given by

    J=((A11+Uh)00000A17A11A220000A170K1(β+Uh)00000θβUh00000αΦ1Sv(1+ϑIh)0(A55+Uv)0000αΦ1Sv(1+ϑIh)0A55(Uv+K2)000000K2Uv),

    where A11=(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)),A17=aΨ1Sh(1+2ϑIv),A22=(K1+θ+Uh), and A55=(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)).

    Indeed, a single eigenvalue of the Jacobian matrix J is λ1=Uh. The resulting matrix simplifies to:

    J1=((A11+Uh)0000A17A11A22000A170K1(β+Uh)00000αΦ1Sv(1+ϑIh)(A55+Uv)0000αΦ1Sv(1+ϑIh)A55(Uv+K2)00000K2Uv).

    After simplification, we get

    J2=(M110000aΨ1Sh(1+2ϑIv)0M22000Λ00M3300K1Λ000M44(Uv+K2)00000M55Λ100000M66),

    where

    M11=(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh),M22=(K1+θ+Uh)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh),M33=(β+Uh),M55=(Uv+K2)(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)[(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh))+Uv],M44=Uv,M66=K1K2(αΦ1Sv(1+ϑIh))(aΨ1Sh(1+2ϑIv))[(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv))+(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)]Uv(Uv+K2)(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh))U2v(Uv+K2)(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh),Λ=(aΨ1Sh(1+2ϑIv))(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv))+(aΨ1Sh(1+2ϑIv))((aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv))+Uh),Λ1=K1Uv(αΦ1Sv(1+ϑIh))(aΨ1Sh(1+2ϑIv))Uh.

    The eigenvalues of J2 take the form

    λ2=(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)<0,λ3=(K1+θ+Uh)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)<0,λ4=(β+Uh)<0,λ5=Uv<0,λ6=(Uv+K2)(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)[(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh))+Uv]<0

    and

    λ7=K1K2(αΦ1Sv(1+ϑIh))(aΨ1Sh(1+2ϑIv))[(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv))+(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)]Uv(Uv+K2)(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh))U2v(Uv+K2)(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)

    and λ7 is negative if

    K1K2(αΦ1Sv(1+ϑIh))(aΨ1Sh(1+2ϑIv))U2v(Uv+K2)(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)<01<R0<(ΓvShSv(1+ϑIh)(1+2ϑIv)). (3.12)

    In this section, we examine the global stability analysis of system (2.2) concerning both the disease-free (DFE) and endemic equilibria. We apply Castillo Chavez's method [26] to establish global stability at the disease-free equilibrium, and we employ a generalized form of Lyapunov theory [22] to analyze the global stability of the endemic equilibrium.

    For the model described in Eq (2.2), global stability at the disease-free equilibrium point is established by employing the Castillo Chavez approach [26]. We shall now outline the Castillo Chavez approach [26]. Consider the two-dimensional system

    dR1dt=G(R1,R2),dR2dt=H(R1,R2). (4.1)

    Here, R1=(Sh,Sv,Rh)R3 and R2=(Ih,Iv,Eh,Ev)R4.

    1) If dR1dt=G(R1,0), then we can conclude that the DFE point, denoted as R01, exhibits global asymptotic stability.

    2) H(R1,R2)=BR2ˉH(R1,R2), where ˉH(R1,R2)0 for (R1,R2)ϑ, and BR2 is an M-matrix.

    Lemma 3. Let R0<1. Then, if the aforementioned conditions are met, the equilibrium point E0=(R01,0) of system (2.2) is globally asymptotically stable [26].

    We now apply the above techniques to establish the global stability of the model represented by Eq (2.2) at the disease-free equilibrium. Consequently, we arrive at the following stability result.

    Theorem 4.1. If R0<1, then system (2.2) is globally asymptotically stable at the disease-free equilibrium point E0, and unstable otherwise.

    Proof: Let

    χ01=(ΓhUh,ΓvUv). (4.2)

    By employing the system described in Eq (2.2), we obtain

    dR1dt=G(R1,R2),dR1dt=(ΓhαΨ1Iv(t)Sh(t)[1+ϑIv(t)]UhSh(t)θEh(t)+βIh(t)UhRh(t)ΓvαΦ1Ih(t)Sv(t)[1+ϑIh(t)]UvSv(t)). (4.3)

    For Sh=S0h, Sv=S0v, and G(R1,0)=0 we obtain

    G(R1,0)=(ΓhUhShΓvUvSv). (4.4)

    Hence, as time approaches infinity (t), it follows from Eq (4.4) that R1 converges to χ01. Therefore, R1=χ01 represents a state of global asymptotic stability. Now,

    BR2ˉH(R1,R2)=((K1+θ+Uh)00αΨ1S0hK1(β+Uh)000αΦ1S0v(Uv+K2)000K2Uv)(EhIhEvIv)(αΨ1S0hI0vαΨ1IvSh[1+ϑIv]0αΦ1S0vI0hαΦ1IhSv[1+ϑIh]0). (4.5)

    As the total population is confined within the bounds of S0h and S0v, i.e., ShS0h and SvS0v, it follows that αΨ1S0hI0vαΨ1IvSh[1+ϑIv] and αΦ1S0vI0hαΦ1IhSv[1+ϑIh]. Consequently, it can be inferred that ˉH(R1,R2)0. Clearly, matrix B satisfies the properties of an M-matrix. Therefore, both conditions are satisfied. As per Lemma 3, it can be concluded that the DFE point E0 is globally asymptotically stable.

    For the assessment of global stability at the endemic equilibrium point E in system (2.2), a geometric approach, as described in reference [22], is employed. The methodology can be summarized as follows: To explore the conditions under which E attains global asymptotic stability, consider a differential equation

    ˙x=f(x). (4.6)

    In this equation, URn is an open, simply connected set, and f:URn is a function that is continuously differentiable C1(U). Assuming f(x)=0 represents a solution of Eq (4.6), and for x(t,x0), the following conditions hold:

    3) There exists a compact absorbing set KU.

    4) System (4.6) has a unique equilibrium.

    The equilibrium point denoted as x is considered to be globally asymptotically stable within the set U when it exhibits local asymptotic stability, and all trajectories within the set U ultimately converge to the equilibrium point x. For n2, it is necessary to impose a condition on the function f to avoid the presence of non-constant periodic solutions in Eq (4.6). This condition is commonly referred to as the Bendixson criteria. The traditional Bendixson criteria, given by divf(x)<0 for n=2, maintains its validity even under C1 conditions [27]. Additionally, a point x0 within the set U is defined as "wandering" for Eq (4.6) if there exists a neighborhood N of x0 and a positive time value τ, such that Nx(t,N) is empty for all t>τ. Hence, the following principle of global stability is established for autonomous systems in any finite dimension:

    Lemma 4. Given the fulfillment of conditions (3) and (4) and the adherence to the Bendixson criterion in the context of (DFE) (4.6), wherein these conditions exhibit resilience under C1 local perturbations of the function f at all non-equilibrium and non-wandering points within the domain of (DFE) (4.6), we establish that the equilibrium point x achieves global asymptotic stability within the set U, provided that it initially demonstrates local stability.

    Next, we define a matrix-valued function P on U as

    P(x)=(n2)×(n2). (4.7)

    Equation (4.7) represents a matrix-valued function on U. We further assume that P1 exists and is continuous for xK. Now, we define a quantity ˉq as

    ˉq=limtsupsup1tt0[U(B(x(s,x0)))]ds (4.8)

    where J[2] is the second additive compound matrix of J, i.e., J(x)=Uf(x), and B=PfP1+PJ[2]P1. Let (B) be the Lozinskii measure of matrix B with respect to the norm . in Rn, defined as

    (B)=limx0|I+Bx|1x. (4.9)

    Therefore, if ˉq<0, this implies the absence of any orbit that gives rise to a simple closed rectifiable curve, such as periodic orbits and heterocyclic cycles.

    Lemma 5. If U is simply connected and conditions (3) and (4) are satisfied, then the unique equilibrium x of (DFE) (4.6) is globally asymptotically stable in U if ˉq<0 [22].

    According to [27], ˉq in Lemma 3 can be evaluated as

    ˉq=inf{τ:D+zτz,for all solutions ˙z=Bz}

    where D+ represents the right-hand derivative. Now, we apply the above techniques to demonstrate the global stability of model (2.2) at its endemic equilibrium. Thus, we have the following stability analysis.

    Theorem 4.2. Assuming R0>1, the sole endemic equilibrium denoted as E achieves global asymptotic stability within the region Δ when the following inequalities hold true:

    (K1+θ+Uh)(Uv+K2),Uh>K2,ΓvSv>aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh).

    Proof: In order to establish the global asymptotic stability of the presented model (2.2) at the endemic equilibrium E, we will focus on the subsystem within (2.2), which can be described as:

    {dShdt=ΓhαΨ1Iv(t)Sh(t)[1+ϑIv(t)]UhSh(t),dEhdt=αΨ1Iv(t)Sh(t)[1+ϑIv(t)](K1+θ+Uh)Eh(t),dSvdt=ΓvαΦ1Ih(t)Sv(t)[1+ϑIh(t)]UvSv(t),dEvdt=αΦ1Ih(t)Sv(t)[1+ϑIh(t)](Uv+K2)Ev(t). (4.10)

    Commencing with the Jacobian matrix J associated with system (4.10),

    J=((aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)000aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)(K1+θ+Uh)0000(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)+Uv)000aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)(Uv+K2)). (4.11)

    The matrix representing the second additive compound is expressed as

    J2=(A11000000A2200000aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)A330000aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)0A440000aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)A55000000A66) (4.12)

    where

    A11=(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)+(K1+θ+Uh);A22=(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)+(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)+Uv),A33=(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)+(Uv+K2);A44=(K1+θ+Uh)+(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)+Uv),A55=(K1+θ+Uh)+(Uv+K2);A66=(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)+Uv)+(Uv+K2).

    Now, choose a function Q(χ) such that

    Q(χ)=(1Ev0000001Ev0000001Ev0000001Sv0000001Sv0000001Sv), (4.13)
    Q(χ)=Q(Sh,Eh,Sv,Ev)=diag{1Ev,1Ev,1Ev,1Sv,1Sv,1Sv}.

    The matrix Q1(χ) is given by

    Q1(χ)=diag{Ev1,Ev1,Ev1,Ev1,Sv1,Sv1}.

    Subsequently, when we calculate the time derivative, denoted as Qf(χ), we obtain

    Qf(χ)=diag{˙EvE2v,˙EvE2v,˙EvE2v,˙SvS2v,˙SvS2v,˙SvS2v}. (4.14)

    Hence,

    QfQ1=diag{˙EvEv,˙EvEv,˙EvEv,˙SvSv,˙SvSv,˙SvSv},

    and

    QJ2Q1=(A11000000A2200000aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)A330000aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)EvSv0A440000aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)EvSvaΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)A55000000A66). (4.15)

    Now, using

    ˙EvEv=(aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev)+(Uv+K2), (4.16)
    ˙SvSv=ΓvSv+(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)+Uv) (4.17)

    matrix B=QfQ1+QJ2Q1 becomes

    B=(B11000000B2200000B32B330000B420B440000B53B54B55000000B66), (4.18)

    where

    B11=(aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev)+(Uv+K2)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)(k+θ+Uh),B22=(aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev)+(Uv+K2)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uv),B33=(aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh),B32=aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh),B44=ΓvSv(k+θ+Uh),B42=aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)EvSv,B55=ΓvSv+(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)+Uv)(k+θ+Uh)(Uv+K2),B66=ΓvSv(Uv+K2),B54=aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh),B53=aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)EvSv.

    We consider the following norm on R6 [28]. Furthermore, if we consider z as belonging to R6 with components Mi, where i ranges from 1 to 6, then

    z=max{U1,U2} (4.19)

    and

    U1(M1,M2,M3)={max{|M1|,|M2|+|M3|}ifsgn(M1)=sgn(M2)=sgn(M3)max{|M2|,|M1|+|M3|}ifsgn(M1)=sgn(M2)=sgn(M3)max{|M1|,|M2|,|M3|}ifsgn(M1)=sgn(M2)=sgn(M3)max{|M1|+|M3|,|M2|+|M3|}ifsgn(M1)=sgn(M2)=sgn(M3)
    U2(M4,M5,M6)={max{|M4|+|M5|+|M6|}ifsgn(M4)=sgn(M5)=sgn(M6)max{|M4|+|M5|,|M4|+|M6|}ifsgn(M4)=sgn(M5)=sgn(M6)max{|M5|,|M4|+|M6|}ifsgn(M4)=sgn(M5)=sgn(M6)max{|M4|+|M6|,|M5|+|M6|}ifsgn(M4)=sgn(M5)=sgn(M6)

    Next, we have to find some τ>0 so that D+zτz. If z is satisfies this inequality, then, by linearity, z will also satisfy this inequality. As mentioned in [29], we subdivide our proof into all sixteen different, possible cases, depending upon the definition of the norm (4.19). The following inequalities are incorporated for accomplishing the required analysis:

    |M2|<U1,|M3|<U1,|M2+M3|<U1, (4.20)

    and

    |Mi|,|Mi+Mj|,|M4+M5+M6|U2(z);i=4,5,6;ij. (4.21)

    Case 1: U1>U2,M1,M2,M3>0, and |M1|>|M2|+|M3|. Then,

    z=|M1|

    so that

    D+z=z1=B11M1
    [aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev)+aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh+(K1+θ+Uh)(Uv+K2)]z. (4.22)

    Case 2: U1>U2,M1,M2,M3>0, and |M1|<|M2|+|M3|. Then,

    z=|M2|+|M3|,

    so that

    D+z=z2+z3=B22M2+B32M2+B33M2
    [aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev+aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+(Uh+Uv)(Uv+K2)]z. (4.23)

    Case 3: U1>U2,M1<0,M2,M3>0, and |M1|>|M2|. Then,

    z=|M1|+|M3|,

    so that

    D+z=z1+z3=B11M1+B32M2+B33M3((aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev)(Uv+K2)+(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)+(k+θ+Uh))|M1|+aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)|M2|+((aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh))|M3|.

    Since |M1|>|M2|, we then have

    D+z[(Uv+K2)(k+θ+Uh)]z. (4.24)

    Case 4: U1>U2,M1<0,M2,M3>0, and |M1|<|M2|. Then,

    z=|M2|+|M3|

    so that

    D+z=z2+z3=B22M2+B32M2+B33M3
    [(aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev)+(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv))+(UhK2)]z. (4.25)

    Case 5: U1>U2,M1,M2>0,M3<0, and |M2|>|M1|+|M3|. Then,

    z=|M2|

    so that

    D+z=z2=B22M2
    [(aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev)+(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)+aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)+(UhK2)]z. (4.26)

    Case 6: U1>U2,M1,M2>0,M3<0, and |M2|<|M1|+|M3|. Then,

    z=|M1|+|M3|

    so that

    D+z=z1z3=B11M1B32M2B33M3((aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev)+(Uv+K2)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)(k+θ+Uh))|M1|(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh))|M2|((aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh))|M3|.

    Since (aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh))|M2|<0, then

    D+z<[(k+θ+Uh)(Uv+K2)]z. (4.27)

    Case 7: U1>U2,M1,M3>0,M2<0, and |M1|>max{|M2|,|M3|}. Then,

    z=|M1|

    so that

    D+z=z1=B11M1
    [((aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev)+(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv))+(K1+θ+Uh)(Uv+K2)]z. (4.28)

    Case 8: U1>U2,M1,M3>0,M2<0, and |M2|>max{|M1|,|M3|}. Then,

    z=|M2|

    so that

    D+z=z2=B22M2
    [aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev+aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)+(UhK2)]z. (4.29)

    Case 9: U1>U2,M1,M3>0,M2<0, and |M3|>max{|M1|,|M2|}. Then,

    z=|M3|

    so that

    D+z=z3=B32M2+B33M3(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh))|M2|+(aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev+(Uv+K2)(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)(Uv+K2))|M3|.

    Since (aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh))|M2|<0, we then have

    D+z<[(aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev)+(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)+Uh)]z. (4.30)

    Case 10: U1<U2,M4,M5,M6>0. Then,

    z=|M4|+|M5|+|M6|

    so that

    D+z=z4+z5+z6=B42M2+B44M4+B53M3+B54M4+B55M5+B66M6(aΨ1Iv(1ϑIv)EvSv)|M2|+(ΓvSv+(aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev+Uv)(k+θ+Uh)(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)Uv))|M4|+(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)EvSv)|M3|+(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh))|M4|+(ΓvSv+(aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev+Uv)(k+θ+Uh)(Uv+K2))|M5|+(ΓvSv+(aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev+Uv)(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)+Uv)(Uv+K2))|M6|.

    Since |M2|+|M3|<U1<U2<|M4|+|M5|+|M6|, we then have

    D+z<[ΓvSvaΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev+(K1+θ+Uh)+(Uv+K2)]z. (4.31)

    Case 11: U1<U2,M4,M5>0,M6<0, and |M5|>|M6|. Then,

    z=|M4|+|M5|

    so that

    D+z=z4+z5=B42M2+B44M4+B53M3+B54M4+B55M5(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)EvSv)|M2|+(ΓvSv(k+θ+Uh))|M4|+(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)EvSv)|M3|+(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh))|M4|+(ΓvSv+(aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev+Uv)(k+θ+Uh)(Uv+K2))|M5|

    Since |M2|+|M3|<U1<U2<|M4|+|M5|, we then have

    D+z<[ΓvSvaΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev+aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)+(K1+θ+Uh)+K2]z. (4.32)

    Case 12: U1<U2,M4,M5>0,M6<0, and |M5|<|M6|. Then,

    z=|M4|+|M6|

    so that

    D+z=z4z6=B42M2+B44M4B66M6(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)EvSv)|M2|+(ΓvSv(k+θ+Uh))|M4|+(ΓvSv+(K1+θ+Uh))|M6|.

    Since |M2|<U1<U2<|M4|+|M6|, we then have

    D+z<0. (4.33)

    Case 13: U1<U2,M4,M6>0,M5<0, and |M5|>|M4|+|M6|. Then,

    z=|M5|

    so that

    D+z=z5=B53M3+B54M4B55M5(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)EvSv)|M3|(aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)Ev)|M4|+(ΓvSv+(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)+Uv)(k+θ+Uh)(Uv+K2))|M5|.

    Since (aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)EvSv)|M3|<0 and (aΦ1IhSv(1+ϑIh)EvSv)|M4|<0, we then have

    D+z[ΓvSvaΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)+(k+θ+Uh)+K2]z. (4.34)

    Case 14: U1<U2,M4,M6>0,M5<0, and |M5|<|M4|+|M6|. Then,

    z=|M4|+|M6|

    so that

    D+z=z4+z6=B42M2+B44M4B66M6(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)EvSv)|M2|+(ΓvSv(k+θ+Uh))|M4|+(ΓvSv(K1+θ+Uh))|M6|.

    Since |M2|<U1<U2<|M4|+|M6|, we then have

    D+z<[ΓvSv+(K1+θ+Uh)]z. (4.35)

    Case 15: U1<U2,M5,M6>0,M4<0, and |M5|<|M4|. Then,

    z=|M4|+|M6|

    so that

    D+z=z4+z6=B42M2B44M4+B66M6(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)EvSv)|M2|(ΓvSv(k+θ+Uh))|M4|+(ΓvSv(K1+θ+Uh))|M6|.

    Since (aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)EvSv)|M2|<0, thus we have

    D+z<[ΓvSv+(K1+θ+Uh)]z. (4.36)

    Case 16: U1<U2,M5,M6>0,M4<0 and |M5|>|M4|. Then,

    z=|M5|+|M6|

    so that

    D+z=z5+z6=B53M3+B54M4+B55M5+B66M6(aΨ1Iv(1+ϑIv)EvSv)|M3|+aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)|M4|+(ΓvSv+(aΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh))+Uv)(k+θ+Uh)(Uv+K2))|M5|+(ΓvSv(K1+θ+Uh))|M6|.

    Since |M3|<U1<U2<|M5|+|M6| and |M4|<|M5|, it can be deduced that

    D+z<[ΓvSvaΦ1Ih(1+ϑIh)+(K1+θ+Uh)+K2]z. (4.37)

    Now, we examine the subsystem within the framework of system (2.2), where

    {dIhdt=K1Eh(t)(β+Uh)Ih(t),dRhdt==βIh(t)+θEh(t)UhRh(t),dIvdt=K2Ev(t)UvIv(t). (4.38)

    Now, let us reformulate system (4.38) as

    {dIhdt+(β+Uh)Ih(t)=K1Eh(t),dRhdt+UhRh(t)=βIh(t)+θEh(t),dIvdt+UvIv(t)=K2Ev(t). (4.39)

    The integrating factors for the system can be expressed as et(β+Uh), et(Uh), and et(Uv). We utilize these integrating factors to solve system (4.39). As time t becomes significantly large, i.e., as t, Ih tend to Ih, Rh tends to Rh, and Iv approaches Iv. This behavior demonstrates that the endemic equilibrium point E is indeed globally asymptotically stable.

    Controlling and mitigating epidemic diseases, bifurcation analysis plays a pivotal role. In epidemiological modeling, it is a classical requirement to ensure the disease's eradication by imposing a condition on the basic reproduction number, denoted as R0, which must be less than unity [30,31]. Furthermore, researchers have extensively studied the bifurcation analysis of dynamical systems [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. However, it is noteworthy that if a bifurcation occurs, the existence of an endemic equilibrium is guaranteed even when R0<1. This highlights the significance of conducting bifurcation analysis in the fields of epidemiology and preventive medicine. We demonstrate that system (2.2) exhibits bifurcation by using central manifold theory [42]. Specifically, we set R0=1 to determine Ψ1 as

    Ψ1=Γh(K1+θ+Uh)(β+Uh)(Uv+K2)U2vK1K2a2Φ1ΓvUh. (5.1)

    We calculate the Jacobian matrix at the DFE as

    J0(Ψ1)=(Uh00000αΨ10(K1+θ+Uh)0000αΨ10K1(β+Uh)00000θβUh00000αΦ1ΓvUhΓhUv0Uv0000αΦ1ΓvUhΓhUv00(Uv+K2)000000K2Uv).

    Consequently, the characteristic equation of J0(Ψ1) becomes (λ+Uh)(λ+Uh)(λ+Uv)(λ4+a1λ3+a2λ2+a3λ)=0, where

    a1=Uv+(Uv+K2)+(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh),a2=Uv(Uv+K2)+Uv(β+Uh)+(β+Uh)(Uv+K2)(K1+θ+Uh)Uv+(Uv+K2)(K1+θ+Uh)+(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh),a3=Uv(β+Uh)(Uv+K2)+(Uv+K2)(K1+θ+Uh)Uv+(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)Uv+(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh)(Uv+K2).

    The existence of a zero eigenvalue within the spectrum serves as a confirmation of the occurrence of a bifurcation phenomenon. Following the approach outlined in [42], we proceed to determine the left eigenvectors associated with the matrix J0(Ψ1):

    w1=(αΨ1K2UhUv)w6,w2=(αΨ1K2Uv(K1+θ+Uh))w6,w3=(K1αΨ1K2Uv(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh))w6,w4=(θαΨ1K2(β+Uh)+βK1K2αΨ1UhUv(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh))w6,w5=(a2Φ1ΓvUhK1K2Ψ1ΓhU3v(β+Uh)(K1+θ+Uh))w6,w7=(K2Uv)w6. (5.2)

    Furthermore, we compute the right eigenvectors in a manner consistent with established methodologies:

    \begin{equation} \begin{array}{rcl} v_1 & = & 0, \\ v_2 & = & \frac{v_6(\mathfrak{U}_v+\mathcal{K}_2)\mathfrak{U}_v}{\alpha \Psi_1\mathcal{K}_2}, \\ v_3 & = & \frac{v_6\mathfrak{U}_v(\mathfrak{U}_v+\mathcal{K}_2)(\mathcal{K}_1+\theta+\mathfrak{U}_h)}{\alpha \Psi_1\mathcal{K}_1\mathcal{K}_2}, \\ v_4 & = & 0, \\ v_5 & = & 0, \\ v_7 & = & \frac{v_6(\mathfrak{U}_v+\mathcal{K}_2)}{\mathcal{K}_2}. \end{array} \end{equation} (5.3)

    When we substitute the following values into Eq (2.2)

    \mathsf{S}_h for x_1

    \mathsf{E}_h for x_2

    \mathsf{I}_h for x_3

    \mathsf{R}_h for x_4

    \mathsf{S}_v for x_5

    \mathsf{E}_v for x_6

    \mathsf{I}_v for x_7

    we obtain

    \begin{equation} \begin{array}{rcl} f_1(x)& = &\Gamma_h-\alpha \Psi_1x_7x_1[1+\vartheta x_7]-\mathfrak{U}_hx_1, \\ f_2(x)& = &\alpha \Psi_1x_7x_1[1+\vartheta x_7]-(\mathcal{K}_1+\theta+\mathfrak{U}_h)x_2, \\ f_3(x)& = &\mathcal{K}_1x_2-(\beta+\mathfrak{U}_h)x_3, \\ f_4(x)& = &\theta x_2+\beta x_3-\mathfrak{U}_h x_4, \\ f_5(x)& = &\Gamma_v-\alpha \Phi_1x_3x_5[1+\vartheta x_3]-\mathfrak{U}_vx_5, \\ f_6(x)& = &\alpha \Phi_1x_3x_5[1+\vartheta x_3]-(\mathfrak{U}_v+\mathcal{K}_2)x_6, \\ f_7(x)& = &\mathcal{K}_2x_6-\mathfrak{U}_v x_7. \end{array} \end{equation} (5.4)

    Considering both the left and right eigenvectors, we can compute coefficients a and b in accordance with the methods described in references [43] and [24]. Consequently, we have

    a = \sum\limits_{k, i, j = 1}^{7}v_k w_i w_j \frac{\partial^2 f_k}{\partial x_i \partial x_j}.

    This relationship suggests that

    a = v_2\sum\limits_{i, j = 1}^{7} w_i w_j \frac{\partial^2 f_2}{\partial x_i \partial x_j}+v_3\sum\limits_{i, j = 1}^{7} w_i w_j \frac{\partial^2 f_3}{\partial x_i \partial x_j}+v_7\sum\limits_{i, j = 1}^{7} w_i w_j \frac{\partial^2 f_7}{\partial x_i \partial x_j}.

    Next, it is evident that

    a = -v_6(\mathfrak{U}_v+\mathcal{K}_2)^2w_6^2\frac{(\mathcal{K}_1+\theta+\mathfrak{U}_h)(\beta+\mathfrak{U}_h)\mathfrak{U}_v}{\mathcal{K}_1\alpha \Phi_1 \Gamma_v \mathfrak{U}_h}.

    We also find

    b = \sum\limits_{k, i, = 1}^{7}v_k w_i\frac{\partial^2 f_k}{\partial x_i \partial \Psi_1}.

    By this relation, we have

    b = v_2\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{7} w_i \frac{\partial^2 f_2}{\partial x_i \partial \Psi_1}+v_3\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{7} w_i \frac{\partial^2 f_3}{\partial x_i \partial \Psi_1}+v_7\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{7} w_i\frac{\partial^2 f_7}{\partial x_i \partial \Psi_1}.

    Hence, it follows that

    b = \frac{v_6w_6 \mathcal{K}_1 \mathcal{K}_2 a^2\Phi_1\Gamma_v \mathfrak{U}_h}{\Gamma_h(\mathcal{K}_1+\theta+\mathfrak{U}_h)(\beta+\mathfrak{U}_h)\mathfrak{U}_v^2}.

    Given that a < 0 and b > 0 , a forward bifurcation is present in our proposed system, as described in Eq (2.2).

    Figure 1.  The stability is indicated by the solid line (-), while instability is represented by the dashed line (- -).

    Case study: Kohat District, Khyber Pakhtunkhawa (Pakistan)

    The Kohat district in the KPK province has been significantly affected by Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL), largely due to the influx of internally displaced people from other districts. A brief study conducted by Hussain et al. [3] not only delineates the prevalence of CL from April 2015 to May 2016 but also identifies the specific species responsible for CL spread among the local population and internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Kohat. The total population of the Kohat district in 2015 was approximately 0.2 million [3]. Our focus is on Ghamkol, a location in Kohat with a population of 3256 people.

    In this section, we utilized the least squares curve fitting method to analyze reported CL instances in the Kohat district from April 2015 to September 2015. The system's (2.2) estimated parameters are based on Pakistan's overall data on confirmed events and fatalities. The ordinary least squares solution (OLS) is employed to reduce the error terms of daily reports, and the goodness of fit test uses the related relative error.

    \min\left( \frac{\sum_{i = 1}^{n}\left( \mathsf{I}_i-\hat{ \mathsf{I}}_{i}\right) ^{2}}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \mathsf{I}_{i}^{2}}\right)

    where the reported total number of infected is \(\mathsf{I}_{i}\), and the simulated total number of infected is \(\hat{ \mathsf{I}}_{i}\). The estimated values of the parameters are provided in Table 1, while a comparison of the model with the reported cases is shown in Figure 2.

    Table 1.  Parametric values of system (1) used for simulation.
    Parameter Value Reference Parameter Value Reference
    \alpha 0.046 Estimated \Psi_1 0.069 Estimated
    \theta 0.35 Estimated \mathcal{K}_1 0.36 Estimated
    \Phi_1 0.39 Estimated \mathcal{K}_2 0.25 Estimated
    \mathfrak{U}_h 0.21 Estimated \mathfrak{U}_v 0.75 Estimated
    \beta 0.50 Estimated \Gamma_h 0.48 Estimated
    \Gamma_v 0.59 Estimated

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 2.  Incidence data of Leishmania cases from the Kohat district, KPK, Pakistan.
    Figure 3.  The figure profiles for the sensitivity analysis of each parameter vs R_0 .

    In Figure 2, the total cases of Leishmania virus are depicted from April 2015 to September 2015, showcasing the peak period of Leishmania cases in the Kohat district. We conducted a data fitting procedure where we employed our Leishmania model's infected human population class. This analysis clearly demonstrates the suitability of our model in capturing the observed dynamics of the infected human population in real-world data.

    The identification of influential parameters in mitigating the spread of infectious diseases is a crucial aspect addressed through sensitivity analysis in epidemiological modeling. In particular, forward sensitivity analysis holds significant importance, although its application can be computationally demanding, especially in intricate biological models. Within this context, the sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number ( R_0 ) has garnered substantial attention from the ecological and epidemiological communities. To formally define the concept, we introduce the notion of the normalized forward sensitivity index for R_0 , which depends differentiably on a parameter denoted as \omega .

    Definition 1. The normalized forward sensitivity index ( S_\omega ) of R_0 , with respect to a parameter \omega , is defined as

    \begin{equation} S_\omega = \frac{\omega}{R_0}\frac{\partial R_0}{\partial \omega}. \end{equation} (7.1)

    In practice, three distinct methods are conventionally employed to compute these sensitivity indices:

    ● (ⅰ) Direct Differentiation: Calculating S_\omega directly as S_\omega = \frac{\omega}{R_0} \frac{\partial R_0}{\partial \omega} , where \omega represents a parameter.

    ● (ⅱ) Latin Hypercube Sampling: Employing a Latin hypercube sampling technique.

    ● (ⅲ) Linearization of the System: Linearizing the underlying system and subsequently solving the resultant set of linear algebraic equations.

    In our study, we choose to employ the direct differentiation method because of its ability to provide analytical expressions for these sensitivity indices [44,45]. These indices play a dual role by shedding light on the influence of various factors related to the transmission of infectious diseases and supplying valuable data regarding the relative alterations between R_0 and various parameters. Consequently, this knowledge assists in the formulation of effective disease control strategies.

    An examination of the results presented in Table 2 reveals that certain parameters, specifically a , \Phi_1 , \mathfrak{U}_h , \Gamma_v , \Psi_1 , \mathcal{K}_1 , and \mathcal{K}_2 , exert a positive influence on the basic reproduction number ( R_0 ). This implies that a 10% increase or decrease in these parameters would correspondingly result in a 10 percent increase or decrease in the value of R_0 . More specifically, these parameters exhibit sensitivity indices of 10%, 4.9%, 1.3%, 5.0%, 5.0%, 1.0%, and 1.75%, respectively. Conversely, parameters such as \theta , \beta , \mathfrak{U}_v , and \Gamma_h are found to have a negative influence on the reproduction number R_0 . In practical terms, this means that increasing these parameters by 10 percent would lead to a decrease in the value of R_0 . The sensitivity indices for these parameters reveal the extent of this impact, with values of –4.79%, –2.27%, –0.17% and –5.0%, respectively. These findings provide valuable insights into the critical parameters affecting disease transmission and can inform targeted intervention strategies.

    Table 2.  Sensitivity indices of the reproduction number R_0 against mentioned parameters.
    Parameter S.Index Value Parameter S.Index Value
    \alpha \mathrm{S}_\alpha 1.000000000 \Psi_1 \mathrm{S}_{\Psi_1} 0.500000000
    \theta \mathrm{S}_{\theta} –0.4792332268 \mathcal{K}_1 \mathrm{S}_{\mathcal{K}_1} 0.1006389776
    \Phi_1 \mathrm{S}_{\Phi_1} 0.4999999998 \mathcal{K}_2 \mathrm{S}_{\mathcal{K}_2} 0.01754385960
    \mathfrak{U}_h \mathrm{S}_{\mathfrak{U}_h} 0.1314260819 \mathfrak{U}_v \mathrm{S}_{\mathfrak{U}_v} –0.017543859
    \beta \mathrm{S}_{\beta} –0.2272727272 \Gamma_h \mathrm{S}_{\Gamma_h} –0.5000000000
    \Gamma_v \mathrm{S}_{\Gamma_v} 0.5000000004

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In this investigation, we have conducted a comprehensive analysis of the global dynamics and sensitivity of an Anthroponotic Cutaneous Leishmania epidemic model. Our primary focus has centered on the basic reproduction number ( \mathcal{R}_0 ), a fundamental parameter crucial for determining the overall stability of the proposed model. Key findings are presented in Theorems 4.1 and 4.2. Theorem 4.1 establishes global stability concerning the disease-free equilibrium when the threshold parameter ( \mathcal{R}_0 ) remains less than or equal to unity. Conversely, Theorem 4.2 establishes global stability regarding the endemic equilibrium point when the threshold parameter surpasses the value of one. Global dynamics are examined using the Castillo-Chavez method and a geometrical approach, providing a comprehensive understanding of the Anthroponotic Cutaneous Leishmania epidemic model's intricate behavior. To validate our theoretical results, we conducted simulations using the parameters outlined in Table 1. Notably, the calculated value of the basic reproduction number ( \mathcal{R}_0 = 0.000000162315016773084 ) falls below the critical threshold of one, affirming the global asymptotic stability of the disease-free equilibrium, as per Theorem 2.1. Additionally, disease compartments \mathsf{S}_h(t) , \mathsf{E}_h(t) , \mathsf{I}_h(t) , \mathsf{R}_h(t) , \mathsf{S}_v(t) , \mathsf{E}_v(t) , and \mathsf{I}_v(t) converge toward their respective disease-free equilibrium points, as visually depicted in Figure 4.

    Figure 4.  In the context of a compartmental epidemiological model, the dynamic variables representing the susceptible population ( \mathsf{S}_h(t) and \mathsf{S}_v(t) ), the exposed population ( \mathsf{E}_h(t) and \mathsf{E}_v(t) ), the infected population ( \mathsf{I}_h(t) and \mathsf{I}_v(t) ), and the recovered population ( \mathsf{R}_h(t) and \mathsf{R}_v(t) ) exhibit a convergence behavior towards their respective disease-free equilibrium states when the basic reproduction number ( \mathcal{R}_0 ) is less than 1. This phenomenon signifies that, in the absence of significant transmission, the system approaches a stable state characterized by minimal disease prevalence, as described by epidemiological theory.

    This section is dedicated to elucidating the dynamics predicted by the Anthroponotic Cutaneous Leishmania model (2.2) through graphical representations. The primary objective is to scrutinize the influence of crucial parameters on the dynamics and assess the potential for controlling the epidemic. The model (2.2) is numerically solved using an iterative scheme based on the standard RK-4 method, and the results are presented in Figures 46. Figure 4(a) illustrates the diminishing trajectory of susceptible human individuals ( \mathsf{S}_h ) over time, aligning with expectations as infected individuals transition out of the susceptible class. In Figure 4(b), the population of exposed human individuals ( \mathsf{E}_h ) displays a gradual decrease, accelerating as the interaction duration between individuals is shortened. Similarly, the infected individuals ( \mathsf{I}_h ) depicted in Figure 4(c) show a gradual increase in the early weeks, corresponding to the decline in the exposed class. Subsequently, the infected class gradually decreases, approaching the equilibrium point and achieving stability. With the decline in the number of infected individuals, there is a rapid increase in the recovered human population ( \mathsf{R}_h ), as shown in Figure 4(d). The decline in susceptible vectors ( \mathsf{S}_v ) due to viral exposure is demonstrated in Figure 4(e), aligning with epidemiological models' expectations. Figure 4(g) portrays the population of exposed vectors ( \mathsf{E}_v ), exhibiting steady and rapid growth attributed to susceptible vectors becoming infected during the initial weeks of the outbreak. Finally, Figure 4(g) delineates the trajectory of infected vectors ( \mathsf{I}_v ), indicating a substantial portion exiting the exposed class within a few weeks of exposure. This observation underscores the dynamic evolution of the Anthroponotic Cutaneous Leishmania epidemic, providing insights into infection progression in both human and vector populations. The graphical representations illustrating variations in all compartments in response to changes in the parameter \alpha , representing the sandfly biting rate, are presented in Figure 5. As the sandfly biting rate increases, there is a discernible upward trend in the counts of individuals and vectors in classes \mathsf{I}_h and \mathsf{I}_v , as depicted in Figures 5(c), (g). This observation aligns with expectations, as an elevated sandfly biting rate results in more susceptible individuals being exposed to ACL infections. Additionally, the influence of changes in the natural death rate ( \mu_h ) of individuals demonstrates a continuous increase in the population, consistent with the trends depicted in Figure 6.

    Figure 5.  The figure presents profiles of dynamic variables representing the susceptible populations ( \mathsf{S}_h(t) and \mathsf{S}_v(t) ), the exposed populations ( \mathsf{E}_h(t) and \mathsf{E}_v(t) ), the infected populations ( \mathsf{I}_h(t) and \mathsf{I}_v(t) ), and the recovered population ( \mathsf{R}(t) ) for various values of \alpha .
    Figure 6.  The figure presents profiles of dynamic variables representing the susceptible populations ( \mathsf{S}_h(t) and \mathsf{S}_v(t) ), the exposed populations ( \mathsf{E}_h(t) and \mathsf{E}_v(t) ), the infected populations ( \mathsf{I}_h(t) and \mathsf{I}_v(t) ), and the recovered population ( \mathsf{R}(t) ) for various values of \alpha and \mathcal{K}_1 = 0.93 .

    In summary, this study has delved into the qualitative behavior of an Anthroponotic Cutaneous Leishmania epidemic model characterized by a convex incidence rate. Through the application of advanced mathematical and epidemiological techniques, we have significantly advanced our comprehension of the dynamics inherent in the transmission of this disease. Our investigation has led to several key insights and potential directions for future research:

    Epidemiological Modeling Significance: This study underscores the crucial role of mathematical modeling in understanding and managing infectious diseases. Drawing parallels with the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the importance of proactive modeling efforts in anticipating and addressing emerging health challenges.

    Stability Analysis Contributions: Meticulous exploration of the local and global stability conditions of the Disease-Free Equilibrium (DFE) and endemic equilibrium states, contingent upon R_0 , provides critical insights into the potential persistence or eradication of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.

    Parameter Sensitivity Insights: The sensitivity analysis identifies key parameters influencing the threshold number ( R_0 ), a crucial determinant of disease spread. Understanding the sensitivity of these parameters is essential for devising effective control strategies.

    Geometric Approach for Global Stability: The extension of Lyapunov theory using a geometric approach, incorporating a secondary additive compound matrix to establish global stability at the endemic equilibrium, represents an innovative contribution to the toolbox of methods for analyzing disease dynamics.

    Practical Validation Through Simulations: The theoretical findings have been validated through numerical simulations, demonstrating the practical applicability of our results.

    To further broaden the impact of this research, future investigations could consider reformulating an epidemic model for visceral leishmaniasis, incorporating a harmonic mean-type incidence rate. This expansion would open avenues for exploring stability analysis, parameter sensitivity, bifurcation analysis, and optimal control strategies, significantly enhancing our ability to combat visceral leishmaniasis and similar infectious diseases.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors are thankful to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Najran University for funding this work under the General Research Funding program grant code (NU/RG/SERC/12/22).

    The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.



    [1] R. Molina, L. Gradoni, J. Alvar, HIV and the transmission of Leishmania, Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol., 97 (2003), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1179/000349803225002516 doi: 10.1179/000349803225002516
    [2] A. Hati, S. Sur, H. Dwivedi, J. Bhattacharyya, H. Mukhejee, G. Chandra, A longitudinal study on the distribution of Phlebotomus argentipes sandflies at different heights in cattleshed, Ind. J. Med. Res., 93 (1991), 388–390.
    [3] M. Hussain, S. Munir, M. A. Jamal, S. Ayaz, M. Akhoundi, K. Mohamed, Epidemic outbreak of anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Kohat District, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, Acta Tropica, 172 (2017), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.04.035 doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.04.035
    [4] J. Kolaczinski, S. Brooker, H. Reyburn, M. Rowland, Epidemiology of anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Afghan refugee camps in northwest Pakistan, Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hygiene, 98 (2004), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2003.11.003 doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2003.11.003
    [5] L. F. Chaves, M. J. Cohen, M. Pascual, M. L. Wilson, Social exclusion modifies climate and deforestation impacts on a vector-borne disease, PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis., 2 (2008), e176. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000176 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000176
    [6] D. L. Sacks, P. V. Perkins, Development of infective stage Leishmania promastigotes within phlebotomine sandflies, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 34 (1985), 456–467.
    [7] J. Harre, K. Dorsey, L. Armstrong, J. Burge, K. Kinnamon, Comparative fecundity and survival rates of Phlebotomus papatasi sandflies membrane-fed on blood from eight mammal species, Med. Vet. Entomol., 15 (2001), 189–196.
    [8] O. E. Kasap, B. Alten, Comparative demography of the sand fly Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) at constant temperatures, J. Vector Ecol., 31 (2006), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.3376/1081-1710(2006)31[378:CDOTSF]2.0.CO;2 doi: 10.3376/1081-1710(2006)31[378:CDOTSF]2.0.CO;2
    [9] R. Porrozzi, A. Teva, V. F. Amara, M. V. Santos dacocta, G. J. R. Grimaldi, Cross-immunity experiments between different species or strains of Leishmania in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 71 (2004), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2004.71.297 doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2004.71.297
    [10] L. F. Chaves, M. J. Hernandez, Mathematical modelling of American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Incidental hosts and threshold conditions for infection persistence, Acta Tropica, 92 (2004), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.08.004 doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.08.004
    [11] L. F. Chaves, M. J. Cohen, M. Pascual, M. L. Wilson, Social exclusion modifies climate and deforestation impacts on a vector-borne disease, PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis., 2 (2008), e176. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000176 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000176
    [12] A. Khan, R. Zarin, M. Inc, G. Zaman, B. Almohsen, Stability analysis of leishmania epidemic model with harmonic mean type incidence rate, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 135 (2020), 528. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00535-0 doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00535-0
    [13] K. Khan, R. Zarin, A. Khan, A. Yusuf, M. Al-Shomrani, A. Ullah, Stability analysis of five-grade Leishmania epidemic model with harmonic mean-type incidence rate, Adv. Differ. Equations, 2021 (2021), 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03249-4 doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03249-4
    [14] Y. Zhao, A. Khan, U. W. Humphries, R. Zarin, M. Khan, A. Yusuf, Dynamics of visceral leishmania epidemic model with non-singular kernel, Fractals, 30 (2022), 2240135.
    [15] R. Zarin, A. Khan, M. Inc, U. W. Humphries, T. Karite, Dynamics of five grade leishmania epidemic model using fractional operator with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 147 (2021), 110985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110985 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110985
    [16] L. F. Chaves, M. J. Hernandez, Mathematical modelling of American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Incidental hosts and threshold conditions for infection persistence, Acta Tropica, 92 (2004), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.08.004 doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.08.004
    [17] P. Das, D. Mukherjee, A. K. Sarkar, Effect of delay on the model of American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, J. Biol. Syst., 15 (2007), 139. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218339007002155 doi: 10.1142/S0218339007002155
    [18] J. E. Calzada, A. Saldaña, C. Rigg, A. Valderrama, L. Romero, L. F. Chaves, Changes in phlebotomine sandfly species composition following insecticide thermal fogging in a rural setting of Western Panama, PLoS ONE, 8 (2013), e53289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053289 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053289
    [19] L. F. Chaves, Climate and recruitment limitation of hosts: The dynamics of American cutaneous Leishmaniasis seen through semi-mechanistic seasonal models, Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol., 103 (2009), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1179/136485909X398267 doi: 10.1179/136485909X398267
    [20] N. Bacaer, S. Guernaoui, The epidemic threshold of vector-borne diseases with seasonality: The case of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Chichaoua, Morocco, J. Math. Biol., 53 (2006), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-006-0015-0 doi: 10.1007/s00285-006-0015-0
    [21] M. Zamir, G. Zaman, A. S. Alshomrani, Sensitivity analysis and optimal control of anthroponotic cutaneous Leishmania, PLoS ONE, 11 (2016), e0160513. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160513 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160513
    [22] M. Y. Li, J. S. Muldowney, A geometric approach to global-stability problems, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 27 (2006), 1070–1083. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036141094266449 doi: 10.1137/S0036141094266449
    [23] A. Korobeinikov, Global properties of infectious disease models with nonlinear incidence, Bull. Math. Biol., 69 (2007), 1871–1886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-007-9196-y doi: 10.1007/s11538-007-9196-y
    [24] B. Buonomo, D. Lacitignola, On the backward bifurcation of a vaccination model with nonlinear incidence, Nonlinear Anal. Modell. Control, 16 (2011), 30–46.
    [25] B. Buonomo, D. Lacitignola, On the dynamics of an SEIR epidemic model with a convex incidence rate, Ricerche di Matematica, 57 (2008), 261–281.
    [26] C. Castillo-Chavez, Z. Feng, W. Huang, Mathematical Approaches for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases: An Introduction, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, New York, 2001.
    [27] R. H. Martin, Logarithmic norms and projections applied to linear differential systems, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 45 (1974), 432–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(74)90084-5 doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(74)90084-5
    [28] C. Sun, W. Yang, Global results for an SIRS model with vaccination and isolation, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 11 (2010), 4223–4237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2010.05.009 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2010.05.009
    [29] A. B. Gumel, C. C. McCluskey, J. Watmough, An SVEIR model for assessing potential impact of an imperfect Anti-SARS vaccine, Math. Biosci. Eng., 3 (2006), 485–512.
    [30] O. Sharomi, C. N. Podder, A. B. Gumel, E. H. Elbasha, J. Watmough, Role of incidence function in vaccine-induced backward bifurcation in some HIV models, Math. Biosci., 210 (2007), 436–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2007.05.012 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2007.05.012
    [31] H. Abboubakar, J. C. Kamgang, D. Tieudjo, Backward bifurcation and control in transmission dynamics of arboviral diseases, Math. Biosci., 278 (2016), 100–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2016.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2016.06.002
    [32] D. Mua, C. Xub, Z. Liua, Y. Panga, Further insight into bifurcation and hybrid control tactics of a chlorine dioxide-iodine-malonic acid chemical reaction model incorporating delays, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 89 (2023), 529–566. https://doi.org/10.46793/match.89-3.529M doi: 10.46793/match.89-3.529M
    [33] C. Xu, Z. Liu, P. Li, J. Yan, L. Yao, Bifurcation mechanism for fractional-order three-triangle multi-delayed neural networks, Neural Process. Lett., 55 (2023), 6125–6151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-11130-y doi: 10.1007/s11063-022-11130-y
    [34] P. Li, R. Gao, C. Xu, J. Shen, S. Ahmad, Y. Li, Exploring the impact of delay on Hopf bifurcation of a type of BAM neural network models concerning three nonidentical delays, Neural Process. Lett., 55 (2023), 11595–11635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-023-11392-0 doi: 10.1007/s11063-023-11392-0
    [35] P. Li, Y. Lu, C. Xu, J. Ren, Insight into hopf bifurcation and control methods in fractional order BAM neural networks incorporating symmetric structure and delay, Cognit. Comput., 15 (2023), 1825–1867.
    [36] C. Xu, Q. Cui, Z. Liu, Y. Pan, X. Cui, W. Ou, et al., Extended hybrid controller design of bifurcation in a delayed chemostat model, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 90 (2023), 609–648.
    [37] M. Alqhtani, M. M. Khader, K. M. Saad, Numerical simulation for a high-dimensional chaotic lorenz system based on gegenbauer wavelet polynomials, Mathematics, 11 (2023), 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020472 doi: 10.3390/math11020472
    [38] K. M. Saad, H. M. Srivastava, Numerical solutions of the multi-space fractional-order coupled Korteweg–De Vries equation with several different kernels, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 716. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7100716 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7100716
    [39] S. A. Fahel, D. Baleanu, Q. M. Al-Mdallal, K. M. Saad, Quadratic and cubic logistic models involving Caputo–Fabrizio operator, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top., 232 (2023), 2351–2355. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-023-00935-0 doi: 10.1140/epjs/s11734-023-00935-0
    [40] P. Li, X. Peng, C. Xu, L. Han, S. Shi, Novel extended mixed controller design for bifurcation control of fractional-order Myc/E2F/miR-17-92 network model concerning delay, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 46 (2023), 18878–18898. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.9597 doi: 10.1002/mma.9597
    [41] Y. Zhang, P. Li, C. Xu, X. Peng, R. Qiao, Investigating the effects of a fractional operator on the evolution of the ENSO model: Bifurcations, stability and numerical analysis, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7080602 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7080602
    [42] J. Carr, Applications of Center Manifold Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2012.
    [43] C. Castillo-Chavez, B. Song, Dynamical models of tuberculosis and their applications, Math. Biosci. Eng., 1 (2004), 361–404.
    [44] A. Khan, R. Zarin, G. Hussain, A. H. Usman, U. W. Humphries, J. F. Gomez-Aguilar, Modeling and sensitivity analysis of HBV epidemic model with convex incidence rate, Results Phys., 22 (2021), 103836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103836 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103836
    [45] R. Zarin, U. W. Humphries, A robust study of dual variants of SARS-CoV-2 using a reaction-diffusion mathematical model with real data from the USA, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 138 (2023), 1057. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04631-9 doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04631-9
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Hamadjam Abboubakar, Sylvain Ardo Banbeto Gouroudja, Rashid Jan, Salah Boulaaras, Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the transmission dynamics of Ebola with convex incidence rates: a case study of Guinea, 2024, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-024-02161-6
    2. Wadhah Al‐sadi, Zhouchao Wei, Tariq Q. S. Abdullah, Abdulwasea Alkhazzan, J. F. Gómez‐Aguilar, Dynamical and numerical analysis of the hepatitis B virus treatment model through fractal–fractional derivative, 2024, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.10348
    3. E. Azroul, S. Bouda, G. Diki, M. Guedda, Analytical solutions and classification of vesicle motion and deformation in shear flow: Uncovering new tank-treading modes, 2024, 34, 1054-1500, 10.1063/5.0189923
    4. Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Muhammad Owais Kulachi, Aqeel Ahmad, Muhammad Farman, Muhammad Saqib, Muhammad Umer Saleem, Fractional order cancer model infection in human with CD8+ T cells and anti-PD-L1 therapy: simulations and control strategy, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-66593-x
    5. Akhtar Jan, Rehan Ali Shah, Hazrat Bilal, Bandar Almohsen, Rashid Jan, Bhupendra K. Sharma, Dynamics and stability analysis of enzymatic cooperative chemical reactions in biological systems with time-delayed effects, 2024, 11, 26668181, 100850, 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100850
    6. Mudassar Rafique, Muhammad Aziz Ur Rehamn, Muhammad Rafiq, Zafar Iqbal, Nauman Ahmed, Hadil Alhazmi, Shafiullah Niazai, Ilyas Khan, Time delayed fractional diabetes mellitus model and consistent numerical algorithm, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-74767-w
    7. Jaraldpushparaj Simon, Sina Etemad, Britto Antony Xavier Gnanaprakasam, İbrahim Avcı, Mohammad W. Alomari, Alpha‐Delta Integration and Its Application in Discrete Kinetic Equation Using Mittag–Leffler Factorial Function, 2024, 2024, 2314-4629, 10.1155/2024/8030185
    8. Nabeela Anwar, Iftikhar Ahmad, Hijab Javaid, Adiqa Kausar Kiani, Muhammad Shoaib, Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja, Stochastic Runge–Kutta for numerical treatment of dengue epidemic model with Brownian uncertainty, 2024, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984924504086
    9. Parvaiz Ahmad Naik, Muhammad Farman, Khadija Jamil, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Muntazim Abbas Hashmi, Zhengxin Huang, Modeling and analysis using piecewise hybrid fractional operator in time scale measure for ebola virus epidemics under Mittag–Leffler kernel, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-75644-2
    10. Khushbu Agrawal, Sunil Kumar, Badr Saad T. Alkahtani, Sara Salem Alzaid, A vitamin intervention study on the tumour and immune cells via TIV dynamical system-revisited, 2024, 32, 2769-0911, 10.1080/27690911.2024.2404585
    11. Razia Begum, Sajjad Ali, Nahid Fatima, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad, Dynamical behavior of whooping cough SVEIQRP model via system of fractal fractional differential equations, 2024, 12, 26668181, 100990, 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100990
    12. Aqeel Ahmad, Muhammad Ali, Ali Hasan Ali, Magda Abd El-Rahman, Evren Hincal, Husam A. Neamah, Mathematical analysis with control of liver cirrhosis causing from HBV by taking early detection measures and chemotherapy treatment, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-79597-4
    13. Hardik Joshi, Mehmet Yavuz, Osman Taylan, Abdulaziz Alkabaa, Dynamic analysis of fractal–fractional cancer model under chemotherapy drug with generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel, 2025, 260, 01692607, 108565, 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108565
    14. Kamel Guedri, Rahat Zarin, Aurang Zeb, Basim M. Makhdoum, Hatoon A. Niyazi, Amir Khan, A numerical study of HIV/AIDS transmission dynamics and the onset of long-term disability in chronic infection, 2024, 139, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05881-x
    15. Muhammad Farman, Evren Hincal, Saba Jamil, Nezihal Gokbulut, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Aceng Sambas, Sensitivity analysis and dynamics of brucellosis infection disease in cattle with control incident rate by using fractional derivative, 2025, 15, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-83523-z
    16. Dwi Mariyono, Annis Nur Alifatul Kamila, Akmal Nur Alif Hidayatullah, Unity in diversity: navigating global connections through cultural exchange, 2025, 2, 2976-9310, 114, 10.1108/QEA-10-2024-0122
    17. Saima Rashid, Abdul Bariq, Ilyas Ali, Sobia Sultana, Ayesha Siddiqa, Sayed K. Elagan, Dynamic analysis and optimal control of a hybrid fractional monkeypox disease model in terms of external factors, 2025, 15, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-83691-y
    18. Mudassar Rafique, Muhammad Aziz Ur Rehamn, Aisha M. Alqahtani, Muhammad Rafiq, A. F. Aljohani, Zafar Iqbal, Nauman Ahmed, Shafiullah Niazai, Ilyas Khan, A new epidemic model of sexually transmittable diseases: a fractional numerical approach, 2025, 15, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-025-87385-x
    19. G. M. Vijayalakshmi, M. Ariyanatchi, Vediyappan Govindan, Mustafa Inc, Fractal-fractional modelling of thrombocytopenia influence on pregnant women in the context of dengue infection with Mittag–Leffler decay analysis, 2025, 11, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-024-02278-8
    20. Rahat Zarin, Usa Wannasingha Humphries, Analyzing spatial diffusion and vaccination strategies in malaria epidemics: a numerical approach, 2025, 11, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-025-02315-0
    21. M. Manivel, A. Venkatesh, Shyamsunder Kumawat, Numerical simulation for the co-infection of Monkeypox and HIV model using fractal-fractional operator, 2025, 11, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-025-02359-2
    22. Muhammad Farman, Aqeel Ahmad, Usama Atta, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Abdul Ghaffar, Muntazir Hussain, Hyers Ulam stability and bifurcation control of leptospirosis disease dynamics and preventations: Modeling with singular and non-singular kernels, 2025, 20, 1932-6203, e0314095, 10.1371/journal.pone.0314095
    23. Kamel Guedri, Rahat Zarin, and Mowffaq Oreijah, Evaluating the impact of vaccination and progression delays on tuberculosis dynamics with disability outcomes: A case study in Saudi Arabia, 2025, 10, 2473-6988, 7970, 10.3934/math.2025366
    24. Hamadjam Abboubakar, Sylvain Ardo Gouroudja Banbeto, Rashid Jan, Rubin Fandio, Henri Paul Ekobena Fouda, Ilyas Khan, Muhammad Sabaoon Khan, Fractional order modeling of hepatitis B virus transmission with imperfect vaccine efficacy, 2025, 15, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-025-96887-7
    25. Pappu Kumar, Rakhi Tiwari, Vijay Saw, 2025, Chapter 9, 978-981-96-3093-6, 229, 10.1007/978-981-96-3094-3_9
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1748) PDF downloads(82) Cited by(25)

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog